|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001315200 on June 1, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 34, 26376-26384, August 25, 2000
The Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 Binds to and
Dephosphorylates p120 Catenin*
Heike
Keilhack ,
Ulf
Hellman§,
Jolanda
van Hengel¶ ,
Frans
van Roy¶**,
Jasminka
Godovac-Zimmermann §§, and
Frank-D.
Böhmer ¶¶
From the Research Unit "Molecular Cell Biology,"
Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Drackendorfer
Strasse 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany, the § Ludwig Institute for
Cancer Research, Uppsala Branch, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden, the
¶ Molecular Cell Biology Unit, Department of Molecular Biology,
Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology, University of
Ghent, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium, and the
 Institute for Molecular
Biotechnology, Beutenbergstrasse 11, D-07745 Jena, Germany
Received for publication, February 15, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A prominent tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of
~100 kDa (designated pp100) in epidermal growth factor
(EGF)-stimulated A431 cells was found to be a main interaction partner
of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 in pull-down experiments with
a glutathione S-transferase-SHP-1 fusion protein.
Binding was largely mediated by the N-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-1 and
apparently direct and independent from the previously described
association of SHP-1 with the activated EGF receptor. pp100 was
partially purified and identified by mass spectrometric analysis of
tryptic fragments, partial amino acid sequencing, and use of authentic
antibodies as the 3A isoform of the Armadillo repeat protein
superfamily member p120 catenin (p120ctn). Different
p120ctn isoforms expressed in human embryonal kidney 293 cells,
exhibited differential binding to SHP-1 that correlated partly with the extent of EGF-dependent p120ctn tyrosine
phosphorylation. Despite strong phosphorylation, p120ctn
isoforms 3B and 3AB bound, however, less readily to SHP-1. SHP-1 associated transiently with p120ctn in EGF-stimulated A431
cells stably transfected with a tetracycline-responsive SHP-1
expression construct, and p120ctn exhibited elevated
phosphorylation upon a tetracycline-mediated decrease in the SHP-1
level. Functions of p120ctn, which are regulated by tyrosine
phosphorylation, may be modulated by the described
SHP-1-p120ctn interaction.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The protein-tyrosine phosphatase
(PTP)1 SHP-1 (hematopoietic
cell phosphatase, SH-PTP1, and PTP1C) (1) is expressed in
hematopoietic and epithelial cells (for reviews, see Refs. 2-5). The
epithelial and hematopoietic variants of SHP-1 differ in the sequence
of 4 amino acids at the amino terminus (6). SHP-1 contains two SH2
domains that target the enzyme to cellular substrates. Binding of SHP-1
to tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins results in activation of SHP-1. In
consequence, the binding partner may become dephosphorylated, including
the phosphotyrosine residues required for binding, leading eventually
to decomposition of the complex. Alternatively and in addition, SHP-1
can dephosphorylate phosphoproteins in the vicinity of the SH2
domain-binding partner, e.g. signaling molecules acting
downstream of a receptor that binds SHP-1 or vice versa. As revealed by
analysis of chimeras of SHP-1 and the structurally closely related PTP
SHP-2, selectivity of cellular actions of SHP-1 is also determined by
the catalytic domain specificity, in addition to the SH2 domain
specificity (7, 8). In hematopoietic cells, negative modulation of
signal transduction of various cytokine receptors by SHP-1 has been
firmly established, including signaling of the erythropoietin receptor
(9), the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (10), and the
Kit/stem cell factor receptor (11, 12). SHP-1 mediates signals
of inhibitory immunoreceptors (13-19); and in macrophages, SHP-1 has
been shown to negatively regulate integrin-mediated cell adhesion (20).
A family of tyrosine-phosphorylated transmembrane proteins, designated
SIRP or SHP substrate (SHPS), has been described to bind
SHP-1 and SHP-2 and is believed to regulate the cellular actions of
both PTPs (21-23). Little is known about the biological role of SHP-1
in epithelial cells, although the existence of an epithelium-specific
isoform of SHP-1 (6) is suggestive of specific functions in these cells.
Cell-cell adhesion of epithelial cells involves homophilic interactions
of cadherins (24). Cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion is important
for development and maintenance of epithelial tissue integrity (25),
and its disturbance contributes to the invasive and metastatic
phenotype of epithelial tumors (26, 27). Through their intracellular
domains, cadherins associate with molecules of the Armadillo
superfamily, including -catenin and p120 catenin (p120ctn).
The former binds to the carboxyl-terminal domain of E-cadherin and
links this to the vinculin-related actin-binding -catenin (28, 29).
In contrast, p120ctn binds to the juxtamembrane domain of the
cytoplasmic part of E-cadherin (30-32). Cadherin-catenin association
is essential for the functionality of cell-cell adhesion complexes
(33). -Catenin mediates association with the actin cytoskeleton via
the -catenin bridge (34), but also participates in intracellular
signaling (35). Thus, -catenin can translocate to the nucleus to
cooperate with transcription factors of the LEF/TCF family (36).
The stability of cadherin-catenin complexes and thereby the function of
cell-cell adhesion complexes and possibly the signaling function of
catenins appear to be regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation (37).
-Catenin can be phosphorylated, for example, upon Src activation
(38) or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation (39), leading to dissociation of the cadherin-catenin complex. Elevated -catenin phosphorylation has been observed in epithelial tumors (40). A role of tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulation of catenin
function and cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion can also be inferred
from the presence of PTP activity in cadherin-catenin complexes and
from the observation that the transmembrane PTPs PTPµ, PTP , and
LAR localize to cell-cell adhesion complexes and can associate
with -catenin (41-43). Pronounced tyrosine phosphorylation has also
been observed for p120ctn (44, 45). In addition to Src, the
cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase FER has been shown to phosphorylate
p120ctn (46, 47). The precise function of p120ctn is,
however, still not known. It has been reported to be involved in
positive regulation of cadherin clustering and cell-cell adhesion, but
also in cell motility (48, 49). Recent publications reveal apparently
conflicting roles for p120ctn in cadherin-mediated adhesion.
Phosphorylated p120ctn isoforms have been proposed to
negatively modulate cadherin function and cell-cell adhesion in human
colon carcinoma cells (50) and transfected mouse L-cells (51). On the
other hand, Yap et al. (48) and Thoreson et al.
(32) showed that the juxtamembrane domain of cadherins supports
clustering and promotes strong cell-cell adhesion. p120ctn
isoforms lacking sequences encoded by exon 20, designated exon B, have
the capacity to localize to the nucleus, suggesting nuclear functions
of p120ctn (52). Indeed, p120ctn was shown to form a
complex with a zinc-finger transcription factor named Kaiso (53). The
physiological role for tyrosine phosphorylation of p120ctn is
currently unknown, but is likely to regulate p120ctn function.
Inducible FER overexpression in Rat-2 fibroblasts led to reduced
association of cadherin with -and -catenins, suggesting that
FER-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p120ctn may negatively
regulate the stability of cell-cell adhesion complexes (46).
We show here that p120ctn is one of the main binding partners
for the PTP SHP-1 in EGF-stimulated A431 cells and a substrate for
SHP-1 in these cells. Different isoforms of p120ctn exhibit
differential SHP-1 interaction potential, and this appears to be partly
related to their capacity to become tyrosine-phosphorylated in an
EGF-dependent manner. We propose that SHP-1 may regulate the function of p120ctn by its dephosphorylation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Chemicals and Reagents--
EGF was purchased from Pepro Tech,
Inc., (Rocky Hill, NJ). Polyclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies and
monoclonal anti-p120ctn antibodies were obtained from
Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Monoclonal
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies covalently coupled to Sepharose (clone
PT-66) were from Sigma. Polyclonal anti-SHP-1 antibodies were purchased
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-Vav2 antibodies
were kindly provided by Dr. X. Bustelo (State University of New York,
Stony Brook, NY).
Cells, DNAs, and Protein Expression--
A431 cells were from
American Type Culture Collection (CRL 1555; Manassas, VA), and human
embryonal kidney 293 cells were kindly provided by Dr. A. Ullrich
(Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany).
Both cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(Life Technologies, Inc., Eggenstein, Germany) supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum. A cDNA for human SHP-1 (epithelial form) was
generously provided by Drs. A. Ullrich and R. Lammers
(Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry). Generation of A431 cell
lines with inducible SHP-1 expression is described elsewhere (54).
Expression constructs for the various p120ctn isoforms (52) and
constructs for GST fusion proteins of SHP-1 and SHP-1 mutants (55) were
described earlier. GST fusion protein purification (55) and transient
transfections (56) were performed as described.
GST Pull-down Assays and Deglycosylation Assay--
A431 cells
were grown in 94-mm dishes to ~70% confluence in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The
cells were starved for 16 h using serum-free Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium and subsequently stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min and lysed in 700 µl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 0.5 mM sodium
pervanadate). Note that this Triton X-100 concentration appeared to be
critical to observe the SHP-1-p120ctn association, as little if
any association could be seen at 1% Triton X-100. The lysates were
centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 20 min. To investigate
binding of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins to SHP-1, 50 µg of
GST-SHP-1 WT, GST-SHP-1 R32K, GST-SHP-1 R138K, GST-SHP-1 R32K,R138K, or
GST proteins were coupled to 30 µl of glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). The A431 cell lysates were incubated for 2 h
at 4 °C with the immobilized fusion proteins by end-over-end
rotation. The beads were washed three times with HNGT buffer (20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol,
0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.5 mM sodium pervanadate). Then, 60 µl of 2× Laemmli buffer were added, and the mixture was boiled for 5 min. Bound proteins were visualized by SDS-PAGE (7.5% acrylamide gels) and immunoblotting as described previously (7, 55) using
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.
To identify glycosylated SHP-1-binding tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins, a deglycosylation assay was used. Thirty µl of glutathione beads with associated proteins (as described above) were incubated with
45 µl of solution containing 0.1% SDS and 1% -mercaptoethanol for 5 min at 95 °C. Then, 45 µl of 2× reaction buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7), 40 mM EDTA, 1%
-mercaptoethanol, and 2% Triton X-100) and 0.5 units of
endoglycosidases F/N (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) were added. The
reaction was incubated for 16 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, 18 µl
of 6× Laemmli buffer were added, and the mixture was boiled for 5 min.
Proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (7.5% acrylamide gels) and
immunoblotting using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.
To investigate whether the interaction of SHP-1 and p120ctn is
direct or not, a sequential immunoprecipitation approach was used. This
was done basically as described previously (55). Briefly, subconfluent
A431 cells (94-mm dishes) were stimulated with EGF (100 ng/ml) for 5 min and lysed in 700 µl of lysis buffer. p120ctn was
immunoprecipitated in its tyrosine-phosphorylated form using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies covalently coupled to Sepharose. The
bound proteins were denatured by boiling in 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 1% SDS, and 1% -mercaptoethanol for 5 min and subsequently partially renatured by diluting the sample 1:20 with lysis buffer and
incubating at 4 °C for 30 min. Thereafter, the partially renatured lysates were used in GST pull-down assays employing 50 µg of
GST-SHP-1 WT, GST-SH2 (isolated tandem SH2 domains of SHP-1 as a GST
fusion protein), GST-SHP-1 CS (catalytically inactive C455S mutant of SHP-1), or GST (as a control). The associated proteins were visualized by SDS-PAGE (7.5% acrylamide gels) and immunoblotting.
To monitor binding of the p120ctn isoforms to SHP-1, cDNAs
for isoforms 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 3N, 3AB, 3AC, 3ABC, 3B, 3C, and 3BC
(cloned into expression vector pEFBOS) (52, 57) were cotransfected with
pRK5RS-EGFR (56, 58) into 293 cells (94-mm dishes). The cells were
stimulated with EGF (100 ng/ml for 5 min) and lysed in 700 µl of
lysis buffer. The lysates were centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 20 min and subsequently incubated with end-over-end
rotation at 4 °C with 10 µg of GST-SHP-1 immobilized on 30 µl of
glutathione-Sepharose for 2 h. The beads were washed with HNGT
buffer, and noncovalently bound proteins were extracted by boiling for
5 min in the presence of 60 µl of 2× Laemmli buffer. The proteins
were visualized by SDS-PAGE (7.5% acrylamide gels) and immunoblotting.
Partial Purification of p120ctn Isoform 3A
(pp100)--
A431 cells were cultured at large scale in 94-mm dishes.
The cells were stimulated with EGF (100 ng/ml) for 5 min when they reached 70% confluence. The cells were lysed in 700 µl of lysis buffer/plate. The lysates were centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 20 min, pooled, and loaded onto a 0.5-ml
anti-phosphotyrosine-Sepharose column equilibrated in buffer R1 (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM
Na3VO4, and 0.5 M NaCl). The column
was washed with 10 ml of buffer R1 and subsequently with 10 ml of
buffer R2 (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM Na3VO4). The bound
phosphoproteins were eluted with 3 ml of 20 mM phenyl phosphate dissolved in buffer R2. Thereafter, the eluate was applied to
a MonoQ HR5/5 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated in
buffer R2 and connected to a fast protein liquid chromatography system.
The bound proteins were eluted with a linear NaCl gradient (0-500
mM NaCl within 20 ml). The fractions were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and silver staining, and positive fractions were identified by running GST pull-down assays using GST-SHP-1 as described above. These
positive fractions were pooled; 80% acetone was added; and the mixture
was kept on ice for 1 h. The precipitated proteins were pelleted
by centrifugation at 30,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C.
The pellet was dried and dissolved in 2× Laemmli buffer. The proteins
were resolved by SDS-PAGE (7.5% acrylamide gels). Gels were stained
with Coomassie Blue, and the respective bands were excised and used for
structure analysis.
In-gel Digestion, Mass Spectrometric Analysis, and Edman
Sequencing--
The excised band was prepared for and subjected to
in-gel digestion as described (59). In brief, after washing with
ammonium bicarbonate and acetonitrile, the gel piece was completely
dried, and a solution containing modified porcine trypsin
(sequence-grade; Promega, Madison, WI) was allowed to soak into the gel
piece. After overnight incubation at 30 °C, generated peptides were
recovered by extraction. The peptide mixture was analyzed by
matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF)
mass spectrometry using a Bruker Biflex III instrument equipped with
delayed extraction and reflector. The sample was prepared by the
dried droplet technique using -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as the
matrix. The instrument was externally calibrated using angiotensin II
(MH+ 1046.54) and adrenocorticotropic hormone fragment
18-39 (MH+ 2465.20). The peptide mass fingerprinting
analysis was done using ProFound Version 4.7.5.
For Edman degradation, peptides were isolated by microbore
reversed-phase liquid chromatography on a 1 × 150-mm Kromasil C18 column operated in the SMART system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Selected fractions were subjected to amino acid sequence analysis in a Procise 494 instrument (PE-Biosystems, Foster City, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Expression Analysis of p120ctn Isoforms by
RT-PCR--
RNA was isolated from A431 cells using the RNA-easy kit
(QIAGEN Inc., Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. For RT-PCR, cDNA was synthesized as described
previously (57). The PCR mixtures contained template cDNA, 25 pmol
of p120ctn-specific primers, 200 mM dXTPs, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and the buffer supplied with the
Taq DNA polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc., Gent, Belgium).
Taq DNA polymerase was used at 0.5 units/reaction. The
following primers were used: primer set EX1F6 plus EX5R1 covers the
5'-end (alternative start codons) of the p120ctn cDNAs; set
EX10F2 plus EX12R1 generates a product of 175 base pairs when exon C is
absent and one of 193 base pairs when exon C is present; set EX15F1 and
EX20R1 amplifies only cDNA fragments that contain exon B; and set
EX18F1 and EX21R3 amplifies only fragments that contain exon A (a
557-base pair product in the presence of exon B and a 470-base pair
product when exon B sequences are spliced out). The primer sequences
and the corresponding cycling conditions were described before
(57).
Immunoprecipitation and Dephosphorylation Assays--
To monitor
the interaction of p120ctn and SHP-1 in intact cells, A431
cells with inducible SHP-1 expression were used (54). The cells were
grown in the absence of anhydrotetracycline (ATc) in 94-mm dishes to
70% confluence and then either stimulated with EGF (100 ng/ml) for
different time points or left unstimulated and lysed in 700 µl of
lysis buffer Z (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM
NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 0.5% Triton X-100,
1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM zinc
acetate). The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 25,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C and subjected to immunoprecipitation using monoclonal anti-SHP-1 antibodies (1 µg/reaction). The
immunoprecipitations were incubated with end-over-end rotation for
2 h at 4 °C. Subsequently, 15 µl of protein A-Sepharose
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were added, and the mixtures were
incubated for another 30 min with end-over-end rotation at 4 °C. The
beads were washed three times with HNGT buffer containing 1 mM zinc acetate in place of the sodium pervanadate, and the
noncovalently bound proteins were extracted by boiling in 40 µl of
2× Laemmli buffer. The proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (7.5%
acrylamide gels) and visualized by immunoblotting.
To analyze the dependence of tyrosine phosphorylation of
p120ctn on the absence or presence of SHP-1, SHP-1-expressing
A431 cell lines and mock-transfected A431 control cell lines were
cultured for 4 days in the presence or absence of 100 ng/ml ATc
(six-well plates) until the cells reached ~70% confluence. The cells
were stimulated for different time points with EGF (100 ng/ml) and lysed in 200 µl of lysis buffer/well. The lysates were centrifuged at
25,000 × g for 20 min, and p120ctn was
immunoprecipitated using anti-p120ctn antibodies. The
p120ctn tyrosine phosphorylation was monitored after SDS-PAGE
by immunoblotting using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.
To visualize tyrosine phosphorylation efficiency of the different
p120ctn isoforms by EGFR, cDNAs of these isoforms were
cotransfected with EGFR cDNA into 293 cells in six-well plates (0.5 µg of pRK5-EGFR and 3.5 µg of pEFBOS-p120ctn). The cells
were stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 5 min and lysed in 200 µl of
lysis buffer/well. After centrifugation at 25,000 × g
for 20 min at 4 °C, lysate aliquots were loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the tyrosine phosphorylation of the different p120ctn isoforms was monitored by immunoblotting.
 |
RESULTS |
Interaction of SHP-1 with a 100-kDa Phosphoprotein in
EGF-stimulated Cells--
To identify new interaction partners for
SHP-1 in epithelial cells, we performed GST pull-down experiments using
GST-SHP-1 and lysates of EGF-stimulated A431 cells. We observed
precipitation of autophosphorylated EGFR, as described earlier, and of
a prominent tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of ~100 kDa (Fig.
1A), designated operationally as pp100. This protein was apparently one of the major
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins after EGF stimulation in A431 cells.
We tested whether the precipitation of pp100 would exhibit any
specificity with respect to the two SH2 domains of SHP-1 employing
GST-SHP-1 fusions with inactivated SH2 domains (Fig. 1B,
left panel). Inactivation of both SH2 domains by point mutation abolished the association of pp100 as well as of EGFR with the
GST-SHP-1 fusion protein. Point mutation of the N-terminal SH2 domain
completely abrogated interaction with pp100, whereas EGFR was still
precipitated to some extent. Point mutation of the C-terminal SH2
domain reduced the association of pp100, however, to a lesser extent
than the association of EGFR. Taken together, these experiments
indicate that binding of pp100 to SHP-1 is mediated mainly by the
N-terminal SH2 domain. The coprecipitation of EGFR with GST-SHP-1
mutants exhibits a different pattern, suggesting that the association
of pp100 with SHP-1 is independent of the association of EGFR with
SHP-1. Further evidence for a lack of association between pp100 and
EGFR comes from their independent behavior upon wheat germ agglutinin
affinity chromatography, with EGFR largely recovered in the wheat germ
agglutinin-bound fraction and pp100 appearing in the flow-through
fraction (data not shown).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Binding of a 100-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated
protein from EGF-stimulated A431 cells to SHP-1 and its identification
as p120ctn. Subconfluent A431 cells were stimulated for 5 min with EGF and then lysed. A: the lysates were incubated
with immobilized GST-SHP-1 or immobilized GST, and the bound
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were visualized by immunoblotting
using anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-PY) antibodies.
B: left panel, GST alone (negative control) or a
fusion protein of GST and wild-type SHP-1 (GST-SHP-1), SHP-1 with an
inactivated N-terminal SH2 domain (GST-SHP-1 R32K), SHP-1 with an
inactivated C-terminal SH2 domain (GST-SHP-1 R138K), or SHP-1 with both
SH2 domains inactivated (GST-SHP-1 R32K,R138K) was subjected to the
same analysis as described for A. The beads were washed, and
the bound tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were visualized by SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotting. All lanes are from the same blot with identical ECL
exposure, but were rearranged for better clarity. Right
panel, to analyze the SHP-1-associated tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins for glycosylation, beads with bound proteins were incubated in
the absence or presence of endoglycosidases F/N (Endo F/N).
The products were visualized by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. C: a GST-SHP-1 pull-down
assay from lysates of EGF-stimulated A431 cells was performed as
described for A. The anti-phosphotyrosine blot (upper
panel) was stripped and reprobed with a monoclonal
anti-p120ctn antibody (lower panel).
|
|
To identify pp100, we tested the possibility that pp100 may represent
Gab1, c-Cbl, or Vav. Gab1 has been described to become tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to EGF and to bind SHP-2
effectively (60). Also, c-Cbl is tyrosine-phosphorylated in
response to EGF, and this protein may serve as a docking partner for
multiple SH2 domain proteins (61). Vav1 has been shown to functionally interact with SHP-1 in hematopoietic cells (62). Specific antibodies against Gab1, c-Cbl, Vav1, and Vav2 failed, however, to react with
pp100 (data not shown).
We also considered the possibility that pp100 is a member of the
recently described SIRP/SHP substrate family of docking proteins. A
SIRP species of 85-90 kDa has been described in A431 cells (22). The
SIRP species in A431 cells are heavily glycosylated membrane proteins
that undergo a strong reduction in molecular mass upon deglycosylation
with endoglycosidases (22). Treatment with endoglycosidases F/N of
proteins bound to GST-SHP-1 did not result in a strong size change of
the 100-kDa phosphoprotein band (Fig. 1B, right panel), in contrast to what would be expected for A431
cell-derived SIRP. The EGFR band was, however, shifted to lower
molecular mass in this experiment, indicating that the endoglycosidase
F/N treatment was effective. Furthermore, SIRP proteins in A431 cells
are effectively bound to wheat germ agglutinin (22), whereas pp100
failed to bind to wheat germ agglutinin. Taken together, it seems
unlikely that pp100 represents a member of the SIRP family.
Identification of pp100 as p120ctn Isoform
3A--
Since pp100 seemed not to be identical to any of a number of
candidate proteins, we aimed at direct microidentification of pp100 by
chemical methods. Although pp100 could be visualized on silver- and
Coomassie Blue-stained two-dimensional electrophoresis gels with an
apparent isoelectric point of ~7 (data not shown), too little
material could be recovered directly from these gels to allow
unequivocal identification. Therefore, pp100 was partially purified
using a two-step chromatography approach, and purification was
monitored by pull-down assays with GST-SHP-1. In brief, A431 cells were
stimulated with EGF and lysed, and tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins
were enriched using anti-phosphotyrosine affinity chromatography. The
phosphoproteins were further resolved by anion-exchange chromatography. The positive fractions were concentrated and loaded onto a
one-dimensional SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gel was stained with
Coomassie Blue; and a band, tentatively assigned as pp100 on the basis
of its size and enrichment properties, was excised. An in-gel digest was performed using trypsin, and the resulting peptide mixture was
first analyzed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Sixty-seven peptide
masses were determined and used to search the data base. The masses and
parameters for the data base search are shown in Table
I. With the peptide mass fingerprint data
alone, an unequivocal identification of the eluted protein was
possible. According to these data, the purified protein represented an
isoform of human p120ctn, a member of the Armadillo
superfamily. This is supported by finding 31 peptide masses within a
narrow error in the p120ctn sequence, covering 42% of its
sequence. A mass of 1051.58 may represent the p120ctn-derived
peptide with the sequence VVKAASGALR in its phosphorylated form.
Phosphorylation of p120ctn on serine residues has been reported
previously (63). The remaining peptide masses were used to search the
data base, but no significant match was observed.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Peptide mass mapping of a tryptic digest of pp100
pp100 was partially purified, and the band representing pp100 was
excised from a Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel. An in-gel
digest was performed using trypsin, and the resulting peptide mixture
was analyzed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Sixty-seven peptide
masses were determined and used to search the data base. Boldface
values represent masses that match the target protein within the given
mass tolerance. The italicized value represents a peptide that might be
phosphorylated.
|
|
We also resolved the peptide mixture from the in-gel digest by
reversed-phase liquid chromatography and sequenced three peptides. The
peptide sequences found (NLSYQVHR, EIPQAER, and GTTPLMQK) could be
positioned in the human p120ctn sequence, supporting the
results obtained by mass spectrometry. The three peptide sequences were
confirmed by MALDI-TOF of the isolated fractions.
We went on to verify the identity of pp100 to p120ctn. An
antibody raised against authentic p120ctn recognized a 100-kDa
protein in GST-SHP-1 pull-down assays (but not in GST mock
precipitations), which exactly comigrated with pp100 (Fig.
1C). Furthermore, resolving immunoprecipitated p120ctn from EGF-stimulated A431 cells using two-dimensional
electrophoresis gels and immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine or
anti-p120ctn antibodies yielded identical patterns as obtained
with pp100 enriched by GST-SHP-1 pull-down assays (data not shown).
Final identification of a p120ctn isoform as the
SHP-1-interacting pp100 was obtained by coexpression of authentic
p120ctn and SHP-1 and reconstitution of the molecular complex
between both proteins (see below).
The expression of p120ctn is regulated by alternative splicing,
and at least 32 isoforms are theoretically possible (57). The antibody
used recognizes all these isoforms of p120ctn. RT-PCR with
p120ctn isoform-specific primers revealed that A431 cells
express only the p120ctn isoforms of type 3 containing
sequences corresponding to exon A or B or both (Fig.
2A), i.e. 3A, 3AB,
and/or 3B, with the isoform(s) containing exon B expressed to
apparently lower levels. One of the sequenced pp100-derived peptides
yielded the sequence GTTPLMQK, which does not occur in p120ctn
isoforms arising from expression of the alternative exon B. Also, isoform 3A migrated with identical mobility as pp100, whereas isoforms
3AB and 3B migrated with lower mobility than pp100 on SDS gels (Fig.
2B). Little immunoreactivity could be seen in lysates of
EGF-stimulated A431 cells in the position of p120ctn isoform
3AB or 3B. With the same type of lysates, antibodies specifically
recognizing p120ctn isoforms 1 and 2 yielded no signals, in
agreement with the RT-PCR data indicating an absence of these isoforms.
Antibodies specifically recognizing exon A-containing isoforms and
antibodies specifically recognizing exon B-containing isoforms
visualized strong or only weak bands, respectively, of ~100 kDa in
corresponding immunoblots (data not shown), providing further evidence
for a prevalence of p120ctn isoform 3A expression in A431
cells. pp100 has an isoelectric point of ~7. This is close to the
predicted isoelectric point of 6.7 for p120ctn isoform 3A,
whereas p120ctn isoforms 3AB and 3B have predicted isoelectric
points of 5.9. Taken together, it can be concluded that the
SHP-1-interacting phosphoprotein pp100 from A431 cells represents
p120ctn isoform 3A. Our data do not, however, exclude that
SHP-1 can bind, in addition, to other p120ctn isoforms such as
3AB and 3B, which are expressed at comparatively low levels in A431
cells. Indeed, binding of SHP-1 to other p120ctn isoforms could
be shown in additional experiments (see below).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analysis of p120ctn isoform
expression in A431 cells. A, subconfluent cultures of
A431 cells were starved and stimulated or not (as indicated) with EGF.
Then, total RNA was isolated and subjected to RT-PCR analysis with
primers indicating the presence or absence of alternatively used
sequences in the expressed p120ctn isoforms, as shown. The
patterns reveal expression of only type 3 isoforms and the absence of
isoforms harboring sequences of exon C, but the presence of exon A and,
to a lesser extent, exon B. B, lysates of EGF-stimulated 293 cells overexpressing EGFR and p120ctn isoform 3A, 3AB, or 3B
(as indicated) and a lysate of EGF-stimulated A431 cells were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an antibody recognizing all
p120ctn isoforms equally well. The main p120ctn isoform
in A431 cells (pp100) comigrated with p120ctn isoform 3A.
bp, base pairs.
|
|
Characterization of the SHP-1-p120ctn
Interaction--
We first analyzed whether the interaction between
SHP-1 and p120ctn was direct. To test this, p120ctn was
immunoprecipitated from lysates of EGF-stimulated A431 cells by
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. These immunoprecipitates were denatured by boiling in the presence of 1% SDS. Under these
conditions, any possible adaptor protein should be inactivated;
however, the phosphotyrosine motifs in phosphorylated p120ctn
should retain at least part of their binding affinity for the SH2
domains of SHP-1. The denatured immunoprecipitates were diluted with
lysis buffer to reduce the SDS concentration to 0.05% and subjected to
a binding reaction with GST fusion proteins of SHP-1 (GST-SHP-1 WT),
catalytically inactive SHP-1 (GST-SHP-1 CS), and the isolated tandem
SH2 domains of SHP-1 (GST-SH2) or GST as a control. As demonstrated in
Fig. 3, p120ctn could be
recovered on GST-SH2 and GST-SHP-1 WT to nearly the same extent,
whereas no association with GST alone could be observed. This indicates
that SHP-1 is capable of a direct interaction with phosphorylated
p120ctn via its SH2 domains. The use of catalytically inactive
SHP-1 (GST-SHP-1 CS) dramatically increased the amount of
coprecipitating p120ctn. An explanation for this observation
could be the efficient dephosphorylation of p120ctn by SHP-1
during the binding reaction and therefore a removal of the interaction
sites for the SH2 domains of SHP-1. Moreover, CS mutants of PTPs are
known to trap substrates. The strong increase in binding of the SHP-1
CS mutant to p120ctn compared with the GST-SH2 domains points
to a second binding mechanism in addition to the SH2
domain-phosphotyrosine interaction, most likely an enzyme-substrate
complex formation.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
SHP-1 binds directly to p120ctn.
A431 cells were treated with EGF and subsequently lysed.
Immunoprecipitation was carried out using anti-phosphotyrosine
antibodies. To disrupt preexisting protein complexes, the
immunoprecipitates were denatured in the presence of SDS. Subsequently,
the denatured protein solution was diluted with a Triton
X-100-containing buffer to a final SDS concentration of 0.05%. As
indicated, the partially renatured proteins were incubated with either
unfused GST or fusion protein GST-SHP-1 WT, GST-SHP-1 CS (catalytically
inactive mutant), or GST-SH2 (isolated tandem SH2 domains), all
immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose. The beads were washed, and the
associated proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using
anti-p120ctn antibodies (A). Equal levels of
p120ctn in the denatured lysates could be revealed by SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotting (B).
|
|
Differential Binding of SHP-1 to p120ctn
Isoforms--
As mentioned above, the expression of p120ctn is
regulated by alternative splicing, and this leads to a great variety of
isoforms expressed in different cell lines. The major p120ctn
isoform interacting with SHP-1 in A431 cells was identified as p120ctn isoform 3A. We wanted to further confirm the identity
of pp100 by reconstituting the interaction using recombinant
p120ctn. Also, it was interesting to evaluate to what extent
there might be a selectivity of certain p120ctn isoforms for
SHP-1 binding. Therefore, 11 different isoforms of p120ctn,
including p120ctn isoform 3A, were tested for their ability to
associate with SHP-1. The isoforms employed differed in the usage of
the four translation start codons in the p120ctn gene
(designations 1-4) and/or in the presence or absence of the
alternatively used exons A, B, and C. Isoform 3N contains no amino acid
residues encoded by these alternative exons. The cDNAs of these
isoforms were cotransfected with an expression plasmid for EGFR into
293 cells, after which the cells were stimulated with EGF for 5 min and
lysed. The lysates were used in GST pull-down assays using GST-SHP-1
immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose. Total expression levels of the
isoforms were comparable (Fig.
4B). The results of the
pull-down assays presented in Fig. 4A indicate a different
binding behavior of the various p120ctn isoforms for SHP-1.
Isoform 3A exhibited a very strong binding, further verifying its
identity to pp100, whereas isoform 3AB bound clearly weaker. The lower
molecular mass isoform 4A bound much more weakly to SHP-1 than isoforms
1A, 2A, and 3A, indicating that the N-terminal amino acids missing in
isoform 4A are important for the association of p120ctn with
SHP-1. Interestingly, the presence of the small exon C (6 amino acids:
DEWFSR) led to a strong reduction of association with SHP-1 in
comparison with the association of the appropriate isoform without exon
C (for instance, 3N versus 3C or 3A versus 3AC).
One obvious explanation for the differential binding capacity of the
different isoforms for SHP-1 could be a different efficiency of
phosphorylation by the coexpressed and stimulated EGFR. Lysate aliquots
were therefore used to monitor the phosphorylation of the various
isoforms by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 4C, the various
p120ctn isoforms indeed became phosphorylated by EGFR with
different efficiencies. Isoform 3A was a very good substrate for EGFR,
which correlates with results from A431 cells, where this isoform
(pp100) was found to be a major tyrosine-phosphorylated product after EGF stimulation. All isoforms containing the alternative exon C were
phosphorylated to a much lesser extent compared with the corresponding
p120ctn isoforms without exon C (for instance, 3A
versus 3AC). Very little if any phosphorylation was
detectable in isoform 4A (Fig. 4C). Thus, weak binding of
SHP-1 to isoforms 4A, 3AC, 3ABC, 3C, and 3BC is paralleled by poor
tyrosine phosphorylation of these isoforms. In contrast, isoforms 3AB
and 3B are effectively phosphorylated, but still exhibit comparatively
little SHP-1 binding. Taken together, various p120ctn isoforms
have a differential capacity to bind SHP-1, which in part, but not
entirely, correlates with their phosphorylation by coexpressed
EGFR.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Various p120ctn isoforms exhibit
differential binding to SHP-1. 293 cells were transfected with
expression plasmids of different p120ctn isoforms (as
indicated) and EGFR. After EGF stimulation, the cells were lysed, and
lysates were applied to a GST pull-down assay employing immobilized
GST-SHP-1. Bound proteins were visualized by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotting using anti-p120ctn antibodies (A).
Similar expression levels for the various p120ctn isoforms were
revealed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (B). Lysate aliquots
were loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the tyrosine
phosphorylation of the different p120ctn isoforms was analyzed
by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (C). Note that the order of
some lanes in C differs from that in A and
B. anti-PY, anti-phosphotyrosine.
|
|
p120ctn has originally been described as a good substrate of
the cytosolic tyrosine kinase Src (44). Since Src is endogenously expressed in A431 cells and becomes activated upon EGFR activation (64), it could possibly contribute to the EGF-mediated phosphorylation of p120ctn. To explore this possibility, we performed inhibitor
studies using compounds specifically inhibiting either the EGFR or Src kinase activity (Fig. 5). A431 cells were
preincubated for 2 h with either the specific Src family kinase
inhibitor PP1 or the specific EGFR kinase inhibitor AG1478 or with
Me2SO as the negative control. The cells were stimulated
with EGF for 5 min or left unstimulated (as indicated) and finally
lysed. The overall tyrosine phosphorylation was analyzed by running
lysate aliquots on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and subsequent
immunoblotting (Fig. 5, right panel). The tyrosine
phosphorylation of p120ctn was monitored after
immunoprecipitation using anti-p120ctn antibodies, followed by
immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 5, left
panel). p120ctn was found not to be phosphorylated on
tyrosine residues in unstimulated cells. Preincubation of the cells
with PP1 led to a partial reduction of the EGF-mediated p120ctn
phosphorylation to ~50% of the control (cells treated with
Me2SO), but not to a total loss of the phosphorylation. The
EGF-induced overall tyrosine phosphorylation was also somewhat reduced
after PP1 treatment. In contrast, inhibition of the EGFR kinase
resulted in a complete abrogation of the EGF-mediated p120ctn
phosphorylation as well as the overall tyrosine phosphorylation. Therefore, Src either may be directly involved in the EGF-induced phosphorylation of p120ctn subsequent to EGFR activation or
cooperates with EGFR in a different way by influencing the ability of
EGFR to phosphorylate p120ctn.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
EGF-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of
p120ctn is partially mediated by PP1-susceptible
kinase(s). A431 cells at 70% confluence were treated with PP1 (1 µM), AG1478 (0.3 µM), or dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) for 2 h. The cells were subsequently stimulated
with EGF or vehicle (as indicated) and lysed. p120ctn was
immunoprecipitated (IP), and its tyrosine phosphorylation
was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (left panel).
The overall tyrosine phosphorylation was visualized by running lysate
aliquots on SDS gels and immunoblotting (right panel).
anti-PY, anti-phosphotyrosine.
|
|
Association with SHP-1 and Dephosphorylation of p120ctn
by SHP-1 in A431 Cells--
We next asked whether complex formation
between p120ctn and SHP-1 can be shown in intact cells. To test
this, we employed stably transfected A431 cells that express SHP-1
under the control of a tetracycline-dependent promoter in
addition to comparatively low levels of endogenous SHP-1. In these
cells, the presence of ATc represses the expression of SHP-1, and
withdrawal of ATc leads to an induction of SHP-1 expression
("tet-off" system) (54). Such A431 cells, grown in the absence of
ATc and thus expressing SHP-1, were stimulated for different time
periods with EGF. SHP-1 was immunoprecipitated, and any associated
p120ctn was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The
results presented in Fig. 6 indicate that
p120ctn formed a complex with SHP-1 but only when the cells
were stimulated with EGF. The complex formation was rapid and occurred
already after a 30-s stimulation with EGF. Furthermore, the association was of transient nature, peaking at ~5 min and declining after 10 min. Similar experiments were performed with untransfected A431 cells
expressing low levels of endogenous SHP-1 and with ZR75-1 mammary
carcinoma cells expressing high amounts of endogenous SHP-1. We failed,
however, to visualize complex formation in these cell lines (data not
shown). It may be relevant that p120ctn is only poorly
phosphorylated after EGF stimulation of ZR75-1 cells.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
p120ctn becomes physically associated
with SHP-1 in A431 cells upon EGF stimulation. A431 cells stably
expressing SHP-1 were stimulated with EGF for the indicated time
periods. The cells were lysed, and SHP-1 was immunoprecipitated.
Associated p120ctn was visualized by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotting using anti-p120ctn antibodies (A).
Similar expression levels for p120ctn were revealed by running
lysate aliquots on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and subsequent
immunoblotting (B). Mab, monoclonal
antibody.
|
|
The data on the interaction between p120ctn and SHP-1 presented
above suggested the possibility that p120ctn might be an
efficient substrate for SHP-1. To test this, SHP-1-expressing A431
cells (+SHP-1) and mock-transfected cells
( SHP-1) were grown in the absence or presence
of ATc and stimulated with EGF for different time periods or left
unstimulated, as indicated in Fig. 7.
After this, the cells were lysed; p120ctn was
immunoprecipitated; and the tyrosine phosphorylation of the protein was
visualized by immunoblotting. Already after 1 min of EGF stimulation,
p120ctn became strongly tyrosine-phosphorylated. This
phosphorylation was constant up to 10 min of EGF stimulation. In
control cells, the presence or absence of ATc had no effects on the
EGF-induced p120ctn tyrosine phosphorylation. In cells
transfected with the SHP-1 expression construct in the presence of ATc
(suppressed SHP-1 expression), a somewhat lower phosphorylation of
p120ctn was observed as compared with the mock-transfected
cells. This may be due to clonal variation or to some vector leakage.
Indeed, even in the presence of ATc, a small amount of SHP-1 could be detected (Fig. 7C), which might be sufficient to partially
dephosphorylate p120ctn. More important, upon withdrawal of
ATc, the clear induction of SHP-1 was accompanied by a clear reduction
of the p120ctn phosphorylation. These results suggest that in
intact cells, p120ctn is not only a binding partner, but also a
substrate for SHP-1.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
p120ctn is dephosphorylated by SHP-1
in A431 cells inducibly expressing SHP-1. A431 cells stably and
inducibly expressing SHP-1 (+SHP-1) or mock-transfected
cells ( SHP-1) were treated for 5 days with 100 ng/ml ATc or vehicle to either suppress or induce SHP-1, respectively.
The cells were treated with EGF for different time periods (as
indicated), and lysates were prepared. p120ctn was
immunoprecipitated, and its tyrosine phosphorylation was visualized by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using anti-phosphotyrosine
(anti-PY) antibodies (A). Expression of
p120ctn (B) and SHP-1 (C) was revealed by
running lysate aliquots on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and
immunoblotting.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Multiple targets for the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 have
been identified in hematopoietic cells (for reviews, see Refs. 2-5).
In contrast, little is known about the function of SHP-1 in epithelial
cells. In this study, we have identified p120ctn as a binding
partner and substrate for SHP-1 in A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells.
Epithelial isoforms of p120ctn interact with E-cadherin and are
components of adherens junctions (30, 32). One could speculate that
SHP-1 may have the capacity to regulate p120ctn function and,
in turn, cell-cell adhesion. Unfortunately, although p120ctn is
a prominent tyrosine kinase substrate and, in fact, one of the most
abundantly phosphorylated proteins in A431 cells upon EGF stimulation,
the role of its tyrosine phosphorylation is unclear. p120ctn
has been shown to modulate cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion negatively in certain cell types (50, 51), and phosphorylation could
possibly modify this activity. We did, however, not observe any effects
of SHP-1 expression on cell-cell adhesion of A431 cells under the assay
conditions employed.2
Phosphorylation of p120ctn by Src has recently been reported to
increase its binding to E-cadherin in vitro (65). One could
therefore speculate that dephosphorylation of tyrosine-phosphorylated
p120ctn by SHP-1 would decrease its affinity for E-cadherin.
Isoforms of p120ctn lacking sequences corresponding to exon B
have the capacity to localize to the nucleus and may regulate
transcription of specific genes (52). Tyrosine phosphorylation of
p120ctn could potentially affect its cellular localization. The
SHP-1 expression level had, however, little effect on cellular
localization of p120ctn in A431 cells as visualized by indirect
immunofluorescence.2 A better understanding of
p120ctn function in epithelial cells and of the role of
p120ctn tyrosine phosphorylation is required to more
specifically explore the functional effects of its SHP-1
association and SHP-1-mediated dephosphorylation.
Pull-down assays with SDS-denatured p120ctn and with various
SHP-1 mutant proteins revealed that the association is at least partially direct and mediated to a greater extent by the N-terminal SH2
domain as compared with the C-terminal SH2 domain. Interestingly, the
catalytically inactive C455S mutant of SHP-1 exhibited greatly elevated
binding, suggesting that p120ctn is a very efficient SHP-1
substrate even under the conditions of the pull-down assay. Two
tyrosine residues in the sequence of p120ctn partially resemble
the consensus sequence for ligands of the N-terminal SH2 domain of
SHP-1, i.e. hXY(P)XXh (where h = hydrophobic and X = any amino acid). Tyrosines 549 (RGY549ELL, numbering according to isoform 3A) and 561 (RIY561ISL) in their phosphorylated forms are therefore
candidates for SHP-1 interaction sites in p120ctn. These
putative binding sites for SHP-1 in p120ctn are present in all
p120ctn isoforms. We did, however, observe a differential
binding of SHP-1 to 11 tested p120ctn isoforms. This
differential binding can in part be attributed to differential
phosphorylation of the various isoforms. Interestingly, p120ctn
sequences corresponding to exon C had apparently a negative influence on tyrosine phosphorylation of the respective p120ctn isoforms.
Also, isoform 4A, which lacks N-terminal sequences present in isoforms
3, was very poorly phosphorylated and consequently bound very little
p120ctn. Exon C sequences may negatively affect interaction of
p120ctn with the phosphorylating kinase(s). It is noteworthy
that exon C is largely brain-specific (57). Alternatively, N-terminal sequences missing in isoform 4A may positively affect such interaction with a tyrosine kinase. The identity of the latter is not clear. Although the tyrosine phosphorylation of p120ctn in A431 cells
is strictly dependent on the activity of EGFR kinase, as indicated by
total abolishment with the selective EGFR blocker AG1478, the Src
family kinase inhibitor PP1 showed a partial inhibitory effect. This
finding may be due to the fact that Src family kinases partially
contribute to EGF-stimulated p120ctn phosphorylation or may be
due to only partial inhibition of an EGF-dependent
p120ctn-modifying kinase by PP1. For example, susceptibility to
PP1 of the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase FER, which has been shown to
efficiently phosphorylate p120ctn upon overexpression or in a
receptor tyrosine kinase-dependent manner (46), is not
known. Alternatively, Src family kinase inhibition may partially impair
EGFR tyrosine kinase activity. Src kinase has been shown to contribute
to full functionality of EGFR (66, 67). Interestingly, also the
presence of p120ctn sequences corresponding to exon B had a
negative effect on SHP-1-p120ctn association, although the
overall phosphorylation of exon B-containing isoforms was comparable to
that without exon B. The presence of exon B sequences seems therefore
to impair SHP-1 binding independently of tyrosine phosphorylation.
In A431 cells, p120ctn becomes effectively dephosphorylated
upon induction of SHP-1 expression. Complex formation between SHP-1 and
p120ctn appears to be very transient, and SHP-1-mediated
dephosphorylation is probably the cause of rapid complex decomposition.
This may also be the reason why we were unable to visualize
SHP-1-p120ctn complexes in cells with endogenous SHP-1 levels.
To demonstrate control of p120ctn tyrosine
phosphorylation by endogenous SHP-1 will require experiments to
down-regulate endogenous SHP-1 levels.
The observed association of SHP-1 with p120ctn in A431 cells
and its dephosphorylation by SHP-1 provide strong evidence for the first demonstrated interaction of a PTP with this prominently tyrosine-phosphorylated member of the Armadillo superfamily (see "Note Added in Proof"). We propose that SHP-1 has the capacity to
modulate p120ctn function by dephosphorylation. This may not
apply only to epithelial cells. As we have shown, SHP-1 has the
capacity to interact with a variety of p120ctn isoforms, in
addition to isoform 3A. Various p120ctn isoforms have, for
example, been detected in a murine macrophage cell line (63), and
murine macrophages are known to express relatively high levels of
SHP-1. One could therefore speculate that SHP-1 can also modulate
p120ctn tyrosine phosphorylation levels in other cell types
where both molecules are coexpressed.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are very grateful to Drs. A. Ullrich and
R. Lammers for the generous provision of SHP-1 cDNA and also to
Christer Wernstedt (Ludwig Institute Uppsala) for accurate amino acid
sequence determination.
 |
Note Added in Proof |
While this paper was under review, Zondag
et al. (Zondag, G. C. M., Reynolds, A. B., and Moolenaar, W. H. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11264-11269) reported
association of p120ctn with, and
dephosphorylation by, the receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase
RPTPµ.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant Bo 1043/3-1 from the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to F.-D. B. and J. G.-Z.) and by a grant from the Max-Planck Society (to F.-D. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Postdoctoral Fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders.
**
Research Director of the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders.
§§
Present address: Centre for Molecular Medicine, University
College London, 5 University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, UK.
¶¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax:
49-3641-304462; E-mail: i5frbo@rz.uni-jena.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 1, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001315200
2
H. Keilhack, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
WT, wild-type;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization
time-of-flight;
RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction;
ATc, anhydrotetracycline;
SIRP, signal-regulating
protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adachi, M.,
Fischer, E. H.,
Ihle, J.,
Imai, K.,
Jirik, F.,
Neel, B.,
Pawson, T.,
Shen, S. H.,
Thomas, M.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Zhao, Z. Z.
(1996)
Cell
85,
15-15
|
| 2.
|
Feng, G. S.,
and Pawson, T.
(1994)
Trends Genet.
10,
54-58
|
| 3.
|
Neel, B. G.,
and Tonks, N. K.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
193-204
|
| 4.
|
Shultz, L. D.,
Rajan, T. V.,
and Greiner, D. L.
(1997)
Trends Biotechnol.
15,
302-307
|
| 5.
|
Ulyanova, T.,
Blasioli, J.,
and Thomas, M. L.
(1997)
Immunol. Res.
16,
101-113
|
| 6.
|
Banville, D.,
Stocco, R.,
and Shen, S. H.
(1995)
Genomics
27,
165-173
|
| 7.
|
Tenev, T.,
Keilhack, H.,
Tomic, S.,
Stoyanov, B.,
Stein-Gerlach, M.,
Lammers, R.,
Krivtsov, A. V.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Böhmer, F.-D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5966-5973
|
| 8.
|
O'Reilly, A. M.,
and Neel, B. G.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
161-177
|
| 9.
|
Klingmüller, U.,
Lorenz, U.,
Cantley, L. C.,
Neel, B. G.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1995)
Cell
80,
729-738
|
| 10.
|
Chen, H. E.,
Chang, S.,
Trub, T.,
and Neel, B. G.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3685-3697
|
| 11.
|
Lorenz, U.,
Bergemann, A. D.,
Steinberg, H. N.,
Flanagan, J. G.,
Li, X.,
Galli, S. J.,
and Neel, B. G.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
1111-1126
|
| 12.
|
Paulson, R. F.,
Vesely, S.,
Siminovitch, K. A.,
and Bernstein, A.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
309-315
|
| 13.
|
Doody, G. M.,
Justement, L. B.,
Delibrias, C. C.,
Matthews, R. J.,
Lin, J.,
Thomas, M. L.,
and Fearon, D. T.
(1995)
Science
269,
242-244
|
| 14.
|
D'Ambrosio, D.,
Hippen, K. L.,
Minskoff, S. A.,
Mellman, I.,
Pani, G.,
Siminovitch, K. A.,
and Cambier, J. C.
(1995)
Science
268,
293-297
|
| 15.
|
Fry, A. M.,
Lanier, L. L.,
and Weiss, A.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
295-300
|
| 16.
|
Burshtyn, D. N.,
Scharenberg, A. M.,
Wagtmann, N.,
Rajagopalan, S.,
Berrada, K.,
Yi, T. L.,
Kinet, J. P.,
and Long, E. O.
(1996)
Immunity
4,
77-85
|
| 17.
|
Maeda, A.,
Kurosaki, M.,
Ono, M.,
Takai, T.,
and Kurosaki, T.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
1355-1360
|
| 18.
|
Blery, M.,
Kubagawa, H.,
Chen, C. C.,
Vely, F.,
Cooper, M. D.,
and Vivier, E.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2446-2451
|
| 19.
|
Perez-Villar, J. J.,
Whitney, G. S.,
Bowen, M. A.,
Hewgill, D. H.,
Aruffo, A. A.,
and Kanner, S. B.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2903-2912
|
| 20.
|
Roach, T. I. A.,
Slater, S. E.,
White, L. S.,
Zhang, X. L.,
Majerus, P. W.,
Brown, E. J.,
and Thomas, M. L.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1035-1038
|
| 21.
|
Fujioka, Y.,
Matozaki, T.,
Noguchi, T.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Yamao, T.,
Takahashi, N.,
Tsuda, M.,
Takada, T.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6887-6899
|
| 22.
|
Kharitonenkov, A.,
Chen, Z.,
Sures, I.,
Wang, H.,
Schilling, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1997)
Nature
386,
181-186
|
| 23.
|
Timms, J. F.,
Carlberg, K.,
Gu, H.,
Chen, H.,
Kamatkar, S.,
Nadler, M. J.,
Rohrschneider, L. R.,
and Neel, B. G.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3838-3850
|
| 24.
|
Christofori, G.,
and Semb, H.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
73-76
|
| 25.
|
Birchmeier, W.,
and Birchmeier, C.
(1994)
Bioessays
16,
305-307
|
| 26.
|
Birchmeier, W.,
and Behrens, J.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1198,
11-26
|
| 27.
|
Thiery, J. P.
(1996)
J. Cell. Biochem.
61,
489-492
|
| 28.
|
McCrea, P. D.,
and Gumbiner, B. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4514-4520
|
| 29.
|
Hülsken, J.,
Behrens, J.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
711-716
|
| 30.
|
Daniel, J. M.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4819-4824
|
| 31.
|
Finnemann, S.,
Mitrik, I.,
Hess, M.,
Otto, G.,
and Wedlich, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11856-11862
|
| 32.
|
Thoreson, M. A.,
Anastasiadis, P. Z.,
Daniel, J. M.,
Ireton, R. C.,
Wheelock, M. J.,
Johnson, K. R.,
Hummingbird, D. K.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
189-202
|
| 33.
|
Gumbiner, B. M.
(1996)
Cell
84,
345-357
|
| 34.
|
Ozawa, M.,
Ringwald, M.,
and Kemler, R.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4246-4250
|
| 35.
|
Ben-Ze'ev, A.,
and Geiger, B.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
629-639
|
| 36.
|
Eastman, Q.,
and Grosschedl, R.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
233-240
|
| 37.
|
Ozawa, M.,
and Kemler, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6166-6170
|
| 38.
|
Behrens, J.,
Vakaet, L.,
Friis, R.,
Winterhager, E.,
van Roy, F.,
Mareel, M. M.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
757-766
|
| 39.
|
Hoschuetzky, H.,
Aberle, H.,
and Kemler, R.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1375-1380
|
| 40.
|
Takayama, T.,
Shiozaki, H.,
Doki, Y.,
Oka, H.,
Inoue, M.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Tamura, S.,
Shibamoto, S.,
Ito, F.,
and Monden, M.
(1998)
Br. J. Cancer
77,
605-613
|
| 41.
|
Brady-Kalnay, S. M.,
Mourton, T.,
Nixon, J. P.,
Pietz, G. E.,
Kinch, M.,
Chen, H.,
Brackenbury, R.,
Rimm, D. L.,
Del Vecchio, R. L.,
and Tonks, N. K.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
287-296
|
| 42.
|
Fuchs, M.,
Müller, T.,
Lerch, M. M.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16712-16719
|
| 43.
|
Müller, T.,
Choidas, A.,
Reichmann, E.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10173-10183
|
| 44.
|
Reynolds, A. B.,
Roesel, D. J.,
Kanner, S. B.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
629-638
|
| 45.
|
Downing, J. R.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
607-613
|
| 46.
|
Rosato, R.,
Veltmaat, J. M.,
Groffen, J.,
and Heisterkamp, N.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5762-5770
|
| 47.
|
Kim, L.,
and Wong, T. W.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4553-4561
|
| 48.
|
Yap, A. S.,
Niessen, C. M.,
and Gumbiner, B. M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
779-789
|
| 49.
|
Reynolds, A. B.,
Daniel, J. M.,
Mo, Y. Y.,
Wu, J.,
and Zhang, Z.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
225,
328-337
|
| 50.
|
Aono, S.,
Nakagawa, S.,
Reynolds, A. B.,
and Takeichi, M.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
551-562
|
| 51.
|
Ohkubo, T.,
and Ozawa, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21409-21415
|
| 52.
|
van Hengel, J.,
Vanhoenacker, P.,
Staes, K.,
and van Roy, F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7980-7985
|
| 53.
|
Daniel, J. M.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3614-3623
|
| 54.
|
Tenev, T.,
Böhmer, S. A.,
Kaufmann, R.,
Frese, S.,
Bittorf, T.,
Beckers, T.,
and Böhmer, F.-D.
(2000)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
79,
261-271
|
| 55.
|
Keilhack, H.,
Tenev, T.,
Nyakatura, E.,
Godovac-Zimmermann, J.,
Nielsen, L.,
Seedorf, K.,
and Böhmer, F.-D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24839-24846
|
| 56.
|
Tomic, S.,
Greiser, U.,
Lammers, R.,
Kharitonenkov, A.,
Imyanitov, E.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Böhmer, F.-D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21277-21284
|
| 57.
|
Keirsebilck, A.,
Bonne, S.,
Staes, K.,
van Hengel, J.,
Nollet, F.,
Reynolds, A.,
and van Roy, F.
(1998)
Genomics
50,
129-146
|
| 58.
|
Lammers, R.,
Bossenmaier, B.,
Cool, D. E.,
Tonks, N. K.,
Schlessinger, J.,
Fischer, E. H.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22456-22462
|
| 59.
|
Hellman, U.
(1997)
in
Protein Structure Analysis: Preparation, Characterization, and Microsequencing
(Kamp, R. M.
, Choli-Papadopoulou, T.
, and Wittmann-Liebold, B., eds)
, pp. 97-104, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany
|
| 60.
|
Lehr, S.,
Kotzka, J.,
Herkner, A.,
Klein, E.,
Siethoff, C.,
Knebel, B.,
Noelle, V.,
Brüning, J. C.,
Klein, H. W.,
Meyer, H. E.,
Krone, W.,
and Müller-Wieland, D.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
151-159
|
| 61.
|
Fukazawa, T.,
Miyake, S.,
Band, V.,
and Band, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14554-14559
|
| 62.
|
Kon-Kozlowski, M.,
Pani, G.,
Pawson, T.,
and Siminovitch, K. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3856-3862
|
| 63.
|
Mo, Y. Y.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2633-2640
|
| 64.
|
Osherov, N.,
and Levitzki, A.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
225,
1047-1053
|
| 65.
|
Roura, S.,
Miravet, S.,
Piedra, J.,
de Herreros, A. G.,
and Dunach, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36734-36740
|
| 66.
|
Parsons, J. T.,
and Parsons, S. J.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
187-192
|
| 67.
|
Biscardi, J. S.,
Maa, M. C.,
Tice, D. A.,
Cox, M. E.,
Leu, T. H.,
and Parsons, S. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8335-8343
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Simoneau, J. Boulanger, G. Coulombe, M.-A. Renaud, C. Duchesne, and N. Rivard
Activation of Cdk2 Stimulates Proteasome-dependent Truncation of Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 in Human Proliferating Intestinal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2008;
283(37):
25544 - 25556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Mruk, B. Silvestrini, and C. Y. Cheng
Anchoring Junctions As Drug Targets: Role in Contraceptive Development
Pharmacol. Rev.,
June 1, 2008;
60(2):
146 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ezaki, R.-J. Guo, H. Li, A. B. Reynolds, and J. P. Lynch
The homeodomain transcription factors Cdx1 and Cdx2 induce E-cadherin adhesion activity by reducing beta- and p120-catenin tyrosine phosphorylation
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
July 1, 2007;
293(1):
G54 - G65.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Castano, G. Solanas, D. Casagolda, I. Raurell, P. Villagrasa, X. R. Bustelo, A. Garcia de Herreros, and M. Dunach
Specific Phosphorylation of p120-Catenin Regulatory Domain Differently Modulates Its Binding to RhoA
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 1, 2007;
27(5):
1745 - 1757.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mehta and A. B. Malik
Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Endothelial Permeability
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2006;
86(1):
279 - 367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Schnekenburger, J Mayerle, B Kruger, I Buchwalow, F U Weiss, E Albrecht, V E Samoilova, W Domschke, and M M Lerch
Protein tyrosine phosphatase {kappa} and SHP-1 are involved in the regulation of cell-cell contacts at adherens junctions in the exocrine pancreas
Gut,
October 1, 2005;
54(10):
1445 - 1455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-E. Schmidt-Arras, A. Bohmer, B. Markova, C. Choudhary, H. Serve, and F.-D. Bohmer
Tyrosine Phosphorylation Regulates Maturation of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 1, 2005;
25(9):
3690 - 3703.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W Stoker
Protein tyrosine phosphatases and signalling
J. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2005;
185(1):
19 - 33.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Roccato, C. Miranda, G. Raho, S. Pagliardini, M. A. Pierotti, and A. Greco
Analysis of SHP-1-mediated Down-regulation of the TRK-T3 Oncoprotein Identifies Trk-fused Gene (TFG) as a Novel SHP-1-interacting Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 4, 2005;
280(5):
3382 - 3389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Frank, C. Burkhardt, D. Imhof, J. Ringel, O. Zschornig, K. Wieligmann, M. Zacharias, and F.-D. Bohmer
Effective Dephosphorylation of Src Substrates by SHP-1
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 19, 2004;
279(12):
11375 - 11383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Miranda, S. R. Joseph, A. S. Yap, R. D. Teasdale, and J. L. Stow
Contextual Binding of p120ctn to E-cadherin at the Basolateral Plasma Membrane in Polarized Epithelia
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 31, 2003;
278(44):
43480 - 43488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Konstantoulaki, P. Kouklis, and A. B. Malik
Protein kinase C modifications of VE-cadherin, p120, and {beta}-catenin contribute to endothelial barrier dysregulation induced by thrombin
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
August 1, 2003;
285(2):
L434 - L442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Duchesne, S. Charland, C. Asselin, C. Nahmias, and N. Rivard
Negative Regulation of beta -Catenin Signaling by Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 in Intestinal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 11, 2003;
278(16):
14274 - 14283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mareel and A. Leroy
Clinical, Cellular, and Molecular Aspects of Cancer Invasion
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2003;
83(2):
337 - 376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Taddei, P. Chiarugi, P. Cirri, F. Buricchi, T. Fiaschi, E. Giannoni, D. Talini, G. Cozzi, L. Formigli, G. Raugei, et al.
{beta}-Catenin Interacts with Low-Molecular-Weight Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Leading to Cadherin-mediated Cell-Cell Adhesion Increase
Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2002;
62(22):
6489 - 6499.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Johnson and K. Boekelheide
Dynamic Testicular Adhesion Junctions Are Immunologically Unique. I. Localization of p120 Catenin in Rat Testis
Biol Reprod,
April 1, 2002;
66(4):
983 - 991.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Kim, X. Fang, H. Ji, A. F. Paulson, J. M. Daniel, M. Ciesiolka, F. van Roy, and P. D. McCrea
Isolation and Characterization of XKaiso, a Transcriptional Repressor That Associates with the Catenin Xp120ctn in Xenopus laevis
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 1, 2002;
277(10):
8202 - 8208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Aho, L. Levansuo, O. Montonen, C. Kari, U. Rodeck, and J. Uitto
Specific sequences in p120ctn determine subcellular distribution of its multiple isoforms involved in cellular adhesion of normal and malignant epithelial cells
J. Cell Sci.,
January 4, 2002;
115(7):
1391 - 1402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Montonen, M. Aho, J. Uitto, and S. Aho
Tissue Distribution and Cell Type-specific Expression of p120ctn Isoforms
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
December 1, 2001;
49(12):
1487 - 1496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Mariner, P. Anastasiadis, H. Keilhack, F.-D. Bohmer, J. Wang, and A. B. Reynolds
Identification of Src Phosphorylation Sites in the Catenin p120ctn
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 20, 2001;
276(30):
28006 - 28013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|