![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 32, 24984-24992, August 11, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Microbiology,
Washington University School of Medicine and St. Louis Children's
Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received for publication, January 25, 2000, and in revised form, May 19, 2000
Hsp40 co-chaperones, characterized by the
presence of a highly conserved J domain, are involved in nearly all
aspects of protein synthesis, folding, and secretion. Within the lumen
of the endoplasmic reticulum, these chaperones are also involved in
reverse translocation and degradation of misfolded proteins. We
describe here the cloning and characterization of a novel Hsp40
chaperone, which we named HEDJ. Epitope-tagged HEDJ was demonstrated by
confocal microscopy to be localized to the endoplasmic reticulum.
Protease susceptibility, glycosidase treatment, and detergent
solubility assays demonstrated that the molecule was luminally oriented
and membrane-associated. In vitro experiments demonstrated
that the J domain interacted with the endoplasmic
reticulum-associated Hsp70, Bip, in an ATP-dependent manner
and was capable of stimulating its ATPase activity. HEDJ mRNA
expression was detected in all human tissues examined. Highly homologous sequences were found in mouse, Drosophila, and
Caenorhabditis elegans data bases. These results suggest
potential roles for HEDJ in protein import, folding, or translocation
within the endoplasmic reticulum.
The endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)1 plays several vital
roles in protein processing and secretion. For example, the ER is a
site not only of protein modification and sorting but is also an
important site of quality control. Intramolecular folding, a requisite
for normal protein function, must occur upon import into the ER lumen, where molecular chaperones such as calnexin and calreticulin interact with nascent proteins and retain them in the ER until folding has been
correctly achieved (1-3). In an incompletely understood manner,
proteins that remain misfolded are exported from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytoplasm where they are commonly ubiquitinated and
degraded by the proteosome (4, 5).
Central to each of these activities are molecular chaperones belonging
to the Hsp70 and Hsp40 families. Within the ER lumen, Bip (also known
as Grp78 in mammalian cells or Kar2 in yeast), a member of the Hsp70
chaperone family, is involved in essentially all aspects of protein
synthesis and secretion. For example, in the yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, mutations in Bip result in defects in protein
translocation, folding, and reverse translocation (6, 7). However, Bip,
like other Hsp70 chaperones, cannot work in isolation. The intrinsic
ATPase and folding activity of Bip is stimulated by members of the
Hsp40 co-chaperones, also known as DNAJ-related proteins, after
Escherichia coli DNAJ, the progenitor family member. These
co-chaperones are characterized by the presence of a highly conserved
75-amino acid region termed the J domain, which is the predominant site
of interaction with Hsp70 partners (8). The main function of Hsp40
co-chaperones appears to be stimulation of Hsp 70 chaperones (9-12).
Given their importance for Hsp70 function, Hsp40 molecules are involved
in nearly all aspects of protein synthesis and secretion (13, 14). In
addition to their role in stimulating ATP hydrolysis by Hsp70, some
Hsp40 chaperones are felt to have an intrinsic ability to bind and fold
at least some misfolded proteins (15, 16).
During post-translational protein translocation into the yeast ER, Bip
interacts with Sec63, a membrane-anchored protein bearing a J domain
(17-21). It is assumed that Sec63, which forms part of the
translocation apparatus, attracts Bip to the site of protein import via
its J domain. Upon activation by Sec63, Bip binds nascent peptides and
assists in protein import either by serving as an anchor during passive
forward movement (a "Brownian ratchet") (22), by actively pulling
nascent molecules into the ER lumen (23), or perhaps by both
mechanisms. Mutations in either Bip or Sec63 result in defects in
protein translocation into the ER (24). As mentioned previously, it is
known that Bip also participates in refolding misfolded proteins once
they reach the ER lumen and assists in reverse translocation of those
that remain misfolded (25, 26). Recently it has become evident that the
functions of Bip in import and export are distinct (25), perhaps
suggesting that Bip interacts with Hsp40 co-chaperones other than Sec63
in reverse translocation. Similarly, Bip likely interacts with another (or several other) Hsp40 molecules to enable protein folding within the
lumen. Indeed, in S. cerevisiae, two additional Hsp40
co-chaperones have thus far been identified in the ER and found to
interact with Bip in protein folding (27-30). In contrast, no Hsp40
molecules have yet been identified in the ER of higher eucaryotes,
including mammalian cells (28, 29).
We describe here the expression pattern and intracellular localization
of a novel Hsp40 chaperone, which we have termed HEDJ (for
human ER-associated
DNAJ; the nomenclature follows that of yeast
and human cytoplasmic Hsp40 molecules). HEDJ was found to be expressed
in all human tissues examined. It was localized to the endoplasmic
reticulum with a luminal orientation, was membrane-associated, and was
able to bind and stimulate the activity of Bip. Highly homologous genes
were found in mouse, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans data bases.
Cell Lines, Antibodies, and Reagents--
Vero cells were
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf
serum. Transfections were performed as described (31). Approximately
5 × 105 cells were transfected with a mixture of
plasmid DNA (3 µg) and LipofectAMINE (50 µl; Life Technologies,
Inc.) in serum-free medium. 24 h later, medium was added.
Experiments on transiently transfected cells were performed 48 h
after transfection. For stable transfection, geneticin (1000 µg/ml;
G418, Life Technologies, Inc.) was added to culture medium 48 h
after transfection, and the cells were continually passaged in the
presence of geneticin at 1000 µg/ml. Monoclonal anti-V5 antibody was
obtained from Invitrogen. Monoclonal anti-HA antibody was obtained from
Babco. Affinity purified polyclonal anti-calregulin and anti-Bip were
obtained from StressGen. Human multiple tissue RNA blots were purchased
from CLONTECH. Double-stranded DNA probes were
radiolabeled with [32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) by random
priming using reagents from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Taq DNA polymerase and dNTPs were from Life Technologies, Inc.
Isolation of HEDJ cDNA--
A portion of the HEDJ cDNA
was isolated in a genetic screen for molecules involved in
intracellular trafficking of shiga toxin, which will be described in
detail elsewhere. In brief, Vero cells were transiently transfected
with a cDNA expression library and exposed to shiga toxin.
Resistant cells were enriched, and plasmid DNA was harvested by Hirt
extraction and then used in a further two rounds of transfection and
enrichment. After the third round of transient transfection and
enrichment, cells were stably transfected with the enriched cDNA
clones and selected in the presence of shiga toxin for two weeks. The
cDNA inserts in toxin-resistant cells was amplified by polymerase
chain reaction from cell lysates using primers flanking cDNA
inserts. The resulting polymerase chain reaction products were directly
cloned into plasmid pCR3.1Topo/V5/His (Invitrogen). Two transformants
characterized contained identical inserts of approximately 600 base
pairs and demonstrated homology to the Hsp40 family of co-chaperones.
Although no matching sequences were identified in the
GenBankTM data base, several identical sequences were
identified in the human EST data base. Successive searches using BLAST
against the human EST data base allowed identification of the entire
coding region.
Northern Blotting of Human RNA to Detect HEDJ
Expression--
The insert from plasmid pHED3 was released by
digestion with HindIII and XhoI, gel purified,
labeled with [32P]dCTP, and used as probe for Northern
blots. 50 ng of purified Generation of Epitope-tagged HEDJ cDNA--
A full-length,
V5 epitope-tagged molecule was generated by amplifying the HEDJ
cDNA from a human skeletal muscle library
(CLONTECH) using primers Hsp-1
(5'-GGCCTCACAGGGCCGGGTGGGCTGG-3') and Hsp-3 (5'-ATATCCTTGCAGTCCATTGTATACCTTC-3'), which deleted the stop codon. The
resulting product was ligated into plasmid pCR3.1-Topo/V5/His to create
plasmid pHED3, which consists of the full-length HEDJ, an in-frame 3'
fusion with the V5 epitope and a C-terminal histidine tag. The insert
was sequenced to ensure fidelity. A truncated, HA epitope-tagged HEDJ
was constructed by amplifying the HEDJ cDNA with primers Hsp-1 and
Hsp-HA
(5'-CTAGCCTGAGGCATAGTCAGGCACGTCATAAGGATAGCCGTTCTCACTATCTGACAGAACCTC-3'). The resulting product, which encodes amino acid residues 1-81 of the
HEDJ cDNA, a C-terminal HA epitope (NGYPYDVPDYASG), and a stop
codon, was ligated into vector pCR3.1-Topo/V5/His to create plasmid
pHED-HA. The insert was sequenced to verify that errors had not been
introduced by polymerase chain reaction.
Confocal Microscopy--
Vero cells were transiently transfected
with pHED3 (full-length, V5/His-tagged HEDJ) or pHED-HA (truncated,
HA-tagged HEDJ). Transfected cells were seeded in multiwell chambers on
a glass slide, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 1 h,
permeabilized by the addition of 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min at
room temperature, and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature
with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf
serum plus 2% BSA (blocking buffer). Primary antibodies used were
mouse anti-V5 or anti-HA at 1:200 dilution in blocking buffer. Double labeling experiments included goat anti-calnexin (DPP-23) at 1:200 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, Oregon
yellow-conjugated anti-mouse (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) or Texas
Red-conjugated anti-goat (Sigma) secondary antibody was added at
1:200 dilution in blocking buffer and incubated a further 1 h at
room temperature. The slides were washed several times in blocking
buffer then PBS, mounted with Aqua PolyMount (Polysciences, Warrington,
PA), and visualized by epifluoresence confocal microscopy (Bio-Rad).
Image processing was performed with the LaserSharp 1024 software package.
Proteinase K Digestion, Endoglycosidase Treatment, and
Solubilization of HEDJ--
To isolate crude microsomal extracts pHED3
transfected cells were scraped into PBS, centrifuged, resuspended in
100 mM MES buffer, pH 6.7, and then disrupted by 10 strokes
in a tightly fitting glass Dounce homogenizer. Nuclei and cellular
debris were removed by centrifugation at 4000 × g.
Microsomes were precipitated from the supernatant by the addition of
MnCl2 to 20 mM and incubation on ice for 30 min. Microsomes were sedimented for 5 min at 4000 × g
and resuspended in the appropriate buffer for later experiments.
Protease treatment was performed by adding proteinase K to a
concentration of 100 µg/ml to microsomes resuspended in PBS either in
the presence or absence of Triton X-100 at 1% final concentration. After incubating at 4 °C for 1 h, SDS-PAGE buffer was added,
and the samples were boiled, electrophoresed on a 4-20%
polyacrylamide gradient gel, and transferred to nitrocellulose. After
blocking in 5% skim milk in PBS, HEDJ, or calregulin was detected by
the addition of antibody against V5 (1:2500) or calregulin (1:500), respectively, and incubating for 2 h at room temperature. After washing and adding secondary antibody (horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-goat; 1:5000) for 1 h,
filters were washed, immersed in ECL reagents (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), and exposed to film.
Glycosidase treatment was performed by resuspending microsomes to a
final volume of 40 µl in water containing protease inhibitors (complete mixture; Roche Molecular Biochemicals). 40 µl of
denaturation buffer (0.5% SDS, 1%
Solubilization of HEDJ was performed by preparing microsomes from pHED3
transfected cells. After freezing at J Domain-GST Fusion and Purification of GST Fusion
Protein--
The J domain and a segment of the G/F linker region
(residues 18-120) were amplified from plasmid pHED-7 using primers
Hsp8 (5'-GGCCTGGAATTCGGGGCGGTGATTGCCGGACGAG-3') and Hsp9
(5'-GCAGGTCGACTCGAGCTATCCTCCAAACATGAAACCAAAATCCCC-3'). The
product was cloned into vector pCR3.1-Topo, sequenced to
ensure fidelity, released by EcoRI and XhoI
digestion, and subcloned into plasmid pGEX-6.1 (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) to create plasmid pGEX-HED7.
HEDJ J domain-GST fusion protein (GST-tHEDJ) was purified from E. coli D5 Generation and Purification of His-tagged Bip--
The Bip
cDNA, excluding the signal peptide, was amplified from a Daudi
(human Burkitt lymphoma) cell line by polymerase chain reaction
using primers HED-10 (5'-CCAGGACTCGAGCGGGCCGAGGAGGAGGAC-3') and HED-11
(5'-GGACCACTCGAGCTACAACTCATCTTTTTCTGC-3'). The product was
ligated into vector pCR3.1-Topo/V5/His, released by XhoI
digestion and subcloned into XhoI-digested plasmid pET-14b
(Novagene), which placed Bip in-frame with an N-terminal
His6 tag to create plasmid pET-Bip. Subsequently,
nucleotide sequencing revealed a nucleotide substitution in the Bip
cDNA, which resulted in substitution of proline for leucine at
amino acid position 604. Nevertheless, we found that purified Bip bound
the HEDJ J domain in an ATP-dependant fashion (see "Results"),
indicating that the amino acid substitution did not interfere with the
Bip-J domain interaction.
His-tagged Bip was purified from a 1-liter culture of E. coli BL21 (DE3) harboring pET-Bip by growing to an
A600 value of ~0.8 and then inducing protein
expression by the addition of
isopropyl-1-thio- HEDJ-Bip Binding Assays--
Binding assays were performed as
described by Corsi and Schekman (17) with modifications as follows. 50 µg of purified GST-HEDJ or GST were added to 50 µl of glutathione
agarose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in a final volume of 500 µl of
binding buffer. After 1 h at 4 °C the beads were sedimented,
washed several times with ice-cold binding buffer, and then resuspended
in 500 µl of binding buffer. Purified Bip (50 µg) was added to each
sample in the presence or absence of 1 mM ATP. Following a
2-h incubation while rotating at 4 °C, the beads were sedimented and
washed five times with 1 ml of binding buffer. GST-HEDJ, GST, and
associated Bip were released by the addition of 100 µl of binding
buffer containing 20 mM reduced glutathione. Laemmli buffer
was added to the supernatant, and the samples were boiled and subjected
to SDS-PAGE. Proteins were detected by Coomassie staining.
ATPase Assays--
To determine whether the HEDJ J domain was
capable of stimulating the ATPase activity of Bip, in vitro
assays were performed using GST fusion proteins and purified
recombinant Bip. GST-HEDJ, GST, and recombinant Bip were purified as
described above. Each protein was dialyzed overnight into ATPase assay
buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 6.8, 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2). Assays were performed essentially as
described (17), in a final volume of 100 µl consisting of ATPase
buffer, to which was added KCl to 20 mM, 0.5 mCi of [
To demonstrate saturability of the ATPase stimulation of Bip, ATPase
assays were repeated with varying concentrations of either GST-tHEDJ or
GST in the presence or absence of Bip (0.5 µg for a final
concentration of ~70 nM). Reactions were incubated for 60 min at room temperature, and the quantity of ADP released was determined by TLC and scintillation counting as described above. The
Vmax was determined by correcting for the
specific activity of [32P]ATP (220 cpm/pmol) and the
final concentration of GST-tHEDJ in each reaction and then performing
nonlinear regression analysis of the data using GraphPad Prism (version
2.0).
A partial Vero cell cDNA was isolated in the process of a
phenotypic cloning approach to identify genes involved in shiga toxin
trafficking. When compared by BLAST with the GenBankTM data
base there were no sequences that matched with high probability. However, when compared with the human EST data base, several matching sequences were identified. When the nucleotide sequence was translated into predicted peptide sequence using the first ATG as the start codon
and compared with the SwissProt data base, at least 50 matching sequences were identified, all belonging to the DNAJ or Hsp40 family of
co-chaperones. The role of this chaperone in shiga toxin pathogenesis
is currently under study.
Iterative BLAST searches were performed against the human EST data base
to identify the entire HEDJ coding region and predicted stop codon.
Based on the deduced cDNA sequence, primers were designed to allow
amplification of approximately 150 base pairs of 5'-untranslated DNA
and the entire coding region of HEDJ from human skeletal muscle cDNA. Nucleotide sequencing of the insert demonstrated that the HEDJ sequence matched that predicted from EST sequences (Fig. 1A). The cDNA encodes a
peptide consisting of 358 amino acids, which
demonstrate high homology to the Hsp40 (DNAJ) co-chaperones. Blast and
tblastx searches were performed against the mouse EST, C. elegans, and Drosophila data bases. Highly homologous
sequences were found in each (Fig. 1B). No
Saccharomyces sequences matched with high probability. Like
other Hsp40 chaperones, HEDJ contained a highly conserved region of 75 amino acids known as the J domain, which interact with Hsp70 partners
to stimulate ATPase and folding activity. Additionally, HEDJ contained
domains shared by many other Hsp40 molecules such as a
glycine/phenylalanine-rich putative linker region, a cystine-rich
domain, and a C-terminal domain, which in other Hsp40 molecules has
been postulated to directly bind misfolded peptides (Fig.
1C). Unlike essentially all other known Hsp40 genes in
higher eucaryotes, HEDJ contained a predicted signal peptide at the N
terminus, suggesting that it is likely translocated into the
endoplasmic reticulum.
To determine the pattern of HEDJ expression in human tissues, RNA
hybridization experiments were performed using a radiolabeled full-length HEDJ as probe against poly(A) RNA isolated from various tissues. Hybridizing transcripts of 2.2 and 2.0 kilobases were found in
all tissues examined, with relatively highest HEDJ expression found in
the pancreas and testis and the least hybridization to RNA from thymus
and small intestine (Fig. 2). The two
bands likely represent alternately spliced HEDJ message, although the
possibility of a highly related, cross-hybridizing message cannot be
excluded. In all cases, hybridization with an
HEDJ, an Hsp40 Co-chaperone Localized to the Endoplasmic
Reticulum of Human Cells*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin DNA (CLONTECH)
was similarly labeled. Human multiple tissue RNA blots were
prehybridized for 30 min at 68 °C in RapidHyb solution (CLONTECH) and then hybridized for 1 h at
68 °C in the same solution containing 1.5 million cpm/ml of probe.
Filters were washed at 50 °C in 0.2× SSC, O.1% SDS and exposed to
Kodak Biomax MS film at
70 °C.
-mercaptoethanol) was added, and
the samples were placed in a boiling water bath for 10 min and then
divided into three aliquots. To these were added either Endo H (20 milliunits; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), PNGase F (100 units; New
England Biolabs), or no glycosidase. The appropriate buffer was added, the volume was brought to 80 µl with water, and the samples were incubated at 37 °C. Aliquots were removed after 1 or 2 h and
subjected to electrophoresis on a 10% polyacrylamide gel followed by
Western blotting as described above.
20 °C, the microsomes were
resuspended in either PBS alone or PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100,
1% Triton X-100, or 1% deoxycholate (DOC). After rocking at 4 °C
for 1 h the samples were centrifuged at 4000 × g
for 5 min to sediment residual membranes and microsomes. The
supernatant was removed to a new tube, and the pellet was resuspended
in an equal volume of water. SDS-PAGE sample buffer was added, and the products were subjected to electrophoresis and Western blotting as
described above.
by growing a 1-liter culture to an
A600 value of ~0.6 and then inducing
protein expression by the addition of
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside to 1 mM and incubating a further 2 h. Cells were pelleted
by centrifugation, frozen at
20 °C, and then resuspended in 10 ml
1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Bacteria were lysed by sonication, and debris
was removed by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was applied to a 1-ml glutathione agarose column
(GSTrap; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), which was then washed with 5 column volumes of binding buffer (100 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 5 mM MgCl2) and
eluted with binding buffer containing 20 mM reduced
glutathione. 1-ml fractions were collected, and those containing pure
fusion protein were combined and dialyzed against binding buffer.
-D-galactopyranoside to 1 mM and incubating a further 2 h. Bacteria were
sedimented, washed with PBS, frozen at
20 °C, and then resuspended
in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100. The cells were sonicated, debris
was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was applied to a
1-ml Hi-Trap column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After washing with 10 ml of PBS, proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of imidazole in
PBS. Fractions containing Bip were identified by slot-blotting, pooled,
and dialyzed against 20 mM Tris, pH 7.0.
-32P]ATP, and 100 µM ATP. Reactions
contained 1.0 µg of Bip (~140 nM), and either no
addition or 2.5 µg of GST or GST-HEDJ. Comparison was made with
a reaction containing neither Bip or a GST containing protein. At each
time point between 0 and 75 min, which was in the linear range, 5 µl
was removed and spotted on a plastic backed polyethyleneimine-cellulose
thin layer plate (Sigma). Radioactive ADP was separated from ATP by
chromatography in 0.5 M formic acid in 0.5 M
LiCl2. The plates were exposed for 1 h to x-ray film to identify the Rf and location of ADP. Individual spots were cut from
the TLC plate, and the amount of radioactive ADP was determined
in a scintillation counter.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES


View larger version (128K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Sequence analysis of a human HEDJ
cDNA. A, nucleotide sequence and deduced peptide
sequence of the insert in pHED3. Italicized
letters indicate the predicted signal peptide.
Underlined letters indicate the putative J domain.
B, homology of the derived human HEDJ peptide sequence
(HEDJ) with murine, Drosophila, and C. elegans
homologues identified in the murine EST, Drosophila genome,
and C. elegans genome data bases, respectively. Dark
shading indicates amino acid identities, whereas light
shading denotes amino acid similarities. C, a schematic
drawing of the predicted peptide structure of HEDJ in comparison to
E. coli DNAJ.
-actin probe confirmed
approximately equal loading of RNA in each sample.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Detection of HEDJ mRNA expression in
human tissues by RNA hybridization. 2 µg of polyadenylated RNA
from human tissues was hybridized with a radiolabeled HEDJ cDNA
probe (A) or an
-actin probe (B). Hybridizing
mRNA was detected by autoradiography. Numbers in the
margin indicate the migration of molecular mass markers.
Ht., heart; Br., brain; Pl., placenta;
Lu., lung; Li., liver; Sk., skeletal
muscle; Ki., kidney; Pa., pancreas;
Sp., spleen; Th., thymus; Pr.,
prostate; Te., testis; Ov., ovaries;
In., small intestine; Co., colon; Lk.,
peripheral blood leukocytes.
As described previously, Hsp40 chaperones are involved in nearly all
aspects of protein folding, secretion, and degradation. These
activities have been intensively studied in yeast, where three
Hsp40-like proteins have been identified within the ER; each apparently
with overlapping but distinct activities. In contrast, in higher
eucaryotes, the only J domain containing protein known to exist in the
ER is Sec63. In this regard, we were particularly interested in
determining whether HEDJ was localized to the ER, as was predicted by
the presence of the signal peptide. Vero cells were transiently
transfected with a cDNA encoding full-length HEDJ and a C-terminal
V5 epitope and histidine tag. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy
was utilized to examine the intracellular localization of HEDJ.
Cells were permeabilized and labeled with mouse anti-V5 and goat
anti-calregulin (as a marker for endoplasmic reticulum) and then
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse and Texas
Red-conjugated anti-goat antibodies. As expected, all cells were
labeled with anti-calregulin antibody in a perinuclear and lacy
reticular pattern throughout the cell (Fig.
3A). Approximately 15% of
cells were brightly labeled with the anti-V5 antibody in a pattern that
was essentially identical to that of calregulin labeling. These results
imply a transfection efficiency of approximately 15% and demonstrate
that V5-tagged HEDJ is expressed in a similar distribution as
calregulin. Control experiments were performed by omitting primary
antibody or by substituting cells transfected with vector alone and
demonstrated minimal background labeling (data not shown). We have been
unable to raise antiserum in rabbits either to full-length recombinant
HEDJ or to peptide antigens, presumably because of the extremely high
conservation of the HEDJ protein (Fig. 1C). Thus, we were
unable to examine the intracellular localization of HEDJ that did not
bear an epitope tag. To confirm that the ER localization seen with the
V5 epitope-tagged protein was not an artifact of the V5 epitope and to
determine whether the signal peptide and J domain alone would be
sufficient to target the protein to the endoplasmic reticulum, confocal
microscopy was repeated with a truncated, HA-tagged HEDJ cDNA.
Transfected cells were subjected to confocal microscopy as described
above, except that mouse anti-HA antibody was substituted for anti-V5. As was seen with the full-length V5-tagged molecule, HA-tagged truncated HEDJ was found to co-localize with calregulin. These results
confirmed that HEDJ was localized to the endoplasmic reticulum irrespective of the epitope tag.
|
We next sought to determine the orientation of HEDJ with respect to the ER lumen. Although we anticipated that HEDJ would be localized within the lumen where it would be available to interact with Bip (or an as yet uncharacterized Hsp70), it was conceivable that HEDJ was oriented such that the peptide protruded into the cytoplasm, where it might interact with cytosolic Hsp70 molecules such as Hsc70. For example, the yeast DNAJ homologue, Ydj1p, in addition to having a cytoplasmic localization, is associated with the outer surface of the ER membrane (32).
As one means of examining orientation of HEDJ within the ER, protease
susceptibility assays were performed. Microsomes were prepared from
cells transfected with full-length, epitope-tagged HEDJ and exposed to
proteinase K either in the presence or absence of Triton X-100.
Luminally oriented proteins were expected to be protected from
proteinase K, because this protease cannot cross the microsomal
membrane. Addition of Triton X-100 was expected to disrupt the membrane
and allow access of the protease to intraluminal proteins. We found
that in the absence of Triton X-100, HEDJ was protected from proteinase
K, as demonstrated by no decrease in the amount of full-length protein
after a 1-h incubation with proteinase K, as compared with untreated
microsomes (Fig. 4, first and
third lanes). In contrast, addition of 1% Triton X-100
allowed complete degradation of HEDJ. Control experiments demonstrated similar results with other luminal ER proteins such as calregulin (Fig.
4), Bip, and calnexin (not shown). These results indicate that HEDJ is
localized within the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum.
|
Another means of determining the orientation and localization of proteins within the secretory pathway is to examine patterns of glycosylation. The presence of asparagine-linked carbohydrate indicates transit to the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, where high mannose-type sugars are transferred from dolichol-phosphate to nascent proteins, provided they bear at least one potential glycosylation site. High mannose carbohydrates are characterized by susceptibility to cleavage by Endo H. During transit from the ER through the Golgi, N-linked carbohydrates undergo trimming of glucose residues and further modification, which result in resistance to cleavage by Endo H. Notably, these N-linked sugars, like high mannose carbohydrate, remain susceptible to cleavage by PNGase F. HEDJ bears two potential N-linked glycosylation sites at residues 5 and 261. However, the first site is located within the putative signal peptide and transmembrane domain, likely indicating that only the second site is accessible for modification.
The glycosylation pattern of HEDJ was examined in transfected cells by
subjecting microsomes from pHED3-transfected cells to digestion either
with Endo H, PNGase F, or no glycosidase and examining the migration of
HEDJ on SDS-PAGE gels by Western blotting. After 1 h of incubation
with either glycanase, the molecular mass was reduced by
approximately 2 kDa in approximately half of the HEDJ protein. After
2 h of incubation, all of the HEDJ was reduced in apparent
molecular mass by Endo H and PNGase F, as compared with sample
incubated in the absence of glycanase (Fig.
5). Glycosylation of HEDJ confirmed that
the protein was luminally oriented. Moreover, demonstration that
essentially all of the N-linked sugar is Endo H-susceptible
indicated that HEDJ remained resident within the ER.
|
We next sought to determine whether HEDJ was free within the ER lumen
or was membrane-associated. To determine whether HEDJ was
membrane-associated, microsomes were isolated from cells transfected with pHED3 and were subjected to extraction with PBS alone, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1% Triton X-100, or 1% DOC. As expected, calreticulin, a soluble ER luminal protein, was released into the supernatant by
0.1% and 1% Triton X-100 as well as 1% DOC. In fact, freezing and
thawing the microsomes without addition of detergent resulted in
release of approximately half the calregulin. In contrast, essentially
all HEDJ remained in the pellet following 0.1% Triton X-100
extraction. Even exposure to 1% Triton X-100, which was expected to
solubilize most of the microsomal membrane, solubilized only a minimal
amount of HEDJ. Only the stronger detergent, 1% DOC, was able to
solubilize HEDJ, suggesting a strong association with the ER membrane
(Fig. 6).
|
Having demonstrated that HEDJ was localized to the ER and luminally
oriented, we examined the possibility that this novel Hsp40 interacts
with Bip, the only Hsp70 chaperone thus far known to be localized to
the ER of higher eucaryotes. To determine whether the J domain of HEDJ
interacts with Bip, in vitro binding assays were performed
using GST fusion proteins, as described by Corsi and Schekman (17), who
showed that the J domain of Sec63 interacted with Bip in an
ATP-dependent manner. We found, in the presence of 1 mM ATP, Bip bound to a GST-HEDJ fusion protein containing the HEDJ J domain. In contrast, the amount of Bip bound to GST-HEDJ in
the absence of ATP was undetectable by Coomassie staining (Fig. 7). As expected, Bip did not bind the GST
control, either in the presence or absence of ATP.
|
Finally, to determine whether the HEDJ J domain was capable of
stimulating the ATPase activity of Bip, in vitro ATPase
assays were performed. Reactions contained either no additions or Bip plus GST, GST-tHEDJ, or no GST protein. In the absence of any additions
there was minimal ATP hydrolysis. In these experiments, 1 µg of Bip
was added to a final concentration of approximately 140 nM.
Reactions containing Bip alone demonstrated ATP hydrolysis at a rate of
approximately 1.6 mol ADP/mol Bip/min (Fig.
8). Addition of GST had no effect on the
rate of ATP hydrolysis, whereas addition of GST-HEDJ resulted in a
specific activity of 4.2 mol ADP/mol Bip/min, an almost 3-fold increase
in the rate of ATPase activity, similar to the approximately 5-fold
stimulation of S. cerevisiae Bip by a GST-Sec63 J domain
protein (17).
|
To demonstrate that the stimulation of Bip was saturable and was not
due to contaminating ATPase in the GST-tHEDJ fusion protein, assays
were repeated with increasing amounts of tHEDJ fusion protein or GST
alone, either in the presence or absence of 0.5 µg of Bip (final
concentration, 70 nM). Whereas GST addition had minimal ability to stimulate ATP hydrolysis, GST-tHEDJ demonstrated a concentration-dependent and saturable stimulation of Bip
(Fig. 9). In these in vitro
assays, the concentration of GST-tHEDJ causing half-maximal stimulation
of Bip was approximately 150 nM. In the presence of
GST-tHEDJ, the maximal rate of ATP hydrolysis by Bip (Vmax) was found to be 4.3 mol ADP/mol Bip/min,
whereas the Vmax of Bip in the presence of GST
was 1.6 mol ADP/mol Bip/min (essentially the same as reactions
containing no GST fusion protein). These results confirm the ability of
the HEDJ J domain to specifically stimulate the ATPase activity of
Bip.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We describe the isolation, cloning, and characterization of a novel human Hsp40 chaperone, HEDJ. Sequence analysis of the cloned HEDJ demonstrated that, unlike all other Hsp40 molecules identified among higher eucaryotes, HEDJ possesses a predicted signal peptide, suggesting secretion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that recombinant HEDJ bearing either a V5 or HA epitope tag, was indeed co-localized with calnexin to the endoplasmic reticulum. Moreover, essentially all the HEDJ isolated from microsomal extracts was found to be glycosylated, confirming transit to the endoplasmic reticulum. Protease resistance and asparagine-linked glycosylation indicated that the molecule was oriented toward the ER lumen. Finally, extraction of microsomes under various conditions revealed that, unlike calregulin, HEDJ remained insoluble even in the presence of Triton X-100, suggesting a strong association with the ER membrane.
Query of nucleotide and protein data bases revealed highly homologous sequences in mouse, Drosophila, and C. elegans data bases. Interestingly, the yeast S. cerevisiae genome does not contain an HEDJ homologue, perhaps suggesting that HEDJ performs the same function as either Scj1p or Jem1p, two luminal J domain containing molecules found in the yeast ER. Of these two yeast proteins, Scj1 is most closely related to DNAJ and HEDJ. Thus, HEDJ and Scj1p may have related functions in the mammalian and yeast endoplasmic reticulum, respectively. Interestingly, Scj1p is known to interact with Bip and is suggested to be the primary co-chaperone for Bip under normal physiological conditions (28).
Chaperone-assisted protein folding occurs in the cytosol and in intracellular organelles such as endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and nucleus. At least four Hsp70 chaperones, localized to specific intracellular compartments, are described in S. cerevisiae. Each Hsp70 interacts with a specific Hsp40 partner. Interestingly, an Hsp70 from one intracellular compartment may interact with more than one Hsp40 in the same compartment (such as endoplasmic reticulum) and yet cannot be stimulated by DNAJ co-chaperones from other cellular compartments, indicating a high degree of specificity in the interaction between Hsp70 molecules and their Hsp40 partners (10, 27). Because Bip is the only Hsp70 identified thus far in mammalian cells, it is likely that HEDJ serves to activate the ATPase activity of Bip during protein translocation, intraluminal folding, or reverse translocation. However, it is possible that another as yet unidentified Hsp70 exists in the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells. The in vitro assays performed here demonstrate that the HEDJ J domain interacts with Bip in an ATP-dependent manner, suggesting that Bip might be the natural in vivo partner for HEDJ. We cannot exclude the possibility, however, that other Hsp70 chaperones exist in the ER lumen that have higher affinity for HEDJ than does Bip.
Localization of HEDJ to the luminal surface of the ER membrane suggests
that this novel Hsp40 co-chaperone is well situated to interact with
Bip (or another Hsp70) in the retrograde transport of host proteins
across the Sec61 apparatus. The components of this retrograde pathway
are largely unknown in mammalian cells. However, reverse translocation
has been investigated intensely in yeast, where it is known that the
yeast Bip homologue and other chaperones are involved in ER to cytosol
transport (20). Much of the mechanism of retrograde transport, however,
has yet to be elucidated. The process is under intense scrutiny because
the pathogenesis of many diseases such as cystic fibrosis,
1-antitrypsin deficiency, prion-associated disorders, and
Alzheimer's disease all involve misfolding of mutated proteins and
abnormalities of their processing in the endoplasmic reticulum (5).
These misfolded proteins may accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum or
be transported to the cytosol for proteosomal degradation. Moreover,
trafficking of some bacterial toxins within eucaryotic cells may
utilize the reverse translocation apparatus (33, 34). It has therefore been suggested that the ability to therapeutically modulate ER to
cytosol transport may influence the severity of some of these diseases.
Investigations on the role of HEDJ in folding and translocation of
misfolded proteins and bacterial toxins may provide insight into normal
cellular biology and the pathogenesis of diverse human diseases.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
Joseph St. Geme and Jacques Baenziger are gratefully acknowledged for advice, support, and critical review of the manuscript. Antibody DPP-23 was kindly provided by Jeff Teckman.
| |
Addendum |
|---|
Bies et al. (35) recently described the purification of an Hsp40 co-chaperone from dog pancreas microsomes. Peptide sequence analysis indicated that this protein, which Bies et. al. have named ERj3p, is a homologue of the yeast Hsp40 Scj1p and is the canine homologue of the chaperone we describe here, HEDJ.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by American Heart Association Grant 50644N and NIAID,
National Institutes of Health Grant AI42817. Scholar of the Child
Health Research Centers of Excellence in Developmental Biology at
Washington University School of Medicine (Grant HD33688). To whom
correspondence should be addressed: Washington University School of
Medicine, Box 8116, One Children's Place, St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.:
314-454-6050; E-mail: haslam@kids.wustl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 24, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000739200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; HA, hemagglutinin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; Endo H, endoglycosidase H; PNGase F, protein N-glycosidase F; DOC, deoxycholate; EST, expressed sequence tag; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Cannon, K. S., and Helenius, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7537-7544 |
| 2. | Zhang, J. X., Braakman, I., Matlack, K. E., and Helenius, A. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 1943-1954 |
| 3. | Tatu, U., and Helenius, A. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 555-565 |
| 4. | Xiong, X., Chong, E., and Skach, W. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2616-2624 |
| 5. | Kopito, R. R. (1997) Cell 88, 427-430 |
| 6. | Vogel, J. P., Misra, L. M., and Rose, M. D. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 1885-1895 |
| 7. | Nguyen, T. H., Law, D. T., and Williams, D. B. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1565-1569 |
| 8. | Greene, M. K., Maskos, K., and Landry, S. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6108-6113 |
| 9. | Suh, W. C., Burkholder, W. F., Lu, C. Z., Zhao, X., Gottesman, M. E., and Gross, C. A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 15223-15228 |
| 10. | Silver, P. A., and Way, J. C. (1993) Cell 74, 5-6 |
| 11. | Russell, R., Wali Karzai, A., Mehl, A. F., and McMacken, R. (1999) Biochem. 38, 4165-4176 |
| 12. | Cyr, D. M., Langer, T., and Douglas, M. G. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 176-181 |
| 13. | Caplan, A. J., Cyr, D. M., and Douglas, M. G. (1993) Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 555-563 |
| 14. | Cheetham, M. E., and Caplan, A. J. (1998) Cell Stress Chaperon. 3, 28-36 |
| 15. | Hendrick, J. P., Langer, T., Davis, T. A., Hartl, F. U., and Wiedmann, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10216-10220 |
| 16. | Hartl, F. U. (1996) Nature 381, 571-579 |
| 17. | Corsi, A. K., and Schekman, R. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 1483-1493 |
| 18. | Sadler, I., Chiang, A., Kurihara, T., Rothblatt, J., Way, J., and Silver, P. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2665-2675 |
| 19. | Matlack, K. E. S., Plath, K., Misselwitz, B., and Rapoport, T. A. (1997) Science 277, 938-941 |
| 20. | Lyman, S. K., and Schekman, R. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 1163-1171 |
| 21. | Pilon, M., Romisch, K., Quach, D., and Schekman, R. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3455-3473 |
| 22. | Matlack, K. E., Misselwitz, B., Plath, K., and Rapoport, T. A. (1999) Cell 97, 553-564 |
| 23. | Glick, B. S. (1995) Cell 80, 11-14 |
| 24. | Brodsky, J. L., Goeckeler, J., and Schekman, R. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9643-9646 |
| 25. | Brodsky, J. L., Werner, E. D., Dubas, M. E., Goeckeler, J. L., Kruse, K. B., and McCracken, A. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3453-3460 |
| 26. | Sommer, T., and Wolf, D. H. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 1227-1233 |
| 27. | Schlenstedt, G., Harris, S., Risse, B., Lill, R., and Silver, P. A. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 979-988 |
| 28. | Silberstein, S., Schlenstedt, G., Silver, P. A., and Gilmore, R. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 921-933 |
| 29. | Nishikawa, S., and Endo, T. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244, 785-789 |
| 30. | Brizzio, V., Khalfan, W., Huddler, D., Beh, C. T., Andersen, S. S., Latterich, M.., and Rose, M. D. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell . 10, 609-626 |
| 31. | Haslam, D. B., and Baenziger, J. U. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10697-10702 |
| 32. | Caplan, A. J., and Douglas, M. G. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 114, 609-621 |
| 33. | Wesche, J., Rapak, A., and Olsnes, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34443-34449 |
| 34. | Schmitz, A., Herrgen, H., Winkeler, A., and Herzog, V. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 148, 1203-1212 |
| 35. | Bies, C., Guth, S., Janoschek, K., Nastainczyk, W., Volkmer, J., and Zimmermann, R. (1999) Biol. Chem. 380, 1175-1182 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Awad, I. Estrada, Y. Shen, and L. M. Hendershot BiP mutants that are unable to interact with endoplasmic reticulum DnaJ proteins provide insights into interdomain interactions in BiP PNAS, January 29, 2008; 105(4): 1164 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hageman, M. J. Vos, M. A. W. H. van Waarde, and H. H. Kampinga Comparison of Intra-organellar Chaperone Capacity for Dealing with Stress-induced Protein Unfolding J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34334 - 34345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Hebert and M. Molinari In and Out of the ER: Protein Folding, Quality Control, Degradation, and Related Human Diseases Physiol Rev, October 1, 2007; 87(4): 1377 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Saenz, T. A. Doggett, and D. B. Haslam Identification and Characterization of Small Molecules That Inhibit Intracellular Toxin Transport Infect. Immun., September 1, 2007; 75(9): 4552 - 4561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shen and L. M. Hendershot Identification of ERdj3 and OBF-1/BOB-1/OCA-B as Direct Targets of XBP-1 during Plasma Cell Differentiation J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 2969 - 2978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yu and D. B. Haslam Shiga Toxin Is Transported from the Endoplasmic Reticulum following Interaction with the Luminal Chaperone HEDJ/ERdj3 Infect. Immun., April 1, 2005; 73(4): 2524 - 2532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shen, E. L. Snapp, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and R. Prywes Stable Binding of ATF6 to BiP in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2005; 25(3): 921 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. N. Alder, Y. Shen, J. L. Brodsky, L. M. Hendershot, and A. E. Johnson The molecular mechanisms underlying BiP-mediated gating of the Sec61 translocon of the endoplasmic reticulum J. Cell Biol., January 31, 2005; 168(3): 389 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shen and L. M. Hendershot ERdj3, a Stress-inducible Endoplasmic Reticulum DnaJ Homologue, Serves as a CoFactor for BiP's Interactions with Unfolded Substrates Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2005; 16(1): 40 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kroczynska, C. M. Evangelista, S. S. Samant, E. C. Elguindi, and S. Y. Blond The SANT2 Domain of the Murine Tumor Cell DnaJ-like Protein 1 Human Homologue Interacts with {alpha}1-Antichymotrypsin and Kinetically Interferes with Its Serpin Inhibitory Activity J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11432 - 11443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Casano, F. Gianguzza, M. C. Roccheri, R. Di Giorgi, L. Maenza, and M. A. Ragusa Hsp40 Is Involved in Cilia Regeneration in Sea Urchin Embryos J. Histochem. Cytochem., December 1, 2003; 51(12): 1581 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||