![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 3, 2185-2190, January 21, 2000
From the Departments of Medicine and of Microbiology and
Immunology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California
at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
T cell antigen receptor (TCR) stimulation induces
the tyrosine phosphorylation of several intracellular proteins
including the protooncogene Vav1. Vav1 expression is necessary for
normal T cell development and activation. We previously showed that
overexpression of Vav1 in Jurkat T cells potentiates the activity of
the transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT).
The mechanism by which Vav1 participates in TCR signaling events is not
clear. Vav1 contains a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) domain that has specificity for Rac and other Rho GTPases that have been recently implicated in T cell activation events. Significantly, in vitro tyrosine phosphoryation of Vav1 by Lck activates
its exchange activity. This Lck-mediated phosphorylation of Vav1 has been reported to depend upon Tyr-174 in Vav1, a site implicated in Vav1
function by other studies as well. In this report, we demonstrated that
Tyr-174 is not required for the TCR-induced phosphorylation of Vav1
in vivo. Moreover, mutation of Tyr-174 augmented the
ability of Vav1 to up-regulate NF-AT activation as well as the Vav1 GEF
function leading to Rac activation. However, we also showed that the
GEF activity of Vav1 was neither sufficient nor necessary for
potentiation of NF-AT, and thereby we identify a GEF-independent role
of Vav1 in potentiating NF-AT-driven transcription. Oncogenic Vav1 in
which the amino-terminal 67 amino acids were deleted had elevated GEF
activity but did not potentiate NF-AT when overexpressed in Jurkat
cells. We also showed that a GEF mutant form of Vav1 that had impaired
GEF function could still potentiate NF-AT. These studies reveal a
previously unrecognized negative regulatory function of Tyr-174 in Vav1
and suggest that domains other than the Vav1 GEF domain contribute to
TCR signals leading to NF-AT activation.
Engagement of the T cell antigen receptor
(TCR)1 with antigen or with
cross-linking antibodies initiates a signaling cascade that leads to
activation of the T cell. One of the proximal events triggered by TCR
engagement is the activation of protein-tyrosine kinases, which results
in the tyrosine phosphorylation of several substrates. Previous work
has demonstrated that activation of the Src tyrosine kinase Lck is
necessary to initiate the signaling cascade. Lck is required to
phosphorylate the cytoplasmic tails of the CD3 complex ( One substrate that is rapidly tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to
TCR engagement is the 95-kDa protooncogene Vav1. Vav1 is expressed
exclusively in hematopoietic cells. However, a homologous protein,
Vav2, is ubiquitously expressed. Vav1 is a multi-domain-containing protein consisting of a calponin homology domain, an acidic domain, a
guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) domain, a pleckstrin homology
domain, a cysteine-rich (CR) domain, and an SH2 domain surrounded by
two Src homology-3 (SH3) domains. Vav1 was initially identified as an
oncogene based on its ability to transform fibroblasts in a gene
transfer experiment (1). However, the expression, structure and the
inducible tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1 suggests it has an important
role in antigen receptor-mediated signal transduction. The importance
of Vav1 in lymphocyte development and activation was demonstrated in
gene-targeted deletion experiments (2-5). These studies revealed that
mice lacking Vav1 display a profound defect in the positive selection
of T cells and undergo negative selection inefficiently. Furthermore,
the single positive T cells that develop have impaired calcium
mobilization, decreased activation of Erk kinases, decreased activation
of NF The TCR-mediated induction of Vav1 tyrosine phosphorylation may
regulate Vav function. Vav1 contains 30 tyrosines. Neither the sites of
phosphorylation nor the protein-tyrosine kinases responsible for
phosphorylation of specific sites have been definitively established.
However, both Syk and Src family tyrosine kinases have been shown to be
able to phosphorylate Vav1. Syk and ZAP-70 as well as the Src family
kinase Fyn have been implicated in events leading to the
phosphorylation of Vav1 in vivo (9-11). Furthermore, we
have evidence from Lck-deficient thymocytes that Lck contributes to
events leading to the phosphorylation of
Vav.2 Moreover, Lck has been
shown to directly phosphorylate Vav1 in vitro, specifically
at tyrosine 174 (12, 13). In addition, at least two studies have
suggested tyrosine 174 to be a good candidate for phosphorylation by
Syk and ZAP-70 (10, 14) in vitro.
The tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1 appears to be important in
regulating its GEF function. The GEF domain of Vav1 shares considerable
homology with that of the oncogene Dbl and is often referred to as a
Dbl homology domain. Like Dbl, Vav1 has been shown to catalyze the
GDP-GTP exchange for Rho family GTPases in vitro (13, 15).
The GEF function of Vav1 appears to exhibit some preference for the Rac
GTPase. The Vav1 exchange activity in vitro can be induced
by its tyrosine phosphorylation by Lck. Tyr-174 in Vav1 is required for
Lck-dependent phosphorylation of Vav1 in vitro
(12). Thus, the exchange activity of Vav1 leading to its activation of
Rac and other Rho GTPases would appear to depend upon phosphorylation
of Tyr-174.
The function of Rac activation in T cells is an area of active
investigation. One T-cell receptor-derived signaling event required for
T cell activation is induction of the transcription factor nuclear
factor of activated T cells (NF-AT). NF-AT plays a critical role in the
regulation of many genes including lymphokine genes. NF-AT-directed
transcription depends upon Vav1 expression (6, 7) and can be induced by
overexpression of Vav1 (16). Moreover, overexpression of Vav1
synergizes with TCR signals and depends upon proximal TCR-signaling
machinery. This may reflect a requirement for Vav1 tyrosine
phosphorylation. The mechanism by which Vav1 potentiates NF-AT is not
understood. However, the effects of its GEF activity on Rac or Rho have
been implicated based on studies of Vav1-deficient cells (6, 8).
Similarly, Rac activation has been implicated in NF-AT-mediated
activation in response to Fc In this report, we test this model by expressing mutants of Vav1. We
examine the importance of Tyr-174 in Vav in regulating its ability to
influence inducible Vav tyrosine phosphorylation, NF-AT activation, and
Rac GEF activity. Moreover, we directly test the importance of Vav GEF
activation in regulating NF-AT activation in an overexpression system.
Surprisingly, our results demonstrate that Tyr-174 is not required for
inducible Vav phosphorylation, NF-AT activation, or GEF function.
Instead, our studies suggest Tyr-174 negatively regulates Vav function.
Finally, we show that the ability of Vav1 to activate Rac is neither
sufficient nor necessary to stimulate NF-AT-driven transcription.
Cells and Reagents--
The Jurkat T cell line was maintained in
RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM
glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. Cells were stimulated with
C305, an anti-Jurkat TCR- Transfection, Stimulation, and Luciferase Assay--
For
transient transfections, 2 × 107 Jurkat cells in 400 µl of RPMI 1640 were electroporated at 250mV, 960 microfarads with 30 µg of DNA total. 20 µg of the various Vav1 constructs were used to
obtain equal protein expression. TCR stimulation for analysis of Vav1
tyrosine phosphorylation or Rac activation involved incubating phosphate-buffered saline-washed cells (2 × 107
cells/ml) at 37 °C for 15 min followed by the addition of anti-TCR mAb, C305 (1:500). Cells were incubated for 2 min, immediately pelleted, and lysed. For TCR stimulation in luciferase assays, 18 h after transfection cells were either left untreated or were incubated
with anti-TCR mAb C305 (1:500) or PMA (25 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 µM) for 6 h. Cells were then harvested, lysed, and assayed for luciferase activity (27). For luciferase assays with
GEFmtVav, 2 µg of a Preparation of Lysates, Immunoprecipitates, and Western
Blotting--
Cells were lysed at 1 × 108 cells/ml
in lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA,
1% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and protease
and phosphatase inhibitors). After a 15-min incubation on ice with
intermittent vortexing, samples were clarified by centrifugation at
14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. For immunoprecipitations, lysates
were incubated with primary antibody for 1 h on ice and then
protein G-Sepharose beads with continuous mixing for 2 h at
4 °C. Beads were then washed 3 times in 500 µl of lysis buffer. Samples were eluted by resuspending the beads in reducing 4% SDS sample buffer and heated to 95 °C for 5 min. For the GEF assay, lysates were incubated with 2 µg of glutathione
S-transferase-PAK70-106 and
glutathione-Sepharose in a spin column for 15 min at 4 °C with
continuous mixing as reported by Manser et al. (20). After incubation, lysates were spun away from the beads, and the beads were
washed 3 times with 500 µl of lysis buffer and then spun away. Rac
was eluted from the beads by transferring the bead-containing spin
column to a fresh catch tube, resuspending the beads in reducing sample
buffer, heating the column and beads to 95 °C for 5 min, and
spinning the eluted samples into the catch tube. Due to the toxicity of
the GEFmt form of Vav1 on the cells, the assay was altered slightly by
harvesting cells only 6 h after transfection. Eluted samples from
immunoprecipitations or from GEF assays were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and proteins were transferred
to Immobilon-P (Millipore) for analysis by Western blotting. Membranes
were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin and incubated with mAb 4G10
or blocked with 5% nonfat milk and incubated with 9E10 followed by
goat anti-mouse antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase.
Reactive proteins were subsequently visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Mutation of Tyrosine 174 to Phenylalanine Does Not Eliminate
TCR-induced Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Vav1--
Previous studies
have suggested that Tyr-174 is required for Lck-mediated Vav1
phosphorylation in vitro (12) and might play an important
role in Syk- or ZAP-70-dependent phosphorylation of Vav
in vivo (10, 14). To examine the importance of this site
in vivo, a point mutation was introduced into the acidic domain of Vav1 (Fig. 1A),
changing tyrosine 174 to phenylalanine (Y174F). Myc epitope-tagged
cDNA constructs of either wild type Vav1 or Y174F Vav1 were
transiently expressed in Jurkat cells. To determine whether this site
is required for the tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1, the Vav1 proteins
were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibodies using lysates prepared
from unstimulated and TCR-stimulated cells. The immunoprecipitates were
blotted with antiphosphotyrosine mAb (Fig. 1B,
top) or anti-Vav1 antibodies (Fig. 1B,
bottom). As illustrated in Fig. 1B, equivalent
levels of Vav1 were immunoprecipitated, yet Y174F Vav1 was still
inducibly tyrosine-phosphorylated. Although the overall level of
tyrosine phosphorylation of Y174F Vav1 was somewhat reduced compared
with wild type Vav1, it is clear that Tyr-174 is neither the sole site
of tyrosine phosphorylation within Vav1 nor is Tyr-174 tyrosine
phosphorylation required for the TCR-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation
of other sites.
Y174F Vav1 Potentiates NF-AT Activation--
Previous studies from
our lab and others reveal that overexpression of Vav1 can potentiate
the activation of NF-AT in unstimulated as well as in TCR-stimulated
Jurkat cells (16, 18, 19). Since Tyr-174 has been shown to be a
requisite site for Lck-dependent Vav phosphorylation
in vitro and Lck is required for the inducing effects of Vav
overexpression on NF-AT activation, we investigated the effect of this
mutation on the ability of Vav1 to potentiate NF-AT. Jurkat cells were
transfected with a reporter construct containing three NF-AT binding
sites from the IL-2 promoter fused to luciferase. The cells were
cotransfected with either empty vector, wild type Vav1, or Y174F Vav1
and were left unstimulated or were stimulated with an anti-TCR mAb
(Fig. 2). The maximal responsiveness of
the transfected reporter was determined using a combination of the
phorbol ester PMA and ionomycin, which bypasses TCR-dependent signals. As reported previously, expression
of wild type Vav1 potentiates the NF-AT-driven transcription about
5-fold over the activity detected in vector-transfected cells.
Surprisingly, the overexpression of the Y174F mutant further augmented
NF-AT activity 2-3-fold over that seen with wild type Vav1. In
contrast to the gain of function seen with Y174F, in other experiments mutation of tyrosine 209 to phenylalanine (Y209F) potentiated NF-AT to
the same extent as that seen with wild type Vav1 (data not shown).
These data suggest that Tyr-174 is a specific negative regulatory site
of phosphorylation in Vav1.
Y174F Enhances the GEF Activity of Vav1--
The
Lck-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1 has been
implicated in activating its exchange function (13, 15), and Tyr-174
was shown to be required for Lck phosphorylation of Vav1 in
vitro (12). To investigate the effect of the Y174F mutation on the
GEF activity of Vav1, we monitored the GTP-loading of Rac in
vivo. Jurkat cells were transfected with Myc epitope-tagged Rac
and co-transfected with either vector, wild type Vav1, or Y174F Vav1
(Fig. 3). Relative GTP-Rac levels were
estimated using an in vitro binding assay that measures
GTP-dependent absorption of Rac to the GTPase binding amino
terminus of the p21-activated kinase (PAK1) (20). The results shown in
Fig. 3 reveal that GTP-loading of Rac can be detected following
stimulation of the TCR. This activation of Rac is enhanced by
cotransfection of wild type Vav1. Surprisingly, mutation of Tyr-174
markedly increased GTP-loaded Rac levels in the basal state. Moreover,
TCR stimulation did not further enhance this response. By inference,
the Y174F mutation results in an enhancement of the GEF activity of
Vav1 in vivo.
Dissociation of GEF Activity of Vav1 and NF-AT
Potentiation--
The observation that the mutation of Tyr-174
resulted in an enhanced GEF activity as well as an increased
potentiation of NF-AT activity led us to investigate whether GEF
activity is involved in the activation of NF-AT when Vav1 is
overexpressed in Jurkat cells. We first reexamined the effects of
oncogenic Vav1, which structurally differs from protooncogenic (wild
type) Vav1 by lacking the amino-terminal 67 amino acids (21). This
amino-terminal truncation of Vav1 was first identified as a result of a
gene transfer assay, which revealed its transforming potential when expressed in NIH 3T3 cells (1). Previous work from our lab demonstrated
a difference in NF-AT potentiation between wild type Vav1 and oncogenic
Vav1 (16). We confirmed here (Fig.
4A) that, although the wild
type Vav1 potentiated NF-AT, the oncogenic form of Vav1 did not
potentiate NF-AT above the level of the vector transfected cells.
Furthermore, unlike the potentiating effect of the Y174F mutation on
the function of protooncogenic Vav1, the Y174F mutation in oncogenic
Vav1 did not enhance NF-AT-dependent transcription. These
findings indicate that inactivating the putative negative regulatory
function of Tyr-174 cannot reverse the lack of function of oncogenic
Vav1 in regulating NF-AT activity.
To address whether GEF activity of Vav1 and potentiation of NF-AT are
correlated, the GEF activity of oncogenic Vav1 was assayed. The Rac
activation assay was performed, as before, using lysates of Jurkat
cells transfected with Myc epitope-tagged Rac and cotransfected with
either vector, wild type Vav1, Y174F Vav1, or oncogenic Vav1 (Fig.
4C). The cells expressing the oncogenic form of Vav1
demonstrated high levels of GTP-bound Rac in unstimulated Jurkat cells,
equivalent to those seen in cells transfected with the Y174F form of
Vav1. Oncogenic Vav exhibits much greater GEF activity than wild type Vav1 in Jurkat cells, even though this "activated" form of Vav1 failed to up-regulate NF-AT activity. Combined with the results of the
NF-AT assay (Fig. 4A), these results indicate that the GEF
activity of Vav1 is not sufficient to potentiate NF-AT-driven transcription.
To investigate whether the GEF activity of Vav1 is necessary for NF-AT
activation, a series of mutations were introduced to the GEF domain of
Vav1 to disrupt its GEF function. Mutations altering amino acids
338-344 from LLLQELV to IIIQDAA (Fig. 4B) and referred to
as GEFmt were made based on the crystal structure of the Dbl homology
domain of Sos (22) as well as reports of the sequences essential to GEF
activity of other dbl homology domain-containing proteins (23). The Rac
activation assay was performed, as before, with lysates of Jurkat
cells transfected with Myc epitope-tagged Rac and co-transfected with
vector, wild type Vav1, oncogenic Vav1, or the GEFmt form of Vav1 (Fig.
4C). These results confirmed that GEFmtVav1 does not retain
any GEF activity for Rac. The ability of GEFmtVav1 to potentiate
NF-AT-dependent transcription was then assayed. Jurkat
cells were transfected with the NF-AT reporter construct and
co-transfected with either vector, wild type Vav1, oncogenic Vav1, or
GEFmtVav1. Due to the observed toxicity of the GEFmtVav1 when expressed
in Jurkat cells, the potentiation of NF-AT had to be measured only in
unstimulated cells at an earlier time following transfection, at 6 h instead of 18 h following electroporation. For the purpose of
normalization, each cell was co-transfected with a reporter construct
encoding the constitutively active Vav1 contains 30 tyrosine residues and is inducibly
tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to TCR stimulation. Recent reports have implicated the phosphorylation of Vav1 in its ability to function
as a GEF for Rac. In particular, Tyr-174 has been indicated to be a
site for phosphorylation by Lck or by Syk kinases, to bind the SH2
domain of Lck, and to play a role in regulating the GEF activity of
Vav1 (10, 12, 13). Moreover, mutation of this single site eliminated
the ability of Lck to phosphorylate Vav1 in vitro (12). We
had also previously demonstrated that the activating effects of Vav1
depended upon the proximal TCR-regulated signaling machinery,
specifically including Lck (16). In light of these reports, we asked
whether phosphorylation of this residue in Vav1 regulated 1) the
ability of Vav1 to be tyrosine-phosphorylated following TCR
stimulation; 2) the transcriptional activity of NF-AT, or 3) its GEF
activity in vivo. Our data suggest that Tyr-174 is not the
sole site of tyrosine phosphorylation in Vav, and phosphorylation of
this site is not required for TCR-induced Vav1 tyrosine
phosphorylation. Our transcriptional and Rac GEF studies suggest
Tyr-174 is a negative regulatory site of phosphorylation. Quite
surprisingly, further studies to examine the role of the GEF function
of Vav1 demonstrate that the GEF function of Vav is neither sufficient
nor necessary for its NF-AT activating function when overexpressed in
the Jurkat T cell system.
Phosphotyrosine blots of Vav1 immunoprecipitates revealed the Y174F
mutation did not eliminate TCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1
(Fig. 1). Therefore, we can conclude that Tyr-174 is not the only site
of TCR-induced Vav1 tyrosine phosphorylation. This result differs from
the in vitro phosphorylation studies by Han et
al. (12) and a model proposed by Deckert et al. (10).
Those reports examined the in vitro phosphorylation of Vav1
with Lck or Syk and Zap-70 protein-tyrosine kinases, respectively. Han et al. (12) report that the Y174F mutation eliminated all
tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1 when phosphorylated by Lck in
vitro. Our report has analyzed the in vivo
phosphorylation of Vav1. Deckert et al. (10) suggest that
phosphorylation of Tyr-174 by a Syk protein-tyrosine kinase could allow
for the recruitment of Lck via an interaction of its SH2 domain with
Tyr-174. This would suggest that Tyr-174 might be a requisite
initiating phosphorylation event. Our studies demonstrate that the
phosphorylation of Tyr-174 is neither the sole site of Vav1
phosphorylation nor is it required for phosphorylation of other sites
in response to TCR stimulation. It is likely that protein-tyrosine
kinases other than those used for in vitro phosphorylation
and interaction studies as well as the intracellular milieu may
contribute to the tyrosine phosphorylation pattern observed.
Surprisingly, overexpression of Vav1 containing the Y174F mutation
resulted in an even greater NF-AT response than that seen with wild
type Vav1. This was an unexpected result since others suggested this
was a critical phosphorylation site for the activation of Vav GEF
function (12). Our findings suggest that tyrosine 174 in Vav1 is a site
of negative regulation, presumably via phosphorylation, that influences
the ability of Vav1 when overexpressed to induce as well as up-regulate
TCR-mediated NF-AT-driven transcription. The loss of negative
regulatory function appears to be specific for Tyr-174, since a similar
mutation altering tyrosine 209 to phenylalanine did not result in a
gain of function (data not shown). In an attempt to identify candidate
negative regulators that could associate with this site, tyrosine 174 was recognized as a potential docking site for the SH2 domains of the
soluble phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 (18), a phosphatase known to
down-regulate signaling. Indeed, an interaction between SHP-1 and Vav1
has been previously reported (24), and we were able to confirm this
interaction (data not shown). However, co-immunoprecipitation of SHP1
with Vav1 was maintained in immunoprecipitations of Y174F Vav1 (data not shown) and, thus, SHP1 is not considered to be the effector associating with phosphorylated Tyr-174. At present, the mechanism by
which Tyr-174 negatively regulates Vav function is not clear.
The mechanism used by Vav1 to potentiate NF-AT-dependent
transcription is not known. Efforts to identify the mechanism by which
Vav1 potentiates NF-AT have focused on Vav1 as a GEF for Rac. Previous
reports, however, have only partially addressed this by examining the
isolated GEF domain of Vav1 (6) or by monitoring events dependent on
transcription factors other than NF-AT (25). Here, we assessed the GEF
activity of full-length Vav1 by analyzing Rac-GTP levels in
vivo. Our assay shows that Rac is activated in Jurkat cells by the
stimulation of the TCR and that this activation is enhanced when Vav1
is overexpressed. Unexpectedly, the levels of activated Rac are further
enhanced when Y174F Vav1 is expressed. This suggests that Tyr-174 is
not required for Vav1 GEF function, and instead, phosphorylation of this site may negatively regulate its GEF activity.
This GEF gain of function combined with the enhanced NF-AT activity
resulting from the mutation of Tyr-174 suggested that Vav1 GEF function
plays a role in potentiating NF-AT in cells overexpressing Vav1. Rac is
one target of Vav GEF function, and it has been implicated in the
activation of NF-AT in T cells yet is not enough to induce NF-AT-driven
transcription (6). Moreover, it has been reported that GTP-bound-Rac or
a mutant form of Rac that cannot hydrolyze GTP, RacV12, is sufficient
to induce translocation of NF-AT from the cytoplasm to the nucleus yet
is not enough to induce NF-AT-driven transcription (17). This prompted
us to determine whether GEF activity of Vav1 is essential for its role in potentiating NF-AT in Jurkat cells. To address whether the GEF
activity of Vav1 is sufficient to potentiate NF-AT-driven transcription, we examined the GEF activity of oncogenic Vav1. We have
demonstrated here and previously that oncogenic Vav1, in which the
first 67 amino acids are deleted, is not capable of potentiating NF-AT
(16). However, expression of oncogenic Vav1 significantly enhances the
levels of activated Rac recovered from cell lysates, indicating a
robust GEF activity of the transfected oncogenic Vav1. Therefore, we
conclude the GEF activity of Vav1 is not sufficient for activation of
NF-AT in Jurkat cells overexpressing Vav1. These results suggest the
amino-terminal 67 amino acids, possibly along with other domains, may
be responsible for Vav1-mediated NF-AT potentiation. We did not address
whether increased levels of nuclear NF-AT are induced by oncogenic
Vav1. However, to address whether the GEF activity of Vav1 is necessary
for potentiation of NF-AT, a series of point mutations were introduced
in the GEF domain of Vav1 (GEFmtVav1) to abolish its GEF activity.
Quite surprisingly, although GEFmtVav1 does not induce Rac activation, it still retains the ability to potentiate NF-AT driven transcription. The NF-AT potentiation of GEFmtVav1 along with the GEF activity of
oncogenic Vav1 indicates the GEF activity of Vav1 is neither necessary
nor sufficient for Vav1, when Vav1 is overexpressed, to potentiate
NF-AT driven expression.
The mechanism by which Vav1 potentiates NF-AT remains unanswered.
Although it could involve increased nuclear translocation of NF-AT, as
suggested by studies of Rac function in mast cell (17), it is clear
from our studies that a GEF-independent function, and presumably
Rac-independent function, of Vav1 can contribute to NF-AT regulation.
This is not a surprising finding given the multiple protein interaction
domains, besides the GEF domain, present in Vav1. Furthermore, although
we have shown here that the GEF activity of Vav1 can be dissociated
from its ability to potentiate NF-AT when overexpressed in Jurkat
cells, our studies cannot rule out an important role of the GEF domain
for the normal function of Vav1. All of our studies were performed in
the context of cells expressing endogenous wild type Vav1. Thus, Vav1
GEF function could be provided in trans by endogenous Vav1 in our experiments. Nevertheless, our studies have revealed an important negative regulatory function of Tyr-174 and the independent
contribution of domains other than the GEF domain in the regulation of
signaling pathways leading to NF-AT activation by Vav1. Other assay
systems or studies in a Vav1 null background will be required to
establish the precise function of the amino terminus, Tyr-174, and the
Vav1 GEF domain.
We are indebted to Louis Lim for the plasmid
used for expression of glutathione
S-transferase-PAK70-106 and to members of the
Weiss lab for helpful discussions.
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant CA72531.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2
J. Wu and A. Weiss, unpublished observations.
The abbreviations used are:
TCR, T cell
receptor;
GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor;
CR, cysteine-rich;
SH3, Src homology 3;
SH2, Src homology 2;
NF-AT, nuclear factor of
activated T cells;
ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine activation motif;
PAK, p21-activated kinase;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
PMA, phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate.
A Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor-independent Function of
Vav1 in Transcriptional Activation*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


) and
the
chain of the TCR on tyrosines within motifs designated as
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs).
Phosphorylation of the ITAMs provides docking sites for the Src
homology-2 (SH2) domains of the Syk family protein-tyrosine kinases,
ZAP-70, and Syk. Recruitment of ZAP-70 or Syk to the phosphorylated
ITAMs leads to the activation of these protein-tyrosine kinases and
subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple intracellular substrates.
B, a failure to form TCR caps following activation, a reduced
expression of activation marker CD69, and a reduced expression of CD5
(6-8).
RI stimulation in mast cells (17).
Collectively, these data would suggest the following model. TCR-induced
tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1 leads to activation of its GEF
function, which in turn leads to activation of Rac. Rac activation then plays an important, yet ill-defined, role in regulating the activation of NF-AT.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
chain monoclonal antibody (mAb) (26). The
anti-phosphotyrosine and the anti-Myc mAbs were derived from the 4G10
and 9E10 hybridomas, respectively. The NF-AT-luciferase reporter
plasmid has been previously described (27). The Myc-tagged
protooncogenic Vav1 and oncogenic Vav1 plasmids have been described
previously (16). The Y174F, Y209F, and GEF mutants were created with
the Quick Change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).
-galactosidase reporter under the control of
the
-actin promoter were co-transfected into the cells. 6 h
after transfection, cells were lysed, and
-galactosidase and luciferase activities were measured.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Mutation of tyrosine 174 to phenylalanine
does not eliminate TCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav1.
A, a schematic diagram outlines the domains in Vav1 as
calponin homology domain (CH), acidic domain
(AD), GEF, pleckstrin homology domain (PH), CR,
SH3 domain, and a SH2 domain. The location of the point mutation is
indicated. B, lysates from unstimulated (
) or C305
stimulated (+) Jurkat cells overexpressing either a Myc-tagged wild
type form of Vav1 (WT Vav1) or a Myc-tagged mutant form of
Vav1 (Y174F Vav1) were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibodies. The
immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted for phosphotyrosine
(top) or for Vav1 protein (bottom). This is a
representative experiment independently performed five times.
PTyr, phosphotyrosine.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Y174F Vav1 potentiates NF-AT activity.
Jurkat cells were co-transfected with a reporter construct encoding
three NF-AT binding sites from the IL-2 promoter fused to luciferase
with either vector, wild type Vav1 (WT Vav1), or Y174F Vav1.
Transfectants were either left untreated, stimulated with anti-TCR mAb
C305, or stimulated with PMA and ionomycin. Activity is reported as a
percentage of the activity produced from stimulation with PMA and
ionomycin. The inset Vav1 blot shows expression levels of
Vav1 in vector-, WT Vav1-, and Y174F Vav1-transfected cells. This is a
representative experiment independently performed five times.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Y174F Vav1 enhances GEF function. Jurkat
cells were co-transfected with Myc-tagged Rac and either vector,
Myc-tagged wild type Vav1, or Myc-tagged Y174F Vav1 and then either
left unstimulated or stimulated for 2 min with C305. Lysates of the
transfectants were mixed with beads containing the CD42-Rac interaction
and binding domain of p21 activated kinase. A, eluates of
the beads were blotted for Myc. Lysates of the transfected cells were
blotted with anti-Myc antibody to verify that equivalent levels of
Myc-tagged Vav1 proteins (B, top) or Myc-tagged
Rac (B, bottom) were expressed. This is a
representative experiment independently performed five times.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Rac activation alone cannot account for the
potentiating effect of Vav1 on NF-AT. A, Jurkat cells
were co-transfected with a reporter construct encoding three NF-AT
binding sites from the IL-2 promoter fused to a luciferase reporter
with either vector, wild type Vav1 (WT Vav1), Y174F Vav1,
oncogenic Vav1 (onco-Vav1), or oncogenic Vav1 containing the
Y174F mutation (Y174F onco-Vav1). Transfectants were either
left untreated, stimulated with anti-TCR mAb C305, or stimulated with
PMA and ionomycin. Reporter activity is expressed as a percentage of
the maximum activity produced from stimulation with PMA and ionomycin.
B, a schematic diagram outlines the domains in Vav1 and
indicates the location of the point mutations creating GEFmtVav1.
CH, calponin homology domain; AD, acidic domain;
PH, pleckstrin homology domain. C, Jurkat cells
were co-transfected with Myc-tagged Rac and either vector, wild type
Vav1, Y174F Vav1, oncogenic Vav1, or GEFmtVav1 and then either left
unstimulated or TCR-stimulated for 2 min with anti-TCR mAb C305. GEF
activity was assayed as described in Fig. 3. Eluates of the beads were
blotted for Myc (top). Lysates were blotted for Myc to
verify equivalent levels of Myc-tagged Rac expression
(bottom). This is a representative experiment independently
performed five times. D, Jurkat cells were co-transfected
with a reporter construct encoding three NF-AT binding sites from the
interleukin 2 promoter fused to luciferase and either vector, wild type
Vav1, onco-Vav1, or GEFmtVav1. NF-AT activities of transfectants were
normalized to
-galactosidase activity. The inset Vav1
blot shows expression levels of Vav1 in the transfectants. This is a
representative experiment independently performed three times.
-actin promoter fused to
-galactosidase. The reported NF-AT activity was normalized to
-galactosidase. As was seen before, NF-AT activity is enhanced by
expression of the wild type form of Vav1, whereas no potentiation of
NF-AT was seen with the oncogenic form of Vav1. The GEFmt form of Vav1
potentiated NF-AT activity as well or better than the wild type
protein. These results indicate the GEF activity of Vav1 is not
necessary for potentiation of NF-AT in Jurkat cells.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 415-476-1291;
Fax: 415-502-5081; E-mail: aweiss@medicine.ucsf.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Katzav, S.,
Martin-Zanca, D.,
and Barbacid, M.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
2283-2290[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Turner, M.,
Mee, P. J.,
Costello, P. S.,
Williams, O.,
Price, A. A.,
Duddy, L. P.,
Furlong, M. T.,
Geahlen, R. L.,
and Tybulewicz, V. L. J.
(1995)
Nature
378,
298-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Zhang, R.,
Alt, F. W.,
Davidson, L.,
Orkin, S. H.,
and Swat, W.
(1995)
Nature
374,
470-473[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Fischer, K.-D.,
Zmuldzinas, A.,
Gardner, S.,
Barbacid, M.,
Bernstein, A.,
and Guidos, C.
(1995)
Nature
374,
474-477[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Tarakhovsky, A.,
Turner, M.,
Schaal, S.,
Mee, P. J.,
Duddy, L. P.,
Rajewsky, K.,
and Tybulewicz, V. L. J.
(1995)
Nature
374,
467-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Holsinger, L. J.,
Graef, I. A.,
Swat, W.,
Chi, T.,
Bautista, D. M.,
Davidson, L.,
Lewis, R. S.,
Alt, F. W.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
563-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Fischer, K.-D.,
Kong, Y.-Y.,
Nishina, H.,
Tedford, K.,
Marengere, L. E. M.,
Kozieradski, I.,
Sasaki, T.,
Starr, M.,
Chan, G.,
Gardener, S.,
Nghiem, M. P.,
Bouchard, D.,
Barbacid, M.,
Bernstein, A.,
and Penninger, J. M.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
554-562[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Costello, P. S.,
Walters, A. E.,
Mee, P. J.,
Turner, M.,
Reynolds, L. F.,
Prisco, A.,
Sarner, N.,
Zamoyska, R.,
and Tybulewicz, V. L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3035-3040 9.
Michel, F.,
Grimaud, L.,
Tuosto, L.,
and Acuto, O.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31932-31938 10.
Deckert, M.,
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
Couture, C.,
Mustelin, T.,
and Altman, A.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
591-604[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Kadlecek, T. A.,
van Oers, N. S. C.,
Lefrancois, L.,
Olson, S.,
Finlay, D.,
Chu, D. H.,
Connolly, K.,
Killeen, N.,
and Weiss, A.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
4688-4694 12.
Han, J.,
Luby-Phelps, K.,
Das, B.,
Shu, X.,
Xia, Y.,
Mosteller, R. D.,
Krishna, U. M.,
Falck, J. R.,
White, M. A.,
and Broek, D.
(1998)
Science
279,
558-560 13.
Han, J.,
Das, B.,
Wei, W.,
van Aelst, L.,
Mosteller, R. D.,
Khosravi-Far, R.,
Westwick, J. K.,
Der, C. J.,
and Broeck, D.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1346-1353[Abstract]
14.
Brunati, A. M.,
Donella-Deana, A.,
Ruzzene, M.,
Marin, O.,
and Pinna, L. A.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
367,
149-152
15.
Crespo, P.,
Schuebel, K. E.,
Ostrom, A. A.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
and Bustelo, X. R.
(1997)
Nature
385,
169-172[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Wu, J.,
Katzav, S.,
and Weiss, A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4337-4346[Abstract]
17.
Turner, H.,
Gomez, M.,
McKenzie, E.,
Kirchem, A.,
Lennard, A.,
and Cantrell, D. A.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
527-537 18.
Wu, J.,
Motto, D. G.,
Koretzky, G. A.,
and Weiss, A.
(1996)
Immunity
4,
593-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Holsinger, L. J.,
Spencer, D. M.,
Austin, D. J.,
Schreiber, S. L.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9810-9804 20.
Manser, E.,
Loo, T. H.,
Koh, C. G.,
Zhao, Z. S.,
Chen, X. Q.,
Tan, L.,
Tan, I.,
Leung, T.,
and Lim, L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell.
1,
183-192[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Katzav, S.,
Cleveland, J. L.,
Heslop, H. E.,
and Pulido, D.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
1912-1920 22.
Soisson, S. M.,
Nimnual, A. S.,
Uy, M.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1998)
Cell
95,
259-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Hart, M. J.,
Eva, A.,
Zangrilli, D.,
Aaronson, S. A.,
Evans, T.,
Cerione, R. A.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
62-65 24.
Pani, G.,
Fischer, K.-D.,
Mlinaric-Rascan, I.,
and Siminovitch, K. A.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
839-852 25.
Song, J. S.,
Haleem-Smith, H.,
Arudchandran, R.,
Gomez, J.,
Scott, P. M.,
Mill, J. F.,
Tan, T. H.,
and Rivera, J.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
802-810 26.
Weiss, A.,
and Stobo, J. D.
(1984)
J. Exp. Med.
160,
1284-1299 27.
Shapiro, V. S.,
Truitt, K. E.,
Imboden, J. B.,
and Weiss, A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4051-4058[Abstract]
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Oka, S. Ihara, and Y. Fukui Cooperation of DEF6 with Activated Rac in Regulating Cell Morphology J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 2011 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Miletic, K. Sakata-Sogawa, M. Hiroshima, M. J. Hamann, T. S. Gomez, N. Ota, T. Kloeppel, O. Kanagawa, M. Tokunaga, D. D. Billadeau, et al. Vav1 Acidic Region Tyrosine 174 Is Required for the Formation of T Cell Receptor-induced Microclusters and Is Essential in T Cell Development and Activation J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38257 - 38265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Lyons and K. L. Burnstein Vav3, a Rho GTPase Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor, Increases during Progression to Androgen Independence in Prostate Cancer Cells and Potentiates Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activity Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 20(5): 1061 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Godambe, K. M. Knapp, E. A. Meals, and B. K. English Role of vav1 in the Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated Upregulation of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Production and Nuclear Factor for Interleukin-6 Expression Activity in Murine Macrophages Clin. Vaccine Immunol., May 1, 2004; 11(3): 525 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Stovall, A.-K. Yi, E. A. Meals, A. J. Talati, S. A. Godambe, and B. K. English Role of vav1- and src-related Tyrosine Kinases in Macrophage Activation by CpG DNA J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 13809 - 13816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Katzav Vav1: an oncogene that regulates specific transcriptional activation of T cells Blood, April 1, 2004; 103(7): 2443 - 2451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fujikawa, A. V. Miletic, F. W. Alt, R. Faccio, T. Brown, J. Hoog, J. Fredericks, S. Nishi, S. Mildiner, S. L. Moores, et al. Vav1/2/3-null Mice Define an Essential Role for Vav Family Proteins in Lymphocyte Development and Activation but a Differential Requirement in MAPK Signaling in T and B Cells J. Exp. Med., November 17, 2003; 198(10): 1595 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miura-Shimura, L. Duan, N. L. Rao, A. L. Reddi, H. Shimura, R. Rottapel, B. J. Druker, A. Tsygankov, V. Band, and H. Band Cbl-mediated Ubiquitinylation and Negative Regulation of Vav J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2003; 278(40): 38495 - 38504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Kuhne, J. Lin, D. Yablonski, M. N. Mollenauer, L. I. R. Ehrlich, J. Huppa, M. M. Davis, and A. Weiss Linker for Activation of T Cells, {zeta}-Associated Protein-70, and Src Homology 2 Domain-Containing Leukocyte Protein-76 are Required for TCR-Induced Microtubule-Organizing Center Polarization J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 860 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tamas, Z. Solti, P. Bauer, A. Illes, S. Sipeki, A. Bauer, A. Farago, J. Downward, and L. Buday Mechanism of Epidermal Growth Factor Regulation of Vav2, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Rac J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 5163 - 5171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. del Pozo, M. A. Schwartz, J. Hu, W. B. Kiosses, A. Altman, and M. Villalba Guanine Exchange-Dependent and -Independent Effects of Vav1 on Integrin-Induced T Cell Spreading J. Immunol., January 1, 2003; 170(1): 41 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Groysman, I. Hornstein, A. Alcover, and S. Katzav Vav1 and Ly-GDI Two Regulators of Rho GTPases, Function Cooperatively as Signal Transducers in T Cell Antigen Receptor-induced Pathways J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 50121 - 50130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Inabe, M. Ishiai, A. M. Scharenberg, N. Freshney, J. Downward, and T. Kurosaki Vav3 Modulates B Cell Receptor Responses by Regulating Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Activation J. Exp. Med., January 14, 2002; 195(2): 189 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Marignani and C. L. Carpenter Vav2 is required for cell spreading J. Cell Biol., July 9, 2001; 154(1): 177 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Manetz, C. Gonzalez-Espinosa, R. Arudchandran, S. Xirasagar, V. Tybulewicz, and J. Rivera Vav1 Regulates Phospholipase C{gamma} Activation and Calcium Responses in Mast Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2001; 21(11): 3763 - 3774. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
O. Kaminuma, M. Deckert, C. Elly, Y.-C. Liu, and A. Altman Vav-Rac1-Mediated Activation of the c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase/c-Jun/AP-1 Pathway Plays a Major Role in Stimulation of the Distal NFAT Site in the Interleukin-2 Gene Promoter Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(9): 3126 - 3136. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Moores, L. M. Selfors, J. Fredericks, T. Breit, K. Fujikawa, F. W. Alt, J. S. Brugge, and W. Swat Vav Family Proteins Couple to Diverse Cell Surface Receptors Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6364 - 6373. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Genot, C. Arrieumerlou, G. Ku, B. M. T. Burgering, A. Weiss, and I. M. Kramer The T-Cell Receptor Regulates Akt (Protein Kinase B) via a Pathway Involving Rac1 and Phosphatidylinositide 3-Kinase Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2000; 20(15): 5469 - 5478. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Hehner, T. G. Hofmann, O. Dienz, W. Droge, and M. L. Schmitz Tyrosine-phosphorylated Vav1 as a Point of Integration for T-cell Receptor- and CD28-mediated Activation of JNK, p38, and Interleukin-2 Transcription J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2000; 275(24): 18160 - 18171. [Abstract] [Full Text] |