JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003678200 on May 15, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 23005-23011, July 28, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/30/23005    most recent
M003678200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell-Felton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kandarian, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell-Felton, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kandarian, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification of Weight-bearing-responsive Elements in the Skeletal Muscle Sarco(endo)plasmic Reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA1) Gene*

Heather Mitchell-Felton, R. Bridge Hunter, Eric J. Stevenson, and Susan C. KandarianDagger

From the Department of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Received for publication, May 1, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The skeletal muscle sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA1) gene is transactivated as early as 2 days after the removal of weight-bearing (Peters, D. G., Mitchell-Felton, H., and Kandarian, S. C. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C1218-C1225), but the transcriptional mechanisms are elusive. Here, the rat SERCA1 5' flank and promoter region (-3636 to +172 base pairs) was comprehensively examined using in vivo somatic gene transfer into rat soleus muscles (n = 804) to identify region(s) that are both necessary and sufficient for sensitivity to weight-bearing. In all, 40 different SERCA1 reporter plasmids were constructed and tested. Several different regions of the SERCA1 5' flank were sufficient to confer a transcriptional response to 7 days of muscle unloading when placed upstream of a heterologous promoter. Two of these regions were analyzed further because they were necessary for the unloading response of -3636 to +172, as demonstrated using internal deletion constructs. Deletion analysis of these regions (-1373 to -1158 and -330 to +172) suggested that unloading responsiveness corresponded to CACC sites and E-boxes. Mutagenesis of cis-elements in the first region showed that a specific CACC box (-1262) was involved in SERCA1 transactivation and a nearby E-box (-1248) was also implicated. Constructs containing trimerized CACC sites and E-boxes showed that the presence of both elements is required to activate transcription. This is the first identification of specific cis-elements required for the regulation of a Ca2+ handling gene by changes in muscle loading condition.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum is the major organelle that regulates the Ca2+ signaling associated with a multitude of cellular processes (1, 2). The sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA)1 proteins translocate Ca2+ from the cytosol to the sarcoplasmic reticulum or endoplasmic reticulum lumen, thereby reducing intracellular Ca2 and refilling the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ stores. The cloning, expression, and functional characterization of three SERCA genes and their splicing variants have been described (3-12). At least one of the SERCA gene products is expressed in every mammalian tissue studied, emphasizing the fundamental role of this protein in cellular function. Products of the SERCA1 gene are the predominant isoforms expressed in skeletal muscle (SERCA1a adult, SERCA1b neonatal) (4, 9), and one product of the SERCA2 gene is the predominant isoform expressed in cardiac myocytes (SERCA2a (3)). The alternative splicing product of SERCA2 (SERCA2b (3)) and the products of the SERCA3 gene (3, 11) are ubiquitously expressed in muscle and non-muscle tissue but in much lower levels. SERCA expression is much higher in striated muscle than in smooth muscle or non-muscle to accommodate the large calcium fluxes associated with excitation-contraction coupling.

Contractile activity has a marked effect on SERCA expression in striated muscle. Increased contractile activity leads to decreases in SERCA1 and SERCA2a expression in skeletal (13, 14) and cardiac (15, 16) muscle, respectively, whereas decreased contractile activity leads to increases in expression (17-19). SERCA1 expression is particularly sensitive to the reduction of contractile activity due to rat soleus muscle unloading, with significant increases by 2 days and 7-fold increases by 7 days (19). Moreover, the increase in expression is due to increases in SERCA1 gene transcription (19). The up-regulation of SERCA1 with unloading is counterintuitive as it occurs in a background of overall decreases in total protein and mRNA synthesis (20). This suggests that the up-regulation of SERCA1 is an active and highly regulated process. However, the functional significance and the molecular mechanisms of selective gene activation are unknown.

In previous work we isolated the rat 5' flank and promoter region of SERCA1 to -3636 base pairs (21). As a first step in elucidating the transcriptional regulation of SERCA1 by unloading, the sequence from -3636 to +172 was examined using in vivo somatic gene transfer to identify the region(s) both necessary and sufficient for weight-bearing sensitivity. Comprehensive promoter analysis revealed two regions of SERCA1 that were sufficient to confer unloading responsiveness and which were necessary for the unloading sensitivity of the -3636 to +172 construct. Mutagenesis and further deletion analysis of these regions identified a CACC box/E-box interaction, which was required for transcriptional activation with unloading. This is the first demonstration of specific cis-elements required for the in vivo regulation of a Ca2+ handling gene by changes in muscle loading activity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animals-- Female Wistar rats (Bantam and Kingman, n = 402) 8 weeks of age (~200-225 g) were used for all experiments. Twenty-four hours after plasmid DNA was injected into soleus muscles, the hind limbs of one-half of the rats were removed from weight-bearing for 7 days as previously detailed (19).

In Vivo DNA Injections-- In vivo injections were carried out as previously detailed (21). In brief, plasmid DNA was isolated using the endotoxin-free Megaprep kit (Qiagen). The DNA was ethanol-precipitated overnight and resuspended to the appropriate concentration in a 25% sucrose-phosphate-buffered saline solution such that 50 µl of plasmid DNA (50, 75, or 125 µg) was injected per soleus muscle. Luciferase activity was determined on 20 µl of the supernatant fraction as previously detailed (21), so that data reflect activity per whole muscle. Where indicated, luciferase activity was normalized to DNA uptake, as determined by Southern blot analysis (21). Briefly, total muscle DNA was isolated and digested with HaeIII. Control and unloaded DNA (10 µg/lane) was run on a gel with a pGL3-basic DNA standard curve and transferred to membrane, and plasmid DNA was detected with a luciferase-specific randomly primed probe.

Plasmid Construction-- SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3, SERCA1 (-962)-pGL3, SERCA1 (-612)-pGL3, and SERCA1 (-330)-pGL3 were constructed from rat genomic DNA as previously detailed (21). These constructs contain SERCA1 5' flank and promoter sequence that was ligated upstream of the luciferase gene in pGL3-basic. Additional 5' deletion constructs in the present study were made from SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 using the Erase-a-Base kit (Promega). The clones obtained were subjected to restriction analyses and sequencing to determine the exact length.

Fragments of the SERCA1 5' flank were amplified by PCR and ligated upstream of the SV40 minimal promoter in the luciferase reporter plasmid pGL3-promoter (Promega). Primers were designed with restriction enzyme sites added to their 5' end (MluI, BglII, or XhoI). PCR protocol was 25-32 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 65 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min; then 72 °C for 20 min. SERCA1 (-1314 to -1158)-SV40 and SERCA1 (-1248 to -1158)-SV40 were created by digesting SERCA1 (-1373 to -1158)-SV40 with EcoRI and PvuII and recircularizing the large fragment. Internal deletion constructs of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 were created using inverse PCR and components from the Advantage Genomic PCR kit (CLONTECH) following instructions from the manufacturer. The Quik-Change mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was used to mutate specific bases in SERCA1 (-1373 to -1158)-SV40 according to the manufacturer. All clones were checked by sequencing. The construct names and the primers used to create them are listed in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Sequence of PCR primers used to make many of the constructs in this study
Underlined nucleotides have been mutated.

Sense and antisense oligonucleotides were designed with a trimerized sequence of a SERCA1 fragment from -1272 to -1238. This sequence contained the CACC site at -1272, the CACC site at -1262, and the E-box at -1248. Two other oligonucleotides were constructed that contained the sequence with only the CACC site at -1262 and the E-box at -1248 or only the CACC box at -1262. The annealed double-stranded oligonucleotides contained BglII and HindIII ends and were easily ligated into the pGL3 promoter. The sequence of each oligonucleotide sense strand is shown in Table II.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Sequence of sense oligonucleotides used to make the trimerized constructs used in this study

Statistics-- An unpaired Student's t test was used to determine statistical significance between control and unloaded groups at p < 0.05. Regression equations representing the signal intensity from the pGL3-basic DNA standards on Southern blots were used to calculate SERCA1-pGL3 uptake by soleus muscles.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previous work in this laboratory showed that 75 µg was an optimal amount of SERCA1 plasmid to inject in soleus muscles with respect to the efficiency of plasmid uptake and luciferase activity (21). Southern blot analysis revealed that neither the size of the constructs (Ref. 21 and data not shown) nor the intervention of hind limb unloading altered plasmid uptake in soleus muscles (control = 378 ± 40 densitometric absorbance units, n = 108; unloaded = 440 ± 47 absorbance units, n = 109; p = 0.32). To determine whether different amounts of injected DNA affected the extent of transactivation with muscle unloading, 50, 75, or 125 µg of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 was examined. Luciferase activity of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 normalized to plasmid uptake was increased 7-fold after 7 days of unloading (Fig. 1). Since the extent of increase in luciferase activity was similar at the different quantities tested, the amount of DNA injected did not influence the magnitude of the unloading response. The increase in luciferase activity was the same as the unloading-induced activation of the endogenous SERCA1 gene (19), suggesting that elements sufficient for unloading sensitivity were contained in this construct.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Dose-response curve of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 showing that 75 µg of plasmid is an optimal amount to inject in control and 7-day-unloaded rat soleus muscles. The fold activation of control versus unloaded muscles did not depend upon the amount of DNA injected. Luciferase activity was normalized to plasmid DNA uptake using Southern blot analysis detailed in Mitchell-Felton and Kandarian (21). n = 8-16 muscles/group. Data are the means ± S.E. Control (black bars) and 7-day-unloaded (gray bars) values are as plotted.

Initial in vivo deletion analysis of the SERCA1 5' flank was performed with the constructs depicted in Fig. 2. In control muscles, expression of the SERCA1-pGL3 reporter constructs decreased with serial deletions. Unloading responsiveness (i.e. fold activation) was evident in all constructs except SERCA1 (-3174)-pGL3, SERCA1 (-2874)-pGL3, SERCA1 (-1158)-pGL3, SERCA1 (-962)-pGL3, SERCA1 (-612)-pGL3, and SERCA1 (-103)-pGL3. The most obvious loss of unloading responsiveness occurred upon deletion of the region between -1373 and -1158. Therefore, this region was of interest and was selected for further study. Unloading responsiveness was not observed with the deletion of DNA between -1158 and -612. However, injection of the SERCA1 (-330)-pGL3 construct resulted in a return of the unloading response, which was lost again with injection of SERCA1 (-103)-pGL3. The return of unloading responsiveness was unexpected, so the SERCA1 (-330)-pGL3 injection was repeated with newly amplified DNA and a different set of muscles. The same unloading response was observed in the second experiment. Thus, the sequence between -330 and +172 was sufficient in isolation to confer unloading responsiveness, so it was a second region designated for further study. We also observed loss of unloading responsiveness in SERCA1 (-3174)-pGL3 and SERCA1 (-2874)-pGL3 compared with SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3, although the decrease in fold activation was due to increased control values as opposed to decreased unloading values. These regions were also tested further. Taken together these data suggest that there are multiple regions in the SERCA1 promoter-enhancer that can confer unloading responsiveness. The intricacy of the unloading response in this figure is likely due to the comprehensiveness of the promoter analysis as well as the complexity of the in vivo physiological phenomena under study.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   In vivo deletion analysis of the rat SERCA1 5' flank. A construct containing the SERCA1 sequence from the indicated nucleotide to +172 upstream of a luciferase reporter gene (Luc) was injected into soleus muscles (75 µg/muscle). Luciferase activity was determined for control (black bars) and 7-day-unloaded (gray bars) muscles. Fold activation is the unloaded divided by the control value. Plasmid uptake was measured in all muscles by Southern blot analysis, which showed no difference in uptake by unloading or plasmid size. For internal consistency, luciferase activity is reported. n = 8-16 muscles per group. Data are the means ± S.E.

To test regions of SERCA1 for sufficiency in activating transcription with unloading, constructs were created containing SERCA1 fragments upstream of the heterologous SV40 promoter (Fig. 3A). SERCA1 (-1373 to -1158)-SV40 and SERCA1 (-962 to -612)-SV40 resulted in the strongest response with 5.0- and 5.7-fold activation, respectively, over control muscles. The activation of SERCA1 (-962 to -612)-SV40 was unexpected since neither SERCA1 (-962)-pGL3 nor SERCA1 (-612)-pGL3 showed unloading responsiveness (Fig. 2). This finding emphasized the context specificity of the promoter analysis. Other fragments of the SERCA1 5' flank showed either modest increases or no change in luciferase activity when examined in isolation. Next, we sought to determine whether the regions that were sufficient for unloading responsiveness were required in the context of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3. To do this, inverse PCR was used to delete a specific region from the -3636 to +172 parent construct, thereby creating internal deletion constructs (Fig. 3B). Removal of sequence between -1403 and -1158 abolished the unloading response, indicating that this region is required for unloading induced transcriptional activation. Deletion of other sequences did not result in a loss of unloading sensitivity. These data reveal that one obvious region of the SERCA1 5' flank containing elements both necessary and sufficient for unloading responsiveness was between -1373 and -1158. The other observation made from this experiment was that sequences involved in high level expression and unloading sensitivity are distinct and, furthermore, that the sequence required for high level expression is not confined to the 5' end of the construct (Fig. 3B). Data from Fig. 3, A and B were re-plotted as fold activation for comparative purposes, since heterologous and wild type promoters were used to help visualize that -1373 to -1158 was both necessary and sufficient for transcriptional activation with 7 days of muscle unloading (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Identification of regions of the SERCA1 5' flank both necessary and sufficient for unloading sensitivity. A, a fragment of the SERCA1 5' flank (black box) was ligated upstream of the heterologous SV40 promoter to test each fragment for sufficiency of unloading. B, the indicated regions of the SERCA1 5' flank were removed from the SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 parent construct to test their necessity for unloading sensitivity in the context of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3. The lack of an exact match between the removed nucleotides in B and their corresponding fragment in A is because the PCR primers used to create deletion constructs had stringent criteria that could not always be met. Control (black bars) and 7-day-unloaded (gray bars) values are as plotted. C, data from A and B re-plotted as fold activation to emphasize that the region between -1373 and -1158 is both necessary and sufficient for the unloading response. Fold activation is the unloaded divided by the control value. n = 8-16 muscles per group. Data are means ± S.E.

A more extensive analysis of SERCA1 (-1373 to -1158)-SV40 showed that removal of the sequence from -1373 to -1314 did not alter the magnitude of transcriptional activation, but the removal of the region between -1373 and -1248 decreased the response from 5.0- to 2.2-fold. Thus, sequence between -1314 and -1248 is involved in unloading sensitivity (Fig. 4). However, the sequence from -1373 to -1248 was not sufficient, in isolation, to up-regulate activity, suggesting that an interaction between -1314 to -1248 and -1248 to -1158 exists that confers unloading responsiveness. This interaction may involve the E-box at -1248, which is deleted in the constructs showing only a 2-fold activation. Thus, the E-box (-1248) may be necessary for weight-bearing responsiveness.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Deletion analysis of the SERCA1 region from -1373 to -1158. The cis-elements present in each construct are as indicated. The E-boxes at -1314 and -1248 were disrupted in the creation of the different deletion constructs. Constructs were injected into control (black bars) or 7-day-unloaded (gray bars) soleus muscles. Fold activation is the unloaded divided by the control value. n = 8-16 muscles/group. Data are the means ± S.E.

Mutagenesis of SERCA1 (-1373 to -1158)-SV40 was then performed to target cis-elements required for unloading induced transactivation (Fig. 5). Consensus cis-elements were identified using MatInspector (Version 2.2). Mutation of the CACC box at position -1262 abolished the unloading response, indicating that this CACC site is involved in the up-regulation of SERCA1 (-1373 to -1158)-SV40. Disruption of the NFAT (-1367) and CACC (-1272) sites did not change transcriptional activation, whereas mutation of CACC (-1305) and CCAAT (-1287) sites show moderate decreases in the unloading response. Surprisingly, with the exception of the E-box at -1248, mutation of the known elements between -1248 and -1158, the NF-I (-1198) and Sp1 (-1171) sites, did not decrease the unloading response. Since an interaction was predicted from the results of Fig. 4, we explored the possibility that the E-box (-1248) is interacting with the CACC (-1262) site.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mutagenesis of cis-elements in SERCA1 between -1373 and -1158. Individual cis-elements were mutated as indicated (for mutated bases see Table I). Constructs were injected into control (black bars) or 7-day-unloaded (gray bars) soleus muscles. Fold activation is the unloaded divided by the control value. n = 8-16 muscles/group. Data are the means ± S.E.

To test if a CACC/E-box interaction was sufficient to increase transcription, constructs containing trimerized CACC sites and E-boxes upstream of SV40 were examined in control and 7-day unloaded soleus muscles (Fig. 6). Since weight-bearing sensitivity was abolished with the mutation of the CACC box at -1262, the first step was to examine this cis-element. Injection of SERCA1 (CACC)-SV40, a trimerized construct containing the CACC (-1262) site, resulted in no significant change in luciferase activity, supporting the hypothesis that an interaction of CACC (-1262) with a second cis-element is required for transcriptional up-regulation. Examination of SERCA1 (CACC/E-box)-SV40, containing CACC (-1262) and E-box (-1248), resulted in a 9.0-fold increase over control values. Thus, the combination of CACC (-1262) and E-box (-1248) is sufficient to transduce an unloading response, suggesting communication between trans-factors binding these elements. A multimerized construct containing CACC (-1272), CACC (-1262), and E-box (-1248) had a 4.6-fold increase in luciferase activity with unloading. However, the decrease in fold activation was due to a greater increase in the control versus the unloaded luciferase activity, suggesting that the CACC box at -1272 may be important for general high level transcription of SERCA1. This is consistent with the overall decrease in luciferase activity in both control and unloaded muscles with mutagenesis of the CACC box at -1272 base pairs (Fig. 5).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Identification of cis-elements sufficient for transactivation with 7 days of unloading. Constructs were made which contain trimerized CACC sites and E-boxes (as indicated, see Table II for sequence) and injected into control (black bars) and unloaded (gray bars) soleus muscles. Fold activation is the unloaded divided by the control value. n = 8 muscles/group. Data are the means ± S.E.

The sequence between -330 to +172 was further examined because 1) SERCA1 (-330)-pGL3 shows a 9.3-fold increase with unloading, 2) the sequence is in close proximity to the basal promoter, and 3) the sequence contains multiple CACC and E-boxes, which were found to be important in -1373 to -1158. Further interest in the -330 region was spurred by the finding that SERCA1 (-3636 to -330)-SV40 could not activate transcription with unloading (Fig. 7), suggesting that the SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 construct requires the sequence from -330 to +172 for transactivation. Since the sequence between -330 and -103 was not necessary for unloading responsiveness (Figs. 3B and 7), it was particularly interesting to find that luciferase activity was increased in SERCA1 (-3636 to -103)-SV40 with unloading. In addition, SERCA1 (-330 to -103)-SV40 (Figs. 3A and 7) and SERCA1 (-103)-pGL3 (Figs. 2 and 7) were not sufficient to activate transcription, whereas SERCA1 (-330)-pGL3 was sufficient (Figs. 2 and 7). The results indicate that sequence between -330 and +172 was required for the unloading response seen with SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3, but that required elements were found in both -330 to -103 and -103 to +172, regions that contain both CACC sites and E-boxes in high numbers. To delineate the minimal required sequence for activation, further deletion analysis was performed. SERCA1 (-330 to +27)-pGL3 was sufficient to up-regulate transcription, whereas SERCA1 (-330 to -21)-SV40 was not, suggesting that the sequence from -21 to +27 contributes to transducing the unloading signal. It is of interest that the spacing of the E-box and CACC site between -21 and +27 is similar to the CACC site and E-box in -1373 to -1158. Given the density of CACC and E-boxes in -330 to +172, the necessity of this sequence for unloading sensitivity of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3, and the requirement for the sequence between -21 and +27, which contains a CACC site and an E-box, it is likely that these elements are critical to transducing transactivation in response to the removal of weight-bearing in the soleus muscle.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Examination of the region between -330 and +172 for elements involved in unloading responsiveness. The position of both CACC sites and E-boxes between -330 and +172 are indicated. Data are presented as fold activation, since both wild type and heterologous (SV40) promoters were used. Fold activation is the unloaded divided by the control value. n = 8-16 muscles/group. Data are the means ± S.E.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Intracellular Ca2+ regulates the signaling associated with diverse cellular processes such as excitation-contraction coupling, cell proliferation, differentiation, and death (2). SERCA1, by translocating Ca2+ from the cytosol to the lumen of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, is a critical protein in the regulation of skeletal muscle Ca2+ homeostasis. The SERCA1 gene is highly mutable, with mRNA expression and transcription being up-regulated 7-fold by 7 days of unloading in rat soleus muscles (19). Given the central role that SERCA1 plays in maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis, it is surprising how little is known about the transcriptional regulation of the gene. Thus, the focus of the present study was to identify elements involved in the transcriptional activation of the SERCA1 gene by muscle inactivity due to unloading. We found that there were specific CACC sites and E-boxes that were required for unloading-induced transactivation.

The rat SERCA1 5' flank contains cis-elements between -3636 and +172 that are known to be important in regulating muscle-specific genes. These include 21 CACC sites (CACCC), 17 myogenic E-boxes (CAGNTG), 2 M-CAT sites (GGAATG), 4 NFAT sites (WGGAAANH), 1 Sp1 site (GGGCGG), 10 Sp1-like sites (GGGAGG), and 12 TRE half-sites (RGGTSA). Interestingly there are no MEF2 sites (YTAWWWWTAR), MEF3 sites (SSTCAGGTTWC), or CArG boxes (CCWWWWWWGG) previously shown to be important for transcription of some muscle genes (22-27). Given the relatively high number of CACC sites and E-boxes, it is not surprising that these two elements were found to be necessary for transcriptional regulation of the SERCA1 gene with unloading. There is precedence in the literature for the regulatory pairing of CACC and MEF2 sites necessary for transcription of many muscle genes, including rat myosin light chain 2 slow (28), human myoglobin (24), rat muscle creatine kinase (29), mouse troponin C slow (25), and human beta -enolase (30), but the regulatory pairing of CACC sites and E-boxes is less well defined (31, 32).

To date, the transfactor(s) that binds CACC sites for functional activation has not been definitively determined, although there are a number of candidates including the myocyte nuclear factor, a member of the winged helix family of proteins (33), and CBP40 (34). In addition, members of the Sp1/kruppel-like factor family interact with CACC sites (35), although the affinity of binding is lower relative to consensus Sp1 sites (27). Recently a negative regulator, BERF1, was characterized as a CACC-binding protein, and a second CACC-binding protein, which may be an activating factor, was identified with a protein-DNA binding assay (36). The proteins that interact with E-boxes have been well characterized and consist of the myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) MyoD, myogenin, myf-5, and MRF4. They are basic helix-loop-helix proteins that dimerize with the ubiquitously expressed protein products of the E2A and HEB genes to drive the muscle developmental program. However, their role in adult muscle is not yet fully defined, and there are indications that other proteins may interact with E-boxes in adult muscle to direct transcription (37). Functional E-boxes are required for expression of many genes in adult tissue, including muscle creatine kinase (38), myosin light chain 1/3 fast (39), myosin heavy chain IIB (40), cardiac alpha -actin (27), and slow skeletal troponin I (31, 32). Studies with cardiac troponin C have shown that overexpression of MyoD can stimulate transcription even in the absence of E-boxes (25). This can be explained by the fact that MyoD/E12 (or myogenein/E12) and MEF2 proteins trimerize and activate transcription in a synergistic and co-operative manner (41, 42), and this trimer can function when only one cis-element (MEF2 site or E-box) is present (42). Given that SERCA1 contains no MEF2 sites, and requires an E-box (-1248) and CACC site (-1262) for unloading induced transcription, it is possible that a protein complex binding to SERCA1 contains a myogenic regulatory factor, a CACC box-binding protein, and MEF2. Crude nuclear extracts from control and unloaded soleus muscles showed no difference in the pattern or intensity of protein-DNA binding complexes when incubated with individual consensus CACC or E box sequences.2 Studies detailing the protein biochemistry involved in binding to the SERCA1 CACC-E box sequence revealed here is the next logical series of experiments and will be addressed next.

The involvement of the CACC site at -1 to +5 and the E-box at -17 to -12 in the transcriptional regulation of SERCA1 is interesting because of the importance of the proximal promoter in the regulation of SERCA genes. Work done with rabbit SERCA2 revealed that transcriptional activation in C2C12 cells was dependent upon intact Sp1 and Sp1-like sites between -284 and +1 (43). The human SERCA3 gene also contains seven Sp1 and Sp1-like sites in the same region that have been suggested as being critical to transcriptional activation (12). Thus, transcription of both SERCA2 and SERCA3 is dependent upon GC-rich regions in the proximal promoter. The rat SERCA1 proximal promoter contains no Sp1 sites, and although it contains three of the related GC-rich CACC sites, the difference in the GC content of rat SERCA1 promoter (62.4%) versus the rabbit SERCA2 (81.6%) and human SERCA3 (81.2%) promoters suggests that transcriptional regulation of SERCA1 is distinct. This idea is further supported by the observation that thyroid stimulation (44, 45) and contractile activity (14, 17, 19, 46) differentially target SERCA1 and SERCA2a in skeletal muscle.

Promoter analysis of the SERCA1 and SERCA2 gene in skeletal (47, 48) and cardiac muscle (49-51), respectively, has identified an important role of thyroid hormone (T3). Examination of the rat SERCA1 5' flank and promoter region (-962 to +41) in COS cells showed that treatment with T3 activated SERCA1 transcription (47). Within this sequence three regions were identified that contain TRE sites capable of binding T3 receptors and subsequently activating transcription when the receptor was bound to T3. However, unloading does not appear to be regulated by T3, since the TREs do not tract with unloading responsiveness.

Besides revealing the elements involved in the unloading response of SERCA1, the present study also uncovered information about high level expression in control soleus muscles. Many regions of the SERCA1 gene were required for high level expression within the context of SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3, including the sequence between -3636 to -2652 (Fig. 2), -1403 to -1158, and -962 to -612 (Fig. 3B). Simonides et al. (47) performed promoter analysis of rat SERCA1 (-962 to +41) in COS because the promoter constructs exhibited low expression levels when transfected into L6 muscle cells. However, a subsequent study by the same group (48) using the SERCA1 promoter from -2658 to +91 was performed in L6 muscle cells, where expression was detectable, indicating that sequence between -2658 and -962 contributes to high level SERCA1 expression. Thus, our work and that of others supports the finding that regulation of high level expression of SERCA1 is complex and requires a sequence more than 1 kilobase from the transcription start site.

The present study is a comprehensive in vivo analysis of the transcriptional regulation of the rat SERCA1 gene by muscle unloading. We identified specific CACC site-E-box pairings that were necessary and sufficient for the unloading responsiveness of the SERCA1 (-3636)-pGL3 construct. Not only was the pairing of the CACC site at -1262 and E-box at -1248 necessary and sufficient to confer transactivation with unloading, but a CACC and E-box pairing near the transcription start site was also found to be important. The identification of transcription factors that interact to increase transcription of SERCA1 will be critical to understand the regulation of this fundamental calcium-handling gene. It has been suggested that the regulation of calcium-handling genes is co-regulated (52). This is evidenced in our model by increased expression of the L-type calcium channel, the ryanodine receptor, and calsequestrin as well as SERCA1 with unloading (46, 53). Thus, understanding the regulation of SERCA1 may also illuminate regulation of other calcium-handling genes by contractile activity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Melissa Yu for technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AR41705.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger An Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Boston University, Dept. of Health Sciences, 635 Commonwealth Ave., 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-353-5169; Fax: 617-353-7567; E-mail: skandar@bu.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003678200

2 H. Mitchell-Felton, R. B. Hunter, E. J. Stevenson, and S. C. Kandarian, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SERCA, sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RLU, relative light units.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Berridge, M. J. (1993) Nature 361, 315-325
2. Berridge, M. J., Bootman, M. D., and Lipp, P. (1998) Nature 395, 645-648
3. Burk, S. E., Lytton, J., MacLennan, D. H., and Shull, G. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18561-18568
4. Brandl, C. J., deLeon, S., Martin, D. R., and MacLennan, D. H. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 3768-3774
5. Korczak, B., Zarain-Herzberg, A., Brandl, C., James Ingles, C., Green, N. M., and MacLennan, D. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4813-4819
6. Gunteski-Hamblin, A.-M., Greeb, J., and Shull, G. E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15032-15040
7. Lytton, J., Zarain-Herzberg, A., Periasamy, M., and MacLennan, D. H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7059-7065
8. Lytton, J., and MacLennan, D. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15024-15031
9. Wu, K.-D., and Lytton, J. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C333-C341
10. Zarain-Herzberg, A., MacLennan, D. H., and Periasamy, M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4670-4677
11. Poch, E., Leach, S., Snape, S., Cacic, T., MacLennan, D. H., and Lytton, J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C1449-C1458
12. Dode, L., De Greef, C., Mountian, I., Attard, M., Town, M. M., Casteels, R., and Wuytack, F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13982-13994
13. Kandarian, S. C., Peters, D. G., Taylor, J. A., and Williams, G. A. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, C1190-C1197
14. Hu, P., Zhang, K. M., Spratt, J. A., Wechsler, A. S., and Briggs, F. N. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1395, 121-125
15. Arai, M., Matsui, H., and Periasamy, M. (1994) Circ. Res. 74, 555-564
16. Cadre, B. M., Qi, M., Eble, D. M., Shannon, T. R., Bers, D. M., and Samarel, A. M. (1998) J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 30, 2247-2259
17. Schulte, L. M., Navarro, J., and Kandarian, S. C. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, C1308-C1315
18. Bassani, J. W. M., Qi, M., Samarel, A. M., and Bers, D. M. (1994) Circ. Res. 74, 991-997
19. Peters, D. G., Mitchell-Felton, H., and Kandarian, S. C. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C1218-C1225
20. Thomason, D. B., and Booth, F. W. (1990) J. Appl. Physiol. 68, 1-12
21. Mitchell-Felton, H., and Kandarian, S. C. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, C1269-C1276
22. Muscat, G. E., Gustafson, T. A., and Kedes, L. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4120-4133
23. Karns, L. R., Kariya, K., and Simpson, P. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 410-417
24. Grayson, J., Bassel-Duby, R., and Williams, R. S. (1998) J. Cell. Biochem. 70, 366-375
25. Parmacek, M. S., Ip, H. S., Jung, F., Shen, T., Martin, J. F., Vora, A. J., Olson, E. N., and Leiden, J. M. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1870-1885
26. Vincent, C. K., Gualberto, A., Patel, C. V., and Walsh, K. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1264-1272
27. Sartorelli, V., Webster, K. A., and Kedes, L. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1811-1822
28. Esser, K., Nelson, T., Lupa-Kimball, V., and Blough, E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12095-12102
29. Horlick, R. A., and Benfield, P. A. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 2396-2413
30. Feo, S., Antona, V., Barbieri, G., Passantino, R., Cali, L., and Giallongo, A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5991-6002
31. Calvo, S., Venepally, P., Cheng, J., and Buonanno, A. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 515-525
32. Nakayama, M., Stauffer, J., Cheng, J., Banerjee-Basu, S., Wawrousek, E., and Buonanno, A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2408-2417
33. Bassel-Duby, R., Hernandez, M. D., Yang, Q., Rochelle, J. M., Seldin, M. F., and Williams, R. S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4596-4605
34. Bassel-Duby, R., Hernandez, M. D., Gonzalez, M. A., Krueger, J. K., and Williams, R. S. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5024-5032
35. Philipsen, S., and Suske, G. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2991-3000
36. Passantino, R., Antona, V., Barbieri, G., Rubino, P., Melchionna, R., Cossu, G., Feo, S., and Giallongo, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 484-494
37. Kataoka, H., Murayama, T., Yokode, M., Mori, S., Sano, H., Ozaki, H., Yokota, Y., Nishikawa, S., and Kita, T. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 626-633
38. Amacher, S. L., Buskin, J. N., and Hauschka, S. D. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2753-2764
39. Wentworth, B. M., Donoghue, M., Engert, J. C., Berglund, E. B., and Rosenthal, N. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1242-1246
40. Wheeler, M. T., Snyder, E. C., Patterson, M. N., and Swoap, S. J. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C1069-C1078
41. Kaushal, S., Schneider, J. W., Nadal-Ginard, B., and Mahdavi, V. (1994) Science 266, 1236-1240
42. Molkentin, J. D., Black, B. L., Martin, J. F., and Olson, E. N. (1995) Cell 83, 1125-1136
43. Baker, D. L., Dave, V., Reed, T., and Periasamy, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5921-5928
44. Sayen, M. R., Rohrer, D. K., and Dillmann, W. H. (1992) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 87, 87-93
45. Simonides, W. S., van der Linden, G. C., and van Hardeveld, C. (1990) FEBS Lett. 274, 73-76
46. Kandarian, S. C., Peters, D. G., Favero, T. G., Ward, C. W., and Williams, J. H. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C1588-C1594
47. Simonides, W. S., Brent, G. A., Thelen, M. H., van der Linden, C. G., Larsen, P. R., and van Hardeveld, C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32048-32056
48. Thelen, M. H., Simonides, W. S., Muller, A., and van Hardeveld, C. (1998) Biochem. J. 329, 131-136
49. Hartong, R., Wang, N., Kurokawa, R., Lazar, M. A., Glass, C. K., Apriletti, J. W., and Dillmann, W. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13021-13029
50. Zarain-Herzberg, A., Marques, J., Sukovich, D., and Periasamy, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1460-1467
51. Rohrer, D. K., Hartong, R., and Dillmann, W. H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8638-8646
52. Kuo, T. H., Liu, B. F., Yu, Y., Wuytack, F., Raeymaekers, L., and Tsang, W. (1997) Cell Calcium 21, 399-408
53. Kandarian, S. C., O'Brien, S., Thomas, K., Schulte, L., and Navarro, J. (1992) J. Appl. Physiol. 72, 2510-2514


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
G. Feriotto, A. Finotti, P. Volpe, S. Treves, S. Ferrari, C. Angelelli, F. Zorzato, and R. Gambari
Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 Activates Promoter Sequences of the Human A{beta}H-J-J Locus, Encoding Aspartyl-{beta}-Hydroxylase, Junctin, and Junctate
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2005; 25(8): 3261 - 3275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
G. Tsika, J. Ji, and R. Tsika
Sp3 Proteins Negatively Regulate {beta} Myosin Heavy Chain Gene Expression during Skeletal Muscle Inactivity
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2004; 24(24): 10777 - 10791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
T. L. Radzyukevich, A. E. Moseley, D. A. Shelly, G. A. Redden, M. M. Behbehani, J. B. Lingrel, R. J. Paul, and J. A. Heiny
The Na+-K+-ATPase {alpha}2-subunit isoform modulates contractility in the perinatal mouse diaphragm
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1300 - C1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
P. Yang, S. Kupershmidt, and D. M. Roden
Cloning and initial characterization of the human cardiac sodium channel (SCN5A) promoter
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2004; 61(1): 56 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. J. Talmadge, R. R. Roy, V. J. Caiozzo, and V. R. Edgerton
Mechanical properties of rat soleus after long-term spinal cord transection
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2002; 93(4): 1487 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. A. Dellow, P. K. Bhavsar, N. J. Brand, and P. J.R. Barton
Identification of novel, cardiac-restricted transcription factors binding to a CACC-box within the human cardiac troponin I promoter
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2001; 50(1): 24 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/30/23005    most recent
M003678200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow