Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003001200 on June 14, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 35, 27045-27054, September 1, 2000
Crystal Structure and Thermodynamic Analysis of Human Brain Fatty
Acid-binding Protein*
Ganesaratnam K.
Balendiran
§,
Frank
Schnütgen¶

,
Giovanna
Scapin**,
Torsten
Börchers
,
Ning
Xhong§§,
Kap
Lim
,
Roseline
Godbout¶¶,
Friedrich
Spener¶
, and
James C.
Sacchettini
From the
Department of Biochemistry & Biophysics,
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2128, the
¶ Department of Biochemistry, University of Münster, Wilhelm
Klemm-Stra
e 2, D-48149 Münster, Germany, ** Merck Research
Laboratory, Merck & Co, Rahway, New Jersey 07065, 
Institute for Chemical and Biochemical
Sensor Research, Mendelstra
e 7, D-48149 Münster, Germany,
§§ Department of Chemistry, Queens College of
the City University of New York, Flushing, New York 11367, and the
¶¶ Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute,
University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 1Z2, Canada
Received for publication, April 9, 2000, and in revised form, June 13, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Expression of brain fatty acid-binding protein
(B-FABP) is spatially and temporally correlated with neuronal
differentiation during brain development. Isothermal titration
calorimetry demonstrates that recombinant human B-FABP clearly
exhibits high affinity for the polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acids
-linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, and
for monounsaturated n-9 oleic acid (Kd from 28 to
53 nM) over polyunsaturated n-6 fatty acids, linoleic acid,
and arachidonic acid (Kd from 115 to 206 nM). B-FABP has low binding affinity for saturated long chain fatty acids. The three-dimensional structure of recombinant human
B-FABP in complex with oleic acid shows that the oleic acid hydrocarbon
tail assumes a "U-shaped" conformation, whereas in the complex with
docosahexaenoic acid the hydrocarbon tail adopts a helical
conformation. A comparison of the three-dimensional structures and
binding properties of human B-FABP with other homologous FABPs,
indicates that the binding specificity is in part the result of
nonconserved amino acid Phe104, which interacts with double
bonds present in the lipid hydrocarbon tail. In this context, analysis
of the primary and tertiary structures of human B-FABP provides a
rationale for its high affinity and specificity for polyunsaturated
fatty acids. The expression of B-FABP in glial cells and its high
affinity for docosahexaenoic acid, which is known to be an
important component of neuronal membranes, points toward a role for
B-FABP in supplying brain abundant fatty acids to the developing neuron.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Brain tissue contains high amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids,
such as arachidonic, docosahexaenoic acids
(DHA),1 and eicosapentaenoic
acid (EPA), in their membrane phospholipids compared with other tissues
(1, 2). The central nervous system uses DHA and other long chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids during the early postnatal development (3)
when cellular differentiation, active synaptogenesis, and photoreceptor
membrane biogenesis take place (4-6). The critical role of DHA in the
brain has been demonstrated by behavioral studies that have described
n-3 deficiency (7). Arachidonic acid and DHA are synthesized by
elongation, desaturation, and
-oxidation steps of the dietary
essential fatty acids 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3), respectively (8).
Deficiency of n-3 fatty acid leads to an altered electroretinogram (9),
decreased visual activity (10), and impaired learning ability (11). In
addition, DHA may be converted into neuroprostanes by free
radical-catalyzed peroxidation (12-14) or may modulate the production
of oxygenated metabolites from arachidonic acid with important roles in
the physiology and pathology of the central nervous system. Similarly, oxidant stress and peroxidation of lipids, which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of human diseases, including atherosclerosis, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders such as stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and Huntington's diseases (15-21), and
oxidative injury of neuroprostanes could lead to impaired neuronal
function (12).
Little is known about how fatty acid trafficking and transport are
controlled in the brain. Expression of B-FABP in radial glia during the
development of the central nervous system is strictly correlated with
the differentiation and migration of neurons from these cells (22). The
high level of expression of B-FABP during neurogenesis or neuronal
migration has implicated B-FABP to play an important role during
central nervous system development (23). It is conceivable that it
functions as part of a storage/delivery system for either DHA and EPA
or the precursors required for DHA production, assuring a steady supply
of fatty acids to the developing central nervous system. Alternatively
the protein may be involved in transport of fatty acids to specific
sties of regulation and may protect DHA from undergoing free
radical-catalyzed peroxidation.
Human B-FABP is a member of the intracellular 14-15-kDa lipid-binding
protein family. Members of this protein family have high affinity for
amphiphils such as fatty acids, eicosanoids, retinoids, and bile acids.
It has been proposed that these proteins are involved in the cellular
uptake of lipids, their transport to metabolic pathways (24), and in
regulation of lipid transport and metabolizing proteins
(25).2 Although there is a
wide range of variation in the amino acid sequence among members of the
family (for example, human B-FABP shows 67% amino acid sequence
identity to human H/M-FABP, 28% to human liver FABP), their
three-dimensional structures are highly conserved, consisting of ten
antiparallel
strands and two short
helices. The ten
antiparalled
strands are arranged into two nearly orthogonal
5-stranded
sheets that surround the interior binding cavity. Some
of the three-dimensional structures reported to date are bovine myelin
P2 (27), rat intestinal FABP (28), chicken liver basic FABP (29),
bovine H-FABP (30), adipocyte lipid-binding protein (31), human M-FABP
(32), Desert locust Schistocerca gregaria M-FABP (33),
Manduca sexta FABP (34), and porcine ileal lipid-binding
protein (35). The proteins can be grouped according to sequence
homology, which is consistent with the ligand binding characteristics
(36). These criteria would separate the proteins into four categories:
(i) the intracellular retinoid-binding proteins; (ii) the ileal
lipid-binding protein (which binds bile acid) and liver-FABP proteins
that accommodate two fatty acids; (iii) intestinal-FABP, which binds a
single fatty acid in a linear conformation; and (iv) FABPs with the
fatty acid bound in a highly bent or U-shaped conformation.
Brain, adipocyte, and the muscle/heart FABPs belong to the last group.
Within grouping iv, the carboxylate moiety of the fatty acid is buried
within the binding cavity and hydrogen bonds to conserved tyrosine and arginine residues, either directly or through an ordered water molecule. The hydrocarbon tail of the fatty acid forms VDW interactions with hydrophobic residues that line the binding pocket and with ordered
water molecules that are in contact with polar residues in the binding
pockets (37).
Whereas most of the FABPs bind only a single molecule of fatty acid,
different FABPs show variation in their affinity for saturated
versus mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids, and long, medium, and short chain fatty acids, and it has been quite difficult to
completely understand the structural basis for these preferences. However, all of the FABPs studied to date exhibit a preference for long
chain saturated fatty acids (38). As B-FABP has a higher affinity for
long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, it is an excellent system to
begin to explore how structural diversity in the FABPs leads to ligand
specificity. Here we report the crystal structures of complexes of
human B-FABP with OA and DHA and compare the structural data with the
thermodynamic description of fatty acid binding. Our results provide an
explanation for the ligand binding preferences of B-FABP based on key
protein-ligand interactions.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning of Human B-FABP--
Human B-FABP was cloned by
screening a human fetal brain
ZAP11 cDNA library (Stratagene)
under reduced stringency using a radioactively labeled 600-base pair
chicken retina cDNA probe (39). The 3'-ends of the positive clones
had a high homology to mouse B-FABP, but they either lacked the 5'-end
of the cDNA or they had undergone recombination at their 5'-ends.
Sequence information from the section that was homologous to the mouse B-FABP cDNA (23) was employed to clone human B-FABP by rapid amplification of cDNA ends. To obtain the 3'-sequence of the
cDNA human fetal brain poly(A)+ RNA
(CLONTECH) was reverse-transcribed with Moloney
murine leukemia virus reverse trancriptase (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) using a d(T)17-adaptor hybrid primer
(5'-TCGGACAGTCGACATCGGTAA(T)17-3'). The 3'-end of the human
B-FABP cDNA was amplified using an internal sequence specific
primer (5'-CCAACGGTAATTATCAGTCAAGAA-3') and the adaptor primer
(5-TCGGACAGTCGACATCGGT-3'). To obtain the 5'-sequence of the cDNA,
human fetal brain poly(A)+ RNA was reverse-transcribed
using a primer corresponding to the predicted 3'-end of the coding part
of the cDNA containing an attached BamHI restriction
site (5'-CCAGGATCCTTTCTATGCCTTCTC-3'). In this primer the
stop codon TAA was exchanged to TAG. The cDNA for B-FABP was then
tailed with dATP using terminal transferase (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) and amplified using a nested sequence-specific 3'-primer (5'-CTGAGAGTCCTGATGACCACTT-3') and a mixture of
d(T)17-adaptor and adaptor primer. To obtain a continuous
coding sequence a specific 5'-primer with an attached NdeI
restriction site was designed (5'-CATATGGTGGAGGCTTTCTGTGCTAC-3') and used together with
the primer containing the BamHI site in a polymerase chain
reaction with the proofreading Pfu DNA polymerase
(Stratagene). The 400-base pair polymerase chain reaction product
obtained after 35 cycles of amplification was subcloned into a
SmaI cut pUC18 vector (SureClone Ligation Kit; Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). lac
colonies were analyzed
by restriction mapping, and nucleotide sequences were determined by
cycle sequencing using thermosequenase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and
the GATC 1500 direct blotting electrophoresis system (GATC, Germany).
DNA and protein sequences were analyzed using the GCG package.
Expression and Purification of Human B-FABP--
The human
B-FABP coding region of the cDNA was cloned into NdeI-
and BamHI-restricted pET-3 expression vector (Novagen) and introduced into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)pLysS (40).
Terrific broth with cultured cells was induced with 0.4 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside after they reached
an optical density of 1 in a 2-liter and 5 in a 10-liter scale
fermentation. They were then harvested by centrifugation and lysed by
one freeze thaw cycle and sonication. Nucleic acids were partially
digested by Benzonase (Merck). The supernatant of the lysate was
desalted on Sephadex G-25, and recombinant human B-FABP was isolated by
anion exchange chromatography using Q-Sepharose. The protein was
further purified by gel filtration on Fractogel EMD BioSec 650 (S), and
the purity was analyzed by 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(41); sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect
human B-FABP in fractions during purification.
Delipidation of purified human B-FABP by the Lipidex procedure (42)
resulted in only 30% delipidated protein as later became evident upon
titration calorimetry analysis. Therefore, human B-FABP was further
delipidated by extracting 1 ml of protein solution three times with
0.4 ml of diisopropylether:n-butanol (3:2) for 30 min with
gentle shaking (43). The protein was then dialyzed by ultrafiltration
(centricon with 10-kDa cut-off, Amicon) against calorimetry buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.05% sodium azide) to remove n-butanol. M/H-FABP used in
this study was cloned, expressed, purified, and delipidated following previously described procedures (44).
Crystallization and Data Collection of Human B-FABP·OA
Complex--
Crystals of the human B-FABP·OA complex were obtained
using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method, 1.8-2.2 M
(NH4)2SO4 in 100 mM Tris, pH 8.5, precipitant solution. The crystals
diffracted to a maximum resolution of 2.8 Å, an 82.0% (11,489 total/5444 unique reflections) complete data set to 2.8 Å was
collected using a Rigaku RU-200 rotating anode x-ray source operating
at 55 kV and 85 mA and a Siemens Multiwire area detector. Data
processing, scaling, and merging were done using the XENGEN software
(45) (Table I). The unit cell parameters were determined to be a = b = 93.6 Å, c = 46.7 Å,
=
= 90°, and
= 120° with the space group P65 containing one
molecule of protein/asymmetric unit corresponding to the
Vm ratio of 3.5 Å3/Da.
Crystallization and Data Collection of Human B-FABP·DHA
Complex--
Delipidated human B-FABP (42, 43) was incubated with a
2-fold molar excess of DHA for 15 min at 37 °C prior to
crystallization. Crystals of human B-FABP with bound DHA were obtained
at 16 °C with the hanging drop vapor diffusion method by mixing 3 µl of a 10 mg/ml protein solution with an equal amount of precipitant solution containing 20% polyethylene glycol 4000, 0.1 M
Tris, pH 8.1, and 50 mM NaOAc and allowed to equilibrated
against 1 ml of the same precipitant solution. Long and thin crystals
of the B-FABP·DHA-bound protein complex appeared in a week and
reached the dimensions of 0.02 × 0.01 × 0.5 mm. The
crystals diffracted to a maximum resolution of 1.8 Å. An 84% (102,823 total/21,863 unique reflections) complete data set to 2.1 Å with
5-fold redundancy was collected from two crystals at room temperature
using a Rigaku RU-200 rotating anode x-ray source operating at 55 kV
and 85 mA and a Nonius/Macscience dip2030 image plate. Data processing, scaling, and merging was done using the DENZO and SCALEPACK software package (46) (Table I). The unit cell parameters were determined to be
a = 37.2 Å, b = 87.9 Å, c = 46.8 Å, and
= 113.4o with the space group P21 containing two
molecules of protein/asymmetric unit with the corresponding
Vm ratio of 2.4 Å3/Da.
Structure Solution and Refinement of Human B-FABP·OA--
The
three-dimensional structure of the human B-FABP·OA complex was solved
using molecular replacement routines implemented in XPLOR (47, 48),
with a model of human M-FABP (43) without bound fatty acid or water
molecules as the search model. The highest peak obtained from the
cross-rotation search using 15.0-4.0 Å data with a 2
cutoff on F
corresponded to the Eulerian angles 45°, 121.5°, and 27°. A clear
unique solution was found (9.2
above the second best solution) for
the translation search with data between 10.0 and 4.0 Å with a 2
cut-off on F. Fifty cycles of rigid body refinement for data between
10.0 and 3.0 Å lowered the R-factor to 39.1%. The
coordinates were then subjected to simulated annealing procedure (48),
with data between 8.0 and 3.0 Å, which lowered the R-factor
to 35.2%. At this point, the correct amino acid sequence was built
into the structure, and the refinement was continued with alternating
cycles of simulated annealing and manual rebuilding of the model.
Several "omit" maps were used throughout the model building to
confirm that the main chain and side chain atoms were assigned
correctly. The resolution range was extended to include all data
between 20.0 and 2.8 Å. The R-factor at this stage was
20.4%, and the model has conserved a good geometry (r.m.s. deviation
for bond lengths and bond angles were 0.015 Å and 1.95o,
respectively) and stereochemistry (49). Inspection of
||Fo|
|Fc||
calc electron
density maps at this stage allowed the positioning of the bound fatty
acid and 25 ordered water molecules. Two more cycles of model building
and refinement including oleic acid and water molecules reduced the
R-factor and Rfree to 19.0 and
26.1%, respectively (Table I).
Structure Solution and Refinement of Human
B-FABP·DHA--
Refined human B-FABP·OA complex structure without
the fatty acid and water molecules was used as the search model for
molecular replacement (47, 48). The top peaks obtained from the
cross-rotation search, using 12.0-4.5 Å data with a 3
cutoff on
F, corresponded to the Eulerian angles 202.5°, 32.5°, and 277.5°
for the first molecule and 110.0°, 80.0°, and 332.5° for the
second molecule. Each of these rotation solutions gave a unique
translation solution, between 9.0 and 4.0 Å with a 3
cut-off on F. The subsequent refinement was carried out using CNS (50), and strict
noncrystallographic symmetry constraints were imposed. Ninety cycles of
rigid body refinement, using 10.0 and 3.0 Å data, lowered the
R-factor to 40.5%. The resulting model was subjected to
annealing procedure (CNS), 9.0 and 3.0 Å, that lowered the
R-factor to 34.2%. The refinement was continued with
alternating cycles of simulated annealing and manual rebuilding of the
model. Four series of omit electron density maps were used to guide the
model building of the main chain and side chain atoms of both the
molecules. The data were extended to include all reflections between
20.0 and 2.5 Å. The R-factor at this stage was 21.6%, and
the model conserved a good geometry (r.m.s. deviation for bond lengths
and bond angles was 0.015 Å and 2.01o, respectively) and
stereochemistry (49). Inspection of
||Fo|
| Fc||
calc electron
density maps at this stage allowed the positioning of the bound fatty
acid and 140 ordered water molecules. Three cycles of model building
and refinement reduced the R-factor and
Rfree to 18.0 and 25.7%, respectively, without noncrystallographic symmetry constraints (Table
I).
Calorimetric Binding Assays--
Titration calorimetry was
carried out using a Microcal Omega Isothermal Titration
Microcalorimeter (Microcal, Northhampton, MA). After delipidation and
dialysis the protein concentration in calorimetry buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EtSH, 0.05% NaN3) was adjusted to about 60 µM for all
experiments and titrated with the ligands up to two-fold molar excess.
The ligand was weighed into a 1.5-ml microreaction tube and dissolved
in 250 mM KOH to give a concentration of 100 mM. This stock solution was adjusted to the final
concentration with the calorimetry buffer. In a typical experiment this
solution with the final concentration of 1.68 mM was
injected in 25 aliquots (4 µl each) in 4-min intervals at 30 °C.
Raw data were processed by the Origin software package supplied by the
manufacturer. After the heat of dilution was subtracted from the heat
of binding, data were fitted to a model assuming one binding site, and
values for enthalpy and binding affinity were directly obtained (51)
(Table II).
Lipidex Binding and Competition Assays--
The binding of OA to
delipidated recombinant human B-FABP was analyzed by the Lipidex assay
(42) essentially as described for mouse B-FABP (52). Various amounts of
[1-14C]OA (Amersham-Buchler, 53 Ci/mol,
[L]0) were incubated with 0.6 µM human
B-FABP, and data for protein-bound ligand ([PL]) were fit for binding
of a ligand to a single class of binding sites. From the dissociation
constant Kd, the apparent concentration of binding
sites on the protein, [P]0 and
Bmax = [P]0/0.6 µM
were obtained.
For competition assays, delipidated recombinant human B-FABP (3.4 µM) was incubated with equimolar amounts of
[1-14C]OA at 37 °C for 15 min. To 75 µl of this
solution a 25-µl solution with increasing competitor concentration
was added. After 15 min at 37 °C 50 µl of a 50% (v/v)
Lipidex-1000 suspension (Packard) was added with subsequent vortexing,
and the mixture further incubated for 30 min on ice. Raw data for the
construction of binding curves were obtained after separation of
protein bound and free fatty acid (Lipidex bound) by centrifugation (4 min, 15,000 × g, 4 °C) and scintillation counting
of 50 µl of solution. Curves describing the concentration of
B-FABP·OA complex [PL] depending on the concentration of competitor
[C]0 were fit with the assumption that the free protein
concentration is negligible in the binding equilibrium (Table II). With
known values for the binding constant of the B-FABP·OA complex
(KL), B-FABP concentration [P]0
and OA concentration [L]0, the fit directly resulted in
values for the binding constant KC of the B-FABP
competitor complex.
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay Procedure--
Polyclonal
antibodies against recombinant human B-FABP generated in White New
Zealand rabbits were affinity purified using recombinant human B-FABP
coupled to CH-activated Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). To
remove antibodies cross-reacting with human M/H-FABP, this eluate was
applied to a column with immobilized human M/H-FABP. A fraction of
these antibodies was biotinylated by incubation with
D-biotin-
-aminocaprylic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 4 h at 4 °C followed
by dialysis against phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. The sandwich
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was essentially performed as
described for human H-FABP (44). The calibration curve was linear from
0.5 to 35 ng/ml.
 |
RESULTS |
Description of Human B-FABP Structure--
The crystal
structures of human B-FABP with OA (Fig.
1a) and DHA (Fig.
1b) were solved and refined against 2.8 Å and 2.1 Å x-ray
diffraction data, respectively. The structure of the human B-FABP·OA
complex contains one polypeptide chain (131 residues), one molecule of
OA, and 25 water molecules/asymmetric unit, and the structure of the
B-FABP·DHA complex consists of two polypeptide chains, two molecules
of DHA, and 140 water molecules/asymmetric unit. The r.m.s. difference
between the two molecules in the asymmetric unit of B-FABP·DHA is
0.41 Å over 131 C
atoms, and these molecules are related by a
rotation of 179.6° about the noncrystallographic 2-fold axis. The
r.m.s. difference between the human B-FABP·OA complex and human
B-FABP·DHA complex is 0.54 Å (molecule 1) and 0.51 Å (molecule 2)
over 131 C
atoms.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
a, ribbon representation of the
three-dimensional structure of the human B-FABP·OA complex. The bound
OA molecule found in the binding cavity is shown in ball and stick.
b, ribbon representation of the three-dimensional structure
of the human B-FABP·DHA complex. The bound DHA is shown in ball and
stick. Figs. 1a, 1b, 3a, and
3b are prepared using Molscript (64) and Raster3D (65).
Secondary structure elements and the corresponding residues are
-strand B1 (Cys5-Leu10), -helix A1
(Phe16-Ala22), -helix A2
(Gly26-Val35), -strand B2
(Lys37-Glu45), -strand B3
(Lys48-Ser55), -strand B4
(Lys58-Gln65), -strand B5
(Glu69-Thr74), -strand B6
(Asp77-Asp87), -strand B7
(Lys90-Trp97), -strand B8
(Lys100-Ile108), -strand B9
(Gly111-Phe119), and -strand B10
(Val122-Glu129). c, superposition of
human B-FABP·DHA complex and human B-FABP·OA complex is shown using
SPOCK (66), where the deviation between the C atoms is represented
by the width of the worm. OA is shown in cyan, and DHA is
shown in orange. Deviation seen away from the cavity
corresponds to the different crystal packing and that around the cavity
is attributed to the differences caused by DHA binding.
|
|
The general structure of human B-FABP is very similar to that of the
other fatty acid-binding proteins reported to date (53). Eighty seven
of the 131 residues in human B-FABP form 10 antiparallel
-strands
arranged into two perpendicular
-sheets and two short
-helices
(A1, 7 residues, and A2, 10 residues) are located between
-strands
B1 and B2. Backbone hydrogen bonds typical of antiparalleled
-pleated sheets are found between all strands, with the exception of
-strands 4 and 5. These strands are separated, and the space between
these two strands is filled with protein side chain atoms.
-Strands
B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, and B6 form the first
-sheet and B6, B7, B8, B9,
and B10 from the second
-sheet. An exaggerated bend in B6 allows it
to act as a linker between two
-sheets, where the first five
residues (Asp77-Lys81) of the
-strand
hydrogen bond to the first
-sheet, whereas the remaining six
residues (Ser82-Asp87) of B6 hydrogen bond to
main chain atoms of B7, part of the second
-sheet.
OA Binding in U-shaped Conformation--
After the initial
refinement with only atoms of the protein, difference electron density
maps calculated to 2.8 Å showed a U-shaped positive density between
the two
-sheets, in the upper portion of the internal cavity as
viewed of Fig. 2a. A good fit for the electron density was achieved by introducing a C16 fatty acid
(C16:1, n-7) as there was no electron density for the last two carbon
atoms of the OA (C18:1), the fatty acid that was incubated with the
protein prior to crystallization. The fatty acid was in a bent
conformation with an eclipsed bond between C5 and C6 atoms and a
cis-double bond between C9 and C10 atoms (the position corresponding to the double bond in the OA). In the final steps of
molecular refinement the fatty acid was included with torsional constraints only to the torsional angle corresponding to the
cis-double bond. In addition to the fatty acid, five ordered
water molecules were located within the fatty acid binding cavity.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
a, difference Fourier electron density
map, calculated with ||Fo| |Fc|| calc coefficients
using 2.8 Å data, and contoured at 2.0 , for the human
B-FABP·OA complex. b, difference Fourier electron density
map, calculated with ||Fo| |Fc|| calc coefficients
using 2.0 Å data and contoured at 2.0 , for the human B-FABP·DHA
complex. a and b are prepared with the program
SETOR (26).
|
|
O1 of the carboxylate of bound OA hydrogen bonds to the hydroxyl group
of Tyr128 (2.8 Å) and to an ordered water molecule (3.0 Å), which in turn hydrogen bonds to the side chain oxygen of
Thr53 and the guanidinium group of Arg106 (3.2 and 3.3 Å, respectively). The other oxygen is within direct hydrogen
bonding distance to the guanidinium group of Arg126 (2.9 Å). Carbon atoms of the fatty acids' aliphatic chain form VDW
interactions with several residues of the protein (Fig.
3a) and ordered water
molecules. The phenyl ring of Phe16 appears to play a
pivotal role in ligand binding as it is within 4.5 Å from carbons C4,
C7, C12, and C13 of OA's aliphatic chain. In addition, the side chains
of residues Tyr19, Met20, Leu23,
Thr36, Pro38, Val40,
Thr53, and Arg78 are positioned around the
outer surface of the binding site forming a set of interactions that
appear to stabilize the folded conformation of the fatty acid.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Active site of the fatty acid
(a) OA and (b) DHA are shown as found
in the structures of their complexes with human B-FABP. Only
important residues in the active site are shown. The twelve residues,
which form VDW contacts, are Phe16, Val25,
Thr29, Gly33, Ser55,
Phe57, Lys58, Thr60,
Ala75, Asp76, Phe104, and
Met115 in the OA complex. The twenty one residues, which
form VDW contacts are Phe16, Tyr19,
Met20, Leu23, Val25,
Thr29, Val32, Gly33,
Thr36, Ser55, Thr60,
Ile62, Glu72, Thr73,
Thr74, Ala75, Asp76,
Arg78, Gln95, Phe104, and
Leu117 in DHA complex.
|
|
DHA Binding in a Helical or Looped Conformation--
The binding
of DHA to B-FABP is facilitated by interactions of nonconjugated 6 cis double bonds found in the fatty acid (Fig. 2b). The carbon atoms of the acyl chain are in a somewhat
helical conformation with a diameter of about 6 Å (the distance
between C10 and C18) and a rise of about 5 Å, giving a distance of 9 Å between C1 and C22. All six double bonds (between C4=C5, C7=C8, C10=C11, C13=C14, C16=C17, and C19=C20) of DHA are in cis
configuration. Rotational flexibility of the saturated C atoms (C2, C3,
C6, C9, C12, C15, C18, C21, and C22) located between each double bond permit the ligand to attain a suitable conformation that can fit in the
cavity. The arrangement of the double bonds in the bound conformation
also allows formation of intra-fatty acid
interactions between
unsaturated C atoms of DHA.
The carboxylate moiety of DHA binds to the hydroxyl group of
Tyr128 (3.1 Å) and the guanidinium group of
Arg126 (2.6 Å) in a fashion similar to that observed for
hydrogen bonding for OA. The double bonds in DHA form extensive
-
interactions with side chains of the protein. For example,
-
interactions are formed between the C4=C5 double bond and the benzene
ring of Phe104 as well as the sulfur of Met115.
It is important to note that residues Phe104 and
Met115 are structurally replaced by Leu104 and
Leu115 in M-FABP, and Ile104 and
Val115 in ALBP. In addition, double bonds C4=C5,
C7=C8, C10=C11, and C13=C14 are arranged around Phe16 to
permit additional
stacking interactions.
Fatty Acid Binding Studies--
Representative titrations of human
B-FABP with DHA and arachidonic acid are shown in Fig.
4. The binding isotherm was derived from
integration of the peaks and fitting to a model assuming one binding
site. Dissociation constants, binding enthalpies, and calculated
entropies obtained for B-FABP with different ligands are shown in Table
II. The binding stoichiometry in all
cases was very close to 1:1, and the binding entropies near zero,
indicating that binding was primarily an enthalpy driven event. As with
other FABPs, medium chain fatty acids such as lauric acid bind with relatively low affinity. Moreover, the binding of longer saturated fatty acids could not be accurately assayed by titration calorimetry, because of their inherent insolubility, so a second type of binding assay was used (see below). Monounsaturated n-9 fatty acids bound to
human B-FABP with high affinity (Kd 41-47
nM), as did the long chain polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acids
(27-53 nM). The protein also showed a preference for n-3
polyunsaturated fatty acids compared with those of the n-6 group
(Kd 115-206 nM).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Titration of human B-FABP with DHA
(A) and arachidonic acid (B).
Binding isotherms were derived from the raw data shown in the insets,
with 60 µM human B-FABP at 30 °C.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Binding parameters of recombinant human B-FABP for fatty acids
B = Bmax F/(Kd + F), where Bmax is maximal number of binding sites, B
is bound fatty acid concentration, F is unbound fatty acid
concentration and Kd is dissociation constant.
|
|
To confirm our isothermal titration calorimetry results and to test the
binding of long chain saturated fatty acids, we used another accepted
method for measuring fatty acid binding, referred to as the
Lipidex assay (42), a variant of the classical charcoal assay (Table
III). The binding of OA to human B-FABP
gave a Kd of 100 nM using the Lipidex
assay (Fig. 5 and Table II), in the same
order of magnitude as those obtained by titration calorimetry. The
binding affinity of saturated fatty acids (palmitic and stearic acids)
to human B-FABP were two orders of magnitude weaker than that of OA,
and the binding of retinoic acid was as weak as that for the saturated
fatty acids. As the Lipidx assay provides relative Kd values, we normalized the results to the binding
constant for OA obtained by titration calorimetry (Table II and Fig.
6). Although our binding constants are
different from those reported by Xu et al. (54) for murine
B-FABP (Kd OA = 0.44 µM, Kd arachidonic acid = 0.25 µM, and Kd DHA = 10 nM) using a modified Lipidx assay, there is good agreement with the high affinity binding of DHA for both the murine and human
proteins. In addition, their work supports our findings that long chain
saturated fatty acids display only weak binding to B-FABP. Together
these binding studies show that fatty acid solubility is not as
critical a determinate for the binding of long and very long chain
fatty acids to B-FABP, as proposed for other FABPs (38). Binding
affinity for B-FABP is more dependent on the number and position of
double bonds in the fatty acids' hydrocarbon tail.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Binding parameters of recombinant human H/M-FABP for fatty acids
All binding parameters were derived from isothermal titration
calorimetry at 30 °C as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Data are given as mean ± S.D., n = 3.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Binding of OA to recombinant human
B-FABP. Analysis of [1-14C]OA bound to B-FABP (0.6 µM) by the Lipidex assay.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Competition of ligands with
[1-14C]OA. Recombinant human B-FABP (2.55 µM) was incubated with 2.55 µM
[1 14C]OA and increasing amounts of nonradioactive
competitors OA ( ), palmitic acid ( ), all-trans retinoic acid
( ), and DHA ( ). Individual data points obtained in a Lipidex
assay are the mean of three determinations.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Binding of OA and DHA to Human B-FABP--
OA binds to B-FABP in
the so-called U-shaped conformation, which has been observed in several
of the group iv FABP structures determined to date (55). DHA (C22:6,
n-6) assumes a significantly different conformation in the B-FABP
binding cavity, resembling a turn of helix. Analysis of the binding
properties and tertiary structure of B-FABP with bound lipid and a
comparison to similar data for other FABPs provides a structural
understanding for the high binding affinity observed for n-3
unsaturated fatty acids. As reported for other binary complexes of
group iv FABPs, the carboxylates of OA and DHA form hydrogen bonds with
conserved Arg126 and Tyr128 residues in B-FABP
(Table II). These electrostatic interactions are not entirely fixed
within the cavity, as the orientation and precise interactions of the
carboxylate of bound fatty acids varies significantly between OA and
DHA bound to B-FABP (Table II). Similar variations in the orientation
of the fatty acid's carboxylate and the conserved Arg and Tyr have
been observed in other members of this group of FABPs.
The hydrocarbon tail of OA forms a large number of VDW interactions
with side chains within the binding cavity and the single double bond
between C9=C10 interacts with the conserved benzene ring of
Phe16, which is found in all group iv FABPs. The six double
bonds in DHA provide extensive
-
interactions between the
unsaturated groups and polar and aromatic side chains of the protein.
In fact, as the conformation of OA in the cavity appears to be
dominated by VDW interactions between the acyl chain and hydrophobic
residues of B-FABP, the path of the acyl chain of DHA aligns the
unsaturated carbons of the acyl chain more directly with polar groups
in the protein.
A unique feature of the human B-FABP·DHA complex is
-
interactions, which occur between Phe104 and the C4=C5
double bond of DHA. Residue Phe104 is conserved in human
B-FABP and chicken retina FABP. In murine (44, 52, 54, 55) and rat (56)
B-FABP the comparable residue is a Cys. The sulfur in
Cys104 of murine and rat B-FABP may also form sulfur-
interaction with the C4=C5 double bond of DHA in a similar fashion to
the known sulfur-
interactions as observed in eye lens protein
(57).
The helical conformation of DHA is further stabilized by the internal
-
interactions between the double bonds C4=C5 and C7=C8, C10=C11
and C13=C14, and C16=C17 and C19=C20 (Table
IV and Fig. 3b). It can be
expected that as the number of double bonds decreases the
internal
interactions will also decrease, and as a consequence the
propensity of the ligand to be stable in the observed helical
conformation will also decrease. This scenario will lead to a reduction
in affinity of B-FABP for very long chain fatty acids without the
correct number and arrangement of double bonds. The helical
conformation adopted by DHA (and probably EPA) is likely to be the low
energy conformation of DHA in solution and therefore not a conformation
imposed by binding to the protein. Alternatively, B-FABP may force
polyunsaturated fatty acids to accommodate this conformation to prevent
them from undergoing free radical-catalyzed peroxidation.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Interatomic distances between the fatty acids and FABP complexes
Double bond C9 = C10 in OA and C4 = C5, C7 = C8,
C10 = C11, C13 = C14, C16 = C17, and C19 = C20 in
DHA are highlighted in bold. Interatomic spacing less than 4.7 Å is
listed.
|
|
Comparison to Other FABP Proteins--
The three-dimensional
structure of human B-FABP has been compared with the crystal structures
of M/H-FABP (called heart FABP (H-FABP), muscle FABP (M-FABP), and
cardiac FABP (C-FABP)) and the adipocyte lipid-binding proteins ALBP
(31, 58). Human B-FABP has 66.2% identity (79.7% similarity) with
human M-FABP and 56.8% identity (73.5% similarity) with mouse ALBP,
43.5% identity. The similarities in the primary sequences are
reflected in the conservation of their three-dimensional structures, as
seen by the root mean square deviation of 0.72 and 0.63 Å for the C
positions for H/M-FABP(1hms), ALBP(1adl1), respectively.
The "U-shape" fatty acid binding mode of OA to human B-FABP is very
similar to what has been reported for H/M-FABP with OA, palmitic acid,
and elaidic acid as well as ALBP with bound lipid (31, 58). In H/M-FABP and ALBP the carboxylate of the fatty acid interacts with the conserved
residues Arg126 and Tyr128, although the
relative orientation of the carboxylate to these groups on the protein
are not identical, the distances of the hydrogen bonds are well maintained.
A comparison of the binding sites of human B-FABP·DHA, human
B-FABP·OA, H/M-FABP·OA, ALBP·palmitate, and ALBP·arachidonate shows that fatty acids of different length were all found to fit within
the confines of the binding cavity. Interestingly, the volume does not
adjust significantly in response to fatty acid length or degree of
saturation. The binding cavity is about 14 Å wide at the widest point
between residues 75 and 117 in all FABPs. The volume of the cavity of
the B-FABP·DHA complex (after removal of the fatty acid and ordered
waters) is ~914 Å3. This is about 2 Å3
larger than the B-FABP·OA complex, and the cavity for the M-FABP·OA complex is about 25 Å3 more spacious than B-FABP·DHA
complex. Therefore, the amount of space within the binding cavity
appears to be constant and thus, has little effect of fatty acid specificity.
Whereas M-FABP, B-FABP, and ALBP have highly conserved residues within
their respective fatty acids binding sites, only B-FABP has a
phenylalanine residue, Phe104, in close proximity to the
C4=C5 double bond found in both the DHA structure and a model we have
constructed of B-FABP·EPA, using Insight II (Molecular Simulations).
As discussed above, we believe that the
-
interactions between
the side chain of Phe104 and the C4=C5, is a primary
determinate for binding specificity. The comparable residue to
Phe104, in M/H-FABP and ALBP is Leu and Ile, respectively,
which do not have a propensity to form
interactions and this may
explain why M-FABP and ALBP do not show strong affinity for EPA and DHA (Table II). However, all members of the group have a comparable residue
to Phe16, which is in a location that could support
-
interactions with the C9=C10 double bonds found in OA, linoleic, and
-linolenic acid. It is important to note that these fatty acids all
bind with high affinity to the group iv FABPs.
Thermodynamics of Binding--
The binding of fatty acids to human
B-FABP is driven mainly by the enthalpic term. Similar results have
been reported for the binding of OA to locust muscle FABP (59) and of
(1, 8)-anilinonaphtalenesulfonate to intestinal FABP (60). Enthalpic
contributions are attributable to noncovalent bonding interactions such
as electrostatic and hydrogen bonding interactions, which are observed
in the B-FABP crystal structures between residues Thr53,
Arg106, Arg126, and Tyr128 and the
carboxylate group of DHA and OA. Despite the significant difference in
conformation of DHA and OA, the enthalpic components to the binding
energy are similar. The enthalpic contribution of binding observed for
OA, linoleic acid, and
-linolenic acid is comparable, but the
entropic contribution decreases with the number of double bonds. This
may be because of decreased flexibility caused by additional double bonds.
We have previously proposed that the affinity of a given fatty acid for
an FABP can be classified into three primary components: 1) the
energetic strain imposed on the ligand in the bound state, 2) the
specific interactions of the protein with the bound ligand, and 3) the
desolvation of the binding cavity and the ligand upon binding (55). The
relatively low entropic contribution to fatty acid binding that have
been observed in several studies of different FABPs has lead to the
suggestion that desolvation may be less important (61). The structural
and thermodynamic analysis of B-FABP suggests that this protein has a
binding pocket that is well suited to bind n-3 fatty acids by creating
an environment within the cavity that permits binding of these fatty
acids in a low energy conformation and provides specific interactions
of the protein with conserved double bonds in the fatty acid.
Comparison of B-FABP and M-FABP indicates that the number and positions
of the double bonds appear to be a primary determinant of binding affinity. For example, whereas M-FABP's binding cavity is large enough
to accommodate DHA in its low energy conformation and the atoms that
compose the binding cavities are nearly identical, the presence of
Phe104 in B-FABP permits additional
-
interactions
and therefore the binding of DHA to B-FABP (Kd = 53 nM) is significantly tighter than to M-FABP
(Kd = 4100 nM).
The specificity of human B-FABP for n-3 fatty acids reflects the
importance of this protein for brain development. In the brain,
polyunsaturated long chain fatty acids are synthesized by astrocytes
and cerebral endothelial cells (62), which may secrete these fatty
acids into the cerebrospinal fluid. B-FABP may act as a sink for these
fatty acids in glial cells, thereby facilitating their uptake. It may
then deliver n-3 fatty acids to the enzymes of phospholipid synthesis.
Recently, it was shown that liver FABP and intestinal FABP
protect intracellular fatty acids against peroxidation by lipoxygenase
and may modulate the availability of polyunsaturated fatty acids to
intracellular oxidative pathways by differential binding (63). By
analogy, B-FABP may also protect DHA and its precursors but not n-6
fatty acids from competing metabolic pathways in glial cells. In other
cells of the brain, H/M-FABP, which has a low affinity for n-3 fatty
acids, may be involved in normal transport of fatty acids for lipid
metabolism in these cells. The presence of different FABPs in the brain
represents an example of how these proteins may exert specialized
functions in one organ.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. J. Eads and R. Feldbrügge
for help with microcalorimetry and fermentation, respectively. Many
thanks also to H. vom Bruch for his help in large scale chromatography
and to R. Franke for excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation,
Grant SFB 310/A4 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and Grant
GM45859 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code
1FDQ) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank,
Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers
University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 409-862-7641;
Fax: 409-862-7638; E-mail:balendra@reddrum.tamu.edu.
Present address: Institut de Genetique et de Biologie
Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS-INSERM-ULP, Collège de
France, BP 163, 67404 Illkirch-Cedex, France.

Work by F. S. was carried out in partial fulfillment
for the requirements of his Ph.D examination.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 14, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003001200
2
Wolfrum, C., Borrmann, C. M., Rolf, B.,
Börchers, T., and Spener, F. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1437, 194-201.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
DHA, docosahexaenoic
acid;
EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid;
B-FABP, brain fatty acid-binding
protein;
VDW, van der Waals;
OA, oleic acid;
r.m.s., root mean square;
E-FABP, epidermal fatty acid-binding protein;
H-FABP, heart fatty
acid-binding protein;
M-FABP, muscle fatty acid-binding protein;
Kd, dissociation constant;
ALBP, adipocyte
lipid-binding protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
O'Brien, J. S.,
and Sampson, E. L.
(1965)
J. Lipid Res.
6,
545-547
|
| 2.
|
Philbrick, D. J.,
Mahadevappa, V. G.,
Ackman, R. G.,
and Holub, B. J.
(1987)
J. Nutr.
117,
1663-1670
|
| 3.
|
Hassam, A. G.,
Sinclair, A. J.,
and Crawford, M. A.
(1975)
Lipids
10,
417-420
|
| 4.
|
Burton, L.,
Scott, M.,
and Bazan, N. G.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
2903-2907
|
| 5.
|
Neuringer, M.,
Anderson, G. J.,
and Connor, W. E.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
8,
517-541
|
| 6.
|
Salem, N., Jr.,
Serpentino, P.,
Puskin, J. S.,
and Abood, L. G.
(1980)
Chem. Phys. Lipids
27,
289-293
|
| 7.
|
Bourre, J. M.,
Francois, M.,
Youyou, A.,
Dumont, O.,
Piciotti, M.,
Pascal, G.,
and Durand, G.
(1989)
J. Nutr.
119,
1880-1892
|
| 8.
|
Innis, S. M.,
Sprecher, H.,
Hachey, D.,
Edmond, D.,
and Anderson, R. E.
(1999)
Lipids
34,
139-149
|
| 9.
|
Nouvelot, A.,
Debonder, E.,
Dewailly, P.,
and Bourre, J. M.
(1985)
Cah. Nutr. Diet.
20,
123-125
|
| 10.
|
Connor, W. E.,
Neuringer, E. M.,
Barstad, L.,
and Lin, D. S.
(1984)
Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians
97,
1-19
|
| 11.
|
Yamamoto, N.,
Saitoh, M.,
Moriuchi, A.,
Nomura, M.,
and Okuyama, H.
(1987)
J. Lipid Res.
28,
144-151
|
| 12.
|
Roberts, L. J., II,
Montine, T. J.,
Markesbery, W. R.,
Tapper, A. R.,
Hardy, P.,
Chemtob, S.,
Dettbarn, W. D.,
and Morrow, J. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13605-13612
|
| 13.
|
Nourooz-Zadeh, J.,
Liu, E. H. C.,
Anggard, E. E.,
and Halliwell, B.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
242,
338-344
|
| 14.
|
Nourooz-Zadeh, J.,
Liu, E. H. C.,
Yhlen, B.,
Anggard, E. E.,
and Halliwell, B.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
72,
734-740
|
| 15.
|
Harman, D.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
7124-7128
|
| 16.
|
Halliwell, B.,
and Gutteridge, J. M. C.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
186,
1-85
|
| 17.
|
Ames, B. N.
(1983)
Science
221,
1256-1264
|
| 18.
|
Southorn, P. A.,
and Powis, G.
(1988)
Mayo Clin. Proc.
63,
390-408
|
| 19.
|
Markesbery, W. R.
(1997)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
23,
134-147
|
| 20.
|
Knight, J. A.
(1997)
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.
27,
11-25
|
| 21.
|
Simonian, N. A.,
and Coyle, J. T.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
36,
83-106
|
| 22.
|
Feng, L.,
Hatten, M. E.,
and Heintz, N.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
895-908
|
| 23.
|
Kurtz, A.,
Zimmer, A.,
Schnütgen, F.,
Brüning, G.,
Spener, F.,
and Müller, T.
(1994)
Development
120,
2637-2649
|
| 24.
|
Kaikaus, R. M.,
Bass, N. M.,
and Ockner, R. K.
(1990)
Experientia (Basel)
46,
617-630
|
| 25.
|
Wolfrum, C.,
Ellinghaus, P.,
Fobker, M.,
Seedorf, U.,
Assmann, G.,
Börchers, T.,
and Spener, F.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
704-714
|
| 26.
|
Evans, S. V.
(1993)
J. Mol. Graphics
11,
134-138
|
| 27.
|
Jones, T. A.,
Bergfors, T.,
Sedzik, J.,
and Unge, T.
(1989)
EMBO J.
7,
1597-1604
|
| 28.
|
Sacchettini, J. C.,
Gordon, J. I.,
and Banaszak, L. J.
(1989a)
J. Mol. Biol.
208,
327-339
|
| 29.
|
Scapin, G.,
Spadon, P.,
Mammi, M.,
Zanotti, G.,
and Monaco, H. L.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
98,
95-99
|
| 30.
|
Muller-Fahrnow, A.,
Egner, U.,
Jones, T. A.,
Ruedel, H.,
Spener, F.,
and Saenger, W.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
199,
271-276
|
| 31.
|
Xu, Z.,
Bernhlor, D. A.,
and Banaszak, L. J.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
3484-3492
|
| 32.
|
Zanotti, G.,
Scapin, G.,
Spadon, P.,
Veerkamp, J. H.,
and Sacchettini, J. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18541-18550
|
| 33.
|
Haunerland, N. H.,
Jacobson, B. L.,
Wesenberg, G.,
Rayment, I.,
and Holden, H. M.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12378-12385
|
| 34.
|
Benning, M. M.,
Smith, A. F.,
Wells, M. A.,
and Holden, H. M.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
228,
208-219
|
| 35.
|
Lucke, C.,
Zhang, F.,
Ruterjans, H.,
Hamilton, J. A.,
and Sacchettini, J. C.
(1996)
Structure
4,
785-800
|
| 36.
|
Hohoff, C.,
and Spener, F.
(1998)
Fett. Lipid
100,
252-263
|
| 37.
|
Eads, J.,
Sacchettini, J. C.,
Kromminga, A.,
and Gordon, J. I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26375-26385
|
| 38.
|
Kleinfeld, A. M.,
Storms, S.,
and Watts, M.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
8011-8019
|
| 39.
|
Godbout, R.
(1993)
Exp. Eye Res.
56,
95-106
|
| 40.
|
Studier, F. W.,
Rosenberg, A. H.,
Dunn, J. J.,
and Dubendorff, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
185,
60-89
|
| 41.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 42.
|
Glatz, J. F. C.,
and Veerkamp, J. H.
(1983)
Anal. Biochem.
132,
89-95
|
| 43.
|
Cham, B. E.,
and Knowles, B. R.
(1976)
J. Lipid Res.
17,
176-181
|
| 44.
|
Schreiber, A.,
Specht, B.,
Pelsers, M. A. C.,
Glatz, J. F. C.,
Börchers, T.,
and Spener, F.
(1998)
Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.
36,
283-288
|
| 45.
|
Howard, A. J.
(1986)
A Guide for the Data Reduction for the Nicolet Imaging Proportional Counter: the XENGEN System
, Genex Corp., Gaithersburg, MD
|
| 46.
|
Otwinowski, Z.,
and Minor, W.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
276,
307-326
|
| 47.
|
Brünger, A. T.,
Kuryian, J.,
and Karplus, M.
(1987)
Science
235,
458-460
|
| 48.
|
Brünger, A. T.
(1992)
X-PLOR Version 3 Manual: A System for Crystallography and NMR
, Yale University, New Haven, CT
|
| 49.
|
Laskowski, R. A.,
MacArthur, M. W.,
Moss, S. D.,
and Thornton, J. M.
(1993)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
26,
283-291
|
| 50.
|
Brünger, A. T.
(1998)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
54,
905-921
|
| 51.
|
Wiseman, T.,
Williston, S.,
Brandts, J. F.,
and Lin, L.-N.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
197,
131-137
|
| 52.
|
Schnütgen, F.,
Börchers, T.,
Müller, T.,
and Spener, F.
(1996)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
377,
211-215
|
| 53.
|
Sacchettini, J. C.,
and Gordon, J. I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18399-18403
|
| 54.
|
Xu, L. Z.,
Sanchez, R.,
Sali, A.,
and Heintz, N.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24711-24719
|
| 55.
|
Young, C. M.,
Scapin, G.,
Kromminga, A.,
Patel, S. B.,
Veerkamp, J. H.,
and Sacchettini, J. C.
(1994)
Structure
2,
523-534
|
| 56.
|
Bennett, E.,
Stenvers, K. L.,
Lund, P. K.,
and Popko, B.
(1994)
J. Neurochem.
63,
1616-1624
|
| 57.
|
Blundell, T. L.,
Lindley, P. F.,
Miller, L. R.,
Moss, D. S.,
Slingsby, C.,
Tickle, I. J.,
Turnell, W. G.,
and Wistow, G. J.
(1981)
Nature
289,
771-777
|
| 58.
|
LaLonde, J. M.,
Levenson, M. A.,
Roe, J. J.,
Bernlohr, D. A.,
and Banaszak, L. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
25339-25347
|
| 59.
|
Maatman, R. G. H. J.,
Degano, M.,
van Moekerk, H. T. B.,
van Marrewijk, D. J.,
van der Horst, D. J.,
Sacchettini, J. C.,
and Veerkamp, J. H.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
221,
801-810
|
| 60.
|
Kirk, W. R.,
Kurian, E.,
and Prendergast, F. G.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
70,
69-83
|
| 61.
|
Richieri, G. V.,
Ogata, R. T.,
and Kleinfeld, A. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15076-15084
|
| 62.
|
Moore, S. A.,
Yoder, E.,
Murphy, S.,
Dutton, G. R.,
and Spector, A. A.
(1991)
J. Neurochem.
56,
518-524
|
| 63.
|
Ek, B. A.,
Cistola, D. P.,
Hamilton, J. A.,
Kaduce, T. L.,
and Spector, A. A.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1346,
75-85
|
| 64.
|
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallography
24,
946-950
|
| 65.
|
Merritt, E.,
and Murphy, M. E. P.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
50,
869-873
|
| 66.
|
Christopher, J. A.
(1998)
SPOCK: The Structural Properties Observation and Calculation Kit (Program Manual)
, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us