Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003126200 on May 25, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 35, 27386-27392, September 1, 2000
DNA Repair Patch-mediated Double Strand DNA Break Formation
in Human Cells*
Stéphane
Vispé and
Masahiko S.
Satoh
From the DNA Repair Group, Health and Environment Unit, Laval
University Medical Research Center, CHUQ, Faculty of Medicine,
Laval University, 2705 Boulevard Laurier, Sainte-Foy, Quebec G1V
4G2, Canada
Received for publication, April 12, 2000, and in revised form, May 19, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
To investigate the mechanism of double strand DNA
break formation in mammalian cells, an in vitro assay was
established using closed circular DNA containing two uracils on
opposite DNA strands (18 and 30 base pairs apart) and extracts prepared
from human cells. In this assay, formation of double strand breaks was
detected by the conversion of circular DNA to linear DNA. Approximately 4-fold more double strand DNA breaks were produced by extracts from
cells deficient in DNA ligase I (46BR) relative to those produced by
extracts from control cells (MRC5, derived from a clinically normal
individual). In parallel with the amount of double strand DNA breaks,
extracts from 46BR cells produced longer repair patches (up to 24 bases
in length) than those from MRC5 cells (typically <5 bases long). When
purified DNA ligase I was added to 46BR extracts to complement the DNA
ligase deficiency, only a negligible difference was found between the
amount of doublestrand DNA breaks or the repair patch size
generated in the assay relative to MRC5 extracts. Together, our data
demonstrate that double strand DNA breaks are produced through
formation of DNA repair patches. We refer to this process of double
strand break formation as the "DNA repair patch-mediated pathway."
 |
INTRODUCTION |
-Rays and x-rays are cytotoxic for cells (for review, see Refs.
1 and 2). These forms of ionizing radiation produce reactive oxygen
free radicals that generate a variety of DNA lesions, including
oxidized DNA bases, apurinic/apyrimidinic
(AP)1 sites, and single
strand DNA breaks (SSBs) (1-4). In cells, some of these initial
lesions are converted to double strand DNA breaks (DSBs), which play a
central role in the cytotoxicity induced by ionizing radiation (1, 2).
The following mechanisms for the formation of DSBs have been proposed.
Ionizing radiation induces clusters of DNA damage, with lesions spaced
10-20 bases apart (2). The formation of two closely spaced SSBs on
opposite strands can result in strand separation (1, 2) if the
Tm for the intervening sequence is below 37 °C
(assuming a GC content of 50% and an intervening sequence of 10 base
pairs). DSBs can also occur as a result of two closely spaced oxidized
bases or AP sites (5, 6). Oxidized DNA bases are removed by DNA
glycosylases, resulting in the formation of AP sites (7-9). These AP
sites or AP sites generated directly by hydroxy radicals are then
incised by AP endonuclease, which produces SSBs (7-9). Thus, the
cellular response to closely spaced AP sites or oxidized bases will
result in closely spaced SSBs capable of forming DSBs as described
above. In fact, it has been shown that closely spaced AP sites in
duplex oligonucleotides are converted to DSBs by Escherichia
coli or human AP endonuclease (5, 6). When damaged bases are
located sufficiently far apart, the Tm for the
intervening sequence will be too high for DSBs to form by simple strand separation.
During the repair of oxidized DNA bases or AP sites by base excision
repair (BER), 1-base gaps are enzymatically created and filled by DNA
polymerases (8, 10). Using a reconstituted base excision repair assay,
it was found that whereas DNA polymerase
fills these gaps primarily
with a single nucleotide (11), DNA polymerases
and
fill the
gaps with up to 10 nucleotides in conjunction with displacement of the
DNA strand from the initial gaps in the 5' to 3' direction (12-14).
In vivo, repair patches up to 40 nucleotides long have been
observed at damage sites (4, 15, 16). Repair of DNA breaks on opposite
strands gives rise to a situation in which the DNA polymerases
synthesizing new DNA to fill in the repair patches move toward each
other; if the repair patches are long enough, the two polymerases will
collide and fall off the DNA, resulting in a DSB. Alternatively, DNA
polymerase involved in the repair of one break may reach another break
on the opposite strand before completing synthesis of the repair patch,
also resulting in a DSB. Thus, even when the DNA between two lesions
has a Tm >37 °C, such lesions can be converted to DSBs. We refer to this pathway as the "DNA repair patch-mediated pathway" for DSB formation.
To test the hypothesis that long repair patches can mediate DSB
formation, we established an in vitro DSB formation assay using cell-free extracts and closed circular plasmid containing damage
in the form of two uracils on opposite strands. Cell-free extracts were
prepared from MRC5 cells (derived from a clinically normal individual)
and from 46BR cells (generated from a patient with DNA ligase I
deficiency) (17). 46BR cells show delayed rejoining of DNA breaks
following exposure to DNA-damaging agents due to their DNA ligase I
deficiency (18, 19).
Here we show that extracts from 46BR cells produced longer repair
patches (up to 24 bases) relative to extracts from MRC5 cells (up to 5 bases). In parallel with the increased repair patch size, extracts from
46BR cells produced more DSBs as well. Addition of DNA ligase I to the
reaction reduced the repair patch size as well as the amount of DSBs
formed in the presence of 46BR extracts. Thus, our data demonstrate
that the DNA repair patch-mediated pathway is involved in the formation
of DSBs. In cells, this pathway may significantly increase the
probability of DSB formation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines and Recombinant DNA Ligase I--
The simian virus
40-transformed human fibroblasts 46BR.1G1 (DNA ligase I-deficient) and
MRC5 (from a clinically normal individual) were obtained from the
European Collection of Cell Cultures (Salisbury, Wiltshire, United
Kingdom). Lymphoblastoid GMO1953A cells (from a clinically normal
individual) were from the NIGMS Human Mutant Cell Repository (Camden,
NJ). DNA ligase I cDNA cloned into the E. coli
expression vector pET11a was kindly provided by Dr. T. Lindahl, and the
protein was purified essentially following the method of Mackenney
et al. (20) using Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid
resin (QIAGEN Inc.).
Construction of Substrates for DSB Assay--
The following six
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis-purified oligonucleotides
were synthesized (Genosys Biotechnologies, The Woodlands,
TX): KS(+),
5'-GCGCGGGGTACCGGTCCGGACATATGGGCGCCGCGCGCCCATGGGCATGCGGCCGCCT-3'; KS(+)U,
5'-GCGCGGGGTACCGGUCCGGACATATGGGCGCCGCGCGCCCATGGGCATGCGGCCGCCT-3'; KS(
), 5'-CGGCCGCATGCCCATGGGCGCGCGGCGCCCATATGTCCGGACCGGTACCCCGCGC-3'; KS(
)U10,
5'-CGGCCGCATCCCCATGGGCGCGCGGCGCCUATATGTCCGGACCGGTACCCCGCGC-3'; KS(
)U18,
5'-CGGCCGCATCCCCATGGGCGCUCGGCGCCCATATGTCCGGACCGGTACCCCGCGC-3'; and KS(
)U30,
5'-CGGCCGCATUCCCATGGGCGCGCGGCGCCCATATGTCCGGACCGGTACCCCGCGC-3'.
KS(
), KS(
)U10, KS(
)U18, and KS(
)U30 (1 nmol/ml) were
phosphorylated using 70 units/ml T4 polynucleotide kinase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with 1 mM ATP in the reaction mixture
recommended by the supplier. To prepare duplex oligonucleotides, 1 nmol/ml each KS(+) and KS(
), KS(+) and KS(
)U18, KS(+)U and
KS(
)U10, KS(+)U and KS(
)U18, or KS(+)U and KS(
)U30 was mixed and
incubated at 90 °C for 5 min, followed by 56 °C for 5 min. The
resulting annealed oligonucleotides, which contained 3'-TCC protruding
ends and a KpnI site on the other end (see Fig.
1A), are referred to as F0U (without uracil), F1U (one
uracil), F2U10 (two uracils 10 bp apart), F2U18 (two uracils 18 bp
apart), and F2U30 (two uracils 30 bp apart), respectively. These duplex
oligonucleotides also contained NcoI, SfoI, and
BspEI sites as illustrated in Fig. 1A.
The pBS(S) plasmid was constructed by inserting a 40-bp duplex
oligonucleotide containing an SfiI site into the
KpnI and EcoRI sites of pBluescript II
KS+ (Stratagene). Then, 400 µg/ml pBS(S) was digested
with 800 units/ml KpnI for 2 h at 37 °C, followed by
440 units/ml SfiI for 2 h at 50 °C. Fragments (20 bp) produced by the double digest were removed from the rest of
pBS(SfiI-KpnI) by MicroSpin S-400 HR gel
filtration columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). 200 µg/ml
pBS(SfiI-KpnI) fragment with a AGG-3' tail
attached was then ligated to the 3'-TCC tail of the F0U, F1U, F2U10,
F2U18, or F2U30 oligonucleotide (440 pmol/ml) using 38 Weiss units/ml
T4 DNA ligase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and 1 mM ATP in
the reaction mixture provided by Amersham Pharmacia Biotech for 16 h at 16 °C. After phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol
precipitation of DNA, the resulting
pBS(SfiI-KpnI) fragment, ligated to the annealed
oligonucleotides, was digested with 800 units/ml KpnI at
37 °C for 2 h. Then, the DNA was self-circularized through the
KpnI site in ligation buffer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) containing 1 mM ATP and 10 Weiss units/ml T4 DNA ligase for
16 h at 16 °C. The circularized DNA was concentrated by
ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 24 h using
a Beckman SW 28 rotor. Precipitated DNA was recovered, and closed
circular DNA was purified by two sequential EtBr/CsCl centrifugations.
The resulting closed circular plasmids containing F0U, F1U, F2U10,
F2U18, or F2U30 oligonucleotides are referred to as P0U, P1U, P2U10,
P2U18, and P2U30, respectively.
Induction of Single Strand DNA Breaks at the Site of
Uracils--
P2U10, P2U18, and P2U30 plasmids (640 ng) were incubated
with 0.4 units of uracil-DNA glycosylase (New England Biolabs Inc.) in
the reaction mixture (20 µl) provided by the supplier for 1 h at
37 °C. The resulting AP sites were hydrolyzed by 45 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) at 37 °C for 24 h. DNA was then analyzed by
EtBr and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Preparation of Cell-free Extracts, DNA Repair Reaction, and DSB
Formation Assay--
Cell-free extracts were prepared following the
method of Manley et al. (21). The DNA repair reaction was
carried out with 300 ng of substrate DNA, 50 µg of cell-free extract,
and 2 mM NAD+ at 30 °C in a 50-µl reaction
volume under conditions described previously (22, 23). The resulting
DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction followed by
ethanol precipitation in the presence of 14 µg of tRNA as a carrier
and 2.5 M ammonium acetate. Precipitated DNA was dissolved
with 21 µl of 90 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 90 mM boric acid, and 2 mM EDTA and treated with 100 µg/ml
RNase A. The DNA was then fractionated by EtBr and 1% agarose gel
electrophoresis to visualize linear DNA produced by the formation of DSBs.
Analysis of Repair Patch Size--
Cell-free reactions were
carried out with 300 ng of either P0U or P1U as described above in the
presence of 10 µCi of [
-32P]dGTP or
[
-32P]dCTP. After purification and precipitation of
DNA, samples were dissolved in 10 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8.0) and double-digested with AflIII (200 units/ml) and
NcoI (500 units/ml), SfoI (200 units/ml),
BspEI (500 units/ml), or KpnI (1000 units/ml).
Digested DNA fragments were fractionated by EtBr and 1% agarose gel
electrophoresis. After drying the gel and exposing to x-ray film,
32P activity incorporated into the DNA fragments was
quantified by an AlphaImager (Packard Instrument Co.).
 |
RESULTS |
Construction of Substrate--
Closed circular DNAs containing two
uracils on opposite DNA strands either 18 or 30 bp apart were
constructed for use with cell-free extracts in an in vitro
DSB formation assay. As shown in Fig.
1A, two oligonucleotides were
annealed, and double stranded oligonucleotides containing two uracils
spaced either 18 or 30 bp apart (F2U18 and F2U30, respectively) were
prepared. F0U, F1U, and F2U10 (containing no uracil and one uracil and
two uracils 10 bp apart, respectively) were also prepared as controls.
The double-stranded oligonucleotides contained four restriction
sites (NcoI (Nc), SfoI
(Sf), BspEI (Bs), and KpnI
(K)) to allow for analysis of repair patch size. Although
double stranded oligonucleotides can be used directly in an in
vitro DSB formation assay, the presence of two DNA ends that are
themselves DSBs might have complicated analysis of DSB formation. In
addition, repair of DNA breaks by DNA polymerases
and
does not
occur efficiently on linear DNA (24). Therefore, double stranded
oligonucleotides were circularized by insertion into SfiI-
and KpnI-double-digested pBS(S) as summarized in Fig.
1B. AGG-3' and 3'-TCC protruding ends were attached to double-digested pBS(S) and double stranded oligonucleotides,
respectively (Fig. 1, A and B). Since AGG-3' and
3'-TCC are non-palindromic sequences, intermolecular ligation of
double-digested pBS(S) molecules or double stranded oligonucleotides
was inhibited, allowing ligation of double-digested pBS(S) to the
double stranded oligonucleotide. The ligated DNA was then treated with
KpnI and self-circularized. The typical yield of substrate
DNA was ~20 µg from 500 µg of pBS(S). The resulting circular DNAs
contained no uracil, one uracil, two uracils 10 bp apart, two uracils
18 bp apart, or two uracils 30 bp apart and are referred to as P0U,
P1U, P2U10, P2U18, and P2U30, respectively. About 5% of the resulting
DNAs appeared to be closed circular dimers (Fig. 1C,
Non-treated upper bands).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic illustration for the construction
of substrate DNA and analysis of substrate stability after induction of
SSBs at uracil sites. A, two synthetic oligonucleotides
were annealed, and double stranded oligonucleotides were prepared.
These oligonucleotides contained NcoI (Nc),
SfoI (Sf), BspEI (Bs), and
KpnI (K) sites. Oligonucleotides containing no
uracil, one uracil, two uracils 10 bp apart, two uracils 18 bp apart,
and two uracils 30 bp apart are referred as to F0U, F1U, F2U10, F2U18,
and F2U30, respectively. B, these double-stranded
oligonucleotides were ligated into SfiI- and
KpnI-double-digested pBS(S). After ligation through AGG-3'
and 3'-TCC tails, the DNA was treated with KpnI and
self-circularized. C, to test plasmid stability following
induction of SSBs at the site of uracils, P2U10, P2U18, and P2U30 were
treated with uracil-DNA glycosylase and weak alkaline solution to
hydrolyze the resulting AP site, and formation of linear DNA was
analyzed by EtBr and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The
Tm values for the sequence between the two uracils
are 30, 62, and 75 °C for P2U10, P2U18, and P2U30,
respectively.
|
|
Although manipulation of DNA by this procedure did induce some damage,
as detected by incorporation of dGMP (~40 fmol) into P0U (30 fmol)
following incubation of the plasmid with MRC5 cell-free extracts (using
DSB formation assay conditions as described under "Experimental
Procedures"), the amount of damage was not significant. Assuming that
a repair patch size of 1 base was generated, we estimated the number of
damaged bases to be only 1-2/P0U plasmid. In addition, this degree of
damage did not affect analysis of DSB formation since a negligible
amount of P0U DNA was linearized when incubated with cell-free extract
(data not shown).
The calculated Tm values for the intervening
sequence between the two uracils in P2U18 and P2U30 are 62 and
75 °C, respectively. Thus, even if SSBs are produced at the uracil
sites, these substrates are not expected to be linearized at 37 °C.
In fact, after removal of uracils from P2U18 or P2U30 by uracil-DNA glycosylase followed by hydrolysis of the resulting AP sites by alkaline treatment (pH 8.8) for 24 h at 37 °C, >90% of closed circular P2U18 and P2U30 plasmids were converted to the open circular form, but only negligible amounts were linearized (Fig. 1C).
On the other hand, P2U10, with a Tm of 30 °C for
the intervening sequence, was linearized by this treatment.
Distribution of Repair Patch Sizes--
To determine the
distribution of repair patch sizes generated by different cell
extracts, a cell-free DNA repair assay was carried out with P1U, which
contains one uracil. Since the counterpart of uracil is cytosine (Fig.
2A),
[
-32P]dGTP was included in the reaction to label
repair patches. Then, DNA was extracted from the reaction mixture and
digested with AflIII (located 420 bp downstream from uracil)
and one of the following restriction enzymes: NcoI
(Nc), SfoI (Sf), BspEI
(Bs), or KpnI (Kp) (Fig.
2A). Since NcoI is located upstream of the uracils, radioactivity incorporated into the
NcoI-AflIII fragment reflects total repair
activity. The digested DNA was analyzed by EtBr and 1% agarose gel
electrophoresis. If a given restriction site is located within the
repair patch, radioactivity should be found in the DNA fragments
generated by the double digest. However, if the site is located beyond
the repair patch, radioactivity found in the DNA fragment should be
comparable to background levels.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analysis of repair patch distribution.
A, DNA sequences around the uracil in P1U are illustrated.
Fragment size after double digestion with AflIII and
NcoI (Nc), SfoI (Sf),
BspEI (Bs), or KpnI (Kp) is
indicated on the top. Numbers below the sequence are based
on a starting position of 1 for uracil. The counterpart of uracil is
cytosine. B, after incubation of P0U or P1U with extracts
from either MRC5 or 46BR cells for 30 min in the presence or absence of
10 × 10 4 units (Weiss units) of
purified DNA ligase I, DNA was double-digested and fractionated by EtBr
and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. After drying, the gel was
exposed to x-ray film for autoradiography.
C, 32P was quantified with an
AlphaImager.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 2 (B and C,
DNA ligase I), incorporation of radioactivity was found in
the NcoI-AflIII fragments derived from the P1U
plasmid (B and C, P1U, Nc),
whereas less [
-32P]dGMP was found incorporated into
fragments extracted from P0U (B, P0U,
Nc), the plasmid containing no uracil. These data suggest that incorporation of 32P was due to repair of the uracil.
When assays were carried out using extracts from MRC5 cells,
significantly less 32P activity was incorporated into P1U
SfoI-AflIII fragments (Fig. 2, B and
C, MRC5, P1U, Sf). Since
the SfoI restriction site is located 5 bp downstream from
the uracil (Fig. 2A), this result suggests that most of the
repair patches generated by MRC5 cells do not exceed 5 bases in length.
When [
-32P]dCTP, instead of
[
-32P]dGTP, was employed (only repair patches >2
bases were labeled), the 32P activity found in the
NcoI-AflIII fragments was reduced to 20% of that
found in assays with [
-32P]dGTP (data not shown).
Thus, these data suggest that most of the repair patches produced by
extracts from MRC5 cells are of 1 base.
When the P1U plasmid was incubated with 46BR extracts and
[
-32P]dGTP, a significant amount of radioactivity was
detected even in the SfoI-AflIII and
BspEI-AflIII fragments (Fig. 2, B and
C, 46BR, P1U, Sf and
Bs). Since 46BR extracts caused higher nonspecific incorporation of [32P]dGMP into P0U, the amount of
32P activity incorporated into P0U fragments was subtracted
from that incorporated into P1U. As shown in Fig. 2C, the
amounts of [32P]dGMP found in the
SfoI-AflIII and
BspEI-AflIII fragments were still significantly
increased for the assay using 46BR extracts relative to MRC5 extracts.
From this we conclude that most repair patches created by 46BR extracts
are up to 24 bases in length, much longer than the repair patches
produced by MRC5 cell extracts. When [
-32P]dCTP,
instead of [
-32P]dGTP, was employed, the amount of
32P incorporated into the NcoI-AflIII
fragments was only reduced to 70% of that found in the assay with
[
-32P]dGTP (data not shown). These data suggest that
the proportion of single nucleotide repair occurring in assays with
46BR extracts was significantly less than that in assays with MRC5 extracts.
When 46BR extracts were tested in an assay to which purified DNA ligase
I was added, 32P activity in the
SfoI-AflIII and
BspEI-AflIII fragments was significantly reduced
(Fig. 2, B and C, + DNA ligase I). On
the other hand, addition of T4 DNA ligase had no effect on the size of
repair patches (data not shown). These data demonstrate that the
increased repair patch size observed with 46BR extracts is due to the
deficiency in DNA ligase I. In an in vitro reconstituted BER
assay, the absence of DNA ligase I caused increased repair patch size
(13, 25), a result that agrees well with our observations using 46BR extracts.
DSB Formation--
Either P2U18 or P2U30 plasmids were incubated
with MRC5 cell-free extracts. The resulting products were analyzed by
EtBr and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Both open circular forms
(generated by removal of uracils and incision of the resulting AP
sites) and linear forms (generated by DSB formation) were generated
from the closed circular plasmid (Fig.
3A, MRC5). Similar
results were obtained when substrate plasmids containing AP sites
instead of uracils were used (data not shown). The amount of linearized
DNA became saturated above 50 µg of extracts (data not shown).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
DSB formation assay. A, P1U,
P2U18, or P2U30 plasmids were incubated with extracts from MRC5 or 46BR
cells for various times, and the DNA was purified as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The DNA was then fractionated by EtBr
and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis to allow detection of linear DNA, a
reflection of DSB formation. Contrast was adjusted for linear DNA, thus
saturating the signals for open and closed circular DNAs. B,
quantified data are shown.
|
|
To exclude the possibility that the DNA was linearized by nonspecific
digestion, we analyzed P1U, which contains only one uracil.
Linearization of this plasmid in the assay with MRC5 extracts would
indicate that nonspecific nicking, rather than the specific repair of
uracils, was responsible for linearization of the P2U18 and P2U30
plasmids. The fact that negligible amounts of linear P1U DNA were
produced in the presence of extracts from MRC5 cells (Fig.
3A, MRC5) indicates that linearization of the
P2U18 and P2U30 plasmids was linked to the presence of 2 damaged bases. To further confirm that DSBs were created between the two DNA uracils,
linearized DNA was extracted from the agarose gel and digested with
AflIII, resulting in the expected 0.6- and 2.4-kilobase pair
fragments (data not shown).
Under the conditions described, ~7.0 ng of linear DNA (corresponding
to 2.5% of total DNA) was formed from 300 ng of closed circular P2U18
after a 60-min incubation (Fig. 3, A and B). When the P2U30 plasmid was incubated with MRC5 extracts, linearization was
reduced compared with P2U18 linearization (Fig. 3, A and
B, MRC5, 7.0 ng for P2U18 versus 3.0 ng for P2U30), indicating that the probability of forming DSBs is
reduced in proportion to the distance between the two damage sites.
Similar results were obtained when extracts from GMO1953A cells were
used (data not shown).
When the P1U plasmid was incubated with 46BR extracts in the DSB
formation assay, the amount of open circular DNA produced was greater
than that produced by MRC5 extracts (40% of total DNA at 60 min
versus 25% for MRC5 extracts). We routinely added NAD+, the substrate for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, to the
assay to promote automodification of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and thus inhibit binding of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase to DNA breaks (22,
23). In the absence of NAD+, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase
significantly reduces the rate of DNA break rejoining by remaining
on DNA breaks (22, 23). When NAD+ was removed, in
fact, the amount of the open circular form increased to 80% of total
DNA (no significant difference in the amount of open circular DNA was
found for MRC5 versus 46BR extracts). These data suggest
that both extracts contain a similar level of incision activity at
uracil sites and that accumulation of more open circular DNA in 46BR
extracts versus MRC5 extracts under standard assay conditions (i.e. in the presence of NAD+) is due
to DNA ligase I deficiency.
Consistent with results obtained using the P1U plasmid, an increased
amount of open circular DNA was formed when P2U18 was incubated with
extracts from 46BR cells. In addition, ~4-fold more linear DNA (30 ng
or 10% of total DNA at 60 min of incubation) was produced relative to
that formed by extracts from MRC5 cells (Fig. 3, A and
B). In addition, extracts from 46BR cells were capable of
linearizing P2U30 (Fig. 3, A and B, 3.0 ng for
MRC5 versus 14 ng for 46BR). As demonstrated (Fig. 2),
extracts from 46BR cells increased the DNA repair patch size. Thus,
these data suggest that the formation of long repair patches promotes
increased production of DSBs.
Reduced DSB Formation by 46BR Extracts in the Presence of DNA
Ligase I--
As described, addition of DNA ligase I reduced the DNA
repair patch size produced by extracts from 46BR cells (Fig. 2,
B and C). In parallel with this reduction,
addition of DNA ligase I also decreased the amount of linear DNA formed
by 46BR extracts (Fig. 4, A
and B). However, the equivalent amount of DNA ligase I had a
less significant effect on DNA linearization by MRC5 extracts. In this
assay, no circularization or dimerization of linearized DNA was
observed (data not shown), suggesting that reduced formation of linear
DNA was not due to rejoining of DNA ends. When T4 DNA ligase was added
instead of DNA ligase I, the effect on linearization was negligible
(Fig. 4, A and B). Thus, these data suggest that DSB formation in 46BR cells is linked to the deficiency in DNA ligase I
and to formation of long repair patches.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Reduced DSB formation by addition of purified
DNA ligase I. A, P1U and P2U18 were incubated with
extracts from MRC5 or 46BR cells in the absence or presence of purified
DNA ligase I (0.5, 2, or 10 × 10 4 Weiss
units) or T4 DNA ligase (10 × 10 4 Weiss
units) for 60 min as indicated, and DNA was purified as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The DNA was then fractionated by EtBr
and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis for detection of linear DNA
generated by DSB formation. Contrast was adjusted for linear DNA, thus
saturating signals for open and closed circular DNAs. B,
quantified data are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report, we demonstrate a novel pathway for the production
of DSBs. In mammalian cells, DSBs are often observed to develop during
the post-irradiation period (26, 27), leading to speculation that
cellular enzymes are involved. In this context, generation of DSBs by
double incision of two closely spaced AP sites on opposite strands was
demonstrated using a model substrate and purified E. coli or
human AP endonuclease (5, 6). Similarly, Dianov et al. (28)
showed that the excision of two uracil residues closely spaced on
opposite strands by E. coli extracts led to the formation of
DSBs. In addition, closely spaced SSBs and 8-hydroxyguanine sites also
resulted in DSBs when the substrate DNA was treated with E. coli formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (29), an enzyme that
induces DNA breaks at the site of 8-hydroxyguanine through its AP lyase
activity (8, 9). These results provide a conceptual background for the
formation of DSBs. However, in these cases, DSB formation is dependent
on a Tm below 37 °C for dissociation of DNA
between the sites of damage on opposite strands. Assuming a GC content
of 50% in the intervening sequence, the Tm would be
30 °C for a 10-base stretch and 42 °C for a 14-base stretch. However, for DNA lesions spaced >14 bases apart, the intervening DNA
is generally stable at 37 °C. It has been demonstrated that ionizing
radiation induces closely spaced clusters of DNA damage (within a range
of 10-20 bp (2) and possibly up to 80 bp in vivo (2)).
These distances typically preclude DSB formation by the above
mechanism. However, in this paper, we demonstrate the existence of a
new pathway, the DNA repair patch-mediated pathway, which is
capable of generating DSBs from two opposed sites of damage located 18 and even 30 bp apart. The existence of this pathway therefore
significantly increases the likelihood of DSB formation in cells.
In Fig. 5, we present a model for DSB
formation by the DNA repair patch-mediated pathway. A DNA duplex
containing two SSBs on opposite strands is formed. This duplex is
stable if the Tm for the intervening sequence is
>37 °C. When the SSBs are repaired with short repair patches, the
breaks are sealed without formation of DSBs (Fig. 5A). When
long repair patches are formed, the repair patch produced from one SSB
may reach all the way to the SSB on the opposite strand, resulting in
the formation of a DSB (Fig. 5B). Alternatively, the repair
patches generated from the two SSBs may be long enough to overlap,
resulting in collision of the DNA polymerases synthesizing the repair
patches and formation of a DSB (Fig. 5C). Thus, our model
suggests that DNA repair with short patches presents less risk for DSB
formation than repair with long patches.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Model for DNA repair patch-mediated DSB
formation. DNA repair patches are formed by DNA polymerases and,
in the case of long patch, by other factors (e.g. flap
endonuclease 1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen) (12, 38,
43-45). See "Discussion" for details.
|
|
DSBs are the most lethal type of DNA damage. In mammalian cells, DSBs
can be rejoined either through non-homologous end joining by the
DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit/Ku pathway or by
homologous recombination (30-32). However, incorrect or incomplete rejoining of DSB may cause mutations or cytotoxicity. Thus, frequent formation of DSBs by virtue of a long repair patch phenotype may make
cells more vulnerable to permanent mutation or even cell death. In
fact, 46BR cells are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation (33). Upon
exposure of 46BR cells to
-rays, slightly increased amounts of DNA
breaks were found immediately following exposure compared with DNA from
control cells (34), possibly reflecting a reduced rate of DNA break
rejoining due to the cells' DNA ligase I deficiency (17). The fact
that repair of DNA damage clusters with long repair patches in these
cells is more likely to give rise to DSBs may explain their
hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation.
Although exposure to
-rays resulted in slightly increased DNA
breakage in 46BR cells immediately following exposure, Nocentini (35)
found that the rate at which DNA breaks were rejoined in these cells
relative to control cells was similar. Since DNA ligase I deficiency
does not affect the rate of rejoining, Nocentini concluded that DNA
ligase I is not involved in BER, which repairs most kinds of
-ray-induced DNA damage and produces single strand DNA breaks as an
intermediate (8, 10, 36). On the other hand, biochemical data strongly
indicate that DNA ligase I is essential for BER (13, 25, 37-39). In
this regard, we found a slightly reduced rate of DNA break rejoining at
uracil sites in the presence of 46BR extracts compared with MRC5
extracts. The difference was negligible when a plasmid containing AP
sites rather than uracils was used (data not shown). However, extracts from 46BR cells consistently produced increased repair patch sizes at
uracil and AP sites relative to repair patch sizes in the presence of
MRC5 extracts. Thus, our results suggest that DNA ligase I deficiency
does not always reduce the rate of DNA break rejoining and that the
major biochemical effect of the deficiency in DNA ligase I is increased
DNA repair patch size. Therefore, measurements of the rate of DNA break
rejoining by Nocentini may not reflect an abnormality in DNA ligase I activity.
46BR cells are sensitive to alkylating agents in addition to ionizing
radiation (33), although these agents do not form damage clusters (2).
In addition, alkylating agents must cause significantly more DNA
lesions than those produced by ionizing radiation to result in
equivalent cytotoxicity. For example, a 63% killing dose of ionizing
radiation induces ~1 × 103 damages (SSBs) per cell
(2), whereas a similar level of killing by alkylating agents (such as
N-methyl-N-nitrosourea) requires ~8 × 105 damages (7-methylguanine) per cell (2). The formation
of a large number of damage sites within cellular DNA apparently
increases the probability of forming closely spaced DNA lesions on
opposite strands, even in the absence of damage clusters like those
observed upon exposure to ionizing radiation. In fact, it has been
demonstrated that alkylating agents cause DSB formation (40). It is
possible that the long repair patch-mediated pathway is involved in DSB formation downstream of exposure to both alkylating agents and ionizing radiation.
In this work, we used 46BR cells as a model to establish the
relationship between long repair patches, DSB formation, and DNA ligase
I deficiency. However, even in the presence of normal levels of DNA
ligase I activity, BER is known to produce repair patches of various
lengths. Repair patch size depends to some extent on the DNA polymerase
used to fill the gaps. For example, DNA polymerase
together with
the DNA ligase III-XRCC1 complex (10, 11) generally create a short
repair patch, typically only 1 base long (11, 41), whereas DNA
polymerases
and
produce longer repair patches (up to 10 bases
in vitro) (12-14). Based on our model, repair of DNA damage
by DNA polymerase
would be associated with a low risk of DSB
formation (Fig. 5). Although DNA polymerase
lacks 3' to 5'
proofreading activity and thus has an error rate significantly higher
than that of other DNA polymerases (42), the fact that this polymerase
gives rise to repair patches only 1 base in length should confer an
advantage on cells with regard to DSB formation following DNA damage.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Cristina Ward for editing and
scientific comment and Sachiko Sato for discussion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Inst.
of Canada for the Terry Fox Run (to M. S. S.). The Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Quebec Government provided infrastructure support.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a scholarship from the Medical Research Council of
Canada. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 418-656-4141 (ext. 7340); Fax: 418-654-2159; E-mail:
Masahiko.Sato@crchul.ulaval.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 25, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003126200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic;
SSB, singlestrand break;
DSB, double strand
break;
Tm, melting temperature;
BER, base excision
repair;
bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
von Sonntag, C.
(1987)
The Chemical Basis of Radiation Biology
, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London
|
| 2.
|
Ward, J. F.
(1988)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
35,
95-125
|
| 3.
|
Hutchinson, F.
(1985)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res.
32,
115-154
|
| 4.
|
Ward, J.
(1998)
in
DNA Damage and Repair: DNA Repair in Higher Eukaryotes
(Nickoloff, J.
, and Hoekstra, M., eds), Vol. 2
, pp. 65-84, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
|
| 5.
|
Chaudhry, M. A.,
and Weinfeld, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15650-15655
|
| 6.
|
Chaudhry, M. A.,
and Weinfeld, M.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
249,
914-9122
|
| 7.
|
Lindahl, T.
(1993)
Nature
362,
709-715
|
| 8.
|
Seeberg, E.,
Eide, L.,
and Bjoras, M.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
391-397
|
| 9.
|
Wallace, S. S.
(1988)
Environ. Mol. Mutagen.
12,
431-477
|
| 10.
|
Lindahl, T.,
and Wood, R. D.
(1999)
Science
286,
1897-1905
|
| 11.
|
Kubota, Y.,
Nash, R. A.,
Klungland, A.,
Schär, P.,
Barnes, D. E.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6662-6670
|
| 12.
|
Matsumoto, Y.,
Kim, K.,
and Bogenhagen, D. F.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
310-317
|
| 13.
|
Pascucci, B.,
Stucki, M.,
Jonsson, Z. O.,
Dogliotti, E.,
and Hubscher, U.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33696-33702
|
| 14.
|
Stucki, M.,
Pascucci, B.,
Parlanti, E.,
Fortini, P.,
Wilson, S. H.,
Hubscher, U.,
and Dogliotti, E.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
835-843
|
| 15.
|
Cleaver, J. E.
(1985)
Cancer Res.
45,
1163-1169
|
| 16.
|
Walker, I. G.,
Th'ng, J. P.,
Schrader, T. J.,
and Norry, T. W.
(1984)
Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
62,
329-334
|
| 17.
|
Barnes, D. E.,
Tomkinson, A. E.,
Lehmann, A. R.,
Webster, A. D.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1992)
Cell
69,
495-503
|
| 18.
|
Squires, S.,
and Johnson, R. T.
(1983)
Carcinogenesis
4,
565-572
|
| 19.
|
Teo, I. A.,
Broughton, B. C.,
Day, R. S.,
James, M. R.,
Karran, P.,
Mayne, L. V.,
and Lehmann, A. R.
(1983)
Carcinogenesis
4,
559-564
|
| 20.
|
Mackenney, V. J.,
Barnes, D. E.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11550-11556
|
| 21.
|
Manley, J. L.,
Fire, A.,
Samuels, M.,
and Sharp, P. A.
(1983)
Methods Enzymol.
101,
568-582
|
| 22.
|
Satoh, M. S.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1992)
Nature
356,
356-358
|
| 23.
|
Satoh, M. S.,
Poirier, G. G.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5480-5487
|
| 24.
|
Biade, S.,
Sobol, R. W.,
Wilson, S. H.,
and Matsumuto, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
898-902
|
| 25.
|
Mossi, R.,
Ferrari, E.,
and Hübscher, U.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14322-14330
|
| 26.
|
Ahnstrom, G.,
and Bryant, P. E.
(1982)
Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med.
41,
671-676
|
| 27.
|
Dugle, D. L.,
Gillespie, C. J.,
and Chapman, J. D.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
809-812
|
| 28.
|
Dianov, G. L.,
Timchenko, T. V.,
Sinitsina, O. I.,
Kuzminov, A. V.,
Medvedev, O. A.,
and Salganik, R. I.
(1991)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
225,
448-452
|
| 29.
|
Harrison, L.,
Hatahet, Z.,
and Wallace, S. S.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
290,
667-684
|
| 30.
|
Vispé, S.,
and Defais, M.
(1997)
Biochimie (Paris)
79,
587-592
|
| 31.
|
Baumann, P.,
and West, S. C.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
247-251
|
| 32.
|
Jeggo, P. A.
(1998)
Adv. Genet.
38,
185-218
|
| 33.
|
Teo, I. A.,
Arlett, C. F.,
Harcourt, S. A.,
Priestley, A.,
and Broughton, B. C.
(1983)
Mutat. Res.
107,
371-386
|
| 34.
|
Nocentini, S.
(1995)
Radiat. Res.
144,
170-180
|
| 35.
|
Nocentini, S.
(1999)
Radiat. Res.
151,
423-432
|
| 36.
|
Wallace, S. S.
(1998)
Radiat. Res.
150,
S60-S79
|
| 37.
|
Klungland, A.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
3341-3348
|
| 38.
|
Matsumoto, Y.,
Kim, K.,
Hurwitz, J.,
Gary, R.,
Levin, D. S.,
Tomkinson, A. E.,
and Park, M. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33703-33708
|
| 39.
|
Prasad, R.,
Singhal, R. K.,
Srivastava, D. K.,
Molina, J. T.,
Tomkinson, A. E.,
and Wilson, S. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16000-16007
|
| 40.
|
Bradley, M. O.,
Taylor, V. I.,
Armstrong, M. J.,
and Galloway, S. M.
(1987)
Mutat. Res.
189,
69-79
|
| 41.
|
Dianov, G.,
Price, A.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1605-1612
|
| 42.
|
Beard, W. A.,
and Wilson, S. H.
(1998)
Chem. Biol.
5,
R7-R13
|
| 43.
|
Gary, R.,
Kim, K.,
Cornelius, H. L.,
Park, M. S.,
and Matsumoto, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4354-4363
|
| 44.
|
Frosina, G.,
Fortini, P.,
Rossi, O.,
Carrozzino, F.,
Raspaglio, G.,
Cox, L. S.,
Lane, D. P.,
Abbondandolo, A.,
and Dogliotti, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9573-9578
|
| 45.
|
Kim, K.,
Biade, S.,
and Matsumuto, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8842-8848
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Y. Ho, M. Parent, and M. S. Satoh
Induction of Base Damages Representing a High Risk Site for Double-strand DNA Break Formation in Genomic DNA by Exposure of Cells to DNA Damaging Agents
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 27, 2007;
282(30):
21913 - 21923.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Y. Ho and M. S. Satoh
Repair of single-strand DNA interruptions by redundant pathways and its implication in cellular sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 1, 2003;
31(23):
7032 - 7040.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Vispe, E. L. Y. Ho, T. M. C. Yung, and M. S. Satoh
Double-strand DNA Break Formation Mediated by Flap Endonuclease-1
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2003;
278(37):
35279 - 35285.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.