HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 31, 24047-24051, August 4, 2000

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 275/31/24047    most recent M001928200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mariotti, M. Articles by Maier, J. A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mariotti, M. Articles by Maier, J. A. M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Interaction between Endothelial Differentiation-related Factor-1 and Calmodulin in Vitro and in Vivo^*

Massino Mariotti, Lorenza De Benedictis, Eugenia Avon, and Jeanette A. M. Maier^§

From the Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, University of Milan, and the Molecular Oncology Unit, DIBIT-H San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 58-60 Milano, Italy

Received for publication, March 8, 2000, and in revised form, April 17, 2000

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Calmodulin (CaM) is the principal Ca²⁺ receptor protein inside the cell. When activated by Ca²⁺, CaM binds and activates target proteins, thus altering the metabolism and physiology of the cell. Under basal conditions, calcium-free CaM binds to other proteins termed CaM-binding proteins. Recently, we described endothelial differentiation-related factor (EDF)-1 as a protein involved in the repression of endothelial cell differentiation (Dragoni, I., Mariotti, M., Consalez, G. G., Soria, M., and Maier, J. A. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31119-31124). Here we report that (i) EDF-1 binds CaM in vitro and in vivo; (ii) EDF-1 is phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo by protein kinase C; and (iii) EDF-1-CaM interaction is modulated by the concentrations of Ca²⁺ and by the phosphorylation of EDF-1 by protein kinase C both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate treatment of human umbilical vein endothelial cell stimulates the nuclear translocation of EDF-1. On the basis of the high homology of EDF-1 with multiprotein bridging factor-1, a transcriptional coactivator that binds TATA-binding protein (TBP), we also demonstrate that EDF-1 interacts with TBP in vitro and in human endothelial cells. We hypothesize that EDF-1 serves two main functions in endothelial cells as follows: (i) to bind CaM in the cytosol at physiologic concentrations of Ca²⁺ and (ii) to act in the nucleus as a transcriptional coactivator through its binding to TBP.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Angiogenesis, the branching and sprouting of capillaries from pre-existing blood vessels, is a tightly controlled event crucial in development, reproduction, and wound healing (1). The consequences of abnormal angiogenesis are either excessive or insufficient blood vessel growth. Ulcers, strokes, and heart attacks may result from the absence of angiogenesis normally required for wound healing, whereas up-regulated angiogenesis favors tumor growth and spreading, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetic retinopathy (2). Angiogenesis is initiated by vascular endothelial cells and involves their orderly migration, proliferation, and morphogenesis into a new capillary network (3). Although considerable attention has been given to the mechanisms involved in the regulation of endothelial cell growth, the molecular events associated with the non-proliferative aspects of angiogenesis, i.e. the organization/differentiation of endothelial cells into capillaries, are poorly understood (4).

Recently, by RNA fingerprinting we isolated EDF-1,¹ a novel gene product down-regulated in endothelial differentiation (5). EDF-1, which encodes a 16-kDa polypeptide, is the human homologue of the silkworm multiprotein bridging factor (MBF)-1, a transcriptional cofactor that mediates transactivation by stabilizing the protein-DNA interaction (6). Interestingly, a neuronal calmodulin-binding peptide, termed CAP 19, was used to recover a full-length cDNA clone from rat brain (7). This cDNA is the rat homologue of EDF-1. By sequence comparison, we found that the human and rat proteins possess a putative IQ domain that could mediate their binding to CaM. Indeed, calmodulin-binding proteins share a conserved region of about 20 amino acids, designated the IQ motif, that contains a CaM-binding domain and a protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation site (8). The IQ motif was originally identified in neuromodulin that concentrates CaM at specific sites in neurons (9). Since then, several other proteins have been shown to possess this motif as follows: the GTPase-activating protein IQ-GAP (10), p68RNA helicase (11), neurogranin (12), the pro-oncoprotein EWS (13), among others. Calmodulin, which is the classical Ca²⁺ receptor protein inside cells (14), mediates calcium regulation of a number of enzymes such as adenyl cyclases, kinases, and phosphatases that are important components of signal transduction systems implicated in cell cycle progression and cytoskeletal rearrangement (15).

In this paper, we report in vitro and in vivo evidence that EDF-1 binds calmodulin in the absence of calcium. We also demonstrate that EDF-1-CaM interaction is tightly regulated by the levels of Ca²⁺ and the activation of PKC both in vitro and in vivo. To our knowledge, this is the first report about a protein that binds CaM and regulates its availability in endothelial cells. Interestingly, upon exposure to TPA, we can observe a dramatic increase in nuclear associated EDF-1. Moreover, native and phosphorylated EDF-1 interact with the TATA-binding protein (TBP), and EDF-1 and TBP coimmunoprecipitate in endothelial cells.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- HUVEC-C were from the ATCC and were cultured in HF12 containing 10% fetal calf serum, ECGF (150 µg/ml), and heparin (5 units/ml) on gelatin-coated dishes (5).

Site-directed Mutagenesis-- Oligonucleotides were designed to mutate EDF-1 by polymerase chain reaction and to clone the construct in the KpnI/BamHI sites of pQE30. To generate the single mutant Thr-91  Asp, we used the following primers: 5'-AAG GGG CTT GAC CAG AAG GAC CTG -3' and 5'- CAG GTC CTT CTG GTC AAG CCC CTT-3'. To mutate Thr-40  Asp, we used the following primers: 5'-GAT GTG GAG GAT TCC AAG AAA-3' and 5'-TTT CTT GGA ATC CTC CAC ATC-3'. To mutate Thr-58  Asp, we used the following primers: 5'-ACC AAG AAC GAT GCC AAG CTG-3' and 5'-CAG CTT GGC ATC GTT CTT GGT-3'. To mutate Ser-111  Asp, we used the following primers: 5'-GAC TAT GAG GAT GGA CGG GCC-3' and 5'-GGC CCG TCC ATC CTC ATA GTC-3'. The external primers used to generate restriction sites are 5'-CTA GGT ACC CAA GGG GAA CCG GCGG AAC-3' and 5'-CTA GGA TCC GCC ATG GCC GAG AGC GAC-3'. Polymerase chain reaction was performed as described (5). Mutations were confirmed by sequencing. The mutants as well as the wild type protein were purified as described (5).

Western Blot and Immunoprecipitation-- For Western blotting, samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose sheets at 150 mA for 16 h, and probed with anti-EDF-1 immunopurified IgGs (0.1 µg/ml). Secondary antibodies were labeled with horseradish peroxidase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The SuperSignal chemiluminescence kit (Pierce) was used to detect immunoreactive proteins (5). To coimmunoprecipitate EDF-1 and other interacting proteins, HUVEC were washed, lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer, and centrifuged. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-TBP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CaM (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-EDF-1 IgGs or nonimmune IgGs. The immunocomplexes were bound to protein G-Sepharose, extensively washed, and eluted in Laemmli buffer at 95 °C for 5 min, separated on SDS-PAGE. After transfer on nitrocellulose, Western blot was performed as described above using anti-EDF-1 immunopurified IgGs, anti-TBP, or anti-CaM antibodies. All the results shown were reproduced at least four time.

Immunofluorescence Staining-- HUVEC were seeded on gelatin-coated coverslips. When subconfluent, cells were washed and fixed in phosphate-buffered saline containing 3% paraformaldehyde and 2% sucrose. After extensive washing, cells were permeabilized with HEPES-Triton, incubated with anti-EDF-1 immunopurified IgGs and/or goat anti-CaM IgGs, and stained with tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate-labeled swine immunoglobulins against goat IgGs and rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgGs (16). Merging of the anti-EDF-1 and anti-CaM staining were performed to coimmunolocalize the two proteins. Staining with mouse or rabbit nonimmune IgGs did not yield any significant signal.

In Vitro Phosphorylation-- Recombinant EDF-1 was phosphorylated at 28 °C for 30 min by incubation with 10 µg/ml PKC (Upstate Biotechnology) in a final volume of 100 µl using the following reaction conditions: 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl₂, 50 µM ATP, 100 µM CaCl₂, 60 ng/µl L--phosphatidyl-L-serine (PS), 6 ng/µl diolein, and 5 µCi/ml [-³²P]ATP (17). The control sample was incubated in the absence of diolein, PS, and CaCl₂. The reaction was terminated by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer. The samples were run on a 12% SDS-PAGE. Dried gels were exposed for autoradiography.

In Vivo Phosphorylation-- Subconfluent HUVECs were washed twice with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium without phosphate and incubated for 45 min in the same medium. The medium was replaced, and the cells were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium phosphate-free containing 50 µCi/ml carrier-free ³²P to label endogenous ATP pool (18). Then TPA (100 nM) or A23187 (1 µM) alone or in combinations were added for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by removing the medium and rapidly washing with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. The cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-EDF-1 antibodies as described above.

Binding to CaM-Agarose-- EDF-1 was loaded on a CaM-agarose (Sigma) column and extensively washed with a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 500 µg of EGTA, and 10 µg/ml bovine serum albumin. Elution was performed in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and increasing concentrations of CaCl₂ (1-5 mM) (19). Eluates were resolved on SDS-PAGE and processed for Western blot using anti-EDF-1 IgGs as described (5). PKC-phosphorylated EDF-1 and EDF-1 mutants were incubated with CaM-agarose in the aforementioned buffer, washed, centrifuged, and eluted with Laemmli buffer to be analyzed by autoradiography or Western blot, respectively.

In Vitro EDF-1-TBP Interaction-- EDF-1 (100 ng/ml) and TBP (30 ng/ml, Promega) were incubated for 30 min on ice in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 20% glycerol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 60 mM MgCl₂, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (20). The samples were then immunoprecipitated with a monoclonal antibody against TBP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and blotted with anti-EDF-1 IgGs as described.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Interaction between EDF-1 and CaM-- To determine whether EDF-1 interacts with CaM, we loaded recombinant EDF-1 on a calmodulin-agarose column, and we eluted with buffers containing increasing concentrations of Ca²⁺. Fig. 1A shows that EDF-1 interacted with CaM and eluted with 1 and 2 mM Ca²⁺. No interaction was instead observed between EDF-1 and agarose (Fig. 1A). We then evaluated whether EDF-1 and CaM interact also in vivo. To this purpose, HUVEC lysates were immunoprecipitated with an antibody against CaM, and Western blot was performed utilizing an immunopurified antibody against EDF-1. In HUVEC, EDF-1 and CaM coimmunoprecipitate (Fig. 1B). Similar results were obtained when lysates were immunoprecipitated for EDF-1, and Western blot was performed using anti-CaM antibodies (data not shown). No bands were detectable after immunoprecipitation with nonimmune IgGs (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   EDF-1 is a CaM-binding protein. A, EDF-1 was applied to a CaM-agarose or an agarose alone column, washed, and eluted in the indicated buffers. B, HUVEC lysates were immunoprecipitated with a monoclonal antibody anti-CaM (lane 1) or with nonimmune IgGs (lane 2). Western blot was performed using anti-EDF-1 IgGs (upper panel) or an anti-CaM polyclonal antibody (lower panel). C, HUVEC were exposed to A23187 (1 µM) for 20 min and immunoprecipitated with a monoclonal antibody anti-CaM or with nonimmune (NI) IgGs. Western blot was performed using anti-EDF-1 IgGs (upper panel) or an anti-CaM polyclonal antibody (lower panel). FT, flow-through fraction.

Fig. 2 shows that EDF-1 and CaM also colocalize both in the nucleus and in the cytosol. Interestingly, upon exposure to TPA (100 nM), EDF-1 was mainly localized in the nucleus (see below), whereas the subcellular localization of CaM was not significantly altered (Fig. 2).

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Cellular localization of EDF-1. HUVEC were cultured for 48 h on gelatin-coated coverslips and then treated with TPA (100 nM) for 1 h. Cells were then fixed and stained with either rabbit anti-EDF-1 or goat anti-CaM antibodies, followed by a tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate-labeled swine anti-goat IgG and rhodamine anti-rabbit IgG. Merge of the anti-EDF-1 and anti-CaM staining is shown in the lower panels: the yellow signal indicates the colocalization of the two proteins.

To evaluate whether different levels of intracellular Ca²⁺ affected the interaction between CaM and EDF-1 in HUVEC, we exposed HUVEC for 20 min to the calcium ionophore A23187 (1 µM) to increase intracellular Ca²⁺ (21). We therefore coimmunoprecipitated EDF-1 and CaM. Fig. 1C shows that in the presence of A23187 the interaction between EDF-1 and CaM was reduced.

These results indicate that EDF-1 interacts with CaM, and this binding is regulated by the levels of Ca²⁺.

Phosphorylation of EDF-1 by PKC-- Since EDF-1 contains conserved PKC phosphorylation sites, one of which is within the IQ domain, we examined whether the phosphorylation of EDF-1 by PKC affects its binding to CaM. EDF-1 was phosphorylated in vitro by PKC in the presence of Ca²⁺ and phospholipids (Fig. 3A). It is interesting to note that, once phosphorylated, EDF-1 did not interact with calmodulin-agarose, and the ³²P-labeled protein was all recovered in the flow-through fraction of the column (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   Phosphorylation of EDF-1 by PKC prevents its binding to CaM-agarose. A, EDF-1 was phosphorylated in vitro using recombinant PKC in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 50 µM ATP, 100 µM CaCl2, 60 ng/µl PS, 6 ng/µl diolein, and 5 µCi/ml [-32P]ATP (lane 1). The control sample was incubated in the absence of diolein, PS, and CaCl2 (lane 2). The samples were run on SDS-PAGE and autoradiographed. B, in vitro phosphorylated EDF-1 was incubated with CaM-agarose, washed, and centrifuged, and the resin was eluted in sample buffer. The flow-through (lane 1) and the elution from the resin (lane 2) were separated on SDS-PAGE and autoradiographed.

We also determined whether Thr-91, which is the PKC phosphorylation site within the IQ motif, plays a role in modulating EDF-1 interaction with CaM.

To this purpose, because the introduction of a negative charge mimics a phosphorylated residue, the Thr-91  Asp mutation was introduced. Although the substitution of Thr-91 to Ala did not affect EDF-1-CaM interaction (data not shown), conversion of the Thr-91 to Asp (EDF-1_T91D) markedly reduced the affinity of EDF-1 for CaM; indeed, no EDF-1_T91>4 bound CaM (Fig. 4). This results shows that introduction of a single negative charge by phosphorylation at Thr-91 inhibited CaM-EDF-1 interactions. We also mutated three additional putative PKC phosphorylation sites present throughout the sequence of EDF-1 with negatively charged amino acids, thus generating a mutant, denominated EDF-1_D4, that mimics PKC phosphorylation of EDF-1. As described for the in vitro phosphorylated EDF-1, EDF-1_D4 did not interact with CaM-agarose (Fig. 4).

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   EDF-1 mutants do not bind CaM-agarose. EDF-1 and its mutants EDF-1T91D and EDF-1D4 were incubated with CaM-agarose, washed, and centrifuged, and the resin was eluted in sample buffer. The eluates were analyzed by Western blot. Lanes 1-3, recombinant EDF-1, EDF-1T91D, and EDF-1D4, respectively; lanes 4-6, recombinant EDF-1, EDF-1T91D, and EDF-1D4, respectively, eluted from CaM-agarose.

We evaluated whether EDF-1 is phosphorylated in vivo. To do so, HUVEC were metabolically labeled with ³²P and exposed to the phorbol ester TPA (100 nM) for 15 min. Cells were then lysed and immunoprecipitated with an anti-EDF-1 antibody. Immunoprecipitates were divided in two aliquots. One of them was utilized for autoradiography (Fig. 5A, upper panel), and the remaining one was used in Western analysis with anti-EDF-1 antibodies (Fig. 5A, lower panel). Fig. 5A shows that EDF-1, which is unphosphorylated in untreated HUVEC, was readily phosphorylated upon exposure to TPA. The degree of phosphorylation was increased when HUVEC were cotreated with TPA and A23187, probably due to the fact that when intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration increases, more EDF-1 is released from CaM and available to be phosphorylated. To evaluate whether in vivo phosphorylated EDF-1 bound or not to CaM, we coimmunoprecipitated EDF-1 and CaM in HUVEC exposed to TPA. As shown in Fig. 5B, a lower amount of EDF-1 coimmunoprecipitated with CaM in TPA-treated cells when compared with controls. These results show that EDF-1 is a substrate of PKC, and PKC phosphorylation prevents its binding to CaM.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5.   TPA stimulates the phosphorylation of EDF-1 in HUVEC. A, HUVEC were metabolically labeled with 50 µCi/ml carrier-free 32P. Then TPA (100 nM) or A23187 (1 µM) alone or in combinations was added for 20 min. The cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-EDF-1 or nonimmune (last lane) antibodies as described above. Immunoprecipitates were divided in two aliquots. One aliquot was utilized for autoradiography (upper panel), and the remaining aliquot was used in Western analysis with anti-EDF-1 antibodies (lower panel). B, HUVEC were treated with TPA for 1 h. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with a monoclonal antibody anti-CaM, and Western blot was performed using anti-EDF-1 IgGs (upper panel) or an anti-CaM polyclonal antibody (lower panel).

It is noteworthy that, although EDF-1 was localized both in the nucleus and in the cytosol in control cells, EDF-1 was mainly associated with the nucleus of phorbol TPA-treated cells (Fig. 2). No relocalization of CaM was observed in TPA-treated cells.

EDF-1 Interacts with TBP-- Since EDF-1 is highly homologous to MBF-1 which binds TBP, we investigated whether EDF-1 interacted with TBP. As shown in Fig. 6A, EDF-1 and its mutants bound TBP to a similar extent in in vitro protein-protein interactions assays. This interaction was detected by immunoprecipitation with anti-EDF-1 antibodies followed by Western blot utilizing an anti-TBP monoclonal antibody. Analogously, we found that in vitro phosphorylated EDF-1 interacted with TBP (data not shown). We also determined whether this interaction occurred in vivo in HUVEC treated or not with TPA (100 nM) for 20 min. We immunoprecipitated cell extracts with the anti-EDF-1 antibody, and Western analysis was performed using a monoclonal antibody against TBP. Fig. 6B shows that EDF-1 and TBP coimmunoprecipitate. In addition, no modulation of this interaction occurred in HUVEC exposed to TPA.

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6.   EDF-1 binds TBP. A, EDF-1, its mutants, and TBP were incubated for 30 min. The samples were then immunoprecipitated with anti-EDF-1 IgGs and blotted utilizing a monoclonal antibody against TBP as described. B, HUVEC lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-EDF-1 IgGs and blotted with an anti-TBP monoclonal antibody. Lane 1, untreated HUVEC; lane 2, HUVEC treated with TPA (100 nM) for 20 min.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CaM is the principal Ca²⁺ receptor protein inside cells (15). The calcium-rich form of CaM activates a large array of enzymes that are part of intracellular signaling cascades controlling cellular homeostasis (16). Because of the central role of CaM in signal transduction, there is interest in modulatory proteins that alter the way in which CaM senses calcium levels. CaM-binding proteins share a loosely defined IQ motif that directs binding to CaM in its calcium-free form (8). In some cases, this binding is regulated by the PKC pathway (22). For instance, neuromodulin and neurogranin binding to CaM is reversed when they are phosphorylated by PKC (22).

In this report, we show that EDF-1, recently described as a factor involved in the repression of human endothelial cell differentiation (5), contains an IQ motif, interacts with CaM, and is phosphorylated by PKC. Phosphorylation of EDF-1 by PKC prevents the protein from binding CaM, thus suggesting that PKC phosphorylation and CaM binding are mutually exclusive. In addition, upon PKC activation in HUVEC, EDF-1 is translocated to the nucleus where it may exert its function as a transcriptional coactivator. Indeed, we demonstrate by in vitro protein-protein interaction that EDF-1 binds TBP. Moreover, TBP and EDF-1 coimmunoprecipitate in HUVEC, and this interaction is not affected in HUVEC exposed to TPA. We therefore suggest that TPA potentiates the accumulation of EDF-1 in the nucleus where a large amount of EDF-1 would be available to interact with TBP, thus regulating transcription. We therefore hypothesize that EDF-1 serves two principal roles. In the cytosol EDF-1 interacts with CaM in the presence of low Ca²⁺, and in the nucleus it interacts with TBP and modulates transcription. Accordingly, during the course of this work, Kabe et al. (23) showed that the human homologue of MBF-1, which is identical to EDF-1, interacts with TBP and Ad4BP/SF-1, a mammalian counterpart of FTZ-F1, by gel shift.

The nuclear staining of EDF-1 is intriguing, since EDF-1 does not possess a nuclear localization sequence (24). Indeed, EDF-1 is detected both in the cytosol and in the nucleus of control cells. Upon PKC activation, nuclear translocation of EDF-1 is enhanced. It is conceivable to think that EDF-1 is driven to the nucleus by a shuttle protein (25) and that PKC potentiates this shuttle mechanism. In partial disagreement with our results, Kabe et al. (23) show that, when ectopically expressed in COS-1, EDF-1 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm, and coexpression with Ad4BP/SF1 induced nuclear localization of EDF-1. It should be recalled that we localize endogenously synthesized EDF-1 in human endothelial cells, whereas Kabe et al. (23) perform their experiments in a totally different system, i.e. transiently transfected COS-1. However, we agree on the fact that the fate of EDF-1 is to be translocated to the nucleus where it may connect the DNA-binding domain of transcription factors and TBP.

To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration about the expression of a CaM-binding protein that may modulate CaM activation in endothelial cells. When activated CaM influences various metabolic pathways, among which is the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) through endothelial NO synthase (26). NO not only is a potent vasodilator, thus regulating arterial pressure (27), but it is also involved in the nonproliferative events of angiogenesis (28). It is tempting to speculate about a relation between EDF-1 and NO levels and its implication in vascular disease and in angiogenesis.

We show that in vitro EDF-1 has a rather high affinity for CaM-agarose and elutes with 1 mM Ca²⁺. It is unlikely that 1 mM levels of free Ca²⁺ may be reached within the cell; however, it is conceivable that free Ca²⁺ accumulates in highly specialized areas. It is reported that the Ca²⁺ ionophore A23187 transiently increases Ca²⁺ by 4-5-fold in endothelial cells (21). We show that this increase of intracellular Ca²⁺ levels is sufficient to release, at least in part, EDF-1 from CaM. Under these experimental conditions, we hypothesize that calcium-CaM would activate a large array of enzymes, whereas EDF-1 would be available for phosphorylation and/or bind a shuttle protein to be transported to the nucleus where it would mediate transactivation by stabilizing the protein-DNA interaction. Interestingly, a range of Ca²⁺ concentrations between 2 and 5 mM is required to release two prototypic neural-specific CaM-binding proteins, neuromodulin and neurogranin, from CaM-agarose (29). Recently, it has been hypothesized that neurogranin and neuromodulin may function to concentrate CaM at specific sites in neurons and release free CaM in response to increased Ca²⁺ and PKC activation (22).

It is tempting to speculate about the significance of EDF-1-CaM interaction. More experiments are required to address this issue.

In the case of an endothelial cell exposed to angiogenic factors, we hypothesize the following scenario. After binding to their cognate receptors, angiogenic factors lead to the release of Ca²⁺ from internal stores and diacylglycerols, which stimulate PKC (30-31). These two collaborate to sustain high levels of calcium-CaM and calcium/CaM-dependent enzyme activity. Moreover, Ca²⁺ reduces the affinity of EDF-1 for CaM, and PKC blocks the re-binding of CaM by phosphorylating EDF-1. This leads to an increase in free EDF-1, part of which is phosphorylated by PKC and promptly translocated to the nucleus where EDF-1 would modulate gene expression.

	ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. L. Beguinot for critical reading of the manuscript.

	FOOTNOTES

^* This work was supported in part by Associatione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro and Ministero Università e Ricerca Scientifica (to J. A. M. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Supported by fellowship from FIRC.

^§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39-02-26434752; Fax: 39-02-26434844; E-mail maier.jeanette@hsr.it.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 17, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001928200

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: EDF, endothelial differentiation-related factor; CaM, calmodulin; MBF, multiprotein bridging factor; PKC, protein kinase C; TBP, TATA-binding protein; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; PS, L--phosphatidyl-L-serine.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Q.-X. Liu, N. Nakashima-Kamimura, K. Ikeo, S. Hirose, and T. Gojobori Compensatory Change of Interacting Amino Acids in the Coevolution of Transcriptional Coactivator MBF1 and TATA-Box-Binding Protein Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2007; 24(7): 1458 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q.-X. Liu, M. Jindra, H. Ueda, Y. Hiromi, and S. Hirose Drosophila MBF1 is a co-activator for Tracheae Defective and contributes to the formation of tracheal and nervous systems Development, February 15, 2003; 130(4): 719 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 275/31/24047    most recent M001928200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mariotti, M. Articles by Maier, J. A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mariotti, M. Articles by Maier, J. A. M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?