JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001027200 on June 7, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 33, 25299-25307, August 18, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/33/25299    most recent
M001027200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Role of Mg2+ Cofactor in the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange and GTP Hydrolysis Reactions of Rho Family GTP-binding Proteins*

Baolin Zhang, Yaqin Zhang, Zhi-xin WangDagger , and Yi Zheng§

From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38163 and Dagger  Institute of Biophysics, Academic Sinica, Beijing 100101, China

Received for publication, February 8, 2000, and in revised form, April 3, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The biological activities of Rho family GTPases are controlled by their guanine nucleotide binding states in cells. Here we have investigated the role of Mg2+ cofactor in the guanine nucleotide binding and hydrolysis processes of the Rho family members, Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA. Differing from Ras and Rab proteins, which require Mg2+ for GDP and GTP binding, the Rho GTPases bind the nucleotides in the presence or absence of Mg2+ similarly, with dissociation constants in the submicromolar concentration. The presence of Mg2+, however, resulted in a marked decrease in the intrinsic dissociation rates of the nucleotides. The catalytic activity of the guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) appeared to be negatively regulated by free Mg2+, and GEF binding to Rho GTPase resulted in a 10-fold decrease in affinity for Mg2+, suggesting that one role of GEF is to displace bound Mg2+ from the Rho proteins. The GDP dissociation rates of the GTPases could be further stimulated by GEF upon removal of bound Mg2+, indicating that the GEF-catalyzed nucleotide exchange involves a Mg2+-independent as well as a Mg2+-dependent mechanism. Although Mg2+ is not absolutely required for GTP hydrolysis by the Rho GTPases, the divalent ion apparently participates in the GTPase reaction, since the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rates were enhanced 4-10-fold upon binding to Mg2+, and kcat values of the Rho GTPase-activating protein (RhoGAP)-catalyzed reactions were significantly increased when Mg2+ was present. Furthermore, the p50RhoGAP specificity for Cdc42 was lost in the absence of Mg2+ cofactor. These studies directly demonstrate a role of Mg2+ in regulating the kinetics of nucleotide binding and hydrolysis and in the GEF- and GAP-catalyzed reactions of Rho family GTPases. The results suggest that GEF facilitates nucleotide exchange by destabilizing both bound nucleotide and Mg2+, whereas RhoGAP utilizes the Mg2+ cofactor to achieve high catalytic efficiency and specificity.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Rho family GTP-binding proteins Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA belong to the Ras superfamily and are important regulators of diverse cell functions (1-3). These small GTPases have been implicated in cellular processes including cell polarization (4, 5) and morphogenic changes (6), endocytosis and exocytosis (7, 8), neutrophil NADPH oxidase activation (9), oncogenic transformation (10), cell to cell and cell to extracellular matrix adhesion (11, 12), and cell movement (13). A well established biochemical model depicts them as molecular switches linking extracellular stimuli to the intracellular signaling pathways by cycling between the inactive, GDP-bound state and the active, GTP-bound state (14). The GTP binding/GTP hydrolysis cycle of these GTPases serves to turn on and turn off the incoming signals and appears to be under tight regulation by multiple regulatory proteins, among which the guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs)1 and the GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) are responsible for the activation and the deactivation of the Rho GTPases, respectively (15, 16).

Mg2+ has been established as an essential cofactor for GTP-binding protein functions (17). For many Ras superfamily small GTPases, Mg2+ has been shown to be necessary for both guanine nucleotide binding and GTP-hydrolysis. In the presence of Mg2+, Ras exhibits an extremely high binding affinity to the guanine nucleotides with a dissociation constant on the order of subnanomolar concentration (18, 19, 40). In the cases of Rab3A and related Sec4 GTPases, removal of Mg2+ by EDTA treatment drastically increases the off rate of bound nucleotides and completely abolishes GTPgamma S binding capability (20, 21). The intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras and Rab3A became undetectable when Mg2+ cofactor was removed (19, 20), indicating that the bivalent ion is absolutely required for GTP hydrolysis in the respective GTPase reactions. In the guanine nucleotide exchange reactions of Ras and ARF, the specific GEFs Sos and ARNO appear to promote the dissociation of GDP in part through destabilizing bound Mg2+ from the respective GTPases (22-24). The role of the GEFs in these cases was proposed to stimulate GDP dissociation and to facilitate the formation of a reaction transition state in which the GEFs are tightly bound to the nucleotide-depleted form of the small GTPases (25).

The three-dimensional structures of the Rho family GTPases, RhoA, Cdc42, and Rac1, in complex with Mg2+ and guanine nucleotides have been resolved recently (26-29). Not unlike other small GTP-binding proteins, they utilize the conserved residues in the guanine nucleotide binding core to chelate GDP or GTP, but distinct switch I and switch II residues in the surrounding area of the chelating center are also involved in maintaining the overall conformation. The critical Mg2+-interacting sites appear similar to that of Ras with some unique distinctions. For example, the coordination of Mg2+ in RhoA-GTPgamma S was found to be identical to that in Ras bound to GMP-PNP (27), whereas Rho-GDP seems to employ three water molecules in contrast to four in Ras and an additional hydroxyl of Thr19, carbonyl oxygen of Thr37, and the beta -phosphorus oxygen for Mg2+ coordination (26), due to the conformational differences in the switch I domain. In the Rac1-GMP-PNP structure, residues in the switch I region are disordered (29), suggesting that the nucleotide binding core of Rac1 may adopt a more flexible conformation. The regulatory molecules of Rho GTPases such as RhoGEFs and RhoGAPs, on the other hand, are structurally divergent from other Ras regulator families (14). Although certain key features of action may appear similar (e.g. a conserved arginine residue of RhoGAP is critical for its catalytic function like that in RasGAP (30)), the uniqueness of these regulatory proteins suggests that distinct features for the GTPase-activating and guanine nucleotide exchange reactions are probably involved in the deactivation and activation processes, respectively, for the Rho GTPases.

The biochemical properties of guanine nucleotide binding by the Rho family GTPases have not been investigated in detail. Moreover, much remains unknown about the role of Mg2+ in the regulatory interactions of the Rho proteins with their unique sets of GEFs and GAPs. In this study, we provide the first quantitative analysis of the kinetic and equilibrium nucleotide binding properties of three Rho GTPases, Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA. Our results reveal that both the nucleotide binding kinetics and binding affinity of Rho GTPases differ significantly from that of other subfamily members of the Ras superfamily. The Mg2+ cofactor does not affect the nucleotide binding affinity of the Rho proteins per se; rather, it acts solely as a stabilizer for the bound nucleotides by slowing down the off and on rates. We found that RhoGEF plays dual roles in the Rho GTPase activation reaction via a Mg2+-dependent as well as a Mg2+-independent mechanism and that although Mg2+ is not absolutely required for the intrinsic and GAP-stimulated GTP-hydrolysis, it is directly involved in the regulation of the basal GTPase and the GTPase-activating activities. Finally, our studies provide evidence that RhoGEF facilitates guanine nucleotide exchange by destabilizing both bound nucleotide and Mg2+, whereas RhoGAP utilizes the Mg2+ cofactor to achieve high catalytic efficiency and specificity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- The radioactive nucleotides [3H]GDP, [gamma -32P]GTP, and [35S]GTPgamma S were obtained from NEN Life Science Products. GDP, GTP, and GTPgamma S were purchased from Sigma. mantGDP and 2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine ribonucleoside (MESG) were synthesized as described previously (31). All chemicals were of the highest quality available, and the water used for buffer preparations was generated by the Milli-Q Academic purification system (Millipore Corp.) with a conductivity resistance of 18.2 megaohms/cm. In order to focus on the G-protein binding core without the complications brought by the flexible carboxyl-terminal ends, recombinant human Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA proteins containing carboxyl-terminal truncation of seven, eight, and eight residues, respectively, were used in the studies as described previously (31, 32). The Rho family proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli as amino-terminal His6-tagged fusions by using the pET expression system (Novagen). The GAP domain of p50RhoGAP (also known as Cdc42GAP) contains amino acids 205-439 and was expressed in E. coli as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion using the pGEX-KG vector (33). The GST-Dbl protein and GST-Ha-Ras were generated in a baculovirus system or in E. coli as described previously (34). The Trio N-terminal fragment contains residues 1225-1537, including the intact Dbl homology and Pleckstrin homology domains, and was expressed as a His6-tagged fusion protein in DE3 strain cells. The N-terminal tagged proteins were purified by glutathione or Ni2+-agarose affinity chromatography, and the final purity of all proteins used in the assays was >90% as judged by Coomassie Blue staining of SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In general, the proteins stored in 30% glycerol at -20 °C are stable for up to 2 weeks without activity loss. The protein concentrations were determined by using the BCA assay kit (Pierce), and the effective concentrations of GTPases were measured by using the MESG/phosphorylase system assaying the amount of gamma Pi release after one round of single turnover GTP hydrolysis reaction as described (33).

Preparation of Metal Ion- and Nucleotide-free Apo-GTPases-- To remove Mg2+ and nucleotide bound to the Rho GTPases, the purified protein samples (~100 µM) in buffer A containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, and 20 mM EDTA were incubated for 20 min at 25 °C, followed by centrifugation in a Centricon 10 concentrator (Amicon) at 4000 × g for 1 h. This typically results in over 10-fold enrichment of the proteins. The treatments of the samples with buffer A and Centricon 10 were repeated three more times, and the samples were subsequently exchanged into buffer B containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT at ~400 µM concentration. To examine the content of the nucleotide remaining in the protein samples, an aliquot (0.5 ml) of the sample was prepared in a D2O buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 mM DTT at 1 mM concentration, and the phosphorous contents were determined by 31P NMR measurement as described by Geyer et al. (35) on a Varian INOVA 600-MHz spectrometer. The 31P spectra were recorded at 5 °C at a phosphorus resonance frequency of 202 MHz and were referenced to external 85% H3PO4. Over 15,000 free induction decays were summed after excitation with a 65° pulse using a repetition time of 3 s. In addition, the UV absorption spectra of the EDTA-treated samples were measured at wavelengths between 240 and 300 nm and were compared with that of untreated GTPase samples.

Guanine Nucleotide Binding Assay-- To determine the nucleotide binding affinities to Rho GTPases, [3H]GDP or [35S]GTPgamma S at a specific activity of 6000 cpm/µM was incubated with the respective apo-GTPases at 25 °C for 6 h in buffer B containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT with or without supplement of MgCl2 to the indicated concentrations. The binding reactions were stopped by filtration of the mixtures through nitrocellulose filters, and the radionucleotides remaining bound to the Rho GTPases were quantified by scintillation counting (36). The dissociation binding constants (Kd) of the nucleotide-G protein complex were derived by best fitting the data into a bimolecular binding model.

To measure the dissociation rate of guanine nucleotides from Rho GTPases, the apo-GTPases (250 nM) were first complexed with [3H]GDP or [35S]GTPgamma S in buffer B with or without the supplement of 10 mM MgCl2. After a binding equilibrium was reached (~60 min), the dissociation reactions were initiated by the addition of 500 µM GDP or GTPgamma S to the incubation mixtures. At the indicated time intervals, aliquots of the mixtures were withdrawn, and the remaining G-protein-bound radionucleotides were quantified by nitrocellulose filtration. The data were fitted into a single exponential equation to arrive at an apparent dissociation rate constant, koff.

Fluorescence Measurements-- The fluorescence measurements were carried out using an SLM-Aminco Series 2 Luminescence Spectrometer (31). To monitor the mantGDP fluorescence, the excitation wavelength was set at 360 nm and the emission wavelength at 440 nm. All measurements were performed at 25 °C in buffer B with or without the supplement of the indicated amount of MgCl2.

GTPase Activity Assay-- GTP-hydrolysis by the Rho GTPases were measured by the MESG/phosphorylase system, which monitors free gamma Pi release from the bound GTP as described previously (33). Briefly, a 0.8-ml solution containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.2 mM MESG, 10 units of purine nucleoside phosphorylase, 200 µM GTP, and the indicated amount of Rho proteins was mixed in a 4-mm width, 10-mm path length cuvette. The time courses of absorbance change at 360 nm resulting from the Pi-phosphorylase coupling reaction were recorded on an Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Ultraspec III spectrometer. In the cases of GAP-catalyzed reactions, an indicated catalytic amount of p50RhoGAP was included in the reaction buffer. Kinetic data were analyzed by nonlinear regression using equations derived for Cdc42-, Rac1-, and RhoA-GAP interactions (33, 37, 38) with the program Enzfitter (Elsevier Biosoft). A modified Michaelis-Menten equation was used to derive kinetic parameters for GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis assuming GAP acting as the enzyme catalyst, GTPase-GTP as the substrate, and the GDP-bound GTPase and Pi as the products as described previously (33).

Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Assay-- The [3H]GDP/GTP exchange of Cdc42 was measured at 25 or 4 °C as described previously (36). The exchange reactions were carried out in buffer B with or without the supplement of 5 mM MgCl2 in the presence or absence of 20 nM purified GST-Dbl. The reactions were terminated at the 5-min time point by nitrocellulose filtration, and the amounts of [3H]GDP remaining bound to Cdc42 were normalized as the percentage of [3H]GDP bound at time 0. For the measurement of the Rac1 exchange reaction, fluorescence emissions at 440 nm of the mantGDP-bound Rac1 were monitored in buffer B with time at various Mg2+ concentrations in the presence or absence of the indicated amount of Trio. The reactions were initiated by the addition of excess free GTP (400 µM) into the reaction mixture. To extract kinetics parameters of the Trio-catalyzed exchange, the initial reaction rates (V0) were determined at increasing concentrations of Rac1-mantGDP in the presence or absence of Mg2+. The resulting hyperbolic curves were best fitted into a modified Michaelis-Menten equation with a correction term of the intrinsic nucleotide exchange included,


V<SUB>0</SUB>=V<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>[<UP>Rac1</UP>-<UP>mantGDP</UP>]<SUB>0</SUB>/(K<SUB>m</SUB>+[<UP>Rac1</UP>-<UP>mantGDP</UP>]<SUB>0</SUB>)+k<SUB><UP>intrinsic</UP></SUB>[<UP>Rac1</UP>-<UP>mantGDP</UP>]<SUB>0</SUB> (Eq. 1)
where V0 is the initial reaction rate, [Rac1-mantGDP]0 is the total reaction substrate concentration, and kintrinsic is the basal exchange rate of Rac1. kcat is derived by Vmax/[Trio], with [Trio] representing the GEF concentration present in the reaction.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mg2+-independent Guanine Nucleotide Binding of Rho GTPases-- In order to examine the role of Mg2+ in the guanine nucleotide binding process of Rho GTPases, we attempted to generate the metal ion- and nucleotide-free form (apo form) of Rho proteins by using a Centricon-based centrifugation protocol combined with EDTA treatment. This method is similar to what John et al. (19) have described for apo-Ras generation, in which treatment with 5 mM EDTA followed by a high pressure liquid chromatography isolation step led to the nucleotide- and metal ion-free GTPases while retaining >90% of the GDP binding activities. We found that the Rho proteins, Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1, after repeated treatments by a 60-min centrifugation through Centricon 10 cells following incubations with EDTA in buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 20 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT), were mostly devoid of bound guanine nucleotide. The removal of bound nucleotide was verified by the measurement of 31P NMR spectra of the resulting protein products and by a comparison of the UV absorption spectra of the treated GTPases with the original protein samples. Even after 15,000 free induction decays, little 31P signal was detectable for the EDTA-treated GTPase samples at the phosphorus resonance frequency of 202 MHz, whereas the untreated GTPases showed two resonances corresponding to the alpha - and beta -groups of the bound GDP (data not shown). Furthermore, the UV absorption spectra of the treated proteins displayed a single absorption maximum at 276.0 nm, compared with a 274.1-nm absorption peak and a secondary maximum at 253.0 nm for the original Rho GTPase-GDP complex (data not shown). The Mg2+ content was estimated to be less than 0.01 mol/mol of the treated proteins, assuming that the Mg2+-EDTA complex has a dissociation constant of 1.7 µM at pH 7.6 (19). The proteins generated in this manner were thus regarded as apo-GTPases and were employed in the following nucleotide binding studies.

The nucleotide binding properties of the Rho family GTPases were first examined by incubation of the apo-GTPases with [3H]GDP or [35S]GTPgamma S at 25 °C in buffer B (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT), which is free of Mg2+. The amounts of nucleotides bound to the apo-GTPases were assessed after 60 min. Interestingly, we observed that in the absence of Mg2+, both [3H]GDP and [35S]GTPgamma S were able to bind to apo-Rac1 in a saturable fashion with the molar stoichiometry of Rac1/nucleotide at ~1:0.95 (Fig. 1). A wide range of Mg2+ concentrations in the incubation buffer did not affect the equilibrium binding stoichiometry. Cdc42 and RhoA displayed similar properties in binding to [3H]GDP or [35S]GTPgamma S in the absence of Mg2+ (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mg2+-independent guanine nucleotide binding of Rac1. Apo-Rac1 (4.8 µM) was incubated at 25 °C with 6.0 µM [3H]GDP or [35S]GTPgamma S in buffer B containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT supplemented with various concentrations of MgCl2 ranging from 0.5 µM to 2 mM. After 60 min, aliquots were quantified for the Rac1-bound radioactive nucleotides by filter binding. The results represent the means of duplicate measurements.

To confirm the Mg2+-independent nucleotide binding property of the Rho proteins, we carried out a different assay using the fluorescent GDP analog, mantGDP, as a ligand. Fig. 2A shows that the addition of apo-Rac1 to mantGDP in buffer B led to a dose-dependent increase of fluorescence emission, indicating the formation of a Rac1-mantGDP complex under the assay conditions. The mantGDP binding to Rac1 was saturable in the absence of Mg2+ (Fig. 2B), and the presence of excess EDTA (~1 mM) in the binding assay had no effect on the result (data not shown), again suggesting that Mg2+ cofactor is not required for the nucleotide binding to Rac1. This is in contrast to the previous observations made for other members of Ras superfamily GTPases such as Ras (19), Rab3A (20), Sec4p (21), and RalA (39), in which cases removal of bound Mg2+ by EDTA treatment was found to completely abolish their nucleotide binding capabilities. We conclude that the Rho family GTPases behave differently from other Ras-related molecules in this aspect.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Fluorescence measurements of guanine nucleotide binding to Rac1. A, 50 nM mantGDP was incubated with various concentrations of apo-Rac1 in buffer B containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT in the absence of Mg2+. After an equilibrium was reached in 60 min, the fluorescence emission spectra were taken with an excitation wavelength set at 360 nm and a 4-nm emission resolution. B, fluorescence change of mantGDP induced by Rac1 binding. The fluorescence intensity of 50 nM mantGDP at 440 nm was monitored with an excitation wavelength at 360 nm at increasing concentrations of apo-Rac1. The maximum fluorescence change was obtained with the addition of ~20 µM Rac1. Data were fitted into a nonlinear regression to derive a Kd* value shown in Table I.

Guanine Nucleotide Binding and Dissociation Properties of Rho GTPases-- To understand the role of Mg2+ in the guanine nucleotide exchange and GTPase-activating reactions of the Rho proteins, we first sought to obtain the binding affinities of GDP and GTPgamma S to Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 in the absence or presence of MgCl2. Fig. 3A shows that the equilibrium binding isotherm of [3H]GDP to Rac1 differed significantly from that of Ha-Ras at the similar assay conditions with 50 nM small G-proteins and 10 mM Mg2+, yielding a dissociation constant (Kd) of 0.65 µM ± 0.07 compared with that of Ha-Ras at <= 10 nM by fitting the equilibrium binding data into a bimolecular binding model. The much tighter binding of Ras to [3H]GDP does not allow us to accurately determine the affinity under the assay conditions. Fig. 3, B and C, illustrate the equilibrium binding experiments in which 500 nM apo-Rac1 was incubated with increasing concentrations of [3H]GDP or [35S]GTPgamma S in the presence or absence of 10 mM Mg2+. The derived Kd values of GDP and GTPgamma S binding to Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA are presented in Tables I and II. These values ranged from 0.62 µM (Rac1), 0.59 µM (Cdc42), and 0.48 µM (RhoA) for GDP and 0.24 µM (Rac1), 0.17 µM (Cdc42), and 0.16 µM (RhoA) for GTPgamma S in the presence of Mg2+ to 0.81 µM (Rac1), 0.73 µM (Cdc42), and 0.65 µM (RhoA) for GDP and 0.77 µM (Rac1), 0.57 µM (Cdc42), and 0.51 µM (RhoA) for GTPgamma S in the absence of Mg2+. When the data of mantGDP binding to Rac1 collected by monitoring the Rac1-induced fluorescence change of mantGDP in buffer B were fitted into an equilibrium binding equation (Fig. 2B), an apparent binding constant (Kd*) value of 0.24 ± 0.04 µM was obtained. Similar titration of apo-Cdc42 and apo-RhoA to mantGDP yielded Kd* values of 0.22 ± 0.06 µM and 0.11 ± 0.03 µM, respectively. The Kd* values determined by the fluorescence measurement are consistently 4-6-fold lower than the Kd values obtained by the radionucleotide binding method, reflecting the difference between the fluorescent GDP analog (mantGDP) and GDP as previously suggested (47, 48). Overall, Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 displayed a 2-4-fold higher affinity for GTPgamma S than for GDP, and the apparent binding constants are in the submicromolar concentration range as compared with the subnanomalor concentration for Ras (40). It is remarkable that in the absence of Mg2+ cofactor, the Rho proteins were still capable of binding to GDP or GTPgamma S with equilibrium affinities similar to those in the presence of Mg2+. These results further indicate that Mg2+ is not required for the nucleotide binding of Rho GTPases per se.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Determination of the equilibrium binding affinity of guanine nucleotides to Rac1. A, the equilibrium binding isotherm of Rac1 is compared with that of Ha-Ras. 50 nM apo-Rac1 or apo-Ras was incubated with increasing concentrations of [3H]GDP in buffer B containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT with 10 mM MgCl2. At the 6-h time point, duplicate 100-µl aliquots were removed from the samples, and bound nucleotides were quantified by filter binding. Similar reaction conditions were adopted in B and C except that apo-Rac1 was at 200 nM, and parallel reactions were carried out with or without the supplement of 10 mM MgCl2. Data were fitted into a bimolecular binding equation to obtain the Kd values shown in Tables I and II.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of the GDP binding and dissociation properties of Rho family GTPases
The dissociation constants were obtained by nonlinear regression analysis of the binding of radiolabeled [3H]GDP to the apo form of Rho proteins in the absence or presence of 10 mM Mg2+ as shown for Rac1 in Fig. 3B (Kd). The apo-Rho GTPases were incubated at 25 °C with 0.2-10 µM [3H]GDP. At the 6-h time point, duplicate 20-µl aliquots were removed from the samples, and bound nucleotides were quantified as outlined under "Experimental Procedures." To determine the koff (apparent dissociation rate constant) values, 250 nM Rho proteins preloaded with [3H]GDP were incubated at 25 °C in buffer B or buffer B supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2 in the presence of 500 µM GDP (as shown for Rac1 in Fig. 4B). At the designated times, duplicate 20-µl aliquots were taken for the measurement of protein-bound radioactivity. The data were best fitted into a single exponential equation to arrive at the koff values.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Summary of the GTPgamma S binding and dissociation properties of Rho family GTPases
The equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) between the indicated Rho GTPases and GTPgamma S were determined by filter binding assays using [35S]GTPgamma S as the radiolabeled ligand as shown for Rac1 in Fig. 3C. koff represents the first-order [32S]GTPgamma S dissociation rate constant as determined for the case of Rac1 in Fig. 4C. Assay conditions and data treatments were similar to those in Table I. Each value represents the results of two separate experiments.

We next examined the effect of Mg2+ on the dissociation rate of nucleotides from the Rho GTPases. Fig. 4A shows a Mg2+ concentration jump experiment in which the decrease of Mg2+ from 1 mM to less than 50 nM by the addition of EDTA led to a drastic increase of [3H]GDP dissociation rate, similar to the effect on Ha-Ras or Rab3A (19, 20). The apparent dissociation rate constants of [3H]GDP and [35S]GTPgamma S bound to the Rho proteins, koff, were measured as shown in Fig. 4, B and C, by the addition of excess GDP or GTPgamma S in the exchange mixtures. We found that in the absence of Mg2+, koff of GDP dissociation from Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 were at 2.54, 1.40, and 8.74 min-1, respectively, whereas koff of GTPgamma S dissociation from the GTPases were significantly slower at 0.08, 0.042, and 0.11 min-1, respectively (Tables I and II). The apparent dissociation rates of mantGDP for Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 in the absence of Mg2+ determined by using mantGDP (koff*) were found to be ~3-fold slower than the koff values determined by [3H]GDP binding at 0.69 ± 0.20, 0.40 ± 0.12, and 2.52 ± 0.34, respectively, which again may be attributed to the differences between mantGDP and GDP (47, 48). The presence of Mg2+ resulted in a drastic decrease of koff of GDP and, to a lesser extent, of GTPgamma S (Fig. 4). In the presence of 10 mM Mg2+, the off rate of [3H]GDP was reduced by 150-fold for Cdc42, 100-fold for RhoA, and 300-fold for Rac1, whereas the rates of [35S]GTPgamma S dissociation were slowed by ~4-fold for all three proteins (Tables I and II). Similarly, when a set of apparent on-rate constants of the nucleotides (kon) were derived from koff/Kd, significant inhibition by the presence of Mg2+ was also evident (data not shown). When the nucleotide dissociation was examined in the presence of various concentrations of MgCl2, it became clear that the dissociation rate decreased with increasing concentrations of Mg2+. As shown in Fig. 5, the changes in the initial rates of both GDP and GTPgamma S dissociation from Cdc42 underwent a major transition at a concentration range of Mg2+ between 5 and 20 µM. From these data, we can arrive at apparent dissociation constants of 17 and 8 µM for Mg2+ binding to the GDP- and the GTPgamma S-bound Cdc42, respectively. These results establish that Mg2+ is an important regulator of the kinetics of guanine nucleotide binding to the Rho GTPases, functioning as a stabilizer for the bound nucleotides. It is intriguing that the kinetics of nucleotide binding to the Rho proteins appear to be orders of magnitude slower than that of Ras or Rab (19, 20, 40), further suggesting mechanistic differences among the small G-protein subfamilies.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Determination of the dissociation kinetics of GDP and GTPgamma S from Rac1. A, Mg2+ jump experiment of Rac1. 500 nM apo-Rac1 was preloaded with [3H]GDP and incubated with buffer B supplemented with 10 mM EDTA or 1 mM Mg2+. At the indicated time, 10 mM EDTA was added to the sample containing Mg2+ to lower the free Mg2+ concentration to ~10 nM. B and C, apo-Rac1 (250 nM) preloaded with either [3H]GDP (B) or [35S]GTPgamma S (C) was incubated at 25 °C in buffer B or buffer B supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2 in the presence of 500 µM GDP (B) or GTPgamma S (C). At the designated times, duplicate 20-µl aliquots were removed from each sample, and the Rac1-bound nucleotides were quantified by the filter binding method. Data were fitted into a single exponential to derive the apparent dissociation rate constants koff shown in Tables I and II. Results are representative of three independent experiments.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mg2+-dependent nucleotide dissociation from Cdc42. The initial rates of [3H]GDP or [35S]GTPgamma S dissociation from Cdc42 were determined in buffer B supplemented with various concentrations of Mg2+. The difference between the initial rates of the nucleotide dissociation in the absence of Mg2+ and in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+ was taken as 100%. The assay conditions were similar to those for Fig. 4.

Effect of Mg2+ on the GEF-catalyzed Guanine Nucleotide Exchange of Rho GTPases-- Guanine nucleotide exchange reaction of Ras is limited by the off rate of the bound GDP. The role of GEFs in the nucleotide exchange reaction has been postulated, in the cases of Ras and ARF, as to displace Mg2+ and thereby to allow GDP dissociation and GTP binding to occur (25). The difference between the nucleotide dissociation rates of the Rho GTPases in the presence and absence of Mg2+ (Tables I and II) suggests that GEF for Rho GTPases may also function by mediating the GDP dissociation step through an effect on Mg2+ ion. To directly examine the effect of Mg2+ on GEF action, we assayed the GEF activity of the N-terminal fragment of Trio, a Rac-specific GEF, toward Rac1 at increasing concentrations of Mg2+. Mg2+ inhibited the Trio-stimulated mantGDP dissociation at increasing concentrations (10 µM to 5 mM) (Fig. 6A), and the inhibitory effect was not due to the change of ionic strength brought by the increased Mg2+ concentrations in the assay mixture (data not shown). A similar inhibitory effect by Mg2+ was also observed for the Dbl-catalyzed GDP/GTP exchange on Cdc42 (data not shown). When the initial rates of mantGDP dissociation from Rac1 with or without Trio catalysis were analyzed as a function of Mg2+ concentration, it appeared that Trio had effectively caused a lower shift of Mg2+ binding affinity to Rac1 from ~15 to ~150 µM (Fig. 6B). A detailed kinetic analysis of the GEF reaction of the Trio-Rac1 interaction by treating the nucleotide-bound Rac1 as substrate and Trio as enzyme revealed that in the absence of Mg2+, the intrinsic mantGDP dissociation rate was 4.7 × 10-3 s-1 with a Km value of 1.46 ± 0.60 µM and a kcat of 0.12 s-1. In the presence of 1 mM Mg2+, on the other hand, the intrinsic mantGDP dissociation rate was 3.0 × 10-4 s-1 with a Km of 24.5 ± 5.9 µM and a kcat of 0.094 s-1 (Fig. 6C). Mg2+ seems to affect only the Km parameter of Trio catalysis without much effect on kcat. Taken together, these results indicate that one role of GEF is to destabilize bound GDP through the displacement of bound Mg2+ and that Mg2+ is mostly involved in the regulation of the binding interaction of GEF with Rho GTPase substrate.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of Mg2+ on the Trio-catalyzed GEF reaction of Rac1. A, 0.5 µM Rac1-mantGDP was incubated in buffer B supplemented with various concentrations of MgCl2 and 500 nM Trio. At the indicated time point (arrow), 400 µM GTP was added to the mixture to initiate the exchange reaction. B, the initial mantGDP dissociation rates from Rac1 (V0) in the presence (filled circles) or absence (open circles) of 500 nM Trio were analyzed as a function of Mg2+ concentrations. C, the kinetics of Trio-catalyzed mantGDP dissociation of Rac1 in the presence or absence of 1.0 mM MgCl2 were measured at increasing concentrations of Rac1-mantGDP and a constant amount of GTP (400 µM). Trio was at 200 nM (in the absence of Mg2+) or 500 nM (in the presence of Mg2+) concentration. The data were fitted to a hyperbolic equation as described under "Experimental Procedures" to derive a set of reaction kinetic parameters.

A further examination of the GDP/GTP exchange reaction revealed that both Dbl and Trio were able to stimulate GDP dissociation from their respective substrates, Cdc42 and Rac1, in the absence of Mg2+ (Fig. 7). Dbl was active in stimulating the GDP dissociation from Cdc42 that was deprived of bound Mg2+ and was undergoing a fast spontaneous nucleotide exchange, but it suffered approximately 50% loss of the ability compared with the extent of stimulation in the presence of Mg2+ (Fig. 7A). Similarly, Trio displayed a dose-dependent GEF activity toward Rac1 in the absence of Mg2+ and in the presence of 10 mM EDTA (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that GEF also contributes to the destabilization of Rho GTPase-bound nucleotide through a Mg2+-independent mechanism in the exchange reaction.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Mg2+-dependent and -independent nucleotide exchange catalyzed by Dbl or Trio1. A, 2.0 µM apo-Cdc42 preloaded with [3H]GDP was incubated with 500 µM GTP in buffer B or buffer B supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2 in the presence or absence of 20 nM Dbl at 4 °C. The Cdc42-bound radionucleotides were quantified by filter binding after a 5-min incubation. B, 0.5 µM Rac1-mantGDP was incubated with buffer B supplemented with 10 mM Mg2+ only (trace 1), or buffer B supplemented with 10 mM EDTA and 0 nM (trace 2), 50 nM (trace 3), 200 nM (trace 4), or 500 nM (trace 5) Trio. At the indicated time (arrow), 400 µM GTP was added to initiate the respective GEF reactions. The mantGDP fluorescence was monitored as in Fig. 2.

Effect of Mg2+ on the Intrinsic and GAP-catalyzed GTPase Activities of Rho GTPases-- The intrinsic GTPase activity of the Rho proteins was measured by monitoring gamma Pi release from the respective GTPases incubated with an excess amount of free GTP. In the absence of Mg2+, GTP hydrolysis by the Rho GTPases still occurred, albeit at a very slow rate of 0.002 min-1 (Fig. 8), approximately 10-fold slower than that in the presence of Mg2+ (31, 32). The addition of excess EDTA (~1 mM) to the reaction mixture that ensured the free Mg2+ concentration was less than 10 nM did not alter this rate (data not shown). Replenishing MgCl2 in the reaction mixture to 5 mM caused an increase in gamma Pi release by over 5-fold (Fig. 8), indicating that although Mg2+ is not essential for the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Rho proteins, the divalent ion is involved in maintaining a basal GTPase activity of the Rho proteins at the physiological concentration.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Mg2+ participates in the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis reaction of Rho proteins. The gamma Pi release from GTP-bound Cdc42, RhoA, or Rac1 (10 µM) was measured at the 5-min time point at 25 °C by using the MESG/phosphorylase system in the presence or absence of 5 mM MgCl2.

To examine the effect of Mg2+ on the GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis by the Rho GTPases, p50RhoGAP was included in the GTPase reaction mixtures in the presence or absence of 5 mM MgCl2. In the absence of Mg2+, RhoGAP remained capable of stimulating GTP hydrolysis of Rac1 as detected by monitoring the real time Pi release (Fig. 9A). The absence of Mg2+ led Rac1 to undergo a multiple turnover reaction, whereas the presence of Mg2+ resulted in single turnover GTP hydrolysis. Fig. 9B shows an example of the initial rates of gamma Pi release from Rac1 analyzed as a function of the concentration of the small GTPase when a catalytic amount of RhoGAP (20 nM) was present. Treatment of the data with a modified Michaelis-Menten equation yielded a set of kinetic parameters that are indicative of the enzymatic efficiency of the GAP reaction. As summarized in Table III, the presence of Mg2+ cofactor significantly enhanced the catalytic capability of RhoGAP toward all three Rho GTPases, whereas the reaction Km values remained constant and were similar at ~3 µM for Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA with or without 5 mM Mg2+ in the reaction buffer. Remarkably, the superior catalytic efficiency of p50RhoGAP toward Cdc42 diminished completely in the absence of Mg2+ as indicated by a ~40-fold decrease in kcat and kcat/Km values (Table III, Fig. 9C), suggesting that p50RhoGAP utilizes the Mg2+ cofactor to elicit catalytic specificity for Cdc42. We conclude that Mg2+ is not absolutely required for RhoGAP action but is important for the optimal GAP catalytic efficiency and specificity.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effect of Mg2+ on the p50RhoGAP-catalyzed GTPase reaction of Rho proteins. A, the GTP hydrolysis activity of Rac1 under the catalysis of 20 nM RhoGAP in the absence (dashed lines) or presence (solid lines) of 5 mM Mg2+ was measured with 1 or 5 µM Rac1-GTP. The real time absorption values at 360 nM reported by the MESG/phosphorylase coupling reaction reflect the amount of gamma Pi released by Rac1. B, the initial rates of GTP hydrolysis by Rac1 under RhoGAP (20 nM) catalysis are shown as a function of Rac1 concentration in the absence or presence of 5 mM MgCl2. Data were fitted into a modified Michaelis-Menten equation to yield the Km and Vmax values of the respective reactions. Results in this figure and those determined for Cdc42 and RhoA are summarized in Table III. C, the catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km) of RhoGAP action on Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 are compared under the reaction conditions in the presence or absence of 5 mM Mg2+.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Effects of Mg2+ on the RhoGAP-regulated kinetics of Rho family GTPases
The results of GAP assays as shown in Fig. 9 were analyzed by fitting data into a modified Michaelis-Menten equation (see "Experimental Procedures"), which yielded the Km and Vmax values. kcat was derived by Vmax/[GAP]0, with [GAP]0 representing the total GAP concentration (20 nM) in the reaction. The initial rates of the p50RhoGAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis by each Rho GTPase were obtained by the MESG/phosphorylase method. The apo form of the Rho GTPases was used in the respective assays at 25 °C in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM MESG, 10 units/ml purine nucleotide phosphorylase, 200 µM GTP, and 20 nM p50RhoGAP, with or without the supplement of 5 mM MgCl2. Results are representative of at least two independent measurements.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mg2+ is an essential cofactor for small G-protein functions. To date, the effect of Mg2+ on the interaction of members of Rho family GTPases with guanine nucleotides has not been characterized. Moreover, it remains unclear what role Mg2+ plays in the regulatory reactions of these small GTPases. In the present study, we have prepared the metal ion- and nucleotide-free forms of Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1 (apoproteins) and quantitatively analyzed the Mg2+ effect on the intrinsic guanine nucleotide binding and GTP hydrolysis processes of the GTPases and on the GEF- and GAP-catalyzed reactions. Our results demonstrate that, unique to the Rho family proteins, Mg2+ cofactor is not required for the high affinity nucleotide binding per se; rather, it acts as an effective gatekeeper to regulate the nucleotide binding kinetics. In the guanine nucleotide exchange reaction, RhoGEF plays dual roles in stimulating GDP dissociation, to displace bound Mg2+ and to destabilize bound nucleotide, whereas in the GTPase-activating reaction, RhoGAP depends upon the Mg2+ to elicit high catalytic efficiency and specificity.

The basic structure of the nucleotide binding core of the Rho family GTPases is similar to that of other Ras-like proteins (17, 25): the switch I loop provides an essential serine or threonine residue (Thr35 in Ras, Rac1, and Cdc42 and Thr37 in RhoA) ligated to the Mg2+ ion. The loop region of switch II contains a conserved aspartic acid residue (Asp57 in Ras, Rac1, and Cdc42 and Asp59 in RhoA) that serves as a water-mediated Mg2+ ligand. The P-loop preceding the first alpha -helix wraps around the alpha - and beta -phosphates of the nucleotide with a lysine residue (Lys16) and a set of main chain amides, and in addition, offers a conserved serine or threonine (Ser17 in Ras, Thr17 in Rac1 and Cdc42) to coordinate the Mg2+ ion. Even with these shared features, it is becoming clear that substantial differences exist in the nucleotide binding properties among the Ras-like small G-proteins. Previous studies have reported that the nucleotide binding affinities of Ras, Rab3A, RalA, and Sec4 ranged from 10 pM to 70 nM, and the binding preference for GTP over GDP ranged from less than 1-fold to over 20-fold (19-22, 40). The role of Mg2+ in these cases has been proposed as GDP dissociation inhibition (41), and the divalent ion is invariably required for the high affinity nucleotide binding. Our findings of the Rho proteins in the current study provide evidence that the nucleotide affinities of this subfamily of small G-proteins are at the submicromolar concentration (0.1-0.6 µM) and that the presence or absence of Mg2+ does not significantly affect their nucleotide binding affinities. The relatively weaker affinity of Rho proteins to the nucleotides may be attributed to the unique dynamics of the switch I and switch II regions of the Rho family, which seem to adopt a more flexible conformation than Ras (26-29). In addition, a subtle difference in the residues surrounding the nucleotide binding core may also affect the bonding strength of the residues directly in contact with the nucleotide. The later finding that Mg2+ is not essential for the nucleotide binding per se is somewhat surprising, since the Mg2+ coordination in RhoA-GTPgamma S appears to be identical to that of Ras (27), and the Mg2+-chelating residues of RhoA-GDP also differ only lightly from the Ras-GDP complex (26). Mg2+ maintains a potent GDP dissociation-inhibitory activity toward the Rho GTPases by stabilizing both the GDP- and GTP-bound states, but it appears equally effective in inhibiting both the nucleotide dissociation and association processes so that the dissociation binding constant remains mostly unaltered. This property seems to be unique to the Rho family members.

In vivo, the release of GDP from Rho proteins would be inhibited by intracellular free Mg2+. In order to facilitate GDP/GTP exchange, a GEF must overcome the inhibitory restraints imposed by the millimolar free Mg2+ through transient disruption of the Mg2+ coordination to promote GDP dissociation. Such a mechanism is consistent with our observation that the efficiency of the RhoGEF-catalyzed GDP-dissociation reaction is in part dependent on Mg2+ concentration. GEF binding to the Rho proteins led to an over 10-fold lowered affinity of the complex to Mg2+, which may result in a significant increase of the nucleotide on and off rate and/or a weakened nucleotide binding affinity. Further supported by the kinetic data of the GEF reaction (i.e. Mg2+ affects only the Km parameter of the catalysis without a detectable effect on kcat), it seems likely that displacement of bound Mg2+ is one of the major roles of the GEF in mediating the destabilization of bound nucleotide and that the Mg2+ binding state of the Rho proteins has a significant impact on the binding interaction of GEF with the Rho GTPase substrate. The mechanisms proposed for the GEF functions on Ras and ARF (22-24) appear similar in this aspect. For example, in the crystal structures of Ras-Sos and ARF-Gea2p complex, the catalytic domains of Sos and Gea2p insert a leucine (Leu938) and a glutamine (Glu97) into the Mg2+ binding sites of Ras and ARF, respectively, to occupy the Mg2+ coordinates (22, 23). Although the recently available three-dimensional structures of the catalytic Dbl homology domain of RhoGEFs still do not provide sufficient information on how the Dbl homology domain would interact with the Rho substrates (42-44), our biochemical evidence strongly points to the involvement of similar surface residue(s) of the Dbl homology domain like that of Leu938 in Sos or Glu97 in Gea2p in the RhoGEF action. While this manuscript was under revision, Shimizu et al. (49) reported the crystal structure of a Mg2+-free form of RhoA-GDP. Elimination of the Mg2+ cofactor induced significant conformational changes in the switch I region of RhoA by opening up the nucleotide binding site, similar to what has been observed in the switch I region of Ha-Ras in complex with Sos. This structure is consistent with the current finding that RhoGEFs may serve to loosen the bound Mg2+ to produce an open conformation in the exchange reactions.

We show that both Trio and Dbl were able to further stimulate GDP dissociation from their substrates in the absence of Mg2+, suggesting that the displacement of bound Mg2+ is only part of the effect imposed on Rho GTPases by GEFs. It is likely that RhoGEFs contain dual biochemical activities in the GEF reaction: on one hand disrupting bound Mg2+ to enhance the GDP dissociation rate, and on the other hand loosening the bonding of the bound GDP to the nucleotide binding core of the GTPases.

The role of Mg2+ in the GTP hydrolysis of Rho GTPase is thought to stabilize the switch I effector loop at Tyr34, which in turn positions the Mg2+ and gamma -phosphate optimally for hydrolytic attack (45). We have shown here that the intrinsic and the GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis of Rho GTPases does occur in the absence of bound Mg2+, albeit at much slower rates. This result indicates that the Mg2+ cofactor is not absolutely required for GTPase activity of the Rho proteins, which deviates from the cases reported for Ras and Rab3A (19, 20). However, the reaction kinetics of the GTPase and GTPase-activating reactions were immensely affected by the presence of Mg2+. In particular, the presence of Mg2+ led to a significant increase in the catalytic potency of the GTPases as reflected by the enhancement of kcat values, whereas the Km values of GAP reactions that are closely correlated with the binding affinity to the active Rho GTPases remained unchanged. Furthermore, the specificity of p50RhoGAP toward Cdc42 was solely dependent on the Mg2+ cofactor. These biochemical data demonstrate that Mg2+ is intimately involved in the intrinsic as well as the GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis reactions and may act as the major factor dictating the GAP specificity. By a dissociative transition state model for GTP-hydrolysis (46), the chemical nature of the observed Mg2+ effect on the GTPase and GAP reactions can be interpreted as stabilization of charge buildup on the gamma -phosphoryl oxygen or increasing in negative charge on the nonbridging beta -phosphoryl oxygens in the transition state, which allows electrostatic interactions to be catalytic.

In summary, our studies directly demonstrate a role of Mg2+ in regulating the kinetics of guanine nucleotide binding and GTP hydrolysis of Rho family GTPases. The observations that GEF facilitates GDP/GTP exchange by acting to displace bound Mg2+ and to destabilize bound nucleotide and that RhoGAP utilizes the Mg2+ cofactor to elicit catalytic efficiency and specificity in GTP-hydrolysis provide important insight into the GEF and GAP reaction mechanisms of the Rho proteins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Weiping Shao for help with NMR measurements, Dr. Michel Streuli for the Trio cDNA, and Dr. Kejin Zhu and Yuan Gao for providing the GST-Dbl and Trio proteins.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM 60523, American Cancer Society Grant RPG-97-146, and National Science Foundation of China Grant 39825503.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 901-448-5138; Fax: 901-448-7360; E-mail: yzheng@utmem.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 7, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001027200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; mantGDP, 2'(3')-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)GDP; MESG, 2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine ribonucleoside; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate; ARF, ADP-ribosylation factor; DTT, dithiothreitol; GMP-PNP, beta ,gamma -imidoguanosine 5'-triphosphate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Symons, M. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 178-181
2. Hall, A. (1998) Science 279, 509-513
3. Van Aelst, L., and D'Souza-Schorey, C. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2295-3011
4. Chant, J., and Stowers, L. (1995) Cell 81, 1-4
5. Stowers, L., Yelon, D., Berg, L. J., and Chant, J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 5027-5031
6. Murphy, A. M., and Montell, D. J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 617-630
7. Adam, T., Giry, M., Boquet, P., and Sansonetti, P. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 3315-3321
8. Lamaze, C., Chuang, T. H., Terlecky, L. J., Bokoch, G. M., and Schimid, S. L. (1996) Nature 382, 177-179
9. Bokoch, G. M. (1995) Trends Cell Biol. 5, 109-113
10. Westwick, J. K., Lambert, Q. T., Clark, G. J., Symons, M., Van Aelst, L., Pestell, R. G., and Der, C. J. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1324-1335
11. Kuroda, S., Fukata, M., Nakagawa, M., Fujii, K., Nakamura, T., Ookubo, T., Izawa, I., Nagase, T., Nomura, N., Tani, H., Shoji, I., Matsuura, Y., Yonehara, S., and Kaibuchi, K. (1998) Science 281, 832-835
12. Ren, X. D., Kiosses, W. B., and Schwartz, M. A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 578-585
13. Keely, P., Parise, L., and Juliano, R. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 101-106
14. Boguski, M. S., and McCormick, F. (1993) Nature 366, 643-654
15. Lamarche, N., and Hall, A. (1994) Trends Genet. 10, 436-440
16. Cerione, R. A., and Zheng, Y. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 216-222
17. Sprang, S. R., and Coleman, D. E. (1998) Cell 95, 155-158
18. Feuerstein, J., Goody, R. S., and Wittinghofer, A. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8455-8458
19. John, J., Rensland, H., Schlichting, I., Vetter, I., Borasio, G. D., Goody, R. S., and Wittinghofer, A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 923-929
20. Burstein, E. S., and Macara, I. G. (1992) Biochem. J. 282, 387-392
21. Kabcenell, A. K., Goud, B., Northup, J. K., and Novick, P. J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9366-9372
22. Boriack-Sjodin, P. A., Margarit, S. M., Bar-Sagi, D., and Kuriyan, J. (1998) Nature 394, 337-343
23. Goldberg, J. (1999) Cell 95, 237-248
24. Beraud-Dufour, S., Robineau, S., Chardin, P., Paris, S., Chabre, M., Cherfils, J., and Antonny, B. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3651-3659
25. Cherfils, J., and Chardin, P. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 306-311
26. Wei, Y., Zhang, Y., Derewenda, U., Liu, X., Minor, W., Nakamoto, R. K., Somlyo, A. V., Somlyo, A. P., and Derewenda, Z. S. (1997) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 699-703
27. Ihara, K., Muraguchi, S., Kato, M., Shimizu, T., Shirakawa, M., Kuroda, S., Kaibuchi, K., and Hakoshima, T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9656-9666
28. Feltham, J. L., Dotsch, V., Raza, S., Manor, D., Cerione, R. A., Sutcliffe, M. J., Wagner, G., and Oswald, R. E. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 8755-8766
29. Hirshberg, M., Stockley, R. W., Dodson, G., and Webb, M. R. (1997) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 147-152
30. Bourne, H. R. (1997) Nature 389, 673-674
31. Zhang, B., and Zheng, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25728-25733
32. Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., Collins, C. C., Johnson, D. I., and Zheng, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2609-2612
33. Zhang, B., Wang, Z., and Zheng, Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21999-22008
34. Zheng, Y., Hart, M., and Cerione, R. A. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 256, 77-84
35. Geyer, M., Schweins, T., Herrmann, C., Prisner, T., Wittinghofer, A., and Kalbitzer, H. R. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 10308-10320
36. Li, R., Zhang, B., and Zheng, Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32830-32835
37. Zhang, B., and Zheng, Y. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 5249-5257
38. Zhang, B., Chernoff, J., and Zheng, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8776-8782
39. Frech, M., Schlichting, I., Wittinghofer, A., and Chardin, P. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 6353-6359
40. John, J., Sohmen, R., Feuerstein, J., Linke, R., Wittinghofer, A., and Goody, R. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 6058-6065
41. Pan, J. Y., Sanford, J. C., and Wessling-Resnick, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1322-1328
42. Soisson, S. M., Nimnual, A. S., Uy, M., Bar-Sagi, D., and Kuriyan, J. (1998) Cell 95, 259-268
43. Liu, X., Wang, H., Eberstadt, M., Schnuchel, A., Olejniczak, E. T., Meadows, R. P., Schkeryantz, J. M., Janowick, D. A., Harlan, J. E., Harris, E. A. S., Staunton, D. E., and Fesik, S. W. (1998) Cell 95, 269-277
44. Aghazadeh, B., Zhu, K., Kubiseski, T. J., Liu, G. A., Pawson, T., Zheng, Y., and Rosen, M. K. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 12, 1098-1107
45. Rittinger, K., Walker, P. A., Eccleston, J. F., Smerdon, S. J., and Gamblin, S. J. (1997) Nature 389, 758-762
46. Maegley, K. A., Admiraal, S. J., and Herschlag, D. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8160-8166
47. Leonard, D. A., Evans, T., Hart, M., Cerione, R. A., and Manor, D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 12323-12328
48. Rudolph, M. G., Bayer, P., Abo, A., Kuhlmann, J., Vetter, I. R., and Wittinghofer, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18067-18076
49. Shimizu, T., Ihara, K., Maesaki, R., Kuroda, S., Kaibuchi, K., and Hakoshima, T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18311-18317


C