|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002282200 on May 22, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 31, 23707-23717, August 4, 2000
Primary Structure, Genomic Organization, and Functional and
Electrogenic Characteristics of Human System N 1, a Na+-
and H+-coupled Glutamine Transporter*
You-Jun
Fei ,
Mitsuru
Sugawara ,
Takeo
Nakanishi ,
Wei
Huang ,
Haiping
Wang ,
Puttur D.
Prasad §,
Frederick H.
Leibach , and
Vadivel
Ganapathy §¶
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, and § Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of
Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912
Received for publication, March 17, 2000, and in revised form, May 16, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have cloned the human Na+-
and H+-coupled amino acid transport system N (hSN1) from
HepG2 liver cells and investigated its functional characteristics.
Human SN1 protein consists of 504 amino acids and shows high homology
to rat SN1 and rat brain glutamine transporter (GlnT). When expressed
in mammalian cells, the transport function of human SN1 could be
demonstrated with glutamine as the substrate in the presence of LiCl
(instead of NaCl) and cysteine. The transport activity was saturable,
pH-sensitive, and specific for glutamine, histidine, asparagine, and
alanine. Analysis of Li+ activation kinetics showed a
Li+:glutamine stoichiometry of 2:1. When expressed in
Xenopus laevis oocytes, the transport of glutamine or
asparagine via human SN1 was associated with inward currents under
voltage-clamped conditions. The transport function, monitored as
glutamine- or asparagine-induced currents, was saturable,
Na+-dependent, Li+-tolerant, and
pH-sensitive. The transport cycle was associated with the involvement
of more than one Na+ ion. Uptake of asparagine was directly
demonstrable in these oocytes by using radiolabeled substrate, and this
uptake was inhibited by membrane depolarization. In addition,
simultaneous measurement of asparagine influx and charge influx in the
same oocyte yielded an asparagine:charge ratio of 1. These data
suggest that SN1 mediates the influx of two Na+ and one
amino acid substrate per transport cycle coupled to the efflux of one
H+, rendering the transport process electrogenic.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Glutamine, the most abundant amino acid in blood, is involved in
several metabolic pathways. It plays an important role in ammonia
metabolism (1), in the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines (2), and in
the glutamine-glutamate cycle that occurs between neurons and glial
cells in the brain (3, 4) and between placenta and liver in the
developing fetus (5). Glutamine is also an obligatory participant in
the intercellular glutamine cycle that occurs in the liver between
periportal hepatocytes and perivenous hepatocytes (6). Cellular uptake
of glutamine is known to be mediated by at least three different
Na+-dependent amino acid transport systems,
namely system A, system B0, and system N (7-9). The first
two transport systems have a broad substrate specificity accepting
several neutral amino acids, including glutamine as substrates. In
contrast, system N exhibits a much narrower substrate specificity (10).
It transports only glutamine and asparagine, and in some instances,
histidine. The tissue distribution pattern is significantly different
for these three transport systems. System A is expressed ubiquitously
in mammalian tissues, whereas system B0 has been described
primarily in the intestine and kidney and system N in the liver,
skeletal muscle, and brain (7-9). Functional studies have indicated
that system N expressed in the liver, skeletal muscle, and brain may
not be identical (10-12). The differences in the characteristics of
system N in these three tissues have led to the following subtype
classification of this transport system: system N in the liver, system
Nm in the skeletal muscle, and system Nb in
neurons. All three subtypes transport glutamine and asparagine in a
Na+-dependent manner. Differences lie primarily
in Li+ tolerance and pH sensitivity. The liver system N
functions well even when Na+ is replaced by
Li+. Thus, this subtype is Li+-tolerant. In
addition, it is highly pH-sensitive and its transport activity is
almost undetectable at pH 7 or below (10). On the contrary, the
subtypes Nm and Nb are comparatively
Li+-intolerant and pH-insensitive (11, 12). The subtype
Nb can, however, be differentiated from the other two
subtypes by its ability to interact with glutamate (10, 12).
Recent cloning studies have begun to unravel the molecular nature of
these transport systems. We have cloned system B0
(ATB0 or ASCT2) and characterized its ability to transport
glutamine and other neutral amino acids in a Na+-coupled
manner (13-15). On the basis of the primary structure, ATB0 belongs to the family of glutamate transporters (16).
More recently, Varoqui et al.
(17) reported on the cloning of a Na+-coupled transporter
for glutamine and the system A-specific substrate -(methylamino)isobutyric acid. Surprisingly, this
transporter, designated GlnT,1 is expressed
in neurons but not in any other tissue. This suggests that system A may
also consist of distinct subtypes. GlnT represents one of the system A
subtypes. We have recently cloned and characterized the ubiquitously
expressed system A subtype, designated ATA2 for amino acid transporter
A2, the brain-specific system A subtype (GlnT) being ATA1 (18). The
cloning of another Na+-coupled glutamine transporter from
rat brain has been reported recently (19). This transporter is
Li+-tolerant and is expressed primarily in the brain and
liver. Based on functional characteristics and tissue distribution
pattern, this transporter has been identified as system N and
designated SN1 (19). Functional analysis of rat SN1 has led to the
discovery of a unique feature of this transporter. SN1 mediates the
influx of Na+ and glutamine into the cells in exchange with
intracellular H+. This is indicated by the
glutamine-dependent intracellular alkalinization in
SN1-expressing cells. Thus, SN1 is a Na+- and
H+-coupled glutamine transporter. These findings agree with
the pH sensitivity of system N observed in hepatocytes (10). There is
no information available for system N in the liver on the role of
membrane potential in the transport process. However, functional studies with cloned rat SN1 have led to the conclusion that the transport process is electroneutral, suggesting a
Na+:glutamine:H+ stoichiometry of 1:1:1. On the
basis of primary structure, SN1, ATA1, and ATA2 are related to each
other. Interestingly, these three plasma membrane transport proteins
bear significant homology to the vesicular -aminobutyrate
transporter, which is present in synaptic vesicles in the brain (20).
This synaptic vesicle transporter mediates the entry of
-aminobutyrate into the vesicles in exchange for intravesicular
H+ (20, 21), a functional feature similar to that of rat
SN1. ATA1 and ATA2 are also highly pH-sensitive, but whether or not H+ is a transportable substrate for these two transporters
is not known.
In this report we describe the cloning of the human SN1 from the HepG2
liver cell line and the structural organization of the sn1
gene. We also demonstrate here the transport function of human SN1
using two different heterologous expression systems with mammalian
cells and Xenopus laevis oocytes. Human SN1 transports glutamine in a Na+-dependent manner. It is also
H+-coupled and Li+-tolerant. Most importantly,
the present studies show that the transport process mediated by human
SN1 is electrogenic with a Na+:glutamine stoichiometry of
2:1, contrary to the conclusions drawn by Chaudhry et al.
(19) with rat SN1. To determine whether this difference is due to
species-dependent variation in the transport mechanism, we
cloned rat SN1 from skeletal muscle and studied its transport function.
Our results show that rat SN1 is also electrogenic similar to human
SN1. These data suggest that the transport mechanism of SN1 involves
the influx of two Na+ ions and one glutamine molecule
coupled to the efflux of one H+.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
[3H]Glutamine (specific
radioactivity, 49.9 Ci/mmol) was purchased from NEN Life Science
Products. [3H]Asparagine (specific radioactivity, 650 mCi/mmol) was purchased from Moravek (Brea, CA). Human retinal pigment
epithelial (HRPE) cells were originally provided by Dr. M. A. Del
Monte (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) and have been in use in
our laboratory for several years for heterologous expression of a
variety of cloned transporters (22-24). The human liver cell line
HepG2 was obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection
(Manassas, VA). Cell culture media, TRIzol reagent,
oligo(dT)-cellulose, and Lipofectin were from Life Technologies
(Gaithersburg, MD). Restriction enzymes were either from Promega or
from New England BioLabs. Magna nylon transfer membranes used in the
library screening were from Micron Separations, Inc. (Westboro, MA).
The Ready-to-Go oligolabeling kit was purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Probe Preparation--
The recently cloned rat SN1 is highly
homologous to the human cDNA designated g17 in the GenBank data
base (accession number U49082). This indicated that g17 most likely
represents the human homolog of rat SN1. Therefore, to clone the
full-length g17 cDNA for functional studies, we prepared a cDNA
fragment by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
using primers based on the nucleotide sequence of g17. The sense primer was 5'-AACATCGGAGCCATGTCCAG-3', which corresponded to nucleotide positions 581-600 in g17 cDNA sequence, and the antisense primer was 5'-AAGGTGAGGTAGCCGAAGAG-3', which corresponded to nucleotide positions 1136-1155 in g17 cDNA sequence. Because the Northern blot analysis has shown that rat SN1 mRNA is expressed most
abundantly in the liver (19), we used poly(A)+ mRNA
isolated from HepG2 cells, a human liver cell line, as a template for
RT-PCR. A single product of expected size ( 0.6 kilobase pair (kbp))
was obtained in the RT-PCR reaction. This product was subcloned into
pGEM-T vector and sequenced to establish its molecular identity. This
cDNA fragment was used as a probe to screen cDNA libraries.
Construction of cDNA Libraries--
The SuperScript plasmid
system (Life Technologies, Inc.) was used to establish unidirectional
cDNA libraries with poly(A)+ mRNA isolated from
HepG2 cells and rat skeletal muscle. Poly(A)+ mRNA was
prepared by subjecting total RNA twice to oligo(dT)-cellulose affinity
chromatography prior to use in library construction. The cDNA
products with sizes greater than 1 kbp were separated by
size-fractionation and used for ligation at a
SalI/NotI site in pSPORT1 vector.
cDNA Library Screening--
The 0.6-kbp cDNA fragment
of g17 was labeled with [ -32P]dCTP using the
Ready-to-Go oligolabeling kit. The HepG2 and rat skeletal muscle
cDNA libraries were screened with this probe under low stringency
conditions. Hybridization was carried out for 20 h at 60 °C in
a solution containing 5 × SSPE (1 × SSPE = 0.15 M NaC1, 10 mM NaH2PO4,
and 1 mM EDTA), 5 × Denhardt's solution, 0.5% SDS,
and 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. Posthybridization washing
was done as described earlier (22-24), which involved extensive washes
with 3 × SSPE, 0.5% SDS at room temperature. Positive clones were identified, and the colonies were purified by secondary screening.
DNA Sequencing--
Both sense and antisense strands of the
cDNAs were sequenced by primer walking. Sequencing by the
dideoxynucleotide chain termination method was performed by
Taq DyeDeoxy terminator cycle sequencing with an automated
PE Biosystems 377 Prism DNA sequencer. The sequence was analyzed
using the GCG sequence analysis software package GCG, version 7.B
(Genetics Computer Group, Inc. Madison, WI).
Functional Expression in HRPE Cells--
This was done using the
vaccinia virus expression system as described before (22-24).
Subconfluent HRPE cells grown on 24-well plates were first infected
with a recombinant vaccinia virus (VTF7-3) encoding T7 RNA
polymerase and then transfected with the plasmid carrying the
full-length cDNA. After 10-12 h post-transfection, uptake
measurements were made at 37 °C with 50 µM
[3H]glutamine. In most experiments, the uptake medium was
25 mM Tris/Hepes, pH 8.5, containing 140 mM
LiC1, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgSO4, 10 mM cysteine, and 5 mM glucose. The time of incubation was 15 min. Endogenous
transport was always determined in parallel using cells transfected
with empty vector. This transport accounted for 15-25% of the
transport measured in cells that were transfected with the vector
carrying the cDNA insert. Therefore, the transport values measured
in cells transfected with empty vector were always subtracted from the
corresponding transport values measured in cells transfected with
vector-cDNA to obtain the cDNA-specific uptake. The
cDNA-induced [3H]glutamine transport activity was
maximal at pH 8.5 in a LiCl-containing uptake medium (instead of NaCl)
and in the presence of 10 mM cysteine. The influence of pH
on the transport function was studied by measuring the uptake of 50 µM [3H]glutamine in cDNA-transfected
cells and in vector-transfected cells at varying pH. Uptake buffers of
varying pH (6.0-8.5) were prepared by appropriately mixing two
buffers: 25 mM Mes/Tris buffer (pH 6.0), containing 140 mM LiCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 0.8 mM Mg SO4, 10 mM cysteine, and 5 mM glucose; and 25 mM Tris/Hepes buffer (pH 8.5), containing 140 mM LiCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgSO4, 10 mM cysteine, and 5 mM glucose. Saturation
kinetics for glutamine were analyzed by measuring cDNA-specific
transport at varying concentrations of glutamine (0.1-15
mM). The kinetic parameters, Michaelis-Menten constant
(Kt) and maximal velocity (Vmax), were calculated by fitting the data to a
Michaelis-Menten equation describing a single saturable transport
system. Analysis was done by nonlinear regression, and the resultant
values for the kinetic parameters were confirmed by linear regression.
Li+ activation kinetics were analyzed by measuring
cDNA-specific transport of glutamine at varying concentrations of
Li+ (10-80 mM). The osmolality of the buffer
and the concentration of Cl were kept constant by
substituting LiCl with N-methyl-D-glutamine (NMDG) chloride. The data were fit to the Hill equation, and the Hill
coefficient was calculated by nonlinear regression as well as by linear regression.
Functional Expression in X. laevis Oocytes--
cRNA from the
cloned cDNA was synthesized using the MEGAscript kit (Ambion)
according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cDNA was linearized
using NotI, and the cDNA insert was transcribed in
vitro using T7 RNA polymerase in the presence of an RNA cap analog. The resultant cRNA was purified by multiple extractions with
phenol/chloroform and precipitated with ethanol.
Mature oocytes from X. laevis were isolated by treatment
with collagenase A (1.6 mg/ml), manually defolliculated, and maintained at 18 °C in modified Barth's medium supplemented with 10 mg/l gentamycin (25). On the following day, oocytes were injected with 50 ng
of cRNA. Oocytes injected with water served as control. The oocytes
were used for electrophysiological studies 6 days after cRNA injection.
Electrophysiological studies were done by the conventional
two-microelecrode voltage clamp method (26-28). Oocytes were
superfused with a NaCl-containing buffer (100 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 3 mM Hepes, 3 mM Mes, and 3 mM Tris, pH 8.0) followed by the
same buffer containing different amino acid substrates. The membrane
potential was held steady at 50 mV. For studies involving the
current-voltage (I-V) relationship, step changes in membrane potential
were applied, each for a duration of 100 ms in 20-millivolt (mV)
increments. Kinetic parameters for the saturable transport of glutamine
and asparagine were calculated using the Michaelis-Menten equation. Data were analyzed by nonlinear regression and confirmed by linear regression.
When the effects of Na+ on the transport (i.e.
amino acid-induced currents) were evaluated, the oocyte was perifused
with buffer containing different concentrations of Na+ and
10 mM glutamine or asparagine. The data for the
Na+-dependent activation of amino acid-induced
currents were fitted to the Hill equation, and the Hill coefficient was
calculated by nonlinear regression as well as by linear regression. In
some experiments, the perifusion buffer contained LiCl instead of NaCl to determine if Na+ was replaceable with Li+ to
support the amino acid-induced currents. When the influence of
Cl on the amino acid-induced currents was assessed, a
Cl -free buffer was used that contained gluconate salts
instead of chloride salts. In experiments dealing with the influence of
pH on the amino acid-induced currents, NaCl- or LiCl-containing buffers of varying pH were prepared by appropriately adjusting the
concentrations of Mes, Hepes, and Tris.
Uptake of [3H]asparagine in control oocytes and in human
SN1-expressing oocytes was measured at pH 8.0 in the presence of NaCl as described previously (29). The concentration of
[3H]asparagine (unlabeled plus radiolabeled) was 250 µM. To assess the role of membrane potential in the
uptake of asparagine, uptake measurements were made in the presence of
50 mM Na+, but with low (2 mM) or
high (52 mM) K+. The oocyte membrane was
depolarized with the high concentration of K+. This method
has been used previously in our laboratory to study the role of
membrane potential in the transport function of the organic cation
transporter OCT3 (30) and the Na+-dependent
multivitamin transporter (31).
To assess whether there is a direct relationship between the amino acid
influx and the inward currents observed in oocytes expressing human
SN1, we measured simultaneously in the same oocyte the influx of
asparagine and the membrane currents associated with the asparagine
influx. Oocytes, clamped at 50 mV, were perifused with a
NaCl-containing buffer, and current traces were monitored in a chart
recorder until they reached a steady baseline. The oocyte was then
perifused with 2.5 mM asparagine (unlabeled plus radiolabeled) in the same buffer for 8-10 min while the
asparagine-induced currents were recorded. At the end of this period,
the oocyte was perifused with the buffer in the absence of asparagine
until the currents returned to the baseline levels. The oocyte was
removed, rinsed three times with ice-cold buffer, and lysed in 10%
sodium dodecyl sulfate. The amount of radioactivity in the oocyte
lysate was then quantitated for the calculation of asparagine influx. The total inward charge transfer was calculated by integrating the area
under the current versus time curve and by using the Faraday
constant. The magnitude of the amino acid influx was then compared with
the magnitude of the charge transfer to determine the ratio of the
amino acid influx to the charge influx. This experiment utilized the
Fetchex program within the pCLAMP 6.0 software package. We have used
this method previously in our laboratory to determine the
substrate/charge transfer ratio for the H+-coupled peptide
transporter PEPT2 (32) and Na+-coupled dicarboxylate
transporter NaDC3 (33).
 |
RESULTS |
Structural Features of Human SN1--
A full-length human SN1
cDNA was isolated by screening a HepG2 cDNA Library with a
cDNA fragment of g17 clone as a probe. The cDNA (GenBank
accession no. AF244548) is 2437 bp long with an open reading frame
consisting of 1515 bp (including the termination codon). The open
reading frame is flanked by a 113-bp-long 5'-untranslated region and a
809-bp-long 3'-untranslated region. The cDNA codes for a protein of
504 amino acids, with a predicted molecular mass of 56 kDa. Hydropathy
analysis of the amino acid sequence suggests the presence of 12 putative transmembrane domains in the protein. There is a single
putative site for N-linked glycosylation in the
extracellular loop between the transmembrane domains 7 and 8 (Asn-323).
The protein also contains a single protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation site in the cytoplasmic tail
(Thr-497). At the level of amino sequence, the human SN1 exhibits 90%
identity and 91% similarity with the recently cloned rat SN1 (19).
ATA1 (17) and ATA2 (18) also show significant homology to human SN1.
Interestingly, ATA1 and ATA2 represent the two currently known subtypes
of amino acid transport system A. It appears that the amino acid
transporters belonging to system N and system A form a distinct family.
Functional Characteristics of Human SN1 Expressed Heterologously in
Mammalian Cells--
In the recent report of the cloning of rat SN1,
the investigators used PS120 cells for functional expression of the
cloned transporter (19). These cells have an acidic intracellular pH due to the deficiency of Na+-H+ exchange
activity (34). The transport function of rat SN1 could not be detected
in cells such as Chinese hamster ovary cells (19). In the present
study, we used HRPE cells for functional analysis of human SN1. The pH
of the uptake medium was 8.5 based on the known pH dependence of system
N (10). The transport function of human SN1 was not detectable with
glutamine as a substrate in the regular NaC1-containing uptake medium
(Fig. 1A). In fact, the
transport of glutamine was lower in cDNA-transfected cells than in
control cells transfected with vector alone. Because System N is
Li+-tolerant, we then measured glutamine transport in
control cells and in cells expressing human SN1 in an uptake medium in
which NaCl was replaced with LiCl iso-osmotically (Fig. 1B).
Glutamine transport in control cells and in cDNA-transfected cells
decreased considerably as a result of Li+ substitution of
Na+, but the transport in cDNA-transfected cells was
not very much different from the transport in control cells. Thus, the
transport function of human SN1 was not detectable even in the
LiCl-containing medium. Glutamine transport in mammalian cells is
mediated by at least three different
Na+-dependent systems, system A, system
B0, and system N. The identity of the systems that are
responsible for glutamine uptake in HRPE cells is not known. However,
the substrate specificity of system N is very narrow compared with that
of system A and system B0. Therefore, we decided to reduce
the background glutamine uptake in HRPE cells by including in the
uptake medium an amino acid that is a substrate for system A and system
B0 but not for system N. We selected cysteine for this
purpose, because it can inhibit glutamine uptake that is mediated not
only by the Na+-dependent systems A and
B0 but also by the Na+-independent systems asc
and bo,+ (7, 9). When cysteine (10 mM)
was included in the NaCl-containing uptake medium, the transport of
glutamine in control cells decreased by 95%. Interestingly, the
transport function of heterologously expressed human SN1 became
detectable under these uptake conditions (Fig. 1C).
Glutamine transport in control cells transfected with vector alone was
0.88 ± 0.03 nmol/106 cells/15 min. The transport
increased significantly by ~55% in cDNA-transfected cells
(1.36 ± 0.02 nmol/106 cells/15 min). To improve the
detection of cDNA-specific transport even further, we replaced NaCl
in the uptake medium with LiCl but keeping cysteine at 10 mM. This maneuver reduced the background glutamine
transport in control cells further, from 0.88 ± 0.03 to 0.50 ± 0.01 nmol/106/cells/15 min. Under these uptake
conditions, glutamine transport in cDNA-transfected cells increased
dramatically by more than 3-fold (1.70 ± 0.06 nmol/106 cells/15 min) (Fig. 1D). Thus, the
transport function of the cloned human SN1 became easily detectable in
HRPE cells in a Li+-containing uptake medium in the
presence of cysteine. The magnitude of stimulation of glutamine
transport in human SN1 cDNA-transfected cells compared with
vector-transfected cells observed under these conditions in HRPE cells
was comparable to the stimulation reported by Chaudhry et
al. (19) in Na+-H+ exchanger-deficient
P120 cells with rat SN1. We therefore used these specific uptake
conditions (i.e. LiCl-containing medium with 10 mM cysteine) to characterize the transport function of human SN1 in HRPE cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Glutamine transport mediated by human SN1 in
HRPE cells. Cells were transfected with either pSPORT vector alone
or pSPORT-human SN1 cDNA. Transport of 50 µM
[3H]glutamine was measured in cells under four different
conditions: NaCl-containing medium (A), LiCl-containing
medium (B), NaCl-containing medium with 10 mM
cysteine (C), and LiCl-containing medium with 10 mM cysteine (D). The pH of the medium in all
four cases was 8.5.
|
|
Fig. 2A describes the pH
dependence of glutamine transport in vector-transfected cells and in
human SN1 cDNA-transfected cells. The cDNA-specific transport
was almost undetectable at pH 6.0. But, the transport increased
gradually to a marked extent as the pH was changed from 6.0 to 8.5. The
cDNA-specific transport increased almost 5-fold between pH 6.5 and
7.5 and an additional 2.5-fold between pH 7.5 and 8.5. The transport of
glutamine mediated by human SN1 was saturable in the glutamine
concentration range of 0.1-15 mM (Fig. 2B). The
Michaelis-Menten constant (Kt) for the transport
process was 1.6 ± 0.1 mM.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
pH-Dependence (A) and saturation
kinetics (B) of human SN1-mediated glutamine transport.
A, transport of 50 µM [3H]glutamine was
measured in vector-transfected cells ) and in human SN1
cDNA-transfected cells ( ) using the LiCl-containing
medium in the presence of 10 mM cysteine. The pH of the
medium was varied between 6.0 and 8.5 by appropriately adjusting the
concentrations of Mes, Hepes, and Tris. B, glutamine
transport was measured in vector-transfected cells and in human SN1
cDNA-transfected cells over a glutamine concentration range of
0.1-15 mM. The LiCl-containing medium (pH 8.5) with 10 mM cysteine was used in transport measurements. The
cDNA-specific transport was calculated by subtracting the transport
in vector-transfected cells from the transport in cDNA-transfected
cells. These values for cDNA-specific transport were used in
kinetic analysis. Inset, Eadie-Hofstee plot.
|
|
We then tested the substrate specificity of human SN1 (Table
I). The transport of
[3H]glutamine (50 µM) mediated by human SN1
was inhibited by unlabeled glutamine, histidine, asparagine, and
alanine. The acidic amino acids aspartate and glutamate, the cationic
amino acid arginine, and the system A-specific substrate
-(methylamino)isobutyric acid did not have any effect on the
transport function of human SN1. The neutral amino acids leucine and
phenylalanine also did not compete with glutamine for transport via
human SN1. These two amino acids actually caused significant
stimulation of human SN1-specific glutamine transport.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Substrate specificity of human SN1
HRPE cells were transfected with either pSPORT vector alone or
pSPORT-human SN1 cDNA. Functional expression was carried out using
the vaccinia virus expression technique. Transport of 50 µM [3H]glutamine was measured in cells using a
LiCl-containing medium (pH 8.5) with 10 mM cysteine.
Transport assay was done at 37 °C for 15 min. When present, the
concentration of unlabeled amino acids was 5 mM. Values
(means ± S.E.) are from two independent transfection experiments,
each done in triplicate. Values in parentheses are percentage of
control measured in the absence of inhibitors.
|
|
We assessed the ability of increasing concentrations of unlabeled
glutamine, asparagine, and histidine (range, 0.1-10 mM) to
inhibit the transport of 50 µM
[3H]glutamine mediated by human SN1 (Fig.
3A). These three amino acids
inhibited human SN1-specific [3H]glutamine transport with
IC50 values (i.e. concentration necessary for
50% inhibition) of 1.5 ± 0.3, 7.4 ± 1.1, and 1.3 ± 0.2 mM, respectively. These IC50 values are
almost close to inhibition constants (Ki) because
the concentration of [3H]glutamine used in these
experiments was about 30-fold less than the Kt
value (50 µM versus 1.6 mM). These
results show that human SN1 has significantly higher affinity for
glutamine and histidine than for asparagine. Furthermore, the
Ki value for unlabeled glutamine to inhibit the
transport of [3H]glutamine (1.4 ± 0.3 mM) was comparable to the Kt value
determined directly from the transport of glutamine (1.6 ± 0.1 mM).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, dose-response relationship for
the inhibition of human SN1-mediated transport of
[3H]glutamine by unlabeled glutamine ( ), histidine
( ), and asparagine ( ). Transport of 50 µM
[3H]glutamine was measured in vector-transfected cells
and in human SN1 cDNA-transfected cells in a LiCl-containing medium
(pH 8.5) with 10 mM cysteine. Concentration of unlabeled
amino acids was varied in the range of 0.1-10 mM.
cDNA-specific transport was calculated by subtracting the transport
in vector-transfected cells from the transport in cDNA-transfected
cells. Only the cDNA-specific transport is shown. Control transport
in the absence of unlabeled amino acids was taken as 100%.
B, Li+ activation kinetics. Transport of 50 µM
[3H]glutamine was measured in vector-transfected cells
and in human SN1 cDNA-transfected cells at varying concentrations
of Li+ (10-80 mM). In all cases, the pH of the
medium was 8.5 and 10 mM cysteine was present. The media
with varying concentrations of Li+ were prepared by
appropriately mixing a LiCl-containing medium and a NMDG
chloride-containing medium. The cDNA-specific transport was
calculated by subtracting the transport measured in vector-transfected
cells from the transport measured in human SN1 cDNA-transfected
cells. These values for cDNA-specific transport were used in
kinetic analysis. Inset, Hill plot.
|
|
The kinetics of the activation of human SN1 transport function by
Li+ was then investigated (Fig. 3B). The
transport of glutamine was measured in control cells and in
cDNA-transfected cells at varying concentrations of Li+
(10-80 mM). The influence of Li+ on
cDNA-specific transport was analyzed. The relationship between Li+ concentration and human SN1-mediated glutamine
transport was found to be sigmoidal. When the data were fitted to the
Hill equation, a value of 2.0 ± 0.2 was obtained for the Hill
coefficient (Fig. 3, inset). This suggests that two
Li+ ions are involved per transport cycle for the
activation of glutamine transport by human SN1. Therefore, the
Li+:glutamine stoichiometry for the transport process is
2:1.
Electrophysiological Characteristics of Human SN1 Expressed
Heterologously in X. laevis Oocytes--
The involvement of two
Li+ ions per transport cycle in human SN1-mediated
transport process was an unexpected finding, because Chaudhry et
al. (19) have recently concluded that the transport process
mediated by rat SN1 is electroneutral. SN1 catalyzes the influx of
Na+ (or Li+) and glutamine into the cells in
exchange for intracellular H+. The H+ efflux
associated with glutamine influx has been clearly demonstrated for rat
SN1 by intracellular pH measurements (19). Human SN1 is also likely to
mediate the efflux of H+ coupled to the influx of
Na+ (or Li+) and glutamine based on the marked
pH sensitivity of the transport process (Fig. 2A). If the
SN1-mediated transport process is electroneutral, one would expect a
Na+ (or Li+):glutamine stoichiometry of 1:1
with the efflux of one H+. The stoichiometry analysis was,
however, not done for rat SN1 to corroborate the conclusion that the
transport process is electroneutral. Our present findings that the
Li+:glutamine stoichiometry is 2:1 suggest that the
transport mediated by human SN1 is electrogenic with a net transfer of
a positive charge into the cells. To confirm the electrogenic nature of
human SN1, we expressed the transporter in X. laevis oocytes
and assessed its transport function electrophysiologically using the
two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique.
When the oocytes expressing human SN1 were perifused with 5 mM glutamine in the presence of NaCl at pH 8.0, inward
currents were detectable, implying that the transport process was
associated with the transfer of net positive charge into the oocytes
(Fig. 4A). The magnitude of
the glutamine-induced currents was pH-dependent, decreasing
as the pH of the perifusion medium was acidified. The currents were
abolished completely at pH 5.5. Water-injected oocytes did not show
glutamine-induced currents at any pH (data not shown). Because the
inward currents are a measure of the transport activity of human SN1,
the findings with regard to the marked pH dependence of human SN1
transport in X. laevis oocytes were similar to those found
in mammalian cells. The magnitude of the glutamine-induced currents was
also dependent on the concentration of glutamine and on the membrane
potential (Fig. 4B). Kinetics analysis gave a
K0.5 value (i.e. the concentration of
glutamine yielding half-maximal currents) of 0.7 ± 0.1 mM (Fig. 4C). Na+ activation
kinetics indicated that more than one Na+ was likely to be
involved per transport cycle, because the Hill coefficient was
significantly greater than 1 (1.4 ± 0.1) (Fig. 4D).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Electrophysiological characteristics of
glutamine transport mediated by human SN1 in X. laevis
oocytes. Human SN1 cRNA was injected into oocytes, and
transport experiments were made on the 6th day following cRNA
injection. Oocytes were perifused with glutamine under different
conditions, and glutamine-induced currents were monitored using the
two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique. A, pH dependence
of glutamine-induced currents with 5 mM glutamine and 100 mM NaCl. B, dependence of glutamine-induced
currents on glutamine concentration (0.5, 1, and 8 mM) and
membrane potential (+50 to 150 mV) in the presence of 100 mM NaCl at pH 8.0. C, saturation kinetics of
glutamine-induced currents with glutamine concentration (0.5-10
mM) in the presence of 100 mM NaCl at pH 8.0. D, Na+ activation kinetics of glutamine (5 mM)-induced currents at pH 8.0. Inset, Hill
plot.
|
|
The reversal of the glutamine-induced currents when the membrane
potential was depolarized beyond 20 to 30 mV as evident in Fig.
4B was interesting. Because this reversal potential was comparable to the equilibrium potential for Cl , we
wondered whether this could be due the involvement of Cl
ions in the transport process. We therefore tested the influence of
Cl in the perifusion medium on glutamine-induced currents
in human SN1-expressing oocytes. The currents and the current-voltage
relationship were not significantly altered by the presence or absence
of Cl (data not shown). It thus appeared that the
reversal potential was not due to Cl movements. We then
tested whether the phenomenon was unique to glutamine or was also seen
with other substrates of SN1 as well. Surprisingly, the reversal of the
currents was not observed with asparagine as the substrate (Fig.
5A). The asparagine-induced currents were, however, concentration-dependent (Fig.
5A) and pH-dependent (Fig. 5B) as was
the case with the glutamine-induced currents. Additional experiments
carried out with asparagine as the substrate showed that the transport
function of human SN1 could be supported to a significant extent by
Li+ in the place of Na+ (Fig.
6, A and B). The
magnitude of currents induced by asparagine in the presence of
Li+ was about 60% of the current induced in the presence
of Na+. There was, however, no detectable current when the
perifusion medium contained NMDG chloride in place of LiCl or NaCl.
Kinetic analysis of the asparagine-induced currents was then carried
out in the presence of Na+. The currents were saturable
with increasing concentrations of asparagine at all membrane potentials
tested (Fig. 7A). The
K0.5 for asparagine was 16 ± 3 mM at 70 mV, and the value decreased significantly when
the membrane was hyperpolarized beyond 70 mV. The
K0.5 for asparagine was 11 ± 2 mM at 150 mV. Na+ activation kinetics of
asparagine-induced currents showed a sigmoidal relationship (Fig.
7B). The value for the Hill coefficient was 1.4 ± 0.1 at 70 mV, suggesting involvement of more than one Na+ ion
per transport cycle. The Hill coefficient did not change significantly
under conditions of different membrane potentials ( 10 to 150 mV).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Asparagine-induced currents in oocytes
expressing human SN1. A, dependence of asparagine (10 mM)-induced currents on pH and membrane potential in the
presence of 100 mM NaCl. B, comparison of
asparagine (10 mM)-induced currents at three different pH
in the presence of 100 mM NaCl.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A, comparison of asparagine (10 mM)-induced currents in oocytes expressing human SN1 in the
presence of 100 mM NMDG chloride, 100 mM LiCl,
or 100 mM NaCl. The pH of the medium was 8.0 in all three
cases. B, dependence of asparagine (10 mM)-induced currents on membrane potential in the presence
of 100 mM NMDG chloride, 100 mM LiCl, or 100 mM NaCl. The pH of the medium was 8.0 in all three
cases.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
A, saturation kinetics of
asparagine-induced currents in oocytes expressing human SN1 at
different membrane potentials. Concentration of asparagine was varied
in the range of 0.25-20 mM. The medium contained 100 mM NaCl. The pH of the medium was 8.0. B,
Na+ activation kinetics of asparagine (10 mM)-induced currents at pH 8.0 and at different membrane
potentials in oocytes expressing human SN1. Concentration of
Na+ was varied in the range of 2.5-100 mM.
This was done by substituting NaCl with NMDG chloride
iso-osmotically.
|
|
The experiments described thus far show clearly that exposure of the
human SN1-expressing oocytes with SN1-specific substrates leads to
induction of inward currents. To determine whether the induced inward
currents are directly related to substrate influx into the oocytes, we
measured the influx of asparagine, one of the substrates of SN1, and
assessed the influence of K+-induced membrane
depolarization on the influx (Fig.
8A). The substrate influx was
measured with [3H]asparagine. The SN1-specific asparagine
influx was inhibited 33% when the oocyte membrane was depolarized with
high K+ in the extracellular medium (control, 193.6 ± 12.1 pmol/oocyte/h; membrane depolarization, 129.8 ± 11.8 pmol/oocyte/h; asparagine concentration, 250 µM). The
inhibition of SN1-mediated amino acid influx by membrane depolarization
indicates that the influx process is associated with transfer of
positive charge into the oocyte, thus providing the basis for the
inward currents that accompany the transport process. We also
determined the ratio of substrate transfer to charge transfer in the
same oocyte expressing human SN1 (Fig. 8B). The ratio was
close to 1 (3 oocytes), indicating that the transfer of each molecule
of amino acid substrate via human SN1 is accompanied by the transfer of
one positive charge. These results show convincingly that the inward
currents observed in SN1-expressing oocytes upon exposure to amino acid
substrates are directly related to substrate influx.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
A, influence of membrane depolarization
of human SN1-mediated asparagine uptake in X. laevis
oocytes. Uptake of 250 µM [3H]asparagine
(radiolabeled and unlabeled) was measured at pH 8.0 for 1 h under
the indicated ionic conditions. B, simultaneous measurement
of asparagine influx and charge influx from three oocytes. The
concentration of asparagine was 2.5 mM. The amino acid
solution contained radiolabeled as well as unlabeled asparagine, which
allowed simultaneous measurements of asparagine influx from the uptake
of radioactivity and charge influx from the amino acid-induced inward
current in the same oocyte.
|
|
Electrogenicity of Rat SN1--
Our present results with human SN1
regarding the electrogenicity of the transport process are in contrast
to the results with rat SN1 reported by Chaudhry et al.
(19). To determine if these different results could be explained on the
basis of species variations, we studied the transport function of rat
SN1 in X. laevis oocytes using electrophysiological
approaches. We isolated a full-length rat SN1 cDNA while screening
a skeletal muscle cDNA library for SN1-related transporters. This
was surprising to us, because Chaudhry et al. (19) reported
that SN1 mRNA was not detectable in rat skeletal muscle. Based on
the Northern blot analysis reported by these investigators, SN1
mRNA was detectable at high levels in the liver and at
comparatively low levels in the kidney, heart, and brain. There were no
detectable mRNA transcripts in the skeletal muscle, gut, lung, and
spleen. However, when we screened a rat skeletal muscle cDNA
library with the g17 cDNA fragment as the probe (the same probe
used to isolate the full-length human SN1 cDNA from HepG2 cell
cDNA library), several positive clones were identified and
purified. One of these clones was found to code for a protein with an
amino acid sequence identical to that of rat SN1. We expressed this
clone in X. laevis oocytes and assessed its electrogenicity.
As shown in Fig. 9A,
perifusion of oocytes expressing rat SN1 with 10 mM
asparagine at pH 8.0 in the presence of Na+ led to the
induction of large inward currents. The magnitude of the current was
highly pH-sensitive and decreased as the pH of the medium was made
acidic. It was also Li+-tolerant to a significant extent
(Fig. 9B). Replacement of Na+ with
Li+ did not abolish asparagine-induced currents completely.
The magnitude of the currents in the presence of Li+ was
30-40% of the magnitude of the currents detected in the presence of
Na+. The Li+-supported currents were also
pH-sensitive as the Na+-supported currents. These data show
that rat SN1 is also electrogenic as is its human homolog.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Electrogenicity of rat SN1 in oocytes.
Rat SN1 was expressed in X. laevis oocytes by injection of
cRNA. A, asparagine (10 mM)-induced currents at
different pH in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. B,
asparagine-induced currents at different pH in the presence of 100 mM LiCl.
|
|
Genomic Organization of Human sn1 Gene--
A GenBank database
search with the nucleotide sequence of human SN1 cDNA revealed that
the human gene coding for this transporter has been sequenced in its
entirety. The gene is located on chromosome 3p21.3 and is ~16 kbp
long. By aligning the nucleotide sequence of the cloned human SN1
cDNA with the genomic sequence allowed us to deduce the exon-intron
organization of the gene. The gene consists of 16 exons and 15 introns.
The size of each of the exons and introns and the nucleotide sequences
of the splice junctions are given in Table
II. The 5'- and 3'-termini of each intron
possess the consensus sequence for RNA splicing (gt/ag). The
translation start site ATG is present in exon 2, and the translation
termination site TGA is present in exon 16. Exon 1 does not code for
the protein.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The studies reported here describe the cloning of a human amino
acid transport system N (SN1) and the functional characteristics of the
cloned transporter. Rat SN1 has recently been cloned from brain (19).
This transport system is expressed most predominantly in the liver and,
to a smaller extent, in the brain. Functional studies with rat SN1 have
shown that SN1 is a Na+- and H+-coupled amino
acid transporter with preference for glutamine, histidine, and
asparagine (19). These three amino acids contain nitrogen in the side
chain, a fact that led to the designation of the transporter as system
N in the original studies describing the transport process responsible
for the uptake of these amino acids in hepatocytes (10). Rat SN1
mediates the influx of Na+ and glutamine into the cells
coupled to the efflux of H+. In the present study, we
cloned human SN1 from the HepG2 liver cell line. Human SN1, similar to
the rat homolog, mediates the transport of glutamine in a
Na+- and H+-coupled manner. Its substrate
specificity is restricted to glutamine, histidine, asparagine, and
alanine. However, glutamine and histidine are recognized by the
transporter with a 5-fold greater affinity than asparagine and alanine.
Human SN1 is Li+-tolerant, because its transport function
can be supported by a Li+ gradient in place of a
Na+ gradient. There is no involvement of Cl
ions. The transporter shows marked pH dependence consistent with H+ efflux in the transport process. The transporter is
stimulated by an outwardly directed H+ gradient. Thus, an
inwardly directed Na+ gradient and an outwardly directed
H+ gradient provide the driving force for the transport
process mediated by human SN1. This suggests that the transporter
mediates the influx of Na+ and glutamine into the cells
coupled to the simultaneous efflux of H+ out of the cells.
These findings are similar to those described previously by Chaudhry
et al. (19) for rat SN1.
The participation of an outwardly directed H+ gradient as a
driving force for SN1 may be related to our findings in the present study that the amino acids leucine and phenylalanine cause a
significant stimulation of SN1-mediated glutamine transport. Leucine
and phenylalanine are high affinity substrates for the amino acid
transport system L that is known to be coupled to H+
(35-37). An inwardly directed H+ gradient stimulates
system L activity, suggesting cotransport of H+ and amino
acid (37). The involvement of H+ has also been demonstrated
with one of the cloned subtypes of system L (38, 39). Therefore, it is
possible that leucine and phenylalanine acidify intracellular pH as a
result of their transport via system L in HRPE cells. Such an effect on
the intracellular pH is expected to stimulate the transport activity of SN1.
The most important finding in the present study is that the transport
process mediated by human SN1 is electrogenic. This is in contrast to
the results of Chaudhry et al. (19), which showed the
transport process mediated by rat SN1 to be electroneutral. We show
here, however, that the differences between our studies and those by
Chaudhry et al. (19) are not due to species variations between rat SN1 and human SN1 in the transport mechanism. We were able
to demonstrate the electrogenicity of the transport process not only
with human SN1 but also with rat SN1. The supporting evidence for the
electrogenicity of SN1-mediated transport process comes from two
different experimental approaches. When expressed in mammalian cells as
well as in X. laevis oocytes, human SN1 exhibits a
Na+ (or Li+):glutamine stoichiometry of 2:1.
Considering the efflux of H+ that is coupled to the
transport process, this stoichiometry suggests that the overall
transport mechanism is likely to be electrogenic, resulting in the
transfer of a net positive charge into the cells. Unequivocal evidence
for the electrogenic nature of SN1 was obtained in X. laevis
oocytes where glutamine (or asparagine) transport mediated by human or
rat SN1 was found to be associated with inward currents detectable by
the two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique. Inward currents under
these experimental conditions mean that the transport process is
associated with the transfer of net positive charge into the oocytes.
The involvement of membrane potential in the SN1-mediated transport
process was confirmed by the inhibition of SN1-mediated asparagine
influx by membrane depolarization and by the establishment of the 1:1
ratio for the asparagine influx versus charge influx.
Therefore, the membrane potential also plays a very important role in
the energizing of SN1 in addition to the transmembrane gradients for
Na+ and H+.
There is no doubt that the identity of the driving forces involved in
the transport function of SN1 is important to understand the transport
mechanism. But, it is also relevant to the transport function of SN1 in
the physiological context. Glutamine transport in the liver plays a
significant role in urea synthesis, ammonia metabolism, and pH
regulation (1). Interestingly, the direction of glutamine transport
differs between the hepatocytes surrounding the portal veins and the
hepatocytes surrounding the hepatic veins. Periportal hepatocytes take
up glutamine and ammonia from the portal blood. Inside the cells,
glutamine is hydrolyzed by glutaminase to liberate ammonia. The
glutamine-derived ammonia as well as ammonia taken up from the portal
blood are converted into urea. Thus, periportal hepatocytes express
glutaminase and urea cycle enzymes and also a transport system
responsible for the influx of glutamine. In contrast, perivenous
hepatocytes take up ammonia from venous blood and use it to synthesize
glutamine rather than urea. The synthesized glutamine is released into
venous blood. Thus, perivenous hepatocytes express glutamine synthetase
but very little urea cycle enzymes. In addition, these hepatocytes express a transport system responsible for the efflux of glutamine. Interestingly, studies by Chaudhry et al. (19) have shown
that SN1 is expressed uniformly in periportal hepatocytes as well as in
perivenous hepatocytes. This suggests that SN1 may mediate the influx
of glutamine in periportal hepatocytes and the efflux of glutamine in
perivenous hepatocytes. The shift in the function of SN1 from a
mediator of glutamine influx in periportal hepatocytes to a mediator of
glutamine efflux in perivenous hepatocytes is expected to be intimately
involved with changes in driving forces that energize the transport
process. The transmembrane H+ gradient and the
transmembrane glutamine gradient appear to be important in this
context. Because periportal hepatocytes synthesize urea, which requires
not only ammonia but also HCO3 , these cells
have an effective means of HCO3 disposal. In
contrast, perivenous hepatocytes remove ammonia via glutamine synthesis
rather than urea synthesis, and this process does not involve
HCO3 . Thus, perivenous hepatocytes do not
have an effective means of HCO3 disposal.
Therefore, it is likely that the intracellular pH in periportal
hepatocytes is acidic compared with the intracellular pH in perivenous
hepatocytes. An acidic intracellular pH in periportal hepatocytes is
expected to facilitate the transport function of SN1 in the direction
of glutamine influx. Similarly, an alkaline intracellular pH in
perivenous hepatocytes is expected to facilitate the transport function
of SN1 in the direction of glutamine influx. In addition, the
transmembrane glutamine gradient differs significantly between
periportal and perivenous hepatocytes. Periportal hepatocytes possess
glutaminase that effectively hydrolyzes glutamine, thus maintaining low
intracellular levels of glutamine. On the other hand, perivenous
hepatocytes possess glutamine synthetase that generates glutamine, thus
maintaining relatively high intracellular levels to glutamine. These
conditions favor glutamine influx via SN1 in periportal hepatocytes and
glutamine efflux via SN1 in perivenous hepatocytes. This hypothesis is
supported by in vitro liver perfusion studies (1, 40).
Lowering the perfusate pH decreases urea production from portal ammonia
and glutamine and increases glutamine production. Increasing the
perfusate pH has opposite effects. It enhances urea production from
portal ammonia and glutamine and decreases glutamine production. These
findings support the hypothesis, because lowering the perfusate pH is
expected to decrease glutamine influx via SN1 in urea-producing
periportal hepatocytes and increase glutamine efflux via SN1 in
glutamine-producing perivenous hepatocytes. Increasing the perfusate pH
has the opposite effects. There is no information available on whether
there are any significant differences in membrane potential between
periportal hepatocytes and perivenous hepatocytes associated with their
distinct metabolic functions. Such information may be useful, because
the magnitude of membrane potential also has a role in determining the
direction of glutamine flux via SN1.
The ability of SN1 to mediate the influx or efflux of glutamine
depending upon the magnitude and direction of the driving forces
provides a possible explanation for the results of glutamine transport
obtained in vector-transfected cells under different experimental
conditions. Obviously, whether or not the transport function of the
heterologously expressed SN1 becomes detectable in HRPE cells depends
on the endogenous glutamine transport activity. If the endogenous
activity is high as evident when measured in a NaCl-containing medium,
SN1 actually mediates the efflux of glutamine. This is because the
endogenous activity increases the intracellular levels of glutamine
high enough to make the heterologously expressed SN1 operate in the
efflux mode. This explains why the glutamine accumulation in SN1
cDNA-transfected cells is lower than in control cells. However,
when the transport of glutamine via endogenous transport activities is
specifically and effectively blocked by replacing NaCl with LiCl and by
including cysteine in the medium, conditions that do not interfere with
the transport function of SN1, the heterologously expressed SN1 is able
to mediate the influx of glutamine. Thus, the transport activity of SN1
as measured by glutamine influx becomes easily detectable under these conditions.
Another interesting and physiologically relevant finding from the
present study is that SN1 is expressed in skeletal muscle. Even though
the studies by Chaudhry et al. (19) failed to detect SN1
mRNA in rat skeletal muscle, the screening of a rat skeletal muscle
cDNA library in our study has led to the isolation of a full-length
SN1 cDNA that is functional in heterologous expression systems. We
screened the library in an attempt to clone system Nm, a
variant of system N that is expressed specifically in skeletal muscle
(11). Based on the data reported by Chaudhry et al. (19), we
were not expecting to find SN1 cDNA in the library. Quite contrary to our expectation, the screening of the library led to the isolation of SN1 from skeletal muscle. Our present results clearly show that SN1
is expressed in skeletal muscle. We have not yet succeeded in
identifying a clone from the library with functional characteristics of
Nm. The identification of SN1 expression in skeletal muscle
is important because of the well recognized role of glutamine transport
in this tissue in various physiological states (41). There is evidence for glutamine influx as well as glutamine efflux in skeletal muscle depending on the physiological state. In the postabsorptive state, glutamine is released from skeletal muscle, thus supplying an important
metabolic fuel to the rapidly dividing cells of the intestine and
immune system. Glutamine and alanine together make up 80% of the total
amino acids released from this tissue (7, 42, 43). Glutamine also plays
a significant role in skeletal muscle not only as a substrate for
protein synthesis but also an effective modulator of protein turnover.
Glutamine enhances protein synthesis and inhibits protein degradation
(44, 45). Because SN1 is capable of mediating the influx or efflux of
glutamine depending on the magnitude and direction of the cumulative
driving forces, this transporter is likely to play a pivotal role in
glutamine transport in skeletal muscle.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Vickie Mitchell and Kimberly Lord
for expert secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DA10045 and HD33347.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia,
Augusta, GA 30912. Tel.: 706-721-7652; Fax: 706-721-6608; E-mail:
vganapat@mail.mcg.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002282200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GlnT, glutamine
transporter;
SN, system N;
hSN1, human SN1;
rSN1, rat SN1;
rGlnT, rat
GlnT;
NMDG, N-methyl-D-glucamine;
HRPE, human
retinal pigment epithelial;
kbp, kilobase pair(s);
RT-PCR, reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction;
Mes, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sies, H.,
and Haussinger, D.
(1984)
in
Glutamine Metabolism in Mammalian Tissues
(Haussinger, D.
, and Sies, H., eds)
, pp. 78-97, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
|
| 2.
|
Zalkin, H.,
and Smith, J. L.
(1998)
Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol.
72,
87-144
|
| 3.
|
Peng, L.,
Hertz, L.,
Huang, R.,
Sonneward, U.,
Petersen, S. B.,
Westergaard, N.,
Larsson, O.,
and Schousboe, A.
(1993)
Dev. Neurosci.
15,
367-377
|
| 4.
|
Sibson, N. R.,
Dhankhar, A.,
Mason, G. F.,
Behar, K. L.,
Rothman, D. L.,
and Shulman, R. G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2699-2704
|
| 5.
|
Vaughn, P. R.,
Lobo, C.,
Battaglia, F. C.,
Fennessey, P. V.,
Wilkening, R. B.,
and Meschia, G.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
E705-E711
|
| 6.
|
Haussinger, D.,
Stoll, B.,
Stehle, T.,
and Gerok, W.
(1989)
Eur. J. Biochem.
185,
189-195
|
| 7.
|
Christensen, H. N.
(1990)
Physiol. Rev.
70,
43-77
|
| 8.
|
Kilberg, M. S.,
Stevens, B. R.,
and Novak, D. A.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
13,
137-165
|
| 9.
|
Palacin, M.,
Estevez, R.,
Bertran, J.,
and Zorzano, A.
(1998)
Physiol. Rev.
78,
969-1054
|
| 10.
|
Kilberg, M. S.,
Handlogten, M. E.,
and Christensen, H. N.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
4011-4019
|
| 11.
|
Ahmed, A.,
Maxwell, D. L.,
Taylor, P. M.,
and Rennie, M. J.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
264,
E993-E1000
|
| 12.
|
Tamarappoo, B. K.,
Raizada, M. K.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
954-960
|
| 13.
|
Kekuda, R.,
Prasad, P. D.,
Fei, Y. J.,
Torres-Zamorano, V.,
Sinha, S.,
Yang-Feng, T. L.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
18657-18661
|
| 14.
|
Kekuda, R.,
Torres-Zamorano, V.,
Fei, Y. J.,
Prasad, P. D.,
Li, H. W.,
Mader, L. D.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
G1463-G1472
|
| 15.
|
Torres-Zamorano, V.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
245,
824-829
|
| 16.
|
Kanai, Y.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
565-572
|
| 17.
|
Varaqui, H.,
Zhu, H.,
Yao, D.,
Ming, H.,
and Erickson, J. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4049-4054
|
| 18.
|
Sugawara, M.,
Nakanishi, T.,
Fei, Y. J.,
Huang, W.,
Ganapathy, M. E.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16473-16477
|
| 19.
|
Chaudhry, F. A.,
Reimer, R. J.,
Krizaj, D.,
Barber, D.,
Storm-Mathisen, J.,
Copenhagen, D. R.,
and Edwards, R. H.
(1999)
Cell
99,
769-780
|
| 20.
|
McIntire, S. L.,
Reimer, R. J.,
Schuske, K.,
Edwards, R. H.,
and Jorgensen, E. M.
(1997)
Nature
389,
870-876
|
| 21.
|
Schuldiner, S.,
Shirvan, A.,
and Linial, M.
(1995)
Physiol. Rev.
75,
369-392
|
| 22.
|
Wu, X.,
Kekuda, R.,
Huang, W.,
Fei, Y.-J.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Chen, J.,
Conway, S. J.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32776-32786
|
| 23.
|
Rajan, D. P.,
Kekuda, R.,
Huang, W.,
Wang, H.,
Devoe, L. D.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Prasad, P. D.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
29005-29010
|
| 24.
|
Wang, H.,
Dutta, B.,
Huang, W.,
Devoe, L. D.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Ganapathy, V.,
and Prasad, P. D.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1461,
1-9
|
| 25.
|
Parent, L. S.,
Supplisson, S.,
Loo, D. D. F.,
and Wright, E. M.
(1992)
J. Membr. Biol.
125,
49-62
|
| 26.
|
Loo, D. D. F.,
Hazama, A.,
Supplisson, S.,
Turk, E.,
and Wright, E. M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5767-5771
|
| 27.
|
Mackenzie, B.,
Loo, D. D. F.,
Fei, Y.-J.,
Liu, W.,
Ganapathy, V.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Wright, E. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5430-5437
|
| 28.
|
Mackenzie, B.,
Fei, Y. J.,
Ganapathy, V.,
and Leibach, F. H.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1284,
125-128
|
| 29.
|
Fei, Y. J.,
Prasad, P. D.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
8744-8751
|
| 30.
|
Kekuda, R.,
Prasad, P. D.,
Wu, X.,
Wang, H.,
Fei, Y.-J.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15971-15979
|
| 31.
|
Prasad, P. D.,
Srinivas, S. R.,
Wang, H.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Devoe, L. D.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
270,
836-840
|
| 32.
|
Fei, Y. J.,
Nara, E.,
Liu, J. C.,
Boyd, C. A. R.,
Ganapathy, V.,
and Leibach, F. H.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1418,
344-351
|
| 33.
|
Wang, H.,
Fei, Y. J.,
Kekuda, R.,
Yang-Feng, T. L.,
Devoe, L. D.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Prasad, P. D.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
C1019-C1030
|
| 34.
|
Pouyssegur, J.,
and Franchi, A.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
151,
131-139
|
| 35.
|
Shotwell, M. A.,
Jayme, D. W.,
Kilberg, M. S.,
and Oxender, D. L.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
5422-5427
|
| 36.
|
Brandsch, M.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Mahesh, V. B.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1192,
177-184
|
| 37.
|
Mitsumoto, Y.,
Sato, K.,
Ohyashiki, T.,
and Mohri, T.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
4549-4554
|
| 38.
|
Segawa, H.,
Fukasawa, Y.,
Miyamoto, K. I.,
Takeda, E.,
Endou, H.,
and Kanai, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19745-19751
|
| 39.
|
Rajan, D. P.,
Kekuda, R.,
Huang, W.,
Devoe, L. D.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Prasad, P. D.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1463,
6-14
|
| 40.
|
Oliver, J.,
Koelz, A. M.,
Costello, J.,
and Bourke, E.
(1977)
Eur. J. Clin. Invest.
7,
445-449
|
| 41.
|
Taylor, P. M.,
Rennie, M. J.,
and Low, S. Y.
(1999)
in
Biomembrane Transport
(Van Winkle, L. J., ed)
, pp. 295-325, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
|
| 42.
|
Cahill, G. S.
(1976)
Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
5,
397-415
|
| 43.
|
Abumrad, N. N.,
Williams, P.,
Frexes-Steed, M.,
Geer, R.,
Flakoll, P.,
Cersosima, E.,
Brown, L. L.,
Melki, I.,
Bulus, N.,
Hourani, H.,
Hubbard, M.,
and Ghishan, F.
(1989)
Diabetes Metab. Rev.
5,
213-226
|
| 44.
|
Rennie, M. J.,
MacLennan, P. A.,
Hundal, H. S.,
Weryk, B.,
Smith, K.,
Taylor, P. M.,
Egan, C. J.,
and Watt, P. W.
(1989)
Metabolism
38,
47-51
|
| 45.
|
Rennie, M. J.,
Khogali, S. E. O.,
Low, S. Y.,
McDowell, H. E.,
Hundal, H. S.,
Ahmed, A.,
and Taylor, P. M.
(1996)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
24,
869-873
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. S. Umapathy, Y. Dun, P. M. Martin, J. N. Duplantier, P. Roon, P. Prasad, S. B. Smith, and V. Ganapathy
Expression and Function of System N Glutamine Transporters (SN1/SN2 or SNAT3/SNAT5) in Retinal Ganglion Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
November 1, 2008;
49(11):
5151 - 5160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Zhang, A. Gameiro, and C. Grewer
Highly Conserved Asparagine 82 Controls the Interaction of Na+ with the Sodium-coupled Neutral Amino Acid Transporter SNAT2
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2008;
283(18):
12284 - 12292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Broer
Amino Acid Transport Across Mammalian Intestinal and Renal Epithelia
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2008;
88(1):
249 - 286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Srinivas, P. D. Prasad, N. S. Umapathy, V. Ganapathy, and P. S. Shekhawat
Transport of butyryl-L-carnitine, a potential prodrug, via the carnitine transporter OCTN2 and the amino acid transporter ATB0,+
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
November 1, 2007;
293(5):
G1046 - G1053.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Weise, H. M. Becker, and J. W. Deitmer
Enzymatic Suppression of the Membrane Conductance Associated with the Glutamine Transporter SNAT3 Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes by Carbonic Anhydrase II
J. Gen. Physiol.,
July 30, 2007;
130(2):
203 - 215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-P. Schneider, S. Broer, A. Broer, and J. W. Deitmer
Heterologous Expression of the Glutamine Transporter SNAT3 in Xenopus Oocytes Is Associated with Four Modes of Uncoupled Transport
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 9, 2007;
282(6):
3788 - 3798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. S. Umapathy, W. Li, B. A. Mysona, S. B. Smith, and V. Ganapathy
Expression and Function of Glutamine Transporters SN1 (SNAT3) and SN2 (SNAT5) in Retinal Muller Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
November 1, 2005;
46(11):
3980 - 3987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Onan, J. S. Fisher, J.-S. Ju, B. C. Fuchs, and B. P. Bode
Type I Diabetes Affects Skeletal Muscle Glutamine Uptake in a Fiber-Specific Manner
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
October 1, 2005;
230(9):
606 - 611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shigaki, B. J. Barkla, M. C. Miranda-Vergara, J. Zhao, O. Pantoja, and K. D. Hirschi
Identification of a Crucial Histidine Involved in Metal Transport Activity in the Arabidopsis Cation/H+ Exchanger CAX1
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 26, 2005;
280(34):
30136 - 30142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gu, C. J. Villegas, and J. X. Jiang
Differential Regulation of Amino Acid Transporter SNAT3 by Insulin in Hepatocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 15, 2005;
280(28):
26055 - 26062.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. E. Baird, K. J. Beattie, A. R. Hyde, V. Ganapathy, M. J. Rennie, and P. M. Taylor
Bidirectional substrate fluxes through the System N (SNAT5) glutamine transporter may determine net glutamine flux in rat liver
J. Physiol.,
September 1, 2004;
559(2):
367 - 381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Zhou, K. Tanaka, M. J. Soares, and G. You
Characterization of an organic anion transport system in a placental cell line
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
November 1, 2003;
285(5):
E1103 - E1109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Simon, L. Plies, A. Habermeier, U. Martine, M. Reining, and E. I. Closs
Role of Neutral Amino Acid Transport and Protein Breakdown for Substrate Supply of Nitric Oxide Synthase in Human Endothelial Cells
Circ. Res.,
October 31, 2003;
93(9):
813 - 820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Mann, D. L. Yudilevich, and L. Sobrevia
Regulation of Amino Acid and Glucose Transporters in Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2003;
83(1):
183 - 252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Karinch, C.-M. Lin, C. L. Wolfgang, M. Pan, and W. W. Souba
Regulation of expression of the SN1 transporter during renal adaptation to chronic metabolic acidosis in rats
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2002;
283(5):
F1011 - F1019.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. P. Bode, B. C. Fuchs, B. P. Hurley, J. L. Conroy, J. E. Suetterlin, K. K. Tanabe, D. B. Rhoads, S. F. Abcouwer, and W. W. Souba
Molecular and functional analysis of glutamine uptake in human hepatoma and liver-derived cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
November 1, 2002;
283(5):
G1062 - G1073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Shasby
System N in eNdothelium
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
June 1, 2002;
282(6):
L1190 - L1191.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Chaudhry, R. J. Reimer, and R. H. Edwards
The glutamine commute: take the N line and transfer to the A
J. Cell Biol.,
April 29, 2002;
157(3):
349 - 355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Broer, A. Albers, I. Setiawan, R. H Edwards, F. A Chaudhry, F. Lang, C. A Wagner, and S. Broer
Regulation of the glutamine transporter SN1 by extracellular pH and intracellular sodium ions
J. Physiol.,
February 15, 2002;
539(1):
3 - 14.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nakanishi, R. Kekuda, Y.-J. Fei, T. Hatanaka, M. Sugawara, R. G. Martindale, F. H. Leibach, P. D. Prasad, and V. Ganapathy
Cloning and functional characterization of a new subtype of the amino acid transport system N
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
December 1, 2001;
281(6):
C1757 - C1768.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. P. Bode
Recent Molecular Advances in Mammalian Glutamine Transport
J. Nutr.,
September 1, 2001;
131(9):
2475S - 2485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nakanishi, T. Hatanaka, W. Huang, P. D Prasad, F. H Leibach, M. E Ganapathy, and V. Ganapathy
Na+- and Cl--coupled active transport of carnitine by the amino acid transporter ATB0,+ from mouse colon expressed in HRPE cells and Xenopus oocytes
J. Physiol.,
April 15, 2001;
532(2):
297 - 304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Russnak, D. Konczal, and S. L. McIntire
A Family of Yeast Proteins Mediating Bidirectional Vacuolar Amino Acid Transport
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 22, 2001;
276(26):
23849 - 23857.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gu, H. L. Roderick, P. Camacho, and J. X. Jiang
Characterization of an N-system Amino Acid Transporter Expressed in Retina and Its Involvement in Glutamine Transport
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 22, 2001;
276(26):
24137 - 24144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Chaudhry, R. J. Reimer, and R. H. Edwards
The glutamine commute: take the N line and transfer to the A
J. Cell Biol.,
April 29, 2002;
157(3):
349 - 355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|