![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 31, 23516-23522, August 4, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6084
Received for publication, April 21, 2000, and in revised form, May 17, 2000
Nearly all Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G
proteins)1 transduce signals
from cell-surface receptors to intracellular effectors via multiple
pathways. The phenomenon of signal transduction is relevant to both
normal and abnormal physiological processes, prompting significant
advances toward understanding how signal amplitude and duration are
regulated at the level of receptor, G protein, and effector. Modulation
of signaling has been suggested to occur through direct protein
interactions (1) and by dynamic modifications that include
phosphorylation (2, 3) and palmitoylation (4-9).
Palmitoylation is a reversible post-translational modification that
links the fatty acid palmitate to cysteine residues by a thioester
bond. Nearly all For the Gi family Regulated palmitoylation could provide a mechanism for modulating G
protein signaling by allowing for changes in protein interactions and
localization of the Superimposed on the potential regulation of enzymes that catalyze
turnover of palmitate is the possibility that palmitoylation is
modulated by the activation state or subcellular location of the In the present studies we have utilized both
[3H]palmitate incorporation and pulse-chase techniques to
address the dynamics of Materials--
Reagents and supplies were obtained as follows:
F-12 nutrient mixture (HAM F-12), Dulbecco's modified eagle medium,
Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (CaCl2-free and
MgCl2-free), and Geneticin® were from Life
Technologies, Inc.; fetal bovine serum was from HyClone
Laboratories Inc. (Logan, UT); leupeptin and aprotinin were from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals;
(+/ Cell Culture--
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing
the human 5-HT1A receptor (XbaI-BamHI
restriction fragment of G21 (54) in pcDNA1/neo) were provided as a
gift from Dr. Perry B. Molinoff. Cells were maintained in monolayer
culture in HAM F-12 with L-glutamine supplemented with 10%
charcoal-treated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 400 µg/ml Geneticin® at
37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Single
100-mm plates were used for each treatment. Cells were split 2-4 days prior to each experiment and grown to 70-100% confluency.
Radiolabeling--
For [3H]palmitate labeling,
cells were incubated with [3H]palmitate (500 µCi/ml in
3 ml, 60 Ci/mmol) at 37 °C in HAM F-12 supplemented with
penicillin/streptomycin and 3.6 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA for 5-120
min (incorporation experiments) or for 3-4 h (pulse-chase experiments). For pulse-chase experiments, cells were subsequently washed once with HAM F-12 and incubated for 5-180 min at 37 °C in
HAM F-12 supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin, 3.6 mg/ml fatty
acid-free BSA, and 100 µM unlabeled palmitate. For
[3H]myristate labeling, cells were incubated with
[3H]myristate (300 µCi/ml in 3 ml, 60 Ci/mmol) for 6-7
h at 37° C in HAM F-12 supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin and
3.6 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA. For [35S]methionine
labeling, cells were incubated with [35S]methionine (50 µCi/ml in 3 ml, ~1400 Ci/mmol) for 30 min at 37 °C in
L-methionine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing glucose and supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin, 3.6 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA, and 0.584 mg/ml glutamine.
Cell Fractionation--
Plates were placed on ice, the medium
was aspirated, and the cells were washed twice with ice-cold
Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline followed by harvesting with a
cell scraper into 500 µl of ice-cold 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.2, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 2 µg/ml leupeptin (HME/PI). After 5 min on
ice, cells were quick frozen in dry ice/EtOH and stored at Immunoprecipitation--
The resuspended membrane fraction was
combined with an equal volume (500 µl) of 100 mM
NaPO4, pH 7.2, 2% deoxycholate, 2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS,
300 mM NaCl, 4 mM EDTA, pH 7.2, 4 µg/ml aprotinin, and 4 µg/ml leupeptin (2× RIPA) and solubilized for 60 min on ice. Samples were "precleared" by incubation with protein A-Sepharose and rabbit nonimmune serum (1:500) for 60 min at 4 °C
followed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min at
4 °C. SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), Fluorography,
and Densitometry--
Samples and prestained molecular weight markers
were electrophoresed on 9% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Gels were stained
with 50% methanol, 10% acetic acid, and 0.25%
Coomassie® Blue R-250 and destained with 30% methanol and
10% acetic acid followed by 10% acetic acid alone. For 3H
experiments, gels were subsequently incubated in AmplifyTM
for 30 min at room temperature. For all experiments, gels were then
dried at 80 °C for 60 min, exposed to preflashed HyperfilmTM (3H experiments at To address the hypothesis that activation of a
Gi-coupled receptor induces changes in palmitoylation of
To evaluate the possibility of an agonist-promoted incorporation of
palmitate into If regulated palmitoylation plays a role in signal transduction, we
predicted that it would be evident at time points that correlate with
effector regulation. CHO cells were incubated for 5, 30, 60, and 120 min with [3H]palmitate in the absence and presence of
DPAT to evaluate the time course of [3H]palmitate
incorporation into
Regulation of G
i Palmitoylation by Activation of
the 5-Hydroxytryptamine-1A Receptor*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunits of heterotrimeric
GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) are palmitoylated at
cysteine residues near the N terminus. A regulated cycle of
palmitoylation could provide a mechanism for modulating G protein
signaling by affecting protein interactions and localization of the
subunit. In the present studies we utilized both
[3H]palmitate incorporation and pulse-chase
techniques to address the dynamics of
i palmitoylation
in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Both techniques demonstrated a dose-
and time-dependent change in [3H]palmitate
labeling of
i upon activation of stably expressed 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A receptors by the agonist
(+/
)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide (DPAT), with an EC50 of ~10 nM.
For the incorporation assay, DPAT elicited an approximate doubling in
labeling at the earliest time point measured. For the pulse-chase
assay, DPAT promoted a significant loss of radiolabel almost equally as
fast. These data demonstrate that the exchange of palmitate on
i is increased upon stimulation of
5-hydroxytryptamine-1A receptors through the combined processes of
depalmitoylation and palmitoylation. These results provide the basis
for extending the concept of regulated exchange of palmitate beyond
Gs and provide a framework for exploring the specific
functional attributes of the palmitoylated and depalmitoylated forms of subunit.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunits of the four G protein families,
Gs, Gi, Gq, and G12,
are palmitoylated at cysteine residues near the N terminus (10-14).
Gi family
subunits, which are palmitoylated at
Cys3, are also co-translationally
N-myristoylated at Gly2 via an irreversible
amide bond (9). Protein-bound palmitate has widespread functional
significance, influencing protein interactions and membrane
localization for G protein
subunits and other proteins including G
protein-coupled receptors and kinases (15-17), Ras proteins
(18-20), nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (21-23), and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (24, 25).
subunits, palmitoylation decreases
the affinity of
i and
z for the
regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins RGS4, GAIP, and
Gz GAP, and decreases the maximal rate of GTP
hydrolysis of the
subunit-RGS protein complex (26). Cys3 mutations, which abrogate palmitoylation, have been
reported variously to enhance D2 receptor-mediated
inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by
z (27), to have no
effect on D2 receptor-mediated activation of
mitogen-activated protein kinase by
z (28), and to
inhibit coupling of the
2A-adrenoreceptor to
i (29). Cys3 mutations also decrease the
extent of subunit association with membrane (12, 27), which for
i (30) and
z (28) is rescued by
overexpression of 
. It has been proposed that palmitoylation of
subunits maintains membrane association as part of a dual signal
(28) bilayer-trapping mechanism (31) similar to that proposed for
acylated nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (32) and Ras proteins (20).
Furthermore, palmitoylation may maintain
subunits specifically at
the plasma membrane and quite possibly in specific subdomains (33, 34)
because palmitoylation-deficient
z mutants mistarget to
internal membranes (28), as do nonpalmitoylated Gpa1 (yeast
subunit) (35), fyn (22), and Ha-Ras (20).
subunit. Despite rigorous efforts, very little
is known about the potential palmitoyltransferase (36-38) and
palmitoylesterase (39, 40) enzymes that are specific for G protein
subunits; characterization of enzyme regulation awaits successful
purification and/or cloning of these proteins. Recent progress toward
this end has been made by the identification and purification of a
cytoplasmic acyl-protein thioesterase that depalmitoylates G protein
subunits in vitro and in vivo (41). With
respect to the addition of palmitate, no thiotransferase enzyme
specific for G protein
subunits has been purified to homogeneity,
and it is currently unclear as to whether this reaction is an enzymatic or nonenzymatic process (42).
subunit. It has been shown that the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle is activation-dependent for
s
(43-45), the
2-adrenergic receptor (46), and
endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (47). An increase in depalmitoylation
of
s, as measured by the release of
[3H]palmitate in pulse-chase assays, was demonstrated
upon activation of Gs through the
2-adrenergic receptor (43, 44) and by inhibition of
GTPase activity by mutagenesis (43). An increase in
[3H]palmitate incorporation was also demonstrated
following activation of Gs through the
2-adrenergic receptor (43-45) and cholera toxin (45),
presumably due in part to an increase in depalmitoylation, facilitating
an exchange of palmitate for [3H]palmitate. Although
regulated palmitoylation/depalmitoylation has been clearly demonstrated
for the
subunit of Gs, regulated palmitoylation of
subunits belonging to the Gi, Gq, and
G12 classes has only begun to be addressed. Recent reports
have shown an increase in incorporation of [3H]palmitate
for
q/11 (48) and
i (49) upon
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor activation in pituitary cells;
for
q,
i, and
o upon
serotonin receptor activation in rat brain membranes in vitro (50); and for
q and
o upon
-adrenergic receptor activation in aortic membranes in
vitro (51). The concept of palmitate exchange, however, has not
been carefully evaluated in an intact cell setting.
i palmitoylation. We demonstrate
specifically that the exchange of palmitate on
i is
increased upon stimulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) receptors through the combined processes of
depalmitoylation and palmitoylation. Our results provide evidence for a
regulated cycling of palmitate and provide the basis for extending the
concept of regulated exchange beyond the Gs family. The
rapid changes in palmitoylation/depalmitoylation suggest a role in transduction.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide or 8-OH-DPAT (DPAT),
4-iodo-N-(2-[4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-benzamide hydrochloride (MPPI), and pertussis toxin (PTX) were from
Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA); fatty acid-free
bovine albumin (BSA), cycloheximide, and unlabeled palmitate were from Sigma; [9,10-3H]palmitic acid
([3H]palmitate) and [9,10-3H]myristic acid
([3H]myristate) were from American Radiolabeled Chemicals
(St. Louis, MO); [35S]translabel (nominally referred to
as [35S]methionine) was from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Costa
Mesa, CA); enhanced chemiluminescence ECLTM (ECL) kit, AmplifyTM,
HyperfilmTM MP, and SensitizeTM preflash were from Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech. DPAT, PTX, and cycloheximide were dissolved in
H2O. MPPI and unlabeled palmitate were dissolved in
dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO).
[3H]palmitate and [3H]myristate were dried
and resuspended in Me2SO (final of 1% Me2SO when added to cells). Rabbit antisera 8729 (
i1~
i2>
i3) and 1190 (
s), generated against C-terminal keyhole limpet
hemocyanin-conjugated peptides, have been described (52, 53); rabbit
nonimmune serum was obtained from Sigma.
80 °C
until use. Following quick thawing, cells were homogenized by 15 passes
through a 26-gauge needle/1-cc syringe on ice. Homogenates were
centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C to pellet
nuclei and unbroken cells. The supernatant was centrifuged at
100,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C to pellet membranes.
The pellet was washed twice and resuspended in 500 µl of HME/PI by 10 passes through a 26-gauge needle/1-cc syringe on ice.
i or
s was immunoprecipitated
from the supernatant by incubation with protein A-Sepharose and
i- or
s-directed antisera (1:100) overnight at 4 °C. Immunoprecipitates were collected by
centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C.
Pellets were washed three times with 50 mM
NaPO4, pH 7.2, 0.5% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl,
and 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.2, and residual buffer was removed with
a 26-gauge needle/1-cc syringe. Pellets were incubated for 1 min
at 75 °C in 100 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, and bromphenol blue and
then loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels.
80 °C, 35S experiments
at room temperature), and quantified by densitometry using multiple
exposures and comparisons to standard curves to verify that all bands
were within film linear range.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
i, we carried out experiments using CHO cells stably
expressing the 5-HT1A receptor. The pharmacological
properties of the 5-HT1A receptor have been extensively
characterized, and it is quite clear from direct measurements of G
protein activation (55) and PTX sensitivity of effector regulation that
the 5-HT1A receptor couples primarily to members of the
Gi family. The CHO cells used here contain endogenous
i but not
o or
z as
determined by Western blotting (56). Receptor levels were ~3 pmol/mg
as determined by Scatchard analysis of [125I]p-MPPI
saturation binding (57).
i, CHO cells were incubated for 60 min with [3H]palmitate in the absence or presence of
increasing concentrations of DPAT, a 5-HT1A
receptor-selective agonist (58). Incorporation of radiolabel was
assessed by immunoprecipitation of
i from subsequently prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. As shown in
Fig. 1, DPAT elicited a
dose-dependent increase in radiolabel incorporation into
i; the EC50 for DPAT was
~10
8 M. DPAT was used at 1 µM
in all subsequent studies.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
DPAT increases incorporation of
[3H]palmitate into
i in a
dose-dependent manner. CHO cells stably expressing
5-HT1A receptors were incubated with
[3H]palmitate for 60 min in the presence of vehicle
(H2O) (open circle) or increasing concentrations
of DPAT (closed circle). Incorporation of radiolabel was
assessed by immunoprecipitation of
i from subsequently
prepared membranes followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography (inset)
and densitometry. A representative of two independent experiments is
shown.
i. As shown in Fig.
2A, incorporation of
radiolabel increased over time in the absence of agonist (vehicle), representing "basal" turnover of palmitate. DPAT resulted in an increase in radiolabel incorporation at all time points. The data are
expressed as percent change in Fig. 2B. Here, DPAT is seen to elicit the maximal difference beginning at the earliest measurable time point (5 min); this difference was sustained up to 60 min. The
narrowing between stimulated and unstimulated values by 120 min
probably represents an approach to equilibrium. Control experiments in
which cells were pretreated with DPAT for 120 min prior to labeling
excluded the possibilities that DPAT instability or 5-HT1A receptor desensitization accounted for the converging values.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
DPAT-promoted incorporation of
[3H]palmitate into
i
is inhibited by MPPI and PTX. CHO cells stably expressing
5-HT1A receptors were incubated with
[3H]palmitate for 5-120 min in the presence of vehicle
(H2O plus Me2SO), 1 µM DPAT, 1 µM DPAT plus 10 µM MPPI (30-90-min MPPI
pretreatment), or 1 µM DPAT plus 500 ng/ml PTX (7-h PTX
pretreatment). Incorporation of radiolabel was assessed by
immunoprecipitation of
i from subsequently prepared
membranes followed by SDS-PAGE/fluorography and densitometry. A
representative experiment is shown in A and percentage
change (versus vehicle for DPAT and DPAT/MPPI;
versus PTX alone for PTX/DPAT) in B as an
average ± S.E., where n = 4-7 independent
experiments for DPAT, n = 3 for DPAT/MPPI, and
n = 3 for DPAT/PTX. * indicates p < 0.05, and ** indicates p < 0.01 as compared with DPAT
by two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) followed by Fisher's
PLSD post hoc test.
To establish the specificity of the agonist-promoted incorporation of
[3H]palmitate into
i, CHO cells were
incubated for varying lengths of time with [3H]palmitate
in the presence of DPAT and MPPI, a 5-HT1A
receptor-selective antagonist (59), or DPAT and PTX, a bacterial toxin
that ADP ribosylates
i in the heterotrimeric form and
prevents receptor-G protein coupling. MPPI blocked the increase in
incorporation of radiolabel elicited by DPAT at all time points (Fig.
2A). MPPI alone resulted in a small decrease in
incorporation (data not shown), which may have resulted from its weak
inverse-agonist activity or from inhibition of residual serotonin
activity in the charcoal-treated serum. PTX similarly inhibited the
increase in incorporation of radiolabel elicited by DPAT, suggesting
that receptor-G protein coupling is important for regulated palmitate turnover. Of note, when cells were treated with PTX alone, radiolabel incorporation was reduced below basal for
i, though not
s (data not shown), suggesting that receptor-G protein
coupling also contributes to basal palmitate turnover itself. Labeling
was nevertheless observed to some extent despite the complete ADP
ribosylation of
i (as indicated by a shift in
electrophoretic mobility), therefore factors beyond receptor-G protein
coupling likely contribute to basal turnover. Both MPPI and PTX
significantly reduced the percent change elicited by DPAT (Fig.
2B). Taken together, these data demonstrate that the
agonist-dependent increase in palmitate turnover on
i is because of 5-HT1A receptor activation
and is dependent on receptor-G protein coupling.
As shown in Fig. 3, several controls
attested to the specificity of [3H]palmitate
incorporation. No signal was detected when pre-immune antibody was used
instead of the
i-directed antibody (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2). There was no significant change
in incorporation of radiolabel into membrane proteins other than
i (data not shown) or into immunoprecipitated
s (lanes 10 and 11), indicating
that DPAT does not alter equilibration of radiolabel within available intracellular pools. DPAT did not increase
i synthesis
as measured by [35S]methionine labeling (lanes
7 and 9), nor did it alter the amount of
i in the immunoprecipitate as determined by
immunoblotting (data not shown). To further exclude the possibility of
an increase in
i synthesis, we tested whether the
increase in incorporation of [3H]palmitate was evident in
the absence of protein synthesis. Cycloheximide was sufficient to block
protein synthesis as measured by [35S]methionine
(lanes 7 and 8) but did not affect the increase
in
i radiolabeling promoted by DPAT (lanes 5 and 6). These data indicate that de novo
palmitoylation of newly synthesized
i was not a
contributing factor, and further that 5-HT1A receptor
up-regulation (57) did not account for our observations.
|
The cycloheximide data also suggest that the increase in
i labeling promoted by DPAT is not because of an
increase in co-translational myristoylation of newly synthesized
proteins with [3H]myristate metabolized from
[3H]palmitate. To confirm that our measurements were
reflective of palmitoylation, gels containing immunoprecipitated
labeled
i were treated with hydroxylamine. The
incorporation of label was almost completely sensitive to hydroxylamine
(Fig. 3B, lanes 4 and 5), which
indicates fatty acid linkage via a thioester bond and is consistent
with palmitate incorporation. As a negative control,
[3H]myristate, which is linked via an amide bond to
i, was resistant to hydroxylamine as expected
(lanes 3 and 6).
We went on to evaluate [3H]palmitate release from
i by pulse-chase techniques to ascertain whether the
increase in [3H]palmitate incorporation in fact
represented turnover of palmitate. CHO cells were incubated with
[3H]palmitate for 4 h (pulse) followed by a 2-h
incubation with 100 µM unlabeled palmitate in the absence
or presence of increasing concentrations of DPAT (chase). The remaining
[3H]palmitate was assessed by immunoprecipitation of
i from membranes followed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
As presented in Fig. 4, DPAT caused a
dose-dependent enhancement of release of radiolabel from
i. The EC50 for DPAT was
~10
8 M, similar to that obtained from the
incorporation assay.
|
To determine the time course and specificity of the agonist-promoted
release of [3H]palmitate, CHO cells were incubated with
[3H]palmitate for 3-4 h followed by incubation with 100 µM unlabeled palmitate in the presence of either DPAT or
DPAT plus MPPI for varying lengths of time. As shown in Fig.
5A, in the absence of agonist
(vehicle) radiolabel was released from
i over time,
representative of basal depalmitoylation. DPAT promoted a greater loss
of [3H]palmitate at all time points beyond 5 min. This
effect was blocked by MPPI. The data are expressed as percent change
versus vehicle in Fig. 5B. Here, MPPI
significantly inhibited the percent change elicited by DPAT. The
somewhat slower attainment of the maximal response elicited by DPAT, as
compared with that measured by the [3H]palmitate
incorporation experiments, was possibly due to the continued
incorporation of residual [3H]palmitate at the onset of
the chase. The pulse-chase experiments demonstrate an agonist-promoted
depalmitoylation of
i. These data, taken together with
the incorporation experiments that demonstrated an agonist-promoted
incorporation of radiolabel, strongly support an increase in palmitate
turnover upon
i activation.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Palmitoylation of G protein
subunits is emerging as a key
player in modulating subunit location and subunit-protein interactions. The roles of palmitoylation have been investigated mainly by a loss of
function approach involving subunits that lack the cysteine acceptor
site for palmitate or subunits that are depalmitoylated by chemical or
enzymatic means. However, the regulation of
i palmitoylation in an activation-dependent manner has not
been critically assessed. We demonstrate here that palmitoylation of
i is subject to regulation through the
5-HT1A receptor and that this regulation specifically
entails an enhanced exchange of palmitate through the combined
processes of depalmitoylation and palmitoylation. These data provide
the basis for extending the concept of regulated exchange of palmitate
beyond Gs and provide a framework for exploring the
specific functional attributes of the palmitoylated and depalmitoylated forms of subunit.
Incorporation and pulse-chase experiments demonstrated a dose- and
time-dependent change in [3H]palmitate
labeling of
i upon activation of the 5-HT1A
receptor by DPAT. For both types of experiments, the EC50
for DPAT was ~10 nM and maximal changes were achieved by
1 µM. These values are consistent with those previously
reported for effector regulation through the 5-HT1A
receptor (56, 60, 61). For the incorporation assay, DPAT elicited an
increase in labeling with the maximal percent change evident by 5 min.
For the pulse-chase assay, DPAT promoted a loss of radiolabel with the
maximal percent change evident by 120 min. The changes in labeling of
i were specific to receptor stimulation, as they were
inhibited by the antagonist MPPI. They were additionally specific to
receptor-Gi coupling, as they were inhibited by PTX.
Nonspecific labeling, changes in
i synthesis or
immunoprecipitation, and alterations in radioligand uptake were
excluded. The increase in labeling did not represent co-translational
myristoylation or compensatory up-regulation of the 5-HT1A
receptor. Sensitivity to hydroxylamine confirmed the nature of
palmitate attachment as a thioester bond.
The combined use of incorporation and pulse-chase techniques was
important. The incorporation assay does not distinguish an enhanced
exchange of palmitate from a net increase in palmitate. Nor does the
pulse-chase assay distinguish an enhanced exchange from a net decrease.
Detection of agonist-promoted changes by both assays, however, supports
an enhanced exchange. These observations nevertheless do not preclude a
simultaneous change in stoichiometry. For
s, however,
the stoichiometry was reported to be unaffected by agonist (62).
Our results parallel previous observations of an increased turnover of
palmitate on
s upon activation through the
2-adrenergic receptor (43, 44) and by inhibition of
GTPase activity by mutagenesis (43). Also consistent with our results
are recent reports of increases in [3H]palmitate
incorporation for
q/11 (48),
s, and
i (49) upon gonadotropin-releasing hormone
receptor activation in pituitary cells. The changes in these cells,
however, may have been attributable to an increase in subunit
synthesis, as demonstrated subsequently for
q/11 in
gonadotropes (63). Increases in [3H]palmitate
incorporation have also been observed for
q,
s,
i, and
o upon
incubation of rat brain membranes with serotonin in vitro
(50), and for
q and
o upon incubation of
aortic membranes with phenylephrine in vitro (51); however,
neither study addressed the dynamics of palmitoylation in intact cells.
In studies pertaining to
i, specificity, de
novo palmitoylation, and depalmitoylation were not directly
evaluated. Agonist stimulation of the D2 dopamine receptor
in CHO-K1 cells did not promote depalmitoylation of wild-type
z, another member of the Gi family (28).
Differences in receptor expression and coupling efficiencies may
contribute to the differences in results, or regulated palmitate
turnover may not occur for all Gi family
subunits.
The status of
subunit palmitoylation may contribute positively or
negatively to signal transduction. Recent data for Gi family
subunits suggest an interplay between palmitoylation and the
GTPase activity promoted by RGS proteins. Palmitoylation of
i1 inhibits the affinity of RGS4 for
i1,
as well as the GAP activity for the subunit; similar results were
obtained with GAIP and
i and with Gz GAP and
z (26). Data for
s subunits suggest that
palmitoylation contributes to subunit distribution between plasma
membrane and cytosol. A temporal correlation, for example, between
activation-dependent depalmitoylation (43) and increases in
the soluble/cytosolic subunit (64, 65) has been demonstrated. Consistent with these data, nonpalmitoylated
s has a
reduced hydrophobicity and a reduced affinity for 
in
vitro (66), and palmitoylation-defective (C3S) (65, 67) and
constitutively active (R201C) (64, 65)
s mutants are
localized to cytosol; in contrast however, other mutants maintain
membrane association (10, 68), and activation-dependent changes
in solubility are not always detected (62). For
i,
membrane association is maintained for activated subunits (68), similar
to that seen for
o (69) and
z (27), and
depalmitoylation of
i by acyl-protein thioesterase does
not alter cytosolic levels (68). These data suggest that
i may remain at the plasma membrane upon
depalmitoylation but do not preclude alterations in localization of the
subunit to microdomains, which may function to attenuate or promote
signaling. Several investigators have reported that G proteins are
concentrated in caveolin-enriched domains (33, 34), as well as other
subdomains with low buoyant density and distinct immunofluorescence
patterns (68, 70).
Possible mechanisms for activation-dependent
depalmitoylation may involve changes in
subunit conformation or
accessibility upon binding or releasing 
or guanine nucleotide.
The current model favors an increase in susceptibility to a
constitutively active palmitoylesterase upon dissociation of
from

(41, 43). In vitro biochemical data support this
model in that 
protects
s-GDP but not
s-GTP from depalmitoylation by a recombinant esterase
(66). Moreover, heterotrimeric G
that is purified (41) or present in
cell extracts (43) exhibits an increase in depalmitoylation upon
AlF4
activation. Monomeric
s-GTP and monomeric
s-GDP are
depalmitoylated at the same rate in vitro, suggesting that
the nucleotide-dependent changes in
subunit
conformation are not contributing factors (66). Despite compelling
evidence for this model, these data do not preclude the possibility of
additional regulation of palmitoylation downstream of
and 
dissociation (71).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* These studies were supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM53156 and MH14654.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3620 Hamilton Walk,
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084. Tel.: 215-898-1775; Fax: 215-573-2236; E-mail: manning@pharm.med.upenn.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 18, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003439200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
G proteins, heterotrimeric GTP-binding regulatory proteins;
RGS, regulators of G
protein signaling;
5-HT1A, 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A;
HAM
F-12, F-12 nutrient mixture;
Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide;
DPAT, (+/
)-2-dipropylamino-8-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene
hydrobromide or 8-OH-DPAT;
MPPI, 4-iodo- N-[2-[4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-benzamide
hydrochloride;
PTX, pertussis toxin;
BSA, bovine albumin;
CHO, Chinese
hamster ovary;
ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence;
[3H]palmitate, [9,10-3H]palmitic acid;
[3H]myristate, [9,10-3H]myristic acid;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Dohlman, H. G., and Thorner, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3871-3874 |
| 2. | Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Tamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881 |
| 3. | Kozasa, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12562-12567 |
| 4. | Mumby, S. M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 148-154 |
| 5. | Resh, M. D. (1996) Cell. Signalling 8, 403-412 |
| 6. | Milligan, G., Parenti, M., and Magee, A. I. (1995) Trends Biol. Sci. 20, 181-186 |
| 7. | Ross, E. M. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 107-109 |
| 8. | Wedegaertner, P. B., Wilson, P. T., and Bourne, H. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 503-506 |
| 9. | Casey, P. J. (1994) Curr. Biol. 6, 219-225 |
| 10. | Degtyarev, M. Y., Spiegel, A. M., and Jones, T. L. Z. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 8057-8061 |
| 11. | Linder, M. E., Middleton, P., Hepler, J. R., Taussig, R., Gilman, A. G., and Mumby, S. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 3675-3679 |
| 12. | Parenti, M., Vigano, M. A., Newman, C. M. H., Milligan, G., and Magee, A. I. (1993) Biochem. J. 291, 349-353 |
| 13. | McCallum, J. F., Wise, A., Grassie, M. A., Magee, A. I., Guzzi, F., Parenti, M., and Milligan, G. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 1021-1027 |
| 14. | Veit, M., Nurnberg, B., Spicher, K., Harteneck, C., Ponimaskin, E., Schultz, G., and Schmidt, M. F. G. (1994) FEBS Lett. 339, 160-164 |
| 15. | O'Dowd, B. F., Hnatowich, M., Caron, M. G., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Bouvier, M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7564-7569 |
| 16. | Stoffel, R. H., Inglese, J., Macrae, A. D., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Premont, R. T. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 16053-16059 |
| 17. | Loudon, R. P., and Benovic, J. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27422-27427 |
| 18. | Booden, M. A., Baker, T. L., Solski, P. A., Der, C. J., Punke, S. G., and Buss, J. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1423-1431 |
| 19. | Dudler, T., and Gelb, M. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11541-11547 |
| 20. | Cadwallader, K. A., Paterson, H., MacDonald, S. G., and Hancock, J. F. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4722-4730 |
| 21. | van't Hof, W., and Resh, M. D. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 1023-1035 |
| 22. | Timson Gauen, L. K., Linder, M. E., and Shaw, A. S. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 1007-1015 |
| 23. | Bijlmakers, M.-J. E., Isobe-Nakamura, M., Ruddock, L. J., and Marsh, M. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 1029-1040 |
| 24. | Garcia-Cardena, G., Oh, P., Liu, J., Schnitzer, J. E., and Sessa, W. C. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6448-6453 |
| 25. | Feron, O., Michel, J. B., Sase, K., and Michel, T. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 193-200 |
| 26. | Tu, Y., Wang, J., and Ross, E. M. (1997) Science 278, 1132-1135 |
| 27. | Wilson, P. T., and Bourne, H. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9667-9675 |
| 28. | Morales, J., Fishburn, C. S., Wilson, P. T., and Bourne, H. R. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 1-14 |
| 29. | Wise, A., Grassie, M. A., Parenti, M., Lee, M., Rees, S., and Milligan, G. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 10620-10629 |
| 30. | Degtyarev, M. Y., Spiegel, A. M., and Jones, T. L. Z. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30898-30903 |
| 31. | Shahinian, S., and Silvius, J. R. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 3813-3822 |
| 32. | Resh, M. D. (1994) Cell 76, 411-413 |
| 33. | Galbiati, F., Volonte, D., Meani, D., Milligan, G., Lublin, D. M., Lisanti, M. P., and Parenti, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5843-5850 |
| 34. | Song, K. S., Sargiacomo, M., Galbiati, F., Parenti, M., and Lisanti, M. P. (1997) Cell. Mol. Biol. 43, 293-303 |
| 35. | Song, J., and Dohlman, H. G. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 14806-14817 |
| 36. | Das, A. K., Dasgupta, B., Bhattacharya, R., and Basu, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11021-11025 |
| 37. | Dunphy, J. T., Greentree, W. K., Manahan, C. L., and Linder, M. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7154-7159 |
| 38. | Berthiaume, L., and Resh, M. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22399-22405 |
| 39. | Verkruyse, L. A., and Hofmann, S. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15831-15836 |
| 40. | Camp, L. A., Verkruyse, L. A., Afendis, S. J., Slaughter, C. A., and Hofmann, S. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23212-23219 |
| 41. | Duncan, J. A., and Gilman, A. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15830-15837 |
| 42. | Duncan, J. A., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23594-23600 |
| 43. | Wedegaertner, P. B., and Bourne, H. R. (1994) Cell 77, 1063-1070 |
| 44. | Mumby, S. M., Kleuss, C., and Gilman, A. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2800-2804 |
| 45. | Degtyarev, M. Y., Spiegel, A. M., and Jones, T. L. Z. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23769-23772 |
| 46. | Loisel, T. P., Adam, L., Hebert, T. E., and Bouvier, M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 15923-15932 |
| 47. | Robinson, L. J., Busconi, L., and Michel, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 995-998 |
| 48. | Stanislaus, D., Janovick, J. A., Brothers, S., and Conn, P. M. (1997) Mol. Endocrinol. 11, 738-746 |
| 49. | Stanislaus, D., Ponder, S., Ji, T. H., and Conn, P. M. (1998) Biol. Reprod. 59, 579-586 |
| 50. | Bhamre, S., Wang, H.-Y., and Friedman, E. (1998) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 286, 1482-1489 |
| 51. | Gurdal, H., Seasholtz, T. M., Wang, H.-Y., Brown, R. D., Johnson, M. D., and Friedman, E. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 1064-1070 |
| 52. | Lewis, J. M., Woolkalis, M. J., Gerton, G. L., Smith, R. M., Jarett, L., and Manning, D. R. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 1097-1113 |
| 53. | Butkerait, P., Yheng, Y., Hallak, H., Graham, T. E., Miller, H. A., Burris, K. D., Molinoff, P. B., and Manning, D. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18691-18699 |
| 54. | Fargin, A., Raymond, J. R., Lohse, M. J., Kobilka, B. K., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988) Nature 335, 358-360 |
| 55. | Barr, A. J., Brass, L. F., and Manning, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2223-2229 |
| 56. | Cowen, D. S., Sowers, R. S., and Manning, D. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22297-22300 |
| 57. | Cowen, D. S., Molinoff, P. B., and Manning, D. R. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 221-226 |
| 58. | Hjorth, S., Carlsson, A., Lindberg, P., Sanchez, D., Wikstrom, H., Arvidsson, L. E., Hacksell, U., and Nilsson, J. L. G. (1982) J. Neural Transm. 55, 169-188 |
| 59. | Kung, M.-P., Frederick, D., Mu, M., Zhuang, Z.-P., and Kung, H. F. (1995) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 272, 429-437 |
| 60. | Dumuis, A., Sebben, M., and Bockaert, J. (1987) Mol. Pharmacol. 33, 178-186 |
| 61. | Williams, J. T., Colmers, W. F., and Pan, Z. Z. (1988) J. Neurosci. 8, 3499-3506 |
| 62. | Jones, T. L. Z., Degtyarev, M. Y., and Backlund, P. S., Jr. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 7185-7191 |
| 63. | Cornea, A., Janovick, J. A., Stanislaus, D., and Conn, P. M. (1998) Endocrinology 139, 397-402 |
| 64. | Levis, M. J., and Bourne, H. R. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1297-1307 |
| 65. | Wedegaertner, P. B., Bourne, H. R., and von Zastrow, M. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1225-1233 |
| 66. | Iiri, T., Backlund, P. S., Jr., Jones, T. L. Z., Wedegaertner, P. B., and Bourne, H. R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14592-14597 |
| 67. | Wedegaertner, P. B., Chu, D. H., Wilson, P. T., Levis, M. J., and Bourne, H. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25001-25008 |
| 68. | Huang, C., Duncan, J. A., Gilman, A. G., and Mumby, S. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 412-417 |
| 69. | Denker, B. M., Saha, C., Khawaja, S., and Nigam, S. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25750-25753 |
| 70. | Huang, C., Hepler, J. R., Chen, L. T., Gilman, A. G., Anderson, R. G. W., and Mumby, S. M. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2365-2378 |
| 71. | Loisel, T. P., Ansanay, H., Adam, L., Marullo, S., Seifert, R., Lagace, M., and Bouvier, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31014-31019 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Ponimaskin, G. Dityateva, M. O. Ruonala, M. Fukata, Y. Fukata, F. Kobe, F. S. Wouters, M. Delling, D. S. Bredt, M. Schachner, et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor-Regulated Palmitoylation of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Determines Neuronal Morphogenesis J. Neurosci., September 3, 2008; 28(36): 8897 - 8907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chisari, D. K. Saini, V. Kalyanaraman, and N. Gautam Shuttling of G Protein Subunits between the Plasma Membrane and Intracellular Membranes J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24092 - 24098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Resh Palmitoylation of Ligands, Receptors, and Intracellular Signaling Molecules Sci. Signal., October 31, 2006; 2006(359): re14 - re14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. E. Petaja-Repo, M. Hogue, T. T. Leskela, P. M. H. Markkanen, J. T. Tuusa, and M. Bouvier Distinct Subcellular Localization for Constitutive and Agonist-modulated Palmitoylation of the Human {delta} Opioid Receptor J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2006; 281(23): 15780 - 15789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Papoucheva, A. Dumuis, M. Sebben, D. W. Richter, and E. G. Ponimaskin The 5-Hydroxytryptamine(1A) Receptor Is Stably Palmitoylated, and Acylation Is Critical for Communication of Receptor with Gi Protein J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3280 - 3291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Baker, H. Zheng, J. Walker, J. L. Coloff, and J. E. Buss Distinct Rates of Palmitate Turnover on Membrane-bound Cellular and Oncogenic H-Ras J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19292 - 19300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Leaney, A. Benians, F. M. Graves, and A. Tinker A Novel Strategy to Engineer Functional Fluorescent Inhibitory G-protein alpha Subunits J. Biol. Chem., August 2, 2002; 277(32): 28803 - 28809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Y. Hawash, K. P. Kesavan, A. I. Magee, R. L. Geahlen, and M. L. Harrison The Lck SH3 Domain Negatively Regulates Localization to Lipid Rafts through an Interaction with c-Cbl J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2002; 277(7): 5683 - 5691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||