JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003439200 on May 18, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 31, 23516-23522, August 4, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/31/23516    most recent
M003439200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Regulation of Galpha i Palmitoylation by Activation of the 5-Hydroxytryptamine-1A Receptor*

Catherine A. Chen and David R. ManningDagger

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6084

Received for publication, April 21, 2000, and in revised form, May 17, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Nearly all alpha  subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) are palmitoylated at cysteine residues near the N terminus. A regulated cycle of palmitoylation could provide a mechanism for modulating G protein signaling by affecting protein interactions and localization of the subunit. In the present studies we utilized both [3H]palmitate incorporation and pulse-chase techniques to address the dynamics of alpha i palmitoylation in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Both techniques demonstrated a dose- and time-dependent change in [3H]palmitate labeling of alpha i upon activation of stably expressed 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A receptors by the agonist (+/-)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide (DPAT), with an EC50 of ~10 nM. For the incorporation assay, DPAT elicited an approximate doubling in labeling at the earliest time point measured. For the pulse-chase assay, DPAT promoted a significant loss of radiolabel almost equally as fast. These data demonstrate that the exchange of palmitate on alpha i is increased upon stimulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A receptors through the combined processes of depalmitoylation and palmitoylation. These results provide the basis for extending the concept of regulated exchange of palmitate beyond Gs and provide a framework for exploring the specific functional attributes of the palmitoylated and depalmitoylated forms of subunit.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins)1 transduce signals from cell-surface receptors to intracellular effectors via multiple pathways. The phenomenon of signal transduction is relevant to both normal and abnormal physiological processes, prompting significant advances toward understanding how signal amplitude and duration are regulated at the level of receptor, G protein, and effector. Modulation of signaling has been suggested to occur through direct protein interactions (1) and by dynamic modifications that include phosphorylation (2, 3) and palmitoylation (4-9).

Palmitoylation is a reversible post-translational modification that links the fatty acid palmitate to cysteine residues by a thioester bond. Nearly all alpha  subunits of the four G protein families, Gs, Gi, Gq, and G12, are palmitoylated at cysteine residues near the N terminus (10-14). Gi family alpha  subunits, which are palmitoylated at Cys3, are also co-translationally N-myristoylated at Gly2 via an irreversible amide bond (9). Protein-bound palmitate has widespread functional significance, influencing protein interactions and membrane localization for G protein alpha  subunits and other proteins including G protein-coupled receptors and kinases (15-17), Ras proteins (18-20), nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (21-23), and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (24, 25).

For the Gi family alpha  subunits, palmitoylation decreases the affinity of alpha i and alpha z for the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins RGS4, GAIP, and Gz GAP, and decreases the maximal rate of GTP hydrolysis of the alpha  subunit-RGS protein complex (26). Cys3 mutations, which abrogate palmitoylation, have been reported variously to enhance D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by alpha z (27), to have no effect on D2 receptor-mediated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by alpha z (28), and to inhibit coupling of the alpha 2A-adrenoreceptor to alpha i (29). Cys3 mutations also decrease the extent of subunit association with membrane (12, 27), which for alpha i (30) and alpha z (28) is rescued by overexpression of beta gamma . It has been proposed that palmitoylation of alpha  subunits maintains membrane association as part of a dual signal (28) bilayer-trapping mechanism (31) similar to that proposed for acylated nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (32) and Ras proteins (20). Furthermore, palmitoylation may maintain alpha  subunits specifically at the plasma membrane and quite possibly in specific subdomains (33, 34) because palmitoylation-deficient alpha z mutants mistarget to internal membranes (28), as do nonpalmitoylated Gpa1 (yeast alpha  subunit) (35), fyn (22), and Ha-Ras (20).

Regulated palmitoylation could provide a mechanism for modulating G protein signaling by allowing for changes in protein interactions and localization of the alpha  subunit. Despite rigorous efforts, very little is known about the potential palmitoyltransferase (36-38) and palmitoylesterase (39, 40) enzymes that are specific for G protein alpha  subunits; characterization of enzyme regulation awaits successful purification and/or cloning of these proteins. Recent progress toward this end has been made by the identification and purification of a cytoplasmic acyl-protein thioesterase that depalmitoylates G protein alpha  subunits in vitro and in vivo (41). With respect to the addition of palmitate, no thiotransferase enzyme specific for G protein alpha  subunits has been purified to homogeneity, and it is currently unclear as to whether this reaction is an enzymatic or nonenzymatic process (42).

Superimposed on the potential regulation of enzymes that catalyze turnover of palmitate is the possibility that palmitoylation is modulated by the activation state or subcellular location of the alpha  subunit. It has been shown that the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle is activation-dependent for alpha s (43-45), the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (46), and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (47). An increase in depalmitoylation of alpha s, as measured by the release of [3H]palmitate in pulse-chase assays, was demonstrated upon activation of Gs through the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (43, 44) and by inhibition of GTPase activity by mutagenesis (43). An increase in [3H]palmitate incorporation was also demonstrated following activation of Gs through the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (43-45) and cholera toxin (45), presumably due in part to an increase in depalmitoylation, facilitating an exchange of palmitate for [3H]palmitate. Although regulated palmitoylation/depalmitoylation has been clearly demonstrated for the alpha  subunit of Gs, regulated palmitoylation of alpha  subunits belonging to the Gi, Gq, and G12 classes has only begun to be addressed. Recent reports have shown an increase in incorporation of [3H]palmitate for alpha q/11 (48) and alpha i (49) upon gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor activation in pituitary cells; for alpha q, alpha i, and alpha o upon serotonin receptor activation in rat brain membranes in vitro (50); and for alpha q and alpha o upon alpha -adrenergic receptor activation in aortic membranes in vitro (51). The concept of palmitate exchange, however, has not been carefully evaluated in an intact cell setting.

In the present studies we have utilized both [3H]palmitate incorporation and pulse-chase techniques to address the dynamics of alpha i palmitoylation. We demonstrate specifically that the exchange of palmitate on alpha i is increased upon stimulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) receptors through the combined processes of depalmitoylation and palmitoylation. Our results provide evidence for a regulated cycling of palmitate and provide the basis for extending the concept of regulated exchange beyond the Gs family. The rapid changes in palmitoylation/depalmitoylation suggest a role in transduction.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Reagents and supplies were obtained as follows: F-12 nutrient mixture (HAM F-12), Dulbecco's modified eagle medium, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (CaCl2-free and MgCl2-free), and Geneticin® were from Life Technologies, Inc.; fetal bovine serum was from HyClone Laboratories Inc. (Logan, UT); leupeptin and aprotinin were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals; (+/-)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide or 8-OH-DPAT (DPAT), 4-iodo-N-(2-[4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-benzamide hydrochloride (MPPI), and pertussis toxin (PTX) were from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA); fatty acid-free bovine albumin (BSA), cycloheximide, and unlabeled palmitate were from Sigma; [9,10-3H]palmitic acid ([3H]palmitate) and [9,10-3H]myristic acid ([3H]myristate) were from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO); [35S]translabel (nominally referred to as [35S]methionine) was from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Costa Mesa, CA); enhanced chemiluminescence ECLTM (ECL) kit, AmplifyTM, HyperfilmTM MP, and SensitizeTM preflash were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. DPAT, PTX, and cycloheximide were dissolved in H2O. MPPI and unlabeled palmitate were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO). [3H]palmitate and [3H]myristate were dried and resuspended in Me2SO (final of 1% Me2SO when added to cells). Rabbit antisera 8729 (alpha i1~alpha i2>alpha i3) and 1190 (alpha s), generated against C-terminal keyhole limpet hemocyanin-conjugated peptides, have been described (52, 53); rabbit nonimmune serum was obtained from Sigma.

Cell Culture-- Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the human 5-HT1A receptor (XbaI-BamHI restriction fragment of G21 (54) in pcDNA1/neo) were provided as a gift from Dr. Perry B. Molinoff. Cells were maintained in monolayer culture in HAM F-12 with L-glutamine supplemented with 10% charcoal-treated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 400 µg/ml Geneticin® at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Single 100-mm plates were used for each treatment. Cells were split 2-4 days prior to each experiment and grown to 70-100% confluency.

Radiolabeling-- For [3H]palmitate labeling, cells were incubated with [3H]palmitate (500 µCi/ml in 3 ml, 60 Ci/mmol) at 37 °C in HAM F-12 supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin and 3.6 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA for 5-120 min (incorporation experiments) or for 3-4 h (pulse-chase experiments). For pulse-chase experiments, cells were subsequently washed once with HAM F-12 and incubated for 5-180 min at 37 °C in HAM F-12 supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin, 3.6 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA, and 100 µM unlabeled palmitate. For [3H]myristate labeling, cells were incubated with [3H]myristate (300 µCi/ml in 3 ml, 60 Ci/mmol) for 6-7 h at 37° C in HAM F-12 supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin and 3.6 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA. For [35S]methionine labeling, cells were incubated with [35S]methionine (50 µCi/ml in 3 ml, ~1400 Ci/mmol) for 30 min at 37 °C in L-methionine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing glucose and supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin, 3.6 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA, and 0.584 mg/ml glutamine.

Cell Fractionation-- Plates were placed on ice, the medium was aspirated, and the cells were washed twice with ice-cold Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline followed by harvesting with a cell scraper into 500 µl of ice-cold 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 2 µg/ml leupeptin (HME/PI). After 5 min on ice, cells were quick frozen in dry ice/EtOH and stored at -80 °C until use. Following quick thawing, cells were homogenized by 15 passes through a 26-gauge needle/1-cc syringe on ice. Homogenates were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C to pellet nuclei and unbroken cells. The supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C to pellet membranes. The pellet was washed twice and resuspended in 500 µl of HME/PI by 10 passes through a 26-gauge needle/1-cc syringe on ice.

Immunoprecipitation-- The resuspended membrane fraction was combined with an equal volume (500 µl) of 100 mM NaPO4, pH 7.2, 2% deoxycholate, 2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 300 mM NaCl, 4 mM EDTA, pH 7.2, 4 µg/ml aprotinin, and 4 µg/ml leupeptin (2× RIPA) and solubilized for 60 min on ice. Samples were "precleared" by incubation with protein A-Sepharose and rabbit nonimmune serum (1:500) for 60 min at 4 °C followed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. alpha i or alpha s was immunoprecipitated from the supernatant by incubation with protein A-Sepharose and alpha i- or alpha s-directed antisera (1:100) overnight at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Pellets were washed three times with 50 mM NaPO4, pH 7.2, 0.5% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, and 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.2, and residual buffer was removed with a 26-gauge needle/1-cc syringe. Pellets were incubated for 1 min at 75 °C in 100 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, and bromphenol blue and then loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels.

SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), Fluorography, and Densitometry-- Samples and prestained molecular weight markers were electrophoresed on 9% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Gels were stained with 50% methanol, 10% acetic acid, and 0.25% Coomassie® Blue R-250 and destained with 30% methanol and 10% acetic acid followed by 10% acetic acid alone. For 3H experiments, gels were subsequently incubated in AmplifyTM for 30 min at room temperature. For all experiments, gels were then dried at 80 °C for 60 min, exposed to preflashed HyperfilmTM (3H experiments at -80 °C, 35S experiments at room temperature), and quantified by densitometry using multiple exposures and comparisons to standard curves to verify that all bands were within film linear range.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To address the hypothesis that activation of a Gi-coupled receptor induces changes in palmitoylation of alpha i, we carried out experiments using CHO cells stably expressing the 5-HT1A receptor. The pharmacological properties of the 5-HT1A receptor have been extensively characterized, and it is quite clear from direct measurements of G protein activation (55) and PTX sensitivity of effector regulation that the 5-HT1A receptor couples primarily to members of the Gi family. The CHO cells used here contain endogenous alpha i but not alpha o or alpha z as determined by Western blotting (56). Receptor levels were ~3 pmol/mg as determined by Scatchard analysis of [125I]p-MPPI saturation binding (57).

To evaluate the possibility of an agonist-promoted incorporation of palmitate into alpha i, CHO cells were incubated for 60 min with [3H]palmitate in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of DPAT, a 5-HT1A receptor-selective agonist (58). Incorporation of radiolabel was assessed by immunoprecipitation of alpha i from subsequently prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. As shown in Fig. 1, DPAT elicited a dose-dependent increase in radiolabel incorporation into alpha i; the EC50 for DPAT was ~10-8 M. DPAT was used at 1 µM in all subsequent studies.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   DPAT increases incorporation of [3H]palmitate into alpha i in a dose-dependent manner. CHO cells stably expressing 5-HT1A receptors were incubated with [3H]palmitate for 60 min in the presence of vehicle (H2O) (open circle) or increasing concentrations of DPAT (closed circle). Incorporation of radiolabel was assessed by immunoprecipitation of alpha i from subsequently prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography (inset) and densitometry. A representative of two independent experiments is shown.

If regulated palmitoylation plays a role in signal transduction, we predicted that it would be evident at time points that correlate with effector regulation. CHO cells were incubated for 5, 30, 60, and 120 min with [3H]palmitate in the absence and presence of DPAT to evaluate the time course of [3H]palmitate incorporation into alpha i. As shown in Fig. 2A, incorporation of radiolabel increased over time in the absence of agonist (vehicle), representing "basal" turnover of palmitate. DPAT resulted in an increase in radiolabel incorporation at all time points. The data are expressed as percent change in Fig. 2B. Here, DPAT is seen to elicit the maximal difference beginning at the earliest measurable time point (5 min); this difference was sustained up to 60 min. The narrowing between stimulated and unstimulated values by 120 min probably represents an approach to equilibrium. Control experiments in which cells were pretreated with DPAT for 120 min prior to labeling excluded the possibilities that DPAT instability or 5-HT1A receptor desensitization accounted for the converging values.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   DPAT-promoted incorporation of [3H]palmitate into alpha i is inhibited by MPPI and PTX. CHO cells stably expressing 5-HT1A receptors were incubated with [3H]palmitate for 5-120 min in the presence of vehicle (H2O plus Me2SO), 1 µM DPAT, 1 µM DPAT plus 10 µM MPPI (30-90-min MPPI pretreatment), or 1 µM DPAT plus 500 ng/ml PTX (7-h PTX pretreatment). Incorporation of radiolabel was assessed by immunoprecipitation of alpha i from subsequently prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography and densitometry. A representative experiment is shown in A and percentage change (versus vehicle for DPAT and DPAT/MPPI; versus PTX alone for PTX/DPAT) in B as an average ± S.E., where n = 4-7 independent experiments for DPAT, n = 3 for DPAT/MPPI, and n = 3 for DPAT/PTX. * indicates p < 0.05, and ** indicates p < 0.01 as compared with DPAT by two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) followed by Fisher's PLSD post hoc test.

To establish the specificity of the agonist-promoted incorporation of [3H]palmitate into alpha i, CHO cells were incubated for varying lengths of time with [3H]palmitate in the presence of DPAT and MPPI, a 5-HT1A receptor-selective antagonist (59), or DPAT and PTX, a bacterial toxin that ADP ribosylates alpha i in the heterotrimeric form and prevents receptor-G protein coupling. MPPI blocked the increase in incorporation of radiolabel elicited by DPAT at all time points (Fig. 2A). MPPI alone resulted in a small decrease in incorporation (data not shown), which may have resulted from its weak inverse-agonist activity or from inhibition of residual serotonin activity in the charcoal-treated serum. PTX similarly inhibited the increase in incorporation of radiolabel elicited by DPAT, suggesting that receptor-G protein coupling is important for regulated palmitate turnover. Of note, when cells were treated with PTX alone, radiolabel incorporation was reduced below basal for alpha i, though not alpha s (data not shown), suggesting that receptor-G protein coupling also contributes to basal palmitate turnover itself. Labeling was nevertheless observed to some extent despite the complete ADP ribosylation of alpha i (as indicated by a shift in electrophoretic mobility), therefore factors beyond receptor-G protein coupling likely contribute to basal turnover. Both MPPI and PTX significantly reduced the percent change elicited by DPAT (Fig. 2B). Taken together, these data demonstrate that the agonist-dependent increase in palmitate turnover on alpha i is because of 5-HT1A receptor activation and is dependent on receptor-G protein coupling.

As shown in Fig. 3, several controls attested to the specificity of [3H]palmitate incorporation. No signal was detected when pre-immune antibody was used instead of the alpha i-directed antibody (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2). There was no significant change in incorporation of radiolabel into membrane proteins other than alpha i (data not shown) or into immunoprecipitated alpha s (lanes 10 and 11), indicating that DPAT does not alter equilibration of radiolabel within available intracellular pools. DPAT did not increase alpha i synthesis as measured by [35S]methionine labeling (lanes 7 and 9), nor did it alter the amount of alpha i in the immunoprecipitate as determined by immunoblotting (data not shown). To further exclude the possibility of an increase in alpha i synthesis, we tested whether the increase in incorporation of [3H]palmitate was evident in the absence of protein synthesis. Cycloheximide was sufficient to block protein synthesis as measured by [35S]methionine (lanes 7 and 8) but did not affect the increase in alpha i radiolabeling promoted by DPAT (lanes 5 and 6). These data indicate that de novo palmitoylation of newly synthesized alpha i was not a contributing factor, and further that 5-HT1A receptor up-regulation (57) did not account for our observations.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   DPAT-promoted incorporation of [3H]palmitate into alpha i does not require protein synthesis and occurs via a thioester bond. CHO cells stably expressing 5-HT1A receptors were incubated with [3H]palmitate for 30 min, [35S]methionine for 30 min, or [3H]myristate for 7 h in the presence of vehicle (H2O), 1 µM DPAT, or 1 µM DPAT plus 50 µg/ml cycloheximide (30-min cycloheximide pretreatment). Incorporation of radiolabel was assessed by immunoprecipitation of alpha i (except A, lanes 1 and 2, where preimmune serum was added and lanes 10 and 11, where alpha s antiserum was added) from subsequently prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography or autoradiography. In B, gels were incubated overnight in either 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, or 1 M hydroxylamine-KOH, pH 7.0, prior to fluorography as indicated. A representative of three independent experiments is shown.

The cycloheximide data also suggest that the increase in alpha i labeling promoted by DPAT is not because of an increase in co-translational myristoylation of newly synthesized proteins with [3H]myristate metabolized from [3H]palmitate. To confirm that our measurements were reflective of palmitoylation, gels containing immunoprecipitated labeled alpha i were treated with hydroxylamine. The incorporation of label was almost completely sensitive to hydroxylamine (Fig. 3B, lanes 4 and 5), which indicates fatty acid linkage via a thioester bond and is consistent with palmitate incorporation. As a negative control, [3H]myristate, which is linked via an amide bond to alpha i, was resistant to hydroxylamine as expected (lanes 3 and 6).

We went on to evaluate [3H]palmitate release from alpha i by pulse-chase techniques to ascertain whether the increase in [3H]palmitate incorporation in fact represented turnover of palmitate. CHO cells were incubated with [3H]palmitate for 4 h (pulse) followed by a 2-h incubation with 100 µM unlabeled palmitate in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of DPAT (chase). The remaining [3H]palmitate was assessed by immunoprecipitation of alpha i from membranes followed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. As presented in Fig. 4, DPAT caused a dose-dependent enhancement of release of radiolabel from alpha i. The EC50 for DPAT was ~10-8 M, similar to that obtained from the incorporation assay.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   DPAT increases release of [3H]palmitate from prelabeled alpha i in a dose-dependent manner. CHO cells stably expressing 5-HT1A receptors were incubated with [3H]palmitate for 4 h (pulse) followed by a 2-h chase with 100 µM unlabeled palmitate in the presence of vehicle (H2O) (open circle) or increasing concentrations of DPAT (closed circle). Remaining radiolabel was assessed by immunoprecipitation of alpha i from subsequently prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography (inset) and densitometry. A representative of two independent experiments is shown.

To determine the time course and specificity of the agonist-promoted release of [3H]palmitate, CHO cells were incubated with [3H]palmitate for 3-4 h followed by incubation with 100 µM unlabeled palmitate in the presence of either DPAT or DPAT plus MPPI for varying lengths of time. As shown in Fig. 5A, in the absence of agonist (vehicle) radiolabel was released from alpha i over time, representative of basal depalmitoylation. DPAT promoted a greater loss of [3H]palmitate at all time points beyond 5 min. This effect was blocked by MPPI. The data are expressed as percent change versus vehicle in Fig. 5B. Here, MPPI significantly inhibited the percent change elicited by DPAT. The somewhat slower attainment of the maximal response elicited by DPAT, as compared with that measured by the [3H]palmitate incorporation experiments, was possibly due to the continued incorporation of residual [3H]palmitate at the onset of the chase. The pulse-chase experiments demonstrate an agonist-promoted depalmitoylation of alpha i. These data, taken together with the incorporation experiments that demonstrated an agonist-promoted incorporation of radiolabel, strongly support an increase in palmitate turnover upon alpha i activation.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   DPAT-promoted release of [3H]palmitate from prelabeled alpha i is inhibited by MPPI. CHO cells stably expressing 5-HT1A receptors were incubated with [3H]palmitate for 3-4 h (pulse) followed by a 5-180-min chase with 100 µM unlabeled palmitate and vehicle (H2O plus Me2SO), 1 µM DPAT, or 1 µM DPAT plus 10 µM MPPI (30-90-min MPPI pretreatment). Remaining radiolabel was assessed by immunoprecipitation of alpha i from subsequently prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography and densitometry. A representative experiment is shown in A and percentage change versus vehicle in B as an average ± S.E. where n = 5-8 independent experiments for DPAT and n = 3-5 for DPAT/MPPI. * indicates p < 0.05, and ** indicates p < 0.01 as compared with DPAT by two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's PLSD post hoc test.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Palmitoylation of G protein alpha  subunits is emerging as a key player in modulating subunit location and subunit-protein interactions. The roles of palmitoylation have been investigated mainly by a loss of function approach involving subunits that lack the cysteine acceptor site for palmitate or subunits that are depalmitoylated by chemical or enzymatic means. However, the regulation of alpha i palmitoylation in an activation-dependent manner has not been critically assessed. We demonstrate here that palmitoylation of alpha i is subject to regulation through the 5-HT1A receptor and that this regulation specifically entails an enhanced exchange of palmitate through the combined processes of depalmitoylation and palmitoylation. These data provide the basis for extending the concept of regulated exchange of palmitate beyond Gs and provide a framework for exploring the specific functional attributes of the palmitoylated and depalmitoylated forms of subunit.

Incorporation and pulse-chase experiments demonstrated a dose- and time-dependent change in [3H]palmitate labeling of alpha i upon activation of the 5-HT1A receptor by DPAT. For both types of experiments, the EC50 for DPAT was ~10 nM and maximal changes were achieved by 1 µM. These values are consistent with those previously reported for effector regulation through the 5-HT1A receptor (56, 60, 61). For the incorporation assay, DPAT elicited an increase in labeling with the maximal percent change evident by 5 min. For the pulse-chase assay, DPAT promoted a loss of radiolabel with the maximal percent change evident by 120 min. The changes in labeling of alpha i were specific to receptor stimulation, as they were inhibited by the antagonist MPPI. They were additionally specific to receptor-Gi coupling, as they were inhibited by PTX. Nonspecific labeling, changes in alpha i synthesis or immunoprecipitation, and alterations in radioligand uptake were excluded. The increase in labeling did not represent co-translational myristoylation or compensatory up-regulation of the 5-HT1A receptor. Sensitivity to hydroxylamine confirmed the nature of palmitate attachment as a thioester bond.

The combined use of incorporation and pulse-chase techniques was important. The incorporation assay does not distinguish an enhanced exchange of palmitate from a net increase in palmitate. Nor does the pulse-chase assay distinguish an enhanced exchange from a net decrease. Detection of agonist-promoted changes by both assays, however, supports an enhanced exchange. These observations nevertheless do not preclude a simultaneous change in stoichiometry. For alpha s, however, the stoichiometry was reported to be unaffected by agonist (62).

Our results parallel previous observations of an increased turnover of palmitate on alpha s upon activation through the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (43, 44) and by inhibition of GTPase activity by mutagenesis (43). Also consistent with our results are recent reports of increases in [3H]palmitate incorporation for alpha q/11 (48), alpha s, and alpha i (49) upon gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor activation in pituitary cells. The changes in these cells, however, may have been attributable to an increase in subunit synthesis, as demonstrated subsequently for alpha q/11 in gonadotropes (63). Increases in [3H]palmitate incorporation have also been observed for alpha q, alpha s, alpha i, and alpha o upon incubation of rat brain membranes with serotonin in vitro (50), and for alpha q and alpha o upon incubation of aortic membranes with phenylephrine in vitro (51); however, neither study addressed the dynamics of palmitoylation in intact cells. In studies pertaining to alpha i, specificity, de novo palmitoylation, and depalmitoylation were not directly evaluated. Agonist stimulation of the D2 dopamine receptor in CHO-K1 cells did not promote depalmitoylation of wild-type alpha z, another member of the Gi family (28). Differences in receptor expression and coupling efficiencies may contribute to the differences in results, or regulated palmitate turnover may not occur for all Gi family alpha  subunits.

The status of alpha  subunit palmitoylation may contribute positively or negatively to signal transduction. Recent data for Gi family alpha  subunits suggest an interplay between palmitoylation and the GTPase activity promoted by RGS proteins. Palmitoylation of alpha i1 inhibits the affinity of RGS4 for alpha i1, as well as the GAP activity for the subunit; similar results were obtained with GAIP and alpha i and with Gz GAP and alpha z (26). Data for alpha s subunits suggest that palmitoylation contributes to subunit distribution between plasma membrane and cytosol. A temporal correlation, for example, between activation-dependent depalmitoylation (43) and increases in the soluble/cytosolic subunit (64, 65) has been demonstrated. Consistent with these data, nonpalmitoylated alpha s has a reduced hydrophobicity and a reduced affinity for beta gamma in vitro (66), and palmitoylation-defective (C3S) (65, 67) and constitutively active (R201C) (64, 65) alpha s mutants are localized to cytosol; in contrast however, other mutants maintain membrane association (10, 68), and activation-dependent changes in solubility are not always detected (62). For alpha i, membrane association is maintained for activated subunits (68), similar to that seen for alpha o (69) and alpha z (27), and depalmitoylation of alpha i by acyl-protein thioesterase does not alter cytosolic levels (68). These data suggest that alpha i may remain at the plasma membrane upon depalmitoylation but do not preclude alterations in localization of the subunit to microdomains, which may function to attenuate or promote signaling. Several investigators have reported that G proteins are concentrated in caveolin-enriched domains (33, 34), as well as other subdomains with low buoyant density and distinct immunofluorescence patterns (68, 70).

Possible mechanisms for activation-dependent depalmitoylation may involve changes in alpha  subunit conformation or accessibility upon binding or releasing beta gamma or guanine nucleotide. The current model favors an increase in susceptibility to a constitutively active palmitoylesterase upon dissociation of alpha  from beta gamma (41, 43). In vitro biochemical data support this model in that beta gamma protects alpha s-GDP but not alpha s-GTP from depalmitoylation by a recombinant esterase (66). Moreover, heterotrimeric Galpha that is purified (41) or present in cell extracts (43) exhibits an increase in depalmitoylation upon AlF4- activation. Monomeric alpha s-GTP and monomeric alpha s-GDP are depalmitoylated at the same rate in vitro, suggesting that the nucleotide-dependent changes in alpha  subunit conformation are not contributing factors (66). Despite compelling evidence for this model, these data do not preclude the possibility of additional regulation of palmitoylation downstream of alpha  and beta gamma dissociation (71).

    FOOTNOTES

* These studies were supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM53156 and MH14654.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084. Tel.: 215-898-1775; Fax: 215-573-2236; E-mail: manning@pharm.med.upenn.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 18, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003439200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: G proteins, heterotrimeric GTP-binding regulatory proteins; RGS, regulators of G protein signaling; 5-HT1A, 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A; HAM F-12, F-12 nutrient mixture; Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DPAT, (+/-)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide or 8-OH-DPAT; MPPI, 4-iodo- N-[2-[4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-benzamide hydrochloride; PTX, pertussis toxin; BSA, bovine albumin; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; [3H]palmitate, [9,10-3H]palmitic acid; [3H]myristate, [9,10-3H]myristic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Dohlman, H. G., and Thorner, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3871-3874
2. Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Tamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881
3. Kozasa, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12562-12567
4. Mumby, S. M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 148-154
5. Resh, M. D. (1996) Cell. Signalling 8, 403-412
6. Milligan, G., Parenti, M., and Magee, A. I. (1995) Trends Biol. Sci. 20, 181-186
7. Ross, E. M. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 107-109
8. Wedegaertner, P. B., Wilson, P. T., and Bourne, H. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 503-506
9. Casey, P. J. (1994) Curr. Biol. 6, 219-225
10. Degtyarev, M. Y., Spiegel, A. M., and Jones, T. L. Z. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 8057-8061
11. Linder, M. E., Middleton, P., Hepler, J. R., Taussig, R., Gilman, A. G., and Mumby, S. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 3675-3679
12. Parenti, M., Vigano, M. A., Newman, C. M. H., Milligan, G., and Magee, A. I. (1993) Biochem. J. 291, 349-353
13. McCallum, J. F., Wise, A., Grassie, M. A., Magee, A. I., Guzzi, F., Parenti, M., and Milligan, G. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 1021-1027
14. Veit, M., Nurnberg, B., Spicher, K., Harteneck, C., Ponimaskin, E., Schultz, G., and Schmidt, M. F. G. (1994) FEBS Lett. 339, 160-164
15. O'Dowd, B. F., Hnatowich, M., Caron, M. G., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Bouvier, M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7564-7569
16. Stoffel, R. H., Inglese, J., Macrae, A. D., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Premont, R. T. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 16053-16059
17. Loudon, R. P., and Benovic, J. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27422-27427
18. Booden, M. A., Baker, T. L., Solski, P. A., Der, C. J., Punke, S. G., and Buss, J. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1423-1431
19. Dudler, T., and Gelb, M. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11541-11547
20. Cadwallader, K. A., Paterson, H., MacDonald, S. G., and Hancock, J. F. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4722-4730
21. van't Hof, W., and Resh, M. D. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 1023-1035
22. Timson Gauen, L. K., Linder, M. E., and Shaw, A. S. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 1007-1015
23. Bijlmakers, M.-J. E., Isobe-Nakamura, M., Ruddock, L. J., and Marsh, M. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 1029-1040
24. Garcia-Cardena, G., Oh, P., Liu, J., Schnitzer, J. E., and Sessa, W. C. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6448-6453
25. Feron, O., Michel, J. B., Sase, K., and Michel, T. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 193-200
26. Tu, Y., Wang, J., and Ross, E. M. (1997) Science 278, 1132-1135
27. Wilson, P. T., and Bourne, H. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9667-9675
28. Morales, J., Fishburn, C. S., Wilson, P. T., and Bourne, H. R. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1-14
29. Wise, A., Grassie, M. A., Parenti, M., Lee, M., Rees, S., and Milligan, G. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10620-10629
30. Degtyarev, M. Y., Spiegel, A. M., and Jones, T. L. Z. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30898-30903
31. Shahinian, S., and Silvius, J. R. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 3813-3822
32. Resh, M. D. (1994) Cell 76, 411-413
33. Galbiati, F., Volonte, D., Meani, D., Milligan, G., Lublin, D. M., Lisanti, M. P., and Parenti, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5843-5850
34. Song, K. S., Sargiacomo, M., Galbiati, F., Parenti, M., and Lisanti, M. P. (1997) Cell. Mol. Biol. 43, 293-303
35. Song, J., and Dohlman, H. G. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 14806-14817
36. Das, A. K., Dasgupta, B., Bhattacharya, R., and Basu, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11021-11025
37. Dunphy, J. T., Greentree, W. K., Manahan, C. L., and Linder, M. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7154-7159
38. Berthiaume, L., and Resh, M. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22399-22405
39. Verkruyse, L. A., and Hofmann, S. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15831-15836
40. Camp, L. A., Verkruyse, L. A., Afendis, S. J., Slaughter, C. A., and Hofmann, S. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23212-23219
41. Duncan, J. A., and Gilman, A. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15830-15837
42. Duncan, J. A., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23594-23600
43. Wedegaertner, P. B., and Bourne, H. R. (1994) Cell 77, 1063-1070
44. Mumby, S. M., Kleuss, C., and Gilman, A. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2800-2804
45. Degtyarev, M. Y., Spiegel, A. M., and Jones, T. L. Z. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23769-23772
46. Loisel, T. P., Adam, L., Hebert, T. E., and Bouvier, M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 15923-15932
47. Robinson, L. J., Busconi, L., and Michel, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 995-998
48. Stanislaus, D., Janovick, J. A., Brothers, S., and Conn, P. M. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 738-746
49. Stanislaus, D., Ponder, S., Ji, T. H., and Conn, P. M. (1998) Biol. Reprod. 59, 579-586
50. Bhamre, S., Wang, H.-Y., and Friedman, E. (1998) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 286, 1482-1489
51. Gurdal, H., Seasholtz, T. M., Wang, H.-Y., Brown, R. D., Johnson, M. D., and Friedman, E. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 1064-1070
52. Lewis, J. M., Woolkalis, M. J., Gerton, G. L., Smith, R. M., Jarett, L., and Manning, D. R. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 1097-1113
53. Butkerait, P., Yheng, Y., Hallak, H., Graham, T. E., Miller, H. A., Burris, K. D., Molinoff, P. B., and Manning, D. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18691-18699
54. Fargin, A., Raymond, J. R., Lohse, M. J., Kobilka, B. K., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988) Nature 335, 358-360
55. Barr, A. J., Brass, L. F., and Manning, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2223-2229
56. Cowen, D. S., Sowers, R. S., and Manning, D. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22297-22300
57. Cowen, D. S., Molinoff, P. B., and Manning, D. R. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 221-226
58. Hjorth, S., Carlsson, A., Lindberg, P., Sanchez, D., Wikstrom, H., Arvidsson, L. E., Hacksell, U., and Nilsson, J. L. G. (1982) J. Neural Transm. 55, 169-188
59. Kung, M.-P., Frederick, D., Mu, M., Zhuang, Z.-P., and Kung, H. F. (1995) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 272, 429-437
60. Dumuis, A., Sebben, M., and Bockaert, J. (1987) Mol. Pharmacol. 33, 178-186
61. Williams, J. T., Colmers, W. F., and Pan, Z. Z. (1988) J. Neurosci. 8, 3499-3506
62. Jones, T. L. Z., Degtyarev, M. Y., and Backlund, P. S., Jr. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 7185-7191
63. Cornea, A., Janovick, J. A., Stanislaus, D., and Conn, P. M. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 397-402
64. Levis, M. J., and Bourne, H. R. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1297-1307
65. Wedegaertner, P. B., Bourne, H. R., and von Zastrow, M. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1225-1233
66. Iiri, T., Backlund, P. S., Jr., Jones, T. L. Z., Wedegaertner, P. B., and Bourne, H. R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14592-14597
67. Wedegaertner, P. B., Chu, D. H., Wilson, P. T., Levis, M. J., and Bourne, H. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25001-25008
68. Huang, C., Duncan, J. A., Gilman, A. G., and Mumby, S. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 412-417
69. Denker, B. M., Saha, C., Khawaja, S., and Nigam, S. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25750-25753
70. Huang, C., Hepler, J. R., Chen, L. T., Gilman, A. G., Anderson, R. G. W., and Mumby, S. M. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2365-2378
71. Loisel, T. P., Ansanay, H., Adam, L., Marullo, S., Seifert, R., Lagace, M., and Bouvier, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31014-31019


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Ponimaskin, G. Dityateva, M. O. Ruonala, M. Fukata, Y. Fukata, F. Kobe, F. S. Wouters, M. Delling, D. S. Bredt, M. Schachner, et al.
Fibroblast Growth Factor-Regulated Palmitoylation of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Determines Neuronal Morphogenesis
J. Neurosci., September 3, 2008; 28(36): 8897 - 8907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Chisari, D. K. Saini, V. Kalyanaraman, and N. Gautam
Shuttling of G Protein Subunits between the Plasma Membrane and Intracellular Membranes
J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24092 - 24098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
M. D. Resh
Palmitoylation of Ligands, Receptors, and Intracellular Signaling Molecules
Sci. Signal., October 31, 2006; 2006(359): re14 - re14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. E. Petaja-Repo, M. Hogue, T. T. Leskela, P. M. H. Markkanen, J. T. Tuusa, and M. Bouvier
Distinct Subcellular Localization for Constitutive and Agonist-modulated Palmitoylation of the Human {delta} Opioid Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2006; 281(23): 15780 - 15789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Papoucheva, A. Dumuis, M. Sebben, D. W. Richter, and E. G. Ponimaskin
The 5-Hydroxytryptamine(1A) Receptor Is Stably Palmitoylated, and Acylation Is Critical for Communication of Receptor with Gi Protein
J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3280 - 3291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. L. Baker, H. Zheng, J. Walker, J. L. Coloff, and J. E. Buss
Distinct Rates of Palmitate Turnover on Membrane-bound Cellular and Oncogenic H-Ras
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19292 - 19300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. Leaney, A. Benians, F. M. Graves, and A. Tinker
A Novel Strategy to Engineer Functional Fluorescent Inhibitory G-protein alpha Subunits
J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28803 - 28809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Y. Hawash, K. P. Kesavan, A. I. Magee, R. L. Geahlen, and M. L. Harrison
The Lck SH3 Domain Negatively Regulates Localization to Lipid Rafts through an Interaction with c-Cbl
J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2002; 277(7): 5683 - 5691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]