The Role of Mg2+ Cofactor in the Guanine Nucleotide
Exchange and GTP Hydrolysis Reactions of Rho Family GTP-binding
Proteins*
Baolin
Zhang,
Yaqin
Zhang,
Zhi-xin
Wang
, and
Yi
Zheng§
From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Tennessee,
Memphis, Tennessee 38163 and
Institute of Biophysics,
Academic Sinica, Beijing 100101, China
Received for publication, February 8, 2000, and in revised form, April 3, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The biological activities of Rho family GTPases
are controlled by their guanine nucleotide binding states in cells.
Here we have investigated the role of Mg2+ cofactor
in the guanine nucleotide binding and hydrolysis processes of the Rho
family members, Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA. Differing from Ras and Rab
proteins, which require Mg2+ for GDP and GTP binding, the
Rho GTPases bind the nucleotides in the presence or absence of
Mg2+ similarly, with dissociation constants in the
submicromolar concentration. The presence of Mg2+, however,
resulted in a marked decrease in the intrinsic dissociation rates of
the nucleotides. The catalytic activity of the guanine nucleotide
exchange factors (GEFs) appeared to be negatively regulated by free
Mg2+, and GEF binding to Rho GTPase resulted in a 10-fold
decrease in affinity for Mg2+, suggesting that one role of
GEF is to displace bound Mg2+ from the Rho proteins. The
GDP dissociation rates of the GTPases could be further stimulated by
GEF upon removal of bound Mg2+, indicating that the
GEF-catalyzed nucleotide exchange involves a
Mg2+-independent as well as a
Mg2+-dependent mechanism. Although
Mg2+ is not absolutely required for GTP hydrolysis by the
Rho GTPases, the divalent ion apparently participates in the GTPase
reaction, since the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rates were enhanced
4-10-fold upon binding to Mg2+, and
kcat values of the Rho
GTPase-activating protein (RhoGAP)-catalyzed reactions were
significantly increased when Mg2+ was present. Furthermore,
the p50RhoGAP specificity for Cdc42 was lost in the absence of
Mg2+ cofactor. These studies directly demonstrate a role of
Mg2+ in regulating the kinetics of nucleotide binding
and hydrolysis and in the GEF- and GAP-catalyzed reactions of Rho
family GTPases. The results suggest that GEF facilitates
nucleotide exchange by destabilizing both bound nucleotide and
Mg2+, whereas RhoGAP utilizes the Mg2+ cofactor
to achieve high catalytic efficiency and specificity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Rho family GTP-binding proteins Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA belong
to the Ras superfamily and are important regulators of diverse cell
functions (1-3). These small GTPases have been implicated in cellular
processes including cell polarization (4, 5) and morphogenic changes
(6), endocytosis and exocytosis (7, 8), neutrophil NADPH oxidase
activation (9), oncogenic transformation (10), cell to cell and cell to
extracellular matrix adhesion (11, 12), and cell movement (13). A well
established biochemical model depicts them as molecular switches
linking extracellular stimuli to the intracellular signaling pathways
by cycling between the inactive, GDP-bound state and the active,
GTP-bound state (14). The GTP binding/GTP hydrolysis cycle of these
GTPases serves to turn on and turn off the incoming signals and appears to be under tight regulation by multiple regulatory proteins, among
which the guanine nucleotide exchange factors
(GEFs)1 and the
GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) are responsible for the activation
and the deactivation of the Rho GTPases, respectively (15, 16).
Mg2+ has been established as an essential cofactor for
GTP-binding protein functions (17). For many Ras superfamily small GTPases, Mg2+ has been shown to be necessary for both
guanine nucleotide binding and GTP-hydrolysis. In the presence of
Mg2+, Ras exhibits an extremely high binding affinity to
the guanine nucleotides with a dissociation constant on the order of
subnanomolar concentration (18, 19, 40). In the cases of Rab3A and
related Sec4 GTPases, removal of Mg2+ by EDTA treatment
drastically increases the off rate of bound nucleotides and completely
abolishes GTP
S binding capability (20, 21). The intrinsic GTPase
activity of Ras and Rab3A became undetectable when Mg2+
cofactor was removed (19, 20), indicating that the bivalent ion is
absolutely required for GTP hydrolysis in the respective GTPase
reactions. In the guanine nucleotide exchange reactions of Ras and ARF,
the specific GEFs Sos and ARNO appear to promote the dissociation of
GDP in part through destabilizing bound Mg2+ from the
respective GTPases (22-24). The role of the GEFs in these cases was
proposed to stimulate GDP dissociation and to facilitate the formation
of a reaction transition state in which the GEFs are tightly bound to
the nucleotide-depleted form of the small GTPases (25).
The three-dimensional structures of the Rho family GTPases, RhoA,
Cdc42, and Rac1, in complex with Mg2+ and guanine
nucleotides have been resolved recently (26-29). Not unlike other
small GTP-binding proteins, they utilize the conserved residues in the
guanine nucleotide binding core to chelate GDP or GTP, but distinct
switch I and switch II residues in the surrounding area of the
chelating center are also involved in maintaining the overall
conformation. The critical Mg2+-interacting sites appear
similar to that of Ras with some unique distinctions. For example, the
coordination of Mg2+ in RhoA-GTP
S was found to be
identical to that in Ras bound to GMP-PNP (27), whereas Rho-GDP seems
to employ three water molecules in contrast to four in Ras and an
additional hydroxyl of Thr19, carbonyl oxygen of
Thr37, and the
-phosphorus oxygen for Mg2+
coordination (26), due to the conformational differences in the switch
I domain. In the Rac1-GMP-PNP structure, residues in the switch I
region are disordered (29), suggesting that the nucleotide binding core
of Rac1 may adopt a more flexible conformation. The regulatory
molecules of Rho GTPases such as RhoGEFs and RhoGAPs, on the other
hand, are structurally divergent from other Ras regulator families
(14). Although certain key features of action may appear similar
(e.g. a conserved arginine residue of RhoGAP is critical for
its catalytic function like that in RasGAP (30)), the uniqueness of
these regulatory proteins suggests that distinct features for the
GTPase-activating and guanine nucleotide exchange reactions are
probably involved in the deactivation and activation processes, respectively, for the Rho GTPases.
The biochemical properties of guanine nucleotide binding by the Rho
family GTPases have not been investigated in detail. Moreover, much
remains unknown about the role of Mg2+ in the regulatory
interactions of the Rho proteins with their unique sets of GEFs and
GAPs. In this study, we provide the first quantitative analysis of the
kinetic and equilibrium nucleotide binding properties of three Rho
GTPases, Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA. Our results reveal that both the
nucleotide binding kinetics and binding affinity of Rho GTPases differ
significantly from that of other subfamily members of the Ras
superfamily. The Mg2+ cofactor does not affect the
nucleotide binding affinity of the Rho proteins per se;
rather, it acts solely as a stabilizer for the bound nucleotides by
slowing down the off and on rates. We found that RhoGEF plays dual
roles in the Rho GTPase activation reaction via a
Mg2+-dependent as well as a
Mg2+-independent mechanism and that although
Mg2+ is not absolutely required for the intrinsic and
GAP-stimulated GTP-hydrolysis, it is directly involved in the
regulation of the basal GTPase and the GTPase-activating activities.
Finally, our studies provide evidence that RhoGEF facilitates guanine
nucleotide exchange by destabilizing both bound nucleotide and
Mg2+, whereas RhoGAP utilizes the Mg2+ cofactor
to achieve high catalytic efficiency and specificity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
The radioactive nucleotides
[3H]GDP, [
-32P]GTP, and
[35S]GTP
S were obtained from NEN Life Science
Products. GDP, GTP, and GTP
S were purchased from Sigma. mantGDP and
2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine ribonucleoside (MESG) were
synthesized as described previously (31). All chemicals were of the
highest quality available, and the water used for buffer preparations
was generated by the Milli-Q Academic purification system (Millipore
Corp.) with a conductivity resistance of 18.2 megaohms/cm. In
order to focus on the G-protein binding core without the complications
brought by the flexible carboxyl-terminal ends, recombinant human
Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA proteins containing carboxyl-terminal truncation
of seven, eight, and eight residues, respectively, were used in
the studies as described previously (31, 32). The Rho family proteins
were expressed in Escherichia coli as amino-terminal
His6-tagged fusions by using the pET expression system
(Novagen). The GAP domain of p50RhoGAP (also known as Cdc42GAP)
contains amino acids 205-439 and was expressed in E. coli
as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion using the
pGEX-KG vector (33). The GST-Dbl protein and GST-Ha-Ras were generated
in a baculovirus system or in E. coli as described
previously (34). The Trio N-terminal fragment contains residues
1225-1537, including the intact Dbl homology and Pleckstrin homology
domains, and was expressed as a His6-tagged fusion protein in DE3 strain cells. The N-terminal tagged proteins were purified by
glutathione or Ni2+-agarose affinity chromatography,
and the final purity of all proteins used in the assays was >90% as
judged by Coomassie Blue staining of SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. In general, the proteins stored in 30% glycerol at
20 °C are stable for up to 2 weeks without activity loss. The
protein concentrations were determined by using the BCA assay kit
(Pierce), and the effective concentrations of GTPases were measured by
using the MESG/phosphorylase system assaying the amount of
Pi release after one round of single turnover GTP
hydrolysis reaction as described (33).
Preparation of Metal Ion- and Nucleotide-free
Apo-GTPases--
To remove Mg2+ and nucleotide bound to
the Rho GTPases, the purified protein samples (~100 µM)
in buffer A containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, and 20 mM EDTA were incubated for 20 min at 25 °C, followed by
centrifugation in a Centricon 10 concentrator (Amicon) at 4000 × g for 1 h. This typically results in over 10-fold enrichment of the proteins. The treatments of the samples with buffer A
and Centricon 10 were repeated three more times, and the samples were
subsequently exchanged into buffer B containing 50 mM
HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT at
~400 µM concentration. To examine the content of the
nucleotide remaining in the protein samples, an aliquot (0.5 ml) of the
sample was prepared in a D2O buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, and
0.1 mM DTT at 1 mM concentration, and the
phosphorous contents were determined by 31P NMR measurement
as described by Geyer et al. (35) on a Varian INOVA 600-MHz
spectrometer. The 31P spectra were recorded at 5 °C at a
phosphorus resonance frequency of 202 MHz and were referenced to
external 85% H3PO4. Over 15,000 free induction
decays were summed after excitation with a 65° pulse using a
repetition time of 3 s. In addition, the UV absorption spectra of
the EDTA-treated samples were measured at wavelengths between 240 and
300 nm and were compared with that of untreated GTPase samples.
Guanine Nucleotide Binding Assay--
To determine the
nucleotide binding affinities to Rho GTPases, [3H]GDP or
[35S]GTP
S at a specific activity of 6000 cpm/µM was incubated with the respective apo-GTPases at
25 °C for 6 h in buffer B containing 50 mM HEPES,
pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT with or
without supplement of MgCl2 to the indicated
concentrations. The binding reactions were stopped by filtration of the
mixtures through nitrocellulose filters, and the radionucleotides
remaining bound to the Rho GTPases were quantified by scintillation
counting (36). The dissociation binding constants
(Kd) of the nucleotide-G protein complex were
derived by best fitting the data into a bimolecular binding model.
To measure the dissociation rate of guanine nucleotides from Rho
GTPases, the apo-GTPases (250 nM) were first complexed with [3H]GDP or [35S]GTP
S in buffer B with or
without the supplement of 10 mM MgCl2. After a
binding equilibrium was reached (~60 min), the dissociation reactions
were initiated by the addition of 500 µM GDP or GTP
S to the incubation mixtures. At the indicated time intervals, aliquots of the mixtures were withdrawn, and the remaining G-protein-bound radionucleotides were quantified by nitrocellulose filtration. The data
were fitted into a single exponential equation to arrive at an apparent
dissociation rate constant, koff.
Fluorescence Measurements--
The fluorescence measurements
were carried out using an SLM-Aminco Series 2 Luminescence Spectrometer
(31). To monitor the mantGDP fluorescence, the excitation wavelength
was set at 360 nm and the emission wavelength at 440 nm. All
measurements were performed at 25 °C in buffer B with or without the
supplement of the indicated amount of MgCl2.
GTPase Activity Assay--
GTP-hydrolysis by the Rho GTPases
were measured by the MESG/phosphorylase system, which monitors free
Pi release from the bound GTP as described previously
(33). Briefly, a 0.8-ml solution containing 50 mM HEPES, pH
7.6, 0.2 mM MESG, 10 units of purine nucleoside
phosphorylase, 200 µM GTP, and the indicated amount of
Rho proteins was mixed in a 4-mm width, 10-mm path length cuvette. The
time courses of absorbance change at 360 nm resulting from the
Pi-phosphorylase coupling reaction were recorded on an
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Ultraspec III spectrometer. In the cases of GAP-catalyzed reactions, an indicated catalytic amount of p50RhoGAP was
included in the reaction buffer. Kinetic data were analyzed by
nonlinear regression using equations derived for Cdc42-, Rac1-, and
RhoA-GAP interactions (33, 37, 38) with the program Enzfitter
(Elsevier Biosoft). A modified Michaelis-Menten equation was used to
derive kinetic parameters for GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis assuming GAP
acting as the enzyme catalyst, GTPase-GTP as the substrate, and the
GDP-bound GTPase and Pi as the products as described
previously (33).
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Assay--
The
[3H]GDP/GTP exchange of Cdc42 was measured at 25 or
4 °C as described previously (36). The exchange reactions were
carried out in buffer B with or without the supplement of 5 mM MgCl2 in the presence or absence of 20 nM purified GST-Dbl. The reactions were terminated at the
5-min time point by nitrocellulose filtration, and the amounts of
[3H]GDP remaining bound to Cdc42 were normalized as the
percentage of [3H]GDP bound at time 0. For the
measurement of the Rac1 exchange reaction, fluorescence emissions at
440 nm of the mantGDP-bound Rac1 were monitored in buffer B with time
at various Mg2+ concentrations in the presence or absence
of the indicated amount of Trio. The reactions were initiated by the
addition of excess free GTP (400 µM) into the reaction
mixture. To extract kinetics parameters of the Trio-catalyzed exchange,
the initial reaction rates (V0) were determined
at increasing concentrations of Rac1-mantGDP in the presence or absence
of Mg2+. The resulting hyperbolic curves were best fitted
into a modified Michaelis-Menten equation with a correction term of the
intrinsic nucleotide exchange included,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where V0 is the initial reaction rate,
[Rac1-mantGDP]0 is the total reaction substrate
concentration, and kintrinsic is the basal
exchange rate of Rac1. kcat is derived by
Vmax/[Trio], with [Trio] representing the
GEF concentration present in the reaction.
 |
RESULTS |
Mg2+-independent Guanine Nucleotide Binding of
Rho GTPases--
In order to examine the role of
Mg2+ in the guanine nucleotide binding process of Rho
GTPases, we attempted to generate the metal ion- and nucleotide-free
form (apo form) of Rho proteins by using a Centricon-based
centrifugation protocol combined with EDTA treatment. This method is
similar to what John et al. (19) have described for apo-Ras
generation, in which treatment with 5 mM EDTA
followed by a high pressure liquid chromatography isolation step led to
the nucleotide- and metal ion-free GTPases while retaining >90% of
the GDP binding activities. We found that the Rho proteins, Cdc42,
RhoA, and Rac1, after repeated treatments by a 60-min centrifugation through Centricon 10 cells following incubations with EDTA in buffer A
(50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 20 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT), were mostly devoid of bound guanine nucleotide.
The removal of bound nucleotide was verified by the measurement of
31P NMR spectra of the resulting protein products and by a
comparison of the UV absorption spectra of the treated GTPases with the
original protein samples. Even after 15,000 free induction decays,
little 31P signal was detectable for the EDTA-treated
GTPase samples at the phosphorus resonance frequency of 202 MHz,
whereas the untreated GTPases showed two resonances corresponding to
the
- and
-groups of the bound GDP (data not shown). Furthermore,
the UV absorption spectra of the treated proteins displayed a single
absorption maximum at 276.0 nm, compared with a 274.1-nm absorption
peak and a secondary maximum at 253.0 nm for the original Rho
GTPase-GDP complex (data not shown). The Mg2+ content was
estimated to be less than 0.01 mol/mol of the treated proteins,
assuming that the Mg2+-EDTA complex has a dissociation
constant of 1.7 µM at pH 7.6 (19). The proteins generated
in this manner were thus regarded as apo-GTPases and were employed in
the following nucleotide binding studies.
The nucleotide binding properties of the Rho family GTPases were first
examined by incubation of the apo-GTPases with [3H]GDP or
[35S]GTP
S at 25 °C in buffer B (50 mM
HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT), which is
free of Mg2+. The amounts of nucleotides bound to the
apo-GTPases were assessed after 60 min. Interestingly, we observed that
in the absence of Mg2+, both [3H]GDP and
[35S]GTP
S were able to bind to apo-Rac1 in a saturable
fashion with the molar stoichiometry of Rac1/nucleotide at ~1:0.95
(Fig. 1). A wide range of
Mg2+ concentrations in the incubation buffer did not affect
the equilibrium binding stoichiometry. Cdc42 and RhoA displayed similar
properties in binding to [3H]GDP or
[35S]GTP
S in the absence of Mg2+ (data not
shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Mg2+-independent guanine
nucleotide binding of Rac1. Apo-Rac1 (4.8 µM) was
incubated at 25 °C with 6.0 µM [3H]GDP
or [35S]GTP S in buffer B containing 50 mM
HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT
supplemented with various concentrations of MgCl2 ranging
from 0.5 µM to 2 mM. After 60 min, aliquots
were quantified for the Rac1-bound radioactive nucleotides by filter
binding. The results represent the means of duplicate
measurements.
|
|
To confirm the Mg2+-independent nucleotide binding property
of the Rho proteins, we carried out a different assay using the fluorescent GDP analog, mantGDP, as a ligand. Fig.
2A shows that the addition of
apo-Rac1 to mantGDP in buffer B led to a dose-dependent increase of fluorescence emission, indicating the formation of a
Rac1-mantGDP complex under the assay conditions. The mantGDP binding to
Rac1 was saturable in the absence of Mg2+ (Fig.
2B), and the presence of excess EDTA (~1 mM)
in the binding assay had no effect on the result (data not shown),
again suggesting that Mg2+ cofactor is not required for the
nucleotide binding to Rac1. This is in contrast to the previous
observations made for other members of Ras superfamily GTPases such as
Ras (19), Rab3A (20), Sec4p (21), and RalA (39), in which cases removal
of bound Mg2+ by EDTA treatment was found to completely
abolish their nucleotide binding capabilities. We conclude that the Rho
family GTPases behave differently from other Ras-related molecules in
this aspect.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Fluorescence measurements of guanine
nucleotide binding to Rac1. A, 50 nM
mantGDP was incubated with various concentrations of apo-Rac1 in buffer
B containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl,
and 1 mM DTT in the absence of Mg2+. After an
equilibrium was reached in 60 min, the fluorescence emission spectra
were taken with an excitation wavelength set at 360 nm and a 4-nm
emission resolution. B, fluorescence change of mantGDP
induced by Rac1 binding. The fluorescence intensity of 50 nM mantGDP at 440 nm was monitored with an excitation
wavelength at 360 nm at increasing concentrations of apo-Rac1. The
maximum fluorescence change was obtained with the addition of ~20
µM Rac1. Data were fitted into a nonlinear regression to
derive a Kd* value shown in Table I.
|
|
Guanine Nucleotide Binding and Dissociation Properties of Rho
GTPases--
To understand the role of Mg2+ in the guanine
nucleotide exchange and GTPase-activating reactions of the Rho
proteins, we first sought to obtain the binding affinities of GDP and
GTP
S to Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 in the absence or presence of
MgCl2. Fig. 3A
shows that the equilibrium binding isotherm of [3H]GDP to
Rac1 differed significantly from that of Ha-Ras at the similar
assay conditions with 50 nM small G-proteins and 10 mM Mg2+, yielding a dissociation constant
(Kd) of 0.65 µM ± 0.07 compared with
that of Ha-Ras at
10 nM by fitting the equilibrium binding data into a bimolecular binding model. The much tighter binding
of Ras to [3H]GDP does not allow us to accurately
determine the affinity under the assay conditions. Fig. 3, B
and C, illustrate the equilibrium binding experiments in
which 500 nM apo-Rac1 was incubated with increasing
concentrations of [3H]GDP or [35S]GTP
S
in the presence or absence of 10 mM Mg2+. The
derived Kd values of GDP and
GTP
S binding to Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA
are presented in Tables I and
II. These values ranged from 0.62 µM (Rac1), 0.59 µM (Cdc42), and 0.48 µM (RhoA) for GDP and 0.24 µM (Rac1),
0.17 µM (Cdc42), and 0.16 µM (RhoA) for
GTP
S in the presence of Mg2+ to 0.81 µM
(Rac1), 0.73 µM (Cdc42), and 0.65 µM (RhoA)
for GDP and 0.77 µM (Rac1), 0.57 µM
(Cdc42), and 0.51 µM (RhoA) for GTP
S in the absence of
Mg2+. When the data of mantGDP binding to Rac1 collected by
monitoring the Rac1-induced fluorescence change of mantGDP in buffer B
were fitted into an equilibrium binding equation (Fig. 2B),
an apparent binding constant (Kd*) value of
0.24 ± 0.04 µM was obtained. Similar titration of
apo-Cdc42 and apo-RhoA to mantGDP yielded Kd* values
of 0.22 ± 0.06 µM and 0.11 ± 0.03 µM, respectively. The Kd* values
determined by the fluorescence measurement are consistently 4-6-fold
lower than the Kd values obtained by the
radionucleotide binding method, reflecting the difference between the
fluorescent GDP analog (mantGDP) and GDP as previously suggested (47,
48). Overall, Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 displayed a 2-4-fold higher
affinity for GTP
S than for GDP, and the apparent binding constants
are in the submicromolar concentration range as compared with the
subnanomalor concentration for Ras (40). It is remarkable that in the
absence of Mg2+ cofactor, the Rho proteins were still
capable of binding to GDP or GTP
S with equilibrium affinities
similar to those in the presence of Mg2+. These results
further indicate that Mg2+ is not required for the
nucleotide binding of Rho GTPases per se.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Determination of the equilibrium binding
affinity of guanine nucleotides to Rac1. A, the
equilibrium binding isotherm of Rac1 is compared with that of Ha-Ras.
50 nM apo-Rac1 or apo-Ras was incubated with increasing
concentrations of [3H]GDP in buffer B containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT with 10 mM MgCl2. At the
6-h time point, duplicate 100-µl aliquots were removed from the
samples, and bound nucleotides were quantified by filter binding.
Similar reaction conditions were adopted in B and
C except that apo-Rac1 was at 200 nM, and
parallel reactions were carried out with or without the supplement of
10 mM MgCl2. Data were fitted into a
bimolecular binding equation to obtain the Kd values
shown in Tables I and II.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Summary of the GDP binding and dissociation properties of Rho family
GTPases
The dissociation constants were obtained by nonlinear regression
analysis of the binding of radiolabeled [3H]GDP to the apo
form of Rho proteins in the absence or presence of 10 mM
Mg2+ as shown for Rac1 in Fig. 3B
(Kd). The apo-Rho GTPases were incubated at 25 °C
with 0.2-10 µM [3H]GDP. At the 6-h time point,
duplicate 20-µl aliquots were removed from the samples, and bound
nucleotides were quantified as outlined under "Experimental
Procedures." To determine the koff (apparent
dissociation rate constant) values, 250 nM Rho proteins
preloaded with [3H]GDP were incubated at 25 °C in buffer B
or buffer B supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2 in the
presence of 500 µM GDP (as shown for Rac1 in Fig.
4B). At the designated times, duplicate 20-µl aliquots
were taken for the measurement of protein-bound radioactivity. The data
were best fitted into a single exponential equation to arrive at the
koff values.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Summary of the GTP S binding and dissociation properties of Rho
family GTPases
The equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) between
the indicated Rho GTPases and GTP S were determined by filter binding
assays using [35S]GTP S as the radiolabeled ligand as shown
for Rac1 in Fig. 3C. koff represents the
first-order [32S]GTP S dissociation rate constant as
determined for the case of Rac1 in Fig. 4C. Assay conditions
and data treatments were similar to those in Table I. Each value
represents the results of two separate experiments.
|
|
We next examined the effect of Mg2+ on the dissociation
rate of nucleotides from the Rho GTPases. Fig.
4A shows a Mg2+
concentration jump experiment in which the decrease of Mg2+
from 1 mM to less than 50 nM by the addition of
EDTA led to a drastic increase of [3H]GDP dissociation
rate, similar to the effect on Ha-Ras or Rab3A (19, 20). The apparent
dissociation rate constants of [3H]GDP and
[35S]GTP
S bound to the Rho proteins,
koff, were measured as shown in Fig. 4,
B and C, by the addition of excess GDP or GTP
S
in the exchange mixtures. We found that in the absence of
Mg2+, koff of GDP dissociation from
Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 were at 2.54, 1.40, and 8.74 min
1, respectively, whereas
koff of GTP
S dissociation from the GTPases were significantly slower at 0.08, 0.042, and 0.11 min
1, respectively (Tables I and II). The
apparent dissociation rates of mantGDP for Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 in the
absence of Mg2+ determined by using mantGDP
(koff*) were found to be ~3-fold slower than
the koff values determined by
[3H]GDP binding at 0.69 ± 0.20, 0.40 ± 0.12, and 2.52 ± 0.34, respectively, which again may be attributed to
the differences between mantGDP and GDP (47, 48). The presence of
Mg2+ resulted in a drastic decrease of
koff of GDP and, to a lesser extent, of GTP
S
(Fig. 4). In the presence of 10 mM Mg2+, the
off rate of [3H]GDP was reduced by 150-fold for Cdc42,
100-fold for RhoA, and 300-fold for Rac1, whereas the rates of
[35S]GTP
S dissociation were slowed by ~4-fold for
all three proteins (Tables I and II). Similarly, when a set of apparent
on-rate constants of the nucleotides (kon) were
derived from koff/Kd, significant inhibition by the presence of Mg2+ was also
evident (data not shown). When the nucleotide dissociation was examined
in the presence of various concentrations of MgCl2, it
became clear that the dissociation rate decreased with increasing concentrations of Mg2+. As shown in Fig.
5, the changes in the initial rates of
both GDP and GTP
S dissociation from Cdc42 underwent a major
transition at a concentration range of Mg2+ between 5 and
20 µM. From these data, we can arrive at apparent dissociation constants of 17 and 8 µM for
Mg2+ binding to the GDP- and the GTP
S-bound Cdc42,
respectively. These results establish that Mg2+ is an
important regulator of the kinetics of guanine nucleotide binding to
the Rho GTPases, functioning as a stabilizer for the bound nucleotides.
It is intriguing that the kinetics of nucleotide binding to the Rho
proteins appear to be orders of magnitude slower than that of Ras or
Rab (19, 20, 40), further suggesting mechanistic differences among the
small G-protein subfamilies.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Determination of the dissociation kinetics of
GDP and GTP S from Rac1. A,
Mg2+ jump experiment of Rac1. 500 nM apo-Rac1
was preloaded with [3H]GDP and incubated with buffer B
supplemented with 10 mM EDTA or 1 mM
Mg2+. At the indicated time, 10 mM EDTA was
added to the sample containing Mg2+ to lower the free
Mg2+ concentration to ~10 nM. B
and C, apo-Rac1 (250 nM) preloaded with either
[3H]GDP (B) or [35S]GTP S
(C) was incubated at 25 °C in buffer B or buffer B
supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2 in the presence
of 500 µM GDP (B) or GTP S (C).
At the designated times, duplicate 20-µl aliquots were removed from
each sample, and the Rac1-bound nucleotides were quantified by the
filter binding method. Data were fitted into a single exponential to
derive the apparent dissociation rate constants
koff shown in Tables I and II. Results are
representative of three independent experiments.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mg2+-dependent
nucleotide dissociation from Cdc42. The initial rates of
[3H]GDP or [35S]GTP S dissociation from
Cdc42 were determined in buffer B supplemented with various
concentrations of Mg2+. The difference between the initial
rates of the nucleotide dissociation in the absence of Mg2+
and in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+ was taken as
100%. The assay conditions were similar to those for Fig.
4.
|
|
Effect of Mg2+ on the GEF-catalyzed Guanine Nucleotide
Exchange of Rho GTPases--
Guanine nucleotide exchange reaction of
Ras is limited by the off rate of the bound GDP. The role of GEFs in
the nucleotide exchange reaction has been postulated, in the cases of
Ras and ARF, as to displace Mg2+ and thereby to allow GDP
dissociation and GTP binding to occur (25). The difference between the
nucleotide dissociation rates of the Rho GTPases in the presence and
absence of Mg2+ (Tables I and II) suggests that GEF for Rho
GTPases may also function by mediating the GDP dissociation step
through an effect on Mg2+ ion. To directly examine the
effect of Mg2+ on GEF action, we assayed the GEF activity
of the N-terminal fragment of Trio, a Rac-specific GEF, toward Rac1 at
increasing concentrations of Mg2+. Mg2+
inhibited the Trio-stimulated mantGDP dissociation at increasing concentrations (10 µM to 5 mM) (Fig.
6A), and the inhibitory effect was not due to the change of ionic strength brought by the increased Mg2+ concentrations in the assay mixture (data not shown).
A similar inhibitory effect by Mg2+ was also observed for
the Dbl-catalyzed GDP/GTP exchange on Cdc42 (data not shown). When the
initial rates of mantGDP dissociation from Rac1 with or without Trio
catalysis were analyzed as a function of Mg2+
concentration, it appeared that Trio had effectively caused a lower
shift of Mg2+ binding affinity to Rac1 from ~15 to ~150
µM (Fig. 6B). A detailed kinetic analysis of
the GEF reaction of the Trio-Rac1 interaction by treating the
nucleotide-bound Rac1 as substrate and Trio as enzyme revealed that in
the absence of Mg2+, the intrinsic mantGDP dissociation
rate was 4.7 × 10
3
s
1 with a Km value of
1.46 ± 0.60 µM and a kcat of
0.12 s
1. In the presence of 1 mM
Mg2+, on the other hand, the intrinsic mantGDP dissociation
rate was 3.0 × 10
4
s
1 with a Km of 24.5 ± 5.9 µM and a kcat of 0.094 s
1 (Fig. 6C). Mg2+
seems to affect only the Km parameter of Trio
catalysis without much effect on kcat. Taken
together, these results indicate that one role of GEF is to destabilize
bound GDP through the displacement of bound Mg2+ and that
Mg2+ is mostly involved in the regulation of the binding
interaction of GEF with Rho GTPase substrate.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of Mg2+ on the
Trio-catalyzed GEF reaction of Rac1. A, 0.5 µM Rac1-mantGDP was incubated in buffer B supplemented
with various concentrations of MgCl2 and 500 nM
Trio. At the indicated time point (arrow), 400 µM GTP was added to the mixture to initiate the exchange
reaction. B, the initial mantGDP dissociation rates from
Rac1 (V0) in the presence (filled
circles) or absence (open circles) of 500 nM Trio were analyzed as a function of Mg2+
concentrations. C, the kinetics of Trio-catalyzed mantGDP
dissociation of Rac1 in the presence or absence of 1.0 mM
MgCl2 were measured at increasing concentrations of
Rac1-mantGDP and a constant amount of GTP (400 µM).
Trio was at 200 nM (in the absence of Mg2+) or
500 nM (in the presence of Mg2+) concentration.
The data were fitted to a hyperbolic equation as described under
"Experimental Procedures" to derive a set of reaction kinetic
parameters.
|
|
A further examination of the GDP/GTP exchange reaction revealed that
both Dbl and Trio were able to stimulate GDP dissociation from their
respective substrates, Cdc42 and Rac1, in the absence of
Mg2+ (Fig. 7). Dbl was active
in stimulating the GDP dissociation from Cdc42 that was deprived of
bound Mg2+ and was undergoing a fast spontaneous nucleotide
exchange, but it suffered approximately 50% loss of the ability
compared with the extent of stimulation in the presence of
Mg2+ (Fig. 7A). Similarly, Trio displayed a
dose-dependent GEF activity toward Rac1 in the absence of
Mg2+ and in the presence of 10 mM EDTA (Fig.
7B). These results indicate that GEF also contributes to the
destabilization of Rho GTPase-bound nucleotide through a
Mg2+-independent mechanism in the exchange reaction.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Mg2+-dependent and
-independent nucleotide exchange catalyzed by Dbl or Trio1.
A, 2.0 µM apo-Cdc42 preloaded with
[3H]GDP was incubated with 500 µM GTP in
buffer B or buffer B supplemented with 10 mM
MgCl2 in the presence or absence of 20 nM Dbl
at 4 °C. The Cdc42-bound radionucleotides were quantified by filter
binding after a 5-min incubation. B, 0.5 µM
Rac1-mantGDP was incubated with buffer B supplemented with 10 mM Mg2+ only (trace 1),
or buffer B supplemented with 10 mM EDTA and 0 nM (trace 2), 50 nM
(trace 3), 200 nM (trace
4), or 500 nM (trace 5)
Trio. At the indicated time (arrow), 400 µM
GTP was added to initiate the respective GEF reactions. The mantGDP
fluorescence was monitored as in Fig. 2.
|
|
Effect of Mg2+ on the Intrinsic and GAP-catalyzed
GTPase Activities of Rho GTPases--
The intrinsic GTPase activity of
the Rho proteins was measured by monitoring
Pi release
from the respective GTPases incubated with an excess amount of free
GTP. In the absence of Mg2+, GTP hydrolysis by the Rho
GTPases still occurred, albeit at a very slow rate of 0.002 min
1 (Fig. 8),
approximately 10-fold slower than that in the presence of
Mg2+ (31, 32). The addition of excess EDTA (~1
mM) to the reaction mixture that ensured the free
Mg2+ concentration was less than 10 nM did not
alter this rate (data not shown). Replenishing MgCl2 in the
reaction mixture to 5 mM caused an increase in
Pi release by over 5-fold (Fig. 8), indicating that
although Mg2+ is not essential for the intrinsic GTPase
activity of the Rho proteins, the divalent ion is involved in
maintaining a basal GTPase activity of the Rho proteins at the
physiological concentration.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Mg2+ participates in the
intrinsic GTP hydrolysis reaction of Rho proteins. The
Pi release from GTP-bound Cdc42, RhoA, or Rac1 (10 µM) was measured at the 5-min time point at 25 °C by
using the MESG/phosphorylase system in the presence or absence of 5 mM MgCl2.
|
|
To examine the effect of Mg2+ on the GAP-catalyzed GTP
hydrolysis by the Rho GTPases, p50RhoGAP was included in the GTPase
reaction mixtures in the presence or absence of 5 mM
MgCl2. In the absence of Mg2+, RhoGAP remained
capable of stimulating GTP hydrolysis of Rac1 as detected by monitoring
the real time Pi release (Fig.
9A). The absence of
Mg2+ led Rac1 to undergo a multiple turnover reaction,
whereas the presence of Mg2+ resulted in single turnover
GTP hydrolysis. Fig. 9B shows an example of the
initial rates of
Pi release from Rac1 analyzed as a
function of the concentration of the small GTPase when a catalytic
amount of RhoGAP (20 nM) was present. Treatment of the data
with a modified Michaelis-Menten equation yielded a set of kinetic
parameters that are indicative of the enzymatic efficiency of the GAP
reaction. As summarized in Table III, the
presence of Mg2+ cofactor significantly enhanced the
catalytic capability of RhoGAP toward all three Rho GTPases, whereas
the reaction Km values remained constant and were
similar at ~3 µM for Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA with or
without 5 mM Mg2+ in the reaction buffer.
Remarkably, the superior catalytic efficiency of p50RhoGAP toward Cdc42
diminished completely in the absence of Mg2+ as indicated
by a ~40-fold decrease in kcat and
kcat/Km values (Table III,
Fig. 9C), suggesting that p50RhoGAP utilizes the
Mg2+ cofactor to elicit catalytic specificity for Cdc42. We
conclude that Mg2+ is not absolutely required for RhoGAP
action but is important for the optimal GAP catalytic efficiency and
specificity.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of Mg2+ on the
p50RhoGAP-catalyzed GTPase reaction of Rho proteins. A,
the GTP hydrolysis activity of Rac1 under the catalysis of 20 nM RhoGAP in the absence (dashed
lines) or presence (solid lines) of 5 mM Mg2+ was measured with 1 or 5 µM Rac1-GTP. The real time absorption values at 360 nM reported by the MESG/phosphorylase coupling reaction
reflect the amount of Pi released by Rac1. B,
the initial rates of GTP hydrolysis by Rac1 under RhoGAP (20 nM) catalysis are shown as a function of Rac1 concentration
in the absence or presence of 5 mM MgCl2. Data
were fitted into a modified Michaelis-Menten equation to yield the
Km and Vmax values of the
respective reactions. Results in this figure and those
determined for Cdc42 and RhoA are summarized in Table III.
C, the catalytic efficiencies
(kcat/Km) of RhoGAP action on
Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 are compared under the reaction conditions in the
presence or absence of 5 mM Mg2+.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Effects of Mg2+ on the RhoGAP-regulated kinetics of Rho family
GTPases
The results of GAP assays as shown in Fig. 9 were analyzed by fitting
data into a modified Michaelis-Menten equation (see "Experimental
Procedures"), which yielded the Km and
Vmax values. kcat was derived by
Vmax/[GAP]0, with [GAP]0
representing the total GAP concentration (20 nM) in the
reaction. The initial rates of the p50RhoGAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis
by each Rho GTPase were obtained by the MESG/phosphorylase method. The
apo form of the Rho GTPases was used in the respective assays at
25 °C in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM MESG, 10 units/ml purine
nucleotide phosphorylase, 200 µM GTP, and 20 nM p50RhoGAP, with or without the supplement of 5 mM MgCl2. Results are representative of at least
two independent measurements.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Mg2+ is an essential cofactor for small G-protein
functions. To date, the effect of Mg2+ on the interaction
of members of Rho family GTPases with guanine nucleotides has not been
characterized. Moreover, it remains unclear what role Mg2+
plays in the regulatory reactions of these small GTPases. In the
present study, we have prepared the metal ion- and nucleotide-free forms of Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 (apoproteins) and quantitatively analyzed the Mg2+ effect on the intrinsic guanine
nucleotide binding and GTP hydrolysis processes of the
GTPases and on the GEF- and GAP-catalyzed reactions. Our
results demonstrate that, unique to the Rho family proteins, Mg2+ cofactor is not required for the high affinity
nucleotide binding per se; rather, it acts as an effective
gatekeeper to regulate the nucleotide binding kinetics. In the guanine
nucleotide exchange reaction, RhoGEF plays dual roles in stimulating
GDP dissociation, to displace bound Mg2+ and to destabilize
bound nucleotide, whereas in the GTPase-activating reaction, RhoGAP
depends upon the Mg2+ to elicit high catalytic efficiency
and specificity.
The basic structure of the nucleotide binding core of the Rho family
GTPases is similar to that of other Ras-like proteins (17, 25): the
switch I loop provides an essential serine or threonine residue
(Thr35 in Ras, Rac1, and Cdc42 and Thr37 in
RhoA) ligated to the Mg2+ ion. The loop region of switch II
contains a conserved aspartic acid residue (Asp57 in Ras,
Rac1, and Cdc42 and Asp59 in RhoA) that serves as a
water-mediated Mg2+ ligand. The P-loop preceding the first
-helix wraps around the
- and
-phosphates of the nucleotide
with a lysine residue (Lys16) and a set of main chain
amides, and in addition, offers a conserved serine or threonine
(Ser17 in Ras, Thr17 in Rac1 and Cdc42) to
coordinate the Mg2+ ion. Even with these shared features,
it is becoming clear that substantial differences exist in the
nucleotide binding properties among the Ras-like small G-proteins.
Previous studies have reported that the nucleotide binding affinities
of Ras, Rab3A, RalA, and Sec4 ranged from 10 pM to 70 nM, and the binding preference for GTP over GDP ranged from
less than 1-fold to over 20-fold (19-22, 40). The role of
Mg2+ in these cases has been proposed as GDP dissociation
inhibition (41), and the divalent ion is invariably required for the
high affinity nucleotide binding. Our findings of the Rho proteins in
the current study provide evidence that the nucleotide affinities of
this subfamily of small G-proteins are at the submicromolar concentration (0.1-0.6 µM) and that the presence or
absence of Mg2+ does not significantly affect their
nucleotide binding affinities. The relatively weaker affinity of Rho
proteins to the nucleotides may be attributed to the unique dynamics of
the switch I and switch II regions of the Rho family, which seem to
adopt a more flexible conformation than Ras (26-29). In addition, a
subtle difference in the residues surrounding the nucleotide binding
core may also affect the bonding strength of the residues directly in
contact with the nucleotide. The later finding that
Mg2+ is not essential for the nucleotide binding
per se is somewhat surprising, since the Mg2+
coordination in RhoA-GTP
S appears to be identical to that of Ras
(27), and the Mg2+-chelating residues of RhoA-GDP also
differ only lightly from the Ras-GDP complex (26). Mg2+
maintains a potent GDP dissociation-inhibitory activity toward the Rho
GTPases by stabilizing both the GDP- and GTP-bound states, but it
appears equally effective in inhibiting both the nucleotide dissociation and association processes so that the dissociation binding
constant remains mostly unaltered. This property seems to be unique to
the Rho family members.
In vivo, the release of GDP from Rho proteins would be
inhibited by intracellular free Mg2+. In order to
facilitate GDP/GTP exchange, a GEF must overcome the inhibitory
restraints imposed by the millimolar free Mg2+ through
transient disruption of the Mg2+ coordination to promote
GDP dissociation. Such a mechanism is consistent with our observation
that the efficiency of the RhoGEF-catalyzed GDP-dissociation
reaction is in part dependent on Mg2+ concentration. GEF
binding to the Rho proteins led to an over 10-fold lowered affinity of
the complex to Mg2+, which may result in a significant
increase of the nucleotide on and off rate and/or a weakened nucleotide
binding affinity. Further supported by the kinetic data of the GEF
reaction (i.e. Mg2+ affects only the
Km parameter of the catalysis without a detectable
effect on kcat), it seems likely that
displacement of bound Mg2+ is one of the major roles of the
GEF in mediating the destabilization of bound nucleotide and that the
Mg2+ binding state of the Rho proteins has a significant
impact on the binding interaction of GEF with the Rho GTPase substrate. The mechanisms proposed for the GEF functions on Ras and ARF (22-24) appear similar in this aspect. For example, in the crystal structures of Ras-Sos and ARF-Gea2p complex, the catalytic domains of Sos and
Gea2p insert a leucine (Leu938) and a glutamine
(Glu97) into the Mg2+ binding sites of Ras and
ARF, respectively, to occupy the Mg2+ coordinates (22, 23).
Although the recently available three-dimensional structures of the
catalytic Dbl homology domain of RhoGEFs still do not provide
sufficient information on how the Dbl homology domain would interact
with the Rho substrates (42-44), our biochemical evidence strongly
points to the involvement of similar surface residue(s) of the Dbl
homology domain like that of Leu938 in Sos or
Glu97 in Gea2p in the RhoGEF action. While this manuscript
was under revision, Shimizu et al. (49) reported the crystal
structure of a Mg2+-free form of RhoA-GDP. Elimination of
the Mg2+ cofactor induced significant conformational
changes in the switch I region of RhoA by opening up the nucleotide
binding site, similar to what has been observed in the switch I region
of Ha-Ras in complex with Sos. This structure is consistent with the
current finding that RhoGEFs may serve to loosen the bound
Mg2+ to produce an open conformation in the exchange reactions.
We show that both Trio and Dbl were able to further stimulate GDP
dissociation from their substrates in the absence of Mg2+,
suggesting that the displacement of bound Mg2+ is only part
of the effect imposed on Rho GTPases by GEFs. It is likely that RhoGEFs
contain dual biochemical activities in the GEF reaction: on one hand
disrupting bound Mg2+ to enhance the GDP dissociation rate,
and on the other hand loosening the bonding of the bound GDP to the
nucleotide binding core of the GTPases.
The role of Mg2+ in the GTP hydrolysis of Rho GTPase is
thought to stabilize the switch I effector loop at Tyr34,
which in turn positions the Mg2+ and
-phosphate
optimally for hydrolytic attack (45). We have shown here that
the intrinsic and the GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis of Rho GTPases does
occur in the absence of bound Mg2+, albeit at much slower
rates. This result indicates that the Mg2+ cofactor is not
absolutely required for GTPase activity of the Rho proteins, which
deviates from the cases reported for Ras and Rab3A (19, 20). However,
the reaction kinetics of the GTPase and GTPase-activating reactions
were immensely affected by the presence of Mg2+. In
particular, the presence of Mg2+ led to a significant
increase in the catalytic potency of the GTPases as reflected by the
enhancement of kcat values, whereas the
Km values of GAP reactions that are closely
correlated with the binding affinity to the active Rho GTPases remained
unchanged. Furthermore, the specificity of p50RhoGAP toward Cdc42 was
solely dependent on the Mg2+ cofactor. These biochemical
data demonstrate that Mg2+ is intimately involved in the
intrinsic as well as the GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis reactions and may
act as the major factor dictating the GAP specificity. By a
dissociative transition state model for GTP-hydrolysis (46), the
chemical nature of the observed Mg2+ effect on the GTPase
and GAP reactions can be interpreted as stabilization of charge buildup
on the
-phosphoryl oxygen or increasing in negative charge on the
nonbridging
-phosphoryl oxygens in the transition state, which
allows electrostatic interactions to be catalytic.
In summary, our studies directly demonstrate a role of Mg2+
in regulating the kinetics of guanine nucleotide binding and GTP hydrolysis of Rho family GTPases. The observations that GEF facilitates GDP/GTP exchange by acting to displace bound Mg2+ and to
destabilize bound nucleotide and that RhoGAP utilizes the
Mg2+ cofactor to elicit catalytic efficiency and
specificity in GTP-hydrolysis provide important insight into the GEF
and GAP reaction mechanisms of the Rho proteins.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Weiping Shao for help
with NMR measurements, Dr. Michel Streuli for the Trio cDNA, and
Dr. Kejin Zhu and Yuan Gao for providing the GST-Dbl and Trio proteins.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM 60523, American Cancer Society Grant RPG-97-146, and National Science Foundation of China Grant 39825503.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 901-448-5138;
Fax: 901-448-7360; E-mail: yzheng@utmem.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 7, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001027200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GEF, guanine
nucleotide exchange factor;
GAP, GTPase-activating protein;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
mantGDP, 2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)GDP;
MESG, 2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine ribonucleoside;
GTP
S, guanosine
5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate;
ARF, ADP-ribosylation factor;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
GMP-PNP,
,
-imidoguanosine
5'-triphosphate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Symons, M.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
178-181
|
| 2.
|
Hall, A.
(1998)
Science
279,
509-513
|
| 3.
|
Van Aelst, L.,
and D'Souza-Schorey, C.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2295-3011
|
| 4.
|
Chant, J.,
and Stowers, L.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1-4
|
| 5.
|
Stowers, L.,
Yelon, D.,
Berg, L. J.,
and Chant, J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5027-5031
|
| 6.
|
Murphy, A. M.,
and Montell, D. J.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
617-630
|
| 7.
|
Adam, T.,
Giry, M.,
Boquet, P.,
and Sansonetti, P.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3315-3321
|
| 8.
|
Lamaze, C.,
Chuang, T. H.,
Terlecky, L. J.,
Bokoch, G. M.,
and Schimid, S. L.
(1996)
Nature
382,
177-179
|
| 9.
|
Bokoch, G. M.
(1995)
Trends Cell Biol.
5,
109-113
|
| 10.
|
Westwick, J. K.,
Lambert, Q. T.,
Clark, G. J.,
Symons, M.,
Van Aelst, L.,
Pestell, R. G.,
and Der, C. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1324-1335
|
| 11.
|
Kuroda, S.,
Fukata, M.,
Nakagawa, M.,
Fujii, K.,
Nakamura, T.,
Ookubo, T.,
Izawa, I.,
Nagase, T.,
Nomura, N.,
Tani, H.,
Shoji, I.,
Matsuura, Y.,
Yonehara, S.,
and Kaibuchi, K.
(1998)
Science
281,
832-835
|
| 12.
|
Ren, X. D.,
Kiosses, W. B.,
and Schwartz, M. A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
578-585
|
| 13.
|
Keely, P.,
Parise, L.,
and Juliano, R.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
101-106
|
| 14.
|
Boguski, M. S.,
and McCormick, F.
(1993)
Nature
366,
643-654
|
| 15.
|
Lamarche, N.,
and Hall, A.
(1994)
Trends Genet.
10,
436-440
|
| 16.
|
Cerione, R. A.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
216-222
|
| 17.
|
Sprang, S. R.,
and Coleman, D. E.
(1998)
Cell
95,
155-158
|
| 18.
|
Feuerstein, J.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Wittinghofer, A.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
8455-8458
|
| 19.
|
John, J.,
Rensland, H.,
Schlichting, I.,
Vetter, I.,
Borasio, G. D.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Wittinghofer, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
923-929
|
| 20.
|
Burstein, E. S.,
and Macara, I. G.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
282,
387-392
|
| 21.
|
Kabcenell, A. K.,
Goud, B.,
Northup, J. K.,
and Novick, P. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
9366-9372
|
| 22.
|
Boriack-Sjodin, P. A.,
Margarit, S. M.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1998)
Nature
394,
337-343
|
| 23.
|
Goldberg, J.
(1999)
Cell
95,
237-248
|
| 24.
|
Beraud-Dufour, S.,
Robineau, S.,
Chardin, P.,
Paris, S.,
Chabre, M.,
Cherfils, J.,
and Antonny, B.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3651-3659
|
| 25.
|
Cherfils, J.,
and Chardin, P.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
306-311
|
| 26.
|
Wei, Y.,
Zhang, Y.,
Derewenda, U.,
Liu, X.,
Minor, W.,
Nakamoto, R. K.,
Somlyo, A. V.,
Somlyo, A. P.,
and Derewenda, Z. S.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
699-703
|
| 27.
|
Ihara, K.,
Muraguchi, S.,
Kato, M.,
Shimizu, T.,
Shirakawa, M.,
Kuroda, S.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
and Hakoshima, T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9656-9666
|
| 28.
|
Feltham, J. L.,
Dotsch, V.,
Raza, S.,
Manor, D.,
Cerione, R. A.,
Sutcliffe, M. J.,
Wagner, G.,
and Oswald, R. E.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
8755-8766
|
| 29.
|
Hirshberg, M.,
Stockley, R. W.,
Dodson, G.,
and Webb, M. R.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
147-152
|
| 30.
|
Bourne, H. R.
(1997)
Nature
389,
673-674
|
| 31.
|
Zhang, B.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25728-25733
|
| 32.
|
Zhang, B.,
Zhang, Y.,
Collins, C. C.,
Johnson, D. I.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2609-2612
|
| 33.
|
Zhang, B.,
Wang, Z.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21999-22008
|
| 34.
|
Zheng, Y.,
Hart, M.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
256,
77-84
|
| 35.
|
Geyer, M.,
Schweins, T.,
Herrmann, C.,
Prisner, T.,
Wittinghofer, A.,
and Kalbitzer, H. R.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
10308-10320
|
| 36.
|
Li, R.,
Zhang, B.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32830-32835
|
| 37.
|
Zhang, B.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
5249-5257
|
| 38.
|
Zhang, B.,
Chernoff, J.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8776-8782
|
| 39.
|
Frech, M.,
Schlichting, I.,
Wittinghofer, A.,
and Chardin, P.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
6353-6359
|
| 40.
|
John, J.,
Sohmen, R.,
Feuerstein, J.,
Linke, R.,
Wittinghofer, A.,
and Goody, R.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
6058-6065
|
| 41.
|
Pan, J. Y.,
Sanford, J. C.,
and Wessling-Resnick, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1322-1328
|
| 42.
|
Soisson, S. M.,
Nimnual, A. S.,
Uy, M.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1998)
Cell
95,
259-268
|
| 43.
|
Liu, X.,
Wang, H.,
Eberstadt, M.,
Schnuchel, A.,
Olejniczak, E. T.,
Meadows, R. P.,
Schkeryantz, J. M.,
Janowick, D. A.,
Harlan, J. E.,
Harris, E. A. S.,
Staunton, D. E.,
and Fesik, S. W.
(1998)
Cell
95,
269-277
|
| 44.
|
Aghazadeh, B.,
Zhu, K.,
Kubiseski, T. J.,
Liu, G. A.,
Pawson, T.,
Zheng, Y.,
and Rosen, M. K.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
12,
1098-1107
|
| 45.
|
Rittinger, K.,
Walker, P. A.,
Eccleston, J. F.,
Smerdon, S. J.,
and Gamblin, S. J.
(1997)
Nature
389,
758-762
|
| 46.
|
Maegley, K. A.,
Admiraal, S. J.,
and Herschlag, D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8160-8166
|
| 47.
|
Leonard, D. A.,
Evans, T.,
Hart, M.,
Cerione, R. A.,
and Manor, D.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12323-12328
|
| 48.
|
Rudolph, M. G.,
Bayer, P.,
Abo, A.,
Kuhlmann, J.,
Vetter, I. R.,
and Wittinghofer, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18067-18076
|
| 49.
|
Shimizu, T.,
Ihara, K.,
Maesaki, R.,
Kuroda, S.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
and Hakoshima, T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18311-18317
|
C