![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 31, 24208-24214, August 4, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biology, College of Science, Bioproducts
Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea
Received for publication, April 17, 2000, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
We have identified a rice gene encoding a
DNA-binding protein that specifically recognizes the telomeric repeat
sequence TTTAGGG found in plants. This gene, which we refer to as
RTBP1 (rice telomere-binding protein 1), encodes a
polypeptide with a predicted molecular mass of 70 kDa. RTBP1 is
ubiquitously expressed in various organs and binds DNA with two or more
duplex TTTAGGG repeats. The predicted protein sequence includes a
single domain at the C terminus with extensive homology to Myb-like DNA
binding motif. The Myb-like domain of RTBP1 is very closely related to
that of other telomere-binding proteins, including TRF1, TRF2, Taz1p,
and Tbf1p, indicating that DNA-binding domains of telomere-binding
proteins are well conserved among evolutionarily distant species. To
obtain precise information on the sequence of the DNA binding site
recognized by RTBP1, we analyzed the sequence-specific binding
properties of the isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1. The isolated
Myb-like domain was capable of sequence-specific DNA binding as a
homodimer. Gel retardation analysis with a series of mutated telomere
probes revealed that the internal GGGTTT sequence in the two-telomere
repeats is critical for binding of Myb-like domain of RTBP1, which is
consistent with the model of the TRF1·DNA complex showing that
base-specific contacts are made within the sequence GGGTTA. To the best
of our knowledge, RTBP1 is the first cloned gene in which
the product is able to bind double-stranded telomeric DNA in plants.
Because the Myb-like domain appears to be a significant motif for a
large class of proteins that bind the duplex telomeric DNA, RTBP1 may
play important roles in plant telomere function in
vivo.
Telomeres, the specialized nucleoprotein complexes at the ends of
linear eukaryotic chromosomes, are essential for the maintenance of
chromosome integrity and for protection from exonucleolytic degradation
or fusion with other chromosome ends (1, 2). Telomeres in most
eukaryotes are composed of tandem repeats of short sequence elements,
typically 5 to 8 base pairs in length (3). These repeated sequences are
usually rich in G residues on the strand oriented in the 5' to 3'
direction toward the end of the chromosome. The G-rich strand is
extended beyond the complementary C-rich strand and terminates as a
single-stranded 3' overhang in several evolutionarily divergent
organisms (4, 5). Recently, it has been shown that the long stretch of
mammalian double-stranded telomere DNA bends back on itself, forming a
large telomere loop (t-loop), and the 3' G-rich single-stranded
overhang at the end of the t-loop invades the double-stranded telomere
and produces a displacement loop (d-loop) (6, 7). These t-loops are
proposed to mask telomere termini from cellular activities that can act on DNA ends.
The integrity and proper functioning of telomeres seem to be achieved
via associations between the telomere repeat sequences and specific
binding proteins. Studies of telomere chromatin structure have
suggested that telomeres may be packaged into specialized nucleoprotein
complexes. Some proteins specifically interact with the single-stranded
3' extension at the extreme termini, which are essential for chromosome
capping and telomerase regulation (8-10). The other group of
telomere-binding proteins binds specifically to the double-stranded
telomeric repeats. The most well characterized proteins include Rap1p,
identified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rap1p, in addition
to binding to telomeric repeat sequences and performing important
functions in telomere length maintenance (11, 12), is an abundant
nuclear protein needed for the expression of a variety of genes and
implicated in the establishment of silent transcriptional domains.
Taz1p in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, found in a one-hybrid
screen using S. pombe telomeric DNA as a target (13),
is involved in telomere length regulation, repression of telomere
adjacent genes, and the interactions between telomeres and the spindle
pole body during the meiotic prophase (14, 15). In mammalian cells, two
double-stranded telomere-binding proteins have been identified (16).
The binding of TRF1 controls telomere length by inhibiting the action of telomerase (17). TRF2 plays a key
role in the protection of chromosome ends from end-to-end fusion
(18).
Despite the apparently conserved function, telomere-binding proteins
show a limited amino acid sequence similarity. However, they share a
domain that resembles the DNA binding motif present in the vertebrate
c-Myb family of transcriptional activators (19, 20). Interestingly,
whereas the DNA binding domain of the Myb proteins typically consists
of three tandem repeats of the Myb motif (21), Rap1p contains two
Myb-like domains that bind DNA in a tandem orientation (22). In
contrast, the DNA binding domains of TRF1, TRF2, and Taz1p contain only
a single Myb-like domain at their C terminus (16, 23, 24). Recently, it
has been shown that the isolated Myb-like domain of TRF1 binds
specifically and with significant affinity to telomeric DNA as a
monomer (20). Although with less specificity than the full-length
dimer, the isolated Myb-like domain of Taz1p was also capable of
sequence-specific DNA binding (23, 24). Taken together, these results
indicate that the Myb-like domain is indeed responsible for specific
telomeric DNA recognition.
Telomere structure in most plants is very similar to that of other
eukaryotes. The plant telomeric DNA sequence (TTTAGGG)n was
first characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana (25) and was subsequently cloned in several different species (26-28). Compared with the extensive research done in other eukaryotes, many fewer studies of plant telomere-binding proteins have been reported to date.
Protein binding to double-stranded telomeric DNA has been found in
maize and Arabidopsis cellular extracts (29, 30). Previously, we identified and characterized protein factors that specifically bind to the single-stranded G-rich telomeric repeats in
rice and mung bean nuclear extracts (31, 32). However, nothing is known
about the physiological role of telomere-binding proteins in plants.
We report here the molecular cloning and characterization of a rice
gene encoding a double-stranded telomere-binding protein, designated
RTBP1.1 The predicted protein
sequence includes a single Myb-like domain at the C terminus. The
Myb-like domain of RTBP1 is very closely related to other telomeric
proteins, indicating that DNA binding domains of telomere-binding
proteins are well conserved among evolutionarily distant species. The
isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1 is capable of sequence-specific DNA
binding as a homodimer and recognizes a binding site centered on the
sequence GGGTTT. To the best of our knowledge, RTBP1 is the
first cloned gene in which the product is able to bind specifically
double-stranded telomeric DNA in plants. Because the Myb-like domain
appears to be a significant motif for a large class of proteins that
bind the duplex telomeric DNA, RTBP1 may play important roles in plant telomere function in vivo.
Screening of a Cloning and Expression of Full-length RTBP1 and the Isolated
Myb-like Domain--
The full-length RTBP1 cDNA was PCR-amplified
from a pBS-RTBP1 using a set of primers incorporating novel
BamHI (at the 5'-end of the upstream primer) and
HindIII (at the 5'-end of the downstream primer) sites for
ease of cloning. The resulting PCR product was cut with
BamHI and HindIII and cloned into the
corresponding sites in plasmid pGEX-KG (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in
order to fuse GST and RTBP1 in frame. To obtain the Myb-like domain of
RTBP1, residues 446-633 and 506-615 of RTBP1 were PCR-amplified from a pBS-RTBP1. Primers compatible with cloning into the BamHI
and HindIII restriction sites of pGEX-KG were used, and the
sequence of the resulting plasmids was confirmed by the dideoxy
sequencing method. The fusion protein GST-RTBP1 was expressed in
Escherichia coli BL21 cells by adding 0.1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- Southern and Northern blot Analyses--
Rice genomic DNA was
prepared from leaves as described by Murray and Thompson (33) and
digested with various restriction endonucleases. Digested genomic DNA
was separated by electrophoresis in an 0.8% agarose gel and blotted on
a Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Probes
were labeled with [ Gel Retardation Assays--
DNA probes and competitors for gel
retardation assays are described in Table I. To reduce nonspecific
DNA-protein binding, purified RTBP1 was preincubated with 0.5 µg of
poly(dI-dC) and 0.5 µg of nonspecific DNA oligonucleotide in 20 µl
of a binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM
NaCl, and 5% glycerol) for 10 min on ice. End-labeled DNA probe (0.25 ng) was then added to the reaction mixtures. After incubation for 10 min on ice, the mixtures were loaded on an 8% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel. Incubation for 10 min at room temperature gave
similar gel retardation results. Before loading, gels were prerun at 10 V/cm for 30 min, and electrophoresis was in 0.5× TBE (54 mM Tris borate, pH 8.3, 1 mM EDTA) for 2.5 h after loading the samples. For the competition experiments, varying amounts of cold competitor molecules were preincubated with nuclear extract before the addition of labeled probe. Binding activity was
quantified with a Fuji phosphorimager.
DNase I Footprinting Analysis--
For DNase I footprinting
analysis, the two-telomere repeat oligonucleotide RTR-2 was cloned into
the end-filled XbaI of pBend4. The resulting plasmid was
digested with XhoI and radioactively labeled by filling
using [ Isolation and Sequence Analysis of RTBP1 cDNA--
The
computer search for proteins homologous to the Myb-related motif
revealed several open reading frames derived from partial cDNA
sequences that contain a single Myb repeat (19). This analysis includes
five proteins from plants, the maize Shrunken
initiator-binding protein IBP1 (34), the parsley BoxP binding factor
BPF1 (35), two open reading frames from rice (orfR1 and orfR2), and one
open reading frame from A. thaliana (orfA) (19). To
characterize a rice protein derived from partial cDNA sequence
(orfR1), we isolated the full-length rice cDNA representing RTBP1
using a combination of polymerase chain reaction and hybridization
strategies. The DNA sequence of the RTBP1 cDNA was
determined to be 2031 base pair long. Conceptual translation of the
full-length RTBP1 cDNA revealed one long open reading
frame encoding a protein of 633 amino acids, with a predicted molecular
mass of 70 kDa and a pI of 8.91 (Fig.
1A). The C-terminal region of
the protein contains a 55-amino acid stretch of homology with the
Myb-related motif from the other telomere-binding proteins such as
TRF1, Taz1p, and Tbf1p (13, 16, 36) (Fig. 1B). This presumed
helix-turn-helix motif is known as the "telobox" because it is
found in other proteins that bind telomeric DNA sequences (19).
Alignment of the predicted sequences of RTBP1 and TRF1 revealed the
strong conservation in their C-terminal Myb-like domains (31% sequence
identity) (Fig. 1C). Outside of the Myb-like domain, RTBP1
does not have any more homology with TRF1 than with randomly chosen
proteins.
RTBP1 Is Homologous to a Single-copy Gene and Is Ubiquitously
Expressed--
Southern blot analysis of rice genomic DNA was
performed to determine the number of genomic DNA fragments with
homology to the RTBP1 cDNA. Genomic DNA digested with
various restriction enzymes produced only one strongly hybridized band
in each digest (Fig. 2A). No
additional fragment was visible in any of the digests, even with low
stringency hybridization (data not shown). These results suggest that a
single-copy gene encoding RTBP1 cDNA is present in the
rice genome. Transcripts that hybridized to RTBP1 cDNA
were detected on Northern blots of rice poly(A)+-enriched
RNA and total RNA from various organs of rice plant. A band of ~2.3
kilobase pairs hybridized to RTBP1 cDNA in the poly(A)+-enriched lane (Fig. 2B). A predicted
molecular mass of 70 kDa of the RTBP1 coding region is
consistent with the anticipated size of the gene based on the Northern
blot analysis. The mRNA encoding RTBP1 was also detected in all
organs of rice plants, with higher levels in root, leaf, and stem but
lower levels in coleoptile, indicating that RTBP1 is ubiquitously
expressed (Fig. 2B).
RTBP1 Specifically Binds Plant Telomeric Sequences--
To test
whether RTBP1 binds to telomeric DNA, the full-length RTBP1 was used in
a gel retardation assay with a labeled RTR-4 (see Table
I) containing four plant telomeric DNA
repeats. RTBP1 gave rise to a discrete DNA·protein complex that
migrated more slowly than the free probe (Fig.
3A, lanes 2 and 3).
Intensities of shifting bands increased upon the addition of increasing
amounts of RTBP1. Competition binding experiments showed that a 50-fold excess of cold RTR-4 is enough to displace the labeled probe
(lane 5), whereas the same excess molar amounts of unrelated
nonspecific cold competitor did not compete at all (lane 7),
indicating that RTBP1 is a specific telomeric DNA-binding protein.
The C-terminal Myb-like domain of RTBP1 shares 31% amino acid sequence
identity with that of TRF1, and the isolated Myb-like domain of TRF1
binds specifically to telomeric DNA (20). This prompted us to determine
whether the isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1 is responsible for the
DNA binding specificity. Thus, we expressed the C-terminal region of
RTBP1 comprising the Myb-like domain between positions 466 and 633 as a
fusion protein with GST. Gel retardation assay revealed a RTR-4 probe
binding activity in the bacterial extracts of cells induced for the
expression of GST-RTBP1-(466-633) (Fig. 3B, lane
13), whereas no activity was detected in extracts induced for GST
alone (lane 12). GST-RTBP1-(466-633) was digested with
thrombin to isolate the C-terminal region containing the entire Myb
domain, and its DNA binding property was examined. This fragment of
RTBP1 was found to produce three specific complexes, and intensities of
slower migrating complexes increased upon the addition of increased
amounts of RTBP1-(466-633) (lanes 2-5). These complexes
were competed with the cold RTR-4 (lanes 6-8) but not with
the unrelated nonspecific cold competitor (NS, lanes 9-11),
similar to full-length RTBP1. It is worth noting that the band
intensities of complexes 2 and 3 decreased more readily than that of
complex 1 with increasing amounts of competitor (lanes 6-8), suggesting that RTBP1-(466-633) binds as a homo-multimer to the four-telomere repeat site. The faint bands migrating slower than
complex 3 resulted from undigested GST fusion proteins (lanes 5, 9, 10). When the human and Caenorhabditis elegans
telomeric repeats were substituted for the plant telomeric repeats as
competitors, HTR-4 and CTR-4 competed less effectively than their plant
counterpart for the activity that binds the labeled RTR-4 (Fig.
3C, lanes 3-11). Again, higher order complexes
(2 and 3) were competed more readily than complex 1. G-rich and C-rich
single-stranded DNA (RTR-4G and RTR-4C, see Table I) did not compete
for the interaction of RTBP1-(466-633) with RTR-4 (lanes
12-15). In conclusion, the Myb-like domain of RTBP1 is sufficient
to confer specific interactions with plant double-stranded telomeric DNA.
Myb-like Domain of RTBP1 Binds Telomeric Repeat DNA Site as a
Homodimer--
Because RTBP1-(466-633) produced three specific
complexes for binding to RTR-4, the gel retardation analysis was
repeated using a shorter DNA site containing one to three copies of the TTTAGGG repeat to determine the minimal number of telomeric repeats for
DNA binding. As shown in Fig.
4A, RTBP1-(466-633) formed a single-shifted complex with the two-repeat sequence (lanes 5 and 6) and two shifted complexes with the three-repeat
sequence (lanes 8 and 9), whereas a
single-telomere repeat did not exhibit any DNA binding activity
(lanes 2 and 3). These results suggest that the
binding site of the isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1 is contained within the two-telomere repeat sequence TTTAGGGTTTAGGG.
Although full-length TRF1 and Taz1p bind to DNA as a preformed
homodimer, the isolated Myb-like domains of these proteins were capable
of sequence specific binding as a monomer (20, 23). To examine whether
the isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1 is active as a monomer,
RTBP1-(506-615) was fused to the 28-kDa glutathione
S-transferase (GST) protein. Like RTBP1-(466-633), RTBP1-(506-615) contains entire Myb-like domain and was found to
produce a single complex with the RTR-2 probe (see below, Fig. 4B). Gel retardation analysis was carried out using
GST-RTBP1-(506-615) and RTBP1-(506-615). The two different length
proteins were incubated at various concentrations with a DNA binding
site containing two copies of the telomeric repeat. Each protein binds
to the two-repeat sequences and forms a single complex in which
migration is dependent on the size of the protein used (Fig.
4B, lanes 2 and 6). When equimolar
amounts of the two proteins were used in the incubations (lane
5), a new protein·DNA complex that migrated to an intermediate position was observed. This complex likely corresponds to the binding
of one molecule of each length of protein, confirming that two
molecules of the Myb-like domain can bind to the two-repeat sequence.
Internal GGGTTT Sequence in the Two-telomere Repeats Is Critical
for Binding of the Myb-like Domain of RTBP1--
To localize the
positions within the telomeric sequence at which DNA-protein
interactions occurred, DNase I footprinting was performed. Uniquely
end-labeled fragments containing the two-telomere repeat sequence were
preincubated with the RTBP1-(466-633) and subsequently digested with
limited amounts of DNase I. The DNase I footprinting on the G-rich
strand revealed that the addition of RTBP1 resulted in protection of
the predicted sites in the probe (Fig.
5A). The same result was
obtained with the opposite, C-rich strand (Fig. 5B). To
further evaluate the sequence specificity of the RTBP1 binding activity
at nucleotide level, a series of mutant oligonucleotides were
synthesized and assayed for their ability to bind the isolated Myb-like
domain of RTBP1. Each double-stranded oligonucleotide contained a
single nucleotide transition in the two-telomere repeats (Fig.
6A). Gel retardation assays
revealed that nucleoprotein complex was formed between RTBP1-(466-633) and RTR-2, and with M1, M2, M3, M11, M12, M13, and M14, whereas M4
probe was a slightly weaker binder. However, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, and
M10 probes were incapable of significant binding (Fig. 6B).
The amount of gel shift activity in the complexes was quantified for
each probe. The relative amount of shifted complexes was expressed as
the ratio of the amount of probe DNA in the complex to the amount of
total probe DNA in each reaction (Fig. 6C). These results indicate that the internal GGGTTT sequence in the two-telomere repeats
is critical for binding of Myb-like domain of RTBP1.
In all eukaryotic organisms, the telomere is a well conserved
structure that consists of telomeric repeats and telomere binding factors. In addition to the telomeric DNA sequences, a number of
proteins play integral roles in telomere structure and function. Therefore, the identification and characterization of the proteins present at the ends of chromosomes will facilitate our understanding about the functions of telomeres. In this report, we describe the
molecular cloning and characterization of a gene (RTBP1)
encoding a rice protein that binds the telomeric repeat sequence found in plants. Despite the apparently conserved function, several telomeric
repeat-binding proteins share a limited amino acid sequence similarity.
A sequence of ~60 amino acids located in their C termini appears to
be critical for DNA binding and exhibits extensive homologies with Myb
repeats. An anonymous cDNA sequence encoding a Myb-like motif was
reported in the data bases (19). This sequence information was used to
isolate the full-length cDNA encoding the rice telomeric protein.
The predicted amino acid sequence of RTBP1 includes a single Myb-like
domain at its C terminus, which is very closely related to those of
other telomeric proteins.
Gel retardation analysis using the full-length RTBP1 and RTR-4 probe
gave rise to a single DNA·protein complex, whereas the isolated
Myb-like domain was found to produce three specific complexes. These
results suggest that the full-length RTBP1 forms higher aggregates,
which would lead to strongly cooperative binding. Using gel retardation
analysis and DNase I footprinting experiments, we show that the
isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1 binds specifically to the plant
telomeric DNA sequences. Telomere binding activity decreased about
9-fold upon changing the plant telomere sequence to that found in human
telomere. However, RTBP1 does not exhibit significant binding activity
to the C. elegans telomere sequence, indicating that its
binding activity is specific to the plant telomere. Although TRF1 and
Taz1p specifically bind the G-rich single strand of telomeric DNA with
a much lower affinity than the corresponding duplex telomeric DNA (24),
RTBP1 did not bind to either single-stranded G-rich or C-rich telomeric
DNA, indicating that RTBP1 binding activity is specific to the
double-stranded telomeric sequence. Some telomere-binding proteins are
resistant to high salt concentrations (e.g. 2 M
NaCl or 6 M CsCl) (8, 37, 38), whereas other proteins are
salt-sensitive (39). When the isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1 was
incubated with the RTR-4 probe in the presence of increasing amounts of
NaCl concentration, the binding activity gradually decreased upon the addition of increasing salt concentrations, indicating that the binding
appears to be salt-sensitive (data not shown).
Gel retardation analysis with a series of mutant oligonucleotides
revealed that the internal GGGTTT sequence in the two-telomere repeats
is critical for the binding of the isolated Myb-like domain of RTBP1.
This result is consistent with the model of the TRF1·DNA complex,
showing that base-specific contacts are made within the sequence GGGTTA
(20). Their DNA binding sequences are also similar to (G)GGTGT sequence
recognized by the homeodomain-like motifs of the yeast telomere-binding
protein RAP1 (40). However, one of the most striking differences of the
DNA binding mode between RTBP1 and TRF1 is that the isolated Myb-like
domain of RTBP1 binds as a homodimer to the two-telomere repeat site.
Although full-length TRF1 binds to DNA as a preformed homodimer, using
a large conserved domain near the N terminus, and both Myb-like domains
are required for high affinity binding (41), the isolated Myb-like
domain of TRF1 binds as a monomer to the two-repeat site (20, 42). This
suggests that the DNA binding mode of RTBP1 may be different from that
of TRF1.
Plant proteins that specifically bind the duplex TTTAGGG repeat
sequences were identified in nuclear extracts of maize and Arabidopsis (29). Computer searches in sequence data bases
revealed that two plant proteins have a single Myb-like domain at their C termini and bind a specific DNA sequence related to telomeric repeats
(19). The maize initiator-binding protein (IBP1) interacts at the
transcription start site of the Shrunken promoter containing an exact plant telomeric repeat AGGGTTT (34), and the parsley BoxP-binding factor (BPF1) binds a series of GT-rich motifs (35). These
results suggest that, in addition to their function in transcriptional regulation, these proteins may have a functional role in plant telomeres. Because yeast Rap1p functions both as a structural component
of yeast telomeres and a transcriptional regulator (11, 12), the
presence of Myb-like domain and the involvement of transcriptional
regulation may represent universal characteristics of telomere-binding
proteins. This idea is further supported by the fact that a S. pombe telomeric protein, Teb1p, may function as a general
transcription factor (24). An analysis of Arabidopsis DNA
sequences available in data bases revealed that the sequence AAACCCTAA,
corresponding to 1.3 units of the plant telomeric repeat AAACCCT, is
preferentially located in the 5' region of the genes (29). Therefore,
it is of interest to investigate whether RTBP1 plays a role in
transcriptional regulation in addition to binding to telomeric repeat sequences.
The critical question that remains to be answered is whether RTBP1
binds plant telomere in vivo. The homology displayed by RTBP1 to the Myb-like domain of other telomeric proteins suggests that
these proteins are functionally related. Proteins that bind the
double-stranded telomeric DNA sequence have been shown to regulate
telomere length negatively. Such proteins include Rap1p in budding
yeast (43, 44), Taz1p in fission yeast (13), and TRF1 in mammalian
cells (16, 45). A second mammalian telomeric protein, TRF2, plays a key
role in the protection of chromosome ends from end-to-end fusion (18).
Recently, it has been reported that plant cell nuclei contain telomere
DNA-binding proteins that can inhibit telomerase activity by altering
the accessibility of telomeric DNA and may thus participate in telomere
length regulation (46). Given the evolutionary conservation of telomere
sequences and functions, telomeric proteins would also be conserved.
Similarly, the ability of RTBP1 to bind specifically the
double-stranded plant telomeric repeat sequences in vitro
suggests that it may play a role in telomere functions in
vivo. Further studies will be required to determine the actual
function and physiological relevance of RTBP1 in plant cells.
*
This work was supported in part by Grant 97-04-01-04-01-3 from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation and Grant
95K2-0401-00-01-5 from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
through the Bioproducts Research Center at Yonsei University.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF242298.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003250200
The abbreviations used are:
RTBP1, rice
telomere-binding protein 1;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
RTR, rice telomere repeat;
HTR, human telomere repeat;
CTR, Caenorhabditis telomere
repeat.
Sequence-specific DNA Recognition by the Myb-like Domain of Plant
Telomeric Protein RTBP1*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Zap II Rice Seedling cDNA Library--
In
the BLAST search for proteins homologous to the Myb repeat, several
open reading frames containing a single Myb repeat were found (19).
This analysis includes orfR1 from a partial cDNA sequence of rice
(GenBankTM accession no. D23805). Two primers
(5'-GGAGGCCTTTCACTGTTGCTGAAG-3 and 5'-CCTGTTAACGAACCAACAGTAGGA-3') were
designed to clone orfR1 cDNA. After PCR amplification using the DNA
of a rice seedling cDNA library, a product of the expected size
(459 base pair fragment) was obtained. To clone the full-length
cDNA, the
Zap II library of rice seedling cDNA was screened
using the 459-base pair PCR product as a probe. The full-length
cDNA insert containing putative RTBP1 was subcloned into the
Bluescript SK plasmid to create pBS-RTBP1 by in vivo
excision of pBluescript from the Zap II vector (Stratagene).
-D-galactopyranoside and purified on
glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Correct
synthesis was checked by loading the cells directly on SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. GST protein itself was produced from bacteria carrying
an empty pGEX-KG vector. The final protein preparation was dialyzed
against TNE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol), and
stored at
80 °C.
-32P]dCTP using a random-primer kit
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and blots were hybridized with an
internal fragment of RTBP1 cDNA. For Northern blot analysis, total
RNA was isolated from roots, coleoptiles, leaves, and stems according
to the manufacturer's instructions (TRIzol reagent, Life Technologies,
Inc.). Twenty mg of total RNA was fractionated by 1%, 2.2 M formaldehyde gel electrophoresis and blotted onto a
Hybond N+ membrane. Blots were hybridized with an internal
fragment of RTBP1 cDNA. To check for equal loading, blots were
rehybridized with a 0.9-kilobase pair cDNA fragment of 18 S rRNA.
-32P]dCTPs and Klenow polymerase. To excise the
fragment containing the two-telomere repeat, the 3'-end-labeled
fragments were then digested with NheI (for end labeling of
the G-rich strand) or EcoRV (for end labeling of the C-rich
strand) and were then gel-purified. Binding reactions contained 1 ng of
end-labeled fragment, specified amounts of the purified
RTBP1-(446-633), 0.5 µg of poly(dI-dC), and 0.5 µg of nonspecific
oligonucleotide in a total of 20 µl of binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM NaCl, and 5%
glycerol). After incubation for 10 min on ice, DNase I digestions were
initiated by adding 1 µl of 40 mM CaCl2 and 1 µl of 50 µg/ml DNase I. Reactions were terminated after 60 s
by the addition of 2 µl of 0.5 M EDTA. Samples were
ethanol-precipitated, suspended in sequencing gel loading buffer, and
then analyzed on an 8% sequencing gel.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Primary sequence and Myb homology of
RTBP1. A, sequence of RTBP1 amino acids deduced from
sequences of cDNA identified in the screen of the rice seedling
cDNA library. The region with homology to Myb DNA binding motif is
boxed. B, alignment of the RTBP1 protein sequence
to the Myb-like domains of TRF1, Taz1p, and Tbf1p. Amino acids in RTBP1
that show identity to at least one of the other three sequences are
indicated by bold type. The likely positions of the three
helices constituting the Myb-like domain are indicated below
the sequence. C, relative positions of Myb-like domains in
RTBP1 and TRF1, with the percentage of amino acid identity
indicated.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Hybridization analysis of RTBP1
genomic DNA and mRNA. A, Southern blot
analysis of RTBP1 in rice genomic DNA. Rice genomic DNA was
digested with the indicated restriction enzymes, and DNA on the
Southern blots was hybridized with the labeled RTBP1
cDNA. B, Northern blot analysis of
poly(A)+-enriched RNA and total RNA from various rice
organs. Total proteins were separated by denaturing gel
electrophoresis, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with
the labeled RTBP1 cDNA. kb, kilobase.
Oligonucleotide probes and competitors

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Sequence-specific binding of RTBP1 to the
telomeric DNA. A, gel retardation assay showing
full-length RTBP1 binding to labeled RTR-4. Lane 1, probe
alone; lanes 2 and 3, indicated amounts of
full-length RTBP1; lanes 4 and 5, titration with
cold RTR-4 as a competitor; lanes 6 and 7,
titration with cold nonspecific DNA (NS) as a competitor.
B, gel retardation assay showing RTBP1-(466-633) binding to
labeled RTR-4. Lane 1, probe alone; lanes 2-5,
indicated amounts of RTBP1-(466-633); lanes 6-8, titration
with unlabeled RTR-4; lanes 9-11, titration with unlabeled
nonspecific DNA; lane 12, GST; lane 13,
GST-RTBP1-(466-633). C, Competition assay for
RTBP1-(466-633) binding to labeled RTR-4 with unlabeled RTR-4
(lanes 3-5), HTR-4 (lane 6-8), CTR-4
(lanes 9-11), RTR-4G (lanes 12 and
13), or RTR-4C (lanes 14 and
15).

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Gel retardation assay of the Myb-like domain
of RTBP1 to the two- and three-telomere repeats. A, gel
retardation assays were performed with labeled RTR-1 (lanes
1-3), RTR-2 (lanes 4-6), or RTR-3 (lanes
7-9). Each set of lanes contained 0, 0.2, and 0.4 µg of
RTBP1-(466-633). B, two different length proteins,
GST-RTBP1-(506-615) and RTBP1-(506-615), were used for binding to
labeled RTR-2. The two proteins were mixed in different molar ratios
before addition of DNA. The ratios of GST-RTBP1-(506-615) and
RTBP1-(506-615) are 0:1, 0.1:0.9, 0.4:0.6, 0.5:0.5, and 1:0. In the
schematic representation, the DNA is represented by a line,
RTBP1-(506-615) by a black circle, and
GST-RTBP1-(506-615) by a gray circle.
![]()
View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
DNase I footprinting of the Myb-like domain
of RTBP1 on the two-repeat DNA site. A, DNase I
footprint experiments were performed with a
XhoI-NheI fragment (G-rich strand) of pBend4
containing the two-telomere repeats. Binding reactions were carried out
as described under "Experimental Procedures" with indicated amounts
of RTBP1-(466-633). The first two lanes are G+A and C+T
chemical sequencing markers. The two-telomere repeats are indicated by
vertical brackets on the left. B, the
same experiments were performed except that the opposite C-rich strand
was analyzed using a XhoI-EcoRV fragment.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Gel retardation assay of the Myb-like domain
of RTBP1 to the mutated two-telomere repeats. A,
telomeric sequences of mutant repeats used in the experiments. Each
double-stranded probe contained a single nucleotide transition in the
two-telomere repeats as indicated. B, gel retardation assays
were carried out using 0.5 µg of RTBP1-(466-633) and labeled RTR-2
or mutated probes as indicated above each lane.
C, the amount of gel shift activity in the complex was
quantified for each probe. The relative amount of shifted complex was
expressed as the ratios of the amount of probe DNA in the complex to
the amount of total probe DNA in each reaction.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biology,
College of Science, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seoul 120-749, Korea. Tel.: 822-361-2660; Fax: 822-312-5657;
E-mail: topoviro@yonsei.ac.kr.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Blackburn, E. H.
(1991)
Nature
350,
569-573
2.
Greider, C. W.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
337-365
3.
Zakian, V. A.
(1995)
Science
270,
1601-1606
4.
Makarov, V. L.,
Hirose, Y.,
and Langmore, J. P.
(1997)
Cell
88,
657-666
5.
Wright, W. E.,
Tesmer, V. M.,
Huffman, K. E.,
Levene, S. D.,
and Shay, J. W.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2810-2821
6.
Greider, C. W.
(1999)
Cell
97,
419-422
7.
Griffith, J. D.,
Comeau, L.,
Rosenfield, S.,
Stansel, R. M.,
Bianchi, A.,
Moss, H.,
and de Lange, T.
(1999)
Cell
97,
503-514
8.
Cardenas, M. E.,
Bianchi, A.,
and de Lange, T.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
883-894
9.
Froelich-Ammon, S. J.,
Dickinson, B. A.,
Bevilacqua, J. M.,
Schultz, S. C.,
and Cech, T. R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1504-1514
10.
Petracek, M. E.,
Konkel, L. M. C.,
Kable, M. L.,
and Berman, J.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3648-3658
11.
Lustig, A. J.,
Kurtz, S.,
and Shore, D.
(1990)
Science
250,
549-553
12.
Sussel, L.,
and Shore, D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7749-7753
13.
Cooper, J. P.,
Nimmo, E. R.,
Allshire, R. C.,
and Cech, T. R.
(1997)
Nature
385,
744-747
14.
Cooper, J. P.,
Watanabe, Y.,
and Nurse, P.
(1998)
Nature
392,
828-831
15.
Nimmo, E. R.,
Pidoux, A. L.,
Perry, P. E.,
and Allshire, R. C.
(1998)
Nature
392,
825-828
16.
Broccoli, D.,
Smogorzewska, A.,
Chong, L.,
and de Lange, T.
(1997)
Nat. Genet
17,
231-235
17.
van Steensel, B.,
and de Lange, T.
(1997)
Nature
385,
740-749
18.
van Steensel, B.,
Smogorzewska, A.,
and de Lange, T.
(1998)
Cell
92,
401-413
19.
Bilaud, T.,
Koering, C. E.,
Binet-Brasselet, E.,
Ancelin, K.,
Pollice, A.,
Gasser, S. M.,
and Gilson, E.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
1294-1303
20.
Konig, P.,
Fairall, L.,
and Rhodes, D.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
1731-1740
21.
Tanikawa, J.,
Yasukawa, T.,
Enari, M.,
Ogata, K.,
Nishimura, Y.,
Ishii, S.,
and Sarai, A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
9320-9324
22.
Konig, P.,
Giraldo, R.,
Chapman, L,
and Rhodes, D.
(1996)
Cell
85,
125-136
23.
Spink, K. G.,
Evans, R. J.,
and Chambers, A.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
527-533
24.
Vassetzky, N. S.,
Gaden, F.,
Brun, C.,
Gasser, S. M.,
and Gilson, E.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
4687-4694
25.
Richards, E. J.,
and Ausubel, F. M.
(1988)
Cell
53,
127-136
26.
Kilian, A.,
and Kleinhofs, A.
(1992)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
235,
153-156
27.
Wu, K. S.,
and Tanksley, S. D.
(1993)
Plant Mol. Biol.
22,
861-872
28.
Ganal, M. W.,
Lapitan, N. L.,
and Tanksley, S. D.
(1991)
Plant Cell
3,
87-94
29.
Regad, F.,
Lebas, M.,
and Lescure, B.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
239,
163-169
30.
Zentgraf, U.
(1995)
Plant Mol. Biol.
27,
467-475
31.
Kim, J. H.,
Kim, W. T.,
and Chung, I. K.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
36,
661-672
32.
Lee, J. H.,
Kim, J. H.,
Kim, W. T.,
Kang, B. G.,
and Chung, I. K.
(2000)
Plant Mol. Biol.
42,
547-557
33.
Murray, M. G.,
and Thompson, W. F.
(1980)
Nucleic Acids Res.
8,
4321-4325
34.
Lugert, T.,
and Werr, W.
(1994)
Plant Mol. Biol.
25,
493-506
35.
da Costa e Shilva, O.,
Klein, L.,
Typermelzer, E.,
Trezzini, G. F.,
and Hahlbrock, K.
(1993)
Plant J.
4,
125-135
36.
Brigati, C.,
Kurtz, S.,
Balderes, D.,
Vidali, G.,
and Shore, D.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1306-1314
37.
Price, C. M.,
and Cech, T. R.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
769-774
38.
Price, C. M.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
3421-3431
39.
Sheng, H.,
Hou, Z.,
Schierer, T.,
Dobbs, D. L.,
and Henderson, E.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1144-1153
40.
Gilson, E.,
Roberge, M.,
Giraldo, R.,
Rhodes, D.,
and Gasser, S. M.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
231,
293-310
41.
Bianchi, A.,
Smith, S.,
Chong, L.,
Elias, P.,
and de Lange, T.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1785-1794
42.
Nishikawa, T.,
Nagado, A.,
Yoshimura, S.,
Aimoto, S.,
and Nishimura, Y.
(1998)
Structure
6,
1057-1064
43.
Marcand, S.,
Gilson, E.,
and Shore, D.
(1997)
Science
275,
986-990
44.
Krauskopf, A.,
and Blackburn, E. H.
(1996)
Nature
383,
354-357
45.
Chong, L.,
Steensel, B. V.,
Broccoli, D.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Hanish, J.,
Tempst, P.,
and de Lange, T.
(1995)
Science
270,
1663-1667
46.
Fulneckova, J.,
and Fajkus, J.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
467,
305-310
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Mizuno, J. Wu, Y. Katayose, H. Kanamori, T. Sasaki, and T. Matsumoto Chromosome-Specific Distribution of Nucleotide Substitutions in Telomeric Repeats of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 62 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Hong, M. Y. Byun, D.-H. Koo, K. An, J.-W. Bang, I. K. Chung, G. An, and W. T. Kim Suppression of RICE TELOMERE BINDING PROTEIN1 Results in Severe and Gradual Developmental Defects Accompanied by Genome Instability in Rice PLANT CELL, June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1770 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Ryu, Y. H. Kang, Y.-h. Park, I. Hwang, J. Schiefelbein, and M. M. Lee The WEREWOLF MYB protein directly regulates CAPRICE transcription during cell fate specification in the Arabidopsis root epidermis Development, November 1, 2005; 132(21): 4765 - 4775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Yang, S. K. Kim, and W. T. Kim Perturbation of NgTRF1 Expression Induces Apoptosis-Like Cell Death in Tobacco BY-2 Cells and Implicates NgTRF1 in the Control of Telomere Length and Stability PLANT CELL, December 1, 2004; 16(12): 3370 - 3385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. N. Karamysheva, Y. V. Surovtseva, L. Vespa, E. V. Shakirov, and D. E. Shippen A C-terminal Myb Extension Domain Defines a Novel Family of Double-strand Telomeric DNA-binding Proteins in Arabidopsis J. Biol. Chem., November 12, 2004; 279(46): 47799 - 47807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Lee, E. Y. Yu, C. H. Cho, J. Lee, M. T. Muller, and I. K. Chung DNA-Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunit-interacting Protein KIP Binds Telomerase by Interacting with Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34750 - 34755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q.-H. Zhu, K. Ramm, R. Shivakkumar, E. S. Dennis, and N. M. Upadhyaya The ANTHER INDEHISCENCE1 Gene Encoding a Single MYB Domain Protein Is Involved in Anther Development in Rice Plant Physiology, July 1, 2004; 135(3): 1514 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kwon and I. K. Chung Interaction of an Arabidopsis RNA-binding Protein with Plant Single-stranded Telomeric DNA Modulates Telomerase Activity J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12812 - 12818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Yoshimura, H. Maruyama, F. Ishikawa, R. Ohki, and K. Takeyasu Molecular mechanisms of DNA end-loop formation by TRF2 Genes Cells, March 1, 2004; 9(3): 205 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. O. Marian, S. J. Bordoli, M. Goltz, R. A. Santarella, L. P. Jackson, O. Danilevskaya, M. Beckstette, R. Meeley, and H. W. Bass The Maize Single myb histone 1 Gene, Smh1, Belongs to a Novel Gene Family and Encodes a Protein That Binds Telomere DNA Repeats in Vitro Plant Physiology, November 1, 2003; 133(3): 1336 - 1350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kim, S. B. Hwang, I. K. Chung, and J. Lee Sequence-specific Binding to Telomeric DNA by CEH-37, a Homeodomain Protein in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2003; 278(30): 28038 - 28044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Yang, D. H. Kim, J. J. Lee, Y. J. Chun, J.-H. Lee, Y. J. Kim, I. K. Chung, and W. T. Kim Expression of the Telomeric Repeat Binding Factor Gene NgTRF1 Is Closely Coordinated with the Cell Division Program in Tobacco BY-2 Suspension Culture Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21395 - 21407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kimura, T. Hamada, E. H. Morita, and H. Hayashi A High Temperature-Sensitive Mutant of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 with Modifications in the Endogenous Plasmid, pAQ1 Plant Cell Physiol., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 217 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Chen, C. T. Wang, and C. H. Ho A Plant Gene Encoding a Myb-like Protein That Binds Telomeric GGTTTAG Repeats in Vitro J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 16511 - 16519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||