![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 38, 29579-29586, September 22, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From
Received for publication, March 20, 2000, and in revised form, May 28, 2000
Prohibitins, stomatins, and a group of plant
defense response genes are demonstrated to belong to a novel protein
superfamily. This superfamily is bound by similar primary and secondary
predicted protein structures and hydropathy profiles. A
PROSITE-formatted regular expression was generated that is highly
predictive for identifying members of this superfamily using PHI-BLAST.
The superfamily is named PID (proliferation,
ion, and death) because prohibitins are
involved in proliferation and cell cycle control, stomatins are
involved in ion channel regulation, and the plant defense-related genes
are involved in cell death. The plant defense gene family is named HIR
(hypersensitive induced reaction)
because its members are associated with hypersensitive reactions
involving cell death and pathogen resistance. For this study, eight
novel maize genes were introduced: four closely related to prohibitins
(Zm-phb1, Zm-phb2, Zm-phb3,
and Zm-phb4), one to stomatins (Zm-stm1), and three to a gene implicated in plant disease responses
(Zm-hir1, Zm-hir2, and Zm-hir3).
The maize Zm-hir3 gene transcript is up-regulated in a
disease lesion mimic mutation (Les9), supporting a role in maize defense responses. Members of this gene superfamily are involved
in diverse functions, but their structural similarity suggests a
conserved molecular mechanism, which we postulate to be ion channel regulation.
Plants frequently respond to pathogen attack with the
"hypersensitive reaction"
(HR),1 a rapid localized
necrosis at the site of infection that cordons off the pathogen and
limits its spread (1-3). The HR cell death phenomenon bears
similarities to programmed cell death or apoptosis observed in animals
(3). A group of tobacco genes were identified that caused the formation
of HR-like lesions on tobacco leaves when ectopically expressed from a
tobacco mosaic virus expression vector (4). One of these genes,
represented by a cDNA called NG1, caused both HR-like lesion
formation and induced expression of Prohibitins are a group of highly conserved proteins that are thought
to control the cell cycle, senescence, and tumor suppression (reviewed
in Ref. 7). Prohibitins negatively control the cell cycle in the early
G1 phase and specifically inhibit initiation of DNA
synthesis (8, 9). Prohibitin genes appear to be expressed in many
tissues and organisms, but with some modulation of expression consistent with a role in the cell cycle (7, 8, 10). Mutations or
deletions of prohibitin are linked to some human breast and ovarian
cancers, supporting the idea that prohibitin suppresses tumors as part
of its antiproliferative function involving cell cycle control
(11-13). Prohibitins are also implicated in controlling senescence and
aging, with which there may be a functional link to their
antiproliferative function and cell cycle control (7).
Prohibitins are localized largely in the mitochondria, especially in
the inner mitochondrial membrane (7) near the periphery (14). Rat and
human prohibitins possess a short transmembrane helix near their N
termini, which may be integrated into mitochondrial membranes (7). As
mitochondrial inner membrane proteins often control ion transport and
ATP production, it has been speculated that prohibitins may be involved
in these processes, in particular in mitochondrial calcium efflux,
which regulates ATP formation (7). Prohibitin and the prohibitin-like
protein BAP37 (also called prohibitone) have also been localized to the
plasma membrane of mouse lymphocytes, where they together interact with
the IgM antigen receptor and may function in signaling apoptotic
programmed cell death (15). Prohibitin and BAP37 interact directly with each other in animal mitochondria; and in yeast, they control replicative life span, possibly through control of mitochondrial membrane ionic potential (16).
Stomatin is an integral membrane protein found in red blood cells. In
genetic disorders in which this protein is missing, a hemolytic anemia
called stomatocytosis results. In stomatocytosis, the red blood cells
experience high passive diffusion of univalent cations and are often
overhydrated due to an abnormally high amount of intracellular sodium
and low amounts of potassium. These red blood cells assume a mouth-like
shape, thus stomatocytosis, from "stoma," which is Greek for mouth
(17). Stomatin is thought to function as a negative regulator of
univalent cation permeability. Stomatin has a single membrane-spanning
region near its N terminus, with the rest of the protein thought to be
cytoplasmic (18). The molecular mechanism for stomatin function is
unknown, but its cytoplasmic portion has been suggested to act as a
ball and chain tether that can directly plug ion channels and may also interact with the cytoskeleton (17). Northern blots detect stomatin mRNA expression in many human tissues besides red blood cells (18).
In this work, we present eight novel full-length cDNA sequences
from maize, four of which are closely related to prohibitins, three to
the hypersensitive response-inducing protein NG1, and one to stomatins.
We demonstrate that these eight novel plant genes, along with many
animal, bacterial, plant, and fungal sequences representing
prohibitins, NG1-like proteins, stomatins, and other membrane proteins,
compose a novel protein superfamily. Although these genes are involved
in diverse physiological processes, their structural similarity
suggests that they possess a related biochemical function.
Gene Isolation--
The eight full-length maize cDNAs
presented in this study were identified in the EST collection at
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. mRNA sources were from various
tissues and treatments. The cDNA libraries were created at Pioneer
Hi-Bred, and the ESTs were generated at Human Genome Sciences. The NG1
(HIR), prohibitin, and stomatin homologs were identified with the aid
of the IRIS software package from Human Genome Sciences, which includes
the BLAST algorithm, through which homology was indicated to tobacco NG1 (GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number U66271), to
prohibitins from various species, and to human stomatin (accession
number U33925). Full-length insert sequences were produced at
Pioneer Hi-Bred by primer walking using an ABI 377 sequencing machine.
Sequences were assembled using SequencherTM Version 3.0 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI) and/or AssemblyLIGNTM (Eastman
Kodak Co.) software.
Protein Sequence Analysis--
Initial public database searches
were carried out using the BLASTP program (19) with a chickpea HIR-like
gene (NCBI Protein Database accession number gi 3928150) as a
probe, followed by PSI-BLAST (20) with default parameters (Blosum 62, gap existence cost 11, per residue gap cost 1, Gene Expression Analysis--
Plant material for mRNA
expression analysis was produced from the following three maize
families, each with the Les9 mutation (a disease lesion
mutation of maize) segregating 1:1 among the progeny: family 1 (Mo95
18-15 × sibling wild-type +/Les9; background M14/Mo20W), family 2 (Mo94S 16-35 × sibling wild-type
+/Les9; background M14W23/W23r), and family 3 (Mo95
24-3 × sibling wild-type +/Les9; background M14/W23).
Of the three families, only family 1 with the Mo20W background
suppresses the Les9 lesion mimic phenotype.
For the Affymetrix GeneChip® analysis, wild-type and
Les9 mutant plants from all three families were used. Plants
were grown in soil in the greenhouse to the V8 stage, which is when the
characteristic Les9 lesions normally begin to appear. The
young, upper leaf of Les9 phenotype plants that did not yet
express a lesion phenotype on that leaf and corresponding tissue from
wild-type sibling plants were harvested. Using duplicate equal 2-g
samples representing each of these six tissues, total RNA was isolated
by the TriReagent® method according to the manufacturer's
recommendations (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH).
Pooled tissue from three different plants formed one sample, and
the plants used for each sample were distinct. For
GeneChip® expression analysis, 1 mg of total RNA
from each sample was used for poly(A)+ mRNA isolation
by the OligoTex resin binding method according to the manufacturer's
recommendations (QIAGEN Inc., Chatsworth, CA).
Protocols for preparing in vitro transcribed biotinylated
cRNA probes from poly(A)+ mRNA for Affymetrix
GeneChip® gene expression analysis were according to the
manufacturer's recommendations (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and have
been described (27). In brief, 2 µg of poly(A)+
mRNA/sample, described above in mRNA isolations, was used for the first strand cDNA synthesis. This involved a
T7-(dT)24 oligonucleotide primer and reverse transcriptase
SuperScript II (Life Technologies, Inc.). The second strand synthesis
involved Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Life
Technologies, Inc.). The double-stranded cDNA was then cleaned up
using phenol/chloroform extraction and phase-lock gels (5 Prime
The GeneChip® used in these experiments was constructed by
Affymetrix using a set of 1501 maize cDNA ESTs, representing nearly as many genes. The genes used to produce this GeneChip®
encompass many physiological processes; perhaps one-third could be
defense-related based on their homology to known or suspected defense-related genes. Two of the 1501 ESTs represented
Zm-hir3 (ESTs CMSAR19R and CBPCC63R). Each cRNA
GeneChip® probing was replicated two or three times
(repetitions A, B, and C). In brief, the 1.28 × 1.28-cm
GeneChip® contains a high density array of 20-mer
oligonucleotides affixed to a silicon wafer. These oligonucleotides
were synthesized in situ on the silicon wafer by a
light-dependent combinatorial chemical synthesis (27). The
oligonucleotide sequences are complementary to the sense strand of
cDNA ESTs from Pioneer Hi-Bred. For each gene, there are up to 40 20-mer oligonucleotides synthesized. Twenty of these oligonucleotides
are exact matches to different, although sometimes overlapping, regions
of the EST. The other 20 oligonucleotides contain one base mismatch in
the center, which changes hybridization efficiency. (For a minority of
genes, there were <20 oligonucleotide probe pairs, but never <15
pairs per gene.) The perfect match and mismatch oligonucleotide probe
pairs for each gene are tiled in adjacent regions of the
GeneChip®. Comparisons of the hybridization intensities
between different perfect match oligonucleotides for a given gene and
between perfect match to mismatch hybridization intensities for an
oligonucleotide pair are used to determine the overall hybridization to
the gene and hence its level of mRNA abundance in the samples
(27).
For Northern blot analysis, tissues from wild-type and Les9
mutant plants from family 3 were used. Plants were grown in soil in the
greenhouse to the V8 stage. Leaf blades (minus midribs) that had
developed Les9 lesions on the mature half of the leaf tissue
were harvested and divided into the basal lesion-free zone; the
transition zone, where lesions were starting to form; and the leaf tip,
where lesions had reached a mature stage. Corresponding tissues from
wild-type siblings were also harvested. Ten micrograms of total RNA was
mixed with running dye containing ethidium bromide and electrophoresed
at 60 V for 15 h on 0.8% agarose gels in MOPS containing
formaldehyde essentially as described (28). The gels were blotted onto
nylon-backed nitrocellulose membrane and probed with a 1.35-kilobase
pair insert from the CMSAR19R cDNA representing Zm-hir3.
Three distinct maize cDNAs with high homology to the tobacco
NG1 peptide (GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number
U66271) were identified in the EST collection at Pioneer Hi-Bred
International, Inc., and their complete full-length sequences were
produced. These three genes were named Zm-hir1 (accession
number AF236373), Zm-hir2 (accession number AF236374), and
Zm-hir3 (accession number AF236375) for
Zea
mays hypersensitive
induced reaction genes 1,
2, and 3, respectively. Initial searches of maize hir genes using the BLAST program (19) against
the public data bases indicated some similarity to prohibitins and
stomatins, which prompted a search for maize cDNA clones related to
prohibitins and stomatins from the same EST collection. Four distinct
full-length prohibitin-like maize clones were identified and sequenced,
namely Zm-phb1 (accession number AF236368),
Zm-phb2 (accession number AF236369), Zm-phb3
(accession number AF236370), and Zm-phb4 (accession number
AF236371). In addition, one full-length stomatin-like clone, named
Zm-stm1 (accession number AF236372), was also identified and
sequenced. Public data base searches did not reveal a previously
reported plant stomatin-like gene. Pairwise alignments of the three
maize HIR proteins showed high levels of similarity among themselves
(>80% identity) and to HIR-like proteins from tobacco, chickpea, and
Arabidopsis (>80% identity). Pairwise amino acid
similarities of plant HIR and HIR-like proteins with maize prohibitins
were between 28 and 36%, and those with maize stomatin Zm-stm1 were between 34 and 37%. This suggested that the
maize HIR proteins were somewhat closer in amino acid sequence to
stomatins than to prohibitins.
The non-redundant protein data base at NCBI was searched using the
PSI-BLAST program (20) with a hypothetical protein from chickpea
(accession number gi 3928150) as a probe, which has >90% amino acid
similarity to the maize HIR proteins. This search identified many
genes, including stomatins and integral membrane proteins (E < 10 Amino acid sequences for 32 members of this superfamily were also
multiply aligned to reveal shared and diverged features (Fig.
2). The coding region lengths for the HIR
proteins (242-286 amino acids) are comparable to those of prohibitins
(272-289 amino acids) and many of the stomatins and other
membrane-associated proteins (249-481 amino acids). Relative to
prohibitins and stomatins, the HIR proteins are typically shorter at
the N terminus. Several regions of the protein superfamily are highly
conserved and aligned well with fewer gaps. Two residues, Asp and Ala
(corresponding to amino acids 64 and 167, respectively, in Zm-HIR1,
being used here as a reference superfamily member), are completely
conserved among all the proteins, suggesting a critical role for these
residues in the biological function of these proteins. Other amino
acids and structural groups of amino acids are also conserved in the PID superfamily, as shown in the consensus sequence (Fig. 2). Also
depicted in Fig. 2 are the consensus DSC predicted secondary structures
of each of the families within the PID superfamily. Each of the four
families within the PID superfamily share secondary structural features
in the same general relative positions, further indicating a
relationship between these proteins.
Prohibitins, Stomatins, and Plant Disease Response Genes Compose
a Protein Superfamily That Controls Cell Proliferation, Ion Channel
Regulation, and Death*
,
Hoffmann-La Roche, Vitamins Division, Nutley,
New Jersey 07110 and the § Disease Resistance and
¶ Bioinformatics Departments, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.,
Johnston, Iowa 50131-0552
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-glucanase, a
pathogenesis-related protein marker for defense activation. NG1 was
thus interpreted to be a novel activator of the plant HR defense system
(4). The predicted peptide for the cDNA NG1 was presented as 64 amino acids with no significant homology to any known proteins (4).
Independently, an Arabidopsis NG1-like cDNA (gene 106)
was reported to represent an mRNA induced by the plant defense
activator isonicotinic acid (5). This induction was associated with
systemic acquired resistance (reviewed in Ref. 6) and occurred
independent of de novo protein synthesis (5).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
ratio = 0.85, expect threshold 10). About 24 sequences that appeared as significant
hits, both in terms of statistical threshold and the type, were, along
with the eight maize sequences presented herein, multiply aligned by the ClustalW program with default parameters (21). The residues were
reduced to a consensus sequence according to an 80% consensus generated using the CONSENSUS program of Nigel Brown (NIMR,
London). To look for conserved motifs in the 32 members included
in the multiple alignment, we applied the MEME algorithm, which
resulted in the detection of three highly conserved motifs (26). Highly conserved residues based in part on the MEME motifs were identified to
generate a PROSITE-formatted regular expression profile to perform
further data base searches by the PHI-BLAST program (22). Phylogenetic
analysis was carried out by using an option within ClustalW (23) to
generate multiple alignments, followed by distance calculations and
tree constructions with the PROTDIST and neighbor-joining program of
the PHYLIP package (24). Secondary structure predictions were carried
out by the DSC algorithm using multiple sequence inputs (25). Further
structural analyses were carried out by hydropathy profiles using the
Kyte-Doolittle method with a 19-residue sliding window.
3 Prime, Inc., Boulder, CO), followed by ethanol precipitation. For the
in vitro transcription to produce cRNA, biotin-11-CTP and
biotin-16-UTP, in addition to all four NTPs, were used with T7
transcriptase (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX). The in vitro
transcript product was cleaned up using RNeasy affinity resin
columns (QIAGEN Inc.). In vitro labeled transcript yields ranged from 60 to 80 µg/sample. They were stored at
80 °C until used. The in vitro transcript products were fragmented in
acetate buffer (pH 8.1) at 94 °C for 35 min prior to chip
hybridization. Equal amounts (12 µg/sample) of in vitro
labeled transcript were used to probe each chip overnight. The
biotinylated RNA hybridizing to the chips was labeled with a
streptavidin-phycoerythrin conjugate and scanned using a confocal
fluorescence microscope. Expression intensity was determined as
described (27). Comparisons of mRNA abundance (cRNA abundance) were
made per repetition between the Les9 and wild-type samples.
The average -fold change and S.E. for all the repetitions per family
were calculated and are presented.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
16), prohibitins
(E < 10
8), and
HFLK/HFLC proteins (E < 10
6). Twenty-four of these public sequences,
along with the eight maize sequences introduced above, were used to
generate an unrooted dendogram (Fig. 1).
This dendogram revealed a large superfamily with at least four
constituent families. The stomatins and integral membrane proteins,
including a mechanosensor protein from Caenorhabditis elegans (accession number gi 2493263), formed a large family
containing sequences from diverse phyla. A second family was composed
of HIR and HIR-like sequences from plants. The family consisting of
stomatins and integral membrane proteins was most closely related to
the HIR family. The third family was composed of prohibitins and
related sequences from diverse phyla. The bacterial membrane proteins
HFLK/HFLC formed a small fourth family.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
An unrooted dendogram showing relationships
among 32 members of the PID superfamily. The dendogram was
generated by the neighbor-joining method using the PHYLIP 3.572 package
(24). The dendogram clearly shows partitioning of families within the
superfamily. The larger group (with branches colored in red)
is composed of stomatins and integral membrane and hypothetical
proteins that may possibly have some ion channel-regulating activity in
different organisms. The family containing prohibitins is in
blue. The plant HIR protein family is in green.
The bacterial membrane proteins HFLC and HFLK involved in
lysogenization form a separate group colored
brown.


View larger version (184K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Multiple sequence alignment and consensus
and DSC secondary structure predictions for the PID superfamily. A
multiple alignment of 32 amino acid sequences for representative
members of the PID superfamily was constructed by the ClustalW program
and then manually refined: HIR proteins (green bar),
stomatins and membrane proteins (red bar), HFLK proteins
(brown bar), and prohibitins (blue bar).
Highlighted are identical (red) or similar (blue)
residues shared by at least three families within the PID superfamily.
The alignment was used to generate a consensus sequence, which spans
the region corresponding to amino acids 1-253 on Zm-HIR1. The
consensus sequence at the bottom was based on conservation of a residue
at any given position in >80% of sequences. Amino acids conserved
80% or more are shown in uppercase red letters, and two
100% conserved amino acids (Asp and Ala) are shown in uppercase and
red-underlined letters. The abbreviations for
amino acid structural groups are in lowercase letters as
follows: o, alcohol (Ser, Thr); l,
aliphatic (Ile, Leu, Val); a, aromatic (Phe, Trp, Tyr);
c, charged (Asp, Glu, His, Lys, Arg); h,
hydrophobic (Ala, Cys, Phe, Gly, His, Ile, Lys, Leu);
, negative
(Asp, Glu); p, polar (Cys, Asp, Glu, His, Lys, Asn, Gln,
Arg, Ser, Thr); +, positive (His, Lys, Arg); s, small (Ala,
Ser, Thr, Val); u, tiny (Ala, Gly, Ser); t,
turn-like (Ala, Cys, Asp, Glu, Gly, His, Lys, Asn, Gln, Arg, Ser, Thr);
and dot, any residue or gap. The location of the PID
superfamily regular expression is identified by arrows. The
location of the stomatin PROSITE signature is similarly indicated.
Shown below the consensus sequence is the secondary structure
predictions that were carried out using the latest version of the DSC
algorithm (44), the prediction accuracy of which is >72%: DSC_ALL,
DSC_HIR, DSC_PHB, DSC_STM, and DSC_HFLK represent consensus predictions
for all the PID superfamily sequences and all the members of the
respective families of HIR proteins, prohibitins, stomatins, and HFLK
proteins, respectively. C, coil; E,
-strands;
H, helix; dot, gaps.
A systematic search for conserved motifs among the aligned sequences was performed using the MEME algorithm. The MEME motifs have been indicated as reliable indicators of family membership (26). The search resulted in the identification of three conserved motifs (Fig. 2). Using Zm-HIR1 as reference again, the amino acid positions of these motifs are as follows: motif 1, 108-167; motif 2, 56-80; and motif 3, 23-88. The relative spatial positions of these three motifs in all these genes appear to be spatially well conserved, indicating the possibility for a similar structural orientation in three-dimensional space. Motif 2 is a subset of motif 3 and is conserved in all members in the alignment. All three motifs are present in all members of the superfamily, except the HFLK/HFLC proteins, which contain only motif 2. HFLK and HFLC are bacterial membrane proteins with protease activity and are involved in lysogenization. They appear to be more distantly related to the other members of this superfamily.
Based upon the amino acid alignment and the motifs derived from the
MEME algorithm, in particular MEME motif 1, we created a regular
expression and used it to search public protein data bases as a pattern
seed using the PHI-BLAST program (22). This PROSITE-formatted regular
expression for the PID superfamily is [ILM]-[RK]-X(2)-[VLI]-[PGA]-X(10,11)-[RK]-X(2)-[VLI]-X(7)-[VLIM]-X(6)-[WFY] and corresponds to amino acids 105-139 on Zm-HIR1 (Fig. 2). Using PHI-BLAST and this regular expression, we retrieved 98 sequences that
were above the threshold of 0.001 and displayed very significant E values. Of these, the HIR proteins, stomatins, and other
membrane-associated proteins had E values
<10
4, and prohibitins had relatively higher
E values (E = 0.003-10.0). This seed
pattern was thus effective at retrieving members for each of these
three families within the superfamily. In the PROSITE dictionary, the
stomatin (band 7) signature has been listed as R-X(2)-]LIV]-[SAN]-X(6)-[LIV]-D-X(2)-T-X(2)-W-G-[LIV]-[KRH]-[LIV]-X-[KR]-[LIV]-E-[LIV]-[KR]. This PROSITE signature corresponds to amino acids 121-149 on Zm-HIR1, and so it partially overlaps with the PID signature. However, the PID
signature accounts for all superfamily members, not just the stomatins.
The C-terminal half of the stomatin PROSITE signature extends beyond
the C terminus of the PID signature, and this portion is very
stomatin-specific and diverged from the other PID superfamily members
(Fig. 2). The PID signature partially overlaps with MEME motif 1, and
although this motif 1 is not well conserved in HFLK/HFLC proteins, the
PID signature nonetheless recognizes the HFLK/HFLC proteins, affirming
that the HFLK/HFLC proteins are indeed distant members of this
superfamily. This regular expression pattern presented herein thus
represents a signature for all four families contained within this PID superfamily.
A comparison of protein hydropathy plots of maize HIR sequences with
prohibitins from maize and Trypanosoma brucei revealed similar structural profiles. A similar comparison of a stomatin-like gene from Synechocystis sp. with Trypanosoma
prohibitin also indicated structural similarity between several regions
of these genes (Fig. 3). The shared
hydropathy plots further indicate that there are conserved structural
features between these diverse proteins from widely diverged phyla.
Hydropathy analysis of the HFLK/HFLC proteins indicated that these
genes have fewer structural similarities in common with other members
in this superfamily.
|
Plant disease lesion mimics are plant variants or mutants that bear symptoms of disease even though they are not infected. Such lesion mimics are common and diverse, and they are under extensive study to understand the link between plant programmed cell death and disease responses (29, 30). One such mutant of maize is Les9 (partially dominant), which is characterized by numerous spontaneous chlorotic to necrotic lesions that occur by the 9-14 leaf stage (31). The Les9 mutant also shows enhanced resistance to Bipolaris maydis and enhanced expression of defense-related proteins.2 For this study, Les9 leaves of V8 plants, a stage just prior to the formation of spontaneous lesions, were investigated for altered levels of Zm-hir gene expression using the Affymetrix GeneChip® microarray mRNA profiling technology. The Zm-hir3 cDNA was represented twice on a GeneChip® representing 1501 genes. A small set of nearly 70 genes were observed to have a 2-fold or more change in mRNA abundance. Many of these genes are defense-related; others are unknowns or genes not generally understood to be defense-related. Among this set of 70 were the two examples of Zm-hir3. Zm-hir3 showed 2.5-8.1-fold enhanced expression in immature seedling, lesion-free leaves of Les9 mutants compared with those of wild-type siblings in families 2 and 3 (Table I). Northern hybridizations confirmed these microarray results by showing higher Zm-hir3 transcript levels in Les9 than wild-type plants in family 3 (Fig. 4). This elevated Zm-hir3 expression was detected prior to the development of a visible lesion phenotype and was at a stage when Les9 tissue shows enhanced resistance to B. maydis. When Les9 was crossed into the Mo20W background, which considerably suppresses the Les9 lesion mimic phenotype (family 1), the Zm-hir3 expression was not elevated; in fact, it was reduced 2.2-3.3-fold relative to wild-type siblings in the Mo20W background (Table I). Taken together, these results indicate that the Zm-hir3 gene exhibits modulation in mRNA expression in correspondence to the Les9 disease-related phenotypes.
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The eight novel maize gene sequences introduced in this study are structurally related to previously reported prohibitins, stomatins, and a group of plant defense-related proteins that we named HIR. By various primary and secondary structure comparisons, we have shown that these proteins all belong to a large protein superfamily present in diverse phyla. The mRNA expression pattern of the Zm-hir3 gene in the Les9 genetic background associates the Zm-hir3 gene with maize defense responses. These results are therefore compatible with the tobacco HR study (4) and the Arabidopsis systemic acquired resistance study (5), implicating HIR gene involvement in plant defense. They further suggest that a death/disease response function of these HIR genes is conserved in diverse monocot and dicot plants.
The sequence and structural similarities of plant HIR proteins to
prohibitins, stomatins and other integral membrane proteins, some of
which, in particular stomatins, are known to regulate ion channel
function, suggest that the HIR proteins are involved in hypersensitive
reaction and cell death through the regulation of ion channel activity.
The C-terminal region of stomatin is very rich in
-helical content
and has been postulated to act as a plug to regulate potassium ion
channels (17, 32). The HIR and prohibitin proteins are also predicted
to have helical content near their C termini (Fig. 2), suggesting there
may be a similar structure and function of this region to that of the stomatin C terminus.
Studies indicate that in animal models such as tumor cell lines, potassium plays a significant role in the maintenance of membrane potential and integrity and controls apoptosis (33) and energy conservation across membranes (34). In Drosophila, apoptotic proteins (Rpr and grim) have been shown to stably block shaker-type K+ channels to induce apoptosis (35). In plants, potassium is also involved in control of cellular homeostasis and cytoplasmic pH (36). In plants attacked by pathogens, there is often an efflux of cellular potassium, causing cellular acidification and extracellular alkalinization (36). Potassium levels in animals can activate several enzymes, including caspases, which are involved in apoptosis (37, 38). Although caspases or their functional equivalents are poorly understood in plants, a recent study indicated that caspase inhibitors blocked plant HR and cell death (39). In the same study, the amount of cell death was correlated to leakage of ions from leaf discs.
Tumor suppressor genes are known to regulate both cell proliferation and cell death (9, 40). Prohibitins act as negative regulators of cell proliferation in mammals and are implicated in tumor suppression (7). Some tumor suppressor genes, when overexpressed, are known to cause cell death (41, 42). The HIR genes, when overexpressed, also cause cell death (4). Given the fact that HIR proteins are structurally related to prohibitins, they may represent a novel class of plant tumor suppressors. Prohibitins have been shown to suppress the G1-to-S phase transition in the cell cycle. If HIR proteins have a similar function, they likely also act at the G1-to-S phase checkpoint. The retinoblastoma (Rb) and p53 tumor suppressor genes are known to act at the G1-to-S phase checkpoint. Interestingly, suppression of K+ channel activity in a tumor cell line by a potassium channel blocker blocks G1-to-S transition by keeping Rb in a dephosphorylated state (43), indicating that potassium channels function in cellular proliferation signal transduction. There is some indication that prohibitin may be involved in ion control in mitochondria (7). However, this is the first report showing a structural relationship of prohibitins to stomatins, which are known potassium channel regulators, suggesting that their common molecular function is ion channel regulation.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the HR-activating protein
NG1 belongs to a novel gene family, which we named HIR. This family is
conserved in monocot and dicot plants and appears to play a role in
cell death, especially in relation to disease responses. This HIR
family is, in turn, part of a large structurally related superfamily of
proteins widespread in the biosphere, which includes prohibitins,
stomatins, and other membrane proteins. Members of this PID superfamily
are involved in cell proliferation, ion channel activity, and cell
death. We postulate that these genes are generally involved in
controlling ion channels, in particular potassium ion channels, and
that through this control, they affect regulation of seemingly diverse
processes ranging from cell division, osmotic homeostasis, and cell death.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Mary Beatty, Steve Briggs, Karen Bruce, Bill Gordon-Kamm, Eric Karrer, Keith Lowe, Pedro Navarro, John Tossberg, and Mark Whitsitt for advice and assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bioinformatics
Department, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 7250 N. W. 62nd Ave.,
Emerson, P. O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 50131-0552. Tel.: 515-270-5949; Fax: 515-334-4729; E-mail: simmonscr@phibred.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002339200
2 N. Yalpani, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: HR, hypersensitive reaction; EST, expressed sequence tag; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Agrios, G. N. (1988) Plant Pathology , Academic Press Ltd., London |
| 2. | Dangl, J. L., Dietrich, R. A., and Richberg, M. H. (1996) Plant Cell 8, 1793-1807 |
| 3. | Greenberg, J. T. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 12094-12097 |
| 4. | Karrer, E. E., Beachy, R. N., and Holt, C. A. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 36, 681-690 |
| 5. | Ryals, J. A., Alexander, D. C., Beck, J. J., Duesing, J. H., Goodman, R. M., Friedrich, L. B., Harms, C., Meins, F., Jr., Montoya, A., Moyer, M. B., Neuhaus, J.-M., Payne, G. B., Sperisen, C., Stinson, J. R., Uknes, S. J., Ward, E. R., and Williams, S. C. (March 25, 1997) U. S. Patent 5,614,395 |
| 6. | Neuenschwander, U., Lawton, K., and Ryals, J. (1996) in Plant-Microbe Interactions (Stacey, G. , and Keen, N. T., eds), Vol. 1 , pp. 81-106, Chapman and Hall, Inc., New York |
| 7. | McClung, J. K., Jupe, E. R., and Dell'Orco, R. T. (1995) Exp. Gerontol. 30, 99-124 |
| 8. | Nuell, M. J., Stewart, D. A., Walker, L., Friedman, V., Wood, C. M., Owens, G. A., Smith, J. R., Schneider, E. L., Dell'Orco, R., Lumpkin, C. K., Danner, D. B., and McClung, J. K. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 1372-1381 |
| 9. | Roskams, A. J. I., Friedman, V., Wood, C. M., Walker, L., Owens, G. A., Stewart, D. A., Altus, M., Danner, D. B., Liu, X.-T., and McClung, J. K. (1993) J. Cell. Physiol. 157, 289-295 |
| 10. | Choongkittaworn, N. M., Kim, K. H., Danner, D. B., and Griswold, M. D. (1993) Biol. Reprod. 49, 300-310 |
| 11. | Legget, B., Young, J., Buttenshaw, R., Thomas, L., Young, B., Chenevix-Trench, G., Searle, J., and Ward, M. (1995) Br. J. Cancer 71, 1070-1073 |
| 12. | Sato, T., Saito, H., Swensen, J., Olifant, A., Wood, C., Danner, D., Sakamoto, T., Takita, K., Kasumi, F., Miki, Y., Skolnick, M., and Nakamura, Y. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 1643-1646 |
| 13. | Foulkes, W. D., Black, D. M., Stamp, G. W. H., Soloman, E., and Trowsdale, J. (1993) Int. J. Cancer 54, 220-225 |
| 14. | Ikonen, E., Fiedler, K., Parton, R. G., and Simons, K. (1995) FEBS Lett. 358, 273-277 |
| 15. | Terashima, M., Kim, K.-M., Adachi, T., Nielsen, P., Reth, M., Kohler, G., and Lamers, M. C. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3782-3792 |
| 16. | Coates, P. J., Jameison, D. J., Smart, K., Prescott, A. R., and Hall, PA. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 607-610 |
| 17. | Stewart, G. W., Argent, A. C., and Dash, B. C. J. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1225, 15-25 |
| 18. | Stewart, G. W., Hepworth-Jones, B. E., Keen, J. N., Dash, B. C. J., Argent, A. C., and Casimir, C. M. (1992) Blood 79, 1593-1601 |
| 19. | Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 |
| 20. | Altschul, S. F., Madden, T. L., Schäffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D. J. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402 |
| 21. | Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680 |
| 22. | Zhang, Z., Schäffer, A., Miller, W., Madden, T. L., Lipman, D. J., Koonin, E. V., and Altschul, S. F. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3986-3990 |
| 23. | Higgins, D. G., Thompson, J. D., and Gibson, T. J. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 266, 383-402 |
| 24. | Felsenstein, J. (1993) PHYLIP Phylogeny Inference Package, Version 3.5c , Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle |
| 25. | King, R. D., Saqi, M., Sayle, R., and Sternberg, M. J. E. (1997) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13, 473-474 |
| 26. | Grundy, W. N., Bailey, T. L., Elkan, C. P., and Baker, M. E. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 231, 760-766 |
| 27. | Wodicka, L., Dong, H., Mittmann, M., Ho, M.-H., and Lockhart, D. J. (1997) Nature Biotechnol. 15, 1359-1367 |
| 28. | Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1992) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , 2nd Ed. , John Wiley & Sons, New York |
| 29. | Walbot, V., Hoisington, D. A., and Neuffer, M. G. (1983) in Genetic Engineering of Plants (Kosuge, T. , Meredith, C. P. , and Hollaender, A., eds) , pp. 431-442, Plenum Press, New York |
| 30. | Johal, G. S., Hulbert, S., and Briggs, S. P. (1995) Bioessays 17, 685-692 |
| 31. | Hoisington, D. A. (1986) Maize Genet. Coop. News Lett. 60, 51 |
| 32. | Stewart, G. W. (1997) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 29, 271-274 |
| 33. | Furlong-Isla, J., Lopez, M. C., Ascaso, R., Lopez, R. A., and Collins, K. L. (1998) Cell Death Differ. 5, 214-221 |
| 34. | Atlante, A., Gagliardi, S., Marra, E., and Calissano, P. (1998) Neurosci. Lett. 245, 127-130 |
| 35. | Avdonin, V., Kasuya, J., Ciorba, M. A., Kaplan, B., Hoshi, T., and Iverson, L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11703-11708 |
| 36. | Atkinson, M., Huang, J. S., and Knopp, J. A. (1985) Plant Physiol. 79, 843-847 |
| 37. | Hughes, F. M., Jr., Bortner, C. D., Purdy, G. D., and Cidlowski, J. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30567-30576 |
| 38. | Schulz, J. B., Beinroth, S., Weller, M., Wuellner, U., and Klockgether, T. (1998) Neurosci. Lett. 245, 9-12 |
| 39. | Pozo, O. D., and Lam, E. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 1129-1132 |
| 40. | Yonish-Rouach, E., Grunwald, D., Wilder, S., Kimchi, A., May, E., Lawrence, J. J., May, P., and Oren, M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1415-1423 |
| 41. | Lassus, P., Ferlin, M., Piette, J., and Hibner, U. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 4566-4573 |
| 42. | Zong, Z. P., Fujikawa, Y. K., Ota, T., Murakami, M., Li, A. L., Yamaguchi, N., Tanino, M., and Odashima, S. (1998) Cell Struct. Funct. 23, 231-237 |
| 43. | Xu, B., Wilson, B. A., and Lu, L. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, C2037-C2044 |
| 44. | Ross, K. D., and Sternberg, M. J. E. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 2298-2310 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Marmagne, M. Ferro, T. Meinnel, C. Bruley, L. Kuhn, J. Garin, H. Barbier-Brygoo, and G. Ephritikhine A High Content in Lipid-modified Peripheral Proteins and Integral Receptor Kinases Features in the Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane Proteome Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2007; 6(11): 1980 - 1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Takata, J. Kasuga, D. Takezawa, K. Arakawa, and S. Fujikawa Gene expression associated with increased supercooling capability in xylem parenchyma cells of larch (Larix kaempferi) J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2007; 58(13): 3731 - 3742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Morel, S. Claverol, S. Mongrand, F. Furt, J. Fromentin, J.-J. Bessoule, J.-P. Blein, and F. Simon-Plas Proteomics of Plant Detergent-resistant Membranes Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1396 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. Graham The Diphenylether Herbicide Lactofen Induces Cell Death and Expression of Defense-Related Genes in Soybean Plant Physiology, December 1, 2005; 139(4): 1784 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-J. Wen, F. Hochholdinger, M. Sauer, W. Bruce, and P. S. Schnable The roothairless1 Gene of Maize Encodes a Homolog of sec3, Which Is Involved in Polar Exocytosis Plant Physiology, July 1, 2005; 138(3): 1637 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H.H. Borner, D. J. Sherrier, T. Weimar, L. V. Michaelson, N. D. Hawkins, A. MacAskill, J. A. Napier, M. H. Beale, K. S. Lilley, and P. Dupree Analysis of Detergent-Resistant Membranes in Arabidopsis. Evidence for Plasma Membrane Lipid Rafts Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 104 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Marmagne, M.-A. Rouet, M. Ferro, N. Rolland, C. Alcon, J. Joyard, J. Garin, H. Barbier-Brygoo, and G. Ephritikhine Identification of New Intrinsic Proteins in Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane Proteome Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2004; 3(7): 675 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Takahashi, T. Kawasaki, H. L. Wong, U. Suharsono, H. Hirano, and K. Shimamoto Hyperphosphorylation of a Mitochondrial Protein, Prohibitin, Is Induced by Calyculin A in a Rice Lesion-Mimic Mutant cdr1 Plant Physiology, August 1, 2003; 132(4): 1861 - 1869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wienkoop and G. Saalbach Proteome Analysis. Novel Proteins Identified at the Peribacteroid Membrane from Lotus japonicus Root Nodules Plant Physiology, March 1, 2003; 131(3): 1080 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Huang, I. Parmryd, F. Nilsson, A. L. Persson, H. B. Pakrasi, B. Andersson, and B. Norling Proteomics of Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803: Identification of Plasma Membrane Proteins Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2002; 1(12): 956 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Steinmoen, E. Knutsen, and L. S. Havarstein Induction of natural competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae triggers lysis and DNA release from a subfraction of the cell population PNAS, May 28, 2002; 99(11): 7681 - 7686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||