|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M000767200 on May 31, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 34, 26423-26427, August 25, 2000
Superoxide Regulation of Endothelin-converting Enzyme*
Susana
López-Ongil ,
Veronica
Senchak§,
Marta
Saura ,
Carlos
Zaragoza,
Michael
Ames¶,
Barbara
Ballermann§,
Manuel
Rodríguez-Puyol ,
Diego
Rodríguez-Puyol , and
Charles J.
Lowenstein **
From the Divisions of Cardiology and
§ Nephrology, the Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, the
Department of Physiology, Research Unit and IRSIN, Alcala
de Henares University, 28871 Madrid, Spain, and the
¶ Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, Center for Environmental Health
Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Received for publication, January 31, 2000, and in revised form, May 23, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as signaling
molecules in the cardiovascular system, regulating cellular
proliferation and migration. However, an excess of ROS can damage cells
and alter endothelial cell function. We hypothesized that endogenous
mechanisms protect the vasculature from excess levels of ROS. We now
show that superoxide can inhibit endothelin-converting enzyme activity (ECE) and decrease endothelin-1 synthesis. Superoxide inhibits ECE but
hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide do not. Superoxide inhibits ECE by
ejecting zinc from the enzyme, and the addition of exogenous zinc
restores enzymatic activity. Superoxide may inhibit other zinc
metalloproteinases by a similar mechanism and may thus play an
important role in regulating the biology of blood vessels.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Endothelins are polypeptides that play important signaling roles
in the cardiovascular system (1, 2). Endothelins have many
physiological activities, stimulating smooth muscle cell contraction
and proliferation, inducing the release of neuropeptides, and
regulating bone resorption (reviewed in Ref. 3). Endothelins may play a
role in a variety of diseases, including hypertension, vasospasm,
congestive heart failure, and renal failure (3).
The three isoforms of endothelin are expressed in endothelial cells and
a variety of other cells as well (1, 2). Endothelin-1 (ET-1)1 is synthesized from a
large precursor, prepro-ET-1 (4). A signal peptidase cleaves
prepro-ET-1 into pro-ET-1, which in turn is cleaved by a furin-like
enzyme into big ET-1. Endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE) then cleaves
big ET-1 into ET-1, a 21-amino acid residue polypeptide. Cleavage of
big ET-1 into ET-1 is essential for its activity, because big ET-1 is
biologically inactive.
The endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE) was first purified from rat lung
and was subsequently discovered to be expressed in endothelial cells of
many organs (5, 6). ECE is also found in adrenal cells, pancreatic
cells, the testis, and brain. ECE-1 and ECE-2 are encoded by separate
genes and share 59% homology. Human ECE-1 has three isoforms, ECE-1a,
ECE-1b, and ECE-1c (7-10). All three ECE-1 isoforms are encoded by a
single gene; they share a common carboxyl-terminal portion but three
alternate promoters regulate expression of unique amino-terminal portions.
The ECEs are members of a larger zinc metalloproteinase family that
includes neutral endopeptidase. ECE is a type II membrane glycoprotein.
ECE shares with other zinc metalloproteinases a zinc-binding
HEXXH motif. An arginine residue, Arg129, plays
a role in binding of big ET. ECE-1 is a homodimer, with a single
disulfide bond between the Cys412 residue of each monomer,
linking two 130-kDa ECE-1 monomers together.
The precise mechanisms that regulate ECE-1 expression, localization,
and activity are partially understood. Differences in the response
elements of the three alternate promoters of ECE-1 may account for
differences in the expression of the isoforms. For example, ECE-1c is
expressed predominantly in human smooth muscle, whereas human ECE-1a is
expressed in endothelial cells. Differences in the subcellular
localization of ECE-1 isoforms may be due to differences in
amino-terminal targeting motifs. Human ECE-1a and ECE-1c are found
mostly in the plasma membrane, and human ECE-1b is localized in an
intracellular compartment. Phosphoramidon, an inhibitor of ECE, induces
internalization of ECE. However, little is known about the
post-translational regulation of ECE activity.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide or hydrogen peroxide
are produced in the cardiovascular system during a variety of
physiological and pathophysiological conditions (11-14). Every cell
type in blood vessels can produce ROS, including endothelial cells,
fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells; and neutrophils and macrophages
that infiltrate into vessels can also produce ROS (15-20). Low levels
of ROS can serve as second messengers in various signal transduction
pathways. For example, hydrogen peroxide mediates signal transduction
of platelet-derived growth factor (21). Superoxide mediates
p21ras regulation of the cell cycle (22). ROS activate a
variety of other redox-sensitive intracellular cellular targets as well
(reviewed in Refs. 11, 13, 14, and 23-26). Thus ROS have been shown to
play important roles in the regulation of cell growth and migration.
However, high levels of ROS can be cytotoxic. For example, vessel
injury can lead to the adherence of neutrophils to the endothelium, the
activation of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase, and the generation of
extracellular superoxide, which can damage endothelial cells (reviewed
in Refs. 11, 13, and 26-28). Furthermore, ischemia and reoxygenation
can lead to the production of high levels of ROS inside endothelial and
smooth muscle cells, which can also damage cells.
ROS may also play a pathophysiological role in hypertension. Superoxide
levels are increased in vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats
compared with wild-type rat vessels (29). Griendling and co-workers
(18, 30) have shown that ROS play an important role in angiotensin
signaling. Angiotensin binding to its receptors leads to intracellular
production of superoxide; superoxide can combine with nitric oxide
(NO), decreasing NO levels, and in theory leads to vasospasm. Thus
excessive levels of ROS can be potentially harmful to the vasculature.
Although superoxide may be detrimental to the vasculature, endogenous
counter-regulatory mechanisms may exist that inhibit the harmful
effects of superoxide upon the vessel wall. We hypothesized that ROS
inhibit the activity of ECE. A reduction in ET levels might then lead
to an increase in local blood flow, which would increase perfusion of
damaged tissues. Thus ROS inhibition of ECE activity might counteract
some of the potentially harmful effects of ROS. To test this
hypothesis, we prepared endothelial cell membranes that contain ECE,
and we examined the effect of various ROS upon ECE activity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Glucose oxidase, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
catalase, leupeptin, and bovine Big ET-1 and ET-1 were purchased from
Sigma. RPMI 1640 medium, bovine calf serum, trypsin-EDTA, and
penicillin/streptomycin were purchased from BioWhittaker (Walkersville,
MD). The endothelin-1 ELISA system was purchased from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech.
Cell Culture--
Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC) were
isolated using methods previously described (31). BAEC were grown on
gelatin-coated plates at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95%
air and 5% CO2. Individual clones were established and
subcloned to obtain pure cell populations (32). Cells were fed every 2 days with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 15% calf serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Studies were
performed on confluent monolayers at passages 2-7, made quiescent by
serum deprivation. Toxicity was evaluated by the trypan blue dye
exclusion method and measurement of lactate dehydrogenase activity in
the incubation media.
Immunoblotting--
Confluent monolayers of BAEC were grown in
10-cm dishes. Cells were homogenized in 1 ml of homogenization buffer
(20 mmol/liter Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mmol/liter MgCl2, 0.1 mmol/liter phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µmol/liter leupeptin, 20 µmol/liter aprotinin) (33). The homogenates were sonicated and then
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 45 min. The membranes
were washed three times in homogenization buffer. The protein
concentration in each supernatant was determined according to standard
methods (BCA protein assay, Pierce). 100 µg of protein extracts were
incubated with or without 0.1 mM xanthine plus 1 milliunit/ml xanthine oxidase (XXO) for 2 h at 37 °C. When catalase or superoxide dismutase (SOD) were used, they were added 15 min before XXO at 80 and 100 units/ml, respectively. Following incubation, sample buffer was added in the presence or no
-mercaptoethanol to study ECE-1 protein in reducing or non-reducing
conditions, respectively. Proteins were separated on 6% SDS-PAGE (100 µg of protein/lane) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at 22 °C, incubated for 1.5 h at 22 °C
with 10 µg/ml of the monoclonal antibody against bovine ECE-1 (33), a
generous gift from Dr. Kohei Shimada (Biological Research Laboratories, Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), washed in TTBS (20 mmol/liter Tris-HCl, 0.9% NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20), and incubated with 200-fold diluted peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG at 22 °C for 1 h. The immunoreactive bands were visualized with the SuperSignal detection system (Pierce) after 30 s of exposure to film.
ECE Activity Assay--
Membrane proteins were extracted from
confluent layers of BAEC as described above, and 30 µg of this
homogenate were incubated in the presence or absence of different
radical donors for 1 h. Bovine Big ET-1 (100 ng) was then added,
and the mixture was incubated for 4 h at 37 °C in 250 µl of a
reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7 (34, 35). The reaction was stopped by adding 600 µl of ice-cold
ethanol. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min, the resulting supernatant was lyophilized. The dried residues were
reconstituted with assay buffer, and the production of ET-1 in each
sample was measured by an ELISA for ET-1 using a 96-well microtiter
plate reader (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (35). To generate a standard
curve for ET-1, serial dilutions of ET-1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
ranging from 1 to 16 fmol (2.49-39.9 pg) was added to assay buffer and
placed in the ELISA wells. A cubic spline curve was fitted to the
standards and unknown values interpolated from the standard curves automatically.
To measure the effect of superoxide upon the substrate big ET-1, 100 ng
of big ET-1 in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, was incubated with
buffer or with 0.04 mM xanthine and 0.4 milliunits/ml
xanthine oxidase for 2 h at 37 °C. SOD (100 units/ml) was then
added to scavenge further superoxide anions, and the mixture was
incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. BAEC membrane proteins (30 µg) were
then added to pretreated big ET-1 and incubated for 4 h at
37 °C, and the production of ET-1 was measured as above.
To measure the effect of superoxide upon the product ET-1, ET-1 was
incubated with buffer, 0.04 mM xanthine, and 0.4 milliunits/ml xanthine oxidase for 1 h at 37 °C. SOD (100 units/ml) was added to some mixtures and incubated for 4 h at
37 °C. An ELISA was used to measure ET-1.
Quantitation of Superoxide Production--
The amount of
superoxide generated by xanthine and xanthine oxidase was measured by
the SOD inhibitable rate of cytochrome c reduction (36, 37).
In brief, 75 µM cytochrome c (Sigma) was mixed
with buffer or 20 units/ml SOD and then mixed with xanthine (0.04 mM) plus xanthine oxidase (0.4 milliunits/ml). The amount of reduced cytochrome c was measured as
A550 nm in aliquots of reaction mixture
analyzed at various time points and compared with a standard curve; the
amount of superoxide generated by xanthine oxidase with xanthine was
calculated from the difference in amounts of cytochrome c
reduced in the absence and the presence of SOD.
Zinc Assay--
Zinc measurements were performed by Instrumental
Neutron Activation Analysis at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology's Research Reactor, MITR-II. The protein samples were
placed into small acid-washed polyethylene vials using an additional
0.2 ml of buffer solution to ensure complete transfer. These vials and two zinc reference samples (NIST Standard Reference Material
2710 Montana Soil, certified zinc concentration 6952 ± 91 mg/kg) were placed in a polyethylene "rabbit" to enable them to
travel in the reactor's pneumatic irradiation facility. The samples
and standards were irradiated together for 12 h at a neutron flux of 8 × 1012 Newtons/cm2 s, were
transferred to irradiated vials using two additions of 0.5 ml of
unirradiated buffer, and were then allowed to decay for approximately 4 weeks. The presence of the activation product 65Zn
(half-life = 243.8 days, gamma energy = 1115.5 keV) was
measured in the samples and standards using four High Purity Germanium detectors coupled to a dedicated personal computer (all hardware and
software from Canberra Industries Inc., Meriden, CT). The zinc
levels in the proteins were calculated based on the 65Zn
activities in the protein samples and the reference materials, the
reference sample masses, and the certified zinc reference concentrations. Measurement uncertainties were calculated using the
nuclear analytical counting uncertainties and the uncertainty in the
reference zinc concentrations.
Statistical Analysis--
In every case, the data shown are the
mean ± S.E. In the endothelin-1 ELISA, each individual data was
the mean of three wells. As the number of data was always under 10, and
normality test are inadequate for this number of data, non-parametric
statistics for more than two groups (Friedman test) were performed. A
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Xanthine Oxidase with Xanthine Inhibits ECE Activity--
To
explore the role of radicals in regulating ECE, we incubated membranes
isolated from bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC) with various
substances that release radical molecules. Big ET-1 was then added to
the mixture, and the amount of ET-1 released from the mixture was
measured by an ELISA. Incubation of the membranes with xanthine and
xanthine oxidase inhibits the generation of ET-1 (Table
I). In contrast, incubation of the
membrane with hydrogen peroxide, or with glucose oxidase and glucose
that generates hydrogen peroxide, or with several nitric oxide donors
does not affect ECE activity. (To confirm that ECE activity is being
assayed, the ECE inhibitor phosphoramidon was added, which reduces
endothelin production as expected.) Xanthine oxidase in combination
with xanthine inhibits ECE activity in a dose-dependent
manner (Fig. 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of radical donors upon ECE activity
BAEC membranes were incubated with radical donors, big ET-1 was added,
and the amount of ET-1 produced was measured by ELISA
(n = 3 ± S.E.).
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Dose-dependent inhibition
of ECE by xanthine oxidase with xanthine. BAEC membranes were
incubated with increasing doses of xanthine with xanthine oxidase, and
then big ET-1 was added to the mixture, and ET-1 production was assayed
by an ELISA. (n = 3; * for p < 0.05 compared with xanthine 0 mM and xanthine oxidase 0 milliunits/ml.)
|
|
To exclude the possibility that superoxide inhibits ECE processing of
big ET-1 by modifying the substrate big ET-1, we incubated big ET-1
with buffer or with xanthine and xanthine oxidase, then added SOD and
continued the incubation, and finally added BAEC membrane proteins. We
then measured the amount of ET-1 produced. BAEC membrane proteins
process big ET-1 whether or not big ET-1 is previously exposed to
superoxide donors (Table II). These data suggest that the target of superoxide is ECE and not big ET-1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Superoxide does not affect big ET-1
Big ET-1 was pretreated or not with xanthine oxidase and xanthine.
Membrane proteins from BAEC were then added to big ET-1, and an ELISA
was used to measure the amount of ET-1 generated (n = 6 ± S.E.). mU indicates milliunits.
|
|
To confirm that superoxide inhibits ECE processing without modifying
the substrate big ET-1, we incubated membranes isolated from BAEC with
buffer or with xanthine and xanthine oxidase for 1 h, then added
SOD and incubated the mixture for 10 min, and then added the substrate
big ET-1 and incubated the mixture for 4 h. Pretreatment with
xanthine oxidase and xanthine inhibits the ability of BAEC membranes to
process big ET-1, even when radicals are scavenged during the
processing of big ET-1 (Table III).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Superoxide inhibits ECE activity
BAEC membranes were treated with xanthine and xanthine oxidase for
1 h; SOD was added to the mixture for 10 min, and then big ET-1
was added for 4 h. An ELISA was used to measure the amount of ET-1
(n = 5 ± S.E.).
|
|
To exclude the possibility that superoxide somehow modifies ET-1,
decreasing the sensitivity of the ET-1 ELISA, we next incubated ET-1
with buffer, xanthine oxidase and xanthine, or xanthine oxidase and
xanthine followed by SOD. Treated and untreated ET-1 was then measured
by ELISA. Superoxide treatment of ET-1 does not affect the sensitivity
of the ELISA (Table IV). These data
suggest that superoxide does not interfere with the ELISA by modifying
ET-1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Superoxide does not affect detection of ET-1
ET-1 was treated with buffer, xanthine oxidase and xanthine, or
xanthine oxidase and xanthine followed by SOD. An ELISA was used to
measure the amount of ET-1 (n = 3 ± S.E.).
|
|
To measure the amount of superoxide generated by xanthine oxidase, we
incubated cytochrome c and xanthine oxidase and xanthine with or without SOD, and we measured the
A550 nm at various times. This assay shows that
0.04 M xanthine and 0.4 milliunits/ml xanthine oxidase
produce 920 nmol/liter of superoxide over 1 h, 1070 nmol/liter
over 2 h, and 2040 nmol/liter over 4 h.
Superoxide Inhibits ECE Activity--
Xanthine oxidase synthesizes
superoxide (O 2) using xanthine as a substrate. To determine
whether or not O 2 mediates xanthine oxidase inhibition of ECE,
SOD was added to mixtures of BAEC membranes, xanthine oxidase, and
xanthine. ECE activity was then assayed as above. As before, xanthine
oxidase with xanthine inhibits ECE activity. SOD reverses this
inhibition; catalase does not (Fig. 2).
These data suggest that superoxide inhibits ECE. However, hydrogen
peroxide does not, since catalase has no effect. Furthermore, SOD or
catalase alone do not have an effect on ECE activity (data not
shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Superoxide dismutase but not catalase
decreases inhibition of ECE by xanthine and xanthine oxidase. ET-1
production was assayed as above after adding catalase (CAT)
or increasing amounts of SOD to membranes incubated with xanthine
oxidase with xanthine (XXO). (n = 3; * for
p < 0.05 compared with no XXO ( ), and ** for
p < 0.05 compared with XXO (+).)
|
|
Superoxide Does Not Affect ECE Homodimerization--
We next
explored the mechanism by which superoxide inhibits ECE. Superoxide
might inhibit ECE by interfering with ECE homodimerization. ECE
homodimerization is maintained by a single disulfide bond between each
ECE monomer. Oxidants could indirectly disrupt this disulfide bond,
converting active ECE homodimers into inactive monomers; or oxidants
could inhibit the formation of this disulfide bond, decreasing the
amount of ECE homodimers and increasing the amount of monomers. To test
this hypothesis, we treated BAEC membranes with or without xanthine
oxidase and xanthine and then fractionated the membranes on denaturing
and non-denaturing PAGE. Treatment of membranes with xanthine oxidase
and xanthine did not affect the mobility of ECE. The relative mobility
of ECE on denaturing PAGE is approximately 130 kDa; the relative
mobility of ECE on non-denaturing PAGE is approximately 260 kDa,
whether or not membranes are incubated with superoxide donors (Fig.
3). Thus superoxide does not inhibit ECE
by converting active ECE homodimers into inactive monomers.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Xanthine oxidase with xanthine does not
affect homodimerization of ECE subunits. BAEC membranes were
treated or not with xanthine oxidase with xanthine, fractionated by
SDS-PAGE in reducing conditions (left) or SDS-PAGE in
non-reducing conditions (right), transferred to a membrane,
and incubated with antibody to ECE. (n = 2 separate
experiments for each condition.)
|
|
Superoxide Ejects Zinc from ECE--
We next hypothesized that
superoxide inhibits ECE by removing Zn2+ from ECE. ECE is a
metalloproteinase that contains Zn2+ as a cofactor.
Zn2+ is bound to ECE through an HEXXH motif. We
first confirmed that Zn2+ is necessary for ECE activity by
determining the effect of EDTA upon ECE activity. BAEC membranes were
incubated with and without EDTA, and then ECE activity was measured.
EDTA decreases ECE activity, and adding Zn2+ to membranes
incubated with Zn2+ restores ECE activity (Fig.
4A). These data confirm the
importance of Zn2+ to ECE activity, as others (38-40) have
shown. Next we treated BAEC membranes with xanthine and xanthine
oxidase. Xanthine with xanthine oxidase also decreases ECE activity,
and Zn2+ restores ECE activity (Fig. 4B). These
data suggest that O 2 removes zinc from ECE.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of zinc upon ECE activity.
A, EDTA inhibits ECE activity. BAEC membranes were incubated
with and without EDTA, varying amounts of zinc were added, and then ECE
activity assayed as above. (n = 3; * for
p < 0.05 compared with EDTA 0 µM, and **
for p < 0.05 compared with EDTA 1 µM.)
B, addition of zinc restores ECE activity inhibited by
superoxide. BAEC membranes were incubated with and without xanthine
oxidase and xanthine (XXO), zinc was added, and then ECE activity
assayed by ELISA. (n = 3; * for p < 0.05 compared with no XXO ( ), and ** for p < 0.05 compared with XXO (+) alone.)
|
|
To prove that O 2 removes Zn2+ from ECE, we next
measured the amount of Zn2+ in ECE by instrumental neutron
activation analysis. ECE was immunoprecipitated from BAEC membranes and
exposed to media alone or to xanthine oxidase with xanthine. A constant
amount of ECE protein was then irradiated with neutrons and allowed to
decay for 4 weeks, and the amount of 61Zn was measured.
Native ECE contains 61Zn, but ECE exposed to superoxide
contains 4-fold less 61Zn, consistent with background
levels (Table V). Thus superoxide decreases the amount of Zn2+ in ECE.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table V
Effect of superoxide donors upon zinc content of ECE
ECE was immunoprecipitated (IP) from BAEC exposed or not to xanthine
oxidase with xanthine, and the amount of zinc (Zn) in 300 µg of
immunoprecipitated protein was analyzed by Instrumental Neutron
Activation Analysis. Samples were prepared from BAEC (ECE), BAEC
treated with xanthine oxidase with xanthine (ECE + XXO),
immunoprecipitants from BAEC using a control antibody
immunoprecipitation with control antibody), or immunoprecipitation
buffer and antibody and xanthine oxidase with xanthine but lacking BAEC
membranes. (This experiment was performed in duplicate with similar
results. p < 0.05 for ECE + XXO compared to ECE.)
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The major finding of our study is that superoxide inhibits ECE by
ejecting zinc from the enzyme. This inhibition is due specifically to
superoxide; hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide do not affect ECE
activity. Furthermore, this inhibition is reversible, since the
addition of zinc restores ECE activity.
The mechanism by which superoxide ejects zinc from ECE is unclear.
However, it is unlikely that superoxide destroys the structure of ECE,
since the addition of zinc restores ECE activity. One possible
mechanism by which superoxide could remove zinc from ECE is by
reducing the residues that coordinate zinc binding. Superoxide can
convert histidine into 2-oxo-histidine, but this reaction is not
reversible (41-44). Another possibility is that superoxide reduces
Zn2+ to Zn+, which might interact less strongly
with the HEXXH motif of ECE and disassociate from ECE. This
mechanism would explain why the addition of exogenous zinc restores ECE
activity, since Zn2+ can interact with the HEXXH
motif. This reduction and ejection of zinc from ECE by
superoxide is similar to the effect of superoxide upon iron during
superoxide inactivation of iron-sulfur-containing (de)hydratases such
as cis-aconitase (45, 46).
There are over 200 zinc metalloproteinases, and they regulate a variety
of physiological and pathophysiological processes, including
development, reproduction, tissue remodeling or destruction, inflammation, carcinogenesis, and fibrosis (47, 48). Superoxide may
also regulate other zinc metalloproteinases in addition to ECE as well.
Others have shown that superoxide can increase matrix metalloproteinase activity. For example, superoxide can increase activity of collagenase, MMP-2, and MMP-9 (19, 49-52). Furthermore, superoxide dismutase inhibits matrix degradation (53, 54). In contrast,
our data suggest that superoxide inhibits ECE. Perhaps superoxide
activates one set of metalloproteinases and inhibits another because of
the difference in zinc-binding motifs. ECE belongs to the zinc
metalloproteinase clan MA with the zinc-binding motif HEXXH
and the third zinc ligand Glu. In contrast, the matrix metalloproteinase clan MB contains the zinc-binding motif
HEXXHXXGXXH, and the third zinc ligand
is His.
What are the potential physiological consequences of superoxide
inhibition of ECE? ROS might act as part of a negative feedback loop
during inflammation of the vasculature. For example, neutrophils can
bind to endothelial cells as a result of hypoxia or cytokine stimulation. The neutrophil NADPH oxidase can then secrete high levels
of superoxide. Superoxide can damage endothelial cells, leading to
endothelial cell dysfunction, decreasing endothelial NO production,
which can lead to local vasospasm. However, if superoxide also
decreases local synthesis of ET-1, then vasospasm might be diminished.
Thus ROS which is normally produced during inflammation might actually
serve to counteract vasospasm by decreasing ET synthesis. Since ET may
play a role in a variety of other pathophysiological conditions, these
data also suggest a novel target for inhibitors of ECE.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Grant SAF98-0054 from the
Comisíon Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (to
D. R.-P.), Grant PM97-0067 from the Direccion General de Ensenanza
Superior (to M. R. P.), a grant from CAM (to S. L.-O.), National
Institutes of Health Grants P50 HL52315 (to C. J. L.), R01 HL5361 (to
C. J. L.), and R01 HL63706 (to C. J. L.), the Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease (to C. J. L.), the Cora and John H. Davis Foundation (to C. J. L.), and the Bernard Bernard Foundation (to C. J. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Cardiology,
Dept. of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail: clowenst@jhmi.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 31, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000767200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ET-1, endothelin-1;
ECE, endothelin converting enzyme;
O 2, superoxide anion;
ROS, reactive oxygen species;
SOD, superoxide dismutase;
XXO, xanthine and
xanthine oxidase;
NO, nitric oxide;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
BAEC, bovine aortic
endothelial cells.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Yanagisawa, M.,
Kurihara, H.,
Kimura, S.,
Tomobe, Y.,
Kobayashi, M.,
Mitsui, Y.,
Yazaki, Y.,
Goto, K.,
and Masaki, T.
(1988)
Nature
332,
411-415
|
| 2.
|
Inoue, A.,
Yanagisawa, M.,
Kimura, S.,
Kasuya, Y.,
Miyauchi, T.,
Goto, K.,
and Masaki, T.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
2863-2867
|
| 3.
|
Miyauchi, T.,
and Masaki, T.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
61,
391-415
|
| 4.
|
Inoue, A.,
Yanagisawa, M.,
Takuwa, Y.,
Mitsui, Y.,
Kobayashi, M.,
and Masaki, T.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14954-14959
|
| 5.
|
Takahashi, M.,
Matsushita, Y.,
Iijima, Y.,
and Tanzawa, K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21394-21398
|
| 6.
|
Shimada, K.,
Takahashi, M.,
and Tanzawa, K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18275-18278
|
| 7.
|
Schweizer, A.,
Valdenaire, O.,
Nelbock, P.,
Deuschle, U.,
Dumas Milne Edwards, J. B.,
Stumpf, J. G.,
and Loffler, B. M.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
328,
871-877
|
| 8.
|
Orzechowski, H. D.,
Richter, C. M.,
Funke-Kaiser, H.,
Kroger, B.,
Schmidt, M.,
Menzel, S.,
Bohnemeier, H.,
and Paul, M.
(1997)
J. Mol. Med.
75,
512-521
|
| 9.
|
Valdenaire, O.,
Rohrbacher, E.,
and Mattei, M. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29794-29798
|
| 10.
|
Shimada, K.,
Takahashi, M.,
Ikeda, M.,
and Tanzawa, K.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
371,
140-144
|
| 11.
|
Griendling, K. K.,
and Harrison, D. G.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
85,
562-563
|
| 12.
|
Suzuki, Y. J.,
and Ford, G. D.
(1999)
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
31,
345-353
|
| 13.
|
Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J.,
and Moldovan, L.
(1999)
Gene Expr.
7,
255-260
|
| 14.
|
Finkel, T.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
248-253
|
| 15.
|
Zweier, J. L.,
Kuppusamy, P.,
and Lutty, G. A.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
4046-4050
|
| 16.
|
Phan, S. H.,
Gannon, D. E.,
Varani, J.,
Ryan, U. S.,
and Ward, P. A.
(1989)
Am. J. Pathol.
134,
1201-1211
|
| 17.
|
Pagano, P. J.,
Tornheim, K.,
and Cohen, R. A.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
H707-H712
|
| 18.
|
Griendling, K. K.,
Minieri, C. A.,
Ollerenshaw, J. D.,
and Alexander, R. W.
(1994)
Circ. Res.
74,
1141-1148
|
| 19.
|
Rajagopalan, S.,
Meng, X. P.,
Ramasamy, S.,
Harrison, D. G.,
and Galis, Z. S.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
2572-2579
|
| 20.
|
Pagano, P. J.,
Clark, J. K.,
Cifuentes-Pagano, M. E.,
Clark, S. M.,
Callis, G. M.,
and Quinn, M. T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14483-14488
|
| 21.
|
Sundaresan, M., Yu, Z. X.,
Ferrans, V. J.,
Irani, K.,
and Finkel, T.
(1995)
Science
270,
296-299
|
| 22.
|
Irani, K.,
Xia, Y.,
Zweier, J. L.,
Sollott, S. J.,
Der, C. J.,
Fearon, E. R.,
Sundaresan, M.,
Finkel, T.,
and Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J.
(1997)
Science
275,
1649-1652
|
| 23.
|
Finkel, T.
(1999)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
65,
337-340
|
| 24.
|
Griendling, K. K.,
and Alexander, R. W.
(1997)
Circulation
96,
3264-3265
|
| 25.
|
Griendling, K. K.,
and Alexander, R. W.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
283-292
|
| 26.
|
Harrison, D. G.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2153-2157
|
| 27.
|
Munzel, T.,
Hink, U.,
Heitzer, T.,
and Meinertz, T.
(1999)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
874,
386-400
|
| 28.
|
Harrison, D. G.
(1997)
Clin. Cardiol.
20,
11-17
|
| 29.
|
Suzuki, H.,
Swei, A.,
Zweifach, B. W.,
and Schmid-Schonbein, G. W.
(1995)
Hypertension
25,
1083-1089
|
| 30.
|
Rajagopalan, S.,
Kurz, S.,
Munzel, T.,
Tarpey, M.,
Freeman, B. A.,
Griendling, K. K.,
and Harrison, D. G.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
1916-1923
|
| 31.
|
Lopez-Ongil, S.,
Saura, M.,
Rodriguez-Puyol, D.,
Rodriguez-Puyol, M.,
and Lamas, S.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
H1072-H1078
|
| 32.
|
Marsden, P. A.,
Brock, T. A.,
and Ballermann, B. J.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
258,
F1295-F1303
|
| 33.
|
Takahashi, M.,
Fukuda, K.,
Shimada, K.,
Barnes, K.,
Turner, A. J.,
Ikeda, M.,
Koike, H.,
Yamamoto, Y.,
and Tanzawa, K.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
311,
657-665
|
| 34.
|
Ohnaka, K.,
Takayanagi, R.,
Yamauchi, T.,
Okazaki, H.,
Ohashi, M.,
Umeda, F.,
and Nawata, H.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
168,
1128-1136
|
| 35.
|
Aubin, P.,
Le Brun, G.,
Moldovan, F.,
Villette, J. M.,
Creminon, C.,
Dumas, J.,
Homyrda, L.,
Soliman, H.,
Azizi, M.,
and Fiet, J.
(1997)
Clin. Chem.
43,
64-70
|
| 36.
|
Jones, O. T. G.,
and Hancock, J. T.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
233,
222-229
|
| 37.
|
Mayo, L. A.,
and Curnutte, J. T.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
186,
567-575
|
| 38.
|
Shimada, K.,
Takahashi, M.,
Turner, A. J.,
and Tanzawa, K.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
315,
863-867
|
| 39.
|
Kundu, G. C.,
and Wilson, I. B.
(1993)
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
42,
64-67
|
| 40.
|
Kundu, G. C.,
and Wilson, I. B.
(1992)
Life Sci.
50,
965-970
|
| 41.
|
Jewett, S. L.,
Rocklin, A. M.,
Ghanevati, M.,
Abel, J. M.,
and Marach, J. A.
(1999)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
26,
905-918
|
| 42.
|
Retsky, K. L.,
Chen, K.,
Zeind, J.,
and Frei, B.
(1999)
Free. Radic. Biol. Med.
26,
90-98
|
| 43.
|
Uchida, K.,
and Kawakishi, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2405-2410
|
| 44.
|
Uchida, K.,
and Kawakishi, S.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
332,
208-210
|
| 45.
|
Gardner, P. R.
(1997)
Biosci. Rep.
17,
33-42
|
| 46.
|
Gardner, P. R.,
Raineri, I.,
Epstein, L. B.,
and White, C. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13399-13405
|
| 47.
|
Parks, W. C.,
and Mecham, R. P.
(1998)
Matrix Metalloproteinases
, Academic Press, London
|
| 48.
|
Barrett, A. J.,
Rawlings, N. D.,
and Woessner, J. F.
(1998)
Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes
, Academic Press, London
|
| 49.
|
Galis, Z. S.,
Asanuma, K.,
Godin, D.,
and Meng, X.
(1998)
Circulation
97,
2445-2453
|
| 50.
|
Burkhardt, H.,
Schwingel, M.,
Menninger, H.,
Macartney, H. W.,
and Tschesche, H.
(1986)
Arthritis & Rheum.
29,
379-387
|
| 51.
|
Burkhardt, H.,
Hartmann, F.,
and Schwingel, M. L.
(1986)
Enzyme (Basel)
36,
221-231
|
| 52.
|
Owens, M. W.,
Milligan, S. A.,
Jourd'heuil, D.,
and Grisham, M. B.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
L445-L450
|
| 53.
|
Shingu, M.,
Isayama, T.,
Yasutake, C.,
Naono, T.,
Nobunaga, M.,
Tomari, K.,
Horie, K.,
and Goto, Y.
(1994)
Inflammation
18,
613-623
|
| 54.
|
Shingu, M.,
Takahashi, S.,
Ito, M.,
Hamamatu, N.,
Suenaga, Y.,
Ichibangase, Y.,
and Nobunaga, M.
(1994)
Rheumatol. Int.
14,
77-81
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Martinez-Miguel, V. Raoch, C. Zaragoza, J. M. Valdivielso, M. Rodriguez-Puyol, D. Rodriguez-Puyol, and S. Lopez-Ongil
Endothelin-converting enzyme-1 increases in atherosclerotic mice: potential role of oxidized low density lipoproteins
J. Lipid Res.,
March 1, 2009;
50(3):
364 - 375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Posen, V. Kalchenko, R. Seger, A. Brandis, A. Scherz, and Y. Salomon
Manipulation of redox signaling in mammalian cells enabled by controlled photogeneration of reactive oxygen species
J. Cell Sci.,
May 1, 2005;
118(9):
1957 - 1969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Lee, R. F. Gonzalez, C. J. Chapin, J. Busch, J. R. Fineman, and J. A. Gutierrez
Nitric oxide decreases surfactant protein gene expression in primary cultures of type II pneumocytes
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
May 1, 2005;
288(5):
L950 - L957.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Brennan, R. Wait, S. Begum, J. R. Bell, M. J. Dunn, and P. Eaton
Detection and Mapping of Widespread Intermolecular Protein Disulfide Formation during Cardiac Oxidative Stress Using Proteomics with Diagonal Electrophoresis
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 1, 2004;
279(40):
41352 - 41360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. K. Kelly, S. Wedgwood, R. H. Steinhorn, and S. M. Black
Nitric oxide decreases endothelin-1 secretion through the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
May 1, 2004;
286(5):
L984 - L991.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F.-S. Wang, C.-J. Wang, S.-M. Sheen-Chen, Y.-R. Kuo, R.-F. Chen, and K. D. Yang
Superoxide Mediates Shock Wave Induction of ERK-dependent Osteogenic Transcription Factor (CBFA1) and Mesenchymal Cell Differentiation toward Osteoprogenitors
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 22, 2002;
277(13):
10931 - 10937.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Namgaladze, H. W. Hofer, and V. Ullrich
Redox Control of Calcineurin by Targeting the Binuclear Fe2+-Zn2+ Center at the Enzyme Active Site
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 15, 2002;
277(8):
5962 - 5969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. Gantt, T. L. Goldman, M. L. McCormick, M. A. Miller, S. M. B. Jeronimo, E. T. Nascimento, B. E. Britigan, and M. E. Wilson
Oxidative Responses of Human and Murine Macrophages During Phagocytosis of Leishmania chagasi
J. Immunol.,
July 15, 2001;
167(2):
893 - 901.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|