Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003103200 on July 11, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 38, 29458-29465, September 22, 2000
High and Low Affinity Heparin-binding Sites in the G Domain of
the Mouse Laminin
4 Chain*
Hirotake
Yamaguchi
§,
Hironobu
Yamashita
§,
Hitoshi
Mori
,
Ikuko
Okazaki¶,
Motoyoshi
Nomizu¶,
Konrad
Beck
**, and
Yasuo
Kitagawa

From the
Graduate Course for Regulation of Biological
Signals, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences and
Bioscience Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan and
the ¶ Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido
University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
Received for publication, April 12, 2000, and in revised form, June 26, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
G domains of the mouse laminin
1 and
4
chains consisting of its five subdomains LG1-LG5 were overexpressed in
Chinese hamster ovary cells and purified by heparin
chromatography.
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5 eluted at NaCl
concentrations of 0.30 and 0.47 M, respectively. In
solid phase binding assays with immobilized heparin, half-maximal
concentrations of 14 (
1LG1-LG5) and 1.4 nM
(
4LG1-LG5) were observed. N-Glycan cleavage of
4LG1-LG5 did not affect affinity to heparin. The affinity of
4LG1-LG5 was significantly reduced upon denaturation with 8 M urea but could be recovered by removing urea.
Chymotrypsin digestion of
4LG1-LG5 yielded high and low heparin
affinity fragments containing either the
4LG4-LG5 or
4LG2-LG3
modules, respectively. Trypsin digestion of heparin-bound
4LG1-LG5
yielded a high affinity fragment of about 190 residues corresponding to
the
4LG4 module indicating that the high affinity binding site is
contained within
4LG4. Competition for heparin binding of synthetic
peptides covering the
4LG4 region with complete
4LG1-LG5
suggests that the sequence AHGRL1521 is crucial for high affinity
binding. Introduction of mutation of H1518A or R1520A in glutathione
S-transferase fusion protein of the
4LG4 module produced
in Escherichia coli markedly reduced heparin binding activity of the wild type. When compared with the known structure of
2LG5, this sequence corresponds to the turn connecting strands E and
F of the 14-stranded
-sheet sandwich, which is opposite to the
proposed binding sites for calcium ion,
-dystroglycan, and heparan sulfate.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Basement membranes are sheet-like extracellular matrices
underlying epithelial and endothelial cells, surrounding muscle cells, adipocytes, and peripheral nerve axons, and acting as supportive architecture for the cells to proliferate, differentiate, and migrate.
These matrices contain one or more members of the laminin family as a
major component. The laminins consist of heterotrimeric (

)
glycoproteins, and five
, three
, and three
subchains have
been recognized to combine into more than 11 heterotrimeric molecules
identified so far (1-7). The best characterized laminin-1 (
1
1
1) is a cross-shaped molecule in which all three chains contribute to the
-helical coiled-coil to form the long arm of the
cross, whereas the short arms are composed of one chain each (8). Since
the N-terminal short arm region is truncated in
3 (splice variant of
3A),
4,
3, and
2, we can define three groups of laminins;
the cross-shaped laminins containing a complete complement of domains
(laminins-1, -2, -3, -4, -10, and -11), the rod-shaped laminins lacking
domains in all three short arms (laminin-5), and the Y-shaped laminins
lacking an
chain short arm but remaining full-sized
and
chains (laminins-6, -7, -8, and -9). Laminin-1, -2, and -4 form
polymers by reversible self-assembly of monomers at short arms in a
calcium ion- and temperature-dependent manner with a
critical concentration of assembly of 70-140 nM (9-11).
This polymerization of the cross-shaped laminins has a central role in
forming the meshwork architecture of basement membranes. Since all
three short arms are required for self-assembly (11), the laminins
lacking either of three short arms cannot contribute to the architecture.
Compared with
and
chains, all
chains are unique in that
their C termini contain a tandem of five laminin G-like
(LG)1 modules, which form a
large globular structure at the C-terminal end of laminins and contains
binding sites for heparin (12) and
-dystroglycan (13, 14). Taking
advantage of recombinant G domain overexpressed in cultured cell lines,
their functional regions have been characterized for
1,
2, and
5 (15-21). Recent crystallography of the mouse
2LG5 revealed a
14-stranded
-sheet sandwich structure, in which a calcium
ion-binding site is mapped at one edge of the sandwich surrounded by
the residues implicated in heparin and
-dystroglycan binding (22).
Crystal structure of the
2LG4-LG5 pair showed that they are
arranged in a V-shaped fashion related by a 110° rotation to locate
two calcium ion-binding sites 65 Å apart at the tips of the domains
opposite the polypeptide termini where they have contacting interface
(23).
Laminin
4 lacks the N-terminal short arm and shows an expression
pattern distinct from that of the full size
chains. It is expressed
in the cell of mesenchymal origin such as endothelial cells (24-27)
and mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes (28, 29). Studies on developing mice showed
4 mRNA to be detectable at embryonic day 7 and peaked at day 15 (30). In adult tissues, the expression was localized mainly in
mesenchymal cells of lung, cardiac, and skeletal muscle fibers, and
immunohistology detected laminin
4 antigen in capillary basement
membranes as well as perineurium (30).
Since truncation of N-terminal short arm and characteristic expression
patterns suggest distinct activity of the
4 G domain from those of
1 and
2, we have overexpressed mouse
4LG1-LG5 in
dhfr-deficient CHO cells and compared its heparin binding
activity with that of
1LG1-LG5 overexpressed in parallel. We report
here that
4LG1-LG5 has stronger affinity to heparin than
1LG1-LG5. While the region spanning
4 LG2-LG3 had affinity
comparable to
1LGs,
4LG4 was found to be responsible for the
strong binging to heparin.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmid Construction--
Plasmids for the expression of
recombinant mouse laminin
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5 (Fig. 1) were
constructed based on the pEF series of plasmids (31, 32) which have
laminin chain cDNA sequences inserted between the signal sequence
of erythropoietin receptor for the delivery of the products to the
secretory pathway and a c-Myc sequence for epitope tagging. For
pEF
4Gmyc, mouse laminin
4cDNA clones isolated from a mouse
heart cDNA library constructed in
ZAPII (Stratagene) were used.
These included pA4-3 (covering the 1.4-kb fragment between nt 4261 and
poly(A) tail; nucleotide numbers according Ref. 33), pA4-8 (1.4 kb, nt
3658-5021), pA4-14 (1.9 kb, nt 2714-4611), and pA4-15 (2.5 kb, nt
840-3315). The 0.7-kb EcoRI-XbaI fragment of
pA4-8 and the 1.4-kb SacI-EcoRI fragment of
pA4-14 were connected at the EcoRI end and subcloned in
SacI and XbaI sites of pBluescript
SK+ to generate pBSA4Sac/Xba. A cDNA fragment
corresponding to nt 4954-5445 was prepared by PCR using pA4-3 as
template and a reverse primer tagged with an extra 5' EcoRV
sequence. The resulting fragment was digested with XbaI and
EcoRV, and subcloned into XbaI and EcoRV sites of pBSA4Sac/Xba to yield
pBSA4Sac/EcoRV. A cDNA fragment nt 2497-2758t was
prepared by PCR using pA4-15 as template and a forward primer tagged
with an extra 5' SmaI sequence. The resulting fragment was
connected to the SacI-EcoRV fragment in
pBSA4Sac-EcoRV after digestion with SmaI and
SacI and inserted to SmaI and EcoRV sites of the pEF
1S to generate pEF
4Gmyc. The sequence was
confirmed to code for the mouse
4LG1-LG5 sequence from
Gly833 to Ala1815 followed by a
Myc-tag sequence. For construction of pEF
1Gmyc, a cDNA
fragment coding for the mouse laminin
1 sequence (34) from
Ile2100 to Pro3060 was prepared by RT-PCR using
total RNA extracted from mouse embryonal carcinoma F9 cells and forward
and reverse primers tagged with extra 5' BamHI and
EcoRV sequences, respectively. The laminin
1 fragment in
pEFE
1S was replaced by this fragment at BamHI and
EcoRV sites to generate pEF
1Gmyc.
4LG4 module was expressed also in Escherichia coli as a
GST fusion protein. For this, a cDNA fragment corresponding to nt 4357-4908 was prepared by PCR of pEF
4myc using a forward primer tagged with an extra 5' BamHI sequence and a reverse primer
tagged with an extra 5' EcoRI sequence. The amplified
fragment was digested with BamHI and EcoRI and
inserted into corresponding sites of pGEX-2T (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). Site-directed mutagenesis was accomplished with Quick Change
Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). For H1518A mutation,
paired primers of 5'-CTGTTCTTGGCCGCGGGTCGCTTGGTC-3' and
5'-GACCAAGCGACCCGCGGCCAAGAACAG-3' were used. For R1520A mutation, paired primers of 5'-CCTGTTCTTGGCCCATGGTGCGTTGGTCTTTATGTTTAATG-3' and
5'-CATTAAACATAAAGACCAACGCACCATGGGCCAAGAACAGG-3' were used.
Cell Culture--
dhfr-deficient CHO DG44 cells
(provided by Dr. Lawrence Chasin, Columbia University, New York) were
used for overexpression of mouse
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5 domains.
Cells were maintained in
-minimal essential medium containing
nucleosides and deoxynucleosides, and supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum and antibiotics. Once the stable transfectants were established,
-minimal essential medium without nucleosides and deoxynucleosides
was used. To check for N-glycosylation of G domains, cells
were allowed to attach to culture dishes, washed with Dulbecco's
modified PBS, and fed with fresh medium containing 10 µg/ml
tunicamycin. After 12 h, cell lysates and conditioned media were
analyzed by immunoblot using antiserum against c-Myc (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, sc-789).
DNA Transfection and Selection for Stable
Transfectants--
Cells were transfected with the plasmids together
with pGEMSVdhfr encoding a DHFR minigene (provided by Dr. Hiroshi
Teraoka, Shionogi Research Laboratory, Osaka, Japan) by
calcium-phosphate precipitation. Selection for stable transfectants and
subsequent amplification of the introduced cDNA were carried out as
described (35). Expression levels of recombinant G domains were
monitored by dot immunoassay of conditioned media with antiserum
against c-Myc.
Purification of
1 and
4 G Domains--
Conditioned medium
(about 500 ml each) of
1LG1-LG5 or
4LG1-LG5 expressing cells
was harvested and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min
to remove cell debris. The supernatant was adjusted to 0.5 mM N-ethylmaleimide, and applied to a 5-ml
heparin affinity column (HiTrap, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; 3 ml/min)
equilibrated in 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM
NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
N-ethylmaleimide (buffer A). For efficient binding, the
flow-through was recycled about 5 times. Elution was carried out on a
FPLC system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was washed with 30 ml of buffer A, eluted at 0.5 ml/min with a 150-ml linear gradient of
150 to 600 mM NaCl in buffer A, and 2.5-ml fractions were
collected. Protein concentration in the fractions was determined with
the BCA assay (Pierce) with BSA as standard. Purity and amount of recombinant protein was monitored by SDS-gel electrophoresis in 8%
acrylamide gels under reducing conditions (20-µl aliquots). Pure
fractions were combined, concentrated up to 0.4 mg/ml, and desalted
using Centriprep-30 concentrators (Amicon). 500 ml of medium yielded
about 3 mg of purified
1LG1-LG5 or
4LG1-LG5.
Urea De- and Renaturation of
4LG1-LG5 Bound to
Heparin--
Three 1-ml HiTrap heparin columns A, B, and C were
equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 2 mM
EDTA (buffer B) and loaded with 0.3 mg each of purified
4LG1-LG5.
After washing with 3 ml of buffer B, column A was further washed with 3 ml of buffer B while the others were washed with 3 ml of buffer B
containing 8 M urea. Columns A and C were then washed with
3 ml of buffer B while column B was washed with 3 ml of buffer B
containing 8 M urea. Elution was performed on a FPLC system
(0.1 ml/min) with a 30-ml linear gradient from 0 to 800 mM
NaCl in buffer B for columns A and C, and in 8 M urea
containing buffer B for column B. Proteins of 1-ml fractions were
precipitated by 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid, pellets were washed
with acetone, and dissolved in SDS sample buffer.
Proteolytic Fragmentation of
4LG1-LG5--
Purified
4LG1-LG5 (1.2 mg) was digested at 37 °C with
1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-2-heptanone-treated
-chymotrypsin
(Sigma C-3142) or L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl
ketone-treated trypsin (Sigma T-8642) at a 1:50 enzyme/substrate ratio
for 2 h. Digestion was stopped by addition of phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride to a final concentration of 1 mM. The digest was
applied to a 1-ml Hi-trap heparin column. The column was washed with 6 ml of buffer A, bound protein was eluted on a FPLC system with a 30-ml linear gradient from 150 to 700 mM NaCl in buffer A, and
1-ml fractions were collected. For SDS-gel electrophoresis, fractions were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid as described above.
Alternatively, digestion with trypsin was carried out after binding to
a heparin column. Purified
4LG1-LG5 (0.4 mg) was bound to a 1-ml
heparin column, and 15 µg of trypsin dissolved in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2 was applied to the column. The column
was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C and connected to a FPLC system.
After washing with 6 ml of buffer A, the column was eluted (0.1 ml/min)
with a 25-ml linear gradient from 150 to 600 mM NaCl in
buffer A, and 1-ml fractions were collected. For Tricine-gel
electrophoresis, fractions were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid
as described.
Microsequencing of Proteolytic Fragments--
After
electrophoresis, separated peptides were transferred onto
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250. Corresponding parts of the membrane were cut out, and the peptides were sequenced from the N terminus (36).
Digestion with PNGase F--
N-Glycans of
4LG1-LG5 were cleaved with PNGase F (BioLabs) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. 15 µl of enzyme solution and 30 µl
of × 10 G7 buffer (500 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH
7.5) were added to purified protein (75 µg in 250 µl) and incubated
at 37 °C overnight. As a control, 15 µl of water instead of the
enzyme solution was used on a separate sample. After appropriate
dilution, the digest was directly used for immunoblot and heparin
binding analysis.
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5 Binding to Solid-phase
Heparin--
Solid-phase assays were carried out as described with
slight modification (37). Multiwell plates (96 wells; Nunc) were
incubated with 10 µg/ml heparin-BSA (Sigma) in 15 mM
Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3 (pH 9.2), and 3 mM NaN3 as the first ligand for
18 h at 4 °C. Wells were then blocked with 1% (w/v) BSA in 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2 (blocking buffer) at room temperature for 2 h. After washing five times with 0.04% Tween 20 in PBS (10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM
K2HPO4, 140 mM NaCl, and 3 mM KCl; washing buffer), wells were incubated with
1LG1-LG5 or
4LG1-LG5 serially diluted with blocking buffer as
the second ligand. After incubation for 2 h at 4 °C, wells were
washed five times with washing buffer, and the bound G domain was
incubated with antiserum against
1LG1-LG5,
4LG1-LG5, or
c-Myc with dilutions of 1:1000, 1:1000, or 1:400, respectively.
After washing five times with washing buffer, bound antibodies were
detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) followed by addition of 0.4 mg/ml
o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma) dissolved in 50 mM phosphate citrate buffer and 0.01%
H2O2. The reaction was stopped with 3 M HCl. Color yields were determined at 492 nm in a
Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad, Model 3550-UV).
Competition Assay of Synthetic Peptides with
4LG1-LG5 for
Heparin Binding--
One-hundred and 16 peptides (A4G1-116) covering
4LG1-LG5 were designed according to the deduced amino acid
sequenced in Ref. 33. Twenty-four peptides (A4G74-97) corresponding to
4LG4 module and two control peptides (A4G82S and A4G82T) were
synthesized by the 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) strategy and
purified by high performance liquid chromatography as described
previously (38). Purity and identity of the peptides were confirmed by an analytical high performance liquid chromatography and an ion spray
mass spectrometer, respectively. Either of the synthetic peptides (21 µg),
4LG1-LG5 (3.4 µg) and heparin-Sepharose CL-6B beads (1 mg)
were mixed in 70 µl of 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl. After incubation for 1 h at 4 °C, the
mixture was loaded on an open column. Beads were flashed three times
with 100 µl of the same buffer. Bound protein was extracted with SDS
sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-gel electrophoresis.
Heparin Binding Assay of the Mutants of
4LG4 Module--
GST
fusion proteins of
4LG4 module and the mutants were extracted from
E. coli by sonication in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 2 mM EDTA. The extract
(5 ml) was applied to a heparin-Sepharose CL-6B column of 0.5 ml
equilibrated with the same buffer. For efficient binding, the
flow-through fraction was reloaded three times. The column was
washed with 5 ml of the buffer and eluted with 5 ml each of the buffer
containing 100, 200, 400, 500, 600, and 1000 mM NaCl. 10 µl of the fractions was analyzed by immunoblot.
Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblot Analysis--
SDS-gel
electrophoresis was performed using 8 or 12% acrylamide gels as
described (39). Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250.
Samples were dissolved in SDS sample buffer with or without 2% (v/v)
2-mercaptoethanol. Tricine-gel electrophoresis was carried out as
described (40) followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
G-250. For immunoblot analysis, proteins were transferred to Hybond ECL
nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and the membrane
was blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk in PBS (immunoblot blocking
buffer) at room temperature for 2 h. After washing five times with
0.1% Tween 20 in PBS (immunoblot washing buffer), the membrane was
incubated at room temperature for 2 h with antiserum against
1LG1-LG5,
4LG5, synthetic peptide having the sequence in
4LG5, c-Myc, or GST diluted in immunoblot blocking buffer
1:1000 or 1:400 as the first antibody. After further washing, the
membrane was incubated at room temperature for 1 h with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) diluted in immunoblot blocking buffer to 1:1000 as
the second antibody. ECL Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) were used for developing.
Antisera--
Antisera against
4LG1-LG5,
4LG1-LG5, and
GST were raised by injecting the purified proteins into rabbits.
Antiserum against a synthetic peptide LDESFNIGLKFEI (residues
1652-1665 of mouse
4) was raised as described (29).
 |
RESULTS |
Overexpression of Mouse
4LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5--
dhfr-deficient CHO cells were transfected
with plasmids encoding the G domains of mouse laminin
1
(
1LG1-LG5) and
4 (
4LG1-LG5) chains, respectively, together
with a dhfr minigene (pGEMSVdhfr) (Fig.
1). Cells overexpressing and secreting
the G domains into the medium were selected among the clones resistant
to increasing concentrations of methotrexate by dot-blot immunoassay
using anti-c-Myc antiserum.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Plasmids encoding
1LG1-LG5 or 4LG1-LG5
sequences. Map of pEF 1Gmyc and pEF 4Gmyc and the strategy of
plasmid construction are summarized. Expression was under the control
of the elongation factor 1 (EF1 ) promoter. The cDNA sequence
encoding mouse 1LG1-LG5 or 4LG1-LG5 was inserted between
cDNA sequences of the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) signal
sequence for the delivery of products to the secretory pathway and
c-myc for epitope tagging. The modular structure of
the G domains is schematically shown with Y-shaped symbols
and letters C indicating the approximate positions of
N-glycosylation sites and cysteine residues,
respectively.
|
|
To test for N-glycosylation of
4LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5
in selected clones, media samples and lysates of cells grown in the presence and absence of tunicamycin were analyzed by SDS-gel
electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting with antiserum against c-Myc
(Fig. 2A). Faster migration of
the major band of ~120 kDa in the presence of tunicamycin indicates
N-glycosylation of both
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5. When
compared with
4LG1-LG5, the larger migration difference observed
for the tunicamycin-treated and untreated
1LG1-LG5 might reflect
the different number of potential N-glycosylation sites (7 in
1LG1-LG5; 4 in
4LG1-LG5; compare Fig. 1). In contrast to the
1LG1-LG5 expressing cells, tunicamycin treatment of the
4LG1-LG5 expressing cells nearly completely blocked
4LG1-LG5 secretion. Detection of several distinct minor bands migrating faster
than the full-length LG1-LG5 modules in the cell lysates suggests
intracellular degradation of intermediates. Some degradation was also
observed for the secreted proteins. Analysis of conditioned medium by
SDS-gel electrophoresis performed under reducing or nonreducing
conditions shows an increased mobility of the non-reduced
4LG1-LG5,
whereas the migration position of the major part of
1LG1-LG5
remained unaffected (Fig. 2B). This suggests a more compact
configuration for the oxidized
4LG1-LG5 due to intrachain disulfide
bonds, although the upward smear seen in the non-reduced sample could
be due to some heterogeneity. The unchanged mobility observed for most
of
1LG1-LG5 might indicate incomplete disulfide bond formation; the
weak band migrating faster under non-reducing conditions might reflect
a minor population with more disulfide bonds.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
N-Glycosylation and intrachain
disulfide bonding of 1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5. A, cells overexpressing
1LG1-LG5 ( 1G) or 4LG1-LG5 ( 4G) were allowed to attach to
culture dishes, washed with Dulbecco's modified PBS and fed with fresh
media with (+) or without ( ) 10 mg/ml tunicamycin. After 12 h,
cell lysates (C) and conditioned medium (M) were
separated by SDS electrophoresis in 12% acrylamide gels under reducing
conditions and immunoblotted with antiserum against c-Myc.
B, conditioned medium was separated by SDS electrophoresis
in 12% acrylamide gels under non-reducing and reducing conditions and
immunoblotted with antiserum against c-Myc. Positions of size
markers are indicated by arrowheads.
|
|
High Affinity Heparin Binding Activity of
4LG1-LG5--
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5 were purified by
heparin affinity chromatography. Applying a linear gradient, the
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5 eluted at salt concentrations of 300 and
470 mM, respectively, and analysis of column fractions by
SDS-gel electrophoresis showed major bands in the migration positions
of full-length G domains (Fig. 3). For
both proteins, minor bands could bee seen at positions corresponding to
about 50-60 kDa which on immunoblots were recognized by
1LG1-LG5-
or
4LG1-LG5-specific antisera (not shown). Addition of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to the medium directly after harvesting
reduced the amount of these contaminants suggesting that serine
protease(s) produced by CHO cells digested the products. The
differential heparin affinity of such fragments as especially observed
for
4LG1-LG5 suggests that some subdomains contain high and low
affinity binding sites.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Purification of
1LG1-LG5 and 4LG1-LG5 by
heparin columns. Conditioned medium (about 500 ml) of CHO cells
expressing 1LG1-LG5 or 4LG1-LG5 was applied to a 5-ml heparin
column, the column was washed and eluted with a NaCl gradient
(dashed line in A and C). The protein
elution profile as determined by the BCA assay (closed
circles) and SDS gels stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue of
column fractions are shown for 1LG1-LG5 (A and
B) or 4LG1-LG5 (C and D). Fraction
numbers are given at the top of the gels. Molecular weight
markers (lane M) and their size are shown on the
left.
|
|
Binding of G domains to solid-phase heparin confirmed the high affinity
of the
4 G domain (Fig. 4). Serially
diluted
1LG1-LG5 or
4LG1-LG5 was incubated with heparin bound
to the surface of multiwell plates. The concentrations required for
half-maximal binding determined with specific antisera were 14 and 1.4 nM for
1LG1-LG5 and
4LG1-LG5, respectively.
Antiserum against the c-Myc tag resulted in the same values
confirming that the higher affinity of
4LG1-LG5 was not due to
different titers of antisera. The half-maximal concentration determined
for
1LG1-LG5 is in the same range as previously reported (19). When
the same experiments were performed in the presence of 5 mM
Ca2+, no measurable changes for heparin affinity were
observed for
4LG1-LG5 (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Binding of 1
and 4 G domains to solid-phase heparin.
Binding of serially diluted 1LG1-LG5 or 4LG1-LG5 to solid-phase
heparin-BSA coated to the surface of multi-well plates was detected by
antisera against 1LG1-LG5 (anti- 1G),
4LG1-LG5(anti- 4G), or Myc tag
(anti-myc).
|
|
Characterization of Heparin Binding Activity of
4LG1-LG5--
The results in Fig. 5
show that N-glycan in
4LG1-LG5 is not essential for its
high affinity binding to heparin. To remove N-linked
carbohydrates,
4LG1-LG5 was treated with PNGase F. When analyzed by
gel electrophoresis, more than 80% of the product migrated in a
comparable position as the intracellular precursor produced in the
presence of tunicamycin (Fig. 5A). Despite the extensive
digestion of N-glycans,
4LG1-LG5 retained its high affinity to solid-phase heparin indicating that this activity is not
mediated by carbohydrates (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of N-glycan digestion on
heparin binding of 4LG1-LG5.
A, 4LG1-LG5 was treated with PNGase F and separated by
SDS-gel electrophoresis under reducing condition together with the
untreated protein and lysates of cells cultured in the presence or
absence of tunicamycin. 4LG1-LG5 was detected by immunoblotting
using specific antiserum. B, the binding activity of control
and PNGase F-treated 4LG1-LG5 to solid-phase heparin was determined
as described in the legend to Fig. 4 using antiserum against the
Myc tag.
|
|
To determine whether the heparin binding activity depends on the native
structure of
4LG1-LG5, de- and renaturation experiments with urea
were performed. Three heparin columns A, B, and C were loaded with
equal amounts of protein (Fig. 6). While
column A was left under native conditions, columns B and C were washed with 8 M urea. Column C was then washed with a buffer
without urea. All three columns were then eluted with a 0 to 800 mM NaCl gradient in the absence (columns A and C) or
presence (column B) of 8 M urea. Gel electrophoresis of the
column fractions showed that heparin binding activity was reduced to
about 180 mM NaCl for column B, but could be nearly
completely recovered by the renaturation step used on column C. Although denaturation of
4LG1-LG5 substantially lowers the
affinity, it is important to note that the denatured
4LG1-LG5
showed the affinity to heparin.

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of de- and renaturation of
4 G domain on heparin binding activity. Three
heparin columns (A, B, and C) were loaded with
purified 4LG1-LG5. Column A was washed with buffer B whereas
columns B and C were washed with buffer B containing 8 M
urea. Columns A and C were then washed with 3 ml of buffer B while
column B was washed with 3 ml of buffer B containing 8 M
urea. Columns were eluted with a 0-800 mM NaCl gradient in
buffer B which for column B contained 8 M urea. Gels of
fractions from column B show somewhat lower staining intensity which
might be due to a lower efficiency of trichloroacetic acid
precipitation in the presence of urea.
|
|
High and Low Affinity Heparin Binding Subdomains in the
4 G
Domain--
Endogenous protease(s) of CHO cells appeared to partially
degrade
4LG1-LG5 resulting in fragments with different affinity for
heparin (Fig. 3D). Since this suggests multiple
binding sites of different affinity, we tried to dissect
4LG1-LG5
by proteolytic digestion. Both chymotrypsin and trypsin applied at
enzyme/substrate ratios of 1/50 for 2 h converted most of the
intact
4LG1-LG5 into discrete fragments of 35-45 kDa as determined
by SDS electrophoresis. At higher enzyme/substrate ratios, additional
smaller fragments could be found. After loading chymotrypsin-digested
4LG1-LG5 on a heparin column equilibrated in 150 mM
NaCl, most protein appeared in the flow-through (Fig.
7A). Elution with a salt
gradient removed two major species at ~330 and ~480 mM
NaCl, respectively. SDS electrophoresis of peak 1 showed a single band
of 41 kDa whereas peak 2 showed two bands of 44 and 39 kDa (left panel
in Fig. 7B). Sequencing of the 41-kDa band resulted in
TQSRAAS corresponding to a start at residue 1037 suggesting that this
fragment contains LG2 and LG3 modules (Fig. 9). Sequencing of the 44- and 39-kDa bands gave the identical sequence KFLEQKE corresponding to a
start at residue 1437 which is within a hinge region connecting the LG3
and LG4 modules (Fig. 9). Both fragments thus contain the entire LG4
subdomain. Since the 44-kDa fragment was recognized by
anti-c-Myc antiserum (right panel in Fig.
7B), it covers the sequence down to the C terminus of G
domain. The 39-kDa fragment reacted with antiserum against a synthetic
peptide LDESFNIGLKFEIA1665 (middle panel in Fig.
7B) located close to the N terminus of the LG5 module (Fig.
9), but not with anti-Myc (right panel in Fig. 7B). The size of this fragment suggests that it covers the
LG4 module and about 80-90% of the LG5 module (Fig. 9). Despite that the exact cleavage sites were different, parallel analysis of tryptic
digests gave quite similar results: two peaks were eluted from the
heparin column with one (45 kDa) and two (40 and 35 kDa) bands detected
in these peaks. The low and high affinity fragments covered LG2-LG3
and LG4-LG5 modules, respectively (data not shown).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
High and low affinity heparin binding
4 G chymotryptic fragments. A,
4LG1-LG5 was partially digested with chymotrypsin (enzyme/substrate
ratio, 1:50, 37 °C, 2 h) and the digest was applied to a
heparin column. Bound protein eluted in two peaks corresponding to an
ionic strength of 330 and 480 mM. Closed circles
and dotted line indicate protein and estimated NaCl
concentrations, respectively. B, peak 1 and peak 2 fractions
were analyzed by SDS-gel electrophoresis and stained with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue, or were immunoblotted with antiserum against a
synthetic peptide of 4LG5 module (anti- 4LG5 peptide) or the c-Myc
tag (anti-c-myc).
|
|
To narrow down the identity of the high affinity binding site,
4LG1-LG5 was bound to heparin beads and extensively digested with
trypsin. The heparin bound form was chosen to protect the active
configuration. Two fragments of 35 and 23 kDa could be eluted at an
ionic strength of about 370-400 mM NaCl (Fig.
8A). Both fragments did not
react with anti-c-Myc, but they were recognized by
anti-
4LG1-LG5 antiserum (Fig. 8B). Sequencing of both
fragments gave identical N termini of AIEHAYQ corresponding to a start
at residue 1457 which is about the begin of LG4 module (Fig.
9). Since the 23-kDa fragment was
negative to antiserum against the
4LG5 peptide (Fig. 8B),
it seems to cover the entire LG4 module and perhaps some residues of
the LG5 module (Fig. 9). Thus, the 23-kDa fragment was the shortest
fragment preserving the high affinity heparin-binding site of
4LG1-LG5. The elution of this fragment from the heparin column at a
slightly lower NaCl concentration than that observed for the longer
fragments extending more into the LG5 subdomain (Fig. 7) suggests that
the sequence within LG5 can support the LG4-binding site.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
High affinity heparin-binding site in
4LG4 module. A, 4LG1-LG5 was
bound to a heparin column and digested with trypsin (2 h, 37 °C),
eluted with a NaCl gradient from 150 to 600 mM, and 1-ml
fractions were collected. Fractions 18-20, corresponding to about
370-400 mM salt, were analyzed by Tricine electrophoresis,
and the gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. B,
immunoblots using antiserum against the c-Myc tag
(myc), the synthetic peptide of 4LG5 (peptide)
and 4LG1-LG5 ( 4G) are shown.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Regions of 4LG1-LG5
contained in chymotryptic and tryptic fragments. The N-terminal
sequences and estimated sizes of the chymotryptic and tryptic fragments
of are shown aligned to schematic modular structure of 4LG1-LG5
with triangles indicating the approximate positions of
N-glycosylation sites and cysteine residues. The positions
of 12 cysteine residues and their estimated disulfide bondings are
indicated at the bottom.
|
|
Competition of Synthetic Peptides within
4LG4 Module for Heparin
Binding--
To further specify the high affinity heparin-binding
site, a series of 24 overlapping 12-mer synthetic peptides were
synthesized which cover the sequence region of residues 1450 to 1651 including the entire LG4 module (Fig.
10A). Peptides (~200
µM) were added to a mixture of
4LG1-LG5 (~0.4
µM) and heparin-coated beads to find which sequence can
compete for the binding of
4LG1-LG5 to heparin. As some peptides
(see asterisks in Fig. 10A) were insoluble in
aqueous solvent, they were omitted from the assay. Except for peptide
A4G-93, none of them contains any basic residue and thus they are
unlikely to cover a heparin-binding site. Only peptide A4G-82 was able
to strongly compete for heparin binding with
4LG1-LG5, although
A4G-83 showed some weak activity (Fig. 10B). This suggests that two basic amino acids (His1518 and
Arg1520) in the sequence TLFLAHGRLVFM1524 are important for
the high affinity binding of the
4 G domain. The inactivity of
peptides A4G-82S and -82T consisting of the same amino acids but in a
randomly scrambled order indicates the significance of the specific
positioning and context of these basic residues. When the peptide
concentration was reduced to ~20 µM, the competitive
effect of A4G-82 was hardly detectable. This indicates that a more than
50-fold molar excess of peptide was needed to bind to heparin at
efficiency comparable to that of
4LG1-LG5.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Competition of synthetic peptides with
4LG1-LG5 for heparin binding. A, a
series of overlapping peptides covering 4LG4 module were
synthesized. A4G-82S and -82T contain the same residues as peptide
A4G-82 but in scrambled order. The two cysteine residues of the 4LG4
sequence which would be located between A4G-93/94 and A4G-95/96 were
omitted. Asterisks denote peptides that were insoluble in
aqueous solution. B, 4LG1-LG5 (~0.4 mM),
peptides (~200 mM), and heparin-coated beads were
incubated for 1 h at 4 °C, washed, and eluted with SDS sample
buffer which was analyzed by gel electrophoresis followed by staining
with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. A control sample without peptide is
shown in the left lanes ( ). C, the 4LG4
sequence environment of peptide A4G-82 is shown aligned to the mouse
2LG5 module ( 2LG5) which high resolution structure has been
solved (21). The position of  strands D to G of 2GL5 is
indicated by boxes. Basic and acidic residues of 4LG4 are
highlighted by dots and triangles,
respectively.
|
|
Heparin Binding Activity of Recombinant
4LG4 Module Having
Mutation at His1518 or Arg1520--
To confirm
the critical role of basic amino acids in peptide A4G-83, we produced a
GST fusion protein of
4LG4 module in E. coli by
constructing a pGEX plasmid harboring cDNA encoding the sequence
from Ser1452 through Pro1636 with mutation of
none, R1518A, or H1520A. pGEX was our choice to extract the product
from bacteria by sonication. When the extract from the clone producing
wild type
4LG4 fusion protein was applied to a heparin column,
one-half of the protein was detected in unbound fraction probably due
to overloading, but the least was eluted at NaCl concentration of
400-500 mM (Fig. 11). GST
sequence alone showed no affinity to heparin (Fig. 11). This showed
that the bacterial system could produce the
4LG4 module with similar
configuration as in the CHO system. The affinity was comparable to the
44- and 39-kDa fragments (Fig. 7) but was higher than the 35- and
23-kDa fragment (Fig. 8), suggesting that Arg1456 may
contribute to heparin binding. Mutation of R1518A reduced the affinity
and the protein was eluted at NaCl concentrations of 100-200
mM (Fig. 11). Mutation of H1520A showed a more dramatic effect and almost totally ruined the affinity of the
4LG4 module (Fig. 11). We thus found that the sequence of AHGRL1521 was critical for heparin binding.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Heparin binding activity of GST fusion
protein of 4LG4 module having mutation of
R1518A or H1520R. GST fusion protein of 4LG4
(GST- 4LG4), its mutant of R1518A
(GST- 4LG4(R/A)), of
H1220A (GST- 4LG4(H/A))
or GST was extracted from E. coli of the corresponding clone
and loaded to a heparin-Sepharose column. After washing with a buffer
containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 2 mM
EDTA, the column was eluted stepwise by the same buffer containing the
indicated concentration of NaCl. 10 µl of the fractions was separated
by SDS electrophoresis using 12% acrylamide gel and the proteins were
detected by immunoblot with antiserum against 4LG1-5 or GST.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
When compared with other laminin G domains so far studied
(15-21),
4 G domain shows the highest affinity to heparin.
4LG1-LG5 eluted from a heparin column at a NaCl concentration of
470 mM (Fig. 3C) whereas different LG modules of
1 and
2 chains, and the whole
1 G domain were eluted at an
ionic strength of 140-360 mM (15, 17, 19). The
1LG1-LG5 prepared by us also eluted at 300 mM NaCl
(Fig. 3A). In a solid phase binding assay using immobilized
heparin, the concentrations of
4LG1-LG5 and
1LG1-LG5 required
for half-maximal binding were 1.4 and 14 nM, respectively (Fig. 4). For the
1 G domain, this value is in the same range as
reported for various
1 and
2 LG modules (19). The half-maximal concentration of 3 nM reported recently for
5LG4-LG5
(21) was yet higher than we found for
4LG1-LG5. The affinity of
4 G domain is comparable to that found for the high affinity heparin
binding type III repeats in fibronectin (41) and for the
heparin-binding region present within the triple helical part of the
collagen
1(V) chain (42), but lower than the extremely high affinity of lipoprotein lipase (43) and antithrombin III (44). The physiological
significance of this high affinity of
4 G domain remains unclear. In
laminins containing the full size
chains (
1 and
2), further
heparin-binding sites have been mapped to the N-terminal domain (45).
As these regions are absent in the truncated
3 (2) and
4 chains
(27, 29, 30, 33), an enhanced affinity to heparan sulfate proteoglycans
at the C termini might produce a basement membrane architecture
different from that suggested for the laminins containing the full-size
laminin chains (46).
As shown for
1 G domain (15, 16), trypsin and chymotrypsin digestion
of
4LG1-LG5 produced fragments with differential affinity to
heparin. Our fragments of low affinity eluting at 330 mM
NaCl consisted of LG2-LG3 modules; the high affinity fragments eluting
at 480 mM NaCl contained LG4-LG5 modules (Fig. 7).
Extensive digestion into the LG4 module slightly reduced its affinity
(Fig. 8), but it still retained high affinity comparable to the whole
4LG1-LG5. This indicates that the binding sites are independent and
do not cooperate to enhance the affinity to heparin. This is different
from the heparin-binding site of antithrombin III, where seven lysine
and arginine residues line a 50-Å cannel supported by the whole
structure of the molecule (44). In that situation, the key residues can
cooperate with each other to produce extremely high affinity requiring
2 M NaCl to be eluted from a heparin column. Digestion of
4LG1-LG5 with PNGase F did not alter the affinity to heparin (Fig.
5B). Considering that all putative
N-glycosylation sites are within LG2-LG3 modules (Fig. 9),
however, this does not prove that N-glycans are dispensable.
Since the affinity of the whole
4LG1-LG5 was determined by the most
potential site located within the LG4 module, there remains a
possibility that binding of the LG2-LG3 low affinity site to heparin
might be affected by the digestion but binding of the whole molecule
was supported by the high affinity site within LG4 module.
Treatment of
4LG1-LG5 with 8 M urea reversibly
diminished its heparin binding activity (Fig. 6), indicating that
binding depends on the local configuration despite the independence of individual binding sites. Since the binding activity could be recovered
to the high affinity exerted mainly by LG4 module after withdrawal of
urea, the effect of denaturation/renaturation on the binding activity
of whole
4LG1-LG5 was expected to reflect the configuration of LG4
module. Notably, weak but distinct affinity to heparin was even
retained in the presence of 8 M urea (Fig. 6B),
suggesting that some affinity is independent of the correct tertiary
structure. Based on these observations, we tested the competition of a
series of overlapping synthetic peptides covering the entire LG4
sequence for the binding with
4LG1-LG5 to heparin beads.
Surprisingly, peptide A4G-82 containing only two basic residues,
His1518 and Arg1520, specifically competed for
binding whereas peptides containing two large basic clusters, namely
Lys1492-Arg1494-His1497 in A4G-79
and
His1529-Lys1530-Lys1531-Lys1533
in A4G-84, did not show any activity (Fig. 10B).
Site-directed mutagenesis of the sequence by producing GST fusion
proteins of the
4LG4 module in E. coli confirmed the
critical role of His1518 and Arg1520 (Fig. 11).
Alignment of
4LG4 sequence with that of the
2LG5 module (Fig.
10C) suggests that the peptide A4G-82 sequence relates to
the turn between strands E and F in the recently determined
2LG5
structure (22). Thus, His1518 and Arg1520 would
be extruded at the opposite edge of the 14-stranded
-sheet sandwich
structure to where a calcium ion binds. The neighboring basic cluster
of His1529 to Lys1533 represented by peptide
A4G-84 would correspond to the turn connecting strands F and G (Fig.
10C) close to the calcium ion coordinating center in
2LG5
(20). The
4LG4 module contains a cluster of acidic amino acids
Asp1506-Glu1508-Glu1509-Asp1511
which matches to the turn between strands D and E (Fig. 10C)
and would be extruded to the calcium ion binding edge. In our
solid-phase binding assay, measurements of the heparin affinity of the
4 G domain showed identical results in the presence and absence of 5 mM Ca2+. The
4LG4 high affinity site for
heparin binding is thus opposite to the edge responsible for the
interaction with calcium ion, heparin, and
-dystroglycan in
2LG5
(20).
A 500-fold concentration of A4G-82 was needed to observe the
competition. This suggested that only a small part of the A4G-82 peptide had the correct configuration of the heparin-binding site. Alternatively, some additional sequence motif adjacent to the E-F turn
might be needed for the high affinity heparin binding. The crystal
structure of the
2LG5 module predicts that another basic amino acid
cluster of Lys1492-Arg1494-His1497
at the N terminus of the strand D (Fig. 10C) might be
adjacent to F-G turn. Although the peptide representing this cluster
(A4G-79) alone did not show competitive effect (Fig. 10B),
we could expect that
Lys1492-Arg1494-His1497 would
cooperate with His1518-Arg1520 to organize a
high affinity heparin-binding site. Combination of A4G-82 and A4G-79 in
the competition assay, however, did not show any synergetic effect on
the competition activity of A4G-82 (data not shown).
Crystal structure of the
2LG4 and LG5 module pair showed that the
extended N-terminal sequence (the linker sequence between LG3 and LG4
modules) is disulfide bonded to the LG5 module and the paired modules
are arranged in a V-shaped fashion related by a 110° rotation to
locate two calcium-binding sites 65 Å apart at the tips of the domains
opposite the polypeptide termini (23). Because of this extra disulfide
bonding, LG5 is likely to be closer in space to the LG1-LG3 portion
than LG4. LG4 might be thus extruded from the main body of G domain.
Although the edge opposite the calcium ion-binding site comes to the
bottom of V-shape arrangement of the modules, the E-F turn is exposed
outside of the contacting interface. Thus, the high affinity
heparin-binding site suggested in
4LG4 might be located at the tip
of entire laminin molecule for facilitated access to other
extracellular matrix components. When overlapped on
4G4 sequence,
the extra disulfide bonding fond in
2LG4-LG5 pair correspond to a
bonding between Cys1449 and Cys1719 (7th and
10th cysteines in Fig. 9). It is intriguing that the 39-kDa fragment in
chymotrypsin disgusts (Fig. 7) contained this putative disulfide
bonding whereas the shortest fragments of 35 and 23 kDa in trypsin
digests of
4LG1-LG5 bound to heparin (Fig. 8) did not (Fig. 9).
Reduced affinity of the latter fragments suggests that the extra
disulfide bonding is also important for heparin binding by combining
the N-terminal half of LG5 to LG4 module.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aids 09460046 and
11460154 for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education,
Science, Culture and Sports of Japan (to Y. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These authors contributed equally to the results of this work.
**
Visiting research professor supported by the Ministry of Education,
Science, Culture and Sports of Japan.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Graduate School of
Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya-shi 464-8601, Japan. Tel./Fax: 81-52-789-5227; E-mail: i45073a@nucc.cc.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003103200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LG, laminin G-like
domain;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
kb, kilobase(s);
nt, nucleotide(s);
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase;
dhfr, DHFR gene;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PNGase
F, peptide-N4-(acetyl-
-glucosaminyl)-asparagine
amidase;
RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction;
Tricine, N-
[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Burgeson, R. E.,
Chiquet, M.,
Deutzmann, R.,
Ekblom, P.,
Engel, J.,
Kleinman, H.,
Martin, G. R.,
Meneguzzi, G.,
Paulsson, M.,
Sanes, J.,
Timpl, R.,
Tryggvason, K.,
Yamada, Y.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1994)
Matrix Biol.
14,
209-211
|
| 2.
|
Ryan, M. C.,
Tizard, R.,
VanDevanter, D. R.,
and Carter, W. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22779-22787
|
| 3.
|
Iivanainen, A.,
Sainio, K.,
Sariola, H.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
365,
183-188
|
| 4.
|
Miner, J. H.,
Patton, B. L.,
Lentz, S. I.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Snider, W. D.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
and Sanes, J. R.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
685-701
|
| 5.
|
Miner, J. H.,
Lewis, R. M.,
and Sanes, J. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28523-28526
|
| 6.
|
Koch, M.,
Olson, P. F.,
Albus, A.,
Jin, W.,
Hunter, D. D.,
Brunken, W. J.,
Burgeson, R. E.,
and Champliaud, M. F.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
605-618
|
| 7.
|
Iivanainen, A.,
Morita, T.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14107-14111
|
| 8.
|
Beck, K.,
Hunter, I.,
and Engel, J.
(1990)
FASEB J.
4,
148-160
|
| 9.
|
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Cheng, Y. S.,
and Schittny, J. C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
3981-3991
|
| 10.
|
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Cheng, Y. S.,
and Colognato, H.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
1119-1133
|
| 11.
|
Cheng, Y. S.,
Champliaud, M. F.,
Burgeson, R. E.,
Marinkovich, M. P.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31525-31532
|
| 12.
|
Ott, U.,
Odermatt, E.,
Engel, J.,
Furthmayr, H.,
and Timpl, R.
(1982)
Eur. J. Biochem.
123,
63-72
|
| 13.
|
Ervasti, J. M.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
809-823
|
| 14.
|
Gee, S. H.,
Blacher, R. W.,
Douville, P. J.,
Provost, P. R.,
Yurchenco, P. D.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14972-14980
|
| 15.
|
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Sung, U.,
Ward, M. D.,
Yamada, Y.,
and O'Rear, J. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
8356-8365
|
| 16.
|
Sung, U.,
O'Rear, J. J.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
250,
138-143
|
| 17.
|
Sung, U.,
O'Rear, J. J.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1255-1268
|
| 18.
|
Talts, J. F.,
Mann, K.,
Yamada, Y.,
and Timpl, R.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
426,
71-76
|
| 19.
|
Talts, J. F.,
Andac, Z.,
Göhring, W.,
Brancaccio, A.,
and Timpl, R.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
863-870
|
| 20.
|
Andac, Z.,
Sasaki, T.,
Mann, K.,
Brancaccio, A.,
Deutzmann, R.,
and Timpl, R.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
287,
253-264 |