Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003213200 on June 5, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 33, 25342-25350, August 18, 2000
2-Adrenergic Receptor Activates Extracellular
Signal-regulated Kinases (ERKs) via the Small G Protein Rap1 and the
Serine/Threonine Kinase B-Raf*
John M.
Schmitt and
Philip J. S.
Stork
From the Vollum Institute and the Department of Cell and
Developmental Biology, Oregon Health Sciences University,
Portland, Oregon 97201
Received for publication, April 14, 2000, and in revised form, May 31, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
G protein-coupled receptors can induce cellular
proliferation by stimulating the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase
cascade. Heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of both
and 
subunits that can signal independently to diverse intracellular
signaling pathways including those that activate MAP kinases. In this
study, we examined the ability of isoproterenol, an agonist of the
2-adrenergic receptor (
2AR), to
stimulate extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). Using HEK293
cells, which express endogenous
2AR, we show that
isoproterenol stimulates ERKs via
2AR. This action of
isoproterenol requires cAMP-dependent protein kinase and is insensitive to pertussis toxin, suggesting that
G
s activation of cAMP-dependent
protein kinase is required. Interestingly,
2AR activates
both the small G proteins Rap1 and Ras, but only Rap1 is capable of
coupling to Raf isoforms.
2AR inhibits the
Ras-dependent activation of both Raf isoforms Raf-1 and
B-Raf, whereas Rap1 activation by isoproterenol recruits and activates
B-Raf.
2AR activation of ERKs is not blocked by
expression of RasN17, an interfering mutant of Ras, but is blocked by
expression of either RapN17 or Rap1GAP1, both of which interfere with
Rap1 signaling. We propose that isoproterenol can activate ERKs via
Rap1 and B-Raf in these cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cell proliferation is regulated by extracellular signals including
growth factors and hormones. Growth factors activate receptor tyrosine
kinases to stimulate a number of intracellular signaling cascades. One
cascade, the MAP1 kinase (or
ERK) cascade triggers cellular proliferation through multiple
mechanisms including inducing stimulation of progression through the
G1/S transition of the cell cycle and by activating rate-limiting proteins involved in both DNA and protein synthesis (1,
2). ERKs are activated in cancerous cells through the action of
proto-oncogenes like ras that lie upstream of the MAP kinase
cascade. Hormones can also activate the MAP kinase cascade to stimulate
proliferation in many cell types (3). Some hormones, like insulin, act
like growth factors to activate receptor tyrosine kinases to stimulate
intracellular cascades leading to ERK (4, 5). However, most hormones
act via serpentine (or seven-transmembrane receptors), and couple to
heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) to elicit their
effects (6, 7).
Heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of two functional units, an
subunit and a 
subunit. Both
and 
are released from
hormone receptors upon ligand binding and can directly bind to and
activate specific effectors. For
, one of these effectors is
adenylate cyclase. Historically
subunits that stimulate adenylate cyclase are called
s for stimulatory,
whereas those that inhibit adenylate cyclase are termed
i, for inhibitory. Over the past 5 years,
cross-talk between G protein-coupled signaling pathways have been
identified for many G protein-coupled receptors (3, 8). The activation
of MAP kinase cascades has been established for G proteins of diverse
classes, including Gs, Gi, and Gq
(9-11). For some of these, direct or indirect involvement of
cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases has been shown (12-16). For others,
association with regulatory molecules like RasGAP (17) or Rap1GAP1 (18, 19) provides the cross-talk necessary to modulate signals to the small
G proteins Ras or Rap1, respectively, to regulate the MAP kinase cascade.
Perhaps the best studied mechanism of cross-talk between G proteins and
the MAP kinase cascade involves the 
subunit of heterotrimeric G
proteins. Activation of both Gq- and Gi-coupled receptors releases 
to activate the tyrosine kinase c-Src, which can activate Ras via the phosphorylation of the adaptor molecule Shc,
which then recruits a complex consisting of Grb2 and SOS, the
Ras-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), to the membrane
where it can activate Ras (20). In some cases, a role for
phosphoinositol 3-kinase
in Src activation has been shown (21). In
other cases, Src is activated by a calcium-sensitive kinase PYK2 (12).
Despite variations on the mechanisms used, all examples of 
signaling to ERKs require Ras activation.
Recently, the
subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins have also been
shown to signal to the MAP kinase cascade. The
subunits of
Gi and Go (which share extensive sequence
homology and PTx sensitivity) both bind to Rap1GAP1, a
GTPase-activating protein specific
for a distinct small G protein Rap1 (19). Rap1 is a cell type-specific
antagonist of Ras-dependent signaling, and its inhibition
by Rap1GAP1 can allow Ras to signal effectively to ERKs. The
subunit of Gs has also been implicated in MAP kinase activation. For example, constitutively activated mutants of
G
s are oncogenic (22-25). These mutants encode an
oncogene called gsp that can activate ERKs when
expressed in transfected cells. Activated G
s triggers
the synthesis of the second messenger cAMP through direct association
with specific adenylate cyclases (26, 27). The major target of cAMP is
the cAMP-dependent protein kinase PKA (28, 29). PKA has
cell type-specific actions on MAP kinase signaling. In many cell types,
PKA antagonizes Ras-dependent activation of Raf-1, an
ubiquitously expressed MAP kinase kinase kinase (30-33) to inhibit
cellular proliferation and Ras-dependent transformation
(34). In other cell types, PKA can activate MAP kinase through a
distinct pathway involving Rap1 and a cell type-specific isoform
of Raf called B-Raf (9, 35, 36). Recently, a second enzyme target for
cAMP, cAMP-GEF (or Epac), was identified as a Rap1-specific GEF (37,
38). Therefore, in B-Raf-expressing cells, cAMP has at least two
potential mechanisms to activate ERKs through Ras-independent pathways,
one via PKA and another through direct activation of Rap1-GEFs.
The ability of hormones that couple to G
s to activate
Rap1 and ERKs has been examined in transfected cell lines
overexpressing specific serpentine receptors. In Chinese hamster ovary
cells overexpressing the adenosine A2A receptor, adenosine
has been shown to activate ERKs via Rap1 (39). In HEK293 cells, a well studied model of G protein coupling, overexpression of
2-adrenergic receptor (
2AR) was shown to
couple to ERKs via a Ras-dependent pathway (40, 41). The
best studied receptor system coupled to G
s is the
2AR and its activation by the agonist isoproterenol. In
this study, we examine the mechanism by which isoproterenol activates
ERKs in HEK293 cells expressing endogenous levels of
2AR.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Antibodies to Rap1, B-Raf, Raf-1, recombinant
MEK-1 protein, and agarose-conjugated antibodies to ERK1, ERK2 (c-16),
and myc-ERK were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc (Santa
Cruz, CA). Anti-Ras antibody was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Phosphorylation-specific ERK antibodies (pERK)
that recognize phosphorylated ERK1 (pERK1) and ERK2 (pERK2), at
residues threonine 183 and tyrosine 185 were purchased from New England
Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Isoproterenol, thrombin, carbachol, Flag (M2)
antibody, and lysophosphatidic acid were purchased from Sigma.
Forskolin, clonidine, PTx, alprenolol, atenolol, epidermal growth
factor (EGF), AG1478, and
N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)
ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide (H89) were purchased from Cal Biochem
(Riverside, CA). Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose was purchased
from Qiagen Inc. (Chatswoth, CA). Radioisotopes were from NEN Life
Science Products.
Cell Culture--
HEK293 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) plus 10% fetal calf serum at 37 °C
in 5% CO2. Cells were maintained in serum-free DMEM for
16 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 prior to treatment with
various reagents for both immune complex assays and Western blotting.
Cells pre-treated with PTx (100 ng/ml) were incubated in serum-free
media for 16 h prior to stimulations. All inhibitors, unless
otherwise indicated, were added to cells 20 min prior to treatment.
Western Blotting--
Cell lysates were prepared as described
(9). Cell lysate protein concentrations were quantified using Bradford
protein assay. For detection of B-Raf, ERK2, myc-ERK, Rap1, Flag, Ras, and phospho-ERK1/2 (pERK), equal protein amounts of cell lysate per
treatment condition were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) membranes and probed with the corresponding antibodies according to the manufacturer's guidelines.
Plasmids and Transfections--
Seventy to 80% confluent HEK293
cells were co-transfected with the indicated cDNAs using a
LipofectAMINE kit (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The control vector, pcDNA3
(Invitrogen Corp.), was included in each set of transfections to assure
that each plate received the same amount of DNA. Following
transfection, cells were allowed to recover in serum-containing media
for 24 h. Cells were then starved overnight in serum-free DMEM
before treatment and lysis.
Immune Complex Assays--
For ERK assays, all cell treatments
were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
8.0, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 200 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 1 µM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin
inhibitor, 10 mM NaF, 0.1 µM aprotinin, and 1 mM NaVO4). The lysates were centrifuged at low
speed to remove nuclei, and the supernatant was examined for ERK
activity using myelin basic protein (MBP) as a substrate and
[
-32P]ATP as a phosphate donor with equal protein
amounts per assay condition as described (9). For B-Raf assays,
untreated and treated cells were lysed in ice-cold 1% Nonidet P-40
buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM
EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Immune complex kinase assays were performed as described (9)
using MEK-1 as a substrate and [
-32P]ATP as a
phosphate donor with equal protein amounts per assay. The reaction
products of all kinase assays were resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel and analyzed with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Nickel Affinity Chromatography--
Experiments utilizing
polyhistidine-tagged Rap1 (His-Rap1 and His-RapV12) and Ras (His-Ras),
were performed by transfecting HEK293 cells using LipofectAMINE
reagent. Cells were lysed in ice-cold buffer containing 1% Nonidet
P-40, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 20 mM NaCl, 30 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 0.5 mg/ml aprotinin. Supernatants were prepared by low
speed centrifugation. Transfected His-tagged proteins were precipitated
from supernatants containing equal amounts of protein using
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose and washed with 20 mM
imidazole in lysis buffer and eluted with 500 mM imidazole
and 5 mM EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline. One-half of the
eluates containing His-tagged proteins were separated on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and B-Raf or Raf-1 proteins
were detected by Western blotting (9). The remaining His-Rap1 eluates,
of equal amounts, were immunoprecipitated with B-Raf antisera, and
B-Raf kinase activity was measured by immune complex assay. Equal
amounts of His-Rap1 and His-Ras was confirmed by Western blotting.
Affinity Assay for Rap1 Activation in HEK293 Cells--
GST
fusion protein of the Rap1-binding domain of RalGDS was expressed in
Escherichia coli following induction by
isopropyl-1thio-
-D-galactopyranoside (GST-RalGDS was a
gift from Dr. Bos (Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands) to
P. J. S. S.). Bacterial lysates were prepared, and GST
fusion proteins were immobilized by incubating lysates for 1 h at
4 °C with glutathione-Sepharose. Sepharose beads were washed three
times in order to remove excess GST fusion protein. HEK293 cells were
grown as described, and were stimulated at 37 °C for the indicated
times and immediately lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 200 mM
NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml
soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 mM NaF, 0.1 µM
aprotinin, and 1 mM NaVO4). Active Rap1 was
isolated using methods as described by Franke et al. (42).
Briefly, cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation, and equal amounts
of supernatants were incubated with GST-RalGDS-Rap1 binding domain
pre-coupled to glutathione beads. Following a 1-h incubation at
4 °C, beads were pelleted and rinsed threes times with ice-cold
lysis buffer, protein was eluted from the beads using 2× Laemmli
buffer and applied to a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, blocked in 5% milk
for 1 h, and probed with
-Rap1/Krev-1 or Flag (M2) antibody
overnight at 4 °C, followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
anti-rabbit secondary antibody. Proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence.
Affinity Assay for Ras Activation in HEK293 Cells--
HEK293
cells were grown as described, and were stimulated at 37 °C for the
indicated times and immediately lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40, 200 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µM
leupeptin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 mM NaF, 0.1 µM aprotinin, and 1 mM
NaVO4). Following the manufacturer's recommended protocol,
activated Ras was isolated from stimulated lysates using
agarose-coupled GST-Raf1-RBD provided in the Ras activation assay kit
(Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.). Proteins were eluted from the beads
using 2× Laemmli buffer and applied to a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel.
Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane,
blocked in 5% milk for 1 h, and probed with
-Ras antibody
overnight at 4 °C, followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody. Proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence.
 |
RESULTS |
Isoproterenol Activates ERK via Endogenous
2ARs--
Isoproterenol treatment of HEK293 cells with
the
-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol, induces phosphorylation of
MAP kinase ERK in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
1A). Three-minute stimulations with increasing concentrations of isoproterenol, revealed maximal ERK
kinase activity at concentrations over 10 µM. Similar to
previously published data, 10 µM isoproterenol induced
endogenous ERK kinase activity maximally between 3 and 5 min (Fig.
1B) (43). Isoproterenol-induced ERK kinase activation was
completely blocked by pretreatment with the selective
1,2-adrenergic antagonist alprenolol (Fig.
1C). Pretreatment with the selective
1-adrenergic antagonist, atenolol, did not inhibit
isoproterenol-mediated activation of MAP kinase. These results suggest
that isoproterenol activates ERKs via endogenously expressed
2ARs with maximal activation between 3 and 5 min.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
ERK activation by
2AR. A, isoproterenol
dose response of phosphorylated ERKs (pERK). HEK293 cells were
serum-starved and treated with increasing concentrations of
isoproterenol for 3 min. Cell lysates were prepared as detailed under
"Experimental Procedures." B, time course of endogenous
ERK activation following isoproterenol stimulation in HEK293 cells.
HEK293 cells were harvested for either immune complex kinase assay
using MBP as a substrate or Western blotting, using phosphospecific
ERK1/2 (pERK) antibodies. Cells were treated with isoproterenol or EGF,
as indicated. Upper panel, a representative
Western blot probed with pERK antibody. Middle
panel, a representative autoradiogram with the position of
MBP shown. Lower panel, Western blotting showing
equal loading of protein amounts within cell lysate was performed using
ERK2 antibody. C, blockade of isoproterenol stimulation of
pERK. Serum-starved cells were treated with isoproterenol following a
10-min pretreatment with either atenolol or alprenolol.
Upper panel, a representative Western blot probed
with pERK antibody. Bottom panel, equal amounts
of protein were utilized as evidenced by the Western blot probed with
ERK2 antibody.
|
|
2ARs mediate their intracellular signals via
G
s, which, upon isoproterenol binding is released to
activate adenylate cyclase. This results in the rapid elevation of
intracellular cAMP levels and activation of the
cAMP-dependent protein kinase PKA. To determine whether PKA
plays a role in mediating endogenous ERK activation we utilized the
selective PKA inhibitor H89 (44). Pretreatment of serum-starved HEK293
cells with H89 completely eliminated the ability of isoproterenol to
activate ERK kinase (Fig. 2). As a positive control, we treated cells with forskolin, an activator of
adenylate cyclase. Forskolin activated ERKs, and H89 abolished forskolin activation of ERKs (Fig. 2). Taken together, the above data
demonstrate that isoproterenol activates endogenous signaling pathways
that utilize both the
2AR and the
cAMP-dependent kinase PKA.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Endogenous
2-adrenergic receptors in HEK293 cells
activate ERKs via PKA. Serum-starved HEK293 cells were treated
with isoproterenol for 3 min or forskolin for 5 min in the absence or
presence of the PKA inhibitor H89 (10 µM), as indicated.
Cells were then lysed, and equal protein amounts per treatment
condition were used for Western blot with pERK or kinase assay using
MBP as a substrate. A representative experiment showing both pERK
(upper panel) and kinase activity
(middle panel) is shown. The lower
panel demonstrates equal protein levels as evidenced by
Western blot probed for ERK2.
|
|
ERK Activation by Isoproterenol Is Insensitive to PTx Treatment--
Recent reports using HEK293 cells transiently transfected with
cDNA encoding the
2AR have shown that
isoproterenol-induced activation of ERK was blocked by PTx (41, 45).
These data imply that ERK activation utilizes a G
i (or
G
o) pathway to stimulate ERK activity. To investigate
whether
2AR can activate endogenous signaling pathways
in the presence of PTx, we pretreated HEK293 cells overnight with PTx
and assessed the ability of isoproterenol to activate endogenous ERKs.
In an extended time course measuring ERK activation by isoproterenol,
no differences between PTx-treated cells and untreated cells were seen
(Fig. 3A). ERK activation following treatment of HEK293 cells with both the muscarinic agonist carbachol (Fig. 3A) and lysophosphatidic acid (data not
shown) was blocked by PTx, consistent with their ability to couple to G
i. To further confirm that the activation of ERKs by
isoproterenol was insensitive to PTx, immune complex kinases assays
were performed on endogenous ERK1/2. As can be seen in Fig.
3B, isoproterenol's activation of ERKs was not blocked by
PTx. However, activation of ERKs by the
-adrenergic receptor
agonist, clonidine, was blocked by PTx. As a negative control, we show
that EGF-mediated activation of ERKs was not blocked by PTx (Fig.
3A). These results would indicate that
2AR is
able to activate endogenous ERKs via a
G
i/G
o-independent pathway.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
2AR-mediated
activation of ERKs via endogenous receptors is insensitive to PTx.
A, HEK293 cells were serum-starved and received either no
pretreatment or pretreatment with 100 ng/ml PTx for 16 h. Cells
were then stimulated with 10 µM isoproterenol for the
indicated times. As negative and positive controls, respectively,
HEK293 cells were also treated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min and 10 µM carbachol for 5 min in the presence or absence of PTx.
HEK293 cells were lysed, and equal amounts of protein were analyzed by
Western blotting with pERK antibody (upper
panel). B, HEK293 cells were prepared similarly
to those in panel A with PTx pre-treatment for 16 h. Cells were
then treated with 10 µM isoproterenol for 3 min, 100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min, and 50 µM clonidine for 5 min. Cells
were lysed, and endogenous ERK1/2 were immunoprecipitated from
equivalent amounts of protein using agarose-coupled ERK antibodies (as
in Fig. 1B). A representative immune complex kinase assay
with the location and phosphorylation of the MBP substrate is shown
(upper panel). The lower
panel represents a Western blot identifying the levels of
ERK2 to control for protein loading.
|
|
ERK Activation by
2AR Requires Rap1--
Recent
studies have identified a role for Rap1 in signaling via G proteins (9,
18, 19). Therefore, we sought to determine whether endogenous
2AR stimulation by isoproterenol could activate Rap1. To
determine whether Rap1 was activated in response to isoproterenol treatment, we performed a time course of Rap1 activation. Endogenous Rap1 was activated at the earliest time point examined with maximal activation observed from 3 to 5 min, and a return to base line by 20 min (Fig. 4A). As previously
demonstrated, thrombin was also able to induce endogenous Rap1 activity
in these cells (39). To investigate the requirement for PKA in
activating Rap1, cells were pretreated with H89. Pretreatment of HEK293
cells with 10 µM H89 blocked the ability of either
forskolin or isoproterenol to activate Rap1 at 3 min, but had no effect
on thrombin's action (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these
results would suggest that
2AR activates Rap1 in a
PKA-dependent manner. Recent studies have suggested that
the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor, C3G, may play a role in
activating Rap1 (46). C3G is constitutively associated with a member of
the Crk adaptor family and is stabilized by its association with Crk-L
(47). As can be seen in Fig. 4C, cotransfection of Flag-Rap1
along with Crk-L and C3G results in Rap1 activation in HEK293 cells as
in other cell types (47). To determine whether C3G is playing a role in
activating Rap1 in response to isoproterenol we used a truncated mutant
of C3G containing the CRK-binding region, CBR, which interferes with
CRK function (46, 47). Transfection of CBR along with Flag-Rap1 blocked
the ability of isoproterenol to activate Rap1 (Fig. 4C). To
further confirm the role for PKA in activating Rap1 in response to
isoproterenol we co-transfected the PKA-specific inhibitory protein,
PKI, which abolished the ability of isoproterenol to activate Rap1
(Fig. 4C). These results would suggest that Rap activation
in response to
2AR stimulation is
PKA-dependent and also utilizes the guanine-nucleotide
exchange factor C3G. Indeed, HEK293 cells express endogenous levels of C3G (Fig. 4D) raising the possibility that the
2AR may utilize C3G to activate Rap1.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Isoproterenol activation of Rap1.
A, time course of activation of Rap1 by isoproterenol.
Serum-starved HEK293 cells were treated with 10 µM
isoproterenol or 0.1 unit/ml thrombin for the indicated times. Equal
amounts of cell lysate were incubated with pre-coupled GST-RalGDS
protein, and analyzed by Western blot for GTP-loaded Rap1. HEK293 cell
lysate was used to indicate the position of Rap1. B,
isoproterenol activation of Rap1 is sensitive to H89. Cells were
stimulated with 10 µM isoproterenol for 3 min and 10 µM forskolin for 5 min, following a pretreatment with H89
(10 µM); equal amounts of cell lysate were used to assay
for GTP-loaded Rap1. Thrombin was used as a positive control for Rap1
activation and a negative control for H89. C, isoproterenol
activation of Rap is sensitive to PKI and CBR. HEK293 cells were
co-transfected with Flag-Rap1 and the indicated cDNAs,
serum-starved, and stimulated with 10 µM isoproterenol
for 3 min. Cells transfected with Crk-L/C3G were not stimulated. Equal
amounts of cell lysate were incubated to assay for GTP-loaded Rap1
using GST-RalGDS and a Flag (M2) antibody to identify Flag-Rap1
protein. D, HEK293 cells express C3G. Western blotting of
equal amounts of protein were used to represent cell lysates from
various cell types: COS 7 (lane 1), PC12
(lane 2), and HEK293 (lane
3).
|
|
Recent data have suggested that the small G protein Ras may play a role
in mediating ERK activation by
2AR (41, 48). To examine
the ability of
2AR to activate Ras, we examined a time
course of Ras activation. Similar to Rap1 activation, Ras appeared to
be activated very early following isoproterenol stimulation and was
inactive by 5-10 min (Fig.
5A). HEK293 cells were treated with EGF as a positive control for Ras activation. To determine whether
Ras activation was PKA-dependent, HEK293 cells were
pretreated with H89 and stimulated with isoproterenol. H89 pretreatment
had no effect on Ras activation (Fig. 5B), suggesting that
Ras is activated by isoproterenol in a PKA-independent fashion.
Consistent with this result, forskolin did not activate Ras. Moreover,
EGF stimulation of Ras was not blocked by H89, suggesting that H89's effect was specific for PKA. These data would indicate that Ras activation by
2AR did not require cAMP or PKA and
suggests that G
s stimulation of adenylate cyclase was
not directly involved in Ras activation.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Isoproterenol activation of Ras.
A, time course of activation of Ras by isoproterenol. HEK293
cells were serum-starved and treated with 10 µM
isoproterenol or 100 ng/ml EGF for the indicated times. Equal
quantities of cell lysate were incubated with GST-Raf1RBD, and analyzed
by Western blot for GTP-loaded Ras. HEK293 cell lysate was used to
indicate the position of Ras. B, isoproterenol activation of
Ras is insensitive to H89. Serum-starved HEK293 cells were treated with
isoproterenol for 3 min, 10 µM forskolin for 5 min, or
100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min following a pretreatment with H89 (10 µM); equal amounts of cell lysate were used to assay for
GTP-loaded Ras. EGF was used as a control for Ras activation.
|
|
Based on the finding that both Rap1 and Ras were rapidly activated in
response to isoproterenol treatment, we next examined the role of these
small G proteins in mediating ERK activation. HEK293 cells were
transiently transfected with cDNAs encoding an interfering mutant
of Rap1, RapN17, the Rap1 antagonist Rap1GAP1, and the interfering
mutant of Ras, RasN17. These mutants have previously been characterized
by our laboratory and others and function as selective blockers
of Rap1 or Ras signaling (9, 49,
50).2 Cells transfected with
myc-ERK and stimulated with 10 µM isoproterenol for 3 min
displayed robust ERK kinase activity (Fig.
6A). Isoproterenol-induced ERK
activation was significantly reduced when cells were co-transfected with either RapN17 or Rap1GAP1. RasN17 did not appear to have a
significant effect (Fig. 6A). The differences in kinase
activity were not attributed to varying levels of myc-ERK expression
(Fig. 6A, lower panel). Quantification
of three independent experiments revealed that ERK kinase activity,
induced by isoproterenol for 3 min, was significantly reduced by either
RapN17 or Rap1GAP1 (Fig. 6B). These data indicate that
endogenous Rap1, but not endogenous Ras, is required for
2AR to activate MAP kinase at this time point.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
2AR-mediated
activation of ERKs requires Rap1. A, Rap is required
for ERK activation by isoproterenol. HEK293 cells were transfected with
the indicated cDNAs and treated with 10 µM
isoproterenol for 3 min. Equivalent amounts of cell lysate were
immunoprecipitated using an agarose-coupled Myc antibody followed by an
immune complex kinase assay with the location and phosphorylation of
MBP shown by autoradiography. A representative experiment can be seen
in the upper panel (n = 3).
Lower panel, equal amounts of Myc-tagged protein
were loaded as evidenced by the Western blot probed with Myc antibody.
B, data representing multiple myc-ERK immune complex kinase
assays (from A) are shown as -fold activation over basal
(untreated cells) (n = 3 ± S.D.).
|
|
Isoproterenol Induces Rap1/B-Raf Association and B-Raf Kinase
Activity--
To further investigate the function of active Rap1 in
mediating MAP kinase activation in HEK293 cells, we examined the
downstream target of Rap1, B-Raf. Prior studies from our laboratory
have demonstrated in PC12 cells, which express high levels of B-Raf, that cAMP is able to activate ERKs through a PKA/Rap1/B-Raf pathway (9). HEK293 cells also express high levels of endogenous B-Raf protein
(Fig. 7A). HEK293 cells were
left untransfected or transfected with His-Rap or a constitutively
active mutant of His-Rap, His-RapV12 (9, 52), serum-starved, and
treated with isoproterenol for 3 min in the absence or presence of H89.
Isoproterenol stimulation induced Rap1/B-Raf association and B-Raf
kinase activity (Fig. 7B). Both the association and kinase
activity was blocked by the PKA inhibitor H89. Results from three
independent experiments are shown in Fig. 7C.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
2AR activates
B-Raf, but not Raf-1, via Rap1. A, HEK293 cells express
B-Raf. Western blotting of equal amounts of protein were used to
represent cell lysates from various cell types: PC12 (1),
HEK293 (2), Rat1 fibroblast (3), and PC3
(4). B, isoproterenol induces Rap1/B-Raf
association and B-Raf kinase activity. HEK293 cells were transfected
with His-tagged Rap1 (His-Rap) or His-RapV12 cDNAs, serum-starved,
and treated with 10 µM isoproterenol for 3 min or left
untreated, in the absence or presence of the PKA inhibitor, H89 as
indicated. Equal amounts of protein were passed over a nickel column,
and eluates were probed by Western blotting for B-Raf (upper
panel) and kinase activity using MEK-1 as a substrate
(middle panel). Representative results are shown
(n = 3). The bottom panel
indicates similar protein amounts of His-Rap per treatment as assayed
by Western blot. C, data representing multiple B-Raf kinase
assays. Bars indicate -fold activation over basal
(n = 3 ± S.D.). D, isoproterenol
inhibits Ras/Raf-1 association. HEK293 cells were transfected with
His-Ras, serum-starved, and treated with either 10 µM
isoproterenol for 3 min, 100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min, or pretreated with 10 µM isoproterenol for 5 min and then EGF. Equal amounts of
protein lysate underwent nickel affinity purification, and eluates were
probed by Western blotting for Raf-1 (upper
panel). The lower panel demonstrates
similar levels of His-Ras protein. E, isoproterenol inhibits
Ras/B-Raf association. HEK293 cells were transfected with His-Ras,
serum-starved, and stimulated identically to Fig. 6D.
Following nickel affinity purification, eluates were probed by Western
blotting for B-Raf (upper panel). The
lower panel indicates similar levels of
His-Ras.
|
|
Isoproterenol stimulation of HEK293 cells induced the activation of Ras
(Fig. 5A). To determine whether active Ras could couple to
relevant downstream effectors, we investigated its ability to associate
with the Raf isoforms B-Raf and Raf-1. Previous studies have suggested
that recruitment of Raf to Ras is necessary for its activation
(53-56). HEK293 cells were transfected with His-tagged Ras cDNA
(His-Ras) and treated with either isoproterenol or EGF, or pretreated
with isoproterenol and then treated with EGF. Results presented in Fig.
7D suggest that isoproterenol stimulation did not induce the
association of endogenous Raf-1 with Ras. More importantly,
pretreatment with isoproterenol inhibited the ability of EGF to induce
the association of endogenous Raf-1 with Ras (Fig. 7D).
Parallel experiments examining the association of B-Raf with Ras
indicated that isoproterenol alone inhibited basal as well as
EGF-induced association of B-Raf with Ras (Fig. 7E). These results suggest that, although Ras is activated by
2AR,
it is unable to couple to either Raf-1 or B-Raf kinases.
ERK Activation by
2AR Occurs Independently of EGF
Receptor Phosphorylation--
A recent study has suggested a role for
the EGF receptor in mediating
2AR-induced ERK activation
(57). To address the requirement for the EGF receptor in
2AR signaling, we treated cells with the EGF receptor
kinase inhibitor AG1478, which specifically inhibits kinase
activity of the receptor. Pretreatment of cells with AG1478 did not
block isoproterenol-induced activation of endogenous ERKs (Fig.
8A). The above results would
suggest that Rap1-dependent activation of ERKs by
2AR does not require EGF receptor transactivation.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
ERK/Ras activation by
2AR does not require EGF receptor
phosphorylation. A, isoproterenol-mediated activation
of ERKs is EGF receptor-independent. Serum-starved HEK293 cells were
pretreated with 200 nM AG1478 for 20 min, followed by 10 µM isoproterenol stimulation for the indicated times. As
a control, cells were also treated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min.
Lysates were subjected to Western blotting using pERK antibodies
(upper panel) or ERK2 antibody (lower
panel) to confirm equal protein amounts of cell lysate were
utilized. B, isoproterenol stimulation of Ras is EGF
receptor-independent. HEK293 cells were serum-starved and pretreated
with 200 nM AG1478 for 20 min, followed by a 3-min
stimulation with 10 µM isoproterenol. Stimulation with
100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min was used as a control for Ras activation. Equal
amounts of cell lysate were incubated with pre-coupled GST-Raf1RBD and
analyzed by Western blot for GTP-loaded Ras. C,
isoproterenol-mediated activation of Ras is insensitive to PTx. HEK293
cells were pretreated with 100 ng/ml PTx for 16 h and then
stimulated with either 10 µM isoproterenol for 3 min or
10 µM carbachol for 5 min, as indicated. Equal amounts of
cell lysate were incubated with pre-coupled GST-Raf1RBD and analyzed by
Western blot for GTP-loaded Ras.
|
|
Recent studies have also suggested that the activation of Ras by
2AR may also utilize the EGF receptor, via non-classical coupling to G
i (57). To further elucidate the mechanism
by which Ras is activated by
2AR, we determined whether
endogenous Ras activation by isoproterenol was dependent on EGF
receptor activation. Pretreatment of HEK293 cells with AG1478 did not
block Ras activation by isoproterenol at 3 min (Fig. 8B). To
investigate the possibility that G
i may signal to Ras,
we pretreated HEK293 cells with PTx and stimulated cells with either
isoproterenol or carbachol for 3 and 5 min, respectively.
Representative data presented in Fig. 8C demonstrate that
Ras activation by isoproterenol, but not by carbachol, was insensitive
to PTx. As a positive control, we show that Ras activation by carbachol
was sensitive to PTx (Fig. 8C). The above data as well as
that presented in Fig. 5A indicate that Ras is activated by
the endogenous
2AR independently of either the EGF
receptor or G
i.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The second messenger cAMP is the best studied intracellular
signal. Its major action, the activation of PKA (28, 29) allows hormonal signals to couple to intracellular phosphorylation events. Hormonal elevation of cAMP levels is triggered by the specific heterotrimeric G protein subunit G
s. The range of
extracellular ligands that couple to G
s is extensive and includes
moderately sized peptides, including vasoactive intestinal
peptide-like, members of the glucagon/secretin superfamily,
adrenocorticotropic hormone, parathyroid stimulating hormone, and a
large family of hypothalamic releasing factors, as well as the family
of large glycoproteins thyroid stimulating hormone,
follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone. Small molecules
can also activate Gs to stimulate adenylate cyclases,
including dopamine (via the D1 receptor), adenosine (via the
A2A receptor), prostaglandin E, and the family of
adrenergic molecules, including epinephrine and norepinephrine
(58-60). The cognate receptors for all these ligands are heptahelical
transmembrane proteins (also called serpentine receptors) that
associate with G
s.
In the unliganded, resting state, these receptors bind inactive
GDP-bound G
s subunits that are associated with specific

subunits. Upon ligand binding, exchange of GTP for GDP converts
into its active GTP-bound state, causing it to be released from the
receptor, where it is free to bind to, and activate,
membrane-associated adenylate cyclases. At the same time that
G
s dissociates from the receptor, 
is released
from G
s and can activate effectors independently of
G
s. 
signaling from Gs-coupled
receptors has not been reported. However, 
release from
Gi and Gq is well known to activate a number of
intracellular kinases, including phosphoinositol 3-kinase (20, 21),
phospholipase C (61), Src (16), and ERK (15, 62).
The ability of Gs-coupled receptors to modulate the MAP
kinase (or ERK) cascade provides a mechanism for cAMP-coupled signaling pathways to regulate cell growth (3). The best studied actions of cAMP
on ERK signaling are inhibitory and lead to a decrease in cellular
proliferation (30-32). This is achieved, in part, by a
PKA-dependent phosphorylation of the MAP kinase kinase
kinase Raf-1 on serine 43, which uncouples Raf-1 from its upstream
activator Ras (30). In cells that express the Raf isoform B-Raf (which does not contain a PKA site corresponding to serine 43), cAMP can
activate ERKs (9, 35, 63). Although this has been shown in multiple
cell types, additional factors may influence cAMPs ability to activate
B-Raf. Indeed, cAMP has also been reported to inhibit the activation of
B-Raf through a PKA phosphorylation near the kinase domain itself.
However, this effect is only seen in truncated proteins lacking the N
terminus of B-Raf (64). In cells that express a truncated splice
variant of B-Raf that also lacks the N terminus, cAMPs inhibitory
effects may predominate (65). However, cAMP robustly activates the
full-length B-Raf protein, which is achieved via the activation of the
small G protein Rap1 (9, 66, 67). Interestingly, Rap1 is also an
antagonist of Ras-dependent signaling (52, 68, 69) and
blocks Ras-dependent activation of Raf-1 (52, 70-72).
Unlike Ras, Rap1 is activated by increased cAMP levels via PKA.
Recently, Rap1 activators have been identified that can be directly
activated by cAMP, suggesting that cAMP can activate Rap1 via both
PKA-dependent and PKA-independent mechanisms (37, 38). The
ability of
2AR to inhibit ERK signals has been
demonstrated in adipocytes (32) and smooth muscle cells (31). Recently,
2AR has been shown to activate ERKs in HEK293 cells (40,
41, 73). In this study, we show that
2AR can activate
ERKs in HEK293 cells by activating a Rap1/B-Raf pathway, while
simultaneously blocking Ras-dependent signals.
HEK293 cells are commonly used to examine signaling pathways downstream
of transfected receptors (39-41, 74). We show that these cells express
endogenous
2AR and upon isoproterenol stimulation utilize
2AR to activate ERKs. This activation shows an
EC50 of roughly 1-3 µM, consistent with
other actions of isoproterenol, and is rapid and transient (43). Its
actions on ERKs are mimicked by forskolin and require PKA, suggesting
the involvement of G
s and cAMP. Although signaling via
G
s is classically thought to be insensitive to PTx,
recent reports have demonstrated that
2AR can couple to
ERKs via PTx-sensitive pathways (41). These studies, which utilized
transiently transfected cDNAs encoding
2AR in HEK293
cells, proposed a PKA-dependent switch in
2AR affinity from Gs to Gi. In
our hands, PTx did not block
2AR's activation of ERKs,
while blocking the action of known Gi-coupled agents, including carbachol, lysophosphatidic acid, and clonidine. It is
possible that the ability of
2AR to couple to
PTx-sensitive pathways is dependent on elevated levels of
2AR expression.
Both Ras-dependent and Rap1-dependent
mechanisms of
2AR's activation of ERKs have been
proposed (35, 40). Indeed, we show that both Ras and Rap1 were
activated by isoproterenol. Ras is activated rapidly and transiently,
whereas Rap1 activation is slower and is sustained. This is similar to
the kinetics seen in other cell types, including PC12 cells (47) and in
platelets (75). Interestingly, the activation of Rap1, but not Ras,
required PKA. Forskolin, which acts downstream of G
s to
elevate cAMP, also activated Rap1 but did not activate Ras. These data
suggest that
2AR utilized distinct pathways to activate
Ras and Rap1. We propose that Rap1 is activated by G
s
(via cAMP and PKA), and that Ras is activated independently of
G
s, possibly by a 
-dependent pathway.
For Rap1, PKA appears to act upstream of Rap1 itself, possibly through
a mechanism involving the Rap1 guanine-nucleotide exchanger C3G (47).
C3G is expressed in HEK293 cells and is distinct from recently proposed
exchangers like cAMP-GEFs (Epacs) that appear to be activated by cAMP
in a PKA-independent manner (37, 38).
Surprisingly, only Rap1, but not Ras, was required for
2AR's activation of ERKs. Two agents that interfere
with Rap1 signaling, RapN17 and Rap1GAP1, were used. Overexpression of
RapN17 is thought to sequester endogenous activators of Rap1, whereas
Rap1GAP1 stimulates the GTPase activity of endogenous Rap1 to terminate
Rap1 signaling (9, 18, 76). RasN17 is a well characterized selective
interfering mutant of Ras (50, 77). These data suggest that, although both Ras and Rap1 are activated by
2AR, only Rap1 is
capable of transmitting a signal to ERKs. The signal to ERKs is likely to be B-Raf, since B-Raf is the only known MAP kinase kinase kinase that can be activated by Rap1. Indeed, HEK293 cells express the 96-kDa
isoform of B-Raf that is activated by cAMP (9), and endogenous B-Raf is
recruited to Rap1 upon isoproterenol stimulation, in a
PKA-dependent manner. Both Raf-1 and B-Raf have been shown to be efficiently recruited to Ras under the appropriate conditions (54, 66, 78, 79). However, neither Raf-1 nor B-Raf were recruited to
Ras by isoproterenol treatment, although Ras was GTP-loaded (activated)
at the time point used for this study. The inability of Ras to couple
to Raf explains why
2AR's activation of ERK was
independent of Ras.
Isoproterenol not only did not induce Ras association with effectors,
it reversed the ability of Ras to recruit both Raf-1 and B-Raf
following EGF stimulation. For Raf-1, this may be due to the
phosphorylation of Raf-1 at serine 43 by PKA, which dissociates Raf-1
from activated Ras. However, the ability of isoproterenol to block the
recruitment of B-Raf to Ras cannot be explained by this mechanism and
suggests that an additional action of PKA is antagonizing Ras function,
in general. Indeed, cAMP can also block recruitment of B-Raf to Ras
(data not shown). A potential mediator of this effect is Rap1 itself.
We propose a model in which Rap1 activation by PKA has two opposing
functions in B-Raf/Raf-1-expressing cells; the activation of B-Raf and
the antagonism of Ras. The net effect of these two actions will depend
on the relative levels of Rap1 as well as B-Raf and Raf-1 in each cell type.
Although we show that activated Ras cannot activate ERKs in these
cells, the mechanism by which Ras was activated by
2AR in these cells is not known. Recently, the ability of
2AR to activate Ras-dependent signaling has
been suggested by Lefkowitz and colleagues. In their model, transiently
transfected
2AR utilized a PTx-sensitive pathway to
transactivate the endogenous EGF receptor. However, using cells
expressing endogenous
2AR, we show that isoproterenol's
ability to activate either ERK or Ras did not require EGF receptor
kinase activity. In addition, Ras activation by isoproterenol was not
blocked by PTx. Since Ras activation by isoproterenol was not sensitive
to H89, we propose that Ras activation by
2AR is not
mediated by PKA, Gi, or EGF receptor. We suggest that

subunits, which have been shown to activate Ras in many systems,
may contribute to
2AR's actions. The ability of both
and 
to regulate ERK signaling following receptor binding may
be a common mechanism of coordinating signals to ERKs. For example,
hormones that are able to activate Gi-coupled pathways have
been shown to modulate ERKs via both 
and
subunits. 
activates Ras via phosphoinositol 3-kinase
(21) and
G
i activates a Rap1GAPII to inactivate Rap1 (19). Here,
we show a second mechanism of Rap1 regulation by
subunits, the
activation of Rap1 via elevation of intracellular cAMP levels. Although
PKA-independent regulation of Rap1 by cAMP has been proposed (37, 38),
the data shown here demonstrate that cAMP requires PKA to activate Rap1
in HEK293 cells, as well as other cell types (9, 35, 39).
The Rap1/B-Raf pathway identified here may be an important mechanism by
which
2AR stimulates ERKs in multiple systems. This may
be especially true in neurons and in prostate cells that express high
levels of B-Raf and where cAMP signaling to ERKs has been shown to
require Rap1 (9, 63, 80). For example,
2AR-dependent models of long term
potentiation in hippocampal neurons has recently been shown to require
ERKs (81) and deficits in this form of long term potentiation have been
identified in transgenic mice deficient in hippocampal Rap1 signaling
(82). Taken together, these studies suggest that the ability of
Gs-coupled receptors to activate or inhibit ERKs may
depend, in part, on the expression of B-Raf (51). Although the
activation of Rap1 may have a significant positive effect on ERK
signaling in B-Raf-expressing cells, one can speculate that the
activation of Rap1 by Gs-coupled receptors may antagonize
Ras-dependent signaling to ERKs in cells that do not
express B-Raf.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Savraj Grewal and Mike Forte for
critically reading the manuscript and Ken Carey and Dr. Johannes Bos
for generating and providing important reagents.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Vollum Inst., L474,
Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd.,
Portland, OR 97201-3098. Tel.: 503-494-5494; E-mail:
stork@ohsu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003213200
2
K. D. Carey, J. M. Schmitt,
A. M. Baird, T. J. Dillon, A. D. Holdorf, A. S. Shaw, and P. J. S. Stork, submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MAP, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase;
GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase;
2AR,
2-adrenergic receptor;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
PTx, pertussis toxin;
MBP, myelin basic protein;
GST, glutathione S-transferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(2000)
Nature
403,
255-256
|
| 2.
|
Graves, L. M.,
Guy, H. I.,
Kozlowski, P.,
Huang, M.,
Lazarowski, E.,
Pope, R. M.,
Collins, M. A.,
Dahlstrand, E. N.,
Earp, H. S., III,
and Evans, D. R.
(2000)
Nature
403,
328-332
|
| 3.
|
Dhanasekaran, N.,
Heasley, L. E.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
Endocrine Rev.
16,
259-270
|
| 4.
|
Avruch, J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
182,
31-48
|
| 5.
|
Boulton, T. G.,
Nye, S. H.,
Robbins, D. J.,
Ip, N. Y.,
Radziejewska, E.,
Morgenbesser, S. D.,
DePinho, R. A., N, P.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1991)
Cell
65,
663-675
|
| 6.
|
Bourne, H. R.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
134-142
|
| 7.
|
Ginell, R. P.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
741-749
|
| 8.
|
Sugden, P. H.,
and Clerk, A.
(1997)
Cell. Signal.
9,
337-351
|
| 9.
|
Vossler, M.,
Yao, H.,
York, R.,
Rim, C.,
Pan, M.-G.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1997)
Cell
89,
73-82
|
| 10.
|
van Biesen, T.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
Hawes, B. E.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
Endocr. Rev.
17,
698-714
|
| 11.
|
Budd, D. C.,
Rae, A.,
and Tobin, A. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12355-12360
|
| 12.
|
Lev, S.,
Moreno, H.,
Martinez, R.,
Canoll, P.,
Peles, E.,
Musacchio, J. M.,
Plowman, G. D.,
Rudy, B.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1995)
Nature
376,
737-745
|
| 13.
|
Tang, H.,
Zhao, Z. J.,
Huang, X. Y.,
Landon, E. J.,
and Inagami, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12401-12407
|
| 14.
|
Wan, Y.,
Kurosaki, T.,
and Huang, X. Y.
(1996)
Nature
380,
541-544
|
| 15.
|
Florio, T.,
Yao, H.,
Carey, K. D.,
Dillon, T. J.,
and Stork, P. J.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
24-37
|
| 16.
|
Luttrell, L. M.,
Hawes, B. E.,
van Biesen, T.,
Luttrell, D. K.,
Lansing, T. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19443-19450
|
| 17.
|
Jiang, Y.,
Ma, W.,
Wan, Y.,
Kozasa, T.,
Hattori, S.,
and Huang, X. Y.
(1998)
Nature
395,
808-813
|
| 18.
|
Jordan, J. D.,
Carey, K. D.,
Stork, P. J. S.,
and Iyengar, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21507-21510
|
| 19.
|
Mochizuki, N.,
Ohba, Y.,
Kiyokawa, E.,
Kurata, T.,
Murakami, T.,
Ozaki, T.,
Kitabatake, A.,
Nagashima, K.,
and Matsuda, M.
(1999)
Nature
400,
891-894
|
| 20.
|
Hawes, B. E.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
van Biesen, T.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12133-12136
|
| 21.
|
Lopez-Llasaca, M.,
Crespo, P.,
Pellicci, P. G.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
and Wetzker, R.
(1997)
Science
275,
394-397
|
| 22.
|
Landis, C.,
Masters, S.,
Spada, A.,
Pace, A.,
Bourne, H.,
and Vallar, L.
(1989)
Nature
340,
692-696
|
| 23.
|
Lyons, J.,
Landis, C. A.,
Harsh, G.,
Vallar, L.,
Grunewald, K.,
Feichtinger, H.,
Duh, Q. Y.,
Clark, O. H.,
Kawasaki, E.,
Bourne, H. R.,
and McCormack, F.
(1990)
Science
249,
655-659
|
| 24.
|
Zachary, I.,
Master, S. B.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
168,
1184-1193
|
| 25.
|
Faure, M.,
Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T. A.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7851-7854
|
| 26.
|
Masters, S. B.,
Sullivan, K. A.,
Miller, R. T.,
Beiderman, B.,
Lopez, N. G.,
Ramachandran, J.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1988)
Science
241,
448-451
|
| 27.
|
Pieroni, J. P.,
Jacobowitz, O.,
Chen, J.,
and Iyengar, R.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
3,
345-351
|
| 28.
|
Butcher, R. W.,
Robison, G. A.,
Hardman, J. G.,
and Sutherland, E. W.
(1968)
Adv. Enzyme Regul.
6,
357-389
|
| 29.
|
Beavo, J. A.,
Bechtel, P. J.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1975)
Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res.
5,
241-251
|
| 30.
|
Wu, J.,
Dent, P.,
Jelinek, T.,
Wolfman, A.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1993)
Science
262,
1065-1068
|
| 31.
|
Graves, L. M.,
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
Raines, E. W.,
Potts, B. C.,
Macdonald, S. G.,
Ross, R.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10300-10304
|
| 32.
|
Sevetson, B. R.,
Kong, X.,
and Lawrence, J. C., Jr.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A.
90,
10305-10309
|
| 33.
|
Cook, S. J.,
and McCormick, F.
(1993)
Science
262,
1069-1072
|
| 34.
|
Chen, J.,
and Iyengar, R.
(1994)
Science
263,
1278-1281
|
| 35.
|
Wan, Y.,
and Huang, X. Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14533-14537
|
| 36.
|
Dugan, L. L.,
Creedon, D. J.,
Johnson, E. M.,
and Holtzman, D. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4086-4091
|
| 37.
|
Kawasaki, H.,
Springett, G. M.,
Mochizuki, N.,
Toki, S.,
Nakaya, M.,
Matsuda, M.,
Housman, D. E.,
and Graybiel, A. M.
(1998)
Science
282,
2275-2279
|
| 38.
|
de Rooij, J.,
Zwartkruis, F. J.,
Verheijen, M. H.,
Cool, R. H.,
Nijman, S. M.,
Wittinghofer, A.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1998)
Nature
396,
474-477
|
| 39.
|
Seidel, M. G.,
Klinger, M.,
Freissmuth, M.,
and Holler, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25833-25841
|
| 40.
|
Della Rocca, G. J.,
van Biesen, T.,
Daaka, Y.,
Luttrell, D. K.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19125-19132
|
| 41.
|
Daaka, Y.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1997)
Nature
390,
88-91
|
| 42.
|
Franke, B.,
Akkerman, J.-W.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
252-259
|
| 43.
|
Crespo, P.,
Cachero, T. G.,
Xu, N.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25259-25265
|
| 44.
|
Chijiwa, T.,
Mishima, A.,
Hagiwara, M.,
Sano, M.,
Hayashi, K.,
Inoue, T.,
Naito, K.,
Toshioka, T.,
and Hidaka, H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
5267-5272
|
| 45.
|
Pierce, K. L.,
Maudsley, S.,
Daaka, Y.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1489-1494
|
| 46.
|
Gotoh, T.,
Hattori, S.,
Nakamura, S.,
Kitayama, H.,
Noda, M.,
Takai, Y.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
Matsui, H.,
Hatase, O.,
Takahashi, H.,
Kurata, T.,
and Matsuda, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
6746-6753
|
| 47.
|
York, R. D.,
Yao, H.,
Dillon, T.,
Ellig, C. L.,
Eckert, S. P.,
McCleskey, E. W.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1998)
Nature
392,
622-625
|
| 48.
|
Zou, Y.,
Komuro, I.,
Yamazaki, T.,
Kudoh, S.,
Uozumi, H.,
Kadowaki, T.,
and Yazaki, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9760-9770
|
| 49.
|
Tsukamoto, N.,
Hattori, M.,
Yang, H.,
Bos, J. L.,
and Minato, N.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
18463-18469
|
| 50.
|
Feig, L. A.,
and Cooper, G. M.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
3235-3243
|
| 51.
|
Schaeffer, H. J.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2435-2444
|
| 52.
|
Cook, S. J.,
Rubinfeld, B.,
Albert, I.,
and McCormick, F.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
3475-3485
|
| 53.
|
Mineo, C.,
Anderson, R. G.,
and White, M. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10345-10348
|
| 54.
|
Marais, R.,
Light, Y.,
Paterson, H. F.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
3136-3145
|
| 55.
|
Marais, R.,
Light, Y.,
Paterson, H. F.,
Mason, C. S.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4378-4383
|
| 56.
|
Morrison, D. K.,
and Cutler, R. E., J.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
174-179
|
| 57.
|
Maudsley, S.,
Pierce, K. L.,
Zamah, A. M.,
Miller, W. E.,
Ahn, S.,
Daaka, Y.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
and Luttrell, L. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9572-9580
|
| 58.
|
Spiegel, A. M.,
Shenker, A.,
and Weinstein, L. S.
(1992)
Endocr. Rev.
13,
536-565
|
| 59.
|
Ji, T. H.,
Grossmann, M.,
and Ji, I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17299-17302
|
| 60.
|
Iismaa, T. P.,
and Shine, J.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
4,
195-202
|
| 61.
|
Birnbaumer, L.
(1992)
Cell
71,
10069-10072
|
| 62.
|
Luttrell, L. M.,
van Biesen, T.,
Hawes, B. E.,
Koch, W. J.,
Touhara, K.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16495-16498
|
| 63.
|
Dugan, L. L.,
Kim, J. S.,
Zhang, Y.,
Bart, R. D.,
Sun, Y.,
Holtzman, D. M.,
and Gutmann, D. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25842-25848
|
| 64.
|
MacNicol, M. C.,
and MacNicol, A. |