![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 23005-23011, July 28, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Health Sciences, Boston University,
Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Received for publication, May 1, 2000
The skeletal muscle sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum
calcium ATPase (SERCA1) gene is transactivated as early as 2 days after
the removal of weight-bearing (Peters, D. G., Mitchell-Felton, H., and Kandarian, S. C. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C1218-C1225), but the transcriptional mechanisms are elusive. Here, the
rat SERCA1 5' flank and promoter region ( The sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum is the major organelle that
regulates the Ca2+ signaling associated with a multitude of
cellular processes (1, 2). The sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum
Ca2+ ATPase
(SERCA)1 proteins translocate
Ca2+ from the cytosol to the sarcoplasmic reticulum or
endoplasmic reticulum lumen, thereby reducing intracellular
Ca2 and refilling the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum
Ca2+ stores. The cloning, expression, and functional
characterization of three SERCA genes and their splicing variants have
been described (3-12). At least one of the SERCA gene products is
expressed in every mammalian tissue studied, emphasizing the
fundamental role of this protein in cellular function. Products of the
SERCA1 gene are the predominant isoforms expressed in skeletal muscle
(SERCA1a adult, SERCA1b neonatal) (4, 9), and one product of the SERCA2
gene is the predominant isoform expressed in cardiac myocytes (SERCA2a
(3)). The alternative splicing product of SERCA2 (SERCA2b (3)) and the
products of the SERCA3 gene (3, 11) are ubiquitously expressed in
muscle and non-muscle tissue but in much lower levels. SERCA expression
is much higher in striated muscle than in smooth muscle or non-muscle
to accommodate the large calcium fluxes associated with
excitation-contraction coupling.
Contractile activity has a marked effect on SERCA expression in
striated muscle. Increased contractile activity leads to decreases in
SERCA1 and SERCA2a expression in skeletal (13, 14) and cardiac (15, 16)
muscle, respectively, whereas decreased contractile activity leads to
increases in expression (17-19). SERCA1 expression is particularly
sensitive to the reduction of contractile activity due to rat soleus
muscle unloading, with significant increases by 2 days and 7-fold
increases by 7 days (19). Moreover, the increase in expression is due
to increases in SERCA1 gene transcription (19). The up-regulation of
SERCA1 with unloading is counterintuitive as it occurs in a background
of overall decreases in total protein and mRNA synthesis (20). This
suggests that the up-regulation of SERCA1 is an active and highly
regulated process. However, the functional significance and the
molecular mechanisms of selective gene activation are unknown.
In previous work we isolated the rat 5' flank and promoter region of
SERCA1 to Animals--
Female Wistar rats (Bantam and Kingman,
n = 402) 8 weeks of age (~200-225 g) were used for
all experiments. Twenty-four hours after plasmid DNA was injected into
soleus muscles, the hind limbs of one-half of the rats were removed
from weight-bearing for 7 days as previously detailed (19).
In Vivo DNA Injections--
In vivo injections were
carried out as previously detailed (21). In brief, plasmid DNA was
isolated using the endotoxin-free Megaprep kit (Qiagen). The DNA was
ethanol-precipitated overnight and resuspended to the appropriate
concentration in a 25% sucrose-phosphate-buffered saline solution such
that 50 µl of plasmid DNA (50, 75, or 125 µg) was injected per
soleus muscle. Luciferase activity was determined on 20 µl of the
supernatant fraction as previously detailed (21), so that data reflect
activity per whole muscle. Where indicated, luciferase activity was
normalized to DNA uptake, as determined by Southern blot analysis (21).
Briefly, total muscle DNA was isolated and digested with
HaeIII. Control and unloaded DNA (10 µg/lane) was run on a
gel with a pGL3-basic DNA standard curve and transferred to membrane,
and plasmid DNA was detected with a luciferase-specific randomly primed probe.
Plasmid Construction--
SERCA1 (
Fragments of the SERCA1 5' flank were amplified by PCR and ligated
upstream of the SV40 minimal promoter in the luciferase reporter
plasmid pGL3-promoter (Promega). Primers were designed with restriction
enzyme sites added to their 5' end (MluI, BglII, or XhoI). PCR protocol was 25-32 cycles of 95 °C for
30 s, 65 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min; then 72 °C
for 20 min. SERCA1 (
Sense and antisense oligonucleotides were designed with a trimerized
sequence of a SERCA1 fragment from Statistics--
An unpaired Student's t test was
used to determine statistical significance between control and unloaded
groups at p < 0.05. Regression equations representing
the signal intensity from the pGL3-basic DNA standards on Southern
blots were used to calculate SERCA1-pGL3 uptake by soleus muscles.
Previous work in this laboratory showed that 75 µg was an
optimal amount of SERCA1 plasmid to inject in soleus muscles with respect to the efficiency of plasmid uptake and luciferase activity (21). Southern blot analysis revealed that neither the size of the
constructs (Ref. 21 and data not shown) nor the intervention of hind
limb unloading altered plasmid uptake in soleus muscles (control = 378 ± 40 densitometric absorbance units, n = 108;
unloaded = 440 ± 47 absorbance units, n = 109; p = 0.32). To determine whether different amounts
of injected DNA affected the extent of transactivation with muscle
unloading, 50, 75, or 125 µg of SERCA1 ( Initial in vivo deletion analysis of the SERCA1 5' flank was
performed with the constructs depicted in Fig.
2. In control muscles, expression of the
SERCA1-pGL3 reporter constructs decreased with serial deletions.
Unloading responsiveness (i.e. fold activation) was evident
in all constructs except SERCA1 (
Identification of Weight-bearing-responsive Elements in the
Skeletal Muscle Sarco(endo)plasmic Reticulum Ca2+
ATPase (SERCA1) Gene*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
3636 to +172 base pairs) was
comprehensively examined using in vivo somatic gene
transfer into rat soleus muscles (n = 804) to identify
region(s) that are both necessary and sufficient for sensitivity to
weight-bearing. In all, 40 different SERCA1 reporter plasmids were
constructed and tested. Several different regions of the SERCA1 5'
flank were sufficient to confer a transcriptional response to 7 days of
muscle unloading when placed upstream of a heterologous promoter. Two of these regions were analyzed further because they were necessary for
the unloading response of
3636 to +172, as demonstrated using internal deletion constructs. Deletion analysis of these regions (
1373 to
1158 and
330 to +172) suggested that unloading
responsiveness corresponded to CACC sites and E-boxes. Mutagenesis of
cis-elements in the first region showed that a specific CACC box
(
1262) was involved in SERCA1 transactivation and a nearby E-box
(
1248) was also implicated. Constructs containing trimerized CACC
sites and E-boxes showed that the presence of both elements is required to activate transcription. This is the first identification of specific
cis-elements required for the regulation of a Ca2+ handling
gene by changes in muscle loading condition.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
3636 base pairs (21). As a first step in elucidating the
transcriptional regulation of SERCA1 by unloading, the sequence from
3636 to +172 was examined using in vivo somatic gene
transfer to identify the region(s) both necessary and sufficient for
weight-bearing sensitivity. Comprehensive promoter analysis revealed
two regions of SERCA1 that were sufficient to confer unloading
responsiveness and which were necessary for the unloading sensitivity
of the
3636 to +172 construct. Mutagenesis and further deletion
analysis of these regions identified a CACC box/E-box interaction,
which was required for transcriptional activation with unloading. This
is the first demonstration of specific cis-elements required for the
in vivo regulation of a Ca2+ handling gene by
changes in muscle loading activity.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
3636)-pGL3, SERCA1
(
962)-pGL3, SERCA1 (
612)-pGL3, and SERCA1 (
330)-pGL3 were
constructed from rat genomic DNA as previously detailed (21). These
constructs contain SERCA1 5' flank and promoter sequence that was
ligated upstream of the luciferase gene in pGL3-basic. Additional 5'
deletion constructs in the present study were made from SERCA1
(
3636)-pGL3 using the Erase-a-Base kit (Promega). The clones obtained
were subjected to restriction analyses and sequencing to determine the
exact length.
1314 to
1158)-SV40 and SERCA1 (
1248 to
1158)-SV40 were created by digesting SERCA1 (
1373 to
1158)-SV40
with EcoRI and PvuII and recircularizing the
large fragment. Internal deletion constructs of SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3
were created using inverse PCR and components from the Advantage
Genomic PCR kit (CLONTECH) following instructions from the manufacturer. The Quik-Change mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was
used to mutate specific bases in SERCA1 (
1373 to
1158)-SV40 according to the manufacturer. All clones were checked by sequencing. The construct names and the primers used to create them are listed in
Table I.
Sequence of PCR primers used to make many of the constructs in this
study
1272 to
1238. This sequence
contained the CACC site at
1272, the CACC site at
1262, and the
E-box at
1248. Two other oligonucleotides were constructed that
contained the sequence with only the CACC site at
1262 and the E-box
at
1248 or only the CACC box at
1262. The annealed double-stranded
oligonucleotides contained BglII and HindIII ends and were easily ligated into the pGL3 promoter. The sequence of each
oligonucleotide sense strand is shown in Table
II.
Sequence of sense oligonucleotides used to make the trimerized
constructs used in this study
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
3636)-pGL3 was examined.
Luciferase activity of SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3 normalized to plasmid
uptake was increased 7-fold after 7 days of unloading (Fig.
1). Since the extent of increase in
luciferase activity was similar at the different quantities tested, the
amount of DNA injected did not influence the magnitude of the unloading
response. The increase in luciferase activity was the same as the
unloading-induced activation of the endogenous SERCA1 gene (19),
suggesting that elements sufficient for unloading sensitivity were
contained in this construct.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Dose-response curve of SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3
showing that 75 µg of plasmid is an optimal
amount to inject in control and 7-day-unloaded rat soleus muscles.
The fold activation of control versus unloaded muscles did
not depend upon the amount of DNA injected. Luciferase activity was
normalized to plasmid DNA uptake using Southern blot analysis detailed
in Mitchell-Felton and Kandarian (21). n = 8-16
muscles/group. Data are the means ± S.E. Control (black
bars) and 7-day-unloaded (gray bars) values are as
plotted.
3174)-pGL3, SERCA1 (
2874)-pGL3,
SERCA1 (
1158)-pGL3, SERCA1 (
962)-pGL3, SERCA1 (
612)-pGL3, and
SERCA1 (
103)-pGL3. The most obvious loss of unloading responsiveness
occurred upon deletion of the region between
1373 and
1158.
Therefore, this region was of interest and was selected for further
study. Unloading responsiveness was not observed with the deletion of
DNA between
1158 and
612. However, injection of the SERCA1
(
330)-pGL3 construct resulted in a return of the unloading response,
which was lost again with injection of SERCA1 (
103)-pGL3. The return
of unloading responsiveness was unexpected, so the SERCA1 (
330)-pGL3
injection was repeated with newly amplified DNA and a different set of
muscles. The same unloading response was observed in the second
experiment. Thus, the sequence between
330 and +172 was sufficient in
isolation to confer unloading responsiveness, so it was a second region designated for further study. We also observed loss of unloading responsiveness in SERCA1 (
3174)-pGL3 and SERCA1 (
2874)-pGL3 compared with SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3, although the decrease in fold activation was due to increased control values as opposed to decreased unloading values. These regions were also tested further. Taken together these data suggest that there are multiple regions in the
SERCA1 promoter-enhancer that can confer unloading responsiveness. The
intricacy of the unloading response in this figure is likely due to the
comprehensiveness of the promoter analysis as well as the complexity of
the in vivo physiological phenomena under study.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
In vivo deletion analysis of the
rat SERCA1 5' flank. A construct containing the SERCA1 sequence
from the indicated nucleotide to +172 upstream of a luciferase reporter
gene (Luc) was injected into soleus muscles (75 µg/muscle).
Luciferase activity was determined for control (black bars)
and 7-day-unloaded (gray bars) muscles. Fold activation is
the unloaded divided by the control value. Plasmid uptake was measured
in all muscles by Southern blot analysis, which showed no difference in
uptake by unloading or plasmid size. For internal consistency,
luciferase activity is reported. n = 8-16 muscles per
group. Data are the means ± S.E.
To test regions of SERCA1 for sufficiency in activating transcription
with unloading, constructs were created containing SERCA1 fragments
upstream of the heterologous SV40 promoter (Fig.
3A). SERCA1 (
1373 to
1158)-SV40 and SERCA1 (
962 to
612)-SV40 resulted in the strongest
response with 5.0- and 5.7-fold activation, respectively, over control
muscles. The activation of SERCA1 (
962 to
612)-SV40 was unexpected
since neither SERCA1 (
962)-pGL3 nor SERCA1 (
612)-pGL3 showed
unloading responsiveness (Fig. 2). This finding emphasized the context
specificity of the promoter analysis. Other fragments of the SERCA1 5'
flank showed either modest increases or no change in luciferase
activity when examined in isolation. Next, we sought to determine
whether the regions that were sufficient for unloading responsiveness
were required in the context of SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3. To do this,
inverse PCR was used to delete a specific region from the
3636 to
+172 parent construct, thereby creating internal deletion constructs
(Fig. 3B). Removal of sequence between
1403 and
1158
abolished the unloading response, indicating that this region is
required for unloading induced transcriptional activation. Deletion of
other sequences did not result in a loss of unloading sensitivity.
These data reveal that one obvious region of the SERCA1 5' flank
containing elements both necessary and sufficient for unloading
responsiveness was between
1373 and
1158. The other observation
made from this experiment was that sequences involved in high level
expression and unloading sensitivity are distinct and, furthermore,
that the sequence required for high level expression is not confined to
the 5' end of the construct (Fig. 3B). Data from Fig. 3,
A and B were re-plotted as fold activation for
comparative purposes, since heterologous and wild type promoters were
used to help visualize that
1373 to
1158 was both necessary and
sufficient for transcriptional activation with 7 days of muscle unloading (Fig. 3C).
|
A more extensive analysis of SERCA1 (
1373 to
1158)-SV40
showed that removal of the sequence from
1373 to
1314 did not alter
the magnitude of transcriptional activation, but the removal of the
region between
1373 and
1248 decreased the response from 5.0- to
2.2-fold. Thus, sequence between
1314 and
1248 is involved in
unloading sensitivity (Fig. 4). However,
the sequence from
1373 to
1248 was not sufficient, in isolation, to
up-regulate activity, suggesting that an interaction between
1314 to
1248 and
1248 to
1158 exists that confers unloading
responsiveness. This interaction may involve the E-box at
1248, which
is deleted in the constructs showing only a 2-fold activation. Thus,
the E-box (
1248) may be necessary for weight-bearing
responsiveness.
|
Mutagenesis of SERCA1 (
1373 to
1158)-SV40 was then performed to
target cis-elements required for unloading induced transactivation (Fig. 5). Consensus cis-elements were
identified using MatInspector (Version 2.2). Mutation of the CACC box
at position
1262 abolished the unloading response, indicating that
this CACC site is involved in the up-regulation of SERCA1 (
1373 to
1158)-SV40. Disruption of the NFAT (
1367) and CACC (
1272)
sites did not change transcriptional activation, whereas mutation of
CACC (
1305) and CCAAT (
1287) sites show moderate decreases in the
unloading response. Surprisingly, with the exception of the E-box at
1248, mutation of the known elements between
1248 and
1158, the
NF-I (
1198) and Sp1 (
1171) sites, did not decrease the unloading
response. Since an interaction was predicted from the results of Fig.
4, we explored the possibility that the E-box (
1248) is interacting
with the CACC (
1262) site.
|
To test if a CACC/E-box interaction was sufficient to increase
transcription, constructs containing trimerized CACC sites and E-boxes
upstream of SV40 were examined in control and 7-day unloaded soleus
muscles (Fig. 6). Since weight-bearing
sensitivity was abolished with the mutation of the CACC box at
1262,
the first step was to examine this cis-element. Injection of SERCA1 (CACC)-SV40, a trimerized construct containing the CACC (
1262) site,
resulted in no significant change in luciferase activity, supporting
the hypothesis that an interaction of CACC (
1262) with a second
cis-element is required for transcriptional up-regulation. Examination
of SERCA1 (CACC/E-box)-SV40, containing CACC (
1262) and E-box
(
1248), resulted in a 9.0-fold increase over control values. Thus,
the combination of CACC (
1262) and E-box (
1248) is sufficient to
transduce an unloading response, suggesting communication between
trans-factors binding these elements. A multimerized construct containing CACC (
1272), CACC (
1262), and E-box (
1248) had a 4.6-fold increase in luciferase activity with unloading. However, the
decrease in fold activation was due to a greater increase in the
control versus the unloaded luciferase activity, suggesting that the CACC box at
1272 may be important for general high level transcription of SERCA1. This is consistent with the overall decrease in luciferase activity in both control and unloaded muscles with mutagenesis of the CACC box at
1272 base pairs (Fig. 5).
|
The sequence between
330 to +172 was further examined because 1)
SERCA1 (
330)-pGL3 shows a 9.3-fold increase with unloading, 2) the
sequence is in close proximity to the basal promoter, and 3) the
sequence contains multiple CACC and E-boxes, which were found to be
important in
1373 to
1158. Further interest in the
330 region was
spurred by the finding that SERCA1 (
3636 to
330)-SV40 could not
activate transcription with unloading (Fig.
7), suggesting that the SERCA1
(
3636)-pGL3 construct requires the sequence from
330 to +172 for
transactivation. Since the sequence between
330 and
103 was not
necessary for unloading responsiveness (Figs. 3B and 7), it
was particularly interesting to find that luciferase activity was
increased in SERCA1 (
3636 to
103)-SV40 with unloading. In addition,
SERCA1 (
330 to
103)-SV40 (Figs. 3A and 7) and SERCA1 (
103)-pGL3 (Figs. 2 and 7) were not sufficient to activate
transcription, whereas SERCA1 (
330)-pGL3 was sufficient (Figs. 2 and
7). The results indicate that sequence between
330 and +172 was
required for the unloading response seen with SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3, but that required elements were found in both
330 to
103 and
103 to
+172, regions that contain both CACC sites and E-boxes in high numbers.
To delineate the minimal required sequence for activation, further
deletion analysis was performed. SERCA1 (
330 to +27)-pGL3 was
sufficient to up-regulate transcription, whereas SERCA1 (
330 to
21)-SV40 was not, suggesting that the sequence from
21 to +27
contributes to transducing the unloading signal. It is of interest that
the spacing of the E-box and CACC site between
21 and +27 is similar
to the CACC site and E-box in
1373 to
1158. Given the density of
CACC and E-boxes in
330 to +172, the necessity of this sequence for
unloading sensitivity of SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3, and the requirement for
the sequence between
21 and +27, which contains a CACC site and an
E-box, it is likely that these elements are critical to transducing
transactivation in response to the removal of weight-bearing in the
soleus muscle.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intracellular Ca2+ regulates the signaling associated with diverse cellular processes such as excitation-contraction coupling, cell proliferation, differentiation, and death (2). SERCA1, by translocating Ca2+ from the cytosol to the lumen of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, is a critical protein in the regulation of skeletal muscle Ca2+ homeostasis. The SERCA1 gene is highly mutable, with mRNA expression and transcription being up-regulated 7-fold by 7 days of unloading in rat soleus muscles (19). Given the central role that SERCA1 plays in maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis, it is surprising how little is known about the transcriptional regulation of the gene. Thus, the focus of the present study was to identify elements involved in the transcriptional activation of the SERCA1 gene by muscle inactivity due to unloading. We found that there were specific CACC sites and E-boxes that were required for unloading-induced transactivation.
The rat SERCA1 5' flank contains cis-elements between
3636 and +172
that are known to be important in regulating muscle-specific genes.
These include 21 CACC sites (CACCC), 17 myogenic E-boxes (CAGNTG), 2 M-CAT sites (GGAATG), 4 NFAT sites (WGGAAANH), 1 Sp1 site
(GGGCGG), 10 Sp1-like sites (GGGAGG), and 12 TRE half-sites (RGGTSA).
Interestingly there are no MEF2 sites (YTAWWWWTAR), MEF3 sites
(SSTCAGGTTWC), or CArG boxes (CCWWWWWWGG) previously shown to be
important for transcription of some muscle genes (22-27). Given the
relatively high number of CACC sites and E-boxes, it is not surprising
that these two elements were found to be necessary for transcriptional
regulation of the SERCA1 gene with unloading. There is precedence in
the literature for the regulatory pairing of CACC and MEF2 sites
necessary for transcription of many muscle genes, including rat myosin
light chain 2 slow (28), human myoglobin (24), rat muscle creatine
kinase (29), mouse troponin C slow (25), and human
-enolase
(30), but the regulatory pairing of CACC sites and E-boxes is less well
defined (31, 32).
To date, the transfactor(s) that binds CACC sites for functional
activation has not been definitively determined, although there are a
number of candidates including the myocyte nuclear factor, a
member of the winged helix family of proteins (33), and CBP40 (34). In
addition, members of the Sp1/kruppel-like factor family interact
with CACC sites (35), although the affinity of binding is lower
relative to consensus Sp1 sites (27). Recently a negative regulator,
BERF1, was characterized as a CACC-binding protein, and a second
CACC-binding protein, which may be an activating factor, was identified
with a protein-DNA binding assay (36). The proteins that interact with
E-boxes have been well characterized and consist of the myogenic
regulatory factors (MRFs) MyoD, myogenin, myf-5, and MRF4. They are
basic helix-loop-helix proteins that dimerize with the ubiquitously
expressed protein products of the E2A and
HEB genes to drive the muscle developmental program.
However, their role in adult muscle is not yet fully defined, and there are indications that other proteins may interact with E-boxes in adult
muscle to direct transcription (37). Functional E-boxes are required
for expression of many genes in adult tissue, including muscle creatine
kinase (38), myosin light chain 1/3 fast (39), myosin heavy chain IIB
(40), cardiac
-actin (27), and slow skeletal troponin I (31, 32).
Studies with cardiac troponin C have shown that overexpression of MyoD
can stimulate transcription even in the absence of E-boxes (25). This
can be explained by the fact that MyoD/E12 (or myogenein/E12) and MEF2
proteins trimerize and activate transcription in a synergistic and
co-operative manner (41, 42), and this trimer can function when only
one cis-element (MEF2 site or E-box) is present (42). Given that SERCA1
contains no MEF2 sites, and requires an E-box (
1248) and CACC site
(
1262) for unloading induced transcription, it is possible that a
protein complex binding to SERCA1 contains a myogenic regulatory
factor, a CACC box-binding protein, and MEF2. Crude nuclear extracts
from control and unloaded soleus muscles showed no difference in the pattern or intensity of protein-DNA binding complexes when incubated with individual consensus CACC or E box
sequences.2 Studies detailing
the protein biochemistry involved in binding to the SERCA1 CACC-E box
sequence revealed here is the next logical series of experiments and
will be addressed next.
The involvement of the CACC site at
1 to +5 and the E-box at
17 to
12 in the transcriptional regulation of SERCA1 is interesting because
of the importance of the proximal promoter in the regulation of SERCA
genes. Work done with rabbit SERCA2 revealed that transcriptional activation in C2C12 cells was dependent upon intact Sp1 and Sp1-like sites between
284 and +1 (43). The human SERCA3 gene also contains seven Sp1 and Sp1-like sites in the same region that have been suggested as being critical to transcriptional activation (12). Thus,
transcription of both SERCA2 and SERCA3 is dependent upon GC-rich
regions in the proximal promoter. The rat SERCA1 proximal promoter
contains no Sp1 sites, and although it contains three of the related
GC-rich CACC sites, the difference in the GC content of rat SERCA1
promoter (62.4%) versus the rabbit SERCA2 (81.6%) and
human SERCA3 (81.2%) promoters suggests that transcriptional regulation of SERCA1 is distinct. This idea is further supported by the
observation that thyroid stimulation (44, 45) and contractile activity
(14, 17, 19, 46) differentially target SERCA1 and SERCA2a in skeletal muscle.
Promoter analysis of the SERCA1 and SERCA2 gene in skeletal (47, 48)
and cardiac muscle (49-51), respectively, has identified an important
role of thyroid hormone (T3). Examination of the rat SERCA1
5' flank and promoter region (
962 to +41) in COS cells showed that
treatment with T3 activated SERCA1 transcription (47). Within this sequence three regions were identified that contain TRE
sites capable of binding T3 receptors and subsequently
activating transcription when the receptor was bound to T3.
However, unloading does not appear to be regulated by T3,
since the TREs do not tract with unloading responsiveness.
Besides revealing the elements involved in the unloading response of
SERCA1, the present study also uncovered information about high level
expression in control soleus muscles. Many regions of the SERCA1 gene
were required for high level expression within the context of SERCA1
(
3636)-pGL3, including the sequence between
3636 to
2652 (Fig.
2),
1403 to
1158, and
962 to
612 (Fig. 3B).
Simonides et al. (47) performed promoter analysis of rat SERCA1 (
962 to +41) in COS because the promoter constructs exhibited low expression levels when transfected into L6 muscle cells. However, a
subsequent study by the same group (48) using the SERCA1 promoter from
2658 to +91 was performed in L6 muscle cells, where expression was
detectable, indicating that sequence between
2658 and
962 contributes to high level SERCA1 expression. Thus, our work and that of
others supports the finding that regulation of high level expression of
SERCA1 is complex and requires a sequence more than 1 kilobase from the
transcription start site.
The present study is a comprehensive in vivo analysis of the
transcriptional regulation of the rat SERCA1 gene by muscle unloading. We identified specific CACC site-E-box pairings that were necessary and
sufficient for the unloading responsiveness of the SERCA1 (
3636)-pGL3
construct. Not only was the pairing of the CACC site at
1262 and
E-box at
1248 necessary and sufficient to confer transactivation with
unloading, but a CACC and E-box pairing near the transcription start
site was also found to be important. The identification of
transcription factors that interact to increase transcription of SERCA1
will be critical to understand the regulation of this fundamental
calcium-handling gene. It has been suggested that the regulation of
calcium-handling genes is co-regulated (52). This is evidenced in our
model by increased expression of the L-type calcium channel, the
ryanodine receptor, and calsequestrin as well as SERCA1 with unloading
(46, 53). Thus, understanding the regulation of SERCA1 may also
illuminate regulation of other calcium-handling genes by contractile activity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We are grateful to Melissa Yu for technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AR41705.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
An Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To
whom correspondence should be addressed: Boston University, Dept. of
Health Sciences, 635 Commonwealth Ave., 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-353-5169; Fax: 617-353-7567; E-mail: skandar@bu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003678200
2 H. Mitchell-Felton, R. B. Hunter, E. J. Stevenson, and S. C. Kandarian, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: SERCA, sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RLU, relative light units.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Berridge, M. J. (1993) Nature 361, 315-325 |
| 2. | Berridge, M. J., Bootman, M. D., and Lipp, P. (1998) Nature 395, 645-648 |
| 3. | Burk, S. E., Lytton, J., MacLennan, D. H., and Shull, G. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18561-18568 |
| 4. | Brandl, C. J., deLeon, S., Martin, D. R., and MacLennan, D. H. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 3768-3774 |
| 5. | Korczak, B., Zarain-Herzberg, A., Brandl, C., James Ingles, C., Green, N. M., and MacLennan, D. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4813-4819 |
| 6. | Gunteski-Hamblin, A.-M., Greeb, J., and Shull, G. E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15032-15040 |
| 7. | Lytton, J., Zarain-Herzberg, A., Periasamy, M., and MacLennan, D. H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7059-7065 |
| 8. | Lytton, J., and MacLennan, D. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15024-15031 |
| 9. | Wu, K.-D., and Lytton, J. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C333-C341 |
| 10. | Zarain-Herzberg, A., MacLennan, D. H., and Periasamy, M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4670-4677 |
| 11. | Poch, E., Leach, S., Snape, S., Cacic, T., MacLennan, D. H., and Lytton, J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C1449-C1458 |
| 12. | Dode, L., De Greef, C., Mountian, I., Attard, M., Town, M. M., Casteels, R., and Wuytack, F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13982-13994 |
| 13. | Kandarian, S. C., Peters, D. G., Taylor, J. A., and Williams, G. A. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, C1190-C1197 |
| 14. | Hu, P., Zhang, K. M., Spratt, J. A., Wechsler, A. S., and Briggs, F. N. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1395, 121-125 |
| 15. | Arai, M., Matsui, H., and Periasamy, M. (1994) Circ. Res. 74, 555-564 |
| 16. | Cadre, B. M., Qi, M., Eble, D. M., Shannon, T. R., Bers, D. M., and Samarel, A. M. (1998) J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 30, 2247-2259 |
| 17. | Schulte, L. M., Navarro, J., and Kandarian, S. C. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C1308-C1315 |
| 18. | Bassani, J. W. M., Qi, M., Samarel, A. M., and Bers, D. M. (1994) Circ. Res. 74, 991-997 |
| 19. | Peters, D. G., Mitchell-Felton, H., and Kandarian, S. C. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C1218-C1225 |
| 20. | Thomason, D. B., and Booth, F. W. (1990) J. Appl. Physiol. 68, 1-12 |
| 21. | Mitchell-Felton, H., and Kandarian, S. C. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, C1269-C1276 |
| 22. | Muscat, G. E., Gustafson, T. A., and Kedes, L. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4120-4133 |
| 23. | Karns, L. R., Kariya, K., and Simpson, P. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 410-417 |
| 24. | Grayson, J., Bassel-Duby, R., and Williams, R. S. (1998) J. Cell. Biochem. 70, 366-375 |
| 25. | Parmacek, M. S., Ip, H. S., Jung, F., Shen, T., Martin, J. F., Vora, A. J., Olson, E. N., and Leiden, J. M. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1870-1885 |
| 26. | Vincent, C. K., Gualberto, A., Patel, C. V., and Walsh, K. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1264-1272 |
| 27. | Sartorelli, V., Webster, K. A., and Kedes, L. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1811-1822 |
| 28. | Esser, K., Nelson, T., Lupa-Kimball, V., and Blough, E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12095-12102 |
| 29. | Horlick, R. A., and Benfield, P. A. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 2396-2413 |
| 30. | Feo, S., Antona, V., Barbieri, G., Passantino, R., Cali, L., and Giallongo, A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5991-6002 |
| 31. | Calvo, S., Venepally, P., Cheng, J., and Buonanno, A. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 515-525 |
| 32. | Nakayama, M., Stauffer, J., Cheng, J., Banerjee-Basu, S., Wawrousek, E., and Buonanno, A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2408-2417 |
| 33. | Bassel-Duby, R., Hernandez, M. D., Yang, Q., Rochelle, J. M., Seldin, M. F., and Williams, R. S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4596-4605 |
| 34. | Bassel-Duby, R., Hernandez, M. D., Gonzalez, M. A., Krueger, J. K., and Williams, R. S. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5024-5032 |
| 35. | Philipsen, S., and Suske, G. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2991-3000 |
| 36. | Passantino, R., Antona, V., Barbieri, G., Rubino, P., Melchionna, R., Cossu, G., Feo, S., and Giallongo, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 484-494 |
| 37. | Kataoka, H., Murayama, T., Yokode, M., Mori, S., Sano, H., Ozaki, H., Yokota, Y., Nishikawa, S., and Kita, T. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 626-633 |
| 38. | Amacher, S. L., Buskin, J. N., and Hauschka, S. D. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2753-2764 |
| 39. | Wentworth, B. M., Donoghue, M., Engert, J. C., Berglund, E. B., and Rosenthal, N. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1242-1246 |
| 40. | Wheeler, M. T., Snyder, E. C., Patterson, M. N., and Swoap, S. J. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C1069-C1078 |
| 41. | Kaushal, S., Schneider, J. W., Nadal-Ginard, B., and Mahdavi, V. (1994) Science 266, 1236-1240 |
| 42. | Molkentin, J. D., Black, B. L., Martin, J. F., and Olson, E. N. (1995) Cell 83, 1125-1136 |
| 43. | Baker, D. L., Dave, V., Reed, T., and Periasamy, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5921-5928 |
| 44. | Sayen, M. R., Rohrer, D. K., and Dillmann, W. H. (1992) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 87, 87-93 |
| 45. | Simonides, W. S., van der Linden, G. C., and van Hardeveld, C. (1990) FEBS Lett. 274, 73-76 |
| 46. | Kandarian, S. C., Peters, D. G., Favero, T. G., Ward, C. W., and Williams, J. H. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C1588-C1594 |
| 47. | Simonides, W. S., Brent, G. A., Thelen, M. H., van der Linden, C. G., Larsen, P. R., and van Hardeveld, C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32048-32056 |
| 48. | Thelen, M. H., Simonides, W. S., Muller, A., and van Hardeveld, C. (1998) Biochem. J. 329, 131-136 |
| 49. | Hartong, R., Wang, N., Kurokawa, R., Lazar, M. A., Glass, C. K., Apriletti, J. W., and Dillmann, W. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13021-13029 |
| 50. | Zarain-Herzberg, A., Marques, J., Sukovich, D., and Periasamy, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1460-1467 |
| 51. | Rohrer, D. K., Hartong, R., and Dillmann, W. H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8638-8646 |
| 52. | Kuo, T. H., Liu, B. F., Yu, Y., Wuytack, F., Raeymaekers, L., and Tsang, W. (1997) Cell Calcium 21, 399-408 |
| 53. | Kandarian, S. C., O'Brien, S., Thomas, K., Schulte, L., and Navarro, J. (1992) J. Appl. Physiol. 72, 2510-2514 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Feriotto, A. Finotti, P. Volpe, S. Treves, S. Ferrari, C. Angelelli, F. Zorzato, and R. Gambari Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 Activates Promoter Sequences of the Human A{beta}H-J-J Locus, Encoding Aspartyl-{beta}-Hydroxylase, Junctin, and Junctate Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2005; 25(8): 3261 - 3275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tsika, J. Ji, and R. Tsika Sp3 Proteins Negatively Regulate {beta} Myosin Heavy Chain Gene Expression during Skeletal Muscle Inactivity Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2004; 24(24): 10777 - 10791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Radzyukevich, A. E. Moseley, D. A. Shelly, G. A. Redden, M. M. Behbehani, J. B. Lingrel, R. J. Paul, and J. A. Heiny The Na+-K+-ATPase {alpha}2-subunit isoform modulates contractility in the perinatal mouse diaphragm Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1300 - C1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Yang, S. Kupershmidt, and D. M. Roden Cloning and initial characterization of the human cardiac sodium channel (SCN5A) promoter Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2004; 61(1): 56 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Talmadge, R. R. Roy, V. J. Caiozzo, and V. R. Edgerton Mechanical properties of rat soleus after long-term spinal cord transection J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1487 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Dellow, P. K. Bhavsar, N. J. Brand, and P. J.R. Barton Identification of novel, cardiac-restricted transcription factors binding to a CACC-box within the human cardiac troponin I promoter Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2001; 50(1): 24 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||