|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003494200 on July 19, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 39, 30176-30185, September 29, 2000
Reconstituting the Barrier Properties of a Water-tight Epithelial
Membrane by Design of Leaflet-specific Liposomes*,
Warren G.
Hill and
Mark L.
Zeidel
From the Laboratory of Epithelial Cell Biology, Renal-Electrolyte
Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
Received for publication, April 24, 2000, and in revised form, July 14, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
To define aspects of lipid composition and
bilayer asymmetry critical to barrier function, we examined the
permeabilities of liposomes that model individual leaflets of the
apical membrane of a barrier epithelium, Madin-Darby canine kidney type
1 cells. Using published lipid compositions we prepared exofacial
liposomes containing phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin,
glycosphingolipids, and cholesterol; and cytoplasmic liposomes
containing phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, and
cholesterol. The osmotic permeability of cytoplasmic liposomes to water
(Pf), solutes, and NH3 was
18-90-fold higher than for the exofacial liposomes
(Pf(ex) = 2.4 ± 0.4 × 10 4 cm/s, Pf(cy) = 4.4 ± 0.3 × 10 3 cm/s;
Pglycerol(ex) = 2.5 ± 0.3 × 10 8 cm/s,
Pglycerol(cy) = 2.2 ± 0.02 × 10 6 cm/s; PNH3(ex) = 0.13 ± 0.4 × 10 4 cm/s,
PNH3(cy) = 7.9 ± 1.0 × 10 3
cm/s). By contrast, the apparent proton permeability of exofacial liposomes was 4-fold higher than cytoplasmic liposomes
(PH+(ex) = 1.1 ± 0.1 × 10 2 cm/s, PH+(cy) = 2.7 ± 0.6 × 10 3 cm/s). By adding
single leaflet permeabilities, we calculated a theoretical
Pf for a Madin-Darby canine kidney apical
membrane of 4.6 × 10 4 cm/s, which
compares favorably with experimentally determined values. In exofacial
liposomes lacking glycosphingolipids or sphingomyelin, permeabilities
were 2-7-fold higher, indicating that both species play a role in
barrier function. Removal of cholesterol resulted in 40-280-fold
increases in permeability. We conclude: 1) that we have reconstituted
the biophysical properties of a barrier membrane, 2) that the barrier
resides in the exofacial leaflet, 3) that both sphingomyelin and
glycosphingolipids play a role in reducing membrane permeability but
that there is an absolute requirement for cholesterol to mediate this
effect, 4) that these results further validate the hypothesis that each
leaflet offers an independent resistance to permeation, and 5) that
proton permeation was enhanced by sphingolipid/cholesterol interactions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The phospholipid bilayers, which constitute cellular boundaries
and which permit the selective movement of ions, protons, and water
through embedded proteins, are themselves often surprisingly permeable
to a wide range of small molecules like water and urea. In contrast to
this, there are certain cells and tissues, which, for functional
reasons, exhibit exceedingly low permeabilities (1). These include the
urinary bladder, which must maintain strikingly high concentration
gradients for urea, NH3, protons, and CO2, when
compared with the blood and surrounding interstitium (2); the stomach,
the secretions of which have an extremely low pH; and the collecting
duct in the kidney, which separates the urine being formed from the
interstitium (1, 3). Failure of the cell to maintain these barriers can
lead to significant human pathology including renal tubular disorders,
peptic ulcer disease, and cystitis (4, 5).
The features of the lumenal surface that confer these remarkable
properties are currently unclear, although it is now accepted that the
barrier to permeation resides in the apical membrane of the superficial
epithelial cells (3, 6-10). Early physiological studies of mammalian
bladder demonstrated an extremely high transepithelial resistance of up
to 78,000 ohms cm2 (11), and electrode impalement studies
of the various epithelial cell layers demonstrated that the apical
membrane of the most superficial layer was the location of the high
electrical resistance (8, 11, 12). Creation of that barrier appears to
depend on the cell's ability to synthesize an asymmetric bilayer,
i.e. to apportion different lipid constituents to the outer
or exofacial leaflet compared with the inner or
cytoplasmic leaflet, and then to restrict the intermingling
of those lipids (13). An earlier study from our laboratory demonstrated
the functional consequences of losing bilayer asymmetry, when gastric
apical vesicles, which possessed exceptionally low permeabilities to
water, protons, and non-electrolytes, were made symmetrical by
quantitative lipid extraction and reconstitution into liposomes. The
newly formed liposomes, although made from identical apical membrane
lipids, exhibited much higher permeabilities than the native membrane (10). Bilayer asymmetry is maintained by tight junctions between cells
that not only isolate the basolateral and apical membranes, but also
the exofacial leaflet from the cytoplasmic leaflet of the apical
membrane (14, 15). Thus, by means of lipid sorting in the trans-Golgi
network and vectorial delivery of lipids to specific membrane domains,
the cell can erect a membrane with low permeability. The precise
structural features responsible for barrier function are unclear;
however, it appears that certain combinations of lipids result in a
more highly ordered membrane that has lower permeabilities for water
and non-electrolytes. For example, sphingomyelin
(SM)1 and cholesterol have
been shown to associate closely due to van der Waals forces and
hydrogen bonding, and these interactions induce tight packing in the
bilayer (16). We, and others have previously shown that MDCK type 1 cells grown on permeable supports exhibit the permeability properties
of a barrier epithelium (17). Because the lipid structure of the MDCK
cell apical membrane is well defined, we aimed to reconstitute the low
permeability properties of the MDCK type 1 cell, in an effort to
understand the determinants that contribute significantly to this
membrane's barrier properties (17). We also wished to further validate
our earlier findings that each leaflet in a phospholipid bilayer offers
an independent resistance to permeation (18, 19). This hypothesis can
be summarized by the following equation, in which the resistance offered by each leaflet is equivalent to the reciprocal of the permeability.
|
(Eq. 1)
|
PAB is the permeability of a bilayer
composed of leaflets A and B, PA is the
permeability of leaflet A, and PB is the
permeability of leaflet B. We have exploited this property in
attempting to recreate the MDCK apical membrane: an asymmetric bilayer.
Accordingly, we constructed liposomes with particular combinations of
lipids in order to mimic the exofacial leaflet and the cytoplasmic
leaflet of MDCK cells, and then measured their permeabilities to water, non-electrolytes, protons, and NH3. The cytoplasmic
leaflets had dramatically higher permeabilities than the exofacial
liposomes (20-90-fold depending on the permeant). By the use of
Equation 1, we derived a theoretical water permeability for the MDCK
apical membrane that correlates extremely well with published
permeabilities. Further experiments aimed at identifying the lipids
responsible for barrier function implicate sphingolipid/cholesterol
interactions as a key determinant in the formation of low permeability membranes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Liposome Preparation--
The following lipids from Avanti Polar
Lipids Inc. (Alabaster, AL) were used to construct liposomes; bovine
heart phosphatidylethanolamine (PE, catalog no. 830025), brain
phosphatidylserine (PS, catalog no. 830032) bovine liver
phosphatidylinositol (PI, catalog no. 830042), bovine heart
phosphatidylcholine (PC, catalog no. 830052), cholesterol (catalog no.
700000), egg SM (catalog no. 860061), and brain cerebrosides (GSLs,
catalog no. 131303). Natural lipids from mammalian tissues were chosen
so that acyl chain heterogeneity and degree of unsaturation would
reflect the likely chain composition of the canine cells we were
modeling. In some experiments dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and
Escherichia coli PE were used, and this is indicated in the
text. Lipids were mixed by weight according to the proportions shown in
Table I, dissolved in chloroform:methanol (2:1), aliquoted by volume
into tubes, then dried down in a heating block set to 37 °C under a
stream of nitrogen. Lipids were then completely dried in an evacuated
chamber for 2 h before storage at 20 °C. On the day of
liposome preparation, lipids were suspended in buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM carboxyfluorescein (CF), 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5. Lipids were vortexed for 2 min, heated to
37 °C in a water bath for 10 min, vortexed for 2 min, probe
sonicated three times (2 min each time) on ice at a medium power
setting (with 2-min intervals) and then extruded through a 200 nm
polycarbonate membrane. Liposomes were allowed to equilibrate on ice
for 90 min, and then extravesicular CF was removed by passing vesicles
over a Sephadex G50 column (Sigma). Vesicles were sized by
quasi-elastic light scattering using a Nicomp model 270 submicron
particle analyzer as described (3).
Water Permeability Measurements--
Osmotic water permeability
(Pf) was measured at 25oC as
described (3, 18, 20). All other permeabilities were measured at
25oC also. Briefly, permeabilities were determined using
a stopped-flow fluorimeter (SF.17 MV, Applied Photophysics,
Leatherhead, United Kingdom) with a measurement dead-time of less than
1 ms. Liposomes containing 20 mM CF were rapidly mixed with
an equal volume of an identical buffer that had 3 times the osmolality
due to sucrose addition. The rate of water efflux from vesicles was
measured as a function of vesicle shrinkage and CF fluorescence
self-quenching. From parameters that included the initial rate of
quenching, vesicle diameter, and applied osmotic gradient,
Pf was calculated using MathCad software
(MathSoft Inc., Cambridge MA) (21).
Solute Permeability Measurements--
Permeability measurements
were performed as described using a stopped-flow fluorimeter (3, 20,
21). Briefly liposomes were equilibrated in buffer (500 mosmol/kg) containing 200 mM solute (glycerol, urea,
formamide, or acetamide) for 30-60 min at room temperature before the
experiment was commenced, and then the liposomes were rapidly mixed
with an equal volume of a solution with identical osmolality,
containing 100 mM solute. Osmolalities of all solutions
were confirmed and adjusted if necessary, by measuring freezing point
depression on a Precision Instruments Osmette A osmometer. The
concentration gradient results in solute efflux from liposomes followed
by water efflux. Vesicle shrinkage can be monitored due to CF
self-quenching. By use of parameters from the single exponential curve
fit to the data, Psolute was solved using
MathCad software (3, 20-22).
Proton Permeability--
Apparent proton permeabilities were
measured using pH-dependent quenching of fluorescence as
described previously (3, 10, 19, 20, 22). Stopped-flow experiments were
performed in which the liposomes were pretreated with 1 µM valinomycin and then rapidly mixed with an identical
buffer acidified to pH 6.50. Valinomycin, which was used to collapse
any potential difference arising as a result of proton influx, did not
appear to be necessary, as permeability measurements performed in its
absence did not alter the results. Buffer capacity was determined on an
SLM-Aminco 500C spectrofluorimeter by adding 10 mM acetate
(final concentration) to liposomes as described (3). Fluorescence data
from the stopped-flow device were fit to a single exponential curve,
and fitting parameters were used to solve the following equation for
PH+.
|
(Eq. 2)
|
JH+ is the flux of protons,
C is the initial difference in concentration of protons
between the inside and the outside of the vesicle, pH is the change
in pH when time equals , the time constant of the single exponential
curve describing the initial change in fluorescence as a function of
time, and BCV is the buffer capacity of an individual vesicle (3, 10,
20).
NH3 Permeability--
NH3 permeability
was determined using stopped-flow fluorimetry by monitoring the
pH-sensitive increase in fluorescence when vesicles equilibrated to pH
6.8 were rapidly mixed with the same buffer containing 20 mM NH4Cl as described (3, 10, 20). NH3 in solution passes through the membrane and becomes
protonated to NH4+ in the vesicle
interior. By combining values for the rate of change of intravesicular
pH, the final intravesicular pH and the buffer capacity (assessed in
the same way as for proton permeability), PNH3
was calculated (20).
Statistics--
Testing for significant differences was
performed by the Bonferroni t test, which allows for
multiple comparisons. Differences from the exofacial permeability were
tested for, and a p < 0.05 was considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
MDCK Apical Membrane Composition--
The predicted phospholipid
composition of the MDCK type 1 apical membrane leaflets was derived
from published analyses (15, 23) and by making a number of
experimentally supported but simplifying assumptions about the
asymmetric distribution of lipids in the bilayer. Explicitly, the
assumptions were: (i) that the apical:basolateral membrane surface area
ratio is 1:4 (24); (ii) that cholesterol and phospholipid in the apical
membrane are present in a 1:1 ratio (13); (iii) that GSLs are
distributed between apical and basolateral membranes in a 2:1 ratio
(25); (iv) that half of the lipid moles are in each leaflet; (v) that
all GSLs, SM, and PC in the apical membrane are in the exofacial
leaflet (13); and (vi) that all of the PE, PI, and PS in the apical
membrane are in the cytoplasmic leaflet (13).
Hansson et al. (23) performed careful analyses of total
lipids extracted from MDCK type 1 cells and tabulated in
nanomoles/filter the amount of each lipid present. We used these
figures along with further data on the specific apical and basolateral
membrane compositions found in Ref. 15. After allocating lipids on the basis of the published values and the above-listed assumptions, the
remaining moles were balanced with cholesterol, for which no definitive
information exists as to bilayer distribution. Resulting liposome
compositions are shown in Table I.
Liposomes were prepared by suspending dried lipid mixtures in buffer
containing 20 mM CF, heating to 37 °C, vortexing
extensively, probe sonicating, and then extruding through a 200-nm
polycarbonate membrane using an Avanti mini-extruder (26). Phospholipid
and cholesterol quantitation were performed by HPLC analysis (Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., Alabaster, AL) and confirmed that all the
constituents in the cytoplasmic liposomes were present in the correct
proportions. HPLC analyses of exofacial liposomes were performed by
Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., and confirmed that PC, SM, and cholesterol were present in the correct relative ratios, but were unable to provide
any information about the presence or concentration of GSLs. To confirm
that GSLs were being incorporated at the correct molar ratio in the
lipid mixture, liposomes were prepared from lipids in
(chloroform:methanol), which had been spiked with BODIPY FL
C5-glucocerebroside (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR),
[14C]cholesterol (NEN Life Science Products), and
[3H]PC (NEN Life Science Products) prior to drying down
under nitrogen. After the liposomes were prepared, they were washed by
repeated centrifugation and then aliquots of the final liposome
suspension were either scintillation counted or lysed with 0.025%
(w/v) Triton X-100 and fluorimetry performed. From fluorescence
standard curves and the known specific activity of the isotopes used,
we confirmed that each component was present in the correct amount
relative to the others.
Water Permeability of Exofacial and Cytoplasmic Leaflet
Liposomes--
Exofacial and cytoplasmic liposomes were tested for
their permeability to water using stopped-flow fluorimetry. Vesicles
with entrapped CF were rapidly mixed with an identical buffer to which sucrose (an impermeant solute) was added. Vesicles were thus rapidly exposed to an external solution osmolality 2-fold higher than inside.
Water efflux in response to the imposed osmotic gradient causes vesicle
shrinkage and CF self-quenching (Fig.
1C). Cytoplasmic liposomes
exhibited a permeability to water that was approximately 20-fold higher
than that exhibited by exofacial liposomes (Fig. 1C). The
rate of vesicle shrinkage displays single exponential decay kinetics
and curves have been fitted to all stopped-flow profiles to show this.
From parameters that include the initial rate of shrinkage, vesicle
diameters, and applied osmotic gradient, the permeability coefficients
were calculated. Fig. 1A shows the mean results from three
separate liposome preparations. These experiments revealed an extremely
low water permeability for exofacial liposomes of 2.4 ± 0.4 × 10 4 cm/s, whereas cytoplasmic liposomes
were 18.1 times more permeable with a Pf = 4.4 ± 0.3 × 10 3 cm/s
(p < 0.05).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Water permeability of exofacial, cytoplasmic,
and modified exofacial liposomes. Liposomes were prepared as
described under "Experimental Procedures" with entrapped CF.
Stopped-flow experiments were performed in which liposomes were rapidly
exposed to a doubling of extravesicular osmolality. Vesicle shrinkage
results in CF self-quenching. A, osmotic water permeability
of outer leaflet (Exofacial) and inner leaflet
(Cyto) liposomes; mean ± S.E. for three separate
liposome preparations. B, osmotic water permeability of
exofacial liposomes modified by the removal of individual lipids.
C and D, averaged stopped-flow traces
(n = 6 - 10) from a single experiment. Fluorescence was
converted to relative volume and curves show raw data plus superimposed
fitted single exponential decay functions. *, p < 0.05 compared with exofacial.
|
|
Previous work from our laboratory has shown that the leaflets in a
bilayer each offer independent resistances to water and solute
permeation (18, 19). From Equation 1 we can calculate a single leaflet
permeability from the exofacial liposomes and a single leaflet
permeability for the cytoplasmic liposomes (both symmetric bilayers)
and combine them to arrive at a theoretical permeability for an MDCK
apical membrane. Performing this calculation for water permeability
yields a value of 4.6 × 10 4 cm/s, which
is in good agreement with published permeabilities for MDCK type 1 apical membranes, which range from 1.8 × 10 4 cm/s to 10 × 10 4 cm/s (17, 27-29).
Water Permeability of Modified Exofacial Liposomes--
One of the
more striking features of the bilayer asymmetry observed in certain
barrier membranes is the highly concentrated localization of
sphingolipids in the exofacial leaflet (13). We wished to investigate
whether GSLs and/or SM contribute significantly to the observed
membrane impermeability and therefore carried out stopped-flow
experiments on liposomes that lacked these components. We were also
interested to explore the role of cholesterol in reducing membrane
permeability. Accordingly, we prepared exofacial liposomes minus SM
(Exo-SM), minus GSLs (Exo-GSLs), and minus cholesterol (Exo-Chol). In
each case the missing component was replaced on a mol% basis with PC.
In Fig. 1D stopped-flow profiles for each of these
modifications is shown. When compared with the rate of vesicle
shrinkage exhibited by complete exofacial liposomes, removal of either
of the sphingolipids resulted in increased water permeability. Removal
of cholesterol resulted in extremely fast water fluxes. The combined
results from three experiments are shown in Fig. 1B. Removal
of GSLs or SM resulted in 2.1 times higher or 2.4 times higher
Pf, respectively (p < 0.05).
Thus, both SM and GSLs contribute to the low permeability properties of
this membrane. Unsurprisingly, the removal of cholesterol also increased the permeability of this membrane. The magnitude of the
increase is, however, remarkable. Water permeability was increased 37-fold even in the presence of a full complement of sphingolipids.
Effect of Changing Acyl Chain Composition on Water
Permeability--
As we had limited control over the acyl chain
composition of these membranes, we chose lipids purified from mammalian
cells. We anticipated this would yield bilayers with an "averaged"
double bond and chain length heterogeneity (see Supplemental
Material available in the on-line version of this article). To examine further the importance of acyl chain composition on the permeation behavior of these membranes, we constructed exofacial liposomes in
which we replaced bovine heart PC (predominantly 16:0, 18:1, and 18:2
acylation) with DPPC (16:0-16:0), and cytoplasmic liposomes that had
bovine heart PE (predominantly 18:0-20:4) with E. coli PE
(predominantly 16:0-18:1). The other lipids and their proportions were
kept the same. Exofacial liposomes made with DPPC (DPPC/Exo) showed a
reduction in Pf from 2.4 × 10 4 cm/s to 1.6 × 10 4 cm/s, whereas the cytoplasmic liposomes
also exhibited a reduction in water permeability from 4.4 × 10 3 to 1.5 × 10 3 cm/s (Fig.
2B). These membranes exhibited
significantly lower water permeability due to a reduction in the number
of double bonds (p < 0.05). The influence of replacing
bovine heart PC with DPPC is particularly interesting, given that this
species represents only 9% of the total lipid and yet effects a
one-third reduction in Pf (Fig. 2A).
We further tested these DPPC-exofacial liposomes by removing GSLs and
replacing them on a mole for mole basis with DPPC (DPPC/Exo-GSLs in
Fig. 2, A and C). There was no change in permeability (Fig. 2A). As DPPC has a high melting point
(Tm ~41oC) and is structurally
analogous to SM, the choice of artificial PC-lipid effectively masks
the true effect of removing GSLs from the membrane. When bovine heart
PE was replaced with E. coli PE, the result was a two-thirds
reduction in permeability (Fig. 2, B and D). As
PE constitutes 40% of the lipid in this membrane, a reduction in
double bond complement in PE would be anticipated to have a more
profound effect. These data point to the need to carefully consider the
appropriateness of lipids before conducting membrane modeling
experiments. The acyl chain content can dramatically affect a
membrane's biophysical properties.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of changing acyl chain composition on
water permeability. Liposomes were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures" with entrapped CF. Stopped-flow
experiments were performed in which liposomes were rapidly exposed to a
doubling of extravesicular osmolality. A, osmotic water
permeability of exofacial liposomes. Exofacial liposomes had bovine
heart PC replaced with DPPC (DPPC/Exo), or DPPC/Exo
liposomes had GSLs removed and replaced with more DPPC
(DPPC/Exo-GSLs). B, osmotic water permeability of
cytoplasmic liposomes. Cytoplasmic liposomes had bovine heart PE
replaced with E. coli PE (E. coli/Cyto). C and D, averaged
stopped-flow traces (n = 6-10) from single
experiments. Fluorescence was converted to relative volume, and curves
were fitted with single exponential decay functions. Results shown in
A and B are mean ± S.E. for three separate
liposome preparations. *, p < 0.05 compared with
cytoplasmic liposomes.
|
|
Solute Permeability of Exofacial and Cytoplasmic Leaflet
Liposomes--
The permeability of inner and outer leaflet liposomes
to a range of solutes was examined. By abruptly exposing liposomes
pre-loaded with 200 mM solute to an external buffer
solution containing 150 mM solute, solute efflux occurs and
vesicles shrink leading to CF self-quenching. In Figs.
3-6, it can be seen that the
permeability of cytoplasmic liposomes to formamide (Fig. 3,
A and C), acetamide (Fig. 4,
A and C), urea (Fig.
5, A and C), and
glycerol (Fig. 6, A and
C) all exhibit much higher permeabilities than the exofacial liposomes (p < 0.05 for all). The permeability of
cytoplasmic liposomes to formamide, acetamide, urea and glycerol were
22-, 35-, 52-, and 91-fold greater, respectively. These differences are
greater than that observed for water permeability and demonstrate a
rank order that equates with increasing molecular weight of the
permeant. The data show remarkably low permeabilities associated with
the exofacial leaflet and indicate that barrier function to solutes can
clearly be accounted for by the specialized lipid composition of a
single leaflet.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Formamide permeability of exofacial,
cytoplasmic, and modified exofacial liposomes. Liposomes were
prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures" with
entrapped CF. Liposomes were preloaded with 200 mM
formamide and then abruptly exposed to a solution of identical
osmolality containing 150 mM formamide. Solute efflux and
vesicle shrinkage results in CF self-quenching. A, formamide
permeability of outer leaflet (Exofacial) and inner leaflet
(Cyto) liposomes; mean ± S.E. for three separate
liposome preparations. B, formamide permeability of
exofacial liposomes modified by the removal of individual lipids;
Exo-GSL lack glycosphingolipids; Exo-SM lack sphingomyelin; Exo-Chol
lack cholesterol. C and D, averaged stopped-flow
traces (n = 6-10) from a single experiment.
Fluorescence was converted to relative volume, and curves were fitted
with single exponential decay functions. *, p < 0.05 compared with exofacial.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Acetamide permeability of exofacial,
cytoplasmic, and modified exofacial liposomes. Liposomes were
prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures" with
entrapped CF. Liposomes were preloaded with 200 mM
acetamide and then abruptly exposed to a solution of identical
osmolality containing 150 mM acetamide. Solute efflux and
vesicle shrinkage results in CF self-quenching. A, acetamide
permeability of outer leaflet (Exofacial) and inner leaflet
(Cyto) liposomes; mean ± S.E. for three separate
liposome preparations. B, acetamide permeability of
exofacial liposomes modified by the removal of individual lipids;
Exo-GSL lack glycosphingolipids; Exo-SM lack sphingomyelin; Exo-Chol
lack cholesterol. C and D, averaged stopped-flow
traces (n = 6-10) from a single experiment.
Fluorescence was converted to relative volume, and curves were fitted
with single exponential decay functions. *, p < 0.05 compared with exofacial.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Urea permeability of exofacial, cytoplasmic,
and modified exofacial liposomes. Liposomes were prepared as
described under "Experimental Procedures" with entrapped CF.
Liposomes were preloaded with 200 mM urea and then abruptly
exposed to a solution of identical osmolality containing 150 mM urea. Solute efflux and vesicle shrinkage results in CF
self-quenching. A, urea permeability of outer leaflet
(Exofacial) and inner leaflet (Cyto) liposomes;
mean ± S.E. for three separate liposome preparations.
B, urea permeability of exofacial liposomes modified by the
removal of individual lipids; Exo-GSL lack glycosphingolipids; Exo-SM
lack sphingomyelin; Exo-Chol lack cholesterol. C and
D, averaged stopped-flow traces (n = 3-8)
from a single experiment. Fluorescence was converted to relative
volume, and curves were fitted with single exponential decay functions.
*, p < 0.05 compared with exofacial.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Glycerol permeability of exofacial,
cytoplasmic, and modified exofacial liposomes. Liposomes were
prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures" with
entrapped CF. Liposomes were preloaded with 200 mM glycerol
and then abruptly exposed to a solution of identical osmolality
containing 150 mM glycerol. Solute efflux and vesicle
shrinkage results in CF self-quenching. A, glycerol
permeability of outer leaflet (Exofacial) and inner leaflet
(Cyto) liposomes; mean ± S.E. for three separate
liposome preparations. B, glycerol permeability of exofacial
liposomes modified by the removal of individual lipids; Exo-GSL lack
glycosphingolipids; Exo-SM lack sphingomyelin; Exo-Chol lack
cholesterol. C and D, averaged stopped-flow
traces (n = 3-8) from a single experiment.
Fluorescence was converted to relative volume, and curves were fitted
with single exponential decay functions. *, p < 0.05 compared with Exofacial.
|
|
Solute Permeability of Modified Exofacial Leaflet
Liposomes--
When GSLs, SM, and cholesterol were omitted from the
exofacial membranes, the stopped-flow experiments indicated a higher rate of permeation for all of the solutes occurred. This was especially true when cholesterol was absent and rates were much greater
(panel D in Figs. 3-6). The results of
experiments performed in triplicate are shown in Figs. 3-6
(panel B). The increases in exofacial
permeability when GSLs and SM were removed were fairly constant and did
not appear to be solute-dependent. For example removal of
GSLs resulted in 3.4 times higher (formamide, Fig. 3B), 6.1 times higher (acetamide, Fig. 4B), 4.4 times higher (urea,
Fig. 5B), and 5.2 times higher (glycerol, Fig.
6B) permeabilities. For all four solutes, the removal of SM
resulted in rates that were somewhat higher than the GSL-lacking
liposomes. For formamide, acetamide, urea, and glycerol, the increases
were 4.3, 7.5, 5.6, and 5.9 times, respectively. Doing a simple mean on
these two sets of numbers shows that the membranes lacking SM were 22%
more permeable than those lacking GSLs. As the mole fractions of these
two lipids are approximately the same (see Table I), we conclude that
both SM and GSLs contribute to the barrier of the exofacial leaflet,
but SM is 20-25% better at reducing permeability. The removal of
cholesterol, as for water, resulted in a massive increase in the
permeability of all four solutes. The increases for formamide,
acetamide, urea, and cholesterol were 95, 136, 191, and 285 times,
which again follows the rank order of molecular weights for these
non-electrolytes. These data make it clear that sphingolipids alone
will not significantly restrict solute or water permeation.
NH3 Permeability of Leaflet Liposomes--
The
permeation kinetics of NH3 were tested by exposure of
liposomes to an NH4Cl solution clamped to pH 6.8. Free
NH3 gas in the buffer permeates across the membrane and
upon protonation to NH4+ effects an
increase in intravesicular pH, which can by measured by fluorescence
changes. Fig. 7C shows that
NH3 flux is extremely rapid across the membrane of
cytoplasmic leaflet liposomes. In contrast, the flux across exofacial
membranes is much slower. This illustrates an important physiological
phenomenon, namely that ordering a membrane to reduce the permeability
of water and small non-electrolytes is also sufficient to hinder the
permeability of a gas. Fig. 7A shows the quantitative
difference in the permeability of the two membranes to NH3
to be 60-fold. When GSLs were removed from exofacial liposomes the
permeability increased 2.2 times, and when SM was removed the increase
was 4.0 times. Removal of cholesterol increased the NH3
permeability of the membrane 82-fold. These increases are similar to
those seen for solutes and imply that NH3 permeation occurs
by a similar solubility-diffusion mechanism.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
NH3 permeability of exofacial,
cytoplasmic, and modified exofacial liposomes. Liposomes were
prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures" with
entrapped CF. Liposomes equilibrated to pH 6.8 were abruptly exposed to
a buffer of identical pH containing NH4Cl. NH3
entering the liposome becomes protonated to
NH4+, and, as a result, the pH and CF
fluorescence increases. A, NH3 permeability of
outer leaflet (Exofacial) and inner leaflet
(Cyto) liposomes; mean ± S.E. for three separate
liposome preparations. B, NH3 permeability of
exofacial liposomes modified by the removal of individual lipids;
Exo-GSL lack glycosphingolipids; Exo-SM lack sphingomyelin; Exo-Chol
lack cholesterol. C and D, averaged stopped-flow
traces (n = 6-10) from a single experiment.
Fluorescence was converted to pH, and curves were fitted with single
exponential decay functions. *, p < 0.05 compared with
exofacial.
|
|
Apparent Proton Permeability of Leaflet Liposomes--
The proton
permeability of the two membranes was assessed by exposing liposomes
equilibrated to pH 7.5 to an external buffer with pH 6.9. Therefore,
our measurement follows the rate of dissipation of a pH gradient across
the liposomal membrane. Although the precise mechanism of proton
permeation is unclear, this approach allows us to measure the apparent
proton permeability of the membranes in question. It should be noted
that this technique does not allow us to necessarily distinguish
between proton influx or hydroxide anion efflux. However, because
proton flux appears to be independent of pH, there is good reason to
believe that protons are in fact the permeating species (for a fuller
discussion of this point, see Ref. 30). In Fig.
8B, typical
pH-dependent fluorescence quenching profiles are shown for
exofacial and exofacial-lacking-cholesterol liposomes. Cytoplasmic
membrane permeability to protons was unexpectedly slower than that of
exofacial membranes by a factor of four (Fig. 8A). Membranes
with the lowest permeability to protons were cholesterol-depleted exofacial liposomes (Exo-Chol; Fig. 8A). This implies that
cholesterol may contribute to the proton permeation pathway. The
combined permeability data for all liposome variants is shown in Fig.
8A and reveals that the exofacial membranes had the highest
proton permeability (0.011 cm/s) and that removal of sphingolipids
reduced that permeability approximately 2-fold.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Apparent H+ permeability of
exofacial, cytoplasmic, and modified exofacial liposomes.
Liposomes were prepared as described under "Experimental
Procedures" with entrapped CF. Liposomes were abruptly exposed
to a buffer of lower pH such that the extravesicular pH was 6.9. Dissipation of the pH gradient reduces intravesicular pH and CF
fluorescence. A, H+ permeability of outer
leaflet (Exofacial) and inner leaflet (Cyto)
liposomes and of exofacial liposomes modified by the removal of
individual lipids; Exo-GSL lack glycosphingolipids; Exo-SM lack
sphingomyelin; Exo-Chol lack cholesterol; mean ± S.E. for three
separate liposome preparations. B, averaged stopped-flow
traces (n = 6 - 10) from a single experiment.
Fluorescence was converted to pH, and curves were fitted with single
exponential decay functions. *, p < 0.05 compared with
exofacial. The conservativeness of the Bonferroni t test
resulted in only one significant difference. Single comparison testing
gave p = 0.034 and p = 0.013 for
Exo-GSL and inner leaflet (Cyto) liposomes,
respectively.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have used published data on the lipid composition of MDCK type
1 apical membranes and in addition made a number of simplifying assumptions regarding its bilayer asymmetry, in order to construct vesicles that mimic each leaflet's composition. This analysis predicts
that the apical membrane of these cells is comprised of an asymmetric
bilayer, which is enriched in SM, GSLs, and PC in the exofacial
leaflet, whereas the inner leaflet is composed mostly of the
glycerophospholipids, PE, PS, and PI (Table I). Evidence to support
these conclusions has come from a number of studies. For instance, in
brush border membranes from rabbit intestine, it was shown that PE
phospholipid was largely inaccessible to reagents from the outside
(31). A similar accessibility study of rabbit kidney brush border
membranes revealed that PE, PS, and PI were localized to the inner
leaflet, whereas SM was external (32). In MDCK cells a fluorescent
ceramide analogue, which was taken up and converted to SM and GSL in
the Golgi, was completely extractable by bovine serum albumin from the
apical side, demonstrating a preferential accumulation in the exofacial
leaflet (25). The predicted asymmetry also fits with well established
rules, which indicate that choline-containing lipids are mostly
exofacial, whereas the amino-containing phospholipids localize
cytoplasmically (33). Cholesterol is present in both leaflets and was
apportioned according to the quantitative analyses described in the
reference papers (15, 23).
Because the lipids of the exofacial leaflet of polarized epithelia are
laterally constrained by the presence of tight junctions, whereas the
lipids of the cytoplasmic leaflet are not, the inner leaflet of the
apical domain is assumed to be the same as that of the basolateral
membrane (13, 34). As a consequence, it appears likely that the barrier
function exhibited by "water-tight" epithelia resides in the
exofacial leaflet. Present studies directly tested this hypothesis and
confirmed its validity. For water, small non-electrolytes, and
NH3, all substances known to cross phospholipid bilayers by
a "solubility-diffusion" mechanism, the permeability of the
cytoplasmic leaflet was 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than the
exofacial. These data indicated that the presence of appropriate lipids
present in defined ratios was sufficient to generate a membrane with
extremely low permeability to water, solutes, and NH3.
Moreover, these experiments have allowed us to quantitate the magnitude
of that difference in leaflet permeabilities for a range of
biologically relevant permeant molecules.
For water, the cytoplasmic leaflet liposomes were 18 times more
permeable than the exofacial with osmotic permeability coefficients of
4.4 × 10 3 cm/s and 2.4 × 10 4 cm/s, respectively. We have previously
shown that each leaflet is able to offer an independent resistance to
permeation (18, 19). By analogy with electrical circuit theory,
resistance is equal to the reciprocal of the permeability,
i.e. R = 1/Pf (see Eq. 1). As our exofacial and cytoplasmic liposomes have symmetrical leaflets, knowing the membrane permeability of each bilayer allows us
to calculate single leaflet permeabilities according to Equation 1.
Combining the derived value for an exofacial leaflet and a cytoplasmic
leaflet gave us a theoretical osmotic permeability coefficient
(Pf) of 4.6 × 10 4 cm/s, which correlates well with the
measured permeability of this membrane in cultured MDCK type 1 cells.
Such close concordance of measured and theoretical values as determined
by our model system argues that the assumptions made and the lipid
compositions arrived at are probably reasonable representations of the
real membrane and allow us to conclude that the outer leaflet of the MDCK type 1 apical membrane is probably 20-fold less permeable to water
than the inner leaflet. These results also successfully apply Equation 1 to membranes of real cells for the first time.
Although we based our leaflet compositions on the best evidence
available, there is little information known about the acyl chain
composition of these various lipid classes in the MDCK apical membrane.
Consequently, we chose mammalian lipids as the source for these
experiments in an attempt to minimize artifacts that may have arisen
from the use of bacterial or other lipid sources. Based on information
provided by Avanti Polar Lipids, we know the acyl chain composition of
our artificial membranes (see Supplemental Material available on-line).
As expected the saturation ratio (i.e. saturated:unsaturated
(S:U)) was quite different between the two membranes. Exofacial
membranes had an S:U of 2.5 due to the presence of saturated acyl
chains on SM and GSL. In contrast, cytoplasmic membranes had an S:U of
0.6, indicating a much higher proportion of double bond-containing
fatty acids. Exofacial membranes contained high proportions of 16:0
(35.0%), 18:0 (8.1%), and 24:0 (16.4%) acyl chains. The predominant
unsaturated acyl chains were 18:1 and 18:2 (11.1%) and 24:1 (8.4%).
In comparison to this, the cytoplasmic membranes contained little 16:0
with the predominant saturated species being 18:0 (34.1%). Unsaturated
chains were 18:1 (12.3%), 18:2 (12.3%), and 20:4 (27.1%). The acyl
chain composition of these membranes is likely to be an important
contributor to their permeation properties due to the different packing
constraints imposed by the presence of double bonds. Double bonds
introduce a rigid bend in an acyl chain, resulting in greater free
volume space and higher fluidity in the membrane. It has been shown
previously, for substances that cross membranes by a
solubility-diffusion mechanism, that membrane fluidity and permeability
are tightly correlated (20). The results presented here further support this principle.
We investigated the effect of using lipids with different fatty acid
substituents. The use of disaturated DPPC in an exofacial membrane
reduced the membrane permeability but more surprisingly appeared to
substitute for GSLs upon their removal by maintaining low permeability.
At 25oC DPPC is in the gel state and with a
phosphocholine head group strongly resembles SM. Although there is no
amide group for hydrogen bonding with cholesterol, the tight chain
packing induced by cholesterol and saturated PC in the gel state
appears sufficient to compensate for loss of GSLs. It is therefore
extremely important that the most physiologically relevant lipids are
used in membrane modeling studies. Clearly the complement of
unsaturated acyl chains is an important determinant in the permeation
properties of the membrane.
To further examine the validity of our leaflet-specific liposomes as a
model for predicting reconstituted membrane permeabilities, it is
informative to compare our results with permeabilities found in other
barrier epithelia. Our theoretical MDCK membrane permeability to urea
(employing Equation 1) is 6.2 × 10 8
cm/s. This compares to values of 2.1 × 10 7 cm/s (3-fold higher), 7.8 × 10 7 cm/s (13-fold higher), and 5.5 × 10 7 cm/s (9-fold higher) for toad bladder
apical membrane, mammalian bladder apical membrane, and gastric apical
membrane, respectively (3). Therefore, our reconstituted membrane
system has a urea permeability approximately 1 order of magnitude lower
than that seen for some other barrier membranes. We have, in addition,
previously measured the diffusive urea permeability of MDCK cells to be
6.0 × 10 6 cm/s (17). This is
approximately 1 order of magnitude higher than is seen for other
barrier epithelia, and 2 orders of magnitude higher than our model
liposomes would predict for this membrane. We believe this may indicate
some form of facilitated urea uptake by MDCK cells. To the best of our
knowledge, urea transport activity has not specifically been
demonstrated in MDCKs; however, it is possible that cells derived from
the distal nephron would possess such an activity. Further support for
this conjecture comes from permeability studies performed by Rivers
et al. (27), in which they measured the acetamide and
formamide permeabilities of MDCK apical membranes to be 4.1 × 10 6 and 5.5 × 10 6 cm/s, respectively. The theoretical
permeabilities for these two non-electrolytes as derived from our model
liposomes was 3.8 × 10 6 and 5.5 × 10 6 cm/s, respectively, which are in very
close agreement. Furthermore, liposomes composed of 25% SM, 40%
cholesterol, and 35% PC have been shown to have a urea permeability of
4.4 × 10 8 cm/s (20), which is close to
the value obtained for the exofacial liposomes used in this study
(3.1 × 10 8 cm/s with a composition of
25% SM, 39% cholesterol, 36% PC and GSLs). Taken together these
results indicate that urea permeability may be facilitated in MDCK
cells and not reflect simple membrane permeant behavior. Measurements
of water and other solutes, however, appear to validate our hypothesis
and the use of Equation 1 to predict apical membrane permeability properties.
The theoretical MDCK membrane permeability to NH3 is
2.6 × 10 4 cm/s, which is within an order of
magnitude of values measured for other barrier epithelia (3). The
proton permeability for our artificial membrane was 4.3 × 10 3 cm/s, which compares favorably with
values of 8.0 × 10 3 cm/s, 3.0 × 10 3 cm/s, and 19 × 10 3 cm/s, obtained for medullary thick
ascending limb apical membrane, whole mammalian bladder, and gastric
apical membrane, respectively (3). These comparisons between our
in vitro reconstituted membranes and real asymmetric barrier
membranes lend support to the conclusion that these artificial
liposomes reconstitute the biophysical characteristics of true barrier
membranes to a wide range of biologically important permeant molecules.
We performed measurements of proton permeation that relied upon the
dissipation of an applied pH gradient across the liposomal membrane
with consequent quenching of an intravesicular pH-dependent fluorophore. Although this is a well established technique for monitoring proton permeation processes (3, 10, 19, 20, 22, 30, 37), the
exact mechanism is not well understood. Measurements of proton
permeability can yield very different values depending on the method
used. If small pH gradients are allowed to dissipate around pH 7, values in the range of 10 4 cm/s are obtained
(35). However, if large pH gradients are applied to liposomes, proton
fluxes with values of 10 9 cm/s are recorded
(36). This phenomenon was explored by Deamer and Nichols (37) and led
them to conclude that decay of large pH gradients results in diffusion
potentials that limit proton flux. Addition of valinomycin in
K+-containing buffers eliminated the formation of membrane
potentials and therefore allowed proton fluxes to become rate-limiting.
However, if proton fluxes were measured near pH 7 in the presence of
small proton gradients, there was no formation of a limiting diffusion potential (37). Our experiments were carried out under the latter conditions, and as noted by Deamer and Nichols, the presence or absence
of valinomycin did not affect the rate of proton flux. Although this
indicates our measurements were not influenced by the formation of
membrane potentials, it does appear to contradict rules of
electroneutrality. Given that we cannot rule out that our proton flux
may be accompanied by some other charge-dissipating process
i.e. proton-anion co-permeation, we have chosen to refer to
these measurements as demonstrating the apparent proton permeability of
the liposomal membranes.
Our measurements of proton permeability in cytoplasmic and exofacial
membranes yielded the unusual result that cytoplasmic lipids had 4-fold
lower proton permeability than the exofacial (Fig. 8). The mechanism by
which protons translocate across phospholipid bilayers is not well
understood, but it has clearly been established that, unlike water,
solutes, and NH3, membrane fluidity is not a key
determinant in permeation (19, 20, 38). In a study that examined the
relationship between membrane fluidity and permeability, it was found
that liposomes of differing composition and fluidities exhibited water
permeabilities that varied up to 70-fold, whereas proton permeability
varied no more than 3-fold. Moreover, within that 3-fold range, there
was poor correlation between proton permeability and the fluidity of
the membrane (20). Another set of experiments performed on DPPC
liposomes revealed that protons permeated 4 times faster when the
liposomes were heated above the phase-transition temperature, but that
solute fluxes under the same conditions increased by 2 orders of
magnitude (19). Brookes et al. (38) showed that liposomes
made from phospholipids extracted from the mitochondrial inner membrane
of eight different vertebrate species, with widely varying
mitochondrial proton leak and degree of acyl chain unsaturation
exhibited no differences in proton permeability. They concluded there
was no correlation between liposome proton permeability and
phospholipid fatty acid composition. The data presented here further
support this. When cholesterol was removed from the exofacial membrane,
water permeability increased nearly 40-fold. In dramatic contrast to
this, proton permeability decreased 6.5-fold.
Proton permeation across membranes has been shown to occur at rates
5-6 orders of magnitude higher than for other monovalent cations.
Several explanations have been proposed to account for this anomalous
behavior. The first hypothesizes the presence of fatty acid
"contaminants" within the membrane that are available for
protonation. The protonated species translocates to the other side,
releases a proton, and then cycles back as the anionic species (39,
40). The second proposes the formation of transient defects in the
interfacial region of the bilayer through which water "fingers" may
project briefly and from which hydrated pores carrying protons may be
pinched off. Water molecules present within the hydrophobic interior of
the bilayer may then form transient hydrogen bonded chains or water
wires, along which protons can move, thus allowing sequential water to
water translocation across the membrane (30, 39, 41). Evidence for both
mechanisms exist, and it is likely that both contribute to some degree
depending on the nature of the membrane: its composition, thickness,
the pH on either side of the bilayer, the relevant buffering agents
present, and the temperature. Our proton flux data for the modified
exofacial membranes reveal an additional intriguing possibility. When
either of the sphingolipids was removed, proton permeation was reduced
(Fig. 8). When cholesterol was removed entirely, the rate fell to
one-sixth of that shown by the complete membrane. This phenomenon
suggests that there is something specific about the presence of both
cholesterol and sphingolipid in this membrane that facilitates proton
transfer. One possibility is that the specific hydrogen bonding
interaction, which occurs between the 3-OH group of cholesterol and the
amide group present on GSLs and SM, provides a suitable early docking site for protons close to the aqueous/lipid headgroup interfacial region. The presence of this hydrogen bond may lower the free energy
required for protons to partition into the proximal hydrophobic region
of the membrane. The slow rate of permeation across cytoplasmic membranes may be consistent with this model. Although cholesterol constitutes 37 mol% of this bilayer, there are no sphingolipids present; therefore, the specific hydrogen bonding interaction we
speculate may be important is not present. The effect of cholesterol and cholesterol/sphingolipid interactions on proton transport has not
previously been studied. Therefore, further work will be needed to
confirm this hypothesis.
Our model liposomes appear to recapitulate the barrier properties of
the MDCK apical membrane to water, solutes (with the exception of
urea), and NH3, to a degree consistent with that actually
observed in these cells. The differences in permeability between the
two membrane compositions is most likely due to the reduction in
fluidity and increase in chain ordering, which occurs as a consequence
of sphingolipid/cholesterol interactions in the exofacial liposomes.
Specifically, it has been shown that there are likely to be hydrogen
bonding interactions between the amide functional group of SM and the
3-OH group of cholesterol (16, 42). In addition, there are likely to be
strong van der Waals attractions as a result of the contribution of the
planar steroid rings interacting with the saturated hydrocarbon chains
of the sphingolipids. These cohesive forces result in greater chain
ordering due to a reduction in trans-gauche isomerization
about the carbon-carbon bonds and an increase in sphingolipid packing
density (42). In addition to these interactions, GSLs are also known to
self-associate through hydrogen bonding of their glycosyl head groups.
Therefore, either in isolation or collectively, these molecular
interplays may be responsible for reducing the fluidity and
consequently the permeability of the exofacial leaflet.
To investigate which of the associative interactions between the lipids
used in our exofacial liposomes were of greatest significance, we
focused on the putative contribution of the sphingolipids. As GSLs are
present in high concentration in the exofacial leaflet of epithelial
apical membranes and appear to be almost exclusively localized to this
membrane domain, we hypothesized that they might play a significant
role in reducing membrane permeability. Indeed, this proved to be the
case with both GSLs and SM contributing to reduced membrane
permeability. The removal of approximately 20 mol% of either species
and replacement with bovine heart PC resulted in 2-3-fold increases in
membrane water permeability. For solutes, the increases were a little
higher (3-7-fold). The data suggested that SM was better at reducing
membrane permeability than GSLs. This is consistent with findings that
show that cholesterol has a greater condensing effect on SM compared
with galactosylceramide films when those sphingolipids were acyl
chain-matched and in similar phase states (43). The greater
cross-sectional area reduction exhibited by SM compared with GSL would
certainly lead to tighter packing and hence lower permeability. When
cholesterol was removed, the water permeability increased by 37-fold. A
large increase in permeability was anticipated because of the known ability of cholesterol to condense and rigidify lipid bilayers. Cholesterol with its relatively planar structure orients itself with
the polar 3-OH group toward the aqueous phase and its tetracyclic rings
positioned between carbons 2 and 10 of the acyl chains (42). This
spatial localization tends to increase local ordering of acyl chains in
the proximal portion of the leaflet. In addition, as noted, the 3-OH
can function as hydrogen bond donor and interact with the amide group
of sphingolipids.
It is worth noting that the presence of sphingolipids in high
concentrations in the outer leaflet of epithelial apical membranes can
trap cholesterol in that leaflet by virtue of hydrogen bonding interactions and therefore may be contributing to the formation and
functioning of detergent insoluble glycolipid rafts. These cholesterol
and sphingolipid enriched microdomains have been implicated in a range
of critical cellular processes including intracellular lipid and
protein sorting, caveolae formation, and signal transduction (44, 45).
The cell, therefore, may not only be erecting a defensive shield at its
apical pole but also be assembling functional lipid ensembles necessary
for other specific molecular interactions.
These results demonstrate that MDCK type 1 cells can synthesize a low
permeability apical membrane by the selective trafficking of
cholesterol, SM, and GSLs to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane.
The cytoplasmic leaflet of this membrane, although possessing a
relatively high cholesterol content (37.3 mol%), is nonetheless quite
permeable to water and solutes, presumably due to the inability of
cholesterol to form hydrogen bonds with glycerophospholipids like PE
and PS. The successful application of the additive reciprocal equation
for leaflet permeabilities validates our modeling of the MDCK apical
membrane. The concordance of derived apical membrane permeability
coefficients with actual permeabilities measured by others provides
strong evidence that our liposomes had realistic lipid compositions and
further validates the hypothesis that leaflets offer independent
barriers to the permeation of small uncharged molecules.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. Dexi Liu for use of the particle sizer.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a research fellowship from the
National Kidney Foundation and by National Institutes of Health Grant
DK43955.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The on-line version of this article (available at
http://www.jbc.org) contains a table with the complete acyl chain
composition of our artificial membranes.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
Epithelial Cell Biology, Renal-Electrolyte Div., 1218 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St., University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Tel.:
412-648-9636; Fax: 412-648-2117; E-mail:
zeidel@msx.dept-med.pitt.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 19, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003494200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SM, sphingomyelin;
MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney;
PE, phosphatidylethanolamine;
PS, phosphatidylserine;
PI, phosphatidylinositol;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
GSL, glycosphingolipid;
DPPC, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine;
CF, carboxy- fluorescein;
Pf, osmotic water
permeability coefficient;
Exo-SM, exofacial liposomes minus
sphingomyelin;
Exo-GSL, exofacial liposomes minus glycosphingolipid;
Exo-Chol, exofacial liposomes minus cholesterol;
S:U, saturated:unsaturated ratio;
HPLC, high pressure liquid
chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Zeidel, M. L.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
F243-F245
|
| 2.
|
Negrete, H. O.,
Lavelle, J. P.,
Berg, J.,
Lewis, S. A.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
F886-F894
|
| 3.
|
Rivers, R.,
Blanchard, A.,
Eladari, D.,
Leviel, F.,
Paillard, M.,
Podevin, R. A.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
F453-F462
|
| 4.
|
Lavelle, J. P.,
Apodaca, G.,
Meyers, S. A.,
Ruiz, W. G.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
F205-F214
|
| 5.
|
Lavelle, J. P.,
Meyers, S. A.,
Ruiz, W. G.,
Buffington, C. A. T.,
Zeidel, M. L.,
and Apodaca, G. A.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
F540-F553
|
| 6.
|
Lewis, S. A.,
Eaton, D. C.,
Clausen, C.,
and Diamond, J. M.
(1977)
J. Gen. Physiol.
70,
427-440
|
| 7.
|
Lichtenberger, L. M.
(1987)
Clin. Invest. Med.
10,
181-188
|
| 8.
|
Lewis, S. A.,
and Hanrahan, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
192,
632-650
|
| 9.
|
Priver, N. A.,
Rabon, E. C.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
2459-2468
|
| 10.
|
Lande, M. B.,
Priver, N. A.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
C367-C374
|
| 11.
|
Lewis, S. A.
(1977)
Am. J. Physiol.
232,
F187-F195
|
| 12.
|
Lewis, S. A.,
and de Moura, J. L.
(1984)
J. Membr. Biol.
82,
123-136
|
| 13.
|
Simons, K.,
and van Meer, G.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
6197-6202
|
| 14.
|
van Meer, G.,
Gumbiner, B.,
and Simons, K.
(1986)
Nature
322,
639-641
|
| 15.
|
van Meer, G.,
and Simons, K.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
1455-1464
|
| 16.
|
Bittman, R.,
Kasireddy, C. R.,
Mattjus, P.,
and Slotte, J. P.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
11776-11781
|
| 17.
|
Lavelle, J. P.,
Negrete, H. O.,
Poland, P. A.,
Kinlough, C. L.,
Meyers, S. D.,
Hughey, R. P.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
F67-F75
|
| 18.
|
Negrete, H. O.,
Rivers, R. L.,
Goughs, A. H.,
Colombini, M.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11627-11630
|
| 19.
|
Hill, W. G.,
Rivers, R. L.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1999)
J. Gen. Physiol.
114,
405-414
|
| 20.
|
Lande, M. B.,
Donovan, J. M.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1995)
J. Gen. Physiol.
106,
67-84
|
| 21.
|
Grossman, E. B.,
Harris, H. W., Jr.,
Star, R. A.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
262,
C1109-C1118
|
| 22.
|
Chang, A.,
Hammond, T. G.,
Sun, T. T.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
C1483-C1492
|
| 23.
|
Hansson, G. C.,
Simons, K.,
and van Meer, G.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
483-489
|
| 24.
|
van Genderen, I.,
and van Meer, G.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
645-654
|
| 25.
|
van Meer, G.,
Stelzer, E. H. K.,
Wijnaendts-van Resandt, R. W.,
and Simons, K.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
1623-1635
|
| 26.
|
Prasad, G. V. R.,
Coury, L. A.,
Finn, F.,
and Zeidel, M. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33123-33126
|
| 27.
|
Rivers, R. L.,
McAteer, J. A.,
Clendenon, J. L.,
Connors, B. A.,
and Williams, J. C.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C226-C234
|
| 28.
|
Timbs, M. M.,
and Spring, K. R.
(1996)
J. Membr. Biol.
153,
1-11
|
| 29.
|
Farinas, J.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
3511-3522
|
| 30.
|
Deamer, D. W.,
and Volkov, A. G.
(1995)
in
Permeability and Stability of Lipid Bilayers
(DiSalvo, E. A.
, and Simon, S. A., eds)
, pp. 161-177, CRC Press, London
|
| 31.
|
Barsukov, L. I.,
Bergelson, L. D.,
Spiess, M.,
Hauser, H.,
and Semenza, G.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
862,
87-99
|
| 32.
|
Venien, C.,
and Le Grimellec, C.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
942,
159-168
|
| 33.
|
Op den Kamp, J. A.
(1979)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
48,
47-71
|
| 34.
|
van Meer, G.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
5,
247-275
|
| 35.
|
Nichols, J. W.,
and Deamer, D. W.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
2038-2042
|
| 36.
|
Nozaki, Y.,
and Tanford, C.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
4324-4328
|
| 37.
|
Deamer, D. W.,
and Nichols, J. W.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
165-168
|
| 38.
|
Brookes, P. S.,
Hulbert, A. J.,
and Brand, M. D.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1330,
157-164
|
| 39.
|
Gutknecht, J.
(1987)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
19,
427-442
|
| 40.
|
Gutknecht, J.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6443-6446
|
| 41.
|
Nagle, J. F.,
and Morowitz, H. J.
(1978)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
75,
298-302
|
| 42.
|
Brown, R. E.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1-9
|
| 43.
|
Smaby, J. M.,
Momsen, M.,
Kulkarni, V. S.,
and Brown, R. E.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
5696-5704
|
| 44.
|
Brown, D. A.,
and London, E.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
14,
111-136
|
| 45.
|
Simons, K.,
and Ikonen, E.
(1997)
Nature
387,
569-572
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Adijanto, T. Banzon, S. Jalickee, N. S. Wang, and S. S. Miller
CO2-induced ion and fluid transport in human retinal pigment epithelium
J. Gen. Physiol.,
May 25, 2009;
133(6):
603 - 622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Missner, P. Kugler, S. M. Saparov, K. Sommer, J. C. Mathai, M. L. Zeidel, and P. Pohl
Carbon Dioxide Transport through Membranes
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2008;
283(37):
25340 - 25347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Mathai, S. Tristram-Nagle, J. F. Nagle, and M. L. Zeidel
Structural Determinants of Water Permeability through the Lipid Membrane
J. Gen. Physiol.,
December 31, 2007;
131(1):
69 - 76.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Endeward and G. Gros
Low carbon dioxide permeability of the apical epithelial membrane of guinea-pig colon
J. Physiol.,
August 15, 2005;
567(1):
253 - 265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Hill, E. Almasri, W. G. Ruiz, G. Apodaca, and M. L. Zeidel
Water and solute permeability of rat lung caveolae: high permeabilities explained by acyl chain unsaturation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2005;
289(1):
C33 - C41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Zeidel, J. C. Mathai, J. D. Campbell, W. G. Ruiz, G. L. Apodaca, J. Riordan, and M. L. Zeidel
Selective permeability barrier to urea in shark rectal gland
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2005;
289(1):
F83 - F89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Hill, N. M. Southern, B. MacIver, E. Potter, G. Apodaca, C. P. Smith, and M. L. Zeidel
Isolation and characterization of the Xenopus oocyte plasma membrane: a new method for studying activity of water and solute transporters
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2005;
289(1):
F217 - F224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Brunaldi, M. A. Miranda, F. Abdulkader, R. Curi, and J. Procopio
Fatty acid flip-flop and proton transport determined by short-circuit current in planar bilayers
J. Lipid Res.,
February 1, 2005;
46(2):
245 - 251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Hill, J. C. Mathai, R. H. Gensure, J. D. Zeidel, G. Apodaca, J. P. Saenz, E. Kinne-Saffran, R. Kinne, and M. L. Zeidel
Permeabilities of teleost and elasmobranch gill apical membranes: evidence that lipid bilayers alone do not account for barrier function
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2004;
287(1):
C235 - C242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Nikaido
Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 2003;
67(4):
593 - 656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Min, G. Zhou, M. Schapira, T.-T. Sun, and X.-P. Kong
Structural basis of urothelial permeability barrier function as revealed by Cryo-EM studies of the 16 nm uroplakin particle
J. Cell Sci.,
October 15, 2003;
116(20):
4087 - 4094.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Hill, M. A. Kaetzel, B. K. Kishore, J. R. Dedman, and M. L. Zeidel
Annexin A4 Reduces Water and Proton Permeability of Model Membranes but Does Not Alter Aquaporin 2-mediated Water Transport in Isolated Endosomes
J. Gen. Physiol.,
April 28, 2003;
121(5):
413 - 425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Hu, S. Meyers, F.-X. Liang, F.-M. Deng, B. Kachar, M. L. Zeidel, and T.-T. Sun
Role of membrane proteins in permeability barrier function: uroplakin ablation elevates urothelial permeability
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
December 1, 2002;
283(6):
F1200 - F1207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Mathai, G. D. Sprott, and M. L. Zeidel
Molecular Mechanisms of Water and Solute Transport across Archaebacterial Lipid Membranes
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 13, 2001;
276(29):
27266 - 27271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Fischer, J. H. Widdicombe, and B. Illek
Acid secretion and proton conductance in human airway epithelium
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
April 1, 2002;
282(4):
C736 - C743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|