Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M004580200 on June 16, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 34, 26241-26244, August 25, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/34/26241    most recent
M004580200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spreitzer, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spreitzer, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Activase Region on Chloroplast Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase

NONCONSERVATIVE SUBSTITUTION IN THE LARGE SUBUNIT ALTERS SPECIES SPECIFICITY OF PROTEIN INTERACTION*

Carolyn M. OttDagger §, Bryan D. SmithDagger , Archie R. Portis Jr.||, and Robert J. SpreitzerDagger **

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 and || Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois and Photosynthesis Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Received for publication, May 26, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the active form of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco, EC 4.1.1.39), a carbamate at lysine 201 binds Mg2+, which then interacts with the carboxylation transition state. Rubisco activase facilitates this spontaneous carbamylation/metal-binding process by removing phosphorylated inhibitors from the Rubisco active site. Activase from Solanaceae plants (e.g. tobacco) fails to activate Rubisco from non-Solanaceae plants (e.g. spinach and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii), and non-Solanaceae activase fails to activate Solanaceae Rubisco. Directed mutagenesis and chloroplast transformation previously showed that a proline 89 to arginine substitution on the surface of the large subunit of Chlamydomonas Rubisco switched its specificity from non-Solanaceae to Solanaceae activase activation. To define the size and function of this putative activase binding region, substitutions were created at positions flanking residue 89. As in the past, these substitutions changed the identities of Chlamydomonas residues to those of tobacco. Whereas an aspartate 86 to arginine substitution had little effect, aspartate 94 to lysine Rubisco was only partially activated by spinach activase but now fully activated by tobacco activase. In an attempt to eliminate the activase/Rubisco interaction, proline 89 was changed to alanine, which is not present in either non-Solanaceae or Solanaceae Rubisco. This substitution also caused reversal of activase specificity, indicating that amino acid identity alone does not determine the specificity of the interaction.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (EC 4.1.1.39) (Rubisco)1 catalyzes carboxylation of RuBP in the first step of the Calvin cycle of photosynthesis (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). To be active, Lys-201 on the Rubisco large subunit must be carbamylated and coordinated with Mg2+ prior to binding RuBP (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3). Thus, Rubisco is similar to urease, which also uses a carbamate as a ligand for metal binding (5). However, whereas urease requires a set of proteins for the addition of Ni2+ to its active site (6), Rubisco appears to require only one. This protein, Rubisco activase, removes inhibitory sugar phosphates, including RuBP, from the nonactivated active site, thereby facilitating subsequent, spontaneous carbamylation and Mg2+ binding (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4). In some cases, fully activated (metal-bound) Rubisco may bind inhibitory sugar phosphates that mimic the carboxylation transition state (7, 8). These molecules are also removed by Rubisco activase to restore a functional active site (8, 9). Like one of the urease activation proteins, UreG (5), Rubisco activase hydrolyzes nucleoside triphosphate during the activation process (10, 11). However, except for a P-loop motif, there is little homology between these two proteins.

Rubisco activase from plants in the family Solanaceae (e.g. tobacco) fails to activate Rubisco from plants outside the family (e.g. spinach and the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii), and activase from non-Solanaceae plants fails to activate Solanaceae Rubisco (12). Comparison of sequences and x-ray crystal structures revealed that there are seven residues clustered on the surface of the Rubisco large subunit that differ in charge between the Solanaceae and non-Solanaceae enzymes (residues 86, 89, 94, 95, 356, 466, and 468) (3, 13). Because the large subunit is coded by a chloroplast gene (rbcL) in plants and green algae, and because chloroplast transformation has been difficult to achieve in land plants with respect to this gene (14, 15), directed mutagenesis and chloroplast transformation were used to investigate the significance of this region in Chlamydomonas Rubisco (13, 16). Two of the most conserved residues of non-Solanaceae Rubisco were switched to those characteristic of Solanaceae Rubisco. A K356Q substitution had no detectable effect on Rubisco function or activation properties. However, a P89R mutant enzyme could no longer be activated by non-Solanaceae Rubisco activase but, instead, could be activated by Solanaceae activase (13). Thus, it is likely that this surface region plays a role in the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase.

Because of its important role in plant productivity, a deeper understanding of the interaction between Rubisco and its activation protein may present new ideas for engineering an increase in enzyme activity (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4). Furthermore, species specificity between Rubisco and Rubisco activase may prove to be a stumbling block for the transfer of a catalytically improved enzyme from one species into the chloroplast of a different, agronomically important species (reviewed in Ref. 2). In the present study, additional substitutions were made to define the nature of the large-subunit region that interacts with activase. One substitution changes the specificity of the interaction by introducing a residue at position 89 that differs from either of the residues characteristic of Solanaceae and non-Solanaceae Rubisco.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Strains and Culture Conditions-- C. reinhardtii 2137 mt+ is the wild-type strain (17). Mutant 18-7G mt+ was used as the host for transformation (18). It lacks photosynthesis and requires acetate for growth because of an rbcL nonsense mutation that terminates large-subunit translation after residue 65 (18, 19). Photosynthesis-competent mutant P89R was created by directed mutagenesis and chloroplast transformation in a previous study (13). All strains are maintained in darkness at 25 °C with 10 mM acetate medium containing 1.5% Bacto agar (17). For biochemical analysis, cells were grown in 50-250 ml of liquid acetate medium on a rotary shaker in darkness.

Directed Mutagenesis and Chloroplast Transformation-- A 2670-base pair HpaI DNA fragment (bases -742 to 1928), containing the entire rbcL gene (bases 1-1428) (20), was cloned into SmaI-digested pUC19 (21) and propagated in Escherichia coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed with a kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (22). To produce the D86R substitution, the rbcL gene sequence GAT (bases 256-258) was changed to CGT, which eliminated an EcoRV restriction site. To create the P89A substitution, CCA (bases 265-267) was changed to GCT, which eliminated a BsrI restriction site. To create the D94K substitution, GAC (bases 280-282) was changed to AAA, which eliminated a BbsI restriction site. The mutations were confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing. The resulting rbcL mutant plasmids, named pLS-D86R, pLS-P89A, and pLS-D94K, were transformed into the chloroplast by microprojectile bombardment (23, 24), and photosynthesis-competent colonies were recovered in all cases. Following previous methods (13, 24, 25), rbcL genes were completely sequenced to ensure that only the expected mutations were present. The rbcL mutant strains created by directed mutagenesis and chloroplast transformation were named D86R, P89A, and D94K.

Sucrose Gradients, Electrophoresis, and Immunoblotting-- Total soluble cell proteins were extracted from dark-grown cells by sonication (26) and quantified (27). Cell extract was fractionated on sucrose gradients (26) or subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with a 7.5-15% polyacrylamide gradient in the running gel (28). Proteins were transferred from the gel to nitrocellulose, probed with rabbit anti-tobacco Rubisco immunoglobulin G (0.5 µg/ml), and detected via enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously (13).

Large Scale Preparation of Rubisco-- Rubisco was purified from wild-type and mutant cells in a carbamylation buffer (50 mM Tricine, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA) as described previously (13). The non-carbamylated, RuBP-inhibited enzyme was prepared in 50 mM Tricine, pH 8.0, 2 mM RuBP, and 0.1 mM EDTA (13). The amount of protein was determined by assuming an extinction coefficient of 1.64 absorbance units for 1 mg/ml at 280 nm. Enzyme was stored in liquid N2.

Rubisco Activase Purification and Assay-- Leaves from spinach and tobacco plants were powdered in liquid N2, and Rubisco activase was purified as described previously (12). The purified enzyme was stored in bis-Tris, pH 7.0, and 0.2 mM ATP under liquid N2. Rubisco activase activity was measured by following the increase in carboxylase activity of the RuBP-inhibited Rubisco enzymes with time in spectrophotometric assays that couple the production of phosphoglycerate to the oxidation of NADH (13, 29).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recovery and Phenotypes of the D86R and D94K Mutants-- It was previously shown that a P89R substitution in the Chlamydomonas large subunit reversed the specificities of the interactions with non-Solanaceae (spinach) and Solanaceae (tobacco) Rubisco activases (13). Of those residues that differ between non-Solanaceae and Solanaceae Rubisco in the region surrounding large-subunit residue 89 (13), residues 86 and 94 flank residue 89 and may cause substantial differences in conformation (Fig. 1). His-86 interacts with Glu-88 in spinach (30), but Arg-86 interacts with Glu-88 in tobacco (31). Glu-94 interacts with Asn-95 in spinach, but Lys-94 interacts with Glu-93 in tobacco (Fig. 1). Like many of the other non-Solanaceae enzymes, Chlamydomonas Rubisco contains Asp at positions 86 and 94. Therefore, to gain further insight into the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase, we decided to create D86R and D94K large-subunit substitutions that would change the identities of the Chlamydomonas residues to those of tobacco. In addition, because most Rubisco enzymes contain either Pro (non-Solanaceae) or Arg (Solanaceae) at residue 89, we reasoned that it might be possible to eliminate the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase (without substantially altering Rubisco structural stability) by creating a P89A substitution.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Region on the Rubisco large subunit that interacts with Rubisco activase (30, 31). X-ray crystal structures for residues 83-103 in the spinach (A) and tobacco (B) large subunits are compared (C). Residues 83-89 and 97-103 comprise beta -strands C and D, respectively. Glu-60 is the last residue of alpha -helix B. The structures (Protein Data Bank codes: 8RUC, spinach; 4RUB, tobacco) represent activated Rubisco with the bound transition state analog carboxyarabinitol 1,5-bisphosphate (30, 31).

D86R, D94K, and P89A mutant strains were recovered by transforming the chloroplast of the 18-7G rbcL nonsense mutant with directed mutant rbcL genes and selecting for photosynthetic competence on minimal medium in the light. Because transformant colonies were recovered at frequencies comparable with the transformation frequency with wild-type rbcL (13, 23-25), it was apparent that none of the amino acid substitutions substantially affected Rubisco holoenzyme structure, activation, or function in vivo. When compared with wild type in spot tests (17), only the D94K mutant exhibited slightly reduced growth on minimal medium in the light (80 µmol of photons/m2/s). Growth at 18 or 35 °C or under 15-min light (80 µmol of photons/m2/s), 15-min dark cycles failed to exacerbate the phenotype of D94K or reduce the growth of the D86R, P89A, or P89R mutant strains relative to that of wild type. Sucrose-gradient fractionation and Western analysis (Fig. 2) revealed that the D86R, D94K, and P89A mutants contain about half as much Rubisco as wild-type and mutant P89R, presumably because of increased holoenzyme instability/proteolysis in vivo (24, 25). However, when fully carbamylated, all of the purified mutant enzymes had near normal RuBP carboxylase specific activities. As found previously for P89R (13), the large subunits of the D86R and D94K enzymes displayed increased mobility during SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2). Because this is not the case for the P89A large subunit (Fig. 2, lane 5), it is likely that the introduction of positive charge, rather than an alteration in conformation (32), is responsible for the altered migration.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Western analysis of total soluble proteins from wild type and mutants D86R, D94K, P89R, and P89A. Cells were grown in acetate medium in darkness prior to extraction. Each lane of an SDS-polyacrylamide gel received 25 µg of protein. Following electrophoresis, the proteins were blotted to nitrocellulose and probed with rabbit anti-tobacco Rubisco immunoglobulin G. Lane 1, wild type; lane 2, mutant D86R; lane 3, mutant D94K; lane 4, mutant P89R; lane 5, mutant P89A. The large subunit (LS) and small subunit (SS) are indicated.

Rubisco Activase Assays-- Non-carbamylated, RuBP-inhibited Rubisco was prepared from the mutant strains. The rates at which these enzymes became carbamylated were then determined in the presence of either spinach or tobacco Rubisco activase (Fig. 3). Mutant D86R Rubisco was indistinguishable from the wild-type enzyme with regard to activation properties. Both enzymes were activated by spinach activase, but activation by tobacco activase was not much greater than the spontaneous rate in the absence of activase (Fig. 3, compare panels A and B). In contrast, mutant D94K Rubisco was activated only slightly above the spontaneous rate by spinach activase, but at a near normal rate by tobacco activase (Fig. 3C). This reversal of specificity is similar to that observed for P89R Rubisco in a previous study (13). However, when mutant P89A Rubisco was analyzed, it was also found to be activated by tobacco activase but not at all by spinach activase (Fig. 3D). This was an unexpected result because tobacco Rubisco contains Arg at this position.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Activation specificity of Chlamydomonas Rubisco from wild type (A), mutant D86R (B), mutant D94K (C), and mutant P89A (D) for spinach () and tobacco (black-triangle) Rubisco activase. The assays were performed with 5 µg/ml Rubisco and 80 µg/ml Rubisco activase. The increase in RuBP carboxylase activity in the absence of activase is also shown (). Maximal specific activities were wild type, 3.3; mutant D86R, 3.2; mutant D94K, 2.8; and mutant P89A, 2.4 µmol/min/mg.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A large-subunit P89R substitution, shown previously (13), or a D94K substitution, in the present study (Fig. 3), alters the specificity of the interaction between Chlamydomonas Rubisco and land-plant Rubisco activase. Whereas the wild-type Chlamydomonas enzyme can be activated by spinach (non-Solanaceae) activase but not tobacco (Solanaceae) activase, both of the mutant enzymes can be activated by tobacco activase but not spinach activase (Ref. 13; Fig. 3). These results would seem to indicate that either of at least two residues (Arg-89 or Lys-94) on the surface of the Rubisco large subunit is sufficient for recognition by tobacco activase, but both of at least two residues (Pro-89 and Asp-94) are necessary for recognition by spinach activase. However, a large-subunit P89A substitution also blocks Rubisco activation by spinach activase and permits activation by tobacco activase (Fig. 3). Perhaps it is the absence of Pro rather than the presence of Arg at residue 89 that is required for activation by tobacco activase.

Inspection of the spinach and tobacco Rubisco crystal structures (30, 31) (Fig. 1) reveals that Lys-94 in tobacco forms an ionic bond with Glu-93, but the side chain of Glu-94 in spinach is either exposed to solvent or may form a hydrogen bond with Asn-95. By replacing Asp-94 in Chlamydomonas Rubisco with Lys, an ionic interaction may be formed with the otherwise solvent-exposed Glu-93, mimicking the structure of tobacco Rubisco. Arg-89 in tobacco might be able to form an ionic interaction with Asp-95 in vivo, preventing an ionic interaction between Asp-95 and Lys-94. Replacing Pro-89 in Chlamydomonas Rubisco with Arg would not mimic this potential interaction because Chlamydomonas contains Asn-95 and Asp-94 (Fig. 1). Instead, by introducing a solvent-exposed Arg or small, aliphatic Ala, the conformational constraints imposed by Pro-89 would be eliminated. Thus, we propose that it is the conformation of the loop between beta -strands C and D (Fig. 1), not specific ionic interactions, that is responsible for the specificity of activase for Rubisco. It may be necessary to compare mutant enzyme crystal structures to address this possibility (33). However, now that it has recently become possible to engineer tobacco Rubisco in vivo (14, 15), it would be interesting to see whether an R89A substitution would reverse activase specificity, presumably by promoting the formation of an ionic bond between Lys-94 and Asp-95 and mimicking the loop structure of spinach Rubisco.

It is of interest to note that beta -strands C and D pack against alpha -helix B in the N-terminal domain of the Rubisco large subunit (30). Whereas the loop between beta -strands C and D interacts with Rubisco activase, as evidenced by the effect of P89R, P89A, and D94K substitutions on Rubisco activase specificity (13, Fig. 3), the last residue of alpha -helix B, Glu-60, forms an ionic bond with Lys-334 in the C-terminal domain of a neighboring large subunit (30, 31). Lys-334 resides at the apex of alpha /beta -barrel loop 6, which determines the specificity of Rubisco for carboxylation and oxygenation (34-36). Because loop 6 traps substrate and intermediates in the active site (30, 31), it is tempting to consider whether an interaction with Rubisco activase might produce subtle changes in the structure of the N-terminal domain that are responsible for the removal of phosphorylated inhibitors from the active site. Although a site of recognition between Rubisco and Rubisco activase is not necessarily the site at which activase facilitates activation, it may be interesting to examine the activation properties of N-terminal domain mutant enzymes that have alterations in CO2/O2 specificity (23, 37).

The D94K, P89R, and P89A mutant strains grow under photoautotrophic conditions even though their mutant Rubisco enzymes cannot be activated by spinach Rubisco activase in vitro (13, Fig. 3). Considering that Chlamydomonas can survive photoautotrophically with as little as 15% of the wild-type level of RuBP carboxylase activity (reviewed in Ref. 16), and the presence of a CO2 concentrating mechanism may provide a high level of spontaneous carbamylation (reviewed in Ref. 38), it would not be surprising to find that Rubisco activase is not essential for the growth of Chlamydomonas. However, this does not mean that activase would provide no benefit for the function of Rubisco and the growth of Chlamydomonas. Alternatively, Chlamydomonas activase may be able to activate the D94K, P89R, and P89A mutant enzymes in vivo because it lacks the specificity of spinach and tobacco activases or because it recognizes a large-subunit conformation that is not affected by the D94K, P89R, and P89A substitutions. It has not yet been possible to purify sufficient quantities of Chlamydomonas activase to resolve these questions. Nonetheless, now that we have a better understanding of the large-subunit region that interacts with activase (Figs. 1 and 3), it may be possible to engineer single or multiple substitutions that would eliminate the interaction between Rubisco and Rubisco activase. Such mutants may be useful for identifying amino acid substitutions in activase that restore the interaction with Rubisco (16), thereby defining a complementing binding site on Rubisco activase.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by United States Department of Agriculture Grant 97-35306-4525 (to R. J. S.), Cooperative Regional Research Project NC-142 (to A. R. P. and R. J. S.), and Nebraska Agricultural Research Division undergraduate fellowships (to C. M. O. and B. D. S.). This is Nebraska Agricultural Research Division Journal Series Paper 13031.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Recipient of a Milton E. Mohr undergraduate scholarship. Present address: Dept. of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.

Recipient of a Milton E. Mohr undergraduate scholarship. Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 402-472-5446; Fax: 402-472-7842; E-mail: rspreitzer1@unl.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 16, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004580200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; bis-Tris, 1,3-bis[tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino]propane.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Tabita, F. R. (1999) Photosynth. Res. 60, 1-28
2. Spreitzer, R. J. (1999) Photosynth. Res. 60, 29-42
3. Portis, A. R., Jr. (1995) J. Exp. Bot. 46, 1285-1291
4. Salvucci, M. E., and Ogren, W. L. (1996) Photosynth. Res. 47, 1-11
5. Jabri, E., Carr, M. B., Hausinger, R. P., and Karplus, P. A. (1995) Science 268, 998-1004
6. Soriano, A., and Hausinger, R. P. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 11140-11144
7. Berry, J. A., Lorimer, G. H., Pierce, J., Seemann, J. R., Meek, J., and Freas, S. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 734-738
8. Robinson, S. P., and Portis, A. R., Jr. (1988) FEBS Lett. 233, 413-416
9. Mate, C. J., Hudson, G. S., von Caemmerer, S., Evans, J. R., and Andrews, T. J. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102, 1119-1128
10. Wang, Z. Y., and Portis, A. R., Jr. (1992) Plant Physiol. 99, 1348-1353
11. van de Loo, F. J., and Salvucci, M. E. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 4621-4625
12. Wang, Z. Y., Snyder, G. W., Esau, B. D., Portis, A. R., Jr., and Ogren, W. L. (1992) Plant Physiol. 100, 1858-1862
13. Larson, E. M., O'Brien, C. M., Spreitzer, R. J., and Portis, A. R., Jr. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17033-17037
14. Kanevski, I., Maliga, P., Rhoades, D. F., and Gutteridge, S. (1999) Plant Physiol. 119, 133-141
15. Whitney, S. M., von Caemmerer, S., Hudson, G. S., and Andrews, T. J. (1999) Plant Physiol. 121, 579-588
16. Spreitzer, R. J. (1998) in The Molecular Biology of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Chlamydomonas (Rochaix, J. D. , Goldschmidt-Clermont, M. , and Merchant, S., eds) , pp. 515-527, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
17. Spreitzer, R. J., and Mets, L. (1981) Plant Physiol. 67, 565-569
18. Spreitzer, R. J., and Ogren, W. L. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 6293-6297
19. Spreitzer, R. J., Goldschmidt-Clermont, M., Rahire, M., and Rochaix, J. D. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 5460-5464
20. Dron, M., Rahire, M., and Rochaix, J. D. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 162, 775-793
21. Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1985) Gene 33, 103-119
22. Deng, W. P., and Nickoloff, J. A. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 200, 81-88
23. Zhu, G., and Spreitzer, R. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3952-3956
24. Zhu, G., and Spreitzer, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18494-18498
25. Moreno, J., and Spreitzer, R. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26789-26793
26. Spreitzer, R. J., and Chastain, C. J. (1987) Curr. Genet. 11, 611-616
27. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-252
28. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
29. Lan, Y., and Mott, K. A. (1991) Plant Physiol. 95, 604-609
30. Andersson, I. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 259, 160-174
31. Schreuder, H. A., Knight, S., Curmi, P. M. G., Andersson, I., Cascio, D., Sweet, R. M., Branden, C. I., and Eisenberg, D. (1993) Protein Sci. 2, 1136-1146
32. Mattice, W. L., Riser, J. M., and Clark, D. S. (1976) Biochemistry 15, 4264-4272
33. Yen, A., Haas, E. J., Selbo, K. M., Ross II, C. R., Spreitzer, R. J., and Stezowski, J. J. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 668-670
34. Chen, Z., and Spreitzer, R. J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 3051-3053
35. Chen, Z., Yu, W., Lee, J. H., Diao, R., and Spreitzer, R. J. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 8846-8850
36. Lorimer, G. H., Chen, Y. R., and Hartman, F. C. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 9018-9024
37. Spreitzer, R. J., Thow, G., and Zhu, G. (1995) Plant Physiol. 109, 681-686
38. Spalding, M. H. (1998) in The Molecular Biology of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Chlamydomonas (Rochaix, J. D. , Goldschmidt-Clermont, M. , and Merchant, S., eds) , pp. 529-547, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. R. Portis Jr, C. Li, D. Wang, and M. E. Salvucci
Regulation of Rubisco activase and its interaction with Rubisco
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1597 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. M. Whitney and R. E. Sharwood
Construction of a tobacco master line to improve Rubisco engineering in chloroplasts
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1909 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
F. R. Tabita, T. E. Hanson, H. Li, S. Satagopan, J. Singh, and S. Chan
Function, Structure, and Evolution of the RubisCO-Like Proteins and Their RubisCO Homologs
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2007; 71(4): 576 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Li, M. E. Salvucci, and A. R. Portis Jr.
Two Residues of Rubisco Activase Involved in Recognition of the Rubisco Substrate
J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24864 - 24869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Satagopan and R. J. Spreitzer
Substitutions at the Asp-473 Latch Residue of Chlamydomonas Ribulosebisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Cause Decreases in Carboxylation Efficiency and CO2/O2 Specificity
J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 14240 - 14244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. C. Taylor, A. Backlund, K. Bjorhall, R. J. Spreitzer, and I. Andersson
First Crystal Structure of Rubisco from a Green Alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2001; 276(51): 48159 - 48164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/34/26241    most recent
M004580200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spreitzer, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spreitzer, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement