|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002169200 on June 15, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 37, 29147-29152, September 15, 2000
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Negatively Regulates Both
DNA-binding and Transcriptional Activities of Heat Shock Factor 1*
Ilungo J.
Xavier ,
Phillipe A.
Mercier ,
Christine M.
McLoughlin ,
Adnan
Ali§,
James R.
Woodgett§, and
Nick
Ovsenek ¶
From the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology,
College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon,
Saskatchewan S7N 5E5, Canada and the § Division of
Experimental Therapeutics, Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret
Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
Received for publication, March 15, 2000, and in revised form, June 6, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Stress activation of heat shock factor (HSF1)
involves the conversion of repressed monomers to DNA-binding
homotrimers with increased transcriptional capacity and results in
transcriptional up-regulation of the heat shock protein (hsp) gene
family. Cells tightly control the activity of HSF1 through interactions
with hsp90 chaperone complexes and through integration into a number of
different signaling cascades. A number of studies have shown that HSF1
transcriptional activity is negatively regulated by constitutive
phosphorylation in the regulatory domain by glycogen synthase kinase
(GSK3) isoforms / . However, previous studies have not
examined the ability of GSK3 to regulate the DNA-binding activity of
native HSF1 in vivo under heat shock conditions. Here we
show that GSK3 inhibits both DNA-binding and transcriptional activities of HSF1 in heat-shocked cells. Specific inhibition of GSK3
increased the levels of DNA binding and transcription after heat shock
and delayed the attenuation of HSF1 during recovery. In contrast, the
overexpression of GSK3 resulted in significant reduction in
heat-induced HSF1 activities. These results confirm the role of GSK3
as a negative regulator of HSF1 transcription in cells during heat
shock and demonstrate for the first time that GSK3 functions to
repress DNA binding.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The stress response is a highly conserved cellular reaction
leading to rapid expression of cytoprotective heat shock proteins (hsp).1 Hsps are molecular
chaperones that aid in the folding, transport, regulation, and
degradation of cellular proteins under normal conditions, and their
expression during stress is essential for cell survival (1). In higher
organisms the response is controlled at the transcriptional level by
transient activation of the heat shock transcription factor (HSF1) (2).
Under normal conditions, HSF1 is maintained as latent non-DNA-binding
monomers that upon stress assemble into active homotrimers capable of
interacting with heat shock elements upstream of hsp genes. Full
activation is a multistep process involving additional modifications to
the transcriptional activation domain, i.e. transcriptional
competence is regulated independently from oligomerization/DNA binding
(3). Upon the removal of stress or after the expression of a critical level of hsps, trimers are disassembled back to inactive monomers in a
process called attenuation.
The functional domains responsible for oligomeric switching, DNA
binding, and transcriptional activation of HSF1 have been determined,
and it is known that intrinsic properties of the molecule control its
own activity (2). However, the cellular mechanisms governing HSF1
regulation appear to be quite complex and not fully understood. Recent
studies have shown that HSF1 is regulated by association with a dynamic
series of hsp90-chaperone complexes (4-7). In addition, it is a highly
phosphorylated molecule that appears to be integrated into a number of
stress-activated signaling cascades. Signaling pathways/kinases that
are activated in stressed cells include PKB (8), PKC (9, 10), PKR (for
review, see Ref.11), and mitogen-activated protein kinase family
members, such as extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK1/2),
stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and p38/Hog-1
(for review, see Ref. 12). Glycogen synthase kinase (GSK3) isoforms
/ have also been implicated in the stress response (13-15).
HSF1 is constitutively phosphorylated on several serine residues, and
the molecule is hyperphosphorylated after heat shock (13, 16-18). Upon
stress, some residues remain constitutively phosphorylated, some become
dephosphorylated, and several others are phosphorylated. The magnitude
and complex dynamics of HSF1 phosphorylation throughout the
activation/deactivation process has made it difficult to ascertain the
functional role of these modifications, and the links to the various
kinases still remain unclear. There is a great deal of contradictory
evidence in the literature regarding the role of hyperphosphorylation.
For example, hyperphosphorylation has been shown in some studies to
accompany transcriptional activation, thus suggesting its importance
for this process (14, 16, 19, 20). In support of this, HSF1 is not
hyperphosphorylated by salicylate, which activates DNA binding but not
transcription (21). Hsp expression is either reduced by
serine/threonine kinase inhibitors (H7, staurosporine, 2-aminopurine,
calphostin) or increased by serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitors
(calyculin A, okadaic acid, sodium fluoride) (17, 22-26). In contrast,
other studies suggest that hyperphosphorylation functions to deactivate
transcription after heat shock (27) or even that it plays no role in
regulating HSF1 activity (28, 29).
A number of studies using general kinase inhibitors to examine the
potential regulatory role of phosphorylation on the DNA-binding activity of HSF1 have also yielded contradictory information. For
example the serine/threonine kinase inhibitor H7 was reported to either
inhibit DNA binding (26) or have no effect (17, 28). Other general
kinase inhibitors, such as GF-X, staurosporine, K252b, and KT5720, have
no effect on DNA binding (17, 23, 28). General phosphatase inhibitors
have been shown to have inconsistent effects. They increase activation
(25), delay activation (20), or delay attenuation of DNA binding (17,
28).
Previous studies have clearly demonstrated that amino acids 303, 307, and 363 in the regulatory domain of human HSF1 are constitutively phosphorylated by GSK3, ERK1/2, and PKC, respectively, and in vivo analyses of specific mutants have demonstrated that these phosphorylations function to repress the transcriptional activity of
HSF1 (13, 14, 16, 30, 31). Repression can be overcome by heat shock,
suggesting that phosphorylations in the regulatory domain, including
those by GSK3, act in concert with other negative regulatory mechanisms
to tightly control HSF1 activity in unshocked cells. However, the
potential role for regulatory domain phosphorylations in controlling
trimerization and DNA binding has never been directly examined. This is
because past work has involved phosphorylation mutants of either GAL4-
or LexA-HSF1 chimeras that did not contain the DNA-binding and
oligomerization domains of HSF1 (16, 30, 31) or were overexpressed but
constitutively active (under non-shock conditions) full-length HSF1
mutants (13, 14).
Here, we directly examined the in vivo role of GSK3 on
the regulation of endogenous HSF1 under physiological stress
conditions. In microinjection experiments with Xenopus
oocytes, overexpression of GSK3 repressed both the DNA-binding and
transcriptional activity of endogenous HSF1. In contrast, inhibition of
GSK3 with LiCl or by overexpression of a GSK3-binding protein (GBP)
increased DNA binding and transcription and significantly delayed the
attenuation of DNA binding during recovery. These results confirmed
that GSK3 acts as a negative regulator of HSF1 transcription
in vivo during heat shock and demonstrated that GSK3
represses the DNA-binding activity of HSF1.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Oocyte Manipulations--
Xenopus laevis frogs were
purchased from Xenopus I (Ann Arbor, MI). Ovaries were
surgically removed from adult female frogs, and follicular cells were
removed from oocytes by treatment in a calcium-free OR2 buffer (82.5 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 5 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, 10 mg/liter streptomycin sulfate, 10 mg/liter benzyl penicillin) that contained 2 mg/ml collagenase (type
II, Sigma) for 3 h at 18 °C. Oocytes were washed extensively and were allowed to recover for 4 h in the OR2 buffer (as noted above with 1 mM CaCl2 added) at 18 °C. These
oocytes were maintained in the OR2 buffer during experimental
treatments. Only stage VI oocytes were selected for experiments. Nuclei
and cytoplasms were obtained by scoring animal hemispheres with a
needle and by gently squeezing the equatorial region with watchmaker's forceps.
Oocyte Microinjection and Stress Treatments--
Capped
mRNAs encoding active or inactive (kinase-dead) forms of GSK3
and GBP were synthesized in vitro from pXG73/CS2,
pXG114/CS2, and pBP20 (32), respectively, by using SP6 RNA polymerase
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). pXG73/CS2-encoding active GSK3 was
generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cloning from XG73 (kindly
provided by D. Kimelman) by using PCR primers,
5'-cgcggatccatgtcgggaaggccgagaac-3' and
5'-cgcggatcctcaggaggagttggaggcag-3' (33). The PCR product was
ligated into the PCR TA3.1 cloning vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA),
and the BamHI insert was further isolated and cloned into
the pCS2 expression vector. pXG114/CS2 encoding the kinase dead mutant
that contained a lysine to arginine substitution at position 114 was
constructed as above by PCR cloning from XG114 (provided by D. Kimelman). For expression in oocytes, 20 nl of respective mRNA
solutions (2 mg/ml) were injected directly into the cytoplasm. For
immediate elevation of nuclear levels of GSK3 , purified recombinant
rabbit skeletal muscle GSK3 (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA)
was injected directly into the oocyte nuclei. Cells injected with
mRNA were incubated for 12 h at 18 °C to allow for the
translation of expressed protein before heat shock. Cells injected with
purified enzyme were incubated for 1 h at 18 °C before heat
shock. For stress treatments with LiCl, oocytes were incubated in the
OR2 buffer that contained 10, 25, and 50 mM LiCl for 1 h before heat shock in LiCl-free OR2. Heat shock was at 33 °C for
1 h (unless otherwise indicated). For recovery, oocytes were
transferred to the OR2 buffer at 18 °C for the indicated times. In
all experiments, a minimum of 25 oocytes was used for each sample.
Protein Extracts and Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
Protein
extracts were prepared by homogenizing oocytes in Buffer C (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 50 mM KCl,
0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml
aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin) in a volume of 10 µl of buffer
per oocyte. Homogenates were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and
centrifuged for 5 min at 15,000 × g (4 °C). The
resulting supernatants were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 80 °C.
DNA mobility shift assays were performed by using radiolabeled
oligonucleotide probes as described previously (34, 35). DNA-binding
reactions contained 10 µl of extract (one oocyte equivalent by volume
or 20 µg of soluble proteins). Binding reactions were performed with
1 µg of poly(dI·dC), 10 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, and 5% glycerol in a final volume of 20 µl.
Reactions were incubated on ice for 20 min and immediately loaded onto
5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels that contained 6.7 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 3.3 mM sodium acetate. Gels were electrophoresed for 2.5 h
at 150 V, dried, and exposed to x-ray film. Quantitation of DNA-binding
activity was performed by using an NIH Image (Version 1.6.1) and was
expressed in arbitrary densitometry units.
Immunoblotting--
Protein extracts were fractionated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10% acrylamide), then
electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Blots were
blocked for 2 h in TBST (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20) containing 5% milk powder.
Blots were incubated in primary antibody (1:5000) in TBST with 2.5%
milk and for 2 h, were washed in TBST and incubated with a
secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit
or anti-mouse IgG, Bio-Rad) diluted 1:10,000 in TBST and 2.5% milk.
Blots were washed and proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence
(Renaissance system, NEN Life Science Products). Antibodies against
GSK3 , I B, FLAG tag, and PCNA were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Transcription and Kinase Assays--
CAT assays were performed
by using one oocyte equivalent to a whole cell extract as described
previously (35). CAT expression vectors (36) and CAT assay protocols
were as previously used in Ref. 5. Heat shock treatments were performed
4 h after CAT plasmid injections, then oocytes were incubated at
18 °C for 12 h to allow for CAT expression. GSK3 activity was
assayed as described previously (37). Activity was measured by
scintillation counting of label transfer from
[ -32P]ATP to the cAMP-response element-binding protein
phosphopeptide substrate (New England Biolabs, Inc.) and was expressed
as a percentage of activity in uninjected, unshocked cells.
 |
RESULTS |
GSK3 Represses HSF1-mediated DNA Binding--
To examine
whether GSK3 modulates HSF1 in vivo under relevant stress
conditions, we overexpressed GSK3 and observed the effects on HSF1
activity in Xenopus oocytes. Overexpression was achieved
either by microinjection of mRNA into the cytoplasm or by direct
injection of purified GSK3 into the nucleus. Increased levels and
activity of GSK3 in cells were confirmed by immunoblotting and by
specific kinase assays (Fig.
1A). We typically attained a
4- to 5-fold increase in GSK3 protein and activity levels over uninjected control cells (Fig. 1A). By comparison, heat
shock for 1 h resulted in a 2-fold increase in endogenous GSK3
activity. In repeated experiments, overexpression of GSK3
consistently resulted in a 5-fold decrease in the amount of
HSF1-mediated DNA-binding activity after 1 h of heat shock (Fig.
1B). Microinjection of purified GSK3 enzyme also resulted
in decreased DNA binding after heat shock (Fig. 1B).
Heat-inducible DNA-binding activity was almost completely inhibited
after injection of 0.5 unit of GSK3 . To control for potential
nonspecific effects on HSF1 because of the microinjection procedure and
to confirm that the effects observed were attributable specifically to
alterations in GSK3 activity, we performed similar experiments with
an inactive GSK3 mutant lacking kinase activity (kinase-dead
GSK3 ) (38). Expression of kinase-dead enzyme did not change the
total GSK3 kinase activity (Fig. 1A) and had no
measurable effect on the amount of DNA binding by HSF1 after heat shock
(Fig. 1B). Comparisons between HSF1 and GSK3 activation
during the time course of heat shock showed rapid induction of heat
shock element binding (at 5 min) well before the increase in GSK3
activity, which was initially observed after 30 min (Fig.
1C). Control experiments showed that endogenous HSF1 was not
activated by the injection procedure itself and that the manipulation
of GSK3 had no apparent effect on other DNA-binding activities.
(Fig. 1D). Therefore, the results of these experiments appear to be specific effects of GSK3 on the DNA-binding activity of
HSF1.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Overexpression of GSK3
results in decreased DNA binding. A, expression
and activity of kinases from in vitro synthesized mRNA.
Immunoblot of whole cell extracts of control and heat-shocked
(33 °C, 1 h) oocytes injected with mRNA coding for active
and inactive (kinase-dead) GSK3 and purified enzyme (0.5 unit). The
activity of overexpressed GSK3 was confirmed by specific kinase
assay. Kinase activity is expressed as a percentage of uninjected
control (100%) and are means of values obtained from five experiments. B,
gel mobility shift assay of non-shocked (NS) and
heat-shocked (HS, 33 °C) stage VI oocytes. Oocytes were
microinjected (cytoplasmic) with in vitro synthesized
mRNA coding for active or inactive GSK3 or were microinjected
(nuclear) with different concentrations of purified GSK3 30 min
before 60 min of heat shock. Results shown are representative of at
least five separate experiments performed with different batches of
oocytes. Quantitation of DNA binding is shown below each panel.
C, a comparison between HSF1 activation and GSK3 activity
during time course of heat shock induction. Top panel, gel
mobility shift assay; bottom panel, GSK3 activity.
D, gel mobility shift assays showing a comparison of heat
shock element binding in uninjected (control) and
H2O-injected oocytes (upper) and the effects of
GSK manipulation on CCAAT-(center) and Sp1-binding
activities (lower).
|
|
In converse experiments, we inhibited endogenous GSK3 by pretreating
cells with LiCl (39) or by overexpression of GBP, a Xenopus
protein, which specifically binds to and inactivates GSK3 (32). LiCl
and GBP inactivate both GSK3 and - subtypes. Endogenous oocyte
GSK3 activity was reduced to less than 10% of the controls after
treatment with LiCl (25 mM) or after overexpression of GBP (Fig. 2A). Under non-shock
conditions, the DNA-binding activity of HSF1 was unchanged by GBP
expression but was significantly increased at different time points
during heat shock induction (Fig. 2B). Inhibition by LiCl
also resulted in a dose-dependent increase in DNA binding.
DNA binding was apparently activated in the absence of heat shock at 50 mM LiCl, suggesting that GSK3 may function to repress HSF1
under non-shock conditions.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of GSK3
elevates heat shock-induced DNA binding of HSF1.
A, expression of GBP from in vitro synthesized
mRNA. Immunoblot of whole cell extracts from oocytes injected with
mRNA coding for FLAG-GBP. The inhibition of GSK3 by LiCl and GBP
was confirmed using kinase assays as described in Fig. 1. B,
gel mobility shift assay of heat-shocked oocytes pretreated with
various concentrations of LiCl in OR2 buffer for 1 h before heat
shock (upper panel). The pretreated oocytes were
heat-shocked at 33 °C for 1 h. Separate sets of oocytes were
microinjected with mRNA coding for GBP (lower panel).
Quantitation of DNA binding is shown below each panel. NS,
non-shocked; HS, heat-shocked.
|
|
GSK3 has been hypothesized to facilitate the inactivation of HSF1
transcription and the dispersal of stress granules following heat
stress (15). Therefore, we next determined the potential role of GSK3
on the DNA-binding activity of HSF1 during recovery. Inhibition of GSK3
by LiCl or GBP delayed attenuation of DNA-binding activity relative to
untreated cells (Fig. 3A).
Overexpression of GSK3 appeared to accelerate recovery (Fig.
3A), an opposite effect to what was seen with GSK
inhibition. Kinase assays confirmed the magnitude of changes in the
levels of GSK3 activity in these experiments (Fig. 3B). The
prolonged retention of HSF1 activity in LiCl and GBP inhibition
experiments and the accelerated recovery after overexpression suggest
that GSK3 functions normally in efficient disassembly of trimers during
attenuation. These results, combined with previously reported evidence
of elevated GSK3 activity in cells recovering from heat shock (15),
suggest that one of the physiological roles of HSF1 phosphorylation by
GSK3 might be to inactivate DNA binding and transcription at the later
phases of the activation process. Overall, the results of experiments
shown in Figs. 1-3 clearly demonstrate that GSK3 represses the
DNA-binding activity of HSF1 during and after heat shock.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of GSK3
delays attenuation of HSF1 during recovery from heat shock.
A, oocytes pretreated with LiCl (25 mM, 1 h), overexpressing GBP, or overexpressing active GSK3 were
heat-shocked at 33 °C for 1 h and then allowed to recover at
18 °C for the times indicated, and the DNA-binding activity of HSF1
was analyzed by gel mobility shift assay. Quantitation of DNA binding
is shown below each panel. B, relative GSK3 activity in
control and treatment groups (as indicated) during recovery (time of
recovery below panel). Kinase activity is expressed as a
percentage of uninjected control (100%) and are means of values
obtained from five experiments.
|
|
GSK 3 Represses HSF1-mediated Transcription during Heat Shock in
Vivo--
The role of GSK3 in regulating HSF1-dependent
transcription was determined in oocytes by measuring CAT expression
from a microinjected reporter construct, hsp70-CAT. This construct was under control of the hsp70 promoter, which is known to be switched on
by heat shock and by various other stresses in oocytes (36, 40, 41).
The heat shock-induced transcriptional activity of HSF1 was
significantly reduced in cells with elevated levels of GSK3 activity
that were achieved by microinjection of either mRNA or active
kinase (Fig. 4). Kinase-dead GSK3 had
no apparent effect on HSF1-mediated transcription. Conversely,
inhibition of GSK3 activity by LiCl or microinjection of GBP elevated
the levels of HSF1-mediated transcription in heat-shocked cells. The possibility that GSK3 manipulation caused a general inhibition of
transcription was ruled out by the controls in which equal expression
from the cytomegalovirus promoter was observed after each
treatment (Fig. 4). It is possible that the decreased transcription observed in oocytes with elevated GSK3 activity was because of decreased DNA binding; however, in the experiment in which GSK3 was
expressed from microinjected mRNA, DNA binding was not completely inhibited (Fig. 1B), whereas the transcription was nearly
abolished in similarly treated oocytes (Fig. 4). This suggests that
GSK3 has dual effects on DNA binding and transcription. Therefore, these results confirm that GSK3 serves to repress HSF1-mediated transcription under stress conditions in vivo.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
GSK3 modulates
HSF1-mediated transcription in heat-shocked cells. CAT assays of
oocytes microinjected with hsp70-CAT or cytomegalovirus
(CMV)-CAT. Cells were injected with purified GSK3 (0.5 unit), with mRNA coding for active and inactive GSK3 , or with
mRNA encoding GBP, or oocytes were pretreated with 25 mM LiCl for 1 h before heat shock
(HS). In each experiment, the same batch of oocytes
was used to minimize variation. Each experiment was repeated at least
five times with different batches of oocytes, and representative assays
are shown. The lower panel expresses relative heat
shock-inducible CAT activity as a ratio between control (untreated) and
treated groups. NS, non-shocked.
|
|
Intracellular Localization of Endogenous GSK3 during Heat
Shock--
We have previously shown that HSF1 is a nuclear protein in
oocytes before and after heat shock (42). Therefore, direct
phosphorylation of HSF1 by GSK3 would require colocalization of
these proteins during activation or deactivation. To assess the
intracellular distribution of GSK3 before and after heat shock,
nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from manually enucleated cells were
analyzed by immunoblotting and kinase assays. GSK3 protein and GSK3
activity were mostly cytoplasmic under non-shock and heat shock
conditions, and they were barely detectable in the nuclei of unshocked
cells (Fig. 5). In intact cells, GSK3
activity was elevated by heat shock. The nuclear levels of GSK3
protein were elevated after heat shock, and nuclear kinase activity
rose accordingly (Fig. 5). No significant change in GSK3 activity was
seen after the inhibition of de novo protein synthesis with
cycloheximide in both non-shock and heat shock conditions, which
suggests that heat shock up-regulates endogenous kinase activity.
However, the increase in nuclear GSK3 activity could have been caused
by a combination of nuclear translocation and activation of the enzyme. To demonstrate that the nuclear preparations used in these assays were
free of contaminating cytoplasms, we assayed for the presence of I B
and PCNA, which are strictly cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins, respectively. The cytoplasmic marker I B was not detected in the nuclear extracts, and PCNA was not detected in cytoplasmic extracts (Fig. 5).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Intracellular localization of
GSK3 . Western immunoblot of whole cell,
cytoplasmic, and nuclear fractions and detection with anti-GSK3
antibody. Control blots with nuclear (PCNA) and cytoplasmic
(I B) marker proteins are also shown. One
oocyte equivalent of protein extract was used for whole cell and
cytoplasmic samples. One nuclear equivalent was loaded for detection of
GSK3 and PCNA, but 10 nuclear equivalents of protein were used for
detection of I B. Cycloheximide treatment was at 150 µg/ml in OR2
for 1 h. GSK3 activities are as described in Fig. 1.
NS, non-shocked; HS, heat-shocked.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
GSK3 is a proline-directed serine/threonine kinase that was
originally discovered as the major kinase-phosphorylating glycogen synthase (43). Various other GSK3 substrates have since been identified, including protein phosphatases, kinases, adhesion molecules, myelin basic proteins, and several transcription factors including c-Jun/AP-1, JunD, c-Myb, c-Myc, L-Myc (44). The results shown
here clearly demonstrate for the first time that GSK3 negatively regulates the DNA-binding activity of HSF1 in vivo and
confirms that it functions to repress transcription in cells that are
exposed to heat shock. It is interesting that GSK3 phosphorylates c-Jun in the DNA-binding domain and down-regulates its DNA-binding activity (45), and that it negatively regulates Myc and Myb family members (46).
Therefore, it appears that the inhibitory action of GSK3 may be common
to a variety of transcription factors including HSF1.
The role of GSK3 as a negative modulator of HSF1 was supported here
by observations that heat-induced DNA binding was inhibited in cells
overexpressing GSK3 and conversely that DNA binding was stimulated
after the inhibition of GSK3. In addition to the effects on DNA
binding, our results confirmed the role of GSK3 in modulating
transcription. HSF1-mediated transcription was either decreased after
increasing GSK3 or increased after the inhibition of GSK3. In each
experiment in which GSK3 was either increased or decreased, we observed
consistent and reciprocal effects on HSF1 activities. The degree to
which GSK3 is important for HSF1 regulation in vivo is
illustrated by the observation that nuclear enzyme injection almost
completely inhibited DNA binding in response to heat shock.
Transcriptional effects on HSF1 by manipulating GSK3 were likely not
due to changes in the ability of HSF1 to form trimers and bind DNA.
This was because we observed a complete transcriptional repression but
an incomplete repression of DNA binding with 4-fold increases in
GSK3 activity. These repressions lead us to suggest that GSK3
modulates both DNA-binding and transcriptional activities and that this
could be through targeting at single or multiple sites on the molecule.
The conclusion that GSK3 regulates both activities separately is
consistent with the uncoupling of DNA binding and transcription as seen
when HSF1 is activated by anti-inflammatory agents, such as salicylate
and indomethacin (21).
When during the activation-deactivation process does GSK3 exert its
influence on HSF1? Previous work suggests that GSK3 might act
constitutively to repress HSF1 (13, 14, 16, 30). Consistent with this
theory, we found that HSF1 was inhibited in GSK3 -overexpressing cells during the early phases of the activation process. We also observed the activation of HSF1-DNA binding under non-shock conditions after inhibiting GSK3 with LiCl, although it is possible that this
effect was caused by toxic effects of LiCl. Therefore, it appears that
GSK3 represses the DNA-binding and transcriptional activity of HSF1
under normal conditions, and so it is important for the maintenance of
the transcriptionally inactive monomeric conformation. However, several
observations lead us to suggest that its primary role is in the later
stages of heat shock and attenuation. Our experiments showed that the
total level of GSK3 activity had increased in response to heat shock
well after HSF1 was activated, the nuclear levels of GSK had increased
after 1 h of heat shock, and the inhibition of GSK3 delayed
attenuation during recovery. Our observations are consistent with the
findings of He et al. (15) that show the localization of
GSK3 to stress granules in vivo and the disappearance of
transcriptionally active HSF1 granules. The current data suggest that
GSK3 is required for the efficient recovery of HSF1 following
resumption of normal conditions.
What is the mechanism by which GSK3 -mediated phosphorylation
represses HSF1? GSK3 has been shown to phosphorylate human HSF1 at
serine 303 (13, 14), and so it is likely that it acts directly on HSF1
in oocytes. As with several other GSK3 substrates (47, 48),
phosphorylation at this site on HSF1 depends on the hierarchical
phosphorylation at an upstream site, serine 307, by ERK1/2 (13, 14).
Sequence alignment of human and Xenopus HSF1 (Fig.
6) reveals that the (Thr-286) of frog
aligns with serine 303 and matches the consensus phosphorylation site
for GSK3 ((S/T)*XXXpS) (47, 48). The effects of
GSK3 manipulation observed in these experiments could have been
through phosphorylation at this site or other site(s) in the
Xenopus HSF1 molecule. It will be interesting to address
whether the dual regulation of HSF1 by GSK3 involves targeting of
single or multiple sites and to determine the dynamics of
phosphorylations throughout the activation profile.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Sequence alignment of human and
Xenopus HSF1. Human serine 303 aligns with
threonine 286 as indicated by the closed
triangle.
|
|
We hypothesize that GSK3 acts as the terminal kinase of several
stress signal transduction pathways that regulate HSF1 activity. GSK3
is known to be the terminal effector kinase of a number of signal
transduction pathways. The upstream activators of GSK3 have not been
identified, but it has been shown that the phosphatideylinositol 3-kinase-PKB pathway, p70S6K, p90rsk, and certain
isotypes of PKC phosphorylate and down-regulate GSK3
(49-51). Of them, PKC and PKB are known to be activated by stress, but only PKC has been implicated as a negative regulator of
HSF1. Treatment of human erythroleukemia K562 cells with
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate), a specific activator
of PKC, has been shown to enhance heat-induced activity and accelerate
attenuation (52), and this effect was abolished by the concurrent
treatment of cells with a specific PKC inhibitor (53). In addition, PKC
has been shown to directly phosphorylate human HSF1 near the
transcriptional activation domain and inhibit its transcription (14).
It is difficult with the current evidence to determine the relationship between HSF1, PKC, and GSK3 at different phases of the stress response.
It is interesting that PKC and GSK3 are both activated by stress and
are negative regulators of HSF1. Therefore, initial events in the
activation of HSF1 probably involve integration of multiple signals and
a complex series of hsp90 chaperone interactions (5-7).
Complete understanding of the role of HSF1 phosphorylation will require
incorporation of the effects of other kinases known to phosphorylate
HSF1, such as ERK1/2 and PKC. What remains to be answered is whether
the constitutively phosphorylated sites in the regulatory domain are
actually modified during stress or if GSK3 acts through other sites
on the HSF1 molecule. This is part of the larger question
concerning the role of multiple signaling pathways and phosphorylation
events in the activation and attenuation of HSF1.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank D. Kimelman for GBP expression
vector and A. Wolffe for CAT constructs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Medical Research Council (MRC)
Grants MT-13110 (to N. O.) and MT-12043 (to J. R. W.), postdoctoral fellowship scholarships from Health Services Utilization and Research Commission (to I. J. X.) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (to A. A.), a MRC graduate scholarship (to
P. M.), and a NSERC summer studentship (to C. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Anatomy
and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Rd., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E5, Canada. Tel.: 306-966-4069; Fax: 306-966-4298; E-mail: ovsenekn@duke.usask.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002169200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
hsp, heat shock
protein;
HSF1, heat shock factor;
GSK3, glycogen synthase kinase;
ERK1/2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
GBP, GSK3-binding
protein;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
PK, protein kinase;
PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear
antigen.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Morimoto, R. I.,
Tissieres, A.,
and Georgopoulos, C.
(1994)
The Biology of Heat Shock Proteins and Molecular Chaperones
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
|
| 2.
|
Wu, C.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
11,
441-469
|
| 3.
|
Shi, Y.,
Kroeger, P. E.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4309-4318
|
| 4.
|
Nair, S. C.,
Toran, E. J.,
Rimerman, R. A.,
Hjermstad, S.,
Smithgal, T. E.,
and Smith, D. F.
(1996)
Cell Stress Chaperones
1,
237-250
|
| 5.
|
Ali, A.,
Bharadwaj, S.,
O'Carroll, R.,
and Ovsenek, N.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4949-4960
|
| 6.
|
Zou, J.,
Guo, Y.,
Guettouche, T.,
Smith, D. F.,
and Voellmy, R.
(1998)
Cell
94,
471-480
|
| 7.
|
Bharadwaj, S.,
Ali, A.,
and Ovsenek, N.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
8033-8041
|
| 8.
|
Shaw, M.,
Cohen, P.,
and Alessi, D. R.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
336,
241-246
|
| 9.
|
Wooten, M. W.
(1991)
Exp. Cell Res.
193,
274-278
|
| 10.
|
Ritz, M. F.,
Masmoudi, A.,
Matter, N.,
Rogue, P.,
Lang, D.,
Freysz, L.,
and Malviya, A. N.
(1993)
Receptor
3,
311-324
|
| 11.
|
Williams, B. R. G.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6112-6120
|
| 12.
|
Tibbles, L. A.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1999)
Cell Mol. Life Sci.
55,
1230-1254
|
| 13.
|
Chu, B.,
Soncin, F.,
Price, B. D.,
Stevenson, M. A.,
and Calderwood, S. K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30847-30857
|
| 14.
|
Chu, B.,
Zhong, R.,
Soncin, F.,
Stevenson, M. A.,
and Calderwood, S. K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18640-18646
|
| 15.
|
He, B.,
Meng, Y. H.,
and Mivechi, N. F.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6624-6633
|
| 16.
|
Kline, M. P.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
2107-2115
|
| 17.
|
Xia, W.,
and Voellmy, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4094-5102
|
| 18.
|
Winegarden, N. A.,
Wong, K. S.,
Sopta, M.,
and Westwood, J. T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26971-26980
|
| 19.
|
Kim, J.,
Nueda, A.,
Meng, Y. H.,
Dynan, W. S.,
and Mivechi, N. F.
(1997)
J. Cell. Biochem.
67,
43-54
|
| 20.
|
Mivechi, N. F.,
and Giaccia, A. J.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
5512-5519
|
| 21.
|
Jurivich, D. A.,
Sistonen, L.,
Kroes, R. A.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1992)
Science
255,
1243-1245
|
| 22.
|
Chang, N.-T.,
Huang, L. E.,
and Liu, A. Y.-C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1436-1439
|
| 23.
|
Erdos, G.,
and Lee, Y. J.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
202,
476-483
|
| 24.
|
Yamamoto, N.,
Smith, M. W.,
Maki, A.,
Berezesky, I. K.,
and Trump, B. F.
(1994)
Kidney Int.
45,
1093-1104
|
| 25.
|
Cheng, T.-J.,
Chen, T.-M.,
Chen, C.-H.,
and Lai, Y.-K.
(1998)
J. Cell. Biochem.
69,
221-231
|
| 26.
|
Ohnishi, K.,
Wang, X.,
Takahashi, A.,
Matsumoto, H.,
and Ohnishi, T.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
197,
129-135
|
| 27.
|
Hoj, A.,
and Jakobsen, B. K.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2617-2624
|
| 28.
|
Fritsch, M.,
and Wu, C.
(1999)
Cell Stress Chaperones
4,
102-117
|
| 29.
|
Sorger, P. K.,
and Pelham, H. R.
(1988)
Cell
54,
855-864
|
| 30.
|
Knauf, U.,
Newton, E. M.,
Kyriakis, J.,
and Kingston, R. E.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2782-2793
|
| 31.
|
Xia, W.,
Guo, Y.,
Vilaboa, N.,
Zuo, J.,
and Voellmy, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8749-8755
|
| 32.
|
Yost, C.,
Farr, G. H.,
Pierce, S. B.,
Ferkey, D. M.,
Chen, M. M.,
and Kimelman, D.
(1998)
Cell
93,
1031-1041
|
| 33.
|
Dominguez, I.,
Itoh, K.,
and Sokol, S. Y.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8498-8502
|
| 34.
|
Sheaff, R. J.,
Groudine, M.,
Gordon, M.,
Roberts, J. M.,
and Clurman, B. E.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1464-1478
|
| 35.
|
Ovsenek, N.,
Williams, G. T.,
Morimoto, R. I.,
and Heikkila, J. J.
(1990)
Dev. Genet.
11,
97-109
|
| 36.
|
Landsberger, N.,
Ranjan, M.,
Almouzni, G.,
Stump, D.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1995)
Dev. Biol.
170,
62-74
|
| 37.
|
Ryves, W. J.,
Fryer, L.,
Dale, T.,
and Harwood, A. J.
(1998)
Anal. Biochem.
264,
124-127
|
| 38.
|
He, X.,
Saint-Jeannet, J.-P.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
Varmus, H. E.,
and Dawid, I. B.
(1995)
Nature
374,
617-622
|
| 39.
|
Stambolic, V.,
Ruel, L.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
1664-1668
|
| 40.
|
Ananthan, J.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
and Voellmy, R.
(1986)
Science
232,
522-524
|
| 41.
|
Bharadwaj, S.,
Hnatov, A.,
Ali, A.,
and Ovsenek, N.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1402,
79-85
|
| 42.
|
Mercier, P. A.,
Foksa, J.,
Ovsenek, N.,
and Westwood, J. T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14147-14151
|
| 43.
|
Embi, N.,
Rylatt, D. B.,
and Cohen, P.
(1980)
Eur. J. Biochem.
107,
519-527
|
| 44.
|
Plyte, S. E.,
Hughes, K.,
Nikolakaki, E.,
Pulverer, B. J.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1114,
147-162
|
| 45.
|
Boyle, W. J.,
Smeal, T.,
Defize, L. H.,
Angel, P.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
Karin, M.,
and Hunter, T.
(1991)
Cell
64,
573-584
|
| 46.
|
Pulverer, B. J.,
Fisher, C.,
Vousden, K.,
Littlewood, T.,
Evan, G.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
59-70
|
| 47.
|
Woodgett, J. R.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
200,
564-577
|
| 48.
|
Roach, P. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
14139-14142
|
| 49.
|
Goode, N.,
Hughes, K.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16878-16882
|
| 50.
|
Matsuzaki, H.,
Konishi, H.,
Tanaka, M.,
Ono, Y.,
Takenawa, T.,
Watanabe, Y.,
Ozaki, S.,
Kuroda, S.,
and Kikkawa, U.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
396,
305-308
|
| 51.
|
Konishi, H.,
Matsuzaki, H.,
Tanaka, M.,
Ono, Y.,
Tokunaga, C.,
Kuroda, S.,
and Kikkawa, U.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7639-7643
|
| 52.
|
Holmberg, C. I.,
Leppa, S.,
Eriksson, J. E.,
and Sistonen, L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6792-6798
|
| 53.
|
Holmberg, C. I.,
Roos, P. M.,
Lord, J. M.,
Eriksson, J. E.,
and Sistonen, L.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
3357-3365
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Gupte, G. L. Bomhoff, J. K. Morris, B. K. Gorres, and P. C. Geiger
Lipoic acid increases heat shock protein expression and inhibits stress kinase activation to improve insulin signaling in skeletal muscle from high-fat-fed rats
J Appl Physiol,
April 1, 2009;
106(4):
1425 - 1434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Das, L. Xi, and R. C. Kukreja
Protein Kinase G-dependent Cardioprotective Mechanism of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition Involves Phosphorylation of ERK and GSK3{beta}
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 24, 2008;
283(43):
29572 - 29585.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gong, A. Rifai, Y. Ge, S. Chen, and L. D. Dworkin
Hepatocyte Growth Factor Suppresses Proinflammatory NF{kappa}B Activation through GSK3{beta} Inactivation in Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 21, 2008;
283(12):
7401 - 7410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Li, I. S. Ali, and R. W. Currie
Insulin-induced myocardial protection in isolated ischemic rat hearts requires p38 MAPK phosphorylation of Hsp27
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
January 1, 2008;
294(1):
H74 - H87.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Yang, J. J. Peairs, R. Tano, and G. J. Jaffe
Oxidant-mediated Akt Activation in Human RPE Cells.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
October 1, 2006;
47(10):
4598 - 4606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Li, I. S. Ali, and R. W. Currie
Insulin induces myocardial protection and Hsp70 localization to plasma membranes in rat hearts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
October 1, 2006;
291(4):
H1709 - H1721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shinohara, N. Takahashi, T. Ooie, M. Hara, S. Shigematsu, M. Nakagawa, H. Yonemochi, T. Saikawa, and H. Yoshimatsu
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent activation of akt, an essential signal for hyperthermia-induced heat-shock protein 72, is attenuated in streptozotocin-induced diabetic heart.
Diabetes,
May 1, 2006;
55(5):
1307 - 1315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Conde, J. Xavier, C. McLoughlin, M. Chinkers, and N. Ovsenek
Protein Phosphatase 5 Is a Negative Modulator of Heat Shock Factor 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 12, 2005;
280(32):
28989 - 28996.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yamaguchi, S.-H. Lee, T. E. Eling, and S. J. Baek
Identification of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug-activated Gene (NAG-1) as a Novel Downstream Target of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT/GSK-3{beta} Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 26, 2004;
279(48):
49617 - 49623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. C Chi and J. S Karliner
Molecular determinants of responses to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: focus on hypoxia-inducible and heat shock factors
Cardiovasc Res,
February 15, 2004;
61(3):
437 - 447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Hernandez, M. Perez, J. J. Lucas, A. M. Mata, R. Bhat, and J. Avila
Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Plays a Crucial Role in Tau Exon 10 Splicing and Intranuclear Distribution of SC35: IMPLICATIONS FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 30, 2004;
279(5):
3801 - 3806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ren, V. V. Senatorov, R.-W. Chen, and D.-M. Chuang
Postinsult treatment with lithium reduces brain damage and facilitates neurological recovery in a rat ischemia/reperfusion model
PNAS,
May 13, 2003;
100(10):
6210 - 6215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Salinas, R. Diaz, N. G. Abraham, C. M. Ruiz de Galarreta, and A. Cuadrado
Nerve Growth Factor Protects against 6-Hydroxydopamine-induced Oxidative Stress by Increasing Expression of Heme Oxygenase-1 in a Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-dependent Manner
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 11, 2003;
278(16):
13898 - 13904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Takahashi-Yanaga, Y. Taba, Y. Miwa, Y. Kubohara, Y. Watanabe, M. Hirata, S. Morimoto, and T. Sasaguri
Dictyostelium Differentiation-inducing Factor-3 Activates Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta and Degrades Cyclin D1 in Mammalian Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2003;
278(11):
9663 - 9670.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. Hardt and J. Sadoshima
Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3{beta}: A Novel Regulator of Cardiac Hypertrophy and Development
Circ. Res.,
May 31, 2002;
90(10):
1055 - 1063.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. L. Gabai and M. Y. Sherman
Molecular Biology of Thermoregulation: Invited Review: Interplay between molecular chaperones and signaling pathways in survival of heat shock
J Appl Physiol,
April 1, 2002;
92(4):
1743 - 1748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. K. Acquaah-Mensah, J. P. Kehrer, and S. W. Leslie
In Utero Ethanol Suppresses Cerebellar Activator Protein-1 and Nuclear Factor-kappa B Transcriptional Activation in a Rat Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Model
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
April 1, 2002;
301(1):
277 - 283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ch. Papasozomenos and A. Shanavas
Testosterone prevents the heat shock-induced overactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta but not of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and concomitantly abolishes hyperphosphorylation of tau : Implications for Alzheimer's disease
PNAS,
January 17, 2002;
(2002)
32646799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Guo, T. Guettouche, M. Fenna, F. Boellmann, W. B. Pratt, D. O. Toft, D. F. Smith, and R. Voellmy
Evidence for a Mechanism of Repression of Heat Shock Factor 1 Transcriptional Activity by a Multichaperone Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 30, 2001;
276(49):
45791 - 45799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. A. Graef, J. M. Gastier, U. Francke, and G. R. Crabtree
Evolutionary relationships among Rel domains indicate functional diversification by recombination
PNAS,
May 8, 2001;
98(10):
5740 - 5745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. N. Bijur and R. S. Jope
Proapoptotic Stimuli Induce Nuclear Accumulation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 28, 2001;
276(40):
37436 - 37442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ch. Papasozomenos and A. Shanavas
Testosterone prevents the heat shock-induced overactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta but not of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and concomitantly abolishes hyperphosphorylation of tau : Implications for Alzheimer's disease
PNAS,
February 5, 2002;
99(3):
1140 - 1145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|