|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002299200 on June 23, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 34, 26121-26127, August 25, 2000
Kinetic Effects of the Electrochemical Proton Gradient on
Plastoquinone Reduction at the Qi Site of the Cytochrome
b6f Complex*
Romina Paola
Barbagallo §,
Cécile
Breyton¶ , and
Giovanni
Finazzi **
From the Centro di Studio del CNR sulla Biologia
Cellulare e Molecolare delle Piante, via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano,
Italy and the ¶ Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Department of
Structural Biology, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Strasse 7, D-60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Received for publication, March 20, 2000, and in revised form, June 12, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have investigated the effects of the
light-induced thylakoid transmembrane potential on the turnover of the
b6f complex in cells of the
unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The
reduction of the potential by either decreasing the light intensity or
by adding increasing concentrations of the ionophore carbonylcyanide p-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone
(FCCP) revealed a marked inhibition of the cytochrome
b6 oxidation rate (10-fold) without substantial
modifications of cytochrome f oxidation kinetics. Partial
recovery of this inhibition could be obtained in the presence of
ionophores provided that the membrane potential was re-established by
illumination with a train of actinic flashes fired at a frequency higher than its decay. Measurements of isotopic effects on the kinetics
of cytochrome b6 oxidation revealed a synergy
between the effects of ionophores and the
H2O-D2O exchange. We propose therefore, that
protonation events influence the kinetics of cytochrome b6 oxidation at the Qi site and that these
reactions are strongly influenced by the light-dependent
generation of a transmembrane potential.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The cytochrome b6f
complex is a central component of the photosynthetic chain,
transferring electrons from the photosystem II
(PSII)1 to the photosystem I
(PSI). It comprises four major subunits (1, 2): the Rieske protein,
which binds a Fe2S2 cluster, with an
Em of +290 mV (3), a c-type cytochrome, cytochrome f, with an Em of +330 mV (2), a b-type
cytochrome, cytochrome b6, which binds the high
and low potential hemes, bh and
bl, with Em values of 84 mV and
158 mV, respectively (2), and the subunit IV. Four additional small subunits PetG, PetL, PetM and PetN (2, 4-5) have also been evidenced. Sequence comparisons have shown that cytochrome
b6 and subunit IV are, respectively, homologous
to the N- and C-terminal parts of mitochondrial and bacterial
cytochromes b (6).
As a member of the bc-type proteins, cytochrome
b6f complex couples proton
translocation across the membrane to electron transfer from a
lipophilic two-electron donor (plastoquinol) to a hydrophilic one-electron acceptor protein (plastocyanin or a c-type cytochrome). This electron transfer operates through a high potential chain (also
called the linear path) formed by the Rieske protein and cytochrome
f. The most widely accepted hypothesis to explain the function mechanism of bc complexes is the "Q cycle"
hypothesis of Mitchell (7). It predicts that oxidation of quinols
not only involves the linear path but also a cyclic path composed of
the b hemes, bl and
bh, and termed the low potential chain. This
mechanism, as modified by Crofts et al. (8), postulates both
an oxidation and a reduction of plastoquinol at two distinct sites of
the protein, the Qo and Qi sites, on opposite sides of the membrane.
The oxidation of plastoquinol at the Qo site is associated with the
reduction of both cytochrome f and bl
(7-8) and the release of two protons into the lumen.
The recent elucidation of the structure of the respiratory
bc1 complex, the mitochondrial analogue of the
b6f complex, by x-ray
crystallography (9-11) suggests a mechanism for plastoquinol oxidation
at the Qo site (9-11). It has been reported that the extramembrane
domain of the Rieske protein assumes different conformations with
respect to its transmembrane helix (10-13). A movement of the quinol
molecule has also been predicted, on the basis of the position within
the Qo site of residues responsible for the resistance to different
inhibitors (10-13). An interpretative model has been then proposed
(11, 14) according to which the quinol and the oxidized Rieske protein
remain close together at the Qo site until an electron is transferred
from the quinol to the iron of the Rieske. They then move apart to
reduce the bl and the c heme,
respectively. We have recently confirmed the validity of this model in
the case of the cytochrome b6f
complex, measuring the effects of different inhibitors of the Qo site
on the kinetics of electron injection into the low and the high
potential paths (15).
Less information is available on the oxidation mechanism of the
b6 hemes (16-18). According to the Q cycle,
this occurs through a two-step reduction of a plastoquinone molecule at
the Qi site. Thus, under oxidizing conditions, the electron transfer
sequence is the reduction by plastoquinol of cytochrome
bl, which is in turn oxidized by cytochrome
bh. A second turnover places both
bl and bh in a reduced state and causes the reduction of a plastoquinone to a plastoquinol at the Qi
site, b hemes reoxidation, and proton uptake from the
stromal space. The redox cofactors involved in plastoquinol oxidation through the linear path (the Fe2S2 cluster and
the c-type heme) lie in a plane parallel to that of the membrane,
whereas the b hemes axis (cyclic path) is essentially
perpendicular to it (9-12). As a consequence, only the cyclic
path is electrogenic, as it involves the vectorial transfer of one
charge across the membrane. This charge movement, in addition to PSI
and PSII charge separation, is responsible for the generation of an
electric field across the membrane ( ) (19). The 
contributes with the pH (resulting from the activity of PSII and of
cytochrome b6f) to the
generation of the electrochemical proton gradient
( H+) (19).
This model has been confirmed experimentally in the case of the
cytochrome bc1 complex, mainly on the basis of
results obtained in the presence of the inhibitor antimycin (20), which
is known to bind selectively to the Qi site (9-11, 21). However, these results cannot be transposed directly to the cytochrome
b6f complex for the following
different reasons. (i) Antimycin is not effective in the case of the
b6f complex (21). Other
inhibitors specifically affect the Qi site of the
b6f complex (e.g.
2-n-nonyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxide; NQNO;
22), the mechanism of which seems to be similar to that of
antimycin (23-24), although not identical (see a discussion in Ref.
17); (ii) the redox potentials of the b hemes are different in the bc1 and the
b6f complexes (reviewed in
Ref. 25). This difference probably explains why the equilibrium between
the heme bh and the quinone molecule is shifted in
favor of the latter in the bc1 complexes and of
the former in the case of cytochrome b6f complexes (16-17). This
has a relevant consequence on the mechanism of quinone reduction at the
Qi site; although the two electrons can be injected consecutively onto
the quinone molecule in the case of the bc1, the
transfer must occur essentially in a concerted manner in the case of
the cytochrome b6f complex
(16-17).
In this paper, we have studied the mechanism of cytochrome
b6 oxidation in intact cells of the green algae
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. We have observed an inhibition of
the cytochrome b6 oxidation rate (by a factor of
~10) when the membrane potential decay was accelerated by the
addition of the ionophore FCCP, without substantial modifications of
cytochrome f oxidation kinetics. The same phenomenon was
observed also when the  H+ was reduced by changing the light intensity. Moreover, a partial recovery of this
inhibition was obtained in the presence of ionophores when the
potential was re-established by illumination with a train of actinic
flashes fired at a frequency higher than its decay. Measurements of
isotopic effects on the kinetics of cytochrome b6 oxidation revealed a synergy between the
effects of ionophores and the H2O-D2O exchange.
We propose therefore, that protonation events influence the
kinetics of cytochrome b6 oxidation at the Qi
site and that these reactions are strongly influenced by the light-dependent generation of a
 H+.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Culture Media--
C. reinhardtii wild
type cells derived from the strain 137C were kindly provided by the
Laboratoire de Physiologie Membranaire et Moléculaire du
Chloroplaste at the Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France. They were grown at 27 °C in acetate-supplemented medium (26) under ~60 µE m 2
s 1 of continuous white light. They were
harvested during exponential growth and resuspended at the required
concentration in a 20 mM Hepes medium (pH 7.2) with 20%
(w/v) Ficoll to avoid sedimentation. The ratio of the pellet and the
resuspension buffer was usually 1:10. Alternatively, algae were
resuspended in the same buffer containing D2O (99.8%
deuterium atom) and stirred for an hour. After a second centrifugation
the pellet was resuspended in the same buffer with a pellet volume to
resuspension buffer volume ratio of 1:20. No increase in the kinetic
isotope effect was observed when the duration of the incubation in
D2O was increased. FCCP was purchased from Sigma.
Spectroscopic Measurements--
Spectroscopic measurements were
performed at room temperature using a Joliot-type spectrophotometer as
described in Joliot et al. (27). Actinic flashes were
provided by a xenon lamp (3 µs at half-height) filtered through a
Schott filter (RG 695). They were fired at a frequency of 0.15 Hz
and were non-saturating (hitting ~25% of the centers) unless
otherwise indicated. Algae were kept in the dark under argon atmosphere
in a large reservoir connected to the measuring cuvette to ensure dark
reduction of the plastoquinone pool.
The transmembrane potential was estimated by the amplitude of the
electrochromic shift at 515 nm, which yields a linear response with
respect to the electric component of the
 H+ (28). Under the conditions employed
here, the kinetics of the electrochromic signal displayed two rising
phases previously described in Joliot and Delosme (29): a fast phase
completed in less than 1 µs, associated with PSI and PSII charge
separation (phase a), and a slow phase, which develops in the ms time
range, associated with the turnover of the cytochrome
b6f complex (phase b). A
third, slow decay was also present (phase c) that is mainly dependent on the passive ion leak through the membrane and the proton flux through the CF0-CF1 ATP synthase (29, 30). PSII absorption changes were
prevented by a preillumination in the presence of 3-(3',4'-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) (10 µM)
and hydroxylamine (1 mM) (31). Thus, the phase a was
indicative of the sole PSI charge separation.
Cytochrome f redox changes were evaluated as the difference
between absorption at 554 nm and a base line drawn between 545 and 573 nm. A small correction for the contribution of the electrochromic signal (5% of the signal observed at 515 nm) was made. Cytochrome b6 redox changes were measured as the difference
between the absorption at 564 nm and the same base line.
Protein Analysis--
Biochemical analysis was performed on
thylakoid membranes obtained from cells that were incubated for 1 h at 30 °C and treated with 30 µM FCCP. Thylakoid
membranes were purified after breaking the cells with a French press.
The cytochrome b6f complex was specifically solubilized from the thylakoid membranes with 30 mM Hecameg (2), and the solubilization supernatant was
submitted to sucrose density gradient (10-30% sucrose, 20 mM Hecameg, 0.1 g/liter phosphatidylcholine, 20 mM Tricine-NaOH, pH 8.0, 3 mM MgCl2, 3 mM KCl; see Ref. 2).
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12.5% acrylamide) followed by
silver staining was performed on the fractionated gradient.
 |
RESULTS |
Effects of Increasing Concentrations of FCCP on the Cytochrome
b6f Turnover Kinetics--
Fig.
1 shows the effects of increasing
concentrations of the ionophore FCCP on the kinetics of the
electrochromic signal (A), of cytochrome
b6 (B), and cytochrome f
(C) redox changes. In Fig. 1A, the kinetics of
the electrochromic signal is presented after normalization to the
amplitude of the fast, PSI driven generation of the membrane potential
(phase a). In these experiments indeed, the addition of hydroxylamine
and 3-(3',4'-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) blocked PSII
activity and the consequent light generation of plastoquinol by PSII.
Nevertheless, the plastoquinone pool was fully reduced in the dark by
cellular metabolism (32), and the cytochrome
b6f Qo site was consequently
saturated (see e.g. Ref. 33).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of increasing FCCP concentrations on
the kinetics of the electrochromic signal (A),
cytochrome b6 (B), and
cytochrome f (C) redox changes.
Algae were collected during exponential growth and resuspended in Hepes
20 mM, pH 7.2, with the addition of 20% (w/v) Ficoll to
avoid sedimentation. They were illuminated with red flashes at the
frequency of 0.15 Hz. 3-(3',4'-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU)
and hydroxylamine were added at the concentrations of 10 µM and 1 mM, respectively, to block PSII
activity. FCCP concentrations were 1 µM
(squares), 5 µM (circles), 15 µM (upward triangles), 30 µM
(downward triangles), and 40 µM
(diamonds). The chlorophyll concentration was ~ 50 µM. Traces in panels A and
B represent a best fit using an equation described in Fig.
4.
|
|
The addition of the ionophore FCCP induced an acceleration of the
membrane potential decay that was concentration-dependent. Thus, the decaying phase (phase c, see "Experimental Procedures") largely superimposed the rising one (phase b) in which amplitude was
reduced accordingly. At higher concentrations of the ionophore, phase c
became as fast as the phase b, and no net signal increase could
be observed (Fig. 1A, diamonds).
In Figs. 1, B and C, the reduction phases of the
cytochrome redox changes are shown as upward changes, whereas oxidation
phases are shown as downward changes. The kinetics of cytochrome
b6 redox changes is presented in panel
B. In the presence of 1 µM FCCP, a small signal
increase (reflecting cytochrome bl reduction) was
observed followed by a large decrease signal. The latter is attributable to the oxidation of the bh heme at the
Qi site. Indeed, no redox signal changes are expected during the electron transfer between the bl and
bh hemes, for their spectra are almost identical
(Refs. 2 and 34; but see, however, Ref. 35). When the concentration of
FCCP was increased from 1 µM to 40 µM, the
kinetics of cytochrome b6 oxidation became slower, whereas its reduction rate was substantially unaffected. As a
consequence, the amplitude of the reduction phase increased at the
expense of the oxidation signal. The inhibitory efficiency of FCCP was
increased at higher temperatures, which decreased the incubation time
required to observe such effects (not shown).
The kinetics of cytochrome f is reported in panel
C. Both the oxidation and the reduction rates were not
substantially affected by the addition of FCCP. We have verified that
the signals measured in the presence of high concentrations of FCCP
represented genuine changes of the cytochrome b6
hemes; Fig. 2 shows the spectra of the
redox changes measured in the 558-573-nm region in the presence of 1 µM (panel A) or 40 µM
(panel B) of FCCP. In both cases, typical spectra of
cytochromes b6 were recorded (2, 34-35).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Light induced redox changes in
the 558-573-nm spectral region measured upon single turnover flash
illumination. Spectra were recorded 2 ms (squares) and
50 ms (circles) after the actinic flash illumination. FCCP
concentration was 1 µM (A) or 40 µM (B). Other conditions are as in Fig.
1.
|
|
To test whether the inhibitory effect of FCCP was due to any artifact
induced by the presence of large amounts of the chemical in the
membranes (e.g. monomerization of the complex), we have examined some biochemical properties of cytochrome
b6f complexes extracted from
thylakoid membranes treated or not with high concentrations of FCCP.
The oligomerization state of the solubilized complex as well as its
subunit composition were investigated by sucrose density gradient. The
results are presented in Fig. 3,
where it appears that FCCP did not alter either the oligomeric state
cytochrome b6f complex nor its
composition. The treated complex migrated as a dimer (36), and all
subunits comigrated, especially the Rieske protein. This is important
evidence for the structural integrity of the complex, as it has
been shown that in case of any perturbation of the complex, the
Rieske protein is the first subunit to be lost (4, 33, 36).

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Biochemical properties of cytochrome
b6f complex upon
treatment with FCCP. Thylakoid membranes were solubilized with
Hecameg. The supernatant was then centrifuged on a 10-30%
sucrose density gradient. Fractions were collected, analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and silver-stained. Cytochrome
f (Cyt f), cytochrome
b6 (Cyt b6,
poorly stained), the Rieske subunits (FeS), and subunit IV
(SuIV) are indicated by arrows.
b6f, purified
b6f sample used as a marker.
For other conditions, see "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
A more careful analysis of the data in Fig. 1 revealed a small but
significant inhibition of both cytochromes b6
and f reduction at very high FCCP concentrations (40 mM, Fig. 1, B and C,
diamonds), suggesting the possible occurrence of nonspecific
inhibition. To rule out the occurrence of any artifact in the observed
phenomenon, we have repeated the same experiments using other
ionophores (nigericin plus nonactin (37) and crown (34)).
We found that they were equally effective in promoting the slowing down
of cytochrome b6 oxidation kinetics provided
they were added at concentrations that substantially increased the
membrane potential decay (not shown, see Fig. 6 below). On an other
hand, the addition of the H+/K+ exchanger
nigericin (37) at concentrations inducing the relaxation of the
pH-only did not modify the kinetics of cytochrome
b6 oxidation at all (not shown).
Relationship between Transmembrane Potential and Cytochrome
b6 Oxidation Kinetics--
Taken together, these data
suggest that the amplitude of the  H+ is
able to affect the kinetics of cytochrome b6
oxidation. This conclusion is reinforced by the data of Fig. 4, where the relationship between the
rate of membrane potential decay and that of cytochrome
b6 oxidation is presented. Apparently there is a
threshold effect; when the  H+ decay remained low as compared with the kinetics of cytochrome
b6 oxidation, the latter did not show any
slowing, even when the rate of membrane potential decay was
accelerated. However, when this rate became closer to that of
cytochrome b6 oxidation, an inverse
proportionality could be observed. A new plateau level appeared for
higher rates of the membrane potential decay.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Relationship between membrane potential decay
and the rate of cytochrome b6
oxidation. Data were obtained by fitting data as in Fig. 1 using
the following equation.
|
(Eq. 1)
|
This was done to improve the deconvolution of the
electrochromic signal rise from its decay (see e.g. Ref.
38). Then rate constants were plotted. We checked that at low FCCP
concentrations this procedure gave figures comparable with data
previously obtained under similar conditions (38).
|
|
Two complementary experiments further confirmed the influence of the
 H+ on the kinetics of cytochrome
b6 oxidation. In the first one we modulated the
amplitude of the membrane potential by changing the intensity of the
actinic light at a constant concentration of ionophores. This is shown
in Fig. 5A, where the traces
of the electrochromic signal measurements are shown. When the light
intensity was decreased, the amplitude of the
 H+ was diminished, because a smaller fraction of PSI reaction centers performed the charge separation. Under
these conditions the cytochrome b6 oxidation
kinetics was slowed by a factor of 6-7, i.e. to an extent
somewhat smaller but still comparable with that calculated in the
presence of high concentration of ionophores (Fig. 1).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of the transmembrane potential extent
on cytochrome b6 oxidation kinetics.
Effect of light intensity. Algae were illuminated with saturating
(squares) or low intensity (~5%, circles)
single turnover actinic flashes. Panel A: recordings of the
electrochromic signals. Panel B, kinetics of cytochrome
b6 redox changes. There kinetics have been
normalized to allow a better comparison. Other conditions are as in
Fig. 1.
|
|
In a second experiment, we increased the amplitude of the membrane
potential in high ionophore concentration-treated samples by firing a
series of flashes at a frequency that was sufficiently high to prevent
its complete relaxation between two consecutive illuminations.
According to the hypothesis mentioned above, an acceleration of
cytochrome b6 oxidation kinetic is expected upon rebuilding of the membrane potential. The results of this experiment are reported in Fig. 6; five flashes were
fired to samples treated with low (squares) and high
concentrations of ionophores (circles). The interval between
two consecutive flashes (20 ms) was smaller than the rate of potential
decay both in the low and the high ionophore concentration-treated
samples (t1/2 of ~ 500 ms and ~150 ms,
respectively). Therefore, the  H+ was
increased at each flash, as indicated by the increasing amplitude of
the electrochromic signal after each flash (arrows in
panel A). As expected, the effect of the flashes was larger
in the low ionophore-treated samples than in the high ionophore-treated
ones because of their different decay rates. In these experiments, a
combination of nigericin plus nonactin was chosen as the high concentrated ionophore, since we found it easier to modulate the rate
of potential decay using these compounds. Panel B reports the kinetics of cytochrome b6 redox changes
measured in the same conditions as in panel A. A marked
difference in cytochrome b6 oxidation rate could
be observed between the low and high ionophore-treated samples after
the first flash (panel C), whereas the difference largely
diminished at the fifth flash, where the two rates became almost
identical (panel D).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of the transmembrane potential
amplitude on the kinetics of cytochrome b6
oxidation. Effect of illumination frequency. Algae were
illuminated with a sequence of five saturating single turnover flashes
(arrows), and the kinetics of the electrochromic signal
(panel A) and of cytochrome b6 redox
changes (panel B) were recorded. Panel C,
kinetics of cytochrome b6 redox changes measured
after the first saturating flash. Panel D, same kinetics as
in C, measured after the fifth saturating flash. Traces have
been superposed to allow a better comparison. Squares, 1 µM FCCP. Circles, 2 µM nigericin
plus 4 µM nonactin.
|
|
The extent of the reduction and oxidation signals decreased from the
first to the last flash in both the low and high ionophore concentration-treated samples (compare panels C
and D). This is due to the fact that the interval between
flashes was too short to allow a complete re-reduction of cytochrome
bh in the dark (34) (the bl heme
was always oxidized in our conditions because its dark reduction
requires several minutes (34)). For this reason, the fraction of
oxidized b6f complexes (bl+bh+)
increased during the flash series. These complexes are not expected to
perform a net oxidation of cytochrome b6 (see a
discussion in Refs. 16, 32, and 38). Their increase, therefore,
explains the reduction of the signal amplitude in both low and high
ionophore concentration-treated samples. Obviously, the change in the
relative proportion of oxidized and semireduced complexes is not
expected to affect the overall rate of cytochrome
b6 oxidation (see e.g. Ref. 38).
Consistently with this, these kinetics remained essentially the same in
low ionophore concentration-treated samples (Fig. 6, panels
C and D)
Isotopic Effect on Cytochrome b6 Oxidation
Kinetics--
It has been recently reported that the substitution of
H2O by D2O in the reaction medium influences
the kinetics of cytochrome b6f
(39). Although minor effects were observed on the rates of
cytochrome f oxidation and of cytochrome f and
b6 reduction, a large slowing down of the
initial step of the phase b was observed. This was interpreted as
evidence for proton movement during the initial phase of the
electrogenicity associated with cytochrome b6f turnover (39). In this
work, however, no data were presented concerning the oxidation kinetics
of cytochrome b6. We have therefore performed
measurements of isotopic effects on this latter kinetics to understand
whether proton diffusion-limiting steps were involved in this reaction.
The experiments have been performed essentially as in Deniau and
Rappaport (39), and we have been able to reproduce the same results
presented in the case of the phase b and cytochrome f redox
changes (not shown) as well as the slowing down of cytochrome b6 reduction (Fig.
7, A and B). In
addition to this effect on the reduction, we observed a slowing down of
the oxidation kinetics; the presence of D2O in the reaction
medium slowed the kinetics by a factor of ~2 (compare
panels A and B). The isotopic effect increased when the algae were incubated with increasing concentrations of the ionophore FCCP; it was a factor of 3 when the concentration of
FCCP was 15 µM and ~6 at 30 µM FCCP.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of increasing FCCP concentration on
cytochrome b6 redox changes measured in
the presence of H2O (A) or D2O
(B). FCCP concentrations were 1 µM
(squares), 15 µM (circles), 30 µM (triangles). Other conditions are as in
Fig. 1.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Effects of Membrane Potential on Cytochrome b6
Kinetics--
We report here effects of increasing concentrations of
the ionophore FCCP on the kinetics of cytochrome
b6f turnover. We found (Fig. 1) that high concentrations induce a selective slowing down of
the kinetics of cytochrome b6 oxidation (by a
factor of ~10 upon increasing from 1 to 40 µM FCCP)
without affecting the kinetics of cytochrome b6
and of cytochrome f reduction (within a factor of 2).
Consequently, the amplitude of the reduction phase of cytochrome b6 kinetics was increased at the expense of the
oxidation phase. In the 30-40 µM range, the observed
kinetics did not show any net oxidation. High concentrations of FCCP
have been previously used to dissipate the electrochemical proton
gradient existing across thylakoid membranes in C. reinhardtii (40-41), and the obtained traces of cytochrome
b6 redox changes reported (42) closely resemble
those measured here.
We believe that the decreased rate of cytochrome
b6 oxidation measured in the presence of FCCP is
not due to a direct effect of the ionophore itself. Indeed, even if at
very high concentrations, some small nonspecific effects can be
evidenced (within a factor of 2, Fig. 1, B and C,
diamonds), it was possible to reproduce its effects with
other ionophores (see Fig. 6). The investigated biochemical properties
of the complex remained unaffected upon incubation with 30 µM FCCP; the complex remained dimeric and contained all
four high molecular weight subunits, including the Rieske protein,
whose association with the complex is very sensitive to any
structural perturbation (4, 33, 36). This hypothesis is in
contrast with that proposed in previous studies (43-44) on the basis
of measurements in isolated spinach thylakoids after treatments with
the ionophore valinomycin (44). Klughammer et al.
(44) indeed suggest that the slowing down of cytochrome b6 oxidation results from specific binding of
the ionophore to the complex itself, whereas this does not seem to be
the case in our experimental conditions.
We can also rule out any influence of the redox state of the
cofactors involved in the reaction in the observed phenomenon. Indeed,
we have shown that changes in the redox state of the
bh heme, which can be modulated by changes in the
illumination frequency, (34) do not modify the oxidation kinetics of
the cytochrome b6 (Fig. 6, see also Ref. 38). On
the contrary, we propose that the slowed kinetics of cytochrome
b6 oxidation observed in the presence of high
FCCP concentrations is due to the decrease of the
 H+. This hypothesis is confirmed by the experiments performed in Figs. 4-6; there we show that the rate of
cytochrome b6 oxidation is not sensitive to the
increase of membrane potential decay, provided that its amplitude
remains unchanged during the turnover of cytochrome
b6f (Fig. 4). When the two
rates become comparable, an effect is observed (Fig. 4). In addition,
it is possible to mimic the effect of ionophores if the extent of the
membrane potential is reduced by a decrease in the actinic light
intensity (Fig. 5), and it is possible to recover a fast kinetic of
cytochrome b6 oxidation when the
 H+ is reestablished by firing a series of
flashes at a frequency higher than its decay rate (Fig. 6).
In principle, the two components of the membrane potential (the
protonic one, pH, and the electric one,  ) could be involved in
the observed phenomenon. Different ionophores were able to reproduce
the effect of FCCP provided that they increased the decay rate of the
membrane potential, but the addition of the H+/K+ exchanger nigericin had no effect. It has
been reported that this ionophore induces a partial conversion of the
pH into  (45). If the pH alone was responsible for the
observed effects, one would have expected nigericin to be the most
effective ionophore. Our results thus indicate that the presence of
 alone is sufficient to keep the kinetics of cytochrome
b6 oxidation in its native, fast state.
In green algae, it is known that a transmembrane potential can be
established across the thylakoid membranes in the dark at the expenses
of cellular metabolism (46). This potential could also influence the
rate of cytochrome b6 oxidation. However, we can
rule out its involvement in our experiments, where FCCP was always
present at concentrations (0.5-1 mM) sufficient to fully suppress it (45).
Mechanism of the Membrane Potential Effect on Plastoquinone
Reduction by the Cytochrome b6f Complex--
The
oxidation of cytochrome b6 is a complex reaction
where both electron and proton transfer are involved (16-17). Three
reaction steps concern electron transfer: cytochrome bl
reduction at the Qo site, interheme transfer between
bl and bh, and the oxidation of
the latter by a plastoquinone at the Qi site. A fourth one, the
protonation of reduced plastoquinone, involves H+ transfer
from the stroma to the Qi site.
Among them, only two (the interheme electron transfer and the
protonation of reduced plastoquinone) occur in a plane parallel to the
membrane potential, as inferred from the structure of the homologous
cytochrome bc1 complex (9-12). These steps are
potentially influenced by the  and represent possibly good
candidates for the phenomenon reported here. However, we do not
consider the interheme electron transfer as responsible for the
observed  enhancement of the rate of cytochrome
b6 oxidation (i.e. Fig. 6). Indeed
(i) the target reaction step is sensitive to the
H2O-D2O substitution (Fig. 7), i.e.
it should involve protonation reactions (see e.g. Ref. 47).
(ii) The presence of a  should inhibit the interheme electron
transfer by reducing its driving
force.2 (iii) In the absence
as well as in the presence of  , the rate of this reaction should
be by far larger than that of cytochrome b6
oxidation.2 For very similar reasons, we can reject the
involvement in the phenomenon described here of the Lavergne's factor
"G" (Ref. 50; see also Ref. 32), a soluble cytochrome (32) that
exchanges electrons with the bh heme. Even if the
equilibrium between the two is  -sensitive, the electron transfer
is accomplished in ~100 ms, i.e. at least 2 order of
magnitude faster than the reactions observed here (Fig. 1).
In the past, the occurrence of a membrane
potential-dependent back-reaction through the Qi site has
been documented in the case of bc1 complexes
(51-54). The presence of this back-reaction has suggested that the
interheme electron transfer is a reversible process. Thus it might be
modulated by the  also by affecting its equilibrium constant.
Again, we consider this possibility rather unlikely for at least the
two following reasons (i) The effect of  on the equilibrium
constant should be inhibitory rather than stimulatory, and (ii) the
rate of the back-reaction is comparable with that of the forward
process only under conditions that are not physiological (see
e.g. Ref. 51), suggesting that the
bl to bh interheme electron flow
is probably a unidirectional process in native conditions.
Thus, we consider the possibility that the effects of 
reported here concern the electron transfer steps as very unlikely. Also an effect of  on the rate constant of protonation is to reject for essentially the same reasons discussed above in the case of
electron transfer. (i) The presence of  should be inhibitory, and
ii) this rate constant is also very high (see e.g. Ref. 55), at least when a continuous network of proton carriers is involved, as
is the case in the quinone binding pockets (see a review in Ref.
56).
The proton transfer, therefore, is not the limiting step of cytochrome
b6 oxidation, unless the H+
concentration is not saturating. This is, however, likely to occur at
the basic stromal pH (45). Therefore, a possible mechanism for the
 -mediated acceleration of cytochrome b6
oxidation can be proposed based on the H+ availability at
the Qi site. The  , indeed, is expected to influence the pH at the
membrane H2O stromal interface, where protons
would concentrate in its presence, to compensate the accumulation of negative charges (19). The increased H+ availability would
enhance the rate of protonation at the Qi site in the presence of
 , as already observed in the case of other protein systems (57),
and plastoquinone reduction would be limited by both electron and
proton transfer steps at the Qi site. This would explain the rather low
isotopic effect measured (within a factor of 2, Fig. 7,
squares). Dissipation of the membrane potential would
increase the local pH and consequently decrease the rate of
plastoquinone protonation without directly affecting the electron
transfer step. Protonation would then become the major limiting factor,
explaining the increased isotopic effect up to a factor of 6 (Fig. 7,
triangles). This value is usually considered as a strong
indication that the rate-limiting step involves H-bond breaking or
formation (47).
The data presented here clearly provide evidence for the effect of the
membrane potential on the efficiency of cytochrome b6 oxidation; independently of how the potential
is decreased (by ionophores, Figs. 1 and 5, or by changing the actinic
light intensity, Fig. 4), a parallel slowing down of the oxidation rate is observed.
However, a careful comparison of the results obtained with the two
methods reveals stronger consequences of the membrane potential in high
light-treated samples. This difference is not explainable by the
hypothesis of a sole modulation by the membrane potential; neither can
it be ascribed to specific effects of the high concentrations of
ionophores employed under high light treatments (see above).
To us it suggests another possibility, i.e. that
illumination might affect the turnover of the complex. Even if a direct
influence of light is hardly explainable, consequences can be envisaged on the availability of the quinones. Indeed, evidences for a
modification of the macroscopic structure of the thylakoids by
illumination have already been reported (see e.g. Ref. 58).
These changes might affect the diffusion of the quinone species (see a
discussion in Lavergne and Joliot (59)), thus modulating the substrate availability at the Qo and Qi site. This effect is expected to have
important consequences at the Qi site due to the scarcity of
plastoquinone in the membrane under our anaerobic conditions.
Involvement of Cytochrome b6f Qi Site in
the Photosynthetic Control--
It is known that the
 H+ couples electron transport to the
generation of ATP (19). It also regulates the rate of the electron
transfer into the cytochrome
b6f complex via the
"photosynthetic control," a regulation mechanism analogous to the
"respiratory control" observed in respiratory electron transport
(reviewed in Ref. 60). The phenomenon is usually described as an
inhibition of the rate of plastoquinol oxidation at the Qo site by the
pH component of the  H+ (16-17, 19, 26,
45, 60). A mechanism for this phenomenon has been recently proposed in
the case of the cytochrome bc1 complex on the
basis of its three-dimensional structure (61).
The results presented here, however, suggest a more complex scenario
for the photosynthetic control, where the participation of the
reactions occurring at the Qi site (i.e. the reduction of plastoquinone) should also be considered. In the presence of the
 H+, indeed, the kinetics of the reactions that follow plastoquinol oxidation at the Qo site (cytochrome b6 and f reduction) is slowed by the
acid lumenal pH (see e.g. Ref. 45), whereas that of
plastoquinone reduction at the Qi site (cytochrome
b6 oxidation) is accelerated by the concomitant generation of a  (e.g. Figs. 1 and 5). Under these
conditions, plastoquinol oxidation becomes rate-limiting. Upon
dissipation of the  H+, either artificially
by the addition of ionophores or via ATP synthesis, oxidation of
plastoquinol at the Qo site is enhanced while its reduction at the Qi
site is slowed down. The latter reaction becomes therefore the
rate-limiting reaction in the whole turnover of the cytochrome
b6f complex (Fig. 1). This
suggests an additional function of the  H+ in the modulation of the activity of this complex; it would balance the
rates of the different catalytic reaction steps to optimize their
concerted functioning.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Giorgio Forti for most valuable
discussions and for his continuous support during the realization of
this work. Fabrice Rappaport is also thanked for fruitful discussions
and for kind help during measurements of isotopic effects on cytochrome
b6f kinetics.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Consiglio Nazionale delle
Ricerche.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the Ministero
dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica.
Recipient of a post-doctoral fellowship from the Max Planck Institute.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39 02 26604423;
Fax: 39 02 26604399; E-mail: giovanni.finazzi@unimi.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002299200
2
The driving force for electron transfer between
the bl and bh hemes is expressed
by G° = nF E°, where E° = 74 mV (2). When they are submitted to the
light-induced electric field ( ), the G° is
decreased according to G°=
nF(  E° ), where is the
fraction of electrogenicity associated with the reaction. represents the fraction of the membrane that is traversed by the
electron transferred during the reaction. Thus, using a value of 
of 50-100 mV (48), a distance between the hemes of ~13 Å (edge to
edge, Refs. 9-12) and a reorganization energy of = 0.7-1
(49), it is possible to compute (49) the rate constant for the reaction
in the 1.5-3 × 106 s 1 in
the absence of  . This value decreased to 0.15-0.3 × 106 s 1 in its presence. These
values are to be compared with that calculated for cytochrome
b6 oxidation (0.1-0.3 × 103 s 1, Fig. 1).
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PSI and PSII, photosystem I and II, respectively;
Em, redox
midpoint potential;
bh, high potential heme of
cytochrome b6;
bl, low
potential heme of cytochrome b6;
crown, dicyclohexyl-18-crown-6;
FCCP, carbonylcyanide
p-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone;
Hecameg, (6-O-(N-heptylcarvamoyl)-methyl- -D-glucopyranoside;
Qi, quinol-reducing site of cytochrome
b6f complex;
Qo, quinol-oxidizing site of cytochrome
b6f complex;
Tricine, N-tris (hydroxymethyl)methylglycine;
I, reference
transmittance;
I, difference between the transmittance of the
measuring sample and that of the reference.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lemaire, C.,
Girard-Bascou, J.,
Wollman, F.,
and Bennoun, P.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
851,
229-238
|
| 2.
|
Pierre, Y.,
Breyton, C.,
Kramer, D.,
and Popot, J.-L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29342-29349
|
| 3.
|
Nitschke, W.,
Joliot, P.,
Liebl, U.,
Rutherford, A. W.,
Hauska, G.,
Müller, A.,
and Riedel, A.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1102,
266-268
|
| 4.
|
Takahashi, Y.,
Rahire, M.,
Breyton, C.,
Popot, J.-L.,
Joliot, P.,
and Rochaix, J.-D.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
3498-3506
|
| 5.
|
Hager, M.,
Biehler, K.,
Illerhaus, J.,
Ruf, S.,
and Bock, R.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5834-5842
|
| 6.
|
Widger, W. R.,
Cramer, W. A.,
Herrmann, R. G.,
and Trebst, A.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
674-678
|
| 7.
|
Mitchell, P.
(1975)
FEBS Lett.
56,
1-6
|
| 8.
|
Crofts, A. R.,
Meinhardt, S. W.,
Jones, K. R.,
and Snozzi, M.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
723,
202-218
|
| 9.
|
Xia, D., Yu, C. A.,
Kim, H.,
Xian, J. Z.,
Kachurin, A., M.,
Zhang, L., Yu, L.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1997)
Science
277,
60-66
|
| 10.
|
Zhang, Z.,
Huang, L.,
Shulmeister, V.,
Chi, Y.,
Kim, K.,
Hung, L.,
Crofts, A.,
Berry, E.,
and Kim, S.
(1998)
Nature
392,
677-684
|
| 11.
|
Iwata, S.,
Lee, J.,
Okada, K.,
Lee, J.,
Iwata, M.,
Rasmussen, B.,
Link, T.,
Ramaswamy, S.,
and Jap, B.
(1998)
Science
281,
64-71
|
| 12.
|
Kim, H.,
Xia, D., Yu, C. A.,
Xia, J. Z.,
Kachurin, A. M.,
Zhang, L., Yu, L.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8026-8033
|
| 13.
|
Brugna, M.,
Albouy, D.,
and Nitschke, W.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
3719-3723
|
| 14.
|
Crofts, A. R.,
and Berry, E. A.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
8,
501-509
|
| 15.
|
Barbagallo, R. P.,
Finazzi, G.,
and Forti, G.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
12814-12821
|
| 16.
|
Cramer, W. A.,
Soriano, G. M.,
Ponomarev, M.,
Huang, D.,
Zhang, H.,
Martinez, S. E.,
and Smith, J. L.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
47,
477-508
|
| 17.
|
Hope, A. B.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1143,
1-22
|
| 18.
|
Crofts, A. R.,
and Wraight, C. A.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
726,
149-185
|
| 19.
|
Witt, H. T.
(1979)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
505,
355-427
|
| 20.
|
Dutton, P. L.,
and Jackson, J. B.
(1972)
Eur. J. Biochem.
30,
495-510
|
| 21.
|
Degli Esposti, M.,
de Vries, S.,
Crimi, M.,
Ghelli, A.,
Patarnello, T.,
and Meyer, A.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1143,
243-271
|
| 22.
|
Selak, M. A.,
and Whitmarsh, J.
(1984)
Photochem. Photobiol.
39,
485-489
|
| 23.
|
Joliot, P.,
and Joliot, A.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
849,
211-222
|
| 24.
|
Jones, R. W.,
and Whitmarsh, J.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
933,
258-268
|
| 25.
|
Hauska, G.,
Schutz, M.,
and Buttner, M.
(1996)
in
Oxygenic Photosynthesis: The Light Reactions
(Ort, D. R.
, and Yocum, C. F., eds)
, pp. 377-398, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands
|
| 26.
|
Gorman, D. S.,
and Levine, R. P.
(1965)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
54,
1665-1669
|
| 27.
|
Joliot, P.,
Beal, D.,
and Frilley, B.
(1980)
J. Chem. Phys.
77,
209-216
|
| 28.
|
Junge, W.,
and Witt, H. T.
(1968)
Z. Naturforsch.
24,
1038-1041
|
| 29.
|
Joliot, P.,
and Delosme, R.
(1974)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
357,
267-284
|
| 30.
|
Rumberg, B.,
and Sieggel, U.
(1968)
Z. Naturforsch.
23,
239-244
|
| 31.
|
Bennoun, P.
(1970)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
216,
357-363
|
| 32.
|
Joliot, P.,
and Joliot, A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
1034-1038
|
| 33.
|
Finazzi, G.,
Büschlen, S.,
de Vitry, C.,
Rappaport, F.,
Joliot, P.,
and Wollman, F.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
2867-2874
|
| 34.
|
Joliot, P.,
and Joliot, A.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
933,
319-333
|
| 35.
|
Kramer, D. M.,
and Crofts, A. R.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1184,
193-201
|
| 36.
|
Breyton, C.,
Tribet, C.,
Olive, J.,
Dubacq, J.-P.,
and Popot, J.-L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21892-21900
|
| 37.
|
Cramer, W. A.,
and Knaff, D. B.
(1989)
in
Energy Transduction in Biological Membranes: A Textbook in Bioenergetics
(Cantor, C. R., ed)
, pp. 79-138, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York
|
| 38.
|
Zito, F.,
Finazzi, G.,
Joliot, P.,
and Wollman, F.-A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
10395-10403
|
| 39.
|
Deniau, C.,
and Rappaport, F.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
3304-3310
|
| 40.
|
Soriano, G. M.,
Ponomarev, M. V.,
Tae, G. S.,
and Cramer, W. A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
14590-14598
|
| 41.
| Comolli, L. R., Zhou, J., Linden, T., Breitling, R., Flores, J.,
Hung, T., Jamshidi, A., Huang, L., and Fernandez-Velasco, J. (1998) Photosynthesis: Mechanisms and Effects (Garab, G.,
ed) pp. 1589-1592, Vol. III, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group,
Dordrecht, Netherlands
|
| 42.
|
Ponamarev, M. V.,
and Cramer, W. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
17199-17208
|
| 43.
|
Klughammer, C.,
and Schreiber, U.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
336,
491-495
|
| 44.
|
Klughammer, C.,
Heimann, S.,
and Schreiber, U.
(1998)
Photosynth. Res.
56,
117-130
|
| 45.
|
Finazzi, G.,
and Rappaport, F.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
9999-10005
|
| 46.
|
Diner, B.,
and Mauzerall, D
(1973)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
305,
329-352
|
| 47.
|
Connors, K., A.
(1990)
Chemical Kinetics, the Study of Reaction Rates in Solution
, VCH Publishers, Inc., New York
|
| 48.
|
Joliot, P.,
and Joliot, A
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
975,
355-360
|
| 49.
|
Moser, C. C.,
Keske, J. M.,
Warncke, K.,
Farid, R. S.,
and Dutton, P. L.
(1992)
Nature
355,
796-802
|
| 50.
|
Lavergne, J.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
725,
25-33
|
| 51.
|
Robertson, D. E.,
Giangiacomo, K. M.,
de Vries, S.,
Moser, C. C.,
and Dutton, P. L.
(1984)
FEBS Lett.
178,
343-350
|
| 52.
|
Miki, T.,
Miki, M.,
and Orii, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1827-1833
|
| 53.
|
Tolkatchev, D., Yu, L.,
and Yu, C. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12356-12363
|
| 54.
|
Matsuno-Yagi, A.,
and Hatefi, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9283-9288
|
| 55.
|
Svenssonek, M.,
Thomas, J. W.,
Gennis, R. B.,
Nilsson, T.,
and Brzezinski, P.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
13673-13680
|
| 56.
|
Lancaster, C. R.,
and Michel, H.
(1995)
in
Reaction Centers of Photosynthetic Bacteria: Structure and Dynamics
(Michel-Beyerle, H., ed)
, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
|
| 57.
|
Yam, R.,
Nachliel, E.,
Kiryati, S.,
Gutman, M.,
and Huppert, D.
(1991)
Biophys. J.
59,
4-11
|
| 58.
|
Barzda, V.,
Istokovics, A.,
Simidjiev, I.,
and Garab, G.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
8981-8985
|
| 59.
|
Lavergne, J.,
and Joliot, P.
(1991)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
16,
129-134
|
| 60.
|
Bendall, D.
(1982)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
683,
119-115
|
| 61.
|
Crofts, A. R.,
Hong, S. J.,
Ugulava, N.,
Barquera, B.,
Gennis, R.,
Guergova-Kuras, M.,
and Berry, E. A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
10021-10026
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Nelson, G. Finazzi, Q. J. Wang, K. A. Middleton-Zarka, J. Whitmarsh, and T. Kallas
Cytochrome b6 Arginine 214 of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, a Key Residue for Quinone-reductase Site Function and Turnover of the Cytochrome bf Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 18, 2005;
280(11):
10395 - 10402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|