![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24693-24700, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,From Third Wave Technologies, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin 53719
Received for publication, March 15, 2000, and in revised form, May 24, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA replication and repair require a specific
mechanism to join the 3'- and 5'-ends of two strands to maintain
DNA continuity. In order to understand the details of this process, we
studied the activity of the 5' nucleases with substrates containing an RNA template strand. By comparing the eubacterial and archaeal 5'
nucleases, we show that the polymerase domain of the eubacterial enzymes is critical for the activity of the 5' nuclease domain on RNA
containing substrates. Analysis of the activity of chimeric enzymes between the DNA polymerases from Thermus aquaticus
(TaqPol) and Thermus thermophilus (TthPol) reveals two
regions, in the "thumb" and in the "palm" subdomains, critical
for RNA-dependent 5' nuclease activity. There are two
critical amino acids in those regions that are responsible for the high
activity of TthPol on RNA containing substrates. Mutating glycine 418 and glutamic acid 507 of TaqPol to lysine and glutamine, respectively,
increases its RNA-dependent 5' nuclease activity
4-10-fold. Furthermore, the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase
activity is controlled by a completely different region of TaqPol and
TthPol, and mutations in this region do not affect the 5' nuclease
activity. The results presented here suggest a novel substrate binding
mode of the eubacterial DNA polymerase enzymes, called a 5' nuclease
mode, that is distinct from the polymerizing and editing modes
described previously. The application of the enzymes with improved
RNA-dependent 5' nuclease activity for RNA detection using
the invasive signal amplification assay is discussed.
The structure-specific 5' nucleases are involved in DNA
replication and nucleotide excision repair, where the primary function of these enzymes is to remove the RNA primers of Okazaki fragments or
damaged DNA fragments, respectively (1-6). The activity of the 5'
nucleases is controlled by DNA polymerases that create for them an
optimal substrate by displacing the 5'-end of the downstream strand
during DNA synthesis (7-9). The precise removal of the displaced arm
by the 5' nuclease creates a nicked structure repaired by DNA ligase
(9). Previously, we studied the substrate specificity of seven
eubacterial and archaeal structure-specific 5' exonucleases with DNA
substrates (9). The enzymes showed very similar specificities, despite
their limited level of sequence similarity and different structural
organization; eubacterial 5' nucleases are discrete domains of the DNA
polymerases, whereas in archaea the 5' nucleases are separate
polypeptides. Comparison of the 5' nuclease activities of
Taq DNA polymerase
(TaqPol)1 and its isolated
nuclease domain (TaqExo) showed that the 5' nuclease domain can
function independently, although the polymerase domain influences the
5' nuclease activity by imposing additional stringency on substrate
recognition and by increasing substrate binding (9, 10).
A specific substrate for the 5' nucleases that resembles DNA undergoing
displacement synthesis can be created with synthetic oligonucleotides.
This substrate, termed the "overlapping substrate," is formed by
annealing adjacent upstream and downstream oligonucleotides on a
template strand, also called the target strand. The duplexes formed by
the two oligonucleotides must overlap by at least one base pair for
efficient cleavage by the 5' nucleases (9-11). The upstream
oligonucleotide in this substrate is completely annealed to the target
except for the 3' terminal nucleotide that may interact with the 5'
nuclease. The downstream oligonucleotide consists of the target
specific region and the 5' arm region that is not annealed to the
target and cleaved by the 5' nuclease to create the nicked substrate
(9, 11). The ability of the 5' nucleases to specifically recognize and
cleave the overlapping substrate has been utilized in assays for
quantitative DNA detection and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis
(11-14). In this method, called the invasive signal amplification
reaction, cleavage of the downstream oligonucleotide is dependent upon
the presence of a particular target sequence in a sample. Each target
molecule can generate more than 103 reporter molecules by
rapid turnover of the downstream oligonucleotide at elevated
temperatures (11, 12).2 By
adding a second invasive reaction, total signal amplification can reach
a factor of 107 (12). The invasive signal amplification
reaction can also be used for quantitative RNA detection, although this
would require an investigation of the ability of the structure-specific
5' nucleases to cleave the overlapping substrate with an RNA target.
In order to gain insight into the mechanism of substrate recognition by
the structure-specific 5' nucleases and to develop an enzyme for RNA
detection using the invasive signal amplification assay, we compared
the activity of eubacterial and archaeal 5' nucleases using an
overlapping substrate containing an RNA target. We find that only the
eubacterial DNA polymerases TaqPol and TthPol possess RNA
template-dependent 5' nuclease activity, although it is
significantly reduced compared with the 5' nuclease activity with a DNA
target. Of the two enzymes, TthPol has a higher
RNA-dependent 5' nuclease activity than TaqPol. We have
used this observation to investigate the activity of chimeric enzymes
constructed from TthPol and TaqPol, and we have identified two regions
in the polymerase domain involved in substrate recognition of 5'
nuclease substrates. Site-directed mutagenesis studies reveal that
lysine 420 and glutamine 509 of TthPol are the amino acids in these
regions that are critical for the 5' nuclease activity on
RNA-containing substrates. Mutating the analogous amino acids of TaqPol
(G418K and E507Q) to match TthPol at those positions increases the
RNA-dependent 5' nuclease activity of TaqPol 4-10-fold but
has no effect on its DNA- or RNA-dependent polymerase
activities. Based on these results, we propose a novel 5'
nuclease-specific mode of substrate binding by eubacterial DNA polymerases.
Materials--
Polymerase chain reaction amplification was done
with the Advantage cDNA polymerase chain reaction kit
(CLONTECH). Restriction enzymes were purchased from
New England Biolabs. Chemicals and buffers were from Fisher unless
otherwise noted.
Cloning, Expression, and Purification of
Enzymes--
TthPol, TaqPol, TaqExo, and archaeal FEN1 enzymes
from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Methanococcus
jannaschii, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, and
Pyrococcus furiosus were cloned, expressed, purified, and quantitated as described (9-11). All enzymes were dialyzed and stored in 50% glycerol, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 50 mM KCl, 0.5% Tween 20, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 100 µg/ml
bovine serum albumin.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Site-directed mutagenesis of the
TaqPol and TthPol genes was performed with the Transformer
Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (CLONTECH) according
to the manufacturer's protocol. Using site-directed mutagenesis, three
new unique restriction sites, NotI, BstBI, and
NdeI, were created in the TaqPol gene at positions
approximately corresponding to amino acids 328, 382, and 443, respectively. The same restriction sites were also introduced at the
homologous positions 330, 384, and 443 of the TthPol gene. The
NotI sites were created by using mutagenic primers
5'-GCCGCCAGGGGCGGCCGCGTCCACCGGGCC and
5'-GCCTGCAGGGGCGGCCGCGTGCACCGGGCA, which
correspond to the sense strands of the TaqPol and TthPol genes,
respectively. The BstI and NdeI sites were
introduced into both genes using sense strand mutagenic primers
5'-CTCCTGGACCCTTCGAACACCACCCC and
5'-GTCCTGGCCCATATGGAGGCCAC. The mutated
nucleotides are shown in boldface type, and the corresponding
restriction sites are underlined.
Construction and Purification of Chimeric Enzymes--
Chimeric
constructs were created by substituting homologous fragments between
the cloned TaqPol and TthPol genes using the common unique restriction
sites EcoRI, NotI, BstBI, NdeI,
BamHI, and SalI and standard cloning techniques.
Expression and purification of the chimeric enzymes was done as
described (9-11) except that the His Bind resin chromatography
purification step was replaced by affinity chromatography using an
Econo-Pac heparin cartridge (Bio-Rad) and a Dionex DX 500 HPLC
instrument. Briefly, the cartridge was equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, and enzyme extract dialyzed against the same buffer was loaded on the column and
then eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl (0-2 M) in the same buffer. The HPLC-purified protein was dialyzed and stored as
described above. Expression of the TthPol-TaqPol chimeric genes yielded
proteins of the expected size. The enzymes were purified to homogeneity
according to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (9) and were shown
to cleave the invasive substrates with both DNA and RNA targets.
Substrate Preparation and Purification--
The downstream and
upstream oligonucleotides and the IL-6 DNA target were synthesized on a
PerSeptive Biosystems instrument using standard phosphoramidite
chemistry (Glen Research). The synthetic RNA-DNA chimeric IrT target
labeled with biotin at the 5'-end was synthesized utilizing 2'-ACE RNA
chemistry (Dharmacon Research). The 2'-protecting groups were removed
by acid-catalyzed hydrolysis according to the manufacturer's
procedure. The downstream probes labeled with 5'-fluorescein or
5'-tetrachlorofluorescein at their 5' ends were purified by reverse
phase HPLC using a Resource Q column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). A
fragment of human IL-6 cDNA (nucleotides 64-691 of the sequence
published in Ref. 15) was cloned using a TOPO-TA Cloning Kit
(Invitrogen), and the 640-nucleotide IL-6 RNA target was synthesized by
T7 RNA polymerase run-off transcription of the cloned fragment using a
Megascript Kit (Ambion). All oligonucleotides were finally purified by
separation on a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel followed by excision
and elution of the major band. Oligonucleotide concentration was
determined by measuring absorption at 260 nm. The biotin-labeled IrT
target was incubated with a 5-fold excess of streptavidin (Promega) in
a buffer containing 10 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, and 10 µg/ml tRNA at room temperature for 10 min.
RNA Template-dependent 5' Nuclease Activity
Assay--
Unless otherwise indicated, RNA
template-dependent probe cycling reactions were carried out
in 10 µl of a reaction buffer containing 10 mM MOPS, pH
7.5, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 10 µg/ml tRNA, 100 mM KCl, and 5 mM MgSO4. The
substrates and 5' nuclease enzymes were mixed with the reaction buffer
lacking MgSO4 and overlaid with Chill-out liquid wax (MJ
Research). The enzyme and substrate concentrations are specified in the
figure legends of Figs. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Reactions were
brought up to reaction temperature, started by the addition of
MgSO4, and incubated for the specified length of time.
Reactions were stopped by the addition of 10 µl of 95% formamide
containing 10 mM EDTA and 0.02% methyl violet (Sigma).
Samples were heated to 90 °C for 1 min immediately before
electrophoresis through a 20% denaturing acrylamide gel (19:1
cross-linked) containing 7 M urea in a buffer of 45 mM Tris borate, pH 8.3, 1.4 mM EDTA. Gels were
then scanned on an FMBIO-100 fluorescence gel scanner (Hitachi) using a
505-nm emission filter. The fraction of cleaved product was determined from intensities of bands corresponding to uncut and cut substrate with
FMBIO Analysis software (version 6.0; Hitachi). The fraction of
cleavage product did not exceed 20% to ensure that measurements approximated initial cleavage rates. The cycling cleavage rate was
defined as the concentration of the cut downstream probe divided by the
target concentration and the time of the reaction (in minutes).
Michaelis-Menten Kinetics Assays--
Assays consisted of
10-µl reactions containing 10 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 0.05%
Tween 20, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 10 µg/ml tRNA, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 nM enzyme (TaqPol, TthPol, or
TaqG418K/E507Q), and different concentrations (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, or 1 µM) of an equimolar mixture of the IrT target and the
probe. The cleavage kinetics for each enzyme and each substrate
concentration were measured at 46 °C. The fraction of cleaved
product was determined as described above and plotted as a function of
reaction time. The initial cleavage rates were determined from the
slopes in the linear range of the cleavage kinetics and were defined as
the concentration of cut product divided by the enzyme concentration
and the time of the reaction (in minutes). The Michaelis constant
Km and the maximal catalytic rate
kcat of each enzyme with the IrT substrate were
determined from the plots of the initial cleavage rate
versus the substrate concentration.
Polymerase Activity Assays--
Primer extension reactions were
carried out in 10 µl of buffer containing 10 mM MOPS, pH
7.5, 5 mM MgSO4, 100 mM KCl. In
each reaction, 40 ng of enzyme were used to extend 10 µM
(dT)25-30 primer in the presence of either 10 µM poly(A)286 or 1 µM
poly(dA)273 template, 45 µM dTTP, and 5 µM 5'-fluorescein-dUTP at 60 °C for 30 min. Reactions
were stopped with 10 µl of stop solution (95% formamide, 10 mM EDTA, 0.02% methyl violet dye). Samples (3 µl) were
fractionated on a 15% denaturing acrylamide gel (19:1 cross-linked), and the fraction of incorporated 5'-fluorescein-dUTP was quantitated using an FMBIO-100 fluorescence gel scanner (Hitachi) equipped with a
505-nm emission filter as described above.
DNA and RNA Template-dependent 5' Nuclease Activities
of Structure-specific 5' Nucleases--
The 5' nuclease activity assay
was designed similarly to the invasive signal amplification reaction
described previously (11). The IL-6 substrate used in these experiments
consists of the downstream and upstream oligonucleotides annealed with
either RNA or DNA target (the terms "target" and "template"
will be used interchangeably) as shown in Fig.
1A. The fluorescently labeled
downstream oligonucleotide, also called the probe, is specifically
cleaved by the 5' nuclease at the site where the upstream
oligonucleotide overlaps or "invades" the probe (9, 10). The
invasive signal amplification reaction is carried out under conditions
of limiting target and excess probe. At the optimal reaction
temperature, which occurs at the melting temperature of the
probe, a single target molecule gives rise to multiple cleaved probes
due to a rapid probe exchange.2 The cleavage rate of this
reaction is determined as the number of the probe molecules cleaved per
target molecule per minute.
In agreement with the previous results,2 all enzymes showed
high cleavage activity with the IL-6 DNA target (Fig. 1B).
When the DNA target was replaced with the IL-6 RNA target, only TthPol and TaqPol were able to cleave the probe, although at a reduced rate
compared with the DNA target (Fig. 1C). The cleavage rates of TaqPol and TthPol with the RNA target are only 0.2 and 0.8 min Chimeric Enzymes between TaqPol and TthPol--
DNA polymerase
enzymes from Thermus species, like all DNA polymerase I
homologues, consist of two distinctive domains, the 5' nuclease and the
polymerase domains, shown schematically in Fig.
2. The polymerase domain comprises the
C-terminal two-thirds of the proteins, and it is responsible for both
DNA-dependent and RNA-dependent DNA polymerase
activities, whereas the N-terminal one-third contains the 5' nuclease
domain. According to a commonly accepted nomenclature (17), the
polymerase domain has been described as having a physical form
resembling a right hand. The palm region consists of, roughly, amino
acids 300-500 of a genus Thermus DNA polymerase I, the
thumb region includes amino acids 500-650, and the fingers region is
formed by the remaining amino acids from 650 to 830 (Fig. 2).
The amino acid sequences of TaqPol and TthPol share about 87% identity
and greater than 92% similarity. We took advantage of this high degree
of sequence similarity between the enzymes to construct a series of
chimeric enzymes between TthPol and TaqPol. The chimeric constructs
shown in Fig. 2 were created by swapping DNA fragments defined by the
restriction endonuclease sites, EcoRI and BamHI,
common for both genes, the SalI site in the cloning vector,
and the new sites, NotI, BstBI, and
NdeI, created at the homologous positions of both genes by
site-directed mutagenesis (see "Experimental Procedures" and Fig.
2). Since TthPol has a 4-fold higher cleavage rate with the IL-6 RNA
template than TaqPol (Fig. 1C), the activities of the
chimeric enzymes were rated relative to TthPol and used as a parameter
to identify the region(s) affecting RNA template-dependent
5' nuclease activity.
RNA-dependent 5' Nuclease Activity of the Chimeric
Enzymes--
The activity of each chimeric enzyme was evaluated using
the invasive signal amplification assay with the IL-6 RNA target (Fig.
1A); the cleavage rates shown in Fig.
3 were determined as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Comparison of the cleavage rates of the
first two chimeras, TaqTth(N) and TthTaq(N), created by swapping the
polymerase and 5' nuclease domains at the NotI site (Fig.
2), shows that TaqTth(N) has the same activity as TthPol, whereas its
counterpart TthTaq(N) retains the activity of TaqPol (Fig. 3). This
result indicates that the higher cleavage rate of TthPol is associated
with its polymerase domain, which is consistent with an important role
for the polymerase domain in the 5' nuclease activity (9, 10).
The next step was to identify the minimal region of TthPol polymerase
domain that would give rise to the TthPol-like 5' nuclease activity
when substituted for the corresponding region of the TaqPol sequence.
To this end, we selected the TaqTth(N) chimera to generate a series of
new constructs by replacing its TthPol sequence with homologous regions
of TaqPol. First, we substituted the N-terminal and C-terminal segments
of the TaqPol polymerase domain for the corresponding regions of
TaqTth(N) using the common BamHI site as a breaking point to
create TaqTth(N-B) and TaqTth(B-S) chimeras, respectively (Fig. 2).
TaqTth(N-B), which has the TthPol sequence between amino acids 328 and
593, is approximately 3 times more active than the TaqTth(B-S) and 40%
more active than TthPol (Fig. 3). This result demonstrates that the
NotI-BamHI region of the TthPol polymerase
domain is responsible for the high 5' nuclease activity of TthPol with
RNA targets.
The NotI-BamHI region of TthPol was further
subdivided into two approximately equal parts using NdeI
(Fig. 2), and the effect of the substitution of each of these sequences
on the cleavage rate of TaqPol was investigated by measuring the
activities of the TaqTth(N-Nd) and TaqTth(Nd-B) chimeras. Each of these
chimeric enzymes showed TaqPol-like activity (Fig. 3), suggesting that both NotI-NdeI and
NdeI-BamHI regions of TthPol contain amino acids
indispensable for the high cleavage rate of TthPol. The substitution of
the BstBI-BamHI region of TthPol for the
homologous sequence of TaqPol produced the TaqTth(Bs-B) chimera, which
exhibited the same activity as TthPol (Fig. 3). Thus, this study of the chimeric enzymes limited the portion of the TthPol sequence determining its high RNA template-dependent 5' nuclease activity to the
BstB-BamHI region located approximately between
amino acids 382 and 593 (Fig. 2).
Site-directed Mutagenesis of the Chimeric Enzymes--
Comparison
of the TthPol and TaqPol amino acid sequences between the
BstBI and BamHI sites reveals only 25 differences
(Fig. 4A). Among these, there
are 12 conservative substitutions and 13 substitutions resulting in an
alteration of charge. Since the analysis of the chimeric enzymes
suggested that the critical mutations are located in both
BstBI-NdeI and NdeI-BamHI
regions of TthPol, we used chimeric enzymes that have TthPol sequence
in one of these regions and introduced TthPol-specific amino acids by
site-directed mutagenesis in the other region that has TaqPol sequence.
For example, six TthPol-specific substitutions changing amino acid charge were created in the BstBI-NdeI region of
the TaqTth(Nd-B) chimera by single or double amino acid mutagenesis
(Fig. 4A). Only one of these substitutions, double mutation
W417L/G418K, was able to restore the TthPol activity with the IL-6 RNA
target, whereas the other four mutations were neutral (Fig.
4B and data not shown). Similarly, all 12 TthPol amino acid
substitutions were introduced at the homologous positions of the
NdeI-BamHI region of the TaqTth(N-Nd) chimera,
and only one, E507Q, increased the cleavage rate to the TthPol level,
whereas the other 10 mutations were neutral, and one, G499R, showed a
smaller increase (Fig. 4B and data not shown).
To confirm that the W417L, G418K, and E507Q substitutions are
sufficient to increase the TaqPol activity to the TthPol level, TaqPol
variants carrying these mutations were created, and their cleavage
rates with the IL-6 RNA target were compared with that of TthPol. Fig.
4C shows that the TaqPol W417L/G418K/E507Q and TaqPol
G418K/E507Q mutants have a 1.4 times higher activity than TthPol and
more than a 4-fold higher activity than TaqPol, whereas the TaqPol
W417L/E507Q mutant has the same activity as TthPol. Thus, these results
provide strong evidence that the RNA-dependent 5' nuclease
activity of TaqPol with the RNA IL-6 target can be significantly
increased by just two critical amino acid substitutions, G418K and E507Q.
Characterization of the TaqPol G418K/E507Q Mutant--
Next, we
compared the TaqPol G418K/E507Q, TaqPol, and TthPol enzymes in the RNA
template-dependent 5' nuclease assay while varying
temperature and the concentrations of salt and divalent ions. The
upstream DNA oligonucleotide and the RNA target of the substrate used
in this study were linked into a single molecule, called the IrT
target, as shown in Fig. 5A,
and the labeled probe was present in large excess. The 5'-end of the
IrT target was blocked with a biotin-streptavidin complex to prevent
nonspecific degradation by the enzyme during the reaction (18,
19).2 The cleavage rates for TaqPol G418K/E507Q, TaqPol,
and TthPol are plotted versus temperature in Fig.
5B. The activity difference between TthPol and TaqPol with
the IrT target is even greater than that found with the IL-6 RNA
target. The G418K/E507Q mutations increase the activity of TaqPol more
than 10-fold and by 25% as compared with TthPol. All three enzymes
show a typical temperature profile of the invasive signal amplification
reaction2 and have the same optimal temperature. We found
no significant effect of the G418K/E507Q mutations on DNA
template-dependent 5' nuclease activity of TaqPol with an
all-DNA target analogous to IrT under the same conditions (data not
shown).
The effects of KCl and MgSO4 concentrations on the 5'
nuclease activity of TaqPol G418K/E507Q, TaqPol, and TthPol with the IrT target are shown in Fig. 5, C and D. The
activities of all enzymes have similar salt dependences with an optimal
KCl concentration of 100 mM for TaqPol G418K/E507Q and
TthPol and 50 mM for TaqPol. The optimal MgSO4
concentration for all enzymes is approximately 8 mM. The
analysis of the data presented in Fig. 5 suggests that the properties
of TaqPol G418K/E507Q are much closer to those of TthPol than TaqPol,
confirming the key role of the G418K/E507Q mutations in the recognition
of the substrate with an RNA target.
To understand the mechanism of the reduction of the 5' nuclease
activity in the presence of an RNA versus a DNA target, we determined the Michaelis constant, Km, and the
maximal catalytic rate, kcat, of TaqPol, TthPol,
and TaqPol G418K/E507Q using an excess of the IrT target and the probe
and a limiting enzyme concentration as described under "Experimental
Procedures." It was found that all three enzymes have similar
Km values in the range of 200-300 nM
and kcat values of approximately 4 min Polymerase Activities of TthPol, TaqPol, and TaqTth Chimeric
Enzymes--
To determine whether the RNA
template-dependent 5' nuclease activity of the
Thermus DNA polymerase enzymes is related to their RNA-dependent polymerase activity, we have reversed the
D785N and D787N mutations used to create the polymerase-deficient
versions of TaqPol and TthPol, respectively (9). The polymerase
activities were then evaluated by extension of a
dT25-35-oligonucleotide primer with fluorescein-labeled
dUTP in the presence of either poly(dA) or poly(A) template as
described under "Experimental Procedures." As shown in Fig.
6, the DNA-dependent
polymerase activities are very similar for all constructs used in this
experiment, whereas the RNA-dependent polymerase activities
of TthPol, TaqTth(N), and TaqTth(B-S) are at least 6-fold higher than
the activities of TaqPol, TaqTth(N-B), and the TaqPol W417L/G418K/E507Q
mutant. From the analysis of these results, it can be concluded that
the high RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity of TthPol is
determined by the C-terminal half of the polymerase domain (amino acids
593-830) and that the RNA-dependent 5' nuclease and
polymerase activities are controlled by different regions and thus are
not related to each other. An approach similar to that described in
this work can be used to identify the critical amino acids affecting
the reverse transcriptase activity of the Thermus DNA
polymerase enzymes.
Whereas all structure-specific 5' nucleases tested in this work
efficiently cleave the overlapping substrate with a DNA target, only
TthPol and TaqPol enzymes retain partial activity with the substrate in
which the DNA target is replaced with an RNA target (Fig. 1). These
were the only enzymes that had both 5' nuclease and DNA polymerase
domains, thereby implying an important role for the polymerase domain
in substrate recognition. This conclusion agrees with our previous
finding that the polymerase domain of TaqPol affects the activity and
specificity of its 5' nuclease domain and that both TthPol and TaqPol
bind the overlapping DNA substrate more strongly than the archaeal 5'
nucleases and the isolated 5' nuclease domain of TaqPol (9,
10).2 Using the chimeric constructs between TthPol and
TaqPol and site-directed mutagenesis, we identified two groups of amino
acids that are important for the RNA template-dependent 5'
nuclease activity and that are possibly involved in recognition of the
target strand of the overlapping substrate. In the TthPol sequence, the
first group includes leucine 419 and lysine 420, and the second one consists of glutamine 509. Mutation of the homologous amino acids in
TaqPol (W417L, G418K, and E507Q) increases its RNA
template-dependent 5' nuclease activity 4-10-fold and
makes it even higher than the activity of TthPol. To understand the
role of these mutations in the interactions of TaqPol with the
overlapping substrate, we used the known three-dimensional structures
of binary/ternary complexes of DNA polymerases and
primer-template DNA duplexes (20, 21, 22). The primer-template
duplex of those structures is analogous to the upstream duplex of the
overlapping substrate that formed by the upstream and target strands.
The positions of the W417L, G418K, and E507Q mutations in the crystal
structure of a ternary complex of the polymerase domain of TaqPol
(Klentaq1), dideoxynucleotide, and a primer-template DNA (20) are shown
in Fig. 7. The E507Q mutation is located at the tip of the thumb subdomain at a nearest distance of 3.8 Å and
18 Å from the backbone phosphates of the primer and template strands,
respectively. The interaction between the thumb and the minor groove of
the DNA primer-template was previously suggested by the binary complex
structures of Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (21) and TaqPol (22)
with DNA. Deletion of a 24-amino acid portion of the tip of the thumb
in Klenow fragment, corresponding to amino acids 494-518 of TaqPol,
reduces the DNA binding affinity by more than 100-fold (23). These
observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the thumb region,
which includes the E507Q mutation, is involved in interactions with the
upstream duplex of the overlapping substrate.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Activities of structure-specific 5' nucleases
in the invasive signal amplification reaction with DNA and RNA
targets. A, sequence and proposed structure of
substrate for the invasive signal amplification reaction with the human
IL-6 RNA target. The cleavage site of the probe is indicated by an
arrow. Sequence of the IL-6 DNA target is shown
below. B, cleavage of IL-6 substrate containing
0.05 nM IL-6 DNA target and a 0.5 µM
concentration of each downstream and upstream oligonucleotide with 0.28 µM TaqExo (lane 1), 28 nM TaqPol (lane 2), 28 nM
TthPol (lane 3), 0.28 µM archaeal
FEN1 enzyme from P. furiosus (Pfu)
(lane 4), 0.28 µM archaeal FEN1
enzyme from A. fulgidus (Afu) (lane
5), 0.28 µM archaeal FEN1 enzyme from M. jannaschii (Mja) (lane 6), and
0.28 µM FEN1 enzyme from M. thermoautotrophicum (Mth) (lane
7). Lane 8, no enzyme (NE)
control. Reactions were carried out at 60 °C for 30 min as described
under "Experimental Procedures" except that the reaction buffer (10 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 10 µg/ml tRNA, and 5 mM MgSO4) contained no KCl.
C, cleavage of the IL-6 substrate with the RNA target was
done as described in B, except that the IL-6 RNA target
concentration was 1 nM and the reactions were performed at
57 °C for 60 min.
1, respectively, which is almost 2 orders
of magnitude lower than the cleavage rates on the DNA substrate with
the same sequence (the rates were determined from the data shown in
Fig. 1, B and C, as described under
"Experimental Procedures"). All other enzymes, including the TaqExo
nuclease domain and the archaeal 5' nucleases, showed no
RNA-dependent 5' nuclease activity. The common feature of
these 5' nucleases is the absence of a polymerase domain. Thus, it
would be logical to assume that the polymerase domain is involved in
the ability of the eubacterial enzymes to cleave the substrate with an
RNA target.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Schematic diagram of the TaqPol gene and
TaqPol-TthPol chimeric constructs. Open and
shaded boxes denote TaqPol and TthPol sequences,
respectively. The numbers correspond to the amino acid
sequence of TaqPol (16). The 5' nuclease and polymerase domains of
TaqPol and the palm, thumb, and fingers regions of the polymerase
domain are indicated. E, EcoRI; N,
NotI; Bs, BstBI; Nd,
NdeI; B, BamHI; S,
SalI.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Activities of TaqPol, TthPol, and TaqTth
chimeric enzymes with IL-6 RNA target. Cleavage rates were
measured for the IL-6 substrate (Fig. 1A) containing 1 nM IL-6 RNA target and 0.5 µM downstream and
upstream oligonucleotides. Reactions were carried out with a 28 nM concentration of each enzyme at 57 °C for 60 min. The
cleavage rates, defined as the number of the downstream probe molecules
cut per IL-6 RNA target molecule per minute, were determined as
described under "Experimental Procedures."

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Improvement of the RNA template dependent 5'
nuclease activity by site-directed mutagenesis. A,
amino acid sequence alignment between the
BstI-BamHI fragments of TaqPol and TthPol. Pairs
of similar amino acids are shaded light
gray. Aligned amino acids that have a charge difference are
shaded dark gray. The
numbers correspond to the amino acid sequence of TaqPol.
Amino acids of TaqPol changed to the corresponding amino acids of
TthPol by site-directed mutagenesis are indicated by plus
signs. B, TaqTth(N-Nd) W417L/G418K and
TaqTth(Nd-S) E507Q mutant enzymes have a higher cleavage rate than
TaqTth(N-Nd), TaqTth(Nd-S), and TthPol. The cleavage rates were
measured for the IL-6 substrate (Fig. 1A) containing 1 nM IL-6 RNA target and 0.5 µM downstream and
upstream oligonucleotides as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Reactions were carried out with a 28 nM
concentration of each enzyme at 57 °C for 60 min. C, the
G418K/E507Q mutations increase the cleavage rate of TaqPol to the level
of TthPol. The cleavage rates with the IL-6 RNA target were measured as
described for B.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Analysis of the properties of the TaqPol
G418K/E507Q mutant. A, sequence and proposed structure
of a substrate for the invasive signal amplification reaction with the
IrT target. The 5'-end of the target molecule is modified with biotin
and blocked with streptavidin as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The cleavage site of the probe is indicated by an
arrow. Effect of temperature (B), KCl
concentration (C), and MgSO4 concentration
(D) on the cleavage rate with the IrT substrate and 20 nM of TaqPol (
), TthPol (
), or TaqPol G418K/E507Q
(×) enzyme. Unless indicated in the graphs, the reactions contained 2 µM probe and 10 nM IrT target and were
carried out at 54 °C for 5 min. The cleavage rate was determine as
described under "Experimental Procedures."
1 for TaqPol and TthPol and of 9 min
1 for TaqPol G418K/E507Q (data not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Analysis of DNA- and
RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activities of TthPol, TaqPol,
and TaqTth constructs. The schematic diagrams show enzymes used
for the polymerization assays. All enzymes had the wild type aspartic
acid at positions 785 and 787 of the TaqPol and TthPol sequences,
respectively. Open and shaded boxes
denote TaqPol and TthPol sequences, respectively. The 5' nuclease and
polymerase domains are indicated. The asterisks denote
W417L, G418K, and E507Q mutations in TaqPol. The DNA- and
RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activities were determined as
a percentage of incorporated dUTP labeled with fluorescein under
conditions described under "Experimental Procedures." N,
NotI; Bs, BstBI.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Location of the W417L/G418K/E507Q mutations
in the crystal structure of a ternary complex of Klentaq1 with
dideoxynucleotide and primer-template DNA in the polymerizing mode
determined by Li et al. (20). Amino acids
Trp417, Gly418, and Glu507 are
displayed in a space-filling view, and the rest of the
polypeptide is shown as a white ribbon. Heavy
atoms of the DNA template and primer strands are shown in
green. A portion of the tip of the thumb, corresponding to
amino acids 494-518, and a part of the structurally conserved region
of the palm subdomain (see "Discussion") corresponding to
amino acids 402-435 are shown as red
ribbons.
The W417L and G418K mutations present in the palm region of TaqPol (Fig. 7) are located approximately 25 Å from the nearest phosphates of the primer-template duplex according to the binary/ternary complex structures of TaqPol with DNA bound in polymerizing mode (20, 22). The same distance was observed between the analogous W513 and P514 amino acids of Klenow fragment and the template strand of DNA bound in the editing mode (21). Thus, no interactions between amino acids 417-418 of TaqPol and the overlapping substrate can be suggested from the available binary complex studies.
To explain the data described here, we propose that the amino acids at positions 417 and 418 in the palm region of TaqPol interact with the upstream duplex of the overlapping substrate only when the enzyme functions as a 5' nuclease but no interaction of the substrate with these amino acids occurs when TaqPol switches into polymerizing mode. This hypothesis suggests a novel mode of substrate binding by DNA polymerases, which we call the 5' nuclease mode. Several lines of evidence support this hypothesis. The chimeric enzyme study clearly separates regions of the polymerase domain involved in the 5' nuclease and polymerase activities. Accordingly, the W417L and G418K mutations, together with the E507Q mutation, affect the 5' nuclease activity of TaqPol on substrates having an RNA target strand (Fig. 4C) but have no effect on either RNA- or DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activities (Fig. 6). Conversely, mutations in the active site of TaqPol, such as R573A, R587A, E615A, R746A, N750A, and D785N, which correspond to substitutions in Klenow fragment that affect both polymerase activity and substrate binding affinity in the polymerizing mode (24-26), have little or no effect on the 5' nuclease activity (data not shown). Superposition of the polymerase domains of TaqPol (22), Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (21), and Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA polymerase I (27) using DALI (28, 29) and Insight II (Molecular Simulation Inc.) programs shows that a portion of the palm subdomain of TaqPol between amino acids 402 and 451, including Trp417 and Gly418, is highly conserved between the three polymerases, although there is no structural similarity between the rest of the palm subdomains. This observation suggests an important role for this region in eubacterial DNA polymerases.
What could be the reason for a 5' nuclease binding mode? As we discussed above, the 5' nuclease and polymerase activities should be precisely synchronized in order to create a nicked structure rather than a gap or an overhang that could result in a deletion or an insertion during Okazaki fragment processing or DNA repair. According to the previously proposed model (9), the 3' terminal nucleotide of the upstream strand in the overlapping substrate is sequestered by the 5' nuclease domain to prevent its extension, thus halting synthesis. This interaction with the 3' nucleotide activates the 5' nuclease, which then endonucleolytically removes the displaced 5' arm of the downstream strand by precise incision at the site defined by the 3' nucleotide to create the nick. This model requires a substantial rearrangement of the substrate-enzyme complex that may include a translocation of the complex to the 5' nuclease mode to separate the primer-template duplex from the polymerase active site.
The hypothesized translocation into the 5' nuclease mode could be accomplished through an interaction of the downstream duplex formed between the template and downstream strands with the crevice formed by the finger and thumb subdomains. Such an interaction could force conformational transitions in the thumb that would bring the upstream duplex into close contact with the Trp417 and Gly418 amino acids. Significant flexibility of the thumb has been previously reported that might explain such changes (17, 20-22, 30, 31). Additional conformational changes in the fingers domain that might help to open the crevice, such as the transition from the "closed" to the "open" structure described by Li et al. (20), are consistent with this model. To answer the question as to why the 5' nuclease binding mode was not observed in any of the published co-crystal structures of a DNA polymerase I, we would argue that the majority of the structures were solved for the polymerase domain only and with a primer-template substrate rather than with an overlapping substrate.
The Km values of 200-300 nM determined in this work for TaqPol, TthPol, and TaqPol G418K/E507Q for the RNA-containing substrate are much higher than the Km value of <1 nM estimated previously for TthPol with an all-DNA overlapping substrate,2 suggesting that the RNA target adversely affects substrate binding. The reduced affinity for RNA-containing substrates can be explained by the unfavorable interaction between the enzyme and the A-form duplex adopted by the substrate with an RNA target or by inhibition of binding by the ribose 2' hydroxyls of the RNA target. Among these two factors, the latter looks more attractive, since the 5' nucleases of eubacterial DNA polymerases can efficiently cleave substrates with an RNA probe (18), which would presumably have an A-form, and since the binary complex structural studies suggest that the primer-template duplex partially adopts a conformation close to A-form in its complex with DNA polymerase (20, 22, 27). The G418K/E507Q mutations increase the kcat of TaqPol more than 2-fold but have little effect on Km. Such an effect would be expected if the mutations positioned the substrate in an orientation more appropriate for cleavage rather than simply increasing the binding constant.
In conclusion, we have identified specific mutations in two regions of
the polymerase domain of TaqPol important for RNA
template-dependent 5' nuclease activity. We propose a novel
5' nuclease mode of substrate binding that is distinct from the
previously described editing and polymerizing modes. According to the
model, the transition of the enzyme-substrate complex from the
polymerizing to the 5' nuclease mode requires the presence of the 5'
nuclease domain and a specific overlapping substrate. The transition is
probably accompanied by a dislocation of the thumb subdomain that
brings the substrate in direct contact with the structurally conserved portion of the palm subdomain. This work opens up the possibility of
development of 5' nucleases that can specifically cleave signal probes
in the presence of an RNA target and, therefore, can be used for RNA
analysis with the invasive signal amplification reaction.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank James Dahlberg, Peggy Eis, Robert Kwiatkowski, and Hon Ip for valuable discussion and for critically reading the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Department of Commerce Advanced Technology Program Cooperative Agreements 70NANB5H1030 and 70NANB7H3015 (to Lance Fors).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Third Wave
Technologies, Inc., 502 S. Rosa Rd., Madison, WI 53719. Tel.:
608-273-8933; Fax: 608-273-8618; E-mail: wma@twt.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 25, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002268200
2 Lyamichev, V. I, Lyamicheva, N. E., Kaiser, M. W., Hall, J. G., Ma, W., Vologodskii, A. V., Allawi, H. T., and Neri, B. (2000) Biochemistry, in press.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TaqPol, T. aquaticus DNA polymerase; TaqExo, 5' nuclease domain of TaqPol; TthPol, T. thermophilus DNA polymerase; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; IL, interleukin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ishimi, Y., Claude, A., Bullock, P., and Hurwitz, J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 19723-19733 |
| 2. | Goulian, M., Richards, S. H., Heard, C. J., and Bigsby, B. M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 18461-18471 |
| 3. | Turchi, J. J., and Bambara, R. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15136-15141 |
| 4. | Waga, S., Bauer, G., and Stillman, B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10923-10934 |
| 5. | Murray, J. M., Tavassoli, M., al-Harithy, R., Sheldrick, K. S., Lehmann, A. R., Carr, A. M., and Watts, F. Z. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4878-4888 |
| 6. | Johnson, R. E., Kovvali, G. K., Prakash, L., and Prakash, S. (1995) Science 269, 238-240 |
| 7. | Lundquist, R. C., and Olivera, B. M. (1982) Cell 31, 53-60 |
| 8. | Kornberg, A., and Baker, A. (1992) DNA Replication , 2nd Ed. , pp. 113-164, Freeman, New York |
| 9. | Kaiser, M. W., Lyamicheva, N., Ma, W., Miller, C., Neri, B., Fors, L., and Lyamichev, V. I. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21387-21394 |
| 10. | Lyamichev, V., Brow, M. A., Varvel, V. E., and Dahlberg, J. E. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 6143-6148 |
| 11. | Lyamichev, V., Mast, A. L., Hall, J. G., Prudent, J. R., Kaiser, M. W., Takova, T., Kwiatkowski, R. W., Sander, T. J., de Arruda, M., Arco, D. A., Neri, B. P., and Brow, M. A. (1999) Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 292-296 |
| 12. | Kwiatkowski, R. W., Lyamichev, V., de Arruda, M., and Neri, B. P. (1999) Mol. Diagn. 4, 353-364 |
| 13. | Ryan, D., Nuccie, B., and Arvan, D. (1999) Mol. Diagn. 4, 135-144 |
| 14. | Griffin, T. J., Hall, J. G., Prudent, J. R., and Smith, L. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 6301-6306 |
| 15. | May, L. T., Helfgott, D. C., and Sehgal, P. B. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 8957-8961 |
| 16. | Lawyer, F. C., Stoffel, S., Saiki, R. K., Myambo, K., Drummond, R., and Gelfand, D. H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 6427-6437 |
| 17. | Ollis, D. L., Brick, P., Hamlin, R., Xuong, N. G., and Steitz, T. A. (1985) Nature 313, 762-766 |
| 18. | Lyamichev, V., Brow, M. A., and Dahlberg, J. E. (1993) Science 260, 778-783 |
| 19. | Murante, R. S., Rust, L., and Bambara, R. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30377-30383 |
| 20. | Li, Y., Korolev, S., and Waksman, G. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 7514-7525 |
| 21. | Beese, L. S., Derbyshire, V., and Steitz, T. A. (1993) Science 260, 352-355 |
| 22. | Eom, S. H., Wang, J., and Steitz, T. A. (1996) Nature 382, 278-281 |
| 23. | Minnick, D. T., Astatke, M., Joyce, C. M., and Kunkel, T. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24954-24961 |
| 24. | Polesky, A. H., Steitz, T. A., Grindley, N. D., and Joyce, C. M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14579-14591 |
| 25. | Polesky, A. H., Dahlberg, M. E., Benkovic, S. J., Grindley, N. D., and Joyce, C. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8417-8428 |
| 26. | Pandey, V. N., Kaushik, N., Sanzgiri, R. P., Patil, M. S., Modak, M. J., and Barik, S. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 214, 59-65 |
| 27. | Kiefer, J. R., Mao, C., Braman, J. C., and Beese, L. S. (1998) Nature 391, 304-307 |
| 28. | Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 233, 123-138 |
| 29. | Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1996) Science 273, 595-603 |
| 30. | Kim, Y., Eom, S. H., Wang, J., Lee, D. S., Suh, S. W., and Steitz, T. A. (1995) Nature 376, 612-616 |
| 31. | Korolev, S., Nayal, M., Barnes, W. M., Di Cera, E., and Waksman, G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9264-9268 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Bu, R. Biehl, M. Monkenbusch, D. Richter, and D. J. E. Callaway Coupled protein domain motion in Taq polymerase revealed by neutron spin-echo spectroscopy PNAS, December 6, 2005; 102(49): 17646 - 17651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Ho, W. M. Byrnes, W.-p. Ma, Y. Shi, D. J. E. Callaway, and Z. Bu Structure-specific DNA-induced Conformational Changes in Taq Polymerase Revealed by Small Angle Neutron Scattering J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 39146 - 39154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tian, L. Cao, Y. Tan, S. Williams, L. Chen, T. Matray, A. Chenna, S. Moore, V. Hernandez, V. Xiao, et al. Multiplex mRNA assay using electrophoretic tags for high-throughput gene expression analysis Nucleic Acids Res., September 8, 2004; 32(16): e126 - e126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. WAGNER, M. L. CURTIS, N. D. ROBSON, A. P. BARANIAK, P. S. EIS, and M. A. GARCIA-BLANCO Quantification of alternatively spliced FGFR2 RNAs using the RNA invasive cleavage assay RNA, December 1, 2003; 9(12): 1552 - 1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ayyagari, X. V. Gomes, D. A. Gordenin, and P. M. J. Burgers Okazaki Fragment Maturation in Yeast. I. DISTRIBUTION OF FUNCTIONS BETWEEN FEN1 AND DNA2 J. Biol. Chem., January 10, 2003; 278(3): 1618 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I Kao, L. A. Henricksen, Y. Liu, and R. A. Bambara Cleavage Specificity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Flap Endonuclease 1 Suggests a Double-Flap Structure as the Cellular Substrate J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14379 - 14389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||