![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24575-24582, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics and the
Neuroscience and Smooth Muscle Research Groups, University of Calgary,
Calgary, T2N 4N1 Canada
Received for publication, January 14, 2000, and in revised form, May 16, 2000
We recently described domains II and III as
important determinants of fast, voltage-dependent
inactivation of R-type calcium channels (Spaetgens, R. L., and
Zamponi, G. W. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22428-22438). Here we examine in greater detail the structural
determinants of inactivation using a series of chimeras comprising
various regions of wild type Calcium entry through voltage-dependent calcium
channels is important for a range of cellular processes, including
neurotransmitter release and activation of
Ca2+-dependent enzymes. Molecular cloning has
identified the primary structures of at least 9 different neuronal
Ca2+ channel Molecular Biology--
We previously introduced convenient
silent restriction enzyme sites (obtained from Life Technologies, Inc.
and from New England Biolabs) into the cDNAs encoding for wild-type
rat brain II S6 Chimeras--
The EECC and CCEE chimeras (in the pMT2
expression vector) were used as the template for mutagenesis to
introduce unique AgeI sites near the beginning of the II S6
segments. Both constructs were first cut with SalI (II-III
linker, 3'-polycloning site) and recircularized to reduce their length
by about 5 kb1 before
proceeding with mutagenesis. Using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene), we created silent mutations at bp 2109 of CCEE and bp
1815 of EECC. Restriction digests confirmed successful addition of the
sites, and the coding region was sequenced to confirm the absence of
errors. To construct the chimeras, CCEE (+AgeI) and EECC
(+AgeI) were cut with KpnI and AgeI,
and the resulting 2-kb fragments from each construct were exchanged via
ligation. Finally, the excised 5-kb SalI fragment was
reintroduced into both constructs to yield two full-length clones:
III S6 Chimeras--
The EEEC and CCCE chimeras (in the pMT2
expression vector) were used as the templates for mutagenesis to
introduce unique AatII sites near the beginning of the III
S6 segments. Using the QuikChange kit, a silent mutation at bp 4002 of
EEEC and a non-silent mutation at bp 3384 of CCCE were introduced.
However, because the non-silent mutation of CCCE involved a
substitution to the corresponding residue in the EEEC sequence (serine
to valine), the substitution became inconsequential in the completed
chimera. Successful addition of the sites was confirmed by restriction digests, and the coding region was sequenced to confirm the absence of
errors. To construct the chimeras, CCCE + AatII and EEEC + AatII were cut with NotI and AatII
restriction enzymes, and the resulting 4-kb fragments from each
construct were exchanged and religated to yield two full-length clones:
Double Chimeras--
To create double chimeras,
I-II Linker Chimera--
To create CeCCC, a unique non-silent
SplI site was generated by site-directed mutagenesis
(QuikChange) at the very end of the domain I-II linker regions of CECC
and CCCC at exactly complimentary positions in a stretch of residues
that is completely conserved between both parent channels (VFYW). A
KpnI-SplI fragment (~1.5 kb) was excised from
CECC and ligated into likewise digested CCCC to produce CeCCC but still
carrying the non-silent SplI site. Finally, another round of
site-directed mutagenesis was used to remove the non-silent
SplI site, thereby restoring the original amino acid
sequence (VFYW).
Additional Chimeras--
To create CEEE(II+IIIS6C), an
AvrII fragment cut from CCCC (900 bp before 5' polylinker,
I-II linker region, ~2 kb) and ligated into likewise-digested
Transient Expression of Calcium Channels and Electrophysiological
Recordings--
We previously provided a detailed description of the
procedures for transient expression of the wild type and chimeric
calcium channels in human embryonic kidney tsa-201 cells and their
electrophysiological analysis via whole cell patch clamp (34). Unless
stated otherwise, the external and internal recording solutions
contained, respectively, 20 mM BaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 40 mM tetraethylammonium chloride, 10 mM glucose,
65 mM CsCl (pH 7.2 with tetraethylammonium hydroxide) and
108 mM cesium methanesulfonate (CsMS), 4 mM
MgCl2, 9 mM EGTA, 9 mM HEPES (pH
7.2 with tetraethylammonium hydroxide), thus minimizing the possibility
of contamination from calcium-dependent inactivation
processes. Pipette resistances were typically on the order of 3 to 4 M The Cytoplasmic Milieu Affects Inactivation Properties--
We
previously reported that wild type Transfer of
As seen in Fig. 2A,
replacement of the II S6 or III S6 segments of The Domain I-II Linker Region of
To identify the putative region sustaining rapid inactivation of
Multiple Structural Elements Control the Voltage Dependence of
Inactivation--
We have previously shown that domains II and III
could account for the majority of differences in half-inactivation
potential between the two wild type channels, whereas domains I and IV
contributed to a lesser extent (34). To test whether the effects of
domains II and III could be attributed to the S6 regions, we compared the half-inactivation potentials of the wild type and chimeric calcium
channels (Fig. 4). Replacement of
the II S6 region of
Replacement of the domain III S6 region resulted in more substantial
(~15 mV) hyperpolarizing shifts in half-inactivation potential that
were not mirrored by activation potential shifts. In view of the 60-mV
spread between the wild type channels, the contributions from the S6
regions were relatively minor, suggesting that other regions in domains
II and III may determine the voltage dependence of inactivation.
Indeed, both the CeCCC and CECC (IIS6C) constructs inactivated 20 mV
more negatively than the wild type Comparison with Previous Work--
We previously presented
evidence that the calcium channel domains II and III are critical
determinants of both the voltage dependence and the rate of
inactivation (34). Each of those two domains contributed to about half
of the observed differences in half-inactivation potential between
The involvement of the I-II linker would be consistent with the
observation that two separate point mutations in this region can slow
the inactivation of What Controls the Voltage Dependence of Inactivation?--
We
previously presented evidence that domains II and III accounted for
much of the difference in half inactivation potentials seen with the
wild type channels (34). Within domain III, we can attribute a
significant effect to the S6 segment, indicating that the III S6 region
is involved in controlling both the rate and some of the voltage
dependence of inactivation. A similar argument can be made for the
domain I-II linker region. In contrast, the II S6 region had little
effect on the voltage dependence of inactivation despite being an
important feature for determining the inactivation rate. Conversely,
domain I does not affect inactivation rate but does contribute to
voltage dependence (compare What Is the Mechanism That Underlies Calcium Channel Fast
Voltage-dependent Inactivation?--
Our original intent
was to gather additional evidence in support of our hypothesis that
fast calcium channel inactivation might occur via a mechanism
reminiscent of the C-type inactivation process, which is thought to
involve a pore collapse mediated by the four S6 segments
(i.e. Refs. 35 and 36). Our data implicating the domain II
and III S6 regions fit with such a model. However, the critical
involvement of the cytoplasmic domain I-II linker region argues against
simple pore collapse. As a result, our data are best described by a
model in which the I-II linker region forms a cytoplasmic gating
particle (39) similar to that proposed for the domain III-IV linker of
voltage-dependent sodium channels (23, 24) (see Fig.
5). If so, then the S6 regions might
perhaps serve as the docking site for the inactivation gate. The
current belief that that S6 segments line the inner vestibule of the
pore would be consistent with such a mechanism (40, 41, 42), but it may
well be possible that other regions of the channel could be part of the
docking interaction. A putative role of the domain I-II linker as the
inactivation gate would fit the previously reported effects of point
mutations in the
A hinged-lid model could also accommodate our observations that
intracellular TEA slows inactivation rates. If a TEA molecule acting as
a low affinity blocker were to compete with the I-II linker for its
docking site, one would expect to observe a slowing of the macroscopic
time course of inactivation. Such a mechanism would not be without
precedent, as TEA prevents inactivation gate closure of shaker B
potassium channels (35), and open channel block of
batrachotoxin-activated cardiac sodium channels by local anesthetics
and related compounds prevents fast inactivation (46, 47).
How can a hinged-lid mechanism account for the observation that the
presence of either the domain IIS6, III S6, or the domain I-II linker
region of
In summary, a hinged-lid model of inactivation can nicely account for
our data as well as the key observations reported in the literature.
The redundancy of the structural elements that are sufficient to
maintain rapid inactivation underlines the fundamental importance of
this process for the precise control of calcium entry and, thus,
prevention of accumulation of toxic levels of intracellular calcium
(18-20).
We thank Dr. T. P. Snutch for the wild
type calcium channel cDNA constructs.
*
This work was supported by a grant from the Heart and Stroke
Foundation of Alberta and the Northwest Territories, with some additional grant support from the Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Currently supported via studentship awards from the Alberta
Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR).
¶
Supported through a studentship award from the AHFMR.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000399200
The abbreviations used are:
kb, kilobase(s);
bp, base pair(s);
CsMS, cesium methanesulfonate;
TEA, tetraethylammonium.
Fast Inactivation of Voltage-dependent Calcium
Channels
A HINGED-LID MECHANISM?*
§,
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1C and
1E
calcium channels. Substitution of the II S6 and/or III S6 segments of
1E into the
1C backbone resulted in rapid
inactivation rates that closely approximated those of wild type
1E channels. However, neither individual or combined
substitution of the II S6 and III S6 segments could account for the 60 mV more negative half-inactivation potential seen with wild type
1E channels, indicating that the S6 regions contribute
only partially to the voltage dependence of inactivation. Interestingly, the converse replacement of
1E S6
segments of domains II, III, or II+III with those of
1C
was insufficient to significantly slow inactivation rates. Only when
the I-II linker region and the domain II and III S6 regions of
1E were concomitantly replaced with
1C
sequence could inactivation be abolished. Conversely, introduction of
the
1E domain I-II linker sequence into
1C conferred
1E-like inactivation rates,
indicating that the domain I-II linker is a key contributor to calcium
channel inactivation. Overall, our data are consistent with a mechanism
in which inactivation of voltage-dependent calcium channels
may occur via docking of the I-II linker region to a site comprising,
at least in part, the domain II and III S6 segments.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 subunits (termed
1A through
1I (1-15)) that encode the
previously identified native L-, P-, N, -Q-, T-, and R-types (for
review, see Refs. 16 and 17). Calcium channels, like many other
voltage-dependent ion channels, undergo a series of conformational changes in response to voltage, resulting in their opening, closing, and inactivation. Voltage-dependent
inactivation of calcium channels is an important intrinsic process that
prevents the breakdown of the calcium gradient as well as excessive
calcium entry that is toxic to most cells (18-20). In addition, many
pharmacological agents interact predominantly with inactivated channels
(21, 22). Unlike sodium (23, 24) and potassium (25-27) channels, the
mechanisms that govern calcium channel voltage-dependent
inactivation are not fully understood. Although a number of structural
moieties of the calcium channel
1 subunit have been
implicated in being important in fast calcium channel inactivation (7,
22, 28-30, 32, 33), the detailed mechanism underlying the inactivation process remain unknown, and there have been few systematic attempts to
resolve this issue. By creating a series of chimeras between non-inactivating (L-type)
1C and rapidly inactivating
(R-type)
1E rat brain calcium channels, we recently
demonstrated that multiple structural domains determine the voltage
dependence and rates of calcium channel inactivation (34). Here, we
present novel evidence implicating the domain II and III S6 segments
and the domain I-II linker region as key elements in setting the rate of calcium channel inactivation. Using a number of additional chimeras
derived from
1C and
1E channels, we
demonstrate that insertion of either the domain II S6, III S6, or I-II
linker regions of
1E into
1C is
sufficient to confer
1E-like inactivation kinetics.
Consistent with these data, removal of inactivation from
1E required the concomitant substitution of all three
regions with
1C sequence. Based on this evidence, we
propose a model in which the I-II linker forms a hinged lid that may
dock at the domain II and III S6 regions of the channel.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1E (rbE-II, GenBankTM accession
number L15453) and
1C (rbC-II, GenBankTM
accession number M67515). AvrII was inserted at the
beginning of the I-II linker, and SalI was inserted at the
beginning of the II-III linker (see Ref. 34) to facilitate the creation
of a series of chimeras encompassing various combinations of
transmembrane domains of the two parent channels. To permit exchange of
the domain II and III S6 segments, an additional pair of restriction sites was introduced into several of these chimeras at exactly complimentary positions; an AgeI restriction site was
introduced 20 amino acids 5' to the beginning of the II S6 segment, and
an AatII site was created 5 amino acids 5' to the beginning
of the III S6 segment. The residues prior to the beginning of II S6 and III S6 are identical in both channels, and hence, the resultant chimeras only differ in their S6 regions. To permit exchange of the
domain I-II linker region, a silent NarI site was introduced into the ECCC sequence at the beginning of domain II.
1E (IIS6C)/pMT2 and
1C
(IIS6E)/pMT2.
1E (IIIS6C)/pMT2 and
1C
(IIIS6E)/pMT2.
1E (IIS6C) and
1E (IIIS6C) were cut with
SalI (II-III linker, 3' polylinker, ~5 kb). Subsequently, the 5-kb SalI fragment derived from
1E
(IIIS6C) was ligated into
1E (IIS6C) to produce
1E (II/IIIS6C). An analogous approach was used to create
1C (II/IIIS6E) from
1C (IIS6E)
1C (IIIS6E). In each case, the correct orientation was
determined using restriction digest patterns.
1E(II/IIIS6C). To create CECC(IIS6C), CEEE(II/IIIS6C)
and EECC were cut with SalI, and the fragment from the
latter chimera (corresponding to domains III and IV of
1C) was ligated into the former construct. The correct
orientation of the constructs was confirmed via restriction digests. To
create CcEEE(II/IIIS6C), we first introduced a silent NarI
site into the EEEE(II/IIIS6C) sequence ~20 amino acid residues before
the end of the domain I-II linker region. ECCC contained an endogenous NarI site at an exactly complementary position. A 1900-bp
NarI fragment (1000 bp before the 5' polylinker, end of I-II
linker) was excised from ECCC substituted in the EEEE(II/IIIS6C + NarI) construct to give rise to EcEEE(II/IIIS6C), with the
lowercase letter indicating the origin of the I-II linker. This
construct did not express functionally in HEK cells but was used to
create the chimera CcEEE(II/IIIS6C) by substituting domain I of
EcEEE(II/IIIS6C) with that of CCCC using AvrII. Correct
orientations of the inserts were confirmed via restriction enzyme digests.
, and series resistance was compensated by 85% to minimize voltage
errors. Currents were typically elicited from holding potentials of
100 mV (or
130 mV for
1E and other chimeras which
activated more negatively) to various test potentials using Clampex
software (Axon Instruments). However, to obtain steady state
inactivation curves, a 5-s conditioning pulse preceded a test
depolarization to +10 mV. The rate of inactivation was assessed by
considering both the percentage of current that had inactivated over a
time course of 125 ms and by mono-exponential fits to the time course
of inactivation. Data were analyzed using Clampfit (Axon Instruments)
and Sigmaplot 4.0 (Jandel Scientific). Steady state inactivation curves
and macroscopic current voltage relations were analyzed using the
Boltzmann equation (see Ref. 34). All error bars are standard errors,
numbers in parentheses displayed in the figures reflect numbers of
experiments, and p values were determined by Student's
t tests.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1C and
1E channels exhibited pronounced differences in their
inactivation profiles (34). Since completion of our original study, we
switched our internal recording solution (105 mM CsCl, 25 mM tetraethylammonium chloride, 11 mM EGTA, and
10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2) to a solution composed of 108 mM CsMS, 4 mM MgCl2, 9 mM EGTA, 9 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), which we found to
yield more stable recordings. Hence, it was necessary to reassess the
inactivation properties of the two wild type channels under our present
experimental conditions. Fig. 1 compares
the inactivation profiles of wild type
1C and
1E channels, coexpressed with
2-
and
1b subunits. As shown in the figure, the two wild type
channels exhibit diametrically different inactivation properties such
that the half-inactivation potential of
1E is 60 mV more negative than that of
1C. Furthermore, the rate of
inactivation, expressed either as the time constant for current decay,
, or the percentage of current that has inactivated over a time
course of 125 ms, is 2-4-fold greater for
1E than
1C, depending on the test potential. These differences
in the inactivation profiles of the two channels are qualitatively
consistent with our previous recordings (34); however, a closer
comparison with our previous work reveals three quantitative
differences. First, the current densities obtained in the CsMS internal
solution were on average twice as large as those observed in CsCl (not
shown). Second, the half-inactivation potentials of
1E
and
1C were shifted, respectively, by 10 to 20 mV in the
hyperpolarizing direction, whereas the half-activation potential was
not significantly affected (p > 0.05). Finally, the
inactivation rates in internal CsMS were considerably accelerated.
Neither the substitution of negative counter ion nor the presence or
absence of internal magnesium was found to account for the effects (not
shown). However, internal TEA ions significantly affected the
inactivation properties of the channel such that the presence of 25 mM internal TEA resulted in a significant slowing of the
inactivation rate (Fig. 1, C and D) and an
~10-mV rightward shift in the midpoint of the steady state
inactivation. Thus, TEA ions, commonly thought to be inert for
voltage-dependent calcium channels, exert a pronounced
effect on calcium channel gating.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A and B, comparison of
inactivation properties of the wild type channels.
Schematic, proposed transmembrane topology of
voltage-dependent calcium channels. Secondary structure of
1C and
1E are depicted, respectively, in
black and white. A, comparison of the
steady state inactivation properties of
1C and
1E (coexpressed with
1b and
2-
). Currents were obtained by stepping from various
conditioning potentials (5-s duration) to a test potential of +10 mV.
The data were fitted with the Boltzmann relation. B,
comparison of the voltage dependence of the inactivation rates
(
1C: n = 12;
1E:
n = 8). Currents were elicited by stepping from
100
mV or
130 mV (
1E) to a series of test potentials.
Left panel, inactivation rates expressed as the fraction of
current inactivated over a time course of a 125-ms test depolarization.
Right panel, inactivation rates reflected as the time
constant for inactivation obtained from monoexponential fits to the raw
current data. C and D, effects of internal TEA
ions on inactivation properties of
1E calcium channels
coexpressed with
1b and
2-
.
C, current records elicited by test depolarization to +10 mV
in either 108 mM CsMS, 4 mM MgCl2,
9 mM EGTA, 9 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) or 83 mM CsMS, 25 mM tetraethylammonium
(TEA) chloride, 4 mM MgCl2, 9 mM EGTA, 9 mM HEPES (pH 7.2). The currents were
arbitrarily scaled to overlap at peak. D, effect of internal
TEA (n = 5) on the time constant of inactivation,
.
1E Domain II S6 or III S6 Regions
Accelerates Inactivation of
1C--
Our previous work
showed that multiple transmembrane domains were involved in the
inactivation process of
1E channels, with domain II and III contributing to the greatest extent (34). We
theorized that calcium channel inactivation may occur via a mechanism reminiscent of that underlying C-type inactivation common to
many types of voltage-dependent potassium channels, a
process that is believed to involve pore constriction mediated by the S6 segments of the channel (35, 36). To assess a putative role of the
S6 segments in fast calcium channel inactivation, we created chimeras
in which the S6 regions of domains II/III of
1C were
replaced by the corresponding regions of
1E.
1C with
that of
1E dramatically increased the inactivation rate
of
1C to levels observed with wild type
1E channels. These data suggest that the individual S6
segments in domains II and III are important determinants of calcium
channel inactivation. To test whether the effects of domains II and III
were additive, we also examined a double chimera
1C
(II/IIIS6E) in which the S6 segments of domains II and III of
1E were inserted into
1C concomitantly
(Fig. 2). The double replacement did not result in further speeding of
the inactivation kinetics, nor could it enhance the slower,
1C-like rates that persisted at relatively hyperpolarized test potentials in the two single S6 chimeras. Thus,
although the presence of a single "inactivating" S6 segment is
sufficient to confer many aspects of the more rapid inactivation of the
wild type
1E channels, even their combination cannot
account for all of the voltage dependence associated with the
inactivation rates.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Contribution of the S6 segments of domains II
and III of
1E to inactivation
rate. Throughout the figure, gray squares and
open circles reflect, respectively, data obtained from the
wild type
1E and
1C channels (coexpressed
with
1b and
2-
). A,
comparison of the current waveforms of the parent channels and chimeras
arbitrarily scaled to overlap at peak. Note that insertion of the II or
III S6 segments of
1E into the
1C
backbone confers rapid inactivation kinetics. The records for the wild
type channels are the same in all three panels.
Schematic, proposed secondary structure of the
constructed chimeras. B, voltage dependence of the
inactivation rates of the chimeras. The data for the wild type channels
are the same as in Fig. 1 and were included merely to facilitate
comparison; the numbers of experiments (n) refer only to the
chimeras. The experimental conditions were as described in Fig.
1.
1E Maintains Rapid
Inactivation Kinetics--
If the presence of a single S6 segment in
domain II or III of
1E is sufficient to confer rapid
inactivation kinetics onto
1C, one might expect that
replacement of only one of those two S6 segments in
1E
should be ineffective in removing inactivation. To test this
hypothesis, we examined two additional chimeras,
1E
(IIS6C) and
1E (IIIS6C). As seen in Fig.
3, A and B, the two
chimeras exhibited inactivation rates that did not differ significantly
from those of the wild type
1E channel, except at
relatively hyperpolarized test potentials. However, even simultaneous substitution of the II S6 and III S6 regions of
1E with
those of
1C (i.e.
1E
(II/IIIS6C)) did not significantly slow inactivation (Fig.
3C), suggesting the presence of an additional region in the
1E sequence that is independently capable of maintaining inactivation.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The calcium channel domain I-II linker is an
important structural element for inactivation. Shown are the
proposed secondary structures of the chimeras using
black-filled drawings and bold lines
to indicate
1C sequences. Inactivation rates and
percentage of current inactivated were determined as described for Fig.
1; the data for the wild type channels (gray squares,
1E; open circles,
1C) are the
same as in Fig. 1. The n values included in the figure refer
to the numbers of experiments carried out with each chimera.
A-C, insertion of the II S6 and/or III S6 segments of
1C into
1E does not affect the rate of
inactivation. D, a chimera composed of the
1E backbone carrying domain I and II S6 and III S6
regions of
1C (CEEE II/IIIS6C) shows
1E-like inactivation. E, addition of the
1C I-II linker region to CEEE (II/IIIS6C) results in
loss of inactivation. F, insertion of the I-II linker region
of
1E into
1C accelerates inactivation
kinetics.
1E, we first inserted the
1C domain I
into EEEE(II/IIIS6C), creating the CEEE(II/IIIS6C) chimera, and still,
1E-like inactivation persisted (Fig. 3D).
However, upon substitution of most of the
1C domain I-II
linker region into this construct, inactivation was virtually abolished
(Fig. 3E), suggesting that it was the domain I-II linker
region of
1E that maintained
1E-like
inactivation rates in the
1E (II/IIIS6) construct. To
unequivocally show the importance of the domain I-II linker region, we
created two additional chimeras (EcEEE and EcEEE (II/IIIS6C)); however,
neither construct expressed functionally in tsa-201 cells. Nonetheless,
if our hypothesis is correct, then an
1C channel
containing the domain I-II linker of
1E should exhibit
rapid inactivation kinetics. Data obtained with such a chimera (CeCCC)
are shown in Fig. 3F. As evident from the figure, the CeCCC
construct exhibited inactivation kinetics that were significantly
faster than those seen with the wild type
1C channels,
consistent with our hypothesis. We also examined an additional
construct that contained the domain I-II linker plus the first five
transmembrane segments of domain II of
1E (thus
retaining the "non-inactivating" domain II S6 and III S6 regions of
1C), and similar to that of the CeCCC chimera, the CECC(IIS6C) construct exhibited inactivation kinetics that were significantly more rapid than those of the wild type
1C
channel (n = 12, not shown). Taken together, this
supports the idea that the presence of either one of three regions in
1E, the domain I-II linker or II S6 or III S6 regions,
is sufficient to preserve rapid inactivation, whereas the concomitant
replacement of these three regions with the corresponding elements of
1C is required to confer slow inactivation kinetics.
1E did not affect the
half-inactivation potential, and the reverse substitution in
1C resulted in only a small ~10-mV hyperpolarizing shift in steady state inactivation kinetics, which was paralleled by a
comparable change in half-activation potential (Fig. 4). Thus, it seems
unlikely that the domain II S6 region contributes in a meaningful
manner to the determination of steady state inactivation kinetics
despite its pronounced effects on inactivation rate.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Half-inactivation and half-activation
potentials potentials of wild type and chimeric calcium channels.
The data for the activation and inactivation potentials were,
respectively, obtained by fitting individual macroscopic current
voltage relations and individual steady state inactivation curves. The
numbers in parentheses reflect numbers of
experiments.
1C channel (Fig. 4)
despite sharing a common half-activation potential with
1C, thereby implicating the domain I-II linker. Thus,
although insertion of a single inactivating structure of
1E is sufficient to confer the rapid inactivation
profile in an essentially all or none fashion, multiple substitutions,
including some that do not affect inactivation rates (i.e.
domain I in Fig. 4D of Ref. 34), are required to account for
the differences in voltage dependence of inactivation of the wild type channels.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1C and
1E, and insertion of either
domains II or III of
1E into the
1C
sequence conferred all of the rapid inactivation kinetics of
1E (34). Here, we have more narrowly identified the
regions involved in determining the inactivation rate. As seen from
Table I, with one exception (ECEE), any construct containing the
1E sequence in the
domain IIS6, III S6, or I-II linker regions exhibited
1E-like inactivation kinetics. In contrast, only
constructs carrying
1C sequence in each of those regions
inactivated slowly, consistent with the idea that the above regions are
the central structural elements involved in the control of inactivation
rates.
Dependence of the inactivation rate on the presence of the domain
I-II linker, and domain II S6 and III S6 regions
1E-like inactivation. The check marks indicate the
presence of an
1E sequence in domain II S6 or III S6 or in
the domain I-II linker. The asterisk denotes a chimera which we found
to be an outlier in our original paper (34).
1A calcium channels (7, 30). In
addition, overexpression of the I-II linker regions of
1A was found to speed inactivation of the
1A channel (31). Also consistent with our data, amino
acid substitutions in the domain III S6 region have been reported to
affect inactivation kinetics (32, 37). Zhang et al. (28)
implicate exclusively the domain I S6 region in the fast inactivation
process by utilizing a series of chimeras between rabbit
1A and marine ray
1E calcium channels, which contrasts with our observations that rapid inactivation kinetics
do not require the presence of
1E domain I nor is
replacement of this region with
1C sequence sufficient
to abolish inactivation. Both
1E and
1A
share identical domain II and III S6 regions and differ in their domain
I S6 regions in only one position (methionine in
1A
versus valine in
1E (38)). Interestingly, the
1C sequence also contains a valine residue in this
position, thus perhaps masking any subtle effects of domain I in our
experiments. Alternatively, it is possible that an amino acid
substitution in the domain I S6 regions secondarily affects
inactivation by altering the conformation of the associated I-II
linker region.
1E (II/IIS6C) and CEEE
(II/IIIS6C)). Thus, despite some overlap, the structural determinants
governing the rates and voltage dependence of inactivation appear to be
distinct. Whereas the critical determinants of inactivation rate are
fairly localized, the mechanism controlling the voltage dependence of
inactivation appears to be more globally distributed across the calcium
channel
1 subunit.
1A calcium channel I-II linker (7, 30)
and the ability of overexpressed
1A I-II linker to
accelerate the inactivation rate of
1A calcium channels.
This model could also account for the effects of the calcium channel
subunits, which are known to physically bind to the I-II linker
region, on inactivation rate (10, 43, 44). The antagonistic effects of
the
2a subunit on inactivation (44) could perhaps arise
from a restricted mobility of the domain I-II linker region as a
consequence of anchoring the palmitoylated N terminus of this subunit
to the plasma membrane (45).

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Possible model of fast inactivation of
high voltage-activated calcium channels. Based on the involvement
of the domain I-II linker and II S6 and III S6 regions, we hypothesize
that the I-II linker region could form a hinged lid/ball and chain-type
structure, which may physically occlude the inner vestibule of the
channel by docking at least in part to the domain II and III S6
regions.
1E was generally sufficient to mediate rapid
inactivation? Within the framework of our model, the domain I-II linker
of
1C would have the ability to dock to either the domain II S6 or III S6 regions of
1E. Conversely, the
domain I-II linker of
1E would have to be capable of
interacting with either one of the domain II S6 or III S6 regions of
1C. In contrast, the relative lack of inactivation of
L-type channels would require an inability of the
1C
I-II linker region to dock effectively to the domain II S6 and III S6
regions when of
1C origin. Biochemical evidence,
however, will ultimately be required to prove a putative existence of a
physical binding interaction between the domain I-II linker and the S6 segments.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Contributed equally to this work.
This author holds faculty scholarships from the Medical
Research Council of Canada, the AHFMR, and the EJLB Foundation
and is the Novartis Investigator for schizophrenia research. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, T2N
4N1 Canada. Tel.: 403-220-8687; Fax: 403-210-8106; E-mail: Zamponi@ ucalgary.ca.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Williams, M. E.,
Feldman, D. H.,
McCue, A. F.,
Brenner, R.,
Velicelebi, G.,
Ellis, S. B.,
and Harpold, M. M.
(1992)
Neuron
8,
71-84
2.
Tomlinson, W. J.,
Stea, A.,
Bourinet, E.,
Charnet, P.,
Nargeot, J.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1993)
Neuropharmacology
32,
1117-1126
3.
Bech-Hansen, N. T.,
Naylor, M. J.,
Maybaum, T. A.,
Pearce, W. G.,
Koop, B.,
Fishman, G. A.,
Mets, M.,
Musarella, M. A.,
and Boycott, K. M.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
264-267
4.
Dubel, S. J.,
Starr, T. V.,
Hell, J.,
Ahlijanian, M. K.,
Enyeart, J. J.,
Catterall, W. A.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5058-5062
5.
Williams, M. E.,
Brust, P. F.,
Feldman, D. H.,
Patthi, S.,
Simerson, S.,
Maroufi, A.,
McCue, A. F.,
Velicelebi, G.,
Ellis, S. B.,
and Harpold, M. M.
(1992)
Science
245,
389-395
6.
Fujita, Y.,
Mynlieff, M.,
Dirksen, R. T.,
Kim, M. S.,
Niidome, T.,
Nakai, J.,
Friedrich, T.,
Iwabe, N.,
Miyata, T.,
Furuichi, T.,
Furutama, D.,
Mikoshiba, K.,
Mori, Y.,
and Beam, K. G.
(1993)
Neuron
10,
465-598
7.
Bourinet, E.,
Soong, T. W.,
Sutton, K.,
Slaymaker, S.,
Mathews, E.,
Monteil, A.,
Zamponi, G. W.,
Nargeot, J.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1999)
Nat. Neurosci.
2,
407-415
8.
Mori, Y.,
Friedrich, T.,
Kim, M. S.,
Mikami, A.,
Nakai, J.,
Ruth, P.,
Bosse, E.,
Hofmann, F.,
Flockerzi, V.,
Furuichi, T.,
Mikoshiba, K.,
Imoto, K.,
Tanabe, T.,
and Numa, S.
(1991)
Nature
350,
398-402
9.
Sather, W. A.,
Tanabe, T.,
Zhang, J. F.,
Mori, Y.,
Adams, M. E.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
291-303
10.
Stea, A.,
Tomlinson, W. J.,
Soong, T. W.,
Bourinet, E.,
Dubel, S. J.,
Vincent, S. R.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10576-10580
11.
Cribbs, L. L.,
Lee, J. H.,
Yang, J.,
Satin, J.,
Zhang, Y.,
Daud, A.,
Barclay, J.,
Williamson, M. P.,
Fox, M.,
Rees, M.,
and Perez-Reyes, E.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
103-109
12.
Perez-Reyes, E.,
Cribbs, L. L.,
Daud, A.,
Lacerda, A. E.,
Barclay, J.,
Williamson, M. P.,
Fox, M.,
Rees, M.,
and Lee, J. H.
(1998)
Nature
391,
896-900
13.
Soong, T. W.,
Stea, A.,
Hodson, C. D.,
Dubel, S. J.,
Vincent, S. R.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1993)
Science
260,
1133-1136
14.
Williams, M. E.,
Marubio, L. M.,
Deal, C. R.,
Hans, M.,
Brust, P. F.,
Philipson, L. H.,
Miller, R. J.,
Johnson, E. C.,
Harpold, M. M.,
and Ellis, S. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22347-22345
15.
Tottene, A.,
Moretti, A.,
and Pietrobon, D.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
16,
6342-6363
16.
McCleskey, E. W.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
4,
304-312
17.
Stea, A.,
Soong, T. W.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1995)
Neuron
15,
929-940
18.
Choi, D. W.
(1988)
Trends Neurosci.
11,
465-469
19.
Orrenius, S.,
McConkey, D. J.,
Bellomo, G.,
and Nicotera, P.
(1989)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
10,
281-285
20.
Orrenius, S.,
and Nicotera, P.
(1994)
J. Neural Transm. Suppl.
43,
1-11
21.
Hawthorn, M. H.,
Ferrante, J. N.,
Kwon, Y. W.,
Rutledge, A.,
Luchowski, E.,
Bangalore, R.,
and Triggle, D. J.
(1992)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
229,
143-148
22.
Hering, S.,
Aczel, S.,
Kraus, R. L.,
Berjukow, S.,
Striessnig, J.,
and Timin, E. N.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13323-13328
23.
Vassilev, P.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8147-8140
24.
Eaholtz, G.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
1041-1048
25.
Zagotta, W. N.,
Hoshi, T.,
and Aldrich, R. W.
(1990)
Science
250,
506-507
26.
Hoshi, T.,
Zagotta, W. N.,
and Aldrich, R. W.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
454-436
27.
Isacoff, E. Y.,
Jan, Y. N.,
and Jan, L. Y.
(1991)
Nature
342,
86-90
28.
Zhang, J. F.,
Ellinor, P. T.,
Aldrich, R. W.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1994)
Nature
372,
97-100
29.
Zamponi, G. W.,
Soong, T. W.,
Bourinet, E.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
2430-2443
30.
Herlitze, S.,
Hockerman, G. H.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1402-1406
31.
Cens, T.,
Restituito, S.,
Galas, S.,
and Charnet, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5483-5490
32.
Hering, S.,
Aczel, S.,
Grabner, M.,
Doring, F.,
Berjukow, S.,
Mitterdorfer, J.,
Sinnegger, M. J.,
Striessnig, J.,
Degtiar, V. E.,
Wang, Z.,
and Glossmann, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24471-24475
33.
Hering, S.,
Berjukow, S.,
Aczel, S.,
and Timin, E. N.
(1998)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
19,
439-443
34.
Spaetgens, R. L.,
and Zamponi, G. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22428-22438
35.
Choi, K. L.,
Aldrich, R. W.,
and Yellen, G.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
5092-5095
36.
Kukuljan, M.,
Lebarca, P.,
and Latorre, R.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
C425-C436
37.
Kraus, R. L.,
Sinnegger, M. J.,
Glossmann, H.,
Hering, S.,
and Striessnig, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5586-5590
38.
Stea, A.,
Soong, T. W.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1995)
in
Handbook of Receptors and Channels: Ligand- and Voltage-gated Ion Channels
(North, R. A., ed)
, pp. 113-141, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL
39.
Armstrong, C. M.,
and Bezanilla, F.
(1977)
J. Gen. Physiol.
70,
447-590
40.
Doyle, D. A.,
Morais-Cabral, J.,
Pfuetzner, R. A.,
Kuo, A.,
Gulbis, J. M.,
Cohen, S. L.,
Chait, B. T.,
and MacKinnon, R.
(1998)
Science
280,
69-77
41.
MacKinnon, R.,
Cohen, S. L.,
Kuo, A.,
Lee, A.,
and Chait, B. T.
(1998)
Science
280,
106-109
42.
Lopez, G. A.,
Nung, Y.,
and Jan, L. Y.
(1994)
Nature
367,
179-182
43.
Pragnell, M.,
DeWaard, M.,
Mori, Y.,
Tanabe, T.,
Snutch, T. P.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1994)
Nature
368,
67-70
44.
Olcese, R.,
Neely, A.,
Qin, N.,
Wei, X.,
Birnbaumer, L.,
and Stefani, E.
(1996)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
497,
675-686
45.
Qin, N.,
Platano, D.,
Olcese, R.,
Costantin, J. L.,
Stefani, E.,
and Birnbaumer, L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
14,
4690-4695
46.
Zamponi, G. W.,
Sui, X.,
Codding, P. W.,
and French, R. J.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
65,
2324-2334
47.
Zamponi, G. W.,
and French, R. J.
(1993)
Biophys J.
65,
2335-2347
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. F. Barrett and R. W. Tsien The Timothy syndrome mutation differentially affects voltage- and calcium-dependent inactivation of CaV1.2 L-type calcium channels PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 2157 - 2162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yamashita, L. Navarro-Borelly, B. A. McNally, and M. Prakriya Orai1 Mutations Alter Ion Permeation and Ca2+-dependent Fast Inactivation of CRAC Channels: Evidence for Coupling of Permeation and Gating J. Gen. Physiol., October 29, 2007; 130(5): 525 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Pitt Calmodulin and CaMKII as molecular switches for cardiac ion channels Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2007; 73(4): 641 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Raybaud, Y. Dodier, P. Bissonnette, M. Simoes, D. G. Bichet, R. Sauve, and L. Parent The Role of the GX9GX3G Motif in the Gating of High Voltage-activated Ca2+ Channels J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2006; 281(51): 39424 - 39436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. McDavid and K. P. M. Currie G-Proteins Modulate Cumulative Inactivation of N-Type (CaV2.2) Calcium Channels J. Neurosci., December 20, 2006; 26(51): 13373 - 13383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wahl-Schott, L. Baumann, H. Cuny, C. Eckert, K. Griessmeier, and M. Biel Switching off calcium-dependent inactivation in L-type calcium channels by an autoinhibitory domain PNAS, October 17, 2006; 103(42): 15657 - 15662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Halling, P. Aracena-Parks, and S. L. Hamilton Regulation of Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels by Calmodulin Sci. Signal., December 20, 2005; 2005(315): re15 - re15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhou, K. Yu, K. L. McCoy, and A. Lee Molecular Mechanism for Divergent Regulation of Cav1.2 Ca2+ Channels by Calmodulin and Ca2+-binding Protein-1 J. Biol. Chem., August 19, 2005; 280(33): 29612 - 29619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ishiguro, T. L. Wellman, A. Honda, S. R. Russell, B. I. Tranmer, and G. C. Wellman Emergence of a R-Type Ca2+ Channel (CaV 2.3) Contributes to Cerebral Artery Constriction After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Circ. Res., March 4, 2005; 96(4): 419 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Dafi, L. Berrou, Y. Dodier, A. Raybaud, R. Sauve, and L. Parent Negatively Charged Residues in the N-terminal of the AID Helix Confer Slow Voltage Dependent Inactivation Gating to CaV1.2 Biophys. J., November 1, 2004; 87(5): 3181 - 3192. [Abstract] [Full Text] |