Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002194200 on June 21, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 39, 30211-30219, September 29, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/39/30211    most recent
M002194200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makhlouf, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makhlouf, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Heterologous Desensitization Mediated by G Protein-specific Binding to Caveolin*

Karnam S. MurthyDagger and Gabriel M. Makhlouf

From the Departments of Physiology and Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0711

Received for publication, March 13, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We examined the notion that sequestration of G protein subunits by binding to caveolin impedes G protein reassociation and leads to transient, G protein-specific desensitization of response in dispersed smooth muscle cells. Cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) and substance P (SP) were used to activate Gq/11, cyclopentyl adenosine (CPA) was used to activate Gi3, and acetylcholine (ACh) was used to activate both Gq/11 and Gi3 via m3 and m2 receptors, respectively. CCK-8 and SP increased only Galpha q/11, and CPA increased only Galpha i3 in caveolin immunoprecipitates; caveolin and other G proteins were not increased. ACh increased both Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 in a time- and concentration-dependent fashion: only Galpha q/11 was increased in the presence of an m2 antagonist, and only Galpha i3 was increased in the presence of an m3 antagonist. To determine whether transient G protein binding to caveolin affected subsequent responses mediated by the same G protein, PLC-beta activity was measured in cells stimulated sequentially with two different agonists that activate either the same or a different G protein. After treatment of the cells with ACh and an m2 antagonist, the phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta ) response to CCK-8 and SP, but not CPA, was decreased; conversely, after treatment of the cells with ACh and an m3 antagonist, the PLC-beta response to CPA, but not CCK-8 or SP, was decreased. Similarly, after treatment with CCK-8 or SP, the PLC-beta response mediated by Gq/11 only was decreased, whereas after treatment with CPA, the PLC-beta response mediated by Gi3 only was decreased. A caveolin-binding Galpha q/11 fragment blocked the binding of activated Galpha q/11 but not Galpha i3 to caveolin-3 and prevented desensitization of the PLC-beta response mediated only by other Gq/11-coupled receptors. A caveolin-binding Galpha i3 fragment had the reverse effect. Thus, transient binding of receptor-activated G protein subunits to caveolin impedes reassociation of the heterotrimeric species and leads to desensitization of response mediated by other receptors coupled to the same G protein.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular cloning has identified three distinct genes encoding caveolins, the main structural proteins of caveolae (1-7). Caveolins (caveolin-1alpha and caveolin-1beta , caveolin-2, and caveolin-3) exhibit tissue-specific distribution: caveolin-1 and caveolin-2 are co-localized and abundantly expressed in adipocytes, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts; caveolin-3 is expressed exclusively in skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle and is not co-localized with caveolin-2 except in undifferentiated cells (3, 8, 9). Caveolin-1 and caveolin-3 form large homo-oligomers (200-440 kDa); in addition, caveolin-1 associates with caveolin-2 to form larger hetero-oligomers (8, 10, 11).

The structure of caveolin monomers is similar, with a central 33-amino acid segment and hydrophilic N-terminal (70-101 amino acids) and C-terminal (43-44 amino acids) segments facing the cytoplasm (3, 7, 12). The C-terminal segment directs the formation of homo-oligomers. A short cytosolic domain within this segment (residues 82-101 in caveolin-1alpha , 54-73 in caveolin-2, and 55-74 in caveolin-3) termed the "caveolin-scaffolding domain" determines the binding of caveolin to various signaling molecules, such as G protein subunits (13-15), endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (16, 17), protein kinase C isoforms (18, 19), G protein-coupled receptor kinases (20), and a variety of receptor and cytosolic tyrosine kinases (Ras and Src family tyrosine kinases, mitogen-activated protein kinases, and epidermal and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (21-27)). Upon activation, some G protein-coupled receptors (e.g. endothelin-A (28), bradykinin-B2 (29), beta 2 adrenergic (30), and muscarinic m2 receptors (31)) translocate to caveolae where they bind to caveolin.

Compelling evidence exists that a variety of signaling events are initiated in caveolae (16, 22, 42), consistent with the notion that caveolin provides a scaffold for the assembly of signaling molecules into modules primed for activation. Caveolin could also act to restrain cellular response by selective binding of signaling molecules, such as G proteins. Caveolin-binding motifs consisting of 10-15-mer sequences with characteristically spaced aromatic residues (theta Xtheta XXXXtheta or theta XXXXtheta XXtheta , where theta  is the aromatic amino acid Trp, Phe, or Tyr), are present in all caveolin-binding proteins, including G proteins (13). Binding of G proteins to caveolin could lead to their sequestration and enrichment in inactive form in caveolar microdomains (6). Pharmacological activation with GTPgamma S1 strongly inhibits and mutational activation abolishes G protein binding to caveolin consistent with preferential interaction of caveolin with GDP-bound Galpha subunits (15).

The possibility that receptor-activated G protein subunits are sequestered by binding to caveolin or a caveolin-associated protein, leading to transient, G protein-specific desensitization of response, has been raised but not experimentally tested (29). This notion was examined in the present study using a series of agonists previously shown to activate Gq/11 (cholecystokinin octapeptide, and substance P), Gi3 (cyclopentyl adenosine), or both Gq/11 and Gi3 (acetylcholine) in smooth muscle (33-37). Caveolin-binding fragments of Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 were used to inhibit competitively Galpha binding to caveolin and suppress desensitization of response (13, 15). The results show that receptor activation was followed by transient binding of activated Galpha to caveolin that was selectively blocked by caveolin-binding fragments. Binding of Galpha to caveolin resulted in transient desensitization of cellular response mediated by other receptors coupled to the same G protein.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation of Dispersed Smooth Muscle Cells-- Muscle cells were isolated from the circular muscle layer of rabbit intestine by enzymatic digestion at 31 °C with collagenase, followed by filtration though 500-µm Nitex mesh and low speed centrifugation as described previously (33, 35, 37). The cells were suspended in HEPES medium containing 120 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KH2PO4, 4.0 mM KCl, 0.6 mM MgCl2, 25 mM HEPES, and 2.1% essential amino acid mixture. In some experiments, muscle cells were permeabilized by 5-min treatment with saponin (35 µg/ml) and resuspended in low Ca2+ (100 nM) medium (37).

Identification of Receptor-activated G Proteins-- G proteins selectively activated by various receptors were identified by the method of Okamoto et al. and others (37, 38). Muscle cell homogenates were centrifuged at 27,000 × g for 15 min, and the crude membranes were suspended in 20 mM HEPES medium (pH 7.4) containing 2 mM EDTA and 240 mM NaCl. The membranes were diluted 20-fold and incubated at 37 °C with 60 nM [35S]GTPgamma S in a medium containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 µM EDTA, and 10 mM MgCl2. The reaction was stopped with 10 volumes of 100 mM Tris-HCl medium (pH 8.0) containing 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, and 20 µM GTP, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h on ice in wells coated with specific G protein antibodies. The wells were washed with phosphate buffer solution containing 0.05% Tween 20, and the radioactivity from each well was counted.

Assay for PLC-beta Activity-- PLC-beta activity was measured from the formation of total inositol phosphates in muscle cells prelabeled with myo-[3H]inositol as described previously (39). 10 ml of cell suspension (2 × 106 cell/ml) were labeled with myo-[3H]inositol (15 µCi/ml) for 3 h at 31 °C. The cells were centrifuged at 350 × g for 10 min and resuspended in 10 ml of fresh HEPES medium. The cells were treated with one agonist for 10 min and centrifuged again at 350 × g for 5 min. Various agonists were then added to 0.5 ml of cell suspension for 30 s, and the reaction was terminated with 940 µl of chloroform:methanol:HCl (50:100:1 v/v/v). After chloroform (310 µl) and water (310 µl) were added, the samples were vortexed, and the phases were separated by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 15 min. The upper aqueous phase was applied to Dowex AG-1 × 8 columns. After washing, inositol phosphates were eluted with 5 ml of 0.8 M ammonium formate with 0.1 M formic acid, and the eluates were collected into scintillation vials and counted in gel phase after addition of 10 ml of scintillant. The results were expressed as cpm/106 cells.

Caveolin Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting of Galpha Proteins-- Smooth muscle cells (2-3 × 106 cells/ml) were lysed by incubation for 30 min at 4 °C in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 60 mM octyl glucoside, and the lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was precleared by incubation with 0.1% albumin-coated protein A-Sepharose for 6 h at 4 °C and then incubated overnight with polyclonal caveolin-3 antibody at a final concentration of 4 µg/ml. Protein A-Sepharose was then added for 1 h, and the mixture was centrifuged for 5 min. The immunoprecipitates were washed four times with lysis buffer and boiled in Laemmli buffer. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE in 12% acrylamide gel, electrotransferred to nitrocellulose paper, and probed with antibodies to Galpha i3, Galpha q/11, or caveolin-3. After incubation with secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, the proteins were visualized using the Super Signal ULTRA chemiluminescent substrate. The intensity of the protein band on Hyperfilm-ECL was determined by densitometry.

Detergent-free Purification of Caveolin-enriched Membrane Fractions-- Caveolin-enriched membrane fractions derived from intestinal smooth muscle were prepared by the method of Song et al. (9). Dispersed muscle cells were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline and suspended in 2 ml of 500 mM sodium carbonate (pH 11.0) containing 0.2 mM of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 20 µg/ml of leupeptin and homogenized with a Polytron tissue grinder (three 10-s bursts) and by sonication (three 20-s bursts). The homogenate was adjusted to 45% sucrose in MBS (25 mM Mes, pH 6.5, and 0.15 M NaCl), placed in an ultracentrifuge tube and overlaid with two 4-ml layers of 35 and 5% sucrose in MBS containing 250 mM sodium carbonate. The gradient was centrifuged at 39,000 rpm for 20 h. Twelve 1-ml fractions were collected sequentially from the top and designated as fractions 1-12. Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (15% acrylamide gels); after transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, Western blot analysis was performed with antibodies to caveolin-3 and various Galpha subunits. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by 1-h incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies followed by enhanced chemiluminescence assay.

For protein immunoprecipitation from caveolin-enriched fractions, the purified membranes were diluted to 2 mg protein/ml in lysis buffer, incubated on ice for 1 h, and centrifuged. The lysate was precleared by 1-h incubation with protein A-Sepharose and then incubated overnight with caveolin-3 antibody and for 2 h with protein A-Sepharose. Immunoprecipitates were washed five times with lysis buffer and resuspended in 30 µl of 2-fold concentrated Laemmli buffer; after separation on SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, immunoblot analysis with caveolin-3 and Galpha antibodies was performed.

Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Assay in Caveolar Membranes-- PIP2 was measured by thin layer chromatography in caveolar membranes as described previously (40, 41). A 20-ml cell suspension (106 cells/ml) was incubated with 500 µCi of [32P]Pi at 31 °C for 3 h. Duplicate samples (106 cells/ml) were incubated at 31 °C with ACh (0.1 µM), cholecystokinin-8 (CCK-8 1 nM), SP (1 µM), and CPA (1 µM) separately for 30 s. The reaction was terminated by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 5 min followed by addition of 1 ml of HEPES buffer (25 mM) containing 0.5% Triton X-100. The mixture was incubated for 10 min and then centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatant and pellets were extracted with 1.8 ml of chloroform-methanol-HCl (100:200:2 v/v/v). The organic phase was analyzed for PIP2 by thin layer chromatography. The results were expressed as cpm/106 cells.

[3H]Scopolamine Binding to Smooth Muscle Cells-- Binding of [3H]scopolamine to dispersed intestinal smooth muscle cells was done as described previously (37). Muscle cells were suspended in HEPES medium containing 1% bovine serum albumin. Triplicate 0.5-ml aliquots (106 cells/ml) were incubated for 15 min with 1 nM [3H]scopolamine alone or with acetylcholine. Bound and free radioligand were separated by rapid filtration under reduced pressure through 5-µm polycarbonate Nucleopore filters and washed four times with 3 ml of ice-cold HEPES medium containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin. Nonspecific binding (28 ± 6%) was calculated as the amount of radioactivity in the presence of 10 µM acetylcholine. [3H]Scopolamine binding was measured in control cells and in cells treated for 10 min with 1 nM CCK-8, 1 µM SP, 1 µM CPA, or 0.1 µM ACh.

Materials-- Two peptides corresponding to the caveolin-binding domains of Galpha q/11, Tyr192-Ala206 (YPFDLQSVIFRMVDA) and Galpha i3, Thr187-Val201 (THFTFKELYFKMFDV) were synthesized by the solid phase method and purified (95-99%) by high performance liquid chromatography (Peptidogenic, CA). [2-3H]Inositol, [3H]scopolamine, [35S]GTPgamma S, and [32P]orthophosphate were obtained from NEN Life Science Products; Dowex AG-1 × 8 resin was from Bio-Rad; polyclonal Galpha q/11, Galpha i1/2, and Galpha i3 antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; and caveolin-3 antibody was from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). All other reagents were from Sigma.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Agonist-induced Activation of G Proteins-- G protein activation was determined directly from the increase in agonist-stimulated binding of [35S]GTPgamma S to specific Galpha subunits in solubilized intestinal smooth muscle cell membranes. CCK-8 and SP selectively activated Gq/11, whereas CPA selectively activated Gi3 (Table I). ACh activated both Gq/11 and Gi3 via m3 and m2 receptors, respectively, as shown previously (37).

Distribution of Caveolin-3 and G Proteins in Caveolar Membranes in the Basal State and after Stimulation with Agonists-- Immunoblot analysis of 12 fractions derived from intestinal smooth muscle cells showed that caveolin-3 was confined to low density fractions 5 and 6, whereas G proteins (Galpha q, Galpha i1/2, and Galpha i3) were present in fractions 5 and 6, as well as in membrane fractions 9-12 (Fig. 1). The pattern was similar to that obtained in other cell types (15, 29).


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Location of caveolin-3 and Galpha subunits in smooth muscle membrane fractions. Twelve sucrose-density gradient fractions were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures" and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis with specific antibodies to caveolin-3 and Galpha subunits. Caveolin-3 was confined to low density fractions 5 and 6. Galpha subunits were present in fractions 5 and 6, as well as fractions 9-12.

A specific redistribution of G proteins to caveolin-enriched fractions (combined fractions 5 and 6) occurred upon treatment of smooth muscle cells with agonists. Treatment with CCK-8 (1 nM) for 10 min caused a significant increase of Galpha q/11 (154 ± 18%; p < 0.01) but not Galpha i3, Galpha i2, or Galpha i1 in caveolin immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2). Conversely, treatment with CPA (1 µM) caused a significant increase of Galpha i3 (168 ± 24%; p < 0.01), but not Galpha q/11, Galpha i2, or Galpha i1, in caveolin immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2). There was no change in caveolin-3 after treatment with either agonist (Fig. 2). The increase in Galpha binding to caveolin paralleled agonist-induced activation of the corresponding G protein (Table I).


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Immunoblot analysis of G protein subunits and caveolin-3 in caveolin immunoprecipitates. Caveolin immunoprecipitates were obtained from caveolin-enriched fractions (fractions 5 and 6 in Fig. 1) derived from muscle cells treated for 10 min with CCK-8 (1 nM) or CPA (1 µM). Immunoblot analysis with Galpha and caveolin-3 antibodies was then performed. A selective increase of Galpha q/11 with CCK-8 (p < 0.01), and of Galpha i3 with CPA (p < 0.01) was observed, without increase in Galpha i1/2 or caveolin-3. Results are expressed as percentages of basal level. Values are the means ± S.E. of three experiments.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Selective activation of G proteins by agonists
CHAPS-solubilized smooth muscle membranes were incubated for 20 min with 60 nM [35S]GTPgamma S alone or with various agonists and then added to wells coated with specific Galpha antibodies (Ab). Values are the means ± S.E. of three experiments.

Distribution of G Proteins in Caveolin Immunoprecipitates after Stimulation with Agonists-- A similar pattern was obtained in caveolin immunoprecipitates derived from cell lysates. Treatment of muscle cells with CCK-8 or SP increased Galpha q/11 in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates by 187 ± 22% (p < 0.01) and 181 ± 24% (p < 0.01), respectively, but had no effect on Galpha i3 (Fig. 3). In contrast, treatment of muscle cells with CPA (1 µM) increased Galpha i3 in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates by 173 ± 18% (p < 0.01) but had no effect on Galpha q/11 (Fig. 3). Galpha i2 and Galpha i1 are not activated by CCK-8, SP, or CPA (Table I) and did not increase in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates upon treatment of muscle cells with all three agonists (Fig. 4). There was no increase in caveolin-3 in caveolin immunoprecipitates or in Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 immunoprecipitates after treatment with any agonist (Fig. 4).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Pattern of increase of Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates induced by different agonists. Dispersed smooth muscle were treated for 10 min with various agonists (1 nM CCK-8, 1 µM SP, 1 µM CPA, and 0.1 µM ACh alone or with 4-DAMP (m3 antagonist) and methoctramine (meth, m2 antagonist). Increase of Galpha q/11 (upper panel) and Galpha i3 (lower panel) in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates was determined by immunoblot analysis. Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Immunoblot analysis of Galpha i1/2 and caveolin-3. Whole cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with caveolin-3 antibody (A) and Galpha i3 or Galpha q/11 antibody (B). Samples from caveolin immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with Galpha i1/2 or caveolin-3 antibody; samples from Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with caveolin-3 antibody. There was no increase in caveolin-3 or Galpha i1/2 from basal levels after treatment with various agonists. The m2 but not the m3 receptor was bound to caveolin-3 after treatment with ACh (C).

The pattern of selective increase in Galpha subunits was reinforced by analysis of caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates after stimulation with ACh. Treatment of muscle cells with ACh (0.1 µM) increased both Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates by 177 ± 29% (p < 0.01) and 181 ± 37% (p < 0.01), respectively (Fig. 3). The increase in Galpha q/11 was abolished by the m3 receptor antagonist, 4-DAMP, but was not affected by the m2 receptor antagonist, methoctramine, whereas the increase in Galpha i3 was abolished by methoctramine but was not affected by 4-DAMP (Fig. 3). In these experiments also there was no increase in Galpha i1 or Galpha i2 in caveolin immunoprecipitates and no increase in caveolin-3 either in caveolin immunoprecipitates or Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 4). The m2 but not m3 receptors were detected in caveolin immunoprecipitates after treatment of muscle cells with ACh (Fig. 4C).

Stimulation with agonists that activate Gi1 and/or Gi2 showed that caveolin binding was not confined to Galpha q/11 or Galpha i3. Treatment of muscle cells with cANP4-23 (1 µM), a selective ligand of the natriuretic peptide clearance receptor, NPR-C, shown recently to couple to both Gi1 and Gi2 (42), increased Galpha i1 by 199 ± 23% (p < 0.01) and Galpha i2 by 212 ± 20% (p < 0.01) in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates. Treatment with somatostatin-14 (1 µM), which activates Gi1 in smooth muscle (43), increased Galpha i1 by 192 ± 20% (p < 0.01) in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates, whereas treatment with [D- Pen2,5]enkephalin, which activates Gi2 (44), increased Galpha i2 by 190 ± 18% (p < 0.01). In contrast to agonists, activation of G proteins with GTPgamma S (100 µM) in permeabilized smooth muscle cells did not increase Galpha q/11 (11 ± 17%; NS) or Galpha i3 (8 ± 14%; NS) in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates consistent with preferential binding of caveolin to inactive GDP-bound Galpha subunits (15).

A common beta  antibody was used to determine whether beta gamma subunits increased in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates. Both CCK-8 and CPA increased Gbeta in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates by 182 ± 21% (p < 0.01) and 232 ± 28 (p < 0.01), respectively.

Time Course and Concentration Dependence of Agonist-stimulated Increase of Galpha in Caveolin-3 Immunoprecipitates-- Treatment of smooth muscle cells with a maximal concentration of ACh (0.1 µM) caused a time-dependent increase of Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 in caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates that attained a peak in 5 min. The peak was sustained for 15 min and declined rapidly to control levels in the next 20 min (Fig. 5). The peak increase was concentration-dependent (Fig. 6).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Time course of acetylcholine-stimulated binding of Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 to caveolin-3 in smooth muscle. Dispersed smooth muscle were treated with ACh (0.1 µM) for various periods. After lysis, caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and probed with Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 antibodies; the bands were analyzed by densitometry. Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. p < 0.01 for binding between 2 and 30 min.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Concentration-dependent stimulation of Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 binding to caveolin-3 by acetylcholine. Dispersed smooth muscle were treated with various concentrations of ACh for 10 min, and the binding of Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 to caveolin-3 was determined. Values are the means ± S.E. of 3-7 experiments. p < 0.01 at all concentrations.

Inhibition of G Protein Binding to Caveolin-3 by Caveolin-binding G Protein Fragments-- G protein fragments that selectively bind to the caveolin-scaffolding domain were used to block the binding of activated G proteins to caveolin-3. Addition of the caveolin-binding Galpha q/11 fragment, YPFDLQSVIFRMVDA (50 µM), to permeabilized muscle cells for 10 min blocked the increase in Galpha q/11 binding to caveolin elicited by SP but not the increase in Galpha i3 binding elicited by CPA (Fig. 7). Conversely, addition of the Galpha i3 fragment, THFTFKELYFKMFDV (50 µM), blocked the increase in Galpha i3 binding to caveolin-3 elicited by CPA but not the increase in Galpha q/11 binding elicited by SP (Fig. 7).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Inhibition of G protein binding to caveolin-3 by caveolin-binding G protein fragments. Permeabilized smooth muscle were incubated with for 10 min with SP (1 µM) or CPA (1 µM) alone and in combination with Galpha q/11 or Galpha i3 fragments that selectively bind to the caveolin-scaffolding domain. Caveolin-3 immunoprecipitates were probed with Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 antibodies, and the bands were analyzed by densitometry. The caveolin-binding Galpha q/11 fragment blocked the increase in Galpha q/11 binding to caveolin elicited by SP but not the increase in Galpha i3 binding elicited by CPA. Conversely, the Galpha i3 fragment blocked the increase in Galpha i3 binding to caveolin-3 elicited by CPA but not the increase in Galpha q/11 binding elicited by SP. Bands denote representative experiments. Values denoted by bars are the means ± S.E. of three experiments.

Heterologous Desensitization of PLC-beta Activity Mediated by G Protein-specific Binding to Caveolin-- The possibility that binding of activated G proteins to caveolin-3 could result in desensitization of response was tested by sequential stimulation of muscle cells with different agonists that couple to the same or a different G protein. PLC-beta activity in response to CCK-8 or CPA was measured in muscle cells pretreated for periods ranging from 5 to 60 min with 0.1 µM ACh or for 10 min with different concentrations of ACh (10 pM to 0.1 µM). PLC-beta activity in response to both CCK-8 and CPA decreased in parallel with the time of pretreatment with ACh, attaining a maximum in cells pretreated for 5-10 min and reverting to control levels in cells pretreated for 40 min (Fig. 8). The decrease in PLC-beta activity paralleled the increase in Galpha binding to caveolin (Figs. 5 and 8). Pretreatment with different concentrations of ACh for 10 min decreased the PLC-beta response to CCK-8 and CPA in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig. 9). In both concentration response and time course studies, there was a close linear correlation (r = 0.99) between the decrease in PLC-beta activity and the increase in caveolin-bound Galpha q/11 or Galpha i3 (Fig. 10).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Time course of inhibition of CCK- and CPA-stimulated PLC-beta activity after treatment of muscle cells with ACh. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were labeled with [3H]myo-inositol and treated for different periods with ACh (0.1 µM). After washing, the cells were restimulated with either CCK-8 (1 nM) or CPA (1 µM). PLC-beta activity was determined from the formation of [3H]inositol phosphates expressed in cpm/106 cells above basal levels (406 ± 42 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. p < 0.01 for all values between 5 and 30 min.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Inhibition of CCK- and CPA-stimulated PLC-beta activity after treatment with various concentrations of ACh. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were labeled with [3H]myo-inositol and treated for 10 min with various concentrations of ACh. After washing, the cells were restimulated with either CCK-8 (1 nM) or CPA (1 µM). PLC-beta activity was determined from the formation of [3H]inositol phosphates expressed in cpm/106 cells above basal levels (387 ± 44 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 decrease in PLC-beta activity from control.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Correlation between binding of Galpha subunits to caveolin-3 and inhibition of PLC-beta activity. Data from Figs. 5, 6, 8, and 9 were used to determine the correlation between the increase in caveolin-bound Galpha q/11 or Galpha i3 induced by ACh and the inhibition of CCK- and CPA-stimulated PLC-beta activity after treatment with ACh (linear correlations, r = 0.99 for each slope).

Pretreatment with ACh after blockade of m3 receptors with 4-DAMP decreased PLC-beta activity in response to CPA (71 ± 3%) but not CCK-8 (9 ± 6%) or SP (7 ± 5%) (Fig. 11), whereas pretreatment with ACh after blockade of m2 receptors with methoctramine decreased PLC-beta activity in response to CCK-8 (51 ± 6%) and SP (49 ± 3%) but not CPA (Fig. 11). Pretreatment with ACh after blockade of both m3 and m2 receptors did not decrease PLC-beta activity in response to any agonist, including ACh itself (range of decrease, 1 ± 7 to 10 ± 5%).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Inhibition of CCK-, SP-, and CPA-stimulated PLC-beta activity after treatment of muscle cells with ACh alone or with specific m2 and m3 antagonists. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were labeled with [3H]myo-inositol and treated for 10 min with ACh (0.1 µM) alone or with 4-DAMP (m3 antagonist) and methoctramine (m2 antagonist). After washing, the cells were restimulated with either CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), or CPA (1 µM). PLC-beta activity was determined from the formation of [3H]inositol phosphates expressed in cpm/106 cells above basal levels (412 ± 35 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. **, p < 0.01 decrease in PLC-beta activity from control.

Desensitization of PLC-beta Activity after Treatment with Noncholinergic Agonists-- Pretreatment with other agonists besides ACh provided further support for the notion that inhibition of PLC-beta activity was G protein-specific. Pretreatment with CCK-8 decreased PLC-beta activity in response to SP (41 ± 4%) and ACh (56 ± 4%) but not CPA (Fig. 12). Similarly, pretreatment with SP decreased PLC-beta activity in response to CCK-8 (52 ± 4%) and ACh (51 ± 8%) but not CPA. In contrast, pretreatment with CPA decreased PLC-beta activity in response to ACh (26 ± 3%) but not CCK-8 or SP (Fig. 12). Thus, pretreatment with one agonist inhibited the response to a different agonist that activated the same G protein.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   Inhibition of PLC-beta activity stimulated by various agonists after treatment with CCK-8, SP, and CPA. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were labeled with [3H]myo-inositol and treated for 10 min with 1 nM CCK-8, 1 µM SP, or 1 µM CPA. After washing, the cells were restimulated with either CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), CPA (1 µM), or ACh (0.1 µM). PLC-beta activity was determined from the formation of [3H]inositol phosphates expressed in cpm/106 cells above basal levels (388 ± 39 cpm/106 cells). Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 decrease in PLC-beta activity from control.

Finally, pretreatment of muscle cells for 10 min with CCK-8, SP, ACh, or CPA decreased PLC-beta activity in response to subsequent treatment with the same agonist by 83 ± 3 to 91 ± 4%. The large decrease in PLC-beta activity reflected homologous desensitization of the receptor as well as desensitization resulting from transient G protein sequestration in caveolae.

Linkage of G Protein-specific Desensitization to G Protein-specific Binding to Caveolin-- Pretreatment of permeabilized muscle cells with ACh (0.1 µM) for 10 min decreased PLC-beta activity in response to SP (59 ± 5%) or CPA (61 ± 6%) to the same extent as in intact cells. Pretreatment of the cells with ACh and the caveolin-binding Galpha q/11 fragment (50 µM) blocked the decrease in PLC-beta activity in response to SP, but not in response to CPA (Fig. 13). Conversely, pretreatment of the cells with ACh and the caveolin-binding Galpha i3 fragment (50 µM) blocked the decrease in PLC-beta activity in response to CPA but not in response to SP (Fig. 13). Pretreatment of permeabilized muscle cells with either G protein fragment alone had no effect on control PLC-beta activity stimulated by SP or CPA (Fig. 13).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13.   Blockade of desensitization of PLC-beta response by caveolin-binding Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 fragments. PLC-beta activity in response to SP or CPA was measured before (solid bars) or after 10-min treatment with ACh (0.1 µM) alone and in combination with Galpha q/11 or Galpha i3 fragments (50 µM) (hatched bars). Pretreatment with Galpha q/11 or Galpha i3 fragments prevented the decrease in PLC-beta response to SP and CPA, respectively. Data are the means ± S.E. of three experiments. **, p < 0.01 from control response.

PKC-independent Desensitization of PLC-beta Activity Mediated by Gq/11 and Gi3-- To rule out the involvement of PKC in heterologous desensitization of PLC-beta activity, muscle cells were pretreated for 10 min with ACh (0.1 µM) in the presence or absence of calphostin C (1 µM). Pretreatment with ACh in the presence of calphostin C had no effect on the decrease in PLC-beta activity in response to CCK-8, SP, or CPA, implying that desensitization was not caused by PKC-dependent phosphorylation of G proteins or other protein targets (receptors or effector enzymes) in the PI signaling pathway mediated by Gq/11 or Gi3 in smooth muscle (Fig. 14).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14.   Lack of effect of PKC inhibition on desensitization of PLC-beta response. Dispersed smooth muscle cells labeled with [3H]myo-inositol were treated for 10 min with ACh (0.1 µM) alone or in combination with 1 µM calphostin C. After washing the cells were restimulated with CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), or CPA (1 µM). PLC-beta activity was expressed as [3H]inositol phosphates (cpm/106 cells) above basal level (456 ± 54 cpm/106 cells). The decrease in PLC-beta activity induced by CCK-8, SP, and CPA was not altered by calphostin C. Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. **, p < 0.01 for difference from control.

To determine whether pretreatment with various agonists affected receptor binding, [3H]scopolamine binding was measured in dispersed smooth muscle cells before and after treatment with CCK-8, SP, or CPA. Treatment with all three agonists had no effect on [3H]scopolamine binding, whereas treatment with ACh caused a significant decrease in binding, reflecting homologous desensitization of m2 and m3 receptors (Fig. 15).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 15.   [3H]Scopolamine binding to dispersed muscle cells before and after treatment with agonists. Specific [3H]scopolamine binding was measured before and after treatment of muscle cells for 10 min with CCK-8 (1 nM), SP (1 µM), CPA (1 µM), or ACh (0.1 µM). Inhibition of binding was observed after treatment with ACh only. Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments.

Activation of PLC-beta in Caveolar Membranes-- To determine whether activation of PLC-beta occurred in caveolar membranes, PIP2 levels were measured in both Triton-soluble and -insoluble (i.e. caveolar) fractions before and after treatment with all four agonists. No significant change was observed in PIP2 levels in the Triton-soluble fraction after treatment with various agonists (control, 2781 ± 203 cpm/106 cells; range with various agonists, 2633 ± 108 to 2729 ± 169 cpm/106 cells). However, each agonist separately decreased PIP2 levels in Triton-insoluble fractions (ACh, 48 ± 3%; CCK-8, 39 ± 5%; SP, 37 ± 3%; CPA, 34 ± 2%), implying that PIP2 hydrolysis occurred in caveolae (Fig. 16).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 16.   Agonist-stimulated PIP2 hydrolysis in caveolar membranes. Dispersed smooth muscle cells were labeled with [32P]Pi and stimulated with various agonists (0.1 µM ACh, 1 nM CCK-8, 1 µM SP, or 1 µM CPA). PIP2 levels were measured by thin layer chromatography in Triton-soluble and -insoluble (caveolar) fractions and expressed as cpm/106 cells. Each agonist separately decreased PIP2 levels in Triton-insoluble caveolar fractions. No change in PIP2 levels was found in Triton-soluble fractions. Values are the means ± S.E. of four experiments. **, p < 0.01 decrease in PIP2 levels from control. Inset: Immunoblot analysis of caveolin-3 using equal amounts of protein from Triton-soluble (S) and -insoluble (I) fractions.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Receptor desensitization by GRKs and beta -arrestins and/or by feedback phosphorylation via second messenger-activated protein kinases, chiefly cAMP-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C (PKC), are well established mechanisms of desensitization of response mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (45). Phosphorylation by second messenger-activated protein kinases does not require receptor occupancy and can thus target both homologous and heterologous receptors, reducing their ability to transduce signals and, in some instances, switching the specificity of receptor coupling to G proteins. Phosphorylation of downstream targets in the signaling pathway (e.g. G proteins or effector enzymes) can also result in desensitization of response (46-51). PKC-dependent phosphorylation, however, is G protein-specific: Gz, G12, and G13 are readily phosphorylated, whereas Gq/11 and Gs are not (47-49). PKC-dependent phosphorylation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins in intestinal smooth muscle was observed with Gi1 and Gi2, but not Gi3 or Go, and resulted in PKC-dependent desensitization of responses mediated by Gi1 and Gi2 (51). Consistent with these results, a selective PKC inhibitor had no effect on desensitization of responses mediated by Gi3 or Gq/11 in the present study, making it possible to explore other G protein-dependent mechanisms of desensitization. The results indicate that transient sequestration of receptor-activated G protein subunits by binding to caveolin leads to heterologous desensitization of responses mediated by other receptors coupled to the same G protein.

Compelling evidence exists that caveolin can act as a scaffold for the assembly and activation of signaling molecules (16, 22, 32). The present study suggests a novel, complementary function whereby caveolin acts to restrain cellular response by transient, selective binding of G proteins. Receptor-activated G protein subunits interact with an assembly of signaling molecules consisting of an effector enzyme (e.g. PLC-beta ) and its substrate (e.g. PIP2) located in caveolae. Upon GTP hydrolysis, Galpha .GDP binds with high affinity to caveolin-3 and is transiently sequestered, impeding reassociation of the heterotrimeric G protein. The decrease in the levels of G protein available to receptors in the extracaveolar membrane causes a transient decrease in the ability of agonists to activate PLC-beta , i.e. a G protein-specific heterologous desensitization of response.

Caveolin Binding of Activated G Proteins-- The increase of Galpha in caveolin immunoprecipitates derived from caveolin-enriched fractions and whole cell lysates was confined to activated G proteins. The Galpha subunits appeared to bind directly to caveolin-3 rather than to a caveolin-associated protein and could be competed out by the corresponding caveolin-binding G protein fragment. Thus, a caveolin-binding Galpha q/11 fragment blocked the binding of activated Galpha q/11 but not Galpha i3 to caveolin-3, whereas a caveolin-binding Galpha i3 fragment had the reverse effect, blocking the binding of activated Galpha i3 but not Galpha q/11 to caveolin-3.

The increase in Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 binding to caveolin-3 induced by ACh was both time- and concentration-dependent, reflecting concurrent activation of m3 receptors coupled to Gq/11 and m2 receptors coupled to Gi3, a notion confirmed by the increase in the binding of only one G protein subunit in the presence of selective m3 or m2 receptor antagonists. The increase induced by other agonists was also G protein-specific, with CCK-8 and SP increasing Galpha q/11 and CPA increasing Galpha i3 binding to caveolin. de Weerd and Leeb-Lundberg (29) have shown that activation of bradykinin B2 receptors that couple to Gq/11 and Gi in DDT1 MF-2 smooth muscle cells increased Galpha q and Galpha i binding to caveolin with a time course similar to that elicited by ACh in intestinal smooth muscle cells. Some receptors, for example, m2 receptors in cardiac myocytes (31) and CCK-A receptors in pancreatic acinar cells (52) also bind to caveolin upon activation. In the present study, m2 but not m3 receptors bound to caveolin-3 upon activation with ACh, implying that translocation of receptors to caveolae was not a prerequisite for desensitization of response, which was observed upon selective activation of either m2 or m3 receptors.

The decrease in caveolar PIP2 levels suggested that activation of PLC-beta by G proteins occurred in caveolae. A similar decrease in caveolar PIP2 levels has been reported in A431 cells stimulated with bradykinin and epidermal growth factor (41, 53, 54). Our previous studies had shown that PIP2 hydrolysis induced by receptors (e.g. CCK-A and m3 receptors) coupled to Gq/11 was mediated by Galpha -dependent activation of PLC-beta 1, whereas PIP2 hydrolysis induced by receptors coupled to Gi/o (e.g. somatostatin-3, delta -opioid, adenosine A1, and muscarinic m2 receptors) was mediated by beta gamma -dependent activation of PLC-beta 3 (33, 36, 42, 43).

Galpha subunits activated by the nonhydrolyzable analog, GTPgamma S, did not bind to caveolin-3, implying that caveolin binding of receptor-activated Galpha subunits occurred only after GTP hydrolysis, which yielded a GDP-bound Galpha subunit with high affinity for caveolin-3 (13, 15). The transient binding to caveolin was followed by reassociation of the Galpha and Gbeta gamma subunits and their eventual reintegration into the extracaveolar membrane. The entire cycle was completed in 40-60 min (Fig. 5). During this interval, the stoichiometry of the heterotrimeric G protein pool accessible to receptors was altered imposing a G protein-specific barrier to activation of effector enzymes (e.g. PLC-beta ) by receptors that couple to the same G protein.

G Protein-specific Desensitization of PLC-beta Response-- The time course of decrease in PLC-beta activity in response to CCK-8 and CPA closely paralleled the time course of Galpha binding to caveolin induced by pretreatment with ACh. At various intervals and for various concentrations of ACh, the extent of decrease in PLC-beta activity was correlated with the increase in Galpha binding to caveolin. A similar G protein-specific decrease in PLC-beta activity was observed after sequential treatment of the cells with various agonists. Thus, activation of one receptor coupled to Gq/11 (e.g. CCK-A, NK-1, or m3 receptor) inhibited subsequent PLC-beta responses mediated by these receptors but not those mediated by A1 and m2 receptors. Conversely, activation of one receptor coupled to Gi3 (e.g. m2 or A1 receptor) inhibited subsequent PLC-beta responses mediated by these receptors but not those mediated by CCK-A, NK-1, or m3 receptors. Thus, activation of one receptor type decreased the response to another receptor type coupled to the same G protein. It is worth noting that activation of one receptor did not induce desensitization of other receptors; pretreatment of muscle cells with CCK-8, SP, or CPA, for example, had no effect on [3H]scopolamine binding, whereas pretreatment with ACh caused a large decrease in [3H]scopolamine binding, indicative of homologous desensitization of m3 and m2 receptors. PLC-beta activity in response to sequential stimulation with ACh decreased by about 90%, reflecting both receptor-specific (homologous) and G protein-specific (heterologous) desensitization.

Studies with caveolin-binding fragments of Galpha q/11 and Galpha i3 provided decisive evidence for selective binding of activated Galpha to caveolin-3 and established a linkage between caveolin binding and G protein-specific heterologous desensitization of response. A caveolin-binding Galpha q/11 fragment that selectively blocked the binding of activated Galpha q/11 to caveolin-3 elicited by ACh prevented desensitization of responses mediated by other Gq/11-coupled receptors but not by Gi3-coupled receptors. Conversely, a caveolin-binding Galpha i3 fragment that selectively blocked the binding of activated Galpha i3 to caveolin-3 elicited by ACh prevented desensitization of responses mediated by other Gi3-coupled receptors but not by Gq/11-coupled receptors.

Desensitization of response by G protein binding to caveolin was not confined to Gq/11 and Gi3. Both Galpha i1 and Galpha i2 bound to caveolin-3 following activation of Gi1 by somatostatin-3 receptors, activation of Gi2 by opioid delta -receptors, and activation of both Gi1 and Gi2 by natriuretic peptide clearance receptors (42-44). The resultant desensitization was G protein-specific with one component reflecting Galpha i1 and/or Galpha i2 binding to caveolin-3 and the other component reflecting phosphorylation of Galpha i1 and/or Galpha i2 by PKC; only the latter was blocked by pretreatment of muscle cells with a PKC inhibitor (51).2 However, neither Gq/11 nor Gi3 in smooth muscle is susceptible to phosphorylation by PKC (51); as shown in Fig. 14, desensitization of PLC-beta response was not affected by inhibition of PKC activity, implying that desensitization was not mediated by PKC-dependent phosphorylation of G proteins or other protein targets (receptors or effector enzymes) in the phosphoinositide signaling pathway mediated by either Gq/11 or Gi3 in smooth muscle.

In summary, this study demonstrates a role for caveolin in signal transduction that depends on its ability to bind transiently receptor-activated G protein subunits and impede reassociation of the heterotrimeric species, thereby decreasing the ability of receptors that specifically couple to these G proteins to signal effectively. The process may contribute to both homologous and heterologous desensitization of response.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant DK15564 from the NIDDK, National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: P.O. Box 980711, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0711. Tel.: 804-828-8504; Fax: 804-828-2500; skarnam@hsc.vcu.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002194200

2 K. S. Murthy and G. M. Makhlouf, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-0-(gamma -thio)triphosphate; PLC-beta , phospholipase C-beta ; CPA, cyclopentyl adenosine; CCK-8, cholecystokinin octapeptide; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; 4-DAMP, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiotide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; SP, substance P; ACh, acetylcholine; Mes, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; PKC, protein kinase C; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Scherer, P. E., Tang, Z., Chun, M., Sargiacomo, M., Lodish, H. F., and Lisanti, M. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16395-16401
2. Glenney, J. R., and Soppet, D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10517-10521
3. Tang, Z., Scherer, P. E., Okamoto, T., Song, K., Chu, C., Kohtz, D. S., Nishimoto, I., Lodish, H. F., and Lisanti, M. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2255-2261
4. Scherer, P. E., Okamoto, T., Chun, M., Nishimoto, I., Lodish, H. F., and Lisanti, M. P. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 131-135
5. Rothberg, K. G., Heuser, J. E., Donzell, W. C., Ying, Y. S., Glenny, J. R., and Anderson, R. G. (1992) Cell 68, 673-682
6. Okamoto, T., Schlegel, A., Scherer, P. E., and Lisanti, M. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5419-5422
7. Shaul, P. W., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, L843-L851
8. Scherer, P. E., Lewis, R. Y., Volonte, D., Engleman, J. A., Galbiati, F., Chute, J., Kohtz, D. S., von Donselaar, E., Peters, P., and Lisanti, M. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29337-29346
9. Song, K. S., Scherer, P. E., Tang, Z., Okamoto, T., Li, S., Chafel, M., Chu, C., Kohtz, D. S., and Lisanti, M. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15160-15165
10. Sargiacomo, M., Scherer, P. E., Tang, Z., Kubler, E., Song, K. S., Sanders, M. C., and Lisanti, M. P. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9407-9411
11. Monier, S., Parton, R. G., Vogler, F., Behlke, J., Henske, A., and Kurzchalia, T. V. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 911-917
12. Kurzchalia, T. V., Dupree, P., and Monier, S. (1994) FEBS Lett. 346, 88-91
13. Couet, J., Li, S., Okamoto, T., Ikezu, T., and Lisanti, M. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6525-6533
14. Chang, W. J., Ying, Y. S., Rothberg, K. G., Hooper, N. M., Turner, A. J., Gambliel, H. A., De Gunzburg, J., Mumby, S. M., Gilman, A. G., and Anderson, R. G. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 127-138
15. Li, S., Okamoto, T., Chun, M., Sargiacomo, M., Casanova, J. E., Hansen, S. H., Nishimoto, I., and Lisanti, M. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15693-15701
16. Feron, O., Belhassen, L., Kobzik, L., Smith, T. W., Kelly, R. A., and Michel, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22810-22814
17. Shaul, P. W., Smart, E. J., Robinson, L. J., German, Z., Yuhanna, I. S., Ying, Y., Anderson, R. G., and Michel, T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6518-6522
18. Song, K. S., Sargiacomo, M., Galbiati, F., Parenti, M., and Lisanti, M. P. (1997) Cell. Mol. Biol. 43, 293-303
19. Oka, N., Yamamoto, M., Schwencke, C., Kawabe, J.-I., Ebina, T., Ohno, S., Chute, J., Lisanti, M. P., and Ishikawa, Y. (1997) J. Bio. Chem. 272, 33416-33421
20. Carman, C. V., Lisanti, M. P., and Benovic, J. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8858-8864
21. Sargiacomo, M., Sudol, M., Tang, Z., and Lisanti, M. P. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 789-807
22. Mineo, C., James, G. L., Smart, E. J., and Anderson, R. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11930-11935
23. Lisanti, M. P., Schrer, P. E., Vidugiriene, J., Tang, Z., Hermanowski-Vosatka, A., Cook, R. F., and Sargiacomo, M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 111-126
24. Wu, C., Butz, S., Ying, Y., and Anderson, R. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3554-3559
25. Smart, E. J., Ying, Y. S., Mineo, C., and Anderson, R. G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10104-10108
26. Couet, J., Sargiacomo, M., and Lisanti, M. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30429-30438
27. Liu, P., Ying, Y., and Anderson, R. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13666-13670
28. Chun, M., Liyanage, U. K., Lisanti, M. P., and Lodish, H. F. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 11728-11732
29. de Weerd, W. F. C., and Leeb-Lundberg, L. M. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17858-17866
30. Schwencke, C., Okumura, S., Yamamoto, M., Geng, Y. J., and Ishikawa, Y. (1999) J. Cell. Biochem. 75, 64-72
31. Feron, O., Smith, T. W., Michel, T., and Kelly, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17744-17748
32. Liu, P., and Anderson, R. G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27179-27185
33. Murthy, K. S., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, C969-C978
34. Kwatra, M. M., Schwinn, D. A., Schreurs, J., Blank, J. L., Kim, C. M., Benovic, J. L., Krause, J. E., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9161-9164
35. Sohn, U. D., Han, B., Tashjian, A. H., Behar, J., and Biancani, P. (1995) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 273, 482-491
36. Murthy, K. S., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 1172-1179
37. Murthy, K. S., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 21317-21324
38. Okamoto, T., Ikezu, T., Murayama, Y., Ogata, E., and Nishimoto, I. (1992) FEBS Lett. 305, 125-128
39. Murthy, K. S., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 261, G945-G951
40. Murthy, K. S., Kuemmerle, J. F., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, G93-G102
41. Pike, L. J., and Casey, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26453-26456
42. Murthy, K. S., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17587-17592
43. Murthy, K. S., Coy, D. H, and Makhlouf, G. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23458-23463
44. Murthy, K. S., and Makhlouf, G. M. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 770-778
45. Prmont, R. T., Inglese, J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 175-182
46. Hipkin, R. W., Friedman, J., Clark, R. B., Eppler, A. M., and Schobrunn, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13869-13876
47. Bushfield, Murphy, G. J., M., Lavan, B. E., Parker, P. J., Hruby, V. J., Milligan, G., and Houslay, M. D. (1990) Biochem. J. 268, 449-457
48. Fields, T. A., and Casey, P. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23119-23125
49. Kosaza, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12562-12567
50. Filtz, T. M., Cunningham, L., Stanig, K. J., Paterson, A., and Harden, T. K. (1999) Biochem. J. 338, 257-264
51. Murthy, K. S., Grider, J. R., and Makhlouf, G. M. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, C925-C934
52. Roettger, B. F., Rentsch, R. U., Pinon, D., Holicky, E., Larkin, J. M., and Miller, J. M. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 1029-1041
53. Hope, H. R., and Pike, L. J. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 843-851
54. Pike, L. J., and Miller, J. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22298-22304


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
K. S. Murthy, S. Mahavadi, J. Huang, H. Zhou, and W. Sriwai
Phosphorylation of GRK2 by PKA augments GRK2-mediated phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization of VPAC2 receptors in smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): C477 - C487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. Gosens, G. L. Stelmack, G. Dueck, M. M. Mutawe, M. Hinton, K. D. McNeill, A. Paulson, S. Dakshinamurti, W. T. Gerthoffer, J. A. Thliveris, et al.
Caveolae facilitate muscarinic receptor-mediated intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and contraction in airway smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): L1406 - L1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
Z. Xiao, F. Schmitz, V. E. Pricolo, P. Biancani, and J. Behar
Role of caveolae in the pathogenesis of cholesterol-induced gallbladder muscle hypomotility
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): G1641 - G1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. Gosens, G. Dueck, W. T. Gerthoffer, H. Unruh, J. Zaagsma, H. Meurs, and A. J. Halayko
p42/p44 MAP kinase activation is localized to caveolae-free membrane domains in airway smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): L1163 - L1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. Huang, H. Zhou, S. Mahavadi, W. Sriwai, and K. S. Murthy
Inhibition of G{alpha}q-dependent PLC-beta1 activity by PKG and PKA is mediated by phosphorylation of RGS4 and GRK2
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): C200 - C208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
Y. Shakirova, J. Bonnevier, S. Albinsson, M. Adner, B. Rippe, J. Broman, A. Arner, and K. Sward
Increased Rho activation and PKC-mediated smooth muscle contractility in the absence of caveolin-1.
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): C1326 - C1335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. Fischmeister, L. R.V. Castro, A. Abi-Gerges, F. Rochais, J. Jurevicius, J. Leroy, and G. Vandecasteele
Compartmentation of Cyclic Nucleotide Signaling in the Heart: The Role of Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases
Circ. Res., October 13, 2006; 99(8): 816 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. V. Remillard and J. X.-J. Yuan
Transient Receptor Potential Channels and Caveolin-1: Good Friends in Tight Spaces
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1151 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
W. Xu, S.-I. Yoon, P. Huang, Y. Wang, C. Chen, P. L.-G. Chong, and L.-Y. Liu-Chen
Localization of the {kappa} Opioid Receptor in Lipid Rafts
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1295 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
V. Rudajev, J. Novotny, L. Hejnova, G. Milligan, and P. Svoboda
Dominant Portion of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Is Excluded from Lipid Domains. Detergent-Resistant and Detergent-Sensitive Pools of TRH Receptor and Gq{alpha}/G11{alpha} Protein
J. Biochem., August 1, 2005; 138(2): 111 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
P. A. Dabisch, D. B. Miller, S. A. Reutter, R. J. Mioduszewski, and S. A. Thomson
Miotic Tolerance to Sarin Vapor Exposure: Role of the Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Nervous Systems
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2005; 85(2): 1041 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J.-P. Gratton, P. Bernatchez, and W. C. Sessa
Caveolae and Caveolins in the Cardiovascular System
Circ. Res., June 11, 2004; 94(11): 1408 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. D. Minshall, W. C. Sessa, R. V. Stan, R. G. W. Anderson, and A. B. Malik
Caveolin regulation of endothelial function
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): L1179 - L1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Kifor, I. Kifor, F. D. Moore Jr., R. R. Butters Jr., and E. M. Brown
m-Calpain Colocalizes with the Calcium-sensing Receptor (CaR) in Caveolae in Parathyroid Cells and Participates in Degradation of the CaR
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31167 - 31176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
D. GRATZINGER, S. CANOSA, B. ENGELHARDT, and J. A. MADRI
Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 modulates endothelial cell motility through the small G-protein Rho
FASEB J, August 1, 2003; 17(11): 1458 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. Manganello, J.-S. Huang, T. Kozasa, T. A. Voyno-Yasenetskaya, and G. C. Le Breton
Protein Kinase A-mediated Phosphorylation of the Galpha 13 Switch I Region Alters the Galpha beta gamma 13-G Protein-coupled Receptor Complex and Inhibits Rho Activation
J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. Sabourin, L. Bastien, D. R. Bachvarov, and F. Marceau
Agonist-Induced Translocation of the Kinin B1 Receptor to Caveolae-Related Rafts
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2002; 61(3): 546 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
B. Razani and M. P. Lisanti
Two distinct caveolin-1 domains mediate the functional interaction of caveolin-1 with protein kinase A
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): C1241 - C1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/39/30211    most recent
M002194200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makhlouf, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Makhlouf, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement