![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 22882-22887, July 28, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
, and
¶
From the
Institute of Veterinary Biochemistry,
University of Zürich-Irchel, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057,
Zürich, Switzerland and the § Laboratory for
Physiological Chemistry, Utrecht University and Centre for Biomedical
Genetics, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Received for publication, March 6, 2000, and in revised form, May 11, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is best known
as a DNA polymerase accessory protein but has more recently also been
shown to have different functions in important cellular processes such as DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell cycle control. PCNA has been
found in quaternary complexes with the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21 and
several pairs of cyclin-dependent protein kinases and their
regulatory partner, the cyclins. Here we show a direct interaction between PCNA and Cdk2. This interaction involves the regions of the
PCNA trimer close to the C termini. We found that PCNA and Cdk2 form a
complex together with cyclin A. This ternary PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex
was able to phosphorylate the PCNA binding region of the large subunit
of replication factor C as well as DNA ligase I. Furthermore, PCNA
appears to be a connector between Cdk2 and DNA ligase I and to
stimulate phosphorylation of DNA ligase I. Based on our results, we
propose the model that PCNA brings Cdk2 to proteins involved in DNA
replication and possibly might act as an "adaptor" for Cdk2-cyclin
A to PCNA-binding DNA replication proteins.
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen
(PCNA)1 (1) was first
characterized as a processivity factor for DNA polymerase PCNA has furthermore been identified in quaternary complexes with the
kinase inhibitor p21, the cyclin-dependent protein kinases (Cdks), and their regulatory partners, the cyclins (4). The pairs of
Cdk-cyclin found in these complexes were Cdk4-cyclin D,
Cdk2-cyclin E, Cdk2-cyclin A, and Cdc2-cyclin B. Cdks represent a
family of protein kinases that control the transition between successive phases of the cell cycle in all eukaryotic cells (10). The
G0 While searching for interacting partners with PCNA, we found that Cdk2
can directly interact with PCNA. First, Myc-tagged PCNA was
transiently overexpressed in 293 cells and immunoprecipitated by using
an anti-Myc antibody. Co-immunoprecipitated proteins as well as
polymerase Materials--
For cell culture, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium, fetal calf serum (FCS) and the solution of penicillin and
streptomycin were from Life Technologies, Inc. Hydroxyurea was from
Sigma. Flow cytometry analyses were done by using a
FACScanTM flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). The IBIS
system (Intersens Instruments BV, Amersfoort, Holland) was used for
surface plasmon resonance (17). CM5 research grade sensor chips and
coupling agents were purchased from BIAcore (Upsala, Sweden).
Nucleic Acids--
Poly(dA)1000-1500 was from
Sigma, and oligo(dT) was from Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). To
generate constructs for eukaryotic overexpression of wild type PCNA and
PCNA mutants, polymerase chain reaction primers were constructed to
either generate a single N-terminal Myc tag or a Kozak consensus
sequence in front of the PCNA open reading frame. Following polymerase
chain reaction amplification, the resulting fragments were cloned into
either pCDNA3 (for N-Myc-PCNA) or pCDNA3.1 (for
C-Myc-His-PCNA). All clones were sequenced completely to confirm the
absence of polymerase chain reaction-induced errors. The pGEX-3X
plasmids expressing human wild type Cdk2 GST fusion protein and human
wild type cyclin A GST fusion protein were kindly provided by C. Bonne-Andréa and R. Fotedar, respectively. The plasmid pT7/PCNA
was a gift of Bruce Stillman.
Proteins and Antibodies--
Human wild type PCNA was produced
in E. coli using the plasmid pT7/hPCNA and purified to
homogeneity as described (18). Mutant PCNA proteins were purified as
described (9). The pCDNA3 derivative clones were used for transient
expression of Myc- or Myc-(poly-His)-tagged proteins. Cells were
transfected according to Hottiger and Nabel (19). The purified
Cdk2-cyclin A complex (13) was a gift from H. P. Nasheuer. The
histone H1 was from Roche. Anti-Cdk2 rabbit (H-298), anti-cyclin A
rabbit (H-432), anti-PCNA mouse (PC10), and anti-GST rabbit antibodies
(Z-5) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The
mouse IgG1, Cell Culture and Preparations of Cell Extracts--
HeLa and 293 were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% FCS, 10 µg/ml antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) at
37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2. For synchronization in G1, cells grown to approximately 50%
confluence were arrested by serum starvation in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 0.5% FCS and released at
2 h. S phase cells were harvested 2 h after release from a
24-h block with 2 mM hydroxyurea. The proportion of cells
in the various phases of the cell cycle was determined by flow
cytometry. For S-100 extracts, cells were resuspended in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 5 mM NaCl, 0.3% (v/v)
Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 2 µg/ml each of pepstatin and
leupeptin and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. After 10 min of
centrifugation at 3000 × g, the supernatant was
adjusted to 120 mM NaCl and ultracentrifuged at
100,000 × g for 1 h.
For nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts (20), HeLa cells were grown to
approximately 60% confluence. Harvested cells were first lysed at
4 °C in buffer A containing 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and 2 µg/ml each of leupeptin and
pepstatin for 5 min. The cytoplasmic extract was collected after 5 min
of centrifugation at 8000 × g and diluted 1:3 with buffer D (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 20% glycerol). The nuclei pelleted
were extracted for 15 min in buffer C containing 20 mM
Hepes (pH 7.9), 0.42 M NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25% (v/v) glycerol, and 2 µg/ml each
of leupeptin and pepstatin and cleared by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min. The nuclear fraction was diluted 1:6 in
buffer D.
Pull-down Assays--
For in vitro binding, 10 µl
of glutathione-Sepharose beads were incubated with 10 µM of
GST-proteins for 2 h at 4 °C. GST-proteins bound to the beads
were incubated with 100 ng of purified PCNA or 100 µg of 293 S-100
extracts containing overexpressed wild type and mutant His-PCNA. After
1 h at 4 °C, the beads were washed four times with 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v)
Nonidet P-40, and 2 µg/ml each of leupeptin and aprotinin (binding
buffer) at 4 °C, and bound proteins were eluted with 50 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 2 mM EDTA, 1% (w/v)
SPR Analysis--
All experiments were performed at room
temperature. Purified PCNA was covalently coupled to the dextran of a
CM5 research grade sensor chip. The carboxymethylated dextran was
activated for 5 min with 0.1 M
N-hydroxysuccinimide and 0.4 M
N-ethyl-N'-(dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide in
water. The ligand was then injected on the reactive surface (100 µl
of 0.8 mM PCNA) in 10 mM NaCH3COOH
(pH 5.3) and 20 mM NaCl. Afterward, the residual
N-hydroxysuccinide esters on the sensor chip surface were
deactivated for 5 min with 1 M ethanolamine (pH 8.5) in
water. Final regeneration of the matrix was performed with 0.5 M NaCl and 0.025% (w/v) SDS. Purified wild-type GST-Cdk2 and mutant proteins were diluted in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, and 10% (v/v) glycerol. A 100-µl sample was injected
over the PCNA-coupled surface for 5 min. Multiple injections at
various concentrations were performed for each ligand. The association
phases of the recorded sensorgrams were fitted to a first order binding
model (Rt = R0 + (kaCRmax/kS)(1 Immunoprecipitation--
150 µg of cytoplasmic HeLa, 50 µg of nuclear HeLa, and 150 µg of S-100 HeLa extracts were adjusted
to 40 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.5), 8 mM
MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 1 µg/ml each of aprotinin and leupeptin (IP buffer) and added to a
column coupled or preincubated with antibody. After a 2-h incubation at
4 °C, the column was washed with IP buffer, and the bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer as described under "Pull-down Assays."
Immunoblotting--
Protein samples were separated in a SDS-12%
polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Micron
Separations Inc.) in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM
glycine, and 20% methanol using a Bio-Rad Trans Blot apparatus.
After blocking with 5% milk in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 (TBST), antibodies were
incubated for 2 h and then washed in TBST. The antigen/antibody
reaction was revealed by using an enhanced chemiluminescence procedure
according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Pierce).
Protein Kinase Assays--
The assays were performed with
purified Cdk2-cyclin A complexes (13) or Cdk-cyclin complexes
immunoprecipitated. Protein G-Sepharose containing the
immunocomplex was washed with IP buffer and then with a solution
containing 40 mM Hepes (pH 7.5) and 8 mM
MgCl2 (kinase buffer). Assays were performed in a reaction mixture of 18 µl containing kinase buffer, 33.3 µM ATP,
10 µCi of [ PCNA Can Form a Complex with Cdk2 and Cyclin A in the
Nucleus--
We first performed co-immunoprecipitation of Myc-tagged
PCNA transiently overexpressed in 293 cells to discover
PCNA-interacting proteins. Since Cdk2 was clearly shown to interact
with PCNA, experiments were done to confirm the interaction with
endogenous proteins. For this purpose, cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts
from unsynchronous HeLa cells were immunoprecipitated using anti-Cdk2 and anti-cyclin A antibodies. The immunoprecipitated complexes were
analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Cdk2, anti-cyclin A, and anti-PCNA
antibodies. The anti-Cdk2 antibody co-precipitated cyclin A as well as
PCNA from both nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions (Fig.
1). While cyclin A was found in a complex
with Cdk2 in the nucleus as well as in the cytoplasm, a ternary
PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex could only be found in the nucleus, as seen
in Fig. 1, when immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-cyclin A
antibody.
PCNA and Cdk2 Form a Complex in S Phase--
Next we addressed the
question of whether the formation of the complex between PCNA and Cdk2
is cell cycle-specific. For this, immunoprecipitations of Cdk2 were
performed from cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of HeLa cells
synchronized in G1 and S phase. The cells were synchronized
in G1 phase by serum starvation (0.5% FCS) followed by a
release of 2 h and in S phase by hydroxyurea block followed by a
release of 2 h. The synchronization was analyzed by flow
cytometry. The co-immunoprecipitated complexes were identified by
immunoblot, by using anti-Cdk2 and anti-PCNA antibodies. When the
majority of HeLa cells are in G1 phase, PCNA and Cdk2
formed a complex in the nucleus but not in the cytoplasm (Fig.
2A). The same result was
obtained by hydroxyurea block (data not shown). When most of the cells
are in S phase, the complex was found in the nucleus as well as in the
cytoplasm (Fig. 2B). These results suggested that a
PCNA-Cdk2 complex could be formed in the cytoplasm in the S phase.
Pull-down and Surface Plasmon Resonance Experiments Suggest That
Cdk2 but Not Cyclin A Binds Directly to PCNA--
To test a direct
interaction with PCNA, Cdk2, and cyclin A were generated as GST fusion
proteins. The GST fusion proteins were incubated with bacterially
expressed PCNA and isolated by immobilization on glutathione-Sepharose.
The washing steps were done with 150 mM NaCl. Bound PCNA
was then detected by immunoblotting with an anti-PCNA monoclonal
antibody (PC10). Fig. 3A shows
an interaction between PCNA and Cdk2 but no interaction between PCNA and cyclin A. The PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (RF-C B) and p21 were
used as positive controls. The DNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (RF-C A)
and GST were negative controls (21). Different salt
concentrations for washing were used to test the salt dependence of the
interaction between PCNA and Cdk2 (Fig. 3B). The interaction could resist up to 1 M NaCl and was lost at 2 M, which is characteristic of a hydrophobic
interaction.
Next, the binding properties of PCNA to Cdk2 were measured by using a
surface plasmon resonance-based assay (IBIS System, Intersens
Instruments BV). Fig. 3C shows sensorgrams obtained with
GST-Cdk2, heat-denatured GST-Cdk2, and GST injected on a dextran sensor
chip coupled with PCNA. The response (R), expressed in
millidegrees, is a measure for the protein mass at the surface of the
sensor chip; binding is detected as an increased of millidegrees (R) in time. Only native GST-Cdk2 was able to interact with
PCNA. GST and heat-denatured GST-Cdk2 were boiled and used as
negative controls to exclude unspecific binding of GST and buffer jump, respectively. The association rate constant (ka)
derived from multiple measurements at different concentrations of
GST-Cdk2 is 8.3 ± 3.2 × 105
M Cdk2 Binds to the "Front Side" of PCNA--
To map the binding
site of Cdk2 on PCNA, we used mutants of PCNA that were N-terminally
Myc-tagged and transiently overexpressed in 293 cells. The three
mutants were constructed by changing residues of loops exposed on the
surface of the PCNA trimer (9). The mutant S43A/H44A/V45A is
mutated in the A Pull-down Experiment Suggests That PCNA Does Not Compete with p21
for Cdk2 Binding--
To determine if PCNA and the kinase inhibitor
p21cip1/WAF-1 have the same interaction site on Cdk2,
p21 was used as a potential competitor of PCNA for binding wild type
Cdk2 in a GST pull-down experiment. From the structure of
p27kip1 bound to the Cdk2-cyclin A complex, it has been
shown that the members of the Kip/Cip family interact with the
N-terminal lobe of Cdk2. As described above, GST-proteins bound to
beads were incubated with PCNA (100 ng) or a mixture of PCNA (100 ng)
and p21 (100 ng). The ability to bind the GST-Cdk2 was determined by
immunoblot with an anti-PCNA antibody (PC10). As seen in Fig. 5, p21 bound to Cdk2 did not affect the
ability of PCNA to interact with Cdk2, while interacting with Cdk2,
indicating that PCNA does not bind the same site on Cdk2 as on
p21.
PCNA Can Bring the Cdk-Cyclin Phosphorylation Activity to
PCNA-interacting DNA Replication Proteins, Replication Factor C
and DNA Ligase I--
Next, experiments were designed to see if the
Cdks could phosphorylate proteins involved in DNA replication. PCNA was
immunoprecipitated from HeLa nuclear extracts, and the activity of the
co-immunoprecipitated Cdk-cyclins was tested in a kinase assay. Histone
H1, Lig I, and the PCNA binding region of RF-C (RF-C B) were used as
substrates (2 µg), since Lig I and RF-C B have many potential
Cdk-cyclin phosphorylation sites. The Cdk2-PCNA complex was able to
phosphorylate histone H1 (Fig.
6A). Phosphorylation of
bacterially expressed PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (Fig.
6B) and Lig I (Fig. 6C) was also evident and
specific for Cdks, since the cyclin-dependent kinase
inhibitor p21 prevented phosphorylation of both PCNA-binding replication protein and the control protein histone H1. From
this experiment we concluded that PCNA could target Cdk-cyclin to
PCNA-binding DNA replication proteins.
Binding of Cdk2 to DNA Ligase I Is Favored in the Presence of Equal
Amounts of PCNA and DNA Ligase I--
To test a possible direct
interaction between Lig I and Cdk2, GST-Cdk2 fusion proteins bound on
beads were incubated with bacterially expressed Lig I (500 ng) or a
mixture of Lig I (500 ng) and PCNA (500 ng). Bound Lig I was then
detected by immunoblotting with an anti-Lig I polyclonal antibody. Fig.
7 shows that the interaction between Lig
I and Cdk2 was favored 5 times in the presence of an equal amount of
PCNA, as compared with the control reaction in the absence of PCNA.
PCNA Can Stimulate Phosphorylation of DNA Ligase I by Cdk2-Cyclin
A--
Finally, phosphorylation of Lig I by pure Cdk2-cyclin A complex
was tested in the presence or absence of PCNA. Different amounts of
Cdk2-cyclin A complex (25, 50, and 100 ng) and Lig I (100 ng) and
different amounts of PCNA (50, 100, and 200 ng) were first incubated at
4 °C for 1 h, and the mixture was then tested in a kinase
assay. When PCNA was added in the reaction (Fig.
8), phosphorylation of Lig I was
stimulated. Phosphorylation was increased 4 times with equal amounts of
Cdk2-cyclin A complexes, PCNA, and Lig I (lane
7), as compared with the control reaction in the absence of
PCNA (lane 5). As a negative control, p21 was
added to the reaction. Inhibition of the assay showed that
phosphorylation was specific to Cdk2-cyclin A complex.
A complex with PCNA was identified in nuclear extracts of HeLa
cells by immunoprecipitating cyclin A and Cdk2 (Fig. 1). However, the
ternary complex was not detected in the cytoplasm, suggesting that Cdk2
is represented in this compartment of the cell in two pools, namely
either bound to PCNA alone or to cyclin A alone. PCNA-Cdk2 complex is
present in the nucleus throughout the cell cycle and is preferentially
formed during S phase in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). These results together
with the fact that a direct interaction between PCNA and Cdk2 is also
seen in GST pull-down experiments (Fig. 3A) and by surface
plasmon resonance analysis (Fig. 3C) suggested that PCNA and
Cdk-cyclin could form a complex. Cdk2 did not bind C-terminally
Myc-tagged PCNA (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the front side of
PCNA containing the C terminus is involved in the interaction with
Cdk2. We did not detect competition between PCNA and p21 for binding to
Cdk2, suggesting that these two proteins bind Cdk2 using distinct
interaction sites (Fig. 5). By immunoprecipitation, we observed that
the PCNA-Cdk2 complex is present in the nucleus both during
G1 and S phases, but during S phase the complex was also
detected in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). We therefore hypothesize that Cdk2
could be involved in the translocation of PCNA from the cytoplasm into
the nucleus during S phase, as detected by complex formation, since
PCNA has no nuclear localization sequence. Alternatively, Cdk2-PCNA
complex formation could be inhibited in the cytoplasm during
G1 phase, while during S phase productive complex formation
in the cytoplasm could result in nuclear import of Cdk2-PCNA complexes.
The finding that a Cdk activity brought to PCNA was able to
phosphorylate two DNA replication proteins, the PCNA binding region of
RF-Cp145 (Fig. 6B) and Lig I (Fig. 6C) could be
physiologically significant. A Cdk2-cyclin recognition motif has been
identified in substrate proteins, and p21-like
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (23, 24). This
recognition motif was present in the sequence of the retinoblastoma
protein (pRb); the transcription factors E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3;
and the Cdk inhibitor p21, p27, and p57. These findings suggested a
recognition step between Cdks-cyclins and substrates preceding
phosphorylation. Lig I has many potential sites of phosphorylation by
Cdk-cyclin, suggesting a phosphorylation of Lig I by the
PCNA-Cdk-cyclin complex (Fig. 6C). Although the putative
Cdk2-cyclin binding motif of p27 and p57 (23) is present at the
C-terminal and the N-terminal parts of Lig I, we could demonstrate in a
pull-down experiment that this motif was alone not sufficient.
Consequently, PCNA might be the link between Lig I and Cdk2 (Fig. 7),
suggesting that in a Lig I-PCNA-Cdk2 complex, Lig I can bind to Cdk2
only via an interaction with PCNA. The other point was the finding that
PCNA could stimulate the phosphorylation of Lig I by Cdk2-cyclin A
(Fig. 8). Our data suggest that PCNA may contribute to the recognition
step preceding phosphorylation by acting as a kind of connector for
Cdks-cyclins, which are active on specific target proteins.
PCNA is a trimer, probably interacting with several different proteins
simultaneously. Even if these bind to the same site of a PCNA monomer,
the proteins could still bind different monomers in the PCNA trimer. As
PCNA binds a large number of proteins, it could connect Cdk2 and its
substrates. The involvement of Cdk2 in the control of S phase is not
completely established. It has been shown that a Cdk2-cyclin A complex
is responsible for activating SV40 plasmid replication in mammalian S
phase cell extracts (25). Proteins involved in replication are also
substrates for this kinase family. Phosphorylation regulates the origin
binding (26) and DNA helicase activity of T antigen (12). It has also
been shown that polymerase Furthermore, in preliminary immunoprecipitations of Myc-tagged PCNA
overexpressed in 293 cells, we could show an interaction with
Cdk4 that is involved in G1 phase and is bound to
cyclin D (data not shown). Indeed, PCNA has been found in complexes
with cyclin D-Cdk4, cyclin E-Cdk2, and cyclin B-Cdc2, which control the
entry points of G1, S, and G2/M phases,
respectively (4). An interaction of PCNA and Cdc2 active in S phase
associated with cyclin A has not yet been investigated, and
consequently the role of PCNA in such complexes has not yet been established.
Cdks are cell cycle regulatory proteins and involved in the control of
gene expression by the pRb pathway. Our findings of the
phosphorylation of target proteins involved in DNA replication and the
dependence of DNA replication upon Cdk2 activity suggest that Cdk2 also
controls DNA replication. It will be interesting to see which step(s)
of DNA replication Cdk2 controls. Phosphorylation of a target DNA
replication protein could lead to activation or inhibition in its
function. Since DNA replication is a meticulously organized
macromolecular event, Cdk2 could act in many different steps. The
finding of all target proteins phosphorylated by Cdk2 and its
consequences will eventually allow us to understand the control of DNA
replication by Cdk2 in more detail.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
. However, within the last few years many proteins besides polymerases
and
and the clamp loader replication factor C (RF-C) have been found to
interact with PCNA. They include the flap-specific endonuclease Fen1
(2), the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21 (3), cyclins (4), the growth
arrest and DNA damage response protein Gadd45 (5), the DNA mismatch
repair proteins MSH2 and MLH1 (6), the nucleotide excision repair
endonuclease XP-G (7), the human DNA-(cytosine-5) methyl-transferase (8), and the human DNA ligase I (2). At
the same time, PCNA has been shown to have roles in cellular pathways
other than DNA replication, such as nucleotide excision repair,
mismatch repair, base excision repair, cell cycle control, apoptosis, and transcription. All of these interactions led to the
idea that PCNA plays a central role in connecting all of these important cellular processes and can act as a cellular communicator (9).
G1 transition is regulated by
Cdk4-cyclin D and Cdk6-cyclin D; G1
S transition by
Cdk2-cyclin E; the G2 and S phases by Cdk2-cyclin A; and
the G2
M transition by Cdc2-cyclin B. The different
Cdk-cyclin complexes display distinct physiological functions.
Cdk4-cyclin D can phosphorylate the retinoblastoma gene product
pRb, which sequesters transcription factors, to allow the
progression into S phase (11). Proteins involved in DNA replication
such as T antigen (12), polymerase
/primase (13), polymerase
(14), and replication protein A (15) are also substrates of Cdk-cyclin
(16). In mitosis, the nuclear lamina is disassembled by a direct
Cdc2-cyclin B phosphorylation (10). Since PCNA is found in a complex
with Cdks and can bind many proteins, the function of the
PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex could function in attracting proteins and in
particular replication proteins as target for kinases.
(p125 subunit and p50 subunit), Lig I, Fen I, and p21
were detected by immunoblotting. The interaction between PCNA and Cdk2
was clearly confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation and surface plasmon
resonance. Since the function of this complex is unknown, we studied
the PCNA-Cdk2 complex in more detail. The PCNA-Cdk2 complex was present
throughout the cell cycle as shown by immunoprecipitation. Since both
Cdk2 and PCNA are involved in S phase events, PCNA was
immunoprecipitated from cell extracts to see if a Cdk-cyclin kinase
activity can be co-immunoprecipitated. The immunoprecipitation of PCNA
from nuclear cell extracts resulted in a PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex
that was active in phosphorylating the PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145
as well as Lig I. Finally, PCNA was found to be necessary for binding
of Lig I to Cdk2 and to stimulate phosphorylation of Lig I by
Cdk2-cyclin A, suggesting that PCNA might bring the Cdk2-cyclin A
complex to its site(s) of action.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(MOPC-21) purified immunoglobulin from Sigma was
used as negative control for immunoprecipitation. The polyclonal
antibody against human DNA ligase I was a gift from T. Lindahl.
-mercaptoethanol, 8% (v/v) glycerol, and 0.025% (w/v) bromphenol
blue (SDS sample buffer).
e
kSt)) by nonlinear
least squares curve fitting using the IBIS kinetic evaluation software.
At various concentrations of analyte, the kS values
were determined, and the association rate constant ka was calculated by the linear curve fitting of a
kS versus C plot (kS = ka·C + kd).
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science
Products), the substrate (histone H1, RF-C B, or Lig I), and 10 µl of
packed protein G-Sepharose or purified Cdk2-cyclin A complexes. After
20 min at 37 °C, the reactions were stopped by adding SDS
sample buffer and loaded on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel,
electrophoresed for 90 min at 120 V, stained with Coomassie Brilliant
Blue, dried, and autoradiographed.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
PCNA can form a complex with Cdk2 and cyclin
A in HeLa cells in the nucleus. Immunoprecipitations with
anti-cyclin A and anti-Cdk2 antibodies were performed with cytoplasmic
and nuclear extracts of asynchronous HeLa cells as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The immunoprecipitated samples were
loaded on two gels and tested by immunoblotting using anti-Cdk2 and
anti-cyclin A for one blot and anti-PCNA antibodies for the other. For
the input, 2 µg of extracts were loaded. The negative control (
)
was an immunoprecipitation with an anti-GST polyclonal antibody.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
PCNA and Cdk2 form a complex in S phase.
A1, flow cytometry analysis of U2OS cells synchronized in
G1 phase by serum starvation (0.5% FCS) and a release of
2 h. A2, immunoprecipitation (IP) with
anti-Cdk2 antibody using cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of HeLa cells
in G1 phase as described under "Experimental
Procedures." B1, flow cytometry analysis of U2OS cells
synchronized in S phase, hydroxyurea block, and 2 h of
release. B2, immunoprecipitations with anti-Cdk2
antibody were performed by using cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of
HeLa cells in S phase as described under "Experimental Procedures."
As a control, 2 µg of extracts was loaded. The negative control (
)
was an immunoprecipitation with an anti-GST polyclonal antibody.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Pull-down (A and
B) and surface plasmon resonance (C)
experiments show that Cdk2 can bind directly to PCNA. A
and B, GST-Cdk2 fusion protein GST-cyclin A and a control
GST-protein were bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads, incubated with
100 ng of PCNA, and washed with binding buffer, containing varying
concentrations of salt (B). The pull-down experiment,
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblots were performed
as described under "Experimental Procedures." C, 5 µg
each of GST-Cdk2 (1), boiled GST-Cdk2 (2), and
GST (3) were passed over a sensor chip on which PCNA was
immobilized as described under "Experimental Procedures."
R is the response expressed in millidegrees.
1 s
1.
This ka is in the same range as the one already
described for PCNA/p21 interaction (1.1 × 105
M
1 s
1;
Ref. 22). Taken together, the GST binding experiment and the surface
plasmon resonance analysis show a direct interaction between Cdk2 and
PCNA.
C1-
D1 loop, which forms a
part of the hydrophobic pocket on the front side of the trimer close to where the C termini are located. The second mutant,
Q125A/L126A/G127A/I128A, targets the middle of the
domain-connecting loop, and the third mutant, V188A/D189A/K190A,
targets the loop between
D2 and
D1 on the
backside of the torus. Wild type PCNA with either an N-terminal Myc tag
or a C-terminal Myc-His tag was also overexpressed in the same
cell line. Extracts were prepared from these cells and used in GST
pull-down experiments, to see if the overexpressed mutant and wild type
proteins were able to bind Cdk2. GST-RF-C B was used as a positive
control. In pull-down assays, N-Myc-tagged PCNA was found to interact
strongly with Cdk2 (Fig. 4A),
whereas no interaction was observed between Cdk2 and C-Myc-His-PCNA
from cell extracts or bacterially expressed C-His-PCNA. All three
mutants were able to bind Cdk2 (Fig. 4B). This may suggest
that the different mutated regions are not directly involved in the
interaction with Cdk2 or that Cdk2 interacts with a relatively large
region on the PCNA surface. These results suggested that the binding
site of Cdk2 on PCNA is located at the PCNA front side of where the C
termini are located.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Cdk2 binds close to the C termini of
PCNA. GST-Cdk2 fusion protein and control GST-protein were bound
on glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated with wild type PCNA either
N-Myc- or C-Myc-His-tagged (A) and with the three
mutants of PCNA (S43A/H44A/V45A (SHV43),
Q125A/L126A/G127A/I128A (QLGI125), and
V188A/D189A/K190A (VDK188)) (9), all N-Myc-tagged
(B). The bound proteins were solved in SDS sample buffer and
separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The ability of the respective
recombinant proteins to bind PCNA was determined by immunoblotting with
the PCNA antibody PC10 as described under "Experimental
Procedures."

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
A pull-down experiment suggests that PCNA
does not compete with p21 to bind Cdk2. GST-Cdk2 wild type fusion
proteins and control GST-proteins were bound on glutathione-Sepharose
beads and incubated with PCNA (100 ng) or a mix of p21 (100 ng) and
PCNA (100 ng). The pull-down experiment, SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, and autoradiographed immunoblots were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The ability of the
respective recombinant proteins to bind PCNA was determined by
immunoblotting with anti-PCNA antibody (A) and anti-p21
antibody (B), respectively.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
PCNA can bring the Cdk-cyclin phosphorylation
activity to the PCNA-interacting DNA replication proteins, replication
factor C and DNA ligase I. Immunoprecipitation (IP)
with anti-PCNA antibody was performed by using nuclear extracts of HeLa
cells as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
immunoprecipitated complexes were used in a kinase assay on histone H1
(control) (A), the PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (RF-C B)
(B), and Lig I (C). The specificity of Cdks was
measured by adding the inhibitor protein p21. The negative control (
)
was an immunoprecipitation with the IgG1,
(MOPC-21)
monoclonal antibody described under "Experimental
Procedures."

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Binding of Cdk2 to DNA ligase I is favored by
the presence of PCNA. GST-Cdk2 wild type fusion proteins and
control GST-proteins were bound on glutathione-Sepharose beads and
incubated with Lig I (500 ng) or a mixture of Lig I (500 ng) and PCNA
(500 ng). The pull-down experiment, SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, and autoradiographed immunoblots were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The ability of the
respective GST proteins to bind Lig I was determined by immunoblotting
with anti-Lig I antibody.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
PCNA can stimulate phosphorylation of DNA
ligase I by Cdk2-cyclin A. Cdk2-cyclin A complex (25, 50, and 100 ng), Lig I (100 ng), and PCNA (50, 100, and 200 ng) were incubated at
4 °C for 1 h and tested in a kinase assay. The specificity of
Cdk2 was measured by adding the specific Cdk inhibitor p21 (100 ng).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
primase (13) is unable to initiate SV40 DNA replication in vitro when phosphorylated. RPA-32 (16)
and polymerase
(14) are two other replication proteins
phosphorylated by Cdks, but it is not known if and how their function
is affected. Here we present evidence that the PCNA binding regions of
RF-Cp145 and Lig I are also substrates of Cdk2. Recently it has been
shown that a strong casein kinase II consensus site of Lig I, which is
localized on the PCNA binding site, is dephosphorylated during G1 and S phase. Dephosphorylation in these cell cycle
phases correlated with the capacity of Lig I to bind PCNA (27).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Rati Fotedar for providing the pGEX-3X plasmid expressing GST-Cdk2, Catherine Bonne-Andréa for providing pGEX-3X plasmid expressing GST-cyclin A, Andréas Dinter for help with the FACScanTM flow cytometer, and H. P. Nasheuer for providing purified Cdk2-cyclin A complexes.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 3100-43138 95/2 (to S. K. and Z. O. J.) and Grant 31-57 285 99/99 (to S. H.) and European Training Mobility and Research (EU-TMR) Project ERBMRXCT CT 970125 (to U. H., R. d. J., and P. v. d. V.), and by the Kanton of Zürich (to U. H. and M. O. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 41 1 635 54 72; Fax: 41 1 635 68 40; E-mail: hubscher@vetbio.unizh.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001850200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; RF-C, replication factor C; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; Lig I, DNA ligase I; FCS, fetal calf serum; GST, glutathione S-transferase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Jónsson, Z., and Hübscher, U. (1997) BioEssays 19, 967-975 |
| 2. | Li, X., Li, J., Harrington, J., Lieber, M., and Burgers, P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22109-22112 |
| 3. | Waga, S., Hannon, G., Beach, D., and Stillman, B. (1994) Nature 369, 574-578 |
| 4. | Xiong, Y., Zhang, H., and Beach, D. (1992) Cell 71, 505-514 |
| 5. | Smith, M., Chen, I., Zhan, Q., Bae, I., Chen, C., Gilmer, T., Kastan, M., O'Connor, P., and Fornace, A. J. (1994) Science 266, 1376-1380 |
| 6. | Umar, A., Buermeyer, A. B., Simon, J., Thomas, D., Clark, A., Liskay, R., and Kunkel, T. (1996) Cell 87, 65-73 |
| 7. | Gary, R., Ludwig, D., Cornelius, H., MacInnes, M., and Park, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24522-24529 |
| 8. | Chuang, L., Ian, H., Koh, T., Ng, H., Xu, G., and Li, B. (1997) Science 277, 1996-2000 |
| 9. | Jónsson, Z., Hindges, R., and Hübscher, U. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2412-2425 |
| 10. | Nigg, E. (1995) BioEssays 17, 471-480 |
| 11. | Hinds, P. W., and Weinberg, R. A. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 135-141 |
| 12. | McVey, D., Ray, S., Gluzman, Y., Berger, L., Wildeman, A., Marshak, D., and Tegtmeyer, P. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 5206-5215 |
| 13. | Voitenleitner, C., Fanning, E., and Nasheuer, H. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1611-1615 |
| 14. | Wu, S., Zhang, P., Zeng, X., Zhang, S-J., Mo, J., Li, B., and Lee, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9561-9569 |
| 15. | Dutta, A., and Stillman, B. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 189-199 |
| 16. | Din, S., Brill, S., Fairman, M., and Stillman, B. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 968-977 |
| 17. | Dekker, J., Kanellopoulos, P., van Oosterhout, J. A., Stier, G., Tucker, P. A., and van der Vliet, P. C. (1998) EMBO J. 277, 825-838 |
| 18. | Schurtenberger, P., Egelhaaf, S., Hindges, R., Maga, G., Jónsson, Z., May, R., Glatter, O., and Hübscher, U. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 275, 123-132 |
| 19. | Hottiger, M., and Nabel, G. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 8252-8256 |
| 20. | Osborn, L., Kunkel, S., and Nabel, G. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 2336-2340 |
| 21. | Fotedar, R., Mossi, R., Fitzgerald, P., Rousselle, T., Maga, G., Brickner, H., Messier, H., Kasibhatla, S., Hübscher, U., and Fotedar, A. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4423-4433 |
| 22. | Knibiehler, M., Goubin, F., Escalas, N., Jónsson, Z., Mazarguil, H., Hübscher, U., and Ducommun, B. (1996) FEBS Lett. 391, 66-70 |
| 23. | Adams, P., Sellers, W., Sharma, S., Wu, A., Nalin, C., and Kaelin, W. J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6623-6633 |
| 24. | Chen, J., Saha, P., Kornbluth, S., Dynlacht, B. D., and Dutta, A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4673-4682 |
| 25. | Fotedar, A., Cannella, D., Fitzgerald, P., Rousselle, T., Gupta, S., Doree, M., and Fotedar, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31627-31637 |
| 26. | McVey, D., Brizuela, L., Mohr, I., Marshak, D., Gluzman, Y., and Beach, D. (1989) Nature 341, 503-507 |
| 27. | Rossi, R., Villa, A., Negri, C., Scovassi, I., Ciarrocchi, G., Biamonti, G., and Montecucco, A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5745-5754 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Law, E. Forrester, A. Chytil, P. Corsino, G. Green, B. Davis, T. Rowe, and B. Law Rapamycin Disrupts Cyclin/Cyclin-Dependent Kinase/p21/Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Complexes and Cyclin D1 Reverses Rapamycin Action by Stabilizing These Complexes Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 1070 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-C. Chuang and P. R. Yew Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Recruits Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor Xic1 to DNA and Couples Its Proteolysis to DNA Polymerase Switching J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35299 - 35309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Frouin, M. Toueille, E. Ferrari, I. Shevelev, and U. Hubscher Phosphorylation of human DNA polymerase {lambda} by the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk2/cyclin A complex is modulated by its association with proliferating cell nuclear antigen Nucleic Acids Res., September 20, 2005; 33(16): 5354 - 5361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kontopidis, S.-Y. Wu, D. I. Zheleva, P. Taylor, C. McInnes, D. P. Lane, P. M. Fischer, and M. D. Walkinshaw From the Cover: Structural and biochemical studies of human proliferating cell nuclear antigen complexes provide a rationale for cyclin association and inhibitor design PNAS, February 8, 2005; 102(6): 1871 - 1876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dong, S.-C. Lyu, A. M. Krensky, and C. Clayberger DQ 65-79, A Peptide Derived from HLA Class II, Mimics p21 to Block T Cell Proliferation J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 5064 - 5070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ferrari, R. Rossi, D. Arosio, A. Vindigni, G. Biamonti, and A. Montecucco Cell Cycle-dependent Phosphorylation of Human DNA Ligase I at the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Sites J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37761 - 37767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Maga and U. Hubscher Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2003; 116(15): 3051 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Advani, R. R. Weichselbaum, and B. Roizman Herpes simplex virus 1 activates cdc2 to recruit topoisomerase IIalpha for post-DNA synthesis expression of late genes PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4825 - 4830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Schmidt, K. L. Derry, and R. D. Kolodner Saccharomyces cerevisiae RRM3, a 5' to 3' DNA Helicase, Physically Interacts with Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 45331 - 45337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamauchi, M. J. Keating, and W. Plunkett UCN-01 (7-Hydroxystaurosporine) Inhibits DNA Repair and Increases Cytotoxicity in Normal Lymphocytes and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Lymphocytes Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2002; 1(4): 287 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Advani, R. R. Weichselbaum, and B. Roizman cdc2 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Binds and Phosphorylates Herpes Simplex Virus 1 UL42 DNA Synthesis Processivity Factor J. Virol., November 1, 2001; 75(21): 10326 - 10333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Scott, P. Bonnefin, D. Vieyra, F.-M. Boisvert, D. Young, D. P. Bazett-Jones, and K. Riabowol UV-induced binding of ING1 to PCNA regulates the induction of apoptosis J. Cell Sci., January 10, 2001; 114(19): 3455 - 3462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Parker, Y. Gu, W. Mahoney, S.-H. Lee, K. K. Singh, and A-L. Lu Human Homolog of the MutY Repair Protein (hMYH) Physically Interacts with Proteins Involved in Long Patch DNA Base Excision Repair J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5547 - 5555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||