![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24781-24786, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
,
,
From the
Department of Mathematical and Life
Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University,
Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526 and the § Department of Molecular
Biology, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Okayama
University Medical School, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
Received for publication, January 27, 2000, and in revised form, May 9, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The activity of prokaryotic and mammalian thymine
glycol (Tg) glycosylases including Escherichia coli
endonuclease III (Endo III) and endonuclease VIII (Endo VIII) and mouse
Endo III homologue (mNth1) for formamidopyrimidine (Fapy) has been
investigated using defined oligonucleotide substrates.
2,6-Diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine, a
methylated Fapy derived from guanine, was site specifically incorporated in the oligonucleotide. The substrates containing Fapy:N
pairs (N = A, G, C, T) as well as a Tg:A pair, a physiological substrate of Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1, were treated by the enzymes and nicked products were quantified by gel electrophoresis. The
activity of Endo III and Endo VIII for Fapy varied markedly depending
on the paired base, being the highest with G (activity relative to
Tg = 0.55 (Endo III) and 0.41 (Endo VIII)) and the lowest with C
(0.05 (Endo III) and 0.06 (Endo VIII)). In contrast, mNth1 recognized
all Fapy pairs equally well and the activity was comparable to Tg. The
results obtained in the nicking assay were further substantiated by the
analysis of the Schiff base intermediate using NaBH4
trapping assays. These results indicate that Escherichia
coli and mammalian Tg glycosylases have a potential activity to
recognize Fapy. However, as demonstrated for Fapy:C pairs, their
distinctive activities implicate unequal participation in the repair of
Fapy lesions in cells.
DNA damage caused by exogenous and endogenous agents is a major
threat to genetic integrity of cells, and when unrepaired, it results
in lethal and/or mutagenic events of cells (1). The deleterious effects
of DNA damage have been also implicated in carcinogenesis and aging (2,
3). Among the diverse DNA lesions thus far identified, alterations of
the base moiety by reactive oxygen species constitute one of the major
classes of DNA damage. In cells, this class of damage is generally
restored by the base excision repair
(BER)1 pathway, a highly
conserved mechanism across species (4, 5). The BER process for oxidized
bases is initiated by DNA N-glycosylases that remove damaged
bases from DNA. In Escherichia coli, DNA
N-glycosylases responsible for this reaction are basically
classified into two subgroups depending on the substrate, albeit some
overlapping specificities. Oxidized pyrimidine bases such as thymine
glycol (Tg) and 5-hydroxycytosine, etc., are excised from DNA by
endonuclease III (Endo III) and endonuclease VIII (Endo VIII) (5, 6) encoded by the nth and nei genes, respectively
(7-9). In contrast, oxidized purine bases such as
7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) and formamidopyrimidine (Fapy) are
removed by formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) (10, 11) encoded
by the fpg/mutM gene (12). The nth nei double
mutant of E. coli lacking Endo III and Endo VIII exhibits a
mutator phenotype and a increased sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide and
ionizing radiation (8, 9). The mutations observed for the double mutant
are mostly C Recently, functional homologues of Endo III (Ntg1 and Ntg2 proteins
(also called Scr1 and Scr2)) and Fpg (yOgg1 protein) have been
identified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the substrate specificities of the expressed proteins have been studied. The yOgg1
protein recognizes 8-oxoG and Fapy, showing a substrate specificity
similar to Fpg (16, 17). Ntg1 and Ntg2 proteins recognize a variety of
oxidized pyrimidines, such as Tg and 5-hydroxycytosine, that are also
substrates for Endo III (18-23). Despite such similar substrate
specificities between Endo III and its S. cerevisiae homologues, the latter enzymes also recognize Fapy derivatives (18-20,
22) that have been reported not to be excised by Endo III (6) and its
human homologue (hNTH1) (24). The additional substrate specificity of
Ntg1 and Ntg2 for Fapy derivatives is rather unexpected since both
proteins show significant amino acid sequence homology to Endo III
(24% identity and 46% similarity (Ntg1), 25% identity and 51%
similarity (Ntg2)). Moreover, the enzymes have the helix-hairpin-helix
(HhH) motif and key amino acids (Lys-243 and Asp-262 (Ntg1), Lys-248
and Asp-267 (Ntg2)) possibly involved in DNA recognition and catalysis.
The HhH motif and catalytic amino acids are highly conserved in Endo
III homologues (25). Ntg2 (but not Ntg1) also possesses a conserved
4Fe-4S cluster near the C terminus.
The apparently different activities toward a Fapy substrate of Endo III
and its S. cerevisiae homologues (Ntg1 and Ntg2) raised a
question whether the activity is peculiar to Ntg1 and Ntg2 or has been
somehow overlooked in previous studies on the Endo III homologues from
other sources. In view of the question above, we have reinvestigated
the activity of prokaryotic and mammalian thymine glycol glycosylases
for Fapy using defined oligonucleotide substrates. We report here that
thymine glycol glycosylases including Endo III, Endo VIII, and the
mouse Endo III homologue (mNth1/mNthl1) have a potential activity to
excise Fapy from DNA. However, the activity of Endo III and Endo VIII
varies dramatically depending on the base opposite Fapy, whereas the
activity of mNth1 is essentially independent of the paired base and is
comparable to that for Tg.
Enzymes--
E. coli DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment
and T4 polynucleotide kinase were purchased from Life Technologies,
Inc. and New England Biolabs, respectively. Endo III, Endo VIII, and
Fpg proteins were overexpressed in E. coli cells harboring
plasmids containing the nth, nei, or
fpg gene (gifts from S. S. Wallace and Z. Hatahet) and
purified as described (8, 26). Expression and purification of the mouse
Endo III homologue (mNth1/mNthl1) has been reported previously (27).
Human 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine glycosylase (hOGG1/hMMH, type 1a
isoform) was generously supplied by Nishimura (28). The repair enzymes
used in this study were apparently homogenous in SDS-PAGE analysis.
Oligonucleotides--
Oligonucleotides used in this study are
listed in Table I. The oligonucleotides
except 25FP and 19TG were synthesized by the phosphoramidite method and
purified by reversed phase HPLC. 25FP containing a single
2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine (Fapy)
was prepared by the reported procedure (29). Briefly, 15PRM was
5'-end-labeled with [ Activity Assays for Substrates Containing Fapy and
Tg--
Duplex substrates (5 nM), 25FP/25COM-N (N = A, G, C, T) and 19TG/19COM-A, were incubated with Endo III, Endo VIII,
or mNth1 in appropriate buffers (10 µl) at 37 °C for 5 min. The
composition of the buffer for Endo III and Endo VIII was 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, and 100 mM NaCl (buffer A), and that for mNth1 was 20 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 0.25 mM EDTA, and 0.25 mM dithiothreitol (buffer B).
The amount of the repair enzymes used in the experiments was indicated
in the table or figures. To ensure the linear response of the product
formation, appropriate amounts of the enzymes and incubation time for
the assay were determined by varying these parameters in preliminary
kinetic experiments (data not shown). These reaction conditions were
used for the activity assays. After incubation, the sample was mixed with gel loading buffer (0.05% xylene cyanol, 0.05% bromphenol blue,
20 mM EDTA, and 98% formamide), heated at 50 °C for 5 min, and separated by 16% denaturing PAGE. The gel was
autoradiographed at Activity Assays for Substrates Containing
8-OxoG--
25OX/25COM-C (5 nM) was incubated with Endo
III (2 ng), Endo VIII (10 ng), mNth1 (2 ng), Fpg (3 ng), or hOGG1 (6 ng) in appropriate buffers (10 µl) at 37 °C for 15 min (hOGG1) or
5 min (other enzymes). Buffer A was used for the reactions with Endo
III, Endo VIII, and Fpg, and buffer B for mNth1. Buffer C for hOGG1
consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM
EDTA, 50 mM KCl, and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin.
NaBH4 Trapping of Schiff Base Intermediates--
An
aqueous solution of 500 mM NaBH4 (1 µl) was
added to trapping reaction buffers (8 µl) containing substrates
(25FP/25COM-N (N = A, G, C, T) or 19TG/19COM-A, final
concentration 5 nM). Immediately after, the solution was
mixed with repair enzymes (Endo III (5 ng), Endo VIII (20 ng), mNth1 (5 ng), all in 1 µl) and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. The final
compositions of the trapping reaction buffers were the same as those
for the activity assay buffers A and B described above, except that
NaCl (Endo III and Endo VIII) and KCl (mNth1) were omitted and 50 mM NaBH4 was present. After incubation, the
solution was mixed with SDS-loading buffer (100 mM Tris,
8% SDS, 24% (v/v) glycerol, 4% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02% SERVA Blue
G) and heat-denatured. The sample was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE.
Autoradiography and quantitation of the radioactivity were performed as
described above.
Activity of Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1 for Fapy Paired with
C--
To examine the incision activity for Fapy, Endo III, Endo VIII,
and mNth1 were incubated with a duplex substrate 25FP/25COM-C containing a Fapy:C pair. Cytosine was chosen as a paired base since
Fapy used in this study was originally derived from guanine and a
Fapy:C pair could be a naturally occurring base pair. PAGE analysis of
the reaction products revealed that treatments with Endo III (Fig.
1A) and Endo VIII (Fig.
1B) resulted in weak bands corresponding to
To compare the activity of Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1 for Fapy on
the biologically relevant basis, two substrates containing Fapy
(25FP/25COM-C) and Tg (19TG/19COM-A) were treated with each enzyme
under the same conditions. Prior to the quantitative activity assay,
the reaction conditions (the amount of the enzyme and incubation time)
were properly adjusted based on the preliminary experiments. Under
these conditions, the formation of the product was essentially within a
linear (or not saturating) range, thereby allowing direct comparison
the activities for Fapy and Tg (This was also the case for the data in
Fig. 3). Table II summarizes the amount
of products (i.e., percentage of nicked substrate) for both
substrates. Comparison of the yield of products for Fapy and Tg showed
that the activity of Endo III and Endo VIII for the Fapy:C pair was
approximately 20-fold lower than that for the Tg:A pair, an intrinsic
substrate of these enzymes. However, mNth1 recognized both Fapy and Tg
equally well.
Paired Base Effects on the Recognition of Fapy--
It is known
that the activity of certain BER enzymes varies depending on the base
opposite a lesion. For example, 8-oxoG paired with C and A is excised
by Fpg and hOGG1 with different efficiencies (Ref. 29, and references
cited therein). The repair activity of Endo III for
5-hydroxypyrimidines (31) and a ring fragmentation product of thymine
C5-hydrate (32) also varies depending on the paired base.
In view of these facts, substrates containing all four possible Fapy
pairs (25FP/25COM-N (N = A, G, C, T)) were constructed and tested
for Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1. Fig. 2 shows the results of product analysis
by PAGE for Fapy pairs together with Tg. The yield of the
NaBH4 Trapping of Reaction Intermediates--
The
bifunctional BER enzymes that release a damaged base (DNA
N-glycosylase activity) and incise a phosphodiester bond (AP lyase activity) form a covalent Schiff base intermediate with DNA
during the reaction (25). Formation of the intermediate has been
substantiated by the NaBH4 or NaCNBH3 trapping
assay for several Endo III homologues including Endo III itself (33), Ntg1/Ntg2 (21, 22, 34), and hNTH1 (35, 36). Thus, formation of a Schiff
base intermediate between the substrate containing Fapy and thymine
glycol glycosylases (Endo III, Endo VIII, mNth1) provides additional
evidence for their activity to Fapy. Duplex substrates containing Fapy
(25FP/25COM-N, where N = A, G, C, T) and Tg (19TG/19COM-A) were
incubated with Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1 in the presence of
NaBH4 and the trapped Schiff intermediate was analyzed by
SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4). With all tested
enzymes, bands migrating more slowly than free substrates were
observed, showing the Schiff base formation. Based on these assays, the
amount of the trapped intermediate was quantified and the percentage of the substrate cross-linked to the enzymes was compared. With Endo III
(Fig. 5A), the trapping
efficiency of the Fapy substrate decreased in the following order of
paired bases: A (1.0) > G (0.78) > T (0.53) > C
(0.06), where the value in the parenthesis indicated the yield of the
Schiff intermediate relative to Tg. The corresponding order for Endo
VIII was G (0.66) > A (0.41) > T (0.31) > C (0.04) (Fig. 5B). The paired base effect on the Schiff base
formation between the Fapy substrates and Endo III/Endo VIII correlates fairly well with that on the incision activity of these enzymes shown
in Fig. 3 (A and B). With mNth1, the paired
base-dependent variation of the Schiff base formation was
much less obvious than with Endo III and Endo VIII. Moreover, the
amounts of trapped intermediates for the Fapy substrates were virtually
comparable to that for Tg (G (0.99), A (0.88), T (0.79), C (0.57)).
These results were also consistent with the activity assay of mNth1 shown in Fig. 3C.
Activity of Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1 for 8-OxoG--
The
repair enzymes (Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1) used in the present
study were overexpressed and purified from E. coli cells
carrying the wild type fpg gene that codes for Fpg, the major repair enzyme for both Fapy and 8-oxoG in E. coli
cells. To demonstrate that the activity of Endo III, Endo VIII, and
mNth1 for Fapy was not due to the contaminating Fpg protein, the
enzymes were incubated with 25OX/25COM-C containing an 8-oxoG:C pair
and products were analyzed by PAGE. None of these enzymes exhibited a
detectable activity to 8-oxoG (Fig. 6,
lanes 3-5), although the same substrate was
efficiently incised by Fpg (Fig. 6, lane 6) and
hOGG1 (Fig. 6, lane 7), resulting in Biological Implications of the Fapy Repair Activity of Endo III,
Endo VIII, and mNth1--
In the present study, it has been shown that
thymine glycol glycosylases from E. coli (Endo III and Endo
VIII) and mouse (mNth1) have a potential activity to remove the Fapy
lesion derived from guanine. Combining the present results and those
reported for the S. cerevisiae (Ntg1 and Ntg2) (18-20, 22),
the repair activity of Fapy is potentially conserved among the thymine
glycol glycosylases across species. However, the activity of the
E. coli enzymes, but not the mouse enzyme, was dramatically
influenced by the base opposite this lesion. Endo III and Endo VIII
efficiently recognized Fapy when it paired with purines (particularly G
in the case of Endo VIII) and very poorly when paired with C (Fig. 3).
The very weak activity of Endo III for a Fapy:C pair relative to Tg may explain the reason why Endo III released Tg but not G-derived Fapy from
It has been shown previously by transfection studies that Fapy derived
from G is lethal but not mutagenic (38, 39), suggesting that G-derived
Fapy does not form mispairs with A, G, and T. Thus, as far as G damage
is concerned, a Fapy:C pair is the predominant form that repair enzymes
encounter in cells. In view of the very weak activity of Endo III and
Endo VIII for a Fapy:C pair (20-fold lower than Tg), the activity of
these enzymes for a Fapy:C pair may not be physiologically important in
E. coli cells relative to Fpg. In contrast, the situation
will be different in eukaryotic cells whose Endo III homologues (at
least mNth1, Ntg1, Ntg2) have a strong activity for Fapy:C pairs. Very
recently, knockout mice deficient in OGG1 protein, a functional
homologue of Fpg, have been generated (40). Although the activity for
8-oxoG was completely diminished in the tissue extracts from
ogg1 Paired Base Effects on the Incision Activity of Fapy--
The
present study has shown that Endo III and Endo VIII, but not mNth1,
recognize Fapy in a paired base-dependent manner (Fig. 3).
Endo III recognized Fapy:A and Fapy:G pairs most efficiently and a
Fapy:C pair least efficiently (Fig. 3A). These paired base effects are quite different from those observed for Fpg and hOGG1, which recognize all Fapy base pairs with comparable efficiencies (29).
Endo III excises a variety of pyrimidine lesions, and a common feature
of these substrates is the loss of aromatic character due to saturation
of the C5-C6 double bond (e.g. pyrimidine glycols and
photohydrates), ring fragmentation (e.g. urea and
Endo VIII showed a paired base specificity similar to Endo III though
activity to a Fapy:A pair was lower than a Fapy:G pair (Fig.
3B). Endo VIII is a functional homologue of Endo III, but its amino acid sequence shows no homology to Endo III (8, 9). The
overlapping substrate specificity including Fapy pairs between Endo III
and Endo VIII implies that Endo VIII employs a damage sensing mechanism
similar to Endo III, though the final products formed by the AP lyase
activity of Endo III and Endo VIII are different (
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
T transitions probably arising from impaired excision
of oxidized cytosine lesions (13). The fpg mutant of
E. coli deficient in Fpg shows a mutator phenotype though
the sensitivity to ionizing radiation or hydrogen peroxide remains
unchanged (14, 15). The frequent mutations observed for the
fpg mutant are G
T transversions due to impaired excision of 8-oxoG (15). Thus, the substrate specificity of the two
subgroups of DNA N-glycosylases correlates fairly well with
the phenotype of their mutants.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide
kinase and purified by a C18 Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters). 15PRM was
annealed to the template 30COM-C and extended by polymerase I Klenow
fragment in the presence of dCTP, dTTP, and 7-methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine
5'-triphosphate (Sigma). The 7-methylguanine residue incorporated
opposite C in 30COM-C was converted to Fapy by the alkali treatment at
pH 11.4. 25FP was separated from 30COM-C by denaturing polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and recovered from the gel. Finally, 25FP
was annealed to the appropriate complementary strands (25COM-A, -G, -C,
-T). 19TG containing a single cis-Tg was synthesized by
KMnO4 oxidation of a 19-mer oligonucleotide that contained
thymine at the position of Tg (27, 30). The crude 19TG was purified by
a C18 Sep-Pak cartridge followed by reversed phase HPLC. 19TG was
5'-end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide
kinase, purified, and annealed to the complementary strand 19COM-A. The
duplex substrate 25OX/25COM-C containing 8-oxoG was constructed in a
similar manner.
List of oligonucleotides used in this study
80 °C overnight. Alternatively, the
radioactivity of the separated bands was analyzed by Fuji BAS 2000.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
- and
-elimination products, respectively, which migrated somewhat slower
(
) and faster (
) than the size marker (M). Although
the amount of incision products increased with that of incubated Endo
III and Endo VIII (Fig. 1, A and B, lanes 1-3), only minor proportions of the
substrate were converted to the incision product even with an excess of
the enzymes. These results suggest that both Endo III and Endo VIII
recognize Fapy paired with C but the activity is extremely low. In
contrast, incubation with mNth1 resulted in strong bands corresponding
to the
-elimination product (Fig. 1C), showing highly
efficient recognition of Fapy by mNth1.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Reaction products formed in the treatment of
the substrate containing a Fapy:C pair with Endo III, Endo VIII, and
mNth1. 25FP/25COM-C containing a Fapy:C pair (5 nM)
was incubated with varying amounts of Endo III (A), Endo
VIII (B), and mNth1 (C) at 37 °C for 5 min,
and products were analyzed by PAGE. The amounts of the enzymes used in
lanes 1-3 were 1, 5, and 10 ng for Endo III; 10, 20, and 100 ng for Endo VIII; and 0.8, 1.3, and 5 ng for mNth1,
respectively. In panels A-C, lanes
4 and 5 show the untreated substrate and a marker
(M) prepared by 5'-labeling of 15PRM, respectively. The
bands of
- and
-elimination products are indicated by
arrows.
Activity of Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1 for Tg:A and Fapy:C pairs
-elimination product by Endo III (Fig. 2A,
lanes 3-6) and the
-elimination product by
Endo VIII (Fig. 2B, lanes 3-6) varied
remarkably depending on the paired base, whereas that by mNth1
(
-elimination product) did not (Fig. 2C, lanes
3-6). Based on the repeated assays as shown in Fig. 2, the
incision activity for Fapy:N pairs (N = A, G, C, T) were quantified and compared (Fig. 3). The
results for Tg obtained under the same reaction conditions were also
included in Fig. 3. The activity of Endo III for Fapy decreased in the
following order of paired bases: G (activity relative to Tg = 0.55) = A (0.55) > T (0.3) > C (0.05). The variation
of the activity was 11-fold between the most (G, A) and least (C)
preferred pairs. The corresponding order for Endo VIII was G
(0.41) > A (0.14) >= T (0.09) >= C (0.06), with the activity
variation of 7-fold between the most (G) and least (C) preferred pairs.
For mNth1, all Fapy pairs were equally good substrates and the activity
was comparable to Tg, i.e., Fapy:G (activity relative to
Tg = 1.7), Fapy:A (1.7), Fapy:T (1.3), Fapy:C (1.1). Therefore,
the variation of the activity depending on the paired base was only
1.6-fold.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Reaction products formed in the treatment of
the substrates containing Fapy:N (N = A, G, C, T) and Tg:A pairs
with Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1. 25FP/25COM-N and 19TG/19COM-A
containing Fapy:N (N = A, G, C, T) and Tg:A pairs, respectively,
were incubated with Endo III (A), Endo VIII (B),
and mNth1 (C), and products were analyzed by PAGE. The
substrates (5 nM) were treated with the enzymes (Endo III
(1 ng), Endo VIII (10 ng), and mNth1 (0.8 ng)) at 37 °C for 5 min.
The damage in the oligonucleotide (Fapy and Tg), paired base (A, G, C,
T) and treatment with (+) and without (
) enzyme are indicated on the
top. In panels A-C, lane
1 shows a marker (M) prepared by 5'-labeling of
15PRM. The bands of
- and
-elimination products are indicated by
arrows.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effects of the paired base on the repair of
Fapy by Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1. The substrates containing
Fapy:N (N = A, G, C, T) and Tg:A pairs were treated with Endo III
(A), Endo VIII (B), and mNth1 (C) as
described in Fig. 2. The percentage of the nicked substrate was
determined by PAGE analysis and plotted against the base pair. The data
were the average of three or four independent experiments. Standard
deviations are shown by error bars.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
NaBH4 trapping of the Schiff base
intermediates. 25FP/25COM-N and 19TG/19COM-A (both 5 nM) containing Fapy:N (N = A, G, C, T) and Tg:A pairs,
respectively, were incubated with Endo III (A), Endo VIII
(B), and mNth1 (C) in the presence of 50 mM NaBH4 at 37 °C for 5 min. The amounts of
Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1 used in the reactions were 5, 20, and 5 ng, respectively. Products were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. The damage
in the oligonucleotide (Fapy and Tg), paired base (A, G, C, T) and
incubation with (+) and without (
) enzyme are indicated on the
top. Free substrates and trapped Schiff base intermediates
are indicated in the figure.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effects of the base opposite Fapy on the
formation of trapped Schiff base intermediates. The substrates
containing Fapy:N (N = A, G, C, T) and Tg:A pairs were incubated
with Endo III (A), Endo VIII (B), and mNth1
(C) in the presence of NaBH4 as described in
Fig. 4. The fraction of the substrate converted to the cross-linked
product was determined by SDS-PAGE analysis. The percentage of the
cross-linked substrate was plotted against the base pair. The data were
average of three or four independent experiments. Standard deviations
are shown by error bars.
- and
-elimination products, respectively. These results indicate that the
activity for Fapy is not due to contaminating Fpg but is indeed
associated with Endo III, Endo VIII, and mNth1. This conclusion was
further supported by the mode of strand cleavage characteristic to Endo III (
-elimination), Endo VIII (
-elimination), and mNth1
(
-elimination) (Fig. 2) as well as the presence of a single species
of the cross-linked intermediate for each enzyme (Fig. 4).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
PAGE analysis of the products formed in the
treatment of the substrate containing an 8-oxoG:C pair with repair
enzymes. 25OX/25COM-C (5 nM) was incubated with the
indicated enzymes, and products were analyzed by PAGE. The reaction was
performed with Endo III (2 ng), Endo VIII (10 ng), mNth1 (2 ng), Fpg (3 ng), and hOGG1 (6 ng) at 37 °C for 15 min (hOGG1) or 5 min (other
enzymes).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-irradiated DNA substrates in the previous study (6) (for A-derived
Fapy, see the next section). According to the reported data (19, 22),
Ntg1 and Ntg2 recognize Fapy:C pairs in
-irradiated DNA and
methylated/alkali-treated poly(dG-dC) as efficiently as Tg. These
results suggest that Ntg1 and Ntg2 resemble the mammalian homologue
(mNth1) rather than the E. coli enzymes (Endo III and Endo
VIII) with respect to the activity for Fapy:C pairs. The substrate
specificity of Endo III homologues of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Nth-Spo) (37) and human (hNTH1) (24) has been also examined
previously using
-irradiated or
H2O2/Fe-treated DNA. Nth-Spo and hNTH1 released
several pyrimidine damages, but neither enzyme released Fapy
derivatives from the damaged DNA. Therefore, as far as eukaryotic
enzymes are concerned, yeast Ntg1 and Ntg2 but not Nth-Spo recognize
Fapy:C pairs, and the mouse (mNth1) but not human (hNTH1) enzyme
recognize Fapy:C pairs. The negligible activity of hNTH1 and Nth-Spo
toward Fapy:C pairs was rather surprising since the amino acid sequence
of mNth1 shows 81% identity to hNTH1 in 300 overlapping residues and
58.2% identity to Nth-Spo in 226 residues (27). Additionally, all
activity assays of mNth1 (this study), hNTH1 (24), and Nth-Spo (37)
were performed with recombinant histidine-tagged proteins. An apparent
difference in the assay conditions was the enzyme substrate, which
contained a single Fapy lesion and multiple types of lesions in the
present (mNth1) and previous (hNTH1 and Nth-Spo) studies, respectively.
Thus, the influences of co-existing damage in the substrate together with other possible factors need to be assessed to solve the apparent activity difference toward Fapy lesions.
/
null mice, that for Fapy (paired with
C) was only partially reduced (~1/3 of the
ogg1+/+ mice), indicating that in
vivo repair activity of Fapy resided on not only OGG1 but also
another protein with a redundant activity. This observation is
consistent with the activity of mNth1 for Fapy:C pairs demonstrated in
this study. Accordingly, unlike in prokaryotic cells, Fapy lesions are
likely repaired by the action of both OGG1 and NTH1 (or Ntg1/Ntg2)
proteins in eukaryotic cells.
-ureidoisobutyric acid residues), and ring contraction
(e.g. hydantoin derivatives). The structural alterations of
these substrates occur along the C4-C5-C6-N1 bonds of the pyrimidine
ring. When the structure of Fapy is superimposed on the pyrimidine
lesions recognized by Endo III, the ruptured imidazole ring of Fapy
overlaps the C4-C5-C6-N1 region. An example for Tg is shown in Fig.
7A, where the deoxyribose moieties of Fapy and Tg were primarily superimposed to reflect the DNA
structure. Thus, the ruptured imidazole ring mimics a defective
pyrimidine. It is possible that Endo III potentially senses this
feature of Fapy for the initial stage of damage recognition. Concerning
the paired base effects, a Fapy (derived from G):C pair is likely to
form hydrogen bonds similar to a G:C pair, albeit weaker, since the
functional groups involved in hydrogen bonding remain intact in Fapy
(Fig. 7, B and C). This notion is also supported by the theoretical calculation of the stabilization energy of the
Fapy:C pair (41). Since Endo III uses a flip-out mechanism (42), the
stabilization of the Fapy:C pair by hydrogen bonds may retard the
extrusion of the Fapy residue into the active site pocket that is
suggested to accommodate a flipped out base. Considering that A-derived
Fapy was not excised by Endo III from
-irradiated DNA (6), similar
stabilization may occur for a base pair between A-derived Fapy and
thymine. Conversely, if a bulky purine is placed opposite Fapy, the
steric crash between Fapy and the purine in a helix extrudes the Fapy
residue into a partially extrahelical position, a geometry like in a
pretransition state of base flipping. A presumable disposition of a
Fapy:G pair is shown in Fig. 7 (D and E).
Accordingly, the lack of stabilizing hydrogen bonds and partial
extrusion of the Fapy residue facilitate excision of Fapy paired with
purines.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Structures of Fapy, Tg, and possible
dispositions of Fapy:C and Fapy:G pairs. The structures of
individual molecules were energy-minimized as deoxyribonucleosides and
viewed along the helical axis. A, comparison of the
structures of Fapy (solid line) and Tg
(gray line). The deoxyribose moieties of the two
molecules were primarily superimposed. The atom number of the
pyrimidine ring is shown in the Tg structure. B and
C, a possible base pairing scheme between Fapy and cytosine
in DNA. In the wire frame model (B), hydrogen atoms are not
shown for simplicity, and suggested hydrogen bonds between Fapy and C
are indicated by broken lines. In the
space-filling model (C), all atoms as well as lone pair
electrons are included. D and E, a possible
disposition of Fapy opposite guanine in DNA. Wire frame (D)
and space-filling (E) models are shown.
- and
-elimination products, respectively). In contrast to Endo III and
Endo VIII, mNth1 exhibited a consistently high activity for all Fapy
base pairs (Fig. 3C). The distinctive activities of Endo III
and mNth1 for Fapy pairs are rather surprising since the fundamental
architecture and catalytic mechanism are predicted to be conserved
between Endo III and mNth1 based on the amino acid sequence homology
and the characteristic HhH and 4Fe-4S motifs (27), as well as the
formation of common Schiff base intermediates (Fig. 4C). The
present results suggest that, upon binding to DNA, mNth1 may induce
extra structural perturbations in DNA such as kinks or bends
over Endo III to extrude the Fapy residue from a stable Fapy:C pair.
Currently we do not know the exact origin of such extra perturbations
conferred by mNth1. The answer to this question must await for
determination of three-dimensional structures of DNA-protein binary
complexes of mNth1 and Endo III.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Susan S. Wallace and Zafer Hatahet for generous gifts of the E. coli cells overexpressing nth, nei, and fpg gene products, and Susumu Nishimura for hOGG1/hMMH protein. We are also grateful to Rei Hasegawa and Hironobu Nakano for preparation of an oligonucleotide containing Tg.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan (to H. I.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Present address: Dept. of Human Nutrition, Chugoku Junior College, Okayama 701-0197, Japan.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel./Fax:
81-824-24-7457; E-mail: ideh@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 25, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000576200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: BER, base excision repair; Tg, thymine glycol; 8-oxoG, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine; Fapy, formamidopyrimidine or 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-N-methylformamidopyrimidine; Endo III, endonuclease III; Endo VIII, endonuclease VIII; mNth1, mouse endonuclease III homologue; hNTH1, human endonuclease III homologue; Ntg1(2), endonuclease III-like glycosylase 1(2); Nth-Spo, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Endo III homologue; Fpg, formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase; hOGG1, human 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; HhH, helix-hairpin-helix.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., and Siede, W. (1995) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis , ASM Press, Washington, D. C. |
| 2. | Ames, B. N., and Gold, L. S. (1991) Mutat. Res. 250, 3-16 |
| 3. | Wiseman, H., and Halliwell, B. (1996) Biochem. J. 313, 17-29 |
| 4. | Hickson, I. D. (1997) Base Excision Repair of DNA Damage , Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX |
| 5. | Wallace, S. S. (1997) in Oxidative Stress and the Molecular Biology of Antioxidant Defenses (Scandalios, J., ed) , pp. 49-90, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 6. | Dizdaroglu, M., Laval, J., and Boiteux, S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 12105-12111 |
| 7. | Asahara, H., Wistort, P. M., Bank, J. F., Bakerian, R. H., and Cunningham, R. P. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 4444-4449 |
| 8. | Jiang, D., Hatahet, Z., Blaisdell, J. O., Melamede, R. J., and Wallace, S. S. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 3773-3782 |
| 9. | Saito, Y., Uraki, F., Nakajima, S., Asaeda, A., Ono, K., Kubo, K., and Yamamoto, K. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 3783-3785 |
| 10. | Tchou, J., Kasai, H., Shibutani, S., Chung, M. H., Laval, J., Grollman, A. P., and Nishimura, S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 4690-4694 |
| 11. | Karakaya, A., Jaruga, P., Bohr, V. A., Grollman, A. P., and Dizdaroglu, M. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 474-479 |
| 12. | Boiteux, S., O'Connor, T. R., and Laval, J. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 3177-3183 |
| 13. | Blaisdell, J. O., Hatahet, Z., and Wallace, S. S. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 6396-6402 |
| 14. | Boiteux, S., and Huisman, O. (1989) Mol. Gen. Genet. 215, 300-305 |
| 15. | Michaels, M. L., Pham, L., Cruz, C., and Miller, J. H. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 3629-3632 |
| 16. | Auffret van der Kemp, P., Thomas, D., Barbey, R., De Oliveira, R., and Boiteux, S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5197-5202 |
| 17. | Karahalil, B., Girard, P.-M., Boiteux, S., and Dizdaroglu, M. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1228-1232 |
| 18. | Eide, L., Bjoras, M., Pirovano, M., Alseth, I., Berdal, K. G., and Seeberg, E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10735-10740 |
| 19. | Senturker, S., Auffret van der Kemp, P., You, H. J., Doetsch, P. W., Dizdaroglu, M., and Boiteux, S. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 5270-5276 |
| 20. | You, H. J., Swanson, R. L., and Doetsch, P. W. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 6033-6040 |
| 21. | Bruner, S. D., Nash, H. M., Lane, W. S., and Verdine, G. L. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 393-403 |
| 22. | Alseth, I., Eide, L., Pirovano, M., Rognes, T., Seeberg, E., and Bjoras, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3779-3787 |
| 23. | You, H. J., Swanson, R. L., Harrington, C., Corbett, A. H., Jinks-Robertson, S., Senturker, S., Wallace, S. S., Boiteux, S., Dizdaroglu, M., and Doetsch, P. W. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11298-11306 |
| 24. | Dizdaroglu, M., Karahalil, B., Senturker, S., Buckley, T. J., and Roldan-Arjona, T. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 243-246 |
| 25. | David, S. S., and Williams, S. D. (1998) Chem. Rev. 98, 1221-1261 |
| 26. | Hatahet, Z., Kow, Y. W., Purmal, A. A., Cunningham, R. P., and Wallace, S. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18814-18820 |
| 27. | Sarker, A. H., Ikeda, S., Nakano, H., Terato, H., Ide, H., Imai, K., Akiyama, K., Tsutsui, K., Bo, Z., Kubo, K., Yamamoto, K., Yasui, A., Yoshida, M. C., and Seki, S. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 282, 761-774 |
| 28. | Monden, Y., Arai, T., Asano, M., Ohtsuka, E., Aburatani, H., and Nishimura, S. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 258, 605-610 |
| 29. | Asagoshi, K., Yamada, T., Terato, H., Ohyama, Y., Monden, Y., Arai, T., Nishimura, S., Aburatani, H., Lindahl, T., and Ide, H. (2000) J. Biol. Chem 275, 4956-4964 |
| 30. | Kao, J. Y., Goljer, I., Phan, T. A., and Bolton, P. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17787-17793 |
| 31. | Wang, D., and Essigman, J. M. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 8628-8633 |
| 32. | Jurado, J., Saparbaev, M., Matray, T. J., Greenberg, M. M., and Laval, J. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 7757-7763 |
| 33. | Hilbert, T. P., Boorstein, R. J., Kung, H. C., Bolton, P. H., Xing, D., Cunningham, R. P., and Teebor, G. W. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 2505-2511 |
| 34. | Augeri, L., Lee, Y.-M., Barton, A. B., and Doetsch, P. W. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 721-729 |
| 35. | Hilbert, T. P., Chaung, W., Boorstein, R. J., Cunningham, R. P., and Teebor, G. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6733-6740 |
| 36. | Ikeda, S., Biswas, T., Roy, R., Izumi, T., Boldogh, I., Kurosky, A., Sarker, A., Seki, S., and Mitra, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21585-21593 |
| 37. | Karahalil, B., Toldan-Arjona, T., and Dizdaroglu, M. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 590-595 |
| 38. | O'Connor, T. R., Boiteux, S., and Laval, J. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 5878-5894 |
| 39. | Tudek, B., Boiteux, S., and Laval, J. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3079-3084 |
| 40. | Klungland, A., Rosewell, I., Hollenbach, S., Larsen, E., Daly, G., Epe, B., Seeberg, E., Lindahl, T., and Barnes, D. E. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 13300-13305 |
| 41. | Cysewski, P., and Olinski, R. (1999) Z. Naturforsch. 54c, 239-245 |
| 42. | Thayer, M. M., Ahern, H., Xing, D., Cunningham, R., and Tainer, J. A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4108-4120 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Golan, D. O. Zharkov, H. Feinberg, A. S. Fernandes, E. I. Zaika, J. H. Kycia, A. P. Grollman, and G. Shoham Structure of the uncomplexed DNA repair enzyme endonuclease VIII indicates significant interdomain flexibility Nucleic Acids Res., September 6, 2005; 33(15): 5006 - 5016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakano, A. Katafuchi, R. Shimizu, H. Terato, T. Suzuki, H. Tauchi, K. Makino, M. Skorvaga, B. Van Houten, and H. Ide Repair activity of base and nucleotide excision repair enzymes for guanine lesions induced by nitrosative stress Nucleic Acids Res., April 14, 2005; 33(7): 2181 - 2191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Rachek, V. I. Grishko, M. F. Alexeyev, V. V. Pastukh, S. P. LeDoux, and G. L. Wilson Endonuclease III and endonuclease VIII conditionally targeted into mitochondria enhance mitochondrial DNA repair and cell survival following oxidative stress Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2004; 32(10): 3240 - 3247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Katafuchi, T. Nakano, A. Masaoka, H. Terato, S. Iwai, F. Hanaoka, and H. Ide Differential Specificity of Human and Escherichia coli Endonuclease III and VIII Homologues for Oxidative Base Lesions J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 14464 - 14471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Ishchenko, G. Sanz, C. V. Privezentzev, A. V. Maksimenko, and M. Saparbaev Characterisation of new substrate specificities of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae AP endonucleases Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2003; 31(21): 6344 - 6353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. COOKE, M. D. EVANS, M. DIZDAROGLU, and J. LUNEC Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease FASEB J, July 1, 2003; 17(10): 1195 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakano, H. Terato, K. Asagoshi, A. Masaoka, M. Mukuta, Y. Ohyama, T. Suzuki, K. Makino, and H. Ide DNA-Protein Cross-link Formation Mediated by Oxanine: A NOVEL GENOTOXIC MECHANISM OF NITRIC OXIDE-INDUCED DNA DAMAGE J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 25264 - 25272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Terato, A. Masaoka, K. Asagoshi, A. Honsho, Y. Ohyama, T. Suzuki, M. Yamada, K. Makino, K. Yamamoto, and H. Ide Novel repair activities of AlkA (3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II) and endonuclease VIII for xanthine and oxanine, guanine lesions induced by nitric oxide and nitrous acid Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2002; 30(22): 4975 - 4984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Asagoshi, H. Terato, Y. Ohyama, and H. Ide Effects of a Guanine-derived Formamidopyrimidine Lesion on DNA Replication. TRANSLESION DNA SYNTHESIS, NUCLEOTIDE INSERTION, AND EXTENSION KINETICS J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14589 - 14597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Masaoka, H. Terato, M. Kobayashi, Y. Ohyama, and H. Ide Oxidation of Thymine to 5-Formyluracil in DNA Promotes Misincorporation of dGMP and Subsequent Elongation of a Mismatched Primer Terminus by DNA Polymerase J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 16501 - 16510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Burgess, P. Jaruga, M. L. Dodson, M. Dizdaroglu, and R. S. Lloyd Determination of Active Site Residues in Escherichia coli Endonuclease VIII J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2002; 277(4): 2938 - 2944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||