![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 23240-23246, July 28, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development and
the BioProcess Technology Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55108
Received for publication, November 17, 1999, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
The lactose permease is an integral membrane
protein that cotransports H+ and lactose into the
bacterial cytoplasm. Previous work has shown that bulky substitutions
at glycine 64, which is found on the cytoplasmic edge of transmembrane
segment 2 (TMS-2), cause a substantial decrease in the maximal velocity
of lactose uptake without significantly affecting the
Km values (Jessen-Marshall, A. E., Parker, N. J., and Brooker, R. J. (1997) J. Bacteriol.
179, 2616-2622). In the current study, mutagenesis was conducted along
the face of TMS-2 that contains glycine-64. Single amino acid
substitutions that substantially changed side-chain volume at codons
52, 57, 59, 63, and 66 had little or no effect on transport activity, whereas substitutions at codons 49, 53, 56, and 60 were markedly defective and/or had lower levels of expression. According to helical
wheel plots, Phe-49, Ser-53, Ser-56, Gln-60, and Gly-64 form a
continuous stripe along one face of TMS-2. Several of the TMS-2 mutants
(S56Y, S56L, S56Q, Q60A, and Q60V) were used as parental strains to
isolate mutants that restore transport activity. These mutations were
either first-site mutations or second-site suppressors in TMS-1, TMS-2,
TMS-7 or TMS-11. A kinetic analysis showed that the suppressors had a
higher rate of lactose transport compared with the corresponding
parental strains. Overall, the results of this study are consistent
with the notion that a face on TMS-2, containing Phe-49, Ser-53,
Ser-56, Gln-60, and Gly-64, plays a critical role in conformational
changes associated with lactose transport. We hypothesize that TMS-2
slides across TMS-7 and TMS-11 when the lactose permease interconverts
between the C1 and C2 conformations. This idea is discussed within the
context of a revised model for the structure of the lactose permease.
The lactose permease is found within the cytoplasmic membrane of
Escherichia coli and cotransports lactose and H+
into the bacterial cytoplasm with a stoichiometry of 1:1 (1, 2). The
inwardly directed H+ electrochemical gradient provides the
driving force for the active accumulation of lactose (3, 4). The gene
encoding the lactose permease, lacY, has been cloned on
multicopy vectors and sequenced, revealing an open reading frame
encoding a protein of 417 amino acid residues (5, 6). Several
topological studies are consistent with a secondary structural model in
which the lactose permease contains 12 transmembrane segments in an
The lactose permease is a member of a large superfamily of transporters
called the major facilitator superfamily
(MFS)1 (10-13). This
superfamily includes symporters, antiporters, and uniporters.
Structurally, most members of the MFS are predicted to contain 12 membrane-spanning segments by hydropathicity analysis (14). In the
lactose permease, this topological arrangement has been confirmed by
gene fusions with alkaline phosphatase and Several previous studies have centered on the role of transmembrane
segment 2 (TMS-2) and the connecting loop 2/3 motif in the structure
and function of the lactose permease (21-23). Cysteine scanning
mutagenesis of TMS-2 showed that most residues in TMS-2 tolerated
cysteine replacements reasonably well (i.e. greater than
25% activity), except at Gly-64 (23). However, when lactose permease
strains harboring single cysteine mutations along TMS-2 were reacted
with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), single cysteine
substitutions at positions 49, 53, 56, and 65 were strongly inhibited
(i.e. less than 25% activity) (23). The NEM-inhibited
strains were not subjected to a kinetic analysis, so it is not known if
NEM modification blocks sugar binding and/or prevents conformational changes associated with lactose transport. While investigating the role
of the conserved loop 2/3 motif, our laboratory found that several
different mutations at Gly-64 were very inhibitory for the velocity of
lactose transport without affecting the affinity for lactose. In
secondary models of the lactose permease, Gly-64 is predicted to lie
along the cytoplasmic edge of TMS-2. This observation is consistent
with the idea that a face on TMS-2 is important for conformational
changes, which alternate the H+ and lactose binding sites
from a periplasmically accessible conformation to a cytoplasmically
accessible conformation. In the current study, mutagenesis was
conducted along the face of TMS-2 that contains glycine 64 to see if
such mutations have an effect on lactose transport.
Reagents--
Lactose
(O- Bacterial Strains and Methods--
The relevant genotypes of the
bacterial strains and plasmids are described below in Table I. Plasmid
DNA was purified using the PERFECT-prep Plasmid DNA kit obtained from 5 Prime In Vitro Galactoside Transport--
Cells were grown at 37 °C
with shaking to mid-log phase in YT media supplemented with 5 µg/ml
tetracycline and 0.25 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- Calculations--
The Km and
Vmax values for lactose transport were
determined by plotting [S]/v versus [S], which is
a Hanes-Woolf plot (25). Straight lines were observed in all cases. The
slope is 1/Vmax and the y intercept
is Km/Vmax.
Membrane Isolation and Western Blot Analysis--
10 ml of
mid-log cells grown as for transport assays were harvested by
centrifugation (5000 × g, 10 min). The pellet was
quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and resuspended in 800 µl of MTPBS
(150 mM NaCl, 16 mM
Na2HPO4, 4 mM
NaH2PO4) plus phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
(0.1 mg/ml) and pepstatin A (1 µg/ml). The suspension was quickly
frozen two more times in liquid nitrogen. The cell suspension was then
sonicated three times for 20 s each. Triton X-100 was added to a
final concentration of 1%, and the membrane fraction was harvested by
centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of MTPBS and
subjected to a modified Lowry protein assay (Sigma). A sample of 100 µg of protein was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
using a 12% acrylamide gel. The proteins were electroblotted to
nitrocellulose, and Western blot analysis was performed according to
Sambrook et al. (26). The primary polyclonal antibody
recognizes the lactose permease C-terminal 10 amino acids. The
secondary antibody, goat-anti-rabbit, conjugated to alkaline phosphatase, was purchased from Sigma. The Western blot was developed using the nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate colorimetric reaction. The Western blot was then scanned using a
Molecular Dynamics laser densitometer and analyzed by comparison to
wild-type values for the same preparation and Western blot. As shown
below in Table I, the values are reported as a percentage of wild-type
for three separate preparations.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Site-directed mutagenesis was
performed using mutagenic polymerase chain reaction primers, which
spanned an AvaI site located at codons 70 and 71 within the
lacY gene. A mutagenic primer was used with a second primer,
which spanned a SacII site within the vector to generate a
1.6-kilobase pair fragment. This fragment was ligated to pGEM-T vector,
and clones containing the polymerase chain reaction-generated fragment
were identified as white colonies on plates containing
isopropyl-1-thio- DNA Sequencing--
Mutations were confirmed by sequencing the
appropriate regions of the lactose permease. Sequencing was performed
on double stranded plasmid according to Kraft, et al.
(27).
Mutagenesis of TMS-2--
As already mentioned, previous work has
shown that position 64 along TMS-2 appears to be important for
conformational changes associated with H+/lactose
cotransport. Although an alanine substitution was tolerated at
codon-64, all other substitutions resulted in transport activities that
were less than 4% of wild-type levels (21). In the current study, we
have positioned 23 site-directed mutants at locations that are
found on the side of TMS-2, which includes Gly-64. Fig. 1 presents a helical wheel plot of TMS-2.
Our rationale for making substitutions along TMS-2 is that Gly-64 may
be contained within a face of TMS-2 that is important for
conformational changes, and that alterations in side-chain volume along
such a face may disrupt the ability of the lactose permease to make
these conformational changes. To test this hypothesis, the following
single substitutions have been made: Phe-49
Table I shows the expression levels of
the strains containing the wild-type or mutant permeases. As seen here,
the majority of mutants are expressed at levels that are moderate or
similar to the wild-type strain. However, one position 56 mutation
(S56Q) and three position 60 mutations (Q60A, Q60L, and Q60V) had low but detectable levels of permease in the membrane.
Sugar transport in Wild-type and Mutant Strains--
To initially
explore the transport characteristics of the parental and mutant
strains, their phenotype on MacConkey plates was used as a crude
measure of transport activity. In general, to exhibit a white or pink
phenotype on MacConkey plates, a mutation must render the lactose
permease very defective (i.e. less than 10% activity).
Strains with 10% or more activity usually form red colonies on sugar
MacConkey plates. As shown in Table II, most of the mutant strains were able to transport lactose (a
To obtain a quantitative description of the transport process, in
vitro transport experiments were conducted. Table
III (middle column) shows the results of
a "downhill" lactose transport assay that was carried out on the
wild-type and mutant strains. To conduct this experiment, plasmids
containing the wild-type or mutant lacY genes were
transformed into a lacZ+ Escherichia
coli strain, HS4006/F'Z+Y
As seen in Table III, mutations at codons 66, 59, 52, 63, and 57 had
negligible effects on downhill lactose transport. However, certain
substitutions at codons 56, 49, 60, and 53 resulted in substantial
decreases in lactose transport. In the case of the S56Q mutation, the
lower level of transport could be due to a lower level of expression
(refer back to Table I). However, the S56Y strain had a moderate level
of permease in the membrane, and the S56L strain had a normal level of
permease, but both of these strains were very defective at downhill
transport. With regard to the codon-60 mutations, low levels of
transport tended to correlate with low levels of expression, except
that the Q60V mutation had higher levels of transport than expected. As
described in other studies, some mutations cause the lactose permease
to be unstable so that the protein is degraded during the membrane isolation procedure required for the Western analysis, even though the
transport activity in whole cells is relatively high (29).
Taken together, the results of Tables I-III indicate that mutations at
codons 56, 49, 60, and 53 often have a detrimental effect on lactose
transport and/or protein expression and stability. These four sites are
found adjacent to each other in a helical wheel plot of TMS-2 (see Fig.
1). Furthermore, they are found adjacent to Gly-64, which was shown in
previous studies to be important for lactose transport (21).
Similar results were also obtained in uphill transport assays. In the
experiment of Table III (right column), the active accumulation of
[14C]lactose was measured in wild-type and mutant
strains. Again, mutations at codons 66, 59, 52, 63, and 57 usually had
substantial accumulation; the most defective in this region was the
I52W substitution, which showed approximately 30% accumulation levels.
By comparison, substitutions at codons 56, 49, 60, and 53 were
generally defective in uphill accumulation, and some mutants were very
defective (i.e. S56Y, S56L, S56Q, and Q60A). Overall, the
results of Tables I-III, along with previous studies at position 64, suggest that a stripe of TMS-2, including Ser-56, Phe-49, Gln-60,
Ser-53, and Gly-64, is critical for lactose permease function and stability.
To determine if the mutations at codons 56, 49, 60, and 53 exert their
effects by inhibiting sugar binding and/or inhibiting the velocity for
lactose transport, a kinetic analysis was conducted in which the
Km and Vmax values for
transport were measured in the wild-type and a few selected mutant
strains. As shown in Table IV, the
mutations at these codons primarily affected the velocity of lactose
transport rather than the affinity of the sugar as judged by the
apparent Km. The wild-type strain exhibited an
apparent Km for lactose of 1.0 mM with a Vmax of 399.5 nmol of lactose/min/mg of
protein. The F49A, S53F, S56L, Q60A, and Q60V strains showed
Km values of 1.6, 1.1, 0.5, 1.1, and 0.4 mM, respectively, and Vmax values of
95.9, 29.8, 1.7, 51.6, and 104.9 nmol lactose/min/mg of protein,
respectively. Although some small variation is seen in the
Km values, these data indicate that the primary
defect in lactose transport seen in the mutant strains is not due to an
inability to bind lactose. Rather, the data show that the main effect
is to diminish the rate of lactose transport. At the level of protein
structure, this may be due to an inability of the mutant permease to
make conformational changes that are necessary for lactose to gain access to either side of the membrane and/or a decrease in expression level.
Suppressor Analysis--
To further explore the effects of
mutations in TMS-2, several strains were chosen as parental strains for
the isolation of second-site suppressors. The parent mutations chosen
were S56Y, S56L, S56Q, Q60A, and Q60V. All of these mutations produce a
white or pink colony phenotype on melibiose MacConkey plates when the mutant plasmids are transformed into E. coli strain T184. It
should be pointed out, however, that three different causes can
underlie a white or pink phenotype on MacConkey plates. First, strains that are highly defective in downhill sugar transport will exhibit a
white or pink phenotype due to an inability to take up the sugar. Similarly, mutations that result in low levels of permease expression will have a white or pink phenotype. Finally, a third reason is related
to gene induction. Melibiose is not a very good inducer of the
lac operon. Mutations in the lactose permease that prevent the uphill accumulation of sugar may exhibit a pink phenotype due to
poor levels of induction, even though the downhill transport rate of
the sugar is moderate. The Q60V mutation appears to be pink for this
reason. As shown earlier, this mutation has a moderate rate of downhill
transport, but is unable to accumulate sugar against a concentration gradient.
When the S56Y, S56L, S56Q, Q60A, and Q60V strains were streaked on
melibiose MacConkey plates, spontaneous mutations that restore sugar
transport activity were identified as red flecks. This red phenotype
could be due to an increase in the transport rate, an increase in
protein expression, and/or a recovery in the ability to accumulate
sugar against a concentration gradient. These suppressors were
restreaked and subjected to DNA sequencing. As shown in Table
V, three strains, Y56C, L56P, and Q56P,
were the result of mutations involving a codon change at the original site. Codon 56 was changed to a cysteine or a proline to restore transport activity. In addition to the wild-type codon (Ser-56), these
results indicate that a cysteine or proline are reasonably well
tolerated at position 56. In addition, several strains were intragenic
suppressors in which a second mutation in the lacY gene was
able to restore transport activity. Remarkably, four of these
second-site suppressors (S53F, S56L, Q60P, and Q60L) involved
substitutions along the same face of TMS-2 (which includes Ser-56,
Phe-49, Gln-60, and Ser-53, see Fig. 1) that was shown in the
experiments of Tables I-III to be important for lactose transport and/or expression. The observation that second-site suppressors were
also found in this region lends further support to the notion that this
face is critical for conformational changes associated with lactose
transport, and also important for protein stability.
Finally, four second-site suppressors, Y26H, V229A, V229G, and Q359L,
were found outside of TMS-2. These suppressors could exert their
effects in one of two ways. One possibility is that the suppressor
could alter the tertiary structure in a way that affects the topology
of TMS-2. Alternatively, the suppressor could affect the topology of a
helix that interacts with TMS-2 during the process of making a
conformational change. As described later under "Discussion," we
hypothesize that the conformational change involving the
interconversion of the lactose permease from an outwardly accessible
conformation (i.e. the C1 conformation) to an inwardly
accessible conformation (i.e. the C2 conformation) may
involve a change in the positioning of TMS-2 relative to TMS-7 and
TMS-11. If so, the V229A, V229G, and Q359L mutations may exert their
effects by altering the topologies of TMS-7 and TMS-11 in a way that
compensates for the change in TMS-2 caused by the first-site mutation.
In contrast, because codon-26 is in the first half of the permease, it
seems more likely that the Y26H mutation alters the tertiary structure
in a way that restores the topology of TMS-2.
Table VI shows the results of downhill
and uphill lactose transport assays that were carried out on the
wild-type, revertant, and second-site suppressor strains. Compared with
the parental strains (S56Y, S56L, Q60A, and Q60V, refer back to Table
IV), the revertants and second-site suppressors had substantially
improved levels of transport. The first-site revertants, Y56C and L56P, had fairly high levels of transport, which were similar to the wild-type strain. The second-site suppressors were more variable in
their ability to restore lactose transport.
Previously, in the experiments of Table IV, it was shown that
first-site mutations in TMS-2 primarily affect the velocity for lactose
transport. To determine if the second-site suppressors exert their
effects by restoring the velocity for lactose transport, a kinetic
analysis was conducted in which the Km and Vmax values for transport were measured in the
wild-type and a few second-site suppressor strains (see Table
VII). Compared with the parental strains
(refer back to Table IV), the double mutant strains containing the
second-site suppressor mutations had a significantly improved
Vmax value. The S56L parent had a
Vmax value of 1.7 nmol/min/mg of protein,
whereas the S56L/Q60L and S56L/V229G strains had
Vmax values of 30.7 and 75.2 nmol/min/mg of
protein, respectively. Similarly, the Q60A parent had a
Vmax value of 51.6 nmol/min/mg of protein,
whereas the Q60A/S53Y, Q60A/S56L, and Q60A/Q359L strains had
substantially improved Vmax values of 236.2, 167.8, and 447.2 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively. And finally, the
Q60V parent had a Vmax value of 104.9 nmol/min/mg of protein, whereas the Q60V/Y26H and Q60V/S53F strains had
Vmax values of 137.8 and 639.7 nmol/min/mg of
protein, respectively. It is interesting to note that the S53F mutation
alone had a Vmax value of 29.8 nmol
lactose/min/mg of protein, which was also significantly below the
wild-type value (see Table IV). However, when the Q60V and S53F
mutations are coupled in the same protein, the
Vmax value is actually higher than the wild-type
value. Taken together, these data indicate that the defect in lactose
transport velocity seen in the parental strains is partially or
completely restored by the second-site mutation.
The results of the current study have identified a critical face
on TMS-2 in the lactose permease that includes Ser-56, Phe-49, Gln-60,
and Ser-53 (in the clockwise direction shown in Fig. 1). Mutations at
these sites, which involve significant changes in side-chain volume,
have detrimental effects on transport velocity, protein expression,
and/or the uphill accumulation of sugar. Furthermore, several
suppressor mutations involved changes in TMS-2, consistent with the
notion that the topology of TMS-2 is critical for lactose permease
function. In contrast, cysteine substitutions at these four sites were
not highly inhibitory, and we found that S56T, Q60N, and Q60V
substitutions were also not very inhibitory. The results of the current
study and the cysteine-scanning mutagenesis study indicate that
substantial changes in side-chain volume are usually required at these
sites to have a major impact on permease structure and function. Other
studies have also shown that Gly-64 is important for protein
conformational changes associated with lactose transport (21-23). At
this site, an alanine substitution was tolerated, but any residue
larger than alanine was very inhibitory. Taken together, the results of
the current study and other studies indicate that a face of TMS-2 is
indispensable for the function and stability of the lactose permease
(21-23).
To understand how this face of TMS-2 plays an important role in
permease function, it is necessary to consider its location within the
tertiary structure of the protein. Several tertiary models for the
lactose permease have been proposed (14, 30-32). Fig.
2 shows our revised model for the
tertiary structure of the lactose permease. This arrangement of helices
is only slightly different from our previous model that was proposed in
1995 (14). In our newer model, TMS-2 is shifted more toward TMS-7. In
addition, TMS-1 and TMS-7 are shifted more toward the channel opening,
whereas TMS-4 and TMS-10 are shifted slightly away from the channel
opening. However, the basic arrangement of transmembrane segments is
identical to our previous model. Our model still hypothesizes that the
two halves of the lactose permease are folded in a similar manner, and
interact with each other at a rotationally symmetrical interface.
Our model shown in Fig. 2 is not based on the results of the current
study, but instead, is derived from bioinformatic considerations (see
Ref. 14), ion pair data (shown with red bars (9, 33-40)), and cross-linking studies using bifunctional reagents (shown with black lines (30-32, 39-44)). Based on our model, it
appears that cross-linking studies often times involve cross-links
across the putative hydrophilic channel region. In other words, the
bifunctional cross-linkers covalently connect residues that are found
on transmembrane faces that project into the passageway for the
transport of H+ and lactose. This observation is also
consistent with the relative sizes of the bifunctional reagents and the
size of lactose. In the cross-linking studies, the bifunctional
reagents are in the size range of 6-16 Å. Similarly, the size of the
lactose, in its most stable form (i.e. the extended chair
conformation), is approximately 9 Å long. Many studies have indicated
that the lactose binding site is located on transmembrane segments
(45-47), although it is not known if the lactose binding site is
vertical or horizontal with regard to the plane of the lipid bilayer.
We hypothesize that an opening of 6-16 Å should accommodate the entry
of lactose into its binding site. If so, cross-linkers of the 6-16 Å size range would be able to span the binding pocket and cross-link residues on transmembrane segments that are facing the channel lumen.
Such cross-links would not necessarily have to involve residues that
are on transmembrane segments that are physically adjacent to one
another in the tertiary structure.
The model shown in Fig. 2 has the face of TMS-2 that is important for
conformational changes (i.e. the face containing Ser-56, Phe-49, Gln-60, Ser-53, and Gly-64) projecting toward TMS-11 and TMS-7.
Studies using bifunctional cross-linking reagents have shown
interactions between these transmembrane segments (30, 42). The
cytoplasmic side of TMS-2 cross-links with the cytoplasmic side of
TMS-11, whereas the periplasmic side of TMS-2 cross-links with the
periplasmic side of TMS-7 (30). These results suggest that TMS-2 lies
obliquely across TMS-7 and TMS-11. These cross-linking results were
obtained in the absence of sugar, and would likely cause the
cross-linking of the most stable conformation of the unloaded permease.
It was also shown that the addition of the lactose analogue,
thiodigalactoside, altered the efficiency of cross-linking, indicating
that this region of the permease undergoes a sugar-induced rigid body
movement (30). Because most of the residues along TMS-2, TMS-7, and
TMS-11 are not thought to be near the sugar binding site, an
interpretation of these data is that thiodigalactoside induces a
conformational change that alters the relative arrangements of TMS-2,
TMS-7, and TMS-11, and thereby has an effect on cross-linking. However,
the cross-linking results cannot determine if any particular faces
along these transmembrane segments are critical for such conformational changes.
A putative conformational change involving TMS-2 and TMS-11 (and
perhaps TMS-7) is consistent with our previous proposal that the
interconversion between the C1 and C2 conformations involves a motion
at the interface between the two halves of the permease. We previously
suggested that this motion would involve a change in TMS-2 relative to
TMS-11, and TMS-8 relative to TMS-5, on the other side of the permease
(see Ref. 20). Based on the cross-linking data described in Reference
41, as well as our own suppressor analyses, the newer evidence suggests
that the interconversion may involve a scissoring motion of TMS-2
relative to both TMS-7 and TMS-11, and TMS-8 relative to both TMS-1 and
TMS-5. For example, in the C1 conformation, TMS-2 may be relatively
parallel to TMS-11 while in the C2 conformation, TMS-2 would lie
obliquely across TMS-7 and TMS-11. On the other side of the permease,
the C1 conformation would depict TMS-8 lying parallel to TMS-5, whereas
the C2 conformation would result in TMS-8 moving to an oblique
arrangement across TMS-1 and TMS-5. According to such a model, lactose
could enter its binding site from the periplasm in the C1 conformation,
but be prevented from entry into the cytoplasm by the presence of the
large hydrophilic loop 6/7 (see Fig. 3).
In the C2 conformation, the scissoring motion across the interface
between the two halves of the protein would close the passageway from
the periplasm and shift the position of loop 6/7 so that lactose could
enter the cytoplasm.
We thank Dr. Thomas H. Wilson for providing
us with the antibody used in the experiment of Table I, and Elizabeth
Matzke for her assistance with the protein expression experiments.
*
This work was supported by Grant GM53259 from the National
Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909202199
The abbreviations used are:
MFS, major
facilitator superfamily;
TMS-2, transmembrane segment 2;
NEM, N-ethylmaleimide.
A Revised Model for the Structure and Function of the Lactose
Permease
EVIDENCE THAT A FACE ON TRANSMEMBRANE SEGMENT 2 IS IMPORTANT FOR
CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helical conformation (7-9).
-galactosidase (8,
15). The N- and C-terminal segments are cytoplasmic as shown by
antibody binding studies (16-18). The general homology of the two
halves of the proteins are evidence for an early evolutionary gene
duplication, which led to the current superfamily of proteins (19).
Analysis of the MFS for hydrophobicity, amphipathicity, loop length,
and potential salt bridges between helices of the lactose permease
provided enough information for us to propose a tertiary structure
model (14). This model depicts identical folding patterns for each half
of the lactose permease, and other MFS members. The two halves are
proposed to interact in a rotationally symmetrical manner. We later
hypothesized that the two halves of the permease move relative to each
other to facilitate H+/lactose cotransport (20).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranosyl-(1,4)-
-D-glucopyranose)
and melibiose
(O-
-D-galactopyranosyl-(1,6)-
-D-glucopyranose)
were purchased from Sigma. [14C]Lactose and Sequenase
(version 2.0) were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Restriction enzymes and ligase were purchased from New England BioLabs,
Inc. (Beverly, MA). All remaining reagents were of analytical grade.
3 Prime, Inc., Boulder, CO. Restriction digests and ligations
were performed according to the manufacturers' recommendations. Cell
cultures were grown in YT media (24) supplemented with tetracycline
(0.01 mg/ml).
-D-galactopyranoside. The cells were
pelleted by centrifugation at 5000 × g for 5 min, and
the resulting pellet was washed in phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing
60 mM K2HPO4 and 40 mM
KH2PO4 then resuspended in the same buffer at a
concentration of about 0.5 mg of protein/ml. The cells were
equilibrated at 30 °C for 5-10 min before
[14C]lactose (2.5 µCi/ml) was added to a final
concentration of 0.1 mM. Aliquots of 200 µl were removed
at the appropriate time points, and the cells were captured on
0.45-µm Metricel membranes (Gelman Sciences, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI).
The cells were then washed with 5-10 ml of ice-cold phosphate buffer
by rapid filtration. The filter with the cells was then placed in
liquid scintillation fluid and counted using a Beckman LS1801 liquid
scintillation counter. Uphill and downhill transport assays were
similar except that a lacZ minus strain was used in the
uphill assays.
-D-galactopyranoside and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside. The
insert was removed from the T-vector by digestion with AvaI
and SacII, purified on an agarose gel, and then ligated into
a vector carrying the wild-type lacY gene in which the
1.6-kilobase pair fragment had been removed. The ligated DNA was then
transformed into E. coli strain T184. DNA from colonies was
isolated, and the mutation was verified by double stranded DNA
sequencing. At least two independent clones were kept for further study.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(Ala/Trp); Ile-52
(Ala/Trp); Ser-53
(Thr/Leu/Phe); Ser-56
(Thr/Tyr/Leu/Glu);
Leu-57
(Ala/Phe); Phe-59
(Ala/Trp); Gln-60
(Ala/Asn/Val/Leu); Phe-63
(Ala/Trp); and Leu-66
(Ala/Trp).

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Helical wheel plot of transmembrane segment
2. A periplasmic view of a helical wheel plot of TMS-2 from amino
acids 46 to 66.
Bacterial strains and plasmids
-galactoside) and melibiose (an
-galactoside) as indicated by
their red phenotype on MacConkey plates containing 0.4% or 1%
concentrations of these sugars. However, certain mutations at codon-56
(i.e. S56Q, S56L, and S56Y) and codon-60 (Q60A) were very
defective, as shown by their white or pink phenotypes. The Q60V
mutation also produced a pink phenotype on melibiose MacConkey plates
when this plasmid was transformed into other E. coli
strains.
Phenotype on MacConkey platesa
, which is
-galactosidase-positive. When lactose enters the cell, it is rapidly
metabolized so that the external lactose concentration is always higher
than the internal concentration (28). Therefore, this in
vitro assay measures lactose transport as it moves from a higher
to lower concentration, or "downhill."
Downhill and uphill transport in wild-type and mutant
strainsa
Apparent Km and Vmax valuesa of
wild-type and mutant strains
Locations of revertant and suppressor mutations
Downhill and uphill transport in revertant and suppressor
strainsa
Apparent Km and Vmax
valuesa of suppressor strains
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Revised model of the structure and function
of the lactose permease. This model shows a periplasmic view of
the arrangements of the 12 transmembrane segments. Bifunctional
cross-linking data indicate interactions shown with black
lines (30-32, 39-44). An exception is the line connecting
Ala-273 and Met-299, which was determined by excimer fluorescence and
EPR (50). Spectroscopic and suppressor analyses indicate ionic
interactions shown with red bars (9, 33-40). Codons where
TMS-2, loop 2/3, and loop 8/9 suppressors have occurred are shown in
orange (20, 22, 51, and this study). Our model does not show
the locations of Glu-126 and Arg-144, which are predicted to interact
with each other (52, 53). In our revised model, these two residues are
located on the faces of TMS-4 and TMS-5 that project toward each other.
An arginyl side chain and a glutamate side chain are long enough to
span a distance that is longer than the width of an
-helix. For the
Glu-126/Arg-144 interaction to be compatible with our model, these
residues would have to be located in a cytoplasmic loop or TMS-1 would
have to be shifted out of the way.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Putative interconversion between the C1 and
C2 conformation of the lactose permease. The interconversion is
suggested to involve a change of TMS-2 relative to both TMS-7 and
TMS-11, and TMS-8 relative to both TMS-1 and TMS-5. In the C1
conformation, TMS-2 is shown to be relatively parallel to TMS-11 and
TMS-8 is parallel to TMS-5. In the C2 conformation, TMS-2 lies
obliquely across TMS-7 and TMS-11, and TMS-8 lies obliquely across
TMS-1 and TMS-5. In this mechanism, lactose can enter its binding site
from the periplasm in the C1 conformation, but is unable to enter the
cytoplasm due to steric hindrance of the large hydrophilic loop 6/7. In
the C2 conformation, the periplasmic loops in the lactose permease come
much closer together, which prevents entry of lactose from the
periplasm, whereas the position of loop 6/7 has shifted, allowing entry
of lactose into the cytoplasm.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: BioProcess Technology
Institute, 240 Gortner Laboratories, 1479 Gortner Ave., St. Paul, MN
55108. Tel.: 612-624-3053; E-mail: robert-b@biosci.cbs.umn.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Varela, M. F.,
and Wilson, T. H.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1276,
21-34
2.
Brooker, R. J.
(1990)
Res. Microbiol.
141,
309-316
3.
Crane, R. K.
(1977)
Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol.
78,
99-159
4.
Mitchell, P.
(1963)
Biochem. Soc. Symp.
22,
142-168
5.
Teather, R. M.,
Muller-Hill, B.,
Abrutsch, U.,
Aichele, G.,
and Overath, P.
(1978)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
159,
239-248
6.
Buchel, D. E.,
Gronenborg, B.,
and Muller-Hill, B.
(1980)
Nature
283,
541-545
7.
Foster, D. L.,
Boublik, M.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
31-34
8.
Calamia, J.,
and Manoil, C.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4937-4941
9.
King, S. C.,
Hansen, C. L.,
and Wilson, T. H.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1062,
177-186
10.
Griffith, J. K.,
Baker, M. E.,
Rouch, D. A.,
Page, M. G. P.,
Skurray, R. A.,
Paulsen, I. T.,
Chater, K. F.,
Baldwin, S. A.,
and Henderson, P. F. J.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
4,
684-695
11.
Henderson, P. J. F.
(1990)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
22,
525-569
12.
Henderson, P. J. F.,
and Maiden, M. C. J.
(1990)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond-Biol. Sci.
326,
391-410
13.
Pao, S. S.,
Paulsen, I. T.,
and Saier, M. J., Jr.
(1998)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62,
1-34
14.
Goswitz, V. C.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
534-537
15.
Calamia, J.,
and Manoil, C.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
224,
539-543
16.
Carrasco, N.,
Tahara, S. M.,
Patel, L.,
Goldkorn, T.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
6894-6898
17.
Herzlinger, D.,
Viitanen, P.,
Carrasco, N.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
3688-3693
18.
Sun, J.,
Wu, J.,
Carrasco, N.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
990-998
19.
Maiden, M. C. J.,
Davis, E. O.,
Baldwin, S. A.,
Moore, D. C. M.,
and Henderson, P. J. F.
(1987)
Nature
325,
641-643
20.
Jessen-Marshall, A. E.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1400-1404
21.
Jessen-Marshall, A. E.,
Paul, N. J.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16251-16257
22.
Jessen-Marshall, A. E.,
Parker, N. J.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
2616-2622
23.
Frillingos, S.,
Sun, J.,
Gonzalez, A.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
269-273
24.
Miller, J.
(1972)
Experiments in Molecular Genetics
, p. 433, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
25.
Segal, I.
(1975)
Enzyme Kinetics
, p. 210, Wiley and Interscience, New York
26.
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatas, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
27.
Kraft, R.,
Tardiff, J.,
Drauter, K. S.,
and Leinwand, L. A.
(1988)
Biotechniques
6,
544-547
28.
Rickenberg, H. V.,
Cohen, G.,
Buttin, G.,
and Monod, J.
(1956)
Ann. Inst. Pasteur (Paris)
91,
829-857
29.
Pazdernik, N. J.,
Jessen-Marshall, A. E.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
735-741
30.
Wu, J.,
Hardy, D.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
282,
959-967
31.
Wang, Q.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
3120-3126
32.
Wang, Q.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
291,
683-692
33.
Sahin-Toth, M.,
Dunten, R. L.,
Gonzalez, A.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10547-10551
34.
Dunten, R. L.,
Sahin-Toth, M.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
3139-3145
35.
Voss, J.,
Salwinski, L.,
Ronald, K. H.,
and Hubbell, W. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
12295-12299
36.
Voss, J.,
Hubbell, W. L.,
and Ronald, K. H.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
12300-12303
37.
Jung, K.,
Voss, J.,
He, M.,
Hubbell, W. L.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
6272-6277
38.
He, M. M.,
Voss, J.,
Hubbell, W.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
15661-15666
39.
He, M. M.,
Voss, J.,
Hubbell, W.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
15667-15670
40.
Wu, J.,
Voss, J.,
Hubbell, W. L.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10123-10127
41.
Wu, J.,
Hardy, D.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
15785-15790
42.
Wu, J.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
270,
285-293
43.
Wu, J.,
Hardy, D.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
1715-1720
44.
Wu, J.,
Hardy, D.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
2320-2325
45.
Brooker, R. J.,
and Wilson, T. H.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
3959-3963
46.
Collins, J. C.,
Permuth, S. F.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14698-14703
47.
Franco, P. J.,
Eelkema, J. A.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
15988-15992
48.
Teather, R. M.,
Bramhall, J.,
Riede, I.,
Wright, J. K.,
Fürst, M.,
Aichele, G.,
Wilhelm, U.,
and Overath, P.
(1980)
Eur. J. Biochem.
108,
223-231
49.
Franco, P. J.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7379-7386
50.
Wang, Q.,
Voss, J.,
Hubbell, W.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
4910-4915
51.
Pazdernik, N. J.,
Cain, S. M.,
and Brooker, R. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26110-26116
52.
Frillingos, S.,
Gonzalez, A.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
14284-14290
53.
Sahin-Toth, M.,
le Coutre, J.,
Kharabi, D.,
le Maire, G.,
Lee, J. C.,
and Kaback, H. R.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
813-819
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. Unkles, D. A. Rouch, Y. Wang, M. Y. Siddiqi, A. D. M. Glass, and J. R. Kinghorn Two perfectly conserved arginine residues are required for substrate binding in a high-affinity nitrate transporter PNAS, December 14, 2004; 101(50): 17549 - 17554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mazurkiewicz, G. J. Poelarends, A. J. M. Driessen, and W. N. Konings Facilitated Drug Influx by an Energy-uncoupled Secondary Multidrug Transporter J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 2004; 279(1): 103 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, M. J. Lemieux, J. Song, M. Auer, and D.-N. Wang Structure and Mechanism of the Glycerol-3-Phosphate Transporter from Escherichia coli Science, August 1, 2003; 301(5633): 616 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Shinnick, S. A. Perez, and M. F. Varela Altered Substrate Selection of the Melibiose Transporter (MelY) of Enterobacter cloacae Involving Point Mutations in Leu-88, Leu-91, and Ala-182 That Confer Enhanced Maltose Transport J. Bacteriol., June 15, 2003; 185(12): 3672 - 3677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirai, J. A. W. Heymann, P. C. Maloney, and S. Subramaniam Structural Model for 12-Helix Transporters Belonging to the Major Facilitator Superfamily J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2003; 185(5): 1712 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Sorgen, Y. Hu, L. Guan, H. R. Kaback, and M. E. Girvin An approach to membrane protein structure without crystals PNAS, October 29, 2002; 99(22): 14037 - 14040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. McMurry, M. L. Aldema-Ramos, and S. B. Levy Fe2+-Tetracycline-Mediated Cleavage of the Tn10 Tetracycline Efflux Protein TetA Reveals a Substrate Binding Site near Glutamine 225 in Transmembrane Helix 7 J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2002; 184(18): 5113 - 5120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||