|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M004580200 on June 16, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 34, 26241-26244, August 25, 2000
Activase Region on Chloroplast Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate
Carboxylase/Oxygenase
NONCONSERVATIVE SUBSTITUTION IN THE LARGE SUBUNIT ALTERS SPECIES
SPECIFICITY OF PROTEIN INTERACTION*
Carolyn M.
Ott §,
Bryan D.
Smith ¶,
Archie R.
Portis Jr. , and
Robert J.
Spreitzer **
From the Department of Biochemistry, University of
Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 and Department of Crop
Sciences, University of Illinois and Photosynthesis Research Unit,
Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture,
Urbana, Illinois 61801
Received for publication, May 26, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
In the active form of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate
carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco, EC 4.1.1.39), a carbamate at lysine
201 binds Mg2+, which then interacts with the
carboxylation transition state. Rubisco activase facilitates this
spontaneous carbamylation/metal-binding process by removing
phosphorylated inhibitors from the Rubisco active site. Activase from
Solanaceae plants (e.g. tobacco) fails to activate Rubisco
from non-Solanaceae plants (e.g. spinach and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii), and non-Solanaceae activase
fails to activate Solanaceae Rubisco. Directed mutagenesis and
chloroplast transformation previously showed that a proline 89 to
arginine substitution on the surface of the large subunit of
Chlamydomonas Rubisco switched its specificity from
non-Solanaceae to Solanaceae activase activation. To define the size
and function of this putative activase binding region, substitutions
were created at positions flanking residue 89. As in the past, these
substitutions changed the identities of Chlamydomonas
residues to those of tobacco. Whereas an aspartate 86 to arginine
substitution had little effect, aspartate 94 to lysine Rubisco was only
partially activated by spinach activase but now fully activated by
tobacco activase. In an attempt to eliminate the activase/Rubisco
interaction, proline 89 was changed to alanine, which is not
present in either non-Solanaceae or Solanaceae Rubisco. This
substitution also caused reversal of activase specificity,
indicating that amino acid identity alone does not determine the
specificity of the interaction.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (EC 4.1.1.39)
(Rubisco)1 catalyzes
carboxylation of RuBP in the first step of the Calvin cycle of
photosynthesis (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). To be active, Lys-201 on
the Rubisco large subunit must be carbamylated and coordinated with
Mg2+ prior to binding RuBP (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3).
Thus, Rubisco is similar to urease, which also uses a carbamate as a ligand for metal binding (5). However, whereas urease requires a set of
proteins for the addition of Ni2+ to its active site (6),
Rubisco appears to require only one. This protein, Rubisco activase,
removes inhibitory sugar phosphates, including RuBP, from the
nonactivated active site, thereby facilitating subsequent, spontaneous
carbamylation and Mg2+ binding (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4).
In some cases, fully activated (metal-bound) Rubisco may bind
inhibitory sugar phosphates that mimic the carboxylation transition
state (7, 8). These molecules are also removed by Rubisco activase to
restore a functional active site (8, 9). Like one of the urease
activation proteins, UreG (5), Rubisco activase hydrolyzes nucleoside
triphosphate during the activation process (10, 11). However, except
for a P-loop motif, there is little homology between these two proteins.
Rubisco activase from plants in the family Solanaceae (e.g.
tobacco) fails to activate Rubisco from plants outside the family (e.g. spinach and the green alga Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii), and activase from non-Solanaceae plants fails to
activate Solanaceae Rubisco (12). Comparison of sequences and x-ray
crystal structures revealed that there are seven residues clustered on
the surface of the Rubisco large subunit that differ in charge between
the Solanaceae and non-Solanaceae enzymes (residues 86, 89, 94, 95, 356, 466, and 468) (3, 13). Because the large subunit is coded by a
chloroplast gene (rbcL) in plants and green algae, and
because chloroplast transformation has been difficult to achieve in
land plants with respect to this gene (14, 15), directed mutagenesis
and chloroplast transformation were used to investigate the
significance of this region in Chlamydomonas Rubisco (13, 16). Two of the most conserved residues of non-Solanaceae Rubisco were
switched to those characteristic of Solanaceae Rubisco. A K356Q
substitution had no detectable effect on Rubisco function or activation
properties. However, a P89R mutant enzyme could no longer be activated
by non-Solanaceae Rubisco activase but, instead, could be activated by
Solanaceae activase (13). Thus, it is likely that this surface region
plays a role in the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase.
Because of its important role in plant productivity, a deeper
understanding of the interaction between Rubisco and its activation protein may present new ideas for engineering an increase in enzyme activity (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4). Furthermore, species specificity
between Rubisco and Rubisco activase may prove to be a stumbling block
for the transfer of a catalytically improved enzyme from one species
into the chloroplast of a different, agronomically important species
(reviewed in Ref. 2). In the present study, additional substitutions
were made to define the nature of the large-subunit region that
interacts with activase. One substitution changes the specificity of
the interaction by introducing a residue at position 89 that differs
from either of the residues characteristic of Solanaceae and
non-Solanaceae Rubisco.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Culture Conditions--
C. reinhardtii
2137 mt+ is the wild-type strain (17). Mutant
18-7G mt+ was used as the host for
transformation (18). It lacks photosynthesis and requires acetate for
growth because of an rbcL nonsense mutation that terminates
large-subunit translation after residue 65 (18, 19).
Photosynthesis-competent mutant P89R was created by directed mutagenesis and chloroplast transformation in a previous study (13).
All strains are maintained in darkness at 25 °C with 10 mM acetate medium containing 1.5% Bacto agar (17). For
biochemical analysis, cells were grown in 50-250 ml of liquid acetate
medium on a rotary shaker in darkness.
Directed Mutagenesis and Chloroplast Transformation--
A
2670-base pair HpaI DNA fragment (bases 742 to 1928),
containing the entire rbcL gene (bases 1-1428) (20), was
cloned into SmaI-digested pUC19 (21) and propagated in
Escherichia coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene). Site-directed
mutagenesis was performed with a kit from Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech (22). To produce the D86R substitution, the
rbcL gene sequence GAT (bases 256-258) was changed to CGT,
which eliminated an EcoRV restriction site. To create the
P89A substitution, CCA (bases 265-267) was changed to GCT, which
eliminated a BsrI restriction site. To create the D94K
substitution, GAC (bases 280-282) was changed to AAA, which eliminated
a BbsI restriction site. The mutations were confirmed by
restriction enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing. The resulting rbcL mutant plasmids, named pLS-D86R, pLS-P89A, and
pLS-D94K, were transformed into the chloroplast by microprojectile
bombardment (23, 24), and photosynthesis-competent colonies were
recovered in all cases. Following previous methods (13, 24, 25),
rbcL genes were completely sequenced to ensure that only the
expected mutations were present. The rbcL mutant strains
created by directed mutagenesis and chloroplast transformation were
named D86R, P89A, and D94K.
Sucrose Gradients, Electrophoresis, and
Immunoblotting--
Total soluble cell proteins were extracted from
dark-grown cells by sonication (26) and quantified (27). Cell extract was fractionated on sucrose gradients (26) or subjected to
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with a 7.5-15% polyacrylamide
gradient in the running gel (28). Proteins were transferred from the
gel to nitrocellulose, probed with rabbit anti-tobacco Rubisco
immunoglobulin G (0.5 µg/ml), and detected via enhanced
chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously
(13).
Large Scale Preparation of Rubisco--
Rubisco was purified
from wild-type and mutant cells in a carbamylation buffer (50 mM Tricine, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA) as described previously (13). The
non-carbamylated, RuBP-inhibited enzyme was prepared in 50 mM Tricine, pH 8.0, 2 mM RuBP, and 0.1 mM EDTA (13). The amount of protein was determined by
assuming an extinction coefficient of 1.64 absorbance units for 1 mg/ml
at 280 nm. Enzyme was stored in liquid N2.
Rubisco Activase Purification and Assay--
Leaves from spinach
and tobacco plants were powdered in liquid N2, and Rubisco
activase was purified as described previously (12). The purified enzyme
was stored in bis-Tris, pH 7.0, and 0.2 mM ATP under liquid
N2. Rubisco activase activity was measured by following the
increase in carboxylase activity of the RuBP-inhibited Rubisco enzymes
with time in spectrophotometric assays that couple the production of
phosphoglycerate to the oxidation of NADH (13, 29).
 |
RESULTS |
Recovery and Phenotypes of the D86R and D94K Mutants--
It was
previously shown that a P89R substitution in the
Chlamydomonas large subunit reversed the specificities of
the interactions with non-Solanaceae (spinach) and Solanaceae (tobacco)
Rubisco activases (13). Of those residues that differ between
non-Solanaceae and Solanaceae Rubisco in the region surrounding
large-subunit residue 89 (13), residues 86 and 94 flank residue 89 and
may cause substantial differences in conformation (Fig.
1). His-86 interacts with Glu-88 in
spinach (30), but Arg-86 interacts with Glu-88 in tobacco (31). Glu-94
interacts with Asn-95 in spinach, but Lys-94 interacts with Glu-93 in
tobacco (Fig. 1). Like many of the other non-Solanaceae enzymes,
Chlamydomonas Rubisco contains Asp at positions 86 and 94. Therefore, to gain further insight into the interaction between Rubisco
and Rubisco activase, we decided to create D86R and D94K large-subunit
substitutions that would change the identities of the
Chlamydomonas residues to those of tobacco. In addition,
because most Rubisco enzymes contain either Pro (non-Solanaceae) or Arg
(Solanaceae) at residue 89, we reasoned that it might be possible to
eliminate the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase (without
substantially altering Rubisco structural stability) by creating a P89A
substitution.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Region on the Rubisco large subunit
that interacts with Rubisco activase (30, 31). X-ray crystal
structures for residues 83-103 in the spinach (A) and
tobacco (B) large subunits are compared (C).
Residues 83-89 and 97-103 comprise -strands C and D, respectively.
Glu-60 is the last residue of -helix B. The structures (Protein Data
Bank codes: 8RUC, spinach; 4RUB, tobacco) represent activated
Rubisco with the bound transition state analog carboxyarabinitol
1,5-bisphosphate (30, 31).
|
|
D86R, D94K, and P89A mutant strains were recovered by transforming the
chloroplast of the 18-7G rbcL nonsense mutant with directed
mutant rbcL genes and selecting for photosynthetic
competence on minimal medium in the light. Because transformant
colonies were recovered at frequencies comparable with the
transformation frequency with wild-type rbcL (13, 23-25),
it was apparent that none of the amino acid substitutions substantially
affected Rubisco holoenzyme structure, activation, or function in
vivo. When compared with wild type in spot tests (17), only the
D94K mutant exhibited slightly reduced growth on minimal medium in the
light (80 µmol of photons/m2/s). Growth at 18 or 35 °C
or under 15-min light (80 µmol of photons/m2/s), 15-min
dark cycles failed to exacerbate the phenotype of D94K or reduce the
growth of the D86R, P89A, or P89R mutant strains relative to that of
wild type. Sucrose-gradient fractionation and Western analysis (Fig.
2) revealed that the D86R, D94K, and P89A
mutants contain about half as much Rubisco as wild-type and mutant
P89R, presumably because of increased holoenzyme
instability/proteolysis in vivo (24, 25). However, when
fully carbamylated, all of the purified mutant enzymes had near normal
RuBP carboxylase specific activities. As found previously for P89R
(13), the large subunits of the D86R and D94K enzymes displayed
increased mobility during SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig.
2). Because this is not the case for the P89A large subunit (Fig. 2,
lane 5), it is likely that the introduction of positive
charge, rather than an alteration in conformation (32), is responsible
for the altered migration.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Western analysis of total soluble proteins
from wild type and mutants D86R, D94K, P89R, and P89A. Cells were
grown in acetate medium in darkness prior to extraction. Each
lane of an SDS-polyacrylamide gel received 25 µg of
protein. Following electrophoresis, the proteins were blotted to
nitrocellulose and probed with rabbit anti-tobacco Rubisco
immunoglobulin G. Lane 1, wild type; lane 2,
mutant D86R; lane 3, mutant D94K; lane 4, mutant
P89R; lane 5, mutant P89A. The large subunit (LS)
and small subunit (SS) are indicated.
|
|
Rubisco Activase Assays--
Non-carbamylated, RuBP-inhibited
Rubisco was prepared from the mutant strains. The rates at which these
enzymes became carbamylated were then determined in the presence of
either spinach or tobacco Rubisco activase (Fig.
3). Mutant D86R Rubisco was
indistinguishable from the wild-type enzyme with regard to activation
properties. Both enzymes were activated by spinach activase, but
activation by tobacco activase was not much greater than the
spontaneous rate in the absence of activase (Fig. 3, compare
panels A and B). In contrast, mutant D94K Rubisco
was activated only slightly above the spontaneous rate by spinach
activase, but at a near normal rate by tobacco activase (Fig.
3C). This reversal of specificity is similar to that
observed for P89R Rubisco in a previous study (13). However, when
mutant P89A Rubisco was analyzed, it was also found to be activated by
tobacco activase but not at all by spinach activase (Fig.
3D). This was an unexpected result because tobacco
Rubisco contains Arg at this position.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Activation specificity of
Chlamydomonas Rubisco from wild type
(A), mutant D86R (B), mutant D94K
(C), and mutant P89A (D) for spinach
( ) and tobacco ( ) Rubisco activase. The assays were
performed with 5 µg/ml Rubisco and 80 µg/ml Rubisco activase. The
increase in RuBP carboxylase activity in the absence of activase is
also shown ( ). Maximal specific activities were wild type, 3.3;
mutant D86R, 3.2; mutant D94K, 2.8; and mutant P89A, 2.4 µmol/min/mg.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A large-subunit P89R substitution, shown previously (13), or a
D94K substitution, in the present study (Fig. 3), alters the
specificity of the interaction between Chlamydomonas Rubisco and land-plant Rubisco activase. Whereas the wild-type
Chlamydomonas enzyme can be activated by spinach
(non-Solanaceae) activase but not tobacco (Solanaceae) activase, both
of the mutant enzymes can be activated by tobacco activase but not
spinach activase (Ref. 13; Fig. 3). These results would seem to
indicate that either of at least two residues (Arg-89 or Lys-94) on the
surface of the Rubisco large subunit is sufficient for recognition by tobacco activase, but both of at least two residues (Pro-89 and Asp-94)
are necessary for recognition by spinach activase. However, a
large-subunit P89A substitution also blocks Rubisco activation by
spinach activase and permits activation by tobacco activase (Fig. 3).
Perhaps it is the absence of Pro rather than the presence of Arg at
residue 89 that is required for activation by tobacco activase.
Inspection of the spinach and tobacco Rubisco crystal structures (30,
31) (Fig. 1) reveals that Lys-94 in tobacco forms an ionic bond with
Glu-93, but the side chain of Glu-94 in spinach is either exposed to
solvent or may form a hydrogen bond with Asn-95. By replacing Asp-94 in
Chlamydomonas Rubisco with Lys, an ionic interaction may be
formed with the otherwise solvent-exposed Glu-93, mimicking the
structure of tobacco Rubisco. Arg-89 in tobacco might be able to form
an ionic interaction with Asp-95 in vivo, preventing an
ionic interaction between Asp-95 and Lys-94. Replacing Pro-89 in
Chlamydomonas Rubisco with Arg would not mimic this
potential interaction because Chlamydomonas contains Asn-95 and Asp-94 (Fig. 1). Instead, by introducing a solvent-exposed Arg or
small, aliphatic Ala, the conformational constraints imposed by Pro-89
would be eliminated. Thus, we propose that it is the conformation of
the loop between -strands C and D (Fig. 1), not specific ionic
interactions, that is responsible for the specificity of activase for
Rubisco. It may be necessary to compare mutant enzyme crystal
structures to address this possibility (33). However, now that it has
recently become possible to engineer tobacco Rubisco in vivo
(14, 15), it would be interesting to see whether an R89A substitution
would reverse activase specificity, presumably by promoting the
formation of an ionic bond between Lys-94 and Asp-95 and mimicking the
loop structure of spinach Rubisco.
It is of interest to note that -strands C and D pack against
-helix B in the N-terminal domain of the Rubisco large subunit (30).
Whereas the loop between -strands C and D interacts with Rubisco
activase, as evidenced by the effect of P89R, P89A, and D94K
substitutions on Rubisco activase specificity (13, Fig. 3), the last
residue of -helix B, Glu-60, forms an ionic bond with Lys-334 in the
C-terminal domain of a neighboring large subunit (30, 31). Lys-334
resides at the apex of / -barrel loop 6, which determines the
specificity of Rubisco for carboxylation and oxygenation (34-36).
Because loop 6 traps substrate and intermediates in the active site
(30, 31), it is tempting to consider whether an interaction with
Rubisco activase might produce subtle changes in the structure of the
N-terminal domain that are responsible for the removal of
phosphorylated inhibitors from the active site. Although a site of
recognition between Rubisco and Rubisco activase is not necessarily the
site at which activase facilitates activation, it may be interesting to
examine the activation properties of N-terminal domain mutant enzymes
that have alterations in CO2/O2 specificity
(23, 37).
The D94K, P89R, and P89A mutant strains grow under photoautotrophic
conditions even though their mutant Rubisco enzymes cannot be activated
by spinach Rubisco activase in vitro (13, Fig. 3). Considering that Chlamydomonas can survive
photoautotrophically with as little as 15% of the wild-type level of
RuBP carboxylase activity (reviewed in Ref. 16), and the presence of a
CO2 concentrating mechanism may provide a high level of
spontaneous carbamylation (reviewed in Ref. 38), it would not be
surprising to find that Rubisco activase is not essential for the
growth of Chlamydomonas. However, this does not mean that
activase would provide no benefit for the function of Rubisco and the
growth of Chlamydomonas. Alternatively, Chlamydomonas activase may be able to activate the D94K,
P89R, and P89A mutant enzymes in vivo because it lacks the
specificity of spinach and tobacco activases or because it recognizes a
large-subunit conformation that is not affected by the D94K, P89R, and
P89A substitutions. It has not yet been possible to purify sufficient quantities of Chlamydomonas activase to resolve these
questions. Nonetheless, now that we have a better understanding of the
large-subunit region that interacts with activase (Figs. 1 and 3), it
may be possible to engineer single or multiple substitutions that would eliminate the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase. Such
mutants may be useful for identifying amino acid substitutions in
activase that restore the interaction with Rubisco (16), thereby
defining a complementing binding site on Rubisco activase.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by United States Department
of Agriculture Grant 97-35306-4525 (to R. J. S.), Cooperative Regional Research Project NC-142 (to A. R. P. and R. J. S.), and Nebraska Agricultural Research Division undergraduate fellowships (to
C. M. O. and B. D. S.). This is Nebraska Agricultural Research Division Journal Series Paper 13031.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of a Milton E. Mohr undergraduate scholarship. Present
address: Dept. of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco,
CA 94143.
¶
Recipient of a Milton E. Mohr undergraduate scholarship.
Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 402-472-5446;
Fax: 402-472-7842; E-mail: rspreitzer1@unl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 16, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004580200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase;
RuBP, ribulose
1,5-bisphosphate;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
bis-Tris, 1,3-bis[tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino]propane.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Tabita, F. R.
(1999)
Photosynth. Res.
60,
1-28
|
| 2.
|
Spreitzer, R. J.
(1999)
Photosynth. Res.
60,
29-42
|
| 3.
|
Portis, A. R., Jr.
(1995)
J. Exp. Bot.
46,
1285-1291
|
| 4.
|
Salvucci, M. E.,
and Ogren, W. L.
(1996)
Photosynth. Res.
47,
1-11
|
| 5.
|
Jabri, E.,
Carr, M. B.,
Hausinger, R. P.,
and Karplus, P. A.
(1995)
Science
268,
998-1004
|
| 6.
|
Soriano, A.,
and Hausinger, R. P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11140-11144
|
| 7.
|
Berry, J. A.,
Lorimer, G. H.,
Pierce, J.,
Seemann, J. R.,
Meek, J.,
and Freas, S.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
734-738
|
| 8.
|
Robinson, S. P.,
and Portis, A. R., Jr.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
233,
413-416
|
| 9.
|
Mate, C. J.,
Hudson, G. S.,
von Caemmerer, S.,
Evans, J. R.,
and Andrews, T. J.
(1993)
Plant Physiol.
102,
1119-1128
|
| 10.
|
Wang, Z. Y.,
and Portis, A. R., Jr.
(1992)
Plant Physiol.
99,
1348-1353
|
| 11.
|
van de Loo, F. J.,
and Salvucci, M. E.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
4621-4625
|
| 12.
|
Wang, Z. Y.,
Snyder, G. W.,
Esau, B. D.,
Portis, A. R., Jr.,
and Ogren, W. L.
(1992)
Plant Physiol.
100,
1858-1862
|
| 13.
|
Larson, E. M.,
O'Brien, C. M.,
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Portis, A. R., Jr.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17033-17037
|
| 14.
|
Kanevski, I.,
Maliga, P.,
Rhoades, D. F.,
and Gutteridge, S.
(1999)
Plant Physiol.
119,
133-141
|
| 15.
|
Whitney, S. M.,
von Caemmerer, S.,
Hudson, G. S.,
and Andrews, T. J.
(1999)
Plant Physiol.
121,
579-588
|
| 16.
|
Spreitzer, R. J.
(1998)
in
The Molecular Biology of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Chlamydomonas
(Rochaix, J. D.
, Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.
, and Merchant, S., eds)
, pp. 515-527, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
|
| 17.
|
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Mets, L.
(1981)
Plant Physiol.
67,
565-569
|
| 18.
|
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Ogren, W. L.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
6293-6297
|
| 19.
|
Spreitzer, R. J.,
Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.,
Rahire, M.,
and Rochaix, J. D.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
5460-5464
|
| 20.
|
Dron, M.,
Rahire, M.,
and Rochaix, J. D.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
162,
775-793
|
| 21.
|
Yanisch-Perron, C.,
Vieira, J.,
and Messing, J.
(1985)
Gene
33,
103-119
|
| 22.
|
Deng, W. P.,
and Nickoloff, J. A.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem.
200,
81-88
|
| 23.
|
Zhu, G.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3952-3956
|
| 24.
|
Zhu, G.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
18494-18498
|
| 25.
|
Moreno, J.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26789-26793
|
| 26.
|
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Chastain, C. J.
(1987)
Curr. Genet.
11,
611-616
|
| 27.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-252
|
| 28.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 29.
|
Lan, Y.,
and Mott, K. A.
(1991)
Plant Physiol.
95,
604-609
|
| 30.
|
Andersson, I.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
259,
160-174
|
| 31.
|
Schreuder, H. A.,
Knight, S.,
Curmi, P. M. G.,
Andersson, I.,
Cascio, D.,
Sweet, R. M.,
Branden, C. I.,
and Eisenberg, D.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
2,
1136-1146
|
| 32.
|
Mattice, W. L.,
Riser, J. M.,
and Clark, D. S.
(1976)
Biochemistry
15,
4264-4272
|
| 33.
|
Yen, A.,
Haas, E. J.,
Selbo, K. M.,
Ross II, C. R.,
Spreitzer, R. J.,
and Stezowski, J. J.
(1998)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
54,
668-670
|
| 34.
|
Chen, Z.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
3051-3053
|
| 35.
|
Chen, Z., Yu, W.,
Lee, J. H.,
Diao, R.,
and Spreitzer, R. J.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
8846-8850
|
| 36.
|
Lorimer, G. H.,
Chen, Y. R.,
and Hartman, F. C.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
9018-9024
|
| 37.
|
Spreitzer, R. J.,
Thow, G.,
and Zhu, G.
(1995)
Plant Physiol.
109,
681-686
|
| 38.
|
Spalding, M. H.
(1998)
in
The Molecular Biology of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Chlamydomonas
(Rochaix, J. D.
, Goldschmidt-Clermont, M.
, and Merchant, S., eds)
, pp. 529-547, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Portis Jr, C. Li, D. Wang, and M. E. Salvucci
Regulation of Rubisco activase and its interaction with Rubisco
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
59(7):
1597 - 1604.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Whitney and R. E. Sharwood
Construction of a tobacco master line to improve Rubisco engineering in chloroplasts
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
59(7):
1909 - 1921.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Tabita, T. E. Hanson, H. Li, S. Satagopan, J. Singh, and S. Chan
Function, Structure, and Evolution of the RubisCO-Like Proteins and Their RubisCO Homologs
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 2007;
71(4):
576 - 599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Li, M. E. Salvucci, and A. R. Portis Jr.
Two Residues of Rubisco Activase Involved in Recognition of the Rubisco Substrate
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 1, 2005;
280(26):
24864 - 24869.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Satagopan and R. J. Spreitzer
Substitutions at the Asp-473 Latch Residue of Chlamydomonas Ribulosebisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Cause Decreases in Carboxylation Efficiency and CO2/O2 Specificity
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 2, 2004;
279(14):
14240 - 14244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. C. Taylor, A. Backlund, K. Bjorhall, R. J. Spreitzer, and I. Andersson
First Crystal Structure of Rubisco from a Green Alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 14, 2001;
276(51):
48159 - 48164.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|