Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002841200 on June 16, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 35, 26821-26827, September 1, 2000
A Key Point Mutation (V156E) Affects the Structure and Functions
of Human Apolipoprotein A-I*
Kyung-Hyun
Cho and
Ana
Jonas
From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois College
of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Received for publication, April 3, 2000, and in revised form, May 31, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A naturally occurring point mutant of human
apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), V156E, which is associated with extremely
low plasma apoA-I and high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, and
coronary artery disease (Huang, W., Sasaki, J., Matsunaga, A.,
Nanimatsu, H., Moriyama, K., Han, H. Kugi, M., Koga, T., Yamaguchi, K.,
and Arakawa, K. (1998) Arterioscler. Throm. Vasc. Biol. 18, 389-396), was produced in an Escherichia coli expression
system. The purified recombinant proapoA-I V156E mutant was examined in
its structural and functional properties, both, in the lipid-free and
lipid-bound states. In the lipid-free form the mutant protein exhibited
small changes in conformation, but was more stable, and quite resistant to self-association, compared with control apoA-I. The V156E mutant was
able to interact with phospholipid (PL) at high PL:protein ratios
(95:1, mol/mol), but was inefficient in forming reconstituted HDL
(rHDL) complexes at lower PL:protein ratios (40:1). In the lipid-bound,
rHDL state, the mutant protein was somewhat more
-helical and formed
a larger complex (110 Å) than control apoA-I (97 Å). Furthermore, the
rHDL particles containing the V156E mutant did not rearrange to smaller
particles in the presence of low density lipoproteins, and had minimal
reactivity with lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), compared
with rHDL particles made with control apoA-I. These results suggest a
key role for Val-156, or the adjacent central region of apoA-I in the
modulation of apoA-I conformation, stability, and self-association in
solution, and in the formation of small HDL, the conformational
adaptability of apoA-I leading to structural rearrangements of HDL, and
the activation of LCAT.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Apolipoprotein A-I
(apoA-I)1 is the major
protein component of high density lipoproteins (HDL). ApoA-I
solubilizes phospholipids and cholesterol and transports them in blood
from peripheral tissues to liver and steroidogenic tissues for
excretion and metabolism. Thus apoA-I and HDL exhibit anti-atherogenic
properties related to the process of reverse cholesterol transport (1).
In addition to its major role in binding lipids and defining the
structure of HDL, apoA-I is the main activator of lecithin-cholesterol
acyltransferase (LCAT) in the esterification of cholesterol in plasma
(2), and is a ligand for binding to cells and to the SR-BI receptor (3).
The functional properties of apoA-I have been correlated with its
primary and secondary structure. The primary sequence of 243 amino acid
residues contains repeated homologous segments of 22 amino acids
separated by Pro residues (4). These 22-amino acid segments form
amphipathic helices that constitute the phospholipid binding units of
the apolipoprotein (5). While most of the apoA-I helices participate in
lipid binding, various helical regions also have other functions: the
helices spanned by residues 143-187 are critical for LCAT activation
(6-8), and the helices from residue 192 to the COOH terminus are
involved in interactions with cells and phospholipid bilayers (9, 10).
In addition, amphipathic helices of apoA-I are thought to participate
in structural rearrangements of HDL when their contents of lipids and
apolipoproteins change during metabolism. A "hinge" or "mobile
region" between residues 100 and 183 of apoA-I has been implicated in
such rearrangements (11, 12). A well documented example of structural
rearrangement is the conversion of 96-Å reconstituted HDL (rHDL) discs
into 78-Å particles upon incubation with low density lipoproteins
(LDL) (13, 14). The 78-Å products have reduced phospholipid content (lost to LDL) and altered apoA-I structure with a markedly decreased ability to activate LCAT (13, 15). The structural changes are a
consequence of the conformational adaptability of apoA-I due to the
presence of a hinge and the functional effect points to a role
of the hinge in LCAT activation and perhaps in apoA-I interactions with
other proteins.
As described above, various functions of apoA-I have been localized to
specific helical regions; however, these regions are quite large and
the roles of individual amino acids are unknown. Therefore, in this
study we set out to analyze the structural and functional effects of an
interesting point mutation, V156E, in apoA-I. This mutation occurs
naturally and results in very low levels of apoA-I and HDL in a
homozygous subject (16), furthermore, the mutation substitutes a
nonpolar residue (Val) on the nonpolar face of helix 6 with a charged
residue (Glu) which may lead to structural perturbation of apoA-I and
of its hinge and LCAT-activating functions.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Radiolabeled [4-14C]cholesterol was
obtained from NEN Life Science Products Inc.;
1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine (POPC), L-
-phosphatidylcholine from egg yolk (egg PC), and
sodium cholate were purchased from Sigma. Bis-sulfosuccinimidyl
suberate (BS3) was obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL). The
quick change site-directed mutagenesis kit was purchased from
Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Enterokinase and the pET30a(+) expression
vector were purchased from Roche (Germany) and Novagen (Madison, WI),
respectively. Human apoA-I and LDL were prepared by routine
methods used in our laboratory (14, 17) from blood plasma purchased
from the Champaign County Blood Bank.
Construction of Expression Vector--
The expression system for
wild-type (WT) proapoA-I cDNA was developed previously in our
laboratory (18). The V156E mutant of the proapoA-I cDNA was
generated using the polymerase chain reaction-based
site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) employing oligonucleotides
produced at the Biotechnology Center of the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign. The sequence of the mutagenic primer was as follows:
5'-CGCGACCGCGCGCGCGCCCACGAGGATGCACTGCGC-3'. The sequence of the
construct was verified by appropriate endonuclease digestion
and DNA sequencing on an Applied Biotechnology Systems DNA sequencer at
the Biotechnology Center.
Expression and Purification of ProapoA-I and Mutant
Protein--
The mutant construct and WT (proapoA-I) cDNA were
subcloned into the pET30a(+) expression vector (Novagen) using
NcoI and HindIII restriction sites. The plasmids
were then transfected into BL21 (DE3) host cells (Novagen).
Overexpression of the fusion protein, including a 6-kDa His tag, was
carried out using a single colony picked from a freshly streaked plate
in 1 liter of the Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with 30 µg/ml kanamycin, at 37 °C. Protein synthesis was induced when the
cell density (A600) reached 0.9-1.0 by the
addition of isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside (final
concentration, 1 mM) in a New Brunswick C25 shaker rotating at 200 rpm. After the addition of
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside, the induced cells
were incubated 4 h longer under the same conditions.
After harvesting, the cells were resuspended in buffer, containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.9, plus 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride and 0.02 mM 4-amidinophenylmethane-sulfonyl fluoride (this is the "binding buffer"). The cells were
sonicated twice for 30 s or until they were no longer viscous, on
ice using a Vibra Cell sonicator (Sonics and Materials, New Town, CT).
The sonicated cells were fractionated by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm
using a Beckman JA-17 rotor. The supernatant was directly applied to a
His-affinity column that previously had been charged with
NiSO4 and equilibrated with the binding buffer. The pellet fraction was extracted with 6 M guanidine hydrochloride
(GdnHCl) to solubilize precipitated protein and dialyzed against the
binding buffer overnight, at 4 °C, prior to use. The dissolved
pellet fraction was applied to the His-affinity column. The column was washed with the binding buffer followed by a buffer containing 60 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.9.
After washing the column, the fusion protein was eluted with a high
concentration of imidazole (1 M) in 20 mM
Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.9. The eluted fusion protein
was lyophilized after dialysis against 5 mM ammonium
bicarbonate to remove the imidazole and buffer components.
Removal of the His Tag and Delipidation--
Egg PC-rHDL
particles were synthesized with the fusion proteins (100/1, egg
PC:protein, mol/mol) before enterokinase cleavage to avoid nonspecific
degradation of the proteins. The enterokinase cleavage was carried out
at an enzyme:protein ratio of 1/250 (w/w) for 16 h at room
temperature with gentle shaking. The cleaved products were passed over
the His-affinity column to remove the His tag. After the removal of the
His tag, egg PC was removed by delipidation with cold ethanol:ether
(3/2, v/v) and hexane:2-propanol (3/2, v/v), sequentially. Finally,
delipidated and recovered proteins, mutant and WT, were dialyzed
against ammonium bicarbonate and lyophilized.
Preparation and Characterization of the POPC-rHDL
Particles--
The lyophilized proteins were solubilized in
Tris-buffered saline, pH 8.0 (TBS), containing 3 M GdnHCl
and then dialyzed against TBS before use. Discoidal reconstituted HDL
(rHDL) particles were made by the sodium cholate dialysis method (19)
described previously using initial molar ratios of POPC:FC:apoA-I of
95:5:1 and 40:0:1. The rHDL particles used as substrates in the LCAT
reaction also contained trace amounts of 14C-cholesterol.
The particles were used without further purification, and their sizes
were determined from 8 to 25% native polyacrylamide gradient gel
electrophoresis (PAGGE, Pharmacia Phast system) by comparison with
standard globular proteins (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The gradient
gels were stained with Coomassie Blue and scanned with an LKB Ultro
Scan XL-laser densitometer. The number of apoA-I molecules per
rHDL particle, as well as self-association properties of lipid-free
proteins, were determined by cross-linking with BS3 as
described by Staros (20) and analyzing the products of the reaction by
SDS-PAGE on 8-25% gradient gels.
POPC-rHDL Particle Size Conversion by Incubation with
LDL--
In order to examine the conformational adaptability of WT
proapoA-I and the mutant protein in POPC-rHDL particles, we observed particle size changes upon incubation with LDL and loss of
phospholipid, as described previously by our research group (13, 14).
To observe the changes in particle sizes, 100 µg (protein) of each POPC-rHDL (0.05 ml) were incubated with 120 µg (protein) of human LDL
(0.05 ml) at 37 °C for a designated time interval up to 24 h
(21). After the incubation, aliquots of the samples were analyzed directly by electrophoresis on the 8-25% native PAGGE, using the Pharmacia Phast system.
Circular Dichroism and Isothermal Denaturation
Measurements--
The average
-helical structure of lipid-free or
lipid-bound apoA-I and the V156E mutant were determined by CD
spectroscopy using a J-720 spectropolarimeter located in the Laboratory
for Fluorescence Dynamics at the University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign. The spectra were measured from 250 to 190 nm at
25 °C in a 0.1-cm path length cell using a 1.0 nm bandwidth, and 4-s
response time. Four scans were collected and averaged. The protein
concentration was adjusted to 0.07 or 0.1 mg/ml in TBS for lipid-free
or lipid-bound protein, respectively. Percent
-helix was calculated
from the molar ellipticity at 222 nm as described by Chen et
al. (22) using a mean residue weight for apoA-I of 115.3.
The effects of GdnHCl addition on the secondary structure of apoA-I and
the mutant, in both lipid-free state and POPC-rHDL particles, were
monitored by CD spectroscopy. The
-helix contents of the proteins
after 72-h incubations with increasing concentrations of GdnHCl at
4 °C were used to obtain their free energy of unfolding (
GD°) according to Aune and Tanford (23) and
Sparks et al. (24). While denaturation of lipid-free
apolipoprotein is instantaneous and reversible, denaturation of the
lipid-bound proteins is very slow, requiring 72 h for
equilibration. Furthermore, denaturation of the lipid-bound
apolipoproteins is not a reversible process (18). Therefore, the
GD° for the lipid-bound proteins is only an
apparent thermodynamic parameter.
Fluorescence Spectral Measurements--
Concentrations of all
samples for fluorescence measurements were adjusted to 0.07-0.1 mg/ml
(protein) in TBS. At these concentrations plasma apoA-I is monomeric in
the lipid-free state. The wavelength of maximum fluorescence of the
tryptophan residues in apoA-I, proapoA-I, and the V156E mutant were
determined from uncorrected spectra using a Perkin-Elmer MPF-66
fluorescence spectrofluorometer with 4-nm excitation and emission band
widths. The samples were excited at 295 nm to avoid tyrosine
fluorescence, and the emission was scanned from 305 to 375 nm at room temperature.
Reaction of the POPC-rHDL with LCAT--
The LCAT assay was
carried out as described in detail previously (25) using recombinant
human LCAT (26). The reaction mixture contained the radiolabeled
POPC-rHDL (with approximately 1.9 × 104 14C cpm/µg
of free cholesterol, 4% defatted bovine serum albumin, and 4 mM
-mercaptoethanol; the reaction was initiated by
adding recombinant LCAT (0.163 µg, 50 µl) and was carried out at
37 °C for 30 min. The POPC-rHDL substrates were present in various
concentrations in the range from 1.7 × 10
7 to 1.4 × 10
6 M apolipoprotein in the 0.5 ml of the reaction mixture. The reaction was performed in duplicate and
the background values were determined by omitting only LCAT at each
substrate concentrations from the reaction tubes. The initial reaction
velocities at each substrate concentration were analyzed by
Lineweaver-Burk plots, which gave the apparent Km
and Vmax values by linear regression.
Miscellaneous Methods--
The protein concentrations were
determined by using absorbance and the extinction coefficient for
apoA-I and proapoA-I at 280 nm (1.13 and 1.28 ml/mg·cm, respectively)
or the Lowry/Markwell protein assay (27) and a bovine serum albumin
standard. The phospholipid and cholesterol contents were determined
according to Chen et al. (28) and Heider and Boyett (29), respectively.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression and Purification of the V156E Mutant Protein--
A new
expression system for proapoA-I and its V156E mutant was used in this
study. The apolipoproteins were produced with a 6-kDa His tag attached
to their amino terminus by a sequence susceptible to enterokinase
cleavage (30). The fusion proteins were expressed in excellent yields
(60-73 mg per liter of culture) and were readily purified by affinity
chromatography on a Ni2+ column. However, enterokinase
digestion of the fusion proteins gave unexpected, extensive cleavage of
both proteins. To protect the proteins from nonspecific cleavage, the
fusion proteins were reconstituted into rHDL particles with egg PC and
were then digested with enterokinase. After another column step and
delipidation, 27 and 32 mg of pure WT proapoA-I and its V156E mutant
were recovered per liter of culture. The purity of the proteins,
together with a plasma apoA-I control was checked by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
1A). From densitometric
scanning of the gel the purity of the recombinant proteins is at least
95%.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Electrophoresis patterns of apolipoproteins
in the lipid-free state. Panel A shows the purity of
the apolipoproteins on 20% SDS-PAGE. At least 95% purity was
estimated by laser densitometry. Lane M, molecular weight
markers (low range, Bio-Rad); lane 1, plasma apoA-I;
lane 2, V156E mutant; lane 3, propapoA-I (WT).
Panel B shows the self-association behavior of the
apolipoproteins at two concentrations, analyzed by BS3
cross-linking and 8-25% SDS-PAGGE. The cross-linking reactions were
carried out in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, lane
1, plasma apoA-I (0.1 mg/ml); lane 2, plasma apoA-I
(1.0 mg/ml); lane 3, V156E (0.1 mg/ml); lane 4,
V156E (1.0 mg/ml); lane 5, proapoA-I (0.1 mg/ml); lane
6, proapoA-I (1.0 mg/ml).
|
|
Self-association of Lipid-free Proteins--
The self-association
behavior of the proteins in the lipid-free state was examined at two
different protein concentrations (0.1 and 1.0 mg/ml), by cross-linking
with BS3 in phosphate buffer. The cross-linking and
SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that the V156E mutant has an impaired
ability to self-associate as shown in panel B of Fig. 1. The
control proteins (plasma apoA-I and WT propapoA-I) showed the typical
oligomerization patterns with substantial formation (>60%) of dimers,
trimers, and tetramers at 1.0 mg/ml concentrations, while the V156E
mutant only formed small amounts of dimers (~10%). Apparently
the V156E mutation is located in a region of apoA-I that is involved in
protein monomer contacts, or alternatively, the mutation affects the
protein structure preventing self-association. In all cases, the
apolipoproteins do not self-associate at concentrations of 0.1 mg/ml.
Physicochemical Properties of Reconstituted POPC-rHDL
Particles--
Two kinds of reconstituted rHDL particles were prepared
using initial molar ratios of 95:5:1 and 40:0:1, POPC:FC:apoA-I. Those two preparations have been shown, with plasma apoA-I, to result primarily in 96-Å (95:1, POPC:protein) and 78-Å (40:1, POPC:protein) diameter particles containing two molecules of apoA-I per particle (15). The 40:1 preparations are quite heterogeneous and contain in
addition to the 78-Å particles, larger 87- and 96-Å species, as well
as small amounts of free apoA-I. The final compositions, particle
sizes, and the content of apoA-I molecules per particle of the larger,
essentially pure, rHDL particles are given in Table I. There was no significant difference
between plasma apoA-I and WT proapoA-I in the composition and diameter
(97 Å) of the rHDL. In contrast, the particles made with the V156E
mutant had an increased PL to protein ratio and particle size of 110 Å, as shown in Fig. 2A. These
particles were used in subsequent experiments without further
purification because of their good homogeneity (Fig.
2A).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Composition and size of reconstituted HDL particles made with human
plasma apoA-I, recombinant proapoA-I (WT), and V156E mutant proapoA-I
|
|

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Electrophoresis patterns of apolipoproteins
in POPC-rHDL complexes. The rHDL particles were prepared by the
Na-cholate dialysis method using two molar ratios of PC:apolipoprotein.
Panel A shows rHDL prepared with the larger molar ratio
(95:5:1:150, POPC:FC:apoA-I:Na-cholate) on a 8-25% native gradient
gel. Lane M, high molecular weight makers (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech); lane 1, plasma apoA-I rHDL; lane
2, V156E rHDL; lane 3, proapoA-I (WT) rHDL. Panel
B shows the electrophoresis patterns of cross-linked POPC-rHDLs
from panel A analyzed by 8-25% SDS-PAGGE. Panel
C displays the electrophoresis patterns of rHDL prepared with the
smaller molar ratios (40:0:1:150, POPC:FC:apoA-I:Na-cholate) on a
8-25% native gradient gel. Lane M, high molecular weight
makers (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); lane 1, plasma apoA-I
rHDL; lane 2, V156E; lane 3, proapoA-I (WT) rHDL.
Panel D shows the electrophoresis patterns of the
cross-linked POPC-rHDLs from panel C analyzed by 8-25%
SDS-PAGGE. For panels B and D: lane 1, lipid-free
apoA-I; lane 2, plasma apoA-I; lane 3, V156E
mutant; lane 4, proapoA-I (WT).
|
|
In addition, BS3 cross-linking and SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig.
2B) revealed that the number of protein molecules per
particle was two for all three rHDL, even though the V156E particle
size was larger. While both plasma apoA-I and WT proapoA-I were
completely associated with lipid in the POPC-rHDL, a small amount of
lipid-free V156E protein was detected at the bottom of the native gel
(lane 2, Fig. 2A).
In the rHDL preparations with 40:1 molar ratio of POPC:apoA-I, smaller
particles (78 Å diameter) were produced together with larger particles
and free protein when control proteins were used (see Fig.
2C). However, the V156E mutant, at the same 40:1 molar ratio, produced a slightly bigger 82-Å particle and a large proportion of lipid-free protein (lane 2, Fig. 2C).
Cross-linking results (Fig. 2D) are also strikingly
different for the control proteins and the V156E mutant particles. The
particles formed with apoA-I and WT proapoA-I contain two protein
molecules per particle, as expected, while the V156E mutant shows no
cross-linking. The failure to cross-link the mutant protein in the
82-Å particles may be due to a changed apolipoprotein conformation,
with inaccessible cross-linking sites, or to the presence of a single
protein molecule per particle. The latter explanation appears unlikely
because of the relatively large diameter of these particles.
Furthermore, presence of free mutant protein in the 40:1 preparation
contributes heavily to the monomer band on the SDS-PAGE.
Circular Dichroism and Fluorescence Measurements--
Far
UV-circular dichroism spectra were measured to determine the average
-helix structure in lipid-free and lipid-bound control apolipoproteins and the V156E mutant. The CD spectra of the V156E mutant exhibited two pronounced minima at 208 and 222 nm,
characteristic of
-helical proteins. The
-helix contents
expressed as the percentage of total amino acids are listed in Table
II. For the control proteins the
-helix contents are in reasonable agreement with published values
(18), while the V156E mutant appears to be slightly less helical in the
lipid-free state (52%) and somewhat more helical in the rHDL particles
(74%) compared with the control proteins.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
-Helix content and denaturation of free (first three lines) and
lipid-associated apoA-I, recombinant proapoA-I (WT), and mutant
proapoA-I (V156E)
|
|
To determine the stability of the V156E mutant, we measured the
standard free energy change (
GD°) by an
isothermal denaturation method (23, 24) using increasing GdnHCl
concentrations from 0 to 7 M and determining the change in
-helical content, at equilibrium, for each GdnHCl concentration
(Fig. 3). Interestingly, the lipid-free
mutant protein has a mid-point of denaturation of 2.7 M
GdnHCl, considerably higher than the control proteins (1.2 M), and a
GD° value of 3.0 kcal/mol, compared with 2.3-2.6 kcal/mol for apoA-I, indicating that
the V156E mutant is significantly more stable in solution than apoA-I
(see Table II). In the lipid-bound state, the midpoints of denaturation
are similar for all three apolipoproteins (3.2-3.3 M
GdnHCl) but the apparent
GD° value is larger
for the mutant protein, suggesting a different denaturation behavior
for the mutant compared with the control proteins in rHDL
particles.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Denaturation of apolipoproteins in lipid-free
state (A) and in lipid-bound POPC-rHDL particles
(B). The fraction of folded apolipoprotein was
obtained from CD ellipticity measurements at 222 nm, as a function of
GdnHCl concentration after an equilibration of 72 h at 4 °C.
Plasma apoA-I ( ), WT proapoA-I ( ), and V156E mutant ( ).
|
|
In addition to the increased stability, the mutant protein exhibits a
slightly red-shifted tryptophan fluorescence, suggesting that
structural changes in the V156 region in the COOH-terminal half of
apoA-I, are transmitted to the NH2-terminal half of the protein where the Trp residues are located. As indicated by the red-shifted fluorescence of the mutant protein, the Trp residues, on
average, are exposed to a slightly more polar environment not only in
the lipid-free, but also in the rHDL state.
Particle Size Rearrangements--
Native and rHDL particles are
known to undergo structural and size rearrangements when their lipid
contents are altered by spontaneous or facilitated lipid transfers (15,
31). In this study, we examined the ability of rHDL particles made with
the control proteins and with the V156E mutant to rearrange into
smaller particles when exposed to LDL. As reported in previous studies (13, 14), rHDL particles (97 Å) containing apoA-I lose phospholipids to LDL by spontaneous transfer and rearrange their protein
conformations to produce some intermediate particles, and a 78-Å
product which accumulates after 24 h (see Fig.
4, A and C). In
contrast to the control rHDL particles, the rHDL containing the V156E
mutant does not rearrange into smaller particles over the same time of
incubation with LDL (Fig. 4B). The inability of the mutant
rHDL to rearrange is most likely due to a structural change in the
apolipoprotein that inhibits its ability to adapt to the altered lipid
content. Several laboratories have suggested that apoA-I can change its conformation via a helical hinge domain when adapting to changing lipid
contents in HDL (11, 12). Different reports have localized the hinge
domain to the sequence of apoA-I between residues 100 and 183 (12, 32).
Our present results suggest that either the helix containing V156E
(helix 6) or adjacent helices are involved in the hinge and its
structural rearrangements.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Size rearrangements of the rHDL particles in
the presence of LDL. The rHDLs were prepared with a molar ratio of
95:5:1:150 (POPC:FC:apoA-I:Na-cholate). The reaction was initiated by
adding 120 µg of human LDL (protein) to the 100 µg of rHDL
(protein) at 37 °C. An aliquot of the incubation mixture was taken
at time intervals and stored in 4 °C with gel loading buffer without
SDS. The aliquoted samples were separated on the 8-25% native gels,
and protein bands were visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. The
rearrangement patterns of plasma apoA-I-rHDL, V156E-rHDL, and
proapoA-I-POPC-rHDL are displayed in panels A, B, and
C, respectively. Lane M, high molecular weight markers;
lanes 1-5 correspond to 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h of
incubation.
|
|
LCAT Activation--
It has now been firmly established that
helices 6 and 7 of apoA-I (residues 143-186) are involved in LCAT
activation (6-8, 33). However, the role of individual amino acid
residues within this sequence is not yet understood. To determine the
effect of a point mutation, V156E, in this region of apoA-I on LCAT
activation, we measured the reaction kinetics of LCAT with the rHDL
containing the V156E mutant in conjunction with the control rHDL
particles. Fig. 5 shows plots of the
initial velocity of the enzymatic reaction as a function of rHDL
concentration, expressed as the apolipoprotein concentration. Clearly
the reactivity of LCAT with the V156E rHDL is dramatically decreased
compared with the control rHDL substrates. The apparent kinetic
constants are listed in Table III. They
are essentially the same for the apoA-I and WT proapoA-I rHDL and are
comparable to previously published values (18). For the mutant rHDL the
apparent Vmax is 16-fold lower and the apparent Km is 6-fold higher than for the control rHDL
substrates. Thus the overall reactivity of the V156E rHDL with LCAT is
only about 1% that of the normal apoA-I rHDL or WT proapoA-I rHDL. This minimal reactivity and the apparent kinetic constants are comparable to those of rHDL prepared with apoA-II, which is not considered an activator of LCAT (34, 35). Thus V156E or the local
apoA-I conformation due to the point mutation are critically important
in LCAT activation by apoA-I.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Kinetis of LCAT reaction with POPC-rHDL
substrates. The rHDLs were prepared with molar ratios of
95:5:1:150 (POPC:FC:apoA-I:Na-cholate). The symbols
correspond to initial velocities as a function of apolipoprotein
concentrations for plasma apoA-I ( ), V156E ( ), and proapoA-I
( ) rHDL complexes.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Reaction of rHDL particles with lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase
Values in this table are expressed as the mean from two independent
LCAT assays.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study has shown that the V156E mutant of apoA-I exhibits
significant structural differences from WT proapoA-I and plasma apoA-I
in both, the lipid-free and the lipid-bound state. In the lipid-free
state the mutant was more stable and had slightly decreased
-helix
content, slightly increased polarity of its Trp residues, and markedly
decreased self-association in solution, when compared with the control
apolipoproteins. In functional tests the V156E mutant also had a
strikingly different behavior from the control apolipoproteins. The
mutant protein was less efficient in forming rHDL with POPC, and the
particles formed had larger diameters and higher
-helix contents
than the corresponding apoA-I and WT proapoA-I rHDL. In tests of
conformational adaptability and ability to activate LCAT, the V156E
mutant in rHDL particles was essentially inactive compared with the
normal apolipoproteins. The subsequent discussion will focus on the
phenotype of the V156E mutant observed clinically (16), on the
structure-function relationships of apoA-I, and on current structural
models of discoidal rHDL, in light of the detailed in vitro
results for the V156E mutant obtained in this study.
The phenotype reported by Huang et al. (16), in the original
description of the natural V156E mutation in a homozygous subject, was
a marked decrease in apoA-I and HDL concentrations, corneal opacities,
and coronary artery disease. In addition, LCAT activity, cholesterol
esterification rate and LCAT mass were about half of normal. Turnover
studies of the mutant protein in rabbits showed rapid clearance, in
contrast to normal human apoA-I. Our results provide an explanation for
these clinical observations. We found that the V156E apoA-I mutant
binds less efficiently to physiologic phospholipids (POPC), especially
at low PC:apoA-I ratios. Therefore the formation of
pre-
1 HDL particles may be impaired and their subsequent
maturation to larger discoidal HDL and to spherical
-HDL will be
strongly inhibited by the inability of the mutant apoA-I to adapt to
changing lipid contents and inability to activate LCAT. Indeed, Huang
et al. (16) report that the variant apoA-I occurs
predominantly in small HDL or in lipid-poor form. Such forms of apoA-I
are expected to be cleared more rapidly from plasma than normal HDL
leading to low apoA-I and HDL levels in the patient. The reduced
activity of LCAT is related to its decreased mass, while the lower
cholesterol esterification rate results from cholesterol esterification
on LDL (36) and HDL particles containing apolipoproteins E and C-I,
which are modest activators of LCAT (34, 37). The V156E variant apoA-I
does not contribute to cholesterol esterification because it does not
activate LCAT to any significant extent as found in this study.
The changes in the structure and function of the V156E apoA-I mutant,
compared with the control proteins, also illuminate some properties of
apoA-I structure and function. While there are numerous reports of
natural and engineered point mutations of apoA-I, most of them have
little effect on the properties of apoA-I (21, 38, 39). The V156E
mutation is quite unusual in its dramatic structural and functional effects.
In the lipid-free state the mutant is more stable than normal apoA-I
and has a markedly decreased tendency to self-associate. The
substitution of a hydrophobic amino acid (Val) with a negatively charged amino acid (Glu) in position 156, on the hydrophobic face of
helix 6 evidently interferes with the formation of protein-protein contacts that lead to self-association. Previous work by our group has
shown that deletion of the COOH-terminal sequence of apoA-I also
interferes with self-association of apoA-I (10). Therefore, we conclude
that interprotein contacts involving the COOH terminus of one monomer
with the central region (near residue 156) of another monomer, lead to
dimerization and subsequent oligomerization of apoA-I. In agreement
with this concept, elongation of oligomers by partial overlap of apoA-I
monomers was predicted by early hydrodynamic studies of Barbeau
et al. (40).
Stabilization of the mutant with respect to apoA-I suggests that a
hydrophobic patch in this area of apoA-I, that participates in
self-association, is exposed to water in the monomer form. Introduction
of the Glu residue in place of Val-156 may result in favorable
hydration and stabilization of the mutant monomer.
The lipid-binding properties of the V156E apoA-I mutant are
significantly different from normal apoA-I. At relatively low POPC:apolipoprotein molar ratios (40:1) there is impaired formation of
lipoprotein particles and large amounts of residual lipid-free V156E
protein. Under the same conditions, apoA-I binds lipid quite efficiently. Presence of a charged amino acid residue (Glu) on the
hydrophobic face of helix 6 may contribute to the decreased lipid
binding by the mutant protein, but the inability to form small, stable
78-Å particles is probably the most important factor limiting the
lipid binding by the mutant. At larger (95:1) molar ratios of
POPC:apolipoprotein, the V156E mutant binds lipid and forms discoidal
rHDL more efficiently (only about 10% of free protein remains).
However, the diameter of the particles (110 Å) is atypical, and the
conformation of the apolipoprotein appears distinct (increased
-helix content and slightly red-shifted Trp fluorescence) compared
with control apoA-I. In addition to the structural and conformational
differences, the apparent
GD° is somewhat
larger for the mutant compared with the control rHDL. This may explain,
in part, the impaired rearrangement of the V156E rHDL in the presence
of LDL, as discussed next.
Another very interesting finding in this study is the inability of the
mutant rHDL to undergo structural and size rearrangements under
conditions that readily convert control 97-Å rHDL particles into 78-Å
rHDL products. This normal conversion is well documented and is
attributed to the loss of phospholipid and resultant apoA-I conformational adaptation to a smaller particle diameter. It is possible that this conformational adaptation involves a hinge region of
apoA-I, equivalent to 2
-helical segments, that swings away from the
lipid interface and allows the particle to shrink, forming discrete,
smaller particles (13, 15). The properties of these 78-Å rHDL are
dramatically different from those of 97-Å rHDL. They have reduced
-helix content, markedly decreased reactivity with LCAT (only 5% of
normal), and decreased ability to bind to SR-BI
receptors.2 The V156E mutant
rHDL does not undergo this structural rearrangement, strongly
suggesting that the presence of the Glu residue at position 156, or a
structural change resulting from this mutation in helix 6 itself, or in
adjacent helices, is responsible for this behavior. At the amino acid
level, the formation of a new salt bridge between Glu and a basic
residue in an adjacent helix, or a local conformational distortion that
shifts interprotein interactions, could contribute to the loss of
conformational adaptability of the apoA-I mutant. In any case, a hinge
region can be more precisely localized to helix 6 or nearby helices.
One of the most studied functions of apoA-I in rHDL is its activation
of LCAT. The 97-Å rHDL, made with apoA-I, POPC and small amounts of
cholesterol, is one of the most effective substrates for LCAT,
exceeding the reactivity of natural HDL3 substrates by a
factor of 6-fold (36). In contrast, the mutant V156E rHDL particles are
strikingly unreactive with LCAT, at least equaling apoA-II in its
minimal reactivity with LCAT (34, 35). Most of the kinetic change is
due to a dramatically decreased apparent Vmax
value which suggests that activation of LCAT is impaired; an increased
apparent Km (6-fold) suggests that the binding affinity of LCAT to the rHDL is also decreased. From recent work, using
the surface plasmon resonance method, we have established that the
association rate constant of LCAT with various lipoproteins and lipid
vesicles is very similar, but that the dissociation rate is influenced,
among other factors, by LCAT-apolipoprotein interactions (41). Thus the
enzymatic kinetic constants point to a lack of interaction
between LCAT and the V156E apoA-I mutant. To our knowledge, this
is the first point mutant of apoA-I that has such a profound effect on
LCAT activation. This suggests a direct involvement of V156E in LCAT
activation and reinforces reports by Sorci-Thomas et al. (7,
33), Minnich et al. (6), and Holvoet et al. (8)
implicating helix 6 of apoA-I in LCAT activation.
Finally, the relevance of the two current models of apoA-I organization
on discoidal rHDL particles to the structure of the V156E mutant will
be addressed. In one of the models of rHDL, the helical segments of
each of two apoA-I molecules are organized as a "picket fence" on
the periphery of the disc, while in the "belt model" two extended
antiparallel molecules of apoA-I encircle the disc. In the first model
(42), the Glu in the V156E mutant could form a salt bridge with a
nearby Arg in helix 7, thus changing local stability and charge
balance, which could affect conformational adaptability of the
apolipoprotein. Furthermore, if there is indeed proximity of the
NH2-terminal and central regions of apoA-I in rHDL, as
suggested by monoclonal antibody binding studies (12, 32) and our
fluorescence results, then changes in the mutant apoA-I may release the
NH2 terminus which may result in the formation of the extra
-helical structure and the increased rHDL diameter. The ability of
apoA-I to form extra-helical structure (up to 85%
-helix) has been
demonstrated to occur under special conditions (e.g. in 30%
1-propanol) (17).
Considering the "belt" model of rHDL (43) the V156E mutation occurs
in position 3 of the 6th 11/3
-helix. Position 3 is in the
hydrophobic face of the helix, but is pointing away from the L
protein-protein interface. Thus direct perturbation of protein-protein interactions by the Glu residue is not predicted; however, the mutation
could locally influence the interaction with the charged groups of
POPC. To explain the change in diameter of the rHDL, significant
structural perturbations would have to be invoked, involving
protein-protein salt bridge rearrangements of the most favorable LL5/5
rotamers. While neither model can fully explain the structural and
functional changes observed with the V156E mutant, future refinements
of the current models or new models will have to take into account the
conformational flexibility of apoA-I, and the discrete diameter changes
that apoA-I rHDL can undergo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We express our gratitude to Andrea Agree who
developed the His tag expression and purification procedure for the
preparation of proapoA-I mutants in our laboratory. We also thank Drs.
S. Harvey and J. Segrest, University of Alabama, for comments regarding the belt model of rHDL and the implications of the V156E mutation to
this model.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HL 16059 and HL 29939.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois, 506 South Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Tel.: 217-333-0452; Fax:
217-333-8868; E-mail: a-jonas@uiuc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 16, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002841200
2
D. van der Westhuysen, D. Durbin, and A. Jonas,
unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
apoA-I, apolipoprotein A-I;
HDL, high density lipoprotein;
LCAT, lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase;
rHDL, reconstituted high density
lipoprotein;
POPC, 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl phosphatidylcholine;
egg PC, egg phosphatidylcholine;
BS3, bis-sulfosuccinimidyl
suberate;
LDL, low density lipoprotein;
WT proapoA-I, recombinant
wild-type proapoA-I;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
GdnHCl, guanidine
hydrochloride;
FC, free cholesterol;
PAGGE, polyacrylamide gradient gel
electrophoresis;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Fielding, C. J.,
and Fielding, P. E.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
211-228
|
| 2.
|
Jonas, A.
(1998)
Prog. Lipid Res.
37,
209-234
|
| 3.
|
Xu, S.,
Laccotripe, M.,
Huang, X.,
Rigotti, A.,
Zannis, V. I.,
and Krieger, M.
(1997)
J. Lipid Res.
38,
1289-1298
|
| 4.
|
Boguski, M. S.,
Freeman, M.,
Elshourbagy, N. A.,
Taylor, J. M.,
and Gordon, J. I.
(1986)
J. Lipid Res.
27,
1011-1034
|
| 5.
|
Segrest, J. P.,
Jones, M. K.,
De Loof, H.,
Brouillette, C. G.,
Venkatachalapathi, Y. V.,
and Anantharamaiah, G. M.
(1992)
J. Lipid Res.
33,
141-166
|
| 6.
|
Minnich, A.,
Collet, X.,
Roghani, A.,
Cladaras, C.,
Hamilton, R. L.,
Fielding, C. J.,
and Zannis, V. I.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16553-16560
|
| 7.
|
Sorci-Thomas, M.,
Kearns, M. W.,
and Lee, J. P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21403-21409
|
| 8.
|
Holvoet, P.,
Zhao, Z.,
Vanloo, B.,
Vos, R.,
Deridder, E.,
Dhoest, A.,
Taveirne, J.,
Brouwers, E.,
Demarsin, E.,
Engelborghs, Y.,
Rosseneu, M.,
Collen, D.,
and Brasseur, R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
13334-13342
|
| 9.
|
Sviridov, D.,
Pyle, L. E.,
and Fidge, N.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33277-33283
|
| 10.
|
Ji, Y.,
and Jonas, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11290-11297
|
| 11.
|
Brouillette, C. G.,
Jones, J. L.,
Ng, T. C.,
Kercret, H.,
Chung, B. H.,
and Segrest, J. P.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
359-367
|
| 12.
|
Bergeron, J.,
Frank, P. G.,
Scales, D.,
Meng, Q. H.,
Castro, G.,
and Marcel, Y. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27429-27438
|
| 13.
|
Jonas, A.,
Kézdy, K. E.,
and Wald, J. H.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
4818-4824
|
| 14.
|
Jonas, A.,
Kézdy, K. E.,
Williams, M. I.,
and Rye, K. A.
(1988)
J. Lipid Res.
29,
1349-1357
|
| 15.
|
Jonas, A.,
Wald, J. H.,
Toohill, K. L. H.,
Krul, E. S.,
and Kézdy, K. E.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
22123-22129
|
| 16.
|
Huang, W.,
Sasaki, J.,
Matsunaga, A.,
Nanimatsu, H.,
Moriyama, K.,
Han, H.,
Kugi, M.,
Koga, T.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
and Arakawa, K.
(1998)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
18,
389-396
|
| 17.
|
Leroy, A.,
and Jonas, A.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1212,
285-294
|
| 18.
|
McGuire, K. A.,
Davidson, W. S.,
and Jonas, A.
(1996)
J. Lipid Res.
37,
1519-1528
|
| 19.
|
Matz, C. E.,
and Jonas, A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
4535-4540
|
| 20.
|
Staros, J. V.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
3950-3955
|
| 21.
|
Jonas, A.,
von Eckardstein, A.,
Kézdy, K. E.,
Steinmetz, A.,
and Assmann, G.
(1991)
J. Lipid Res.
32,
97-106
|
| 22.
|
Chen, Y-H.,
Yang, J. T.,
and Martinez, H. M.
(1972)
Biochemistry
11,
4120-4131
|
| 23.
|
Aune, K. C.,
and Tanford, C.
(1969)
Biochemistry
8,
4586-4590
|
| 24.
|
Sparks, D. L.,
Lund-Katz, S.,
and Phillips, M. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
25839-25847
|
| 25.
|
Matz, C. E.,
and Jonas, A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
4541-4546
|
| 26.
|
Jin, L.,
Lee, Y. P.,
and Jonas, A.
(1997)
J. Lipid Res.
38,
1085-1093
|
| 27.
|
Markwell, M. A. K.,
Haas, S. M.,
Bieber, L. L.,
and Tolbert, N. E.
(1978)
Anal. Biochem.
87,
206-210
|
| 28.
|
Chen, P. S., Jr.,
Toribara, T. Y.,
and Warner, H.
(1956)
Anal. Chem.
28,
1756-1758
|
| 29.
|
Heider, J. G.,
and Boyett, R. L.
(1978)
J. Lipid Res.
19,
514-518
|
| 30.
|
Hopp, T. P.,
Prickett, K. S.,
Price, V. L.,
Libby, R. T.,
March, C. J.,
Cerretti, D. P.,
Urdal, D. L.,
and Conlon, P. J.
(1988)
Bio/Technology
6,
1204-1210
|
| 31.
|
Rye, K.-A.,
Garrety, K. H.,
and Barter, P. J.
(1992)
J. Lipid Res.
33,
215-224
|
| 32.
|
Marcel, Y. L.,
Provost, P. R.,
Koa, H.,
Raffai, E.,
Vu Dac, N.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
and Rassart, E.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3644-3653
|
| 33.
|
Sorci-Thomas, M. G.,
Curtiss, L.,
Parks, J. S.,
Thomas, M. J.,
and Kearns, M. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7278-7284
|
| 34.
|
Jonas, A.,
Sweeny, S. A.,
and Herbert, P. N.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
6369-6375
|
| 35.
|
Durbin, D.,
and Jonas, A.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
2293-2302
|
| 36.
|
Burkybile-Kosek, A.,
Durbin, D.,
and Jonas, A.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
258,
548-551
|
| 37.
|
Zorich, N.,
Jonas, A.,
and Pownall, H. J.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
8831-8837
|
| 38.
|
Laccotripe, M.,
Makrides, S. C.,
Jonas, A.,
and Zannis, V. I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17511-17522
|
| 39.
|
Davidson, W. S.,
Arnvig-McGuire, K.,
Kennedy, A.,
Kosman, J.,
Hazlett, T. L.,
and Jonas, A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
14387-14395
|
| 40.
|
Barbeau, D. L.,
Jonas, A.,
Teng, T.,
and Scanu, A. M.
(1979)
Biochemistry
18,
362-369
|
| 41.
|
Jin, L.,
Shieh, J.-J.,
Grabbe, E.,
Adimoolam, S.,
Durbin, D.,
and Jonas, A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
15659-15665
|
| 42.
|
Phillips, J. C.,
Wriggers, W.,
Li, Z.,
Jonas, A.,
and Schulten, K.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
2337-2346
|
| 43.
|
Segrest, J. P.,
Jones, M. K.,
Klon, A. E.,
Sheldahl, C. J.,
Hellinger, M.,
De Loof, H.,
and Harvey, S. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31755-31758
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-M. Han, T.-S. Jeong, W. S. Lee, I. Choi, and K.-H. Cho
Structural and functional properties of V156K and A158E mutants of apolipoprotein A-I in the lipid-free and lipid-bound states
J. Lipid Res.,
March 1, 2005;
46(3):
589 - 596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-h. Li, M. J. Thomas, W. Pan, E. Alexander, M. Samuel, and M. G. Sorci-Thomas
Preparation and incorporation of probe-labeled apoA-I for fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of rHDL
J. Lipid Res.,
December 1, 2001;
42(12):
2084 - 2091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-H. Cho, D. M. Durbin, and A. Jonas
Role of individual amino acids of apolipoprotein A-I in the activation of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase and in HDL rearrangements
J. Lipid Res.,
March 1, 2001;
42(3):
379 - 389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|