|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 23194-23198, July 28, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Cell Biology and Applied Botany,
Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse,
D-35032 Marburg, Germany
Received for publication, April 12, 2000
Complex plastids, found in many alga groups, are
surrounded by three or four membranes. Therefore, proteins of the
complex plastids, which are encoded in the cell nucleus, must cross
three or four membranes during transport to the plastid. To study this process we have developed a method for isolating transport-competent two membrane-bound plastids derived from the complex plastids of the
cryptophyte Guillardia theta. This in vitro
protein import system provides the first non-heterologous system for
studying the import of proteins into four-membrane complex plastids. We use our import system as well as canine microsomes to demonstrate in
the case of cryptomonads how nuclear proteins pass the first nucleomorph-encoded proteins the third and fourth membrane and discuss
the potential mechanisms for protein transport across the second membrane.
Plastids from higher plants, red and green algae, as well as from
Glaucocystophytes are typically surrounded by two membranes. This
membrane pair, called the plastid envelope, contains the translocons
Tic and Toc. As shown in higher plants, these allow specific transport
of proteins from the cytoplasm into the stroma (e.g. Ref.
1).
However, most alga groups harbor plastids surrounded by three or four
membranes. Such plastids, termed complex plastids, have evolved in
secondary endocytobiosis (2-4). In the case of haptophytes and
heterokonts the plastid is surrounded by four membranes, whereas in
euglenophytes and most dinophytes the plastid envelope consists of
three membranes. Chlorarachniophytes and cryptophytes (harboring complex plastids with four membranes, respectively) are unique in
respect to their plastid morphology (Fig.
1). This occurs because a narrow
eukaryotic cytoplasmic compartment containing an additional pigmy
nucleus called the nucleomorph exists between the outer and inner
membrane pair (5).
Although knowledge on protein transport into chloroplasts of green
plants and the components of the translocation machinery is rapidly
increasing (1), and first studies on protein import in Cyanophora were
regarded (6), little is known about the transport of proteins into
complex plastids. In these, the plastid proteins encoded in the cell
nucleus have to cross three or four membranes to reach the stroma.
These imported proteins contain an N-terminal extension, which is built
up as a bipartite presequence (e.g. Refs. 7 and 8). Topology
predictions suggest that the N-terminal part of the preprotein are
similar to signal sequences in the first part and to transit peptides
in the second part.
In the case of Euglena it was shown that translocation of
proteins into the stroma involves translocation of the preprotein into
the ER,1 vesicular transport
from ER to the Golgi apparatus, and fusing of Golgi vesicles with the
outermost membrane of the plastid of Euglena (9, 10).
However, it is still unknown how proteins cross intermediate and inner
plastid membrane of Euglena.
The study of protein transport into complex plastids surrounded by four
membranes was started by the isolation of physiologically active, but
transport-incompetent, plastids from a diatom (11). It was found that
nuclear-encoded plastid proteins from diatoms were imported into canine
microsomes where they were processed (7, 12). By using heterologous pea
and spinach chloroplasts, Kroth and co-workers (7) demonstrated that
the transit peptide of the In this study we present evidence that in cryptomonads the first step
in translocation of nuclear-encoded proteins into the stroma of complex
plastids involves co-translational translocation via an ER-like
membrane. By developing a method for the isolation of
transport-competent plastids from a cryptomonad, we demonstrate for the
first time import of nucleomorph-encoded proteins into homologous
complex plastids. Furthermore, a model for the translocation of
nucleus- and nucleomorph-encoded proteins into the stroma is presented.
Cloning Procedures--
All constructs used have been reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction-amplified from G. theta RNA (14) and subcloned into the pGEM-T (Promega Corp.,
Madison, WI). Sequencing the inserts has been done on ALF-Express
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using the Thermo Sequenase
fluorescent-labeled primer cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) with 7-deaza-dGTP. The full-length gapC1 gene (15)
was amplified by the use of 5'-GCAAAAATGGCGTACTTCAAGGC-3' and
5'-CTATTAGGCCTTGACCTTGG-3'. Deletion of the signal sequence encoding
domain of G. theta gapC1 gene was obtained with the forward primer 5'-CAACATGGGATCCTCCTTTGTTCC-3' (introducing a new
translation start) and the reverse primer 5'-CTATTAGGCCTTGACCTTGG-3'.
The nucleomorph gene encoding rubredoxin was amplified using the
forward primer 5'-CGCGTCGTTTTACATATGTTTG-3' and reverse primer
5'-GTGATAGGATCCAGCCTATTC-3'.
Brefeldin A and Electron Microscopy--
G. theta
cells were treated with 10 µg·ml Preparation of Pea Chloroplasts and G. theta
Plastids--
Chloroplasts derived from pea seedlings (10-12 days)
were isolated according to standard protocols described previously
(16).
For isolation of G. theta plastids a modified procedure for
isolation of Euglena plastids (17) was used. One liter of
algae was harvested for 10 min at 1,500 × g and
resuspended in 10 ml of isoosmotic buffer (400 mM sorbitol,
50 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0) containing 0.1% (w/v) proteinase K and incubated on a shaker for approximately 60 min. When cells became round-shaped (controlled by phase contrast microscopy), 20 ml of resuspension buffer containing 100 mM
Pefabloc SC (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as inhibitor for proteinase K was added to the cells. Harvesting the cells occurred for 5 min at
2,500 × g, and the pellet was resuspended in 60 ml of
breaking buffer (250 mM sorbitol, 20 mM HEPES,
0.4 mM Na2EDTA, pH 7.4). By the use of a Waring
blender, cells were disrupted for 20 s. First centrifugation for 5 min at 1000 × g pelleted still intact cells.
Centrifugation of the supernatant for 5 min at 2,500 × g yielded the crude plastid fraction as the pellet.
Carefully, resuspension of the pellet in 0.5 ml of gradient buffer (330 mM sorbitol, 1% (w/v) Ficoll, 5 mM HEPES, 15 mM NaCl, pH 6.8) and centrifugation on a discontinuous
50:30% Percoll gradient for 12 min at 11,000 × g
resulted in a red band representing intact plastids at the boundary of
the two Percoll cushions. Broken plastids (green color) remained at the
top of the 30% Percoll cushion. After collecting, the intact plastids
were washed twice in import buffer (330 mM sorbitol, 3 mM MgCl2, 50 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.6) before chlorophyll determination and subsequent use for import reactions.
In Vitro Transcription/Translation and Import
Procedures--
In vitro transcription and translation of
the constructs were performed using the coupled reticulocyte
transcription/translation system (TNT system, Promega). Translation of
the template was performed in the presence of
[35S]methionine (1000 Ci/mmol, Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) according to manufacturer's protocol. Co-translational import
was obtained by adding canine pancreatic microsomes (Promega, Madison,
MI) to the in vitro transcription/translation reaction
according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Post-translational import of labeled precursor proteins into pea
chloroplast and G. theta plastids took place in 100-µl
assays containing chloroplasts/plastids (equivalent to 15 µg of
chlorophyll) in import buffer with 2 mM ATP, 20 mM potassium gluconate, 10 mM methionine, 10 mM NaHCO3, and 2% bovine serum albumin.
After addition of labeled in vitro translation product, the
import mixture was incubated for 30 min at 25 °C for pea
chloroplasts and 10 min at 25 °C for G. theta plastids,
respectively. Termination of import was obtained by centrifugation the
chloroplasts for 1 min at 1,000 × g. After washing in
import buffer, chloroplasts were redissolved in 100 µl of import
buffer and subjected to thermolysin treatment (0.1% (w/v) thermolysin
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) with 1 mM CaCl2
final concentration for 10 min on ice to digest external protein of the
import mixture. The digestion was stopped by adding EDTA to a final
concentration of 5 mM, followed by a centrifugation through
a 40% Percoll cushion (4,500 × g, 5 min) recovering
intact plastids. After washing the plastids and centrifugation, harvested chloroplasts were redissolved immediately in sample buffer
for analysis by SDS-PAGE and subsequent autoradiography.
Heterologous Transport of a Nuclear-encoded Plastid
Protein--
Nuclear-encoded but plastid-localized proteins in complex
plastids show similar N termini. These consist of a bipartite
presequence with two distinct domains that are compositionally similar
to those in complex plastids of different algal groups and members of
the apicomplexa (18). Previously, studies with heterologous transport
systems have involved complex plastid proteins (e.g. the
Further Evidence That the Outermost Membrane Is ER-like--
In
heterokonts and cryptophytes the outermost membrane of the complex
plastid is covered on the cytoplasmic side with ribosomes; therefore,
this membrane has been referred to as "chloroplast" ER (19). In
order to test if this membrane behaves like an ER membrane, we
incubated G. theta cells with Brefeldin A, a hydrophobic compound produced by toxic fungi that inhibits anterograde vesicle transport (2). After incubation, the cells were embedded, cut thin, and
visualized by means of electron microscopy. Under the conditions used,
characteristic changes were observed, the Golgi apparatus disassembled
and the ER became dilated (Fig. 3,
A and B). Furthermore, the space between the
outermost and the second membrane of the complex plastid also became
dilated (Fig. 3C).
Our observations that (i) ribosomes were attached to the outermost
membrane, (ii) that Brefeldin A influenced the plastid membrane, and
(iii) that the transport of GapDH occurred across microsome membranes
strongly suggest that the first step in translocation of proteins into
complex plastids is identical with co-translational ER translocation.
Transport of Proteins into Heterologous Chloroplasts--
The
second part of the bipartite signal peptide of the nuclear-encoded but
plastid-located preproteins has the characteristics of transit
peptides. We used the truncated GapDH for import into heterologous
chloroplasts. As shown in Fig. 4, the
truncated GapDH (pGapDH) can pass the plastid envelope of pea
chloroplasts, demonstrated by the fact that the lower processed band
(representing the mature protein) is protease-resistant and is digested
when Triton and thermolysin are added after the import reaction.
However, pea chloroplasts are a heterologous system to study import of
cryptomonad proteins. Therefore, we developed a method to isolate two
membrane-surrounded plastids from cryptomonads which is, to our
knowledge, the first example of transport-competent plastids from an
organism with plastids surrounded by four membranes.
Homologous Transport in Complex Plastids--
Cryptomonads contain
a second nucleus, the nucleomorph, which is located in between the
outer and inner membrane pair in a narrow cytoplasm, the periplastidal
compartment (Fig. 1). Plastid proteins encoded by this vestigial
nucleus offers the unique possibility to investigate homologous protein
transport across two membranes within these complex plastids. By
sequencing the chromosomes of the nucleomorph of G. theta
(4, 20), we demonstrated that in the nucleomorph a variety of
plastid-located proteins are encoded (20-22). As expected, these
proteins possess an N-terminal extension in comparison to their
cyanobacterial homologs. However, these stretches revealed no
similarity to known transit peptides from plants and green algae as
predicted by PSORT and ChloroP V1.0. In order to investigate homologous
transport of nucleomorph-encoded plastid proteins into plastids, we
have used rubredoxin, a non-heme iron protein (23), which is encoded on
chromosome II of the cryptomonad alga G. theta. For this we
have developed a method to isolate plastids from G. theta.
Fig. 5A shows a Percoll
density gradient indicating the plastid fraction. Light microscopic
analysis (Fig. 5B) indicated that the plastid fraction was
devoid of contaminations of other cell compartments. By using of these
plastids, we investigated protein translocation into homologous
plastids.
Fig. 6 shows the result of rubredoxin
transport with into cryptomonad plastids. Cleavage of the precursor
(pRub) accompanied the translocation of rubredoxin. The molecular mass
of the protease-resistant mature rubredoxin (mRub) is approximately 11 kDa, demonstrating that our protocol for the isolation of cryptomonad
plastids indeed led to transport-competent plastids. A processed
protease-resistant band with similar molecular mass is also identified
by using rubredoxin for the import into the heterologous pea
chloroplasts (data not shown). If a construct without the coding
sequence for the 56 N-terminal amino acids was used, no translocation
across two membrane-bound plastids occurred (data not shown).
In further experiments, we used the truncated GapDH (pGapDH) under the
same conditions for import experiments in cryptomonad plastids.
Interestingly, with this protein no import could be detected (data not
shown) implicating a different entry pathway of nuclear-encoded
proteins into the stroma.
In cryptomonads as well as in diatoms plastid-located but
nuclear-encoded proteins pass the first membrane co-translationally (this study and Refs. 7 and 12). By using a homologous import system in
this study, we have shown that for nucleomorph-encoded plastid proteins
the third and inner membrane resembles a plastid envelope, as known
from higher plants. Therefore, translocons similar to Tic and Toc,
characterized in chloroplasts of higher plants (24), may also be
involved in transport across the third and fourth plastid membrane of
cryptomonads complex plastids. This is also further suggested from the
observation that, in the nucleomorph genome, some proteins homologous
to the pea translocon machinery are
encoded.2 Our results show
that import of nucleomorph-encoded proteins into plastids is comparable
to that of proteins into pea chloroplasts. This leads to the conclusion
that the N-terminal extension of nucleomorph-encoded proteins
(e.g. rubredoxin) is sufficient to direct the precursor into
the plastid compartment. Processing of precursor proteins also seems to
occur in a similar manner. Nevertheless, our homologous import system
is not efficient for nuclear-encoded plastid proteins, which leads us
to speculate that import of nuclear proteins into the stroma uses
another mechanism. This is suggested by the fact that the possible
transit peptides of the nuclear proteins are compositionally different
from those of the nucleomorph-encoded proteins, which show a conserved
stretch at its N terminus. Such a different import mechanism could be founded in the transport of nuclear proteins across the second membrane, a process that still seems to be uncharacterized. Previously it was thought that nuclear-encoded proteins with a plastid destination could be transported across the second membrane by a vesicularly mediated system (19). In electron microscopic studies on chromophytes vesicle-like structures were visible in the space between the second
and third membrane (25). If a vesicle-mediated transport system is
used, two possibilities for the further destination of the vesicles
arise. First, the vesicles are uncoated in the space between the second
and third membrane, leading to free proteins within the periplastidal
space. Second, the vesicles fuse with the third membrane, and plastid
proteins will be transported by this process into the space between the
third and fourth membrane.
Another possibility is that translocation across the second
membrane occurs as the result of a specific, protein-based mechanism. In this case membrane proteins used for protein transport across the
cytoplasmic membrane of the eukaryotic symbiont could have evolved to
an import system, or components of the translocon machinery of the
plastid envelope were relocated into the second membrane, a process
mentioned recently (26). Our findings demonstrate that the N-terminal
signal sequence is used for a co-translational translocation across the
outermost membrane. Therefore, if the signal sequence is cleaved by
crossing the outermost membrane, the only known topogenic signal that
is left in the preprotein is the transit peptide.
In cryptomonads the outermost membrane is continuous with the ER. Thus,
a mixture of proteins for the exocytose pathway and for a plastid
destination must be postulated for the space between the first and
second membrane. If so, a specific sorting mechanism needs to exist to
discriminate between the proteins requiring different subcellular
localization. Pores for nonspecific protein transport as suggested for
the complex plastids of diatoms (7) would be insufficient in the case
of cryptophytes. Unlikely also is that sorting of proteins occurs at
the level of signal recognition particle/signal sequence interaction,
as proposed (8).
As mentioned above, there is no evidence that beside the signal
sequence and the transit peptide another topogenic signal for protein
translocation exists in nuclear-encoded proteins for a plastid
destination. Therefore, if the signal sequence is cleaved off after
passing the first membrane, which is in agreement with our results, the
transit peptide is the best signal for discrimination between plastid
proteins and proteins for the exocytose pathway. Than nuclear-encoded
plastid proteins can be detected by a Tic/Toc similar mechanism in the
second membrane and transported through the periplastidal space
directly or by a vesicle-mediated mechanism. As our homologous plastid
import system is inefficient for nuclear proteins, vesicle fusion with
the third membrane or transport across the plastid envelope by an other
translocon or with the help of further factors is likely.
Taken together, our findings demonstrate by the use of Brefeldin A that
the outermost membrane of cryptomonad complex plastids is an ER-like
membrane. Nuclear-encoded plastid proteins that contain a bipartite
N-terminal topogenic signal were transported across the first membrane
co-translationally and, as shown in vitro with microsomes,
processed. In heterologous pea plastids nuclear-encoded proteins
lacking the signal sequence as well as nucleomorph-encoded plastid
proteins were imported and processed, whereas in homologous plastids
from cryptomonads only the nucleomorph-encoded plastid protein is
imported. Thus, a different import mechanism is possible for the two
types of non-organellar encoded proteins, most likely caused by protein
sorting mechanisms in the ER-like lumen between the first and the
second plastid membrane.
We thank M. Johannsen for technical support,
Dr. P. J. Lockhart for critically reading and comments on the
manuscript, and Dr. J. von Lintig (Freiburg) for introducing the pea system.
*
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003125200
2
J. Wastl and U.-G. Maier, unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
gapC1, gene for the chloroplast
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatase;
GapDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatase;
PAGE, denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Transport of Proteins into Cryptomonads Complex Plastids*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Scheme of a cryptomonad cell. The
different membranes of a cryptomonad cell are indicated. The membranes
of the complex plastid are numbered 1-4. Membrane 3 and 4 represent the plastid envelope. Nu, nucleus; Nm,
nucleomorph.
-subunit of the plastid ATPase from
Odontella sinensis led to import into the stroma of these
heterologous chloroplasts. Today transformation techniques are
established for the use of protein import studies in diatoms and
apicomplexa (5, 13).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
Brefeldin A (solubilized in methanol) or only with methanol as a
control. After 4 h, the cryptomonad cells were fixed and embedded
in Epon 812 according to instructions from the manufacturer.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit of the chloroplast ATPase from the diatom O. sinensis, see Ref. 7). As part of the present work we also report
the heterologous transport for the first nuclear-encoded protein
(GapDH, see Ref. 15) from the cryptophyte G. theta using two
preproteins. These are the complete GapDH precursor, which has an
intact bipartite transit peptide, and a modified precursor GapDH, which
has had the signal sequence deleted. In order to test if the putative N-terminal signal peptide of nuclear-encoded chloroplastic GapDH from
G. theta (15) is sufficient for co-translational import in
an ER-like mechanism, we translated in vitro the GapDH gene in the presence of canine microsomes. Analysis of these products by
SDS-PAGE showed two bands with an apparent molecular mass of 43 and 40 kDa (Fig. 2). The upper band disappeared
when thermolysin was added to the reaction, whereas the lower band was
protease-resistant. In the presence of Triton X-100 and thermolysin the
upper and lower bands disappeared, leading to the conclusion that the
lower band is the processed microsome import product and that the
N-terminal few amino acids of the GapDH protein are a signal
peptide.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Co-translational import of GapDH in canine
microsomes. Autoradiography of SDS-12% PAGE is shown. Lane
1 shows the in vitro transcription/translation products
of full-length gapC1 (fl GapDH) and a
processed form (pro GapDH) in the presence of 6 units of
microsomal membranes. 5 µl of a 25-µl reaction mix was used for gel
electrophoretic analysis. Lane 2 represents the protein
pattern after thermolysin treatment (0.1% (w/v) for 10 min at 4 °C)
indicating the lower band protected against proteolytic digestion. The
difference of the molecular masses of full-length GapDH (43 kDa) and
processed GapDH (40 kDa) represents the signal sequence. Lane
3 shows the identical conditions as in lane 2 with
additional Triton treatment (0.2% final concentration) prior to
thermolysin digestion.

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of Brefeldin A on cryptomonad
cells. Cells were incubated with Brefeldin A according to
"Experimental Procedures." A, cells were treated with
methanol as a control. B, the effect of Brefeldin A
(solubilized in methanol). C, dilation of the space between
the first and second membrane is indicated by arrows. The
bars in A and B represent 0.5 µm.
C represents 1 µm.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Heterologous import of nucleus-encoded but
signal sequence-truncated GapDH into pea chloroplasts.
Autoradiography of SDS-15% PAGE is shown. Lane 1 corresponds to the import reaction of the
[35S]methionine-labeled precursor protein of
nucleus-encoded but N-terminally deleted GapDH (indicated by
pGapDH) with pea chloroplasts. Lane 2 represents
the protein pattern of pea chloroplasts after identical import
procedure with additional thermolysin treatment (see "Experimental
Procedures") revealed protease-insensitive proteins (representing the
mature protein, mGapDH) detected by autoradiography. Lane 3 shows the same procedure according to lane 2 with additional
Triton X-100 treatment prior to external protein digestion.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Isolation of G. theta
plastids. Plastids were isolated according to
"Experimental Procedures." A, Percoll density gradient
after cell disruption and differential centrifugation. Intact G. theta plastids (red) remain at the border between the
lower 50% and the upper 30% Percoll cushion. B, light
microscopic view of isolated G. theta plastids.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Homologous import of nucleomorph-encoded
rubredoxin into transport-competent G. theta
plastids. Autoradiography of SDS-17.5% PAGE is shown.
Lane 1 shows the full-length translation product of
nucleomorph-encoded rubredoxin (indicated by pRub). In
lane 2 translation mix was incubated with G. theta plastids as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Thermolysin treatment after import procedure yielded a protease
digestion protected protein corresponding to mature rubredoxin
(mRub). Lane 4 shows the result of Triton X-100
treatment of the import mixture prior thermolysin digestion.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-6421-2821543;
Fax: 49-6421-2822057; E-mail: maier@mailer.uni-marburg. de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
May, T.,
and Soll, J.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
452,
52-56
2.
Chardin, P.,
and McCormick, F.
(1999)
Cell
97,
153-155
3.
Delwiche, C. F.,
and Palmer, J. D.
(1997)
Plant Syst. Evol.
11 (suppl.),
53-863
4.
Gilson, P. R.,
Maier, U.-G.,
and McFadden, G. I.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7,
800-806
5.
McFadden, G. I.,
Gilson, P. R.,
Douglas, S. E.,
Cavalier-Smith, T.,
Hofmann, C. J. B.,
and Maier, U.-G.
(1997)
Trends Genet.
13,
46-49
6.
Jakowitsch, J.,
Neumann-Spallart, C.,
Ma, Y.,
Steiner, J.,
Schenk, H. E.,
Bohnert, H. J.,
and Löffelhardt, W.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
381,
153-155
7.
Lang, M.,
Apt, K. E.,
and Kroth, P. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30973-30978
8.
Schwartzbach, S. D.,
Osafune, T.,
and Löffelhardt, W.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
38,
247-263
9.
Sulli, C.,
and Schwartzbach, S. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13084-13090
10.
Sulli, C.,
and Schwartzbach, S. D.
(1996)
Plant Cell
8,
43-53
11.
Wittpoth, C.,
Kroth, P. G.,
Weyrauch, K.,
Kowallik, K. V.,
and Strotmann, H.
(1998)
Planta
206,
79-85
12.
Bhaya, D.,
and Grossman, A.
(1991)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
229,
400-404
13.
Apt, K. E.,
Kroth-Panic, P.,
and Grossman, A. R.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
252,
572-579
14.
Müller, S. B.,
Rensing, S. A.,
Martin, W. F.,
and Maier, U.-G.
(1994)
Curr. Genet.
26,
410-414
15.
Liaud, M. F.,
Brandt, U.,
Scherzinger, M.,
and Cerff, R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Evol.
44 Suppl. 1,
28-37
16.
Bonk, M.,
Hoffmann, B.,
Von Lintig, J.,
Schledz, M.,
Al-Babili, S.,
Hobeika, E.,
Kleinig, H.,
and Beyer, P.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
247,
942-950
17.
Ortiz, W.,
Reardon, E. M.,
and Price, C. A.
(1980)
Plant Physiol.
66,
291-294
18.
Waller, R. F.,
Keeling, P. J.,
Donald, R. G.,
Striepen, B.,
Handman, E.,
Lang-Unnasch, N.,
Cowman, A. F.,
Besra, G. S.,
Roos, D. S.,
and McFadden, G. I.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12352-12357
19.
Gibbs, S. P.
(1981)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
361,
193-208
20.
Zauner, S.,
Fraunholz, M.,
Wastl, J.,
Penny, S.,
Beaton, M.,
Cavalier-Smith, T.,
Maier, U.-G.,
and Douglas, S.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
200-205
21.
Fraunholz, M. J.,
Mörschel, E.,
and Maier, U.-G.
(1998)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
260,
207-211
22.
Wastl, J.,
Fraunholz, M.,
Zauner, S.,
Douglas, S.,
and Maier, U.-G.
(1999)
J. Mol. Evol.
48,
112-117
23.
Wastl, J.,
Sticht, H.,
Maier, U.-G.,
Rösch, P.,
and Hoffmann, S.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
471,
191-196
24.
Soll, J.,
and Tien, R.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
38,
191-207
25.
Gibbs, S. P.
(1979)
J. Cell Sci.
35,
253-266
26.
Cavalier-Smith, T.
(1999)
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
46,
347-366
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. H. Gile and P. J. Keeling Nucleus-Encoded Periplastid-Targeted EFL in Chlorarachniophytes Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1967 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Gould, E. Fan, F. Hempel, U.-G. Maier, and R. B. Klosgen Translocation of a Phycoerythrin {alpha} Subunit across Five Biological Membranes J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 30295 - 30302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Sommer, S. B. Gould, P. Lehmann, A. Gruber, J. M. Przyborski, and U.-G. Maier Der1-mediated Preprotein Import into the Periplastid Compartment of Chromalveolates? Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 918 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Durnford and M. W. Gray Analysis of Euglena gracilis Plastid-Targeted Proteins Reveals Different Classes of Transit Sequences Eukaryot. Cell, December 1, 2006; 5(12): 2079 - 2091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Gould, M. S. Sommer, P. G. Kroth, G. H. Gile, P. J. Keeling, and U.-G. Maier Nucleus-to-Nucleus Gene Transfer and Protein Retargeting into a Remnant Cytoplasm of Cryptophytes and Diatoms Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2413 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Haferkamp, P. Deschamps, M. Ast, W. Jeblick, U. Maier, S. Ball, and H. E. Neuhaus Molecular and Biochemical Analysis of Periplastidial Starch Metabolism in the Cryptophyte Guillardia theta Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2006; 5(6): 964 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Slavikova, R. Vacula, Z. Fang, T. Ehara, T. Osafune, and S. D. Schwartzbach Homologous and heterologous reconstitution of Golgi to chloroplast transport and protein import into the complex chloroplasts of Euglena J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2005; 118(8): 1651 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Ralph, B. J. Foth, N. Hall, and G. I. McFadden Evolutionary Pressures on Apicoplast Transit Peptides Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2183 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nassoury, M. Cappadocia, and D. Morse Plastid ultrastructure defines the protein import pathway in dinoflagellates J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2003; 116(14): 2867 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Dewel, M. U. Connell, and W. C. Dewel Bridging Morphological Transitions to the Metazoa Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 28 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Apt, L. Zaslavkaia, J. C. Lippmeier, M. Lang, O. Kilian, R. Wetherbee, A. R. Grossman, and P. G. Kroth In vivo characterization of diatom multipartite plastid targeting signals J. Cell Sci., January 11, 2002; 115(21): 4061 - 4069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Stibitz, P. J. Keeling, and D. Bhattacharya Symbiotic Origin of a Novel Actin Gene in the Cryptophyte Pyrenomonas helgolandii Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2000; 17(11): 1731 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wastl, E. C. Duin, L. Iuzzolino, W. Dorner, T. Link, S. Hoffmann, H. Sticht, H. Dau, K. Lingelbach, and U.-G. Maier Eukaryotically Encoded and Chloroplast-located Rubredoxin Is Associated with Photosystem II J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2000; 275(39): 30058 - 30063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |