Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002646200 on June 1, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24565-24574, August 11, 2000
Substrate Specificity of
v
3
Integrin-mediated Cell Migration and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT
Pathway Activation*
Duo-Qi
Zheng,
Amy S.
Woodard
,
Giovanni
Tallini, and
Lucia R.
Languino§
From the Department of Pathology, Yale University School of
Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
Received for publication, March 28, 2000, and in revised form, May 22, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The
v
3
integrin has been shown to bind several ligands, including osteopontin
and vitronectin. Its role in modulating cell migration and downstream
signaling pathways in response to specific extracellular matrix ligands
has been investigated in this study. Highly invasive prostate cancer
PC3 cells that constitutively express
v
3
adhere and migrate on osteopontin and vitronectin in an
v
3-dependent manner. However,
exogenous expression of
v
3 in noninvasive
prostate cancer LNCaP (
3-LNCaP) cells mediates adhesion and migration on vitronectin but not on osteopontin. Activation of
v
3 by epidermal growth
factor stimulation is required to mediate adhesion to osteopontin but
is not sufficient to support migration on this substrate. We show that
v
3-mediated cell migration requires
activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase)/protein kinase B (PKB/AKT) pathway since wortmannin, a PI 3-kinase inhibitor, prevents PC3 cell migration on both osteopontin and vitronectin; furthermore,
v
3 engagement by osteopontin
and vitronectin activates the PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Migration of
3-LNCaP cells on vitronectin also occurs through
activation of the PI 3-kinase pathway; however, AKT phosphorylation is
not increased upon engagement by osteopontin. Furthermore,
phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), known to support cell
migration in
3-LNCaP cells, is detected on both substrates. Thus, in PC3 cells,
v
3
mediates cell migration and PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway activation on
vitronectin and osteopontin; in
3-LNCaP cells,
v
3 mediates cell migration and PI
3-kinase/AKT pathway activation on vitronectin, whereas adhesion to
osteopontin does not support
v
3-mediated
cell migration and PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway activation. We conclude
therefore that
v
3 exists in multiple
functional states that can bind either selectively vitronectin or both
vitronectin and osteopontin and that can differentially activate cell
migration and intracellular signaling pathways in a ligand-specific manner.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Integrins are heterodimeric cell surface receptors that consist of
noncovalently associated
and
subunits; these receptors have
been shown to play a role in cell migration, proliferation, and gene
transcription and can affect cancer cell invasion and growth (1-3).
The role of
v
3 integrin in mediating cell
migration and survival has been described (4-6). Exogenous expression
of
v
3 has been shown to increase melanoma
tumor growth and metastases (7, 8), to induce conversion from radical
to vertical growth phase in primary human melanoma cells, and to
promote melanoma cell survival in vivo (9) and in
three-dimensional collagen gels (10) indicating
v
3 contribution at the level of motility and proliferation in vivo. We have previously shown that
highly invasive and metastatic human PC3 prostate cancer cells express
v
3 whereas nontumorigenic and noninvasive
LNCaP cells do not (5).
The
v
3 integrin is a promiscuous receptor
that mediates adhesion of several cell types to different ligands and
of cancer cells to platelets (11, 12). Among others, vitronectin
(VN)1- (11, 13, 14) and
osteopontin (OPN)-coated (15-20) substrates have been shown to support
cell adhesion via
v
3.
OPN is expressed in mature bone where prostate cancer cells
preferentially metastasize. A causal role for OPN during tumor progression has been suggested by several studies, including the observation that high levels of OPN support a tumorigenic and metastatic phenotype (21, 22). OPN is up-regulated in prostate cancer
and other carcinomas (23, 24) and increases anchorage-independent growth of prostate cancer cells (22) as well as proliferation of normal
prostate cells (25). Furthermore, it is found in plasma of patients
with metastatic diseases, and it increases metastatic ability of
transformed cells (26, 27). Its interaction with different surface
receptors has been shown: specifically,
4
1,
8
1,
9
1,
v
1,
v
5, and CD44 on different cell types
(28-35). The ability of OPN to support haptotaxis of different cell
types via
v
3 has been shown (16).
However, the signaling mechanisms activated via
OPN-
v
3 interaction that support cell
migration have never been described.
It has recently been shown that
v
3 can be
activated (36-38) in a cell-type specific (39) manner. Its activation
appears to be a sophisticated mechanism to induce adhesion to
v
3 ligands, specifically to prothrombin
via protein kinase C activation or ADP stimulation, to VN via either
hepatocyte growth factor or AP5, an antibody to
v
3, and to OPN via either AP5 or
agonists, including ADP (38, 40-42). It has been recently shown that
activated
v
3 mediates cell adhesion and
migration to bone sialoprotein (43). In one instance, upon activation
by AP5,
v
3 was shown to increase adhesion
and migration of
v
3-expressing melanoma cells on OPN and VN in a comparable manner (41). However, the role of
activation-dependent and activation-independent ligands of
v
3 in modulating cell functions and
downstream signaling events has not been described.
Several signaling molecules, specifically FAK, PI 3-kinase, and members
of the MAP kinase family, play a role in modulating integrin-mediated
cell migration (44). FAK is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase localized in
focal contacts that becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated and subsequently
activated upon integrin-mediated cell adhesion to several matrix
proteins, including VN (5, 45, 46). FAK phosphorylation of tyrosine 397 (Tyr397) is crucial for cell migration (47). PI 3-kinase is
a lipid kinase involved in proliferation, survival, and migration in
response to growth factors including EGF and integrin signaling
(48-50). PI 3-kinase forms a complex with FAK via
FAK-Tyr397 in response to cell adhesion or platelet-derived
growth factor stimulation (51, 52), and it is known to act as a
downstream effector of FAK and to control FAK-induced cell migration
activated by cell adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins (53, 54). AKT plays an important role in transducing survival signals in response
to several growth factors and
1 integrin engagement (55,
56) and very recently in supporting vascular endothelial growth
factor-induced chemotaxis (57). In response to integrin engagement, AKT
activation is PI 3-kinase-dependent because wortmannin completely prevents AKT serine phosphorylation (50) and is also controlled by Cdc42, a member of the GTPase family (58) or by ILK (59).
Integrin engagement has also been shown to stimulate activation of two
members of the MAP kinase family, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase-1 and -2 (ERK1/2) (2), which contribute to integrin-mediated
cell migration (60, 61).
In this study, we show that adhesion of invasive prostate cancer PC3
cells to OPN and VN activates the PI 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway;
however, exogenous expression of
v
3 in
noninvasive LNCaP cells mediates VN binding but requires EGF
stimulation to mediate binding to OPN. In these cells, adhesion to OPN
does not support cell migration and PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway activation, whereas
v
3 mediates cell migration and PI
3-kinase/AKT pathway activation on VN. These results show that
v
3 is expressed in multiple functionally
different states and is able to mediate cell migration in a
substrate-specific and functional state-dependent manner;
finally, they show that
v
3 activates
intracellular signaling pathways in a selective manner in response to
individual ligands.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines and Materials--
LNCaP stable transfectants
expressing
3 (
3-LNCaP) and mock
transfectants (mock-LNCaP) have been described (5). PC3 and LNCaP cells
were cultured in RPMI 1640, A431 (American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC), Manassas, VA), and HeLa S3 cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing either 10 or 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml
penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 292 µg/ml
L-glutamine (all from Gemini Bio-Products, Inc., Calabasas,
CA), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, and 1 mM
sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies, Inc.). Monoclonal antibody against
v
3 integrin LM609 was used as ascites
(provided by Dr. D. A. Cheresh, The Scripps Research Institute, La
Jolla, CA) or as affinity-purified IgG (Chemicon International, Inc., Temecula, CA). Monoclonal antibodies against
v
5 integrin were: P1F6, used as ascites
and purchased from Life Technologies, Inc., and P3G2 hybridoma
supernatant, a gift of Dr. E. A. Wayner (Fred Hutchinson Cancer
Research Center, Seattle, WA (62)). Monoclonal antibody to
1, TS2/16 hybridoma supernatant, was purchased from ATCC. Monoclonal antibody against human EGF receptor, HER (EGFR-528) and polyclonal antibody against ERK1/2 (K-23) were purchased from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Negative control 1C10
ascites and X653 hybridoma supernatant have been described (5).
Polyclonal antibodies against phospho-AKT (Ser473)
and AKT, as well as monoclonal antibody against phospho-ERK1/2 Thr202/Tyr204 (E10) were purchased from New
England Biolabs, Inc. (Beverly, MA). Fibronectin (FN) was purified from
human plasma, and VN was purified from human serum as described
previously (63, 64). Laminin-1 was purchased from Life Technologies,
Inc. OPN purified from human milk was a gift from Dr. D. R. Senger
(Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (65)). Bovine serum
albumin (BSA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) were
purchased from Sigma. Recombinant human EGF was purchased from R&D
Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Wortmannin was purchased from Calbiochem.
Flow Cytometric Analysis--
Fluorescence-activated cell
sorter (FACS) analysis was performed using LM609 ascites (1:500),
P1F6 ascites (1:500), TS2/16 hybridoma supernatant (1:10), or EGFR-528
(5 µg/ml) described above. The 1C10 (1:500), X653 (1:10), and
nonimmune mouse IgG (5 µg/ml; Cappel, Durham, NC) were used as
negative controls. After washing the primary antibodies with PBS, the
cells were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
anti-mouse IgG (40 µg/ml; Cappel) at 4 °C for 30 min. The cells
were washed again with PBS. FACS sorting were performed using a
FACSort, and analysis was performed using CellQuest 2.0 (Becton
Dickinson, Mountain View, CA).
Cell Adhesion and Migration Assays--
Cell adhesion and
migration assays have been described previously (5). Cell adhesion
assays were performed by incubating cells with the coated substrates at
37 °C for 1 or 3 h, and quantitated by measuring absorbance at
630 nm using a Titertek Multiskan Bichromatic (ICN Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., Costa Mesa, CA) for crystal violet staining. In some experiments,
adhesion was quantitated using cells labeled with
[51Cr]sodium chromate (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). The quantitation of [51Cr]sodium
chromate-labeled cells was carried out by
-counting, and the
counts/min were converted to cell numbers based on cell labeling
efficiency. Cell migration assays was performed by incubating cells
with the coated Transwell chamber (12-µm pore size, Costar, Cambridge, MA) at 37 °C for 4 h. Cell adhesion and migration
assays with EGF were performed using cells that had been preincubated with 200 ng/ml EGF at 4 °C for 60 min; EGF was present at the same
concentration during the experiments. In the wortmannin inhibition assays, cells were harvested using trypsin (0.05%)/EDTA (0.53 mM) following neutralization in an equal volume of 0.5 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor and washed twice in PBS. Wortmannin
dissolved in Me2SO at a stock concentration of 10 mM and further diluted to the indicated concentrations in
PBS was added to the cell suspension at the time of cell seeding onto
the coated plates. Wortmannin was not preincubated with the cells
before addition to the coated wells. Cell adhesion and migration were
carried out in the presence of the indicated amounts of wortmannin.
After incubation at the indicated times, unbound cells were washed away
using PBS. The adherent or migrated cells were fixed using 3%
paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 30 min followed by crystal violet
staining at 25 °C for 3 h. In the case of adhesion experiments
using 51Cr-labeled cells, bound cells were lysed in the
plate without fixation or staining. Triplicate observations were performed.
AKT, Phospho-AKT, FAK, and Phospho-FAK Immunoblotting--
Cells
were starved in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium for 24 h, detached
using 0.05% trypsin, 0.53 mM EDTA, and neutralized with 0.5 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor. The cells were washed twice with
serum-free RPMI 1640, resuspended in the same medium, and incubated
with either 200 ng/ml EGF or serum-free medium at 4 °C for 60 min.
Cells were either held in suspension using 10 mg/ml BSA-coated plate or
seeded on 60-mm dishes coated with FN, VN, or OPN at indicated
concentrations and allowed to attach at 37 °C for the indicated
times. Cells were lysed in 1% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer: 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5 (American Bioanalytical, Natick, MA), 1%
Nonidet P-40 (Calbiochem), 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 50 mM NaF, 0.2 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 (all from Sigma). The protein concentration of each lysate was determined using BCA protein assay reagent (Pierce).
For AKT and phospho-AKT immunoblotting, 30 µg of cell lysates were
loaded in each lane on a 7.5% or 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions. The proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride
membranes (Millipore). The membrane was blocked with 5% milk in
Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 at 25 °C for 3 h.
Polyclonal antibodies to AKT (0.1 µg/ml) or to phospho-AKT Ser473 (0.05 µg/ml) were incubated with the membrane at
4 °C for 16 h. Then, the membrane was incubated with
peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit IgG at 25 °C for 1 h. The
specific proteins were detected with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Quantitative analysis was performed using
a computing densitometer (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Analysis of FAK phosphotyrosine content was performed as described
previously (5). Briefly, precleared lysates were prepared as above and
then immunoprecipitated using 0.5 µg of polyclonal antibody to FAK,
C-20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc). Immunoblotting analysis was
performed using 1 µg/ml anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody,
PY20 (Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA). To detect
immunoprecipitated proteins, membranes were stripped and reblotted
using C-20 (0.1 µg/ml). Experiments were repeated three times.
Quantitative analysis was performed using a computing densitometer.
ERK1/2 and Phospho-ERK1/2 Immunoblotting--
Immunoblotting was
performed as described previously (66). Cells were harvested as
described before. Cells were washed once with 0.5 mg/ml soybean trypsin
inhibitor and twice with serum-free RPMI 1640 medium. Cells were
resuspended in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium, incubated at 37 °C
without CO2 with agitation for 15 to 30 min, and plated on
60-mm Petri dishes that had been coated with 3 µg/ml either VN or FN.
The concentration of human VN and FN used for coating had been
previously determined to generate comparable cell attachment (data not
shown). Cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for
the indicated intervals. The attached cells were washed twice with PBS
and lysed in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.1% Triton X-100, 300 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate,
0.2 mM EDTA, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
benzamidine. Thirty µg of each lysate were loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE
(9.93% acrylamide, 0.07% bisacrylamide) under reducing conditions,
and proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes.
After blocking, the membrane was incubated with 0.1 µg/ml
polyclonal antibody to ERK1/2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) or
monoclonal antibody to phospho-ERK1/2
Thr202/Tyr204 (1:2000) at 4 °C for
16 h. The membranes were washed using 0.1% Tween 20 in
Tris-buffered saline and incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated goat
affinity-purified antibody to rabbit IgG at room temperature for 1 h. ERK1/2 or phosphorylated ERK1/2 was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence.
Statistical Analysis--
Statistical analysis was performed
using the Student's t test or one way analysis of variance,
Sigma Stat (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
EGF Mediates Cell Adhesion to OPN via
v
3--
Highly metastatic PC3 and
nonmetastatic LNCaP prostate cancer cells differentially express the
v
3 integrin but express comparable levels
of
5 and
1 (Fig.
1 and Ref. 5). To investigate whether
v
3 mediated prostate cancer cell adhesion
to OPN, we analyzed the ability of PC3 cells and LNCaP cells stably
transfected with
3 cDNA (
3-LNCaP) to
bind OPN. PC3 cells adhered to OPN (Fig. 2, A and B) in an
v
3-dependent manner, because
LM609, a monoclonal antibody to
v
3,
inhibited their adhesion to OPN (Fig. 2A). PC3 were shown to
attach equally well to OPN and VN, although at the lowest concentration
tested (0.1 µg/ml), OPN was more active in supporting cell adhesion
than VN (Fig. 2C). Surprisingly,
3-LNCaP cells did not bind OPN (Fig. 3,
A and B), although a significant amount of
v
3 was expressed on the cell surface
(Fig. 1), and the cells did adhere to VN in an
v
3-dependent manner (Fig.
3A) (5). We hypothesized that exogenously expressed
v
3 was in a conformation that did not
bind OPN and that external stimuli would be required for its
activation. It has been shown that
v
3 activation requires protein kinase C (38) and that EGF and its receptor
activate protein kinase C (67, 68). Thus, we tested the ability of EGF
to activate
v
3. EGF increased
3-LNCaP cell adhesion to OPN but had no effect on BSA
(Fig. 3A). EGF stimulation did not increase
v
3 expression levels in
3-LNCaP cells (Fig. 1). In contrast, in the presence of
EGF, PC3 cell adhesion to OPN was not increased (Fig. 2B).
EGF-stimulated
3-LNCaP cell adhesion to OPN was blocked
by LM609 but not by P3G2, an antibody to
v
5 (Fig. 3C). P3G2 previously
shown to block
v
5 adhesion to its ligand
was active in inhibiting HeLa cell adhesion to VN (data not shown) at
the concentrations used in Fig. 3C.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of integrins in PC3, parental
LNCaP, 3-LNCaP and mock-LNCaP
cells. FACS analysis was performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures" using LM609 (1:500), a monoclonal
antibody to v 3 (top row); P1F6
(1:500), a monoclonal antibody to v 5
(middle row); or TS2/16 (1:10), a monoclonal antibody to
1 (bottom row). Secondary anti-mouse IgG is
conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate. 1C10 (1:500) or
nonspecific hybridoma supernatant X653 (1:10) were used as negative
control antibodies (filled profiles). FACS analysis of
v 3 expression in 3-LNCaP
cells (third profile of top row) is shown in the
presence (dotted line) or absence (continuous
line) of EGF.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PC3 cells adhere to OPN in an
v 3-dependent
manner. A, adhesion of 51Cr-labeled PC3
cells to OPN (10 µg/ml) was performed in the presence of LM609
(1:100), a monoclonal antibody to v 3, or
1C10 (1:100) as negative control. No Ab represents cell
adhesion to OPN in the absence of an antibody. Cell adhesion to BSA (10 mg/ml) was used as negative control. The difference between adhesion to
OPN in the presence of LM609 or of 1C10 is statistically significant
(p < 0.01). The experiment was repeated three times
with consistent results. B, 51Cr-labeled PC3
cell adhesion to 10 µg/ml OPN in the presence (solid bars)
or absence (hatched bars) of 200 ng/ml EGF is shown. Cell
attachment to BSA (10 mg/ml) in the presence or absence of 200 ng/ml
EGF was used as negative control. C, the number of
51Cr-labeled PC3 cells attached to 96-well plates coated
with the indicated concentrations of VN (solid) or OPN
(open) at 37 °C for 2 h in the absence of EGF is
shown. Error bars, mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Adhesion of
3-LNCaP transfectants to OPN requires
activation of
v 3
by EGF. A, 51Cr-labeled
3-LNCaP transfectants attached to OPN (10 µg/ml), VN
(3 µg/ml) in the presence (solid bars) or absence
(hatched bars) of EGF (200 ng/ml) are shown. BSA (10 mg/ml)
with and without EGF is shown as negative control. B,
3-LNCaP cell adhesion to the indicated concentrations of
OPN in the presence (solid) or absence (open) of
200 ng/ml EGF at 37 °C for 3 h is shown. Except for one
concentration (0.01 µg/ml), the differences between cell adhesion in
the presence or absence of EGF at each coating concentration of OPN
were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
C, adhesion of 3-LNCaP transfectants to OPN
in the presence of EGF was performed in the presence of LM609 (1:100
ascites; *, p < 0.05) antibody to
v 3 or P3G2 antibody to
v 5 (1:5 culture supernatant). 1C10 (1:100
ascites) and X653 (1:5 culture supernatant) were used as negative
controls. No Ab represents cell adhesion to OPN with EGF in
the absence of an antibody. All experiments were repeated at least
three times with consistent results. Error bars, mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
|
|
3-LNCaP and mock-LNCaP transfectants express HER at
comparable levels (Fig. 4); however, the
effect of EGF was specific for
3 because OPN adhesion
was not up-regulated either in parental LNCaP cells (Fig.
5A) or in mock-transfected
LNCaP cells (Fig. 5B) that do not express
v
3. In conclusion, EGF is required to activate
v
3 adhesion of noninvasive
prostate cancer LNCaP cells to OPN, indicating a new level of
complexity in the regulation of cell adhesion by
v
3.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of HER in PC3, parental
LNCaP, 3-LNCaP, and mock-LNCaP
cells. HER expression was measured by FACS analysis as described
under "Experimental Procedures" using EGFR-528 (5 µg/ml), a
monoclonal antibody to HER. Nonimmune IgG (5 µg/ml) were used as
negative control (filled profiles).
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Adhesion of parental LNCaP and mock-LNCaP
cells to OPN is not increased in the presence of EGF.
A, 51Cr-labeled parental LNCaP cell attachment
to OPN (10 µg/ml) either in the presence (solid bars) or
in the absence (hatched bars) of 200 ng/ml EGF is shown.
B, 51Cr-labeled mock-LNCaP cell attachment to
OPN (10 µg/ml) either in the presence (solid bars) or in
the absence (hatched bars) of 200 ng/ml EGF is shown. Cell
attachment to FN (3 µg/ml) is shown as control of cell adhesion. Cell
attachment to BSA (10 mg/ml) in the presence or absence of 200 ng/ml
EGF is shown as a negative control. All experiments were repeated at
least two times with consistent results. Error bars,
mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
|
|
Role of PI 3-Kinase in
v
3-mediated
Cell Migration--
To investigate whether adhesion to OPN would
result in increased cell migration, PC3 and
3-LNCaP cells were analyzed in Transwell migration
assays using an EGF concentration gradient or a constant concentration
of EGF in both the upper and bottom chambers. PC3 cells migrated on
both OPN and VN substrates; migration on OPN occurred at a higher
extent than on VN (Fig. 6, A
and C). Wortmannin, a PI 3-kinase inhibitor, inhibited PC3
cell migration on OPN and VN (Fig. 6, A and C)
but not adhesion on these substrates (Fig. 6, B and
D). Instead,
3-LNCaP cells did not migrate on
OPN in the presence or absence of EGF (Fig.
7A and data not shown),
although these cells migrated on FN (Fig. 7A) and VN (Fig.
7B and Ref. 5). Wortmannin inhibited
3-LNCaP
cell migration on VN (Fig. 7B) but not adhesion to VN (Fig.
7C). In all experiments, concentrations of VN and OPN that
gave comparable levels of adhesion were selected; OPN coating of either
the bottom part or of both sides of the Transwell chamber gave
comparable results (data not show). EGF was active in mediating
chemotaxis of A431 cells on laminin-1-coated substrates (data not
shown). These results show that a signaling step, crucial for cell
migration, failed to be activated in
3-LNCaP cell
transfectants adherent to OPN but was active in PC3 cells.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
PC3 cell migration on OPN and VN is mediated
by PI 3-kinase. Cell migration was performed at 37 °C for
4 h as shown under "Experimental Procedures" using Transwell
chambers coated on both sides with BSA (10 mg/ml), VN (3 µg/ml), and
OPN (10 µg/ml). A, migration of PC3 cells on OPN in the
presence of the indicated concentrations of wortmannin (WM)
at 37 °C for 4 h is shown. B, adhesion of PC3 cells
to OPN (10 µg/ml) in the presence of indicated concentrations of
wortmannin at 37 °C for 2 h is shown. C, migration
of PC3 cells on VN in presence of the indicated concentrations of
wortmannin at 37 °C for 4 h is shown. D, adhesion of
PC3 cells to VN (10 µg/ml) in the presence of wortmannin at 37 °C
for 2 h is shown. In panels A-D, migration
and adhesion of PC3 cells to BSA (10 mg/ml) is shown as negative
control; Me2SO (DMSO) was used as vehicle for
wortmannin. In panels B and D, attached cells
were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 30 min, stained with
0.5% crystal violet at room temperature for at least 2 h, and
described under "Experimental Procedures." Triplicate observations
were performed. The numbers of migrated cells/mm2 are
shown. All experiments were repeated at least three times with
consistent results. A-D, error bars,
mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
3-LNCaP
transfectants do not migrate on OPN but migrate on VN via PI 3-kinase
activation. A, migration of 3-LNCaP
cells at 37 °C for 4 h in the Transwell chambers coated on both
sides with BSA (10 mg/ml), FN (3 µg/ml), and OPN (10 µg/ml) is
shown. OPN was tested in the presence or absence of 200 ng/ml EGF.
Migration on FN is shown as a control. B, migration of
3-LNCaP cells on VN (3 µg/ml) in the presence of 25 nM wortmannin (WM) at 37 °C for 4 h is
shown. Me2SO (DMSO) was used as a vehicle for
wortmannin. C, adhesion of 3-LNCaP cells to
VN (3 µg/ml) performed in the presence of 10 and 25 nM
wortmannin at 37 °C for 2 h is shown. In panels
A-C, BSA (10 mg/ml) was used as negative control.
Attached cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 30 min, stained with 0.5% crystal violet at room temperature for at least
2 h, and described under "Experimental Procedures." Comparable
levels of adhesion were observed at the used concentrations of each
substrate. Triplicate observations were performed. All experiments were
repeated at least three times with consistent results.
A-C, error bars, mean ± S.E.
(n = 3).
|
|
Substrate Specificity of PI 3-Kinase Pathway Activation--
To
analyze whether a differential activation by
v
3 of downstream integrin-mediated
signaling events occurs in response to adhesion to a specific
substrate, PC3 and
3-LNCaP cells were allowed to attach
to either OPN or VN. To examine PI 3-kinase activation, we analyzed the
levels of Ser473 phosphorylation of AKT, a downstream
effector of PI 3-kinase, as a sensitive readout of PI 3-kinase activity
(56). PC3 cells stimulated the PI 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway on OPN
more significantly than on VN through
v
3
or than on FN through
1 integrins (Fig. 8A), although they attached to
OPN, VN, and FN equally well (Fig. 8B). The maximum levels
of AKT phosphorylation on OPN were observed between 30 and 45 min. As
shown in Fig. 9A,
3-LNCaP cell adhesion to OPN did not induce AKT
Ser473 phosphorylation, whereas adhesion to VN induced a
significant increase in AKT Ser473 phosphorylation.
Densitometric analysis performed using three separate exposures in a
linear range showed a 13- to 18-fold increase in AKT Ser473
phosphorylation on VN and a 1- to 2-fold increase on OPN. AKT phosphorylation induced by EGF was detected at 20, 30, 60, and 120 min
on cells attached to their extracellular matrix (not shown); however
EGF did not induce AKT Ser473 phosphorylation in
3-LNCaP cells attached to OPN (Fig. 9A) nor did it increase AKT phosphorylation when these cells attached to VN
(Fig. 9B).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Increased AKT Ser473
phosphorylation in response to
v 3
engagement by OPN in PC3 cells. A, PC3 cells starved in
serum-free medium for 24 h were seeded on FN (2 µg/ml)-, VN (0.3 µg/ml)-, and OPN (0.3 µg/ml)-coated Petri dishes at 37 °C for
the indicated times. The attached cells were lysed on the dish as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Thirty µg of cell
lysate per lane were loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE. Phosphorylation of AKT is
shown by immunoblotting (WB) using a polyclonal antibody to
phospho-AKT Ser473 (0.05 µg/ml, top panel).
Protein loading control is shown on the lower panel by AKT
immunoblotting with polyclonal antibody to AKT (0.1 µg/ml).
B, adhesion of 51Cr-labeled PC3 cells at
37 °C for 2 h on 96-well plates coated with OPN (0.3 µg/ml),
VN (0.3 µg/ml), or FN (2 µg/ml) is shown. Cell adhesion to BSA (10 mg/ml)-coated wells is shown as a negative control. Error
bars, mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Adhesion of
3-LNCaP transfectants to OPN does not
stimulate AKT Ser473 phosphorylation. A,
top panel, AKT phosphorylation of 3-LNCaP
transfectants attached to OPN (10 µg/ml) or VN (3 µg/ml) or held in
suspension (10 mg/ml BSA) at 37 °C for 3 h was measured by
immunoblotting using a polyclonal antibody to phospho-AKT
Ser473 (0.05 µg/ml). Protein loading control is shown on
the bottom panel by AKT immunoblotting (WB) with
polyclonal antibody to AKT (0.1 µg/ml). B shows
phospho-AKT Ser473 (top panel) and AKT protein
loading (bottom panel) of 3-LNCaP
transfectants attached to VN (3 µg/ml) at 37 °C for 3 h with
and without EGF. The experiments were repeated at least three times
with consistent results.
|
|
A pharmacologic approach was also used to investigate the role of other
downstream effectors of FAK that have been previously shown to mediate
cell migration, ERK1 and -2 (60, 61). An inhibitor of MEK-1 in the MAP
kinase pathway, PD98059 (69), was tested to analyze its effect on
3-LNCaP and PC3 cell migration. PD98059 had no effect on
migration of either cell type on VN, although it did inhibit
endothelial cell migration (data not shown and Ref. 61). Activation of
ERK1/2 occurred in PC3 cells attached to both VN and OPN substrates
(Fig. 10A); in contrast,
3-LNCaP cells attached to VN and OPN did not activate
ERK1/2 phosphorylation at any of the time points analyzed (Fig.
10B and not shown); ERK1/2 activation was detected in
response to EGF treatment in cells attached to their matrix in tissue
culture dishes (Fig. 10B). In Fig. 10A, ERK1/2
activation is longer than other cells tested in our laboratory in
similar conditions; these results do not have a mechanistic explanation
at this time. However, the observed sustained activation seems to be
non-integrin-dependent because it is seen in cells in
suspension as well after 30 min. Thus, ERK1/2 activation did not play a
role or correlate with either PC3 or
3-LNCaP cell
migration.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Activation of ERK1/2 and FAK signaling
pathways on OPN and VN. A, ERK1/2 phosphorylation was
tested using a monoclonal antibody to phospho-ERK1/2 (top
panel), and protein loading was confirmed (bottom
panel) using a polyclonal antibody to ERK1/2. The experiments were
repeated at least twice with consistent results. B, cell
lysates from cells attached to OPN (10 µg/ml) or VN (3 µg/ml) or to
their matrix in tissue culture dishes (on dish) in the absence of EGF
or in the presence of EGF (200 ng/ml) were analyzed using 0.1 µg/ml
rabbit affinity-purified antibody to ERK1/2 (bottom panel)
and a monoclonal antibody to phospho-ERK1/2 (top panel). The
experiments were repeated at least two times with consistent
results.
|
|
Our previous report showed that FAK played a predominant role in
mediating cell migration on VN, because migration was inhibited by
expression of FAK-related non-kinase (5). It has been shown that PI
3-kinase forms a complex with FAK, acts as a downstream effector of
FAK, and controls cell migration (53). In
3-LNCaP cells,
FAK is phosphorylated in response to
v
3
engagement by OPN and by VN (Fig. 11).
Densitometric analysis performed using three separate exposures in a
linear range showed the following increase in FAK phosphorylation:
8.5-fold increase on OPN and 9.4-fold on VN in presence of EGF and
8.1-fold on VN in the absence of EGF. EGF stimulation did induce
comparable levels of HER tyrosine phosphorylation in cells in
suspension or attached to VN or OPN (data not shown), thus indicating
that HER is functional in all tested conditions; however, EGF did not
increase FAK-tyrosine phosphorylation either on VN or in suspended
cells (Fig. 11). In conclusion, on OPN substrates,
v
3-mediated signaling events fail to be
activated downstream of FAK at the level of PI 3-kinase/AKT activation.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK in
3-LNCaP cells attached to OPN or
VN. FAK tyrosine phosphorylation of 3-LNCaP cell
transfectants was measured using PY20 (1 µg/ml) immunoblotting
(top panels) of immunocomplexes precipitated by C-20
polyclonal antibody to FAK (0.5 µg) from 3-LNCaP
transfectant detergent lysates. Lysates were prepared from cells
attached to OPN (10 µg/ml)- or VN (3 µg/ml)-coated dishes in the
presence or absence of EGF (200 ng/ml). The same membrane was stripped,
and FAK protein levels were analyzed using 0.1 µg/ml
affinity-purified antibody to FAK (bottom panels). FAK
tyrosine phosphorylation is expressed as -fold increase over the levels
detected in cells held in suspension. The experiments were repeated at
least three times with consistent results.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study shows that
v
3 is
expressed in multiple functional states and that its ability to mediate
cell migration and intracellular signaling pathways is
substrate-specific and functional state-dependent. In PC3
cells,
v
3 mediates cell adhesion,
migration, and PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway activation on VN and OPN. In
contrast, adhesion to OPN of noninvasive LNCaP cells upon exogenous
expression of
v
3 requires its activation
by EGF although
v
3 is in a functional
state that allows adhesion to a different ligand, VN, in the absence of
EGF. Furthermore, in LNCaP cells, while
v
3 mediates cell migration and PI
3-kinase/AKT pathway activation on VN, adhesion to OPN fails to support
cell migration and PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway activation mediated by
v
3. This is the first report that shows
an integrin ligand-mediated phenotypical alteration that reverts a
migratory cell into a nonmigratory cell via engagement of the same
integrin. We conclude that
v
3 exists in
multiple functional states that can bind either VN selectively or both
VN and OPN and that can differentially activate cell migration and the
PI 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway in a ligand-specific manner. The
results highlight a versatile role for
v
3
in the regulation of the PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway and in a
substrate-dependent control of cell invasion.
We show for the first time that EGF reverts a form of
v
3 that does not recognize OPN in an
OPN-binding form. Although the mechanism of activation remains to be
identified, EGF effect is not due to a change in integrin expression on
the cell surface because EGF regulates cell adhesion to OPN without a
significant change in integrin expression (Fig. 1). EGF- downstream
players that might potentially activate
v
3 are protein kinase C, known to be
involved in mediating
v
3 activation (38),
and HER through its direct association with integrins (70); however,
additional modulators, such as integrin-associated proteins (71, 72), might be responsible for changes in ligand binding or post-ligand binding activities. Similar to our findings, activation-independent (fibrinogen) and -dependent (prothrombin) ligands for
v
3 have been shown by Byzova and Plow
(38) suggesting that a sophisticated mechanism of tight regulation and
ligand selection involves
v
3.
The EGF receptor has been shown to synergize with
v
5 to increase cell migration (73); LNCaP
cells express low levels of
5 and large amounts of
1 (Fig. 1 and Ref. 5). However, these previously
described OPN receptors did not play a role in the adhesion of these
cells to OPN in our experimental system, since first, parental or
mock-LNCaP cells that did not express
v
3 did not adhere to OPN in response to EGF stimulation and second, an
antibody to
v
5 did not inhibit OPN
adhesion of
3-LNCaP cells. We conclude that EGF and its
receptor HER synergize with
v
3 in a
substrate-specific manner on OPN but not on VN. This change required
for
3-LNCaP cell adhesion to OPN did not support cell migration on OPN although these cells migrated on VN. The ability of
v
3 to mediate cell migration is therefore
substrate-specific. Invasive PC3 cells have the ability to up-regulate
cell migration through
v
3 on OPN;
therefore, it is conceivable that when cancer cells lose the ability to
select their cell binding partners by uncoupling/deregulating the
synergistic activity of
v
3 integrin and
HER, such as in PC3 cells, they migrate in response to engagement by
multiple
v
3 ligands.
Among the three known pathways that mediate cell migration and
are activated by integrins: FAK, PI 3-kinase/AKT, and MAP kinase pathways, we have shown that the FAK (5) and the PI 3-kinase/AKT pathways support migration on VN in
3-LNCaP cells and on
VN and OPN in PC3 cells. The MAP kinase pathway did not play a role in either
3-LNCaP or PC3 cell migration because PD98059 did
not block cell migration (not shown). It should be pointed out that AKT
has the ability to support cell migration mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor in endothelial cells (57); it is not known,
however, whether this mechanism is active in other cells. We show that
v
3-OPN interaction mediates FAK tyrosine
phosphorylation but this signal, although necessary, is not sufficient
to mediate cell migration in noninvasive cells. PI 3-kinase, a mediator
of integrin and growth factor activities including EGF (74), is known
to act as a downstream effector of FAK and to control cell migration
activated by cell adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins (53, 54).
Integrin-mediated adhesion to the extracellular matrix proteins
stimulates the association of the p85 regulatory PI 3-kinase subunit
with FAK through FAK Tyr397 (51, 52); FAK binding to PI
3-kinase has been demonstrated to activate the latter one (53). Because
FAK is tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to OPN adhesion mediated by
EGF, we conclude that a block at the level of PI 3-kinase/AKT
activation downstream of FAK explains the failure of
3-LNCaP cells to migrate, although
v
3 and the PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway are
fully functional in these cells upon
v
3
engagement by VN. The data suggest that the generated
3-LNCaP cells are a model system that allows the study
of the
v
3 effectors that mediate cell
migration downstream of FAK. It remains to be analyzed whether FRNK, a
negative regulator of FAK that we have shown inhibits VN-mediated
migration in
3-LNCaP cells (5), specifically inhibits
FAK/PI 3-kinase interaction. It should be stressed that the PI
3-kinase/AKT pathway might also control cell adhesion, as shown by
Byzova and Plow since in this study (43) wortmannin did inhibit both
cell adhesion and migration after a 30-min preincubation; however, we
did not observe wortmannin inhibition of cell adhesion to VN and OPN in
our system due to either a cell type-specific effect or to the lack of
preincubation with wortmannin in our experimental system. PTEN, a lipid
phosphatase that prevents FAK and PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway activation
(75, 76) and down-regulates cell motility and directionality (77) is
not expected to contribute to the migration of these cells, because
LNCaP and PC3 cells have been shown to express a mutated and a deleted
PTEN, respectively (78). In both cell types, PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway
activation is controlled by integrins in the absence of an active PTEN,
confirming that other molecules such as either Cdc42 (58) or ILK (59)
could control integrin-mediated cell migration.
We show here that in
3-LNCaP cells a differential
activation of the PI 3-kinase/AKT pathway by
v
3 occurs: OPN interaction with
v
3 does not activate the PI 3-kinase/AKT
pathway, whereas VN does. It should be noted that PI 3-kinase/AKT
pathway is stimulated via OPN engagement of
v
3 in PC3 cells (Fig. 8A) and
in osteoclasts (79), thus indicating that the specific failure to
activate the PI 3-kinase pathway is cell type-dependent.
Because OPN-null mice generate significantly smaller metastases than
wild type mice (21), it is thus conceivable that in the event LNCaP or another noninvasive cell will migrate to a metastatic site where OPN is
predominantly expressed, the interaction of
v
3 with OPN will not provide a migratory
or, alternatively, survival signal for these cells. Recently, the role
of AKT in promoting cell survival of androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells but
not of androgen-insensitive PC3 cells has been shown (80). It is noted
that because AKT activation promotes cell survival (48) and LNCaP cells
undergo apoptosis in the presence of the PI 3-kinase inhibitor,
wortmannin (80), the failure of OPN to stimulate AKT activation might
result in apoptosis of these poorly tumorigenic cells. It remains to be
determined whether direct
v
3 integrin
engagement in prostate cells prevents apoptosis by activation of the PI
3-kinase/AKT pathway. The synergistic activity of
v
3, OPN, and the downstream PI
3-kinase/AKT pathway might balance proliferative, apoptotic, and
migratory stimuli, thus playing a crucial role in tumor growth and
metastatic events in vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We would like to thank Drs. D. R. Senger,
E. A. Wayner, and D. A. Cheresh for generously providing OPN
or antibodies. Special thanks to Drs. J. A. Madri and M. Centrella
for constructive discussion. We also would like to thank N. Bennett for
helping with preparation of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA-71870 and DK-52670 and Army Prostate Cancer Research
Program Grant DAMD17-98-1-8506 (to L. R. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Genetics Institute, One Burtt Rd., Andover, MA 01810.
§
To whom correspondence and requests for reprints should be
addressed: Dept. of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, P. O. Box 208023, 310 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520. Tel.:
203-737-1454; Fax: 203-737-1455; E-mail:
lucia.languino@yale.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 1, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002646200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VN, vitronectin;
OPN, osteopontin;
FN, fibronectin;
PI 3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
BSA, bovine serum
albumin;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter;
FAK, focal adhesion
kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
HER, human EGF
receptor;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Haas, T. A.,
and Plow, E. F.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
656-662
|
| 2.
|
Juliano, R.
(1996)
BioEssays
18,
911-917
|
| 3.
|
Hynes, R. O.
(1996)
Dev. Biol.
180,
402-412
|
| 4.
|
Eliceiri, B. P.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
1227-1230
|
| 5.
|
Zheng, D. Q.,
Woodard, A. S.,
Fornaro, M.,
Tallini, G.,
and Languino, L. R.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
1655-1664
|
| 6.
|
Petitclerc, E.,
Stromblad, S.,
von Schalscha, T. L.,
Mitjans, F.,
Piulats, J.,
Montgomery, A. M.,
Cheresh, D. A.,
and Brooks, P. C.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
2724-2730
|
| 7.
|
Felding-Habermann, B.,
Mueller, B. M.,
Romerdahl, C. A.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
89,
2018-2022
|
| 8.
|
Filardo, E. J.,
Brooks, P. C.,
Deming, S. L.,
Damsky, C.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
1-10
|
| 9.
|
Hsu, M. Y.,
Shih, D. T.,
Meier, F. E.,
Van Belle, P.,
Hsu, J. Y.,
Elder, D. E.,
Buck, C. A.,
and Herlyn, M.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
153,
1435-1442
|
| 10.
|
Montgomery, A. M.,
Reisfeld, R. A.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8856-8860
|
| 11.
|
Felding-Habermann, B.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5,
864-868
|
| 12.
|
Felding-Habermann, B.,
Habermann, R.,
Saldivar, E.,
and Ruggeri, Z. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5892-5900
|
| 13.
|
Woodard, A. S.,
García-Cardeña, G.,
Leong, M.,
Madri, J. A.,
Sessa, W. C.,
and Languino, L. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
469-478
|
| 14.
|
Seftor, R. E. B.,
Seftor, E. A.,
Gehlsen, K. R.,
Stetler-Stevenson, W. G.,
Brown, P. D.,
Ruoslahti, E.,
and Hendrix, M. J. C.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1557-1561
|
| 15.
|
Senger, D. R.,
Ledbetter, S. R.,
Claffey, K. P.,
Papadopoulos-Sergiou, A.,
Perruzzi, C. A.,
and Detmar, M.
(1996)
Am. J. Pathol.
149,
293-305
|
| 16.
|
Senger, D.,
and Perruzzi, C. A.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1314,
13-24
|
| 17.
|
Ross, F. P.,
Chappel, J.,
Alvarez, J. I.,
Sander, D.,
Butler, W. T.,
Farach-Carson, M. C.,
Mintz, K. A.,
Robey, P. G.,
Teitelbaum, S. L.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
9901-9907
|
| 18.
|
Hu, D. D.,
Hoyer, K. R.,
and Smith, J. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9917-9925
|
| 19.
|
Miyauchi, A.,
Alvarez, J.,
Greenfield, E. M.,
Teti, A.,
Grano, M.,
Colucci, S.,
Zambonin-Zallone, A.,
Ross, F. P.,
Teitelbaum, S. L.,
Cheresh, D.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
20369-20374
|
| 20.
|
Faccio, R.,
Grano, M.,
Colucci, S.,
Zallone, A. Z.,
Quaranta, V.,
and Pelletier, A. J.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
249,
522-525
|
| 21.
|
Crawford, H. C.,
Matrisian, L. M.,
and Liaw, L.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
5206-5215
|
| 22.
|
Thalmann, G. N.,
Sikes, R. A.,
Devoll, R. E.,
Kiefer, J. A.,
Markwalder, R.,
Klima, I.,
Farach-Carson, C. M.,
Studer, U. E.,
and Chung, L. W. K.
(1999)
Clin. Cancer Res.
5,
2271-2277
|
| 23.
|
Senger, D. R.,
Asch, B. B.,
Smith, B. D.,
Perruzzi, C. A.,
and Dvorak, H. F.
(1983)
Nature
302,
714-715
|
| 24.
|
Brown, L. F.,
Papadopoulos-Sergiou, A.,
Berse, B.,
Manseau, E. J.,
Tognazzi, K.,
Perruzzi, C. A.,
Dvorak, H. F.,
and Senger, D. R.
(1994)
Am. J. Pathol.
145,
610-623
|
| 25.
|
Elgavish, A.,
Prince, C.,
Chang, P. L.,
Lloyd, K.,
Lindsey, R.,
and Reed, R.
(1998)
Prostate
35,
83-94
|
| 26.
|
Oates, A. J.,
Barraclough, R.,
and Rudland, P. S.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
97-104
|
| 27.
|
Rittling, S. R.,
and Denhardt, D. T.
(1999)
Exp. Nephrol.
7,
103-113
|
| 28.
|
Bayless, K. J.,
Meininger, G. A.,
Scholtz, J. M.,
and Davis, G. E.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1165-1174
|
| 29.
|
Denda, S.,
Reichardt, L. F.,
and Muller, U.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
1425-1435
|
| 30.
|
Saegusa, Y.,
Ziff, M.,
Welkovish, L.,
and Cavender, D.
(1990)
J. Cell Phys.
142,
488-495
|
| 31.
|
Smith, L. L.,
and Giachelli, C. M.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
242,
351-360
|
| 32.
|
Haapasalmi, K.,
Makela, M.,
Oksala, O.,
Heino, J.,
Yamada, K. M.,
Uitto, V.-J.,
and Larjava, H.
(1995)
Am. J. Pathol.
147,
193-206
|
| 33.
|
Hu, |