JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001850200 on May 15, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 22882-22887, July 28, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/30/22882    most recent
M001850200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koundrioukoff, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hübscher, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koundrioukoff, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hübscher, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Direct Interaction between Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) and Cdk2 Targets PCNA-interacting Proteins for Phosphorylation*

Stéphane KoundrioukoffDagger , Zophonías O. JónssonDagger , Sameez HasanDagger , Rob N. de Jong§, Peter C. van der Vliet§, Michael O. HottigerDagger , and Ulrich HübscherDagger

From the Dagger  Institute of Veterinary Biochemistry, University of Zürich-Irchel, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zürich, Switzerland and the § Laboratory for Physiological Chemistry, Utrecht University and Centre for Biomedical Genetics, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Received for publication, March 6, 2000, and in revised form, May 11, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is best known as a DNA polymerase accessory protein but has more recently also been shown to have different functions in important cellular processes such as DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell cycle control. PCNA has been found in quaternary complexes with the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21 and several pairs of cyclin-dependent protein kinases and their regulatory partner, the cyclins. Here we show a direct interaction between PCNA and Cdk2. This interaction involves the regions of the PCNA trimer close to the C termini. We found that PCNA and Cdk2 form a complex together with cyclin A. This ternary PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex was able to phosphorylate the PCNA binding region of the large subunit of replication factor C as well as DNA ligase I. Furthermore, PCNA appears to be a connector between Cdk2 and DNA ligase I and to stimulate phosphorylation of DNA ligase I. Based on our results, we propose the model that PCNA brings Cdk2 to proteins involved in DNA replication and possibly might act as an "adaptor" for Cdk2-cyclin A to PCNA-binding DNA replication proteins.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)1 (1) was first characterized as a processivity factor for DNA polymerase delta . However, within the last few years many proteins besides polymerases delta  and epsilon  and the clamp loader replication factor C (RF-C) have been found to interact with PCNA. They include the flap-specific endonuclease Fen1 (2), the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21 (3), cyclins (4), the growth arrest and DNA damage response protein Gadd45 (5), the DNA mismatch repair proteins MSH2 and MLH1 (6), the nucleotide excision repair endonuclease XP-G (7), the human DNA-(cytosine-5) methyl-transferase (8), and the human DNA ligase I (2). At the same time, PCNA has been shown to have roles in cellular pathways other than DNA replication, such as nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, base excision repair, cell cycle control, apoptosis, and transcription. All of these interactions led to the idea that PCNA plays a central role in connecting all of these important cellular processes and can act as a cellular communicator (9).

PCNA has furthermore been identified in quaternary complexes with the kinase inhibitor p21, the cyclin-dependent protein kinases (Cdks), and their regulatory partners, the cyclins (4). The pairs of Cdk-cyclin found in these complexes were Cdk4-cyclin D, Cdk2-cyclin E, Cdk2-cyclin A, and Cdc2-cyclin B. Cdks represent a family of protein kinases that control the transition between successive phases of the cell cycle in all eukaryotic cells (10). The G0 right-arrow G1 transition is regulated by Cdk4-cyclin D and Cdk6-cyclin D; G1 right-arrow S transition by Cdk2-cyclin E; the G2 and S phases by Cdk2-cyclin A; and the G2 right-arrow M transition by Cdc2-cyclin B. The different Cdk-cyclin complexes display distinct physiological functions. Cdk4-cyclin D can phosphorylate the retinoblastoma gene product pRb, which sequesters transcription factors, to allow the progression into S phase (11). Proteins involved in DNA replication such as T antigen (12), polymerase alpha /primase (13), polymerase delta  (14), and replication protein A (15) are also substrates of Cdk-cyclin (16). In mitosis, the nuclear lamina is disassembled by a direct Cdc2-cyclin B phosphorylation (10). Since PCNA is found in a complex with Cdks and can bind many proteins, the function of the PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex could function in attracting proteins and in particular replication proteins as target for kinases.

While searching for interacting partners with PCNA, we found that Cdk2 can directly interact with PCNA. First, Myc-tagged PCNA was transiently overexpressed in 293 cells and immunoprecipitated by using an anti-Myc antibody. Co-immunoprecipitated proteins as well as polymerase delta  (p125 subunit and p50 subunit), Lig I, Fen I, and p21 were detected by immunoblotting. The interaction between PCNA and Cdk2 was clearly confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation and surface plasmon resonance. Since the function of this complex is unknown, we studied the PCNA-Cdk2 complex in more detail. The PCNA-Cdk2 complex was present throughout the cell cycle as shown by immunoprecipitation. Since both Cdk2 and PCNA are involved in S phase events, PCNA was immunoprecipitated from cell extracts to see if a Cdk-cyclin kinase activity can be co-immunoprecipitated. The immunoprecipitation of PCNA from nuclear cell extracts resulted in a PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex that was active in phosphorylating the PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 as well as Lig I. Finally, PCNA was found to be necessary for binding of Lig I to Cdk2 and to stimulate phosphorylation of Lig I by Cdk2-cyclin A, suggesting that PCNA might bring the Cdk2-cyclin A complex to its site(s) of action.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- For cell culture, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, fetal calf serum (FCS) and the solution of penicillin and streptomycin were from Life Technologies, Inc. Hydroxyurea was from Sigma. Flow cytometry analyses were done by using a FACScanTM flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). The IBIS system (Intersens Instruments BV, Amersfoort, Holland) was used for surface plasmon resonance (17). CM5 research grade sensor chips and coupling agents were purchased from BIAcore (Upsala, Sweden).

Nucleic Acids-- Poly(dA)1000-1500 was from Sigma, and oligo(dT) was from Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). To generate constructs for eukaryotic overexpression of wild type PCNA and PCNA mutants, polymerase chain reaction primers were constructed to either generate a single N-terminal Myc tag or a Kozak consensus sequence in front of the PCNA open reading frame. Following polymerase chain reaction amplification, the resulting fragments were cloned into either pCDNA3 (for N-Myc-PCNA) or pCDNA3.1 (for C-Myc-His-PCNA). All clones were sequenced completely to confirm the absence of polymerase chain reaction-induced errors. The pGEX-3X plasmids expressing human wild type Cdk2 GST fusion protein and human wild type cyclin A GST fusion protein were kindly provided by C. Bonne-Andréa and R. Fotedar, respectively. The plasmid pT7/PCNA was a gift of Bruce Stillman.

Proteins and Antibodies-- Human wild type PCNA was produced in E. coli using the plasmid pT7/hPCNA and purified to homogeneity as described (18). Mutant PCNA proteins were purified as described (9). The pCDNA3 derivative clones were used for transient expression of Myc- or Myc-(poly-His)-tagged proteins. Cells were transfected according to Hottiger and Nabel (19). The purified Cdk2-cyclin A complex (13) was a gift from H. P. Nasheuer. The histone H1 was from Roche. Anti-Cdk2 rabbit (H-298), anti-cyclin A rabbit (H-432), anti-PCNA mouse (PC10), and anti-GST rabbit antibodies (Z-5) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The mouse IgG1,kappa (MOPC-21) purified immunoglobulin from Sigma was used as negative control for immunoprecipitation. The polyclonal antibody against human DNA ligase I was a gift from T. Lindahl.

Cell Culture and Preparations of Cell Extracts-- HeLa and 293 were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 10 µg/ml antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) at 37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2. For synchronization in G1, cells grown to approximately 50% confluence were arrested by serum starvation in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 0.5% FCS and released at 2 h. S phase cells were harvested 2 h after release from a 24-h block with 2 mM hydroxyurea. The proportion of cells in the various phases of the cell cycle was determined by flow cytometry. For S-100 extracts, cells were resuspended in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 5 mM NaCl, 0.3% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 2 µg/ml each of pepstatin and leupeptin and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. After 10 min of centrifugation at 3000 × g, the supernatant was adjusted to 120 mM NaCl and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h.

For nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts (20), HeLa cells were grown to approximately 60% confluence. Harvested cells were first lysed at 4 °C in buffer A containing 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and 2 µg/ml each of leupeptin and pepstatin for 5 min. The cytoplasmic extract was collected after 5 min of centrifugation at 8000 × g and diluted 1:3 with buffer D (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 20% glycerol). The nuclei pelleted were extracted for 15 min in buffer C containing 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.9), 0.42 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25% (v/v) glycerol, and 2 µg/ml each of leupeptin and pepstatin and cleared by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min. The nuclear fraction was diluted 1:6 in buffer D.

Pull-down Assays-- For in vitro binding, 10 µl of glutathione-Sepharose beads were incubated with 10 µM of GST-proteins for 2 h at 4 °C. GST-proteins bound to the beads were incubated with 100 ng of purified PCNA or 100 µg of 293 S-100 extracts containing overexpressed wild type and mutant His-PCNA. After 1 h at 4 °C, the beads were washed four times with 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and 2 µg/ml each of leupeptin and aprotinin (binding buffer) at 4 °C, and bound proteins were eluted with 50 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 2 mM EDTA, 1% (w/v) beta -mercaptoethanol, 8% (v/v) glycerol, and 0.025% (w/v) bromphenol blue (SDS sample buffer).

SPR Analysis-- All experiments were performed at room temperature. Purified PCNA was covalently coupled to the dextran of a CM5 research grade sensor chip. The carboxymethylated dextran was activated for 5 min with 0.1 M N-hydroxysuccinimide and 0.4 M N-ethyl-N'-(dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide in water. The ligand was then injected on the reactive surface (100 µl of 0.8 mM PCNA) in 10 mM NaCH3COOH (pH 5.3) and 20 mM NaCl. Afterward, the residual N-hydroxysuccinide esters on the sensor chip surface were deactivated for 5 min with 1 M ethanolamine (pH 8.5) in water. Final regeneration of the matrix was performed with 0.5 M NaCl and 0.025% (w/v) SDS. Purified wild-type GST-Cdk2 and mutant proteins were diluted in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10% (v/v) glycerol. A 100-µl sample was injected over the PCNA-coupled surface for 5 min. Multiple injections at various concentrations were performed for each ligand. The association phases of the recorded sensorgrams were fitted to a first order binding model (Rt = R0 + (kaCRmax/kS)(1 - e-kSt)) by nonlinear least squares curve fitting using the IBIS kinetic evaluation software. At various concentrations of analyte, the kS values were determined, and the association rate constant ka was calculated by the linear curve fitting of a kS versus C plot (kS = ka·C + kd).

Immunoprecipitation-- 150 µg of cytoplasmic HeLa, 50 µg of nuclear HeLa, and 150 µg of S-100 HeLa extracts were adjusted to 40 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.5), 8 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 1 µg/ml each of aprotinin and leupeptin (IP buffer) and added to a column coupled or preincubated with antibody. After a 2-h incubation at 4 °C, the column was washed with IP buffer, and the bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer as described under "Pull-down Assays."

Immunoblotting-- Protein samples were separated in a SDS-12% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Micron Separations Inc.) in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 20% methanol using a Bio-Rad Trans Blot apparatus. After blocking with 5% milk in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 (TBST), antibodies were incubated for 2 h and then washed in TBST. The antigen/antibody reaction was revealed by using an enhanced chemiluminescence procedure according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Pierce).

Protein Kinase Assays-- The assays were performed with purified Cdk2-cyclin A complexes (13) or Cdk-cyclin complexes immunoprecipitated. Protein G-Sepharose containing the immunocomplex was washed with IP buffer and then with a solution containing 40 mM Hepes (pH 7.5) and 8 mM MgCl2 (kinase buffer). Assays were performed in a reaction mixture of 18 µl containing kinase buffer, 33.3 µM ATP, 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products), the substrate (histone H1, RF-C B, or Lig I), and 10 µl of packed protein G-Sepharose or purified Cdk2-cyclin A complexes. After 20 min at 37 °C, the reactions were stopped by adding SDS sample buffer and loaded on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, electrophoresed for 90 min at 120 V, stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue, dried, and autoradiographed.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PCNA Can Form a Complex with Cdk2 and Cyclin A in the Nucleus-- We first performed co-immunoprecipitation of Myc-tagged PCNA transiently overexpressed in 293 cells to discover PCNA-interacting proteins. Since Cdk2 was clearly shown to interact with PCNA, experiments were done to confirm the interaction with endogenous proteins. For this purpose, cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts from unsynchronous HeLa cells were immunoprecipitated using anti-Cdk2 and anti-cyclin A antibodies. The immunoprecipitated complexes were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Cdk2, anti-cyclin A, and anti-PCNA antibodies. The anti-Cdk2 antibody co-precipitated cyclin A as well as PCNA from both nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions (Fig. 1). While cyclin A was found in a complex with Cdk2 in the nucleus as well as in the cytoplasm, a ternary PCNA-Cdk2-cyclin A complex could only be found in the nucleus, as seen in Fig. 1, when immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-cyclin A antibody.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   PCNA can form a complex with Cdk2 and cyclin A in HeLa cells in the nucleus. Immunoprecipitations with anti-cyclin A and anti-Cdk2 antibodies were performed with cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of asynchronous HeLa cells as described under "Experimental Procedures." The immunoprecipitated samples were loaded on two gels and tested by immunoblotting using anti-Cdk2 and anti-cyclin A for one blot and anti-PCNA antibodies for the other. For the input, 2 µg of extracts were loaded. The negative control (-) was an immunoprecipitation with an anti-GST polyclonal antibody.

PCNA and Cdk2 Form a Complex in S Phase-- Next we addressed the question of whether the formation of the complex between PCNA and Cdk2 is cell cycle-specific. For this, immunoprecipitations of Cdk2 were performed from cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of HeLa cells synchronized in G1 and S phase. The cells were synchronized in G1 phase by serum starvation (0.5% FCS) followed by a release of 2 h and in S phase by hydroxyurea block followed by a release of 2 h. The synchronization was analyzed by flow cytometry. The co-immunoprecipitated complexes were identified by immunoblot, by using anti-Cdk2 and anti-PCNA antibodies. When the majority of HeLa cells are in G1 phase, PCNA and Cdk2 formed a complex in the nucleus but not in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2A). The same result was obtained by hydroxyurea block (data not shown). When most of the cells are in S phase, the complex was found in the nucleus as well as in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2B). These results suggested that a PCNA-Cdk2 complex could be formed in the cytoplasm in the S phase.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   PCNA and Cdk2 form a complex in S phase. A1, flow cytometry analysis of U2OS cells synchronized in G1 phase by serum starvation (0.5% FCS) and a release of 2 h. A2, immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-Cdk2 antibody using cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of HeLa cells in G1 phase as described under "Experimental Procedures." B1, flow cytometry analysis of U2OS cells synchronized in S phase, hydroxyurea block, and 2 h of release. B2, immunoprecipitations with anti-Cdk2 antibody were performed by using cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts of HeLa cells in S phase as described under "Experimental Procedures." As a control, 2 µg of extracts was loaded. The negative control (-) was an immunoprecipitation with an anti-GST polyclonal antibody.

Pull-down and Surface Plasmon Resonance Experiments Suggest That Cdk2 but Not Cyclin A Binds Directly to PCNA-- To test a direct interaction with PCNA, Cdk2, and cyclin A were generated as GST fusion proteins. The GST fusion proteins were incubated with bacterially expressed PCNA and isolated by immobilization on glutathione-Sepharose. The washing steps were done with 150 mM NaCl. Bound PCNA was then detected by immunoblotting with an anti-PCNA monoclonal antibody (PC10). Fig. 3A shows an interaction between PCNA and Cdk2 but no interaction between PCNA and cyclin A. The PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (RF-C B) and p21 were used as positive controls. The DNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (RF-C A) and GST were negative controls (21). Different salt concentrations for washing were used to test the salt dependence of the interaction between PCNA and Cdk2 (Fig. 3B). The interaction could resist up to 1 M NaCl and was lost at 2 M, which is characteristic of a hydrophobic interaction.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Pull-down (A and B) and surface plasmon resonance (C) experiments show that Cdk2 can bind directly to PCNA. A and B, GST-Cdk2 fusion protein GST-cyclin A and a control GST-protein were bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads, incubated with 100 ng of PCNA, and washed with binding buffer, containing varying concentrations of salt (B). The pull-down experiment, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblots were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." C, 5 µg each of GST-Cdk2 (1), boiled GST-Cdk2 (2), and GST (3) were passed over a sensor chip on which PCNA was immobilized as described under "Experimental Procedures." R is the response expressed in millidegrees.

Next, the binding properties of PCNA to Cdk2 were measured by using a surface plasmon resonance-based assay (IBIS System, Intersens Instruments BV). Fig. 3C shows sensorgrams obtained with GST-Cdk2, heat-denatured GST-Cdk2, and GST injected on a dextran sensor chip coupled with PCNA. The response (R), expressed in millidegrees, is a measure for the protein mass at the surface of the sensor chip; binding is detected as an increased of millidegrees (R) in time. Only native GST-Cdk2 was able to interact with PCNA. GST and heat-denatured GST-Cdk2 were boiled and used as negative controls to exclude unspecific binding of GST and buffer jump, respectively. The association rate constant (ka) derived from multiple measurements at different concentrations of GST-Cdk2 is 8.3 ± 3.2 × 105 M-1 s-1. This ka is in the same range as the one already described for PCNA/p21 interaction (1.1 × 105 M-1 s-1; Ref. 22). Taken together, the GST binding experiment and the surface plasmon resonance analysis show a direct interaction between Cdk2 and PCNA.

Cdk2 Binds to the "Front Side" of PCNA-- To map the binding site of Cdk2 on PCNA, we used mutants of PCNA that were N-terminally Myc-tagged and transiently overexpressed in 293 cells. The three mutants were constructed by changing residues of loops exposed on the surface of the PCNA trimer (9). The mutant S43A/H44A/V45A is mutated in the beta C1-beta D1 loop, which forms a part of the hydrophobic pocket on the front side of the trimer close to where the C termini are located. The second mutant, Q125A/L126A/G127A/I128A, targets the middle of the domain-connecting loop, and the third mutant, V188A/D189A/K190A, targets the loop between beta D2 and beta D1 on the backside of the torus. Wild type PCNA with either an N-terminal Myc tag or a C-terminal Myc-His tag was also overexpressed in the same cell line. Extracts were prepared from these cells and used in GST pull-down experiments, to see if the overexpressed mutant and wild type proteins were able to bind Cdk2. GST-RF-C B was used as a positive control. In pull-down assays, N-Myc-tagged PCNA was found to interact strongly with Cdk2 (Fig. 4A), whereas no interaction was observed between Cdk2 and C-Myc-His-PCNA from cell extracts or bacterially expressed C-His-PCNA. All three mutants were able to bind Cdk2 (Fig. 4B). This may suggest that the different mutated regions are not directly involved in the interaction with Cdk2 or that Cdk2 interacts with a relatively large region on the PCNA surface. These results suggested that the binding site of Cdk2 on PCNA is located at the PCNA front side of where the C termini are located.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Cdk2 binds close to the C termini of PCNA. GST-Cdk2 fusion protein and control GST-protein were bound on glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated with wild type PCNA either N-Myc- or C-Myc-His-tagged (A) and with the three mutants of PCNA (S43A/H44A/V45A (SHV43), Q125A/L126A/G127A/I128A (QLGI125), and V188A/D189A/K190A (VDK188)) (9), all N-Myc-tagged (B). The bound proteins were solved in SDS sample buffer and separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The ability of the respective recombinant proteins to bind PCNA was determined by immunoblotting with the PCNA antibody PC10 as described under "Experimental Procedures."

A Pull-down Experiment Suggests That PCNA Does Not Compete with p21 for Cdk2 Binding-- To determine if PCNA and the kinase inhibitor p21cip1/WAF-1 have the same interaction site on Cdk2, p21 was used as a potential competitor of PCNA for binding wild type Cdk2 in a GST pull-down experiment. From the structure of p27kip1 bound to the Cdk2-cyclin A complex, it has been shown that the members of the Kip/Cip family interact with the N-terminal lobe of Cdk2. As described above, GST-proteins bound to beads were incubated with PCNA (100 ng) or a mixture of PCNA (100 ng) and p21 (100 ng). The ability to bind the GST-Cdk2 was determined by immunoblot with an anti-PCNA antibody (PC10). As seen in Fig. 5, p21 bound to Cdk2 did not affect the ability of PCNA to interact with Cdk2, while interacting with Cdk2, indicating that PCNA does not bind the same site on Cdk2 as on p21.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A pull-down experiment suggests that PCNA does not compete with p21 to bind Cdk2. GST-Cdk2 wild type fusion proteins and control GST-proteins were bound on glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated with PCNA (100 ng) or a mix of p21 (100 ng) and PCNA (100 ng). The pull-down experiment, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and autoradiographed immunoblots were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The ability of the respective recombinant proteins to bind PCNA was determined by immunoblotting with anti-PCNA antibody (A) and anti-p21 antibody (B), respectively.

PCNA Can Bring the Cdk-Cyclin Phosphorylation Activity to PCNA-interacting DNA Replication Proteins, Replication Factor C and DNA Ligase I-- Next, experiments were designed to see if the Cdks could phosphorylate proteins involved in DNA replication. PCNA was immunoprecipitated from HeLa nuclear extracts, and the activity of the co-immunoprecipitated Cdk-cyclins was tested in a kinase assay. Histone H1, Lig I, and the PCNA binding region of RF-C (RF-C B) were used as substrates (2 µg), since Lig I and RF-C B have many potential Cdk-cyclin phosphorylation sites. The Cdk2-PCNA complex was able to phosphorylate histone H1 (Fig. 6A). Phosphorylation of bacterially expressed PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (Fig. 6B) and Lig I (Fig. 6C) was also evident and specific for Cdks, since the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 prevented phosphorylation of both PCNA-binding replication protein and the control protein histone H1. From this experiment we concluded that PCNA could target Cdk-cyclin to PCNA-binding DNA replication proteins.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   PCNA can bring the Cdk-cyclin phosphorylation activity to the PCNA-interacting DNA replication proteins, replication factor C and DNA ligase I. Immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-PCNA antibody was performed by using nuclear extracts of HeLa cells as described under "Experimental Procedures." The immunoprecipitated complexes were used in a kinase assay on histone H1 (control) (A), the PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (RF-C B) (B), and Lig I (C). The specificity of Cdks was measured by adding the inhibitor protein p21. The negative control (-) was an immunoprecipitation with the IgG1,kappa (MOPC-21) monoclonal antibody described under "Experimental Procedures."

Binding of Cdk2 to DNA Ligase I Is Favored in the Presence of Equal Amounts of PCNA and DNA Ligase I-- To test a possible direct interaction between Lig I and Cdk2, GST-Cdk2 fusion proteins bound on beads were incubated with bacterially expressed Lig I (500 ng) or a mixture of Lig I (500 ng) and PCNA (500 ng). Bound Lig I was then detected by immunoblotting with an anti-Lig I polyclonal antibody. Fig. 7 shows that the interaction between Lig I and Cdk2 was favored 5 times in the presence of an equal amount of PCNA, as compared with the control reaction in the absence of PCNA.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Binding of Cdk2 to DNA ligase I is favored by the presence of PCNA. GST-Cdk2 wild type fusion proteins and control GST-proteins were bound on glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated with Lig I (500 ng) or a mixture of Lig I (500 ng) and PCNA (500 ng). The pull-down experiment, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and autoradiographed immunoblots were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The ability of the respective GST proteins to bind Lig I was determined by immunoblotting with anti-Lig I antibody.

PCNA Can Stimulate Phosphorylation of DNA Ligase I by Cdk2-Cyclin A-- Finally, phosphorylation of Lig I by pure Cdk2-cyclin A complex was tested in the presence or absence of PCNA. Different amounts of Cdk2-cyclin A complex (25, 50, and 100 ng) and Lig I (100 ng) and different amounts of PCNA (50, 100, and 200 ng) were first incubated at 4 °C for 1 h, and the mixture was then tested in a kinase assay. When PCNA was added in the reaction (Fig. 8), phosphorylation of Lig I was stimulated. Phosphorylation was increased 4 times with equal amounts of Cdk2-cyclin A complexes, PCNA, and Lig I (lane 7), as compared with the control reaction in the absence of PCNA (lane 5). As a negative control, p21 was added to the reaction. Inhibition of the assay showed that phosphorylation was specific to Cdk2-cyclin A complex.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   PCNA can stimulate phosphorylation of DNA ligase I by Cdk2-cyclin A. Cdk2-cyclin A complex (25, 50, and 100 ng), Lig I (100 ng), and PCNA (50, 100, and 200 ng) were incubated at 4 °C for 1 h and tested in a kinase assay. The specificity of Cdk2 was measured by adding the specific Cdk inhibitor p21 (100 ng).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A complex with PCNA was identified in nuclear extracts of HeLa cells by immunoprecipitating cyclin A and Cdk2 (Fig. 1). However, the ternary complex was not detected in the cytoplasm, suggesting that Cdk2 is represented in this compartment of the cell in two pools, namely either bound to PCNA alone or to cyclin A alone. PCNA-Cdk2 complex is present in the nucleus throughout the cell cycle and is preferentially formed during S phase in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). These results together with the fact that a direct interaction between PCNA and Cdk2 is also seen in GST pull-down experiments (Fig. 3A) and by surface plasmon resonance analysis (Fig. 3C) suggested that PCNA and Cdk-cyclin could form a complex. Cdk2 did not bind C-terminally Myc-tagged PCNA (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the front side of PCNA containing the C terminus is involved in the interaction with Cdk2. We did not detect competition between PCNA and p21 for binding to Cdk2, suggesting that these two proteins bind Cdk2 using distinct interaction sites (Fig. 5). By immunoprecipitation, we observed that the PCNA-Cdk2 complex is present in the nucleus both during G1 and S phases, but during S phase the complex was also detected in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). We therefore hypothesize that Cdk2 could be involved in the translocation of PCNA from the cytoplasm into the nucleus during S phase, as detected by complex formation, since PCNA has no nuclear localization sequence. Alternatively, Cdk2-PCNA complex formation could be inhibited in the cytoplasm during G1 phase, while during S phase productive complex formation in the cytoplasm could result in nuclear import of Cdk2-PCNA complexes.

The finding that a Cdk activity brought to PCNA was able to phosphorylate two DNA replication proteins, the PCNA binding region of RF-Cp145 (Fig. 6B) and Lig I (Fig. 6C) could be physiologically significant. A Cdk2-cyclin recognition motif has been identified in substrate proteins, and p21-like cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (23, 24). This recognition motif was present in the sequence of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb); the transcription factors E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3; and the Cdk inhibitor p21, p27, and p57. These findings suggested a recognition step between Cdks-cyclins and substrates preceding phosphorylation. Lig I has many potential sites of phosphorylation by Cdk-cyclin, suggesting a phosphorylation of Lig I by the PCNA-Cdk-cyclin complex (Fig. 6C). Although the putative Cdk2-cyclin binding motif of p27 and p57 (23) is present at the C-terminal and the N-terminal parts of Lig I, we could demonstrate in a pull-down experiment that this motif was alone not sufficient. Consequently, PCNA might be the link between Lig I and Cdk2 (Fig. 7), suggesting that in a Lig I-PCNA-Cdk2 complex, Lig I can bind to Cdk2 only via an interaction with PCNA. The other point was the finding that PCNA could stimulate the phosphorylation of Lig I by Cdk2-cyclin A (Fig. 8). Our data suggest that PCNA may contribute to the recognition step preceding phosphorylation by acting as a kind of connector for Cdks-cyclins, which are active on specific target proteins.

PCNA is a trimer, probably interacting with several different proteins simultaneously. Even if these bind to the same site of a PCNA monomer, the proteins could still bind different monomers in the PCNA trimer. As PCNA binds a large number of proteins, it could connect Cdk2 and its substrates. The involvement of Cdk2 in the control of S phase is not completely established. It has been shown that a Cdk2-cyclin A complex is responsible for activating SV40 plasmid replication in mammalian S phase cell extracts (25). Proteins involved in replication are also substrates for this kinase family. Phosphorylation regulates the origin binding (26) and DNA helicase activity of T antigen (12). It has also been shown that polymerase alpha  primase (13) is unable to initiate SV40 DNA replication in vitro when phosphorylated. RPA-32 (16) and polymerase delta  (14) are two other replication proteins phosphorylated by Cdks, but it is not known if and how their function is affected. Here we present evidence that the PCNA binding regions of RF-Cp145 and Lig I are also substrates of Cdk2. Recently it has been shown that a strong casein kinase II consensus site of Lig I, which is localized on the PCNA binding site, is dephosphorylated during G1 and S phase. Dephosphorylation in these cell cycle phases correlated with the capacity of Lig I to bind PCNA (27).

Furthermore, in preliminary immunoprecipitations of Myc-tagged PCNA overexpressed in 293 cells, we could show an interaction with Cdk4 that is involved in G1 phase and is bound to cyclin D (data not shown). Indeed, PCNA has been found in complexes with cyclin D-Cdk4, cyclin E-Cdk2, and cyclin B-Cdc2, which control the entry points of G1, S, and G2/M phases, respectively (4). An interaction of PCNA and Cdc2 active in S phase associated with cyclin A has not yet been investigated, and consequently the role of PCNA in such complexes has not yet been established.

Cdks are cell cycle regulatory proteins and involved in the control of gene expression by the pRb pathway. Our findings of the phosphorylation of target proteins involved in DNA replication and the dependence of DNA replication upon Cdk2 activity suggest that Cdk2 also controls DNA replication. It will be interesting to see which step(s) of DNA replication Cdk2 controls. Phosphorylation of a target DNA replication protein could lead to activation or inhibition in its function. Since DNA replication is a meticulously organized macromolecular event, Cdk2 could act in many different steps. The finding of all target proteins phosphorylated by Cdk2 and its consequences will eventually allow us to understand the control of DNA replication by Cdk2 in more detail.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Rati Fotedar for providing the pGEX-3X plasmid expressing GST-Cdk2, Catherine Bonne-Andréa for providing pGEX-3X plasmid expressing GST-cyclin A, Andréas Dinter for help with the FACScanTM flow cytometer, and H. P. Nasheuer for providing purified Cdk2-cyclin A complexes.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 3100-43138 95/2 (to S. K. and Z. O. J.) and Grant 31-57 285 99/99 (to S. H.) and European Training Mobility and Research (EU-TMR) Project ERBMRXCT CT 970125 (to U. H., R. d. J., and P. v. d. V.), and by the Kanton of Zürich (to U. H. and M. O. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 41 1 635 54 72; Fax: 41 1 635 68 40; E-mail: hubscher@vetbio.unizh.ch.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001850200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; RF-C, replication factor C; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; Lig I, DNA ligase I; FCS, fetal calf serum; GST, glutathione S-transferase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Jónsson, Z., and Hübscher, U. (1997) BioEssays 19, 967-975
2. Li, X., Li, J., Harrington, J., Lieber, M., and Burgers, P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22109-22112
3. Waga, S., Hannon, G., Beach, D., and Stillman, B. (1994) Nature 369, 574-578
4. Xiong, Y., Zhang, H., and Beach, D. (1992) Cell 71, 505-514
5. Smith, M., Chen, I., Zhan, Q., Bae, I., Chen, C., Gilmer, T., Kastan, M., O'Connor, P., and Fornace, A. J. (1994) Science 266, 1376-1380
6. Umar, A., Buermeyer, A. B., Simon, J., Thomas, D., Clark, A., Liskay, R., and Kunkel, T. (1996) Cell 87, 65-73
7. Gary, R., Ludwig, D., Cornelius, H., MacInnes, M., and Park, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24522-24529
8. Chuang, L., Ian, H., Koh, T., Ng, H., Xu, G., and Li, B. (1997) Science 277, 1996-2000
9. Jónsson, Z., Hindges, R., and Hübscher, U. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2412-2425
10. Nigg, E. (1995) BioEssays 17, 471-480
11. Hinds, P. W., and Weinberg, R. A. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 135-141
12. McVey, D., Ray, S., Gluzman, Y., Berger, L., Wildeman, A., Marshak, D., and Tegtmeyer, P. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 5206-5215
13. Voitenleitner, C., Fanning, E., and Nasheuer, H. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1611-1615
14. Wu, S., Zhang, P., Zeng, X., Zhang, S-J., Mo, J., Li, B., and Lee, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9561-9569
15. Dutta, A., and Stillman, B. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 189-199
16. Din, S., Brill, S., Fairman, M., and Stillman, B. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 968-977
17. Dekker, J., Kanellopoulos, P., van Oosterhout, J. A., Stier, G., Tucker, P. A., and van der Vliet, P. C. (1998) EMBO J. 277, 825-838
18. Schurtenberger, P., Egelhaaf, S., Hindges, R., Maga, G., Jónsson, Z., May, R., Glatter, O., and Hübscher, U. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 275, 123-132
19. Hottiger, M., and Nabel, G. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 8252-8256
20. Osborn, L., Kunkel, S., and Nabel, G. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 2336-2340
21. Fotedar, R., Mossi, R., Fitzgerald, P., Rousselle, T., Maga, G., Brickner, H., Messier, H., Kasibhatla, S., Hübscher, U., and Fotedar, A. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4423-4433
22. Knibiehler, M., Goubin, F., Escalas, N., Jónsson, Z., Mazarguil, H., Hübscher, U., and Ducommun, B. (1996) FEBS Lett. 391, 66-70
23. Adams, P., Sellers, W., Sharma, S., Wu, A., Nalin, C., and Kaelin, W. J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6623-6633
24. Chen, J., Saha, P., Kornbluth, S., Dynlacht, B. D., and Dutta, A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4673-4682
25. Fotedar, A., Cannella, D., Fitzgerald, P., Rousselle, T., Gupta, S., Doree, M., and Fotedar, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31627-31637
26. McVey, D., Brizuela, L., Mohr, I., Marshak, D., Gluzman, Y., and Beach, D. (1989) Nature 341, 503-507
27. Rossi, R., Villa, A., Negri, C., Scovassi, I., Ciarrocchi, G., Biamonti, G., and Montecucco, A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5745-5754


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Law, E. Forrester, A. Chytil, P. Corsino, G. Green, B. Davis, T. Rowe, and B. Law
Rapamycin Disrupts Cyclin/Cyclin-Dependent Kinase/p21/Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Complexes and Cyclin D1 Reverses Rapamycin Action by Stabilizing These Complexes
Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 1070 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L.-C. Chuang and P. R. Yew
Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Recruits Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor Xic1 to DNA and Couples Its Proteolysis to DNA Polymerase Switching
J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35299 - 35309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
I. Frouin, M. Toueille, E. Ferrari, I. Shevelev, and U. Hubscher
Phosphorylation of human DNA polymerase {lambda} by the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk2/cyclin A complex is modulated by its association with proliferating cell nuclear antigen
Nucleic Acids Res., September 20, 2005; 33(16): 5354 - 5361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Kontopidis, S.-Y. Wu, D. I. Zheleva, P. Taylor, C. McInnes, D. P. Lane, P. M. Fischer, and M. D. Walkinshaw
From the Cover: Structural and biochemical studies of human proliferating cell nuclear antigen complexes provide a rationale for cyclin association and inhibitor design
PNAS, February 8, 2005; 102(6): 1871 - 1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Dong, S.-C. Lyu, A. M. Krensky, and C. Clayberger
DQ 65-79, A Peptide Derived from HLA Class II, Mimics p21 to Block T Cell Proliferation
J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 5064 - 5070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Ferrari, R. Rossi, D. Arosio, A. Vindigni, G. Biamonti, and A. Montecucco
Cell Cycle-dependent Phosphorylation of Human DNA Ligase I at the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Sites
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37761 - 37767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
G. Maga and U. Hubscher
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners
J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2003; 116(15): 3051 - 3060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. J. Advani, R. R. Weichselbaum, and B. Roizman
Herpes simplex virus 1 activates cdc2 to recruit topoisomerase IIalpha for post-DNA synthesis expression of late genes
PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4825 - 4830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. H. Schmidt, K. L. Derry, and R. D. Kolodner
Saccharomyces cerevisiae RRM3, a 5' to 3' DNA Helicase, Physically Interacts with Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen
J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 45331 - 45337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
T. Yamauchi, M. J. Keating, and W. Plunkett
UCN-01 (7-Hydroxystaurosporine) Inhibits DNA Repair and Increases Cytotoxicity in Normal Lymphocytes and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Lymphocytes
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2002; 1(4): 287 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. J. Advani, R. R. Weichselbaum, and B. Roizman
cdc2 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Binds and Phosphorylates Herpes Simplex Virus 1 UL42 DNA Synthesis Processivity Factor
J. Virol., November 1, 2001; 75(21): 10326 - 10333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Scott, P. Bonnefin, D. Vieyra, F.-M. Boisvert, D. Young, D. P. Bazett-Jones, and K. Riabowol
UV-induced binding of ING1 to PCNA regulates the induction of apoptosis
J. Cell Sci., January 10, 2001; 114(19): 3455 - 3462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Parker, Y. Gu, W. Mahoney, S.-H. Lee, K. K. Singh, and A-L. Lu
Human Homolog of the MutY Repair Protein (hMYH) Physically Interacts with Proteins Involved in Long Patch DNA Base Excision Repair
J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5547 - 5555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/30/22882    most recent
M001850200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow