HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 36, 27917-27923, September 8, 2000

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 275/36/27917    most recent M909832199v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bläsing, O. E. Articles by Svensson, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bläsing, O. E. Articles by Svensson, P. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Evolution of C4 Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase in Flaveria, a Conserved Serine Residue in the Carboxyl-terminal Part of the Enzyme Is a Major Determinant for C4-specific Characteristics^*

Oliver E. Bläsing, Peter Westhoff, and Per Svensson^§¶

From the  Institut für Entwicklungs und Molekularbiologie der Pflanzen, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany and the ^§ Department of Plant Biology, The Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

Received for publication, December 13, 2000, and in revised form, June 26, 2000

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylases have evolved from ancestral C3 isoforms during the evolution of angiosperms and gained distinct kinetic and regulatory properties compared with the C3 isozymes. To identify amino acid residues and/or domains responsible for these C4-specific properties the C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase of Flaveria trinervia (C4) was compared with its orthologue in the closely related C3 plant Flaveria pringlei. Reciprocal enzyme chimera were constructed and the kinetic constants, K_0.5 and k_cat, as well as the Hill coefficient, h, were determined for the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate both in the presence and absence of the activator glucose 6-phosphate. By this approach two regions were identified which determined most of the kinetic differences of the C4 and C3 ppcA phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylases with respect to the substrate PEP. In addition, the experiments suggest that the two regions do not act additively but interact with each other. The region between amino acids 296 and 437 is essential for activation by glucose 6-phosphate. The carboxyl-terminal segment between amino acids 645 and 966 contains a C4 conserved serine or a C3 invariant alanine at position 774 in the respective enzyme isoform. Site-directed mutagenesis shows that this position is a key determinant for the kinetic properties of the two isozymes.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (EC 4.1.1.31; PEPC)¹ catalyzes the fixation of HCO₃ to the receptor phosphoenolpyruvate resulting in the formation of oxaloacetate and inorganic phosphate. The enzyme uses Mg²⁺ as a cofactor and is a homotetramer with four active sites and a molecular mass of about 100 kDa. PEPC has been found in prokaryotes, algae, and higher plants but not in animals, fungi, and yeast. The enzyme serves mainly to regenerate C4-dicarboxylic acids for the tricarboxylic acid cycle. In addition to this anaplerotic function other PEPC isozymes play an important role in C4 and CAM photosynthesis where they serve as the primary carboxylase (1). In C4 plants PEPC is compartmentalized in the mesophyll cells while the secondary carboxylase, ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, is confined to the bundle sheath cells. The spatial separation of the C4 cycle reactions results in CO₂ pumping from mesophyll into bundle sheath cells which is responsible for the high efficiency of C4 photosynthesis (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3).

C4 plants have evolved several times independently from ancestral C3 plants due to selective environmental conditions (4). Today, only a few genera of dicots and monocots contain both C4 and C3 species, e.g. Flaveria, Atriplex, Moricandia, Parthenium, and Panicum (5-7). Particularly interesting among these taxa is the dicotyledonous genus Flaveria, which comprises not only C3 and C4 species but also a large number of C3-C4 intermediates. This suggests that evolution toward C4 photosynthesis is still ongoing in this genus and makes Flaveria a good model system for the study of the underlying evolutionary processes (8, 9).

To investigate the molecular evolution of C4 PEPC in the genus Flaveria we have chosen the C4 species Flaveria trinervia and the C3 plant Flaveria pringlei as the starting point. Cloning, sequencing, and genomic Southern blot experiments revealed that the nearest neighbor of the C4 enzyme of F. trinervia (gene designation: ppcA) is found in F. pringlei. Both ppcA PEPCs are 966 amino acids in size and share 96% identical residues. The comparison of these two orthologous ppcA PEPCs was therefore selected as the paradigm for studying the evolution of the ancestral C3 isoform toward the current C4 enzyme (10, 11).

When expressed into functional protein in Escherichia coli the C4 and C3 ppcA PEPCs showed the expected kinetic and regulatory features of a C4 and C3 isoform, respectively. The C4 ppcA isoform possesses a high K_0.5 for the substrate phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and a low sensitivity against feedback inhibition by malate, while the C3 ppcA isoform displays the opposite characteristics (12). These findings prompted us to investigate whether the determinants for the C4-specific properties could be located within segments of the primary structure. Since the high sequence similarity allowed the easy exchange of corresponding protein parts between the two isoforms a series of reciprocal exchanges was constructed. The kinetic properties of the chimerical enzymes were studied with respect to K_0.5-PEP, k_cat, and the Hill coefficient (h) in the presence or absence of the activator glucose 6-phosphate (Glc6P). In addition to these reciprocal ppcA PEPC chimera the functional role of a conserved amino acid residue in the carboxyl terminus of the PEPCs was studied. Sequence comparison of plant PEPCs revealed that C4 isoforms of both mono and dicot origin possesses a serine in the carboxyl-terminal region, which in Flaveria is equivalent to amino acid 774. In all C3 and CAM PEPC isoforms this serine is replaced by an alanine. This strict correlative behavior of the serine/alanine position suggested a functional importance of this amino acid residue (11) and therefore its role was investigated by site-directed mutagenesis.

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Materials-- DNA modifying enzymes were purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany) or from MBI Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania). Glc6P and NADH were obtained from Sigma (München, Germany), NADH-malate dehydrogenase (porcine heart) from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany), and the trisodium salt of PEP from ICN (Eschwege, Germany). All chromatography materials were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Freiburg, Germany).

Construction of Chimerical ppcA Sequences-- The ppcA PEPC sequences from F. trinervia (13) and F. pringlei (12) had been inserted into the expression vector pTrc99A (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) resulting in plasmids Ft966 and Fp966, respectively. In order to facilitate the construction of ppcA chimerical clones the 3' ends of the inserted fragments were modified introducing a SacI restriction site. Plasmid Fp966 was restricted with XhoI and PstI and a SacI linker sequence was ligated to the blunted ends. Plasmid Ft966 was digested with EcoRI and PstI and the SacI linker was added correspondingly. The resulting plasmids were named Fp966* and Ft966*, respectively.

For constructing the chimerical ppcA sequences suitable fragments of plasmids Ft966, Ft966*, Fp966, and Fp966* were excised with the appropriate restriction endonucleases (Table I and Fig. 1) and recombined using standard methods. The successful construction of the intended chimerical ppcA sequences (see Table I) was confirmed by restriction and/or sequence analysis. All ppcA chimerical expression plasmids were transformed (14) into the ppc E. coli strain PCR1 (15).

Site-directed Mutagenesis of Serine/Alanine Residue 774-- The conversion of serine 774 of the F. trinervia PEPC into alanine and vice versa the exchange of alanine 774 of the F. pringlei protein into serine was carried out with the Chameleon^TM double-stranded site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The mutagenic primer for the S774A conversion was 5'-CCATGGATCTTTGCATGGACTCAGACC-3' and for the A774S conversion 5'-CCATGGATCTTTTCATGGACTCAGACC-3'. The selection primer was 5'-CCTCTAGAGTCGACGAGCTCGCATGCAAGCTTGG-3'. This primer converts the PstI restriction site of the vector into SacI. DNA sequencing of fragments containing the desired mutation confirmed the success of mutagenesis. The mutagenized fragments were then inserted into the chimerical ppcA sequences as described for the corresponding nonmutagenized fragments (Table I).

Expression and Purification of Recombinant ppcA PEPCs-- The recombinant chimerical enzymes were produced in E. coli strain PCR1 essentially as described before. The PEPC proteins were purified by precipitation with polyethylene glycol 8000 and successive chromatography on phenyl-Sepharose CL-4B, Mono Q, and Superdex 200 HR (12). Enzyme fractions obtained after the size exclusion chromatography were pooled and stored in 50% (v/v) glycerol at 20 °C.

In case of the chimerical enzyme FT296FP670 the purification through phenyl-Sepharose CL-4B had to be replaced by Q-Sepharose Fast Flow chromatography since no active enzyme could be eluted from the phenyl-Sepharose column. The polyethylene glycol-precipitated proteins were resuspended in buffer A (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 5% (v/v) glycerol) and loaded at 1 ml/min onto a Q-Sepharose column that was pre-equilibrated with the same buffer. PEPC activity was eluted by a linear 30-ml gradient of 0-0.5 M KCl in buffer A. Peak fractions of 1 ml were pooled, concentrated with a Centricon 30 microconcentrator (Millipore Amicon, Eschborn, Germany), and then subjected to size exclusion chromatography on the Superdex 200 HR column. Active fractions were stored as described above.

PEPC Activity Assay-- PEPC activity was measured spectroscopically at 340 nm by coupling to exogenous NADH-malate dehydrogenase. The standard reaction mixture of 0.6 ml contained 50 mM Tricine/KOH, pH 8.0, 5 mM PEP, 10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM KHCO₃, 0.15 mM NADH, and 6 units of NADH-malate dehydrogenase (porcine heart). The reaction was started by adding recombinant PEPC which was diluted in buffer B (10 mM Tricine/KOH, pH 8.0, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50% (v/v) glycerol) to the desired activity. One unit of enzyme was defined as the activity oxidizing 1 µmol of NADH per min at 25 °C. In order to determine the kinetic parameters (K_0.5-PEP, k_cat, and Hill coefficient, h) the Hill equation was fitted to the experimental data by nonlinear regression analysis using the software package Kaleidagraph (version 3.0.8, Synergy Software). For each chimerical enzyme two independent preparations were analyzed and each kinetic measurement was repeated at least once.

Miscellaneous-- Standard molecular biological techniques were carried out essentially as described in Ref. 16. Double stranded plasmid DNAs were sequenced with the T7 sequencing kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Nucleic acid and protein sequences were analyzed with the software packages CLUSTAL V (17) and MacMolly^TM Tetra (Softgene GmbH, Berlin, Germany).

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Kinetic Properties of the ppcA PEPCs of F. trinervia (FT966) and F. pringlei (FP966)-- The basis for the study was the large difference in K_0.5-PEP observed between the C3 (FP966) and C4 (FT966) isoenzyme, respectively. Since the C4 isoenzyme has evolved from an ancestral C3 enzyme, we searched for positions that have changed to give rise to the C4 value of K_0.5-PEP. Under the assay conditions used the C3 enzyme displayed only small deviations from Michaelis-Menten kinetics both when investigated in its nonactivated state and when activated with Glc6P. This was also true for the activated C4 enzyme. However, the nonactivated C4 enzyme showed sigmoidal kinetics indicating an allosteric behavior. In order to be able to compare enzymes with different types of kinetics the K_0.5-PEP was used throughout this study and the Hill coefficient was calculated for all enzymes.

Experimental Strategy-- To localize C4/C3 determinants for the kinetic properties with respect to the substrate PEP within the ppcA PEPCs we took advantage of several conserved restriction sites in the ppcA PEPC sequences from F. trinervia and F. pringlei (Fig. 1). We interchanged progressively smaller parts of the C3 and C4 enzymes, produced active recombinant chimerical enzymes in E. coli, and measured K_0.5-PEP and k_cat both of the nonactivated enzyme and when activated by 5 mM Glc6P (Tables II and III).

View larger version (107K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Amino acid sequence comparison of the ppcA PEPCs of F. trinervia (FT966) and F. pringlei (FP966). Conserved restriction sites, which were used to construct the reciprocal chimerical enzymes, are indicated at their position within the polypeptide chain. Highly conserved amino acid sequences among all known PEPCs of bacteria and plants are labeled by boxes in gray. Regions with known functions are designated accordingly. The stars show those amino acid residues that are identical in the two PEPCs.

Turning a C3 Enzyme into C4 Type-- Using the C3 enzyme (FP966) as the starting point we swapped parts of the enzyme with corresponding parts of the C4 isozyme starting from the amino terminus (Fig. 2), and asked the question when C4 properties appeared in the chimerical enzymes. The first chimerical enzyme, FT296FP670 (Fig. 2), was comprised of the 296 amino-terminal amino acids (region 1) of the C4 enzyme (FT966) while the remainder was of C3 type (FP966). This region contains the phosphorylation site for light activation (18), a domain suggested to be involved in oxaloacetate formation (19) and, additionally, two well conserved domains of unknown function found in all PEPC (Fig. 1). When comparing the K_0.5-PEP of the nonactivated and activated FT296FP670 chimera with that of the C3 enzyme (FP966) no significant change was found (Fig. 2). This result indicates that the first 296 amino acids do not contribute significantly to the differences in K_0.5-PEP. The second chimerical enzyme, FT437FP529, was investigated already in the previous study (11) and the results here are the same: the nonactivated enzyme shows a small but significant alteration in K_0.5-PEP while the activated one is practically unchanged in comparison to the original C3 enzyme (Fig. 2). This implies that amino acids 296 to 437, called region 2 in Fig. 2, bear a C4-relevant domain. In the next chimera, FT591FP375, the C4 PEPC sequences were extended by 154 amino acids (region 3) to comprise the first 591 amino-terminal amino acids while the 375 carboxyl-terminal amino acids were of C3 origin. The 154 additional amino acids contain several small domains (Fig. 1) with unknown function but which are conserved in all examined PEPCs. However, this extension of the C4 part had no significant influence either on the activated or on the nonactivated enzyme. In the last construct of this series the C4 part was expanded up to amino acid position 645 (region 4) to create the chimerical enzyme FT645FP321 (Fig. 2). Region 4 contains two well conserved domains where the second one is involved in PEP and PEP/HCO₃ binding (20), (Fig. 1). As can be seen in Fig. 2 the K_0.5-PEP for the nonactivated and activated enzyme rises somewhat but this cannot be considered to be significant.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Localization of C4 characteristics by C3 to C4 chimerical enzymes. The appearance of C4 properties was studied by a progressive replacement of segments of the C3 enzyme (gray) by its C4 counterparts (white), starting from the amino terminus. Note the drastic change in K0.5-PEP when region 5 is changed from C3 type (FT645FP321) to C4 (FT966). Site-directed mutagenesis of alanine 774 into a serine resulted in a substantial change of K0.5-PEP, indicating that this position is a major determinant for C4 characteristics in this region (see lower part of the figure). The enzymes were divided into 5 regions according to common restriction sites. The black boxes denote the highly conserved amino acid sequences in all PEPCs (see Fig. 1). Amino acid 774 is indicated by a circle. The figures presented are mean values of four measurements from two independent enzyme preparations. For standard errors, see Table II.

It follows from these experiments that region 5 of the enzyme must contain the major determinant(s) for the acquisition of a C4-specific K_0.5-PEP. As outlined already in the Introduction, amino acid 774 in this carboxyl-terminal region is an interesting candidate in this respect, since all C4 enzymes examined possess a serine residue at this position while C3 as well as CAM enzymes instead have an alanine (11). To test if a serine at this position is essential for gaining C4 properties site-directed mutagenesis was performed and the alanine 774 of the construct FT645FP321 was replaced by serine creating the enzyme FT645FP321-A774S (Fig. 2). As can be seen from the kinetic data, this single amino acid change had a striking effect in comparison to both the nonactivated and activated FT645FP321 enzyme and resulted in K_0.5-PEP values close to those of the C4 enzyme (Fig. 2).

To assess the importance of this position for C4 characteristics without interference from other regions of the C4 enzyme, alanine 774 in the C3 enzyme (FP966) was substituted by serine. The resulting enzyme, FP966-A774S, showed a significant increase in the K_0.5-PEP of the nonactivated enzyme, however, the impact of this exchange on the activated enzyme was marginal (Fig. 2).

Since K_0.5 values only partially describe the kinetic properties of an enzyme and the turnover number k_cat has to be taken into account, the specificity constants, k_cat/K_0.5, were calculated for each chimerical enzyme. Table II shows that the pattern of changes in k_cat/K_0.5 parallels that of the changes obtained by K_0.5 alone indicating a close relationship of these two kinetic parameters.

Taken together, this C3 to C4 exchange series of chimerical enzymes defines two domains to be involved in the acquisition of C4-specific properties for both K_0.5-PEP and k_cat/K_0.5. Region 2 between positions 296 and 437 makes a small but significant contribution. Region 5 between amino acids 645 and 966, however, causes the major change of the C3 enzyme into C4 type. Serine 774 is the essential determinant for C4 characteristics in this region. It is necessary for C4-specific kinetics, but not sufficient.

Because the C3 enzyme follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics but the C4 enzyme displays sigmoidal behavior we analyzed when the C3-type Hill coefficient changed into C4 type while exchanging segment for segment. Table II shows that a major change is observed when region 2 is altered from C3 to C4. The full cooperative behavior, however, was only achieved when region 5 was of C4 type too, or, at least, the alanine 774 was replaced by serine. This finding suggests that regions 2 and 5 are not only involved in determining K_0.5-PEP but also the mode of enzyme kinetics.

Turning a C4 Enzyme into C3 Type-- In order to test the conclusions drawn above we made the reciprocal experiments. We used the C4 enzyme (FT966) as the starting point, progressively interchanged parts of the C4 enzyme with C3 counterparts, and assayed for loss of C4 characteristics (Table III and Fig. 3). As was found for the C3 to C4 exchange series, the exchange of region 1 had no significant effect on the K_0.5-PEP of either the nonactivated or the activated enzyme. Further exchanges, however, differed in their effects on the kinetic properties of the nonactivated and activated chimerical enzymes and are therefore described separately.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   Localization of C4 characteristics by C4 to C3 chimerical enzymes. The loss of C4 properties was investigated by a progressive replacement of segments of the C4 enzyme (white) by its C3 counterparts (gray), starting from the amino terminus. Note the profound drop in K0.5-PEP of the activated enzyme (+Glc6P) when region 2 of FP296FT670 is changed to its C3 counterpart creating the chimerical enzyme FP437FT670. This suggests that region 2 is of utmost importance for the Glc6P activation. The K0.5-PEP of the nonactivated enzyme drops significantly when regions 2 or 5 are changed from C4 to C3, indicating that these regions harbor determinants for C4 characteristics in the nonactivated enzyme. In addition, site-directed mutageneses (lower part of the figure) show that the replacement of serine 774 in region 5 by an alanine drastically lowers the K0.5-PEP indicating that this position is a major determinant for C4 properties of the nonactivated enzyme. The black boxes denote the highly conserved amino acid sequences in all PEPCs (see Fig. 1). Amino acid 774 is indicated by a circle. The figures presented are mean values of four measurements from two independent enzyme preparations. For standard errors, see Table III.

With respect to the nonactivated enzyme the replacement of region 2 (FP437FT529) but also of region 3 (FP591FT375) led to significant decreases of K_0.5-PEP, while the last exchange (FP645FT321) had no effect on this kinetic parameter. However, only when serine 774 of FP645FT321 was replaced by alanine (FP645FT321-S774A) was a K_0.5-PEP close to that of the C3 enzyme (FP966) obtained. It follows that for the nonactivated enzymes regions 2, 3, and the serine/alanine 774 position of region 5 are the most important causes for the loss of C4 characteristics in K_0.5-PEP.

In contrast, when the k_cat/K_0.5 values of this series of nonactivated chimerical enzymes were compared, region 3 and region 5 turned out to contain major determinants for the decrease in C4 characteristics, while the contribution of region 2 was neglectable. The replacement of serine 774 by alanine was not sufficient to bring about a C3 like k_cat/K_0.5 value in the FP645FT321 enzyme. This indicates that region 5 must bear additional amino acids influencing this kinetic constant. The Hill coefficient was not significantly affected by this series of exchanges from C4-type enzyme to C3 except when the serine of FP645FT321 was mutagenized to an alanine (Table III). This result reinforces that serine 774 is strongly involved in determining allosteric behavior. When investigating the activated chimerical enzymes of this C4 to C3 exchange series region 2 turned out to be the most important determinant for the change from a C4 to a C3 K_0.5-PEP value. The replacement of this region by its C3 counterpart in the FP296FT670 enzyme led to a C3 like K_0.5-PEP. All the further substitutions and the serine-alanine replacement had only minor effects.

Region 2 also plays a major role for explaining the increase in k_cat/K_0.5 when changing the C4 into a C3 enzyme. Its replacement in FP296FT670 by the corresponding segment of the C3 enzyme resulted in a doubling of k_cat/K_0.5 from 10 × 10⁵ to 21 × 10⁵ s¹ M¹. This is about 50% of the difference between the C4 and C3 enzymes. Approximately the same difference in k_cat/K_0.5 was observed when region 3 of the C4 enzyme was replaced by the corresponding part of the C3 enzyme suggesting that besides region 2, region 3 holds major determinants for k_cat/K_0.5.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

We are interested in the events that led to the evolution of the C4 PEPC and are using the C4 PEPC of F. trinervia and its orthologue in the closely related C3 species F. pringlei as our experimental system (10, 11). The two isozymes exhibit about the same turnover numbers (k_cat) but differ drastically in the K_0.5 for the substrate PEP both in the nonactivated and the activated state. The two enzymes also differ in their degree of activation by the allosteric regulator Glc6P. While the C3 enzyme is activated only 1.5-fold, the C4 enzyme shows about a 5-fold activation. Finally, the two enzymes display different types of kinetics with respect to their substrate PEP. There is no difference in the activated enzymes which both show a typical Michaelis-Menten kinetic. However, the nonactivated C4 enzyme, but not the C3 enzyme, shows a sigmoidal behavior. Taken together the evolution of the C4 isoform, therefore, must have involved changes in the steady-state interaction with its substrate PEP, the kinetic behavior, and an increase in the activation by Glc6P.

To determine the structural elements that give the C4 PEPC its specific kinetic and regulatory properties a domain swapping strategy was pursued and two sets of chimerical enzymes were constructed. In the first series the C3 enzyme (FP966) was progressively interchanged with corresponding parts of the C4 enzyme (FT966) starting from the amino terminus (Fig. 2). In the second series the reciprocal strategy was applied, i.e. regions of the C4 enzyme were swapped with corresponding segments of the C3 PEPC (Fig. 3). The enzymes, which were in their nonphosphorylated state (21), were investigated by performing saturation kinetics with the substrate PEP under nonactivated and activated conditions, and the kinetic constants K_0.5, k_cat, and the Hill coefficient were determined.

The main conclusion from these series of mosaic C3/C4 enzymes is that region 2 (positions 296 to 437) and region 5 (positions 645 to 966) contain the major determinants for C4-specific kinetic and regulatory properties. Region 5 is the key factor for K_0.5-PEP of the nonactivated enzymes. The central determinant in this region is amino acid position 774, which holds a serine in all C4 enzymes but an alanine in all C3 and CAM PEPCs. Region 2 is essential for the allosteric regulation by Glc6P. However, in order to exert its effect, region 2 of the C4 enzyme has to be combined with a region 5 that contains a serine residue at position 774. This indicates that regions 2 and 5 do not operate independently in the activated enzyme but interact with each other. The interaction of the two regions becomes obvious when comparing the changes in K_0.5-PEP of the activated enzymes in the two exchange series. In the C4 to C3 series (Fig. 3) the C4 K_0.5-PEP is lost when region 2 is exchanged from C4 to C3. If serine 774 of the intact C4 enzyme is altered to alanine the same effect is observed, i.e. the enzyme loses its C4 K_0.5-PEP and becomes C3 like. The conclusion is that both region 2 and position 774 of region 5 must be of the C4 type in order to get a C4 K_0.5-PEP of the activated enzyme. As this mutual dependence is true only for the activated enzyme we suggest that at least one of these regions is involved in the allosteric behavior of the C4 PEPC. The C3 to C4 exchange series is consistent with this interpretation. The addition of a C4 type region 2 to a C3 enzyme affects the K_0.5-PEP of the activated enzyme only if alanine 774 is converted to serine.

There is evidence that other regions are also involved in C4-specific properties. The analysis of the kinetic parameter k_cat/K_0.5 suggests that besides regions 2 and 5, region 3 may contain determinants for C4 characteristics. However, the contribution of region 3 to the C4-specific properties becomes only apparent in the C4 to C3 exchange series.

How do these suggestions of the effect of regions 2 and 5, and especially position 774 of region 5, suit with the three-dimensional structure of the E. coli PEPC that recently became available (22)? The E. coli PEPC is very similar to the plant enzyme in the primary structure suggesting that the three-dimensional structure of the bacterial enzyme can be directly applied to plant PEPC (22). The position 774 (corresponding to alanine 720 in the E. coli PEPC) is located above and very close to the active site suggesting influence on the catalysis (Fig. 4). The substitution of this alanine to serine might give rise to a hydrogen bond that interacts with the substrate PEP or with other parts of the enzyme. Such a change may very well result in weaker steady-state interactions revealed as a higher K_0.5-PEP, which is typical for C4 PEPCs (23). Thus, the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme is in accordance with our view of position 774 as a determinant for C3/C4 characteristics.

View larger version (75K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Three-dimensional view of the E. coli PEPC corresponding to the C4-specific serine and region 2 of the Flaveria enzymes. The picture was created from the three-dimensional structure of the E. coli enzyme published recently (20) by using SwissPdbViewer version 3.5 (24). The Ala-720 marked with an arrow in the upper part of the figure corresponds to position 774 of the F. trinervia enzyme that holds the C4-specific serine residue. The amino acids located above the  barrel (in green) are involved in enzyme catalysis (1, 19, 25, 26). Region 2 of the Flaveria enzymes corresponds to helices 11 to 15 of the E. coli enzyme. The lysine 347 of the C4 PEPC which is suggested to be involved in Glc6P activation is located between 12 and 13 in a small domain that is missing in the bacterial enzyme.

As the exact location of the C4 determinant(s) in region 2 is not known it is more difficult to grasp how this region interacts with the catalytic center and position 774. Comparison of the two ppcA PEPCs reveals 13 amino acids that differ in this region (Fig. 1). Some of these positions can be located by a comparison with the crystallized E. coli enzyme but they are far away from the catalytic center. However, this region contains a 13-amino acid long sequence in plant PEPCs that is missing in the bacterial enzyme (Fig. 5). Two of the positions in this stretch differ between the investigated PEPCs. Amino acid 347 in the Flaveria PEPC is an interesting candidate. This position harbors a lysine in FT966 (C4) but an arginine in FP966 (C3) and was suggested as a candidate of C3/C4 difference (11). However, with more C4 sequences available (i.e. Amaranthus hypochondriacus; accession number L49175) it became apparent that this lysine residue is not 100% C4 unique. This might indicate that the conversion of a C3 enzyme into C4-type depends on one strictly conserved site in the carboxyl terminus, serine/alanine at position 774, and a second determinant in the amino-terminal half whose position is more flexible. The second determinant may be composed of several positions but we suggest that one of them is position 347 arginine/lysine at least what concerns the Flaveria PEPCs. Preliminary sequence data from other C3 and C4 PEPCs in the Flaveria genus support this suggestion.² The fact that none of the 13 amino acid candidates in region 2 are in close contact to the active site (Fig. 4) may indicate that the C3/C4 determinant in region 2 is involved in the allosteric regulation of the enzyme. The strong influence that this region has on the Glc6P activation is in favor of this suggestion.

In conclusion, our results show that the genus Flaveria offers the opportunity to get insight in the evolutionary process leading from C3 to C4 metabolism. The fact that this genus contains C3, C4, as well as C3/C4 intermediate species suggests that it should be possible to ascertain both the stepwise evolutionary changes as well as the order of these steps. In this paper we have put a small piece of work toward this goal of what concerns PEPC, the key enzyme of C4 metabolism.

	ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr K. Izui (Kyoto University, Japan) for the valuable discussion at the Photosynthesis Congress 1998 in Budapest, which renewed our interest in the importance of the carboxyl-terminal serine/alanine residue for determining C3/C4 characteristics. We are grateful to Dr. K. C. Woo for stimulating discussions about the regulatory properties of C4 PEPC during his sabbatical stay at the University of Düsseldorf.

	FOOTNOTES

^* This work was supported by Graduiertenkolleg "Molekulare Physiologie" of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to P. W.), Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes (to O. E. B.), and the Carl Trygger Foundation (to P. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

^¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Plant Biology, The Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 7080, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Tel.: 46-18-67-13-74; Fax: 46-18-67-32-79; E-mail: Per.Svensson@vbiol.slu.se.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909832199

² O. E. Bläsing, P. Westhoff, and P. Svensson, unpublished results.

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PEPC, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Endo, Y. Mihara, T. Furumoto, H. Matsumura, Y. Kai, and K. Izui Maize C4-form phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase engineered to be functional in C3 plants: mutations for diminished sensitivity to feedback inhibitors and for increased substrate affinity J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1811 - 1818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. V. Lara, S. D.X. Chuong, H. Akhani, C. S. Andreo, and G. E. Edwards Species Having C4 Single-Cell-Type Photosynthesis in the Chenopodiaceae Family Evolved a Photosynthetic Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Like That of Kranz-Type C4 Species Plant Physiology, October 1, 2006; 142(2): 673 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Rao, J. Reiskind, and G. Bowes Light Regulation of the Photosynthetic Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase (PEPC) in Hydrilla verticillata Plant Cell Physiol., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1206 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Xu, S. Ahmed, H. Moriyama, and R. Chollet The Importance of the Strictly Conserved, C-terminal Glycine Residue in Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase for Overall Catalysis: MUTAGENESIS AND TRUNCATION OF GLY-961 IN THE SORGHUM C4 LEAF ISOFORM J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2006; 281(25): 17238 - 17245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. RONDEAU, C. ROUCH, and G. BESNARD NADP-Malate Dehydrogenase Gene Evolution in Andropogoneae (Poaceae): Gene Duplication Followed by Sub-functionalization Ann. Bot., December 1, 2005; 96(7): 1307 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Takahashi-Terada, M. Kotera, K. Ohshima, T. Furumoto, H. Matsumura, Y. Kai, and K. Izui Maize Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase: MUTATIONS AT THE PUTATIVE BINDING SITE FOR GLUCOSE 6-PHOSPHATE CAUSED DESENSITIZATION AND ABOLISHED RESPONSIVENESS TO REGULATORY PHOSPHORYLATION J. Biol. Chem., March 25, 2005; 280(12): 11798 - 11806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Gowik, J. Burscheidt, M. Akyildiz, U. Schlue, M. Koczor, M. Streubel, and P. Westhoff cis-Regulatory Elements for Mesophyll-Specific Gene Expression in the C4 Plant Flaveria trinervia, the Promoter of the C4 Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Gene PLANT CELL, May 1, 2004; 16(5): 1077 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. WESTHOFF and U. GOWIK Evolution of C4 Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase. Genes and Proteins: a Case Study with the Genus Flaveria Ann. Bot., January 1, 2004; 93(1): 13 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sanchez and F. J. Cejudo Identification and Expression Analysis of a Gene Encoding a Bacterial-Type Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase from Arabidopsis and Rice Plant Physiology, June 1, 2003; 132(2): 949 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Rao, N. C. Magnin, J. B. Reiskind, and G. Bowes Photosynthetic and Other Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase Isoforms in the Single-Cell, Facultative C4 System of Hydrilla verticillata Plant Physiology, October 1, 2002; 130(2): 876 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Jeanneau, J. Vidal, A. Gousset-Dupont, B. Lebouteiller, M. Hodges, D. Gerentes, and P. Perez Manipulating PEPC levels in plants J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2002; 53(376): 1837 - 1845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 275/36/27917    most recent M909832199v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bläsing, O. E. Articles by Svensson, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bläsing, O. E. Articles by Svensson, P. Social Bookmarking