myo-Inositol 3,4,5,6-Tetrakisphosphate
Inhibits an Apical Calcium-activated Chloride Conductance in
Polarized Monolayers of a Cystic Fibrosis Cell Line*
Mark A.
Carew
§,
Xiaonian
Yang
,
Carsten
Schultz¶, and
Stephen B.
Shears
From the
Inositide Signaling Section, Laboratory of
Signal Transduction, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 and the ¶ Institut für
Organische Chemie, Universität Bremen, UFT,
28359 Bremen, Germany
Received for publication, March 20, 2000, and in revised form, May 29, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Does inositol 3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate
(Ins(3,4,5,6)P4) inhibit apical
Ca2+-activated Cl
conductance (CaCC)? We
studied this question using human CFPAC-1 pancreatoma cells grown in
polarized monolayers. Cellular Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels were
acutely sensitive to purinergic receptor activation, rising 3-fold
within 1 min of agonist addition. Intracellular Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels were therefore specifically elevated,
independently of receptor activation, by incubating cells with a
cell-permeant bioactivable analogue,
1,2-di-O-butyl-myo-inositol
3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate octakis(acetoxymethyl)ester
(Bt2Ins (3,4,5,6)P4/AM). The latter inhibited Ca2+-activated Cl
secretion by
60%. We next used nystatin to selectively permeabilize the basolateral
membrane to monovalent anions and cations, thereby preventing this
membrane from electrochemically dominating ion movements through the
apical membrane. Thus, we studied autonomous regulation of apical
Cl
channels in situ. The properties of
Cl
flux across the apical membrane were those expected of
CaCC: niflumic acid sensitivity, outward rectification, and 2-fold
greater permeability of I
over Cl
.
Following nystatin-treatment, we elevated intracellular levels of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 with either purinergic agonists or with
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM. Both protocols inhibited
Ca2+-activated Cl
secretion (up to 70%).
These studies provide the first demonstration that, in a
physiologically relevant context of a polarized monolayer, there is an
apical, Ins(3,4,5,6)P4-inhibited CaCC.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The movement of Cl
ions across secretory epithelia
underpins the process of salt and fluid secretion (1-3). Some of the
molecular aspects of the secretory process have been well
characterized. Cl
enters the cell across the basolateral
membrane through a Na+/K+/2Cl
co-transporter (Fig. 1). The
CFTR1 comprises an important
conduit for Cl
exit across the apical membrane (Fig. 1).
However, considerable controversy and many questions surround attempts
to understand the extent to which Ca2+-activated
Cl
conductance
(CaCC)2 both participate in
the secretory process (Fig. 1), and might even be a focal point for its
regulation. The resolution of these issues is of considerable
biochemical and physiological significance, in no small part because
this uncertainty impacts the relevance of proposals that epithelial
salt and fluid secretion can be regulated by Ins(3,4,5,6)P4
(4-8).
In order to understand the nature of the controversy concerning the
contribution that CaCC makes to salt and fluid secretion, it is
necessary to appreciate the electrochemical interdependence of the
apical and basolateral membranes (Fig. 1). The primary regulation
of CaCC activity does potentially provide a mechanism by which
Cl
secretion can be regulated. However, electrically
uncompensated Cl
efflux would depolarize the cell,
inhibiting further Cl
efflux. This does not occur during
epithelial fluid secretion. A compensatory increase in the driving
force for Cl
efflux across the apical membrane comes from
the hyperpolarization provided by the actions of
Ca2+-dependent K+ channels in the
basolateral membrane provides (Fig. 1). Equally, a stimulus that
directly regulates K+ channel activity can secondarily
affect Cl
flux through CaCC. Indeed, when we first
discovered that Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 inhibited Cl
secretion (4), Barrett (9) proposed that this resulted indirectly from
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 primarily down-regulating K+
channel conductance. This possibility is not excluded by the demonstration that 125I
efflux through
Cl
channels was inhibited by Ins(3,4,5,6)P4
in human colonic epithelial (T84) cell monolayers (10), since the
latter study did not separately determine if Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 affected
K+ efflux. Indeed, it has been emphasized that these assays
of isotope efflux from monolayers may not reveal the primary effector
sites of regulatory agents (11). The reduction in rate of
125I
efflux that followed the addition of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 (10) could have resulted indirectly from
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 inhibiting K+ channel
conductance. This interpretational difficulty underscores the need for
different types of experiments that study if Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 directly regulates CaCC in situ.
Another factor has prevented Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 from being
widely accepted as a physiologically relevant regulator of CaCC. The polarized cell monolayer is the paradigm for studying Cl
secretion, which is a process that CaCC can only contribute to, if this
Cl
channel is expressed in the apical membrane (Fig. 1).
Evidence has been published indicating that, when polarized, T84 cells do not contain CaCC in their apical membrane (12-15). Furthermore, it
has been argued that CaCC also does not contribute to intestinal Cl
secretion in vivo, since in the intestinal
epithelium of human CF individuals, a Ca2+-activated,
Cl
secretory pathway was not observed (14, 16). Thus, the
colonic epithelial T84 cell model has been criticized as not offering physiologically relevant information on the role of CaCC in regulating Ca2+-activated salt and fluid secretion in vivo.
This is unfortunate because T84 cells were used for all of the previous
experiments that have studied the influence of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 upon secretion (4, 6, 10, 17). There is,
therefore, a need to study the mechanism of action of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 in cell that does not originate from
intestinal epithelia.
In this report, we confront these problems by taking a new approach to
the study of CaCC regulation by Ins(3,4,5,6)P4. We selected
a particular cell-type, namely, the human CFPAC-1 pancreatic ductal
cell line (18), in which the effects of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 could be investigated in a less controversial context. For example, in
some cells at least, Cl
efflux that is activated by
Ca2+ has been suggested to occur through CFTR and not CaCC
(13). As CFPAC-1 cells were derived from an individual with cystic
fibrosis (18), we could interpret effects of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4
with the knowledge that we can exclude any Cl
secretion
occurring through CFTR (Fig. 1). The selection of CFPAC-1 cells for our
study was also driven by their ability to form electrically resistive
monolayers (19) so that electrogenic Cl
transport can be
studied in Ussing chambers (20). Finally, we have previously shown that
non-polarized CFPAC-1 cells have an
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4-sensitive CaCC (7). Thus, we had the
opportunity to now determine the physiological relevance of the latter
effect to the control of Cl
secretion from polarized
CFPAC-1 monolayers.
In order to specifically study the actions of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4, we delivered it into the interior of the
cells in the polarized monolayer, by using the cell-permeant and
bioactivable analogue, Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM
(4). We went on to study the actions of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4
under conditions in which we also isolated the apical membrane from the
electrochemical influences of ion channels in the basolateral membrane
(Fig. 1); this is essential if, in polarized monolayers, one is to study direct regulation of apical CaCC
by Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 in situ. The latter objective
was achieved by using nystatin to selectively permeabilize the
basolateral membranes to monovalent anions and cations (21). This
perforation procedure deprives the basolateral membrane of its
transmembrane electrical gradient which otherwise provides a major
driving force for Cl
exit across the apical membrane (13,
22). The results we have obtained represent the first
unequivocal demonstration that Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 is an active
constituent of a second messenger system designed to carefully regulate
the participation of apical CaCC in the important process of salt and
fluid secretion.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Ion transport mechanisms in secretory
epithelia. The schematic shows five ion transport mechanisms that
can participate in epithelial salt and fluid secretion (adapted from
Ref. 46). Cl enters the cell through the basolateral
Na+/K+/2Cl co-transporter; the
Na+ and K+ are recycled across the basolateral
membrane by the Na+/K+ ATPase and
Ca2+-activated K+ channels (KCA).
At least one Cl transporter, CFTR, is in the apical
membrane. There is some controversy concerning which secretory
epithelia also contain apical CaCC. See text for further
details.
|
|
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Culture of CFPAC-1 Cells--
CFPAC-1 cells (CRL 1918, American
Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were cultured at 37 °C (5%
CO2, 95% air) in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's
medium (Hyclone) supplemented with 10% (w/v) fetal bovine serum
(Hyclone, Logan, UT), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.
Assay of Inositol Phosphate Turnover--
Cells were
radiolabeled with 100 µCi/ml [3H]inositol (American
Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) for 4 days (medium was replaced
on the third day) in 700 µl on 24-well plates. The cells were
confluent by the end of this radiolabeling protocol. After labeling was
completed, the culture medium was removed and the cells were washed
twice in Krebs-Henseleit medium from which bicarbonate was omitted and
10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) was added. Cells were then stabilized
in 300 µl of the same buffer for 2 h, then 20 mM
LiCl was added for an additional 20 min. Any subsequent additions to the cells are as described under "Results." Cells were
quenched with 300 µl of 0.6 M ice-cold perchloric
acid containing 0.2 mg/ml InsP6. The acid-soluble extract
was neutralized with 200 µl of 1 M
K2CO3 containing 5 mM
Na2EDTA. Inositol phosphates were then separated by HPLC
using a 250 × 4.6-mm Synchropak Q100 SAX column (Thompson
Instruments, Chantilly, VA) eluted with the following gradient,
generated by mixing water with Buffer B (2 M
(NH4)H2PO4, pH 3.35, with
H3PO4): 0-5 min, 0% B; 5-240 min, 0-65%
B. The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min. Typically, the eluate was mixed
on-line with 3 volumes of Monoflow-4 scintillant (National
Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA), and 3H-labeled inositol
phosphates were detected using a Radiometric D515 Flow Scintillation
Analyzer (Packard Instrument Co., Meriden, CT). Levels of
3H-labeled inositol phosphates were normalized against
[3H]InsP6, which was not affected by any of
the experimental manipulations employed in this study.
In some experiments, the HPLC eluate was divided into 1-ml fractions,
and 150-µl aliquots were taken and manually mixed with scintillant so
as to identify the
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/[3H]Ins(1,4,5,6)P4
peak. The proportion that was
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 was evaluated in the
following manner: 150-µl aliquots of this peak (240 to 580 disintegrations/min) were mixed with 120 µl of buffer containing 2 M HEPES (pH 8.0 with KOH), 0.7 mM EDTA, 8.7 mM MgSO4, 6.7 mM ATP, 13.3 mM phosphocreatine, 3 units of phosphocreatine kinase. Next
was added 22.5 µl of purified (100 µg/ml)
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 1-kinase (23) in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM MgCl2, 1 µg/ml leupeptin. This final mixture (final pH 6.7) was incubated for
3 h at 37 °C. Assays were acid-quenched, neutralized, and then
the InsP4 and InsP5 were separated by HPLC, as
described above. The amount of [3H]InsP5 that
was formed was used to estimate the proportion of [3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 in the original
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/[3H]Ins(1,4,5,6)P4
peak. This assay was calibrated with a standard of
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 prepared from
[3H]inositol-labeled chick erythrocytes (24).
Extracts from non-radiolabeled cells were "spiked" with the
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 standard and
chromatographed by HPLC. Aliquots of the fractions that contained
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 were incubated with the
1-kinase, exactly as described above, and 90 ± 1%
(n = 5) of the substrate was phosphorylated to
[3H]InsP5. Control experiments showed that
the addition of twice as much enzyme, or extending the assay time to
4 h, did not increase the yield of
[3H]InsP5 (data not shown). Thus, the
non-metabolized InsP4 represents a slight contamination of
the [3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 standards with
[3H]Ins(1,4,5,6)P4 (see also Ref. 24).
Bioelectric Measurements--
Cells were detached from culture
flasks by incubation with 0.25% (w/v) trypsin, 0.02% (w/v)
EDTA for 3-4 min. Cells were then resuspended in serum-containing
medium and centrifuged at 500 × g for 3 min to
remove trypsin. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were
resuspended at a concentration of 1.5 × 106/ml.
Aliquots of 0.2 ml of cells were then seeded into the circular wells
(area = 0.45 cm2) of permeable supports previously
sterilized by UV irradiation. Permeable supports were made by gluing
(SilasticTM sealant, Dow Corning, Midland, MI) a
SylgardTM ring to filters composed of mixed cellulose
esters (pore size 0.45 µm, catalog number HAWP 02500, Millipore
Corp., Bedford, MA). Seeded supports were floated on culture medium and
incubated for 4 or 5 days before being mounted in modified Snapwell
holders in Ussing chambers (EasyMount System, Physiologics Instruments, San Diego, CA). Both sides of the monolayer were bathed, at 37 °C,
in Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 118 mM NaCl, 11.1 mM glucose, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM
CaCl2 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 35 mM
NaHCO3; the medium was gassed with 95% O2, 5%
CO2 to maintain a pH of 7.5. Where indicated, either the
apical or basolateral solution was modified by the substitution of 80 mM Na gluconate for 80 mM NaCl, in order to
generate a Cl
gradient (128 mM to 48 mM Cl
) between the two chambers of the Ussing
apparatus. In these experiments, total Ca2+ was increased
to 4 mM to compensate for Ca2+ chelation by
gluconate (22). Current-passing and voltage-sensing Ag/AgCl pipette
electrodes were filled with 3% agarose, 3 M KCl. Current-passing electrodes were connected directly to the head-stage of
a voltage-clamp amplifier (EC-825, Warner Instrument Corp. Hamden, CT).
Voltage-sensing electrodes were connected to the head-stage via 3%
agarose, 3 M KCl bridges and calomel electrodes. The
potential difference between electrodes was corrected and the
resistance of the bathing solution was nullified before mounting the
filters. The resistance across the monolayers was 290 ± 12 ohms/cm2 (n = 90).
After being mounted in the Ussing chambers, the epithelial monolayers
were continuously voltage-clamped (i.e. short-circuited) to
zero transepithelial potential difference. The magnitude and the
polarity of the applied short-circuit current
(ISC) is a measure of the extent and direction
of the electrogenic ion flux across the epithelial layer (20). A
positive change in ISC indicates an increase in
net anion flux from the basolateral to apical chambers. Conversely, a
negative change in ISC indicates an increase in net anion flux from the apical to basolateral chambers.
ISC was recorded, via a PowerLab/800 interface
(AD Instruments Inc., Milford, MA), on a PC running Chart v3.4. Data
were further processed using Graphpad Prism (Graphpad Software, San
Diego CA); the zero time was set as indicated in the figures, then
individual plots were each baseline subtracted using as a reference
point the average value of ISC between
1 and
2 min.
Composite, average plots were then constructed from all individual
ISC traces in a dataset.
Other
Materials--
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM and
Bt2Ins(1,4,5,6)P4/AM were synthesized as
described previously (4;25). Stock solutions were prepared in dried
dimethyl sulfoxide containing 5% (v/v) pluronic F-127; AM esters were
added to the apical chamber by diluting the vehicle 250-fold in the
Krebs-Henseleit solution. Ionomycin and BHQ were from Calbiochem (San
Diego, CA). All other chemicals were from Sigma.
 |
RESULTS |
Receptor-mediated Accumulation of Inositol Phosphates in CFPAC-1
Cells--
Berridge and colleagues (26, 27) were the first to show
that receptor-activated PLC activity in intact cells can be assayed by
recording changes in levels of Ins(1,4,5)P3 and all of its downstream metabolites (InsPn, where n = 1-4,
but excluding Ins(3,4,5,6)P4, see Fig.
2). Lithium was used to inhibit InsP dephosphorylation to inositol, thereby "trapping" InsPn (26). These changes in levels of InsPn were normalized against
InsP6, which was unaffected by receptor activation (data not shown). UTP, a purinergic agonist, was used to activate the CFPAC-1
cells (Fig. 3A). A dose of 100 µM UTP was chosen since, in CFPAC-1 cells, this provides
maximal activation of receptor-coupled PLC, Ca2+
mobilization, and Cl
secretion (19, 28, 29); data not
shown). There was a biphasic effect of UTP upon InsPn (Fig.
3A); their levels initially increased relatively rapidly,
during the 1-2 min immediately following the addition of UTP. After
that time, the rate of generation of InsPn declined
substantially (Fig. 3A). The levels of InsPn did not
decay significantly during this time course, due to the presence of the
lithium trap (see above and Fig. 2).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Schematic illustrating the assay of
receptor-dependent changes in inositol phosphate levels in
cells. The schematic shows how receptor-coupled PLC activity
hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-P2 to
Ins(1,4,5)P3. The latter is converted to a number of
downstream metabolites, which are "trapped" by using lithium to
inhibit the InsP1 phosphatase (as indicated in the figure).
Thus, changes in levels of InsPn (where n = 1-4, except that Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 is excluded, see below)
represent an assay of PLC activity in situ (26, 47). Changes
in Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 are recorded separately, because this
polyphosphate belongs, with InsP5, in a distinct metabolic
pool (32); this is why these two polyphosphates are depicted in an
inset to the main figure. See Ref. 23 for a description of
the mechanisms by which alterations in PLC activity are coupled to
changes in the net rate of dephosphorylation of InsP5 to
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The effect of UTP upon inositol phosphate
levels in CFPAC-1 cells. [3H]Inositol-labeled
CFPAC-1 cells were treated with either 100 µM UTP or
vehicle and the ensuing changes in levels of inositol phosphates were
determined by HPLC (see "Experimental Procedures"). Panel
A shows the total increase in levels of
[3H]Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 + [3H]Ins(1,3,4,6)P4 + [3H]Ins(1,4,5)P3 + [3H]Ins(1,3,4)P3 + [3H]InsP2 + [3H]InsP1. The increase in levels of all of
these inositol phosphates (i.e. total counts/min of
[3H]InsPn) was normalized against counts/min of
[3H]InsP6. Basal levels of this parameter
were 3.3 ± 0.3. The increases in levels of inositol phosphates
that are depicted in panel A represent an assay of PLC
activity in situ (26, 47). Data are means and standard
errors from three experiments. Panel B depicts the separate,
fold increase in [3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels in
the same experiments (see text for details). The
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 pool is 60-fold smaller
than the concentration of its [3H]InsP5
precursor pool, so the latter was not statistically reduced during UTP
activation (data not shown). Basal levels of
[3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/[3H]InsP6
were 0.071 ± 0.026.
|
|
Agonist-dependent accumulation of
Ins(1,4,5)P3 and its metabolites is invariably
accompanied by an increase in the net rate of dephosphorylation of
InsP5 to Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 (Fig. 2 and Ref. 5).
The mechanisms that couple together these two signaling events are
described elsewhere (23). We used a two-step procedure to analyze
receptor-coupled increases in Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels in
CFPAC-1 cells. HPLC was first used to separate an
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/Ins(1,4,5,6)P4 peak from all the
other inositol phosphates. Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 and Ins(1,4,5,6)P4 are stereoisomers that cannot be resolved
from each other by HPLC. Thus, aliquots of this mixture of isomers were
then incubated with the stereoselective Ins(3,4,5,6)P4
1-kinase (23), and the amount of InsP5 that was formed was
taken as proportional to the amount of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 that
was in the original sample (see "Experimental Procedures"). Using
these methods we made the surprising observation that, after UTP was
added, Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 responded relatively acutely. Levels
of this particular isomer rose 3-fold within 1 min (Fig.
3B). This was unexpected because the consensus that has
emerged from previous experiments is that activation of cell-surface
receptors is accompanied by relatively slow rates of elevations in
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels (30-32). Thus, in CFPAC-1 cells, an
elevation in Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels is a major response of
inositol phosphates to purinergic activation. The Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 concentration went on to be nearly 4-fold
elevated after 10 min (Fig. 3B), and remained at this level
for at least 30 min (data not shown).
Receptor-activated Cl
Secretion in CFPAC-1
Cells--
Ussing chambers were used to record electrogenic ion
transport across a polarized monolayer of CFPAC-1 cells grown on a
permeable support. The parameter which records this ion transport is
ISC, which becomes more positive in value
following an increased net anion flux from the basolateral to apical
chambers of the Ussing apparatus. The addition of 10 µM
amiloride to the apical chamber had no effect on
ISC in CFPAC-1 cells (data not shown, and Ref. 19), excluding the possibility that Na+ absorption might
contribute to the ISC response. A maximally effective dose of 100 µM UTP (19, 28, 29), when added to the apical membrane, elicited a transient increase in
ISC that peaked at 4.31 ± 0.78 µA/cm2 above basal levels after approximately 80 s
(Fig. 4). The ISC then decayed, but not to baseline values; a sustained phase
(approximately 14% of the peak response) was maintained for at least
600 s (Fig. 4). A similar response to purinergic activation of
CFPAC-1 cells has been described in a previous report (19). The fact
that this change in anion flux is primarily carried by Cl
ions is confirmed by ion substitution experiments, as well as by the
use of ion transport inhibitors. For example, in CFPAC-1 cells the
purinergic-dependent increase in ISC
(Fig. 4) was almost completely inhibited when (i) extracellular
Cl
was removed (19), or (ii) the Cl
channels in the apical membrane were inhibited by either 100 µM 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (Ref.
19 and data not shown) or by 100 µM niflumic acid (Fig.
4). Thus, for the remainder of this study, we consider
ISC and Cl
current
(ICl) to be equivalent.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of UTP and niflumic acid on
ISC.
ICl across polarized monolayers of CFPAC-1 cells
was measured in Ussing chambers (see "Experimental Procedures").
Immediately before the addition of 100 µM UTP to the
apical chamber (indicated by the arrow), the absolute value
of ISC was 4.0 ± 1.2 uA/cm2
(n = 8). The value of ISC was
averaged and set to zero immediately prior to the zero time point, as
indicated under "Experimental Procedures." The lower
trace represents a mean of four experiments where 100 µM niflumic acid was added to the apical chamber 5 min
prior to the addition of UTP. Niflumic acid was absent from the
experiments in the upper trace, which represents a mean of
eight experiments. The accompanying schematic illustrates the
[Cl ] in the apical and basolateral chambers, and the
polarity of the UTP-activated Cl flux in these
experiments (basolateral to apical) through CaCC in the apical membrane
and the basolateral Na+/K+/2Cl
co-transporter. Also shown is the site of niflumic acid action
(i.e. CaCC).
|
|
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM Inhibits
Ca2+-activated Cl
Secretion in Polarized
Monolayers of CFPAC-1 Cells--
To study the effect of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 upon Ca2+-activated
Cl
secretion, we followed the protocol that we developed
in our earlier work with T84 cells (4). In the latter study,
intracellular levels of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 were elevated from
0.8 to 3 µM by addition to the extracellular medium of
200 µM of a cell-permeant, bioactivable derivative,
namely, Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM (4).
Cl
secretion was specifically activated by mobilizing
cellular Ca2+ stores through inhibition of sarcoendoplasmic
reticulum Ca2+-ATPase by BHQ (Fig.
5). Compared with the pulse of
Cl
secretion that follows receptor activation (Fig. 4),
BHQ promoted a more slowly developing secretory response that took >10
min to reach its peak value (3.16 ± 0.68 µA/cm2,
Fig. 5). On the other hand, BHQ produces a more sustained
Ca2+ response than that elicited by cell-surface
receptor-coupled agonists (33), so BHQ-activated Cl
secretion was also more sustained (Fig. 5) than that promoted by UTP
(Fig. 4). There was no effect of BHQ upon the cellular levels of
inositol phosphates (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM and
Bt2Ins(1,4,5,6)P4/AM upon
ICl. ICl
across polarized monolayers of CFPAC-1 cells was measured in Ussing
chambers as described under "Experimental Procedures." In the
experiments described by panel A, the monolayers were
pretreated for 30 min by addition to the apical chamber of either 200 µM Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM, or an
equivalent amount of the vehicle (trace labeled "control") that was
used to dissolve the cell-permeant inositol phosphate (see
"Experimental Procedures"). In the experiments described by
panel B, the monolayers were pretreated for 30 min by
addition to the apical chamber of either 200 µM
Bt2Ins(1,4,5,6)P4/AM, or an equivalent amount
of the vehicle (trace labeled "control") that was used to dissolve
the cell-permeant inositol phosphate. The value of
ISC for each condition was averaged
(n = 7 for panel A, n = 4 for panel B) and set to zero immediately prior to the zero
time point, as indicated under "Experimental Procedures." At the
end of the 30 min pretreatment period, 25 µM BHQ was
added to both apical and basolateral chambers.
|
|
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM reduced BHQ-activated
Cl
secretion by 59% (to a peak of 1.29 ± 0.31 µA/cm2, p < 0.05 versus
vehicle control). It has also been shown many times that
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 has no effect on Ca2+
mobilization itself (see Ref. 7, and references therein). Another
important control experiment is the demonstration that Bt2Ins(1,4,5,6)P4/AM had no effect on
Cl
secretion (Fig. 5). Thus, our data represent the first
demonstration that Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 inhibits
Ca2+-activated Cl
secretion from CFPAC-1
cells. The experimental challenge we next undertook has not previously
been attempted in any cell type: can we obtain any evidence that
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 inhibits apical CaCC in a polarized monolayer?
Characterization of Apically Located Ca2+-activated
Cl
Channels in CFPAC-1 Cells--
In order to study the
direct regulation of apical CaCC in polarized monolayers, it was
necessary to eliminate the electrochemical gradient across the
basolateral membrane that normally increases the driving force for
Cl
exit through CaCC. We achieved this by selectively
treating the basolateral membrane with 0.5 mg/ml nystatin, which forms
pores that are specifically permeable to small, monovalent cations and anions (21). Following the addition of nystatin,
ICl settled to a new steady-state value that was
9.0 ± 1.3 µA/cm2 (n = 25) less than
the value of ICl that prevailed before nystatin was added.
In our studies we followed criteria that were previously introduced to
verify the success of the nystatin permeabilization procedure in murine
tracheal epithelial cells (22). A Cl
concentration
gradient was imposed in the apical (128 mM) to basolateral
(48 mM) direction (see "Experimental Procedures"). Under these conditions, Ca2+-activated Cl
secretion from intact monolayers still proceeds in the
basolateral to apical direction (data not shown). However, once the
electrochemical driving force across the basolateral membrane was
eliminated with nystatin, net flux of Cl
ions follows
their concentration gradient, so the polarity of Ca2+-activated Cl
flux was reversed relative
to that in intact monolayers. Thus, for example, mobilization of
Ca2+ by ionomycin promoted a negative change in
ICl (maximally
=
19.1 ± 3.2 µA/cm2, Fig. 6,
A and C). The appearance of this more negative
current acts as an internal control that verifies the efficacy of the nystatin treatment in every experiment.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Activation of
ICl by ionomycin in CFPAC-1 monolayers
following perforation of the basolateral membrane by nystatin.
Monolayers of CFPAC-1 cells were placed in the Ussing apparatus as
described under "Experimental Procedures." In these experiments,
the [Cl ] in the apical and basolateral chambers was
adjusted as described under "Experimental Procedures," so as to
impose a Cl concentration gradient of 128 to 48 mM, in either the apical to basolateral direction
(panel C, see accompanying schematic in panel A)
or the apical to basolateral direction (panel D, see
accompanying schematic in panel B). The basolateral membrane
was selectively perforated by addition of nystatin (0.5 mg/ml) to the
basolateral chamber for 15 min prior to the addition (indicated by the
arrow) to the apical chamber of 1 µM
ionomycin. The value of ICl for each experiment
was averaged (n = 5 for panel C,
n = 6 for panel D). In panels A
and B, the horizontal arrows show the direction
of Cl flux, and the "holes" in the basolateral
membrane depict the nystatin pores, which are selectively permeable
only to small, monovalent anions and cations.
|
|
Note also that the activation by ionomycin was biphasic, such that
ICl decayed from its maximum value to attain a
steady-state level of
10. 9 ± 1.5 µA/cm2 (Fig.
6C). A biphasic response to ionomycin has also previously been observed in nystatin-permeabilized bovine pancreatic duct cells
(34). This phenomenon may reflect ionomycin elevating intracellular
[Ca2+] in a biphasic manner. In addition, this ionomycin
treatment slightly (1.9 ± 0.5-fold, n = 3)
increased cellular levels of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4, which could
also inhibit Cl
current. Third, it is possible there may
be some channel deactivation (28). The idea that this biphasic
phenomenon reflects, in part at least, some inherent property of the
channel itself, is supported by the monophasic nature of the response
of ICl to ionomycin when we reversed the
direction of the Cl
concentration gradient (Fig. 6,
B and D). This procedure also caused the polarity
of ICl to reverse, because the direction of Cl
flux now followed the basolateral to apical
Cl
concentration gradient (Fig. 6B). Thus,
ionomycin caused ICl to become more positive in
value (Fig. 6D). The maximum response of
ICl (
= +6.3 ± 1.0 µA/cm2, Fig. 6D) now represented a smaller
absolute change from baseline, compared with the effect of ionomycin
upon ICl when the Cl
concentration
gradient was apical to basolateral (Fig. 6 and see above). This
inherent preference to conduct Cl
into rather than out of
the cell (i.e. outward rectification) is exactly the
property displayed by CaCC during whole cell patch clamp analysis
(35).
Another characteristic of CaCC in whole cell patch clamp analysis is
that it typically conducts I
with an approximately 2-fold
preference over Cl
(11, 34). In our
nystatin-permeabilized monolayers, when all of the NaCl in the apical
chamber was replaced by equimolar NaI, the maximum current stimulated
by ionomycin (
=
44.6 ± 4.3 µA/cm2,
n = 7) was a little over 2-fold greater than
ICl (see above, and Fig. 6).
Sustained Cl
secretion across intact monolayers requires
continued Cl
entry into the cell across the basolateral
Na+/K+/2Cl
co-transporter (Fig.
1). The latter requirement is by-passed if the basolateral membrane is
successfully permeabilized to small monovalent anions and cations with
nystatin. Thus, as an additional control to verify the nystatin was
performing as anticipated, we examined whether inhibition of the
basolateral Na+/K+/2Cl
co-transporter (Fig. 1) by furosemide would have any effect on apical
Cl
flux (Fig. 7). If the
co-transporter were contributing to net Cl
current,
furosemide would have caused an upward deflection of ICl. In fact, no such effect was observed even
after the furosemide had been present for over 5 min (Fig. 7). The
latter result confirms the conclusion from our other experiments (see
above), namely, that nystatin successfully permeabilizes the
basolateral membrane to monovalent anions and cations. Note we also
performed a positive control using a different experimental paradigm,
so as to verify that the batch of furosemide we used was active. That
is, in intact monolayers, inhibition of the co-transporter by
furosemide inhibited receptor-activated Cl
secretion by
about 30% (Fig. 8).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The effect of furosemide upon
ICl in nystatin-perforated
monolayers. ICl across monolayers of
CFPAC-1 cells measured in Ussing chambers, in experiments in which the
basolateral membrane was selectively perforated to small, monovalent
anions and cations by addition of nystatin (0.5 mg/ml) to the
basolateral chamber for 15 min. Then, 1 µM ionomycin was
added (zero time) to the apical chamber, and at 8 min 100 µM furosemide was added to the basolateral chamber.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The effect of furosemide upon
ICl in intact monolayers.
ICl across intact monolayers of CFPAC-1 cells
was measured in Ussing chambers. The value of
ICl for each experiment was averaged
(n = 3). The point of addition of 100 µM
UTP to the apical chamber is indicated by the arrow. Five
min prior to the addition of UTP, either 100 µM
furosemide (lower trace) or vehicle (upper trace)
was added to the basolateral chamber.
|
|
The effect of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 upon Apical
CaCC--
Having characterized an apical CaCC in nystatin-perforated
monolayers (see above), we next studied the effect of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 in this paradigm (Fig.
9). As discussed previously (see above and Ref. 4), intracellular levels of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 can be elevated approximately 4-fold by adding 200 µM
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM to the extracellular
medium. When we added 100 µM
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM to the apical chamber, the
peak response of ICl to ionomycin was reduced by
45% to
10.6 ± 2.7 µA/cm2 (p < 0.05 compared with control cells, see Fig. 9). The inhibition of the
peak response by 200 µM
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM was approximately 70%
(max
=
5.9 ± 0.9 µA/cm2,
p < 0.01 compared with controls, see Fig. 9) and in
addition, the sustained response of ICl to
ionomycin (
5.2 ± 0.8 µA/cm2) was approximately
50% inhibited (p < 0.05 compared with control cells).
These data represent the first demonstration that
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 inhibits an apical CaCC in polarized
epithelial monolayers. This new observation represents a major step
forward in consolidating the hypothesis that Ins(3,4,5,6)P4
is a physiologically significant regulator of Cl
secretion.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
The effect of
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM upon ionomycin-activated
ICl in nystatin-perforated
monolayers. ICl across monolayers of
CFPAC-1 cells was measured in Ussing chambers, in experiments in which
the basolateral membrane was selectively perforated to small,
monovalent anions and cations by addition of nystatin (0.5 mg/ml) to
the basolateral chamber for 15 min prior to the addition to the apical
chamber of 1 µM ionomycin (indicated by the
arrow). In addition, 30 min prior to ionomycin, the apical
chamber received 0 µM
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM (trace A,
n = 6, vehicle only), 100 µM
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM (trace B,
n = 4), or 200 µM
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM (trace C,
n = 5). Also shown is the effect of 100 µM niflumic acid, added to the apical chamber 5 min prior
to ionomycin, in the absence of
Bt2Ins(3,4,5,6)P4/AM (trace D, broken
line, n = 3).
|
|
A second method for studying the effect of elevated
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels upon CaCC is by purinergic activation
with UTP (Fig. 3). In control experiments, when UTP was added to the
intact apical membrane by itself, there was a substantial (
=
14.2 ± 1.6, µA/cm2, Fig. 9A) but
largely transient stimulation of ICl in
nystatin-treated monolayers. We next added 100 µM UTP to
the intact apical membrane approximately 5 min after the addition of
ionomycin, i.e. when ICl had attained
a steady-state level (Fig. 10). UTP
elicited a brief augmentation of ICl (
=
1.33 ± 0.17 µA/cm2). This effect was small,
presumably because ionomycin had depleted most, but not all, of the
UTP-sensitive Ca2+ stores. Immediately thereafter, UTP
caused the ICl to become more positive in value,
which under these conditions reflects an inhibition of net
Cl
flux. When added after ionomycin, UTP caused the
levels of [3H]Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 to be elevated
2.5 ± 0.3-fold (n = 3) compared with
controls where ionomycin alone was added. Five min after the addition
of UTP, the value of ICl (
7.2 ± 1.1 µA/cm2) was statistically different
(p < 0.05, paired t test) from the value of
ICl at the time point where UTP was added
(ICl =
8.9 ± 1.0 µA/cm2). In
contrast, in paired control experiments where UTP was not added, the
value of ICl did not change significantly over
the same 5-min period. Note that the value of the steady-state
ionomycin-dependent ICl, that was
attained after addition of UTP (Fig. 10), was intermediate between the
two Ins(3,4,5,6)P4-inhibited steady-state values of ICl depicted in Fig. 9.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
The effect of UTP upon ionomycin-activated
ICl in nystatin-perforated
monolayers. ICl across monolayers of
CFPAC-1 cells was measured in Ussing chambers, in experiments in which
the basolateral membrane was selectively perforated to small,
monovalent anions and cations by addition of nystatin (0.5 mg/ml) to
the basolateral chamber for 15 min. After this pretreatment, the
following additions were made to the apical chamber (as indicated by
the arrows): 100 µM UTP alone
(n = 7, panel A) or 1 µM
ionomycin (n = 6, panel B) followed by
either 100 µM UTP (upper trace, panel B) or
vehicle alone (lower trace, panel B).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our current study makes a major advance by showing for the first
time that Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 inhibits the conductance of CaCC in the apical membrane, in a physiologically relevant context of a
polarized monolayer. This ability to study regulation of CaCC in
situ was made possible by our using nystatin to selectively permeabilize the basolateral membrane to monovalent anions and cations,
thereby preventing this membrane from having any electrochemical influence over CaCC function at the apical membrane.
These results also provide new information relevant to understanding
the physiological control of secretion by the exocrine pancreas. The
elevations in Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 levels that accompany PLC
activation of pancreatic duct cells will constrain the ability of
purinergic agonists to act as efficient secretagogues. Indeed, in the
CFPAC-1 cells, the response of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 to receptor activation by UTP was unexpectedly acute (3-fold increase within 1 min of receptor activation) compared with the less than
0.3-fold/min increases in Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 typically observed
following PLC activation in other cell types (32, 36-38).
The apical CaCC that we studied in CFPAC-1 monolayers has similar
properties to the Ca2+-activated Cl
channel
described in many whole cell patch clamp studies of non-polarized secretory cells (see Ref. 35 for a review). In agreement with these
earlier studies, we found that CaCC has higher permeability to
I
compared with Cl
, and ionic conductance
was inhibited by 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid, and
by niflumic acid. The characteristic outward rectification of
patch-clamped calcium-activated Cl
currents
(i.e. the inherent preference to conduct Cl
into the cell), was also observed in our experiments (Fig. 6). Our
studies therefore emphasize that the Cl
current that has
been previously measured in individual, non-polarized cells is relevant
to the polarized monolayer. This conclusion counters the argument
that measurements of CaCC in non-polarized cells are not relevant
to understanding the physiological control of Cl
secretion (12, 13).
Our new findings also have potential therapeutic implications. The
absence of functional CFTR in the CF condition greatly impairs salt and
fluid secretion, leading to obstructions in the pancreatic duct and
intestinal tract, plus defective mucus clearance and bacterial
infections in the lung (39). As there is agreement there is CaCC in the
apical membrane of airway epithelial cells, there is some hope that CF
individuals will benefit from pharmacological up-regulation of the
alternative Ca2+-activated pathway for salt and fluid
secretion (40-42). The activation of PLC-coupled receptors that are
present on the surface of the lung epithelium can be achieved by
inhalation of aerosolized UTP (40, 41). This procedure mobilizes
cellular Ca2+ pools and, hopefully, up-regulates the rate
of Cl
flux through CaCC (41). Unfortunately, this UTP
therapy yields only a small and transient improvement in airway fluid
secretion and pulmonary function (41), so its clinical benefit is still under study. This approach is likely to be constrained by metabolism of
the agonist, as well as by desensitization and internalization of the
purinergic receptor itself (43). An additional, but previously unidentified factor that lies downstream of Ins(1,4,5)P3
has also been acknowledged to inhibit purinergic-dependent
Cl
flux from secretory epithelia (44). Our data indicate
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 could be this factor. Antagonism of the
synthesis and/or actions of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 could therefore
be a useful adjunct to UTP therapy.
There is evidence that Ca2+-dependent
activation of apically located Cl
channels in polarized
epithelia is most effectively activated by the mobilization of
Ca2+ stores that are ipsilateral rather than contralateral
to the apical membrane (45). Our new data now show that
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 also acts in the apical region of the cell.
Thus, the same domain of the cell can contain signaling apparatus that
directs both stimulatory and inhibitory inputs into overall regulation
of CaCC activity. This spatial characterization of
Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 action adds an additional facet to our
understanding that this inositol phosphate is a general and important
regulator of Cl
secretion.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank the following for helpful comments
on this manuscript: Drs A. Traynor-Kaplan, M. W. Y. Ho,
C. M. P. Ribeiro, A. M. Paradiso, and J. W. Putney,
Jr. We also thank Dr. M. Rudolf for assistance in the preparation of
the cell-permeant inositol phosphates.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 919-541-2630;
Fax: 919-541-0559; E-mail: Carew@niehs.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 6, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002316200
2
There is some question as to the existence of
cell-specific mechanisms which dictate whether ion conductance through
the different CaCCs is either activated directly by Ca2+,
and/or activated by Ca2+ indirectly through the actions of
calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II. To reflect
this uncertainty, in this study we utilize
"Ca2+-activated Cl
conductance (CaCC)" as
generic terminology that does not distinguish activation by CaMKII from
direct stimulation by Ca2+.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CFTR, cystic
fibrosis transmembrane regulator (i.e. cAMP-activated
Cl
channel);
BHQ, 2,5-di-(tert-butyl)-1,4-hydroquinone;
CF, cystic
fibrosis;
CaCC, Ca2+-activated Cl
conductance;
Ins(3, 4,5,6)P4, myo-inositol
3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate;
Ins(1, 4,5,6)P4,
myo-inositol 1,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate;
Bt2Ins(1, 4,5,6) P4/AM,
1,2-di-O-butyl-myo-inositol
3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate octakis(acetoxymethyl)ester;
Bt2Ins(3, 4,5,6)P4/AM,
1,2-di-O-butyl-myo-inositol
1,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate octakis(acetoxymethyl)ester;
ICl, Cl
current;
ISC, short-circuit current;
HPLC, high
performance liquid chromatography;
PLC, phospholipase C.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Nauntofte, B.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
263,
G823-G837
|
| 2.
|
Petersen, O. H.
(1992)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
448,
1-51
|
| 3.
|
Barrett, K. E.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
C1069-C1076
|
| 4.
|
Vajanaphanich, M.,
Schultz, C.,
Rudolf, M. T.,
Wasserman, M.,
Enyedi, P.,
Craxton, A.,
Shears, S. B.,
Tsien, R. Y.,
Barrett, K. E.,
and Traynor-Kaplan, A. E.
(1994)
Nature
371,
711-714
|
| 5.
|
Shears, S. B.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1436,
49-67
|
| 6.
|
Xie, W.,
Kaetzel, M. A.,
Bruzik, K. S.,
Dedman, J. R.,
Shears, S. B.,
and Nelson, D. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14092-14097
|
| 7.
|
Ho, M. W. Y.,
Shears, S. B.,
Bruzik, K. S.,
Duszyk, M.,
and French, A. S.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
1160-1168
|
| 8.
|
Ismailov, I. I.,
Fuller, C. M.,
Berdiev, B. K.,
Shlyonsky, V. G.,
Benos, D. J.,
and Barrett, K. E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10505-10509
|
| 9.
|
Barrett, K. E.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
C859-C868
|
| 10.
|
Barrett, K. E.,
Smitham, J.,
Traynor-Kaplan, A.,
and Uribe, J. M.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
C958-C965
|
| 11.
|
Venglarik, C. J.,
Bridges, R. J.,
and Frizzell, R. A.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
259,
C358-C364
|
| 12.
|
Anderson, M. P.,
Sheppard, D. N.,
Berger, H. A.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
263,
L1-L14
|
| 13.
|
Anderson, M. P.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6003-6007
|
| 14.
|
Grubb, B. R.,
and Gabriel, S. E.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
G258-G266
|
| 15.
|
Devor, D. C.,
and Duffey, M. E.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
263,
C780-C787
|
| 16.
|
Gregor, R.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
62,
467-491
|
| 17.
|
Xie, W.,
Solomons, K. R. H.,
Freeman, S.,
Kaetzel, M. A.,
Bruzik, K. S.,
Nelson, D. J.,
and Shears, S. B.
(1998)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
510,
661-673
|
| 18.
|
Schoumacher, R. A.,
Ram, J.,
Iannuzzi, M. C.,
Bradbury, N. A.,
Wallace, R. W.,
Hon, C. T.,
Schmid, S. M.,
Gelder, F. B.,
and Rado, T. A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4012-4016
|
| 19.
|
Chan, H. C.,
Cheung, W. T.,
Leung, P. Y.,
Wu, L. J.,
Chew, S. B.,
Ko, W. H.,
and Wong, P. Y.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C469-C477
|
| 20.
|
Acra, S. A.,
and Ghishan, F. K.
(1991)
J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr.
15,
93s-98s
|
| 21.
|
Horn, R.,
and Marty, A.
(1988)
J. Gen. Physiol.
92,
145-159
|
| 22.
|
Devor, D. C.,
Singh, A. K.,
Bridges, R. J.,
and Frizzell, R. A.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
L785-L795
|
| 23.
|
Yang, X.,
Rudolf, M.,
Yoshida, M.,
Carew, M. A.,
Riley, A. M.,
Chung, S.-K.,
Bruzik, K. S.,
Potter, B. V. L.,
Schultz, C.,
and Shears, S. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
18973-18980
|
| 24.
|
Tan, Z.,
Bruzik, K. S.,
and Shears, S. B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2285-2290
|
| 25.
|
Rudolf, M. T.,
Li, W.,
Wolfson, N.,
Traynor-Kaplan, A. E.,
and Schultz, C.
(1998)
J. Med. Chem.
41,
3635-3644
|
| 26.
|
Berridge, M. J.
(1983)
Biochem. J.
212,
849-858
|
| 27.
|
Berridge, M. J.,
Dawson, R. M.,
Downes, C. P.,
Heslop, J. P.,
and Irvine, R. F.
(1983)
Biochem. J.
212,
473-482
|
| 28.
|
Galietta, L. J. V.,
Zegarra-Moran, O.,
Mastrocola, T.,
Wöhrle, C.,
Rugulo, M.,
and Romeo, G.
(1994)
Pflugers Arch.
426,
534-541
|
| 29.
|
O'Reilly, C. M.,
O'Farrell, A. M.,
and Ryan, M. P.
(1998)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
124,
1597-1606
|
| 30.
|
Stephens, L. R.,
Hawkins, P. T.,
Barker, C. J.,
and Downes, C. P.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
253,
721-733
|
| 31.
|
Barker, C. J.,
Wong, N. S.,
Maccallum, S. M.,
Hunt, P. A.,
Michell, R. H.,
and Kirk, C. J.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
286,
469-474
|
| 32.
|
Menniti, F. S.,
Oliver, K. G.,
Nogimori, K.,
Obie, J. F.,
Shears, S. B.,
and Putney, J. W., Jr.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
11167-11176
|
| 33.
|
Chao, A. C.,
Kouyama, K.,
Heist, E. K.,
Dong, Y.-J.,
and Gardner, P.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
1794-1801
|
| 34.
|
Al-Nakkash, L.,
and Cotton, C. U.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
G204-G216
|
| 35.
|
Frings, S.,
Reuter, D.,
and Kleene, S. J.
(2000)
Prog. Neurobiol.
60,
247-289
|
| 36.
|
Balla, T.,
Baukal, A. J.,
Hunyady, L.,
and Catt, K. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13605-13611
|
| 37.
|
Wong, N. S.,
Barker, C. J.,
Morris, A. J.,
Craxton, A.,
Kirk, C. J.,
and Michell, R. H.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
286,
459-468
|
| 38.
|
McConnell, F. M.,
Shears, S. B.,
Lane, P. J. L.,
Scheibel, M. S.,
and Clark, E. A.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
284,
447-455
|
| 39.
|
Welsh, M. J.
(1997)
FASEB J.
4,
2718-2725
|
| 40.
|
Knowles, M. R.,
Olivier, K. N.,
Hohneker, K. W.,
Robinson, J.,
Bennett, W. D.,
and Boucher, R. C.
(1995)
Chest
107,
71s-76s
|
| 41.
|
Bennett, W. D.,
Olivier, K. N.,
Zeman, K. L.,
Hohneker, K. W.,
Boucher, R. C.,
and Knowles, M. R.
(1996)
Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med.
153,
1796-1801
|
| 42.
|
Kijima, Y.,
Ogunbunmi, E.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22912-22918
|
| 43.
|
Garrad, R. C.,
Otero, M. A.,
Erb, L.,
Theiss, P. M.,
Clarke, L. L.,
Gonzalez, F. A.,
Turner, J. T.,
and Weisman, G. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29437-29444
|
| 44.
|
Clarke, L. L.,
Harline, M. C.,
Otero, M. A.,
Glover, G. G.,
Garrad, R. C.,
Krugh, B.,
Walker, N. M.,
González, F. A.,
Turner, J. T.,
and Weisman, G. A.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
C777-C787
|
| 45.
|
Paradiso, A. M.,
Mason, S. J.,
Lazarowski, E. R.,
and Boucher, R. C.
(1995)
Nature
377,
643-646
|
| 46.
|
Begenisich, T.,
and Melvin, J. E.
(1998)
J. Membr. Biol.
163,
77-85
|
| 47.
|
Shears, S. B.
(1997)
in
Signalling by Inositides: A Practical Approach
(Shears, S. B., ed)
, pp. 33-52, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.