|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24414-24420, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of
Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5125
Received for publication, February 16, 2000, and in revised form, May 17, 2000
Neurotrophins mediate their signals through two
different receptors: the family of receptor tyrosine kinases, Trks, and
the low affinity pan-neurotrophin receptor p75. Trk receptors show more
restricted ligand specificity, whereas all neurotrophins are able to
bind to p75. One important function of p75 is the enhancement of nerve
growth factor signaling via TrkA by increasing TrkA tyrosine
autophosphorylation. Here, we have examined the importance of p75 on
TrkB- and TrkC-mediated neurotrophin signaling in an MG87 fibroblast
cell line stably transfected with either p75 and TrkB or p75 and TrkC,
as well as in PC12 cells stably transfected with TrkB. In contrast to
TrkA signaling, p75 had a negative effect on TrkB tyrosine
autophosphorylation in response to its cognate neurotrophins,
brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin 4/5. On the
other hand, p75 had no effect on TrkB or TrkC activation in
neurotrophin 3 treatment. p75 did not effect extracellular
signal-regulated kinase 2 tyrosine phosphorylation in response to
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin 3, or neurotrophin 4/5.
These results suggest that the observed reduction in TrkB tyrosine
autophosphorylation caused by p75 does not influence
Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in neurotrophin treatments.
The survival and differentiation of neurons in the peripheral
nervous system are dependent on neurotrophic factors, which are
secreted by the target tissues. The first discovered family member of
the closely related neurotrophins is nerve growth factor (NGF)1 (1). Other members are
brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (2, 3), neurotrophin 3 (NT-3)
(4-8), and neurotrophin 4/5 (NT-4/5) (9-11). The primary event in
neurotrophin signaling is the specific activation of receptor tyrosine
kinases of the Trk family. Trk receptors have restricted ligand-binding
specificities, NGF being a preferred ligand to TrkA, BDNF, and NT-4/5
to TrkB and NT-3 to TrkC (9, 11-14). NT-3 can activate also TrkA and TrkB, although at much higher neurotrophin concentrations than TrkC
(reviewed in Refs. 15-17). Neurotrophin binding to a specific Trk
receptor causes receptor dimerization and the activation of the
intrinsic tyrosine kinase domain of Trk. The initial substrate of the
Trk kinase is the receptor itself, which results from tyrosine phosphorylation of the other subunit of Trk dimer (18). A
tyrosine-phosphorylated Trk recruits, phosphorylates, and activates a
variety of adapter molecules that initiate downstream signaling
cascades. Phosphotyrosine residues of activated Trk-receptors serve as
specific recognition sites for effector molecules that contain a Src
homology 2 domain. Among the proteins that interact with
tyrosine-phosphorylated TrkA are the enzymes phospholipase C A second neurotrophin receptor, p75, binds all neurotrophins (28-30).
It belongs to the tumor necrosis factor family of receptors, which also
includes Fas, CD40, CD30, and CD27 (31). The p75 receptor has a number
of distinct effects on Trk function. It alters the ligand binding
specificity of Trks and enhances the proportion of TrkA receptors
binding NGF with high affinity (13, 32, 33). Co-expression of TrkA with
an excess of p75 dramatically increases the rate of association of NGF
with Trk, in effect increasing the binding affinity (34). Another
effect of p75 on TrkA is to enhance NGF-induced TrkA tyrosine kinase
activity. Introduction of p75 into MAH sympathoprogenitor cells
expressing TrkA increases NGF-stimulated TrkA autophosphorylation (35)
and inhibition of NGF binding to p75 on PC12 cells reduces NGF-mediated
TrkA autophosphorylation (36). p75 also has a number of Trk-independent effects on cell processes. These include retrograde transport of
neurotrophins (37, 38), the promotion of Schwann cell migration (39),
and the activation of the transcription factor NF- Although the collaboration of p75 and TrkA has been characterized by
several groups, the influence of p75 on TrkB and TrkC mediated
signaling is more poorly understood. A truncated form of p75 lacking
most of the cytoplasmic domain can collaborate with TrkA and TrkB, but
not with TrkC, in a mouse fibroblast cell line expressing endogenous
NGF and BDNF but not NT-3 (44). p75 is also needed for neural
differentiation in avian neural crest cultures expressing tyrosine
kinase-deficient TrkC (45). Recently Bibel et al. (46) using
co-immunoprecipitation reported the physical interaction of p75 with
all Trk receptors having a hemagglutinin epitope at their N-terminal
end. They also found that the transient expression of p75 in a
fibroblast cell line stably expressing TrkB reduced the TrkB
autophosphorylation induced by NT-4/5 and NT-3, but not by BDNF. In
light of these observations we have studied the function of p75 on TrkB
and TrkC mediated signaling in a mouse fibroblast cell line stably
expressing both p75 and TrkB or TrkC receptors as well as in PC12 cells
stably transfected with TrkB and revealed a dual function of p75 in
Trk-mediated neurotrophin signaling.
Cell Lines and Culture--
The G418-resistant MG87 mouse
fibroblast cell lines stably transfected with rat TrkB or TrkC cDNA
were from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. These cell lines were stably
transfected with 9 µg of rat p75 cDNA and 1 µg of histidinol
selection plasmid, and selected for 10 days with 500 µg/ml G418 (Life
Technologies, Inc.) and 2.5 mM histidinol (Sigma). To
confirm the expression of p75 in the TrkB and TrkC lines, clones were
lysed with RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 0.1%
SDS) supplemented with protease inhibitors (CompleteTM,
Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and subjected to a Western blot analysis.
Blots were probed with rabbit anti-p75 (Promega) and rabbit
anti-pan-Trk (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma) was used as a
secondary antibody. The expression of Trk and p75 was detected with the
enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (DuPont) and by exposure to x-ray
film (X-Omat AR, Kodak). Selected clones were tested by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (47) and Northern blot analysis (data not shown) to
exclude the endogenous expression of NGF, BDNF, NT-3, and NT-4/5, which
could potentially interfere with the results. Cells were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Cellgro) containing 200 µg/ml
G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.), 1 mM histidinol (Sigma),
antibiotics (penicillin, 100 units/ml; streptomycin, 100 µg/ml, Life
Technologies, Inc.), and 10% bovine calf serum (HyClone) in 5%
CO2 at 37 °C. The PC12 cell line was stably transfected
with TrkB cDNA as described above using the neomycin selection
plasmid and maintained in the media noted above except that 6% of
bovine calf serum, 6% of equine serum (HyClone), and 200 µg/ml G418
were used.
Tyrosine Phosphorylation Assay of TrkA and ERK2--
5 × 105 cells/well were plated in 6-well plates 1 day prior to
neurotrophin treatment. Cells were starved in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with antibiotics and 0.1% of bovine serum
albumin, fraction V, (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in the presence or
absence of protein A purified REX antibody (20 µg/ml) (48), a
generous gift from Dr. Louis F. Reichardt) or NGF (1 µg/ml) for 30 min at 37 °C and treated with 0-100 ng/ml NGF (2.5 S, Harlan
Bioproducts for Science, Inc.), BDNF, NT-3, or NT-4/5 (Regeneron
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) for 5 (Trk) or 7 (ERK2) min under the same
conditions. Thereafter, cells were washed once with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline, lysed with RIPA buffer supplemented with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate (Sigma) and protease inhibitors at
4 °C for 20 min, centrifuged, and the supernatants transferred to a
fresh tube. Protein concentration was measured using bicinchoninic acid
protein assay (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
For Trk phosphorylation assays, equal amounts of protein were
immunoprecipitated with pan-Trk antibody and protein A-Sepharose
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 2 h at 4 °C. Immunocomplexes
were washed three times with ice-cold RIPA buffer and resuspended in 30 µl of Laemmli sample buffer (49). For ERK2 assays, equal amount of
whole cell lysates were analyzed. After boiling for 5 min, proteins
were separated by 7.5 (Trk) or 12% (ERK2) SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and analyzed by Western blotting. Blots were probed
with mouse monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 antibody (Upstate
Biotechnology) or mouse monoclonal anti-pERK antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology), the secondary antibody being horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-mouse antibody (Pierce). The
phosphorylation of Trk and ERK2 was detected with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (NEN Life Science Products Inc.) and by
exposure to x-ray film. The results were analyzed by densitometry.
Tyrosine Autophosphorylation of TrkB and TrkC in Response to
Neurotrophins--
In fibroblast cell lines transfected with TrkB or
TrkC cognate neurotrophins are known to induce the autophosphorylation
of the Trk receptors with BDNF, NT-3, and NT-4/5 being preferred ligands for TrkB and NT-3 for TrkC (50). To determine which ligands are
able to induce the tyrosine autophosphorylation of TrkB and TrkC in the
stably transfected MG87 cell lines expressing either TrkB or TrkC, the
lines were exposed to the four neurotrophins in the presence or absence
of stably transfected p75. As expected, TrkB was phosphorylated in
response to 100 ng/ml BDNF, NT-3, and NT-4/5 both with and without p75
expression (Fig. 1, a and
b). In the presence of p75 the tyrosine phosphorylation
level of TrkB was similar in response to all three neurotrophins but in
the absence of p75 the phosphorylation level was lower in response to
NT-3 compared with BDNF and NT-4/5. There are two potential explanations for this observation. Either p75 increases TrkB
phosphorylation in response to NT-3 or p75 decreases TrkB
phosphorylation in response to BDNF and NT-4/5. The data in the next
section show that the latter explanation is correct. TrkC was uniquely
phosphorylated in response to NT-3 only in the absence of p75 (Fig.
1C). Interestingly, a slight tyrosine phosphorylation of
TrkC was observed in response to BDNF and NT-4/5 when p75 was
coexpressed (Fig. 1d).
The Effect of p75 on TrkB and TrkC Tyrosine Autophosphorylation in
Response to Neurotrophins--
p75 has been reported to enhance TrkA
mediated signaling by increasing the tyrosine autophosphorylation of
TrkA in PC12 and MAH cells (35, 36). Recently, p75 was observed to
reduce the tyrosine autophosphorylation of TrkB in response to NT-3 and
NT-4/5 in the A293 cell line stably transfected with TrkB and
transiently with p75 (46). We examined the influence of p75 on TrkB and TrkC mediated signaling with the Trk tyrosine phosphorylation assay in
stably transfected MG87 cells. The neurotrophin binding to p75 was
blocked with either the REX antibody (48) or an excess of NGF. The
positive influence of REX and nonspecific rabbit IgG antibodies on TrkB
and TrkC phosphorylation was excluded using Western blotting (data not
shown). The blocking of BDNF binding to p75 with the REX antibody
caused an increased tyrosine autophosphorylation of TrkB over a wide
range of BDNF concentrations suggesting an inhibitory effect of p75 on
BDNF-induced TrkB mediated signaling (Fig.
2a). Since NGF is known to
bind to p75 but not to TrkB or TrkC, and it was not able to induce TrkB
or TrkC phosphorylation in the MG87 cell lines (Fig. 1) we used its p75
blocking capacity in BDNF treatment using a TrkB/p75 expressing cell
line. Blocking p75 with NGF gave similar results as with the REX
antibody blocking (Fig. 2b).
The blocking of NT-4/5 binding to p75 with NGF caused a reduced TrkB
tyrosine phosphorylation, which was more prominent at lower
neurotrophin concentrations but was not observed at high NT-4/5
concentration (100 ng/ml, Fig. 2c). Interestingly, p75 had
no influence on NT-3 induced TrkB tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig.
2d).
In contrast to the TrkB expressing cell line, TrkC in the TrkC
expressing line was significantly tyrosine autophosphorylated only in
response to NT-3 (Fig. 1, c and d). Therefore,
the influence of p75 on TrkC phosphorylation was examined using only
NT-3 treatment. The inhibition of NT-3 binding to p75 with REX antibody
did not have any influence on TrkC phosphorylation over a wide range of NT-3 concentrations (Fig. 3). Based on
these observations we suggest that p75 does not play a role in TrkB or
TrkC tyrosine autophosphorylation in response to NT-3.
All three Trk receptors are expressed at the highest levels in the
nervous system (14, 51, 52), whereas the expression of p75 is not so
highly restricted (53). Therefore, we wanted to confirm our results in
a more neuronal-like environment and for that purpose PC12 cells stably
transfected with TrkB cDNA were used. TrkA was not phosphorylated
in response to BDNF, NT-3, or NT-4/5 in PC12 cells (Ref. 47 and data
not shown). The phosphorylation status of TrkB was determined in the
presence or absence of REX antibody in BDNF and NT-4/5 treatments. In
both instances the blocking of neurotrophin binding to endogenously
expressed p75 increased the autophosphorylation of TrkB (Fig.
4), which is consistent with the results
obtained from stably transfected MG87 fibroblast cell lines. We also
tested the influence of p75 on TrkA phosphorylation mediated by NGF
treatment. We were able to use the same PC12/TrkB cell line because
PC12 cells express endogenous TrkA in addition to p75. As previously
reported (36), the blocking of NGF binding to p75 with REX caused a
reduced autophosphorylation of TrkA at relatively low concentrations of
NGF (Fig. 4).
ERK2 Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Response to Neurotrophins--
To
analyze downstream effects of p75 on TrkB and TrkC mediated signaling,
we determined the tyrosine phosphorylation status of ERK2 in MG87 cells
stably expressing both p75 and either TrkB or TrkC. Cells were treated
with BDNF, NT-3, or NT-4/5 for 7 min and whole cell lysates were
analyzed by Western blotting using phopho-ERK specific antibody. In the
TrkB expressing cell line, BDNF and NT-4/5 were able to induce
the phosphorylation of ERK2 to a similar extent (Fig.
5a). On the other hand, NT-3
although able to induce ERK2 phosphorylation, was less effective than
BDNF and NT-4/5, even though the level of TrkB autophosphorylation is
the same in the presence of p75 in response to all three neurotrophins (Fig. 1b). More surprisingly, the addition of NGF to abolish
the binding of other neurotrophins to p75 had no effect on the level of
ERK2 phosphorylation induced by these three neurotrophins (Fig. 5a). This suggests that the observed reduction in TrkB
autophosphorylation caused by p75 does not affect the Ras/MAPK
signaling pathway. In the TrkC expressing cell line only NT-3 was
able to increase the phosphorylation of ERK2 (Fig. 5b).
Again, the blocking of p75 had no influence on ERK2 phosphorylation in
this cell line.
The neurotrophins are distinguished by receptor-signaling systems
of two different transmembrane proteins, the Trks and p75. Although at
least some of the biological actions of a neurotrophin are mediated
solely by its interaction with a Trk receptor p75 has been shown to
collaborate with Trks to modify their activation. In this work we found
that in MG87 fibroblasts p75 decreases the autophosphorylation of TrkB
when induced by BDNF or NT-4/5 whereas p75 has no influence on
NT-3-induced TrkB or TrkC activation. The collaboration of p75 with
BDNF- or NT-4/5-induced TrkB and TrkC is, therefore, the opposite of
what has been reported with NGF-induced TrkA. For example, coexpression
of p75 with TrkA in a sympathoadrenal cell line (MAH) led to an 8-fold
increase in tyrosine autophosphorylation of TrkA (35). Consistent with
this result is the blocking of NGF binding to p75 in rat primary
sympathetic neurons (54) and in PC12 cells caused a reduced TrkA
phosphorylation and also a decrease in the induction of the expression
level of an immediate early gene, c-fos (36). Additionally,
BDNF binding to p75 in PC12 cells was shown to result in a reduced TrkA
signaling (55).
In contrast, transient expression of p75 in A293 cells stably
transfected with TrkB has no effect on TrkB phosphorylation induced by
BDNF, whereas NT-3 and NT-4/5 caused reduced TrkB phosphorylation (46).
Only the result with NT-4/5 agrees with the data we have obtained.
Possible reasons behind these different results may be differences in
the transfection status of p75 (transient versus stable)
and/or in the cell lines used in the experiments. It should be noted
that we were able to obtain the same results in PC12 cells that we
obtained in MG87 cells, i.e. suppression of BDNF and
NT-4/5-induced activation of TrkB by p75 and, as a control, p75
enhanced activation of TrkA by NGF at lower concentrations.
In this MG87 fibroblast cell line NT-3 was the dominant ligand for TrkC
and p75 had no effect on the activation of TrkC by NT-3. What was
noticeable about the introduction of p75 into TrkC expressing cell line
was a relaxation in the absolute specificity of TrkC for NT-3. In the
presence of p75 both BDNF and NT-4/5 activated TrkC to a slight extent.
The possibility of TrkB contamination in this cell line was excluded by
Western blotting using a TrkB specific antibody (TRB (48), data not shown).
Mechanisms Involved in the Collaboration of p75 and
Trks--
There are at least two general mechanisms whereby the two
neurotrophin receptors can collaborate at the level of the receptors. In the first, p75 acts to bind and pass on a neurotrophin such as NGF
to TrkA. If the transfer reaction is as rapid as the initial binding to
p75 then the relatively slow on rate of NGF binding to TrkA is
converted to a more rapid on rate, increasing the affinity of the
p75·TrkA complex for NGF (34, 36). The existence of a high molar
ratio of p75 to TrkA argues in favor of this mechanism. In the second,
changes in conformation in one or both receptors are thought to
regulate the affinity of neurotrophin binding. A model based on the
allosteric properties of the p75 receptor has been described in detail
by Bothwell (56). The finding that p75 interacts directly with a Trk
(46) suggests that the second model may be correct. Binding of a
neurotrophin to p75 can now be thought of as directly affecting the
conformation and, therefore, the affinity of a Trk receptor and this
type of regulation could work to increase or decrease Trk affinity.
Alternatively, or in addition, p75 and the Trks could indirectly
interact to modify Trk phosphorylation through their signaling cascade.
For example, elevation of ceramide, one of the signaling molecules
activated by p75 (43), has been shown to locally inhibit sympathetic
axonal growth (57) while McPhee and Barker (55) have identified a
ceramide activated serine-threonine kinase that could potentially
down-regulate TrkA-mediated growth signals through TrkA phosphorylation.
Interestingly, truncated p75 lacking most, but not all, of the
intracellular domain of the receptor still has the ability to enhance
both TrkA and TrkB phosphorylation in the MG87 cell line that expresses
NGF and BDNF (44). These results suggest that changes in
receptor-binding site conformation that occur in the absence of the
intracellular domain may be of primary importance. The truncated p75
had no effect on TrkC phosphorylation in the absence of exogenously
added NT-3. Since these cells do not express endogenous NT-3, it is
possible that the autocrine expression of a neurotrophin (NGF and BDNF
in this instance) can affect p75/Trk interaction.
The inability of p75 to affect exogenous NT-3 binding to TrkB and TrkC
could arise for at least two reasons. First, NT-3 binding to TrkB,
TrkC, and/or p75 causes no change in the conformation of the complex.
If this is correct then TrkB and TrkC behave differently in this regard
than TrkA. This difference has been noted before. There are differences
in the neurotrophin-binding domains of the Trks and these differences
distinguish TrkA from TrkB and TrkC but not the latter two from each
other (58). Furthermore, Canossa et al. (59) found that TrkB
could transphosphorylate TrkC and vice versa, in COS cells but that
TrkA did not take part in this phenomenon. Perhaps the failure of p75
to modify NT-3 binding to TrkB and TrkC fit into the same pattern. The
other explanation for the lack of effect of p75 on NT-3-induced TrkB or
TrkC phosphorylation is that there is no interaction between the
signaling mechanisms of the receptors.
Important aspects of the p75/Trk interaction are their physiological
implications. The ability of p75 to enhance TrkA activation demonstrated in a number of in vitro experiments as
described above is reflected in the properties of sensory neurons from
p75 knock-out mice. There neurons show a reduced sensitivity to low concentrations of NGF compared with wild type mice (60). It appears,
therefore, that these neurons rely on the enhanced activation of TrkA
by p75 to respond to the low levels of NGF present at certain stages of
development. Although the binding of BDNF to p75 has been shown, for
example, to inhibit sympathetic axonal growth in the pineal gland, this
phenomenon is mediated directly through p75 signaling (61, 62) rather
than by inhibition of TrkA signaling. As far as we are aware, potential
systems in which the physiological consequences of the inhibition of
TrkB and TrkC signaling through p75 have not been studied.
p75 Does Not Influence the Phosphorylation Status of ERK2--
As
one attempt to determine if the reduced activation of TrkB and TrkC are
due to changes in the signaling components of the receptors we analyzed
the phosphorylation status of ERK2, one of the commonest signaling
intermediates, after neurotrophin treatment. We found that its
phosphorylation status was not affected by blocking neurotrophin
binding to p75. Lachange et al. (54) also noted, in results
consistent with these observations, that p75 reduced TrkA
phosphorylation but had no effect on NGF-mediated survival in
sympathetic neurons. The phosphorylation of tyrosine 490 (Tyr490) in TrkA activates the Ras/MAPK pathways by
forming a recognition site for the Shc adaptor protein (20, 22). In
addition to this, the binding of PLC
It appears that the role of p75 in neurotrophin activation is far more
complex than was initially assumed. The presence of p75 can act in a
positive (binding of NGF to TrkA) or negative (binding of BDNF or
NT-4/5 to TrkB) fashion or have no effect at all (binding of NT-3 to
TrkB or TrkC) in Trk mediated activation. How p75 affects the
downstream signaling from the Trks is part of the puzzle that is
actively under investigation.
We thank Dr. Jose M. Cosgaya for critical
reading of the manuscript. We also thank Dr. George Yancopoulos from
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for supplying purified NT-3, NT-4/5,
and BDNF, and Dr. Louis F. Reichardt (University of California, San
Francisco) for providing REX and RTB antibodies.
*
This work was supported by The Sigrid Juselius Foundation,
The Academy of Finland, SmithKline Beecham, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS04270, and the McGowan Charitable Trust.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Div. of Neuropathology, Inst. of Pathology,
University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 299 Campus Dr., Stanford, CA 94305-5125. Tel.: 650-723-5811; Fax: 650-725-0388; E-mail:
eshooter@cmgm.stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001641200
The abbreviations used are:
NGF, nerve growth
factor;
BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor;
NT-3, neurotrophin 3;
PLC, phospholipase C;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.
p75 Reduces TrkB Tyrosine Autophosphorylation in
Response to Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor and Neurotrophin
4/5*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(PLC
) and phosphoinositol 3-kinase and the adapter protein Shc
(19-22). Each of these molecules activates distinct signaling pathways
that may have different functions. The Ras/mitogen-activated protein
kinase (MAPK) pathway initiated by Shc or PLC
is involved in
differentiation, while the phosphoinositol 3-kinase pathway is
important for survival. It appears that in response to NGF, MAPKs like
extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2), are cooperatively
regulated by Shc and PLC
in TrkA expressing cell lines (21, 22). A
major consequence of Ras activation in cells is threonine/tyrosine
phosphorylation and activation of ERKs and Ras appears to be an
indispensable element in NGF-promoted ERK activation. In NGF-treated
PC12 cells, ERK becomes phosphorylated at a threonine and a tyrosine
residue (23) leading to activation and translocation of ERK to the
nucleus (24). In the nucleus it phosphorylates its target molecules including several transcription factors, as well as another family of
kinases, the ribosomal S6 kinases (summarized in Refs. 25-27).
B (40). In the
presence of NGF, p75 can also either rescue cells from apoptosis or
trigger the apoptotic cascade (31, 41, 42). The latter may be due to
elevated sphingomyelin hydrolysis leading to increased intracellular
ceramide level (43).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Tyrosine autophosphorylation of TrkB and TrkC
in response to neurotrophin treatment. a, TrkB;
b, TrkB and p75; c, TrkC; and d, TrkC
and p75 expressing MG87 cells were incubated in the absence
(Control) or presence of NGF, BDNF, NT-3, and NT-4/5 at 100 ng/ml for 5 min, lysed, immunoprecipitated with Trk-specific antibody,
and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.
Results are presented as percentage values compared with the results
obtained with BDNF (a and b) or NT-3
(c and d). A representative Western blot is
presented below each figure.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
TrkB tyrosine autophosphorylation in response
to neurotrophin treatment with or without blocking of p75 with REX
antibody or NGF. TrkB and p75 expressing MG87 cells were treated
with BDNF in the presence or absence of: a, REX antibody, or
b, NGF. The same cells were treated with: c,
NT-4/5, or d, NT-3 in the presence or absence of NGF. After
the treatment with various concentrations of neurotrophins for 5 min
cells were lysed, immunoprecipitated with Trk-specific antibody, and
analyzed by Western blotting using anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.
Results are presented as percentage of values at 100 ng/ml of
neurotrophins in the presence of REX or NGF.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
TrkC tyrosine autophosphorylation in response
to NT-3 with or without blocking of p75 with REX antibody. TrkC
and p75 expressing MG87 cells were treated with NT-3 in the presence or
absence of REX antibody. After the treatment with various
concentrations of neurotrophin for 5 min cells were lysed,
immunoprecipitated with Trk-specific antibody, and analyzed by Western
blotting using anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Results are presented as
percentage of values at 100 ng/ml neurotrophins in the presence of
REX.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
TrkA (NGF) and TrkB (BDNF and NT-4/5)
tyrosine autophosphorylation of PC12/TrkB cells in response to
neurotrophin treatment with or without blocking of p75 with REX
antibody. PC12 cells stably transfected with TrkB cDNA were
incubated in the absence (Control) or presence of NGF (25 ng/ml), BDNF or NT-4/5 (50 ng/ml) with or without REX antibody for 5 min. Thereafter, cells were lysed, immunoprecipitated with Trk-specific
antibody, and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody. Results are presented as densitometric units obtained by
densitometry.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
ERK2 tyrosine phosphorylation in response to
neurotrophin treatment with or without blocking of p75 with NGF.
MG87 cells expressing: a, TrkB and p75; or b,
TrkC and p75 were incubated in the absence (Control) or
presence of BDNF, NT-3, or NT-4/5 at 50 ng/ml for 5 min with or without
NGF. The whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using
anti-phospho-ERK-specific antibody. Results are presented as
densitometric units obtained by densitometry. A representative Western
blot is presented below each figure.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
to the activated TrkA at
Tyr785 is sufficient to induce ERK activity in response to
NGF (22). Our observation that the ERK2 phosphorylation level is
similar despite the blocking of the neurotrophin binding to p75
suggests that, at least, Shc or PLC
is activated in response to BDNF
and NT-4/5 even though the total tyrosine phosphorylation of TrkB is
reduced by p75. Most likely, the reduced TrkB tyrosine phosphorylation does not influence the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway but uses another cascade in the signal transduction. Also the invariable phosphorylation status of TrkB, TrkC, and ERK2 after NT-3 treatment suggest that under
these circumstances either p75 does not play a role in NT-3-mediated Trk activation or that its influence is mediated by a Trk tyrosine phosphorylation independent pathway.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Present address: Dept. of Human Genetics, UCLA School of Medicine,
695 Charles E. Young Dr. S., Los Angeles, CA 90095-7088.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Levi-Montalcini, R.
(1987)
Science
237,
1154-1162
2.
Leibrock, J.,
Lottspeich, F.,
Hohn, A.,
Hofer, M.,
Hengerer, B.,
Masiakowski, P.,
Thoenen, H.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1989)
Nature
341,
149-152
3.
Ernfors, P.,
Ibanez, C. F.,
Ebendal, T.,
Olson, L.,
and Persson, H.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5454-5458
4.
Hohn, A.,
Leibrock, J.,
Bailey, K.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1990)
Nature
344,
339-341
5.
Jones, K. R.,
and Reichardt, L. F.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8060-8064
6.
Kaisho, Y.,
Yoshimura, K.,
and Nakahama, K.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
266,
187-191
7.
Maisonpierre, P. C.,
Belluscio, L.,
Squinto, S.,
Ip, N. Y.,
Furth, M. E.,
Lindsay, R. M.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1990)
Science
247,
1446-1451
8.
Rosenthal, A.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
Nguyen, T.,
Lewis, M.,
Shih, A.,
Laramee, G. R.,
Nikolics, K.,
and Winslow, J. W.
(1990)
Neuron
4,
767-773
9.
Berkemeier, L. R.,
Winslow, J. W.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
Nikolics, K.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
and Rosenthal, A.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
857-866
10.
Hallbook, F.,
Ibanez, C. F.,
and Persson, H.
(1991)
Neuron
6,
845-858
11.
Ip, N. Y.,
Ibanez, C. F.,
Nye, S. H.,
McClain, J.,
Jones, P. F.,
Gies, D. R.,
Belluscio, L.,
Le Beau, M. M.,
Espinosa, R. d.,
Squinto, S. P.,
Persson, H.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3060-3064
12.
Kaplan, D. R.,
Martin-Zanca, D.,
and Parada, L. F.
(1991)
Nature
350,
158-160
13.
Kaplan, D. R.,
Hempstead, B. L.,
Martin-Zanca, D.,
Chao, M. V.,
and Parada, L. F.
(1991)
Science
252,
554-558
14.
Lamballe, F.,
Klein, R.,
and Barbacid, M.
(1991)
Cell
66,
967-979
15.
Barbacid, M.
(1993)
Oncogene
8,
2033-2042
16.
Hempstead, B. L.
(1993)
Exp. Neurol.
124,
31-35
17.
Dechant, G.,
Rodriguez-Tebar, A.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1994)
Prog. Neurobiol.
42,
347-352
18.
Jing, S.,
Tapley, P.,
and Barbacid, M.
(1992)
Neuron
9,
1067-1079
19.
Obermeier, A.,
Halfter, H.,
Wiesmuller, K. H.,
Jung, G.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
933-941
20.
Obermeier, A.,
Lammers, R.,
Wiesmuller, K. H.,
Jung, G.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22963-2296
21.
Loeb, D. M.,
Stephens, R. M.,
Copeland, T.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
and Greene, L. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
8901-8910
22.
Stephens, R. M.,
Loeb, D. M.,
Copeland, T. D.,
Pawson, T.,
Greene, L. A.,
and Kaplan, D. R.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
691-705
23.
Payne, D. M.,
Rossomando, A. J.,
Martino, P.,
Erickson, A. K.,
Her, J. H.,
Shabanowitz, J.,
Hunt, D. F.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
885-892
24.
Chen, R. H.,
Sarnecki, C.,
and Blenis, J.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
915-927
25.
Chen, R. H.,
Tung, R.,
Abate, C.,
and Blenis, J.
(1993)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
21,
895-900
26.
Marshall, C. J.
(1994)
Nature
367,
686
27.
Hill, C. S.,
and Treisman, R.
(1995)
Cell
80,
199-211
28.
Rodriguez-Tebar, A.,
Dechant, G.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1990)
Neuron
4,
487-492
29.
Squinto, S. P.,
Stitt, T. N.,
Aldrich, T. H.,
Davis, S.,
Bianco, S. M.,
Radziejewski, C.,
Glass, D. J.,
Masiakowski, P.,
Furth, M. E.,
Valenzuela, D. M.,
DiStefano, P. S.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1991)
Cell
65,
885-893
30.
Rodriguez-Tebar, A.,
Dechant, G.,
Gotz, R.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
917-922
31.
Rabizadeh, S.,
Oh, J.,
Zhong, L. T.,
Yang, J.,
Bitler, C. M.,
Butcher, L. L.,
and Bredesen, D. E.
(1993)
Science
261,
345-348
32.
Hempstead, B. L.,
Martin-Zanca, D.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
Parada, L. F.,
and Chao, M. V.
(1991)
Nature
350,
678-683
33.
Battleman, D. S.,
Geller, A. I.,
and Chao, M. V.
(1993)
J. Neurosci.
13,
941-951
34.
Mahadeo, D.,
Kaplan, L.,
Chao, M. V.,
and Hempstead, B. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6884-6891
35.
Verdi, J. M.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
1359-1372
36.
Barker, P. A.,
and Shooter, E. M.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
203-215
37.
Curtis, R.,
Adryan, K. M.,
Stark, J. L.,
Park, J. S.,
Compton, D. L.,
Weskamp, G.,
Huber, L. J.,
Chao, M. V.,
Jaenisch, R.,
Lee, K. F.,
Lindsay, R. M.,
and DiStefano, P. S.
(1995)
Neuron
14,
1201-1211
38.
von Bartheld, C. S.,
Williams, R.,
Lefcort, F.,
Clary, D. O.,
Reichardt, L. F.,
and Bothwell, M.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
2995-3008
39.
Anton, E. S.,
Weskamp, G.,
Reichardt, L. F.,
and Matthew, W. D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2795-2799
40.
Carter, B. D.,
Kaltschmidt, C.,
Kaltschmidt, B.,
Offenhauser, N.,
Bohm- Matthaei, R.,
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1996)
Science
272,
542-545
41.
Casaccia-Bonnefil, P.,
Carter, B. D.,
Dobrowsky, R. T.,
and Chao, M. V.
(1996)
Nature
383,
716-719
42.
Frade, J. M.,
Rodriguez-Tebar, A.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1996)
Nature
383,
166-168
43.
Dobrowsky, R. T.,
Werner, M. H.,
Castellino, A. M.,
Chao, M. V.,
and Hannun, Y. A.
(1994)
Science
265,
1596-1599
44.
Hantzopoulos, P. A.,
Suri, C.,
Glass, D. J.,
Goldfarb, M. P.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
187-201
45.
Hapner, S. J.,
Boeshore, K. L.,
Large, T. H.,
and Lefcort, F.
(1998)
Dev. Biol.
201,
90-100
46.
Bibel, M.,
Hoppe, E.,
and Barde, Y. A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
616-622
47.
Krüttgen, A.,
Moller, J. C.,
Heymach, J. V., Jr.,
and Shooter, E. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9614-9619
48.
Weskamp, G.,
and Reichardt, L. F.
(1991)
Neuron
6,
649-663
49.
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
50.
Ip, N. Y.,
Stitt, T. N.,
Tapley, P.,
Klein, R.,
Glass, D. J.,
Fandl, J.,
Greene, L. A.,
Barbacid, M.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1993)
Neuron
10,
137-149
51.
Klein, R.,
Parada, L. F.,
Coulier, F.,
and Barbacid, M.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
3701-3709
52.
Martin-Zanca, D.,
Barbacid, M.,
and Parada, L. F.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
683-694
53.
Lomen-Hoerth, C.,
and Shooter, E. M.
(1995)
J. Neurochem.
64,
1780-1789
54.
Lachance, C.,
Belliveau, D. J.,
and Barker, P. A.
(1997)
Neuroscience
81,
861-871
55.
MacPhee, I. J.,
and Barker, P. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23547-23551
56.
Bothwell, M.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
18,
223-253
57.
de Chaves, E. I. P.,
Bussiere, M.,
Vance, D. E.,
Campenot, R. B.,
and Vance, J. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3028-3035
58.
Ultsch, M. H.,
Wiesmann, C.,
Simmons, L. C.,
Henrich, J.,
Yang, M.,
Reilly, D.,
Bass, S. H.,
and de Vos, A. M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
290,
149-159
59.
Canossa, M.,
Twiss, J. L.,
Verity, A. N.,
and Shooter, E. M.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3369-3376
60.
Lee, K. F.,
Davies, A. M.,
and Jaenisch, R.
(1994)
Development
120,
1027-1033
61.
Kohn, J.,
Aloyz, R. S.,
Toma, J. G.,
Haak-Frendscho, M.,
and Miller, F. D.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
5393-5408
62.
Yamashita, T.,
Tucker, K. L.,
and Barde, Y-A.
(1999)
Neuron
24,
585-593
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kajiya, H. Shiba, T. Fujita, K. Ouhara, K. Takeda, N. Mizuno, H. Kawaguchi, M. Kitagawa, T. Takata, K. Tsuji, et al. Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor Stimulates Bone/Cementum-related Protein Gene Expression in Cementoblasts J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2008; 283(23): 16259 - 16267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Peters, M. Conrad, C. Hubold, U. Schweiger, B. Fischer, and H. L. Fehm The principle of homeostasis in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal system: new insight from positive feedback Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R83 - R98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Kanning, M. Hudson, P. S. Amieux, J. C. Wiley, M. Bothwell, and L. C. Schecterson Proteolytic Processing of the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor and Two Homologs Generates C-Terminal Fragments with Signaling Capability J. Neurosci., July 2, 2003; 23(13): 5425 - 5436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Rabin, A. Bachis, and I. Mocchetti Gangliosides Activate Trk Receptors by Inducing the Release of Neurotrophins J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49466 - 49472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Seifer, B. Feng, R. M. Shelden, S. Chen, and C. F. Dreyfus Neurotrophin-4/5 and Neurotrophin-3 Are Present within the Human Ovarian Follicle but Appear to Have Different Paracrine/Autocrine Functions J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2002; 87(10): 4569 - 4571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Anderson, L. L. L. Robinson, J. Brooks, and N. Spears Neurotropins and Their Receptors Are Expressed in the Human Fetal Ovary J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 890 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Mischel, S. G. Smith, E. R. Vining, J. S. Valletta, W. C. Mobley, and L. F. Reichardt The Extracellular Domain of p75NTR Is Necessary to Inhibit Neurotrophin-3 Signaling through TrkA J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2001; 276(14): 11294 - 11301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Esposito, P. Patel, R. M. Stephens, P. Perez, M. V. Chao, D. R. Kaplan, and B. L. Hempstead The Cytoplasmic and Transmembrane Domains of the p75 and Trk A Receptors Regulate High Affinity Binding to Nerve Growth Factor J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2001; 276(35): 32687 - 32695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |