![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24613-24621, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Serono Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Ares-Serono
International SA, Plan-les-Ouates 1228, Geneva, Switzerland, the
Received for publication, February 22, 2000, and in revised form, May 5, 2000
Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase
phosphatase-3 (MKP-3) is a dual specificity phosphatase that
inactivates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) MAP kinases.
This reflects tight and specific binding between ERK and the MKP-3
amino terminus with consequent phosphatase activation and
dephosphorylation of the bound MAP kinase. We have used a series of
p38/ERK chimeric molecules to identify domains within ERK necessary for
binding and catalytic activation of MKP-3. These studies demonstrate
that ERK kinase subdomains V-XI are necessary and sufficient for
binding and catalytic activation of MKP-3. These domains constitute the major COOH-terminal structural lobe of ERK. p38/ERK chimeras possessing these regions display increased sensitivity to inactivation by MKP-3.
These data also reveal an overlap between ERK domains interacting with
MKP-3 and those known to confer substrate specificity on the ERK MAP
kinase. Consistent with this, we show that peptides representing
docking sites within the target substrates Elk-1 and p90rsk
inhibit ERK-dependent activation of MKP-3. In addition,
abolition of ERK-dependent phosphatase activation following
mutation of a putative kinase interaction
motif (KIM) within the MKP-3 NH2 terminus
suggests that key sites of contact for the ERK COOH-terminal structural
lobe include residues localized between the Cdc25 homology domains
(CH2) found conserved between members of the DSP gene family.
Mitogen-activated protein
(MAP)1 kinases represent a
subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases functioning within
pathways that become activated following cell exposure to a large
number of external signals. In mammalian cells at least four MAP kinase classes have been identified. These are known as the extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK), the c-Jun N-terminal
kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK), the p38/RK/CSBP
(p38), and BMK1/ERK5 MAP kinases. In addition to this diversity,
multiple genes and splice variants of each MAP kinase class have also
been identified (1-3). Crystallization of MAP kinases has revealed two
major three-dimensional structural domains (4-7). A smaller
NH2-terminal domain comprises kinase subdomains I-IV
together with the COOH-terminal tail (L16) and is made up mostly from
Different cell stimuli activate preferentially distinct MAP kinases.
Hence, while ERKs are highly responsive to growth factors, phorbol
esters, and some oncogenes, JNK/SAPK and p38 MAP kinases are activated
by inflammatory cytokines and cell stresses (1-3, 8). Recent studies
using mutant kinases, chemical inhibitors, or gene deletion in mice
indicate a key role for MAP kinases in controlling several diverse cell
functions. ERK MAP kinases, for instance, appear important in pathways
leading to cellular proliferation, oncogenic transformation, and
metastasis, as well as in processes underlying memory and learning.
JNK/SAPK and p38 MAP kinases, in contrast, appear to control T cell
differentiation, production of inflammatory cytokines and events
leading to neuronal apoptotic death (1, 9-18). These observations
indicate that mechanisms controlling MAP kinases are likely to be of
central importance to several diverse aspects of normal and
pathological cell functions.
MAP kinase activation is triggered by phosphorylation on specific Thr
and Tyr residues localized within the activation loop TXY motif of kinase domain VIII (where X is Glu,
Pro, or Gly in ERK, JNK/SAPK or p38 MAP kinases, respectively). Several
upstream kinases are now known to activate different MAP kinases
selectively (1-3). Notwithstanding the importance of such stimulatory
input, MAP kinase activation is normally reversible in cells indicating that protein phosphatases also provide an important mechanism for
control. Dual specificity phosphatases (DSPs) represent a subclass of
the protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) gene superfamily which appear to
play an important role dephosphorylating and inactivating MAP kinases.
Nine distinct DSPs have now been reported including CL100/MKP-1 (19,
20), PAC1 (21, 22), hVH-2/MKP-2/TYP1 (23-25), hVH3/B23 (26, 27),
hVH5/M3-6 (28, 29), MKP-3/PYST1/rVH6 (30-32), B59/PYST2/MKP-X
(31-33), MKP-4 (34), and MKP-5 (35). Some DSPs are localized to
different subcellular compartments and moreover, several DSP genes
undergo powerful induction following exposure to cell stresses and/or
growth factors (36). This, together with recent reports of specific MAP
kinase inactivation by some DSPs suggests a sophisticated
transcriptional mechanism for inactivation of selected MAP kinase activities.
MKP-3 is a selective DSP that mediates preferential dephosphorylation
and inactivation of ERK1 and ERK2 MAP kinases (32, 37). We have
reported recently that this reflects tight and specific binding of ERK
to non-catalytic regions within the MKP-3 amino terminus and that this
triggers a powerful increase in MKP-3 phosphatase activity (38, 39).
Other DSPs also display binding and activation by ERK, JNK/SAPK, and
p38 suggesting a general mechanism for targeted inactivation of
different MAP kinases (39). One important unanswered question is of the
molecular domains within MAP kinases important for specific binding and
catalytic activation of DSPs. To address this question we have employed a number of p38/ERK chimeric molecules used previously to reveal domains within MAP kinases important for interactions with upstream activating kinases and that target substrate proteins (40, 41). Based
on studies with purified MKP-3, it appears that regions localized
within the COOH-terminal structural lobe of ERK are essential for
binding and catalytic activation of MKP-3. These subdomains include
regions believed to be important for substrate binding and consistent
with this, peptides based on the ERK substrates Elk-1 and
p90rsk inhibit MKP-3 catalytic activation by this MAP kinase.
p38/ERK Chimera Expression in Escherichia coli--
Constructs
encoding the p38
For protein purification transformed bacteria were grown overnight to
saturation in LB medium containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin, after which
growth was resumed by diluting the culture 1:50 and incubating at
37 °C for 1 h. Following transfer to 20 °C for 1 h,
isopropyl-1-thio- MKP-3 Bacterial Expression and Phosphatase
Activity--
GST-MKP-3, GST-MKP-3 MAP Kinase and p38/ERK Chimera Activities--
Purified MAP
kinases or p38/ERK chimeras (0.5 µg) were activated by incubation for
1 h at 30 °C with 0.1 µg of GST-MEK1 (S218E,S222E) or
GST-MKK6 (as indicated) in 60 µl of 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, containing 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 10 µM [ MKP-3 Binding to p38 MKP-3 Catalytic Activation by p38/ERK Chimeras--
ERK1 or ERK2
binding to the NH2 terminus of MKP-3 triggers a powerful
increase in phosphatase activity. In contrast, neither JNK/SAPK nor p38
MAP kinases bind or activate MKP-3 (38, 39). This suggests a
correlation between tight MAP kinase binding and activation of the
MKP-3 phosphatase. To test this correlation further, we next assessed
the ability of different p38
To assess further the importance of ERK kinase subdomains in activating
MKP-3, we employed some additional chimeras made using sequence from
p38
We have shown previously that the sevenmaker MAP kinase
mutant ERK2 (D319N) displays reduced binding and catalytic activation of MKP-3 (39). The carboxyl-terminal Asp319 of ERK2 lies
within a conserved docking region (termed CD domain) shown recently to
play an important role in MAP kinase binding to a range of regulatory
proteins (42). Consistent with this, the peptide LEQYYDPSDEPIAE (Erk2
311-324) representing the CD domain of ERK2 inhibits activation of
MKP-3 by purified ERK2 (Fig. 3). This
inhibition supports the notion that the CD domain within the
COOH-terminal structural lobe of ERK contributes to the binding and
catalytic activation of MKP-3. Moreover, chimera XI possessing the
COOH-terminal of ERK was observed to bind MKP-3 albeit weakly (Fig.
1B). Notwithstanding this, our data from p38/ERK chimeras indicate that multiple domains within the COOH-terminal major structural lobe of ERK together provide important surfaces for binding
and catalytic activation of the DSP MKP-3.
MKP-3 Inactivation of p38/ERK Chimeras--
Specific MKP-3
catalytic activation by ERK appears to account for the MAP kinase
selectivity of this DSP (38, 39). This model predicts that p38/ERK
chimeras should display differential inactivation by MKP-3. To test
this, chimeras I-XI were activated by an appropriate upstream MAP
kinase kinase (either MEK1 or MKK6) and incubated in the presence of
different concentrations of purified GST-MKP-3. Chimera catalytic
activity was measured by 32P-phosphorylation of either
myelin basis protein or GST-ATF2 as indicated. While chimeras V, III,
and I appear sensitive to inactivation by low concentrations of MKP-3,
chimera VIII and particularly chimera XI and p38 ERK Substrate-binding Domains Mediate MKP-3 Activation--
A
previous study using the same p38
Positively charged amino acids appear critical for binding to ERK (42).
Consistent with this, we find that mutant peptides QKGMMPRDLELPLSPSLL and
QMGMMPMDLELPLSPSLL
(Elk-1 amino acids 312-328; underlined Met replace charged residues)
as well as MMPRAPAKLSFQFPS and
MMPMAPAMLSFQFPS (Elk-1 amino acids
387-399; underlined Met replace charged residues) are ineffective at
inhibiting ERK-dependent activation of MKP-3 (Fig. 7,
A and B). Together these observations indicate
that regions within ERK responsible for binding to the Elk-1 D-domain
and the FXFP motifs, as well as adjacent charged amino acids
within this substrate protein, play an important role in mediating
ERK-dependent catalytic activation of MKP-3.
The p90 ribosomal S6 protein kinase-1 (RSK1, p90rsk) is an
additional well characterized MAP kinase substrate that is activated following its binding and phosphorylation by ERK. Recently, a docking
site within the COOH-terminal 25 amino acids of p90rsk was
found to bind ERK and to be essential for p90rsk
phosphorylation and activation (45-47). To test whether MKP-3 interacts with ERK at sites overlapping with those responsible for ERK
binding to this substrate, we tested a synthetic peptide corresponding
to the COOH terminus of p90rsk. Peptide
TPQLKPIESSILAQRRVRKLPSTTL (p90rsk
700-724) was found to elicit dose-dependent and complete
blockade of ERK-stimulated MKP-3 (Fig.
8). The motif LAXRR
(underlined) within this sequence was shown to be critical for ERK
binding to p90rsk (45) and consistent with this, a control
peptide (where LAQRR was changed to ASQGA) failed to elicit significant
inhibition of the ERK2-activated MKP-3 phosphatase (Fig. 8). A shorter
COOH-terminal p90rsk peptide
LKPIESSILAQRRVRK (p90rsk 703-718), but
not its control (underlined residues exchanged for ASQGA), also
inhibits activation of MKP-3 by ERK2 with similar potency (not shown).
The COOH terminus of p90rsk binds ERK but not JNK/SAPK or p38
MAP kinases (46) suggesting that the effects of this peptide sequence
should be specific for ERK. To test this we employed MKP-4 (34), an
additional DSP gene family member which although closely related to
MKP-3 is subject to activation by ERK, JNK/SAPK, and p38 MAP kinases
(39). Consistent with an ERK-specific action, the p90rsk
peptide 700-724 was found to inhibit MKP-4 activation by ERK2 but not
by JNK3 or p38 An MKP-3 "Kinase Interaction Motif" Is Responsible for Binding
and Activation by ERK--
The ERK docking site within the
p90rsk COOH-terminal appears to be strictly dependent upon the
pentapeptide sequence LAXRR which is also conserved in a
number of downstream kinases including Msk1, Msk2, Mnk1, and Mnk2.
Mutation of these residues abolishes p90rsk binding and
phosphorylation by ERK (45). In addition, the PTP family members
PTP-SL, STEP, and HePTP/LC-PTP bind ERK1 and ERK2 through a
kinase interaction motif (KIM)
which includes within its core the sequence LQERR (48). Mutation of the
arginine residues (underlined) within this motif abolishes binding of
PTP-SL to ERK MAP kinases (49). Interestingly, examination of the MKP-3 primary amino acid sequence (31) reveals a loosely related pentapeptide sequence IMLRR (amino acids 61-65) localized within the
NH2 terminus. These Arg residues have recently been shown
to be important for MKP-3 binding to ERK (42). Consistent with this,
the MKP-3 mutant (R65A) and particularly MKP-3 (R64A, R65A) are
insensitive to catalytic activation by ERK2 (Fig.
11). This is in contrast to another
mutant, MKP-3 (R64A), which undergoes powerful activation by ERK (not
shown). As may be anticipated by reciprocal relationship between MKP-3
catalytic activity and MAP kinase inactivation, ERK2 is either
resistant (R65A) or totally insensitive (R64A/R65A) to
inactivation by these MKP-3 mutants (Fig.
12). Predictably, ERK2 displays similar
sensitivity to inactivation by MKP-3 (R64A) as by wild type MKP-3 (Fig.
12). It is of note that wild type and all MKP-3 mutants display similar
basal phosphatase activity (not shown) indicating that mutant proteins
are all correctly folded and otherwise normal. These observations
suggest that as in p90rsk, PTP-SL, STEP, and HePTP/LC-PTP, a
KIM-like domain within the MKP-3 NH2 terminus also
underlies targeted interaction between ERK and MKP-3.
Conclusion--
Specific MKP-3 catalytic activation by ERK appears
to account for its selectivity between MAP kinase subtypes (39).
Consistent with this, experiments presented here demonstrate a
correlation between MKP-3 catalytic activation by p38/ERK chimeras and
the sensitivity of these MAP kinase variants to inactivation by MKP-3. Together, these studies also indicate that the COOH-terminal major structural lobe of ERK MAP kinases is necessary and sufficient for
binding and catalytic activation of the DSP MKP-3. A previous study
with these chimeras demonstrated a switch to "ERK-like" substrate
specificity when comparing chimera VII with V (40) suggesting an
overlap between structural regions important for substrate docking and
those underlying binding and activation of MKP-3. Consistent with this,
we have shown that peptides representing MAP kinase-binding sites in
Elk-1 and p90rsk (both charged amino acids and putative docking
domains) inhibit ERK-dependent activation of MKP-3.
Presumably, this reflects inhibition of MKP-3 binding through peptide
interaction with critical substrate-binding regions within the
COOH-terminal lobe of ERK. Although the CD domain of ERK (42) appears
to confer weak binding to MKP-3, additional substrate-binding regions
within the COOH-terminal major structural lobe underlie ERK binding and
catalytic activation of MKP-3. Fig. 13
is a structural representation of ERK summarizing data presented in
this report. In blue is the COOH-terminal lobe important for
binding substrate proteins as well as for interactions with MKP-3. Also
shown in yellow are We are grateful to the following for generous
gifts. Dr. E. Bettini (Glaxo Wellcome, Verona, Italy) for
pGEX-c-Jun-(1-79), Dr. J. S. Gutkind for pGEX-ATF2-(1-96), and
Professor C. J. Marshall (Chester Beatty Labs, ICR, London, United
Kingdom) for pGEX-2T-ERK2 and pGEX-3X-MEK-1 (S218E,S222E). We also
thank Chris Hebert for photographic work.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001515200
The abbreviations used are:
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase;
DSP, dual
specificity phosphatase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MKP-3, MAP kinase phosphatase-3;
MKP, MAP kinase phosphatase;
MEK, MAP
kinase/ERK kinase;
JNK/SAPK, c-Jun NH2-terminal
kinase/stress-activated protein kinase;
p38, p38/RK/CSBP;
MKK6, MAP
kinase kinase 6;
ATF-2, activating transcription factor 2;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
p90rsk, ribosomal p90 S6
kinase;
KIM, kinase interaction motif;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction.
Substrate Recognition Domains within Extracellular
Signal-regulated Kinase Mediate Binding and Catalytic Activation of
Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase-3*
,
Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts 02115, the § Department of Pharmacology,
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
75235-9041, and the ¶ CNRS-UMR 6543 Centre de Biochimie,
Universite de Nice, Parc Valrose, 06108 Nice, France
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-strands. The COOH-terminal domain, by contrast, includes kinase
subdomains V-XI and is rich in
-helices. ATP binds deep in the
active site cleft formed between the two domains whereas substrate
protein is believed to associate with a groove formed on the surface of
the COOH-terminal domain. MAP kinases phosphorylate only substrates
that contain proline in the P+1 site which binds within a surface
pocket formed by residues highly conserved in the MAP kinase family.
This P+1 specificity pocket is contiguous with the "activation
loop" or "lip" which contains conserved Thr and Tyr residues
important for control of MAP kinase activation state (see below).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/ERK1 chimeras (Chim I, III, V, VII, VIII, XI, and
p38-ERK-p38) described previously (40) were used as a basis for
constructs enabling bacterial expression of these proteins with an
N-terminal His6-tag. Subcloning involved inserting a
BsmBI-XhoI PCR fragment from each p38
-ERK1
chimera containing a 5' NcoI compatible site and nucleotides
encoding a His6-tag into the
NcoI-XhoI sites of pET23D. The
BsmBI-XhoI PCR fragments were obtained by two
separate PCR reactions. In the first step the coding region of the
different chimera was amplified using the sense
His6-p38
primer
5'-GCTCACCACCACCACCACCACATGTCGCAGGAGAGGCCCACG-3' together with
the ERK1 antisense primer 5'-ATCTGCTCGAGTCAGGGGGCCTCTGGTGCCCCTGG-3'. The resulting PCR products were then used as templates in a second amplification using the same antisense primer together with a common
BsmBI-His6 5' sense primer including a
NcoI compatible 5' BsmBI followed by nucleotides
encoding the His6-tag
(5'-TCTATTTAAAGAATTCGCTATCGATCGTCTCCCATGGCTCACCACCACCACCACCAC-3'). The
wild type p38
construct was obtained by the same PCR procedure using
the primer His6-p38
in combination with an antisense
p38
-Xho-3' primer 5'-ATCTGCTCGAGTCAGGACTCCATTTCTTCTTGGTC-3'. A wild
type ERK1 bacterial expression construct was obtained directly by one PCR amplification using a 5'-sense primer including a BsmBI
site followed by nucleotides encoding the His6-tag and p44
ERK1 sequence (5'-TCTATTTAAAGAATTCGCTATCGATCGTCTCCCATGGCTCATCATCACCATCACCATGGCGGGGAGCCCCGGGGA-3') in combination with the ERK1 Xho-3' antisense primer.
His6-tagged p38
/ERK2 chimeras EIIP, EIIPIVE, and PIVECTP
were exactly as described previously (41).
-D-galactopyranoside was added
to a final concentration of 100 µM and cells cultured for
another 14 h. Cells were harvested, resuspended in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM
benzamidine, and 1 mM PefablocTM (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) and broken by passing three times through a
French Press at 1000 p.s.i. The extract was then centrifuged at
10,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and purified using
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose (Qiagen) according to
the manufacturers instructions. All proteins were >90% pure as
assessed by Coomassie Blue staining.
C, and GST-MKP-3
N were exactly
as described previously (38). The MKP-3 kinase
interaction motif (KIM) mutants MKP-3 (I61A),
MKP-3 (R64A), MKP-3 (R65A), MKP-3 (R64, 65A), MKP-3 (L71A), and MKP-3
(V73A) were produced by subcloning a BamHI-NotI
MKP-3 mutated PCR fragment into the BamHI-NotI
site of pGEX4T3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in-frame with GST.
The MKP-3-mutated fragments were produced by a two-step PCR reaction. First, the 5' terminus of MKP-3 was amplified using a sense
BamHI containing primer
(5'-GCCGGATCCATGATAGATACGCTCAGACC-3') together with antisense primers
encoding the desired amino acid mutation. The antisense primers for
each mutant were as follows: MKP-3 (I61A), 5'-CGCCGCAGCATTGCGCCCGGGATGGCCACGTTGAT-3'; MKP-3 (R64A),
5'-CCCTTCTGCAGACGGGCCAGCATGA-3'; MKP-3 (R65A),
5'-CCCTTCTGCAGAGCCCGCAGCATGA-3'; MKP-3 (R64A/ R65A), 5'
CCCTTCTGCAGAGCGGCCAGCATGA-3'; MKP-3 (L71A),
5'-CGCACCGGGGCGTTGCCCTTCTGCAGAC-3'; and MKP-3 (V73A),
5'-CGCGCGCGCCGGCAGGTTGCCCTTCTGCAGAC-3'. The 3'- terminal of MKP-3 was
amplified using an antisense NotI containing primer
((5'-AGGTATCGCTGCGGCCGCTCACGTAGATTGCAGGGAGTC-3') together with sense
primers encoding the mutated amino acid. The sense primers were as
follows: MKP-3 (I61A), 5'-GGCCATCCCGGGCGCAATGCTGCGGCGTCTGCAGA-3'; MKP-3
(R64A), 5'-ATCATGCTGGCCCGTCTGCAGAAGG-3; MKP-3 (R65A), 5'- ATCATGCTGCGGGCTCTGCAGAAGG-3'; MKP-3 (R64A/R65A),
5'-ATCATGCTGGCCGCTCTGCAGAAGG-3'; MKP-3 (L71A),
5'-GTCTGCAGAAGGGCAACGCCCCGGTGCG-3'; and MKP-3 (V73A), 5'-AAGGGCAACCTGCCGGCGCGCGCGCTATTCACG-3'. The two PCR products were then mixed and amplified using the sense BamHI primer
and the antisense NotI primer. All pGEX4T3/MKP-3 mutants
were verified by sequencing. GST-MKP-3 and the above mutants were
expressed and purified from bacteria, assessed for phosphatase activity and binding to MAP kinase chimeras exactly as described previously (38,
39).
-32P]ATP
(~10,000 dpm/pmol), and 10 µg of myelin basic protein or GST-ATF-2-(19-96). Inactivation by MKP-3 or MKP-3 mutants was assessed
by inclusion of 0.01-10 µg of the GST-MKP-3 proteins as indicated.
Reactions were terminated and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis and autoradiography as described before (38).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/ERK1 Chimeras--
We have reported
previously that ERK but not JNK/SAPK or p38 MAP kinases bind tightly to
the MKP-3 NH2 terminus and that this interaction triggers
phosphatase activation (38, 39). To investigate which domains within
ERK are critical for interacting with MKP-3 we employed a series of
p38
/ERK1 chimeras (40) purified following expression in bacteria as
His-tagged proteins (see Fig. 6 for schematic representation). Each was
estimated as >90% pure (Fig. 1A) and were incubated with
the amino-terminal half of MKP-3 (residues 1-221, MKP-3
C) (38)
expressed as a GST fusion protein and immobilized on beads. Following
extensive washing, Western blot analysis was used to indicate binding
between different p38
/ERK1 chimeras and the MKP-3 NH2
terminus. As observed previously, no binding between p38
and
MKP-3
C was detected (Fig. 1B). Similarly, chimera XI,
which contains predominantly the p38
sequence except for kinase
subdomain XI and the carboxyl terminus of ERK1, was found to bind only
very weakly to immobilized GST-MKP-3
C (Fig. 1B). Chimeras
VIII and VII contain progressively longer carboxyl-terminal sequences
from ERK1 including, respectively, either kinase subdomain VIII or
subdomain VII together with the activation loop. In contrast to
chimera XI, chimeras VIII and VII both bound to immobilized MKP-3
C
(Fig. 1B). Since chimeras VIII and VII bind MKP-3 similarly, neither the activation loop or kinase domain VII of ERK appear to
confer any additional capacity for binding MKP-3. This is consistent with the failure of a p44 ERK1 loop chimera (p38
possessing the activation loop of ERK1) (40) to exhibit any detectable binding to
MKP-3
C (Fig. 1B). Increasing further the proportion of
COOH-terminal ERK1 sequence up to and including kinase subdomains V
(chimera V), III (chimera III), or I (chimera I) resulted in a further increase in binding to MKP-3
C (Fig. 1B). Similar results
were observed when binding was assessed using full-length GST-MKP-3 or
when lysates from COS-7 cells transfected with HA-tagged versions of
the p38
/ERK1 chimeras were incubated with immobilized GST-MKP-3
C (data not shown).

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purified p38/ERK chimera binding to
MKP-3
C. A series of p38
/ERK1 chimeric
molecules (schematically represented in Fig. 6) were expressed in
E. coli as His6-tagged molecules. A,
Coomassie Blue-stained His6-tagged p38
/ERK1 chimeras
following their purification by Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic
acid-agarose and separation by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
using a 12% gel. Chimeras comprise COOH-terminal ERK1 sequence up to
and including kinase subdomain I (Chim I), subdomain III (Chim III),
subdomain V (Chim V), subdomain VII (Chim VII), subdomain VIII (Chim
VIII), and subdomain XI (Chim XI) with p38
residues constituting the
remaining NH2 terminus. p38-ERK-p38 represents an
additional chimera constituting p38
sequence except for the
activation loop of ERK1. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used
a standard (10 or 20 µg) for Coomassie staining. B,
His6-tagged ERK, p38
, or p38
/ERK1 chimeras (as
indicated) were incubated with glutathione-Sepharose beads prebound to
GST-MKP-3
C. Western analysis of washed beads was performed using
anti-His6 monoclonal antibody with goat anti-mouse
monoclonal antibody horseradish peroxidase conjugate and
chemiluminescence. This binding experiment is representative of three
separate experiments.
/ERK1 chimeras to stimulate catalytic
activity of purified MKP-3 as assessed by hydrolysis of the artificial
substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate. As anticipated from this
relationship, both chimera XI and the p44 ERK1 loop chimera were
indistinguishable from p38
and totally ineffective as activators of
the MKP-3 phosphatase (Fig.
2A). In contrast, chimeras
VIII and VII both elicited weak, but a clearly detectable increase in
MKP-3 phosphatase activity (Fig. 2A). Chimeras V, III, and I
were different again insofar that all three are highly effective
stimulators of MKP-3 phosphatase activity and similar to that seen with
control purified ERK2 (Fig. 2A). These data indicate a
correlation between binding and catalytic activation of MKP-3 by the
p38
/ERK1 chimeras.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
MKP-3 phosphatase activation by p38/ERK
chimera. Phosphatase activity was assessed by incubating purified
full-length GST-MKP-3 (10 µg) together with ERK2,
His6-p38
, or His6-tagged p38/ERK chimeras
(0-20 µg as indicated) in the presence of 20 mM
p-nitrophenyl phosphate for 60 min, and measuring absorbance
at 405 nM. Chimeras were either p38
/ERK1 as shown in
Fig. 1 (A) or chimeras EIIP, EIIPIVE, and PIVECTP of
p38
/ERK2 (B) as described (41). Chim V was retested in
B for comparison with this chimera set. A schematic
representation of these chimeras is given in Fig. 6. Data points
represent the mean of triplicate determinations and are representative
of three separate experiments.
and ERK2 (41). Chimera PIVECTP is similar to chimera V except
that it also possesses the COOH-terminal loop L16 of p38
(see Fig. 6
for an illustration of these chimeras). This chimera was designed so
that the NH2- and COOH-terminal major structural domains
are contributed by p38
or ERK2 sequences, respectively (41). Chimera
PIVECTP stimulates powerful activation of MKP-3 and to an extent
similar to chimera V (Fig. 2B). Since chimeras V and III
stimulate similar activation of MKP-3 (Fig. 2A) the role of
ERK kinase subdomains III and IV in this activity is unclear. Chimera
EIIPIVE is constituted mainly of ERK2 sequence although kinase
subdomains III and IV have been substituted with cognate residues from
p38
. This chimera stimulates MKP-3 activation in a manner
indistinguishable from chimera PIVECTP and chimera V (Fig.
2B). Also addressing the possible role of the
NH2-terminal region of ERK, chimera EIIP comprises p38
except for ERK2 subdomains I and II and this molecule was found totally
inactive in this assay (Fig. 2B). Consistent with a close
correlation between MKP-3 catalytic activation and MAP kinase binding,
chimeras PIVECTP and EIIPIVE, but not EIIP, bound and precipitated with
GST-MKP-3 immobilized on beads (not shown).

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of MKP-3 activation by the ERK2 CD
domain peptide. Purified MKP-3 (5 µg) was incubated alone
(control) or with 5 µg of ERK2 and phosphatase activity measured as
described in the legend to Fig. 2. Incubation in the presence of 200 µM of a synthetic peptide LEQYYDPSDEPIAE (Erk2 311-324)
representing the CD domain of ERK2 (42) inhibits activation of MKP-3 by
purified ERK2. Data points are the mean of triplicate determination and
representative of two separate experiments.
are all relatively
resistant to this DSP (Fig. 4). As
predicted by their ability to stimulate phosphatase activity, chimeras
PIVECTP and EIIPIVE were both highly sensitive to inactivation by low
concentrations of MKP-3 (Fig. 5).
Chimeras VII and EIIP as well as the p44 loop chimera displayed
catalytic activities too low for accurate analysis of
MKP-3-dependent inactivation. Together, these results
demonstrate a correlation between MAP kinase chimera binding,
phosphatase activation, and kinase inhibition by MKP-3 and these
observations are summarized schematically in Fig.
6.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Inactivation of
p38
/ERK1 chimera by MKP-3. Purified
p38
/ERK2 chimera (0.5 µg) were activated by 0.1 µg of an
appropriate MAP kinase kinase (MEK1 S218E,S222E for Chim I and III and
MKK6 for all other chimerae) and incubated with 0.01-3.0 µg of
full-length GST-MKP-3. Enzymatic activities of p38
/ERK1 chimera were
assessed by phosphorylation in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP of either 10 µg of myelin basic protein
(MBP) or 10 µg of GST-ATF-2-(19-96) as indicated.
Autoradiogram shows substrate phosphorylation following separation with
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using a 12% gel and is
representative of three separate experiments.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Inactivation of
p38
/ERK2 chimera by MKP-3. Purified
p38
/ERK1 chimera PIVECTP and EIIPIVE (0.5 µg) were activated by
0.1 µg of MKK6 (ERK2 control was activated by MEK1 S218E,S222E) and
incubated with 0.01-10.0 µg of full-length MKP-3. Enzymatic
activities of p38
/ERK2 chimera or ERK2 were assessed by
phosphorylation in the presence of [
-32P]ATP of either
10 µg of myelin basic protein (MBP) or 10 µg of
GST-ATF-2-(19-96) as indicated. Autoradiogram shows substrate
phosphorylation following separation with SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis using a 12% gel and is representative of two separate
experiments.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Schematic representation of p38/ERK
chimeras. The chimeras are denoted using the nomenclature employed
in the original reports describing these molecules (40, 41). Sequence
derived from ERK and p38 are represented by gray and
white boxes, respectively. Chimeras Chim I-XI comprise
COOH-terminal ERK1 sequence up to and including kinase subdomain I
(Chim I), subdomain III (Chim III), subdomain V (Chim V), subdomain VII
(Chim VII), subdomain VIII (Chim VIII), and subdomain XI (Chim XI) with
p38
residues constituting the remaining NH2 terminus.
Chimera EIIP contains NH2-terminal ERK2 residues up to
subdomain II and p38
sequence from subdomain III to the COOH
terminus. Chimera EIIPIVE comprises ERK2 sequence except for subdomains
III and IV that are from p38
. Chimera PIVECTP contains p38
sequence constituting the NH2 terminus up to subdomain IV
as well as the COOH-terminal tail (L16) with the remaining sequence
from ERK2. The black line indicates the ATP-binding site
whereas TxY represents the phosphorylation site motif
localized within the activation loop. Also indicated is a summary of
the data shown in Figs. 1-5 on MKP-3 binding, MKP-3 catalytic
activation, and the sensitivity of each p38/ERK chimera to inactivation
by MKP-3. Values assigned range from not detectable (
) to a value
equivalent to that obtained with ERK (+++). ND, not
done.
/ERK1 chimeras revealed that ERK
substrate recognition occurs within regions COOH-terminal to and
including kinase subdomain V. Thus, chimera V was shown to display a
shift from p38- to ERK-like substrate specificity as indicated by
phosphorylation of Myc, binding and activation of p90rsk, and
increased transcription by the fos promoter (40). Together with data reported here, this suggests an overlap between ERK regions
responsible for substrate recognition and those important for binding
and activation of MKP-3. To investigate this further we employed
synthetic peptides corresponding to docking sites identified within
selected ERK substrates. Elk1 is a member of the ternary complex factor
subfamily of ETS-domain transcription factors that binds ERK though two
distinct docking sites known as the D-domain and the FXFP
motif (also termed DEJL and DEF motifs, respectively). ERK binding to
these targeting domains is essential for efficient Elk-1
phosphorylation (43, 44). To test the importance of ERK
substrate-binding domains for MKP-3 activation we employed two
peptides, QKGRKPRDLELPLSPSLL (Elk-1 amino acids 312-328) and RRPRAPAKLSFQFPS (Elk-1 amino acids 387-399)
which encompass, respectively, the D-domain and FXFP motif
and which have both been shown to inhibit substrate phosphorylation by
ERK (43, 44). Both peptides elicit a dose-dependent
inhibition of MKP-3 catalytic activation by ERK2 (Fig.
7, A and B).
Control peptides in which critical residues (underlined) have been
altered (QKGRKPRDAEAPLSPSLL and
RRPRAPAKLSATAPS) and which are less effective at blocking
ERK-dependent substrate phosphorylation (43, 44) also
display a similarly reduced inhibition of MKP-3 activity (Fig. 7,
A and B).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
ERK-stimulated MKP-3 phosphatase inhibition
by Elk-1 peptides. Purified MKP-3 (5 µg) was incubated with ERK2
(5 µg) and phosphatase activity measured as described in the legend
to Fig. 2. Incubation in the presence of peptide
QKGRKPRDLELPLSPSLL (Elk-1 amino acids 312-328)
(A) or RRPRAPAKLSFQFPS (Elk-1 amino acids
387-399) (B) up to 200 µM (open
circles) results in an inhibition of ERK-dependent
phosphatase activity. Control peptides in which residues
(underlined) important for ERK binding have been altered,
QKGRKPRDAEAPLSPSLL (A) and
RRPRAPAKLSATAPS (B), display reduced inhibition
of MKP-3 (solid circles). Additional control peptides,
QKGMMPRDLELPLSPSLL (A, open squares),
QMGMMPMDLELPLSPSLL
(A, solid squares), MMPRAPAKLSFQFPS
(B, open squares), and
MMPMAPAMLSFQFPS (B,
solid squares) in which underlined Met replace charged
residues are also ineffective at inhibiting ERK-dependent
activation of MKP-3. Data points are the mean of triplicate
determination and are representative of three separate
experiments.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
ERK-stimulated MKP-3 phosphatase inhibition
by the p90rsk COOH-terminal peptide 700-724. Purified
MKP-3 (5 µg) was incubated with ERK2 (5 µg) and phosphatase
activity measured as described in the legend to Fig. 2. Bars
show basal (open) and ERK-stimulated (filled)
MKP-3 phosphatase activity. Incubation in the presence of a synthetic
peptide TPQLKPIESSILAQRRVRKLPSTTL
(p90rsk 700-724) up to 200 µM (open
circles) inhibits MKP-3 phosphatase activity. A control peptide
(filled circles) where residues critical for p90rsk
binding to ERK (underlined) were exchanged for ASQGA
displayed greatly reduced inhibition of the ERK2-activated MKP-3
phosphatase. Points are the mean of triplicate determination and
representative of three separate experiments.
(Fig. 9). Since our
data with chimeric p38/ERK molecules demonstrates an important role for
the ERK COOH-terminal structural lobe in activating MKP-3 (see above),
we next tested the p90rsk peptides using chimera PIVECTP (Fig.
6). Both peptides inhibit MKP-3 activation by chimera PIVECTP in a
manner indistinguishable from their actions on ERK. Fig.
10 illustrates this with an experiment showing does-dependent inhibition of PIVECTP-stimulated
MKP-3 by the peptide p90rsk 703-718 and presumably reflects
interaction at the COOH-terminal structural lobe of ERK2 that is
preserved in this chimeric molecule. Together, these data indicate that
COOH-terminal ERK domains important for interaction with docking sites
and charged residues within the target substrates Elk-1 and
p90rsk are also important for interaction and activation of the
DSP MKP-3.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Selective inhibition of ERK-stimulated MKP-4
phosphatase activity by the p90rsk COOH-terminal peptide
700-724. Purified MKP-4 (10 µg) was incubated with 10 µg of
ERK2 (A), p38
(B), or JNK3/SAPK
(C) and phosphatase activity measured as described in the
legend to Fig. 2. Bars show basal (open) and MAP
kinase stimulated (filled) MKP-4 phosphatase activity.
Incubation in the presence of the synthetic peptide
TPQLKPIESSILAQRRVRKLPSTTL (p90rsk 700-724) up to 200 µM resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of
ERK2-stimulated MKP-4. JNK3/SAPK
and p38
stimulated MKP-4
phosphatase activity was unaltered by this peptide. Data points are the
mean of triplicate determination and representative of two separate
experiments.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Inhibition of PIVECTP-stimulated MKP-3 by
the p90rsk COOH-terminal peptide 703-718. Purified MKP-3
(5 µg) was incubated with chimera PIVECTP (5 µg) and phosphatase
activity measured as described in the legend to Fig. 2. Incubation in
the presence of the p90rsk COOH-terminal peptide
LKPIESSILAQRRVRK (p90rsk 703-718) at
concentrations up to 200 µM inhibits activation of MKP-3
by PIVECTP (filled circles). Control peptide (open
circles) with residues important for p90rsk binding to ERK
(underlined) exchanged for ASQGA displayed reduced
inhibition of ERK2-activated MKP-3 phosphatase activity. Data points
are the mean of triplicate determination and representative of two
separate experiments.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 11.
Mutant MKP-3 R64A,R65A is insensitive to
phosphatase activation by ERK2. Wild type MKP-3 or mutant MKP-3
R64A,R65A (10 µg) were incubated with ERK2 (10 µg) and phosphatase
activity measured as described in the legend to Fig. 2. In contrast to
wild type MKP-3, MKP-3 R64A,R65A displayed little or no increase in
phosphatase activity in the presence of ERK.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 12.
ERK2 is resistant to inactivation by the
MKP-3 mutants R65A and R64A,R65A. ERK2 (0.5 µg) was activated by
MEK1 S218E,S222E (0.1 µg) and incubated with 0.01-3.0 µg of MKP-3,
MKP-3 (R64A), MKP-3 (R65A), or MKP-3 (R64A,R65A). ERK activity was
measured by phosphorylation of 10 µg of myelin basic protein in the
presence of [
-32P]ATP. Autoradiogram shows substrate
phosphorylation following separation with SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis using a 12% gel and is representative of two separate
experiments.
-helices D (kinase subdomain V), F
(kinase subdomain IX), and G (kinase subdomain X) which, based on
structural data from cAMP-dependent protein kinase and twitchin, are believed to form a surface groove and to contact target
substrate proteins (50, 51). Work with JNK/SAPK chimeras also supports
a role for helix G and the adjacent loop L13 as important regions for
tight binding to the substrate protein c-Jun (52). The overlap between
ERK regions binding substrate and MKP-3 suggests that helices D, F, and
G may also play an important role in binding and activating MKP-3. From
the point of view of binding sites within MKP-3, abolition of
ERK-stimulated phosphatase activation by mutating a KIM-like domain
within the MKP-3 NH2 terminus (MKP-3 (R65A), MKP-3
(R64A,R65A)) suggests that key sites of contact for the ERK
COOH-terminal lobe include residues localized between the Cdc25
homology domains (CH2) conserved between members of the DSP gene family
(36, 53). Structural studies of these critical regions within MAP
kinases and DSPs are now eagerly awaited to provide further
clarification on the molecular basis for tight and specific interaction
between these two important gene families.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 13.
Schematic representation of ERK structural
domains. Figure shows major NH2-terminal structural
domain in green comprising kinase subdomains I-IV together
with the COOH-terminal tail, L16. In blue is the
COOH-terminal lobe composed of kinase subdomains V-XI important for
binding substrate proteins as well as for interactions with MKP-3. Also
shown in yellow are
-helices D (kinase subdomain V), F
(kinase subdomain IX), and G (kinase subdomain X) believed to form a
surface groove and to contact target substrate proteins. Results
described in this report using p38/ERK chimeras suggest an overlap
between ERK regions binding substrate and those critical for binding
and activating the MKP-3. Key sites of contact for the ERK
COOH-terminal lobe include MKP-3 NH2-terminal residues
localized within a conserved kinase interaction
motif (KIM) between the Cdc25 homology domains (CH2)
conserved between members of the DSP gene family.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Current address: Serono Reproductive Biology Institute, Inc.,
280 Pond St., Randolph, MA 02368. To whom correspondence should be
addressed. Tel.: 001-781-681-2780; Fax: 001-781-961-3431; E-mail: steve.arkinstall@serono.com.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Cohen, P.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
353-361
2.
Marshall, C. J.
(1995)
Cell
80,
179-185
3.
Schaeffer, H. J.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2435-2444
4.
Zhang, F.,
Strand, A.,
Robbins, D.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1994)
Nature
367,
704-711
5.
Canagarajah, B. J.,
Khokhlatchev, A.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1997)
Cell
90,
859-869
6.
Wang, Z.,
Harkins, P. C.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
Han, J.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2327-2332
7.
Xie, X.,
Gu, Y.,
Fox, T.,
Coll, J. T.,
Fleming, M. A.,
Markland, W.,
Caron, P. R.,
Wilson, K. P.,
and Su, M. S.-S.
(1998)
Structure
6,
983-991
8.
Kato, Y.,
Tapping, R. I.,
Huang, S.,
Watson, M. H.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Lee, J.-D.
(1998)
Nature
395,
713-716
9.
Pages, G.,
Lenormand, P.,
L'Allemain, G.,
Chambard, J. C.,
Meloche, S.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8319-8328
10.
Mansour, S. J.,
Matten, W. T.,
Hermann, A. S.,
Candia, J. M.,
Rong, S.,
Fukasawa, K.,
Vande Woude, G. F.,
and Ahn, N. G.
(1994)
Science
265,
966-970
11.
Cowley, S.,
Paterson, H.,
Kemp, P.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1994)
Cell
77,
841-852
12.
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Science
270,
1326-1331
13.
Kornhauser, J. M.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
839-842
14.
Zanke, B. W.,
Boudreau, K.,
Rubie, E.,
Winnett, E.,
Tibbles, L. A.,
Zon, L.,
Kyriakis, J.,
Liu, F.-F.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
606-613
15.
Ichijo, H.,
Nishida, E.,
Irie, K.,
Dijke, P. T.,
Saitoh, M.,
Moriguchi, T.,
Takagi, M.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Miyazono, K.,
and Gotoh, Y.
(1997)
Science
275,
90-94
16.
Yang, D. D.,
Kuan, C.-Y.,
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
Rincon, M.,
Zheng, T. S.,
Davis, R. J.,
Rakic, P.,
and Flavell, R. A.
(1997)
Nature
389,
865-870
17.
Yang, D. D.,
Conze, D.,
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
Barrett, T.,
Davis, R. J.,
Rincon, M.,
and Flavell, R. A.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
575-585
18.
Dong, C.,
Yang, D. D.,
Wysk, M.,
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Flavell, R. A.
(1998)
Science
282,
2092-2095
19.
Keyse, S. M.,
and Emslie, E. A.
(1992)
Nature
359,
644-646
20.
Sun, H.,
Charles, C. H.,
Lau, L. F.,
and Tonks, N. K.
(1993)
Cell
75,
487-493
21.
Rohan, P. J.,
Davis, P.,
Moskaluk, C. A.,
Kearns, M.,
Krutzsch, H.,
Siebenlist, U.,
and Kelly, K.
(1993)
Science
259,
1763-1766
22.
Ward, Y.,
Gupta, S.,
Jensen, P.,
Wartmann, M.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Kelly, K.
(1994)
Nature
367,
651-654
23.
Guan, K.-L.,
and Butch, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7197-7203
24.
King, A. G.,
Ozanne, B. W.,
Smythe, C.,
and Ashworth, A.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
2553-2563
25.
Misra-Press, A.,
Rim, C. S.,
Yao, H.,
Roberson, M. S.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14587-14596
26.
Kwak, S. P.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1156-1160
27.
Ishibashi, T.,
Bottaro, D. P.,
Michieli, P.,
Kelley, C. A.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29897-29902
28.
Martell, K. J.,
Seasholtz, A. F.,
Kwak, S. P.,
Clemens, K. K.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1995)
J. Neurochem.
65,
1823-1833
29.
Theodosiou, A. M.,
Rodrigues, N. R.,
Nesbit, M. A.,
Ambrose, H. J.,
Paterson, H.,
McLellan-Arnold, E.,
Boyd, Y.,
Leversha, M. A.,
Owen, N.,
Blake, D. J.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Davies, K. E.
(1996)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5,
675-684
30.
Mourey, R. J.,
Vega, Q. C.,
Campbell, J. S.,
Wenderoth, M. P.,
Hauschka, S. D.,
Krebs, E. G.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3795-3802
31.
Muda, M.,
Boschert, U.,
Dickinson, R.,
Martinou, J.-C.,
Martinou, I.,
Camps, M.,
Schlegel, W.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4319-4326
32.
Groom, L. A.,
Sneddon, A. A.,
Alessi, D. R.,
Dowd, S.,
and Keyse, S. M.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3621-3632
33.
Shin, D.-Y.,
Ishibashi, T.,
Choi, T. S.,
Chung, E.,
Chung, I. Y.,
Aaronson, S. A.,
and Bottaro, D. P.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
2633-2639
34.
Muda, M.,
Boschert, U.,
Smith, A.,
Antonsson, B.,
Gillieron, C.,
Chabert, C.,
Camps, M.,
Martinou, I.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5141-5151
35.
Theodosiou, A.,
Smith, A.,
Gillieron, C.,
Arkinstall, S.,
and Ashworth, A.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6981-6988
36.
Camps, M.,
Nichols, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(2000)
FASEB J.
14,
6-16
37.
Muda, M.,
Theodosiou, A.,
Rodrigues, N.,
Boschert, U.,
Camps, M.,
Gillieron, C.,
Davies, K.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27205-27208
38.
Muda, M.,
Theodosiou, A.,
Gillieron, C.,
Smith, A.,
Chabert, C.,
Camps, M.,
Boschert, U.,
Rodrigues, N.,
Davies, K.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9323-9329
39.
Camps, M.,
Nichols, A.,
Gillieron, C.,
Antonsson, B.,
Muda, M.,
Chabert, C.,
Boschert, U.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1998)
Science
280,
1262-1265
40.
Brunet, A.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(1996)
Science
272,
1652-1655
41.
Wilsbacher, J. L.,
Goldsmith, E. J.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16988-16994
42.
Tanoue, T.,
Adachi, M.,
Moriguchi, T.,
and Nishida, E.
(2000)
Nature Cell Biol.
2,
110-116
43.
Yang, S.-H.,
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Sharrocks, A. D.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1740-1749
44.
Jacobs, D.,
Glossip, D.,
Xing, H.,
Muslin, A. J.,
and Kornfield, K.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
163-175
45.
Gavin, A.-C.,
and Nebreda, A. R.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
281-284
46.
Smith, J. A.,
Poteet-Smith, C. E.,
Malarkey, K.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2893-2898
47.
Holland, P. M.,
and Cooper, J. A.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R329-R331
48.
Pulido, R.,
Zuniga, A.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
7337-7350
49.
Zuniga, A.,
Torres, J.,
Ubeda, J.,
and Pulido, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21900-21907
50.
Knighton, D. R.,
Zheng, J.,
Ten Eyck, L. F.,
Xuong, N.-H.,
Taylor, S. S.,
and Sowadski, J. M.
(1991)
Science
253,
414-420
51.
Hu, S.-H.,
Parker, M. W.,
Lei, J. Y.,
Wilce, M. C. J.,
Benian, G. M.,
and Kemp, B. E.
(1994)
Nature
369,
581-584
52.
Kallunki, T.,
Su, B.,
Tsigelny, I.,
Sluss, H. K.,
Derijard, B.,
Moore, G.,
Davis, R.,
and Karin, M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2996-3007
53.
Keyse, S. M.,
and Ginsburg, M.
(1993)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18,
377-378
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Kurita, Y. Watanabe, E. Gunji, K. Ohashi, and K. Mizuno Molecular Dissection of the Mechanisms of Substrate Recognition and F-actin-mediated Activation of Cofilin-phosphatase Slingshot-1 J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2008; 283(47): 32542 - 32552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Chan, V. W.S. Liu, G. S.W. Tsao, K.-M. Yao, T. Furukawa, K. K.L. Chan, and H. Y.S. Ngan Loss of MKP3 mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer cells Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2008; 29(9): 1742 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Morrison, M. K.H. Kim, W. Berkofsky-Fessler, and J. D. Licht WT1 Induction of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase 3 Represents a Novel Mechanism of Growth Suppression Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 6(7): 1225 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Tephly and A. B. Carter Asbestos-Induced MKP-3 Expression Augments TNF-{alpha} Gene Expression in Human Monocytes Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., July 1, 2008; 39(1): 113 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|