|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M004554200 on June 28, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 37, 28371-28379, September 15, 2000
Müllerian Inhibiting Substance Inhibits Breast Cancer
Cell Growth through an NF B-mediated Pathway*
Dorry L.
Segev ,
Thanh U.
Ha ,
Trinh T.
Tran ,
Mary
Kenneally ,
Paul
Harkin§,
Mira
Jung¶,
David T.
MacLaughlin ,
Patricia K.
Donahoe , and
Shyamala
Maheswaran
From the Pediatric Surgical Research Laboratories,
Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts 02114, the § Department of Oncology, Queen's
University, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland, and the
¶ Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Medical
Center, Washington, D. C. 20057
Received for publication, May 25, 2000, and in revised form, June 27, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS), a
member of the transforming growth factor- superfamily,
induces regression of the Müllerian duct in male embryos. In this
report, we demonstrate MIS type II receptor expression in normal breast
tissue and in human breast cancer cell lines, breast fibroadenoma, and
ductal adenocarcinomas. MIS inhibited the growth of both estrogen
receptor (ER)-positive T47D and ER-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer
cell lines, suggesting a broader range of target tissues for MIS
action. Inhibition of growth was manifested by an increase in the
fraction of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle
and induction of apoptosis. Treatment of breast cancer cells with MIS
activated the NF B pathway and selectively up-regulated the immediate
early gene IEX-1S, which, when overexpressed, inhibited breast cancer
cell growth. Dominant negative I B expression ablated both
MIS-mediated induction of IEX-1S and inhibition of growth, indicating
that activation of the NF B signaling pathway was required for these
processes. These results identify the NF B-mediated signaling pathway
and a target gene for MIS action and suggest a putative role for the MIS ligand and its downstream interactors in the treatment of ER-positive as well as negative breast cancers.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
MIS,1 a member of the
TGF- family of hormones, causes regression of the
epithelial-mesenchymal unit of the Müllerian duct in the
embryonic male urogenital ridge. In females the Müllerian duct
autonomously differentiates into the uterus, Fallopian tubes, and upper
vagina (1). The Müllerian ducts of both male and female embryos
are responsive to MIS only during a critical period in development
after which they lose sensitivity (1, 2). However, MIS is produced at
high levels by Sertoli cells of the testis even after the regression of
the Müllerian duct, decreases at adolescence, and is produced
throughout adult life. In females, it is synthesized by postnatal
granulosa cells of the ovary and can be detected in the female serum
until menopause (3, 4). Cleavage of MIS by a kex-like enzyme is
required to manifest MIS activity since a noncleavable mutant is devoid
of biological function (5).
The MIS type II receptor gene, a highly conserved single transmembrane
serine threonine kinase that is homologous to members of the TGF-
family of type II receptors, encodes a 2.0-kilobase mRNA (6-8). It
is expressed at high levels in the Müllerian duct, Sertoli cells,
and granulosa cells of the embryonic and adult gonads and in the uterus
(8). The developmental significance of the MIS type II receptor was
demonstrated in MIS type II receptor null male mice, which develop
normally but have a persistent Müllerian duct that forms a uterus
and oviducts; this phenotype resembles that of MIS ligand-deficient
mice (9-11). Female MIS type II receptor or MIS ligand-deficient mice
are normal and fertile as young adults.
The detection of MIS in the serum of males and females even after the
regression and differentiation of the Müllerian duct (3, 4)
suggests that MIS might be a multifunctional hormone. MIS is a negative
regulatory factor in fetal rat lung maturation, where it inhibits the
production of pulmonary surfactant both in vitro and
in vivo (12, 13). MIS also inhibits oocyte meiosis in
vitro (14, 15). The presence of MIS type II receptor in non-Müllerian tissues such as the ovary, lung, and Leydig cells of the testis (16-18) and the occurrence of Leydig cell hyperplasia and Leydig cell tumors in receptor null male mice (11) also suggest
that the biological action of MIS is not limited to the Müllerian
duct. Furthermore, MIS has been shown to inhibit the growth of tumor
cells in vitro and in vivo (19-22). Masiakos
et al. (17), using ovarian epithelial cells derived from the
ascites of ovarian cancer patients, correlated MIS type II receptor
expression with MIS-mediated growth inhibition. Furthermore, exogenous
MIS has been shown to inhibit metastases of the ocular melanoma cell line OM431 (23) and to block the growth of the vulvar epidermoid carcinoma cell line A431 and the OM431 cell line in vivo
(21, 24).
Expression of MIS-related proteins including TGF- , activin, inhibin,
and BMP ligands and their receptors has been demonstrated in
human breast cancer cell lines and in breast cancer specimens (25-33).
TGF- has been shown to inhibit the growth of numerous cell types
in vitro, including both normal human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancer cell lines (34-36). The importance of the signaling pathways initiated by members of the TGF- superfamily in
the control of breast cell proliferation is also demonstrated by the
presence of genetic mutations or loss of expression of activin/TGF-
receptors in human breast cancers (29, 37). However, MIS type II
receptor expression and the effects of MIS-mediated signaling on growth
and differentiation of the breast have not been investigated.
Recent studies have shown that TGF- -mediated inhibition of breast
cancer cell proliferation is associated with a decrease in NF B DNA
binding activity (38). The signaling cascade associated with activation
of the NF B pathway, initially described in association with
inflammatory responses in the cellular immune system, is also induced
by stress, growth arrest, and apoptosis in a wide variety of cell types
(39, 40). The NF B family consists of transcriptional activators,
including p65, p50, p52, and c-Rel, which share a Rel homology domain.
These molecules form either homo- or heterodimers and bind to DNA in a
sequence-specific manner. NF B in its inactive state exists in the
cytosol bound to the inhibitory I B family of molecules. Activation
of the pathway by extracellular signals leads to phosphorylation and
degradation of I B with subsequent nuclear localization of NF B
(39, 40). IEX-1 is an NF B-inducible immediate early gene that is
induced by radiation, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate,
Fas, and TNF- (41). Wu et al. recently demonstrated the
existence of two IEX-1 splice variants, IEX-1S and IEX-1L. IEX-1L has
an in-frame insertion of 37 amino acids resulting from the presence of
the entire intronic sequence within the coding region of the IEX-1S
transcript (42). The presence of functional binding sites for NF B
and p53 in the IEX-1 promoter supports its role in regulation of
growth, differentiation, and stress response (43).
In this report we demonstrate MIS type II receptor expression in normal
breast and in human breast cancer cell lines, breast fibroadenomas, and
tumors. MIS inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells through
activation of the NF B signaling cascade, which is developmentally
regulated in breast epithelial cells (44) and is aberrantly modulated
in several cancers including breast tumors (45, 46). Thus, breast
tissue might be an additional target for the action of the ovarian
hormone MIS.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines, Reagents, Colony Inhibition Assays, Cell Cycle
Analysis, and Caspase-3 Assays--
Human breast cancer cell lines
T47D, MCF7, MDA-MB-468, and MDA-MB-231 and COS cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% female
fetal bovine serum, glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. ZR 75-1 was
grown in RPMI 1640 containing the same supplements. COS cells were
transfected using Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) as described in the manufacturer's guide to
determine protein expression.
To measure inhibition of cell proliferation, monolayers of equal
numbers of T47D cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate DNA
precipitation technique with vector or CMV-driven expression constructs
(see figure legends) along with 0.5 µg of a construct that encodes
hygromycin resistance. Cells were selected in medium containing 100 µg/ml hygromycin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). After 3-4 weeks,
colonies were stained with crystal violet and counted. To test the
growth inhibitory effect of exogenous rhMIS, cells were seeded in 60-mm
dishes at 3 × 104 cells/plate in the absence of MIS.
MIS was added after 24 h, cultures were grown in the presence or
absence of 35 nM MIS for 4 days, and cells were counted on
the Coulter counter. To analyze the effect of MIS on cell cycle
progression, cells were grown to 20% confluence and treated with 35 nM (5 µg/ml) MIS for 4 days. Cells were detached with
phosphate-buffered saline/EDTA, fixed in 95% ethanol, stained for DNA
content with propidium iodide, and analyzed by fluorescence-activated
cell sorting. Caspase-3 activity was determined as described in the
CLONTECH ApoAlert Caspase-3 Assay kits user manual.
Briefly, T47D cells were treated with 35 nM rhMIS for 3 days and equal amounts of protein lysate were analyzed for caspase-3
activity. Caspase-3 levels in the cell were calculated based on a
standard curve, and relative fold induction was estimated.
NF B Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays and CAT
Assays--
T47D cells were grown to 70% confluence and treated with
indicated concentrations of rhMIS for specified lengths of time. Cells
were harvested in cold phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in 1 ml
of TKM 10:10:1 (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM KCl,
and 1 mM MgCl2), and lysed with 0.1% Triton
X-100. Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm at 4 °C,
and proteins were extracted in buffer containing 10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.0, 350 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. 3 µg of protein was used in 25-µl binding reactions containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 70 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton
X-100, and 4% glycerol. NF B oligonucleotides (Promega) were
32P-end-labeled, and DNA protein complexes were resolved on
4% native polyacrylamide gels. Supershift experiments were performed
by adding 0.1 µg of rabbit anti-p65 or -p50 antibodies (Santa Cruz) to the binding reactions.
The 2X-NF B-CAT reporter construct was a kind gift from Dr. R. Bravo
(Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute). For CAT
assays, T47D cells were transiently transfected by calcium phosphate
DNA precipitation technique with 5 µg of 2X-NF B-CAT and 1 µg of
human growth hormone (hGH) encoding plasmid. Untreated cells and cells
treated with 35 nM MIS for 12 h were harvested, lysed,
and analyzed by CAT-ELISA according to the protocol provided by Roche
Molecular Biochemicals. Transfection efficiency was standardized using
hGH-ELISA as described in the manual provided by Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
RNase Protection, Northern Blot, and PCR Analyses--
RNase
protection assays were done using a 302-base pair antisense probe
containing exon 11 (228 base pairs) and the 3'-untranslated region (74 base pairs) of the human MIS type II receptor cDNA. This receptor
fragment contained within PvuII-XhoI restriction sites was cloned in reverse orientation into
XhoI-EcoRV sites of pCDNA 3.1( ) plasmid.
The resulting construct was sequenced to confirm the boundaries of the
insert and was linearized with HindIII, and the antisense
transcript was obtained using T7 polymerase (MAXIscript in
vitro transcription kit, Ambion). RNase protection assays were
done with 75 µg of total RNA isolated from T47D, MDA-MB-231, ZR 75-1, and COS-7 cells using the RPA III ribonuclease protection assay kit
(Ambion). Briefly, RNA was hybridized with 375,000 cpm of radiolabeled
probe overnight at 55 °C and digested with a mixture of RNase A and
RNase T1 for 30 min at 37 °C. The protected fragments were
precipitated and analyzed on a denaturing 6% polyacrylamide, 8 M urea sequencing gel. 75 µg of yeast tRNA were used as
positive control for the function of RNase, and another sample
containing the same amount of yeast tRNA was incubated without RNase to
control for probe integrity. Sequencing reactions of the plasmid
containing the antisense MIS type II receptor probe was electrophoresed
on the same gel to estimate the sizes of the fragments.
RNA was isolated from cells using RNA STAT-60 total mRNA isolation
kit (Tel-Test, Inc). Poly(A)+ RNA from T47D, MDA-MB-231,
MCF7, and MDA-MB-468 was obtained using the FastTrack 2.0 mRNA
isolation kit (Invitrogen) and poly(A)+ RNA from the adult
human testis was purchased from CLONTECH. 4 µg of
poly(A)+ RNA was separated on a formaldehyde gel,
transferred to HyBond membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and probed
with human MIS type II receptor cDNA.
7.5 µg of total RNA isolated from either T47D or MDA-MB-231 cells was
analyzed by Northern blot with radiolabeled IEX-1 or actin. IEX-1 probe
for Northern analysis was derived by PCR amplification of T47D
cDNA using the following primers: sense,
5'-TCCAGAGGACGCCCCTAACG-3'; and antisense, 5'-GTTCACAGAACATACTAGGC-3'.
Primers for detecting the presence of IEX-1L and IEX-1S transcripts by
PCR were: sense, 5'-TCCGGTCCTGAGATCTTCAC-3'; and antisense,
5'-CTCTTCAGCCATCAGGATCT-3'. cDNA derived from total RNA isolated
from untreated and MIS-treated T47D and MDA-MB-231 cells, and 50 ng of
DNA from CMV-driven IEX-1S and IEX-1L expression constructs were
amplified with the primers above at an annealing temperature of
50 °C for 30 cycles. Primers for detecting MIS type II receptor
expression in normal human breast, breast carcinomas, and cell lines
were: sense, 5'-GCT GGC TTA TGC TCT TCT CCT TC-3'; and antisense,
5'-ACC TCG CAC TCT GTA GTT CTT TCG-3'. Total RNA isolated from tissue
derived from normal human breast, two invasive ductal carcinomas, and a
fibroadenoma of the breast (Tumor Bank, Massachusetts General Hospital)
was converted to cDNA and amplified with the above primers by PCR. The MIS type II receptor in normal rat breast cDNA was amplified using the following primers: sense, 5'-CAGCCCTGGCTTATCCTCAGG; and
antisense, 5'-GCCACACGCATGTCAGCCTGT-3' (which generates a 220-base pair
fragment); sense, 5'-GTGTGTTCTTTGAGGCTCCTGGAGTT-3'; and antisense,
5'-CTCAGCAGCAGCACAAGGAACACT-3' (which produces a 410-base pair fragment).
Antibodies and Western Blot Analyses--
The rabbit MIS type II
receptor antibody was generated by injecting animals with the peptide
C-G-T-D-F-C-N-A-N-Y-S-H-L-P-P-S-G, which corresponds to amino acids
111-127. The antibody was purified over a protein A-Sepharose column
before use. Horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies
were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Proteins were harvested
in RIPA buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 150 mM
NaC1, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS),
fractionated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to Immobilon-P
membrane, and blocked in Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 (25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 136 mM NaCl, 5 mM
KCl, 0.1% Tween) containing 30% milk. The type II receptor antibody was used at a dilution of 1:3000 in 10% milk/Tris-buffered saline and
Tween 20 solution. Blots were incubated with the primary antibodies for
2 h at room temperature, washed, and incubated with the
appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies. Bound
antibodies were detected with ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
COS cells transfected with 3 µg of FLAG-tagged rat MIS type II
receptor construct using 9 µl of FUGENE 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and expression was detected by Western blotting using
antibodies to the type II receptor or FLAG.
 |
RESULTS |
MIS Type II Receptor Expression in the Breast--
Expression of
the MIS type II receptor mRNA in human breast cancer cell lines was
analyzed by RNase protection assay and Northern blot analysis. RNase
protection assay was performed with a 302-base pair radiolabeled
antisense riboprobe containing part of exon 11 and the 3'-untranslated
sequence of the human MIS type II receptor. The MIS type II receptor
mRNA was present in the breast cancer cell lines T47D, MDA-MB-231,
and ZR 75-1 (Fig. 1A,
left panel). The protected fragment was
approximately 93 base pairs shorter than the full-length probe due to
the presence of unrelated vector sequence at both the 5' and 3' ends.
COS-7, the SV-40 transformed kidney cell line derived from the African
green monkey, did not express the MIS type II receptor mRNA (Fig.
1A, right panel). Yeast tRNA samples
were hybridized with the probe and incubated with or without RNase to
control for RNase activity and probe integrity, respectively. Northern
blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA isolated from T47D, MCF 7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 human breast cancer cell lines also
demonstrated that the 2-kilobase MIS type II receptor mRNA was
present in a pattern similar to that observed with poly(A)+
RNA derived from adult human testis (Fig. 1B). The presence
of two transcripts is consistent with Northern analyses of RNA isolated from rat and mouse Leydig cell tumor lines (18) and human ovarian cancer cell lines, which express the MIS type II receptor (17). The
presence of MIS type II receptor in breast cancer cell lines T47D and
MDA-MB-231 was also confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR amplification and sequence analyses using primers specific for exons 1 and 5 (data not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
MIS type II receptor expression in the
breast. A, MIS type II receptor mRNA expression in
human breast cancer cell lines. Upper panel,
total RNA isolated from T47D, MDA-MB-231, ZR 75-1, and COS cells was
analyzed by RNase protection assay. The protected fragments after
digestion with RNase were analyzed on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide
gel. 75 µg of yeast tRNA was hybridized with the probe and incubated
with or without RNase to test the activity of RNases and probe
integrity, respectively. A small aliquot of the probe was loaded
directly on the gel to control for integrity of the probe.
Lower panel, schematic representation of the MIS
type II receptor antisense riboprobe used for RNase protection assay.
UTR, untranslated region; nt, nucletide(s).
B, 4 µg of poly(A)+ RNA isolated from human
breast cancer cell lines T47D, MCF7, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and from
adult human testis purchased from CLONTECH were
analyzed by Northern blot using a human MIS type II receptor cDNA
probe. The positions of 18 S ribosomal RNA (open
arrow), MIS type II receptor mRNA (closed
arrow), and the shorter transcript (open
arrow) are indicated. C, left
panel, characterization of rabbit anti-MIS type II receptor
antibody. Western blot analysis of total protein (100 µg) isolated
from COS cells transfected with 2 µg of FLAG-tagged rat MIS type II
receptor using a rabbit anti-MIS the type II antibody. Right
panel, the blot was reanalyzed with a mouse anti-FLAG
antibody. An equal amount of protein from untransfected COS cells was
used as a negative control. D, MIS type II receptor protein
expression in human breast cancer cell lines. Total protein (100 µg)
from T47D, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 cells were analyzed by
immunoblotting with rabbit anti-MIS type II receptor antibody or with
antibody preincubated with the cognate peptide overnight at 4 °C. A
parallel blot was probed with the preimmune rabbit serum to control for
antibody specificity. Ab, antibody. E,
upper panel, expression of MIS type II receptor
in normal breast and breast tumors. Total RNA isolated from normal
breast, breast fibroadenoma, and two invasive breast ductal
adenocarcinoma tissue samples was converted to cDNA and
analyzed by PCR amplification using primers specific for exons 1 and 5. A DNA fragment of the expected size (582 base pairs) is shown. cDNA
obtained from MDA-MB-231 cells is shown as a positive control.
Lower panel, total RNA isolated from normal rat
breast was converted to cDNA and analyzed using primers that span
exons 2 and 4 (410 base pairs), and exon 11 and the 3'-untranslated
region (220 base pairs) of the rat MIS type II receptor. The rat MIS
type II receptor cDNA was used as a positive control.
|
|
The expression of the MIS type II receptor protein in breast cancer
cell lines was demonstrated by Western blot analysis. COS cells
transfected with a CMV-driven FLAG-tagged rat MIS type II receptor
construct were analyzed by Western blot to characterize the rabbit MIS
type II receptor antibody. The MIS type II receptor protein migrated
with a molecular mass of approximately 63 kDa, as detected by the MIS
type II receptor antibody, and was absent in cells transfected with
vector (Fig. 1C, left panel).
Re-analysis of the membrane with an anti-FLAG antibody displayed a
protein of the same molecular weight in cells transfected with the
receptor (Fig. 1C, right panel).
Immunoblot of total cellular protein isolated from human breast cancer
cell lines T47D, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 using the rabbit MIS type
II receptor antiserum demonstrated the presence of the 63-kDa
endogenous receptor protein. This protein was absent upon preincubation
of the antibody with an excess of the cognate peptide. Antibody
specificity was also confirmed by analyzing the blots with preimmune
rabbit serum (Fig. 1D).
We also detected expression of the MIS type II receptor mRNA in
normal breast and in a breast fibroadenoma and two invasive ductal
carcinomas using PCR amplification of cDNA generated from these
tissues (Fig. 1E, upper panel).
Primers specific for exons 1 and 5 demonstrated the presence of a DNA
fragment of the expected size (582), the DNA sequence of which was
identical to that of exons 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the human MIS type II
receptor (data not shown). MIS type II receptor in normal rat breast
was detected by PCR analyses using primers that span exons 2 and 4 (Fig. 1E, lower panel) and exon 11 and
the 3'-untranslated region (Fig. 1E, lower
panel) of the rat MIS type II receptor. Sequence of the DNA
fragments amplified by these primers was identical to the rat MIS type
II receptor (data not shown).
We could not detect expression of the MIS ligand in culture
supernatants obtained from either normal or cancer cell lines of the
human breast by MIS-ELISA. Furthermore, PCR of cDNA derived from
normal and tumor tissue obtained from human breast cancer patients did
not amplify the MIS ligand. These observations suggests that, although
breast epithelial cells are responsive to serum MIS, they do not
produce detectable levels of the MIS ligand.
MIS-induced Growth Inhibition Requires Activation of
NF B--
To study the functional properties of MIS type II receptor
expression in breast tissue, we determined whether MIS alters the growth properties of the ER-positive breast cancer cell line T47D. We
cotransfected T47D cells with a plasmid encoding hygromycin resistance
and either CMV-vector (V), CMV-driven cleavable bioactive MIS (K2), or noncleavable inactive MIS (K6) (23).
The concentration of wild type and mutant MIS in the medium was 15-20
ng/ml by MIS-ELISA. Expression of MIS in T47D cells resulted in 75%
reduction of drug-resistant colonies compared with vector-transfected
cells. The noncleavable inactive form of MIS did not affect the growth
of T47D cells (Fig. 2A).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
MIS-mediated inhibition of T47D cell
growth. A, monolayers of T47D cells were stably
transfected with 0.5 µg of hygromycin resistance plasmid and 10 µg
each of pCDNA vector (V), pCDNA-bioactive MIS
(K2), or pCDNA-noncleavable inactive MIS
(K6). Hygromycin-resistant colonies were stained with
crystal violet after 3 weeks. Number of colonies per plate is
represented as percentage of survivors with vector-transfected plates
set at 100%. B, T47D were treated with rhMIS over a period
of 6 days and cell numbers were calculated using a Coulter counter. The
mean number of cells in the untreated plates was set at 100%.
C, cell cycle analysis of MIS-treated T47D cells. Cells were
treated with 35 nM MIS for 4 days, stained for DNA content
with propidium iodide, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell cycle
distribution of untreated cells grown for 0 and 4 days is also shown.
D, induction of apoptosis by MIS. T47D cells were treated
with 35 nM rhMIS for 3 days, and equal amounts of protein
lysates were analyzed for caspase-3 activity. Caspase-3 levels were
estimated based on a standard curve, and the relative fold induction
was calculated.
|
|
Addition of exogenous rhMIS (recombinant human MIS) to proliferating
cells also inhibited growth (Figs. 2B and
3E). In order to determine
whether MIS-mediated inhibition of T47D cell growth involved changes in
cell cycle distribution, cells were treated with 35 nM (5 µg/ml) rhMIS, fixed in 95% ethanol, stained for DNA content with
propidium iodide, and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
Treatment with rhMIS lead to a consistent 10-16% increase in the
G1 phase of the cell cycle that was not observed in
untreated cells (Fig. 2C). Activity of caspase-3, an enzyme activated in cells undergoing apoptosis, was monitored to determine whether MIS induces programmed cell death in T47D cells. MIS induced a
3-fold induction in caspase-3 activity in T47D cells compared with
untreated cells (Fig. 2D). MIS-mediated induction of
apoptosis was also confirmed using annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate staining, which detects early stage apoptosis. A 3-fold increase in
annexin V-positive T47D cells was seen following treatment of cells
with MIS (data not shown). Thus, MIS inhibits the growth of breast
cancer cell lines in vitro by interfering with cell cycle
progression and inducing apoptosis.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
MIS-induced NF B
pathway mediates growth inhibition. A, upper
panel, MIS activates the NF B pathway. T47D cells were
treated with 35 nM MIS for indicated periods of time, and 3 µg of nuclear proteins were analyzed by EMSA using a
32P-labeled NF B oligonucleotide probe. Antibody
supershift experiments were done with samples treated with MIS for
6 h. The positions of the NF B DNA protein complexes
(closed arrows) and supershifted complexes
(open arrows) are indicated.
Asterisk (*) represents the most rapidly migrat ing complex, which is competed with excess unlabeled
oligonucleotides but remains unchanged with MIS treatment.
Lower panel, the same samples described above
were analyzed using a control OCT-1 oligonucleotide probe.
B, upper panel, T47D cells were
treated with either 35 nM bioactive rhMIS or 35 nM noncleavable biologically inactive rhMIS for 1 h. 3 µg of nuclear proteins were analyzed by EMSA using a
32P-labeled NF B oligonucleotide probe. Closed
arrow indicates the position of the complex.
Lower panel, T47D and COS-7 cells were treated
with 35 nM MIS for 1 h and nuclear proteins were
analyzed for NF B binding activity. Arrowhead indicates
the position of the complex. C, NF B activated by MIS is
functionally active. T47D cells were transiently transfected with 5 µg of 2X-NF B-CAT construct. Cells were treated with 35 nM MIS for 12 h, and CAT enzyme levels were estimated
by ELISA. Changes in CAT enzyme levels are represented as fold
induction. Transfection efficiencies were standardized by
cotransfecting hGH and analyzing the levels of hGH in culture
supernatants by hGH-ELISA. D, left
panel, inhibition of NF B activation abrogates
MIS-mediated inhibition of growth. Monolayers of T47D cells were stably
transfected with 0.5 µg of hygromycin resistance plasmid and 1)
pCDNA vector (V), 2) 5 µg of pCDNA encoding
bioactive MIS (K2), 3) 5 µg of K2 and 2.5 µg of
pCDNA encoding I B -DN, or 4) 2.5 µg of pCDNA encoding
I B -DN. The amount of DNA transfected was equalized with pCDNA
vector. Hygromycin-resistant colonies were stained with crystal violet
after 3 weeks. The number of colonies per plate are represented as
percentage of survivors. Number of colonies on the plate transfected
with pCDNA vector is set at 100%. Right
panel, I B -DN does not ablate CMV-driven MIS
expression. T47D and COS cells were transiently transfected with 1.5 µg of K2 alone or 1.5 µg of K2 and 1.5 µg of I B -DN using
Fugene 6. The total amount of DNA transfected was equalized with
pCDNA vector. The culture supernatants were analyzed by MIS-ELISA
after 48 h of transfection. E, left
panel, stable expression of T47D cells with I B -DN
abrogates MIS-mediated induction of NF B. T47D cells transfected with
I B -DN were treated with 35 nM rhMIS for 1 h, and
NF B binding activity was analyzed by gel shift. Right
panel, T47D control cells and T47D cells transfected with
I B -DN were treated with 35 nM rhMIS for 4 days and
cell numbers were calculated using a Coulter counter. The mean number
of cells in the untreated plates was set at 100%. F, MIS
does not induce caspase-3 in T47D cells expressing I B -DN. Cells
were treated with 35 nM MIS for 3 days, and caspase-3
activity was estimated. Levels of caspase-3 was estimated based on a
standard curve, and the relative fold induction was calculated.
|
|
We next investigated whether inhibition of T47D cell growth by MIS
involves regulation of the NF B pathway. Following treatment of T47D
cells with 35 nM rhMIS, a robust induction of NF B
binding activity was observed as early as 1 h after treatment and
persisted up to 24 h (Fig. 3A, upper
panel). Simultaneous addition of either rabbit anti-p50 or
anti-p65 antibodies to the binding reaction demonstrated that the
induced complexes predominantly consist of p50 and p65 subunits.
Incubation of nuclear lysates with anti-c-Rel antibody did not
supershift the complex, suggesting that c-Rel protein was not present
in the complexes (data not shown). Although the fastest migrating form
of the DNA protein complex was abolished with an excess of unlabeled
NF B oligonucleotide, it remained unchanged upon treatment with MIS
and was not supershifted with any of the antibodies described. The
specificity of NF B induction by MIS is demonstrated by its failure
to increase the levels of the transcription factor OCT-1 (octamer
binding protein-1; Fig. 3A, lower
panel). Exogenous addition of the noncleavable biologically inactive form of rhMIS, which did not inhibit T47D cell growth (Fig.
2A), failed to induce NF B binding activity (Fig.
3B, upper panel). Furthermore, MIS
treatment did not induce NF B in COS-7 cells, which do not express
the MIS type II receptor (Fig. 3B, lower
panel) (17).
To correlate the increase in NF B binding activity with functional
induction of NF B, reporter gene assays were carried out using a CAT
construct regulated by a basic promoter driven by two upstream NF B
binding sites (2X-NF B-CAT). T47D cells were transiently transfected
with the 2X-NF B-CAT construct and treated with 35 nM
rhMIS for 12 h. A 5-7-fold induction of CAT enzyme expression was
seen in cells treated with MIS, suggesting that the NF B binding
activity induced by MIS was functionally active (Fig.
3C).
Colony inhibition assays were carried out to determine whether ablation
of the NF B pathway by the dominant negative allele of rat I B
(I B -DN) could affect MIS-mediated inhibition of growth. Since
serine residues at positions 32 and 36 of I B , which are
phosphorylated in response to activation signals, are replaced by
alanines in I B -DN, its expression abrogates activation of NF B
(47). As seen previously, expression of MIS in T47D cells resulted in
about 60% inhibition of colony growth compared with cells transfected
with the CMV vector. Cotransfection of I B -DN rescued the cells
from MIS-mediated growth inhibition, whereas expression of I B -DN
alone did not significantly affect the growth of colonies (Fig.
3D, left panel). To ensure that
expression of I B -DN did not inhibit the CMV promoter (48), which
drives the expression of MIS ligand, MIS-ELISAs were performed
following transient transfection of CMV-driven MIS construct (K2) alone or K2 and I B -DN constructs together into T47D or COS cells. MIS-ELISA performed with the culture supernatants after 48 h of transfection demonstrated that expression of the MIS ligand was not
affected by coexpression of I B -DN (Fig. 3D,
right panel).
To further confirm that activation of NF B was required for
MIS-mediated inhibition of growth, I B -DN was stably transfected into T47D cells. Fig. 3E (left panel)
demonstrates that induction of NF B binding activity is attenuated in
T47D cell clones transfected with I B -DN. Although treatment of
control cells with exogenous rhMIS inhibited growth by 64%, growth was
unaffected in cells in which NF B activation was abrogated (Fig.
3E, right panel). This was consistent
with the lack of MIS-mediated induction in caspase-3 activity in these
cells (Fig. 3F). Thus, activation of the NF B pathway is
required for MIS-mediated inhibition of growth.
MIS Induces IEX-1S--
Total RNA isolated from T47D cells treated
with MIS was analyzed by Northern blot using a PCR-derived,
radiolabeled IEX-1 probe, which hybridizes to both IEX-1S and IEX-1L
transcripts. Fig. 4A
illustrates an estimated 10-20-fold induction of IEX-1 mRNA
following 1 h of MIS treatment. Induction was maximal at 1 h
and decreased with time, but remained above basal levels even after
24 h of treatment. Radiolabeled oligonucleotide and PCR-derived probes specifically designed to detect IEX-1L did not hybridize to the
IEX-1 transcript (data not shown). To confirm the absence of IEX-1L
mRNA, PCR analysis was carried out using oligonucleotide primers
which permit the detection of both transcripts. CMV-driven IEX-1L and
IEX-1S cDNA expression constructs were used as positive controls.
Analysis of PCR products revealed that T47D cells expressed IEX-1S
mRNA alone (Fig. 4B). Expression of NF B-inducible
anti-apoptotic genes for A20 and c-IAP-2 (49, 50) was not affected
following treatment with MIS (data not shown).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
MIS induces the expression of IEX-1S.
A, T47D cells were treated with 35 nM MIS for
indicated periods of time and 7.5 µg of total RNA was analyzed by
Northern blot using a PCR-derived IEX-1 probe, which recognizes both
IEX-1S and IEX-1L. Hybridization to actin is shown to control for
loading. B, left panel, schematic
representation of the IEX-1S and IEX-1L PCR fragments expected from the
primers shown. Right panel, PCR products using
IEX-1L and IEX-1S expression constructs and cDNAs derived from
untreated and MIS-treated T47D RNA as templates. Closed
arrows indicate the 220- and 330-bp fragments derived from
IEX-1S and IEX-1L, respectively. Open arrows
indicate the positions of the 200- and 300-base pair markers.
C, two clones of T47D cells stably transfected with
I B -DN were treated with MIS for 0 and 1 h. Upper
panel, 7.5 µg of total cellular RNA was analyzed for
induction of IEX-1; lower panel, hybridization to
actin is shown as control for loading.
|
|
To determine whether induction of IEX-1S by MIS is mediated by
activation of NF B, T47D cell clones expressing I B -DN were tested for activation of IEX-1S mRNA. Induction of IEX-1S mRNA following treatment with MIS was attenuated in T47D cell clones transfected with I B -DN (Fig. 4C).
Expression of IEX-1S Inhibits Growth--
To determine whether
up-regulation of IEX-1S, a downstream effector of NF B activation,
was responsible for the growth inhibitory effect of MIS, T47D cells
were transfected with vector alone or CMV-driven IEX-1S, IEX-1L, or a
mixture of IEX-1S and IEX-1L along with a hygromycin resistance
plasmid. As seen in Fig. 5A,
expression of IEX-1S resulted in 50% reduction of drug-resistant
colonies compared with cells transfected with the vector. IEX-1L, on
the other hand, did not inhibit colony growth. However, it did enhance the number of colonies in some experiments, probably by contributing to
cell survival or increased cell proliferation (42). Cotransfection of
both IEX-1S and IEX-1L also resulted in reduction of drug-resistant colonies, suggesting that the growth inhibitory effect of IEX-1S overcomes the effect of IEX-1L. Both proteins were comparably expressed
following transient transfection into COS cells (Fig. 5B).
These results suggest that MIS-mediated growth inhibition of T47D cells
may be attributed in part to up-regulation of IEX-1S expression and
that, although IEX-1L may be responsible for cell survival (42), IEX-1S
contributes to the growth inhibitory pathway induced by NF B.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
IEX-1S expression inhibits T47D cell
growth. A, T47D cells were stably transfected with 0.5 µg of hygromycin resistance plasmid and 12 µg of vector DNA
(V) or CMV-driven IEX-1S or IEX-1L or a mixture of 6 µg
each of IEX-1L and IEX-1S plasmids. Hygromycin-resistant colonies were
stained with crystal violet after 3 weeks, and number of colonies is
represented as percentage of survivors. B, COS cells were
transiently transfected with 2 µg of CMV-driven FLAG-tagged IEX-1S or
IEX-1L expression constructs. 50 µg of total protein was analyzed by
Western blot analysis using a mouse anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma).
Positions of IEX-1S and IEX-1L are indicated by an open
arrow. The closed arrow probably
represents internally initiated polypeptides.
|
|
MIS Activates the NF B Pathway in Estrogen Receptor-negative
MDA-MB-231 Cells--
Constitutive activation of NF B has been
reported in several ER-negative breast cancer cell lines and primary
breast tumors. Hence, we investigated whether MIS activates the NF B
pathway in the ER-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. As
previously reported (45, 46), the basal level of NF B activity was
higher in MDA-MB-231 cells compared with the ER-positive T47D cell line (data not shown). Treatment with MIS for 1 h strongly induced NF B binding activity in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig.
6A). Antibody supershift
assays indicated that the DNA protein complex consisted of both the p50
and p65 subunits of NF B. As with T47D cells, treatment of MDA-MB-231
with MIS also resulted in the up-regulation of the IEX-1 mRNA (Fig.
6B). PCR analysis of the cDNAs obtained from MDA-MB-231
cells demonstrated the presence of both IEX-1L and IEX-1S transcripts
(Fig. 6C). However, Northern blot analyses with
IEX-1L-specific probes revealed undetectable levels of IEX-1L (data not
shown), suggesting that MIS treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells resulted in
selective up-regulation of IEX-1S mRNA. As with T47D cells,
treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with exogenous MIS inhibited growth by
50% (Fig. 6D).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
MIS induces the NF B
pathway and IEX-1S expression in the estrogen receptor-negative human
breast cancer line MDA-MB-231. A, MDA-MB-231 cells were
treated with 35 nM MIS for 0, 1, and 3 h and 3 µg of
nuclear proteins were incubated with radiolabeled NF B probe and
analyzed by EMSA. Antibody supershifts using 1 µl of rabbit anti-p50
and anti-p65 antibodies were done with the sample treated with MIS for
1 h. Positions of the complexes are indicated. B, total
cellular RNA isolated from MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 35 nM MIS for 0, 1, and 3 h was analyzed by Northern blot
for IEX-1 induction. Equal loading is demonstrated using hybridization
to actin. C, analysis of PCR products using IEX-1L and
IEX-1S expression constructs and cDNAs derived from untreated and
MIS-treated MDA-MB-231 RNA as DNA templates. Closed
arrows indicate the 220- and 330-bp fragments derived from
IEX-1S and IEX-1L, respectively. Open arrows
indicate the positions of the 200- and 300-base pair markers.
D, MIS inhibits MDA-MB-231 cell growth. Cells were grown in
the presence or absence of 35 nM exogenous MIS, and cells
were counted using the Coulter counter. The number of cells in the
untreated plates was set at 100%.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The importance of MIS in the regression of the Müllerian
duct in male embryos is well established (1). High levels of MIS type
II receptor mRNA are detected in the testis, ovary, and uterus, and
lower levels have been detected in rat lungs (6, 8, 16). However,
systematic analyses of other tissues and cell lines that may be
responsive to MIS have not yet been performed. We have demonstrated
expression of MIS type II receptor in normal breast and in human breast
cancer cells using several different techniques. The presence of MIS
type II receptor in the breast and the ability of MIS ligand to block
proliferation of breast cancer cells in vitro suggest that
MIS may have a physiological role in regulating the proliferation of
mammary epithelial cells. MIS induces the NF B signaling pathway in
both ER-negative and -positive breast cancer cell lines and abrogation
of NF B activation ablates MIS-mediated growth inhibition, indicating
that NF B-regulated gene expression is required for this process.
Constitutive activation of NF B has been reported in many tumors,
including primary breast cancers and breast cancer cell lines (45, 46),
associating it with progression of breast epithelial cells toward
malignancy (51). Furthermore, NF B activation is developmentally
regulated in the mammary gland of the mouse and maximal increase in DNA
binding occurs during post-lactational involution, a period of
extensive apoptosis. However, epithelial cells in which NF B is
activated demonstrated normal nuclear morphology, suggesting that its
activation was limited to the nonapoptotic population of mammary
epithelial cells (44). Paradoxically, growth inhibition of breast
cancer cells by MIS requires activation of the NF B pathway. A dual
role for NF B in regulating cell growth and apoptosis has been
reported in many cell systems (39, 40). Induction of apoptosis in
prostate cancer cells by the soy isoflavone genistein is achieved from
a decrease in NF B binding activity (52), but induction of apoptosis
of these cells by the Sindbis virus requires activation of NF B (53).
The influence of NF B activating stimulus on the resulting phenotype
is also demonstrated in RKO cells, in which activation of NF B by p53
induces apoptosis while NF B induction by TNF- in the same cells
results in an anti-apoptotic function (54). The developmentally
specific, contradictory effects of NF B activation on growth are
evident in pro-B cells in which overexpression of p65 results in
G1 arrest and apoptosis while being ineffective in immature
and mature B cell lines (53). Furthermore, inactivation of NF B in
mice (55, 56) and in cell lines in vitro (57, 58)
overwhelmingly supports a role for NF B in cell survival. However,
overexpression of p50 and p65 transgene in the stratified epithelium of
the epidermis of mice demonstrates a growth inhibitory role for NF B
(59). Thus the role of NF B on cell cycle regulation and apoptosis
appears to be specified by cell type, stages of development and
differentiation, and the inducing stimuli.
TGF- 1 and activin A, polypeptides related to MIS, inhibit the growth
of human breast cancer cell lines (31, 33, 34). The ability of TGF-
to inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells is associated with a
decrease in the NF B binding activity resulting from increased
stability of the inhibitory protein I B (38). A similar decrease
in NF B binding was also demonstrated with TGF- -mediated apoptosis
of murine hepatocyte and B cell lines (60, 61). In contrast,
MIS-induced NF B binding activity was persistent up to 24 h in
human breast cancer cell lines and ablation of the NF B pathway
prevented MIS-mediated inhibition of growth. These results suggest
that, although these two related ligands play a similar role in
inhibiting the growth of breast cancer cells, they may utilize
different molecular mechanisms involving either activation or
repression of a distinct subset of genes that are modulated by
NF B.
The exact mechanism by which NF B regulates growth and apoptosis is
not well understood. Regulation of NF B-mediated cell cycle
progression occurs through its physical and functional interaction with
cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases and their inhibitors, and the transcriptional coactivator p300 (62-64). The effect of NF B activation on apoptosis is mediated through regulation of genes such as
A20, c-IAP-2, bcl-Xs, and IEX-1L, which have been shown to contribute
to NF B-associated survival of cells (42, 49, 50, 65). We demonstrate
that MIS-mediated activation of NF B does not induce anti-apoptotic
target genes including IEX-1L, but selectively up-regulates IEX-1S.
IEX-1S represents the first transcript identified to be regulated by
MIS during tumor cell growth inhibition. Growth inhibition following
overexpression of IEX-1S in T47D cells indicates that MIS-mediated
up-regulation of IEX-1S is in part responsible for the growth
inhibitory effect of MIS. Coexpression of IEX-1L and IEX-1S suggests
that the growth inhibitory effect of IEX-1S may be functionally
dominant. This is also supported by cell cycle analysis following
transient transfection of IEX-1 expression constructs, which show that
expression of IEX-1S, but not IEX-1L, significantly increased the
fraction of cells in the G1 phase with the effect of IEX-1S
being dominant.2 Wu et
al. (42) recently demonstrated that NF B-induced expression of
IEX-1L protected cells from TNF- - and Fas-mediated apoptosis; IEX-1S
did not play a role in cellular resistance to apoptosis. Variation in
the ratio between these two forms of IEX-1 during development or
following treatment with various reagents is not known. Differential
regulation and functional interaction between the two splice forms may
be responsible for the different phenotypic effects seen following
NF B induction with various growth factors and cytokines in different
cell types. Interestingly, MIS robustly induces NF B nuclear
localization in ovarian cancer cell lines without affecting the levels
of IEX-1 mRNA,2 which suggests the possibility of
tissue specific gene regulation following NF B induction by MIS.
Mammary tissue undergoes proliferation, differentiation, and extensive
remodeling during puberty and pregnancy. Ovarian hormones such as
estradiol and progestins regulate these processes, and exposure to
these ovarian hormones has been suggested to play a key role in
neoplastic transformation of breast tissue. Progesterone- and
estrogen-mediated signaling pathways in the breast have been extensively studied using both in vitro cell culture and
animal model systems. The role of MIS in development and neoplastic
transformation of the mammary gland, however, is poorly understood. The
presence of MIS type II receptor in breast epithelial cells and the
ability of MIS ligand to block proliferation of breast cancer cells
in vitro suggest a role for serum MIS in growth regulation
of the mammary epithelium. Further characterization of the functional significance of the presence of the MIS receptor in the breast depends
on testing the effect of MIS on estrogen receptor-positive and
-negative mammary carcinoma cell growth in vivo; such
studies will help to determine whether MIS would be of potential
therapeutic benefit in treatment of breast cancer.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Daniel Haber, Jeff Settleman,
Liz Perkins, James Lorenzen, and Leif Ellisen for critically reading
this manuscript. We also thank Dr. Rodrigo Bravo for 2X-NF B-CAT and
I B -DN constructs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant IRG-173H from the American
Cancer Society and a breast cancer research grant from the
Massachusetts Department of Public Health (and to S. M.), National
Institutes of Health NCI Training Grant in Cancer Biology T32 CA 71345 and Resident Research Award from the American College of Surgeons (both to D. L. S.), and Grants HD32112 and CA17393
from the National Institutes of Health, NICHD and NCI, respectively
(both to P. K. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Pediatric Surgical
Research Laboratories, WRN1024, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114. Tel.: 617-724-6552; Fax: 617-724-7221; E-mail: maheswaran@helix.mgh.harvard.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 28, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004554200
2
D. L. Segev and S. Maheswaran, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MIS, Müllerian
inhibiting substance;
TGF- , transforming growth factor- ;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
hGH, human growth hormone;
CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
bp, base pair(s);
BMP, bone morphogenetic
protein;
TNF- , tumor necrosis factor- .
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Teixeira, J.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1996)
J. Androl.
17,
336-341
|
| 2.
|
Donahoe, P. K.
(1992)
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
32,
168-172
|
| 3.
|
Hudson, P. L.,
Dougas, I.,
Donahoe, P. K.,
Cate, R. L.,
Epstein, J.,
Pepinsky, R. B.,
and MacLaughlin, D. T.
(1990)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
70,
16-22
|
| 4.
|
Lee, M. M.,
Donahoe, P. K.,
Hasegawa, T.,
Silverman, B.,
Crist, G. B.,
Best, S.,
Hasegawa, Y.,
Noto, R. A.,
Schoenfeld, D.,
and MacLaughlin, D. T.
(1996)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
81,
571-576
|
| 5.
|
Ragin, R. C.,
Donahoe, P. K.,
Kenneally, M. K.,
Ahmad, M. F.,
and MacLaughlin, D. T.
(1992)
Protein Exp. Purif.
3,
236-245
|
| 6.
|
Baarends, W. M.,
van Helmond, M. J.,
Post, M.,
van der Schoot, P. J.,
Hoogerbrugge, J. W.,
de Winter, J. P.,
Uilenbroek, J. T.,
Karels, B.,
Wilming, L. G.,
Meijers, J. H.,
Themmen, A. P. N.,
and Grootegoed, J. A.
(1994)
Development
120,
189-197
|
| 7.
|
di Clemente, N.,
Wilson, C.,
Faure, E.,
Boussin, L.,
Carmillo, P.,
Tizard, R.,
Picard, J. Y.,
Vigier, B.,
Josso, N.,
and Cate, R.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1006-1020
|
| 8.
|
Teixeira, J.,
He, W. W.,
Shah, P. C.,
Morikawa, N.,
Lee, M. M.,
Catlin, E. A.,
Hudson, P. L.,
Wing, J.,
MacLaughlin, D. T.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
160-165
|
| 9.
|
Behringer, R. R.,
Cate, R. L.,
Froelick, G. J.,
Palmiter, R. D.,
and Brinster, R. L.
(1990)
Nature
345,
167-170
|
| 10.
|
Behringer, R. R.,
Finegold, M. J.,
and Cate, R. L.
(1994)
Cell
79,
415-425
|
| 11.
|
Mishina, Y.,
Rey, R.,
Finegold, M. J.,
Matzuk, M. M.,
Josso, N.,
Cate, R. L.,
and Behringer, R. R.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2577-2587
|
| 12.
|
Catlin, E. A.,
Manganaro, T. F.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1988)
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
159,
1299-1303
|
| 13.
|
Catlin, E. A.,
Powell, S. M.,
Manganaro, T. F.,
Hudson, P. L.,
Ragin, R. C.,
Epstein, J.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1990)
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
141,
466-470
|
| 14.
|
Takahashi, M.,
Hayashi, M.,
Manganaro, T. F.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1986)
Biol. Reprod.
35,
447-453
|
| 15.
|
Ueno, S.,
Manganaro, T. F.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1988)
Endocrinology
123,
1652-1659
|
| 16.
|
Catlin, E. A.,
Tonnu, V. C.,
Ebb, R. G.,
Pacheco, B. A.,
Manganaro, T. F.,
Ezzell, R. M.,
Donahoe, P. K.,
and Teixeira, J.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
790-796
|
| 17.
|
Masiakos, P. T.,
MacLaughlin, D. T.,
Maheswaran, S.,
Teixeira, J.,
Fuller, A. F., Jr.,
Shah, P. C.,
Kehas, D. J.,
Kenneally, M. K.,
Dombkowski, D. M.,
Ha, T. U.,
Preffer, F. I.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1999)
Clin. Cancer Res.
5,
3488-3499
|
| 18.
|
Teixeira, J.,
Fynn-Thompson, E.,
Payne, A. H.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
4732-4738
|
| 19.
|
Donahoe, P. K.,
Fuller, A. F., Jr.,
Scully, R. E.,
Guy, S. R.,
and Budzik, G. P.
(1981)
Ann. Surg.
194,
472-480
|
| 20.
|
Boveri, J. F.,
Parry, R. L.,
Kirkland, R. K. W.,
Gustafson, M. L.,
Lee, K. W.,
He, W. W.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1993)
Int. J. Oncol.
2,
135-143
|
| 21.
|
Chin, T. W.,
Parry, R. L.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
2101-2106
|
| 22.
|
Fuller, A. F., Jr.,
Krane, I. M.,
Budzik, G. P.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1985)
Gynecol. Oncol.
22,
135-148
|
| 23.
|
Kurian, M. S.,
de la Cuesta, R. S.,
Waneck, G. L.,
MacLaughlin, D. T.,
Manganaro, T. F.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1995)
Clin. Cancer Res.
1,
343-349
|
| 24.
|
Parry, R. L.,
Chin, T. W.,
Epstein, J.,
Hudson, P. L.,
Powell, D. M.,
and Donahoe, P. K.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
1182-1186
|
| 25.
|
Arnold, S. F.,
Tims, E.,
and McGrath, B. E.
(1999)
Cytokine
11,
1031-1037
|
| 26.
|
Arteaga, C. L.,
Tandon, A. K.,
Von Hoff, D. D.,
and Osborne, C. K.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
3898-3904
|
| 27.
|
Arteaga, C. L.,
Coffey, R. J., Jr.,
Dugger, T. C.,
McCutchen, C. M.,
Moses, H. L.,
and Lyons, R. M.
(1990)
Cell Growth Differ.
1,
367-374
|
| 28.
|
Clement, J. H.,
Sanger, J.,
and Hoffken, K.
(1999)
Int. J. Cancer
80,
250-256
|
| 29.
|
Di Loreto, C.,
Reis, F. M.,
Cataldi, P.,
Zuiani, C.,
Luisi, S.,
Beltrami, C. A.,
and Petraglia, F.
(1999)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
141,
190-194
|
| 30.
|
Liu, Q. Y.,
Niranjan, B.,
Gomes, P.,
Gomm, J. J.,
Davies, D.,
Coombes, R. C.,
and Buluwela, L.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
1155-1163
|
| 31.
|
Kalkhoven, E.,
Roelen, B. A.,
de Winter, J. P.,
Mummery, C. L.,
van den Eijnden-van Raaij, A. J.,
van der Saag, P. T.,
and van der Burg, B.
(1995)
Cell Growth Differ.
6,
1151-1161
|
| 32.
|
Phippard, D. J.,
Weber-Hall, S. J.,
Sharpe, P. T.,
Naylor, M. S.,
Jayatalake, H.,
Maas, R.,
Woo, I.,
Roberts-Clark, D.,
Francis-West, P. H.,
Liu, Y. H.,
Maxson, R.,
Hill, R. E.,
and Dale, T. C.
(1996)
Development
122,
2729-2737
|
| 33.
|
Zugmaier, G.,
and Lippman, M. E.
(1990)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
593,
272-275
|
| 34.
|
Zugmaier, G.,
Ennis, B. W.,
Deschauer, B.,
Katz, D.,
Knabbe, C.,
Wilding, G.,
Daly, P.,
Lippman, M. E.,
and Dickson, R. B.
(1989)
J. Cell. Physiol.
141,
353-361
|
| 35.
|
Valverius, E. M.,
Walker-Jones, D.,
Bates, S. E.,
Stampfer, M. R.,
Clark, R.,
McCormick, F.,
Dickson, R. B.,
and Lippman, M. E.
(1989)
Cancer Res.
49,
6269-6274
|
| 36.
|
Hosobuchi, M.,
and Stampfer, M. R.
(1989)
In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.
25,
705-713
|
| 37.
|
Chen, T.,
Carter, D.,
Garrigue-Antar, L.,
and Reiss, M.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
4805-4810
|
| 38.
|
Sovak, M. A.,
Arsura, M.,
Zanieski, G.,
Kavanagh, K. T.,
and Sonenshein, G. E.
(1999)
Cell Growth Differ.
10,
537-544
|
| 39.
|
Baichwal, V. R.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
R94-R96
|
| 40.
|
Barkett, M.,
and Gilmore, T. D.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6910-6924
|
| 41.
|
Kondratyev, A. D.,
Chung, K. N.,
and Jung, M. O.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
1498-1502
|
| 42.
|
Wu, M. X.,
Ao, Z.,
Prasad, K. V.,
Wu, R.,
and Schlossman, S. F.
(1998)
Science
281,
998-1001
|
| 43.
|
Schafer, H.,
Diebel, J.,
Arlt, A.,
Trauzold, A.,
and Schmidt, W. E.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
436,
139-143
|
| 44.
|
Clarkson, R. W. E.,
Heeley, J. L.,
Chapman, R.,
Aillet, F.,
Hay, R. T.,
Wyllie, A.,
and Watson, C. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
12737-12742
|
| 45.
|
Nakshatri, H.,
Bhat-Nakshatri, P.,
Martin, D. A.,
Goulet, R. J., Jr.,
and Sledge, G. W., Jr.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
3629-3639
|
| 46.
|
Sovak, M. A.,
Bellas, R. E.,
Kim, D. W.,
Zanieski, G. J.,
Rogers, A. E.,
Traish, A. M.,
and Sonenshein, G. E.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2952-2960
|
| 47.
|
Brown, K.,
Gerstberger, S.,
Carlson, L.,
Franzoso, G.,
and Siebenlist, U.
(1995)
Science
267,
1485-1488
|
| 48.
|
Loser, P.,
Jennings, G. S.,
Strauss, M.,
and Sandig, V.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
180-190
|
| 49.
|
Chu, Z. L.,
McKinsey, T. A.,
Liu, L.,
Gentry, J. J.,
Malim, M. H.,
and Ballard, D. W.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10057-10062
|
| 50.
|
Krikos, A.,
Laherty, C. D.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17971-17976
|
| 51.
|
Rayet, B.,
and Gelinas, C.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6938-6947
|
| 52.
|
Davis, J. N.,
Kucuk, O.,
and Sarkar, F. H.
(1999)
Nutr. Cancer
35,
167-174
|
| 53.
|
Lin, K. I.,
Lee, S. H.,
Narayanan, R.,
Baraban, J. M.,
Hardwick, J. M.,
and Ratan, R. R.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1149-1161
|
| 54.
|
Ryan, K. M.,
Ernst, M. K.,
Rice, N. R.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(2000)
Nature
404,
892-897
|
| 55.
|
Beg, A. A.,
Sha, W. C.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1995)
Nature
376,
167-170
|
| 56.
|
Beg, A. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Science
274,
782-784
|
| 57.
|
Van Antwerp, D. J.,
Martin, S. J.,
Kafri, T.,
Green, D. R.,
and Verma, I. M.
(1996)
Science
274,
787-789
|
| 58.
|
Wang, C. Y.,
Mayo, M. W.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1996)
Science
274,
784-787
|
| 59.
|
Seitz, C. S.,
Lin, Q.,
Deng, H.,
and Khavari, P. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2307-2312
|
| 60.
|
Arsura, M.,
Wu, M.,
and Sonenshein, G. E.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
31-40
|
| 61.
|
Arsura, M.,
FitzGerald, M. J.,
Fausto, N.,
and Sonenshein, G. E.
(1997)
Cell Growth Differ.
8,
1049-1059
|
| 62.
|
Wolff, B.,
and Naumann, M.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
2663-2666
|
| 63.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
Felzien, L. K.,
Betts, J. C.,
Leung, K.,
Beach, D. H.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1997)
Science
275,
523-527
|
| 64.
|
Hinz, M.,
Krappmann, D.,
Eichten, A.,
Heder, A.,
Scheidereit, C.,
and Strauss, M.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2690-2698
|
| 65.
|
Dixon, E. P.,
Stephenson, D. T.,
Clemens, J. A.,
and Little, S. P.
(1997)
Brain Res.
776,
222-229.
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. La Marca, F.J. Broekmans, A. Volpe, B.C. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for
Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know?
Hum. Reprod.,
June 11, 2009;
(2009)
dep210v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Malloy, L. Peng, J. Wang, and D. Feldman
Interaction of the Vitamin D Receptor with a Vitamin D Response Element in the Mullerian-Inhibiting Substance (MIS) Promoter: Regulation of MIS Expression by Calcitriol in Prostate Cancer Cells
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2009;
150(4):
1580 - 1587.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Renlund, R. Pieretti-Vanmarcke, F. H. O'Neill, L. Zhang, P. K. Donahoe, and J. Teixeira
c-Jun N-terminal Kinase Inhibitor II (SP600125) Activates Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Type II Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction
Endocrinology,
January 1, 2008;
149(1):
108 - 115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Yin, S. Ouyang, W. Xu, X. Zhang, K. L. Fok, H. Y. Wong, J. Zhang, X. Qiu, S. Miao, H. C. Chan, et al.
YWK-II protein as a novel Go-coupled receptor for Mullerian inhibiting substance in cell survival
J. Cell Sci.,
May 1, 2007;
120(9):
1521 - 1528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Gupta, G. Yeo, H. Kawakubo, V. Rangnekar, P. Ramaswamy, T. Hayashida, D. T. MacLaughlin, P. K. Donahoe, and S. Maheswaran
Mullerian-Inhibiting Substance Induces Gro-{beta} Expression in Breast Cancer Cells through a Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-Dependent and Smad1-Dependent Mechanism
Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2007;
67(6):
2747 - 2756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Pieretti-Vanmarcke, P. K. Donahoe, L. A. Pearsall, D. M. Dinulescu, D. C. Connolly, E. F. Halpern, M. V. Seiden, and D. T. MacLaughlin
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance enhances subclinical doses of chemotherapeutic agents to inhibit human and mouse ovarian cancer
PNAS,
November 14, 2006;
103(46):
17426 - 17431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. T. Tran, D. L. Segev, V. Gupta, H. Kawakubo, G. Yeo, P. K. Donahoe, and S. Maheswaran
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Regulates Androgen-Induced Gene Expression and Growth in Prostate Cancer Cells through a Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-Dependent Smad-Independent Mechanism
Mol. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2006;
20(10):
2382 - 2391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q.-a. Yuan, H. H. Simmons, M. K. Robinson, M. Russeva, W. A. Marasco, and G. P. Adams
Development of engineered antibodies specific for the Mullerian inhibiting substance type II receptor: a promising candidate for targeted therapy of ovarian cancer.
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
August 1, 2006;
5(8):
2096 - 2105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-L. Kruse, A. Arlt, A. Sieke, F. Grohmann, M. Grossmann, J. Minkenberg, U. R. Folsch, and H. Schafer
Immediate Early Gene X1 (IEX-1) Is Organized in Subnuclear Structures and Partially Co-localizes with Promyelocytic Leukemia Protein in HeLa Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 1, 2005;
280(26):
24849 - 24856.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Gupta, J. L. Carey, H. Kawakubo, A. Muzikansky, J. E. Green, P. K. Donahoe, D. T. MacLaughlin, and S. Maheswaran
Mullerian inhibiting substance suppresses tumor growth in the C3(1)T antigen transgenic mouse mammary carcinoma model
PNAS,
March 1, 2005;
102(9):
3219 - 3224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Carey, L. M. Sasur, H. Kawakubo, V. Gupta, B. Christian, P. M. Bailey, and S. Maheswaran
Mutually Antagonistic Effects of Androgen and Activin in the Regulation of Prostate Cancer Cell Growth
Mol. Endocrinol.,
March 1, 2004;
18(3):
696 - 707.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Frasor, F. Stossi, J. M. Danes, B. Komm, C. R. Lyttle, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Discrimination of Agonistic versus Antagonistic Activities by Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res.,
February 15, 2004;
64(4):
1522 - 1533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. U. Barbie, D. A. Barbie, D. T. MacLaughlin, S. Maheswaran, and P. K. Donahoe
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance inhibits cervical cancer cell growth via a pathway involving p130 and p107
PNAS,
December 23, 2003;
100(26):
15601 - 15606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Hoshiya, V. Gupta, H. Kawakubo, E. Brachtel, J. L. Carey, L. Sasur, A. Scott, P. K. Donahoe, and S. Maheswaran
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Promotes Interferon {gamma}-induced Gene Expression and Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 2003;
278(51):
51703 - 51712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Taddeo, A. Esclatine, W. Zhang, and B. Roizman
The Stress-Inducible Immediate-Early Responsive Gene IEX-1 Is Activated in Cells Infected with Herpes Simplex Virus 1, but Several Viral Mechanisms, Including 3' Degradation of Its RNA, Preclude Expression of the Gene
J. Virol.,
June 1, 2003;
77(11):
6178 - 6187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Osawa, M. Nagaki, Y. Banno, D. A. Brenner, Y. Nozawa, H. Moriwaki, and S. Nakashima
Expression of the NF-{kappa}B Target Gene X-Ray-Inducible Immediate Early Response Factor-1 Short Enhances TNF-{alpha}-Induced Hepatocyte Apoptosis by Inhibiting Akt Activation
J. Immunol.,
April 15, 2003;
170(8):
4053 - 4060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. M. Laurich, A. M. Trbovich, F. H. O'Neill, C. P. Houk, P. M. Sluss, A. H. Payne, P. K. Donahoe, and J. Teixeira
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Blocks the Protein Kinase A-Induced Expression of Cytochrome P450 17{alpha}-Hydroxylase/C17-20 Lyase mRNA in a Mouse Leydig Cell Line Independent of cAMP Responsive Element Binding Protein Phosphorylation
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2002;
143(9):
3351 - 3360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Stephen, L. A. Pearsall, B. P. Christian, P. K. Donahoe, J. P. Vacanti, and D. T. MacLaughlin
Highly Purified Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Inhibits Human Ovarian Cancer in Vivo
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2002;
8(8):
2640 - 2646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. De Keulenaer, Y. Wang, Y. Feng, S. Muangman, K. Yamamoto, J. F. Thompson, T. G. Turi, K. Landschutz, and R. T. Lee
Identification of IEX-1 as a Biomechanically Controlled Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Target Gene That Inhibits Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy
Circ. Res.,
April 5, 2002;
90(6):
690 - 696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Miura, C. Miura, Y. Konda, and K. Yamauchi
Spermatogenesis-preventing substance in Japanese eel
Development,
January 6, 2002;
129(11):
2689 - 2697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Segev, Y. Hoshiya, M. Hoshiya, T. T. Tran, J. L. Carey, A. E. Stephen, D. T. MacLaughlin, P. K. Donahoe, and S. Maheswaran
Mullerian-inhibiting substance regulates NF-kappa B signaling in the prostate in vitro and in vivo
PNAS,
January 1, 2002;
(2002)
221599298.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Teixeira, S. Maheswaran, and P. K. Donahoe
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance: An Instructive Developmental Hormone with Diagnostic and Possible Therapeutic Applications
Endocr. Rev.,
October 1, 2001;
22(5):
657 - 674.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. U. Ha, D. L. Segev, D. Barbie, P. T. Masiakos, T. T. Tran, D. Dombkowski, M. Glander, T. R. Clarke, H. K. Lorenzo, P. K. Donahoe, et al.
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Inhibits Ovarian Cell Growth through an Rb-independent Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 17, 2000;
275(47):
37101 - 37109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Cocolakis, S. Lemay, S. Ali, and J.-J. Lebrun
The p38 MAPK Pathway Is Required for Cell Growth Inhibition of Human Breast Cancer Cells in Response to Activin
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2001;
276(21):
18430 - 18436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Segev, Y. Hoshiya, A. E. Stephen, M. Hoshiya, T. T. Tran, D. T. MacLaughlin, P. K. Donahoe, and S. Maheswaran
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Regulates NFkappa B Signaling and Growth of Mammary Epithelial Cells in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 13, 2001;
276(29):
26799 - 26806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhang, S. F. Schlossman, R. A. Edwards, C.-N. Ou, J. Gu, and M. X. Wu
Impaired apoptosis, extended duration of immune responses, and a lupus-like autoimmune disease in IEX-1-transgenic mice
PNAS,
January 22, 2002;
99(2):
878 - 883.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Segev, Y. Hoshiya, M. Hoshiya, T. T. Tran, J. L. Carey, A. E. Stephen, D. T. MacLaughlin, P. K. Donahoe, and S. Maheswaran
Mullerian-inhibiting substance regulates NF-kappa B signaling in the prostate in vitro and in vivo
PNAS,
January 8, 2002;
99(1):
239 - 244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. De Keulenaer, Y. Wang, Y. Feng, S. Muangman, K. Yamamoto, J. F. Thompson, T. G. Turi, K. Landschutz, and R. T. Lee
Identification of IEX-1 as a Biomechanically Controlled Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Target Gene That Inhibits Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy
Circ. Res.,
April 5, 2002;
90(6):
690 - 696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|