Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001837200 on May 11, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 30, 23326-23332, July 28, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/30/23326    most recent
M001837200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoura, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoura, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Prolactin-induced Cell Proliferation in PC12 Cells Depends on JNK but Not ERK Activation*

Yu Cheng, Igor Zhizhin, Robert L. Perlman, and Dimitra MangouraDagger

From the Kennedy Center, Department of Pediatrics, Committee on Neurobiology and Committee Cell Physiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Received for publication, March 3, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The effects of pituitary and extrapituitary prolactin include cellular proliferation and differentiation. PC12 cells was used as a model to delineate respective signaling of prolactin. Prolactin acted as a mitogen for undifferentiated PC12 cells, as measured by significant increases in bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and in cell numbers, with an efficacy equal to epidermal growth factor. Both the long and short form of the prolactin receptor was expressed, yet only the long isoform was tyrosine-phosphorylated upon agonist binding. Functional prolactin receptor signaling was further demonstrated in the activation of JAK2 and phosphorylation activation of the transcription factors Stat1, -3, and -5a. Surprisingly, prolactin stimulated a sustained activation of Raf-B, without activation of the MAP kinases ERK1 or -2. Instead, in solid phase kinase assays using a glutathione S-transferase-c-Jun fusion protein (amino acids 1-79) as the substrate, a significant activation of the mitogen-activated protein Janus kinase (c-Jun N-terminal kinase; JNK) was observed. The prolactin-induced activation of JNK was prolonged and accompanied by a significant increase in c-Jun mRNA abundance and c-Jun protein synthesis. Moreover, analysis of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation at the single cell level revealed that epidermal growth factor-dependent incorporation was inhibited by PD98059 and independent of SB203580, whereas prolactin-induced incorporation was ERK and mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 independent but was abolished with JNK inhibition by 30 µM SB203580. Our studies suggest that prolactin may have a role in the growth of PC12 cells, where it stimulates concurrent mitogenic and differentiation-promoting signaling pathways.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Prolactin (PRL),1 which was originally identified as an anterior pituitary hormone involved in osmoregulation, reproduction, and behavior (1), has recently been shown to be a growth factor for many cell types in the developing and adult organism (1, 2). The recent emphasis on extrapituitary prolactin has underlined the role of prolactin as a neurotrophic factor. Furthermore, several vertebrate neuroendocrine tissues, including the central nervous system, peripheral neural populations, and adrenal, have been shown to express mRNA encoding the long and short forms of the prolactin receptor (PRLR). The study of prolactin action in the nervous system has been focused on the modulation of neuronal neurotransmitter expression and secretion in postnatal postmitotic neurons. However, the direct effects of prolactin in developing neural cells and the signal transduction pathways that mediate them have only recently been addressed (3, 4).

Moreover, the exact signal transduction pathways for the diverse biological actions of prolactin are little understood. The PRLR belongs to the superfamily of cytokine class-1 receptors (5). The PRLR, like the other members of this family, does not contain a tyrosine kinase domain but signals through activation of associated cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases of the Janus kinase (JAK) and Src kinase families (6-10). Prolactin binding promotes dimerization of PRLR, which triggers activation of tyrosine kinases and further transduction of the signal (8, 10, 11). The major PRLR-associated tyrosine kinase is JAK2 (7, 8, 12, 13). Association of JAK2 with a PRL-bound receptor is sufficient for activation of the kinase, phosphorylation of PRLR, and the recruitment and activation of members of the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family of transcription factors, in particular Stat1, Stat3, and Stat5 (14-16), which are considered as major effectors for prolactin-dependent cell proliferation and gene activation (17). In addition, phospholipase C-protein kinase C and the ERK and p38 MAP kinase activation have also been reported as effectors of PRLR (9, 18, 19). However, it is not clear whether these interacting or often parallel pathways specifically mediate cell proliferation or differentiation. With this background, we undertook these studies to investigate the potential role of prolactin as a growth factor in PC12 cells, a model system to delineate proliferation and differentiation signal transduction pathways.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, epidermal growth factor (EGF), and calf serum were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Ovine prolactin was purchased from Sigma, and rat prolactin was provided by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program, National Institutes of Health. Polyclonal antibodies against Stat3, Stat5a, c-Jun, and JNK were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA); a monoclonal antibody against ERK1/2, monoclonal antibody 4G10 against phosphotyrosine, a polyclonal antibody to JAK2, a polyclonal antibody to Raf-B, and recombinant protein A-agarose were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.; the U5 monoclonal antibody against the prolactin receptor was from ABR Inc.; a monoclonal antibody to Stat1 was from Transduction Laboratories; rabbit anti-mouse IgGs were from Jackson Laboratories; and anti-5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd) staining kit was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. PP1, PD98059, and SB203580 were purchased from Alexis, Inc.

Cell Culture-- PC12 cells, obtained from Dr. Aaron Fox (University of Chicago), were plated at 25,000 cells/ml in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% calf serum and cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cell cultures were switched to chemically defined medium (20) or Neurobasal medium supplemented with L-glutamine and N2 (all from Life Technologies, Inc.) for an average of 48 h, before treatment with prolactin (ovine or rat) or other agonists at concentrations and for the times indicated per experiment.

Cell Counting and Time Lapse Photography-- PC12 cells were plated on Corning plates engraved with a 2 × 2-mm grid. Ten fields per dish of four per experimental group were chosen randomly, charted on the grid, and followed every 12 h by time lapse photography through a 20× lens on a Nikon Diaphot inverted microscope with a N6006 Nikon camera and an 125 ASA Plus-X pan Kodak film. Cell numbers were then counted on black and white pictures. Sister cultures were trypsinized, and cell numbers were directly assessed with a Coulter counter (21).

Immunodetection of BrdUrd Incorporation-- Briefly, PC12 cells were changed to Neurobasal plus N2 medium 36 h prior to indicated treatments. After 16 h of agonist treatment, BrdUrd (10 µM) was added for 60 min, and cultures were fixed and stained with anti-BrdUrd according to the manufacturer's instructions with some modifications (4). The antibody binding was visualized with an anti-mouse alkaline phosphatase-conjugated IgG. Before mounting, nuclei were stained with bis-benzimide (Hoechst 33258, Sigma) to identify normal (intact) and apoptotic (fragmented) nuclei. Cells were viewed and photographed first for BrdUrd uptake under light using a Nikon 6006 camera and a × 20 lens. Assessment of cell numbers and apoptosis was done by switching to a UV optical filter and counting intact and fragmented nuclei.

Immunoblot Analysis-- Total cell lysates, PC12 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, i.e. a 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, buffer containing 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na2VO3, and 1% Triton X-100 with two protease inhibitors, leupeptin and Ep459, at 1 µg/ml. After a 10-min centrifugation, supernatant solutions were assayed for protein content. Lysates normalized per protein content were analyzed with SDS-PAGE. The resolved proteins were transferred onto Immobilon membranes as described (22). To assure equal loading, membranes were first stained with the reversible dye Pounceau S. Abundance and electrophoretic ability of Raf-B, ERK1 and -2, and c-Jun in the various groups were detected by blotting the membranes with a monoclonal antibody. Immunoreactivity was visualized by further incubation with species-specific, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence.

Immunoprecipitations-- Immunoprecipitations were performed as described previously (7, 23). Cells were harvested in 500 µl of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM NAF, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, 100 µM sodium orthovanadate, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) for 30 min. After removal of insoluble material (10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C), supernatant solutions were assayed for protein content with the DC-Bio-Rad kit. Equal amounts of lysates were incubated for at least 2 h with monoclonal antibody U5 (5 µg/ml) or a monoclonal antibody to Stat1 (1 µg/250 µg) or polyclonal antibodies to Stat3 or -5a (1 µg/ml). Monoclonal antibodies were incubated for another hour with rabbit-anti-mouse antibodies (2 µg/ml) prior to the addition of 100 µl of 50% protein A-agarose to all lysates. Immunoprecipitates were briefly centrifuged, the supernatant solutions were discarded, and the agarose pellets were washed three times with lysis buffer and once with PBS. Precipitated material was eluted from the beads by boiling the pellet in 25 µl of sample buffer at 95 °C for 2 min. Following boiling, proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on 8% polyacrylamide gels and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. The phosphotyrosine content of immunoprecipitated proteins was detected by blotting the membranes with the antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody 4G10. The membranes were reblotted routinely with the immunoprecipitating antibody to reassure equal abundance. Each experiment was repeated 4-10 times.

Generation of GST-c-Jun-(1-79) Fusion Protein-- PC12 cells were treated with rat prolactin (1 nM) for 20 min, and total RNA was isolated with the Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Using designed primers according to the rat c-Jun DNA sequence (24) (forward, 5'-TCGTGGGATCCCCATGACTGCAAAGATGGAAACG-3'; backward, 5'-ACCCGGAATTCCTCAGGCGCTCCAGCTCCGGCGA-3') and 5 µg of RNA per sample for reverse transcription-PCR, a DNA fragment that carried the N-terminal c-Jun protein sequence (amino acids 1-79) was generated. The reverse transcription reaction was carried out at 42 °C for 1 h (Titan One; Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Two microliters of this reaction were amplified by 40 cycles of PCR (94 °C × 1 min, 54 °C × 1 min, 72 °C × 1 min) in a Perkin-Elmer PE 2400. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Sizes were calculated relative to a 100-base pair ladder standard (Life Technologies, Inc.). The DNA fragment was digested with BamHI and EcoRI and inserted into a GST-plasmid (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The GST-c-Jun fragment was used to transform TOP10F' One Shot Competent Cells (Invitrogen). After induction with isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside according to standard procedures, the expressed GST-c-Jun-(1-79) fusion protein was purified through a glutathione-Sepharose-4B column.

Solid Phase Assay for JNK-- The assays were performed as described previously with some modification (25). Briefly, JNK was immunoprecipitated from equal amounts (500 µg) of total cell protein with anti-JNK antibodies in a 20 mM HEPES, pH 1.4, 2 mM EGTA, 0.5% Triton, 20 mM glycerophosphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM Na3VO4, and protease inhibitors (leupeptin, aprotinin, and Ep459 at 10 µg/ml). Antibody-antigen complexes were collected with protein A-agarose beads. Beads were washed three times with a 20 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, and resuspended in 30 µl of the kinase buffer: 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl2, 20 mM glycerophosphate, 20 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol). Reactions were initiated with the addition of 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP and 1 µg of GST-c-Jun, carried out for 20 min at 30 °C, and terminated by adding 2× SDS sample buffer. The eluate was analyzed with SDS-PAGE and autoradiography of the dried polyacrylamide gels.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Prolactin Stimulates Cell Proliferation in PC12 Cells-- We used three different methods to study the effects of prolactin on the proliferation or differentiation of PC12 cells, namely cell counts, BrdUrd uptake, and time lapse photography. First, PC12 cells were grown for 2 days after plating and then arrested with preincubation in a chemically defined medium for 48 h or in Neurobasal medium plus N2 supplement. Under these conditions, proliferation ceases and cells acquire differentiated features (20, 26). At the end of this period, rat prolactin (1 nM) or vehicle was added for an additional time with calf serum (10%) and EGF (50 ng/ml) used in parallel cultures as positive mitogenic controls. After treatment, cells were trypsinized, and cell numbers were assessed directly with a Coulter counter. Prolactin was a mitogen, as strong as EGF, while calf serum was, as expected, stronger than both (Fig. 1A). Specifically, cell numbers after 2 days of treatment with prolactin (1 nM) had increased to an average of 5.45 × 105 ± 0.63 cells/dish versus 3.02 × 105 ± 0.15 in cultures treated with vehicle. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.002), suggesting that PRL had induced mitosis. By 72 h, the difference in growth rate between control and prolactin-treated cells was not as dramatic; however, cell numbers in the prolactin-treated group remained significantly higher that in controls (p < 0.01). The increase in cell number was due to cell proliferation, as verified with BrdUrd incorporation studies. A multifold increase in the numbers of nuclei BrdUrd-positive nuclei was evident after prolactin stimulation as compared with control, with 3.5% BrdUrd-positive nuclei in controls (positive/total nuclei) versus 64.8% after 18 h of PRL treatment. Quantitation of apoptotic nuclei in the same cell population by Hoechst 33258 (bisbenzimide) staining showed that apoptosis was negligible. These results established that prolactin is a mitogen for PC12 cells.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.   Prolactin stimulates cell proliferation in PC12 cells. A, PC12 cell cultures were randomly assigned to one of four groups and received vehicle (Control, open bars), 1 nM PRL (dark striped bars), 10% serum (shaded bars), or 50 ng/ml EGF (light striped bars) for the indicated times. Cell numbers were significantly increased with prolactin (asterisks indicate statistical significance, p < 0.001). Bracketed bars represent S.E. values from 4-6 cultures from a typical experiment. B, photomicrographs of PC12 cells treated for 24 h with control (upper row), 1 nM prolactin (middle row), or 50 ng/ml EGF (lower row). PC12 cells were plated at low density into grated tissue culture dishes and arrested when the first set of pictures (left column) were taken. After photography, cultures were treated with vehicle or agonists for 24 h, and the same area was photographed. Stable neurites continue to grow in control cells during the elapsed time (upper row, arrowhead). In the prolactin-treated cultures, several cells had duplicated and assumed a polarized cell shape (middle row arrows point to cells generated during the 24-h treatment with prolactin). Several EGF-treated PC12 cells were still in anaphase (lower row, arrows); the asterisk indicates cell loss.

Next, we sought to establish whether PRL had affected cell differentiation while inducing a cell cycle, as we have established for astrocytes (4). Ten fields per dish were chosen randomly, charted on the imprinted grid of the tissue culture dish, and photographed prior to the addition of prolactin, EGF, or vehicle. The same fields were photographed again 24 h later (Fig. 1B). Statistical analysis verified that, while cell loss was minimal in all groups, cell numbers were significantly increased from an average of 8% per day in the vehicle-treated control group to 34% with prolactin treatment (a representative example is shown in Fig. 1B, control (upper panel) and prolactin-treated (middle panel)). Similar increases were observed with EGF (lower panel). This type of analysis also allowed observations on the state of differentiation and cell loss. Control cultures continued to differentiate during the elapsed 24-h time period, as evident from the increasing length of neurites (Fig. 2B, arrowheads in the upper panel). In the prolactin-treated cultures, several cells had completed a cell cycle over the same period of 24 h (Fig. 2B, arrows in the middle panel) and then assumed a polarized phenotype. In the EGF-treated cultures, while the number of proliferating cells appeared to be similar, the cells appeared to lag behind in cell cycle completion as compared with prolactin, with several of them observed in anaphase (Fig. 2B, lower panel, arrows). This time-lapse analysis also verified that cell loss was minimal (asterisk). All subsequent signaling studies were performed with the same experimental design to assure examination of the events within a time frame of what appeared as a concomitant signal for proliferation and differentiation by prolactin.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2.   Tyrosine phosphorylation of PRL receptor, JAK2, and Stat1, -3, and -5a in response to prolactin in PC12 cells. PC12 cells were incubated for times indicated with 1 nM prolactin. PRL receptors were immunoprecipitated with the U5 monoclonal antibody to PRL-R and immunoblotted with U5 (A) or the 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (B); antibody binding was visualized using chemiluminescence. The long and the short isoforms of the receptor and the associate kinase JAK2 are indicated with arrows. The molecular mass of prestained markers is indicated with bars in kilodaltons. C, immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal antibody to Stat1 and Western blotting with 4G10 revealed the sustained tyrosine phosphorylation/activation of the transcription factor with time of exposure to prolactin. D, similar analysis of the Stat3 phosphotyrosine content showed a less sustained increase with time of PRL treatment; the increases in tyrosine phosphorylation at 5 min were not affected by 1 µM SB203580, SB 30 µM, or 10 µM PP1. E, the Stat5a tyrosine phosphorylation profile in response to PRL is similar to that of Stat1 and -3, including the regulation by the indicated kinase inhibitors.

The Prolactin Receptor, JAK2, and STATs are Tyrosine-phosphorylated Acutely after Prolactin Treatment in PC12 Cells-- Western blot analysis with the monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 has established functional expression of PRLR by showing that several proteins were modified with time of PRL exposure (27). The long isoform of the prolactin receptor is one of the proteins modified by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to prolactin; JAK2 is then activated, and the PRLR-JAK2 complex propagates the signaling through recruitment of a member of the STAT transcription factor family. In order to establish activation of this pathway in PC12 cells, we employed immunoprecipitation combined with Western blot analysis of total lysates of prolactin-treated cells. First, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the U5 anti-prolactin receptor antibody (IP:U5), and the electrophoretically resolved proteins were Western blotted with U5 (WB:U5) (Fig. 2A). Two bands were detected with apparent Mr of 100,000 and 60,000, which correspond to the long and short isoform of PRLR, respectively. When the immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, the long isoform of the receptor corresponded to the most prominent protein band with increased tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 2B). Phosphorylation of the PRLR long form was maximal by 5 min and remained increased for at least 20 min. Two minor bands of lower Mr were faintly detected with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. Another higher Mr protein band that co-immunoprecipitated with the prolactin receptor band also showed increases in phosphotyrosine content with time (Fig. 2B, upper arrow). Reblotting of these Western blots revealed that this protein co-migrated with a protein that was reactive to JAK 2 antibodies (data not shown), as anticipated.

To confirm activation of the JAK-STAT pathway by prolactin, the specific tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat1, -3, and -5a was investigated with immunoprecipitation of whole PC12 cell lysates with the respective antibodies and Western blotting with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies first and then reblotting with the immunoprecipitating antibodies. A rapid phosphorylation of Stat1 by prolactin became maximal at 15 min of exposure to prolactin. The phosphorylation/activation was sustained for hours and returned to unstimulated levels by 3 h (Fig. 2C). The time course of Stat3 (Fig. 2D) and Stat5 (Fig. 2E) tyrosine phosphorylation in response to prolactin was also acute and maximal by 15 min but slightly differed from that of Stat1 in that the tyrosine phosphorylation returned to basal levels in about 2 h. The regulation of the phosphorylation of all three STATs was also similar. As shown representatively in Fig. 2, D and E, low concentrations of SB203580, 1 µM (a concentration that only inhibits p38) or 30 µM (which inhibits p38, JNK2, and c-Raf), or Src family kinases (PP1, at 10 µM) had no significant effect on the PRL-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of these STATs.

Prolactin Activates Raf-B but Not ERK1 and -2 in PC12 Cells-- Having demonstrated that prolactin is a mitogen in PC12 cells, we examined its coupling to ERK activation, the duration of which in PC12 cells is known to correlate with mitogenicity of the signal; i.e. EGF produces a relatively acute but transient activation of ERK 2, while NGF promotes a later but sustained activation of this kinase (28). In this prototypic mitogenic signaling pathway activated by EGF, the serine/threonine kinase Raf-B is upstream to the activation of the MAP kinases ERK1 and -2. Activated Raf phosphorylates and activates downstream kinases of the MEK family, thus initiating the MEK-MAP kinase cascade (29). Upon activation, Raf is phosphorylated on serine and threonine residues, and its apparent molecular weight increases (30). Therefore, activation of Raf-B in total lysates from PC12 cells treated for different times with prolactin was studied by Western blot analysis with anti-Raf-B antibodies (results of a representative Western experiment are shown in Fig. 3A). By 15 min of stimulation with prolactin, the mobility of Raf was obviously retarded, indicating activation of Raf molecules. The activation lasted for over 1 h. In comparison, the activation induced by EGF was more robust but less sustained (Fig. 3B). The effect of EGF, used as a positive control for activation, was established by 1 min, maximal by 5 min, and almost over by 15 min.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3.   Prolactin activates Raf-B but nor ERK in PC12 cells. A, PC12 cells were solubilized in RIPA buffer after indicated times of treatment with rat prolactin. Total proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Raf-B abundance and phosphorylation were analyzed by Western blotting with a polyclonal antibody to Raf-B. Antibody binding was detected using ECL. Prolactin increased phosphorylation of Raf-B as evident from the retarded in gel mobility. B, time course of EGF-induced Raf-B; phosphorylation is stronger but less sustained than with PRL. C, PC12 were treated similarly with 1 nM of prolactin or 50 ng/ml of EGF for the indicated times and then solubilized in RIPA buffer. Total proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. ERK activity was analyzed by Western blotting with a monoclonal antibody against ERK1/2. Antibody binding was detected using ECL. In several experiments with multiple time points, prolactin did not increase the activity of the MAP kinase ERK1/2, while EGF caused a strong activation, as evidenced by the retardation in gel mobility.

The time course of EGF-stimulated Raf phosphorylation was consistent with it being upstream to ERK activation, as seen in total lysates analyzed by Western blotting with a monoclonal antibody, which primarily recognizes ERK2 and cross-reacts with ERK1 (Fig. 3C). Because a significant number of amino acid residues are phosphorylated on ERK1/2 molecules when they are activated, the electrophoretic mobility of the activated molecules also changes. The result is the appearance of an additional band of slightly higher Mr (activated) right above the baseline band (nonactivated ERK) and the overall appearance of ERK1 or -2 as doublet bands in Western blots. Use of ERK mobility as a measure of its activation clearly showed that PRL did not cause detectable activation of ERK1 or -2 as concluded in several experiments (Fig. 3C), while EGF stimulated both ERK1 and ERK2 5 min after its introduction into the culture medium. The activation lasted several more minutes. ERK1 activation appeared more transient than that of ERK2, which lasted for 1 h. Similar experiments using different antibodies or in-gel assays (21, 31) also did not detect any ERK activation with prolactin, even with concentrations as high as 1 µM.

Prolactin Stimulates JNK Activity-- The surprising finding that while Raf was activated by prolactin, several sensitive detection methods of ERK activation clearly showed that the prolactin receptor is not coupled to ERK1/2 in PC12 cells prompted us to investigate whether prolactin is coupled to activation of another major MAP kinase, the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). JNKs exclusively phosphorylate Ser63 and Ser73 in the transactivation domain of c-Jun, a component of the transcription factor AP-1, and we exploited this specificity to measure JNK activation in solid phase kinase assays. We first generated a fragment from amino acids 1-79 of c-Jun using PRL-stimulated PC12 cells as a template, as described under "Experimental Procedures." A GST fusion c-Jun fragment was constructed and used as a substrate to assay JNK activation (Fig. 4). After different times of treatment with prolactin, JNK was immunoprecipitated with anti-JNK antibody and allowed to phosphorylate GST-c-Jun-(1-79) in vitro. The reaction products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Densitometry of the autoradiogram (a typical one is shown in Fig. 4A) revealed that JNK was activated by prolactin in PC12 cells. The activation had reached 3-fold over base line by 30 min and 10-fold, the maximal activation, by 1 h. The activation was sustained maximal for an additional 2 h until it declined to control levels after 6 h (Fig. 4A). This is the first demonstration of prolactin-receptor coupling to JNK in any cell type.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4.   Prolactin activates JNK and increases expression of c-Jun in PC 12 cells. A, PC12 cells were solubilized in RIPA buffer after the indicated times of treatment with rat prolactin. JNK was immunoprecipitated with anti-JNK antibodies and protein A-agarose and tested for its ability to phosphorylate rat GST-c-Jun. GST-c-Jun was prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures" from prolactin-stimulated PC12 cells. GST-c-Jun (1 µg/sample) and [gamma -32P]ATP (10 µCi/sample) were added to the JNK and protein A-agarose complex, and the reaction products were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. Prolactin elicited a strong and sustained activated of JNK. B, PC12 cells were treated with rat prolactin for the indicated times and then solubilized in RIPA buffer. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. C-Jun levels were analyzed by Western blotting with a polyclonal antibody to c-Jun. Antibody binding was detected using ECL. Prolactin acutely activated both the synthesis and phosphorylation (not shown) of c-Jun.

The activation of the transcription factor c-Jun downstream to prolactin receptor activation was verified in vivo as well. Total lysates from cells with different exposure time to prolactin were studied by Western blot analysis using a monoclonal anti-c-Jun antibody as described under "Experimental Procedures." A significant increase in the synthesis of c-Jun was observed starting as early as 1 min of prolactin treatment (Fig. 4B). The increase in of c-Jun expression plateaued by 15 min and remained high for over 1 h (Fig. 4B). A similar methodological approach did not detect any increase in c-Fos (data not shown).

Inhibition of JNK but Not ERK or p38 Activity Abolishes PRL-induced Proliferation-- To further evaluate the role of JNK activation in the PRL-induced PC12 proliferation, we employed specific inhibitors of the three subclasses of MAP kinases, namely SB203580, which acts as a specific inhibitor of p38 at 1 µM and additionally inhibits JNK at concentrations over 10 µM (46), and PD98059 (50 µM) a specific inhibitor of MEK and its downstream ERKs (Fig. 5). PC12 cells were pretreated with vehicle (Fig. 5, upper row), 1 or 30 µM SB203580 (second and third row, respectively), or 50 µM PD98059 (bottom row) for 1 h prior to exposure to vehicle (left column) or the mitogenic stimulants PRL (middle column) and EGF (right column). BrdUrd incorporation as a measure of DNA synthesis and cell proliferation was assessed immunocytochemically 18 h later, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Nuclear incorporation of BrdUrd in the vehicle group was minimal in all vehicle-treated cultures (left column) and inhibition with 1 or 30 µM of SB203580 or PD98059 did not affect the basal mitotic activity in arrested cultures. One µM SB203580 and inhibition of p38 had no effect on the mitogenic activity of either PRL or EGF. Constitant with the ERK activation result, MEK and ERK inhibition abolished the EGF-induced cell proliferation but had no effect on the PRL mitogenic activity (Fig. 5). Most importantly, inhibition of p38, JNK2, and c-Raf with 30 µM SB203580 had opposing actions, with no significant change on the number of BrdUrd-positive nuclei in the EGF-treated cultures but totally blocking the PRL-induced BrdUrd incorporation (Fig. 5).


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5.   Prolactin increases in BrdUrd incorporation is abolished by 30 µM SB203580 but not PD98059. PC12 cells were cultured as described in the legend to Fig. 1A. After a 16-h treatment with prolactin or vehicle, both groups received 10 µM BrdUrd for 60 min. Cells were fixed and processed for immunocytochemistry with anti-BrdUrd antibody and an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody, as described under "Experimental Procedures." The number of nuclei positive for BrdUrd incorporation was significantly increased in PRL (1 nM)- or EGF (50 ng/ml)-treated cells (see "Results" for quantitation), as indicated in these representative microphotographs. Preincubation with 1 µM SB203580 had no significant effect in BrdUrd incorporation. 30 µM SB203580 and inhibition of JNK, however, prevented any BrdUrd incorporation in response to PRL. In contrast, PD98059 (ERK activation inhibitor) abolished the EGF-dependent but not the PRL-dependent BrdUrd incorporation.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we show that prolactin supports concurrent proliferation and differentiation of PC12 cells and present evidence that the PRLR-dependent activation of JNK is associated with the induction of one cell cycle.

Prolactin was mitogenic to PC12 cells. The proliferation rate, similar to that observed with EGF stimulation, caused the cell population to almost double before becoming quiescent. However, after 24 h of treatment, more cells appeared to be in anaphase in the EGF-treated cultures than in prolactin-treated cultures. In contrast, cells treated with prolactin appeared to have completed the cell cycle and to have assumed polarized morphology with longer processes (Fig. 1B). This observation indicates that while prolactin induced proliferation it also induced maintenance and gain in cell differentiation, as observed with astrocytes (4, 23). This finding suggests that pituitary and extrapituitary prolactin may be one of the agonists that participates in the expansion of the chromaffin cell population.

Prolactin Activates the JAK-STAT Pathway in PC12 Cells-- Immunoprecipitation with U5 antibody showed that both the long and short PRLR isoforms are expressed in PC12 cells (Fig. 2). While both PRLR isoforms were detected in immunoprecipitations with the U5 monoclonal antibody, only the long form was tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to prolactin. The U5 anti-PRLR antibody co-immunoprecipitated JAK2 as previously reported (7, 8, 13). The time courses of the tyrosine phosphorylation of both the receptor and the kinase are compatible with previous data that JAK2 preassociates with the receptor and becomes activated after the PRLR-ligand binding presumably by transphosphorylation of tyrosines. The phosphorylated tyrosine on PRLR binds with the Src homology 2 domain of a STAT to recruit it, and the JAK 2 phosphorylation of the receptor-bound STAT causes the release of STAT and its translocation into the nucleus, where the STATs become transcriptionally active (32). In agreement with this mode of interaction, the increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of STATs occurred with a time course compatible with it being a downstream event for prolactin-dependent JAK2 activation in PC12 cells. In PC12 cells prolactin mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat1, -3, and -5a, with similar time courses and regulation. While all three are considered as important effectors for PRLR, genetic analysis has indicated that Stat5a is the most important in the prolactin-specific biological effect of lactogenesis (17). However, since the question has not yet been directly addressed, it remains unclear whether Stat5a is important in the temporally prerequisite alveolar cell proliferation or the following alveolar cell differentiation or both. In most studies, Stat5a activation usually correlates with differentiation, including terminal differentiation of mammary secretory epithelium cells (33). This is in agreement with the gain in morphological differentiation we observed in PC12 cells.

Prolactin Activates Raf-B but Not ERK 1/2 in PC12 Cells-- Prolactin acutely induced increases in the phosphorylation of Raf-B (Fig. 3). Prolactin induces rapid phosphorylation and activation of Raf-1 (Raf-C) kinase in the Nb2 T-cell line, where the PRL receptor also co-immunoprecipitates with Raf-1 (18). Most receptors of the cytokine class-1 family activate Raf-1 by tyrosine phosphorylation. In contrast, PRLR activates Raf-1 with a mechanism similar to that of JAK2 activation; i.e. agonist binding stimulates autokinase activity. This fundamental difference between PRLR and the other receptors has been proposed as point of specificity for the prolactin signaling (18). The time course of the PRL-induced activation is compatible with a similar association of Raf-B with PRLR in PC12 cells.

One surprising finding was that prolactin activated Raf-B, but not its classic downstream effector in mitogenic pathways, the MAP kinase ERK1 or -2 (for PC12 cells (34)). However, the coupling of prolactin to ERK activation appears to be cell type-dependent (35, 36), while the recent finding that the coupling of PRL to ERK may require a soluble factor secreted only under specific cell density (19) suggests that the coupling must be additionally dependent on stages of differentiation within a cell lineage. Moreover, in epithelial cells prolactin may act as an inhibitor of the ERK pathway activated by fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor (37), or EGF (38). The coupling of PRL to the ERKs has not been previously addressed in neuronal cell types. Prolactin activates ERK1 and -2 in postmitotic cortical neurons and in astrocytes (4). We were, however, unable to demonstrate ERK activation by immunoblotting with ERK antibodies (Fig. 3C), antibodies against activated ERK, immunocytochemistry, or myelin basic protein phosphorylation assays. In sister cultures, processed simultaneously, we showed that, as expected (30), EGF transiently activated ERK1 and -2 in PC12 cells (Fig. 3C). Therefore, the possibility that an ERK activation by PRL was overlooked is unlikely.

Prolactin, however, activated the MAP kinase JNK and subsequently c-Jun expression in PC12 cells. c-Jun is a member of the bZip family of transcription factors (39), which can combine with c-Fos to form homo- and heterodimers, with Jun-Jun homodimers, or Jun-Fos heterodimers (referred to as the AP-1 complex), typically to activate gene transcription. Increases in Jun were observed both with immunodetection (Fig. 4) and reverse transcription-PCR. PC12 cells were treated with prolactin for 30 min, and the reverse transcription-PCR-generated cDNA of c-Jun was used to generate the GST-c-Jun fusion protein used in the JNK assays. c-Jun cDNA could not be amplified from equivalent amounts of total RNA, derived from control PC12 cells, providing additional evidence that prolactin stimulated c-Jun expression. The increase in c-Jun phosphorylation was evident within 15 min of incubation with prolactin and was accompanied by an increase in c-Jun levels, which lasted for hours (Fig. 4). Activation of c-Jun has been considered a negative regulator of the human or rat prolactin promoter, however, in the context of forming AP-1 complexes (40). Specific prolactin-dependent c-Jun activation has been reported in metastases of pituitary tumors (41).

Moreover, using solid phase JNK activity assays and GST-c-Jun-(1-79) fusion protein as a substrate for JNK, we measured a sustained activation of JNK activity. JNKs, a group of serine-threonine kinases structurally related to the ERKs, are activated by tyrosine kinases, during processes where drastic changes in membrane shape occur downstream to Ras/Raf activation. JNK activation has been also associated with induction of apoptosis in PC12 cells (42). Our time lapse photography, together with increased rates of both growth and BrdUrd uptake, showed that prolactin did not induce apoptosis in PC12 cells. PRL, at concentrations that usually stimulate cell proliferation, can protect cells against glucocorticoid receptor-mediated apoptosis. Moreover, JNK is mostly associated with mitotic events rather than with apoptosis (43). Thus, JNK is activated in response to EGF and the phorbol esters in most cell types that the coupling has been investigated, albeit with a shorter time course of activation (44). Hashimoto et al. (45) have suggested that EGF-mediated ERK activation depends on Grb2, whereas EGF-mediated JNK activation is dependent on Shc. Similar disengagement of ERK from a proliferation signaling cascade and concurrent detection of increased JNK activity was recently reported in cells growing in the presence of the cytokine IL-4 (35). JNK activity was increased by IL-4 only if cells expressed an activated mutant of Raf-1. Taken together, the view of activation of Raf/ERK as distinct from JNK activation may need to be reassessed, since activation of RAF may influence JNK activity.

The possibility that activation of JNK may also reflect differentiation-related events cannot be excluded with our studies. However, our studies at the single cell level clearly postulate a role for JNK in PRL-induced mitosis (Fig. 5). Low concentration of SB203580, inhibition of p38 or PD98059, and inhibition of MEK and ERKs had no effect on PRL-induced BrdUrd incorporation, whereas 30 µM SB203580 and JNK inhibition abolished it. In contrast, EGF-induced BrdUrd incorporation, independent of SB203580 and p38 or JNK activation, was mediated by ERK activation. Similar experiments with primary astrocytes, where prolactin concurrently mediates mitosis and up-regulation of astrocytic differentation-specific genes showed that BrdUrd incorporation was inhibited with 30 µM SB203580.2 Last, no significant increases of serine or threonine phosphorylation on immunoprecipitated STATs were observed in response to PRL, and therefore the possibility that JNK may mediate its effects after serine phosphorylation of the STATs as reported for EGF (47) was also excluded.

In conclusion, our studies showed that prolactin activates a mitogenic signaling pathway with a concurrent gain in differentiation. Our data agree with the general notion that prolactin is a growth factor that accesses most cell types as a pituitary hormone or a locally secreted factor and identify JNK activation as a major event in the PRL mitogenic signaling in PC12 cells.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pediatrics, Kennedy Center, MC 5058, WCH C-576, Chicago, IL 60637-1470. Tel.: 773-702-1136; Fax: 773-702-9234; E-mail: dm36@midway.uchicago.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001837200

2 D. Mangoura, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PRL, prolactin; PRLR, prolactin receptor; JAK, Janus kinase; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Bole-Feysot, C., Goffin, V., Edery, M., Binart, N., and Kelly, P. A. (1998) Endocr. Rev. 19, 225-268
2. Ben-Jonathan, N., Mershon, J. L., Allen, D. L., and Steinmetz, R. W. (1996) Endocr. Rev. 17, 639-669
3. DeVito, W. J., Stone, S., and Mori, K. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 922-928
4. Mangoura, D., Leung, S., Pelletiere, C., Sakellaridis, N., and Wang, D. (2000) Int. J. Dev. Neurosci., in press
5. Bazan, J. F. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 164, 788-795
6. Rui, H., Djeu, J. Y., Evans, G. A., Kelly, P. A., and Farrar, W. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24076-24081
7. Lebrun, J. J., Ali, S., Sofer, L., Ullrich, A., and Kelly, P. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14021-14026
8. Rui, H., Kirken, R. A., and Farrar, W. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5364-5368
9. Berlanga, J. J., Fresno Vara, J. A., Martin-Perez, J., and Garcia-Ruiz, J. P. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1461-1467
10. Waters, M. J., Daniel, N., Bignon, C., and Djiane, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5136-5143
11. Rillema, J. A., Campbell, G. S., Lawson, D. M., and Carter-Su, C. (1992) Endocrinology 131, 973-975
12. Dusanter-Fourt, I., Muller, O., Ziemiecki, A., Mayeux, P., Drucker, B., Djiane, J., Wilks, A., Harpur, A. G., Fischer, S., and Gisselbrecht, S. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2583-2591
13. Campbell, G. S., Argetsinger, L. S., Ihle, J. N., Kelly, P. A., Rillema, J. A., and Carter-Su, C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 5232-5236
14. Lebrun, J. J., Ali, S., Ullrich, A., and Kelly, P. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10664-10670
15. DaSilva, L., Howard, O. M., Rui, H., Kirken, R. A., and Farrar, W. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18267-18270
16. Ali, S., and Ali, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7709-7716
17. Hennighausen, L., Robinson, G. W., Wagner, K. U., and Liu, W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7567-7569
18. Clevenger, C. V., and Medaglia, M. V. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 674-681
19. Yamashita, H., Xu, J., Erwin, R. A., Larner, A. C., and Rui, H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14699-14705
20. Skaper, S. D., Selak, I., and Varon, S. (1983) J. Neurosci. Res. 10, 303-315
21. Mangoura, D., and Dawson, G. (1998) J. Neurochem. 70, 130-138
22. Mangoura, D. (1997) J. Neurosci. Res. 50, 391-401
23. Mangoura, D., Pelletiere, C., Wang, D., Sakellaridis, N., and Sogos, V. (1997) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 429, 39-53
24. Kitabayashi, I., Saka, F., Gachelin, G., and Yokoyama, K. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 3400
25. Hibi, M., Lin, A., Smeal, T., Minden, A., and Karin, M. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2135-2148
26. Dahmer, M. K., and Perlman, R. L. (1988) Endocrinology 122, 2109-2113
27. Cheng, Y., Perlman, R. L., and Mangoura, D. (1996) Trans. Soc. Neurosci. 22, 1212
28. York, R. D., Yao, H., Dillon, T., Ellig, C. L., Eckert, S. P., McCleskey, E. W., and Stork, P. J. (1998) Nature 392, 622-626
29. Howe, L. R., Leevers, S. J., Gomez, N., Nakielny, S., Cohen, P., and Marshall, C. J. (1992) Cell 71, 335-342
30. Morrison, D. K., Kaplan, D. R., Rapp, U., and Roberts, T. M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8855-8859
31. Pavlovic-Surjancev, B., Cahill, A. L., and Perlman, R. L. (1992) J. Neurochem. 59, 2134-2140
32. Shuai, K., Stark, G. R., Kerr, I. M., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1993) Science 261, 1744-1746
33. Liu, X., Robinson, G. W., Wagner, K. U., Garrett, L., Wynshaw-Boris, A., and Hennighausen, L. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 179-186
34. Jaiswal, R. K., Moodie, S. A., Wolfman, A., and Landreth, G. E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6944-6953
35. Levings, M. K., Bessette, D. C., and Schrader, J. W. (1999) Blood 93, 3694-3702
36. Yu, T. X., and Rillema, J. A. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1448, 126-134
37. D'Angelo, G., Martini, J. F., Iiri, T., Fantl, W. J., Martial, J., and Weiner, R. I. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 692-704
38. Johnson, J. L., Fenton, S., and Sheffield, L. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21574-21578
39. Schuermann, M., Neuberg, M., Hunter, J. B., Jenuwein, T., Ryseck, R. P., Bravo, R., and Muller, R. (1989) Cell 56, l507-l516
40. Conrad, K. E, Oberwetter, J. M, Vaillancourt, R., Johnson, G. L., and Gutierrez-Hartmann, A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1553-1565
41. Hurel, S. J., Harris, P. E., McNicol, A. M., Foster, S., Kelly, W. F., and Baylis, P. H. (1997) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 2962-2965
42. Xia, Z., Dickens, M., Raingeaud, J., Davis, R. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1995) Science 270, 1326-1331
43. Foltz, I. N., and Schrader, J. W. (1997) Blood 89, 3092-3096
44. Pestell, R. G., Albanese, C., Watanabe, G., Lee, R. J., Lastowiecki, P., Zon, L., Ostrowski, M., and Jameson, J. L. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 1084-1094
45. Hashimoto, A., Kurosaki, M., Gotoh, N., Shibuya, M., and Kurosaki, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20139-20143
46. Han, Z., Boyle, D. L., Aupperle, K. R., Bennett, B., Manning, A. M., and Firestein, G. S. (1999) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 291, 124-130
47. Lim, C. P., and Gao, X. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31055-31061

Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Torner, S. Karg, A. Blume, M. Kandasamy, H.-G. Kuhn, J. Winkler, L. Aigner, and I. D. Neumann
Prolactin Prevents Chronic Stress-Induced Decrease of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Promotes Neuronal Fate
J. Neurosci., February 11, 2009; 29(6): 1826 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
N. Hattori, H. Nomoto, H. Fukumitsu, S. Mishima, and S. Furukawa
AMP N1-oxide, a unique compound of royal jelly, induces neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells via signaling by protein kinase A independent of that by mitogen-activated protein kinase
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., October 29, 2007; (2007) nem146v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. C. Tai, D. C. Wong-Faull, R. Claycomb, and D. L. Wong
Nerve Growth Factor Regulates Adrenergic Expression
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1792 - 1801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. H. Gutzman, D. E. Rugowski, M. D. Schroeder, J. J. Watters, and L. A. Schuler
Multiple Kinase Cascades Mediate Prolactin Signals to Activating Protein-1 in Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 18(12): 3064 - 3075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. V. Clevenger, P. A. Furth, S. E. Hankinson, and L. A. Schuler
The Role of Prolactin in Mammary Carcinoma
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2003; 24(1): 1 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cell Growth Differ.Home page
S. Dehez, C. Bierkamp, A. Kowalski-Chauvel, L. Daulhac, C. Escrieut, C. Susini, L. Pradayrol, D. Fourmy, and C. Seva
c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase Pathway in Growth-promoting Effect of the G Protein-coupled Receptor Cholecystokinin B Receptor: A Protein Kinase C/Src-dependent-Mechanism
Cell Growth Differ., August 1, 2002; 13(8): 375 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. S. Chaturvedi, S. Koul, A. Sekhon, A. Bhandari, M. Menon, and H. K. Koul
Oxalate Selectively Activates p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase and c-Jun N-terminal Kinase Signal Transduction Pathways in Renal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 5, 2002; 277(15): 13321 - 13330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. L. Brockman, M. D. Schroeder, and L. A. Schuler
PRL Activates the Cyclin D1 Promoter Via the Jak2/Stat Pathway
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2002; 16(4): 774 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. O. Stocco, L. F. Lau, and G. Gibori
A Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent Activation of ERK1/2 Mediates JunD Phosphorylation and Induction of nur77 and 20alpha -hsd Genes by Prostaglandin F2alpha in Ovarian Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2002; 277(5): 3293 - 3302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. D. Schroeder, J. Symowicz, and L. A. Schuler
PRL Modulates Cell Cycle Regulators in Mammary Tumor Epithelial Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2002; 16(1): 45 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. A. Gray, F. F. Bartol, B. J. Tarleton, A. A. Wiley, G. A. Johnson, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Developmental Biology of Uterine Glands
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1311 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Das, D. M. Bouchey, M. J. Moore, D. C. Hopkins, R. A. Nemenoff, and K. R. Stenmark
Hypoxia-induced Proliferative Response of Vascular Adventitial Fibroblasts Is Dependent on G Protein-mediated Activation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases
J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 15631 - 15640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/30/23326    most recent
M001837200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoura, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mangoura, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement