|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M004201200 on June 23, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 35, 27021-27026, September 1, 2000
Superoxide Reductase as a Unique Defense System against
Superoxide Stress in the Microaerophile Treponema
pallidum*
Murielle
Lombard ,
Danièle
Touati§,
Marc
Fontecave , and
Vincent
Nivière ¶
From the Laboratoire de Chimie et Biochimie des
Centres Redox Biologiques, DBMS-CEA/CNRS/Université Joseph
Fourier, 17 Avenue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France and the
§ Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS/Universités Paris 6 et
Paris 7, 2 place Jussieu, 75251 Paris, Cedex 05, France
Received for publication, May 17, 2000, and in revised form, June 21, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Aerobic life requires the presence of antioxidant
enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase
to eliminate deleterious oxygen derivatives. Treponema
pallidum, a microaerophilic bacterium responsible for venereal
syphilis, is an interesting organism because it lacks all of the
above-mentioned enzymes, as deduced from its recently sequenced genome.
In this paper, we describe a gene in T. pallidum with
sequence homologies to a new class of antioxidant systems, named
superoxide reductases, recently isolated from sulfate-reducing bacteria
(Lombard, M., Fontecave, M., Touati, D., and Nivière, V. (2000)
J. Biol. Chem. 275, 115-121). We report that (i)
expression of the T. pallidum gene fully restored to a
superoxide dismutase-deficient Escherichia coli mutant the
ability to grow under aerobic conditions; (ii) the corresponding
protein displays a strong superoxide reductase activity; and (iii) the
T. pallidum protein contains only one mononuclear nonheme
ferrous center, able to reduce superoxide selectively and efficiently,
whereas previously characterized superoxide reductase from
Desulfoarculus baarsii contains an additional rubredoxin-like ferric center. These results suggest that T. pallidum antioxidant defenses rely on a new class of superoxide
reductase and raise the question of the importance of superoxide
reductases in mechanisms for detoxifying superoxide radicals.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Superoxide radical
(O 2)1 is the
univalent reduction product of molecular oxygen. It belongs to the
group of the so-called toxic oxygen derivatives, which also include
hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals (1). For years, the only
enzymatic system known to catalyze the elimination of superoxide was
the superoxide dismutase (SOD), discovered in 1969 by McCord and
Fridovich (2). Four classes of SOD have been characterized so far (3,
4), depending on the nature of the metal ion of their active sites. They all catalyze the same reaction, e.g. dismutation of
superoxide radical anions to hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen as
follows.
Very recently, a new concept in the field of the mechanisms of
cellular defense against superoxide has emerged. It was discovered that
elimination of O 2 could occur by reduction, a reaction
catalyzed by an enzyme thus named superoxide reductase (SOR).
Up to now, two examples of superoxide reductase have been
described (5, 6). The first one is a small protein found in anaerobic
sulfate-reducing bacteria called desulfoferrodoxin (Dfx). Dfx is a
homodimer of 2 × 14 kDa, which has been well studied (7-9) and
structurally characterized (10). The monomer is organized in two
protein domains, each with a specific mononuclear iron site, named
center I and center II, respectively. Center I contains a mononuclear
ferric iron coordinated by four cysteines in a distorted rubredoxin-type center. Center II has an oxygen-stable ferrous iron
with square pyramidal coordination to four nitrogens from histidines as
equatorial ligands and one sulfur from a cysteine as the axial ligand.
We have shown that the iron center II of Dfx from Desulfoarculus
baarsii is the active site for the SOR activity and that it
reduces superoxide very efficiently, without significant SOD activity
(5). That Dfx could act as a true SOR enzyme was further supported by
the fact that Escherichia coli extracts contain
NAD(P)H-dependent reductase activities able to provide
electrons to Dfx, allowing then catalytic cycles for reduction of
superoxide (5). Whether center I was participating in the electron
transfer and therefore essential for a full SOR activity could
not be concluded from this study. Although Dfx is not naturally present
in E. coli, Pianzzola et al. demonstrated that
expression of Dfx in this bacterium could totally replace the classical
SOD enzymes to overcome a superoxide stress (11). That Dfx was also an
antioxidant protein in sulfate-reducing bacteria was further shown when
the dfx gene was deleted in the chromosome of
Desulfovibrio vulgaris. This deletion increased the oxygen sensitivity of D. vulgaris during transient exposure to
microaerophilic conditions (12).
Another example of SOR has been isolated from the anaerobic archaea,
Pyrococcus furiosus (6). The protein presented strong homologies to neelaredoxin (Nlr), a small protein containing a single
mononuclear center, earlier characterized from sulfate-reducing bacteria (13). Very recently, the three-dimensional structure of the
P. furiosus SOR has been determined at high resolution (14).
The protein fold and the unique mononuclear iron center are similar to
those of the second domain of Dfx (containing center II), but the first
protein domain, chelating the iron center I, in Dfx is missing, as
expected from earlier studies of neelaredoxin (13). The protein is a
homotetramer, in contrast with the dimeric structure reported for Dfx
(10). In P. furiosus, an electron-transferring chain,
including NADH, NADH rubredoxin oxidoreductase, and rubredoxin, was
proposed to provide the electrons necessary for the reaction (6).
However, there is no evidence that neelaredoxin functions as an
antioxidant system in vivo, so far.
Whether SOR activity in anaerobic microorganisms, which have to face
transitory exposure to air, would present a selective advantage with
regard to SOD activity is still an open question. Although some
hypotheses have been already proposed elsewhere (5, 6), careful
analysis of bacterial genomes pointed out that several anaerobic
bacteria possess both genes encoding for putative SORs and SODs, which
makes the real physiological function of SOR puzzling. Analysis of the
complete genome of the bacterium Treponema pallidum (15),
the causative agent of venereal syphilis, a microaerophilic bacteria
optimally growing at 5% oxygen tension (16), reveals that this
organism does not possess the classical antioxidant enzymes, such as
SODs, catalases, and peroxidases. However, a gene encoding a protein
with strong sequence homology to Dfx, but lacking cysteine residues
involved in the chelation of the iron center I, was found (Fig.
1).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequence comparison of the putative Dfx from
T. pallidum with various Dfx sequences. From
top to bottom are shown Dfxs from T. pallidum (Tp.), D. baarsii (Db.),
D. desulfuricans (Dd.), and D. vulgaris Hildenborough (Dv.). The alignments
were produced by Clustal W. Shading indicates the residues
involved in the binding of the two mononuclear iron centers, center I
and center II (10).
|
|
Consequently, we have overproduced, purified, and characterized this
putative Dfx protein from T. pallidum. Here we report that
this protein, despite the lack of iron center I, has powerful SOR
activity and provides a protection from superoxide radicals comparable
with SOD. T. pallidum is thus a unique microorganism in that
its superoxide scavenging capacity might only rely on SOR.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains and Plasmid Constructs--
E. coli
strain QC 2375 (sodA sodB recA) was described previously
(17). For pVN10-2 construction, a 492-base pair DNA fragment containing the dfx gene of T. pallidum was
amplified from pGTPEC10 (15) by polymerase chain reaction, using the
oligonucleotides 5'-ACGGAATTCACGCGGAGGCACGACAG and
5'-CGCGGATCCCCCAATCTCCTGCTCC, with an
EcoRI and a BamHI restriction site (underlined),
respectively. The amplified fragment was digested with EcoRI
and BamHI and inserted into the corresponding sites of
pJF119EH (5) under ptac promoter control, and the
resulting plasmid, pVN10-2, was transformed in DH5 . The
construct was verified by sequencing.
Biochemical and Chemical Reagents--
1-2 mM
KO2 stock solutions were prepared in anhydrous
Me2SO as described in Ref. 5. Xanthine oxidase grade IV
from milk (0.24 units/mg), catalase from Aspergillus niger
(6600 units/mg), cytochrome c from bovine heart, and
CuZn-SOD from bovine erythrocytes (5800 units/mg) were from Sigma.
Purification of the Recombinant Dfx and Analytical
Determination--
E. coli DH5 /pVN10-2 cells were grown
aerobically at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium complemented with
0.1 mM FeCl3 and 100 µg/ml ampicillin. 1 mM IPTG was added at A600 = 0.3. At A600 of about 2.2, cells were chilled
and collected by centrifugation. All of the following operations were
carried out at 4 °C and pH 7.6. The cell pellet (20 g, wet weight)
was suspended in 60 ml of 0.1 M Tris/HCl and sonicated.
After ultracentrifugation at 45,000 rpm during 90 min in a Beckman 50.2 Ti rotor, the supernatant was treated with streptomycin sulfate and
then precipitated with ammonium sulfate (final concentration 80%
(w/v)). The pellet was dissolved in 12 ml of 25 mM Tris/HCl
and loaded onto an ACA 54 column (360 ml) equilibrated with 25 mM Tris/HCl. A fraction (100 mg) corresponding to the
volume of elution of low molecular weight protein was collected.
Protein fractions of 10 mg were further chromatographed using a Bio-Rad
Biologic system equipped with an anion exchange column, Uno Q-1
(Bio-Rad), and equilibrated with 10 mM Tris/HCl. A linear
gradient was applied (0-0.15 M NaCl) in 10 mM
Tris/HCl, with a flow rate of 1 ml min 1
during 65 min. A fraction (7 mg), eluted with about 40 mM
NaCl, contained only one polypeptide of about 16 kDa, as shown by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis (15% acrylamide). The
native molecular mass of the protein was determined with a Superdex 75 gel filtration column (120 ml; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), as
described in Ref. 5. Protein concentration was determined using the
Bio-Rad protein assay reagent (18). Protein-bound iron was determined
by atomic absorption spectroscopy. EPR measurements were made on a
Bruker EMX 081 spectrometer equipped with an Oxford Instrument
continuous flow cryostat. N-terminal sequence and mass spectra were
obtained as described in Ref. 5.
Kinetic Parameters Associated with Oxidation of the Iron
Center by O 2--
The kinetics of the oxidation of Dfx
by O 2, generated by the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system, was
followed spectrophotometrically at 644 nm, in the absence or in the
presence of different amounts of CuZn-SOD, as reported previously (5).
In these conditions, the reciprocal of the initial rate of oxidation of
Dfx (vox) should be linear versus
CuZn-SOD concentrations, according to the equation,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where kXO is the rate constant of
production of O 2 by xanthine oxidase (XO) and
kDfx and kSOD are the
second order rate constants of the reaction of Dfx and SOD with
O 2, respectively. At the concentration of CuZn-SOD that
decreases by 50% the rate of oxidation of Dfx, one can write the
following (5):
|
(Eq. 2)
|
Taking into account the known second order rate constant of the
reaction of O 2 with CuZn-SOD at low [O 2], 2 × 109 M 1
s 1 (19), the second order rate constant of
the oxidation of Dfx by O 2, kDfx, was
calculated using Equation 2.
Assays for SOD and Reductase(s) Activities--
The SOD activity
was measured as described in Ref. 5 using the cytochrome c
reduction assay modified from McCord and Fridovich (2). All kinetics,
in the absence or presence of different amounts of the purified Dfx,
were linear for at least 4 min. One unit of SOD is defined as the
amount of protein that inhibits the rate of the reduction of
ferricytochrome c by 50%. E. coli crude extracts
were prepared as described previously (5). Reduction of Dfx was
followed spectrophotometrically at 650 nm, in a cuvette (0.1-ml final
volume) containing 110 µM of fully oxidized Dfx, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, and 600 µM of NADPH or
NADH. The reaction was initiated by adding 5-20 µg of cell extract
anaerobically at 17 °C. Initial velocities of reduction of the iron
center were calculated from the decrease of absorption at 650 nm. One
unit of activity is defined as the amount of cell extract catalyzing the reduction of 1 nmol of the iron center per min.
 |
RESULTS |
The Product of the dfx Gene from T. Pallidum Contains Only One
Mononuclear Iron Center--
The gene encoding for the putative Dfx
from T. pallidum was cloned under the control of the
ptac promoter of the expression vector pJF119EH and
overexpressed in E. coli. The gene product was identified as
a 16-kDa protein on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis and
purified using a two-step purification protocol (gel filtration and
anion exchange chromatographies). The 16-kDa polypeptide had a
GRELSFFLQK N-terminal amino acid sequence, identical to the N-terminal
translated sequence of the T. pallidum dfx gene (15) but
lacking the N-terminal Met residue. A minor amount of the polypeptide
with the N-terminal Met residue was also detected. Electrospray mass
spectrometry analysis of the solution showed two ionic species, a minor
one at 13,801 Da and a major one at 13,671 Da, corresponding to the
molecular masses expected from the dfx gene sequence
with and without the N-terminal Met residue, respectively (15). These
data show that the purified 16-kDa protein is the product of the
dfx gene. Gel filtration experiments on a Superdex 75 column
with the purified protein gave an apparent molecular mass of 27,800 Da
(data not shown), showing that the Dfx from T. pallidum is a homodimer.
The iron content of Dfx was determined by atomic absorption
spectroscopy. A value of 0.8 iron/polypeptide chain (13,801 Da) was
found. No evidence for the presence of zinc or manganese atoms were found. Fig. 2 shows the UV-visible
spectrum of the as-isolated Dfx, with weak absorption bands centered at
644 and 330 nm. No contributions at 370 and 503 nm, characteristic for
iron center I in Dfx from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans
(7) or D. baarsii (5), could be detected, suggesting
that Dfx from T. pallidum is missing iron center I. When the
protein was treated with potassium ferricyanide, the intensity of the
bands at 644 and 330 nm greatly increased, and a value of 2300 M 1 cm 1
was determined for the molar extinction coefficient at 644 nm in the
fully oxidized protein. Furthermore, the 4 K EPR spectrum of the
isolated protein displays only a weak resonance at g = 4.3, which strongly increased during the treatment with ferricyanide (Fig. 3). This spectrum is similar to
that reported for the ferric form of Dfx from D. desulfuricans (9) and from D. vulgaris (8) and was
attributed to the oxidized center II. The iron center of the as
isolated T. pallidum Dfx was thus essentially in the ferrous
state and could be fully oxidized by ferricyanide.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Absorption spectra of the recombinant
T. pallidum Dfx. A 23.6 µM protein
containing 0.72 iron/polypeptide chain suspended in 50 mM
Tris/HCl, pH 7.6 was used. Spectra of Dfx as isolated (lower
trace) and as treated with 25 µM potassium
ferricyanide (upper trace) are shown. The
inset shows an enlargement of the 400-800-nm region.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
EPR spectra of the Dfx from T. pallidum. A, spectrum of the as-isolated
Dfx. B, spectrum of the Dfx oxidized with 200 µM potassium ferricyanide. Experimental conditions were
as follows: protein concentration, 200 µM; microwave
power, 0.2 milliwatts; frequency, 9.44 Ghz; modulation amplitude, 20 G;
receiver gain, 5.02 × 105. Spectra were recorded at 4 K.
|
|
Collectively, these data show that Dfx from T. pallidum
contains only one iron center, equivalent to center II from well
characterized Dfxs from sulfate-reducing bacteria, and is missing a
second iron center, equivalent to center I, present in the other
characterized Dfxs (7-10). These data are in agreement with the
absence of three cysteine ligands in the T. pallidum Dfx
sequence, replaced by a Gln, Ser, and Ala (Fig. 1).
Dfx from T. pallidum Functionally Complements E. coli SOD-deficient
Mutants--
The capability of the dfx gene product from
T. pallidum to complement E. coli SOD deficiency
was tested. In fact, the E. coli sodA sodB recA mutant
cannot grow in the presence of oxygen because of the combined lack of
superoxide dismutase activity (sodA sodB) and the DNA strand
break repair activity (recA), which results in lethal DNA
oxidative damage (17, 20). As shown in Table I, in the presence of 1 mM
IPTG, the plasmid pVN10-2, which encodes the structural T. pallidum dfx gene under the control of a tac promoter,
fully restores aerobic growth to the sodA sodB recA mutant,
whereas the parental plasmid pJF119EH did not. This clearly showed that
production of Dfx from T. pallidum efficiently suppresses the deleterious effects due to the lack of SOD in E. coli
and consequently fully protects against superoxide stress.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of Dfx production on aerobic survival of a sodA sodB recA E. coli mutant
Anaerobic cultures of QC 2375 transformed with pJF119EH or PVN10-2
were plated on LB medium under anaerobic and aerobic conditions.
Colonies were counted after overnight incubation at 37 °C.
|
|
Reduction of Superoxide by T. pallidum Dfx--
That T. pallidum Dfx could catalyze the elimination of superoxide by
reduction and then act as a superoxide reductase was further
investigated. First, we have verified that Dfx from T. pallidum did not exhibit any significant SOD activity, assayed from its inhibitory effect on the reduction of cytochrome c
by O 2 generated by the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system. The
addition of 28 µg of purified Dfx was required to observe 50%
inhibition of cytochrome c reduction, corresponding to a
value for the specific SOD activity of 35 units
mg 1 (data not shown). This value is only
about 0.5% of a standard SOD enzyme specific activity and strongly
suggested that Dfx from T. pallidum could not function as a
SOD enzyme within the cell.
Successive additions of stoichiometric amounts of O 2
(KO2 dissolved in Me2SO) in the presence of
catalase resulted in the oxidation of the iron center, as shown by the
increase of the band at 644 nm of the visible spectrum of Dfx (Fig.
4). Spectral changes occurred during the
mixing time. A 4-fold molar excess of O 2 was required for a
complete oxidation of the iron center, and further addition of
KO2 did not promote additional changes (data not shown).
Considering the very rapid spontaneous dismutation of superoxide (21),
these data showed that superoxide efficiently oxidized the iron center
of Dfx from T. pallidum.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of O 2 on the visible spectra
of T. pallidum Dfx. The microcuvette (100-µl
final volume) contains 208 µM of Dfx (150 µM iron center) in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, 500 units/ml catalase. Successive additions of 150 µM
KO2, from a 1.5 mM KO2 stock
solution dissolved in 100% Me2SO (14 M), were
performed. After each addition, a spectrum was recorded. From the
bottom to the top, no addition, 1 eq, 2 eq, 3 eq,
and 4 eq per iron center are shown.
|
|
This was confirmed by the determination of the rate constant for the
oxidation of Dfx by O 2, using a methodology developed earlier (5). The kinetics of the oxidation of the iron center by
O 2, generated by the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system in the presence of catalase, was followed spectrophotometrically at 644 nm, in
the absence or in the presence of different amounts of CuZn-SOD. As
shown in Fig. 5A, in the
absence of SOD, oxidation of the iron center by O 2 was linear
with time and was complete after about 2.5 min of reaction. In the
presence of large amounts of CuZn-SOD, the rate of oxidation was
decreased. Fig. 5B shows a linear plot of the reciprocal of
the initial rate of oxidation of iron center
(vox) as a function of CuZn-SOD concentration, according to Equation 1, as described under "Experimental
Procedures." From this plot, the concentration of CuZn-SOD that
decreases by 50% the rate of the iron center was determined to be 3.9 µM. The second order rate constant of the oxidation of
the iron center by O 2 can be now calculated using Equation 2.
A value of 1 109 M 1
s 1 was obtained.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Kinetics of oxidation of the T. pallidum Dfx by O 2. A,
oxidation of the iron center was followed spectroscopically, at
25 °C, by the increase of absorbance at 644 nm. The cuvette contains
(300-µl final volume) 10.3 µM Dfx (corresponding to 7.4 µM iron center), 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, 400 µM xanthine, 500 units/ml catalase, and different amounts
of CuZn-SOD. The oxidation was initiated by adding 0.013 units of
xanthine oxidase. The following traces are presented: CuZn-SOD ( , 0 µM; , 2 µM; , 3 µM) and
5 µM CuZn-SOD ( ). B, the reciprocal of the
initial velocity of the oxidation of the iron center as a function of
[CuZn-SOD].
|
|
The experiments presented above have been carried out in the presence
of catalase in order to eliminate a possible effect of
H2O2 that could be produced during spontaneous
O 2 dismutation. The ability of H2O2 to
oxidize Dfx was nevertheless tested. The kinetic of the oxidation of
the iron center (22 µM Dfx in 50 mM Tris/HCl,
pH 7.6) by 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1, and 1.5 mM
H2O2 was followed spectrophotometrically at 644 nm, at 25 °C. In all cases, the reactions followed a pseudo-first
order kinetic with a value for the second order rate constant equal to
120 M 1
s 1 (data not shown). This is almost
negligible when compared with the value of the rate constant of the
oxidation of the iron center by O 2.
Dfx from T. pallidum Can Act as a Superoxide Reductase--
In the
experiments with the sodA sodB recA E. coli mutant strain
(see above), Dfx was overexpressed. We thus could not a
priori exclude a simple O 2 trapping effect (a
noncatalytic elimination process) of an excess of Dfx, leading to
complementation of the SOD deficiency. However, cytosolic E. coli extracts were able to reduce the oxidized form of the Dfx
from T. pallidum with a specific activity of 22 nmol of iron
center reduced/min/mg in the presence of either NADPH or NADH (data not
shown). The membrane fractions presented also some Dfx reductase
activities, with a specific activity of 10 nmol of iron center
reduced/min/mg, in the presence of either NADH or NADPH (data not
shown). These data demonstrated that both cytosolic and membrane
E. coli extracts had the potential for catalytic reduction
of Dfx from T. pallidum. This reaction regenerates the
active ferrous center for new cycles of superoxide reduction. This
result thus supports the notion that Dfx from T. pallidum is
a superoxide reductase, which allows aerobic growth of E. coli
sod mutant strains. It further indicates that, at
least in E. coli, the presence of an iron center I is not required for
providing Dfx with a functional SOR activity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have isolated a protein from T. pallidum on the
basis of its strong sequence homology with Dfxs from sulfate-reducing
bacteria (Fig. 1). However, there is a major difference between this
protein and the Dfxs previously described. Dfx from T. pallidum only chelates one iron center, which has all of the
spectroscopic characteristics of the so-called ferrous center II in Dfx
from D. vulgaris (8) and D. desulfuricans (9).
Accordingly, all of the ligands chelating the iron center II in Dfxs
are found strictly conserved in the sequence of T. pallidum,
in addition to the residues surrounding these positions (Fig. 1). The
second iron center (center I) is absent in Dfx from T. pallidum, in agreement with the absence of three cysteine ligands
replaced by a Gln, Ser, and Ala (Fig. 1). In that respect, Dfx from
T. pallidum shows interesting similarities to Nlr, a protein
initially isolated from the sulfate-reducing bacteria
Desulfovibrio gigas (13) and recently described as a SOR in
Pyrococcus furiosus (6). Nlr also contains a single mononuclear iron center, with spectroscopic properties similar to those
of the iron center II of Dfxs (13, 14). However, although Nlr presents
a similar structural fold to the C-terminal domain of Dfxs (14), with
conservation of the ligands of the iron center II, it lacks the whole
protein domain corresponding to the N-terminal sequence of Dfxs from
sulfate-reducing bacteria (Fig. 6).
Instead, Dfx from T. pallidum can be aligned with the entire
sequence of the other Dfxs, including the whole N-terminal domain
(Figs. 1 and 6). In addition, Nlr sequences exhibit one major
additional loop, which is not present in the C-terminal domain of
classical Dfxs and in the sequence of the T. pallidum protein (Fig. 6). On the whole, it is correct to classify the protein
from T. pallidum as a new type of Dfx rather than an
Nlr.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Sequence comparison between Dfxs and
Nlrs. From top to bottom, Nlr from P. furiosus (Pf.), Nlr from D. gigas
(Dg.), Dfx from T. pallidum (Tp.), Dfx
from D. baarsii (Db.), Dfx from D. desulfuricans (Dd.), and Dfx from D. vulgaris Hildenborough (Dv.). The alignments
were produced by Clustal W. Shading indicates the
residues involved in the binding of the two mononuclear iron centers
(10, 14).
|
|
All of the data reported here strongly suggest that this new type of
Dfx functions as an SOR. (i) Expression of Dfx from T. pallidum is able to fully protect an E. coli SOD mutant
from oxidative stress (Table I). The data were comparable with the data
reported for the Dfx from D. baarsii (5) and suggested that,
in E. coli, the iron center I of Dfx is not important for a
functional complementation. (ii) Dfx from T. pallidum can
reduce O 2 very efficiently. The second order rate constant of
the oxidation of the reduced Dfx from T. pallidum by
O 2 has been determined to be 1 × 109
M 1 s 1,
a value even greater than that reported for the D. baarsii
enzyme (6-7 × 108
M 1 s 1)
(5). The reaction is specific for O 2, since
H2O2 did oxidize the iron center much more
slowly (second order rate constant 120 M 1 s 1).
Dfx from T. pallidum is also O2-resistant, and
the protein was isolated mainly in a stable ferrous iron state. (iii)
That reduction of O 2 could be catalytic within the cell
depends on the presence of a cellular system able to reduce the
oxidized iron center for a complete catalytic cycle. We have found that cell extracts of E. coli contained
NAD(P)H-dependent reductase activities, which may fulfill
this function. Although these activities are smaller than those
reported in the case of D. baarsii (5), it still
demonstrated that E. coli extracts could catalytically reduce Dfx from T. pallidum. In addition, because the
reductase activities are not specific to membrane or cytosol fractions
and to the reduced pyridine nucleotides, it thus appears that E. coli extracts do not possess a single specific system to reduce
the iron center of SOR. This is in line with the great accessibility of
the active site of SORs (10, 14) and their high redox potential (9,
13), which make a large number of reducing agents and reductases
potentially good candidates. Consequently, it is very likely that
similar activities exist in T. pallidum as well.
A question remains as far as the role of iron center I in Dfxs from
sulfate-reducing bacteria is concerned. The existence of SORs (Dfx from
T. pallidum and Nlr from P. furiosus for example) containing only one iron center would suggest that center I in Dfx from
D. baarsii does not participate in electron
transfer/O 2 reduction during SOR activity and that this
function resides only in iron center II. Further experiments are
required to understand the function of center I.
Although SODs remain the most widespread defense mechanism
against superoxide, several examples of another mechanism, SOR, have
been reported. SORs primarily appeared as a simple and specific means
to anaerobic bacteria to eliminate superoxide (5, 6, 11),
possibly presenting advantage during transitory exposure to air
(12). The benefit of an SOR, compared with a SOD, in these organisms
may be in relation to the presence of large amounts of a variety of
strongly autoxidizable redox proteins, such as redox carriers
(cytochromes, ferredoxins, and flavodoxins, for example). As
illustrated in Fig. 7, by shuttling the
electrons from the autoxidizable redox proteins to superoxide, SOR
could, in a single reaction, eliminate both superoxide and the source of its production. Such a reaction may allow the anaerobic bacteria to
shut off transitory O 2 production from those redox carriers, with no need for sophisticated regulatory systems, such as are found in
facultative anaerobes. Other authors have pointed out that reduction of
superoxide does not produce molecular oxygen, as does the dismutation
reaction, thus protecting O2-sensitive cellular species
from inactivation (4). However, this latter hypothesis is questionable,
taking into account that from the genome and protein sequences
available, it appears that several anaerobic microorganisms,
like D. gigas (13, 24), D. desulfuricans (7, 25),
D. vulgaris Hildenborough
(22),2 Methanobacterium
thermoautotrophicum (23), or Clostridium acetobutylicum (Genome Therapeutics Corp., completed genome, not published; open reading frames CAC2865, CAC2999, CAC1647) contain both sor
and sod genes. Further studies are necessary to determine
the respective roles of each enzyme and why there is such
an apparent redundancy in mechanisms for elimination of
superoxide.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Scheme for the hypothesis of the
detoxification activity of SOR. In the presence of O 2,
formed from the autoxidizable redox proteins in the presence of
O2, SOR eliminates both O 2 and its source of
production. In the absence of O2/O 2, SOR is not
active, and the electrons are shuttled toward the cellular
metabolisms.
|
|
In this respect, T. pallidum is a very interesting
bacterium. It is a microaerophilic microorganism, with an optimal
growth rate in the presence of 5% of molecular oxygen (16). This is the first example of an organism that can grow in the presence of
oxygen without expressing a SOD enzyme (with the exception of Mn-SOD
mimic complexes produced by lactic acid bacteria (26)). Here we have
shown that T. pallidum relies on a simplified version of
Dfx, with full SOR activity, as the only mechanism for elimination of
superoxide and protection from oxidative stress. This makes T. pallidum a unique model for studying the link between superoxide reductase and oxidative stress.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Eric Forest for mass
spectrometry experiments, to Mathilde Louwagie for N-terminal amino
acid sequence determination, and to Dr. Véronique Ducros for
atomic absorption spectroscopy. We acknowledge Dr. Stéphane
Ménage for helping in EPR experiments and Chantal Falco for
technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-4-76-88-91-09; Fax: 33-4-76-88-91-24; E-mail:
vniviere@cea.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004201200
2
N. V. Shenvi and D. M. Kurtz,
GenBankTM accession no. AF034841.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
O 2, superoxide;
SOD, superoxide dismutase;
SOR, superoxide reductase;
Dfx, desulfoferrodoxin;
Nlr, neelaredoxin;
IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sies, H.
(1986)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
25,
1058-1071
|
| 2.
|
McCord, J. M.,
and Fridovich, I.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
6049-6055
|
| 3.
|
Fridovich, I
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
97-112
|
| 4.
|
Choudhury, S. B.,
Lee, J.-W.,
Davidson, G.,
Yim, Y.-I.,
Bose, K.,
Sharma, M. L.,
Kang, S.-O.,
Cabelli, D. E.,
and Maroney, M.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
3744-3752
|
| 5.
|
Lombard, M.,
Fontecave, M.,
Touati, D.,
and Nivière, V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
115-121
|
| 6.
|
Jenney, F. E., Jr.,
Verhagen, M. F. J. M.,
Cui, X.,
and Adams, M. W. W.
(1999)
Science
286,
306-309
|
| 7.
|
Moura, I.,
Tavares, P.,
Moura, J. J. G.,
Ravi, N.,
Huynh, B. H.,
Liu, M. Y.,
and LeGall, J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
21596-21602
|
| 8.
|
Verhagen, M. F. J. M.,
Voorhorst, W. G. B.,
Kolkman, J. A.,
Wolbert, R. B. G.,
and Hagen, W. R.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
336,
13-18
|
| 9.
|
Tavares, P.,
Ravi, N.,
Moura, J. J. G.,
LeGall, J.,
Huang, Y. H.,
Crouse, B. R.,
Johnson, M. K.,
Huynh, B. H.,
and Moura, I.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10504-10510
|
| 10.
|
Coelho, A. V.,
Matias, P.,
Fülöp, V.,
Thompson, A.,
Gonzalez, A.,
and Coronado, M. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.
2,
680-689
|
| 11.
|
Pianzzola, M. J.,
Soubes, M.,
and Touati, D.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
6736-6742
|
| 12.
|
Voordouw, J. K.,
and Voordouw, G.
(1998)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
64,
2882-2887
|
| 13.
|
Chen, L.,
Sharma, P.,
LeGall, J.,
Mariano, A. M.,
Teixeira, M.,
and Xavier, A.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
226,
613-618
|
| 14.
|
Andrew, P. Y.,
Hu, Y.,
Jenney, F. E.,
Adams, M. W. W.,
and Rees, D. C.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
2499-2508
|
| 15.
|
Fraser, C. M.,
Norris, S. J.,
Weinstock, G. M.,
White, O.,
Sutton, G. G.,
Dodson, R.,
Gwinn, M.,
Hickey, E. K.,
Clayton, R.,
Ketchum, K. A.,
Sodergren, E.,
Hardham, J. M.,
McLeod, M. P.,
Salzberg, S.,
Peterson, J.,
Khalak, H.,
Richardson, D.,
Howell, J. K.,
Chidambaram, M.,
Utterback, T.,
McDonald, L.,
Artiach, P.,
Bowman, C.,
Cotton, M. D.,
Fujii, C.,
Garland, S.,
Hatch, B.,
Horst, K.,
Roberts, K.,
Sandusky, M.,
Weidman, J.,
Smith, H. O.,
and Venter, J. C.
(1998)
Science
281,
375-388
|
| 16.
|
Cox, D. L.,
Riley, B.,
Chang, P.,
Sayahtaheri, S.,
Tassell, S.,
and Hevelone, J.
(1990)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
56,
3063-3072
|
| 17.
|
Touati, D.,
Jacques, M.,
Tardat, B.,
Bouchard, L.,
and Despied, S.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
2305-2314
|
| 18.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
|
| 19.
|
Klug, D.,
Rabani, J.,
and Fridovich, I.
(1972)
J. Biol. Chem.
247,
4839-4842
|
| 20.
|
Keyer, K. A.,
Gort, A. S.,
and Imlay, J. A.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
6782-6790
|
| 21.
|
Halliwell, B.,
and Gutteridge, J. M. C.
(1989)
Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine
, pp. 71-79, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 22.
|
Brumlik, M. J.,
and Voordouw, G.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
4996-5004
|
| 23.
|
Smith, D. R.,
Doucette-Stamm, L. A.,
Deloughery, C.,
Lee, H.,
Dubois, J.,
Aldredge, T.,
Bashirzadeh, R.,
Blakely, D.,
Cook, R.,
Gilbert, K.,
Harrison, D.,
Hoang, L.,
Keagle, P.,
Lumm, W.,
Pothier, B.,
Qiu, D.,
Spadafora, R.,
Vicaire, R.,
Wang, Y.,
Wierzbowski, J.,
Gibson, R.,
Jiwani, N.,
Caruso, A.,
Bush, D.,
Safer, H.,
Patwell, D.,
Prabhakar, S.,
McDouglas, S.,
Shimer, S.,
Goyal, A.,
Pietrokovski, S.,
Church, G. M.,
Daniels, C. J.,
Mao, J. I.,
Rice, P.,
Nolling, J.,
and Reeve, J. N.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
7135-7155
|
| 24.
|
Dos Santos, W. G.,
Pacheco, I.,
Liu, M.-Y.,
Teixeira, M.,
Xavier, A. V.,
and LeGall, J.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
796-804
|
| 25.
|
Hatchikian, E. C.,
and Henry, Y. A.
(1977)
Biochimie (Paris)
59,
153-161
|
| 26.
|
Archibald, F., S.,
and Fridovich, I.
(1981)
J. Bacteriol.
146,
928-936
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kawasaki, Y. Sakai, T. Takahashi, I. Suzuki, and Y. Niimura
O2 and Reactive Oxygen Species Detoxification Complex, Composed of O2-Responsive NADH:Rubredoxin Oxidoreductase-Flavoprotein A2-Desulfoferrodoxin Operon Enzymes, Rubperoxin, and Rubredoxin, in Clostridium acetobutylicum
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
February 15, 2009;
75(4):
1021 - 1029.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Mathe, C. O. Weill, T. A. Mattioli, C. Berthomieu, C. Houee-Levin, E. Tremey, and V. Niviere
Assessing the Role of the Active-site Cysteine Ligand in the Superoxide Reductase from Desulfoarculus baarsii
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 27, 2007;
282(30):
22207 - 22216.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zhu, X. Fu, Y. D. Koo, J.-K. Zhu, F. E. Jenney Jr., M. W. W. Adams, Y. Zhu, H. Shi, D.-J. Yun, P. M. Hasegawa, et al.
An Enhancer Mutant of Arabidopsis salt overly sensitive 3 Mediates both Ion Homeostasis and the Oxidative Stress Response
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 15, 2007;
27(14):
5214 - 5224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Katona, P. Carpentier, V. Niviere, P. Amara, V. Adam, J. Ohana, N. Tsanov, and D. Bourgeois
Raman-Assisted Crystallography Reveals End-On Peroxide Intermediates in a Nonheme Iron Enzyme
Science,
April 20, 2007;
316(5823):
449 - 453.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Deka, C. A. Brautigam, F. L. Tomson, S. B. Lumpkins, D. R. Tomchick, M. Machius, and M. V. Norgard
Crystal Structure of the Tp34 (TP0971) Lipoprotein of Treponema pallidum: IMPLICATIONS OF ITS METAL-BOUND STATE AND AFFINITY FOR HUMAN LACTOFERRIN
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 23, 2007;
282(8):
5944 - 5958.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. LaFond and S. A. Lukehart
Biological Basis for Syphilis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.,
January 1, 2006;
19(1):
29 - 49.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kawasaki, Y. Watamura, M. Ono, T. Watanabe, K. Takeda, and Y. Niimura
Adaptive Responses to Oxygen Stress in Obligatory Anaerobes Clostridium acetobutylicum and Clostridium aminovalericum
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
December 1, 2005;
71(12):
8442 - 8450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Grunden, F. E. Jenney Jr., K. Ma, M. Ji, M. V. Weinberg, and M. W. W. Adams
In Vitro Reconstitution of an NADPH-Dependent Superoxide Reduction Pathway from Pyrococcus furiosus
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
March 1, 2005;
71(3):
1522 - 1530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. T. O. Nascimento, A. I. Ko, E. A. L. Martins, C. B. Monteiro-Vitorello, P. L. Ho, D. A. Haake, S. Verjovski-Almeida, R. A. Hartskeerl, M. V. Marques, M. C. Oliveira, et al.
Comparative Genomics of Two Leptospira interrogans Serovars Reveals Novel Insights into Physiology and Pathogenesis
J. Bacteriol.,
April 1, 2004;
186(7):
2164 - 2172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Emerson, E. D. Coulter, R. S. Phillips, and D. M. Kurtz Jr.
Kinetics of the Superoxide Reductase Catalytic Cycle
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 10, 2003;
278(41):
39662 - 39668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. O. Hazlett, F. Rusnak, D. G. Kehres, S. W. Bearden, C. J. La Vake, M. E. La Vake, M. E. Maguire, R. D. Perry, and J. D. Radolf
The Treponema pallidum tro Operon Encodes a Multiple Metal Transporter, a Zinc-dependent Transcriptional Repressor, and a Semi-autonomously Expressed Phosphoglycerate Mutase
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2003;
278(23):
20687 - 20694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Emerson, D. E. Cabelli, and D. M. Kurtz Jr.
Bioinorganic Chemistry Special Feature: An engineered two-iron superoxide reductase lacking the [Fe(SCys)4] site retains its catalytic properties in vitro and invivo
PNAS,
April 1, 2003;
100(7):
3802 - 3807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Hase, N. D. Fedorova, M. Y. Galperin, and P. A. Dibrov
Sodium Ion Cycle in Bacterial Pathogens: Evidence from Cross-Genome Comparisons
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
September 1, 2001;
65(3):
353 - 370.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. I. Liochev and I. Fridovich
Copper- and Zinc-containing Superoxide Dismutase Can Act as a Superoxide Reductase and a Superoxide Oxidase
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 1, 2000;
275(49):
38482 - 38485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|