![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 35, 26683-26689, September 1, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595
Received for publication, January 3, 2000, and in revised form, May 22, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have recently identified an Egr1 motif that
overlaps with the Sp1 element in the tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)
promoter. Here we examine whether this motif has a functional role in
the regulation of TH transcription in PC12 cells. In nuclear extracts
from control PC12 cells, an oligonucleotide containing the TH Sp1/Egr1
motif binds Sp1-containing complexes. Treatment of PC12 cells with
phorbol ester (2 µM
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)) gives rise to a
new Egr1-containing complex. TPA treatment reduces the steady-state
levels of the Sp1 protein and leads to the appearance of immunoreactive
Egr1 protein within 30-60 min. Expression of the Egr1 protein in PC12
cells stimulates the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter
gene placed under the control of the first 272 nucleotides of the rat
TH promoter. Site-directed mutagenesis of either the Sp1/Egr1 motif or
of an upstream AP-1 motif or both abolishes the Egr1-mediated induction
of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity. An oligonucleotide
encompassing the AP-1/E-box sequence of the rat TH promoter competes in
electrophoretic mobility shift assays for binding of nuclear extracts
from control and TPA-treated cells to an oligonucleotide containing the
Sp1/Egr1 element, indicating that these two enhancers may interact. The
results show that Egr1 can activate TH transcription and reveals
cross-talk between Sp1/Egr1 and AP-1 factors.
The first and major rate-limiting regulatory step in the
biosynthesis of the catecholamines (dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) is catalyzed by tyrosine hydroxylase
(TH)1 (1). TH is expressed in
catecholaminergic cells of the central and peripheral nervous systems
and in the adrenal medulla.
The catecholamines are important in the maintenance of internal
homeostasis. Aberrations in catecholamine neurotransmission are thought
to underlie several prevalent diseases including neuropsychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and depression and cardiovascular disorders, such as hypertension. Dysregulation of catecholamine biosynthesis and long term changes in TH activity are some of the
mechanisms implicated in the etiology of these disorders (2). Recently,
polymorphisms in the TH gene have been associated with a
prevalent form of hypertension and with manic depression (3, 4).
Moreover, Parkinson's disease is characterized by degeneration of the
dopaminergic nigro-striatal pathways. Its symptoms may be ameliorated
by gene therapy with TH expression vectors (5, 6). Therefore, an
understanding of the intricate physiological mechanisms that regulate
TH gene expression is crucial.
Physiological and pharmacological stimuli that are associated with long
term stimulation of catecholaminergic cells in vivo increase
TH gene expression. For example, TH transcription, mRNA levels, and
immunoreactive protein are increased in the adrenal medulla of rats
exposed to a variety of stressors or with pharmacological treatments
such as administration of reserpine or nicotine (7-11). In cell
cultures of adrenomedullary origin, increased cAMP or calcium, growth
factors, phorbol esters such as
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), and
glucocorticoids increase TH mRNA levels, transcription, and/or
promoter activity (reviewed in Refs. 12 and 13). A number of studies
have revealed that alterations in transcription are a primary
regulatory mechanism mediating long term changes in TH gene expression.
The TH promoter contains several motifs that are homologous to known
cis-acting regulatory elements including the hypoxia-inducible factor-1
(HIF) element, AP-1, AP-2, E-box, octamer/heptamer, Sp1, and a
cAMP/calcium response element. The relative positions of the AP-1, Sp1,
and cAMP/calcium response elements are strictly conserved in the rat,
mouse, and human TH genes. The perfect consensus cAMP/calcium response
element sequence ( Egr1 might be a new candidate in the regulation of TH transcription. We
have recently demonstrated that the rat TH promoter contains an Egr1
motif that overlaps with the Sp1 motif. Egr1 binding, which is absent
in control extracts, is prominent in the adrenal medulla of rats
exposed to immobilization stress (25). We now examine in PC12 cells if
this element is functional and whether Egr1 can regulate TH transcription.
Materials
Plasmids--
The parental wild type plasmid p5'THCAT( Oligonucleotides--
For EMSA, the following oligonucleotides
and their complementary strands were synthesized by Life Technologies,
Inc.: 1) THSp1/Egr1 (35 bp
5'-GCCCTCGCTCCATGCCCACCCCCGCCTCCCTCAGG-3' ( Antibodies--
All antibodies were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Anti-Egr1 was a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised
against an epitope corresponding to a C-terminal peptide of human Egr1
(p82). Anti-Sp1 was a goat polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide
within the internal domain of rat Sp1 protein. It recognizes both p95
and p106 Sp1 proteins but does not cross-react with Sp2, Sp3, or Sp4.
The anti-actin antiserum was a goat polyclonal against the carboxyl
terminus of human actin. Anti-C/EBP Methods
Cell Culture--
PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells (28) were
originally obtained from Drs. Lloyd Greene (Columbia University) and
Daniel O'Connor (University of California, San Diego). The cells were
grown to medium density in culture dishes (Falcon) in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.),
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 5%
horse serum (Gemini BioProducts), as well as 100 µg/ml
streptomycin/penicillin at 37 °C, 7% CO2, as described
previously (29). The cells were treated with 2 µM (final
concentration) of TPA (Research Biochemicals Inc.) for up to 6 h.
They were washed twice with 1 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline,
harvested, and used to prepare nuclear extracts.
Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility
Shift Assays (EMSAs)--
Extracts were prepared as described
previously (30). Briefly, the cells were suspended in three packed cell
volumes of hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT with protease inhibitors (0.05 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM each of pepstatin,
leupeptin, and aprotinin) and allowed to swell for 10 min on ice. The
cells were homogenized, transferred to new tubes, and centrifuged for
30 min at 10,000 rpm. The released nuclei were suspended in half the
packed cell volume of low salt buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 20 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 25% glycerol, 0.2 mM DTT, and the
mixture of protease inhibitors), followed by the dropwise addition of
high salt buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.6 M
KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 25% glycerol, 0.2 mM DTT, and the mixture of protease inhibitors). The
nuclear suspensions were extracted for 30 min at 4 °C with gentle
agitation, and the suspension was centrifuged for 30 min at 14,000 rpm.
The supernatants (nuclear extracts) were stored at
EMSA was performed as described before (25). Prior to the addition of
labeled DNA probe, 4 µg of PC12 nuclear extracts were incubated for
20 min on ice in 20 µl of reaction buffer containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 4% glycerol, 1 µg of
double-stranded poly(dI-dC), and 1 µg of BSA. Radiolabeled probe was
added (0.5 ng, 40,000 cpm/assay), and the incubation was continued for
another 20 min at room temperature. In competition experiments, the
nuclear extracts were preincubated with the indicated molar excess of
unlabeled, double-stranded oligonucleotides for 20 min on ice. In
supershift experiments, the extracts were preincubated with antibodies
for 60 min on ice. Protein-DNA complexes were analyzed on nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gels as before (25).
Immunoblot Analysis of Whole Cell Extracts--
For immunoblot
analysis, PC12 cells were lysed by three freeze-thaw cycles with 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 90 mM KCl, 1 mM
magnesium acetate, 1 mM DTT, 5% glycerol, and 0.5%
Nonidet P-40 plus protease inhibitors (5 µM each of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pepstatin, leupeptin, and aprotinin).
Cell debris was removed by centrifugation. The amounts of total protein
present in the supernatants were determined. Equal amounts of protein
were fractionated in a 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were
transferred to supported nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). After
transfer, the membranes were briefly rinsed with 10 mM
Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (1× TBST).
The membranes were blocked overnight in 6% (w/v) nonfat milk
(Carnation) in TBST and washed three times at room temperature with
TBST. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated in primary antibody.
After three washes with TBST, the membranes were incubated with
appropriate secondary antibodies. They were washed three times, and the
bands of interest were detected with chemiluminescence
(SuperSignalTM, Pierce). For reprobing, the membranes were
stripped at 55 °C for 30 min in buffer (62.5 mM Tris-Cl,
pH 5.6, 150 mM NaCl) and washed three times for 5 min each
time with 1× TBST at room temperature. They were then blocked with 5%
1× TBST for 45 min and reincubated with antibodies as described above.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Mutagenesis of the Egr1/Sp1 site
in the rat TH promoter region was performed with the
QuickChangeTM polymerase chain reaction-based method
(Stratagene, CA), using two primers
(5'-CTGAGGGAGGCTTTTGTGGGC-3' and
5'-GCCCACAAAAGCCTCCCTCAG-3'), which replaced four
cytosines with four thymines (underlined) at Transfection of PC12 Cells--
For transfections, the plasmids
(3 µg each of the reporter (p5'THCAT constructs) and Egr1 (pCMVEgr1
or pCMVETTL) effector plasmids as well as 0.5 µg of the pCMV Reporter Gene Assays--
For reporter assays, lysates from
transfected cells were prepared and CAT activity was measured using a
scintillation assay as described previously (17). The Phorbol Ester Treatment Induces Egr1 and Reduces Sp1 Binding to the
TH Promoter--
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were carried
out with a radiolabeled oligonucleotide encompassing the Sp1/Egr1 motif of the TH promoter (Fig. 1A)
and nuclear extracts from control and PC12 cells treated with TPA (Fig.
1, B and C). Extracts from control cells formed
two complexes (I and III) that were competed with excess unlabeled
oligonucleotide (Fig. 1B, lane 2). The
addition of an Sp1 consensus oligonucleotide also competed with complex formation, especially for complex I (Fig. 1B,
lane 6).
With nuclear extracts from PC12 cells treated with 2 µM
TPA for 60 or 120 min, complex I was absent, and the intensity of complex III was reduced. Importantly, a new specific complex was formed
(complex II). The formation of this complex was unaffected by
competition with excess Sp1 consensus oligonucleotide (Fig. 1C, lanes 4 and 7).
However, anti-Egr1-specific antisera prevented the formation of complex
II and generated several supershifted complexes (lanes
5 and 8). These results indicate that complex II,
which appears with TPA treatment, contains immnunoreactive Egr1
protein. Thus, TPA treatment induces an Egr1-containing complex.
With TPA treatment, the reduction in the Sp1-containing complex (mostly
complex I) and the formation of the Egr1-specific complex (II) could be
mediated by a number of possible mechanisms. First, the TPA-induced
Egr1 might have greater affinity for this motif and thus effectively
compete with Sp1 for binding. Second, the binding affinity of Sp1 might
be reduced upon treatment of PC12 cells with TPA. Third, Sp1 levels
might be reduced. This could result from increased degradation or
reduced synthesis.
To distinguish among these possibilities, we examined the steady-state
levels of Sp1 and Egr1 with immunoblots at various time intervals, up
to 6 h of TPA treatment (Fig. 2,
A and B). The results revealed that
immunoreactive Sp1 protein is greatly reduced after 30 and 60 min of
TPA. After 4 h, the levels were similar to those in untreated
cells. Concomitantly, Egr1, which is undetectable in control extracts,
was maximally induced at 60 min and subsequently declined to
undetectable levels by 4-6 h. The same membranes were reprobed with
antisera to actin (Fig. 2A) or to C/EBP Egr1 Expression Induces CAT Reporter Activity Driven by the TH
Promoter--
These results and the previously observed induction of
Egr1 binding in adrenal medullary extracts from rats exposed to
immobilization stress (25) suggested that Egr1 might be able to
regulate TH transcription in response to physiological signals. To
directly study the ability of Egr1 to activate the TH promoter, we
transiently transfected PC12 cells with the reporter plasmids
p5'THCAT(
To identify the region in the TH promoter required for the
Egr1-mediated induction of CAT activity, the mutant reporter construct p5'THCAT(
To examine if the increased CAT reporter activity is mediated by the
putative Egr1 motif, the four cytosines (underlined) at
Since phorbol ester-mediated induction of TH has previously been
reported to require the AP-1 sequence motif (19), we also used a
construct with a mutant TH AP-1 site. As reported by some previous
studies (26), mutation of this motif tended to reduce basal activity.
Surprisingly, mutating the AP-1 motif alone or in combination with a
mutant Egr-1 motif completely abolished the ability of the Egr1
expression vector to up-regulate the activity of the CAT reporter gene
(Fig. 4). With these constructs, the reporter activity attained was
comparable with that obtained with the full-length (pCMVEgr1) and
truncated (pCMVETTL) Egr1 effector plasmids. These results suggest that
the activation of TH transcription by Egr1 requires both the Sp1/Egr1
and AP-1 motifs.
An Oligonucleotide That Contains the TH AP-1/E-box Can Compete
against the TH Sp1/Egr1 Oligonucleotide for Nuclear Protein
Binding--
The mutation of either the AP-1 or the Sp1/Egr1 motifs
abolished CAT induction in response to expressed Egr1, suggesting that they may compete for similar factors. We therefore examined whether the
TH AP-1/E-box element could interfere with complex formation with the
Sp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide in EMSA with PC12 nuclear extracts. Nuclear
extracts from control or TPA-treated PC12 cells were incubated with the
labeled THSp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide alone or with a 32-bp oligonucleotide corresponding to the TH AP-1/E-box. Surprisingly, the
TH AP-1/E-box oligonucleotide efficiently competed and prevented formation of complexes I and II and to some extent of complex III (Fig.
5, lanes 3,
6, and 9). A shorter oligonucleotide containing only the AP-1 motif was not as effective a competitor (Fig. 5, lane 15). By comparison, the excess unlabeled TH
Sp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide competed for all complexes with the three
types of extracts (Fig. 5, lanes 2, 5,
and 8), while a consensus Egr1, but not the consensus Sp1
oligonucleotide, competed for complex II (lane 12 versus lane 11). On the other hand, oligonucleotides
representing the C/EBP TPA-induced Complex Formation at the TH AP-1/E-box Enhancer
Sequence--
We also tested the effect of TPA on the binding of AP-1
factors in EMSA with the same nuclear extracts, using as a probe the 32-bp AP-1/E-box sequence oligonucleotide of the rat TH promoter. This
sequence spans the region between Elevation of TH Transcription by Egr1--
The findings of this
study indicate that the transcription factor Egr1 (also known as
Zif268, NGFI-A, or Krox24; reviewed in Ref. 33) is likely to be
involved in the regulation of TH gene expression. This is the first
study to show that Egr1 can activate the transcription of the TH gene.
The introduction of Egr1 into PC12 cells from an expression vector was
sufficient in activating a CAT reporter gene under the control of the
proximal rat TH promoter. Moreover, our findings reveal cross-talk
between factors interacting with the AP-1 and Egr1 motifs.
Egr1 binding to the overlapping Sp1/Egr1 motif of the TH promoter was
observed within 60 min of treatment of PC12 cells with TPA.
egr1, like c-fos, was initially
identified as an early response gene whose mRNA increased within
minutes of treatment of PC12 cells with NGF (34). This response, which
is not blocked by protein synthesis inhibition, is a component of the
early or immediate early response that is presumed to have a key role
in orchestrating a second wave of gene expression that underlies long
term effects of these factors on cell growth and differentiation (35).
Induction of Egr1 binding activity is reportedly also stimulated by
serum, phorbol esters, or okadaic acid, a specific inhibitor of
phosphatases 1 and 2 in a number of cell types (36-38). In PC12 cells,
the induction of Egr1 by NGF is mediated by a regulatory region on the
Egr1 promoter, which is also responsive to phorbol esters (23).
When the reporter plasmid p5'THCAT(
It remains unclear why activation of the CAT reporter occurs 72 h
post-transfection with the Egr1 expression vector. One possibility is
that the Egr1 protein itself is expressed within this time course. An
alternative explanation is that the effect is indirect and that the
Egr1 protein first induces other transcription factors, which
subsequently activate TH. A third possibility is that another factor(s)
is co-required with Egr1 and that the observed lag in the response of
the reporter gene may be the result of this factor(s) being synthesized
within 72 h. Nevertheless, the results with the mutated Egr1 motif
suggest that this sequence is directly involved in activating TH
transcription. Perhaps high levels of Egr1 expression are needed before
it can activate CAT reporter activity, because in these transfected
cells Sp1 should still be present and presumably bound to the Sp1/Egr1
site, in contrast to the situation in TPA-treated PC12 cells.
Sp1 binding is no longer evident in extracts from PC12 cells treated
with TPA for 60 and 120 min. Our immunoblot results indicate that the
treatment of PC12 with TPA results in a marked reduction of Sp1 protein
within 30 min and up to 60 min. By 4 h, and perhaps earlier, Sp1
levels approached those of the control. This is corroborated by the
EMSA results, which show that Sp1 binding activity returns to control
levels after 4-6 h of TPA treatment. In contrast, the levels of Sp1
remained virtually unchanged in the adrenal medulla of rats subjected
to either single or repeated
stress,2 although Egr1 was
also induced in the later (25). In the TPA-treated cells, the Egr1
protein is undetectable in control extracts. It appears 30 min after
TPA application and is highest at 60 min. After 4 h, when Sp1
reappears, Egr1 levels are greatly reduced. The mechanisms by which TPA
rapidly down-regulates Sp1 and up-regulates Egr1 in PC12 cells remain
to be determined. It is attractive to speculate that stimulation of the
protein kinase C pathway by TPA may lead to phosphorylation of Sp1. In
turn, this could lead to its targeting for degradation. It is likely
that transcriptional mechanisms account for the rapid and transient
elevation of Egr1 in the TPA-treated cells, since its promoter was
shown to contain a TPA response element (24).
Interestingly, in addition to the findings of the present study on TH,
another enzyme of the catecholamine biosynthetic pathway, phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase, which
catalyzes the conversion of norepinephrine to epinephrine, is also
activated by Egr1 expression (24, 40). TPA activates the
phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase promoter in the
PC12-derived, RS1 cell line (24). The co-transfection of Egr1
expression vector results in the activation of luciferase reporter
plasmids under the control of the phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase promoter. This effect is mediated by two
overlapping consensus Sp1/Egr1 sequences located at
Induction of Egr1 may be important for the in vivo
regulation of catecholamine biosynthesis. The appearance of an
Egr1-containing complex with the TH Sp1/Egr1 motif was also observed in
adrenomedullary nuclear extracts from rats exposed to immobilization
stress (25). In the adrenomedullary nuclear extracts, the binding
profiles specific for the TH Sp1/Egr1 motif were also altered by
exposure to immobilization stress (25). Complexes similar in mobility to complexes I and III, observed here, were attained in mobility shift
assays with nuclear extracts from control animals. The presence of Sp1,
especially in the lower mobility complex (complex I), was confirmed by
competition with Sp1 consensus oligonucleotide and with specific
antisera. With nuclear extracts from the adrenal medulla of rats
exposed to a single immobilization stress, a new complex comparable
with complex II, containing Egr1, was formed. This complex was also
evident, although somewhat less pronounced with extracts from rats
exposed to repeated immobilization stress (25). These results suggest
that expression of the egr1 gene in the adrenal medulla is
stimulated by stress. These findings are consistent with results
obtained by Wong and co-workers (32) on the induction of the
stress-elicited elevation of adrenomedullary Egr1 mRNA
levels. The induction of adrenomedullary phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase mRNA levels is also rapidly elevated
by immobilization stress (32, 39) and may also be mediated by induction
of Egr1. Therefore, Egr1 may participate in coordinate mechanisms for
the regulation for these catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes.
Cross-talk between Factors Interacting with Sp/Egr1 and AP-1
Motifs--
Previous studies on the regulation of TH by TPA have
concentrated on the AP-1 promoter element (19, 21). Notably, deletion or mutation of the TH AP-1 element in a CAT reporter construct prevents
its induction by TPA or NGF, indicating that it is an essential site
(16, 19, 21).
Mutation of the Sp1/Egr1 motif was not the only mutation that prevented
induction of TH promoter-directed expression of CAT activity by the
Egr1 expression vector. Surprisingly, mutation of the AP-1 also
prevented the Egr1-mediated induction of the CAT reporter. Previous
reports have indicated that the AP-1 region is required for the binding
of AP-1 proteins induced by TPA in PC12 cells (19).
It is plausible that Egr1 may act in concert with other
stress-activated immediate early genes, like c-fos, in the
initial stages of TH transcriptional activation. The AP-1 and Egr1/Sp1 sites might be cooperating in the transmission of the extracellular signals by sharing transcription factors required for complex binding
at both sites or by cooperating with each other. The interaction between these motifs has not been previously investigated for TH gene
promoter function. However, our study suggests that they are both
required for full induction of CAT in PC12 cells by coexpressed Egr1 protein.
Further support for the interaction of the AP-1 region and Sp1/Egr1
motifs is provided by the competition EMSA results with the AP-1/E-box
oligonucleotide. The ability of this oligonucleotide to compete for
complex formation with the THSp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide suggests that it
interacts with proteins necessary for complex formation.
The results of this work suggest a model for functional interactions
between the Sp1/Egr1 and AP-1/E-box motifs in the induction of TH
transcription by Egr1 (Fig. 7). In the
unstimulated state, the Sp1 transcription factor binds the promoter.
Sp1 and AP-1 factors may participate in its basal expression along with
factors at the CRE site, which are clearly important for basal
expression (42). Although the present study and that by Yoon and
Chikaraishi (26) found that mutation of the Sp1 motif did not alter
basal reporter expression under control of the proximal promoter,
recent studies by Yang et al. (43), in which a much longer
promoter construct was used, indicated that mutation of the Sp1/Egr1
greatly reduced basal expression. After stimulation of PC12 cells with TPA, the steady-state levels of Sp1 protein are decreased (perhaps by
protein kinase C-stimulated degradative down-regulation), while Egr1 is
induced. AP-1 binding and c-Fos expression are also induced (19). It is conceivable that Fos and Jun family members may also participate in the cross-talk.
The mechanism by which these factors cross-talk remains to be
determined. c-Jun may be a candidate in mediating this cross-talk. In
this regard, interactions between c-Jun and Sp1 to form a
superactivator of the p21 gene have recently been reported and are
based on physical interactions between these two transcription factors
(44). Other interactions between Egr1/Sp1 sites and AP-1 motifs have
been reported for elements that are in physical proximity (45).
Recently, large cofactor complexes have been identified for
Sp1-mediated promoter activation to function in conjunction with TATA
binding protein-associated factors in HeLa cells (46). These
complexes contain subunits that are unique to it as well as
polypeptides that are shared with other cofactor complexes and may form
a bridge between these two motifs. It remains to be determined whether the cross-talk revealed in this study between the Egr1/Sp1 and AP-1
motifs involves sharing of specific cofactor complexes bridging these
two sites.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
45 to
38) is required for activation of TH
transcription by cAMP, nicotine, elevated calcium, and FGF-2 but not by
phorbol esters (14-18). In contrast, the AP-1 motif
(TGATTCA at
204 to
198), which differs from the consensus sequence (5'-TGACTCA-3') by a single nucleotide
(underlined), appears to be required for TPA- and NGF-induced
transcription of TH in PC12 cells (16, 19-21). In addition, TPA
increases the expression of c-fos and c-jun
mRNAs and proteins in PC12 cells and also the binding of the AP-1
transcription factor complex to the TH AP-1 site (22). Interestingly,
the transcription of egr1 in PC12 cells is also activated by
both NGF (23) and by TPA (24) with typical immediate early kinetics.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
272/+27)
containing the first 272 nucleotides of the rat TH promoter, the
deletion plasmid p5'THCAT(
108/+27) and the mutant AP-1 (GTGATTCA to
TCTCGAGC at
205 to
198) plasmid p5'THCATmAP-1(
272/+27) (26) were
generously provided by Dr. Dona Chikaraishi (Duke University Medical
Center). The derivative plasmids containing the mutant Sp1/Egr1 site
and the double Sp1/Egr1-AP-1 mutant were generated from the
p5'THmAP-1CAT(
272/+27), as described under "Site-directed
Mutagenesis." The plasmids pCMVEgr1 and pCMVETTL, which express a
full-length and a truncated Egr1 protein, respectively, were a gift
from Dr. Dona Wong (Harvard Medical School). In pCMVETTL, a linker with
stop codons in all three reading frames is inserted into the unique
NarI restriction site of pCMVEgr1 at nucleotide 768, thus
leading to termination after serine 170 (27). The pCMV
gal plasmid
was purchased from Invitrogen.
138 to
104); 2) THmSp1
(5'-GCCCTCGCTCCATGCCCACCCTTGCCTCCCTCAGG-3' (
138 to
104) with two thymines at positions
117 and
116 replacing two cytosines; 3) THAP-1/E-box
(5'-CGGGCTGAGGGTGATTCAGAGGCAGGTGCCTG-3' (
216 to
185), containing both the AP-1/E-box regions; 4) THAP-1, 5'-GGCTGAGGGTGATTCAGAGG-3' (
215 to
195). The
double-stranded, consensus Sp1 (5'-ATTCGATCGGGGCGGGGGGAGC-3') and C/EBP
(5'-TGCAGATTGCGCAATCTGCA-3') oligonucleotides were purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).
was a rabbit polyclonal
antiserum, which is not cross-reactive with C/EBP
, C/EBP
, or
C/EBP
, raised against an epitope at the C terminus of rat
C/EBP
.
80 °C in
aliquots. Protein concentrations were determined with the Bradford
assay method (Bio-Rad).
119 to
116. Following
transformation, amplification, selection, and screening, the mutations
were verified with enzymatic sequencing.
-gal
vector were mixed with Superfect ReagentTM according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen) and added to PC12 cells grown in
quadruplicate on 60-mm dishes (Falcon) in 1 ml of Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium. The cells were incubated with the transfection
mixtures for 3 h at 37 °C. The transfection mixtures were
removed, and the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered
saline, which was then replaced with 2 ml of complete Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium, and the cells were incubated for 24, 48, and
72 h. The cells were harvested in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered
saline and collected by centrifugation.
-galactosidase
activity was determined (31). Cell lysates (10 µg) were added to 150 µl of 2×
-galactosidase buffer (200 nM sodium
phosphate, pH 7.3, 2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM mercaptoethanol, 1.33 mg/ml o-nitrophenyl
-D-galactopyranoside). Volumes were adjusted to 300 µl, and samples were incubated 2 h at 37 °C. The reaction was
stopped with 0.5 ml of 1 M Na2CO3 solution, and absorbance was measured at 420 nm. The CAT and
-galactosidase activities for each sample were normalized for equal
amounts of protein in the cell lysates. Statistical significance was
determined by analysis of variance. All experiments were performed at
least twice.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Treatment with TPA alters the binding to TH
Sp1/Egr1 motif. A, diagrammatic representation of the
proximal rat TH promoter. The presence of putative and functional
elements involved in regulation of TH transcription are shown. The
later are shaded. The sequence of the 35-bp oligonucleotide
(THSp1/Egr1,
138 to
104) containing the overlapping Sp1/Egr1 region
and used in EMSA is indicated. B, EMSA analysis of complexes
formed with the
-32P-labeled THSp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide
and extracts from untreated PC12 cells (lanes 1,
2, 5, and 6) or cells treated for 120 min with 2 µM TPA (lanes 3 and
4). The THSp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide (self,
lanes 2 and 4) or consensus Sp1
oligonucleotide (lane 6) at a 100-fold excess
were used as competitors. C, EMSA analysis of complexes at
different times of TPA treatment. The
-32P-labeled
THSp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide was incubated with nuclear extracts from
untreated PC12 cells (lanes 1 and
2), cells treated with 2 µM TPA for 60 min (lanes 3-5) or 120 min (lanes
6-8), or without any addition (lanes
1, 3, and 6), or with 100-fold excess
Sp1 consensus oligonucleotide (lanes 4 and
7), or with Egr1-specific antisera (lanes
2, 5, and 8) as described under
"Methods."
(Fig.
2B), confirming equal loading of protein samples.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that complex II,
containing Egr1, was prominent at 60 min of TPA treatment and gradually
declined thereafter. Complex I, containing Sp1, reappeared after 4 h of TPA (Fig. 2C).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Changes in Sp1 and Egr1 with TPA
treatment. The PC12 cells were treated with 2 µM TPA
for the indicated times. A and B, cell lysates,
recombinant Sp1 (rSp1), and molecular weight markers (MW)
were fractionated on 6% SDS polyacylamide gels, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and probed with anti-Sp1 or actin antibodies
(A) or anti-Egr1 or C/EBP
antibodies (B).
C, electrophoretic mobility shift assays of nuclear extracts
from the same cells as in B.
272/+27) and pCMV
gal and the effector plasmid pCMVEgr1.
The pCMVEgr1 contains the 3.1-kilobase pair Egr1 cDNA, which
encodes the full-length human Egr1 protein, under the control of the
cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (27). The pCMV
gal plasmid served as
an internal control for transfection efficiency. CAT activity was
measured after 24, 48, and 72 h (Fig.
3A). Cells transfected with
pCMVEgr1 displayed a 4-fold increase in
CAT reporter activity 72 h post-transfection (Fig. 3A,
lane 5). In contrast, when cotransfected with
pCMVETTL, a plasmid expressing a truncated Egr1 protein lacking the
N-terminal activation domain, no induction of CAT was observed at any
time point (Fig. 3A, lanes 2,
4, and 6). Treatment with TPA tended to further
increase the Egr1-mediated activation of the TH promoter construct at
48 and 72 h but not at 24 h post-transfection (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Egr1-triggered activation of CAT reporter
activity under the control of the proximal rat TH promoter.
A, PC12 cells were co-transfected with the
p5'THCAT(
272/+27) reporter and pCMVEgr1 effector plasmids
(lanes 1, 3, and 5) or
p5'THCAT(
272/+27) and pCMVETTL (lanes 2,
4, and 6). B, p5'THCAT(
272/+27)
reporter and pCMVEgr1 effector plasmid were transfected for the
indicated times and incubated in the absence (lanes
1, 3, and 5) or presence of 2 µM TPA for 3 h before harvesting (lanes
2, 4, and 6). C,
p5'THCAT(
108/+27) reporter plasmid was cotransfected with either the
pCMVEgr1 or pCMVETTL effector plasmid and pCMV
gal vector as
described under "Methods." The CAT and
-galactosidase
(
Gal) activities were measured at the
indicated times after transfection. Results, mean ± S.E.
(n = 4) of relative CAT/
-galactosidase, are
expressed relative to controls (with no effector plasmid) taken as 1.0. *, p
0.01 compared with controls.
108/+27) was used (Fig. 3C). This construct, in
which CAT is under the control of the first 108 nucleotides of the rat TH promoter, was cotransfected with the pCMVEgr1 and pCMVETTL expression vectors, and CAT reporter gene activity was measured. No
appreciable increase in CAT activity was observed with this construct
in the absence (Fig. 3C) or presence of TPA (not shown). These results indicate that the sequence up to
108 on the rat TH
proximal promoter is not sufficient for the Egr1-mediated induction of
CAT reporter activity.
119 to
116
on the Sp1/Egr1 sequence (5'-CACCCCCGCCT-3')
were mutated to four thymines in the p5'THCAT(
272/+27) reporter
construct. Mutation of this site had little effect on basal activity
but abolished induction of CAT reporter activity triggered by
cotransfection with pCMVEgr1 (Fig.
4).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Demonstration of the requirement for both the
Sp1/Egr1 and AP-1 motifs for the Egr1-triggered activation of CAT
reporter activity. PC12 cells were co-transfected without effector
plasmid or with pCMVETTL or pCMVEgr1 effector plasmids and pCMV
gal
vector (to normalize for transfection efficiency) together with one of
the following reporter constructs: p5'THCAT(
272/+27) plasmid intact
(wild type) or with mutation of Sp1/Egr1 or AP-1 motifs or the double
mutant. The ratio of CAT and
-galactosidase
(
Gal) activities in equal amounts of protein
in homogenates were measured at 72 h post-transfection. Results
are mean ± S.E. relative to controls taken as 1.0. *,
p
0.01 compared with controls.
consensus or AP-2 from the dopamine
-hydroxylase promoter did not compete (lanes
13 and 14).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Interaction between the Sp1/Egr1 and
AP-1/E-box motifs of the TH promoter. Oligonucleotide competition
analysis of complexes formed in EMSA with the TH Sp1/Egr1
oligonucleotide. The labeled THSp1/Egr1 oligonucleotide was incubated
with nuclear extracts from control (lanes 1-3)
or PC12 cells treated with 2 µM TPA for 60 min
(lanes 4-6 and 10-15) or 120 min
(lanes 7-9). Competition with a 100-fold excess
of the same oligonucleotide (lanes 2,
5, and 8) or with the same molar excess of the
32-bp THAP-1/E-box oligonucleotide (lanes 3,
6, and 9), 20-bp TH AP-1 (lane
15), consensus oligonucleotides for Sp1 (lane
11), Egr1 (lane 12), C/EBP
(lane 14), or the AP-2 motif of the dopamine
-hydroxylase promoter (lane 13) are
shown.
216 and
185 on the promoter (Fig.
1A) and is 85 nucleotides upstream from the Sp1/Egr1 motif. TPA treatment increased the binding of AP-1 factors to this sequence. Maximal complex formation was observed between 60 min and 4 h (Fig. 6, lanes
3-5). Since the Egr1 binding activity is also maximal within this time interval (see Fig. 2B) and because mutation
of the AP-1/E-box region abrogates the Egr1-mediated activation of CAT
under the control of the TH promoter (see Fig. 4), we performed supershift EMSAs with antisera raised against Egr1 to test for the
presence of Egr1 in the complex formed at the AP-1/E-box sequence. There was no detectable Egr1 protein either in control (Fig. 6, lane 2), 60 min-treated (lane
5), or 4 h-treated PC12 cells (lane 8). We also used antisera raised against the transcription
factor C/EBP
, a protein frequently activated by cellular stress
(47). No immunoreactive C/EBP
protein was detectable in any of the extracts (lanes 3, 6, and
9).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Changes in AP-1 complex formation with TPA
treatment. PC12 cells were treated with 2 µM TPA for
the indicated times, and nuclear extracts were incubated with the
labeled 32-bp TH AP-1/E-box oligonucleotide in the absence
(lanes 1-6 (left panel)
and lanes 1, 4, and 7 (right panel)) or presence of antisera to Egr1
(lanes 2, 5, and 8 in the
right panel) or C/EBP
(lanes
3, 6, and 9 in the right
panel), as described under "Methods." The
arrow points to the AP-1 complex.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
272/+27) was co-transfected with
the Egr1 expression vector, a nearly 4-fold induction of CAT activity
was observed, which tended to increase further in the presence of TPA.
The involvement of the Egr1 protein in the transcriptional induction of
CAT via the TH promoter is also supported by the fact that the pCMVETTL
effector plasmid, which encodes a truncated Egr1 protein, is unable to
support activation via the reporter plasmid p5'THCAT(
272/+27). The
requirement for the Sp1/Egr1 motif in the activation of CAT reporter
activity by the TH promoter was demonstrated by site-directed
mutagenesis. The site-directed mutations introduced at the Sp1/Egr1
site (CCCC replaced by TTTT) had no effect on basal CAT reporter
activity but eliminated the induction by the co-transfected Egr1
expression vector.
45 and
165
nucleotides in the phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase
promoter (41).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Proposed model for cross-talk between factors
at the Sp1/Egr1 and AP-1/E-box promoter motifs. In the
unstimulated state, Sp1-containing complexes bind the overlapping
Sp1/Egr1 motif, and Jun family members bind the AP-1 motif. With TPA
treatment, the main complex at the Sp1/Egr1 motif contains Egr1, and
the composition of the AP-1 factors is altered with induction of
c-Fos and perhaps induction and/or phosphorylation of other AP-1
family members. The interaction between factors at these sites may
include co-sharing of components of coactivator complexes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Bistra Nankova (New York Medical College) for useful discussions and suggestions, Dr. Dona Wong (Harvard Medical School) for useful discussions and the Egr expression vectors, and Dr. Dona Chikaraishi (Duke University Medical Center) for the reporter constructs.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS28869.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595. Tel.: 914-594-4068; Fax: 914-594-4058; E-mail:
sabban@nymc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 6, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000049200
2 N. A. Papanikolaou and E. L. Sabban, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TH, tyrosine hydroxylase; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor-1; NGF, neural growth factor; bp, base pair(s); C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; DTT, dithiothreitol; CMV, cytomegalovirus.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Nagatsu, T., Levitt, M., and Udenfriend, S. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239, 2910-2917 |
| 2. | Mallet, J. (1996) Trends Neurosci. 19, 191-196 |
| 3. | Wei, J., Ramchand, C. N., and Hemmings, G. P. (1997) Life Sci. 61, 1341-1347 |
| 4. | Sharma, P., Hingorani, A., Jia, H., Ashby, M., Hopper, R., Clayton, D., and Brown, M. J. (1998) Hypertension 32, 676-682 |
| 5. | Corti, O., Sanchez-Capelo, A., Colin, P., Hanoun, N., Hamon, M., and Mallet, J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 12120-12125 |
| 6. | Imaoka, T., Date, I., Ohmoto, T., and Nagatsu, T. (1998) Hum. Gene Ther. 9, 1093-1102 |
| 7. | Nankova, B., Kvetnansky, R., McMahon, A., Viskupic, E., Hiremagalur, B., Frankle, G., Fukuhara, K., Kopin, I. J., and Sabban, E. L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 5937-5941 |
| 8. | Kvetnansky, R., and Sabban, E. L. (1998) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 851, 342-356 |
| 9. | Faucon Biguet, N., Buda, M., Lamouroux, A., Samolyyk, D., and Mallet, J. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 287-291 |
| 10. | Wessel, T. C., and Joh, T. H. (1992) Mol. Brain Res. 15, 349-360 |
| 11. | Fossom, L. L. H., Sterling, C. R., and Tank, A. W. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 42, 898-908 |
| 12. | Sabban, L. E. (1997) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 101-111 |
| 13. | Kumer, S. C., and Vrana, K. E. (1996) J. Neurochem. 67, 443-462 |
| 14. | Kim, K. S., Tinti, C., Song, B., Cubells, J. F., and Joh, T. H. (1994) J. Neurochem. 63, 834-842 |
| 15. | Lewis, E. J., Harrington, C. A., and Chikaraishi, D. M. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 3550-3554 |
| 16. | Hiremagalur, B., Nankova, B., Nitahara, J., Zeman, R., and Sabban, E. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23704-23711 |
| 17. | Osaka, H., and Sabban, E. L. (1997) Mol. Brain Res. 49, 222-228 |
| 18. | Osaka, H., and Sabban, E. L. (1994) Soc. Neurosci. 20, 125.3 |
| 19. | Icard-Liepkalns, C., Biguet, N. F., Vyas, S., Robert, J. J., Sassone-Corsi, P., and Mallet, J. (1992) J. Neurosci. Res. 32, 290-298 |
| 20. | Leonard, D. G. B., Ziff, E. B., and Green, L. A. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 3156-3167 |
| 21. | Gizang-Ginsberg, E., and Ziff, E. B. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 477-491 |
| 22. | Gizang-Ginsberg, E., and Ziff, E. B. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 249-262 |
| 23. | DeFranco, C., Damon, D. H., Endoh, M., and Wagner, J. A. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 365-379 |
| 24. | Morita, K., Ebert, S. N., and Wong, D. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11161-11167 |
| 25. | Papanikolaou, N. A., and Sabban, E. L. (1999) J. Neurochem. 73, 433-436 |
| 26. | Yoon, S. O., and Chikaraishi, D. M. (1992) Neuron 9, 55-67 |
| 27. | Gupta, M. P., Gupta, M., Zak, R., and Sukhatme, V. P. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 12813-12816 |
| 28. | Greene, L. A., and Tischler, A. S. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 2424-2428 |
| 29. | Menezes, A., Zeman, R., and Sabban, E. L. (1996) J. Neurochem. 67, 138-146 |
| 30. | Nankova, B., Devlin, D., Kvetnansky, R., Kopin, I. J., and Sabban, E. L. (1993) J. Neurochem. 61, 776-779 |
| 31. | Maniatis, T., Whittemore, L. A., Du, W., Fan, C. M., Keller, A., Palonbella, V., and Thanos, D. (1992) in Transcriptional Regulation, Part 2 (McKnight, S. L. , and Yamamoto, K., eds) , pp. 1193-1220, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 32. | Wong, D. L., Her, B. J., Siddall, B. J., Bell, R. A., Tai, T. C., Rusnak, M., Farkas, R., Kvetnansky, R, and Shih, J. C. (1999) Fund. Clin. Pharmacol. 13, S46.5 |
| 33. | O'Donovan, K. J., Tourtellotte, W. G., Milbrandt, J., and Baraban, J. M. (1999) Trends Neurosci. 22, 167-173 |
| 34. | Milbrandt, J. (1987) Science 238, 797-799 |
| 35. | Morgan, D. G., and Finch, C. E. (1988) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 515, 145-160 |
| 36. | Cao, X., Mahendran, R., Guy, G. R., and Tan, Y. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16949-16957 |
| 37. | Hass, R., Brach, M., Gunji, H., Kharbanda, S., and Kufe, D. (1992) Biochem. Pharmacol. 44, 1569-1576 |
| 38. | DeFranco, C., Ro, M., Grossel, M., English, M. A., Hansen, U. M., Wagner, J. A., and Licht, J. D. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 194, 425-431 |
| 39. | Viskupic, E., Kvetnansky, R., Sabban, E. L., Fukuhara, K., Weise, V. K., Kopin, I. J., and Schwartz, J. P. (1994) J. Neurochem. 63, 808-814 |
| 40. | Ebert, S. N., Balt, S. L., Hunter, J. P., Gashler, A., Sukhatme, V., and Wong, D. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20885-20898 |
| 41. | Ebert, S. N., and Wong, D. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17299-17305 |
| 42. | Kim, K. S, Lee, M. K., Caroll, J., and Joh, T. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15689-15695 |
| 43. | Yang, C., Kim, H. S., Seo, H., and Kim, K. S. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 1358-1368 |
| 44. | Kardassis, D., Papakosta, P., Pardali, K., and Moustakas, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29572-29581 |
| 45. | Noti, J. D., Reinemann, B. C., and Petrus, M. N. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2940-2950 |
| 46. | Ryu, S., and Tjian, R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 7137-7142 |
| 47. | Poli, V., Mancini, F. P., and Cortese, R. (1990) Cell 63, 643-653 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P.-h. Park, M. R. McMullen, H. Huang, V. Thakur, and L. E. Nagy Short-term Treatment of RAW264.7 Macrophages with Adiponectin Increases Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) Expression via ERK1/2 Activation and Egr-1 Expression: ROLE OF TNF-{alpha} IN ADIPONECTIN-STIMULATED INTERLEUKIN-10 PRODUCTION J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 21695 - 21703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. SABBAN, M. A. HEBERT, X. LIU, B. NANKOVA, and L. SEROVA Differential Effects of Stress on Gene Transcription Factors in Catecholaminergic Systems Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2004; 1032(1): 130 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zhang, M. Lin, P. Abidi, G. Thiel, and J. Liu Specific Interaction of Egr1 and c/EBP{beta} Leads to the Transcriptional Activation of the Human Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Gene J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2003; 278(45): 44246 - 44254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Davis Jr, Z. J. Chen, K. E. Ile, and K. D. Tew Reciprocal regulation of expression of the human adenosine 5'-triphosphate binding cassette, sub-family A, transporter 2 (ABCA2) promoter by the early growth response-1 (EGR-1) and Sp-family transcription factors Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2003; 31(3): 1097 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. TRIFARO Molecular Biology of the Chromaffin Cell Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2002; 971(1): 11 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Shi, R. Kishore, M. R. McMullen, and L. E. Nagy Chronic Ethanol Increases Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated Egr-1 Expression in RAW 264.7 Macrophages. CONTRIBUTION TO ENHANCED TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR alpha PRODUCTION J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14777 - 14785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Carosa, Z. Kozmik, J. E. Rall, and J. Piatigorsky Structure and Expression of the Scallop Omega -Crystallin Gene. EVIDENCE FOR CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF PROMOTER SEQUENCES J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(1): 656 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Eisenhofer, M. M. Walther, T.-T. Huynh, S.-T. Li, S. R. Bornstein, A. Vortmeyer, M. Mannelli, D. S. Goldstein, W. M. Linehan, J. W. M. Lenders, et al. Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 Display Distinct Biochemical and Clinical Phenotypes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 1999 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||