![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24321-24332, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
andFrom Lehrstuhl Mikrobiologie/Membranphysiologie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Received for publication, March 3, 2000, and in revised form, May 8, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The synthesis of the Escherichia coli
zinc transporter, encoded by the znuACB gene cluster, is
regulated in response to the intracellular zinc concentration by the
zur gene product. Inactivation of the zur gene
demonstrated that Zur acts as a repressor when binding
Zn2+. Eight chromosomal mutant zur alleles were
sequenced to correlate the loss of Zur function with individual
mutations. Wild-type Zur and Zur Zinc is essential for all organisms and plays a catalytic as well
as a structural role in many proteins. However, zinc can also be toxic.
It interferes with vital functions by competing with other metal ions
for biologically important ligands, such as active sites of enzymes and
transporter proteins, especially when a critical concentration is
exceeded. Therefore, the intracellular zinc level must be precisely
regulated. Compared with eukaryotes, little is known about zinc
homeostasis in bacteria. In Escherichia coli, a zinc efflux
system (ZntA) and a zinc import system (ZnuABC) have been described
recently. ZntA (Zn2+ transport or
tolerance) is an ion-motive P-type ATPase that exports Zn2+, Cd2+, and Pb2+ (1, 2). The
Zn2+-specific uptake system Znu
(Zn2+ uptake) belongs to the ABC
transporter family and is composed of the periplasmic binding protein
ZnuA, the ATPase ZnuC, and the integral membrane protein ZnuB (3). In
the znu gene cluster, the transcription of the
znuA gene is divergent to that of the znuCB
genes, and the genes are separated by an unusually short intergenic
region of 24 base pairs (4).
As we have reported earlier, the zinc uptake system ZnuABC is regulated
by Zur (Zn2+ uptake
regulator) (3), and the corresponding genes lie In this study, we further defined the role of Zur in metalloregulation
of the znu gene cluster. Wild-type and mutant Zur proteins were overproduced and purified, and the interaction with metal ions and
with operator DNA both in vitro and in vivo was examined.
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, Phages, and Media--
The E. coli strains, plasmids, and phages used in this work are listed in
Table I and Fig. 3. The
preparation of M9 minimal medium, TY medium, and MacConkey lactose
plates; growth conditions; and phage handling were as described by
Patzer and Hantke (3).
Recombinant DNA Techniques--
Standard procedures (12) or
those recommended by the manufacturer were followed for isolation of
chromosomal and plasmid DNAs, DNA modification, ligation,
transformation, PCR,1 and
agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA was sequenced by the dideoxy chain
termination method using an A.L.F. DNA Sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). Oligonucleotides were
synthesized by Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium).
Construction of Plasmids and Strains--
All nucleotide
positions and section numbers are those of the E. coli
genome sequence (4). Non-compatible ends were blunt-ended prior to
ligation by removal of protruding 3' termini or filling in of
recessed 3' termini.
Plasmid pSP93/3 was obtained as one of the gene library plasmids that
complemented a zur mutant (3). The 0.6-kb
Eco47III fragment from pSP93/3, which encompass the
zur operator region, was ligated in either orientation into
the EcoRV site of pBCSK+, resulting in pSP97/61
and pSP97/63.
For construction of the wild-type zur plasmids, the 0.86-kb
BsrI fragment from pSP93/3 was inserted into the
SmaI site of pT7-5 behind the phage T7
To express the mutant zur alleles, genomic DNA extracted
from the appropriate strains or pSP98/35 plasmid DNA was amplified by
PCR using primers ZUR3 and ZUR4 and cloned into
NdeI/EcoRI-cleaved pT7-7, creating the pSP104
plasmids. For negative complementation assays, the PCR fragment
recovered from genomic DNA isolated from MC4100 (wild-type
zur) and from mutant zur strains or from plasmid pSP98/35 with primers ZUR1 and ZUR4 or primers ZUR1 and TET2
(GTCCTGCTCGCTTCGCTACTTGG, nt 1802-1824 of pACYC184), respectively, was
cloned into the EcoRV site of pACYC184, resulting in the
plasmids of the pSP102 series.
For subcloning of the znu operator, the primers YEB1
(CATCAGCAATGGCAGAAGCGATG, nt 870-892, section 170), YEB2
(TATGTGTACCAGGGCGTAAGCGT, nt 1372 to 1350, section 170), YEBP1
(AATATGAGAAGTGTGATATT, nt 1025-1044, section 170), YEBP2
(AATATCACACTTCTCATATT, nt 1044 to 1025, section 170), YEBP3
(CATAATGCGACCAATAATCGTAATGA, nt 1000-1025, section 170), YEBP4
(TCATTACGATTATTGGTCGCATTATG, nt 1025 to 1000, section 170), YEBP5
(TTTAGTCTTGCAGTAGTCATGAA, nt 1074 to 1052, section 170), and YEBP6
(TGAAATGTTATAATATCACACTT, nt 1055 to 1033, section 170) were used for
PCR (see Fig. 3). Plasmid pSP97/47 resulted from ligation of the 0.5-kb
PCR product with primers YEB1 and YEB2 into the EcoRV site
of pACYC184. Plasmid pSP99/224 was constructed by ligating the 0.7-kb
PCR product (zur-19 allele) derived from strain
SIP559 with the primers ZUR1 (GTTGATAATGGTACGACAAGGC, nt 984 to 963, section 368) and ZUR4 into the SmaI site of pT7-5. Equal
amounts of the two complementary oligonucleotides YEBP8 (TGTTATAATATCACA, nt 1050 to 1036, section 170) and YEBP9
(TGTGATATTATAACA, nt 1036-1050, section 170) were annealed and
inserted in both orientations into pBCSK+ at the
EcoRV site, generating pSP105/26 and pSP105/27,
respectively; pSP105/25 contains three oligonucleotides.
Strain SIP500, which has a chromosomal znuA'-lacZ
fusion, was obtained as follows. The 0.69-kb
NcoI/SalI DNA fragment of the znuA
operator was inserted into the SmaI site of the
lacZ operon fusion vector pRS415. The
znuA'-lacZ fusion of the resultant plasmid (pSP87/1) was transferred to the
For genomic inactivation of zur, the 2.87-kb fragment from
chromosomal DNA of strain MC4100 amplified by PCR using the primers ZUR5 (GTTAGTGGTCGGCAATATCCTC, nt 10382-10403, section 367) and ZUR6
(GTGCGTTCCTTCATTCACCAGA, nt 1992 to 1971, section 368) was inserted
into the EcoRV site of pACYC184. In the resulting plasmid (pSP106/28), an internal DraIII/PstI fragment
spanning nt 354-733 (section 368) of the zur gene was
replaced with the 2.0-kb BamHI
Strains with a chromosomal znu'-lacZ fusion were
obtained by infection with a Mud1(Ampr lac cts)
lysate prepared from strain MAL103 as described (14). The Mud1 fusion
sites of zinc-induced and EGTA-sensitive Mud1 fusions were amplified
and cloned with the primers MUD1 (CACGTACATGCCGCCAAACTCACCA, nt 170 to
146, GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number
M33723), which is complementary to the right end of the Mud1 phage, and
YEB1, which binds to the znuA gene. Sequencing revealed that
the Mud1 phage was inserted in the znu gene cluster behind
nt 2122 (section 170) (SIP576) and nt 1409 (section 170) (SIP775). Mud1
insertion inactivates the genes. The Mud1 fusions were isolated by
transduction, creating strains SIP578, SIP579, and SIP800.
Radiolabeling of Proteins--
E. coli K38 pGP1-2
cells carrying the appropriate pT7-5 derivative were labeled with 100 kBq of [35S]methionine (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Meckenheim,
Germany) as outlined by Tabor and Richardson (15) and Tabor
(16). After SDS-PAGE, the dried gel was autoradiographed.
Overproduction and Purification of Zur--
The zur
genes were expressed from the pT7-7-derived plasmids using the optimal
Shine-Dalgarno sequence. E. coli BL21(DE3) cells freshly
transformed with the appropriate plasmid were induced with 1 mM isopropyl- DNase I Footprinting--
For generation of the labeled target
DNA, the appropriate operator fragment was amplified by PCR with
genomic DNA isolated from MC4100 using primer YEB2 and the
fluorescein-labeled primer YEB3 (CTGTGTTGCACCTCCCCAGAGAG, nt 937-959,
section 170) for the ZnuCB-coding strand or primer YEB1 and the
fluorescein-labeled primer YEB7 (AGTTCCAGCGACACATCAGAGAG, nt 1160 to
1138, section 170) for the ZnuA-coding strand. Purified Zur protein was
allowed to equilibrate in 50 µl of binding buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, 5 mM DTT, and 5% glycerol, pH 8.0) containing
metal ions or chelators as indicated for 20 min at room temperature
prior to the addition of 30 ng of the fluorescein-labeled DNA probe.
After further incubation for 10 min and the addition of 50 µl of
DNase buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM
CaCl2, pH 7.8), DNA was digested for 2 min at room
temperature with 1 µl of DNase I in DNase buffer at a concentration
such that In Vivo Footprinting--
Cells were grown in TY medium
supplemented with 10 µM ZnSO4 until
E578 Determination of the Metal Ion Content of Zur--
To saturate
Zur with metal ions, the protein was incubated with a 2-3-fold molar
excess of Zn2+ and/or Fe2+ in buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, and 2 mM
DTT, pH 8.0) for 20 min at room temperature. Unbound metal ions were
removed by gel filtration on a Sephadex G-25M column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with buffer B. The zinc and iron
contents were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy.
Protein Assay and Amino-terminal Protein Sequencing--
Protein
concentrations were quantitated in triplicate using the biuret reaction
and bicinchoninic acid (reagents from Pierce) as described by Smith
et al. (19) or according to Bradford (20) with bovine serum
albumin as the protein standard. Zur was amino-terminally sequenced on
an Applied Biosystems 477A protein sequencer by Ralph Jack
(Universität Tübingen).
Gel Filtration--
Gel filtration was performed on a Superdex
75 HR 10/30 fast protein liquid chromatography column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with buffer A or with buffer containing
20 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, pH 8.0, and
additives as indicated and calibrated with appropriate standards
(bovine chymotrypsinogen A, bovine serum albumin, bovine RNase A,
soybean trypsin inhibitor, chicken ovalbumin, and bovine carbonic
anhydrase) at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min.
Computer Analyses--
Nucleic acid and protein sequences were
analyzed by the PC/GENE Version 6.85 program package (IntelliGenetics,
Inc., Mountain View, CA).
Identification of the Translational Start Site of zur--
The
translational start site of yjbK (zur) was
proposed as Val1 according to E. coli Genome
Sequence Data Base section 368 (4). However, comparison of the Zur and
Fur amino acid sequences (3) suggested that the translation of
zur starts later at Met21 (numbering as in
Blattner et al. (4)), resulting in a smaller protein. To
determine the physiological start site, the DNA fragments for the two
alternative forms corresponding to amino acids 1-191 (long form) and
21-191 (short form) of YjbK were cloned in frame directly upstream of
the optimal Shine-Dalgarno sequence in pT7-7 (pSP100/32 and pSP100/22,
respectively) to initiate translation exactly at the indicated sites.
For comparison, pSP100/3 was used for synthesis of the native Zur
protein. All three plasmids, including the one coding for the short Zur
protein (pSP100/22), expressed physiological active proteins that
complemented a zur mutant. Complementation occurred even
without induction of T7 RNA polymerase or when the inserts were in the
direction opposite to that of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter
(pSP100/34, long form on pT7-7; pSP100/21, short form on pT7-7; and
pSP100/4, native form on pT7-5), indicating that minimal amounts of Zur
protein are sufficient for repression of the znu gene
cluster. Labeling with [35S]methionine (Fig.
1) showed that native Zur (lane
2) was identical to the short form (lane 4) and
comprised 171 amino acids (Fig. 6, ZUR_ECOLI). In
the sample of the labeled proteins synthesized from the plasmid
construct encoding the long form of Zur, small amounts of the native
form were observed (lane 6), which made it impossible to
determine whether the long form is active in vivo. The
amino-terminal sequence of purified wild-type Zur (see below) was
determined to be MEKTTTQELLAQAEK.
Chromosomal Gene Inactivation of zur--
zur mutants
that cause a derepression of the znuACB gene cluster and an
increase in zinc uptake have been previously isolated (3). To decide
whether Zur operates as an activator or as a repressor, a
zur disruption mutant
(zur::Spcr/Strr) was
constructed in which zur was deleted from its chromosomal site. The derivative pSP106/47, which carries the
zur::Spcr/Strr disruption,
did not complement the zur-19 mutant strain SIP584, whereas
the zur-containing plasmid pSP106/28 did. Strain SIP812 (MC4100 zur::Spcr/Strr)
was viable; therefore, zur is not an essential gene under
the conditions tested. In strain SIP600
(zur::Spcr/Strr
znuA::MudX), the znuA'-lacZ fusion
was constitutively derepressed, indicating that Zur acts as a repressor.
zur Mutations--
To correlate the loss of Zur function with
individual mutations in the amino acid sequence of the Zur protein, the
zur alleles of MC4100 (wild-type zur); of the
constitutive 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine mutants SIP557,
SIP559, SIP561, SIP562, SIP564, SIP565, SIP566, and SIP567; and of the
plasmid pSP98/35 were sequenced after the cloning of two independently
generated PCR products. The sequence of wild-type zur
corresponded to that reported by Blattner et al. (4). All
mutant zur genes contained a single point mutation (exclusively G:C to A:T transitions, as common for
1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis) associated with
one-amino acid substitution, and only zur-11 and
zur-36 were identical (Table
II). The mutant zur genes were
tested for negative complementation to see whether interaction of
wild-type Zur with mutant Zur eliminates the function of
wild-type Zur (Table II).
Overproduction, Purification, and Characterization of Wild-type and
Mutant Zur Proteins--
The wild-type Zur protein synthesized
represented a major portion of the total cellular protein (Fig.
2A, lane 2), and
most of the Zur protein accumulated in inclusion bodies, with only a
minor portion in the soluble fraction. High levels of thioredoxin (encoded on plasmid pT-Trx), lowering of the incubation temperature (21), or variation of growth medium (22) does not significantly increase the solubility of Zur.
Because of its metal ion-binding properties and the high His and Cys
content (11%), Zur was purified by immobilized metal affinity
chromatography. Ni2+ and Zn2+ turned out to be
the most suitable metal ions. Zur from the soluble fraction and from
inclusion bodies was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity by nickel
affinity chromatography. SDS-PAGE analysis of purified wild-type Zur
revealed a single protein with a molecular mass of
The gene products of the mutant zur genes zur-11,
zur-19, zur-23, zur-25,
zur-27, zur-31, zur-35, and
zur Zur Forms a Dimer--
To confirm that Zur forms dimers, to
determine the dimer/monomer ratio under various conditions, and to see
whether the mutant Zur proteins differ, the purified proteins were
analyzed by gel filtration. Wild-type Zur eluted as a major peak with a
molecular mass (±S.E.) of 46.0 ± 2.5 kDa (apparently
corresponding to the dimer form), and only trace amounts eluted
with a molecular mass of 29.0 ± 2.9 kDa (representing the
monomer). The higher than expected molecular masses could be caused by
a more rod-like rather than globular shape of the protein. The relative
difference between the expected and observed molecular masses was
smaller for the dimer than for the monomer. This is in agreement with
the explanation provided that the monomers associate at the extended
interfaces to form a dimer that is more globular than the monomer. Due
to the high ionic strength (300 mM NaCl) of the buffer, it
was ruled out that Zur was strongly retained because of its negative
charge at this pH. Thus, wild-type Zur exists as a dimer under these conditions. Addition of the metal ion chelator TPEN (30 µM) or MnCl2 (250 µM), each in
the presence of DTT (2 mM), yielded the same results,
indicating that dimerization was independent of metal ions. For
Zur
Formation of wild-type Zur/Zur Subcloning of the znu Operator Region Affording Zinc Regulation in
Vivo--
To localize the DNA region within the znu
operator that is responsible for Zur regulation, the in vivo
titration assay described previously (3) was employed. Introduction of
the znu operator on a high copy number plasmid (pSP93/2)
titrated Zur and hence derepressed znuA'-lacZ
expression in strain SIP468, resulting in red colonies on
MacConkey lactose agar plates. In contrast, SIP468 harboring the
pBCSK+ vector formed white colonies under these conditions.
The region responsible for the Zur regulation was narrowed down by
subcloning as depicted in Fig. 3. The
smallest active fragment covered nt 1025-1055 of section 170. In this
region, a nearly perfect palindrome was found (Fig.
4C). The segment
TGTGATATTATAACA within this palindrome cloned in either direction into
pBCSK+ (pSP105/26 and pSP105/27) was not active, indicating
that this sequence was not sufficient for effective Zur titration.
However, plasmid pSP105/25, which contains three copies of this
sequence, derepressed znuA'-lacZ fusion
expression in the operator titration assay, either because of the
higher number of copies or because the adjacent nucleotides restored an
active Zur-binding site. Plasmids pSP97/61 and pSP97/63
(pBCSK+ with the zur operator region in the two
orientations) were inactive in the in vivo titration assay,
which indicates that Zur does not interact with its own operator to
autoregulate the expression of its gene.
Zur Binds to the znu Operator--
The data obtained by in
vivo titration assays did not rule out the possibility that
regulation via Zur is indirect, mediated by other factors. DNase I
footprinting assays with purified wild-type Zur protein were used to
determine whether Zur directly binds to this DNA region and to verify
the DNA-binding site on the znu operator. A single region of
the znu operator was protected from DNase I cleavage,
extending from nt 1033 to 1061 of section 170 on the ZnuCB-coding
strand (Fig. 4A) and from nt 1057 to 1029 of section 170 on
the ZnuA-coding strand (Fig. 4B). The protected region
comprises the imperfect palindrome identified by the in vivo
titration assays described above (Fig. 4C). Thus, Zur
appears to bind to the DNA as a dimer. A molar excess of <15 Zur
dimers/DNA molecule was sufficient for protection under optimized
conditions. Higher concentrations of the repressor (a protein/DNA ratio
of up to 1700:1) did not result in an extended protection zone. Zur bound to DNA only in the presence of a reducing agent such as DTT. No
difference was observed between Zur purified from solubilized inclusion
bodies and Zur purified from the soluble fraction.
Zur31 and Zur Metal Ion Dependence of the DNA-binding Activity of Zur--
DNase
I footprinting assays were also employed to study the metal ion
dependence of Zur-DNA binding. Purified Zur as isolated bound to the
znu operator even without the addition of metal ions, which
indicates that the buffers and the protein preparation contained sufficient zinc. Zur acquired zinc either in the cell or during purification; the zinc/protein ratio in the sample of purified Zur was
1:5 as determined by atom absorption spectroscopy (see below). Addition
of 5 µM Zn2+ or Mn2+ enhanced DNA
protection by this partially Zn2+-saturated Zur
preparation. The zinc chelators TPEN (<2 µM) and EDDS
(<100 µM) abolished DNA binding of Zur. The high
concentration of EDDS necessary for Zur inactivation demonstrates the
strong affinity of reduced Zur for Zn2+. The greater
efficiency of TPEN compared with that of EDDS reflects its by far
higher affinity for Zn2+, as has also been observed in
plate assays (3). Other metal chelators such as EGTA and EDTA mainly
complex the Mg2+ essential for DNase I activity and
therefore could not be used in adequate concentrations to chelate
Zn2+. Cu2+, Fe2+, and
Mn2+ at >250 µM impaired DNA protection.
Interestingly, Mn2+ (>250 µM, but not at 25 µM) altered the DNA fragmentation pattern generated by
DNase I digestion when Pi was present. Ni2+ was
not stable under the strong reducing conditions required.
Zur Binds Zn2+ Specifically--
The zinc content of
wild-type Zur was determined. When purified on a Ni2+
column under nonreducing or mildly reducing conditions (10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) and after removal of imidazole, the
Zur preparation barely contained any zinc (~1 zinc ion/5 protein
molecules). Under these conditions, Zur was in the oxidized form as
judged by SDS-PAGE. Only when Zur was reduced by DTT and loaded with
ZnSO4 and then unbound Zn2+ was removed by gel
filtration was zinc detected at 1.2-1.7 zinc ions/Zur molecule,
i.e. one Zur dimer bound at least 2 zinc ions. Zur In Vivo Footprinting Assays--
In DNase I footprinting assays,
wild-type Zur and all the mutant Zur proteins except Zur31 and
Zur
With the ZnuC-coding strand (Fig. 5A), signals for Zur19
(trace 2) were identical to those for in vitro
methylated pSP97/47 in the absence of Zur (negative control,
trace 1). With wild-type Zur (traces 3a and
3b), signal intensities were the same as with the negative
control only for nucleotides before nt 1034 and after nt 1057 of
section 170. In the region in between, most signals diminished
(downward-pointing arrows), but one increased
(upward-pointing arrows), indicating that most residues were
protected by Zur binding in vivo, whereas one residue was
more susceptible to methylation by DMS (hypersensitive). This effect
was greater with increased expression of wild-type Zur (trace
3b). The enhanced reactivity of the hypersensitive residue can be
explained either by protein binding-induced structural alterations of
the DNA that lead to a more exposed reaction site or by the
formation of a so-called hydrophobic pocket by the protein on the DNA
that attracts DMS and hence increases its local concentration. The
latter interpretation seems less likely since such sites of increased
reactivity are often observed at the boundary of the protein on the
DNA. Hypersensitivity was not observed in DNase I footprinting assays,
probably because of steric hindrance of the much larger DNase I protein
in comparison with the small DMS molecule.
With the ZnuA-coding strand (Fig. 5B), most of the
nucleotides located in the region around nt 1039-1054 of section 170 (Zur-binding site of the znu operator) were protected from
methylation by wild-type Zur (trace 3,
downward-pointing arrows) compared with the in
vitro methylated pSP97/47 DNA in the absence of Zur (negative
control, trace 1). These same nucleotides were
not protected in cells with Zur19 (trace 2),
which indicates that Zur19 does not bind to the znu operator
in vivo. Thus, the DNA binding of Zur19 in DNase I
footprinting assays was caused by the nonphysiological conditions. The
protection zone in the in vivo footprinting assay was
generally smaller than in the DNase I footprinting assay presumably
because the DMS molecule is much smaller than the bulky DNase I protein.
Zur-dependent Regulation of the znu Gene
Cluster--
All znuA'-lacZ,
znuB'-lacZ, and znuC'-lacZ
fusions (in SIP468, SIP488, SIP576, SIP578, SIP579, SIP775, and SIP800)
were derepressed by Zn2+ chelators such as TPEN, EDDS,
2,2'-bipyridine (at high concentrations), EDTA, and EGTA and by the
metal ions Mn2+, Fe2+, Cu2+,
Cd2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ (only in
aroB+ strains), whereas Zn2+,
Co2+, and iron chelators such as 2,2'-bipyridine (at lower
concentrations) and desferrioxamine repressed the znu gene
cluster. The influence of iron was also observed in the different
behavior of aroB+ and
aroB Native Zur is a dimer, even in the absence of zinc or other metal
ions, as indicated by gel filtration experiments in the presence of
chelators. A regulatory sequence of dyad symmetry was defined within
the znu operator; this sequence is sufficient for conferring
zinc-dependent and Zur-dependent repression.
Zur protein was shown to bind directly and specifically to DNA with this sequence using three independent assays of DNA binding: in vivo titration, DNase I footprinting, and in vivo footprinting.
Zur occupied its binding site only in the presence of zinc or other
divalent metal cations at low concentrations, as shown by the DNase I
footprinting data. Zur protected a 29-nt approximate palindrome on each
strand of the znu operator with a 3'-stagger of 4 nt. This
footprint resembles that of typical DNA-binding dimers such as
classical helix-turn-helix proteins, e.g. the CI repressor from bacteriophage Zur is active only in the reduced form. As a cytoplasmic protein, it
has predominantly reduced thiols rather than oxidized disulfides due to
the reducing conditions in the cytoplasm (27). In vitro, the
cysteine residues of Zur are easily oxidized to disulfides, as judged
by the slower migration on SDS-polyacrylamide gels under reducing
conditions compared with nonreducing conditions. Oxidized Zur does not
bind DNA or considerable amounts of Zn2+.
Zur seems to be widespread among bacteria, even in Gram-positive
bacteria and cyanobacteria, as indicated by sequence similarity searches. In B. subtilis, apart from Fur and PerR
(peroxide stress response regulator) (11), the
third homologue YqfV can act as Zur (5). The sequence similarity to
E. coli Zur is not strong owing to the distant relationship
between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. A zur gene
has also been found in L. monocytogenes (6). Based on
sequence similarity, we expect that the proposed Fur protein in
Staphylococcus epidermidis (28) is Zur rather than Fur (Fig.
6, FUR_STAEP). It
is possible that other proteins designated as Fur homologues will turn
out to be Zur proteins. Synechocystis sp. (29) may also have
a Zur protein. Of the three homologues, Slr1738 and Sll1937 are more
similar to Zur than to Fur from E. coli. It is noteworthy
that sll1937 is located directly upstream and is divergently
transcribed of the genes encoding the ZnuACB equivalents in
Synechocystis sp.
46-91 formed homo- and
heterodimers. Dimerization was independent of metal ions since it also
occurred in the presence of metal chelators. Using an in
vivo titration assay, the znu operator was narrowed
down to a 31-base pair region overlapping the translational start site
of znuA. This location was confirmed by footprinting
assays. Zur directly binds to a single region comprising a nearly
perfect palindrome. Zinc chelators completely inhibited and
Zn2+ in low concentrations enhanced DNA binding of Zur. No
evidence for autoregulation of Zur was found. Zur binds at least 2 zinc ions/dimer specifically. Although most of the mutant Zur proteins bound
to the znu operator in vitro, no protection was
observed in in vivo footprinting experiments. Analysis of
the mutant Zur proteins suggested an amino-terminal DNA contact domain
around residue 65 and a dimerization and Zn2+-binding
domain toward the carboxyl-terminal end.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
50 min
apart on the E. coli chromosome. Since then, Zur proteins from Bacillus subtilis (5) and Listeria
monocytogenes (6) have been described. Also ZntR, the
Zn2+-responsive transcriptional
regulator of zntA that belongs to the family of
MerR-like prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, has been identified
(7). Other zinc-specific metalloregulatory proteins from bacteria known
to date are SmtB and ZiaR. SmtB in cyanobacteria represses the
expression of the gene encoding the metallothionein SmtA, which confers
resistance to heavy metal ions. SmtB binds zinc and other heavy metals
and belongs to the ArsR family of metallorepressors, which control
mainly prokaryotic metal resistance operons (8). ZiaR is an SmtB-like
repressor of the expression of the gene encoding the zinc efflux pump
ZiaA (zinc ATPase) in Synechocystis
sp. (9). According to sequence similarities, Zur is considered to be a
member of the Fur family of metalloregulatory proteins, which include
the Fur (ferric iron uptake
regulator) proteins of E. coli and other
bacteria involved in iron regulation (10) as well as PerR of B. subtilis, which controls the peroxide stress response (11).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
E. coli strains, plasmids, and phages
10 promoter
(pSP100/3) and in the opposite orientation (pSP100/4). The primers ZUR2
(GTGTTTTTCCTGGAACATGGTA, nt 902 to 881, E. coli
genome sequence (4) section 368) and ZUR4 (TAATCCCTCCTGCCCGACGTGT, nt
287-308, section 368) were used for cloning the large 0.62-kb region
of the zur gene into
NdeI/EcoRI-cleaved pT7-7, yielding pSP100/32
(zur behind the phage T7
10 promoter) and pSP100/34
(zur in the opposite orientation). Sequencing of the
pSP100/32 insert revealed that due to failure during oligonucleotide synthesis, three nucleotides in the ZUR2 primer were lacking, resulting
in an exchange of the first residue (Val) for Met and loss of the
second residue (Phe). The short 0.55-kb form of the zur gene
was amplified by PCR with the primers ZUR3 (TGGAAAAGACCACAACGCAGGA, nt
841 to 820, section 368) and ZUR4 and likewise ligated into NdeI/EcoRI-digested pT7-7, resulting in pSP100/22
(zur behind the phage T7
10 promoter) and pSP100/21
(zur in the opposite orientation). pSP98/35
(zur
46-91) was obtained from an E. coli gene library as a plasmid that derepressed the
znuA::MudX fusion of SIP468 in the in
vivo titration assay.
phage
RS45 by homologous
recombination, giving rise to
SP87/1, which was introduced into
MC4100 as described (13). zur-19 was cotransduced with
lamB::Tn10 (from MM143) into strain
SIP500 (
znuA'-lacZYA), selecting for
Tetr (where Tet is tetracycline and the superscript "r"
indicates resistant/resistance) and znuA'-lacZYA
derepressed colonies, to generate strain SIP584.
fragment
(Spcr/Strr (where Spc is spectinomycin and Str
is streptomycin) gene box) of pHP45
to generate pSP106/47. The
linear 4.5-kb NdeI/NheI fragment of pSP106/47 was
introduced into strain SIP602 by transformation. SIP602 was obtained by
transduction of recD1901::Tn10 (from
CAG12135) into W3110 to allow double selection for Spcr and
Strr. The chromosomal
zur::Spcr/Strr gene
disruption of chloramphenicol-sensitive transformants was confirmed by
PCR, and the allele was transduced into strains MC4100 and SIP468,
creating strains SIP812 and SIP600, respectively.
-D-thiogalactopyranoside,
harvested, resuspended in buffer A (20 mM sodium
Pi and 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), and disrupted by
two passages through a French pressure cell (Aminco, Silver Spring,
MD) at 138 MPa. For purification of Zur from the soluble fraction, the cell extract was centrifuged (70 min at 13 500 × g), and the supernatant was separated by fast protein liquid
chromatography on a Ni2+-iminodiacetic acid column (HiTrap
chelating, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with buffer A. To
isolate Zur from inclusion bodies, the inclusion bodies were recovered
from the cell extract by centrifugation and dissolved in buffer
containing 50 mM HEPES/NaOH and 1 M urea, pH
8.0. Insoluble cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the
supernatant was slowly diluted 10-fold with buffer A and likewise
applied to the column. The resin was washed with buffer A. Zur was
eluted with linear imidazole gradients in the 5-500 mM
range. The buffer was exchanged, and the protein was concentrated by
ultrafiltration (Centricon-10, Amicon, Witten, Germany). Starting with
100 ml of bacterial culture, purification from the soluble fraction
yielded
6 mg of total protein in the supernatant and
1 mg (17%)
of pure protein for wild-type and mutant Zur proteins and
12 mg of
total protein in the supernatant and
6 mg (50%) of pure protein for
Zur
46-91. The yield of total and pure proteins for Zur
46-91 was
higher because no Zur
46-91 was lost in inclusion bodies. The
purified proteins were stable and remained active for at least 6 months
if stored at 4 °C.
40% of the DNA molecules were left intact. Reactions were
terminated by the addition of 10 µl of stop solution (150 mM EDTA and 5% SDS), followed by ethanol precipitation. Samples were electrophoresed on the A.L.F. DNA Sequencer and analyzed with A.L.F. DNA Fragment Manager Version 1.1 software (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The products of the standard DNA sequencing reactions using the same labeled primer and pSP92/3 as DNA template were included on the gel. To exclude the possibility that the observed
DNA protection was due to impurities in the purified Zur fraction,
footprinting assays with the same column fraction recovered
accordingly, but without overproduction of Zur, were performed as a
negative control.
0.4 was reached. Bacteria from 6 ml of
this culture were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in 0.4 ml of
growth medium, and incubated with 4 µl of DMS for 2 min at room
temperature. To stop the methylation reaction, cells were washed
twice in 40 ml of ice-cold M9 minimal medium. For comparison,
plasmid DNA containing the znu operator region was
methylated in vitro with DMS as described by Ausubel
et al. (17), but 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, was
used as the reaction buffer. The genomic or plasmid DNA isolated from
each sample was used as template for a one-sided PCR with
Taq DNA polymerase and the 5'-fluorescein-labeled primer YEB3 or YEB7. When a methylated base is encountered (DMS predominantly methylates N-7 of guanine and N-3 of adenine (18)), the chain extension
by Taq DNA polymerase terminates due to mismatches and the
lack of proofreading activity. This results in 5'-fluorescein labeled DNA fragments starting at nt 1160 (section 170) (primer YEB7)
or nt 937 (section 170) (primer YEB3) and mostly ending at positions
opposite of a methylated residue in the matrix strand. PCR products
were precipitated with ethanol and analyzed on the A.L.F. DNA Sequencer.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (6K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Autoradiography after SDS-PAGE of
[35S]methionine-labeled Zur proteins. E. coli strain K38 pGP1-2 harbors plasmids pSP100/4 (lane
1; zur on pT7-5 in the orientation opposite to that of
the T7 promoter), pSP100/3 (lane 2; zur on pT7-5
under the control of the T7 promoter), pSP100/21 (lane 3;
the short form of zur on pT7-7 in the orientation opposite
to that of the T7 promoter), pSP100/22 (lane 4; the short
form of zur on pT7-7 immediately behind the T7 promoter),
pSP100/34 (lane 5; the long form of zur on pT7-7
in the orientation opposite to that of the T7 promoter), and pSP100/32
(lane 6; the long form of zur on pT7-7
immediately behind the T7 promoter). The positions and molecular masses
of standard proteins are given on the left.
Properties of wild-type and mutant Zur proteins

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
SDS-PAGE of wild-type Zur
(A) and Zur
46-91
(B) and nondenaturing PAGE of Zur and
Zur
46-91 (C). Wild-type
zur and zur
46-91 were
overexpressed using the T7 expression system on pSP100/22
(A) and pSP104/74 (B), respectively, carried by
strain BL21(DE3). Lanes 1, uninduced whole cells;
lanes 2, induced whole cells; lanes 3, soluble
fraction of cell lysate after induction; lanes 4, Zur
purified by imidazole elution from a Ni2+-iminodiacetic
acid-immobilized metal affinity chromatography column. The positions
and molecular masses of standard proteins are shown on the left. In
C are shown the results from the nondenaturing gel
electrophoresis (10% gel, Coomassie blue staining) of wild-type Zur
(lane 2), Zur
46-91 (lane 3), and equimolar
amounts of wild-type Zur and Zur
46-91 (lanes 1 and
4). Samples were preincubated with 1 mM
ZnSO4 and 2 mM DTT.
19 kDa (Fig.
2A, lane 4). This is consistent with the molecular mass of Zur predicted from the amino acid sequence (19.3 kDa).
46-91 were purified accordingly. Only
Zur
46-91 did not form inclusion bodies. Purified Zur
46-91
showed an apparent molecular mass of
14 kDa (Fig. 2B, lane 4) as predicted (14.0 kDa). Despite nearly identical
molecular masses, some of the mutant Zur proteins (Zur19, Zur31, and
Zur35) migrated faster on SDS-PAGE than wild-type Zur. Zur migrated
more slowly under reducing conditions than under nonreducing
conditions, which indicates that the isolated Zur protein was in the
oxidized form with at least one intramolecular disulfide bridge even
when the protein isolation and purification procedures were carried out
in the presence of 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Stronger
reducing agents such as DTT or higher concentrations of
2-mercaptoethanol were not used for Ni2+-immobilized metal
affinity chromatography to avoid reduction of Ni2+. Under
nonreducing conditions, protein bands with lower intensity were
observed at
38 and
57 kDa and at
29 and
43 kDa for
wild-type Zur and Zur
46-91, respectively; these two bands probably
represent the dimer and trimer formed by intermolecular disulfide bridges.
46-91, nearly all of the protein eluted at the dimer size (42.6 kDa) as well. This shows that Zur
46-91 forms dimers despite the
deletion of 46 amino acids in the amino-terminal part, indicating that
this region is not essential for dimerization. For some of the mutant
Zur proteins, the dimer/monomer ratio was shifted, e.g. for
Zur25, the portion of the dimer form was lower than that of wild-type
Zur, and for Zur27, the monomeric state prevailed.
46-91 heterodimers was demonstrated
by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Although wild-type
Zur and Zur
46-91 clearly differ in mass, they are nearly identical
in their charge/mass ratio, the main criterion for separation upon
nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. Therefore, it was difficult to find
conditions to separate these two proteins. Besides the protein bands
for the wild-type Zur homodimer (Fig. 2C, lane 2) and the Zur
46-91 homodimer (lane 3), an additional
intermediate band of the wild-type Zur/Zur
46-91 heterodimer was
visible in samples containing a mixture of the two proteins
(lanes 1 and 4). This band was less than twice as
intense as the homodimer bands expected statistically; therefore,
homodimers seem to be favored above heterodimers.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Mapping of the potential Zur-binding site in
the znu operator region. The DNA inserts
(shaded boxes) were obtained by cleavage with the
restriction endonucleases PinAI, SalI,
MseI, and MnlI and PCR with primers YEB1, YEB2,
YEBP1, YEBP2, YEBP3, YEBP4, YEBP5, and YEBP6 and cloned into the
EcoRV site of pBCSK+. Thick arrows
show the position and direction of the lacZ promoter in each
construct. The numbers reflecting the positions in section 170 of the
E. coli genome and the translational start sites of
znuA and znuC according to Blattner et
al. (4) are given at the bottom. Activity signifies
derepression of znuA'-lacZ expression in strain
SIP468 carrying the corresponding plasmid, analyzed on MacConkey
lactose plates. The znuA' fragment coding for the signal
peptide in the same orientation as the constitutive promoter of the
vector seemed to be detrimental since the cells easily lost such
plasmids and grew poorly in the presence of chloramphenicol.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
DNase I footprinting assay of Zur binding to
the znu operator region. The 436- or 291-base
pair fragment comprising nt 937-1372 of section 170 labeled on the
ZnuCB-coding strand using the fluorescein-labeled YEB3 primer
(A) or nt 870-1160 of section 170 labeled on the
ZnuA-coding strand using the fluorescein-labeled YEB7 primer
(B) without (traces 1) or with
(traces 2) purified Zur protein was treated as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The nucleotide sequence
deduced from the dideoxynucleotide sequencing reaction with the same
end-labeled primer is given below; the protected region is enlarged for
clarity. In C are shown the nucleotide sequence of the
znu operator region with the translational start sites
according to Blattner et al. (4) and the region
determined by the in vivo operator titration assay
(bracketed). The boxed region indicates the
nucleotides protected from DNase I digestion by Zur. The imperfect
palindrome is denoted by convergent arrows, with
complementary bases shown in boldface. Nucleotides are
numbered according to E. coli genome section 170.
46-91 were the only mutant Zur proteins that did not
protect the znu operator in DNase I footprinting assays even
when applied in concentrations 20-fold higher than needed for DNA
protection by wild-type Zur (Table II). A surplus of Zur
46-91 (10-fold) or Zur25, but not Zur27, over wild-type Zur was able to
abolish binding of wild-type Zur to the DNA. Competition for Zn2+ did not account for this effect because the addition
of more Zn2+ did not change the result. An excess of
Zur
46-91 probably titrates wild-type Zur away from the
znu operator by forming heterodimers (see above). Since the
individual components Zur25 and wild-type Zur bind to DNA, it is
surprising that the heterodimer seems to bind less efficiently or
not at all.
46-91
contained as much zinc as wild-type Zur, indicating that zinc binding
is not abolished by the deletion. In the presence of equimolar
concentrations of Zn2+ and Fe2+, the content of
bound Zn2+ decreased to 80% of the value measured without
Fe2+; the remaining 20% of the bound ions were
Fe2+. This result suggests that wild-type Zur has much
higher affinity for Zn2+ than for Fe2+.
46-91 bound to the znu operator, although the mutant
Zur proteins were not able to repress the
znuA'-lacZ fusion in vivo. To
determine whether the DNA binding of the mutant Zur proteins was due to
the nonphysiological conditions or whether the mutant proteins occupy
the Zur-binding site on the znu operator even in
vivo, an in vivo footprinting assay was designed. Whole
cells of the zur-19 mutant strain SIP575 and its parental
strain (MC4100) were treated with DMS, and the methylated genomic DNA
was isolated, followed by one-sided PCR using Taq DNA
polymerase. With genomic DNA, peaks were of low intensity and difficult
to evaluate (data not shown). Therefore, footprinting was also carried
out with cells transformed with the znu operator region on
the pACYC184 vector (pSP97/47), and to compensate for the multicopy
effect, the cells were cotransformed with the zur allele on
pT7-5 (pSP100/3 for wild-type zur and pSP99/224 for zur-19) (Fig. 5). The results
were essentially the same as with genomic DNA, but the peaks were more
distinct.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
In vivo footprinting assay of Zur
binding to the znu operator region on the ZnuC-coding
strand (A) and on the ZnuA-coding strand
(B). Strain SIP575 (zur-19 mutant)
bearing plasmids pSP97/47 (znu operator) and pSP99/224
(zur-19) (traces 2), strain MC4100
(wild-type zur) bearing pSP97/47 (trace
3a), and strain MC4100 bearing pSP97/47 and pSP100/3
(wild-type zur) (traces 3b) were
exposed to DMS in vivo, and plasmid pSP97/47 was methylated
with DMS in vitro (traces 1). Plasmid
DNA from each sample was isolated and subjected to one-sided PCR with
Taq DNA polymerase and the 5'-fluorescein-labeled primer
YEB7 (A) or YEB3 (B) as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The signals in the scan represent
nucleotides that reacted with DMS, thereby generating truncated labeled
extension products. Nucleotides protected by a DNA-interacting protein
are not exposed to DMS and do not give a signal in this assay. Residues
protected from DMS modification upon Zur binding are indicated by
downward-pointing arrows; signals that increased are
indicated by upward-pointing arrows. The nucleotide sequence
resulting from a standard dideoxynucleotide sequencing reaction
performed with the same end-labeled primer is shown at the bottom. Due
to the different migration of samples and the standard on the
sequencing gel, the signals may be shifted by 1-2 nt relative to their
true position. Nucleotides are numbered according to E. coli
genome section 170. Note that due to the different principle of the two
methods, opposite DNA strands are analyzed in the in vivo
footprinting assay and in the DNase I footprinting assay with the same
fluorescein-labeled primer.
strains on MacConkey lactose agar plates:
znu-lacZ aroB+ mutants were white, whereas
znu-lacZ aroB
mutants were red.
aroB is one of the genes necessary for the biosynthesis of
the E. coli siderophore enterochelin, which mediates ferric
iron transport.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(23). The observed 3'-stagger is
indicative of coverage of the minor groove at the ends, but provides no
information about the protein-DNA recognition contacts. Even at high
concentrations of Zur, no polymerization and extension of the protected
region occurred, as has been observed with Fur at several
Fur-dependent operators in footprinting experiments (e.g. Refs. 24 and 25) and by electron and atomic force
microscopy (26).

View larger version (96K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Alignment of E. coli Zur
with putative Zur proteins and E. coli Fur. The
protein sequence alignment was based on the method of Higgins and Sharp
(37). Perfectly conserved residues are indicated with
asterisks, and well conserved residues are marked by
colons. The proteins shown are as follows (with the data
bases and accession numbers in parentheses):
ZUR_ECOLI, Zur from E. coli (this
study); ZUR_KLEPN,
ZUR_YERPE, ZUR_VIBCH,
ZUR_BORPE, ZUR_CAUCR,
ZUR_PSEAE, and ZUR_NEIGO,
Zur homologues deduced from the incomplete genome sequences from
K. pneumoniae (Washington University Genome Sequencing
Center (WUGSC)), Y. pestis (Sanger Center), V. cholerae (Institute for Genomic Research), B. pertussis
(Sanger Center), C. crescentus (Institute for Genomic
Research), P. aeruginosa (Pseudomonas Genome
Project), and N. gonorrhoeae (University of Oklahoma's
Advanced Center for Genome Technology), respectively;
ZUR_LISMO, ZurR from L. monocytogenes
(6); ZUR_BACSU, Zur from B. subtilis
(5) (Swiss-Prot accession number P54479);
FUR_STAEP, proposed Fur from S. epidermidis according to Heidrich et al. (28)
(Swiss-Prot accession number P54204); and
FUR_ECOLI, Fur from E. coli (4)
(GenBankTM/EBI accession number AE000172). The partially
sequenced Np20 from P. aeruginosa (38) and IviXI from
V. cholerae (39), which have been identified as being
implicated in virulence, are part of ZUR_PSEAE
and ZUR_VIBCH, respectively. The amino acid
changes in each of the eight mutant Zur proteins and the mutant
designations are given above the corresponding residues in E. coli wild-type Zur.
In many of the partially sequenced genomes of various bacterial species, a Zur equivalent is found, e.g. in Salmonella typhimurium LT2 (Washington University Genome Sequencing Center (WUGSC)), Salmonella typhi (Sanger Center), Salmonella paratyphi (WUGSC), Klebsiella pneumoniae (WUGSC), Yersinia pestis (Sanger Center), Vibrio cholerae (Institute for Genomic Research), Bordetella pertussis (Sanger Center), Caulobacter crescentus (Institute for Genomic Research), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pseudomonas Genome Project), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (University of Oklahoma's Advanced Center for Genome Technology), and Neisseria meningitidis (Sanger Center). Since these organisms also possess a system homologous to Znu, we propose that these proteins likewise are regulators of zinc uptake. Some of these Zur-equivalent proteins are aligned in Fig. 6.
Since all mutant Zur proteins could be purified in large amounts, it can be ruled out that the Zur phenotype is the result of low protein expression or of an unstable Zur protein that is quickly degraded by cellular proteases. This suggests that the amino acids altered in the mutant Zur proteins are important for the structure and/or function of native Zur. The alignment of the amino acid sequences of the mutant zur products with putative Zur proteins from other organisms reveals that all of the point mutations occur in well conserved areas (Fig. 6).
Zur
46-91, which has an internal deletion (amino acids 46-91) in
the amino-terminal part of Zur, bound as much Zn2+ as
wild-type Zur and formed dimers and heterodimers with wild-type Zur,
but did not protect DNA from DNase I cleavage. Apparently, this region
is responsible for binding of DNA, but is not essential for
dimerization or Zn2+ binding.
Negative complementation by an excess of the mutant Zur protein can be
explained by competition for the corepressor Zn2+ or by
formation of less active heterodimers with wild-type Zur. Zur25
(Leu48
Phe), Zur
46-91, Zur11/Zur36
(Ser81
Phe), Zur19 (Ser98
Leu), Zur23
(Glu111
Lys), and Zur31 (Arg65
His)
were inactive in vivo as zinc-dependent
repressors, but were able to complement negatively, i.e. to
bind Zn2+ or to form dimers. In all these mutant proteins,
residues in the amino-terminal or central region are changed or
deleted. Thus, this region or at least the individual residues are not
crucial for binding of Zn2+ or dimerization. In contrast to
Zur27, Zur25 inhibited DNA binding of wild-type Zur in DNase I
footprinting experiments and showed negative complementation, both of
which can be accounted for by the prevalence of Zur25 dimer formation.
All the mutant Zur proteins except Zur31 and Zur
46-91 were in
principle able to bind DNA since they protected DNA from DNase I
cleavage in vitro, albeit not in vivo. This
indicates that crucial DNA contacts made by the Zur protein are located
in the region around residue 65. Moreover, this region is highly
conserved in all Zur sequences and corresponds to the second helix in
the proposed helix-turn-helix motif in Fur that has previously been
suggested to mediate interactions with DNA (30). However, the mutation
in Zur27 seemed to influence the dimer formation, although the mutation
is close to the assumed DNA-binding site.
The zinc content estimated for Zur was at least 2 Zn2+ ions/Zur dimer, which suggests that at least one metal-binding site of the Zur monomer is occupied by Zn2+. For establishing the metal/Zur stoichiometry, determination of the absolute protein concentration was critical. As shown in the alignment in Fig. 6, Zur lacks the cluster of histidines around amino acid 90 that is conserved in Fur and that is assumed to be involved in Fe2+ binding of Fur (31, 32). Of the nine cysteines present in E. coli Zur, Cys17, Cys113, Cys152, Cys158, and possibly Cys88 are probably not involved in Zn2+ binding because they are not conserved in at least one or even all Zur proteins from other bacterial genera (Fig. 6). Interestingly, E. coli Fur possesses one structural tight-binding zinc site/monomer in addition to the regulatory iron-binding site that senses the intracellular iron concentration (33). The zinc is coordinated tetrahedrally by at least one histidine (33) and Cys93 and Cys96 (34). These cysteines are perfectly conserved in all Zur proteins proposed (Fig. 6) and may therefore serve as Zn2+ ligands also in Zur.
As observed in the DNase I footprinting studies, Zn2+ at very low concentrations acts as a corepressor in Zur and can be replaced in vitro by other divalent metal ions such as Mn2+. A similar unspecificity for divalent cations in vitro is exhibited by Fur with Co2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Mn2+, or Zn2+ and by DtxR and IdeR with Cd2+, Co2+, Fe2+, Mn2+, Ni2+, or Zn2+ acting as corepressors in DNase I footprinting experiments (8, 24, 35, 36), although the response of Fur- or IdeR-regulated genes is clearly iron-specific in vivo. It is unknown which factors determine binding of the individual metal ion to the regulator in the cell; therefore, the results from the DNase I footprinting experiments can explain the in vivo situation only to a limited extent. This limitation is also documented by the binding of most of the mutant Zur proteins to the znu operator in vitro in DNase I footprinting assays, but not in vivo, as was indicated by depression of the znu'-lacZ fusion in the zur mutants and the lack of protection of the znu operator by at least Zur19 in in vivo footprinting experiments.
The znu gene cluster was derepressed by divalent metal ions
such as Fe2+, Mn2+, Cu2+, and
Cd2+. This can be explained either by direct binding of
these divalent cations to Zur, thereby changing the conformation into
an inactive form that no longer represses znuACB, or by
these metal ions exerting their derepressing effect indirectly by
lowering the intracellular zinc level. The latter possibility may be
achieved by the metal ions competing with Zn2+ for an
unspecific transporter and thereby inhibiting uptake of Zn2+. Yet in regulation studies with znu
mutants, the znu system does not play a part because it is
inactive. At high concentrations, the derepressing divalent cations did
indeed impair Zur binding in DNase I footprinting experiments, but with
the restriction as pointed out above regarding the discrepancy between
the results for DNase I footprinting and the in vivo
situation. Purified Zur bound Fe2+ far less efficiently
than Zn2+, and Fe2+ did not considerably hinder
binding of the corepressor Zn2+ to Zur, at least under the
in vitro conditions and concentrations tested, thereby
providing no hint for a direct interaction of iron with Zur.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank the Institut Dr. Jäger (Tübingen, Germany) for atomic absorption analysis, Ralph Jack for amino-terminal protein sequencing, Volkmar Braun (Universität Tübingen) for discussion, and Karen A. Brune (Konstanz) for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant HA 1186/2-3 and by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 49-7071-2974646;
Fax: 49-7071-295843; E-mail: silke.patzer@mikrobio.uni- tuebingen.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 17, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001775200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; kb, kilobase pair; nt, nucleotide(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; DTT, dithiothreitol; DMS, dimethyl sulfate; TPEN, N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine; EDDS, (S,S)-ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Beard, S. J., Hashim, R., Membrillo-Hernández, J., Hughes, M. N., and Poole, R. K. (1997) Mol. Microbiol. 25, 883-891 |
| 2. | Rensing, C., Sun, Y., Mitra, B., and Rosen, B. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32614-32617 |
| 3. | Patzer, S. I., and Hantke, K. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 28, 1199-1210 |
| 4. | Blattner, F. R., Plunkett, G. I., Bloch, C. A., Perna, N. T., Burland, V., Riley, M., Collado-Vides, J., Glasner, J. D., Rode, C. K., Mayhew, G. F., Gregor, J., Davis, N. W., Kirkpatrick, H. A., Goeden, M. A., Rose, D. J., Mau, B., and Shao, Y. (1997) Science 277, 1453-1474 |
| 5. | Gaballa, A., and Helmann, J. D. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 5815-5821 |
| 6. | Dalet, K., Gouin, E., Cenatiempo, Y., Cossart, P., and Héchard, Y. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 174, 111-116 |
| 7. | Brocklehurst, K. R., Hobman, J. L., Lawley, B., Blank, L., Marshall, S. J., Brown, N. L., and Morby, A. P. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 31, 893-902 |
| 8. | Shi, J., Lindsay, W. P., Huckle, J. W., Morby, A. P., and Robinson, N. J. (1992) FEBS Lett. 303, 159-163 |
| 9. | Thelwell, C., Robinson, N. J., and Turner-Cavet, J. S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 10728-10733 |
| 10. | Hantke, K., and Braun, V. (1997) in Metal Ions in Gene Regulation (Walden, W. , and Silver, S., eds) , pp. 11-44, Chapman and Hall, Inc., New York |
| 11. | Bsat, N., Herbig, A., Casillas-Martinez, L., Setlow, P., and Helmann, J. D. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 29, 189-198 |
| 12. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 13. | Simons, R. W., Houman, F., and Kleckner, N. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 53, 85-96 |
| 14. | Casadaban, M. J., and Cohen, S. N. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4530-4533 |
| 15. | Tabor, S., and Richardson, C. C. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 1074-1078 |
| 16. | Tabor, S. (1996) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds) , pp. 16.2.1-16.2.11, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
| 17. | Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1999) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
| 18. | Lawley, P. D., and Brookes, P. (1963) Biochem. J. 89, 127-138 |
| 19. | Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., and Klenk, D. C. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, 76-85 |
| 20. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 |
| 21. | Schein, C. H. (1989) Bio/Technology 7, 1141-1149 |
| 22. | Blackwell, J. R., and Horgan, R. (1991) FEBS Lett. 295, 10-12 |
| 23. | Tullius, T. D., and Dombroski, B. A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 5469-5473 |
| 24. | de Lorenzo, V., Wee, S., Herrero, M., and Neilands, J. B. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 2624-2630 |
| 25. | Hunt, M. D., Pettis, G. S., and McIntosh, M. A. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 3944-3955 |
| 26. | Le Cam, E., Fréchon, D., Barray, M., Fourcade, A., and Delain, E. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 11816-11820 |
| 27. | Gilbert, H. F. (1990) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 63, 69-172 |
| 28. | Heidrich, C., Hantke, K., Bierbaum, G., and Sahl, H. G. (1996) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 140, 253-259 |
| 29. | Kaneko, T., Sato, S., Kotani, H., Tanaka, A., Asamizu, E., Nakamura, Y., Miyajima, N., Hirosawa, M., Sugiura, M., Sasamoto, S., Kimura, T., Hosouchi, T., Matsuno, A., Muraki, A., Nakazaki, N., Naruo, K., Okumura, S., Shimpo, S., Takeuchi, C., Wada, T., Watanabe, A., Yamada, M., Yasuda, M., and Tabata, S. (1996) DNA Res. 3, 109-136 |
| 30. | Holm, L., Sander, C., Rüterjans, H., Schnarr, M., Fogh, R., Boelens, R., and Kaptein, R. (1994) Protein Eng. 7, 1449-1453 |
| 31. | Hennecke, H. (1990) Mol. Microbiol. 4, 1621-1628 |
| 32. | Saito, T., Wormald, M. R., and Williams, R. J. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 197, 29-38 |
| 33. | Jacquamet, L., Aberdam, D., Adrait, A., Hazemann, J.-L., Latour, J.-M., and Michaud-Soret, I. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 2564-2571 |
| 34. | Gonzalez de Peredo, A., Saint-Pierre, C., Adrait, A., Jacquamet, L., Latour, J.-M., Michaud-Soret, I., and Forest, E. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 8582-8589 |
| 35. | Schmitt, M. P., and Holmes, R. K. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 9, 173-181 |
| 36. | Schmitt, M. P., Predich, M., Doukhan, L., Smith, I., and Holmes, R. K. (1995) Infect. Immun. 63, 4284-4289 |
| 37. | Higgins, D. G., and Sharp, P. M. (1989) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 5, 151-153 |
| 38. | Wang, J., Mushegian, A., Lory, S., and Jin, S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10434-10439 |
| 39. | Camilli, A., and Mekalanos, J. J. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 18, 671-683 |
| 40. | Studier, F. W., and Moffatt, B. A. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 189, 113-130 |
| 41. | Singer, M., Baker, T. A., Schnitzler, G., Deischel, S. M., Goel, M., Dove, W., Jaacks, K. J., Grossman, A. D., Erickson, J. W., and Gross, C. A. (1989) Microbiol. Rev. 53, 1-24 |
| 42. | Casadaban, M. J. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 104, 541-555 |
| 43. | Brass, J. M., and Manson, M. D. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 157, 881-890 |
| 44. | Bachmann, B. J. (1972) Bacteriol. Rev. 36, 525-557 |
| 45. | Chang, A. C., and Cohen, S. N. (1978) J. Bacteriol. 134, 1141-1156 |
| 46. | Prentki, P., and Krisch, H. M. (1984) Gene (Amst.) 29, 303-313 |
| 47. | Takeshita, S., Sato, M., Toba, M., Masahashi, W., and Hashimoto-Gotoh, T. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 61, 63-74 |
| 48. | Yasukawa, T., Kanei-Ishii, C., Maekawa, T., Fujimoto, J., Yamamoto, T., and Ishii, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25328-25331 |
| 49. | Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1985) Gene (Amst.) 33, 103-119 |