![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24407-24413, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, December 3, 1999, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
We previously identified a constitutively active
form of STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) 5A by
polymerase chain reaction-driven random mutagenesis followed by
retrovirus-mediated expression screening, which had two point mutations
in the DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains, and was
designated STAT5A1*6. STAT5A1*6 showed markedly elevated DNA binding
and transactivation activities with stable tyrosine phosphorylation and
nuclear accumulation, and conferred autonomous cell growth on
interleukin 3-dependent Ba/F3 cells. We now report another
constitutively active mutant, STAT5A-N642H which has a single point
mutation (N642H) in its SH2 domain, identified using the same strategy
as that used to identify STAT5A1*6. STAT5A-N642H showed identical
properties to those of STAT5A1*6 both biochemically and biologically.
Interestingly the mutation in STAT5A-N642H resulted in restoration of
the conserved critical histidine which is involved in the binding of
phosphotyrosine in the majority of SH2-containing proteins.
Introduction of an additional mutation (Y694F) to STAT5A-N642H, which
disrupted critical tyrosine 694 required for dimerization of
STAT5, abolished all the activities manifested by the mutant
STAT5A-N642H, which indicates that dimerization is required for the
activity of STAT5A-N642H as was the case for the wild-type STAT5A. The
present findings also show that different mutations rendered STAT5A
constitutively active, through a common mechanism, which is similar to
that of physiological activation.
The STAT1 protein is a
transcription factor which is activated upon stimulation with various
cytokines, and plays a central role in cytokine signaling (1-3). The
STAT family consists of seven known members, including closely related
STAT5A and STAT5B. Once ligands bind to their cognate receptors, Janus
kinases (JAKs) and STATs are phosphorylated successively. The
phosphorylated STAT protein forms homo- or heterodimer through
intermolecular interaction between the SH2 domain and the
phosphotyrosine of the STAT. The dimerized STAT then translocates into
the nuclei and binds to promoter regions of target genes to activate
transcription. Since phosphorylated STAT is rapidly dephosphorylated,
transactivation of gene expression by STAT is generally transient (4).
On the other hand, it was reported that human leukemias were frequently associated with the constitutive activation of STATs (5-8), albeit the
role of activated STATs in leukemogenesis being unknown.
Although gene targeting is a powerful strategy in analyzing biological
roles of the gene product, redundancy of functional genes occasionally
masks the phenotype of the null mutation of the gene. In the case of
STAT5A and STAT5B- doubly disrupted mice, fetal anemia and apoptosis of
erythroid progenitors occurred. However, no gross abnormalities were
found in hematopoietic systems of adult mice (9-12). Therefore,
biological functions of STAT5 in hematopoietic cells have remained to
be elucidated.
Our group identified a constitutively active STAT5A mutant (STAT5A1*6)
by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-driven random mutagenesis followed
by retrovirus-mediated expression screening (13). STAT5A1*6 harbors two
point mutations, one in the transactivation domain (S710F) and the
other in the DNA-binding domain (H298R). The interleukin-3 (IL-3)-dependent murine pro-B cell line Ba/F3 can
proliferate autonomously in the absence of IL-3 after transduction with
STAT5A1*6. We recently found that STAT5A1*6 also provoked
differentiation and apoptosis in Ba/F3 cells upon IL-3 stimulation with
prolonged expression of growth-suppressive genes induced by STAT5 (14). We have now identified and characterized another constitutively active
mutant, STAT5A-N642H, which harbors a point mutation on or very close
to the phosphotyrosine-binding site in the SH2 domain and has the
identical phenotype to that of STAT5A1*6. In addition, substitution of
Tyr694, the phosphorylation of which is required for
dimerization and activation of STAT5, abolished the constitutive
activity of STAT5A-N642H. These findings indicate that activation of
these mutant STAT5s mimicked the physiological activation of STAT5, an
event not caused by gain-of-function mutations.
Construction of the STAT5A Mutants--
Mutations were
introduced into the mouse STAT5A sequence by PCR-driven random
mutagenesis (13, 15, 16). The pMX-STAT5A DNA was used as a template,
and a 5' vector primer, pMX5' (5'-CCCGGGGGTGGACCATCCTCT-3'), and a 3'
vector primer, pMX3' (5'-CCCTTTTTCTGGAGACT-3'), were used to amplify
the full-length sequence of STAT5A. PCR was run for 35 cycles (1 min at
94 °C, 2 min at 58 °C, and 3 min at 72 °C) with recombinant
Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer), under standard
conditions, except that the deoxynucleotide triphosphate concentration
was 400 µM. The average frequency of point mutations ranged from 1/600 to 1/1200 under these conditions (data not shown). The constitutively active STAT5As were identified by the ability to
induce IL-3-independent growth of IL-3-dependent Ba/F3
cells in retrovirus-mediated expression screening, as described (13). One such mutant harboring a point mutation (N642H) in the SH2 domain
was designated STAT5A-N642H. We introduced an additional mutation to
STAT5A-N642H by site-directed mutagenesis with a high fidelity DNA
polymerase Pyrobest (Takara), to acquire amino acid substitution from
Tyr694 to Phe (STAT5A-N642H/Y694F) (17). STAT5B-N642H was
constructed by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. DNA sequences of
all the constructs were confirmed by sequencing.
Cells--
Ba/F3 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium
containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 2 ng/ml murine IL-3 (mIL-3)
(provided by DNAX Research Institute). A granulocyte-macrophage colony
stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-dependent human leukemic cell
line, TF-1 (18), was maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS
and 5 ng/ml human GM-CSF (R & D Systems). An ecotropic retrovirus
packaging cell line, BOSC23 (19), was maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 10% FCS and guanine
phosphoribosyltransferase for selection, and transferred into the
medium without guanine phosphoribosyltransferase selection reagents 2 days before transfection. A murine fibroblast cell line, NIH3T3, and a
monkey kidney epithelial cell line, COS-7 were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% FCS.
Retroviral Vectors and Their Expression--
The C terminus of
each STAT5A-N642H and STAT5A-N642H/Y694F was fused in-frame with
enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (CLONTECH) or Flag as an epitope tag (13). These
fusion constructs were digested with both EcoRI and
NotI, and were ligated to EcoRI and
NotI sites of pMX and pMX-neo (pMX with a simian virus 40 early promoter-driven neomycin resistance gene between the multicloning sites and the 3' long terminal repeat) retrovirus vectors (15). High
titer retroviruses harboring STAT5A mutants were produced with BOSC23,
and Ba/F3, TF-1, and NIH3T3 cells were infected with these
retroviruses, as described (20). A mouse ecotropic viral receptor (21)
was exogenously expressed on TF-1 cells prior to infection. To isolate
IL-3-independent Ba/F3 cells expressing high levels of STAT5A-N642H,
cells were transferred to the medium without IL-3 24 h after
infection because IL-3 induces apoptosis of Ba/F3 cells expressing
STAT5A-N642H as in the case of STAT5A1*6 (14). To isolate
GM-CSF-independent TF-1 cells expressing high levels of STAT5A-N642H,
cells were transferred to the medium without GM-CSF 24 h after
infection. Ba/F3 and TF-1 cells expressing STAT5A wild type or
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F were selected in medium containing 600 µg/ml
Geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.) after the infection. NIH3T3 cells
were used to express EGFP fusion constructs, and the intracellular
localization was examined 48 h after infection. The expression
vector for human MPL (16) was constructed using an SR Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting--
Ba/F3 cells
expressing the wild type STAT5A or the mutant STAT5A (STAT5A-N642H and
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F) with a Flag peptide epitope were lysed in the lysis
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl,
1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA) containing 0.2 mM
Na3VO4, and 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The lysates were clarified by
centrifugation, and the supernatants were incubated with an anti-Flag
M2 monoclonal antibody (Eastman Chemical Co.) at 4 °C for 2 h.
The immune complexes were precipitated with protein A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), which were then washed twice with the
lysis buffer, and eluted with sample buffer (62.5 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02%
bromphenol blue) for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After
boiling for 3 min, the immunoprecipitates of each sample were separated on a 5-15% gradient gel (Bio-Rad) by electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). The membrane was
probed with an anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody 4G10 (Upstate
Biotechnology Inc.), and visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescent detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Then the membrane was
incubated in the stripping buffer (100 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7) at
50 °C for 30 min and reprobed with an anti-STAT5A antibody (R & D
systems). The immunoprecipitates of COS-7 cells 48 h after
transfection were prepared and analyzed in the same way as described
above except that the membrane was probed with an anti-phosphorylated
tyrosine residue 694 of STAT5A monoclonal antibody,
anti-phospho-STAT5A/B(Y694/Y699) (Upstate Biotechnology Inc.).
Elctrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
Cells were lysed in
binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mM
EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 100 µM
Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 3 µg/ml of aprotinin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin A, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and
10% glycerol). Cell extracts were clarified by centrifugation and the
supernatants were incubated with 2 µg of poly(dI-dC) for 15 min on
ice, followed by 15 min of incubation with the Klenow-radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides harboring the STAT5A optimal binding
sequence, 5'-GATCCGAATTCCAGGAATTCA-3' and
3'-GCTTAAGGTCCTTAAGTCTAG-5'.
For supershift experiments, the cell extracts were preincubated with
the anti-Flag M2 antibody or a mouse IgG as a control for 30 min on
ice. The prepared samples were separated by electrophoresis on a 4.5%
polyacrylamide gel in 2.2 × TBE (110 mM Tris borate, 2.2 mM EDTA) and autoradiographed.
Luciferase Assay--
Ba/F3 cells were transiently transfected
by electroporation at 960 microfarads and 300 V with 10 µg of a
reporter plasmid consisting of a luciferase gene under the control of
the Northern Blotting--
Total RNA was isolated from Ba/F3 cells
before and after IL-3 stimulation using RNeasy kits (Qiagen). Thirty
µg of total RNA was denatured in 50% formamide at 60 °C for 15 min, separated on 1% agarose with 6% formaldehyde gel by
electrophoresis, and blotted onto Hybond-N membrane (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). The membrane was probed with the randomly primed (Stratagene)
32P-labeled cDNA fragment at 42 °C in solution
containing 50% formamide, 3 × Denhardt's solution, 5 × SSC, 1% SDS, and 200 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. After
hybridization, the membrane was washed in 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at
room temperature, and autoradiographed. The fragments of mouse
oncostatin M (OSM), pim-1,
c-myc, bcl-x, JAB/SSI-1/SOCS-1, CIS, and human
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were used as probes
(14).
TUNEL Assays--
Cells were pelleted and fixed for 30 min at
room temperature in 3% paraformaldehyde. TUNEL assays (Takara) were
performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and analyzed on
a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
Identification of a Constitutively Activated STAT5A Mutant
Harboring a Point Mutation in the SH2 Domain--
We identified
several STAT5A mutants that induced IL-3-independent growth of Ba/F3
cells, using the method described under "Experimental Procedures"
(13). Among them, STAT5A-N642H has a single point mutation in the SH2
domain, which results in amino acid substitution from
Asn642 to His (Fig. 1). To
confirm that this mutation alone was sufficient to cause constitutive
activation of STAT5A, we introduced this point mutation into STAT5A and
cloned in the pMX vector (15). High titer retroviruses harboring
STAT5A-N642H were produced with a transient retrovirus packaging cell
line, BOSC23 (19), and Ba/F3 cells were infected with these
retroviruses (20). The infection efficiencies of Ba/F3 cells in the
experiments were 20-30%, as assessed by simultaneous experiments
using a control vector pMX-EGFP. Twenty-four hours after the infection,
the cells were deprived of IL-3 to determine the potential to induce
factor-independent growth of Ba/F3 cells. The cells transduced with pMX
STAT5A-N642H survived and proliferated well in the absence of IL-3,
while those transduced with pMX STAT5A WT (wild-type) or pMX
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F did not (Fig.
2A). In addition, STAT5A-N642H
induced factor-independent growth of a GM-CSF-dependent
human leukemic cell line TF-1 after retroviral infection (Fig.
2B). Thus a single point mutation in the SH2 domain was
sufficient to render Ba/F3 and TF-1 cells factor-independent. The
difference in the growth rate between IL-3-driven and
STAT5A-N642H-driven Ba/F3 cells (Fig. 2A) and that between
GM-CSF-driven and STAT5A-N642H-driven TF-1 cells (Fig. 2B)
can be explained by the absence of adequate Ras-Raf-MAPK signal in the
latter cells (13). We also introduced the same point mutation to STAT5B
(23) to acquire the amino acid substitution from Asn640 to
His. Ba/F3 cells transduced with this STAT5B mutant also proliferated in the absence of IL-3 (data not shown).
Cytokine Stimulation Was Not Required for the Constitutive
Phosphorylation of STAT5A Mutant--
We examined tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT5A in factor-independent Ba/F3 cells expressing
the Flag epitope-tagged STAT5A-N642H, using immunoprecipitation and
Western blot analysis (Fig.
3a). In Ba/F3 cells,
STAT5A-N642H-Flag was constitutively phosphorylated on the tyrosine
residues in the absence of IL-3, and prolonged hyperphosphorylation of
tyrosine residues after IL-3 stimulation was observed as in the case of
STAT5A1*6-Flag (13). The degree of tyrosine phosphorylation of
STAT5A-N642H-Flag in Ba/F3 cells without IL-3 was nearly as strong as
that seen in Ba/F3 cells expressing the wild-type STAT5A-Flag after
IL-3 stimulation. Next we asked if Tyr694, which is
essential for dimerization, was required for the activity of
STAT5A-N642H by introducing the Y694F mutation (17) in STAT5A-N642H (STAT5A-N642H/Y694F) (Fig. 1). STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag did not give
constitutive or prolonged phosphorylation of STAT5A. Tyrosine phosphorylation observed in STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag in response to IL-3
stimulation probably reflects that of endogenous STAT5A or B which was
co-immunoprecipitated with transduced STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag, or that
of residues other than the Y694F in STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag. To test
these possibilities, we examined tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5A in
COS-7 cells using an anti-phospho-STAT5A/B(Y694/Y699) antibody after
transfection with STAT5A-Flag constructs and human MPL (the receptor
for TPO) expression vector for thrombopoietin (TPO) stimulation (Fig.
3b). As in Ba/F3 cells, STAT5A-N642H-Flag, but not
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag was constitutively phosphorylated on the
critical tyrosine residues in the absence of TPO stimulation. Phosphorylation of Tyr694/Tyr699 was
observed in the immunoprecipitates of the cells expressing wild-type
STAT5A-Flag or STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag only in the presence of TPO
stimulation. This result indicated that co-immunoprecipitation of the
endogenous STAT5A or -B gave rise to tyrosine phosphorylation of
Tyr694/Tyr699 oberved in the cells expressing
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag. However, we cannot exclude the possibility
that the other tyrosines of the STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag are also
phosphorylated.
The Mutant STAT5 Was Predominantly Located in Nuclei and Had a
Potent Transactivational Ability--
Because phosphorylation of STATs
is required for the binding of STATs to the promoter elements of target
genes (17), we examined whether STAT5A-N642H bound the target sequence
without IL-3 stimulation, using Ba/F3 transfectants expressing
wild-type and mutant STAT5As. As shown in Fig.
4, the wild-type STAT5A bound the target
sequence only in the presence of IL-3, while STAT5A-N642H bound the
target sequence even in the absence of IL-3. A supershift experiment
confirmed that STAT5A-N642H is involved in the complex formation. We
next investigated the intracellular localization of mutants of STAT5A
in NIH3T3 cells, using fusion constructs with EGFP. In the absence of
IL-3, STAT5A-N642H-EGFP was mainly localized in the nuclei in NIH 3T3
cells (Fig. 5C), while STAT5A wild-type EGFP (Fig. 5A) and STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-EGFP (Fig.
5E) showed no predominant nuclear accumulation. To determine
whether STAT5A-N642H is transcriptionally active in the absence of
IL-3, we examined transactivation of the STAT5A-N642H Highly Induced Expression of Target Genes--
Next
we studied the effect of STAT5A-N642H expression on induction of target
genes by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 7).
Since OSM (24), pim-1 (25),
bcl-x (26), JAB/SSI-1/SOCS-1 (27-29), and
CIS (30) are target genes of STAT5A, the expression of these genes in Ba/F3 cells in the absence or presence of IL-3 was examined. We also examined the expression of c-myc that is rapidly
induced by IL-3 stimulation (31). Ba/F3 cells expressing the wild-type STAT5A or STAT5A-N642H were deprived of IL-3, and then stimulated with
IL-3. In Ba/F3 cells expressing STAT5A-N642H, pim-1, bcl-x, and c-myc were expressed in the absence of IL-3, while these
genes were not expressed in Ba/F3 cells expressing wild-type STAT5A in
the absence of IL-3. After IL-3 stimulation, expression of JAB/SSI-1/SOCS-1, CIS, and OSM was more strongly
induced in Ba/F3 cells expressing STAT5A-N642H than in Ba/F3 cells
expressing the wild-type STAT5A.
Ba/F3 Cells Expressing STAT5A-N642H Underwent Apoptosis after IL-3
Stimulation--
We earlier reported IL-3-induced apoptosis of Ba/F3
cells expressing STAT5A1*6. Prolonged expression of
JAB/SSI-1/SOCS-1 by STAT5A1*6 was found to be responsible
for the IL-3-induced apoptosis (14). Consistent with the finding of
prolonged expression of JAB/SSI-1/SOCS-1 after IL-3
stimulation in Ba/F3 cells expressing STAT5A-N642H (Fig. 7), the cells
showed apoptotic appearance within 41 h after IL-3 addition, as
shown in Fig. 8A. The TUNEL
assay detected in situ fragmented DNA through fluorescent
end labeling of fragmented DNA in intact nuclei as fluorescein
isothiocyanate positive cells by a flow cytometer. The proportion of
TUNEL-positive cells in Ba/F3 cells expressing STAT5A-N642H was
increased from 0.1% without IL-3 to about 25% at 41 h after IL-3
addition (Fig. 8B).
Cytokines have a wide variety of biological activities including
proliferation, differentiation, and immune responses. Binding of
cytokines to cell surface receptors leads to rapid increases in
phosphorylated proteins. Among them, tyrosine phosphorylation of
proteins play important roles in signaling systems (32, 33). Various
intracellular signaling proteins have Src homology 2 (SH2) domains
which play critical roles in activation and localization of
intracellular molecules by specifically binding to their partners with
distinct phosphorylated tyrosine residues. Such specific bindings occur
between activated receptors and direct downstream signaling molecules
or adapter molecules. These protein-protein interactions are critical
to transmit activated intracellular signals (34). In most cases,
specificity of the binding derives from the specific interaction
between the phosphotyrosine (Tyr(P))-containing peptide sequence
and the Tyr(P)-binding site of the SH2 domain. In particular, the
Tyr(P) and the neighboring C-terminal three amino acids are important
for primary specificity of SH2 interactions (35), and the pocket
structure of the SH2 domain interacts with the pronged structure of the
Tyr(P) (36). The binding pocket of the SH2 domain contains positively
charged critical amino acids to catch negatively charged Tyr(P)
(36-42). In the present report, we focus on a constitutively active
mutant of an SH2-containing transcription factor STAT5, STAT5A-N642H,
that harbors a point mutation in its SH2 domain.
STAT5A-N642H was constitutively phosphorylated and activated in the
absence of cytokine stimulation. The mutation of STAT5A-N642H is
localized to an important residue ( The same point mutation in the corresponding position of STAT5B as in
STAT5A also gave rise to a constitutively activated form of STAT5B.
However, the corresponding mutation of STAT3 (S636H) did not lead to
constitutive activation. To obtain the same constitution of basic amino
acids as in STAT5A, we further introduced an additional substitution of
lysine for Glu638 which is located at the position of Interestingly, introduction of two cysteine residues (A662C and N664C)
within the C-terminal loop of the SH2 domain of STAT3 (designated
STAT3-C) has recently been reported to result in spontaneous dimerization and constitutive activation of STAT3 (47). In this case,
double mutations contribute to dimerization of STAT3 without tyrosine
phosphorylation through sulfhydryl bonds between monomers. It was also
reported that tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT molecules was not
required for activation of STAT6-estrogen receptor fusion protein and
the STAT3-gyrase B chimera that can be inducibly activated by
4-hydroxytamoxifen and coumermycin, respectively (48, 49). In the
present study, however, an additional mutation of Y694F revealed the
necessity for the critical tyrosine residue (17) which is required for
dimerization in the constitutive activity of STAT5A-N642H;
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F did not support proliferation of Ba/F3 cells nor
activate transcription in the absence of IL-3. These findings indicate
that tyrosine phosphorylation is a prerequisite for efficient or stable
dimerization of STAT5A-N642H, which in turn leads to activation of the
molecule. This is in sharp contrast to the constitutively active mutant
STAT3-C (47), STAT6-ER (48), and STAT3-gyrase B (49), of which
dimerization was achieved through rather artificial ways without
significant tyrosine phosphorylation. In this context, activation of
STAT5A-N642H which requires tyrosine phosphorylation of the molecule is
more physiological.
STAT5 regulates many genes associated with cell proliferation and
differentiation. pim-1 and bcl-xL which are
involved in anti-apoptotic effects and inducing cell proliferation
(50-53), were expressed even in the absence of IL-3 in Ba/F3 cells
expressing STAT5A-N642H, and this would induce IL-3-independent cell
growth of the Ba/F3 cells as was the case in Ba/F3 cells expressing
STAT5A1*6 (14). Dysregulation of STAT5 signaling is implicated in
certain stages of tumorigenesis, including leukemogenesis (5-8,
54-59). Constitutively activated STAT5 mutants will lead to a better
understanding of molecular mechanisms of STAT5 functions under the
physiological and pathological conditions, and prospects for treatments
of some diseases can be devised.
We thank Dr. J. N. Ihle for a Flag
construct. M. Ohara provided language assistance.
*
This work was supported in part by grant-in-aids from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and the
Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Department of Hematopoietic Factors
is supported by Chugai Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-5449-5758;
Fax: 81-3-5449-5453; E-mail: kitamura@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909771199
The abbreviations used are:
STAT, signal
transducer and activator of transcription;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
IL-3, interleukin-3;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor;
EGFP, enhanced
green fluorescent protein;
TPO, thrombopoietin;
SH2, Src homology
domain 2.
Constitutive Activation of STAT5 by a Point Mutation in the
SH2 Domain*
§,
,
§,
, and
**
Department of Hematopoietic Factors, The
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
108-8639, Japan, the ¶ Third Department of Internal Medicine, The
University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan, the
Institute of
Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
113-0032, Japan, and the § Third Department of Internal
Medicine, The Yamaguchi University School of Medicine,
Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
promoter (22)
and was designated pME-MPL. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected
with pME-MPL and each expression vector for the STAT5A mutants by using
the LipofectAMINE Reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.).
-casein promoter harboring STAT5-binding sites, 3 µg of Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat-driven
-galactosidase plasmid to monitor transfection efficiency, and 10 µg of each effector plasmid (STAT5A wild type, STAT5A-N642H,
STAT5A1*6, or STAT5A-N642H/Y694F) at room temperature in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10 µg/ml DEAE-dextran. After leaving the cells for
12 h in the presence of 10% FCS and IL-3, the cells were divided
into two groups, one group was maintained in RPMI 1640 medium with
0.5% bovine serum albumin in the absence of IL-3 for 12 h, and
the other was stimulated with 4 ng/ml IL-3 without FCS for the last
6 h after 6 h starvation. Cell lysates were then prepared and
subjected to luciferase and
-galactosidase assays. Transfection
efficiency was normalized with the
-galactosidase activity. Each
experiment was done three times.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagrams of STAT5A mutants.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
STAT5A-N642H induced autonomous growth of
factor-dependent cell lines. Cell number was counted
after transduction of the retroviral vector constructs. Day 0 is the
second day after transduction of the virus. Proliferation of parental
Ba/F3 (A) and TF-1 cells (B) with essential
cytokine (Ba/F3 IL-3 (+) and TF-1 GM (+)) is each shown as a reference.
The average and standard deviation of four independent experiments are
shown.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Time course of tyrosine phosphorylation of
STAT5A in Ba/F3 and COS-7 cells. a, tyrosine
phosphorylation was examined in Ba/F3 cells expressing STAT5A
wild-type-Flag (left panel), STAT5A-N642H-Flag (middle
panel), and STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag (right panel). The
cells were depleted of IL-3 for 12 h (
), stimulated with 10 ng/ml IL-3 for 30 min, and cultured in the absence of IL-3 for the
indicated time periods. The cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
the anti-Flag antibody, blotted with 4G10 (
Tyr(P)), and reprobed
with the anti-STAT5A antibody (
STAT5A). b, tyrosine
phosphorylation was examined in COS-7 cells after transient
transfection with an MPL expression vector and either of the control
vecter (left lane), STAT5A wild-type-Flag (middle left
lane), STAT5A-N642H-Flag (middle right lane), or
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag (right lane). The cells were
cultured in the absence of TPO (shown as
), and stimulated with 50 ng/ml TPO for 15 min (shown as +). The cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag antibody, blotted with an
anti-phospho-STAT5A/B(Y694/Y699) antibody, and reprobed with an
anti-STAT5A antibody.
-casein promoter
in Ba/F3 cells, using luciferase assay (17) (Fig.
6). The transcriptional activity induced
by STAT5A-N642H was 25-fold higher than that induced by STAT5A
wild-type or STAT5A-N642H/Y694F in the absence of IL-3, and was as
potent as that induced by STAT5A wild-type in the presence of IL-3.
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F did not behave as a dominant negative mutant, rather
it had activity comparable to that of the wild type in this assay,
suggesting that heterodimerization of STAT5A-N642H/Y694F with
endogenous STAT5A or STAT5B had occurred. This result is consistent
with that of the Western blot analysis shown in Fig. 3. Thus
STAT5A-N642H activated transcription of the target gene without IL-3
stimulation, and Tyr694 required for dimerization of STAT5A
was necessary for transactivation in STAT5A-N642H as was the case with
the wild-type.

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A single point mutation in the SH2 domain of
STAT5A confers IL-3-independent DNA binding activity on Ba/F3
cells. Cell extracts were prepared from Ba/F3 cells expressing
STAT5A wild-type Flag, and Ba/F3 cells expressing STAT5A-N642H-Flag,
and electrophoretic mobility shift assay was performed to test the DNA
binding activity of STAT5. IL-3:
, Ba/F3 cells expressing the STAT5A
wild-type Flag were cultured in the absence of IL-3 for 11 h, and
those expressing the N642H-Flag were continuously cultured. +, the
cells were continuously cultured in the presence of 2 ng/ml IL-3. ++,
the cells expressing the wild-type Flag were stimulated with 10 ng/ml
IL-3 for 30 min after 11 h starvation of IL-3, and continuously
cultured cells expressing the N642H-Flag in the absence of IL-3 were
stimulated with 10 ng/ml IL-3 for 30 min. The electrophoretic mobility
shift assay complexes were confirmed to contain STAT5A wild-type -Flag
or STAT5A-N642H-Flag by supershift analyses with the anti-Flag
antibody. The arrows and arrowheads indicate the
positions of STAT5A bands and their supershifted bands,
respectively.

View larger version (139K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Nuclear localizations of the mutant
STAT5A-N642H harboring a point mutation in the SH2 domain. The
fusion proteins of STAT5A wild-type EGFP (A and
B), STAT5A-N642H-EGFP (C and D), and
STAT5A-N642H/Y694F-EGFP (E and F) were expressed
in NIH3T3 cells via retrovirus-mediated gene transfer, and observed
under a fluorescence microscope (A, C, and E),
and a phase-contrast microscope (B, D, and F).
Original magnification was ×200.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Transactivational activities of the STAT5A
mutants on the
-casein
promoter in Ba/F3 cells. Luciferase activities in the
lysates of Ba/F3 cells transfected with the pMX neo vector (pMX neo),
the pMX neo STAT5A wild-type -Flag (WT), the pMX neoSTAT5A-N642H-Flag
(N642H), and the pMX neoSTAT5A-N642H/Y694F-Flag (N642H/Y694F) were
examined before and after IL-3 stimulation as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Transfection efficiency was normalized
with the results of a simultaneous
-galactosidase assay. The results
shown are averages of three independent experiments, with standard
deviations.

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Expression and induction of various genes in
Ba/F3 cells expressing either STAT5A wild-type-Flag
(WT), or STAT5A-N642H-Flag (N642H), before and after
IL-3 stimulation. Total RNA was isolated from Ba/F3 cells, and 30 µg of total RNA was separated through 1% agarose, 6% formaldehyde
gel. Expression of OSM, pim-1, c-myc,
bcl-x, JAB, CIS, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was assessed by Northern
blot analysis.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
IL-3-induced apoptosis in Ba/F3 cells
expressing the STAT5A-N642H-Flag. A, phase-contrast
microscopy of the cells expressing the STAT5A-N642H-Flag before and
after IL-3 stimulation (3 ng/ml for 41 h) is shown. Original
magnification was × 200. B, TUNEL assay of the cells
expressing the STAT5A-N642H-Flag before (upper right panel)
and after (lower right panel) IL-3 stimulation (3 ng/ml for
41 h). The samples of parental Ba/F3 cells cultured with
(upper left panel) or without IL-3 for 24 h
(lower left panel) are shown as reference. The percentage of
TUNEL-positive cells is indicated in each panel.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
D4) in the 4th
-sheet of the
SH2 domain (Fig. 9), which is very close
to the Tyr(P)-binding loop in the three-dimensional structure (43, 44).
It is noteworthy that Tyr(P) is known to interact with positively
charged residues at positions of
A2,
B5,
D4, and
D6 of the
SH2 domain (36, 39-42). Although the amino acid residue at
D4 dose
not match to the concensus sequence of the SH2 domain in the wild-type
STAT5A, the N642H mutation results in restoration of the prototype
structure of the SH2 domain with critical four basic amino acids to
interact with Tyr(P). The enhanced activity of STAT5A-N642H by the
N642H mutation is reminiscent of the enhanced activity of c-Src by the H2O1R mutation at the corresponding site (
D4) in the SH2 domain (45)
and of the decreased activity of c-Src by the mutation H201L (46). Thus
we speculate that the mechanism of constitutive activation of
STAT5A-N642H would be the stable binding between the binding site of
the SH2 domain and the Tyr(P), although the possibility of protection
from tyrosine phosphatases by conformational change due to the mutation
would need to be excluded.
![]()
View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Comparison of a part of the SH2 sequence
between murine c-Src, STAT5A, STAT5A-N642H, STAT5B, and STAT3. The
sequences of a part of the SH2 domains are aligned, and the amino acid
residues that match the consensus sequence of the SH2 domain are
boxed. The functionally important residues are indicated by
arrows with their relative positions in secondary structural
elements. The amino acid residue numbers of murine STAT5A are shown
above the c-Src sequence.
D6
in STAT3, but constitutive activation of STAT3 was not attained (data
not shown). The SH2 domain of STAT5B consists of amino acids with 96%
identity to those of STAT5A (23). Moreover, 12 residues immediately
C-terminal to the phosphorylated tyrosine are identical, which include
3 critical residues for the specificity of binding to the consensus motif of the partner SH2 domain. On the other hand, the SH2 domain of
STAT3 has only 66% homology to that of STAT5A at the level of amino
acids, and the amino acid sequences surrounding the phosphotyrosine residue have no significant identity (43, 44). These structural differences may explain why the corresponding mutation of the SH2
domain did not lead to constitutive activation of STAT3.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Ihle, J. N.
(1996)
Cell
84,
331-334
2.
O'Shea, J. J.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
1-11
3.
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1994)
Science
264,
1415-1421
4.
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635
5.
Gouilleux-Gruart, V.,
Gouilleux, F.,
Desaint, C.,
Claisse, J. F.,
Capiod, J. C.,
Delobel, J.,
Weber-Nordt, R.,
Dusanter-Fourt, I.,
Dreyfus, F.,
Groner, B.,
and Prin, L.
(1996)
Blood
87,
1692-1697
6.
Weber-Nordt, R. M.,
Egen, C.,
Wehinger, J.,
Ludwig, W.,
Gouilleux-Gruart, V.,
Mertelsmann, R.,
and Finke, J.
(1996)
Blood
88,
809-816
7.
Chai, S. K.,
Nichols, G. L.,
and Rothman, P.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
4720-4728
8.
Frank, D. A.,
Mahajan, S.,
and Ritz, J.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
3140-3148
9.
Liu, X.,
Robinson, G. W.,
Wagner, K. U.,
Garrett, L.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
and Hennighausen, L.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
179-186
10.
Udy, G. B.,
Towers, R. P.,
Snell, R. G.,
Wilkins, R. J.,
Park, S. H.,
Ram, P. A.,
Waxman, D. J.,
and Davey, H. W.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7239-7244
11.
Teglund, S.,
McKay, C.,
Schuetz, E.,
van Deursen, J. M.,
Stravopodis, D.,
Wang, D.,
Brown, M.,
Bodner, S.,
Grosveld, G.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1998)
Cell
93,
841-850
12.
Socolovsky, M.,
Fallon, A. E.,
Wang, S.,
Brugnara, C.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1999)
Cell
98,
181-191
13.
Onishi, M.,
Nosaka, T.,
Misawa, K.,
Mui, A. L.,
Gorman, D.,
McMahon, M.,
Miyajima, A.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3871-3879
14.
Nosaka, T.,
Kawashima, T.,
Misawa, K.,
Ikuta, K.,
Mui, A. L.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
4754-4765
15.
Onishi, M.,
Kinoshita, S.,
Morikawa, Y.,
Shibuya, A.,
Phillips, J.,
Lanier, L. L.,
Gorman, D. M.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Miyajima, A.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1996)
Exp. Hematol.
24,
324-329
16.
Onishi, M.,
Mui, A. L.,
Morikawa, Y.,
Cho, L.,
Kinoshita, S.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Gorman, D. M.,
Miyajima, A.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1996)
Blood
88,
1399-1406
17.
Gouilleux, F.,
Wakao, H.,
Mundt, M.,
and Groner, B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4361-4369
18.
Kitamura, T.,
Tange, T.,
Terasawa, T.,
Chiba, S.,
Kuwaki, T.,
Miyagawa, K.,
Piao, Y. F.,
Miyazono, K.,
Urabe, A.,
and Takaku, F.
(1989)
J. Cell. Physiol.
140,
323-334
19.
Pear, W. S.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Scott, M. L.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8392-8396
20.
Kitamura, T.,
Onishi, M.,
Kinoshita, S.,
Shibuya, A.,
Miyajima, A.,
and Nolan, G. P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9146-9150
21.
Baker, B. W.,
Boettger, D.,
Spooncer, E.,
and Norton, J. D.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
5234
22.
Takebe, Y.,
Seiki, M.,
Fujisawa, J.,
Hoy, P.,
Yokota, K.,
Arai, K.,
Yoshida, M.,
and Arai, N.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
466-472
23.
Liu, X.,
Robinson, G. W.,
Gouilleux, F.,
Groner, B.,
and Hennighausen, L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8831-8835
24.
Yoshimura, A.,
Ichihara, M.,
Kinjyo, I.,
Moriyama, M.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Hara, T.,
and Miyajima, A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1055-1063
25.
Selten, G.,
Cuypers, H. T.,
Boelens, W.,
Robanus-Maandag, E.,
Verbeek, J.,
Domen, J.,
van Beveren, C.,
and Berns, A.
(1986)
Cell
46,
603-611
26.
Boise, L. H.,
Gonzalez-Garcia, M.,
Postema, C. E.,
Ding, L.,
Lindsten, T.,
Turka, L. A.,
Mao, X.,
Nunez, G.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(1993)
Cell
74,
597-608
27.
Endo, T. A.,
Masuhara, M.,
Yokouchi, M.,
Suzuki, R.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Mitsui, K.,
Matsumoto, A.,
Tanimura, S.,
Ohtsubo, M.,
Misawa, H.,
Miyazaki, T.,
Leonor, N.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Fujita, T.,
Kanakura, Y.,
Komiya, S.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1997)
Nature
387,
921-924
28.
Naka, T.,
Narazaki, M.,
Hirata, M.,
Matsumoto, T.,
Minamoto, S.,
Aono, A.,
Nishimoto, N.,
Kajita, T.,
Taga, T.,
Yoshizaki, K.,
Akira, S.,
and Kishimoto, T.
(1997)
Nature
387,
924-929
29.
Starr, R.,
Willson, T. A.,
Viney, E. M.,
Murray, L. J.,
Rayner, J. R.,
Jenkins, B. J.,
Gonda, T. J.,
Alexander, W. S.,
Metcalf, D.,
Nicola, N. A.,
and Hilton, D. J.
(1997)
Nature
387,
917-921
30.
Yoshimura, A.,
Ohkubo, T.,
Kiguchi, T.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Hara, T.,
and Miyajima, A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2816-2826
31.
Sato, N.,
Sakamaki, K.,
Terada, N.,
Arai, K.,
and Miyajima, A.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
4181-4189
32.
Schindler, C.,
Shuai, K.,
Prezioso, V. R.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1992)
Science
257,
809-813
33.
Shuai, K.,
Schindler, C.,
Prezioso, V. R.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1992)
Science
258,
1808-1812
34.
Shuai, K.,
Horvath, C. M.,
Huang, L. H.,
Qureshi, S. A.,
Cowburn, D.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1994)
Cell
76,
821-828
35.
Songyang, Z.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Chaudhuri, M.,
Gish, G.,
Pawson, T.,
Haser, W. G.,
King, F.,
Roberts, T.,
Ratnofsky, S.,
Lechleider, R. J.,
Neel, B. G.,
Birge, R. B.,
Fajardo, J. E.,
Chou, M. M.,
Hanafusa, H.,
Schaffhausen, B.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1993)
Cell
72,
767-778
36.
Waksman, G.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Pant, N.,
Cowburn, D.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1993)
Cell
72,
779-790
37.
Waksman, G.,
Kominos, D.,
Robertson, S. C.,
Pant, N.,
Baltimore, D.,
Birge, R. B.,
Cowburn, D.,
Hanafusa, H.,
Mayer, B. J.,
Overduin, M.,
Resh, M. D.,
Rios, C. B.,
Silverman, L.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1992)
Nature
358,
646-653
38.
Overduin, M.,
Rios, C. B.,
Mayer, B. J.,
Baltimore, D.,
and Cowburn, D.
(1992)
Cell
70,
697-704
39.
Eck, M. J.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1993)
Nature
362,
87-91
40.
Pascal, S. M.,
Singer, A. U.,
Gish, G.,
Yamazaki, T.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Pawson, T.,
Kay, L. E.,
and Forman-Kay, J. D.
(1994)
Cell
77,
461-472
41.
Cohen, G. B.,
Ren, R.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1995)
Cell
80,
237-248
42.
Futterer, K.,
Wong, J.,
Grucza, R. A.,
Chan, A. C.,
and Waksman, G.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
281,
523-537
43.
Chen, X.,
Vinkemeier, U.,
Zhao, Y.,
Jeruzalmi, D.,
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1998)
Cell
93,
827-839
44.
Becker, S.,
Groner, B.,
and Muller, C. W.
(1998)
Nature
394,
145-151
45.
Hirai, H.,
and Varmus, H. E.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8592-8596
46.
O'Brien, M. C.,
Fukui, Y.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
2855-2862
47.
Bromberg, J. F.,
Wrzeszczynska, M. H.,
Devgan, G.,
Zhao, Y.,
Pestell, R. G.,
Albanese, C.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1999)
Cell
98,
295-303
48.
Kamogawa, Y.,
Lee, H. J.,
Johnston, J. A.,
McMahon, M.,
O'Garra, A.,
and Arai, N.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
1074-1077
49.
O'Farrell, A. M.,
Liu, Y.,
Moore, K. W.,
and Mui, A. L.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1006-1018
50.
Lilly, M.,
and Kraft, A.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
5348-5355
51.
Packham, G.,
White, E. L.,
Eischen, C. M.,
Yang, H.,
Parganas, E.,
Ihle, J. N.,
Grillot, D. A.,
Zambetti, G. P.,
Nunez, G.,
and Cleveland, J. L.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2475-2487
52.
Thomas, J.,
Leverrier, Y.,
and Marvel, J.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1399-1408
53.
Evan, G. I.,
Wyllie, A. H.,
Gilbert, C. S.,
Littlewood, T. D.,
Land, H.,
Brooks, M.,
Waters, C. M.,
Penn, L. Z.,
and Hancock, D. C.
(1992)
Cell
69,
119-128
54.
Danial, N. N.,
Pernis, A.,
and Rothman, P. B.
(1995)
Science
269,
1875-1877
55.
Shuai, K.,
Halpern, J.,
ten Hoeve, J.,
Rao, X.,
and Sawyers, C. L.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
247-254
56.
Migone, T. S.,
Lin, J. X.,
Cereseto, A.,
Mulloy, J. C.,
O'Shea, J. J.,
Franchini, G.,
and Leonard, W. J.
(1995)
Science
269,
79-81
57.
Wellbrock, C.,
Geissinger, E.,
Gomez, A.,
Fischer, P.,
Friedrich, K.,
and Schartl, M.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
3047-3056
58.
Zhang, Q.,
Nowak, I.,
Vonderheid, E. C.,
Rook, A. H.,
Kadin, M. E.,
Nowell, P. C.,
Shaw, L. M.,
and Wasik, M. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9148-9153
59.
Schwaller, J.,
Frantsve, J.,
Aster, J.,
Williams, I. R.,
Tomasson, M. H.,
Ross, T. S.,
Peeters, P.,
Van Rompaey, L.,
Van Etten, R. A.,
Ilaria, R., Jr.,
Marynen, P.,
and Gilliland, D. G.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5321-5333
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Subtil-Rodriguez, L. Millan-Arino, I. Quiles, C. Ballare, M. Beato, and A. Jordan Progesterone Induction of the 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 Promoter in Breast Cancer Cells Involves Coordinated Recruitment of STAT5A and Progesterone Receptor to a Distal Enhancer and Polymerase Tracking Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(11): 3830 - 3849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Mohankumar, J. K. Perry, N. Kannan, K. Kohno, P. D. Gluckman, B. S. Emerald, and P. E. Lobie Transcriptional Activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) 3 and STAT5B Partially Mediate Homeobox A1-Stimulated Oncogenic Transformation of the Immortalized Human Mammary Epithelial Cell Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2219 - 2229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Eleswarapu, Z. Gu, and H. Jiang Growth Hormone Regulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Gene Expression May Be Mediated by Multiple Distal Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Binding Sites Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2230 - 2240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rahmani, T. K. Nguyen, P. Dent, and S. Grant The Multikinase Inhibitor Sorafenib Induces Apoptosis in Highly Imatinib Mesylate-Resistant Bcr/Abl+ Human Leukemia Cells in Association with Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Inhibition and Myeloid Cell Leukemia-1 Down-Regulation Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2007; 72(3): 788 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Crotti, M. Lusic, R. Lupo, P. M. J. Lievens, E. Liboi, G. D. Chiara, M. Tinelli, A. Lazzarin, B. K. Patterson, M. Giacca, et al. Naturally occurring C-terminally truncated STAT5 is a negative regulator of HIV-1 expression Blood, June 15, 2007; 109(12): 5380 - 5389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Ting, C.-W. Lin, S.-L. Wen, H.-M. Hsieh-Li, and H. Li Stat5 constitutive activation rescues defects in spinal muscular atrophy Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2007; 16(5): 499 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miyaoka, M. Tanaka, T. Naiki, and A. Miyajima Oncostatin M Inhibits Adipogenesis through the RAS/ERK and STAT5 Signaling Pathways J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37913 - 37920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rocha-Viegas, G. P. Vicent, J. L. Baranao, M. Beato, and A. Pecci Glucocorticoids Repress bcl-X Expression in Lymphoid Cells by Recruiting STAT5B to the P4 Promoter J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 33959 - 33970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhou and H. Jiang Short Communication: A Milk Trait-Associated Polymorphism in the Bovine Growth Hormone Receptor Gene Does Not Affect Receptor Signaling J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1761 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nanashima, J. Asano, M. Hayakari, T. Nakamura, H. Nakano, T. Yamada, T. Shimizu, M. Akita, Y. Fan, and S. Tsuchida Nuclear Localization of STAT5A Modified with O-Linked N-Acetylglucosamine and Early Involution in the Mammary Gland of Hirosaki Hairless Rat J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 43010 - 43016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rahmani, E. Reese, Y. Dai, C. Bauer, L. B. Kramer, M. Huang, R. Jove, P. Dent, and S. Grant Cotreatment with Suberanoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid and 17-Allylamino 17-demethoxygeldanamycin Synergistically Induces Apoptosis in Bcr-Abl+ Cells Sensitive and Resistant to STI571 (Imatinib Mesylate) in Association with Down-Regulation of Bcr-Abl, Abrogation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Activity, and Bax Conformational Change Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2005; 67(4): 1166 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang and H. Jiang Identification of a Distal STAT5-binding DNA Region That May Mediate Growth Hormone Regulation of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Gene Expression J. Biol. Chem., March 25, 2005; 280(12): 10955 - 10963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |