![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 31, 23919-23926, August 4, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 30, 2000
Among various other roles described so far,
protein kinase CK2 has been involved in cell cycle, proliferation, and
development. Here, we show that in response to specific stresses (heat
shock or UV irradiation), a pool of the cellular CK2 content
relocalizes in a particular nuclear fraction, increasing the activity
of the kinase there. Electron microscopic analysis shows that upon heat shock, CK2 Protein kinase CK2 is a serine/threonine protein kinase,
ubiquitous and highly conserved among eukaryotic organisms (reviewed in
Refs. 1-3). It is composed of two catalytic subunits ( In challenging conditions such as exposure to heat shock, UV
irradiation, heavy metals, and oxidative stress, cells react by
inducing what is called a stress response (reviewed in Refs. 9 and 10).
This involves activation of signaling
pathways,1 activation of
transcription factors (notably the
HSFs),2 and
post-transcriptional modifications (12) (e.g.
phosphorylation and acetylation). Among all the CK2 substrates
described so far, it is striking to note that many are proteins
involved in the response to heat shock, including chaperon proteins
(HSP56 (13) and HSP90 (14)), stress related transcription factors
(HSF-1 and Egr-1 (15)), the DNA repair machinery (topoisomerase II (16), DNA ligase (17), and APE/REF-1 (18)), or in the control of
transcription (4).
In this study, we address the question of whether CK2 might be
implicated in the cellular stress response and more specifically in
response to heat shock. We show that brief exposure to elevated temperature dramatically affects the localization of a cellular pool of
protein kinase CK2 inside the nucleus and increases the activity of the
kinase up to 3-fold in a specific nuclear fraction. Electron
microscopic analysis reveals a differential redistribution of CK2
subunits inside the nucleolus, upon exposure to elevated temperature.
After heat shock, the Cell Culture and Heat Shock--
NIH3T3 or HeLa cells grown at
37 °C with a humidified atmosphere 0.5% CO2 in minimal
essential medium (Life Technologies Inc.) supplemented with 10%
inactivated fetal bovine serum. For heat shock treatment, cells were
seeded at 6 × 104 cells/ml into Petri dish with
medium containing 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 48 h after
plating, cells were submerged in water bath and heat shocked at
temperatures and times as indicated in figure legends.
CK2 Extraction Protocol--
Immediately after heat shock, cells
were rinsed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and
either lysed in RIPA Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5%
sodium desoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) or sequentially lysed in GPV buffer
(20 mM sodium glycerophosphate, pH 7.5, 1 mM
EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
Protein Synthesis Inhibition--
Cells were incubated for
6 h with 1 µM cycloheximide before heat shock
treatment. To measure the percentage of protein synthesis inhibition,
cells were incubated in methionine lacking medium supplemented with 2%
glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 µM cycloheximide, and 50 µCi/ml [35S]methionine for 6 h. At the end of the labeling time, the medium was removed, and the
cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS. The cells were
scrapped off the dish and lysed in with 0.1 N NaOH, 1%
SDS. The proteins were precipitated with 10% ice-cold trichloroacetic
acid for 1 h at 4 °C and centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C at
10,000 × g. The pellet was washed once with
trichloroacetic acid, centrifuged again, and resuspended with 90 °C
warmed up 2% SDS. The remaining radioactivity in the pellet was
counted in scintillation liquid. In these conditions, 90% of protein
synthesis was inhibited.
CK2 Activity and Protein Concentration--
Measure of CK2
activity was as described (21). Briefly, reaction was started by
addition of the sample (3 µl) to the reaction mixture (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl2,
150 mM NaCl, 20 µM ATP, 15 µM
of the synthetic peptide RRREDEESDDEE, and 1 µCi of
[ Immunofluorescence--
Cells were grown on coverslips were
rapidly harvested after heat shock, rinsed twice with ice-cold PBS, and
then fixed for 30 min at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde.
Cells were washed, permeabilized by incubation in PBS containing 0.1%
Triton X-100 and 0.1% sodium citrate for 2 min at 4 °C, and blocked
in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 and 3% bovine serum albumin at
room temperature for 30 min. Cells were then incubated for 1 h at
room temperature or overnight at 4 °C with 25 µg/ml primary polyclonal antibodies raised against full-length CK2 Electron Microscopy--
Monolayer cultures of 3T3 cells with or
without heat shock treatment were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (Merck)
in 0.1 M Sörensen phosphate buffer, pH 7.3-7.4, for
1 h at 4 °C, dehydrated in methanol, and embedded at low
temperature in Lowicryl K4M (Polysciences Europe Gmbh, Eppelheim,
Germany). Polymerization was carried out under long wave-length UV
light (Philips TL 6W fluorescent tubes) at
For the detection of CK2 CK2 Activity Increases in a Specific Subcellular Fraction after
Heat Shock--
Cells were heat shocked (43 °C) for 1 h before
being either extracted in GPV buffer containing increasing NaCl
concentrations (see "Experimental Procedures") or in RIPA buffer.
As shown in Fig. 1, exposure of cells at
43 °C for 1 h induces a dramatic change in the pattern of CK2
activity recovered in the S0, S200, and S400 fractions,
respectively (Fig. 1, A and B). In other
words, after heat treatment, CK2 activity decreased in the S0 and S200 fractions, whereas it increased up to 2-fold in the S400 fraction (Fig.
1A). It was calculated that about 20% of the total CK2
activity shifted from the S0 and S200 fractions to the S400 fraction. A Western blot analysis revealed that after heat shock treatment, the
level of both CK2
On the other hand, the total CK2 activity measured in the extracts
recovered after cell lysis in RIPA buffer was unchanged after heat
treatment (Fig. 1C). Similarly, a Western blot analysis of
the RIPA extracts indicated that the amount of both the catalytic and
the regulatory subunits of the kinase remained constant after heat
shock (Fig. 1D). Therefore, these results suggested that the
change in CK2 activity observed after heat shock was correlated with an
intracellular redistribution of both kinase subunits.
Stress and Dose Dependence of the CK2 Redistribution--
To test
whether the response of CK2 is dependent on the dose of the heat shock
(i.e. on the temperature at which cells are exposed
to), cells were incubated for 1 h at various temperatures ranging
from 37 to 46 °C. A Western blot analysis (Fig.
2A) shows that the
increase of the CK2 protein, visualized in fraction S400, was
proportional to the severity of the heat shock, reaching a maximal
augmentation at temperatures above 43 °C. This increase was
correlated with a comparable decrease in the amount of the enzyme in
fraction S0 and to a lesser extent in fraction S200. Moreover, this
redistribution of the kinase was correlated with a corresponding shift
of the CK2 activity from the S0 and S200 fractions to the S400 fraction
(Fig. 2B). The activity measured in S400 fraction was
greater at the highest temperature (45 °C). This experiment
emphasizes the observation that, in response to heat shock, the
localization of both CK2 subunits balances between the S0 and S200
fractions on one hand and the S400 fraction on the other hand. It was
noticed that above 45 °C (severe heat shock conditions), cells
started to die. Therefore, to obtain maximum effect on CK2 with limited
cell death, the following heat shock experiments were performed at
43 °C (mild heat shock conditions).
To assess the specificity of CK2 response in stress conditions, NIH3T3
cells were subjected to either UV irradiation (20 and 40 J/m2) or
oxidative stress (1-5 mM H2O2 for
2 h) (Fig. 3). It was observed that
UV irradiation (40 J/m2) induced a CK2 relocalization in
the S400 fraction that is analogous to the heat shock-induced CK2
relocalization (Fig. 3A). Similarly to heat shock, CK2
activity increases up to 2-fold upon UV irradiation when compared with
the activity in control cells. Moreover, this augmentation of CK2
activity correlated with an increase in the amount of both CK2 subunits
(Fig. 3B) and was also found to be dose-dependent (data not shown). In contrast,
H2O2 had no effect either on the relocalization
of the kinase nor on the CK2 activity measured in the S400 fraction
(data not shown). Thus, we concluded that CK2 activation was specific
to the type of stress and also dependent on the intensity of the stress
applied.
Characteristics of Heat-induced CK2 Relocalization--
To further
characterize the heat-induced redistribution of CK2, time course
experiments were performed. Fig.
4A shows a representative experiment of the CK2 activity, recovered in the S400 fraction from
control and heat shocked cells. It was observed that CK2 activity
increased in that fraction in a time-dependent manner. This
increase could be detected as early as 10 min and reached a maximum
after 1 h of incubation at 43 °C. The amount of both CK2
It has been shown that cell metabolism is profoundly affected by heat
shock, leading to cell arrest. Nevertheless, when a moderate heat shock
is applied, cells are able to fully recover over a period of 4-6 h
(23). Therefore, to test the reversibility of the heat-induced CK2
response, NIH3T3 cells were subjected to mild heat shock (1 h,
43 °C) and then were incubated back at 37 °C to allow them to
recover. Fig. 5 shows the time course of CK2 activity measured in the S400 fraction during recovery. CK2 activity remained high in this fraction for about 1 h after the cells were returned to 37 °C but started to decrease regularly until
reaching control level, 2 h later (Fig. 5A). In
parallel, the amount of both CK2 subunits, which was elevated after
heat shock, decreased gradually to normal level in 3 h (Fig.
5B).
Heat Shock-induced Relocalization of CK2 Is Not Dependent on
Protein Neosynthesis--
Maximal heat-induced CK2 activity occurred
at a temperature that virtually halts protein synthesis (23). Moreover,
no major change in the amount of CK2
present in whole cell extracts between control and heat shocked cells was observed (Fig. 6).
Nevertheless, the possibility still existed that CK2 neosynthesis
occurred and contributed to the accumulation of the protein kinase in
the S400 fraction. Thus, we tested whether inhibiting protein synthesis would interfere with the heat shock-induced response of CK2 in the S400
fraction. Cells were incubated for 6 h with cycloheximide before
being heat shocked and sequentially extracted. Under these experimental
conditions, more than 90% of the protein synthesis was inhibited as
determined by [35S]methionine incorporation (data not
shown). In contrast cycloheximide had no effect on the heat-induced
increase of CK2 activity (Fig. 6A), nor did it affect the
increase in the amount of CK2 protein recovered in the S400 fraction
after heat shock (Fig. 6B). Therefore, neosynthesis of CK2
subunits could not account for the heat shock-induced CK2 activity
observed in the S400 fraction. These observations were in good
agreement with the fact that, apart from the heat shock proteins that
are induced and specifically transcribed after heat stress, protein
synthesis is rapidly stopped in eukaryotic cells during exposure to
elevated temperatures (23).
Distribution of CK2 at Ultrastructural Level--
To clarify the
pattern of heat-induced relocalization of CK2, electron microscopy was
performed on control and heat shocked cells (1 h treatment at
43 °C). Lowicryl embedded material was used for the precise
localization of individual In this study, we have shown that after heat shock, CK2 activity
increases more than 2-fold in a high salt extractable fraction with
characteristics of a nuclear fraction (S400). This increase of activity
could reflect either an activation of the protein kinase or a
redistribution of the kinase visualized by a heat shock-induced
enrichment in the amount of According to Fig. 1A, about 20% of the total CK2 activity
relocalize to this nuclear fraction in response to heat shock. Because CK2 appears as a multifunctional protein kinase, it is expected that
even a small change in the amount of CK2 in a specific subcellular fraction would be sufficient for the cell to counteract challenging conditions such as heat shock. As shown by our indirect
immunofluorescence analysis, CK2 relocalizes to highly labeled
speckle-like structures in the nucleus of cells subjected to elevated
temperatures, whereas the enzyme exhibits a homogeneous nuclear
distribution in control cells. Higher magnification, provided by the
electron microscopy analysis, revealed that upon heat shock both
subunits are targeted to similar dense and roundish structures 150-300
nm in size at the vicinity of the condensed chromatin. Although, the
exact function of these heat-induced structures has not yet been
clearly defined, they provide an opportunity for the cell to control
the activity of CK2 and to target the kinase to specific substrates
where their phosphorylation is required. Interestingly, many proteins
involved in the heat shock response have been described to enter the
nucleus and to concentrate into speckle-like structure. Indeed, in
response to elevated temperatures, the heat shock transcription factor HSF relocalizes inside the nucleus to structures that also appear as
granules (24, 25). Although showing some differences, the pattern of
HSF relocalization is similar to the rearrangement pattern of
CK2. It is tempting to relate these similar CK2 and HSF structures,
because it has been recently observed that CK2 phosphorylates
HSF.3 Strikingly in squamous
carcinoma SCCHN cells, CK2 also exhibits a punctuate nuclei pattern,
which has been correlated with high CK2 activity and transformed
phenotype (27). Remarkably, several other proteins (including GATA-1
(28), GATA-3 (29) (30), p53 (31), nucleolin (32), and splicing factors
(33)) have also been described to be regulated by specific accumulation
into nuclear domains. Indeed, CK2 phosphorylates and regulates several nuclear proteins involved in the control of gene expression or in DNA
repair in stress conditions, as exemplified by topoisomerase II (16),
DNA ligase (17), or APF/REF-1 (18).
In response to heat shock, CK2 It is known that the catalytic It is known that the regulatory subunit of CK2 is implicated in the
G2/M DNA damage checkpoint arrest (7) and that this CK2
subunit confers partial UV resistance on Xerodermas pigmentosum cells
(8). Therefore, these findings could suggest the possibility that
cellular response to DNA damage is modulated by
CK2-dependent phosphorylation. Indeed our data finally show
that relocalization of CK2 is a common phenomenon for cells challenged
by UV irradiation or heat shock. Both stresses have been shown to
induce DNA damage. Thus, one can speculate that during DNA-damaging
stresses, CK2 is recruited to specifically phosphorylate and activate
those proteins of the reparation machinery. Nevertheless, oxidative stress, which is also a DNA-damaging agent (26), does not induce any
CK2 response under our experimental conditions. Although not necessarily conflicting, these results show that DNA damage may not be
the signal that induces relocalization of CK2 and raises the question
of which upstream events are involved in this cellular process.
In summary, our work demonstrated that in response to heat shock, a
fraction of CK2 relocalizes to specific regions inside the nucleus,
raising the CK2 activity there. Moreover, the redistribution of the
kinase was specific of the stress applied and was
dose-dependent. We do not know, however, the exact
mechanism underlying the regulation of this heat-induced response of
CK2. However, we propose that differential and specific targeting of
both subunits of the kinase inside the nucleus compartment may be of
importance in the cellular response to physiological stress. Whatever
its significance, one can nevertheless predict that in stress
conditions, CK2 may meet a totally different subset of substrates and
partners and thus notably affect the cellular metabolism. To our
knowledge this is the first demonstration of a potential role of CK2 in
the stress response in higher eukaryotic cells.
*
This work was supported by a grant from the INSERM, the
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique (Direction des
Sciences du Vivant/Départment de Biologie Moléculaire et
Structurale/Biologie des Régulations Cellulaires
Endocrines), the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer,
the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, and the Commission of the
European Community (Biomed2).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002697200
1
Bensaude, O. (1999) in Molecular
Chaperones and Folding Catalysts: Regulation, Cellular Function, and
Mechanisms (Bukau, B., ed) pp. 53-76, Harwood Academic Publishers
GmbH, Reading, UK.
3
S. K. Calderwood, personal communication.
The abbreviations used are:
HSF, heat shock
factor;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
Heat-induced Relocalization of Protein Kinase CK2
IMPLICATION OF CK2 IN THE CONTEXT OF CELLULAR STRESS*
,
Laboratoire INSERM U244, CENG, 17 Avenue des
Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France, the § Laboratoire
Organisation Fonctionnelle du Noyau, Institut Fédératif
CNRS, UPR 1983, 94801 Villejuif, France, and the ¶ Laboratoire
Régulation de l'Expression Génétique, CNRS, UMR
8541, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75230 Paris, France
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and CK2
subunits are both detected in similar speckle structures occurring in the interchromatin space but are differentially targeted inside the nucleolus. This CK2 relocalization process takes
place in a time- and dose-dependent manner and is
reversible upon recovery at 37 °C. Altogether, this work suggests
CK2 be involved in the response to physiological stress in higher
eukaryotic cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
or
') and
of two regulatory subunits (
), which tetramerize to adopt an
2
2 structure (1-3). Protein kinase CK2
localizes both in the nucleus and in the cytoplasmic compartment where
it phosphorylates a variety of substrates involved in different
cellular functions. Although its precise role remains elusive, CK2 has
been involved in the major cellular processes including control of cell
division and proliferation (4), development, and differentiation. In yeast, in addition to being necessary for cell viability (5), CK2 has
also been shown to play a role in the maintenance of ion homeostasis,
as highlighted by the Na+ and Li+ stress sensitivity of the
CK2
mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (6), and in the
control of adaptation at the yeast DNA damage checkpoint (7). In
addition, the human homologue of CK2
was shown to increase
resistance to UV irradiation when transfected into Xeroderma
pigmentosum cells (8), raising the question of whether CK2 may play a
role in the response to stress.
CK2 subunit colonizes the nucleolus and
concentrates in dense structures at the vicinity of the perinuclear
layer of condensed chromatin, whereas the
CK2 subunit is only
recovered at the periphery of the condensed chromatin. In addition, we
show that the stress-induced response of the kinase is
dose-dependent and reversible. Finally, this redistribution
of the kinase is specific to heat shock and UV irradiation, because
similar effects are not observed in oxidative stress conditions. The
possible implications of this CK2 relocalization in the context of
cellular stress are discussed.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 µg/ml 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochlorine, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM
Na2VO4). The cell lysate was centrifuged at
3000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The clarified
supernatant (S200) was recovered, whereas the pellet (P0) was
resuspended in GPV containing 200 mM NaCl, and centrifuged
at 3000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The clarified
supernatant (S200) was recovered, the pellet P200 was extracted in GPV
buffer containing 400 mM NaCl and centrifuged at
14,000 × g for 10 min leading to supernatant S400. The
remaining pellet P400 was finally extracted in Laemmli loading buffer.
Each fraction (S0, S200, and S400) was analyzed for CK2 activity and by
Western blot using polyclonal antibodies against the
(antibody
R
403 (19)) and
(antibody
c (20)) subunits, respectively.
-32P]ATP/reaction in a final volume of 20 µl).
Reaction was performed for 5 min at room temperature and stopped with
60 µl of 4% cold trichloroacetic acid. After 30 min of precipitation
at 4 °C, the reaction mixture was centrifuged, and the supernatant
was spotted on phosphocellulose paper. After three successive 15-min
washes in cold phosphoric acid, the radioactivity on the
phosphocellulose paper was counted in scintillation liquid. Results are
given either as total activity (cpm) or as specific activity (cpm/µg
protein/min reaction). Protein concentration was performed using the
Bradford technique with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
(R
403) or
against the C-terminal domain of CK2
(
c)
respectively. Cells were then washed three times with washing buffer
(PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) and stained with fluorescent secondary
anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma) for 45 min at room temperature. They were
rinsed three times, incubated 5 min with 2 µg/ml Hoechst in PBS, and
then finally mounted with DAKO mounting medium.
30 °C for 5 days and,
subsequently, at room temperature for 1 day. Ultrathin sections were
collected on Formvar carbon-coated copper grids (mesh 200).
and CK2
subunits, grids bearing Lowicryl
sections were floated for 2 min over drops of bovine serum albumin (5%
in PBS) to prevent background, prior to being incubated for 30 min at
room temperature over 5-µl drops of primary polyclonal antibodies
(either R
403 or
c antibody at concentrations of 150 and 200 µg/ml in PBS, respectively). After rapid washes on two drops
of PBS, the grids were incubated for 30 min over 5-µl drops of a 1:25
dilution in PBS of rabbit anti-goat IgG conjugated to gold particles 10 nm in diameter (British Biocell International LTD, Cardiff, UK). After
rapid passages on two drops of PBS, grids were rinsed in a stream of
distilled water, air-dried, and, finally, stained with uranyl acetate
prior to be observed with a Philips 400 electron microscope. For
controls, we verified that no labeling occurred when the primary
antibody was omitted or replaced by 1:20 dilution of normal rabbit serum.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and CK2
subunits was sharply increased in the
S400 fraction, whereas it decreased significantly in the S0 fraction
(Fig. 1B). We observed that the increase in CK2 activity in
the S400 fraction did not exactly reflect the high increment in the CK2
amount detected by Western blot analysis of this fraction. Yet we do
not have satisfactory explanation for this light discrepancy. In all
fractions, the ratio of CK2
versus CK2
subunits
remained similar in control or in heat-treated cells. No significant
amount of CK2 protein was detected in the P400 pellet extracted in
Laemmli loading buffer (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
CK2 activity in control or heat shocked
cells. NIH3T3 cells were subjected to heat shock (43 °C, 1 h) and then either sequentially extracted in GPV buffer (A
and B) or extracted in RIPA buffer (C and
D) as described under "Experimental Procedures." The CK2
activity presented (A and C) was measured as
described under "Experimental Procedures" and is representative of
several similar experiments. B, aliquots of each fractions
(containing equal amounts of protein) were loaded on a 12%
bis-acrylamide gel, transferred on to nitrocellulose membrane,
and blotted with antibodies against CK2
(R
403) and CK2
(
c). D, extracts from cells lyzed in RIPA buffer and
containing the same amount of proteins were analyzed by Western
blotting with R
403 and
c antibodies.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Dose dependence of CK2 redistribution.
Various temperatures (42-46 °C) were applied for 1 h on HeLa
cells. After heat shock, cells were sequentially extracted in GPV
buffer as described under "Experimental Procedures." A,
Western blots corresponding to S0, S200, and S400 fractions,
respectively, are presented for all temperatures. B, CK2
activity (in cpm) was determined in the S0, S200, and S400 fractions. A
representative experiment is presented.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Stress specificity of the relocalization of
CK2. A, NIH3T3 cells were subjected to UV irradiation
(40 J/m2) followed by 15, 30, 45, or 60 min recovery at
37 °C, then harvested, and sequentially extracted in GPV buffer. CK2
activity measured in the S400 fraction is presented. B, the
S400 fractions recovered after UV irradiation and recovery were
analyzed by Western blot with the R
403 and
c antibodies.
and
CK2
subunits increased similarly in this fraction throughout the
heat shock (Fig. 4B). This biochemical observation was
correlated with an indirect immunofluorescence analysis, using a
polyclonal antibody (R
403) raised against the full-length CK2
protein (Fig. 4C). In normal growth conditions, a prominent
and uniform nuclear staining was observed, indicating that the CK2
subunit localized mostly inside the nucleus (control). This observation
was in accordance with previous immunofluorescence studies that showed
a preferential labeling of CK2 in the nucleus of growing cells (22).
However, soon after heat shock (15 min), some bright fluorescent
speckles started to appear, becoming clearly visible after 30 min of
incubation (highlighted by arrows in Fig. 4C).
Although R
403 is a polyclonal antibody, the observed signal was
specific because preabsorption of the antibody with purified CK2
abolished the staining (data not shown).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Kinetics of heat-induced relocalization of
CK2. Cells were subjected to heat shock for the indicated times at
43 °C and were then sequentially extracted in GPV buffer (as
described under "Experimental Procedures"). A, CK2
activity was determined in the S400 fraction and plotted as fold
activation. B, same amount of proteins from the S400
fractions was analyzed by Western blot with R
403 and
c
antibodies. C, cells subjected to heat shock were analyzed
by indirect immunofluorescence using the R
403 antibody as described
under "Experimental Procedures."

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Reversibility of the heat-induced CK2
relocalization. NIH3T3 cells were heat shocked for 1 h at
43 °C and incubated back at 37 °C for time ranging from 15 min to
10 h. Cells were then harvested, washed, and sequentially
extracted as described under "Experimental Procedures."
A, CK2 activity was measured in S400 fraction and plotted as
fold activation. B, same amount of proteins from the S400
fractions was analyzed by Western blotting with the R
403 and
c
antibodies.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Cycloheximide does not inhibit heat-induced
CK2 relocalization. Inhibition of protein synthesis was performed
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were then
either left untreated (control) or subjected to heat shock (43 °C,
1 h) before sequentially being lysed in GPV buffer as described
above. A, CK2 activity was determined in the S400 fraction
in each condition and plotted as cpm. B, same amount of
proteins from the S400 fractions was analyzed by Western blot with
R
403 and
c antibodies.
and
subunits of CK2. Following the
use of anti-CK2
antibody, labeling was more intense over the nucleus
than over the cytoplasm. In untreated 3T3 cells, gold particles were
scattered over the nucleoplasm but were absent over the enclosed
clusters of interchromatin granules and coiled bodies. Similarly, the
condensed chromatin and the nucleolus were devoid of gold particles
(Fig. 7, A1). Following a heat
shock treatment, gold particles remained dispersed over the nucleoplasm
(Fig. 7, A2). Moreover, the clusters of interchromatin granules and coiled bodies were unlabeled. In contrast, under these
challenging conditions, gold particles accumulated over roughly round,
moderately electron opaque structures of variable sizes, from 100 nm
(Fig. 7, A3) to 350 nm (Fig. 7, A4). These labeled structures showed a rather fibrillar configuration and were
located often in the vicinity of the perinuclear layer of condensed
chromatin although a few were near the nucleolus (Fig. 7,
A3). Strikingly, in contradistinction with nontreated cells, about 50% nucleoli were clearly labeled, preferentially at the level
of the granular component (Fig. 7, A2). In untreated 3T3 cells, the distribution of the gold particles following the use of
anti-CK2
antibody was similar to that obtained with the anti-CK2
antibody. Indeed, labeling occurred over the nucleoplasm and was excluded from the nucleolus (Fig. 7, B2). Occasionally, gold
particles were additionally observed at the nuclear border (Fig. 7,
B1). Again, heat shock treatment resulted in the additional
labeling of roundish structures of variable sizes, resembling those
decorated with anti-CK2
antibody (Fig. 7, B3). Those
structures, once again, consisted of clustered filaments (Fig. 7,
B4) and were often located close to the perinuclear
condensed chromatin (Fig. 7, B5). In similarity with the
anti-CK2
-labeled structures, anti-CK2
-labeled structures were
heterogeneous in size; however, they were no larger than 250 nm. In
contrast, no significant labeling was observed over the nucleolus (Fig.
7, B3).

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Electron microscope analysis.
A, distribution of CK2
subunit in untreated
(A1) or heat-shocked (A2
A4) NIH 3T3 cells.
A1, following the use of the R
403 antibody, gold
particles are scattered in the interchromatin space but are entirely
absent over the cluster of interchromatin granules (IG). The
nucleolus (NU) and the condensed chromatin (CH)
are unlabeled. Cytoplasm (C) is shown. Bar, 0.5 µm. A2, upon heat shock, gold particles are numerous over
the nucleolus (NU) and disperse over the interchromatin
space. The cluster of interchromatin granules (IG) and the
condensed host chromatin (CH) are unlabeled. Cytoplasm
(C) is shown. Bar, 0.5 µm. A3, gold
particles accumulate over an intranuclear, small, electron-opaque dot,
200 nm in diameter, which is located either near the nuclear border or
near in the nucleolus (NU). Bar, 0.5 µm.
A4, the interchromatin space contains large electon-opaque
dot, 350 nm in diameter, which is intensively and homogeneously
labeled. The higher magnification clearly reveals its fibrillar
configuration. Bar, 0.5 µm. B, distribution of
CK2
subunit in untreated (B1 and B2) or heat
shocked (B3-B5) NIH3T3 cells. B1, following the
use of
c antibody, the intranuclear distribution of
labeling is similar to that obtained in A1 with R
403
antibody; once again, gold particles are scattered over the
interchromatin space but are absent over the clusters of interchromatin
granules (IG). Some gold particles underline the perinuclear
layer of condensed chromatin (CH). Cytoplasm (C)
is shown. Bar, 0.5 µm. B2, the nucleolus is
unlabeled. A cluster of interchromatin granules (IG) is
shown. Bar, 0.5 µm. B3, in the nucleus, gold
particles are associated with a small, fibrillar electron-opaque dots
and are absent over the nucleolus (NU). Bar, 0.5 µm. B4, higher magnification. The fibrillar configuration
of this large electron-opaque dot 250 nm in diameter is clearly
visible. Gold particles underlined the filaments. Bar, 0.5 µm. B5, gold particles are over the filaments of the
electron-opaque dot. This labeled structure is close to the perinuclear
layer of condensed chromatin (CH). Bar, 0.5 µm.
Cytoplasm (C) is shown.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
subunits in this fraction or both.
colonizes the nucleolus as shown by
the electron microscopic analysis. In fact, previous immunofluorescence analysis also demonstrated a high accumulation of CK2 in the nucleoli of mouse tumor cell compared with other cellular compartment (34). Nucleolin, a major nucleolar phosphoprotein, is tightly bound to and
highly phosphorylated by CK2 in growing cells. This phosphorylation is
required for the transcription of rRNA genes to occur. Moreover, it has
been demonstrated that the catalytic
subunit of CK2 directly interacts with nucleolin and that a high percentage of CK2 in the
nucleolus may be complexed with it (35). Moreover, a regulation of rDNA
transcription in mammalian cells by CK2 have already been described by
Belenguer et al. (36) in adult bovine aortic
endothelial cells. Altogether, these observations suggest that
CK2 may play a role in rRNA biosynthesis during stress conditions.
subunit is spontaneously active and
that the presence of the regulatory
subunit inside the CK2
holoenzyme positively or negatively influences the kinase activity.
Consequently, any change in the stoichiometry of the tetramer may
strikingly affect the pattern of phosphorylation of CK2 substrates.
Strengthening this idea, experimental data are now available supporting
the notion that there are free populations of both CK2 subunits, either
totally on their own or in association with other cellular protein
partners (37, 38). In this scenario, it is thought that pools of
CK2
, CK2
, and CK2 holoenzyme would carry out distinct functions
(11, 20). Our biochemical data showed that, in response to heat shock,
no clear variation of the CK2 stoichiometry could be observed (Fig.
1B and data not shown). However, we cannot exclude that upon
heat shock both CK2 subunits are differentially targeted but become
artifactorly associated after biochemical extraction (see below).
Indeed, electron microscopy analysis revealed that upon heat shock,
CK2
subunit localized in the granular compartment of nucleoli,
whereas the regulatory subunit was not detected in this organel. This
observation raise the interesting possibility that in response to heat
shock the CK2 subunits are differentially targeted inside the nucleus
to meet differential partners and functions.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-4-76-88-42-04; Fax: 33-4-76-88-50-58; E-mail:
ccochet1@cea.fr.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Pinna, L. A.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1054,
267-284
2.
Allende, J. E.,
and Allende, C. C.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
313-323
3.
Glover, C. V.
(1998)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res.
59,
96-133
4.
Pinna, L. A.,
and Meggio, F.
(1997)
Prog. Cell Cycle Res.
3,
77-97
5.
Padmanabha, R.,
Chen-Wu, J. L.,
Hanna, D. E.,
and Glover, C. V. C.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4089-4099
6.
Roussou, I.,
and Draetta, G.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
576-586
7.
Toczyski, D. P.,
Galgoczy, D. J.,
and Hartwell, L. H.
(1997)
Cell
90,
1097-1106
8.
Teitz, T.,
Eli, D.,
Penner, M.,
Bakhanashvili, M.,
Naiman, T.,
Timme, T. L.,
Wood, C. M.,
Moses, R. E.,
and Canaani, D.
(1990)
Mutat. Res.
236,
85-97
9.
Laszlo, A.
(1992)
Cell Prolifer.
25,
59-87
10.
Welsch, W. J.
(1992)
Physiol. Rev.
72,
1063-1081
11.
Li, D.,
Dobrowolska, G.,
Aicher, L. D.,
Chen, M.,
Wright, J. H.,
Drueckes, P.,
Dunphy, E. L.,
Munar, E. S.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
32988-32996
12.
Bensaude, O.,
Bellier, S.,
Dubois, M. F.,
Giannoni, F.,
and Nguyen, V. T.
(1996)
Stress-inducible Cellular Responses
, pp. 199-219, Birkhaüser Verlag, Basel
13.
Miyata, Y.,
Chambraud, B.,
Radnyi, C.,
Leclerc, J.,
Leabeau, M-C.,
Renoir, J.-M.,
Shirai, R.,
Catlli, M.-G.,
Yahara, I.,
and Baulieu, E. E.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14500-14505
14.
Miyata, Y.,
and Yahara, I.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
7042-7047
15.
Jain, N., Mahendran, R., Philip, R., Guy, G. R., Tan, Y. H.,
and Cao, X. (1996)
16.
Redwood, C.,
Davies, S. L.,
Wells, N. J.,
Fry, A. M.,
and Hickson, I. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3635-3642
17.
Prigent, C.,
Lasko, D. D.,
Kodama, K.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
2925-2933
18.
Fritz, G.,
and Kaina, B.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
1033-1040
19.
Harlow, D. L.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1988)
Antibodies
, pp. 313-315, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
20.
Egyhazi, E.,
Ossoinak, A.,
Filhol-Cochet, O.,
Cochet, C.,
and Pigon, A.
(1999)
Mol. Cell Biochem.
191,
149-159
21.
Filhol, O.,
Cochet, C.,
Wedegaertner, P.,
Gill, G. N.,
and Chambaz, E. M.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
11133-11140
22.
Penner, C. G.,
Wang, Z.,
and Litchfield, D. W.
(1997)
J. Cell. Biochem.
64,
525-537
23.
Duncan, R. F.
(1996)
Translational Control
, pp. 271-293, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
24.
Cotto, J.,
Fox, S.,
and Morimoto, R.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
2925-2934
25.
Jolly, C.,
Usson, Y.,
and Morimoto, R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6769-6774
26.
Beckman, K.,
and Ames, B. N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19633-19636
27.
Faust, R. A.,
Niehans, G.,
Gapany, M.,
Hoistad, D.,
Knapp, D.,
Cherwitz, D.,
Davis, A.,
Adams, G. L.,
and Ahmed, K.
(1999)
J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
31,
941-949
28.
Elefanty, A. G.,
Antoniou, M.,
Custodio, N.,
Carmo-Fonseca, M.,
and Grosveld, F. G.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
319-333
29.
Van Steensel, B.,
Brink, M.,
van der Meulen, K.,
van Binnendijk, E. P.,
Wansink, D. G.,
de Jong, L.,
de Kloet, E. R.,
and van Driel.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
3003-3011
30.
Van Steensel, B.,
van Binnendijk, E. P.,
Hornsby, C. D.,
van der Voort, H. T.,
Krozowski, Z. S.,
de Kloet, E. R.,
and van Driel, R.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
787-792
31.
Jackson, D. A.,
Hassan, A. B.,
Errington, R. J.,
and Cook, P. R.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
1753-1760
32.
Tuteja, R.,
and Tuteja, N.
(1998)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
33,
407-436
33.
Misteli, T.,
Caceres, J. F.,
and Spector, D. L.
(1997)
Nature
397,
523-527
34.
Delph, M.,
Levy-Favtier, F.,
Moisand, F.,
and Kruh, J.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem
160,
333-335
35.
Li, D.,
Dobrowolska, G.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15662-15668
36.
Belenguer, P.,
Baldin, V.,
Mathieur, C.,
Prats, H.,
Bensaid, M.,
Bouche, G.,
and Amalric, F.
(1989)
Acids Res.
17,
6625-6636
37.
Guerra, B.,
and Issinger, O. G.
(1999)
Electrophoresis
20,
391-408
38.
Guerra, B.,
Siemer, S.,
Boldyreff, B.,
and Issinger, O. G.
(1999)
FEBS
462,
353-357
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. B. Cox, D. L. Riggs, M. Hessling, F. Schumacher, J. Buchner, and D. F. Smith FK506-Binding Protein 52 Phosphorylation: A Potential Mechanism for Regulating Steroid Hormone Receptor Activity Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 2956 - 2967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Kim, J. I. Eom, J.-W. Cheong, A. J. Choi, J. K. Lee, W. I. Yang, and Y. H. Min Protein Kinase CK2{alpha} as an Unfavorable Prognostic Marker and Novel Therapeutic Target in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 13(3): 1019 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Salinas, D. Fuentes, E. Vidal, X. Jordana, M. Echeverria, and L. Holuigue An Extensive Survey of CK2 {alpha} and {beta} Subunits in Arabidopsis: Multiple Isoforms Exhibit Differential Subcellular Localization Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1295 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Panova, K. I. Panov, J. Russell, and J. C. B. M. Zomerdijk Casein kinase 2 associates with initiation-competent RNA polymerase I and has multiple roles in ribosomal DNA transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(16): 5957 - 5968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H.Y. He, C. C. Helbing, M. J. Wagner, C. W. Sensen, and K. Riabowol Phylogenetic Analysis of the ING Family of PHD Finger Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 104 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Riera, M. Figueras, C. Lopez, A. Goday, and M. Pages Protein kinase CK2 modulates developmental functions of the abscisic acid responsive protein Rab17 from maize PNAS, June 29, 2004; 101(26): 9879 - 9884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Koffa, J. Kean, G. Zachos, S. A. Rice, and J. B. Clements CK2 Protein Kinase Is Stimulated and Redistributed by Functional Herpes Simplex Virus ICP27 Protein J. Virol., April 1, 2003; 77(7): 4315 - 4325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Szebeni, K. Hingorani, S. Negi, and M. O. J. Olson Role of Protein Kinase CK2 Phosphorylation in the Molecular Chaperone Activity of Nucleolar Protein B23 J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9107 - 9115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. MEGGIO and L. A. PINNA One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB J, March 1, 2003; 17(3): 349 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Garreton, J. Carpinelli, X. Jordana, and L. Holuigue The as-1 Promoter Element Is an Oxidative Stress-Responsive Element and Salicylic Acid Activates It via Oxidative Species Plant Physiology, November 1, 2002; 130(3): 1516 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Saydam, T. K. Adams, F. Steiner, W. Schaffner, and J. H. Freedman Regulation of Metallothionein Transcription by the Metal-responsive Transcription Factor MTF-1. IDENTIFICATION OF SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION CASCADES THAT CONTROL METAL-INDUCIBLE TRANSCRIPTION J. Biol. Chem., May 31, 2002; 277(23): 20438 - 20445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. A. Nollen, F. A. Salomons, J. F. Brunsting, J. J. L. van der Want, O. C. M. Sibon, and H. H. Kampinga Dynamic changes in the localization of thermally unfolded nuclear proteins associated with chaperone-dependent protection PNAS, September 19, 2001; (2001) 201112398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Murphy, E. Lalli, L. P. Walsh, Z. Liu, J. Soh, D. M. Stocco, and P. Sassone-Corsi Heat Shock Interferes with Steroidogenesis by Reducing Transcription of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Gene Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2001; 15(8): 1255 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. A. Nollen, F. A. Salomons, J. F. Brunsting, J. J. L. v. d. Want, O. C. M. Sibon, and H. H. Kampinga Dynamic changes in the localization of thermally unfolded nuclear proteins associated with chaperone-dependent protection PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12038 - 12043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||