|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003112200 on July 25, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 39, 30326-30334, September 29, 2000
Functional Comparison of the K+-Cl
Cotransporters KCC1 and KCC4*
Adriana
Mercado §,
Luyan
Song¶,
Norma
Vázquez ,
David B.
Mount¶, and
Gerardo
Gamba
From the Molecular Physiology Unit, Instituto
Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador
Zubirán and Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tlalpan 14000, Mexico City, Mexico and the ¶ Division of Nephrology and
Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical
Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
Received for publication, April 12, 2000, and in revised form, June 20, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The K+-Cl
cotransporters (KCCs) are members of the cation-chloride cotransporter
gene family and fall into two phylogenetic subgroups: KCC2 paired with
KCC4 and KCC1 paired with KCC3. We report a functional comparison in
Xenopus oocytes of KCC1 and KCC4, widely expressed
representatives of these two subgroups. KCC1 and KCC4 exhibit
differential sensitivity to transport inhibitors, such that KCC4 is
much less sensitive to bumetanide and furosemide. The efficacy of these
anion inhibitors is critically dependent on the concentration of
extracellular K+, with much higher inhibition in 50 mM K+ versus 2 mM
K+. KCC4 is also uniquely sensitive to 10 mM
barium and to 2 mM trichlormethiazide. Kinetic
characterization reveals divergent affinities for K+
(Km values of ~25.5 and 17.5 mM for
KCC1 and KCC4, respectively), probably due to variation within the
second transmembrane segment. Although the two isoforms have equivalent
affinities for Cl , they differ in the anion selectivity
of K+ transport (Cl > SCN = Br > PO4 3 > I
for KCC1 and Cl > Br > PO4 3 = I > SCN
for KCC4). Both KCCs express minimal K+-Cl
cotransport under isotonic conditions, with significant activation by
cell swelling under hypotonic conditions. The cysteine-alkylating agent
N-ethylmaleimide activates
K+-Cl cotransport in isotonic
conditions but abrogates hypotonic activation, an unexpected
dissociation of N-ethylmaleimide sensitivity and volume
sensitivity. Although KCC4 is consistently more volume-sensitive, the
hypotonic activation of both isoforms is critically dependent on
protein phosphatase 1. Overall, the functional comparison of these
cloned K+-Cl cotransporters reveals important
functional, pharmacological, and kinetic differences with both
physiological and mechanistic implications.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In a great majority of cells, the plasma membrane is permeable to
water. Movement of water across the cell membrane is largely dependent
on the osmotic pressure gradient between the intracellular and
extracellular space, such that water transport accompanies changes in
the concentration of osmotically active molecules. Thus, when
intracellular osmolarity exceeds that of the extracellular milieu, cell
volume increases due to the movement of water into the cell. To cope
with the resultant cell swelling, cells have developed a series of
complex mechanisms to achieve a regulatory volume decrease, primarily
through the activation of efflux mechanisms for intracellular ions. In
particular, net electroneutral release of
K+-Cl is achieved by
K+-Cl cotransport, the simultaneous operation
of K+/H+ and
Cl /HCO3 exchangers, or
through parallel, swelling-activated K+ and
Cl channels (1).
K+-Cl cotransport was first described in red
blood cells as a swelling- and
NEM1-activated K+
efflux mechanism (2, 3), and red cells remain the primary model tissue
for this class of ion transport. However, functional and physiological
evidence has also been reported for the existence of
K+-Cl cotransport in neurons (4), vascular
smooth muscle (5), endothelium (6), epithelia (7, 8), heart (9), and skeletal muscle (10). Consequently, K+-Cl
cotransport has been implicated not only in regulatory volume decrease,
but also in transepithelial salt absorption (8), renal K+
secretion (11), myocardial K+ loss during ischemia (9), and
regulation of neuronal Cl concentration (4). The
physiological mechanisms invoked in cell volume regulation may also
have broader roles in phenomena such as cell growth and apoptosis
(1).
A major advance in the understanding of K+-Cl
cotransport has been the recent molecular identification of mammalian
genes that encode a total of four K+-Cl
cotransporter (KCC) isoforms. These cotransporters were identified due
to their similarity to other members of the electroneutral cation-chloride cotransporter gene family, the bumetanide-sensitive Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporters and the
thiazide-sensitive Na+-Cl cotransporter (12).
The K+-Cl cotransporters have been designated
KCC1 (13), KCC2 (14), KCC3 (15, 16), and KCC4
(16).2 KCC2 is a neuronal
specific isoform, whereas the other three KCCs are widely distributed
in multiple tissues. Phylogenetic and genomic analysis (16, 17)
indicates that the four KCC proteins form a separate subfamily of the
cation-chloride cotransporters. Furthermore, KCC2 and KCC4 form a
closely related subgroup, whereas KCC1 is more homologous to KCC3.
Alternative splicing and alternative promoter usage generate further
molecular heterogeneity. For example, there are at least two
alternative isoforms of KCC3, generated by transcriptional initiation
5' of two separate first coding exons. The longer isoform, KCC3a (16),
utilizes exon 1a, whereas KCC3b uses exon 1b, situated ~23
kilobases 3' within the human KCC3 gene on chromosome
15q14.3 The predicted KCC3a
and KCC3b proteins, 1150 and 1099 amino acids, respectively, differ
dramatically in the content and distribution of predicted
phosphorylation sites for protein kinases.
The extent of molecular heterogeneity in
K+-Cl cotransport was unexpected, even after
the identification of KCC1 and KCC2. In consequence, next to nothing is
known about the functional and pharmacological properties of the four
major KCC isoforms, or indeed of the physiological role of each
isoform. One exception is the recent recognition that KCC2 encodes a
developmentally regulated Cl extrusion mechanism in
neurons, with crucial secondary effects on the response to
-aminobutyric acid and other neurotransmitters that activate
neuronal chloride conductance (4). To begin to understand the
physiology and function of the individual KCCs, it is essential to
characterize the functional properties of each isoform. KCC1 cDNAs
from human, mouse, rabbit, pig, and Caenorhabditis elegans
have been functionally expressed in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK
293) and in Xenopus laevis oocytes (13, 17, 18). Rat KCC2
and human KCC3 cDNAs have also been expressed in HEK 293 cells (15,
19, 20). From these studies, it is already quite clear that there are
differences in the functional and pharmacological properties of the
K+-Cl cotransporter isoforms. For example,
kinetic analysis indicates that KCC2 exhibits significantly a higher
affinity for potassium (14) than that of KCC1 (13) or KCC3 (20). In
contrast, KCC2 is uniquely volume-insensitive, exhibiting minimal if
any activation by cell swelling and considerable isoosmotic transport
activity (21). In the present study, we extended the functional and
pharmacological characterization of the recently cloned mouse KCC4
(16), using the Xenopus laevis oocyte expression system. The
functional comparison of shark and human BSC2/NKCC1 and rabbit
BSC1/NKCC2 has yielded important structure-function information for the
Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporters
(22-24). With this paradigm in mind, we simultaneously studied the
functional properties of KCC1 in our expression system and report
significant functional and pharmacological differences between these
representatives of the two molecular subgroups of the KCCs.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Xenopus laevis Oocyte Preparation--
Adult female
Xenopus laevis frogs were purchased from Carolina Biological
Supply Company (Burlington, NC) and maintained at the Institution
animal facility under constant control of room temperature and
humidity, 16 °C and 65%, respectively. Frogs were fed with frog
brittle dry food from Carolina Biological Supply Company, and water was
changed twice a week. Oocytes were surgically collected from
anesthetized animals under 0.17% tricaine and incubated for 1 h
with vigorous shaking in frog Ringer ND96 (96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl, and 5 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) in the
presence of 2 mg/ml of collagenase B. Oocytes were then washed four
times in ND96, manually defolliculated, and incubated overnight in ND96
at 18 °C. On the next day, stage V-VI oocytes (25) were injected
with 50 nl of water containing 0.25-0.5 µg/µl of cRNA in
vitro transcribed from mouse KCC4 (KCC4) or rabbit KCC1 (KCC1) cDNA. Oocytes were incubated at 18 °C for 4 days in ND96
supplemented with 2.5 mM sodium pyruvate and 5 mg/100 ml
gentamicin; this incubation medium was changed every 24 h. On
the day of the experiment, oocytes were switched to
Cl -free ND96 (96 mM
Na+-isethionate, 2 mM K+ gluconate,
6.0 mM Ca2+ gluconate, 1.0 mM
Mg2+ gluconate, 5 mM Hepes, 2.5 mM
sodium pyruvate, 5 mg/100 ml gentamicin, pH 7.4) 2 h
prior to the uptake assay.
The full-length KCC4 and KCC1 cDNAs were previously subcloned into
the high expression vector pGEMHE (16); rabbit KCC1 was a gift of Dr.
Bliss Forbush III. To prepare cRNA, the KCC1 and KCC4 cDNAs were
linearized at their 3'-ends with NheI and then transcribed
in vitro using the T7 RNA polymerase mMESSAGE kit (Ambion).
Transcription product integrity was confirmed on agarose gels, and
concentration was determined by absorbance reading at 260 nm (DU 640, Beckman, Fullerton, CA). cRNA was stored frozen in aliquots at
80 °C until used.
Assessment of K+-Cl
Cotransport--
K+-Cl cotransport was
assessed by measuring tracer 86Rb+ uptake (NEN
Life Science Products) in experimental groups of at least 15 oocytes.
Since both KCC4 and KCC1 express minimal activity under isotonic
conditions (see "Results"), 86Rb+ uptake
was generally assessed in oocytes swollen by a 30-min incubation period
in a hypotonic K+ and Cl -free medium (50 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG)
gluconate, 4.6 mM Ca2+ gluconate, 1.0 mM Mg2+ gluconate, 5 mM Hepes, pH
7.4) with 1 mM ouabain, followed by a 60-min uptake period
in a hypotonic Na+-free medium with variable
K+-Cl content. K+ and
Cl concentrations were varied separately using
combinations of KCl, NMDG chloride, potassium gluconate, and
NMDG gluconate, for a maximal total concentration of 50 mM;
an uptake solution with 50 mM
K+-Cl did not contain NMDG chloride,
potassium gluconate, or NMDG gluconate, for example. All uptake
solutions also contained 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, and
were supplemented with 1 mM ouabain and 5.0 µCi/ml
86Rb+. Isotonic conditions were generated by
supplementing the same solutions with 3.5 g/100 ml sucrose to reach
isosmolar conditions for oocytes (~210 mosmol/kg). Ouabain was
added to prevent 86Rb+ uptake via the
Na+-K+-ATPase. The absence of
extracellular Na+ and the hypotonicity of the uptake medium
prevented 86Rb+ uptake via the endogenous
Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter that is
present in oocytes (26).
All uptakes were performed at 32 °C temperature. At the end of the
uptake period, oocytes were washed five times in ice-cold uptake
solution without isotope to remove extracellular fluid tracer. Oocytes
were dissolved in 10% SDS, and tracer activity was determined for each
oocyte by -scintillation counting.
To determine the ion transport kinetics of KCC4 and KCC1, we performed
experiments using varying concentrations of K+ and
Cl . The sensitivity for several inhibitors was assessed
by exposing groups of oocytes to the inhibitors at concentrations
varying from 20 µM to 2 mM. For these
experiments, the desired concentration of the inhibitor was present
during both the incubation and uptake periods, except when noted.
Statistical Analysis--
Statistical significance is defined as
two-tailed p < 0.05, and the results are presented as
mean ± S.E. The significance of the differences between groups
was tested by one-way analysis of variance with multiple comparison
using Bonferroni correction or by the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis
of variance on ranks with the Dunn's method for multiple comparison
procedures, as needed.
 |
RESULTS |
Heterologous Expression of KCC4 and KCC1 in Xenopus
Oocytes--
In isotonic conditions, no differences were observed
among KCC4, KCC1, and water-injected oocytes (data not shown). When
uptakes were performed under hypotonic conditions, microinjection of
KCC4 and KCC1 cRNAs resulted in significant
K+-Cl cotransport activity, as compared with
control oocytes that were injected with water. Fig.
1 summarizes five experiments in which oocytes from different frogs were injected with water or KCC4 or KCC1
cRNA, followed by 86Rb+ uptake assay using a
hypotonic uptake solution containing 10 and 50 mM of
extracellular K+ and Cl , respectively. In
control oocytes, 86Rb+ uptake was 588 ± 91 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1
in the presence of Cl and 147 ± 23 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1
in the absence of Cl , indicating the presence of an
endogenous K+-Cl cotransporter.
Microinjection of KCC4 cRNA resulted in an increased 86Rb+ uptake to 24,457 ± 3,476 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1.
This 86Rb+ uptake was
Cl -dependent, in that uptake in KCC4 oocytes
in the absence of extracellular Cl was 1723 ± 402 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1.
In oocytes microinjected with KCC1, 86Rb+
uptake increased to 12,632 ± 2205 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1,
and the influx was Cl -dependent. The
difference in the amount of uptake between KCC4 and KCC1 was
statistically significant (p < 0.05). Although equal amounts of KCC4 and KCC1 cRNA were injected for all experiments that we
performed during the study, using multiple cRNA preparations, the
relative expression level under hypotonic conditions has always been
KCC4 > KCC1. In addition, for each KCC, the absolute uptake varied from frog to frog. Although KCC1 and KCC4 were also compared head-to-head using oocytes from the same frog for individual
experiments, to ease the comparison of the two isoforms we present much
of the results as the percentage of
Cl -dependent 86Rb+
uptake. Thus, 100% generally represents the uptake observed in the
KCC4 or KCC1 control group minus uptake observed in the water-injected oocytes.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
86Rb+ Uptake in
X. laevis oocytes microinjected with water or with
cRNA in vitro transcribed from KCC4 or KCC1 cDNA
as indicated. Uptakes were performed in hypotonic solutions with
120 mosmol/kg in the presence (open bars)
or absence (black bars) of extracellular
Cl . Each bar represents a mean of 90 oocytes
extracted from five different frogs. 86Rb+
uptake was performed during 60 min. *, significantly different from
uptake in KCC1 control group (p < 0.01).
|
|
Inhibitor Profile of KCC4 and KCC1--
The effect of the loop
diuretics furosemide and bumetanide was initially assessed using two
different concentrations of extracellular K+: 2 and 50 mM. In uptake medium with a K+ concentration of
2 mM, relative KCC4 activity was 61 ± 3 and 90 ± 4% in the presence of 2 mM furosemide or bumetanide,
respectively. Interestingly, the inhibition of KCC4 by loop diuretics
was augmented when the uptake medium contained 50 mM
K+; under these conditions, the KCC4 activity was 9 ± 4 or 17 ± 4% in the presence of furosemide or bumetanide,
respectively. In contrast, for KCC1 this effect of extracellular
K+ was not observed for furosemide and was marginal for
bumetanide. KCC1 function in the presence of furosemide was 9 ± 2% in 2 mM K+ and 18 ± 8% in 50 mM K+ (p not significant), and in
the presence of bumetanide it was 51 ± 12 versus
19 ± 7% in 2 and 50 mM K+, respectively
(p = 0.05; t = 1.99). To further define
the differences in the K+ effect on the sensitivity to loop
diuretics between KCC4 and KCC1, we assessed the inhibitory effect of
furosemide and bumetanide at several concentrations of extracellular
K+. The results of these series of experiments are shown in
Fig. 2. The percentage inhibition of KCC4
by both furosemide and bumetanide was significantly affected by
extracellular K+ (Fig. 2, upper
panels). The minimal and maximal inhibition by both loop
diuretics was observed at 2 and 6 mM, respectively; no
further effect was observed at higher K+ concentrations. In
contrast, the percentage of KCC1 inhibition by either furosemide or
bumetanide did not vary as a function of extracellular K+
concentration (Fig. 2, lower panels). Thus, to
define differences between the two KCCs in sensitivity to loop
diuretics, we used a 10 mM concentration of extracellular
K+ to assess the concentration curves for furosemide and
bumetanide inhibition upon the Cl -dependent
86Rb+ uptake induced by KCC4 or KCC1. As Fig.
3 illustrates, KCC4 exhibits apparent
half-maximal inhibition (K0.5) values of ~900
µM for both furosemide and bumetanide. These are lower
than the respective values for KCC1 (~180 µM for
furosemide and bumetanide). Therefore, KCC4 clearly exhibits a lower
affinity for loop diuretics than does KCC1. The inhibition of KCC1 by
furosemide in Fig. 3 suggests the possibility of a second affinity site
for the loop diuretic. However, this inhibition fitted well to a
Michaelis-Menten kinetics pattern with one inhibitor-binding site. The
data did not fit to an equation with two binding sites (data not
shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of extracellular K+
concentration [K+]e on the inhibition of
86Rb+ uptake by the loop diuretics furosemide
and bumetanide. Data from KCC4-injected oocytes are presented in
the upper panels, and data from KCC1-injected
oocytes are shown in the lower panels. In all
experiments, the Cl concentration of the extracellular
medium was 50 mM, whereas the [K+]e
increased from 2 to 20 mM. The mean uptake in the absence
of loop diuretic for each KCC was taken as the 100% of uptake, and
data from diuretic-treated groups was normalized to the uptake in this
control group. Experimental groups were exposed to a 2 mM
concentration of furosemide or bumetanide during the incubation and
uptake periods. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.
of at least 15 oocytes.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Concentration-response profiles for
inhibition of KCC4 (circles) and KCC1
(squares) by furosemide (left
panel) or bumetanide (right
panel). Groups of 15 Xenopus oocytes
microinjected with KCC4 or KCC1 were exposed to increased
concentrations of furosemide or bumetanide in the preincubation and
uptake mediums, from 20 to 2000 µM. Data were normalized
as the percentage of influx in each KCC, taking 100% as the value
observed in oocytes in which uptake was done in the absence of loop
diuretics. Each point represents the mean ± S.E. of at least 15 oocytes.
|
|
The sensitivity of the KCCs to other inhibitors of red cell
K+-Cl cotransport was also assessed in
oocytes injected with KCC4 or KCC1. Fig.
4 illustrates the effect of 100 µM DIDS and 100 µM DIOA on the
86Rb+ uptake induced by the microinjection of
each KCC cRNA. The effect of extracellular K+ concentration
on the inhibition of cotransport was very dramatic for DIDS. When the
concentration of extracellular K+ was 2 mM, the
addition of DIDS to the extracellular medium resulted in reduction of
KCC4 function to 65 ± 10% (p < 0.003) and of
KCC1 to 85 ± 6% (p = 0.113, not significant). In
contrast, when 50 mM of extracellular K+ was
used, DIDS resulted in significant decrease of KCC4 and KCC1 to 13 ± 4 and 13 ± 2%, respectively. The addition of 100 µM of DIOA to the extracellular medium also resulted in
inhibition of the KCCs. However, inhibition of KCC4 was higher when
extracellular K+ was lower, although this was not the case
for KCC1. DIOA is reportedly specific for
K+-Cl cotransport over
Na+-K+-2Cl cotransport (27), and
the same concentration of DIOA had no effect on the function of the
Na+-K+-2Cl cotransport activity
of Xenopus oocytes (26) (data not shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of the inhibitors DIDS
(upper panel) and DIOA (lower
panel) upon 86Rb+ uptake in
KCC4- and KCC1-injected oocytes incubated in hypotonic conditions
(120 mosmol/kg), in the presence of an extracellular
K+ concentration of 2 mM (open
bars) or 50 mM (hatched
bars). The Cl concentration of the
extracellular medium was 50 mM in both conditions. In all
experiments, 86Rb+ uptake was assessed in
control groups of 2 and 50 mM K+ concentration,
in the absence of inhibitors, and experimental groups were exposed to a
100 µM of DIDS or DIOA during incubation and uptake
periods. Each bar represents the mean ± S.E. of at
least 15 oocytes.
|
|
We also tested the effect of a 2 mM concentration of the
thiazide diuretic trichlormethiazide on the percentage of
chloride-dependent 86Rb+ uptake.
Surprisingly, given the supposed specificity of thiazides for
Na+-Cl cotransport (28), KCC4 was moderately
sensitive to trichlormethiazide. As we observed with furosemide and
DIDS, the higher the extracellular K+, the higher the
inhibition by thiazides, since in 2 mM of extracellular K+ 86Rb+ uptake was reduced to
79 ± 3%, and at 50 mM it was reduced to 57 ± 9%. This difference was significant (p < 0.01). In
KCC1-injected oocytes, trichlormethiazide reduced
86Rb+ uptake by a statistically significant
amount to 64 ± 4% in 2 mM K+; this
inhibitory effect was not statistically significant at 50 mM K+ (74 ± 8% reduction in activity).
Consistent sensitivity to trichlormethiazide is thus unique to
KCC4.
Independent studies have suggested that barium can inhibit renal
K+-Cl cotransporters (7, 8, 29). We thus
assessed the effect of 10 mM extracellular barium on the
function of KCC4 and KCC1. Fig. 5 shows
that when 10 mM BaCl2 was added to the uptake
medium, KCC4-induced influx was reduced to 58 ± 4.3% of the
uptake observed in KCC4-injected control oocytes. KCC1 function was
only reduced to 79 ± 4.2%, hence the inhibitory effect of barium
was significantly greater for KCC4 than for KCC1 (p < 0.01).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of 10 mM BaCl2
upon the 86Rb+ influx induced by
microinjections of oocytes with KCC4 or KCC1 cRNA. Uptakes in the
control groups were performed using a hypotonic uptake medium
containing 40 mM NMDG chloride and 10 mM
KCl, and uptakes in the BaCl2 group were performed using a
hypotonic medium containing 30 mM NMDG chloride, 10 mM BaCl2, and 10 mM KCl. Each
bar represents a mean of 20 oocytes. Open
bars represent the normalized influx in control group, and
black bars show normalized influx in
BaCl2 groups. *, p < 0.01 versus uptake in control group.
|
|
Kinetic Properties of KCC4 and KCC1--
To determine and compare
the kinetic properties of KCC4 and KCC1 in the same expression system,
we measured 86Rb+ uptake in KCC4- and
KCC1-injected oocytes as a function of the concentration of each
transported ion. The results of these series of experiments are
depicted in Fig. 6. Uptakes were
performed with K+ or Cl fixed at 50 mM, with changing concentrations of the counterion from 0 to 50 mM. Uptakes were also measured in water injected oocytes (data not shown), and the mean values for water groups were
subtracted from corresponding KCC groups in order to assess only the
86Rb+ uptake mediated by each heterologously
expressed isoform. As shown in Fig. 1, 86Rb+
uptake in water-injected oocytes was low, such that this correction was
generally minor. In the case of KCC4, 86Rb+
influx increased as the concentration of each transported ion was
raised, until a plateau phase was reached at ion concentrations greater
than 20-40 mM, compatible with Michaelis-Menten behavior. The calculated apparent Km and
Vmax for extracellular K+
concentration were 17.5 ± 2.7 mM and 32,370 ± 2115 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1,
respectively. The calculated apparent Km and
Vmax values for extracellular Cl
concentration were 16.12 ± 4.2 mM and 41,440 ± 4174 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1,
respectively. The Hill coefficient for both ions remained close to
unity: 1.08 ± 0.2 and 1.06 ± 0.3 for K+ and
Cl , respectively. KCC1 also exhibited a similar
Michaelis-Menten behavior. The apparent Km and
Vmax in KCC1 were 25.5 ± 3.2 mM and 39,540 ± 2199 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1
for extracellular K+ and 17.2 ± 8.3 mM
and 14,930 ± 2822 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1
for Cl . Hill coefficients for K+ (1.04 ± 0.13) and Cl (1.3 ± 0.5) in KCC1 also were close
to unity.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Kinetic analysis of
86Rb+ uptake using hypotonic conditions in
oocytes injected with cRNA from KCC4 (A and
B) or KCC1 (C and
D). A and C, K+
dependence of 86Rb+ uptake for each KCC.
B and D, Cl dependence of
86Rb+ uptake for each KCC. Uptakes were
performed with K+ or Cl fixed at 50 mM, varying the concentration of the appropriate counterion
from 0 to 50 mM, as indicated. Uptakes were also measured
in water-injected oocytes (data not shown), and the mean values for the
corresponding water groups were subtracted to analyze only the
86Rb+ uptake due to each injected KCC.
Lines were fit using the Michaelis-Menten equation. Data are
expressed as uptakes in
pmol·oocyte 1·h 1,
each point represents the mean of at least 25 oocytes.
|
|
Anion Dependence of KCC4 and KCC1--
It has been shown that some
extracellular anions other than Cl can support ion
translocation through the K+-Cl cotransporter
of both sheep and human erythrocytes (30). It was thus of interest to
measure 86Rb+ transport by KCC4 and KCC1 in the
presence of different anions. The 86Rb+ influx
of KCC4- and KCC1-injected oocytes using an uptake solution containing
40 mM potassium gluconate and 10 mM KCl served
as the reference activity for these experiments, as compared with
uptake activity in oocytes exposed to medium containing 40 mM potassium gluconate and 10 mM of KBr,
KH2PO4, KI, potassium gluconate, or KSCN. Fig.
7 shows the percentage of KCC4
(upper panel) and KCC1 (lower
panel) function when uptakes were performed using these different anion substitutions. KCC4 shows the higher
86Rb+ influx in the presence of 10 mM KCl. 86Rb+ influx was still
observed in the presence of other anions: 58 ± 9% with 10 mM KBr, 22 ± 5.9% with 10 mM
KH2PO4, and 17 ± 3.8% with KI, whereas
potassium gluconate and KSCN did not support transport. These results
are in contrast to those observed in KCC1-injected oocytes, for which
the order of anion-supported transport was Cl > SCN = Br > PO4 3 > I > gluconate.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Anion dependence of KCC4 (upper
panel) and KCC1 (lower
panel). 86Rb+ influx was
assessed in hypotonic uptake medium containing 40 mM
NMDG gluconate plus 10 mM concentration of KCl (control
group) or 10 mM potassium salts of each of the anion
substitutes (KBr, KH2PO4, KI, potassium
gluconate, and KSCN). Preincubation was done in a solution containing
50 mM NMDG gluconate. Data were normalized taking uptake in
th KCl group as 100%. Each bar represents the mean ± S.E. of at least 15 oocytes.
|
|
Regulation of KCC4 and KCC1--
One of the most distinctive
characteristics of K+-Cl cotransport in
several cells and species is activation by the alkylating agent NEM
(2). We therefore analyzed the effect of NEM on
86Rb+ influx in groups of oocytes under
isotonic or hypotonic conditions. Again, in all of the experiments in
which we assessed 86Rb+ influx in oocytes that
were incubated in isotonic medium (~ 210 mosmol/kg), the
uptake observed in KCC4- or KCC1-injected oocytes was not different
from the uptake in water-injected oocytes. However, the addition of 1 mM NEM in isotonic conditions resulted in a 5-fold
activation of KCC4 (214 ± 12 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1
in the KCC4 control group versus 1062 ± 70 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1
in the NEM-treated group, p < 0.001) and a 2.6-fold
activation of KCC1 (120 ± 27 versus 319 ± 76 pmol·oocyte 1·h 1,
p < 0.05) (Fig. 8,
A and B). Of note, when uptakes were performed in
hypotonic medium, the addition of NEM resulted in a dramatic inhibition
of both isoforms (Fig. 8, C and D), such that
86Rb+ uptakes induced by KCC4 and KCC1 were
reduced by 68 and 55%, respectively. In the same experiments,
86Rb+ uptake due to the endogenous oocyte
K+-Cl cotransporter (H2O-injected
oocytes) was significantly increased when uptakes were done under both
isotonic and hypotonic conditions (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of 1 mM NEM on the
86Rb+ uptake in KCC4-injected (A
and C) and KCC1-injected (B and
D) oocytes, under both isotonic (A
and B) and hypotonic (C and
D) conditions. Each bar represents the
mean of 20 oocytes. Uptakes in the control conditions are shown in
open bars, in the absence of extracellular
Cl in black bars, and in the
presence of NEM in hatched bars. *,
p < 0.0001 versus control group.
|
|
It has been known for some time that the inhibition of protein
phosphatases prevents the activation of red cell
K+-Cl cotransport by either cell swelling or
NEM. Since the role of phosphatases in the control of the cloned KCCs
is unclear, we studied the effect of three inhibitors of protein
phosphatases. We used 100 nM calyculin A, which inhibits
the function of protein phosphatases 1 and 2A. The relative role
of specific phosphatases was assessed using okadaic acid at 1 nM, a concentration that only affects protein phosphatase
2A, and cypermethrin at 100 pM, a concentration in which
this compound inhibits the function of protein phosphatase 2B. As Fig.
9 shows, the addition of calyculin A
completely prevents the activation of KCC4 and KCC1 by cell swelling.
In contrast, neither okadaic acid, nor cypermethrin prevented this
activation. These results indicate that protein phosphatase 1 is
required for the activation of both KCC4 and KCC1 by cell swelling.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of the protein phosphatase inhibitors
calyculin A (100 nM) (hatched
bar), okadaic acid (1 nM)
(black bar), and cypermethrin (100 pM) (gray bar) upon the
swelling-induced activation of KCC4 or KCC1. In both
panels, the white bar represents the
control group, 86Rb+ influx in hypotonic medium
in the absence of inhibitor. Each bar represents the
mean ± S.E. of at least 15 oocytes.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have recently shown (16) that heterologous expression of the
mouse KCC4 cDNA induced the expression of a
86Rb+ influx pathway that is activated by cell
swelling, dependent on the presence of extracellular Cl ,
and inhibited by 2 mM of the loop diuretic furosemide.
These data established that KCC4 functions as a
K+-Cl cotransporter. The present study
extends these initial observations and defines the functional
properties of KCC4 in greater detail. In addition, we have studied the
functional properties of KCC1, the other widely distributed KCC
isoform, using the same experimental protocols. Since sequence
comparisons of the four KCC proteins pair KCC4 with KCC2 and KCC1 with
KCC3, this study also constitutes the first direct functional
comparison of the two subgroups of the KCCs.
Our data indicate that KCC1 and KCC4 express minimal
K+-Cl cotransport in unstimulated cells under
isotonic conditions but are strongly activated by cell swelling induced
by hypotonic conditions. In our expression system, neither KCC4- nor
KCC1-injected oocytes exhibited a significant increase of
86Rb+ uptake over water-injected oocytes when
incubated in isotonic media during the influx period. When oocytes were
incubated in hypotonic conditions, however, both cotransporters were
markedly activated, albeit with a different magnitude (KCC4 > KCC1). These findings differ from previous observations (13, 15, 17, 19, 20) that indicate minimal hypotonic activation of KCC1, KCC2, and
KCC3 when these cotransporters were expressed in HEK 293 cells, but
agree with the cell swelling-induced activation of KCC1 found by Su
et al. (18) using Xenopus oocytes as an expression system. Thus, when expressed in Xenopus oocytes,
KCC4 and KCC1 cotransporters can be activated by cell swelling,
suggesting that HEK 293 cells may not possess the appropriate signaling
pathways for the activation of the cotransporters by swelling. In
comparison, volume-regulated transport pathways recapitulate their
in vivo physiology when expressed in Xenopus
oocytes. Thus, shrinkage-activated transport pathways such as the
Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter (26) or
the epithelial sodium channel ENaC (31) and swelling-activated pathways
such as the calcium-activated intermediate K+ channel mIK1
(32) are regulated appropriately in this expression system. Of the four
KCCs, KCC4 seems to be the isoform that exhibits the highest activation
by hypotonicity. Influx mediated by KCC4 in this study was consistently
higher than KCC1, although the amount of injected cRNA was equivalent.
There are, however, several possible explanations for the greater
hypotonic activation of KCC4. For example, KCC4 cRNA may be
intrinsically more stable or better translated than KCC1 in oocytes. Of
note, however, rat KCC2 reportedly encodes a
K+-Cl cotransporter with significant activity
under isotonic conditions when expressed in Xenopus oocytes
and only minimal activation by cell swelling (21). Therefore, it is
likely that much of the observed differences in volume sensitivity is
due to variation in the structure of the four KCC proteins.
The two major loop diuretics inhibit KCC4, with an inhibitor
sensitivity that is lower than that observed for KCC1. The reported effect of external potassium ([K+]e) on the
inhibition of K+-Cl cotransport by loop
diuretics (33) was observed for KCC4 but not KCC1. We observed a
significantly different effect of furosemide and bumetanide on KCC4 at
variable [K+]e, with the minimal and maximal
effect at [K+]e of 2 and 6 mM,
respectively. In contrast, no effect of [K+]e was
observed for the inhibition of KCC1 by loop diuretics. This finding
suggests that, as the isoform with the lower inhibitor affinity, the
inhibition of KCC4 is more dependent on the positive effect of
[K+]e on the interaction between the transporter
protein and loop diuretics. Similar to our loop diuretic experiments, the anion transport inhibitor DIDS inhibited the function of KCC4 and
KCC1, with an apparent Ki that was dramatically
lowered by an increase in [K+]e. Almost no effect
was observed at 2 mM [K+]e, while in
50 mM [K+]e,
86Rb+ influx was completely blocked by a 100 µM DIDS concentration. This relationship between
[K+]e and the inhibition of the
K+-Cl cotransporter by DIDS was previously
observed in low potassium sheep red blood cells (34) and was explained
by the existence of two sites for K+ in the cotransporter:
a modifier site and a transport site. Of interest, DIDS can also
inhibit the function of the thiazide-sensitive Na+-Cl cotransporter but has no effect on the
bumetanide-sensitive Na+-K+-2Cl
cotransporter (26). The acid alkaloid DIOA, considered a specific inhibitor of red cell K+-Cl cotransport (27),
also inhibited KCC4 and KCC1. However, in contrast to DIDS and loop
diuretics, all of which primarily inhibit anion transporters and
exchangers (35, 36), the higher the [K+]e, the
lower the efficacy of DIOA. However, even in a very high
[K+]e (50 mM), the inhibition of
86Rb+ influx by 100 µM DIOA was
still greater than 50%.
The increased 86Rb+ uptake induced by KCC4 was
also inhibited by about 20% in low and 40% in high
[K+]e by 2 mM concentration of the
thiazide-diuretic trichlormethiazide. The members of the electroneutral
cation chloride coupled cotransporters have been defined in part
due to their sensitivity to diuretics. The
Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporters are
sensitive to loop diuretics, derivates of sulfamoylbenzoic acid, and
resistant to the benzothiadiazine derivates, whereas the
Na+-Cl cotransporter is inhibited by
thiazides but not affected by loop diuretics (12). Our results suggest
that KCC4, which exhibits a low degree of identity with the
sodium-dependent cation-chloride cotransporters (~22%),
can be inhibited not only by loop diuretics but also by thiazide-type
diuretics. A similar observation has been reported by Harling et
al. (37), who showed that the plant cation-chloride cotransporter
AXI 4, which exhibits the highest sequence identity with the KCCs
(36-38%), can also be inhibited by bumetanide, furosemide, and the
thiazide-like diuretic metolazone.
We have found that KCC4 and KCC1 can be blocked by the addition of 10 mM BaCl2 to the uptake medium, with a relative
sensitivity of KCC4 > KCC1. Although red cell
K+-Cl cotransport is at least partially
sensitive to quinidine derivatives (38), this is the first indication
that the cloned K+-Cl cotransporters are
directly sensitive to BaCl2. This observation is also
consistent with the controversial proposal by Greger and Schlatter (7)
that the basolateral membrane of renal thick ascending limb cells
contains a barium-sensitive K+-Cl
cotransporter. The observation by Amlal et al. (8) that a thick limb chloride-dependent, barium-sensitive
NH4+ transport mechanism is only
modestly sensitive to furosemide suggests that KCC4 is the isoform
present in the basolateral membrane of the mammalian thick ascending
limb. In this regard, Liapis et al. (39) failed to detect
KCC1 mRNA in human thick ascending limb.
Kinetic analyses reveal that KCC4 and KCC1 exhibit very similar
affinities for extracellular Cl (Km
values in 16.1 ± 4.2 and 17.2 ± 8.3 mM,
respectively), whereas the differences in the affinity for
extracellular K+ approached statistical significance
(Km values 17.5 ± 2.7 and 25.5 ± 3.2 mM, respectively; p = 0.08). Our results for KCC1 agree with those reported by Gillen et al. (13). It is known that the central core of 12 transmembrane (TM) segments determines the kinetic properties of the cation-chloride cotransporters (40). In this regard, the otherwise identical TM segments of the four
KCC proteins differ primarily at amino acid residues within TM2, TM4,
and TM7. An elegant series of studies have implicated TM2 in the
determination of cation (Na+ and K+) affinity
in the Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporters,
whereas residues within TM4 and TM7 appear to affect anion affinity
(23, 24, 40, 41). However, sequence comparisons of the entire gene
family indicate that only TM7 is particularly conserved between the
Na+-dependent and Na+-independent
cation-chloride cotransporters; thus, these observations may not
translate to the K+-Cl cotransporters. Of
particular significance, however, the reported affinity of KCC2 for
K+ (~5 mM) is closer to that of KCC4 than
KCC1, and KCC2 shares significant identity with KCC4 within TM2.
Therefore, as in the Na+-K+-2Cl
cotransporters, TM2 may play a major role in the determination of
cation affinity. The K+ affinity of individual
K+-Cl cotransporters may be of major
physiological significance, since under conditions wherein
extracellular K+ increases, such as cardiac ischemia (9)
and neuronal activity (4), the higher affinity KCCs may function as
K+-Cl influx pathways.
KCC4 and KCC1 exhibit surprisingly similar affinities for chloride.
However, they do differ in another parameter of anion transport, the
anion selectivity or "anion-series" of
K+-Cl cotransport. KCC4 and KCC1 thus differ
in the profile of 86Rb+ transport that can be
sustained by different anions. In KCC4, about 50% of the function can
be observed in the presence of Br , and some
transport is still present with PO4 3,
whereas in KCC1 70% of 86Rb+ uptake can
be obtained in the absence of Cl , when either
Br or SCN are present in the extracellular
medium. Whether these differences are encoded by subtle variation in
TM4 and TM7 will require further study; however, differences in anion
selectivity were crucial for the identification of the anion
channel pore in the CLC chloride channels (42, 43).
The functional properties of KCC4 and KCC1 observed in the present
study suggest that it is unlikely that either of these isoforms is the
predominant K+-Cl cotransporter expressed in
red blood cells. On the one hand, Delpire and Lauf (44) observed that
the K+-Cl cotransporter in hyposmotically
swollen low K sheep erythrocytes exhibited a Km for
extracellular K+ of ~55 mM, which is very
different from the Km obtained in the present study
for KCC4 and KCC1. It has also been shown in sheep red blood cells (45)
that K+ influx is higher in the presence of
Br than in the presence of Cl ; neither KCC4
nor KCC1 exhibited this behavior. Moreover, although it has been shown
that KCC1 mRNA is expressed in mouse erythroleukemic cells, it is
not present in circulating reticulocytes (46), and the KCC2 isoform is
expressed exclusively in the central nervous system (14). Thus, taking
all the information together, our kinetic and anion substitution
experiments suggest that the major K+-Cl
cotransporter in erythrocytes is either KCC3 or an as-yet-unidentified isoform.
K+-Cl cotransport was initially defined as a
red cell transport pathway that is activated by the alkylating agent
NEM. Multiple laboratories have since found that pretreatment of
erythrocytes from several species with 1 mM NEM results in
significant activation of this Cl -dependent
K+ transport pathway (2). It is still unclear if the
activating effect of NEM is related to NEM-induced dephosphorylation,
via activation of an upstream kinase, or to direct modification of the
thiol groups on the cotransporter. There are reports supporting both
possibilities (47) (for reviews, see Refs. 2 and 3). However, like the
activation by cell swelling, NEM-activated transport is prevented by
phosphatase inhibitors, suggesting a positive effect of NEM on upstream
signaling pathways (48-52). In this regard, our data show a very
interesting behavior of the KCCs when exposed to NEM. Under isotonic
conditions, NEM stimulated the function of KCC4 and KCC1, as well as
the endogenous K+-Cl cotransporter of the
oocytes. Su et al. (18) also observed KCC1 activation by NEM
in oocytes. In contrast, in hypotonic conditions, when we exposed
oocytes to NEM, both KCC4 and KCC1 were inhibited. The fact that KCC4
and KCC1 were activated by NEM in isotonic conditions suggests that
oocytes possess the intracellular pathways that NEM requires for
activation of the cotransporters. The mechanisms by which
swelling-activated KCC4 and KCC1 are inhibited by NEM are still
unclear. It has been shown in sheep red cells that
K+-Cl cotransporters can be activated or
inhibited by NEM through high and low affinity stimulatory thiols,
respectively (47, 53, 54). Further experiments will be required to
clarify this issue; however, a reconciliation of these and previous
observations is that there are direct inhibitory sites on the
transporter proteins themselves and stimulatory sites on upstream
kinases. In this regard, there are several transmembrane or
juxtamembrane cysteines in the predicted KCC proteins, and
transmembrane cysteines were recently implicated in the differential
sensitivity of Na+-K+-2Cl
cotransporters to cysteine-reactive compounds (55).
Over the last decade or so, several laboratories have suggested that
dephosphorylation of the K+-Cl cotransporter
is required for its activation, since inhibition of protein
phosphatases prevents the swelling- and NEM-induced activation (48-50,
56, 57). Our data support this hypothesis, since the protein
phosphatase inhibitor calyculin A completely abrogates hypotonic
activation of KCC4 and KCC1. Calyculin A is known to inhibit both
protein phosphatase 1 and 2A (58). To discriminate between
phosphatases, we also tested the effect of okadaic acid in a
concentration of 1 nM, which inhibits only protein phosphatase 2A, and cypermethrin, which inhibits only protein phosphatase 2B (59, 60). Since these two compounds did not affect
activation of KCCs, we suggest that, at least in Xenopus oocytes, protein phosphatase 1 is the phosphatase that is involved in
activation of the KCCs during cell swelling. In addition to a role in
cell volume regulation, activation of K+-Cl
cotransport by protein phosphatase 1 may play a role in
transepithelial transport of salt in the kidney and other
epithelial organs. There is evidence for a swelling-activated
basolateral K+-Cl cotransporter in the
proximal tubule (61, 62), where protein phosphatase 1 also is
responsible for activating the basolateral Na+-K+-ATPase (63); protein phosphatase
1 may thus function to couple the pump to basolateral Cl
and K+ exit through the KCCs. Of more specific relevance to
K+-Cl cotransport, the combined data for NEM,
phosphatase inhibition, and cell swelling dissociates for the first
time these various control points for this transport pathway.
In conclusion, we have found significant regulatory, kinetic, and
pharmacological differences between KCC4 and KCC1. Despite differences
in their relative activation by cell swelling, KCC4 and KCC1 share a
requirement for dephosphorylation by a protein phosphatase for
swelling-induced activity. As previously shown for
K+-Cl cotransport in red cells (48, 50, 56,
64), the relevant protein phosphatase is probably protein phosphatase
1. The two KCC isoforms in this study differ slightly in affinity for
K+, presumably due to variation within transmembrane 2, a
region of the cation-chloride cotransporter proteins previously
implicated in cation affinity (22-24). Ion affinity may also be of
physiological relevance, in that lower affinity
K+-Cl cotransporters, such as KCC1 and the
red cell K+-Cl cotransporter (potentially
KCC3), may function exclusively as efflux mechanisms. As proposed
initially by Payne (19), the higher affinity isoforms (KCC2 and now
KCC4) may function as both efflux and influx pathways. Such a duality
has been verified experimentally in neurons (65), where synaptic
activity may increase extracellular K+ to the point that
KCC2 mediates K+-Cl influx. KCC4 transcript
is in turn particularly abundant in heart, where K+ efflux
during ischemia appears to involve K+-Cl
cotransport (9); again, a higher affinity isoform may play a role in
reclaiming this intracellular K+ in the postischemic
myocardium. Finally, the pharmacological characterization of KCC4
fulfills the prediction, based on observations of the physiology of
renal thick ascending limb cells (7, 66), that
K+-Cl cotransporters may be sensitive to
barium, widely considered a specific inhibitor of K+ channels.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Rafael Moreno for help
in kinetic analysis, to Jesús López for help with frog
care, and to members of the Molecular Physiology Unit for suggestions
and stimulating discussion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y
Tecnologia Grant 97629m and Howard Hughes Medical Institute Grant 75197-553601 (to G. G.) and National Institutes of Health Grants K11
DK02328 and RO1 DK57708 (to D. B. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a scholarship grant from the Dirección General
del Personal Académico of the National University of Mexico.
International Scholar of the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Molecular
Physiology Unit, Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Tlalpan 14000, México
City, Mexico. Tel.: 525-513-3868; Fax: 525-655-0382; E-mail:
gamba@mailer.main.conacyt.mx.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 25, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003112200
2
In our previous work (16), we referred to the
KCC on human chromosome 15q14 as KCC4 and the KCC on chromosome 5p15 as
KCC3. However, in deference to the earlier publication of Hiki et
al., we reversed the numbering of our GenBankTM/EBI
submissions to refer to the KCC on chromosome 15q14 as KCC3 and the KCC
on chromosome 5p15 as KCC4 (see note added in proof in Ref. 16).
3
D. B. Mount and L. Song, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
NEM, N-ethylmaleimide;
KCC, K+-Cl
cotransporter;
KCC4, mouse KCC4 isoform;
KCC1, rabbit KCC1 isoform;
86Rb+, tracer rubidium;
TM, transmembrane
segment;
DIDS, 4,4-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2-disulfonic acid;
DIOA, R(+)-[(2-n-butyl-6,7-dichloro-2-cyclopentyl-2,3-dihydro-1-oxo-1-H-indenyl-5-yl)-oxy]acetic
acid;
HEK 293, human embryonic kidney cell line;
BSC1/NKCC2, bumetanide-sensitive Na+-K+-2Cl
cotransporter 1 (renal specific);
BSC2/NKCC1, bumetanide-sensitive
Na+-K+-2Cl cotransporter 2.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lang, F.,
Busch, G. L.,
Ritter, M.,
Volkl, H.,
Waldegger, S.,
Gulbins, E.,
and Haussinger, D.
(1998)
Physiol. Rev.
78,
247-306
|
| 2.
|
Lauf, P. K.,
Bauer, J.,
Adragna, N. C.,
Fujise, H.,
Zade-Oppen, A. M. M.,
Ryu, K. H.,
and Delpire, E.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
263,
C917-C932
|
| 3.
|
Cossins, A. R.,
and Gibson, J. S.
(1997)
J. Exp. Biol.
200,
343-352
|
| 4.
|
Rivera, C.,
Voipio, J.,
Payne, J. A.,
Ruusuvuori, E.,
Latineen, H.,
Lamsa, K.,
Pirvola, U.,
Saarma, M.,
and Kaila, K.
(1999)
Nature
397,
251-255
|
| 5.
|
Adragna, N. C.,
White, R. E.,
Orlov, S. N.,
and Lauf, P. K.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
C381-C390
|
| 6.
|
Perry, P. B.,
and O'Neill, W. C.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
265,
C763-C769
|
| 7.
|
Greger, R.,
and Schlatter, E.
(1983)
Pflugers Arch.
396,
325-334
|
| 8.
|
Amlal, H.,
Paillard, M.,
and Bichara, M.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
267,
C1607-C1615
|
| 9.
|
Yan, G. X.,
Chen, J.,
Yamada, K. A.,
Kleber, A. G.,
and Corr, P. B.
(1996)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
490,
215-228
|
| 10.
|
Weil-Maslansky, E.,
Gutman, Y.,
and Sasson, S.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
C932-C939
|
| 11.
|
Ellison, D. H.,
Velazquez, H.,
and Wright, F. S.
(1985)
Am. J. Physiol.
248,
F638-F649
|
| 12.
|
Gamba, G.
(1999)
Kidney Int.
56,
1606-1622
|
| 13.
|
Gillen, C. M.,
Brill, S.,
Payne, J. A.,
and Forbush, B., III
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16237-16244
|
| 14.
|
Payne, J. A.,
Stevenson, T. J.,
and Donaldson, L. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16245-16252
|
| 15.
|
Hiki, K.,
D'Andrea, R. J.,
Furze, J.,
Crawford, J.,
Woollatt, E.,
Sutherland, G. R.,
Vadas, M. A.,
and Gamble, J. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10661-10667
|
| 16.
|
Mount, D. B.,
Mercado, A.,
Song, L.,
Xu, J.,
Geroge, A. L., Jr.,
Delpire, E.,
and Gamba, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16355-16362
|
| 17.
|
Holtzman, E. J.,
Kumar, S.,
Faaland, C. A.,
Warner, F.,
Louge, P. J.,
Erickson, S. J.,
Ricken, G.,
Waldman, J.,
and Dunham, P. B.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
F550-F564
|
| 18.
|
Su, W.,
Shmukler, B. E.,
Chernova, M. N.,
Stuart-Tilley, A. K.,
de Franceschi, L.,
Brugnara, C.,
and Alper, S. L.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
C899-C912
|
| 19.
|
Payne, J. A.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C1516-C1525
|
| 20.
|
Race, J. E.,
Makhlouf, F. N.,
Logue, P. J.,
Wilson, F. H.,
Dunham, P. B.,
and Holtzman, E. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
C1210-C1219
|
| 21.
|
Strange, K.,
Singer, T. D.,
Morrison, R.,
and Delpire, E.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
C860-C867
|
| 22.
|
Isenring, P.,
Jacoby, S. C.,
Payne, J. A.,
and Forbush, B., III
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11295-11301
|
| 23.
|
Isenring, P.,
Jacoby, S. C.,
and Forbush, B., III
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7179-7184
|
| 24.
|
Isenring, P.,
Jacoby, S, C.,
Chang, J.,
and Forbush, B., III
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
112,
549-558
|
| 25.
|
Dumont, J. N.
(1970)
J. Morphol.
136,
153-180
|
| 26.
|
Gamba, G.,
Miyanoshita, A.,
Lombardi, M.,
Lytton, J.,
Lee, W. S.,
Hediger, M. A,
and Hebert, S. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17713-17722
|
| 27.
|
Garay, R. P.,
Nazaret, C.,
Hannaert, P. A.,
and Gragoe, E. J., Jr.
(1988)
Mol. Pharmacol.
33,
696-701
|
| 28.
|
Rose, B. D.
(1991)
Kidney Int.
39,
336-352
|
| 29.
|
Di Stefano, A.,
Greger, R.,
Desfleurs, E.,
de Rouffignac, C.,
and Wittner, M.
(1998)
Cell Physiol. Biochem.
8,
89-105
|
| 30.
|
Payne, J. A.,
Lytle, C.,
and McManus, T. J.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
259,
C819-C827
|
| 31.
|
Ji, H. L.,
Fuller, C. M.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C1182-C1190
|
| 32.
|
Vandorpe, D. H.,
Shmukler, B. E.,
Jiang, L.,
Lim, B.,
Maylie, J.,
Adelman, J. P.,
de Franceschi, L.,
Cappellini, M. D.,
Brugnara, C.,
and Alper, S. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21542-21553
|
| 33.
|
Lauf, P. K.
(1984)
J. Membr. Biol.
77,
57-62
|
| 34.
|
Delpire, E.,
and Lauf, P. K.
(1992)
J. Membr. Biol.
126,
89-96
|
| 35.
|
Scott, D. A.,
Wang, R.,
Kreman, T. M.,
Sheffield, V. C.,
and Karnishki, L. P.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
21,
440-443
|
| 36.
|
Moseley, R. H.,
Hoglund, P.,
Wu, G. D.,
Silberg, D. G.,
Haila, S.,
de la, C., A.,
Holmberg, C.,
and Kere, J.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
G185-G192
|
| 37.
|
Harling, H.,
Czaja, I.,
Schell, J.,
and Walden, R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5855-5866
|
| 38.
|
Adragna, N. C.,
and Lauf, P. K.
(1994)
J. Membr. Biol.
142,
195-207
|
| 39.
|
Liapis, H.,
Nag, M.,
and Kaji, D. M.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
275,
C1432-C1437
|
| 40.
|
Isenring, P.,
and Forbush, B., III
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24556-24562
|
| 41.
|
Isenring, P.,
Forbush, B., III,
and Wang, T.
(1996)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
7,
1282
|
| 42.
|
Fahlke, C.,
Beck, C. L.,
and George, A. L., Jr.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2729-2734
|
| 43.
|
Fahlke, C., Yu, H. T.,
Beck, C. L.,
Rhodes, T. H.,
and George, A. L., Jr.
(1997)
Nature
390,
529-532
|
| 44.
|
Delpire, E.,
and Lauf, P. K.
(1991)
J. Gen. Physiol.
97,
173-193
|
| 45.
|
Lauf, P. K.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
260,
C503-C512
|
| 46.
|
Pellegrino, C. M.,
Rybicki, A. C.,
Musto, S.,
Nagel, R. L.,
and Schwartz, R. S.
(1998)
Blood Cells Mol. Dis.
24,
31-40
|
| 47.
|
Lauf, P. K.,
and Adragna, N. C.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
C1167-C1175
|
| 48.
|
Jennings, M. L.,
and Schulz, R. K.
(1991)
J. Gen. Physiol.
97,
799-817
|
| 49.
|
Krarup, T.,
and Dunham, P. B.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C898-C902
|
| 50.
|
Kaji, D. M.,
and Tsukitani, Y.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
260,
C176-C180
|
| 51.
|
Flatman, P. W.,
Adragna, N. C.,
and Lauf, P. K.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C255-C263
|
| 52.
|
Bize, I.,
Güvenç, B,
Robb, A.,
Buchbinder, G.,
and Brugnara, C.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
C926-C936
|
| 53.
|
Lauf, P. K.
(1987)
J Membr. Biol.
98,
237-246
|
| 54.
|
Bauer, J.,
and Lauf, P. K.
(1983)
J Membr. Biol.
73,
257-261
|
| 55.
|
Jacoby, S. C.,
Gagnon, E.,
Caron, L.,
Chang, J.,
and Isenring, P.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
C684-C692
|
| 56.
|
Starke, L. C.,
and Jennings, M. L.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
264,
C118-C124
|
| 57.
|
Bize, I.,
Munoz, P.,
Canessa, M.,
and Dunham, P. B.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
274,
C440-C446
|
| 58.
|
Cohen, P.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
58,
453-508
|
| 59.
|
Bialojan, C.,
and Takai, A.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
256,
283-290
|
| 60.
|
Enan, E.,
and Matsumura, F.
(1992)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
43,
1777-1784
|
| 61.
|
Avison, M. J.,
Gullans, S. R.,
Ogino, T.,
and Giebisch, G.
(1988)
J. Membr. Biol.
105,
197-205
|
| 62.
|
Ishibashi, K.,
Rector, F. C., Jr.,
and Berry, C. A.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
258,
F1569-F1578
|
| 63.
|
Li, D.,
Cheng, S. X. J.,
Fisone, G.,
Caplan, M. J.,
Ohtomo, Y.,
and Aperia, A.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
F863-F869
|
| 64.
|
Flatman, P. W.,
Adragna, N. C.,
and Lauf, P. K.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C255-C263
|
| 65.
|
Jarolimek, W.,
Lewen, A.,
and Misgeld, U.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
4695-4704
|
| 66.
|
Amlal, H.,
Legoff, C.,
Vernimmen, C.,
Paillard, M.,
and Bichara, M.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C455-C463
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. H. Lambert, T. K. Klausen, A. Bergdahl, C. Hougaard, and E. K. Hoffmann
ROS activate KCl cotransport in nonadherent Ehrlich ascites cells but K+ and Cl- channels in adherent Ehrlich Lettre and NIH3T3 cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2009;
297(1):
C198 - C206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Delpire, E. Days, L. M. Lewis, D. Mi, K. Kim, C. W. Lindsley, and C. D. Weaver
Small-molecule screen identifies inhibitors of the neuronal K-Cl cotransporter KCC2
PNAS,
March 31, 2009;
106(13):
5383 - 5388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Fujii, Y. Takahashi, A. Ikari, M. Morii, Y. Tabuchi, K. Tsukada, N. Takeguchi, and H. Sakai
Functional Association between K+-Cl- Cotransporter-4 and H+,K+-ATPase in the Apical Canalicular Membrane of Gastric Parietal Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 2, 2009;
284(1):
619 - 629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. K. Hoffmann, I. H. Lambert, and S. F. Pedersen
Physiology of Cell Volume Regulation in Vertebrates
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2009;
89(1):
193 - 277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ponce-Coria, P. San-Cristobal, K. T. Kahle, N. Vazquez, D. Pacheco-Alvarez, P. de los Heros, P. Juarez, E. Munoz, G. Michel, N. A. Bobadilla, et al.
Regulation of NKCC2 by a chloride-sensing mechanism involving the WNK3 and SPAK kinases
PNAS,
June 17, 2008;
105(24):
8458 - 8463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-M. Hsu, Y.-F. Chen, C.-Y. Chou, M.-J. Tang, J. H. Chen, R. J. Wilkins, J. C. Ellory, and M.-R. Shen
KCl Cotransporter-3 Down-regulates E-Cadherin/{beta}-Catenin Complex to Promote Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2007;
67(22):
11064 - 11073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. De Franceschi, L. Ronzoni, M. D. Cappellini, F. Cimmino, A. Siciliano, S. L. Alper, V. Servedio, C. Pozzobon, and A. Iolascon
K-CL co-transport plays an important role in normal and {beta} thalassemic erythropoiesis
Haematologica,
October 1, 2007;
92(10):
1319 - 1326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. T. Nickell, N. K. Kleene, and S. J. Kleene
Mechanisms of neuronal chloride accumulation in intact mouse olfactory epithelium
J. Physiol.,
September 15, 2007;
583(3):
1005 - 1020.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Kim and L.-y. Chung
Dual GABAergic Synaptic Response of Fast Excitation and Slow Inhibition in the Medial Habenula of Rat Epithalamus
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2007;
98(3):
1323 - 1332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. F. Simard, M. J. Bergeron, R. Frenette-Cotton, G. A. Carpentier, M.-E. Pelchat, L. Caron, and P. Isenring
Homooligomeric and Heterooligomeric Associations between K+-Cl- Cotransporter Isoforms and between K+-Cl- and Na+-K+-Cl- Cotransporters
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 22, 2007;
282(25):
18083 - 18093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Dayioglu, C. K. Buharalioglu, F. Saracoglu, and F. Akar
The Effects of Bumetanide on Human Umbilical Artery Contractions
Reproductive Sciences,
April 1, 2007;
14(3):
246 - 252.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Garzon-Muvdi, D. Pacheco-Alvarez, K. B. E. Gagnon, N. Vazquez, J. Ponce-Coria, E. Moreno, E. Delpire, and G. Gamba
WNK4 kinase is a negative regulator of K+-Cl- cotransporters
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
April 1, 2007;
292(4):
F1197 - F1207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Klein, T.G. Cooper, and C.H. Yeung
The Role of Potassium Chloride Cotransporters in Murine and Human Sperm Volume Regulation
Biol Reprod,
December 1, 2006;
75(6):
853 - 858.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Berenbrink, S. Volkel, P. Koldkjaer, N. Heisler, and M. Nikinmaa
Two different oxygen sensors regulate oxygen-sensitive K+ transport in crucian carp red blood cells
J. Physiol.,
August 15, 2006;
575(1):
37 - 48.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Bergeron, E. Gagnon, L. Caron, and P. Isenring
Identification of Key Functional Domains in the C Terminus of the K+-Cl- Cotransporters
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 9, 2006;
281(23):
15959 - 15969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Ubels, H. M. Hoffman, S. Srikanth, J. H. Resau, and C. P. Webb
Gene Expression in Rat Lacrimal Gland Duct Cells Collected Using Laser Capture Microdissection: Evidence for K+ Secretion by Duct Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
May 1, 2006;
47(5):
1876 - 1885.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. de los Heros, K. T. Kahle, J. Rinehart, N. A. Bobadilla, N. Vázquez, P. San Cristobal, D. B. Mount, R. P. Lifton, S. C. Hebert, and G. Gamba
WNK3 bypasses the tonicity requirement for K-Cl cotransporter activation via a phosphatase-dependent pathway
PNAS,
February 7, 2006;
103(6):
1976 - 1981.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-S. N. Chee, J. Kistler, and P. J. Donaldson
Roles for KCC Transporters in the Maintenance of Lens Transparency
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
February 1, 2006;
47(2):
673 - 682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mercado, V. Broumand, K. Zandi-Nejad, A. H. Enck, and D. B. Mount
A C-terminal Domain in KCC2 Confers Constitutive K+-Cl- Cotransport
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 13, 2006;
281(2):
1016 - 1026.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mercado, N. Vazquez, L. Song, R. Cortes, A. H. Enck, R. Welch, E. Delpire, G. Gamba, and D. B. Mount
NH2-terminal heterogeneity in the KCC3 K+-Cl- cotransporter
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
December 1, 2005;
289(6):
F1246 - F1261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Weinstein
A mathematical model of rat distal convoluted tubule. I. Cotransporter function in early DCT
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2005;
289(4):
F699 - F720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Gamba
Molecular Physiology and Pathophysiology of Electroneutral Cation-Chloride Cotransporters
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2005;
85(2):
423 - 493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zhu, D. Lovinger, and E. Delpire
Cortical Neurons Lacking KCC2 Expression Show Impaired Regulation of Intracellular Chloride
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2005;
93(3):
1557 - 1568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Cohen
SRC family kinases in cell volume regulation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
March 1, 2005;
288(3):
C483 - C493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Watts III and D. W. Good
An apical K+-dependent HCO3- transport pathway opposes transepithelial HCO3- absorption in rat medullary thick ascending limb
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2004;
287(1):
F57 - F63.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-P. Zhou, C. Wong, R. Su, S. C. Crable, K. P. Anderson, and P. G. Gallagher
Human potassium chloride cotransporter 1 (SLC12A4) promoter is regulated by AP-2 and contains a functional downstream promoter element
Blood,
June 1, 2004;
103(11):
4302 - 4309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Jiang, F. Akar, S. L. Cobbs, K. Lomashvilli, R. Lakkis, F. J. Gordon, R. L. Sutliff, and W. C. O'Neill
Blood pressure regulates the activity and function of the Na-K-2Cl cotransporter in vascular smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
April 1, 2004;
286(4):
H1552 - H1557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Romero, S. M. Suzuka, R. L. Nagel, and M. E. Fabry
Expression of HbC and HbS, but not HbA, results in activation of K-Cl cotransport activity in transgenic mouse red cells
Blood,
March 15, 2004;
103(6):
2384 - 2390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-R. Shen, C.-Y. Chou, K.-F. Hsu, Y.-M. Hsu, W.-T. Chiu, M.-J. Tang, S. L. Alper, and J. C. Ellory
KCl Cotransport Is an Important Modulator of Human Cervical Cancer Growth and Invasion
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 10, 2003;
278(41):
39941 - 39950.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Brauer, E. Frei, L. Claes, S. Grissmer, and H. Jager
Influence of K-Cl cotransporter activity on activation of volume-sensitive Cl- channels in human osteoblasts
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2003;
285(1):
C22 - C30.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Bergeron, E. Gagnon, B. Wallendorff, J.-Y. Lapointe, and P. Isenring
Ammonium transport and pH regulation by K+-Cl- cotransporters
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2003;
285(1):
F68 - F78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Piechotta, J. Lu, and E. Delpire
Cation Chloride Cotransporters Interact with the Stress-related Kinases Ste20-related Proline-Alanine-rich Kinase (SPAK) and Oxidative Stress Response 1 (OSR1)
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 20, 2002;
277(52):
50812 - 50819.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bourgeois, S. Masse, M. Paillard, and P. Houillier
Basolateral membrane Cl--, Na+-, and K+-coupled base transport mechanisms in rat MTALH
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
April 1, 2002;
282(4):
F655 - F668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Plata, P. Meade, N. Vazquez, S. C. Hebert, and G. Gamba
Functional Properties of the Apical Na+-K+-2Cl- Cotransporter Isoforms
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 22, 2002;
277(13):
11004 - 11012.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-R. Shen, C.-Y. Chou, K.-F. Hsu, H.-S. Liu, P. B. Dunham, E. J. Holtzman, and J. C. Ellory
The KCl cotransporter isoform KCC3 can play an important role in cell growth regulation
PNAS,
November 20, 2001;
(2001)
251388798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Casula, B. E. Shmukler, S. Wilhelm, A. K. Stuart-Tilley, W. Su, M. N. Chernova, C. Brugnara, and S. L. Alper
A Dominant Negative Mutant of the KCC1 K-Cl Cotransporter. BOTH N- AND C-TERMINAL CYTOPLASMIC DOMAINS ARE REQUIRED FOR K-Cl COTRANSPORT ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 2, 2001;
276(45):
41870 - 41878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Jennings and M. F. Adame
Direct estimate of 1:1 stoichiometry of K+-Cl{-} cotransport in rabbit erythrocytes
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
September 1, 2001;
281(3):
C825 - C832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mercado, P. de los Heros, N. Vazquez, P. Meade, D. B. Mount, and G. Gamba
Functional and molecular characterization of the K-Cl cotransporter of Xenopus laevis oocytes
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2001;
281(2):
C670 - C680.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-R. Shen, C.-Y. Chou, K.-F. Hsu, H.-S. Liu, P. B. Dunham, E. J. Holtzman, and J. C. Ellory
The KCl cotransporter isoform KCC3 can play an important role in cell growth regulation
PNAS,
December 4, 2001;
98(25):
14714 - 14719.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Vazquez, A. Monroy, E. Dorantes, R. A. Munoz-Clares, and G. Gamba
Functional differences between flounder and rat thiazide-sensitive Na-Cl cotransporter
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
April 1, 2002;
282(4):
F599 - F607.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|