JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001156200 on June 29, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 38, 29562-29569, September 22, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/38/29562    most recent
M001156200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Runge, S.
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Runge, S.
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

H19 RNA Binds Four Molecules of Insulin-like Growth Factor II mRNA-binding Protein*

Steffen RungeDagger , Finn Cilius Nielsen§, Jacob NielsenDagger , Jens Lykke-AndersenDagger , Ulla M. Wewer||, and Jan ChristiansenDagger **

From the Dagger  RNA Regulation Centre, Institute of Molecular Biology, and the || Institute of Molecular Pathology, University of Copenhagen, DK-1307 Copenhagen, the § Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

Received for publication, February 11, 2000, and in revised form, June 14, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

H19 RNA is a major oncofetal 2.5-kilobase untranslated RNA of unknown function. The maternally expressed H19 gene is located 90 kilobase pairs downstream from the paternally expressed insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) gene on human chromosome 11 and mouse chromosome 7; and due to their reciprocal imprinting and identical spatiotemporal expression, it is assumed that the two genes are functionally coupled. Here we show that human H19 RNA contains four attachment sites for the oncofetal IGF-II mRNA-binding protein (IMP) with apparent Kd values in the 0.4-1.3 nM range. The multiple attachment sites are clustered within a 700-nucleotide segment encoded by exons 4 and 5. This 3'-terminal segment targets H19 RNA to lamellipodia and perinuclear regions in dispersed fibroblasts where IMP is also localized. The results suggest that IMP participates in H19 RNA localization and provides a link between the IGF-II and H19 genes at post-transcriptional events during mammalian development.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The mammalian H19 gene was identified more than a decade ago. Despite intense efforts, the function of the gene product, H19 RNA, remains enigmatic (1). The H19 gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase II and encodes five exons and four unusually small introns (80-96 nucleotides in humans). The primary transcript is fully processed into a mature 2.5-kilobase polyadenylated RNA that is exported to the cytoplasm (2). The exons are considerably more conserved than the introns, and the mature H19 RNA does not exhibit any conserved open reading frames, arguing for a function of H19 as an untranslated RNA (3).

H19 RNA is expressed during fetal development, predominantly in tissues of mesodermal and endodermal origin, and down-regulated at birth (4). It is also expressed in several tumors in tissues that normally express H19 RNA only during fetal development, thus exhibiting the characteristics of an oncofetal factor (5). The spatiotemporal distribution of H19 RNA is strikingly similar to that of IGF-II1 mRNAs, reflecting the physical linkage and reciprocal imprinting of the two genes (6). The H19 gene, which is situated ~90 kilobase pairs downstream from the IGF-II gene and transcribed in the same direction, is generally expressed from the maternal allele of human chromosome 11 and mouse chromosome 7 (7), whereas the IGF-II gene usually is expressed from the paternal allele (8). In cells of endodermal lineage, the reciprocal imprinting of the two genes has been rationalized in terms of an enhancer competition model (9). However, strict enhancer competition is not sufficient (10) since an intergenic differentially methylated domain in the H19 upstream region is crucial in achieving the proper monoallelic usage (11). Although the reciprocal imprinting of the H19 and IGF-II genes appears to be a general phenomenon, there are exceptions with monoallelic expression of one gene and biallelic expression of the other (12, 13).

Subcytoplasmic localization of RNAs is a conserved mechanism of polarizing genetic information in the establishment of asymmetries during oocyte and embryonic development and in somatic cells such as fibroblasts and neurons. The number of identified localized RNAs with different biological functions is approaching 100, including mRNAs, mitochondrial large ribosomal RNA, and other untranslated RNAs in metazoans such as Drosophila and Xenopus (reviewed in Ref. 14). Moreover, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is also able to localize mRNA (15). Localization mechanisms such as differential protection from degradation, local anchoring, and active directed transport have been described, and a common theme is that cis-acting elements target the RNA to its cytoplasmic destination. The phylogenetically conserved trans-acting factors Vera/Vg1 RNA-binding protein (Vg1RBP) and Staufen contain multiple RNA-binding modules that recognize localization elements, implying that general molecular mechanisms mediate RNA transport (16-19). The integrity of the cytoskeleton is crucial for both transport and anchoring, and the molecular interactions between the translocation complex and the cytoskeletal vehicles are emerging (reviewed in Refs. 14 and 20).

Recently, we identified and characterized a family of mammalian IGF-II mRNA-binding proteins (IMPs) that contains two RNA recognition motifs and four heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K homology domains (21). Similar proteins have been proposed to mediate the subcytoplasmic localization of Vg1 and beta -actin mRNAs in Xenopus oocytes and chicken embryo fibroblasts, respectively (16, 17, 22). In this study, we show that four molecules of this family of RNA-binding proteins bind to the 3'-part of H19 RNA and that the latter is sufficient to direct subcytoplasmic localization of H19 RNA. We suggest that the H19 and IGF-II genes are linked mechanistically at the post-transcriptional level and that IMP participates in the subcytoplasmic localization of H19 RNA.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

H19 Constructs-- The human H19 cDNA (2313 base pairs) was generated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction from human fetal liver total RNA (CLONTECH) using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene). The amplified fragment was inserted into the in vitro transcription vector pGEM-11f (Promega) and into the in vivo intronless expression vector pCB6+ (23). DNA fragments encoding H19 RNA segments C (positions 1-1613), E (positions 1612-2313), H (positions 1836-2008), J (positions 1923-2008), and K (positions 2006-2313) were generated by polymerase chain reaction using full-length H19 cDNA as the template for Pfu DNA polymerase, and the amplified fragments were inserted into pGEM-11f and pCB6+.

In Vitro RNA Synthesis-- RNA segments were generated by in vitro transcription of linearized DNA templates with T7 RNA polymerase and purified by denaturing gel electrophoresis or by gel filtration in Microspin S-300 columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). In UV cross-linking studies, a 10-µl random labeling reaction contained 100 µM unlabeled UTP and 3 µl of [alpha -32P]UTP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), generating RNA with a specific activity of 30 Ci/mmol uridine monophosphate. In electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, the concentration of unlabeled UTP was lowered to 20 µM, thereby increasing the specific activity of uridine monophosphate in RNA to 150 Ci/mmol.

Antisense H19 RNA probes for in situ hybridization, incorporating either digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) or ChromaTide Texas Red-5-UTP (Molecular Probes, Inc.), were generated by SP6 RNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and subsequently exposed to partial base hydrolysis. The final concentrations of digoxigenin-11-UTP/Texas Red-5-UTP and UTP during in vitro transcription were 0.35 and 0.65 mM, respectively.

UV Cross-linking-- In a final volume of 10 µl, 20-50 fmol of radiolabeled RNA (100 nCi) were incubated with 15 µg of total protein from a cytoplasmic extract of human HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells for 25 min at room temperature in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 140 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 2% glycerol, and 0.1 µg/µl Escherichia coli tRNA. Samples were irradiated in a Stratalinker 1800 (Stratagene) with UV light at 254 nm for 20 min in an ice-water bath, and RNA was digested by 1 µg of RNase A for 30 min at 37 °C. Samples were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Analysis-- In a final volume of 10 µl, 100-300 amol of radiolabeled RNA (2 nCi) were incubated with 0.1-2.0 nM recombinant IMP-1 or glutathione S-transferase-tagged polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (GST-PTB) for 20 min at 30 °C in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 5% glycerol, 0.01% Triton X-100, 0.004% bromphenol blue, and 0.1 µg/µl E. coli tRNA. Samples were chilled on ice, and 1 µl of 10% Ficoll-400 was added. Nondenaturing gel electrophoresis was carried out on a 5% polyacrylamide gel containing 90 mM Tris borate (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl2 at 4 °C and 80 V for 6 h. The recombinant proteins were expressed and purified as described previously (21).

Probing with Ribonucleases-- H19 segment H was dephosphorylated by calf intestinal phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and 5'-end labeling was carried out by T4 polynucleotide kinase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP using standard conditions. After each step, full-length transcripts were purified by denaturing gel electrophoresis. The end-labeled RNA was renatured and probed with ribonucleases T1, T2, and V1, and the G and A sequencing tracks were obtained by partial digestion with ribonucleases T1 and U2 as described previously (24).

Northern Analysis-- Total RNA was isolated from mouse embryos by the guanidinium thiocyanate method (25). RNA was denatured in glyoxal/dimethyl sulfoxide, separated on a 1% agarose gel, transferred to a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and hybridized with 32P-labeled cDNA probes. Autoradiography was carried out from 16 to 48 h, and the hybridization signals were visualized with a Fuji BAS 2000 Bioimager. A mouse H19 cDNA probe for Northern analysis was generated by polymerase chain reaction and includes positions 103-979, whereas the IGF-II and IMP cDNAs were coding region probes.

Cell Culture and Cytoplasmic Extracts-- Human HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells and mouse NIH 3T3 embryo fibroblast cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum or in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% calf serum. Stable transfectants of NIH 3T3 cells expressing GFP-IMP-1 were generated by retrovirus-mediated insertion of a construct encoding full-length IMP-1 fused to the C terminus of GFP. A cell pellet of ~5 × 107 confluent HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells was resuspended in 1 ml of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 140 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol) and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 × g and 4 °C. The supernatant was made 5% in glycerol and stored at 80 °C in aliquots containing ~5 µg of protein/µl.

In Situ Hybridization-- NIH 3T3 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% calf serum. Cells were transiently transfected with LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.) or Superfect reagent (QIAGEN Inc.) according to the manufacturers' instructions. Briefly, 30,000 cells/cm2 were seeded on poly-L-lysine-coated microscope slides 24 h prior to transfection. Cells were transfected with 2 µg/ml pCB6+H19, pCB6+H19Delta F, pCB6+H19Delta H, pCB6+E, or pCB6+C and left for 48 h before the medium was changed to Dulbecco's minimal essential medium without phenol red for 3 h. The cells were then fixed in 4% (w/v) formaldehyde, 5% (w/v) acetic acid, and 0.9% (w/v) NaCl at room temperature for 30 min. After de- and rehydration, the slides were incubated with 5 ng/µl digoxigenin- or Texas Red-labeled and base-hydrolyzed antisense H19 RNA probe in 50% formamide, 900 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), 5× Denhardt's solution, 0.5% SDS, and 100 ng/ml salmon sperm DNA for 16 h at 42 °C and washed in 60% formamide, 300 mM NaCl, and 30 mM sodium citrate. The slides incubated with digoxigenin-labeled RNA were subsequently incubated with alkaline phosphatase-coupled anti-digoxigenin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 90 min at room temperature and developed with nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 5-10 min.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of H19 RNA-binding Proteins by UV Cross-linking-- In an initial attempt to identify proteins that associate with H19 RNA, a UV cross-linking strategy was adopted. Full-length H19 RNA and seven RNA segments (Fig. 1) were randomly 32P-labeled and subjected to UV light at 254 nm in the presence of a cytoplasmic extract from human HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Fig. 1B shows the autoradiographs from the resulting SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of full-length H19 RNA and the three 5'-terminal RNA segments A-C (left panel) and the corresponding analysis of the four 3'-RNA segments E-H (right panel). Full-length H19 RNA exhibited three cross-links migrating at apparent masses of 50, 69, and 100 kDa. The 5'-terminal segments A-C cross-linked predominantly to the p100 species and did not cross-link to the p69 species. The four 3'-segments give rise to a cross-linking pattern similar to that of full-length H19 RNA, but with an additional signal at 60 kDa. The 50- and 100-kDa bands appear in cross-links with RNAs other than the H19 RNA segments, and the p50 species has tentatively been identified as the major core protein that associates unspecifically with RNA (26). If 4-thiouridine was incorporated during in vitro transcriptions and UV irradiation was carried out at 365 nm, a similar band pattern was observed.2


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   UV cross-linking of 32P-labeled H19 RNA to a cytoplasmic extract of human HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. A, outline of full-length H19 RNA (2313 nucleotides) with contributing exons 1 (1328 nucleotides), 2 (135 nucleotides), 3 (113 nucleotides), 4 (123 nucleotides), and 5 (614 nucleotides) and of RNA segments used in the cross-linking experiments. B, autoradiographs from UV cross-linking of full-length H19 RNA and the three 5'-terminal RNA segments A (positions 1-252), B (positions 1-946), and C (positions 1-1613) (left panel) and from UV cross-linking of full-length H19 RNA and the four 3'-part RNA segments E (positions 1612-2313), F (positions 1612-2005), G (positions 1612-1880), and H (positions 1836-2008) (right panel). C, cross-linking of segment F in the presence (F) or absence (-CE) of cytoplasmic extract or after treatment with proteinase K (+PK). Protein species and their sizes in kilodaltons are indicated to the left.

Since a UV cross-linking profile can be sensitive to the magnesium ion concentration, cross-linking of segment F was examined at various concentrations of magnesium ions. Fig. 2A shows that the 60-kDa signal was predominant at concentrations at or below 1 mM, but was absent at 10 mM Mg2+. The presence of 0.5 µg of 23 S rRNA was unable to change the cross-linking pattern substantially (Fig. 2B). We infer that H19 RNA cross-links to at least four protein species and that the 173-nucleotide segment H in the 3'-part exhibits a similar cross-linking profile.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Magnesium ion dependence of UV cross-linking of 32P-labeled segment F. A shows the effects of increasing magnesium ion concentration, and B demonstrates the effects of increasing amounts of E. coli 23 S rRNA on the relative cross-linking efficiencies of p100, p69, p60, and p50.

H19 RNA and IGF-II Leader 3 Are Cross-linked to the Same Proteins-- In a previous study of IGF-II mRNA-binding proteins, we showed that four proteins (p50, p60, p69, and p100) from an RD rhabdomyosarcoma lysate are able to cross-link to IGF-II leader 3 (21). Moreover, we identified p60 as PTB and p69 as a member of the novel RNA-binding family termed IMP. Therefore, full-length H19 RNA and IGF-II leader 3 were cross-linked in parallel to a HepG2 cytoplasmic lysate and co-electrophoresed with H19 segment F cross-linked to the same lysate and also to recombinant IMP-1 and GST-PTB. The autoradiograph in Fig. 3A shows that full-length H19 RNA, IGF-II leader 3, and H19 segment F were cross-linked to comigrating protein species and that recombinant IMP-1 gave rise to a cross-link with segment F that comigrated with the p69 band from the lysate. Moreover, recombinant GST-PTB (86 kDa) could also be cross-linked to segment F. 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, UV cross-linking of H19 RNA (lane 1), H19 segment F (lane 2), and full-length IGF-II leader 3 (lane 3) to a cytoplasmic extract of HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Lanes 4 and 5 show H19 segment F cross-linked to recombinant IMP-1 and GST-PTB, respectively. The cross-linked protein species and their sizes in kilodaltons are indicated to the left, and the positions of cross-linked recombinant IMP-1 and GST-PTB are indicated to the right. B, competition between H19 segment H and IGF-II leader 3 segment C for cytoplasmic RNA-binding proteins. The autoradiograph shows UV cross-linking of 32P-labeled H19 segment H to a cytoplasmic extract of HepG2 cells in the presence of the indicated nanomolar amounts of unlabeled IGF-II leader 3 segment C (IGF-II seg. C) or H19 segment H (H19 seg. H). The cross-linked protein species and their sizes in kilodaltons are indicated to the right.

Since the small H19 segment H could account for the cross-linking profile of full-length H19 RNA (Fig. 1) and since a previous study established that 162 nucleotides of IGF-II leader 3 (termed segment C) binds with high affinity (Kd = 0.1 nM) to recombinant IMP-1 (21), 32P-labeled H19 segment H was subjected to a cross-linking experiment in the presence of unlabeled IGF-II segment C or unlabeled H19 segment H. The unlabeled competitor was added at final concentrations of 10 and 100 nM, corresponding to 2- and 20-fold molar excesses, respectively. Fig. 3B shows that the intensity of the p69 cross-linking signal was decreased, whereas the intensity of the p100 signal was increased in the presence of a 20-fold molar excess, regardless of the type of unlabeled competitor. The results show that H19 RNA and IGF-II leader 3 exhibit a virtually identical UV cross-linking pattern and suggest that the p69 and p60 cross-linking signals originate from IMP and PTB, respectively.

H19 Segment H Binds IMP-1 and GST-PTB with High Affinity-- To establish firmly that IMP and PTB are able to bind to H19 RNA, an electrophoretic mobility shift analysis was carried out with the 173-nucleotide segment H and recombinant IMP-1 and GST-PTB. Fig. 4 shows autoradiographs from nondenaturing gel electrophoresis of 32P-labeled segment H with increasing concentrations of recombinant IMP-1 (panel A) and with increasing concentrations of recombinant GST-PTB (panel B). In the examined protein concentration range of 0.15-1.6 nM, segment H was able to bind one molecule of IMP-1 with an apparent Kd of 0.4 nM, whereas in the concentration range of 0.25-1.5 nM, GST-PTB exhibited one attachment site with an apparent Kd of 0.7 nM. At higher GST-PTB concentrations, an additional attachment site was revealed.2 We infer that segment H in H19 RNA behaves similarly to IGF-II leader 3 (21) by being able to bind recombinant IMP-1 and GST-PTB with high affinity.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of H19 segment H with IMP-1 and GST-PTB. A, autoradiograph showing the mobility shift of 32P-labeled H19 segment H (H19 seg. H) with recombinant IMP-1 in the concentration range of 0.1-1.6 nM, as indicated above each lane. The positions of unbound RNA and the RNA-protein complex are shown to the left. B, autoradiograph showing the mobility shift of 32P-labeled H19 segment H with recombinant GST-PTB in the concentration range of 0.25-1.5 nM, as indicated above each lane. The positions of unbound RNA and the RNA-protein complex are shown to the left.

H19 RNA Binds Four Molecules of IMP-1-- Since the 5'-terminal 1.6 kilobases of H19 RNA are unable to cross-link to p69 (Fig. 1) and since one molecule of IMP-1 binds to segment H in the 3'-part of H19 RNA, we examined whether additional IMP-binding sites are present in the 3'-end of H19 RNA. Mobility shift analyses of segments F-K were carried out at an IMP-1 concentration range of 0.25-1.75 nM, and Fig. 5 corroborates that segment H encompasses one IMP-binding site with an apparent Kd of 0.4 nM. Furthermore, it reveals that segment G exhibits two binding sites with apparent Kd values of 0.75 and 1.3 nM and that segment F, which includes both segments G and H, contains three binding sites with Kd values of 0.4, 0.75, and 1.3 nM. Segment K at the 3' terminus contains one binding site with an apparent Kd of 1.0 nM.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Stoichiometric analysis of IMP-1-binding sites for the 3'-part of H19 RNA by electrophoretic mobility shift analysis. An outline of full-length H19 RNA and the analyzed RNA segments is shown at the top. The autoradiographs show mobility shifts of 32P-labeled H19 segments F, G, H, I (positions 1836-1922), J (positions 1923-2008), and K (positions 2006-2313) with recombinant IMP-1 in the concentration range of 0.25-1.75 nM, as indicated above each lane. IGF-II leader 4 (100 nucleotides) was examined in the IMP-1 concentration range of 0.5-10 nM.

In an attempt to reduce further the size of the high affinity binding site in segment H, subsegments I and J were generated. Fig. 5 shows that none of the subsegments nor IGF-II leader 4 was able to bind IMP-1. We conclude that H19 RNA is able to bind four molecules of IMP-1.

Putative RNA Secondary Structure of Segment H-- To gain insight into a putative RNA secondary structure of the high affinity attachment site, we subjected 5'-end-labeled segment H to probing with ribonucleases T1, T2, and V1 (24). Ribonuclease T1 monitors unpaired guanosines; ribonuclease T2 preferentially attacks unpaired adenosines; and ribonuclease V1 exhibits helical specificity. Fig. 6A is an autoradiograph showing the results of the enzymatic probing experiment, and Fig. 6B depicts the derived putative secondary structure. The striking feature of segment H is that besides two hairpins, it is unstructured in a classical Watson-Crick sense. The unstructured regions exhibit reactivities toward both single-stranded probes T1 and T2 and the helical probe V1. Cleavages by V1 suggest that these pyrimidine-rich regions exhibit base stacking in the naked RNA. Computer foldings of human and mouse H19 segment H by the program RNAdraw (27) generated secondary structures similar to the one depicted in Fig. 6B.2


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Secondary structure analysis of 5'-end-labeled H19 segment H. A, autoradiograph showing the results of partial digestion of H19 segment H with ribonucleases T1, T2, and V1. The C lane shows the undigested RNA, and the G and A lanes are sequencing lanes obtained by enzymatic digestion with ribonucleases T1 and U2, respectively. The numbers to the right refer to positions in full-length H19 RNA. B, a putative secondary structure of H19 segment H deduced from the probing experiment. The size of an arrow refers to the intensity of the band in the probing experiment. The filled dot indicates the place where segment H was divided into subsegments I and J. Positions corresponding to those in the autoradiograph in A are shown in boldface.

Expression of H19 RNA and IMP mRNA during Late Mouse Development-- Similar to IGF-II and H19 RNAs, IMPs are mainly expressed in the placenta, fetal skeletal muscle, liver, and epithelia (21, 4). To examine the temporal relation between the expression of H19 RNA and the family of IMP proteins, we subjected total RNA from mouse embryonic day 8.5 to birth to Northern analysis with H19, IMP-1, IMP-2, and IMP-3 cDNA probes (Fig. 7). Whereas H19 RNA expression was at its peak at embryonic day 17.5, global IMP-1, IMP-2, and IMP-3 expression attained a maximum at embryonic day 12.5, followed by a decline toward birth (21), indicating that IMPs exhibit maximal activity during the initial phase of H19 expression.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Expression of H19 RNA and IMP mRNAs during mouse fetal life. Shown are the relative amounts of H19 RNA and IGF-II, IMP-1, IMP-2, and IMP-3 mRNAs obtained from Northern analysis of mouse fetal total RNA from embryonic day 8.5 to birth (0). 100 refers to total RNA from a 100-day-old mouse kidney. Data for IMP mRNAs were derived from Northern analysis (21).

Subcytoplasmic Localization of H19 RNA-- In the cytoplasm of transfected mouse NIH 3T3 embryo fibroblasts, IMP-1 is either evenly distributed or localized to the leading edge of the lamellipodia and perinuclear regions (21). Since the in vitro binding data in Fig. 5 demonstrate that IMP-1 bound H19 RNA with high affinity, a possible role of endogenous IMP in the subcytoplasmic distribution of transfected H19 RNA in NIH 3T3 cells was examined by in situ hybridization. The results show that the distribution of full-length H19 RNA is similar to that of IMP-1 (21) by being either evenly distributed in areas with confluent growth-arrested cells (88% of transfected cells) or, as illustrated in Fig. 8B, localized to the leading edge of lamellipodia and perinuclear regions in dispersed proliferating cells (42% of transfected cells). Untransfected cells in Fig. 8B show that no background reaction occurred with the employed in situ hybridization procedure. Excision of positions 1612-2005 from H19 RNA (H19Delta F RNA) removed three of the four IMP-1-binding sites, and the truncated RNA exhibited a diffuse cytoplasmic localization in both growth-arrested and proliferating NIH 3T3 cells (98% of transfected cells). Excision of the 173-nucleotide segment H (H19Delta H RNA), which encompasses the high affinity IMP-1-binding site (positions 1836-2008), reduced subcytoplasmic localization to 20% of the cells. Expression of H19 segment E (positions 1612-2313), which contains the entire complement of IMP-1- and PTB-binding sites in full-length H19 RNA, resulted in RNA accumulation at the leading edge of the lamellipodia and in perinuclear regions (69% of transfected cells) in a manner indistinguishable from full-length H19 RNA. Finally, H19 segment C (positions 1-1613), which lacks all IMP and PTB attachment sites, exhibited exclusive nuclear localization. Immunocytochemical staining of cells transfected with IMP-1 cDNA showed that IMP-1 localized to similar subcytoplasmic domains as H19 RNA, and transfection of stably transfected cells expressing GFP-tagged IMP-1 with full-length H19 cDNA revealed overlapping localization of GFP-IMP-1 and H19 RNA within the same cell in Fig. 8C. We conclude that IMP-1 and H19 RNA localize to similar subcytoplasmic domains in NIH 3T3 cells and that segment E is sufficient to provide the complete localization response.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   In situ hybridization analysis of H19 RNA in transfected NIH 3T3 cells. A, outline of the transfected cDNAs. B, results of hybridization with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense H19 RNA probe. H19Delta F lacks positions 1612-2005 in H19 RNA; H19Delta H lacks positions 1836-2008; segment E contains positions 1612-2313; and segment C contains positions 1-1613. No hybridization signal was detected in untransfected NIH 3T3 cells in any of the panels. C, immunocytochemical staining of IMP-1 cDNA-transfected NIH 3T3 cells with anti-IMP-1 antiserum (left panel) and in situ hybridization of cells expressing GFP-tagged IMP-1 with a Texas Red-labeled antisense H19 probe following transfection with full-length H19 cDNA (right panels). The arrow shows a lamellipodium with overlapping H19 RNA and GFP-IMP-1 expression.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we show that four molecules of an embryonic IGF-II mRNA-binding protein (IMP-1), containing two RNA recognition motifs and four heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K homology domains, associate specifically with the 3'-part of human H19 RNA. The subcytoplasmic localization of transfected H19 RNA reflects the localization of IMP-1 in lamellipodia and perinuclear regions of fibroblasts, and removal of three of the attachment sites leads to a de-localized distribution of the truncated RNA. The 3'-terminal 700 nucleotides of H19 RNA, which contain the full complement of the four attachment sites, are sufficient to mimic the localization pattern of full-length H19 RNA.

The syntenic nature of the IGF-II and H19 genes, their similar spatiotemporal expression, and their reciprocal imprinting are characteristics that have led to the assumption that the two gene products are functionally coupled. Although the biological significance of the IGF-II peptide is well established (28, 29), the lack of a clue to the biology of H19 RNA has hampered progress considerably. Here, we show that a family of embryonic RNA-binding proteins that were originally identified by the ability to bind to the IGF-II leader 3 mRNA also bind to H19 RNA, thus revealing a common trans-acting factor that may be involved in a mechanistic coupling of the IGF-II and H19 genes at post-transcriptional events such as nuclear export, cytoplasmic localization, and translation. Strictly speaking, we show that only three molecules of IMP-1 are primary RNA-binding proteins since it is conceivable that the fourth molecule associates with segment G via protein-protein interactions. This study identifies PTB as an additional common trans-acting factor that is able to associate with high affinity with the same RNA segments as the IMP family in both H19 RNA and IGF-II leader 3 (21). Interestingly, the theme of two trans-acting factors being able to associate with one RNA is also observed in the Xenopus Vg1 mRNA localization element where the two factors are Vg1RBP/Vera and VgRBP60 (30), the former being the ortholog of human IMP-3 and the latter being homologous to heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein I/PTB. The in situ hybridization data with the de-localized H19Delta F RNA, which lacks three IMP attachment sites and two PTB-binding sites, suggest that a similar molecular mechanism of localization may occur in the mammalian system. Since PTB is predominantly a nuclear protein (31) and since IMP is generally cytoplasmic, attachment of PTB to nascent RNA may provide a "nuclear experience" in the assembly of a translocation complex, so the proper conformation of the localization signal for subsequent IMP binding is achieved.

Although various sequence elements have been suggested as the binding sites of the homologous Vg1RBP/Vera (16, 17), zipcode-binding protein 1 (22), c-Myc coding region determinant-binding protein (32), and IMP (21) proteins, the recognition motifs are not known. Segment H in H19 RNA, which encompasses the high affinity binding site for recombinant IMP-1, was divided into two similarly sized subsegments I and J, neither of which was able to bind IMP-1 with high affinity. The most straightforward interpretation of this result is that the attachment site is severed. Alternatively, the two subsegments may contribute to a higher order RNA structure, or multiple RNA-protein interfaces may exist. To distinguish between the latter possibilities, segment H was subjected to the probing experiment with ribonucleases in Fig. 6, indicating the absence of a higher order interaction between subsegments I and J. Therefore, it is more likely that "unstructured" pyrimidine-rich elements in both subsegments may participate in the recognition event. The possibility of at least two RNA-protein interfaces in the recognition event is in agreement with the multiple RNA-binding domains of the IMP family (21) and provides a rationale for the lack of a simple sequence element in the RNA targets identified so far. The RNA targets are found in the 3'-untranslated region (Vg1 and beta -actin mRNAs), in the translated region (c-Myc mRNA), and in the 5'-untranslated region (IGF-II leader 3 mRNA) in varying numbers, which may influence the fate of a particular mRNA differently.

The binding data and the overlapping cytoplasmic localization pattern of H19 RNA and IMP-1 suggest that IMP-1 recognizes cis-elements in H19 RNA and participates in its subcytoplasmic localization. This suggestion is supported by the in situ hybridization analyses of H19Delta F RNA, H19Delta H RNA, and segment E, which show that the presence of an intact segment E with its four IMP attachment sites at the 3' terminus of H19 RNA is crucial for subcytoplasmic localization. The nuclear localization of segment C implies that the 300 nucleotides at the 3' terminus of H19 RNA, which are present in H19Delta F RNA, contain a signal for nuclear export, but that this segment is insufficient for subcytoplasmic localization. Multiple and even redundant cis-acting signals in RNA localization have been described in a few cases (33-35), but the lack of biophysical data regarding RNA-protein interactions and their stoichiometry makes general conclusions regarding the importance of multiple attachments of trans-acting proteins for efficient localization difficult.

H19 RNA belongs to a group of localized untranslated RNAs with members such as the Drosophila polar granule component RNA (36), the Xenopus and Drosophila Mtlr RNAs (37, 38), and the Xenopus Xlsirt RNAs (39), which play crucial roles during development. Among these, it is only Xlsirt RNAs that have been associated directly with post-transcriptional regulation of a messenger RNA. During Xenopus oogenesis, localization of the untranslated Xlsirt RNAs to the vegetal cortex of stage II/III oocytes is a prerequisite for the subsequent anchoring of the Vg1 mRNA at the vegetal cortex of stage III/IV oocytes (40). Since IMP-3 and Vg1RBP/Vera are orthologous proteins and since both IGF-II and Vg1 are secreted growth factors, a similar molecular mechanism of localization is appealing. However, the Xlsirt RNAs are localized by the early mitochondrial cloud-dependent pathway, whereas Vg1 mRNA is localized later in a microtubule-dependent manner (41), implying that Xlsirt RNAs do not bind Vg1RBP/Vera, which is in contrast to the binding between H19 RNA and the IMP family reported in this study.

What is the function of H19 RNA? Since H19 RNA is expressed in a subset of instances of IGF-II production, whereas the opposite appears not to be the case, the most straightforward interpretation of the biological role of H19 RNA is one of a regulator of IGF-II expression. H19 knockout experiments (42, 43) suggest that H19 RNA is a negative regulator of IGF-II production since the resulting increase in neonatal weight is a hallmark of an increased IGF-II dosage (29). However, the increased levels of IGF-II mRNAs due to the relaxation of genomic imprinting in the H19 knockout mice might obscure a regulatory function of H19 RNA at the post-transcriptional level. Suggestions that H19 RNA could have a function in cis, in analogy with the mechanism of action of Xist RNA in X chromosome inactivation (44), have now been ruled out (45). The evidence regarding a possible function of H19 RNA in trans is limited, although analysis of single cells in a Wilms' tumor suggests a functional interplay between H19 RNA and IGF-II mRNA (46). The combined evidence of the conservation of exons in comparison with introns (3) and the identity of the trans-acting factor presented in this study point to a riboregulator of importance in IGF-II production during mammalian development.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Lena B. Johansson and Bente Rotbøl for technical assistance and Reidar Albrechtsen for help with the immunohistochemistry.

    FOOTNOTES

* The work was supported by the Danish Cancer Society, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, and the Danish Natural Science and Medical Research Councils and their Biotek II Program.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Present address: Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06536.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biological Chemistry, Inst. of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83 H, DK-1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark. Tel.: 45-3532-2008; Fax: 45-3532-2040; E-mail: janchr@mermaid.molbio.ku.dk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 29, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001156200

2 S. Runge, F. C. Nielsen, J. Nielsen, J. Lykke-Andersen, U. M. Wewer, and J. Christiansen, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IGF-II, insulin-like growth factor II; Vg1RBP, Vg1 RNA-binding protein; IMP, IGF-II mRNA-binding protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PTB, polypyrimidine tract-binding protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Pachnis, V., Belayew, A., and Tilghman, S. M. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 5523-5527
2. Brannan, C. I., Dees, E. C., Ingram, R. S., and Tilghman, S. M. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 28-36
3. Hurst, L. D., and Smith, N. G. (1999) Trends Genet. 15, 134-135
4. Poirier, F., Chan, C. T., Timmons, P. M., Robertson, E. J., Evans, M. J., and Rigby, P. W. (1991) Development 113, 1105-1114
5. Ariel, I., Ayesh, S., Perlman, E. J., Pizov, G., Tanos, V., Schneider, T., Erdmann, V. A., Podeh, D., Komitowski, D., Quasem, A. S., de Groot, N., and Hochberg, A. (1997) Mol. Pathol. 50, 34-44
6. Lee, J. E., Pintar, J., and Efstratiadis, A. (1990) Development 110, 151-159
7. Bartolomei, M. S., Zemel, S., and Tilghman, S. M. (1991) Nature 351, 153-155
8. DeChiara, T. M., Robertson, E. J., and Efstratiadis, A. (1991) Cell 64, 849-859
9. Bartolomei, M. S., Webber, A. L., Brunkow, M. E., and Tilghman, S. M. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 1663-1673
10. Schmidt, J. V., Levorse, J. M., and Tilghman, S. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 9733-9738
11. Thorvaldsen, J. L., Duran, K. L., and Bartolomei, M. S. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 3693-3702
12. Adam, G. I., Cui, H., Miller, S. J., Flam, F., and Ohlsson, R. (1996) Development 122, 839-847
13. Svensson, K., Walsh, C., Fundele, R., and Ohlsson, R. (1995) Mech. Dev. 51, 31-37
14. Bashirullah, A., Cooperstock, R. L., and Lipshitz, H. D. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 335-394
15. Long, R. M., Singer, R. H., Meng, X., Gonzalez, I., Nasmyth, K., and Jansen, R. P. (1997) Science 277, 383-387
16. Deshler, J. O., Highett, M. I., Abramson, T., and Schnapp, B. J. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 489-496
17. Havin, L., Git, A., Elisha, Z., Oberman, F., Yaniv, K., Schwartz, S. P., Standart, N., and Yisraeli, J. K. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 1593-1598
18. Marion, R. M., Fortes, P., Beloso, A., Dotti, C., and Ortin, J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2212-2219
19. Wickham, L., Duchaine, T., Luo, M., Nabi, I. R., and DesGroseillers, L. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2220-2230
20. King, M. L., Zhou, Y., and Bubunenko, M. (1999) Bioessays 21, 546-557
21. Nielsen, J., Christiansen, J., Lykke-Andersen, J., Johnsen, A. H., Wewer, U. M., and Nielsen, F. C. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1262-1270
22. Ross, A. F., Oleynikov, Y., Kislauskis, E. H., Taneja, K. L., and Singer, R. H. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2158-2165
23. Gashler, A. L., Swaminathan, S., and Sukhatme, V. P. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4556-4571
24. Christiansen, J., Kofod, M., and Nielsen, F. C. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5709-5716
25. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159
26. Evdokimova, V. M., Kovrigina, E. A., Nashchekin, D. V., Davydova, E. K., Hershey, J. W., and Ovchinnikov, L. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3574-3581
27. Matzura, O., and Wennborg, A. (1996) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12, 247-249
28. DeChiara, T. M., Efstratiadis, A., and Robertson, E. J. (1990) Nature 345, 78-80
29. Eggenschwiler, J., Ludwig, T., Fisher, P., Leighton, P. A., Tilghman, S. M., and Efstratiadis, A. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3128-3142
30. Cote, C. A., Gautreau, D., Denegre, J. M., Kress, T. L., Terry, N. A., and Mowry, K. L. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 431-437
31. Ghetti, A., Pinol-Roma, S., Michael, W. M., Morandi, C., and Dreyfuss, G. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 3671-3678
32. Doyle, G. A., Betz, N. A., Leeds, P. F., Fleisig, A. J., Prokipcak, R. D., and Ross, J. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 5036-5044
33. Chartrand, P., Meng, X. H., Singer, R. H., and Long, R. M. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 333-336
34. Gautreau, D., Cote, C. A., and Mowry, K. L. (1997) Development 124, 5013-5020
35. Gonzalez, I., Buonomo, S. B., Nasmyth, K., and von Ahsen, U. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 337-340
36. Nakamura, A., Amikura, R., Mukai, M., Kobayashi, S., and Lasko, P. F. (1996) Science 274, 2075-2079
37. Kobayashi, S., Amikura, R., and Mukai, M. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 1117-1120
38. Kobayashi, S., Amikura, R., and Okada, M. (1993) Science 260, 1521-1524
39. Kloc, M., Spohr, G., and Etkin, L. D. (1993) Science 262, 1712-1714
40. Kloc, M., and Etkin, L. D. (1994) Science 265, 1101-1103
41. Kloc, M., and Etkin, L. D. (1995) Development 121, 287-297
42. Leighton, P. A., Ingram, R. S., Eggenschwiler, J., Efstratiadis, A., and Tilghman, S. M. (1995) Nature 375, 34-39
43. Ripoche, M. A., Kress, C., Poirier, F., and Dandolo, L. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 1596-1604
44. Jaenisch, R., Beard, C., Lee, J., Marahrens, Y., and Panning, B. (1998) Novartis Found. Symp. 214, 200-209
45. Jones, B. K., Levorse, J. M., and Tilghman, S. M. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2200-2207
46. Li, Y. M., Franklin, G., Cui, H. M., Svensson, K., He, X. B., Adam, G., Ohlsson, R., and Pfeifer, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28247-28252


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Y. Zhou, L. Rong, J. Lu, Q. Pan, and C. Liang
Insulin-Like Growth Factor II mRNA Binding Protein 1 Associates with Gag Protein of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1, and Its Overexpression Affects Virus Assembly
J. Virol., June 15, 2008; 82(12): 5683 - 5692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RNAHome page
F. Oberman, K. Rand, Y. Maizels, A. M. Rubinstein, and J. K. Yisraeli
VICKZ proteins mediate cell migration via their RNA binding activity
RNA, September 1, 2007; 13(9): 1558 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
L. Jonson, J. Vikesaa, A. Krogh, L. K. Nielsen, T. vO. Hansen, R. Borup, A. H. Johnsen, J. Christiansen, and F. C. Nielsen
Molecular Composition of IMP1 Ribonucleoprotein Granules
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2007; 6(5): 798 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. Sparanese and C. H. Lee
CRD-BP shields c-myc and MDR-1 RNA from endonucleolytic attack by a mammalian endoribonuclease
Nucleic Acids Res., February 28, 2007; 35(4): 1209 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. Kato, S. Hayama, T. Yamabuki, N. Ishikawa, M. Miyamoto, T. Ito, E. Tsuchiya, S. Kondo, Y. Nakamura, and Y. Daigo
Increased Expression of Insulin-like Growth Factor-II Messenger RNA-Binding Protein 1 Is Associated with Tumor Progression in Patients with Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 434 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Geng and P. M. Macdonald
Imp Associates with Squid and Hrp48 and Contributes to Localized Expression of gurken in the Oocyte
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2006; 26(24): 9508 - 9516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
N. Stohr, M. Lederer, C. Reinke, S. Meyer, M. Hatzfeld, R. H. Singer, and S. Huttelmaier
ZBP1 regulates mRNA stability during cellular stress
J. Cell Biol., November 20, 2006; 175(4): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. Zekri, K. Chebli, H. Tourriere, F. C. Nielsen, T. V. O. Hansen, A. Rami, and J. Tazi
Control of Fetal Growth and Neonatal Survival by the RasGAP-Associated Endoribonuclease G3BP
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(19): 8703 - 8716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
N. A Hammer, T. v O Hansen, A. G. Byskov, E. Rajpert-De Meyts, M. L. Grondahl, H. E Bredkjaer, U. M Wewer, J. Christiansen, and F. C Nielsen
Expression of IGF-II mRNA-binding proteins (IMPs) in gonads and testicular cancer
Reproduction, August 1, 2005; 130(2): 203 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Ioannidis, L. G. Mahaira, S. A. Perez, A. D. Gritzapis, P. A. Sotiropoulou, G. J. Kavalakis, A. I. Antsaklis, C. N. Baxevanis, and M. Papamichail
CRD-BP/IMP1 Expression Characterizes Cord Blood CD34+ Stem Cells and Affects c-myc and IGF-II Expression in MCF-7 Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 20086 - 20093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Liao, Y. Hu, D. J. Herrick, and G. Brewer
The RNA-binding Protein IMP-3 Is a Translational Activator of Insulin-like Growth Factor II Leader-3 mRNA during Proliferation of Human K562 Leukemia Cells
J. Biol. Chem., May 6, 2005; 280(18): 18517 - 18524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Liao, M. Patel, Y. Hu, S. Charles, D. J. Herrick, and G. Brewer
Targeted Knockdown of the RNA-binding Protein CRD-BP Promotes Cell Proliferation via an Insulin-like Growth Factor II-dependent Pathway in Human K562 Leukemia Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 48716 - 48724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Nielsen, M. A. Kristensen, M. Willemoes, F. C. Nielsen, and J. Christiansen
Sequential dimerization of human zipcode-binding protein IMP1 on RNA: a cooperative mechanism providing RNP stability
Nucleic Acids Res., August 16, 2004; 32(14): 4368 - 4376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
T. V. O. Hansen, N. A. Hammer, J. Nielsen, M. Madsen, C. Dalbaeck, U. M. Wewer,