|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002194200 on June 21, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 39, 30211-30219, September 29, 2000
Heterologous Desensitization Mediated by G Protein-specific
Binding to Caveolin*
Karnam S.
Murthy and
Gabriel M.
Makhlouf
From the Departments of Physiology and Medicine, Medical College of
Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University,
Richmond, Virginia 23298-0711
Received for publication, March 13, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We examined the notion that sequestration of G
protein subunits by binding to caveolin impedes G protein reassociation
and leads to transient, G protein-specific desensitization of response in dispersed smooth muscle cells. Cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) and substance P (SP) were used to activate
Gq/11, cyclopentyl adenosine (CPA) was used to
activate Gi3, and acetylcholine (ACh) was used to activate
both Gq/11 and Gi3 via m3 and m2 receptors, respectively. CCK-8 and SP increased only G q/11, and CPA
increased only G i3 in caveolin immunoprecipitates;
caveolin and other G proteins were not increased. ACh increased both
G q/11 and G i3 in a time- and
concentration-dependent fashion: only G q/11
was increased in the presence of an m2 antagonist, and only
G i3 was increased in the presence of an m3 antagonist.
To determine whether transient G protein binding to caveolin affected
subsequent responses mediated by the same G protein, PLC- activity
was measured in cells stimulated sequentially with two different
agonists that activate either the same or a different G protein. After
treatment of the cells with ACh and an m2 antagonist, the phospholipase C- (PLC- ) response to CCK-8 and SP, but not CPA, was decreased; conversely, after treatment of the cells with ACh and an m3 antagonist, the PLC- response to CPA, but not CCK-8 or SP, was decreased. Similarly, after treatment with CCK-8 or SP, the PLC- response mediated by Gq/11 only was decreased, whereas after
treatment with CPA, the PLC- response mediated by Gi3
only was decreased. A caveolin-binding G q/11 fragment
blocked the binding of activated G q/11 but not
G i3 to caveolin-3 and prevented desensitization of the
PLC- response mediated only by other Gq/11-coupled
receptors. A caveolin-binding G i3 fragment had the
reverse effect. Thus, transient binding of receptor-activated G protein
subunits to caveolin impedes reassociation of the heterotrimeric
species and leads to desensitization of response mediated by other
receptors coupled to the same G protein.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Molecular cloning has identified three distinct genes encoding
caveolins, the main structural proteins of caveolae (1-7). Caveolins
(caveolin-1 and caveolin-1 , caveolin-2, and caveolin-3) exhibit
tissue-specific distribution: caveolin-1 and caveolin-2 are
co-localized and abundantly expressed in adipocytes, endothelial cells,
and fibroblasts; caveolin-3 is expressed exclusively in skeletal,
cardiac and smooth muscle and is not co-localized with caveolin-2
except in undifferentiated cells (3, 8, 9). Caveolin-1 and caveolin-3
form large homo-oligomers (200-440 kDa); in addition, caveolin-1
associates with caveolin-2 to form larger hetero-oligomers (8, 10,
11).
The structure of caveolin monomers is similar, with a central 33-amino
acid segment and hydrophilic N-terminal (70-101 amino acids) and
C-terminal (43-44 amino acids) segments facing the cytoplasm (3, 7,
12). The C-terminal segment directs the formation of homo-oligomers. A
short cytosolic domain within this segment (residues 82-101 in
caveolin-1 , 54-73 in caveolin-2, and 55-74 in caveolin-3) termed
the "caveolin-scaffolding domain" determines the binding of
caveolin to various signaling molecules, such as G protein subunits
(13-15), endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (16, 17), protein kinase C
isoforms (18, 19), G protein-coupled receptor kinases (20), and a
variety of receptor and cytosolic tyrosine kinases (Ras and Src family
tyrosine kinases, mitogen-activated protein kinases, and epidermal and
platelet-derived growth factor receptors (21-27)). Upon activation,
some G protein-coupled receptors (e.g. endothelin-A (28),
bradykinin-B2 (29), 2 adrenergic (30), and
muscarinic m2 receptors (31)) translocate to caveolae where they bind
to caveolin.
Compelling evidence exists that a variety of signaling events are
initiated in caveolae (16, 22, 42), consistent with the notion that
caveolin provides a scaffold for the assembly of signaling molecules
into modules primed for activation. Caveolin could also act to restrain
cellular response by selective binding of signaling molecules, such as
G proteins. Caveolin-binding motifs consisting of 10-15-mer sequences
with characteristically spaced aromatic residues
( X XXXX or
XXXX XX , where is the aromatic amino
acid Trp, Phe, or Tyr), are present in all caveolin-binding proteins,
including G proteins (13). Binding of G proteins to caveolin could lead
to their sequestration and enrichment in inactive form in caveolar
microdomains (6). Pharmacological activation with
GTP S1 strongly inhibits
and mutational activation abolishes G protein binding to caveolin
consistent with preferential interaction of caveolin with GDP-bound
G subunits (15).
The possibility that receptor-activated G protein subunits are
sequestered by binding to caveolin or a caveolin-associated protein,
leading to transient, G protein-specific desensitization of response,
has been raised but not experimentally tested (29). This notion was
examined in the present study using a series of agonists previously
shown to activate Gq/11 (cholecystokinin octapeptide, and
substance P), Gi3 (cyclopentyl adenosine), or both
Gq/11 and Gi3 (acetylcholine) in smooth muscle
(33-37). Caveolin-binding fragments of G q/11 and
G i3 were used to inhibit competitively G binding to
caveolin and suppress desensitization of response (13, 15). The results
show that receptor activation was followed by transient binding of
activated G to caveolin that was selectively blocked by
caveolin-binding fragments. Binding of G to caveolin resulted in
transient desensitization of cellular response mediated by other
receptors coupled to the same G protein.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Preparation of Dispersed Smooth Muscle Cells--
Muscle cells
were isolated from the circular muscle layer of rabbit intestine by
enzymatic digestion at 31 °C with collagenase, followed by
filtration though 500-µm Nitex mesh and low speed centrifugation as
described previously (33, 35, 37). The cells were suspended in HEPES
medium containing 120 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM
KH2PO4, 4.0 mM KCl, 0.6 mM MgCl2, 25 mM HEPES, and 2.1%
essential amino acid mixture. In some experiments, muscle cells were
permeabilized by 5-min treatment with saponin (35 µg/ml) and
resuspended in low Ca2+ (100 nM) medium
(37).
Identification of Receptor-activated G Proteins--
G proteins
selectively activated by various receptors were identified by the
method of Okamoto et al. and others (37, 38). Muscle
cell homogenates were centrifuged at 27,000 × g for 15 min, and the crude membranes were suspended in 20 mM HEPES
medium (pH 7.4) containing 2 mM EDTA and 240 mM
NaCl. The membranes were diluted 20-fold and incubated at 37 °C with
60 nM [35S]GTP S in a medium containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 µM EDTA, and 10 mM MgCl2. The reaction was stopped with 10 volumes of 100 mM Tris-HCl medium (pH 8.0) containing 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, and 20 µM GTP, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h on ice
in wells coated with specific G protein antibodies. The wells were washed with phosphate buffer solution containing 0.05% Tween 20, and
the radioactivity from each well was counted.
Assay for PLC- Activity--
PLC- activity was measured
from the formation of total inositol phosphates in muscle cells
prelabeled with myo-[3H]inositol as described
previously (39). 10 ml of cell suspension (2 × 106
cell/ml) were labeled with myo-[3H]inositol
(15 µCi/ml) for 3 h at 31 °C. The cells were centrifuged at
350 × g for 10 min and resuspended in 10 ml of fresh
HEPES medium. The cells were treated with one agonist for 10 min and centrifuged again at 350 × g for 5 min. Various
agonists were then added to 0.5 ml of cell suspension for 30 s,
and the reaction was terminated with 940 µl of
chloroform:methanol:HCl (50:100:1 v/v/v). After chloroform (310 µl)
and water (310 µl) were added, the samples were vortexed, and the
phases were separated by centrifugation at 1000 × g
for 15 min. The upper aqueous phase was applied to Dowex AG-1 × 8 columns. After washing, inositol phosphates were eluted with 5 ml of
0.8 M ammonium formate with 0.1 M formic acid, and the eluates were collected into scintillation vials and counted in
gel phase after addition of 10 ml of scintillant. The results were
expressed as cpm/106 cells.
Caveolin Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting of G
Proteins--
Smooth muscle cells (2-3 × 106
cells/ml) were lysed by incubation for 30 min at 4 °C in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100,
and 60 mM octyl glucoside, and the lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was
precleared by incubation with 0.1% albumin-coated protein A-Sepharose
for 6 h at 4 °C and then incubated overnight with polyclonal
caveolin-3 antibody at a final concentration of 4 µg/ml. Protein
A-Sepharose was then added for 1 h, and the mixture was
centrifuged for 5 min. The immunoprecipitates were washed four times
with lysis buffer and boiled in Laemmli buffer. Samples were separated
by SDS-PAGE in 12% acrylamide gel, electrotransferred to
nitrocellulose paper, and probed with antibodies to G i3,
G q/11, or caveolin-3. After incubation with secondary
antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, the proteins were
visualized using the Super Signal ULTRA chemiluminescent substrate. The
intensity of the protein band on Hyperfilm-ECL was determined by densitometry.
Detergent-free Purification of Caveolin-enriched Membrane
Fractions--
Caveolin-enriched membrane fractions derived from
intestinal smooth muscle were prepared by the method of Song et
al. (9). Dispersed muscle cells were washed three times in
phosphate-buffered saline and suspended in 2 ml of 500 mM
sodium carbonate (pH 11.0) containing 0.2 mM of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 20 µg/ml of leupeptin and
homogenized with a Polytron tissue grinder (three 10-s bursts) and by
sonication (three 20-s bursts). The homogenate was adjusted to 45%
sucrose in MBS (25 mM Mes, pH 6.5, and 0.15 M
NaCl), placed in an ultracentrifuge tube and overlaid with two 4-ml
layers of 35 and 5% sucrose in MBS containing 250 mM
sodium carbonate. The gradient was centrifuged at 39,000 rpm for
20 h. Twelve 1-ml fractions were collected sequentially from the
top and designated as fractions 1-12. Fractions were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE (15% acrylamide gels); after transfer to nitrocellulose
membranes, Western blot analysis was performed with antibodies to
caveolin-3 and various G subunits. Immunoreactive bands were
visualized by 1-h incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibodies followed by enhanced chemiluminescence assay.
For protein immunoprecipitation from caveolin-enriched fractions, the
purified membranes were diluted to 2 mg protein/ml in lysis buffer,
incubated on ice for 1 h, and centrifuged. The lysate was
precleared by 1-h incubation with protein A-Sepharose and then
incubated overnight with caveolin-3 antibody and for 2 h with
protein A-Sepharose. Immunoprecipitates were washed five times with
lysis buffer and resuspended in 30 µl of 2-fold concentrated Laemmli
buffer; after separation on SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, immunoblot analysis with caveolin-3 and G antibodies was performed.
Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Assay in Caveolar
Membranes--
PIP2 was measured by thin layer
chromatography in caveolar membranes as described previously (40, 41).
A 20-ml cell suspension (106 cells/ml) was incubated with
500 µCi of [32P]Pi at 31 °C for 3 h. Duplicate samples (106 cells/ml) were incubated at
31 °C with ACh (0.1 µM), cholecystokinin-8 (CCK-8 1 nM), SP (1 µM), and CPA (1 µM)
separately for 30 s. The reaction was terminated by centrifugation
at 15,000 × g for 5 min followed by addition of 1 ml
of HEPES buffer (25 mM) containing 0.5% Triton X-100.
The mixture was incubated for 10 min and then centrifuged at
15,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatant and pellets were extracted with 1.8 ml of chloroform-methanol-HCl (100:200:2 v/v/v). The
organic phase was analyzed for PIP2 by thin layer
chromatography. The results were expressed as cpm/106 cells.
[3H]Scopolamine Binding to Smooth Muscle
Cells--
Binding of [3H]scopolamine to dispersed
intestinal smooth muscle cells was done as described previously (37).
Muscle cells were suspended in HEPES medium containing 1% bovine serum
albumin. Triplicate 0.5-ml aliquots (106 cells/ml) were
incubated for 15 min with 1 nM
[3H]scopolamine alone or with acetylcholine. Bound and
free radioligand were separated by rapid filtration under reduced
pressure through 5-µm polycarbonate Nucleopore filters and washed
four times with 3 ml of ice-cold HEPES medium containing 0.2% bovine
serum albumin. Nonspecific binding (28 ± 6%) was calculated as
the amount of radioactivity in the presence of 10 µM
acetylcholine. [3H]Scopolamine binding was measured in
control cells and in cells treated for 10 min with 1 nM
CCK-8, 1 µM SP, 1 µM CPA, or 0.1 µM ACh.
Materials--
Two peptides corresponding to the
caveolin-binding domains of G q/11,
Tyr192-Ala206 (YPFDLQSVIFRMVDA) and
G i3, Thr187-Val201
(THFTFKELYFKMFDV) were synthesized by the solid phase method and
purified (95-99%) by high performance liquid chromatography (Peptidogenic, CA). [2-3H]Inositol,
[3H]scopolamine, [35S]GTP S, and
[32P]orthophosphate were obtained from NEN Life Science
Products; Dowex AG-1 × 8 resin was from Bio-Rad;
polyclonal G q/11, G i1/2, and
G i3 antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology;
and caveolin-3 antibody was from Transduction Laboratories
(Lexington, KY). All other reagents were from Sigma.
 |
RESULTS |
Agonist-induced Activation of G Proteins--
G protein activation
was determined directly from the increase in agonist-stimulated binding
of [35S]GTP S to specific G subunits in solubilized
intestinal smooth muscle cell membranes. CCK-8 and SP selectively
activated Gq/11, whereas CPA selectively activated
Gi3 (Table I). ACh activated both Gq/11 and
Gi3 via m3 and m2 receptors, respectively, as shown previously (37).
Distribution of Caveolin-3 and G Proteins in Caveolar Membranes in
the Basal State and after Stimulation with Agonists--
Immunoblot
analysis of 12 fractions derived from intestinal smooth muscle cells
showed that caveolin-3 was confined to low density fractions 5 and 6, whereas G proteins (G q, G i1/2, and G i3) were present in fractions 5 and 6, as well as in
membrane fractions 9-12 (Fig. 1). The
pattern was similar to that obtained in other cell types (15, 29).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Location of caveolin-3 and
G subunits in smooth muscle membrane
fractions. Twelve sucrose-density gradient fractions were prepared
as described under "Experimental Procedures" and subjected to
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with specific antibodies to
caveolin-3 and G subunits. Caveolin-3 was confined to low density
fractions 5 and 6. G subunits were present in fractions 5 and 6, as
well as fractions 9-12.
|
|
A specific redistribution of G proteins to caveolin-enriched fractions
(combined fractions 5 and 6) occurred upon treatment of smooth muscle
cells with agonists. Treatment with CCK-8 (1 nM) for 10 min caused a significant increase of G q/11 (154 ± 18%; p < 0.01) but not G i3,
G i2, or G i1 in caveolin
immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2). Conversely,
treatment with CPA (1 µM) caused a significant increase
of G i3 (168 ± 24%; p < 0.01),
but not G q/11, G i2, or
G i1, in caveolin immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2). There
was no change in caveolin-3 after treatment with either agonist (Fig. 2). The increase in G binding to caveolin paralleled agonist-induced activation of the corresponding G protein (Table
I).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Immunoblot analysis of G protein subunits and
caveolin-3 in caveolin immunoprecipitates. Caveolin
immunoprecipitates were obtained from caveolin-enriched fractions
(fractions 5 and 6 in Fig. 1) derived from muscle cells treated for 10 min with CCK-8 (1 nM) or CPA (1 µM).
Immunoblot analysis with G and caveolin-3 antibodies was then
performed. A selective increase of G q/11 with CCK-8
(p < 0.01), and of G i3 with CPA
(p < 0.01) was observed, without increase in
G i1/2 or caveolin-3. Results are expressed as
percentages of basal level. Values are the means ± S.E. of three
experiments.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Selective activation of G proteins by agonists
CHAPS-solubilized smooth muscle membranes were incubated for 20 min
with 60 nM [35S]GTP S alone or with various
agonists and then added to wells coated with specific G antibodies
(Ab). Values are the means ± S.E. of three experiments.
|
|
Distribution of G Proteins in Caveolin Immunoprecipitates after
Stimulation with Agonists--
A similar pattern was obtained in
caveolin immunoprecipitates derived from cell lysates. Treatment of
muscle cells with CCK-8 or SP increased G q/11 in
caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates by 187 ± 22% (p < 0.01) and 181 ± 24% (p < 0.01), respectively,
but had no effect on G i3 (Fig.
3). In contrast, treatment of muscle
cells with CPA (1 µM) increased G i3 in
caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates by 173 ± 18% (p < 0.01) but had no effect on G q/11 (Fig. 3). G i2 and G i1 are not activated by CCK-8,
SP, or CPA (Table I) and did not increase in caveolin-3
immunoprecipitates upon treatment of muscle cells with all three
agonists (Fig. 4). There was no increase
in caveolin-3 in caveolin immunoprecipitates or in G q/11 and G i3 immunoprecipitates after treatment with any
agonist (Fig. 4).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Pattern of increase of
G q/11 and
G i3 in caveolin-3
immunoprecipitates induced by different agonists. Dispersed smooth
muscle were treated for 10 min with various agonists (1 nM
CCK-8, 1 µM SP, 1 µM CPA, and 0.1 µM ACh alone or with 4-DAMP (m3 antagonist) and
methoctramine (meth, m2 antagonist). Increase of
G q/11 (upper panel) and G i3
(lower panel) in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates was
determined by immunoblot analysis. Values are the means ± S.E. of
four experiments.
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Immunoblot analysis of
G i1/2 and caveolin-3. Whole
cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with caveolin-3
antibody (A) and G i3 or G q/11
antibody (B). Samples from caveolin immunoprecipitates were
immunoblotted with G i1/2 or caveolin-3 antibody; samples
from G q/11 and G i3 immunoprecipitates
were immunoblotted with caveolin-3 antibody. There was no increase in
caveolin-3 or G i1/2 from basal levels after treatment
with various agonists. The m2 but not the m3 receptor was bound to
caveolin-3 after treatment with ACh (C).
|
|
The pattern of selective increase in G subunits was reinforced by
analysis of caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates after stimulation with ACh.
Treatment of muscle cells with ACh (0.1 µM) increased both G q/11 and G i3 in caveolin-3
immunoprecipitates by 177 ± 29% (p < 0.01) and
181 ± 37% (p < 0.01), respectively (Fig. 3). The increase in G q/11 was abolished by the m3 receptor
antagonist, 4-DAMP, but was not affected by the m2 receptor antagonist,
methoctramine, whereas the increase in G i3 was abolished
by methoctramine but was not affected by 4-DAMP (Fig. 3). In these
experiments also there was no increase in G i1 or
G i2 in caveolin immunoprecipitates and no increase in
caveolin-3 either in caveolin immunoprecipitates or
G q/11 and G i3 immunoprecipitates (Fig.
4). The m2 but not m3 receptors were detected in caveolin
immunoprecipitates after treatment of muscle cells with ACh (Fig.
4C).
Stimulation with agonists that activate Gi1 and/or
Gi2 showed that caveolin binding was not confined to
G q/11 or G i3. Treatment of muscle cells
with cANP4-23 (1 µM), a selective ligand of the natriuretic peptide clearance receptor, NPR-C, shown recently to couple
to both Gi1 and Gi2 (42), increased
G i1 by 199 ± 23% (p < 0.01) and
G i2 by 212 ± 20% (p < 0.01) in
caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates. Treatment with somatostatin-14 (1 µM), which activates Gi1 in smooth muscle
(43), increased G i1 by 192 ± 20%
(p < 0.01) in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates,
whereas treatment with [D-
Pen2,5]enkephalin, which activates Gi2 (44),
increased G i2 by 190 ± 18% (p < 0.01). In contrast to agonists, activation of G proteins with GTP S
(100 µM) in permeabilized smooth muscle cells did not increase G q/11 (11 ± 17%; NS) or
G i3 (8 ± 14%; NS) in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates consistent with preferential binding of caveolin to
inactive GDP-bound G subunits (15).
A common antibody was used to determine whether  subunits
increased in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates. Both CCK-8 and CPA increased G in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates by 182 ± 21%
(p < 0.01) and 232 ± 28 (p < 0.01), respectively.
Time Course and Concentration Dependence of Agonist-stimulated
Increase of G in Caveolin-3 Immunoprecipitates--
Treatment of
smooth muscle cells with a maximal concentration of ACh (0.1 µM) caused a time-dependent increase of
G q/11 and G i3 in caveolin-3
immunoprecipitates that attained a peak in 5 min. The peak was
sustained for 15 min and declined rapidly to control levels in the next
20 min (Fig. 5). The peak increase was
concentration-dependent (Fig.
6).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time course of acetylcholine-stimulated
binding of G q/11 and
G i3 to caveolin-3 in smooth
muscle. Dispersed smooth muscle were treated with ACh (0.1 µM) for various periods. After lysis, caveolin-3
immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and probed with
G q/11 and G i3 antibodies; the bands were
analyzed by densitometry. Values are the means ± S.E. of four
experiments. p < 0.01 for binding between 2 and 30 min.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Concentration-dependent
stimulation of G q/11 and
G i3 binding to caveolin-3 by
acetylcholine. Dispersed smooth muscle were treated with various
concentrations of ACh for 10 min, and the binding of
G q/11 and G i3 to caveolin-3 was
determined. Values are the means ± S.E. of 3-7 experiments.
p < 0.01 at all concentrations.
|
|
Inhibition of G Protein Binding to Caveolin-3 by Caveolin-binding G
Protein Fragments--
G protein fragments that selectively bind to
the caveolin-scaffolding domain were used to block the binding of
activated G proteins to caveolin-3. Addition of the caveolin-binding
G q/11 fragment, YPFDLQSVIFRMVDA (50 µM),
to permeabilized muscle cells for 10 min blocked the increase in
G q/11 binding to caveolin elicited by SP but not the
increase in G i3 binding elicited by CPA (Fig.
7). Conversely, addition of the
G i3 fragment, THFTFKELYFKMFDV (50 µM),
blocked the increase in G i3 binding to caveolin-3
elicited by CPA but not the increase in G q/11 binding
elicited by SP (Fig. 7).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Inhibition of G protein binding to caveolin-3
by caveolin-binding G protein fragments. Permeabilized smooth
muscle were incubated with for 10 min with SP (1 µM) or
CPA (1 µM) alone and in combination with
G q/11 or G i3 fragments that selectively
bind to the caveolin-scaffolding domain. Caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates
were probed with G q/11 and G i3
antibodies, and the bands were analyzed by densitometry. The
caveolin-binding G q/11 fragment blocked the
increase in G q/11 binding to caveolin elicited by SP but
not the increase in G i3 binding elicited by CPA.
Conversely, the G i3 fragment blocked the increase in
G i3 binding to caveolin-3 elicited by CPA but not the
increase in G q/11 binding elicited by SP. Bands denote
representative experiments. Values denoted by bars are
the means ± S.E. of three experiments.
|
|
Heterologous Desensitization of PLC- Activity Mediated by G
Protein-specific Binding to Caveolin--
The possibility that binding
of activated G proteins to caveolin-3 could result in desensitization
of response was tested by sequential stimulation of muscle cells with
different agonists that couple to the same or a different G protein.
PLC- activity in response to CCK-8 or CPA was measured in muscle
cells pretreated for periods ranging from 5 to 60 min with 0.1 µM ACh or for 10 min with different concentrations of ACh
(10 pM to 0.1 µM). PLC- activity in
response to both CCK-8 and CPA decreased in parallel with the time of
pretreatment with ACh, attaining a maximum in cells pretreated for
5-10 min and reverting to control levels in cells pretreated for 40 min (Fig. 8). The decrease in PLC- activity paralleled the increase in G binding to caveolin (Figs. 5
and 8). Pretreatment with different concentrations of ACh for 10 min
decreased the PLC- response to CCK-8 and CPA in a
concentration-dependent fashion (Fig.
9). In both concentration response and
time course studies, there was a close linear correlation
(r = 0.99) between the decrease in PLC- activity and
the increase in caveolin-bound G q/11 or
G i3 (Fig. 10).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Time course of inhibition of CCK- and
CPA-stimulated PLC- activity after treatment
of muscle cells with ACh. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were
labeled with [3H]myo-inositol and treated for
different periods with ACh (0.1 µM). After washing, the
cells were restimulated with either CCK-8 (1 nM) or CPA (1 µM). PLC- activity was determined from the formation
of [3H]inositol phosphates expressed in
cpm/106 cells above basal levels (406 ± 42 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of four
experiments. p < 0.01 for all values between 5 and 30 min.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Inhibition of CCK- and CPA-stimulated
PLC- activity after treatment with various
concentrations of ACh. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were labeled
with [3H]myo-inositol and treated for 10 min
with various concentrations of ACh. After washing, the cells were
restimulated with either CCK-8 (1 nM) or CPA (1 µM). PLC- activity was determined from the formation
of [3H]inositol phosphates expressed in
cpm/106 cells above basal levels (387 ± 44 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of four
experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 decrease in PLC- activity from control.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Correlation between binding of
G subunits to caveolin-3 and inhibition of
PLC- activity. Data from Figs. 5, 6, 8,
and 9 were used to determine the correlation between the increase in
caveolin-bound G q/11 or G i3 induced by
ACh and the inhibition of CCK- and CPA-stimulated PLC- activity
after treatment with ACh (linear correlations, r = 0.99 for each slope).
|
|
Pretreatment with ACh after blockade of m3 receptors with 4-DAMP
decreased PLC- activity in response to CPA (71 ± 3%) but not
CCK-8 (9 ± 6%) or SP (7 ± 5%) (Fig.
11), whereas pretreatment with ACh
after blockade of m2 receptors with methoctramine decreased PLC-
activity in response to CCK-8 (51 ± 6%) and SP (49 ± 3%) but not CPA (Fig. 11). Pretreatment with ACh after blockade of both m3
and m2 receptors did not decrease PLC- activity in response to any
agonist, including ACh itself (range of decrease, 1 ± 7 to
10 ± 5%).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Inhibition of CCK-, SP-, and CPA-stimulated
PLC- activity after treatment of muscle cells
with ACh alone or with specific m2 and m3 antagonists. Dispersed
smooth muscle cells were labeled with
[3H]myo-inositol and treated for 10 min with
ACh (0.1 µM) alone or with 4-DAMP (m3 antagonist) and
methoctramine (m2 antagonist). After washing, the cells were
restimulated with either CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), or CPA (1 µM). PLC- activity was
determined from the formation of [3H]inositol phosphates
expressed in cpm/106 cells above basal levels (412 ± 35 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of
four experiments. **, p < 0.01 decrease in PLC-
activity from control.
|
|
Desensitization of PLC- Activity after Treatment with
Noncholinergic Agonists--
Pretreatment with other agonists besides
ACh provided further support for the notion that inhibition of PLC-
activity was G protein-specific. Pretreatment with CCK-8 decreased
PLC- activity in response to SP (41 ± 4%) and ACh (56 ± 4%) but not CPA (Fig. 12). Similarly,
pretreatment with SP decreased PLC- activity in response to CCK-8
(52 ± 4%) and ACh (51 ± 8%) but not CPA. In contrast,
pretreatment with CPA decreased PLC- activity in response to ACh
(26 ± 3%) but not CCK-8 or SP (Fig. 12). Thus, pretreatment with
one agonist inhibited the response to a different agonist that
activated the same G protein.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
Inhibition of PLC-
activity stimulated by various agonists after treatment with
CCK-8, SP, and CPA. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were labeled
with [3H]myo-inositol and treated for 10 min
with 1 nM CCK-8, 1 µM SP, or 1 µM CPA. After washing, the cells were restimulated with
either CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), CPA (1 µM), or ACh (0.1 µM). PLC- activity was
determined from the formation of [3H]inositol phosphates
expressed in cpm/106 cells above basal levels (388 ± 39 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of
four experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 decrease in PLC- activity from control.
|
|
Finally, pretreatment of muscle cells for 10 min with CCK-8, SP, ACh,
or CPA decreased PLC- activity in response to subsequent treatment
with the same agonist by 83 ± 3 to 91 ± 4%. The large decrease in PLC- activity reflected homologous desensitization of
the receptor as well as desensitization resulting from transient G
protein sequestration in caveolae.
Linkage of G Protein-specific Desensitization to G Protein-specific
Binding to Caveolin--
Pretreatment of permeabilized muscle cells
with ACh (0.1 µM) for 10 min decreased PLC- activity
in response to SP (59 ± 5%) or CPA (61 ± 6%) to the same
extent as in intact cells. Pretreatment of the cells with ACh and the
caveolin-binding G q/11 fragment (50 µM)
blocked the decrease in PLC- activity in response to SP, but not in
response to CPA (Fig. 13). Conversely,
pretreatment of the cells with ACh and the caveolin-binding
G i3 fragment (50 µM) blocked the decrease
in PLC- activity in response to CPA but not in response to SP (Fig.
13). Pretreatment of permeabilized muscle cells with either G protein
fragment alone had no effect on control PLC- activity stimulated by
SP or CPA (Fig. 13).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 13.
Blockade of desensitization of
PLC- response by caveolin-binding
G q/11 and
G i3 fragments. PLC-
activity in response to SP or CPA was measured before (solid
bars) or after 10-min treatment with ACh (0.1 µM)
alone and in combination with G q/11 or
G i3 fragments (50 µM) (hatched
bars). Pretreatment with G q/11 or
G i3 fragments prevented the decrease in PLC- response
to SP and CPA, respectively. Data are the means ± S.E. of three
experiments. **, p < 0.01 from control response.
|
|
PKC-independent Desensitization of PLC- Activity Mediated by
Gq/11 and Gi3--
To rule out the involvement
of PKC in heterologous desensitization of PLC- activity, muscle
cells were pretreated for 10 min with ACh (0.1 µM) in the
presence or absence of calphostin C (1 µM). Pretreatment
with ACh in the presence of calphostin C had no effect on the decrease
in PLC- activity in response to CCK-8, SP, or CPA, implying that
desensitization was not caused by PKC-dependent
phosphorylation of G proteins or other protein targets (receptors or
effector enzymes) in the PI signaling pathway mediated by
Gq/11 or Gi3 in smooth muscle (Fig.
14).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 14.
Lack of effect of PKC inhibition on
desensitization of PLC- response.
Dispersed smooth muscle cells labeled with
[3H]myo-inositol were treated for 10 min with
ACh (0.1 µM) alone or in combination with 1 µM calphostin C. After washing the cells were
restimulated with CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), or
CPA (1 µM). PLC- activity was expressed as
[3H]inositol phosphates (cpm/106 cells) above
basal level (456 ± 54 cpm/106 cells). The decrease in
PLC- activity induced by CCK-8, SP, and CPA was not altered by
calphostin C. Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments.
**, p < 0.01 for difference from control.
|
|
To determine whether pretreatment with various agonists affected
receptor binding, [3H]scopolamine binding was measured in
dispersed smooth muscle cells before and after treatment with CCK-8,
SP, or CPA. Treatment with all three agonists had no effect on
[3H]scopolamine binding, whereas treatment with ACh
caused a significant decrease in binding, reflecting homologous
desensitization of m2 and m3 receptors (Fig.
15).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 15.
[3H]Scopolamine binding to
dispersed muscle cells before and after treatment with agonists.
Specific [3H]scopolamine binding was measured before and
after treatment of muscle cells for 10 min with CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), CPA (1 µM), or
ACh (0.1 µM). Inhibition of binding was observed after
treatment with ACh only. Values are the means ± S.E. of four
experiments.
|
|
Activation of PLC- in Caveolar Membranes--
To determine
whether activation of PLC- occurred in caveolar membranes,
PIP2 levels were measured in both Triton-soluble and
-insoluble (i.e. caveolar) fractions before and after
treatment with all four agonists. No significant change was observed in PIP2 levels in the Triton-soluble fraction after treatment
with various agonists (control, 2781 ± 203 cpm/106
cells; range with various agonists, 2633 ± 108 to 2729 ± 169 cpm/106 cells). However, each agonist separately
decreased PIP2 levels in Triton-insoluble fractions (ACh,
48 ± 3%; CCK-8, 39 ± 5%; SP, 37 ± 3%; CPA, 34 ± 2%), implying that PIP2 hydrolysis occurred in caveolae
(Fig. 16).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 16.
Agonist-stimulated PIP2
hydrolysis in caveolar membranes. Dispersed smooth muscle cells
were labeled with [32P]Pi and stimulated with
various agonists (0.1 µM ACh, 1 nM CCK-8, 1 µM SP, or 1 µM CPA). PIP2
levels were measured by thin layer chromatography in Triton-soluble and
-insoluble (caveolar) fractions and expressed as cpm/106
cells. Each agonist separately decreased PIP2 levels in
Triton-insoluble caveolar fractions. No change in PIP2
levels was found in Triton-soluble fractions. Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. **, p < 0.01 decrease in
PIP2 levels from control. Inset: Immunoblot analysis of
caveolin-3 using equal amounts of protein from Triton-soluble
(S) and -insoluble (I) fractions.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Receptor desensitization by GRKs and -arrestins and/or by
feedback phosphorylation via second messenger-activated protein kinases, chiefly cAMP-dependent protein kinase and
protein kinase C (PKC), are well established mechanisms of
desensitization of response mediated by G protein-coupled receptors
(45). Phosphorylation by second messenger-activated protein kinases
does not require receptor occupancy and can thus target both homologous
and heterologous receptors, reducing their ability to transduce signals
and, in some instances, switching the specificity of receptor coupling to G proteins. Phosphorylation of downstream targets in the signaling pathway (e.g. G proteins or effector enzymes) can also
result in desensitization of response (46-51).
PKC-dependent phosphorylation, however, is G
protein-specific: Gz, G12, and G13
are readily phosphorylated, whereas Gq/11 and
Gs are not (47-49). PKC-dependent
phosphorylation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins in intestinal
smooth muscle was observed with Gi1 and Gi2,
but not Gi3 or Go, and resulted in
PKC-dependent desensitization of responses mediated by
Gi1 and Gi2 (51). Consistent with these
results, a selective PKC inhibitor had no effect on desensitization of
responses mediated by Gi3 or Gq/11 in the
present study, making it possible to explore other G
protein-dependent mechanisms of desensitization. The
results indicate that transient sequestration of receptor-activated G protein subunits by binding to caveolin leads to heterologous desensitization of responses mediated by other receptors coupled to the
same G protein.
Compelling evidence exists that caveolin can act as a scaffold for the
assembly and activation of signaling molecules (16, 22, 32). The
present study suggests a novel, complementary function whereby caveolin
acts to restrain cellular response by transient, selective binding of G
proteins. Receptor-activated G protein subunits interact with an
assembly of signaling molecules consisting of an effector enzyme
(e.g. PLC- ) and its substrate (e.g.
PIP2) located in caveolae. Upon GTP hydrolysis, G .GDP
binds with high affinity to caveolin-3 and is transiently sequestered, impeding reassociation of the heterotrimeric G protein. The decrease in
the levels of G protein available to receptors in the extracaveolar membrane causes a transient decrease in the ability of agonists to
activate PLC- , i.e. a G protein-specific heterologous
desensitization of response.
Caveolin Binding of Activated G Proteins--
The increase of G
in caveolin immunoprecipitates derived from caveolin-enriched fractions
and whole cell lysates was confined to activated G proteins. The G
subunits appeared to bind directly to caveolin-3 rather than to a
caveolin-associated protein and could be competed out by the
corresponding caveolin-binding G protein fragment. Thus, a
caveolin-binding G q/11 fragment blocked the binding of
activated G q/11 but not G i3 to
caveolin-3, whereas a caveolin-binding G i3 fragment had
the reverse effect, blocking the binding of activated
G i3 but not G q/11 to caveolin-3.
The increase in G q/11 and G i3 binding to
caveolin-3 induced by ACh was both time- and
concentration-dependent, reflecting concurrent activation
of m3 receptors coupled to Gq/11 and m2 receptors coupled
to Gi3, a notion confirmed by the increase in the binding
of only one G protein subunit in the presence of selective m3 or m2
receptor antagonists. The increase induced by other agonists was also G
protein-specific, with CCK-8 and SP increasing G q/11 and
CPA increasing G i3 binding to caveolin. de Weerd and
Leeb-Lundberg (29) have shown that activation of bradykinin
B2 receptors that couple to Gq/11 and
Gi in DDT1 MF-2 smooth muscle cells increased G q and G i binding to caveolin with a time
course similar to that elicited by ACh in intestinal smooth muscle
cells. Some receptors, for example, m2 receptors in cardiac myocytes
(31) and CCK-A receptors in pancreatic acinar cells (52) also bind to
caveolin upon activation. In the present study, m2 but not m3 receptors bound to caveolin-3 upon activation with ACh, implying that
translocation of receptors to caveolae was not a prerequisite for
desensitization of response, which was observed upon selective
activation of either m2 or m3 receptors.
The decrease in caveolar PIP2 levels suggested that
activation of PLC- by G proteins occurred in caveolae. A similar
decrease in caveolar PIP2 levels has been reported in A431
cells stimulated with bradykinin and epidermal growth factor
(41, 53, 54). Our previous studies had shown that PIP2
hydrolysis induced by receptors (e.g. CCK-A and m3
receptors) coupled to Gq/11 was mediated by
G -dependent activation of PLC- 1, whereas
PIP2 hydrolysis induced by receptors coupled to
Gi/o (e.g. somatostatin-3, -opioid, adenosine
A1, and muscarinic m2 receptors) was mediated by
 -dependent activation of PLC- 3 (33, 36, 42,
43).
G subunits activated by the nonhydrolyzable analog, GTP S, did not
bind to caveolin-3, implying that caveolin binding of receptor-activated G subunits occurred only after GTP hydrolysis, which yielded a GDP-bound G subunit with high affinity for
caveolin-3 (13, 15). The transient binding to caveolin was followed by reassociation of the G and G subunits and their eventual
reintegration into the extracaveolar membrane. The entire cycle was
completed in 40-60 min (Fig. 5). During this interval, the
stoichiometry of the heterotrimeric G protein pool accessible to
receptors was altered imposing a G protein-specific barrier to
activation of effector enzymes (e.g. PLC- ) by
receptors that couple to the same G protein.
G Protein-specific Desensitization of PLC- Response--
The
time course of decrease in PLC- activity in response to CCK-8 and
CPA closely paralleled the time course of G binding to caveolin
induced by pretreatment with ACh. At various intervals and for various
concentrations of ACh, the extent of decrease in PLC- activity was
correlated with the increase in G binding to caveolin. A similar G
protein-specific decrease in PLC- activity was observed after
sequential treatment of the cells with various agonists. Thus,
activation of one receptor coupled to Gq/11
(e.g. CCK-A, NK-1, or m3 receptor) inhibited subsequent
PLC- responses mediated by these receptors but not those mediated by
A1 and m2 receptors. Conversely, activation of one receptor coupled to
Gi3 (e.g. m2 or A1 receptor) inhibited
subsequent PLC- responses mediated by these receptors but not those
mediated by CCK-A, NK-1, or m3 receptors. Thus, activation of one
receptor type decreased the response to another receptor type coupled
to the same G protein. It is worth noting that activation of one
receptor did not induce desensitization of other receptors;
pretreatment of muscle cells with CCK-8, SP, or CPA, for example, had
no effect on [3H]scopolamine binding, whereas
pretreatment with ACh caused a large decrease in
[3H]scopolamine binding, indicative of homologous
desensitization of m3 and m2 receptors. PLC- activity in response to
sequential stimulation with ACh decreased by about 90%, reflecting
both receptor-specific (homologous) and G protein-specific
(heterologous) desensitization.
Studies with caveolin-binding fragments of G q/11 and
G i3 provided decisive evidence for selective binding of
activated G to caveolin-3 and established a linkage between caveolin
binding and G protein-specific heterologous desensitization of
response. A caveolin-binding G q/11 fragment that
selectively blocked the binding of activated G q/11 to
caveolin-3 elicited by ACh prevented desensitization of responses
mediated by other Gq/11-coupled receptors but not by
Gi3-coupled receptors. Conversely, a caveolin-binding G i3 fragment that selectively blocked the binding of
activated G i3 to caveolin-3 elicited by ACh prevented
desensitization of responses mediated by other Gi3-coupled
receptors but not by Gq/11-coupled receptors.
Desensitization of response by G protein binding to caveolin was not
confined to Gq/11 and Gi3. Both
G i1 and G i2 bound to caveolin-3 following
activation of Gi1 by somatostatin-3 receptors, activation
of Gi2 by opioid -receptors, and activation of both Gi1 and Gi2 by natriuretic peptide clearance
receptors (42-44). The resultant
desensitization was G protein-specific with one component reflecting
G i1 and/or G i2 binding to caveolin-3 and the other component reflecting phosphorylation of G i1
and/or G i2 by PKC; only the latter was blocked by
pretreatment of muscle cells with a PKC inhibitor (51).2
However, neither Gq/11 nor Gi3 in smooth muscle
is susceptible to phosphorylation by PKC (51); as shown in Fig. 14,
desensitization of PLC- response was not affected by inhibition of
PKC activity, implying that desensitization was not mediated by
PKC-dependent phosphorylation of G proteins or other
protein targets (receptors or effector enzymes) in the phosphoinositide
signaling pathway mediated by either Gq/11 or
Gi3 in smooth muscle.
In summary, this study demonstrates a role for caveolin in signal
transduction that depends on its ability to bind transiently receptor-activated G protein subunits and impede reassociation of the
heterotrimeric species, thereby decreasing the ability of receptors
that specifically couple to these G proteins to signal effectively. The
process may contribute to both homologous and heterologous
desensitization of response.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant DK15564 from the NIDDK,
National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: P.O. Box 980711, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0711. Tel.: 804-828-8504; Fax:
804-828-2500; skarnam@hsc.vcu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002194200
2
K. S. Murthy and G. M. Makhlouf,
unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GTP S, guanosine
5'-0-( -thio)triphosphate;
PLC- , phospholipase C- ;
CPA, cyclopentyl adenosine;
CCK-8, cholecystokinin octapeptide;
PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate;
4-DAMP, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiotide;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis;
SP, substance P;
ACh, acetylcholine;
Mes, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
PKC, protein kinase C;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic
acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Scherer, P. E.,
Tang, Z.,
Chun, M.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16395-16401
|
| 2.
|
Glenney, J. R.,
and Soppet, D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10517-10521
|
| 3.
|
Tang, Z.,
Scherer, P. E.,
Okamoto, T.,
Song, K.,
Chu, C.,
Kohtz, D. S.,
Nishimoto, I.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2255-2261
|
| 4.
|
Scherer, P. E.,
Okamoto, T.,
Chun, M.,
Nishimoto, I.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
131-135
|
| 5.
|
Rothberg, K. G.,
Heuser, J. E.,
Donzell, W. C.,
Ying, Y. S.,
Glenny, J. R.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1992)
Cell
68,
673-682
|
| 6.
|
Okamoto, T.,
Schlegel, A.,
Scherer, P. E.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5419-5422
|
| 7.
|
Shaul, P. W.,
and Anderson, R. G. W.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
L843-L851
|
| 8.
|
Scherer, P. E.,
Lewis, R. Y.,
Volonte, D.,
Engleman, J. A.,
Galbiati, F.,
Chute, J.,
Kohtz, D. S.,
von Donselaar, E.,
Peters, P.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29337-29346
|
| 9.
|
Song, K. S.,
Scherer, P. E.,
Tang, Z.,
Okamoto, T.,
Li, S.,
Chafel, M.,
Chu, C.,
Kohtz, D. S.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15160-15165
|
| 10.
|
Sargiacomo, M.,
Scherer, P. E.,
Tang, Z.,
Kubler, E.,
Song, K. S.,
Sanders, M. C.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9407-9411
|
| 11.
|
Monier, S.,
Parton, R. G.,
Vogler, F.,
Behlke, J.,
Henske, A.,
and Kurzchalia, T. V.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
911-917
|
| 12.
|
Kurzchalia, T. V.,
Dupree, P.,
and Monier, S.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
346,
88-91
|
| 13.
|
Couet, J.,
Li, S.,
Okamoto, T.,
Ikezu, T.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6525-6533
|
| 14.
|
Chang, W. J.,
Ying, Y. S.,
Rothberg, K. G.,
Hooper, N. M.,
Turner, A. J.,
Gambliel, H. A.,
De Gunzburg, J.,
Mumby, S. M.,
Gilman, A. G.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
127-138
|
| 15.
|
Li, S.,
Okamoto, T.,
Chun, M.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
Casanova, J. E.,
Hansen, S. H.,
Nishimoto, I.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15693-15701
|
| 16.
|
Feron, O.,
Belhassen, L.,
Kobzik, L.,
Smith, T. W.,
Kelly, R. A.,
and Michel, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22810-22814
|
| 17.
|
Shaul, P. W.,
Smart, E. J.,
Robinson, L. J.,
German, Z.,
Yuhanna, I. S.,
Ying, Y.,
Anderson, R. G.,
and Michel, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6518-6522
|
| 18.
|
Song, K. S.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
Galbiati, F.,
Parenti, M.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1997)
Cell. Mol. Biol.
43,
293-303
|
| 19.
|
Oka, N.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Schwencke, C.,
Kawabe, J.-I.,
Ebina, T.,
Ohno, S.,
Chute, J.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Ishikawa, Y.
(1997)
J. Bio. Chem.
272,
33416-33421
|
| 20.
|
Carman, C. V.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8858-8864
|
| 21.
|
Sargiacomo, M.,
Sudol, M.,
Tang, Z.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
789-807
|
| 22.
|
Mineo, C.,
James, G. L.,
Smart, E. J.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11930-11935
|
| 23.
|
Lisanti, M. P.,
Schrer, P. E.,
Vidugiriene, J.,
Tang, Z.,
Hermanowski-Vosatka, A.,
Cook, R. F.,
and Sargiacomo, M.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
111-126
|
| 24.
|
Wu, C.,
Butz, S.,
Ying, Y.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3554-3559
|
| 25.
|
Smart, E. J.,
Ying, Y. S.,
Mineo, C.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10104-10108
|
| 26.
|
Couet, J.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30429-30438
|
| 27.
|
Liu, P.,
Ying, Y.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13666-13670
|
| 28.
|
Chun, M.,
Liyanage, U. K.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11728-11732
|
| 29.
|
de Weerd, W. F. C.,
and Leeb-Lundberg, L. M. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17858-17866
|
| 30.
|
Schwencke, C.,
Okumura, S.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Geng, Y. J.,
and Ishikawa, Y.
(1999)
J. Cell. Biochem.
75,
64-72
|
| 31.
|
Feron, O.,
Smith, T. W.,
Michel, T.,
and Kelly, R. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17744-17748
|
| 32.
|
Liu, P.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27179-27185
|
| 33.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
C969-C978
|
| 34.
|
Kwatra, M. M.,
Schwinn, D. A.,
Schreurs, J.,
Blank, J. L.,
Kim, C. M.,
Benovic, J. L.,
Krause, J. E.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
9161-9164
|
| 35.
|
Sohn, U. D.,
Han, B.,
Tashjian, A. H.,
Behar, J.,
and Biancani, P.
(1995)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
273,
482-491
|
| 36.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1995)
Mol. Pharmacol.
47,
1172-1179
|
| 37.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21317-21324
|
| 38.
|
Okamoto, T.,
Ikezu, T.,
Murayama, Y.,
Ogata, E.,
and Nishimoto, I.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
305,
125-128
|
| 39.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
261,
G945-G951
|
| 40.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
Kuemmerle, J. F.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
G93-G102
|
| 41.
|
Pike, L. J.,
and Casey, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26453-26456
|
| 42.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17587-17592
|
| 43.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
Coy, D. H,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23458-23463
|
| 44.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
50,
770-778
|
| 45.
|
Prmont, R. T.,
Inglese, J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
175-182
|
| 46.
|
Hipkin, R. W.,
Friedman, J.,
Clark, R. B.,
Eppler, A. M.,
and Schobrunn, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13869-13876
|
| 47.
|
Bushfield,
Murphy, G. J., M.,
Lavan, B. E.,
Parker, P. J.,
Hruby, V. J.,
Milligan, G.,
and Houslay, M. D.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
268,
449-457
|
| 48.
|
Fields, T. A.,
and Casey, P. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23119-23125
|
| 49.
|
Kosaza, T.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12562-12567
|
| 50.
|
Filtz, T. M.,
Cunningham, L.,
Stanig, K. J.,
Paterson, A.,
and Harden, T. K.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
257-264
|
| 51.
|
Murthy, K. S.,
Grider, J. R.,
and Makhlouf, G. M.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
C925-C934
|
| 52.
|
Roettger, B. F.,
Rentsch, R. U.,
Pinon, D.,
Holicky, E.,
Larkin, J. M.,
and Miller, J. M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
1029-1041
|
| 53.
|
Hope, H. R.,
and Pike, L. J.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
843-851
|
| 54.
|
Pike, L. J.,
and Miller, J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22298-22304
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Murthy, S. Mahavadi, J. Huang, H. Zhou, and W. Sriwai
Phosphorylation of GRK2 by PKA augments GRK2-mediated phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization of VPAC2 receptors in smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
February 1, 2008;
294(2):
C477 - C487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gosens, G. L. Stelmack, G. Dueck, M. M. Mutawe, M. Hinton, K. D. McNeill, A. Paulson, S. Dakshinamurti, W. T. Gerthoffer, J. A. Thliveris, et al.
Caveolae facilitate muscarinic receptor-mediated intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and contraction in airway smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
December 1, 2007;
293(6):
L1406 - L1418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Xiao, F. Schmitz, V. E. Pricolo, P. Biancani, and J. Behar
Role of caveolae in the pathogenesis of cholesterol-induced gallbladder muscle hypomotility
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
June 1, 2007;
292(6):
G1641 - G1649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gosens, G. Dueck, W. T. Gerthoffer, H. Unruh, J. Zaagsma, H. Meurs, and A. J. Halayko
p42/p44 MAP kinase activation is localized to caveolae-free membrane domains in airway smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
May 1, 2007;
292(5):
L1163 - L1172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Huang, H. Zhou, S. Mahavadi, W. Sriwai, and K. S. Murthy
Inhibition of G{alpha}q-dependent PLC-beta1 activity by PKG and PKA is mediated by phosphorylation of RGS4 and GRK2
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
January 1, 2007;
292(1):
C200 - C208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Shakirova, J. Bonnevier, S. Albinsson, M. Adner, B. Rippe, J. Broman, A. Arner, and K. Sward
Increased Rho activation and PKC-mediated smooth muscle contractility in the absence of caveolin-1.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
December 1, 2006;
291(6):
C1326 - C1335.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fischmeister, L. R.V. Castro, A. Abi-Gerges, F. Rochais, J. Jurevicius, J. Leroy, and G. Vandecasteele
Compartmentation of Cyclic Nucleotide Signaling in the Heart: The Role of Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases
Circ. Res.,
October 13, 2006;
99(8):
816 - 828.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. V. Remillard and J. X.-J. Yuan
Transient Receptor Potential Channels and Caveolin-1: Good Friends in Tight Spaces
Mol. Pharmacol.,
October 1, 2006;
70(4):
1151 - 1154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Xu, S.-I. Yoon, P. Huang, Y. Wang, C. Chen, P. L.-G. Chong, and L.-Y. Liu-Chen
Localization of the {kappa} Opioid Receptor in Lipid Rafts
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
June 1, 2006;
317(3):
1295 - 1306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Rudajev, J. Novotny, L. Hejnova, G. Milligan, and P. Svoboda
Dominant Portion of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Is Excluded from Lipid Domains. Detergent-Resistant and Detergent-Sensitive Pools of TRH Receptor and Gq{alpha}/G11{alpha} Protein
J. Biochem.,
August 1, 2005;
138(2):
111 - 125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Dabisch, D. B. Miller, S. A. Reutter, R. J. Mioduszewski, and S. A. Thomson
Miotic Tolerance to Sarin Vapor Exposure: Role of the Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Nervous Systems
Toxicol. Sci.,
June 1, 2005;
85(2):
1041 - 1047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Gratton, P. Bernatchez, and W. C. Sessa
Caveolae and Caveolins in the Cardiovascular System
Circ. Res.,
June 11, 2004;
94(11):
1408 - 1417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Minshall, W. C. Sessa, R. V. Stan, R. G. W. Anderson, and A. B. Malik
Caveolin regulation of endothelial function
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
December 1, 2003;
285(6):
L1179 - L1183.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Kifor, I. Kifor, F. D. Moore Jr., R. R. Butters Jr., and E. M. Brown
m-Calpain Colocalizes with the Calcium-sensing Receptor (CaR) in Caveolae in Parathyroid Cells and Participates in Degradation of the CaR
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 15, 2003;
278(33):
31167 - 31176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. GRATZINGER, S. CANOSA, B. ENGELHARDT, and J. A. MADRI
Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 modulates endothelial cell motility through the small G-protein Rho
FASEB J,
August 1, 2003;
17(11):
1458 - 1469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Manganello, J.-S. Huang, T. Kozasa, T. A. Voyno-Yasenetskaya, and G. C. Le Breton
Protein Kinase A-mediated Phosphorylation of the Galpha 13 Switch I Region Alters the Galpha beta gamma 13-G Protein-coupled Receptor Complex and Inhibits Rho Activation
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
124 - 130.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sabourin, L. Bastien, D. R. Bachvarov, and F. Marceau
Agonist-Induced Translocation of the Kinin B1 Receptor to Caveolae-Related Rafts
Mol. Pharmacol.,
March 1, 2002;
61(3):
546 - 553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Razani and M. P. Lisanti
Two distinct caveolin-1 domains mediate the functional interaction of caveolin-1 with protein kinase A
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
October 1, 2001;
281(4):
C1241 - C1250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|