|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001711200 on June 22, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 35, 27494-27499, September 1, 2000
The High Mobility Group I/Y Protein Is Hypophosphorylated in
Endoreduplicating Maize Endosperm Cells and Is Involved in Alleviating
Histone H1-mediated Transcriptional Repression*
Jing
Zhao and
Gideon
Grafi
From Department of Plant Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of
Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Received for publication, March 2, 2000, and in revised form, June 22, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
During maize endosperm development, cells shift
from a mitotic cycle to endoreduplication, driving the massive
synthesis of storage proteins (zeins) and starch. In this developmental
context, we studied changes in expression levels of histone H1 and high mobility group I/Y (HMG-I/Y), two chromatin architectural proteins that
are known to affect gene transcription. Almost no change was found in
the level of histone H1 during endosperm development, despite a
dramatic increase in DNA content (endoreduplication); hence, the
histone H1/DNA ratio decreased substantially. Concurrently with a
reduction in the Cdc2 kinase activity at the shift to
endoreduplication, significant changes were found in the level and
mobility of the HMG-I/Y protein; the faster migrating forms were, at
least partly, hypophosphorylated. Purified maize HMG-I/Y protein
was found to be phophorylated in vitro by the Cdc2 kinase
and bound efficiently to the -zein promoter AT-rich tract ( Z-AT).
Using an in vitro transcription assay, we demonstrated the
capability of the maize HMG-I/Y protein to relieve the inhibitory
effect exerted by histone H1 on templates containing the Z-AT
sequence. These data suggest that during maize endosperm development
transcription and perhaps replication are controlled, at least partly,
by the activity of the Cdc2 kinase and the interplay between histone H1
and HMG-I/Y proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Transcription and replication occur in an "open" chromatin
configuration that allows transcription/replication factors to approach
the DNA. The packaging of DNA into nucleoprotein complexes that make up
chromatin is highly conserved among eukaryotes (1, 2). DNA organization
within the interphase nucleus provides the means not only for DNA
compaction but also for orderly gene expression. In a variety of
eukaryotes, histone H1 binds to the internucleosomal AT-rich linker DNA
and facilitates the compaction of DNA into transcriptionally inactive
chromatin (3). Gene transcription is associated with unfolding of the
chromatin fiber and is accompanied by depletion, replacement, or
displacement of histone H1 by various proteins (4). The ubiquitous
nonhistone HMG1 chromosomal
proteins in vertebrates as well as in plants have been implicated in
transcriptional activation (5-7). These small chromosomal proteins
comprise a heterogeneous protein family common to eukaryotic organisms.
HMG proteins are rich in acidic and basic amino acid residues and are
operationally defined as being extractable from chromatin with 0.35 M NaCl and soluble in 2% trichloroacetic acid or in 5%
perchloric acid (see Ref. 8, and references therein). On the basis of
sequence homology and DNA binding properties, HMG proteins are grouped
into three families: HMG-1/2, HMG-14/17, and HMG-I/Y (8). The HMG-I/Y
as well as HMG-14/17 proteins are implicated in the initial unfolding
of the 30-nm chromatin fiber by displacing histone H1 (7, 9). Besides
their architectural function, HMG-I/Y proteins are actively involved in
the regulation of gene transcription through their interaction with
activator proteins (8, 10, 11). Several HMG-I/Y-related genes were isolated from a variety of plant species (12-18). Sequence analysis showed that plant HMG-I/Y proteins are structurally different from
those of animals and display certain unique features, e.g. they lack the COOH-terminal acidic region characteristic of the animal
proteins and contain an amino-terminal region that shares homology with
the globular domain of histone H1 (13, 18). The role played by plant
HMG-I/Y proteins in chromatin structure and gene regulation has not
been established yet.
Maize endosperm provides a unique metabolic system in which the mode of
the cell cycle is sequentially changed during development. After
fertilization, endosperm development begins with rapid, synchronous
nuclear divisions (acytokinesis mitosis), followed by a mitotic cycle
composed of G1, S, G2, and M phases and,
finally, changing into endoreduplication (19). The shift into
endoreduplication is accompanied by a sharp increase in transcriptional
activity and involves a significant reduction in the mitotic CDK
activity (20). These changes drive the correct functional maturation of
endosperm cells, namely, the massive synthesis of storage proteins and
starch. The expression of zein genes, encoding the major storage proteins of maize, is coordinately regulated during endosperm development by multiple trans- and cis-acting
elements, both at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels
(21-23). We investigated the role played by histone H1 and HMG-I/Y
proteins in controlling the expression of zein genes during endosperm
development. We found that the shift from a mitotic cycle to
endoreduplication was accompanied by a decrease in H1/DNA ratio,
concomitantly with a significant change in level and mobility of the
HMG-I/Y protein. We conclude that during maize endosperm development,
activation of gene transcription is controlled, at least partly, by the
activity of the Cdc2 kinase and the interplay between histone H1 and
HMG-I/Y proteins.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plant Material--
Maize (Pool 33 QPM) plants were grown in the
field (Coastal Plain, Israel) during 1998 and 1999. Ears were bagged
before silking and self-pollinated. At various days after pollination
(DAP), ears were collected and quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Kernels were collected and then peeled, and the embryos were removed. Isolated
endosperm was ground into flour in liquid nitrogen using mortar and
pestle and stored at 80 °C.
Purification of Zeins, HMGs, and Histones from Developing
Endosperm--
Zein storage proteins were extracted from developing
endosperm with 70% ethanol, essentially as described (24). HMG and histone proteins were extracted with 2% trichloroacetic acid (6). Frozen endosperm flour (50 mg) from different developmental stages was
homogenized in 20 volumes of NETN (100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.0, and 0.5%
Nonidet P-40) containing 2% trichloroacetic acid and incubated
overnight at 4 °C with constant shaking. Samples were centrifuged at
12,000 × g for 10 min, and supernatants were collected
and passed through a 0.2-µm filter. To precipitate acid-soluble proteins, trichloroacetic acid was slowly added to 25% (w/v), followed
by incubation at 4 °C for 1 h. Proteins were precipitated by
centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min, washed twice
with cold acetone, dried, and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline. Protein concentration was determined with the Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). Histone H1 and HMG-I/Y proteins were detected by
immunoblotting using antiserum to histone H1 (a gift from Dr. S. Spiker, North Carolina University, Raleigh, NC) and a polyclonal
antiserum raised against HMG-Y protein of Canavalia gladiata
D.C. (a gift from Dr. Minamikawa, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo,
Japan; Ref. 17).
Isolation of the Mitotic CDK and Phosphorylation Assays--
The
mitotic CDK (Cdc2/cyclin B kinase) from developing endosperm was
purified on glutathione-agarose beads containing GST-Suc1 fusion
protein. Glutathione-agarose containing GST-Suc1-associated proteins
were tested directly for kinase activity (25) in the presence of
[ -32P]ATP using as substrates bovine calf thymus
histone H1 (Biochemicals & Laboratory Equipment Ltd.), acid-soluble
fractions from developing maize endosperm, or purified GST-ZmHMG-I/Y
proteins. To verify phosphorylation of acid-soluble proteins,
appropriate samples were re-extracted with 2% trichloroacetic acid and
resolved by 15% SDS-PAGE. Gels were either stained with Coomassie Blue
or dried and autoradiographed.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)--
EMSAs were
performed essentially as described by Zhao et al. (7). A
137-base pair fragment of the -zein promoter AT-rich sequence
(referred to as Z-AT; accession no. X53514, nucleotides 740-876),
containing the homopolymeric (dA·dT)21 tract, was
amplified by PCR in the presence of
[ -32P]dATP, the sense primer
5'-GGCTCCATATTCACACAACC, and the antisense primer
5'-CTAGTCATATGCCTGTGCATTGC. Binding reactions were performed in
EMSA buffer (10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 5% glycerol) containing 250 ng of DNA
( DNA digested with HindIII and EcoRI),
protein extracts from various DAP, and 32P-labeled Z-AT.
Poly(dA-dT) and poly(dI-dC) (Sigma) at various concentrations were used
as competitors. Samples were incubated for 20 min at room temperature
to allow for binding, and DNA-protein complexes were electrophoresed in
4% non-denaturing acrylamide, 0.25× TBE gels for 2 h (10 V/cm).
Gels were vacuum-dried and autoradiographed.
Construction of Plasmids for in Vitro Transcription
Assays--
The plasmid Z-AT-Cdc2 was generated by placing the
-zein promoter AT-rich region upstream from the T7 promoter. This
AT-rich DNA fragment (580-1127; accession no. X53514) was
PCR-amplified using as a template pPHI-3630 (kindly provided by
B. A. Larkins) and the following primers: a sense primer
containing a HindIII site,
5'-GGATCCCGGGAAGCTTCAACGATCGTCTCGTGTC, and an antisense primer flanked
with a SmaI site to which the T7 promoter sequence (in
lowercase) was attached,
5'-GAGACCCGGGccctatagtgagtcgtattaCGGATACAACGAATTCTTGGAGC. The PCR
product was cleaved with HindIII and SmaI
restriction enzymes, resolved on 1% agarose gel, and purified using
the Agarose Gel DNA Extraction kit (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). As a reporter gene we used the maize Cdc2
cDNA (26) that was amplified by PCR using a sense primer containing
a BamHI site,
5'-CGCGAGATCTCGAGGATCCACCATGGAGCAGTACGAGAAGG, and an antisense
primer flanked with an EcoRV site,
5'-GCGGGATCCATCGATATCCTGCAGTCACTGTACCACTTCAAGGTC. The PCR product
was cleaved with BamHI and EcoRV enzymes and
purified from the gel as above. The HindIII-SmaI
Z-AT and the EcoRV-BamHI Cdc2 fragments were
subcloned into the HindIII-BamHI sites of pUC19
to generate the plasmid Z-AT-Cdc2.
Plasmids K38 and K40 (7) were kindly provided by U. K. Laemmli
(University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland). pK38 contains 657 base
pairs of the histone scaffold attachment region (SAR) upstream from the
T7 promoter. pK40 is a control deficient of SAR. Both plasmids were
prepared for in vitro transcription assay as described
(7).
For T7 transcription assays, p Z-AT-Cdc2 was cleaved with
HindIII giving rise to a transcript of 475 nucleotides.
Plasmids K38 and K40 were linearized as described (7) giving rise to transcripts of 252 and 150 nucleotides, respectively.
Expression and Purification of GST-HMG-I/Y Fusion Proteins--
For preparation of glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-HMG-I/Y fusion proteins, the cDNA clone of maize HMG-I/Y
obtained from the ZmDB-Maize Genome Data Base (clone AI770331) was used
as a template in PCRs to amplify either the full-length clone or its
truncated forms. Because of GC richness of the maize HMG-I/Y cDNA,
all PCR reactions were performed in the presence of 10% dimethyl
sulfoxide (Me2SO, Sigma). The PCR primers used to
generate the various HMG-I/Y clones are listed: Hmg-S,
5'-GATATCGGATCCGAGATGGCCACCGACGAAGCCACC-3'; Hmg-AS,
5'-GTCGACGAATTCGAGCTCTCAAGCCGCGGCCGTCTCGCTG-3'; Hmg- N-S, 5'-GAGAGGATCCCCCGAGATGATCCTGGCGGCGATCGAG-3'; Hmg- C-AS,
5'-GAGAGAATTCTCAGGACCCGTCGCCAGCAGG-3'.
All PCR fragments were cut with BamHI and EcoRI
restriction enzymes and cloned into the same sites of pGEX-2T. To
generate the NH2-terminal 69 amino acids fused to GST
(GST-HMG-I/Y 1-69), the pGEX-ZmHMG-I/Y was cleaved with
EcoRI and Ecl136II to remove the half
COOH-terminal AT-hook region, ends were blunted using Klenow fragment
of DNA polymerase I, and the plasmid was religated. Proteins were
expressed and purified by glutathione-agarose, eluted essentially as
described by the manufacturer's protocol (GST Gene Fusion System,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and dialyzed. Protein concentration was
determined with either the Bradford reagent or the Lowry method (Sigma
690-A). Protein aliquots were stored at 80 °C until use.
T7 in Vitro Transcription Assays--
T7 transcription assays
were performed essentially as described (7). Linearized DNA templates
were mixed with purified bovine calf thymus histone H1 (Biochemicals & Laboratory Equipment Ltd.) in a binding buffer (20 mM
Hepes, pH 7.4, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 10% glycerol) at room temperature for 15 min in
a final volume of 10 µl; in derepression experiments, GST-ZmHMG-I/Y
was thereafter added and incubation continued for additional 15 min. Ten µl of T7 transcription mixture (0.5 mM each of ATP,
CTP, and GTP, 0.1 mM UTP, 5 mM dithiothreitol,
4 units/µl RNasin, 2 units/µl T7 RNA polymerase, and 0.5 µCi/µl
[ -32P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol)) was added, and reactions were
incubated at 37 °C for 25 min, then stopped by addition of 180 µl
of TE buffer containing 100 mM NaCl and 1% SDS. RNA
products were purified with phenol-chloroform, precipitated by ammonium
acetate and ethanol, and analyzed by electrophoresis on 7.5%
acrylamide, 7 M urea, 1× TBE denaturing gels. Gels were
dried, and transcription products were visualized by autoradiography
either by exposure to x-ray film or by the Fujifilm imaging apparatus
(BAS 2500).
 |
RESULTS |
Analysis of Histones and HMG-I/Y Proteins during Maize Endosperm
Development--
Among maize storage proteins, -zein is the first
to become evident (12 DAP, Fig. 1),
concomitantly with the initiation of endoreduplication (20). At this
stage, intensive transcriptional activity is initiated, resulting in
the synthesis of zein mRNAs as well as mRNAs involved in starch
synthesis. A unique feature of the -zein promoter is the presence of
short homopolymeric runs of dA·dT base pairs, which act as
preferential binding sites for histone H1 and HMG-I/Y proteins (8, 28,
29). At various DAP, we extracted these and other proteins from
developing endosperm by acid extraction and analyzed them by SDS-PAGE.
The level of histone H1, which appeared in multiple forms (ranging from
35 to 40 kDa), remained almost unchanged (Fig.
2, A and C) despite a significant increase in DNA content resulting from endoreduplication (see Ref. 20); hence, a decrease in histone H1/DNA ratio ensued. In
contrast to the H1 linker histones, the levels of the maize acid-soluble core histone proteins (30) were elevated with the advance
in endoreduplication cycles (Fig. 2B). Hence, it appears that the first level of DNA organization, namely, the nucleosomal structure, is retained during endoreduplication. Similarly to core
histones, the maize HMG-I/Y protein was significantly increased beginning at 12 DAP, accompanied by a slight increase in its mobility (Fig. 2, A and D). The level of acid-soluble
proteins migrating faster than HMG-I/Y (16-18 kDa, Fig.
2A), possibly HMG1-like proteins (31), was also increased
during endosperm development. We focused on the maize HMG-I/Y protein
and examined whether the shift in its mobility could have resulted from
dephosphorylation. Because HMG-I/Y proteins have been shown to be
phosphorylated by the mitotic CDK (8), we tested the capability of the
maize mitotic CDK to phosphorylate the HMG-I/Y protein. We first
analyzed the SUC1-associated Cdc2 kinase activity in protein extracts
from developing endosperm. Fig.
3A shows a high kinase
activity during the mitotic cycle (8 and 10 DAP), followed by a sharp
decrease as cells shifted to endoreduplication (12 and 14 DAP).
Acid-soluble fractions, enriched with HMG-I/Y protein, from developing
endosperm were subjected to phosphorylation by SUC1-associated CDK from
8 DAP endosperm (Fig. 3B). Among the various forms of
HMG-I/Y found in 12 and 14 DAP cells (Fig. 3B,
Coomassie staining), only the upper, slowly migrating forms
are phosphorylated (Fig. 3B, Autoradiogram). This
indicates that the HMG-I/Y protein is phosphorylated, at least partly,
in dividing endosperm cells (6 and 8 DAP) but is hypophosphorylated as
cells shift to endoreduplication, concurrently with the decline in the
mitotic kinase activity (12 DAP and onward; Ref. 20).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Synthesis of storage proteins during maize
endosperm development. Storage proteins were extracted from
developing endosperm at various DAP with 70% ethanol, resolved by 15%
SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie Blue. The positions of - and
-zeins are indicated. M indicates molecular weight
markers. The transition from a mitotic cycle to endoreduplication is
shown.
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Composition of acid-soluble proteins in
developing endosperm. Flour (50 mg) from developing endosperm at
the indicated DAP was extracted with 2% trichloroacetic acid , and
soluble proteins were resolved by 15-17% SDS-PAGE. Gels were stained
with Coomassie Blue (A and B), or blotted onto
membranes and probed with anti-histone H1 (C) or
anti-HMG-I/Y (D). Arrows indicate the positions
of the various forms of histone H1 and HMG-I/Y proteins. M,
molecular weight markers.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The HMG-I/Y protein is phosphorylated by CDK
in dividing endosperm cells and is hypophosphorylated in
endoreduplicating cells. A, SUC1-associated CDK
activity in developing endosperm during mitotic (8 and 10 DAP) and
endoreduplication (12 and 14 DAP) cycles. Histone H1 was used as a
substrate for phosphorylation. B, acid-soluble fractions
from developing endosperm were subjected to phosphorylation by the 8 DAP SUC1-associated kinase. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
either stained by Coomassie Blue (right panel) or
autoradiographed (left panel). The various forms of HMG-I/Y
are indicated on the right by arrows;
phosphorylated forms are designated by the letter
p. C, in vitro phosphorylation of
ZmHMG-I/Y by SUC1-associated Cdc2 kinase. Various ZmHMG-I/Y constructs
(numbered 1-5) were generated by PCR, subcloned into a GST gene fusion
vector, and overexpressed in bacteria. The schematic diagram of the
HMG-I/Y protein is shown to indicate the positions of the
NH2-terminal globular domain (GD) and the half
COOH-terminal containing the four AT-hooks (I-IV). The
positions of potential CDK phosphorylation sites are shown.
Uppercase P indicates consensus site and
lowercase p minimal sites. Phosphorylation of the
various GST-ZmHMG-I/Y fusion proteins by the GST-SUC1-associated Cdc2
kinase is indicated on the right.
|
|
We next determined the maize HMG-I/Y protein regions that can be
phosphorylated by Cdc2 kinase. The putative amino acid sequence of the
protein (18) contains one consensus site (TPGK) and six minimal sites
(SP) for CDK phosphorylation; one minimal site is located at the
amino-terminal region, and all others are at the half COOH-terminal
AT-hook region (Fig. 3C). We generated by PCR various
ZmHMG-I/Y constructs (depicted in Fig. 3C) and cloned them
into pGEX-2T to produce GST fusion proteins. These bacterially produced
proteins were subjected to phosphorylation by the SUC1-associated kinase from 8 DAP endosperm. Fig. 3C summarizes the
phosphorylation activity of Cdc2 on the various GST-ZmHMG-I/Y proteins.
All truncated HMG-I/Y proteins, except the NH2-terminal
region (amino acids 1-69), were phosphorylated by Cdc2, suggesting
that ZmHMG-I/Y CDK-phosphorylation sites are confined to the half
COOH-terminal AT-hook region.
AT Binding Activity of Acid-soluble Proteins during Endosperm
Development--
Because AT-rich sequences are often implicated in
chromatin function through the action of histone H1 and HMG proteins
(8, 29), we tested the AT-rich DNA binding activity of acid-soluble fractions from developing maize endosperm. For this analysis we used
the AT-rich sequence from the promoter region of the storage -zein
gene (referred to as Z-AT). A band-shift assay (Fig.
4A) was carried out with
32P-labeled Z-AT fragment (137 base pairs) amplified by
PCR. Increasing protein levels resulted in multiple complexes of
protein- Z-AT identified by a ladder of shifted products. Among the
tested acid-soluble fractions, the 14 DAP fraction had the highest
affinity to 32P- Z-AT; formation of protein-DNA complexes
required as low as 5 ng of protein from 14 DAP (Fig. 4A,
lane 13) but 40 ng of protein from 8 DAP
endosperm (Fig. 4A, lane 10).
DNA-protein complexes were evident with 20 ng of histone H1 (Fig.
4A, lane 4). Competition experiments
indicated that protein binding to Z-AT is AT-specific, inasmuch as
Z-AT-protein complexes are efficiently competed out with increasing
amounts of poly(dA-dT) but much less efficiently with poly(dI-dC) (data
not shown). Thus, the AT-binding affinity is changed during endosperm
development, becoming higher at developmental stages corresponding to
intensive activities of transcription and replication.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The maize HMG-I/Y protein binds efficiently
to the -zein AT-rich tract. A,
acid-soluble proteins from developing endosperm were assayed for
binding with the AT-rich fragment from the -zein promoter region
( Z-AT). Increasing amounts of 2% trichloroacetic acid -soluble
endosperm proteins (1, 5, 20, 40, and 80 ng) from 8 DAP (mitotic cycle,
lanes 7-11, respectively) or 14 DAP
(endoreduplication cycle, lanes 12-16,
respectively) were incubated with 32P-labeled Z-AT DNA
fragment. DNA-protein complexes thus formed were resolved on 4%
non-denaturing acrylamide gel by low ionic strength electrophoresis.
Increasing amounts of a commercially available histone H1 (1, 5, 20, 40, and 80 ng) were used as a reference (lanes
2-6, respectively). B, DNA binding activity of a
purified ZmHMG-I/Y protein. Band-shift assays were conducted with
purified, bacterially produced ZmHMG-I/Y and its truncated forms fused
to GST (constructs 1-5 in Fig. 3C). Reactions were
performed with increasing amounts (1, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 500 ng) of
GST-ZmHMG-I/Y () fusion protein (lanes
3-8, respectively), or with 100 ng of the indicated
GST-ZmHMG-I/Y derivatives (lanes 9-12). GST
alone (100 ng) was used as a reference protein. This assay was
conducted with two 32P-labeled PCR probes: the Z-AT and
a non-AT fragment. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on 4%
nondenaturing acrylamide gel, dried and autoradiographed. P
(lane 1) indicates the probe mixture only;
FP indicates the free probes.
|
|
The rise in AT binding activity that accompanies enhanced gene
transcription (14 DAP) could be attributed, at least in part, to the
increased level and mobility of the HMG-I/Y protein. To assess this
possibility, we next conducted band-shift experiments with purified
GST-ZmHMG-I/Y proteins described in Fig. 3C. The AT-binding
analysis showed that binding to 32P- Z-AT was a
characteristic of the ZmHMG-I/Y but not of the GST portion of the fused
protein (Fig. 4B, compare lane 2 to
lanes 3-8). In addition, the GST-ZmHMG-I/Y
protein selectively bound to the AT-rich DNA sequence ( Z-AT),
gradually forming two clear complexes as a function of the protein
dose. Removal of the 15 NH2-terminal amino acids
(GST-ZmHMG-I/Y (), Fig. 4B, lane
9) or the COOH-terminal AT-hook (GST-ZmHMG-I/Y (),
Fig. 4B, lane 11), or both
(GST-ZmHMG-I/Y (), Fig. 4B, lane
10), did not affect binding activity; the
NH2-terminal region alone (GST-ZmHMG-I/Y (1-69), Fig.
4B, lane 12) failed to bind to
Z-AT. Competition experiments verified that the DNA binding activity
of the GST-ZmHMG-I/Y protein is AT-specific (data not shown).
HMG-I/Y Alleviates Histone H1-mediated Transcriptional
Repression--
We next investigated the potential of the maize
HMG-I/Y protein to induce gene transcription otherwise suppressed by
histone H1, by using the previously described T7 RNA polymerase
in vitro transcription system (7). In this system, an
AT-rich SAR sequence, to which histone H1 and certain HMG proteins can
bind, was inserted upstream the T7 promoter. The constructs K38
(AT-rich) and K40 (non-AT) used in these experiments were described
previously (7); p Z-AT-Cdc2 is schematically depicted in Fig.
5A. To establish the
experimental protocol, we first confirmed previous findings (7) showing
that at certain concentrations (up to 30% H1/DNA ratio) histone H1
efficiently repressed transcription by T7 polymerase of AT- but not of
non-AT-containing templates (data not shown). At higher concentrations
(>35%), transcription of both templates was inhibited (data not
shown). Transcription from a template containing the Z-AT sequence
upstream the T7 promoter was efficiently inhibited by increasing
concentrations of histone H1 (Fig. 5B, lanes
1-5); addition of increasing amounts of GST-ZmHMG-I/Y
relieved this transcription inhibitory effect (Fig. 5B,
lanes 8-11). Similar transcriptional
derepression activity was obtained by the Arabidopsis HMG-I/Y protein (data not shown).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Alleviation of histone H1-mediated
transcriptional inhibition by ZmHMG-I/Y. A, schematic
representation of the construct Z-AT-Cdc2 used in these experiments.
RI, EcoRI; H, HindIII.
B, selective repression of T7 RNA polymerase transcription
by histone H1 and derepression by ZmHMG-I/Y protein. Linearized K40
(non-AT; Ref. 7) was mixed with a linearized AT-containing template,
Z-AT-Cdc2, and incubated with histone H1 at the indicated H1:DNA
weight ratios (%) for 15 min at room temperature. Samples were then
either transcribed directly with T7 RNA polymerase (lanes
1-5) or subjected to derepression assays (lanes
6-11) by adding various amounts of GST-ZmHMG-I/Y (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 ng, lanes 8-11, respectively) for
additional 15 min. Transcription was performed at 37 °C for 25 min,
and transcripts were resolved on 7.5% urea/acrylamide gel. Indicated
on the left are the positions of transcripts generated by
Z-AT-Cdc2 ( Z-AT) and by K40 (non-AT). Results in the
right panel were obtained by
PhosphorImager.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A unique metabolic feature of maize endosperm is the co-occurrence
of replication and transcription leading to orderly development of the
storage tissue. Here we showed that the abrupt increase in zein gene
expression, concomitantly with the initiation of DNA endoreduplication,
is correlated with a decrease in H1/DNA ratio, which in turn may
reflect structural modifications in chromatin. Electron microscopy
studies showed that H1-DNA complexes appear as thin filaments or as
double fibers at a low H1/DNA ratio; increasing the histone H1/DNA
ratio lead to a rod- or a cable-like appearance (see Ref. 32, and
references therein). The function of H1 in DNA compaction is
demonstrated by the abnormally heterochromatinized nuclei in tobacco
plants overexpressing the Arabidopsis histone H1 (33), or by
the micrococcal nuclease-resistant chromatin in cells enriched with
histone H5 (34) or histone H10 (35) variants. Functionally,
histone H1 was shown to inhibit replication in Xenopus egg
extract by preventing the assembly of pre-replication complexes on
added sperm chromatin (36), an effect that may be related to the role
of histone H1 in compacting DNA fibers. Hence, a reduction in histone
H1/DNA ratio during endosperm development probably contributes to
chromatin relaxation leading to enhanced DNA transcription and replication.
The open chromatin configuration suggested by the reduction in H1/DNA
ratio is reinforced by an increase in the level and mobility of HMG-I/Y
protein during endoreduplication and the enhancement of zein gene
expression. The change in HMG-I/Y mobility can be attributed, at least
partly, to hypophosphorylated forms of this protein, which in turn
enhance its activity. We cannot exclude the possibility that
acetylation/deacetylation may also be involved in regulating the
activity of the HMG-I/Y protein during endosperm development. Both
phosphorylation and acetylation were shown to negatively control
HMG-I/Y activities: phosphorylation, by the mitotic CDK, reduces its
binding affinity to AT-rich DNA sequences (37-39), and acetylation
disrupts the transcriptional enhanceosome complex (40). The pattern of
the mitotic CDK activity during maize endosperm development (Fig.
3A and Ref. 20) supports the finding that HMG-I/Y is
phosphorylated in cycling cells and hypophosphorylated in cells shifted
to endoreduplication.
HMG-I/Y proteins are actively involved in transcription by assembling
and stabilizing complexes of transcriptional factors (11). Recent work
with the oat HMG-I/Y (PF1) has provided a clue for the involvement of
plant HMG-I/Y in trascriptional activation. PF1 has been shown to
enhance the recruitment of the transcriptional activator GT-2 to the
PHYA gene promoter (41). Is the maize HMG-I/Y protein also involved in
enhancing the -zein gene expression? The promoter region of this
gene contains short homopolymeric runs of dA·dT base pairs, a
preferential binding site for HMG-I/Y proteins. The synthesis of
-zein RNA and protein is enhanced significantly in the modified
opaque-2 QPM, whose promoter possesses an extended dA·dT sequence (25 pairs). It has been shown previously that proteins have higher binding
affinity to this extended dA·dT region than to its wild-type
(W64A+) counterpart (16 pairs) (42). Possibly, the extended
dA·dT motif has higher affinity for the HMG-I/Y protein, which in
turn enhances -zein gene transcription.
Plant HMG-I/Y proteins display certain features which are distinct from
those of animals. Whereas animal HMG-I/Y proteins contain three copies
of the AT-hook motif (RGR, Ref. 43), plant proteins usually have four
such copies and lack the COOH-terminal acidic region characteristic of
the animal proteins (13, 18). Of particular significance is the finding
that plant HMG-I/Y proteins, but not their animal counterparts, contain
an amino-terminal region that shares homology with the globular domain
of histone H1 (18). Here we demonstrated that histone H1, unlike
HMG-I/Y, negatively regulates transcription by the T7 RNA polymerase of
AT-containing DNA templates. Conceivably, both H1 and HMG-I/Y proteins
compete with each other for binding to the AT-rich sequence upstream
the promoter region. This competition-type relationship between H1 and
HMG-I/Y is displayed by the reduction in H1/DNA ratio during endosperm
development, under which condition the distribution of histone H1
protein is expected to be skewed toward AT-rich sequences (see Fig.
5B and Ref. 7), the preferential binding sites of HMG-I/Y proteins.
Histone H1 may inhibit transcription by its cooperative binding to DNA,
thus coating the DNA with H1 molecules that render it inaccessible to
RNA polymerases. The occurrence of large H1-DNA complexes (Fig.
4A) incapable of migrating into the gel may suggest cooperative binding; such large complexes could not be detected with
the ZmHMG-I/Y protein (Fig. 4B). The mechanism of
cooperative binding of H1 to DNA is not fully understood. Clark and
Thomas (44) suggested that cooperative binding of H1 is mediated by direct hydrophobic interactions between globular domains, thus contradicting the assumption by Singer and Singer (45) that this domain
is not necessary for cooperativity. The fact that the ZmHMG-I/Y, like
other plant HMG-I/Y proteins, contains an NH2-terminal
H1-like globular domain may support the view that this domain is not
involved in the cooperative binding-mediated transcriptional
repression. Considering that HMG-I/Y could relieve the histone
H1-mediated transcriptional repression in vitro, we suggest
that histone H1 and HMG-I/Y proteins play a role in the activation of
gene transcription in maize endosperm, partly by affecting chromatin
structure. We currently seek to determine the HMG-I/Y domains that
affect chromatin architecture and activate gene transcription.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Y. Avivi and T. Trebitsh for
critical reading and editing of the manuscript, J. Colasanti and V. Sundaresan for the Cdc2 clone, S. Spiker for providing antibodies to
H1, T. Minamikawa for anti-HMG-Y, U. K. Laemmli for providing
plasmids K38 and K40, the ZmDB-Maize Genome Data Base (Ames, IA) for
providing HMG-I/Y cDNA clone, and the Arabidopsis
Biological Resource Center (ABRC) for providing cDNA libraries. We
also thank Dr. B. A. Larkins, in whose laboratory this work was
initiated, and all the members of our laboratory for helping in the
field and on the bench.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by BARD (to G. G).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-934-3505;
Fax: 972-8-934-4181; E-mail: gideon.grafi@weizmann.ac.il.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001711200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HMG, high mobility
group;
HMG-I/Y, high mobility group I/Y;
DAP, days after pollination;
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase;
EMSA, electrophoretic
mobility shift assay;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
SAR, scaffold attachment region;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
TBE, Tris borate/EDTA.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cartwright, I. L.,
and Elgin, S. C. R.
(1988)
in
Architecture of Eukaryotic Genes
(Kahl, G., ed)
, pp. 283-300, VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany
|
| 2.
|
Kahl, G.,
Gorz, A.,
Weising, K.,
Schafer, W.,
and Hirasawa, E.
(1988)
in
Architecture of Eukaryotic Genes
(Kahl, G., ed)
, pp. 301-332, VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany
|
| 3.
|
Garrard, W. T.
(1991)
BioEssays
3,
87-88
|
| 4.
|
Kamakaka, R. T.,
and Thomas, J. O.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
3997-4006
|
| 5.
|
Goodwin, G.,
and Bustin, M.
(1988)
in
Architecture of Eukaryotic Genes
(Kahl, G., ed)
, pp. 187-205, VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany
|
| 6.
|
Spiker, S.
(1988)
in
Architecture of Eukaryotic Genes
(Kahl, G., ed)
, pp. 143-163, VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany
|
| 7.
|
Zhao, K.,
Kas, E.,
Gonzalez, E.,
and Laemmli, U. K.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
3237-3247
|
| 8.
|
Bustin, M.,
and Reeves, R.
(1996)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
54,
35-100
|
| 9.
|
Ding, H. F.,
Bustin, M.,
and Hansen, U.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5843-5855
|
| 10.
|
Thanos, D.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1995)
Cell
83,
1091-1100
|
| 11.
|
Yie, J.,
Merika, M.,
Munshi, N.,
Chen, G.,
and Thanos, D.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
3074-3089
|
| 12.
|
Jacobsen, K.,
Laursen, N. B.,
Jensen, E. O.,
Marcker, A.,
Poulsen, C.,
and Marcker, K. A.
(1990)
Plant Cell
2,
85-94
|
| 13.
|
Laux, T.,
Seurinck, J.,
and Goldberg, R. B.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
4768
|
| 14.
|
Pedersen, T. J.,
Arwood, L. J.,
Spiker, S.,
Guiltinan, M. J.,
and Thompson, W. F.
(1991)
Plant Mol. Biol.
16,
95-104
|
| 15.
|
Nieto-Sotelo, J.,
Ichida, A.,
and Quail, P. H.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
1115-1116
|
| 16.
|
Pwee, K. H.,
Webster, C. I.,
and Gray, J. C.
(1994)
Plant Mol. Biol.
26,
1907-1920
|
| 17.
|
Yamamoto, S.,
and Minamikawa, T.
(1997)
Plant Mol. Biol.
33,
537-544
|
| 18.
|
Krech, A. B.,
Wulff, D.,
Grasser, K. D.,
and Feix, G.
(1999)
Gene (Amst.)
230,
1-5
|
| 19.
|
Kowles, R. V.,
and Phillips, R. L.
(1988)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
112,
97-136
|
| 20.
|
Grafi, G.,
and Larkins, B. A.
(1995)
Science
269,
1262-1264
|
| 21.
|
Wang, Z.,
Ueda, T.,
and Messing, J.
(1998)
Gene (Amst.)
223,
321-332
|
| 22.
|
Or, E.,
Boyer, S. K.,
and Larkins, B. A.
(1993)
Plant Cell
5,
1599-1609
|
| 23.
|
Vicente-Carbajosa, J.,
Moose, S. P.,
Parsons, R. L.,
and Schmidt, R. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7685-7690
|
| 24.
|
Wallace, J. C.,
Lopes, M. A.,
Paiva, E.,
and Larkins, B. A.
(1990)
Plant Physiol.
92,
191-196
|
| 25.
|
Felix, M. A.,
Pines, J.,
Hunt, E.,
and Kersanti, E.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
3059-3069
|
| 26.
|
Colasanti, J.,
Tyers, M.,
and Sundaresan, V.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3377-3381
|
| 27.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 28.
|
Solomon, M.,
Strauss, F.,
and Varshavsky, A.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
1276-1280
|
| 29.
|
Reeves, R.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
4,
413-423
|
| 30.
|
Ivachenko, M. G.,
and Georgieva, E. I.
(1988)
Electrophoresis
9,
812-815
|
| 31.
|
Grasser, K. D.,
Grimm, R.,
and Ritt, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32900-32906
|
| 32.
|
Zlatanova, J.,
and Yaneva, J.
(1991)
DNA Cell Biol.
10,
239-248
|
| 33.
|
Prymakowska-Bosak, M.,
Przewloka, M. R.,
Iwkiewicz, J.,
Egierszdorff, S.,
Kuras, M.,
Chaubet, N.,
Gigot, C.,
Spiker, S.,
and Jerzmanowski, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10250-10255
|
| 34.
|
Sun, J.,
Ali, Z.,
Lurz, R.,
and Ruiz-Carrillo, A.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
1651-1658
|
| 35.
|
Gunjan, A.,
Alexander, B. T.,
Sittman, D. B.,
and Brown, D. T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
37950-37956
|
| 36.
|
Lu, Z. H.,
Sittman, D. B.,
Romanowski, P.,
and Leno, G. H.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
1163-1176
|
| 37.
|
Hill, C. S.,
Rimmer, J. M.,
Green, B. N.,
Finch, J. T.,
and Thomas, J. O.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
1939-1948
|
| 38.
|
Nissen, M. S.,
Langan, T. A.,
and Reeves, R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19945-19952
|
| 39.
|
Schwanbeck, R.,
Manfioletti, G.,
and Wisniewski, J. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1793-1801
|
| 40.
|
Munshi, M.,
Merika, M.,
Yie, Y.,
Senger, K.,
Chen, G.,
and Thanos, D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
2,
457-467
|
| 41.
|
Martinez-Garcia, J. F.,
and Quail, P. H.
(1999)
Plant J.
18,
173-183
|
| 42.
|
So, J-S.,
Geetha, K. B.,
and Larkins, B. A.
(1991)
Mol. Cell
1,
145-149
|
| 43.
|
Huth, J. R.,
Bewley, C. A.,
Nissen, M. S.,
Evans, J. N. S.,
Reeves, R.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
122-132
|
| 44.
|
Clark, D. J.,
and Thomas, J. O.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
187,
569-580
|
| 45.
|
Singer, D. S.,
and Singer, M. F.
(1978)
Biochemistry
17,
2086-2095
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Monjardino, A. G. Smith, and R. J. Jones
Zein Transcription and Endoreduplication in Maize Endosperm are Differentially Affected by Heat Stress
Crop Sci.,
November 21, 2006;
46(6):
2581 - 2589.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Launholt, T. Merkle, A. Houben, A. Schulz, and K. D. Grasser
Arabidopsis Chromatin-Associated HMGA and HMGB Use Different Nuclear Targeting Signals and Display Highly Dynamic Localization within the Nucleus
PLANT CELL,
November 1, 2006;
18(11):
2904 - 2918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zemach, Y. Li, H. Ben-Meir, M. Oliva, A. Mosquna, V. Kiss, Y. Avivi, N. Ohad, and G. Grafi
Different Domains Control the Localization and Mobility of LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1 in Arabidopsis Nuclei
PLANT CELL,
January 1, 2006;
18(1):
133 - 145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. David-Assael, H. Saul, V. Saul, T. Mizrachy-Dagri, I. Berezin, E. Brook, and O. Shaul
Expression of AtMHX, an Arabidopsis vacuolar metal transporter, is repressed by the 5' untranslated region of its gene
J. Exp. Bot.,
March 1, 2005;
56(413):
1039 - 1047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Gutierrez-Marcos, L. M. Costa, C. Biderre-Petit, B. Khbaya, D. M. O'Sullivan, M. Wormald, P. Perez, and H. G. Dickinson
maternally expressed gene1 Is a Novel Maize Endosperm Transfer Cell-Specific Gene with a Maternal Parent-of-Origin Pattern of Expression
PLANT CELL,
May 1, 2004;
16(5):
1288 - 1301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Fass, S. Shahar, J. Zhao, A. Zemach, Y. Avivi, and G. Grafi
Phosphorylation of Histone H3 at Serine 10 Cannot Account Directly for the Detachment of Human Heterochromatin Protein 1gamma from Mitotic Chromosomes in Plant Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 16, 2002;
277(34):
30921 - 30927.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. P. Dilkes, R. A. Dante, C. Coelho, and B. A. Larkins
Genetic Analyses of Endoreduplication in Zea mays Endosperm: Evidence of Sporophytic and Zygotic Maternal Control
Genetics,
March 1, 2002;
160(3):
1163 - 1177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Nagano, H. Furuhashi, T. Inaba, and Y. Sasaki
A novel class of plant-specific zinc-dependent DNA-binding protein that binds to A/T-rich DNA sequences
Nucleic Acids Res.,
October 15, 2001;
29(20):
4097 - 4105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Forzani, C. Loulergue, S. Lobreaux, J.-F. Briat, and M. Lebrun
Nickel Resistance and Chromatin Condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Expressing a Maize High Mobility Group I/Y Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 11, 2001;
276(20):
16731 - 16738.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|