JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C000364200 on July 12, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 39, 30372-30377, September 29, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/39/30372    most recent
C000364200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Read, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shoulders, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Read, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shoulders, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Mechanism of Membrane Neutral Lipid Acquisition by the Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein*

Jacqueline ReadDagger , Timothy A. Anderson§, Penelope J. RitchieDagger , Berlinda Vanloo, Joanna AmeyDagger , David Levitt§, Maryvonne Rosseneu, James ScottDagger ||, and Carol C. ShouldersDagger **

From the Dagger  Molecular Medicine Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, and || National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, United Kingdom, the § Department of Biochemistry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0326, and the  Department of Biochemistry, Laboratorium voor Lipoproteine Chemie, University of Gent, Hospitaalstraat 13, 8-9000 Gent, Belgium

Received for publication, June 6, 2000, and in revised form, July 12, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) belong to the vitellogenin (VTG) family of lipid transfer proteins. MTP is essential for the intracellular assembly and secretion of apoB-containing lipoproteins, the key intravascular lipid transport proteins in vertebrates. We report the predicted three-dimensional structure of the C-terminal lipid binding cavity of MTP, modeled on the crystal structure of the lamprey VTG gene product, lipovitellin. The cavity in MTP resembles those found in the intracellular lipid-binding proteins and bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein. Two conserved helices, designated A and B, at the entrance to the MTP cavity mediate lipid acquisition and binding. Helix A (amino acids 725-736) interacts with membranes in a manner similar to viral fusion peptides. Mutation of helix A blocks the interaction of MTP with phospholipid vesicles containing triglyceride and impairs triglyceride binding. Mutations of helix B (amino acids 781-786) and of N780Y, which causes abetalipoproteinemia, have no impact on the interaction of MTP with phospholipid vesicles but impair triglyceride binding. We propose that insertion of helix A into lipid membranes is necessary for the acquisition of neutral lipids and that helix B is required for their transfer to the lipid binding cavity of MTP.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chylomicrons (CM)1 and very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) are among the largest macromolecular complexes secreted from eukaryotic cells. The assembly of neutral lipids and phospholipids into CM and VLDL is nucleated around a single molecule of apoB and requires a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) complexed to the endoplasmic reticulum-resident protein, protein disulfide isomerase (PDI). The function of the MTP-PDI complex is to supply apoB with sufficient lipid to form a soluble lipoprotein. Defects of apoB and MTP cause hypobetalipoproteinemia and abetalipoproteinemia, respectively (1, 2).

ApoB and MTP have structural homology with lamprey lipovitellin (LV) (3). LV contains an N-terminal beta -barrel (amino acids 17-296), an alpha -helical structure (amino acids 297-614), and a C-terminal lipid binding cavity (4). The structural relationship between MTP, apoB, and LV is supported by conservation of the gene and protein structure (3, 5). Important features of the quaternary structure of the lamprey LV homodimer are adapted in MTP to form a heterodimer with PDI and to associate with apoB during lipoprotein production (3, 5). The defining difference between MTP, apoB, and LV is related to their C-terminal lipid binding structures, which associate with different amounts of lipid (3). LV binds principally phospholipid with a stoichiometry of ~35 molecules/subunit (6). MTP binds 1-5 molecules of lipid (7). ApoB has a long C-terminal extension (~3500 amino acids), which incorporates a large neutral lipid core (8).

Here, we have addressed the mechanism by which MTP-PDI acquires neutral lipid from phospholipid bilayers for the assembly of VLDL and CMs. In the absence of a crystal structure for MTP, we derived a homology model to guide mutagenesis and biophysical studies. The experimental data substantiate the overall predictions of the model and provide insights into the mechanism of lipid acquisition and binding.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Modeling-- Models were developed on the alignment shown in Fig. 1 and the x-ray crystal structure of lamprey LV (Protein Data Bank accession number 1LLV), refined to an R-value of 0.19 at 2.8 Å resolution (4). The C-sheet was modeled using INSIGHT interactive graphics software and the Homology computer program (Biosym Technologies, San Diego) and the A-sheet with the general purpose modeling program O (9). Models were energy minimized and the quality of the coordinates assessed as described (3).

Mutagenesis and Expression Studies-- Mutagenesis was performed by a polymerase chain reaction-based strategy (3). All constructs were sequenced before use. Transfections, preparation of cell extracts, and triglyceride transfer activities were performed as described (2, 3).

Triglyceride Binding and Fusogenic Activity-- Wild-type (WT) and mutant MTP-PDI complexes were purified as described (10). Donor small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) were prepared as described (2), purified to homogeneity (11), and incubated with MTP (w/w 70:1) for 2 h at 37 °C. Lipid-protein complexes were separated on a Sepharose CL-4B (26/100) column.

Peptide Assays and Conformational Studies-- Peptides were synthesized and purified as described (11) and dissolved (1 mg/ml) in trifluoroethanol. Calcein leakage from SUVs was monitored as described (12). Lipid mixing between labeled and unlabeled vesicles was measured by a fluorescence probe dilution assay (12). The predicted conformation of MTP peptide A at the water-lipid interface was determined as described (13).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To build a model of the lipid binding cavity of MTP, we examined the crystal structure of lamprey LV (Fig. 1) and an alignment of the MTPs and VTGs (3) (Fig. 2). The walls of the lipid binding cavity of LV comprise two beta -sheets, designated C and A, and a small section of the alpha -helical domain. The C-sheet comprises seven strands and the A-sheet, 23 (4).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Ribbon diagram of the LV monomer, viewed in stereo through the funnel-shaped cavity. The N-terminal beta -barrel is shown in green, the helical domain in yellow, and the C-sheet domain in red. beta -Strands 2-5 and helices A and B of the A-sheet are shown in dark blue. Strands 6-23 are in cyan. Two lipid ligands are drawn in orange.

The alignment of the predicted C-sheet of human MTP (amino acids 613-722) with amino acids 624-768 of lamprey LV is an extension of the multiple sequence alignment of Mann et al. (3). (Fig. 2). At the gene level, amino acids 613-684 of MTP and the homologous residues of the VTGs are encoded by conserved exons (5). The gaps between amino acids 681-682 and 688-689 of MTP span amino acids 694-702 and 710-734 of lamprey LV. These regions are either proteolytically removed from the LV homodimer or form part of the connecting structures (4). Thus, the alignment is consistent with the evolutionary preference for insertions/deletions to occur in regions connecting the secondary structure (14). The alignment also reveals homology between the first 126 amino acids of the A-sheet of lamprey LV and residues 723-825 of MTP. The alignment between amino acids 747-807 of MTP and residues 800-875 of lamprey LV was manually adjusted on the basis of the secondary structure of lamprey LV and the amphipathic sequences of MTP. In the alignment, a high proportion of the hydrophobic residues in this region of MTP are superimposed onto amino acids in lamprey LV that point inward toward the lipid binding cavity (Fig. 2). Hydrophobic amino acids are known to be favored within internal sequences of secondary structures and disfavored within loops or connecting structures (15).


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Sequence alignment of the C- and A-sheet domains of the lamprey LV precursor, VTG, with representative VTGs and MTPs. Amino acids depicted in cyan have similar values (>0.5) (31) in five or more sequences or in three MTPs and lamprey LV. Residues highlighted in yellow point toward the lipid binding cavity of lamprey LV or the predicted lipid binding cavity of human (H.s) MTP. Underlined residues (664 in Homo sapiens (H.s) MTP, 681 and 683 in Xenopus laevis (X.l) and chicken (G.g, Gallus gallus) VTG, respectively) show conserved intron/exon boundaries, the codon sequence of which is interrupted at the same position. Arrows indicate beta -strands. Cylinders depict alpha -helices. Loops are shown in gray and residues with unassigned coordinates by a dashed line. The first strands of the C (red)- and A (blue)-sheets of lamprey LV, formed by amino acids 196-197 and 188-190, respectively, are not predicted for MTP (3). B.t, Bos taurus; M.a, Mesocricetus auratus (golden hamster); C.e, Caenorhabditis elegans; F.h, Fundulus heteroclitus (kilifish); I.u, Ichthyomyzon unicuspus (lamprey). Accession numbers are documented elsewhere (3).

The alignment suggests conservation of the lipid binding C-sheet of lamprey LV and of the lipid binding portions of beta -strands 2-5 of the A-sheet of lamprey LV in MTP. Common helical motifs in the MTP sequence also support the conservation of helix A and B of lamprey LV in MTP. Helix A contains an N-terminal sequence (PISVV) conforming to a proline-box motif (16). This motif includes an N-cap proline residue, has a preference for a valine residue at the third position (Val727) of the helix, and apolar residues at the -1 and fourth positions. Helix B contains asparagine (Asn780) as the N-cap residue, the most common residue at such a position (17).

The Lipid Binding Cavity of MTP-- We used the realigned sequence of amino acids 613-826 of MTP and the atomic coordinates of lamprey LV to derive the model of the lipid binding structures of MTP. These structures in MTP may also include amino acids 827-894, but extensive sequence divergence from the LVs in this region precludes an evaluation. The models of the C- and A-sheets of MTP predict a hydrophobic cavity, consistent with biochemical studies (18). The MTP cavity is similar to, albeit smaller than, that found in lamprey LV (Fig. 3, a and b). Important evidence for the validity of the MTP structure derives from the finding that the predicted lipid binding surfaces contain a number of hydrophobic residues comparable to that found on the equivalent surface of lamprey LV (Fig. 3, a and b).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Ribbon diagrams for the lipid binding cavities of LV and MTP. a, expanded view of beta -strands 2-7 of the C-sheet of lamprey LV (red) and of beta -strands 2-5 and helices A and B of the A-sheet (blue). b, molecular model of the lipid binding cavity of MTP based on the atomic coordinates of lamprey LV. The strands of the C-sheet comprise Ser613-Glu622, Arg626-Tyr637, Arg644-Ile654, Ala657-Ile668, Met692-Val699, and Arg702-Tyr710. The strands of the A-sheet are formed by Gln39-Ile751, Gln754-Ser768, Asp789-Thr805, and Gly810-Leu825 and comprise between 13-17 amino acids compared with 19-22 residues in LV. Helix A and B comprise amino acids Ile725-Asp736 and Arg781-Ile786, respectively. c, stereo view of the crevice between helices A and B of MTP. Ile732, Asp736, Leu769, Tyr771, Arg772, Lys775, Thr787, Thr788, and Asp789 (green) participate in the network of interactions stabilizing helices A and B. Ile725, Val728, Leu733, Ile735, Arg777, and Ile790 (blue) make no significant contribution to the stability of helix A and B. d, the hydrophobic ridge (yellow) formed by helices A and B at the water-lipid interface of the opening to the lipid binding cavity of MTP. In a and b hydrophobic residues pointing into the lipid binding cavity are shown in yellow.

The predicted C-sheet domain (amino acids 603-712) of the lipid binding cavity of MTP contains six anti-parallel beta -strands, and a short helix (Fig. 3b). The model of the A-sheet domain of MTP (amino acids 725-829) comprises four beta -strands and two alpha -helices, designated A (residues 725-736) and B (residues 781-786) (Fig. 3, a-c). Analogous to LV (Fig. 1), these helices reside in close proximity at the entrance to the lipid binding cavity of MTP (Fig. 3d). We envisage the back of the cavity of MTP closed off by dimerization with PDI, since the posterior openings to the lipid binding cavities of lamprey LV are closed off by homodimerization (4).

The predominantly beta -sheet structure predicted for the lipid binding cavity of MTP is reminiscent of the lipid binding cavities of bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) (19) and the fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) (20, 21). The BPI family of proteins includes phospholipid transfer protein and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) (19). The FABPs have a common topology comprising 10 antiparallel beta -strands arranged in two beta -sheets, typically having two short alpha -helices that loop out to cover the mouth of the cavity. The helices are not required for the structural integrity of the lipid binding cavity (21). Rather, they regulate the kinetics of ligand transfer (21).

The Entrance to the Cavity-- The functional importance of helices A (amino acids 725-736) and B (amino acids 781-786), located at the entrance of the lipid binding cavity of MTP, is suggested by the abetalipoproteinemia N780Y mutation (22). Expression of MTP N780Y in COS-1 cells produced near WT levels of soluble MTP (Fig. 4a) but no triglyceride transfer activity (Table I). The control mutant, N780A, produced near WT activity. Our model of MTP predicts that Asn780 forms the N-cap residue of helix B, and because a tyrosine is rarely found at this position (17), it is conceivable that the N780Y mutation prevents the formation of helix B. Alternatively, the tyrosine residue may, as predicted by our model (data not shown), perturb the alignment of helix B with helix A. The changes in the N780A model are modest, the most significant being the loss of a hydrogen bond between Asn780 and the main chain carbonyl oxygen atom of Val778.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Analysis of WT and mutant MTPs. a, Western blot analysis of WT and mutant MTPs expressed in COS-1 cells. Soluble extracts were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting as described (3). UT, untransfected. b, interaction of MTP with lipid and triglyceride binding. Recombinant MTP-PDI were purified to near homogeneity from Sf9 cells. A single preparation of PC/[3H]glycerol trioleate SUVs was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with no MTP (data not shown), WT MTP (blue), L734A (cyan), and V782A (red) and examined by size exclusion gel chromatography. The three peaks represent triglyceride co-migration with vesicles of large size, SUVs, and MTP. In the absence of MTP, only the middle peak is evident. c, silver-stained gels showing the elution of MTP and PDI. The gel for the L734A mutant was over-developed to demonstrate the absence of MTP in fractions 10-14. The data are from a single representative experiment; similar results were obtained in two independent experiments. d, time course of leakage of liposomal contents induced by 10 µM helical peptide A (amino acids 724-735) of MTP (blue) and beta -amyloid fusion peptide (amino acids 29-42) (30) (pink). In the absence of peptide (open symbols) the spontaneous leakage rate was less than 1% per 15 min. 100% leakage was established by lysing liposomes with Triton X-100. e, time course of lipid mixing induced by helical peptide A (blue), mutant peptide L734M (green), and helical peptide B (red). Peptides (5 µM) were mixed with labeled and unlabeled SUVs, and the excimer/monomer (E/M) fluorescence of the probe measured as a percentage of the initial excimer/monomer ratio. Lipid-mixing fusion events produce a decrease in the excimer/monomer intensity ratio due to probe dilution.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of mutants

To further evaluate the importance of helices A and B of MTP for the lipid transfer process, we introduced mutations predicted to destabilize their packing (Fig. 3c). The individual substitution of Ile732, Tyr771, Arg772, and Lys775 with alanine had a marked impact on lipid transfer activity (Table I), despite recovery of WT or near WT levels of soluble MTP (Fig. 4a). In the MTP model, the side chain atoms of these residues form an extensive network of interactions stabilizing the spatial arrangement between helices A and B. By contrast, alanine substitution of Ile725, Val728, Leu733, Ile735, Arg777, and Ile790, which are predicted to form few or no interactions, had no impact (Fig. 3c).

Helices A and B are located at the entrance to the lipid binding cavity of MTP. There, they form a hydrophobic ridge at the water-lipid interface (Fig. 3d), which we envisage as interacting with a lipid membrane during the lipid transfer process. The importance of amino acids (Val727, Leu731, Leu734, Arg781, Val782, Val785, and Ile786) at the water-lipid interface was examined by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Mutant proteins were individually expressed in COS-1 cells and WT levels of soluble MTP recovered (Fig. 4a). Triglyceride transfer activity was reduced in cells expressing L734A, R781A, and V782A, the activities being 33 ± 8, 59 ± 3, and 26 ± 4% of WT, respectively (Table I). The importance of Leu734 and Val782 for triglyceride transfer activity was confirmed by the markedly reduced activity of the double mutant L734A/V782A (Fig. 4a, Table I). In contrast, the individual combination of L731A, V785A, or I786A with L734A had no additional effect (Table I).

To further evaluate the functional importance of size, hydrophobicity, and geometry of residues at positions 734 and 782 of MTP, we mutated Val782 to Leu and Leu734 to Ser, Val, Ile, Phe, and Met (Fig. 4a). The activities of L734M, V782L, L734I, L734V, L734F, and L734S were 132 ± 28, 120 ± 9, 102 ± 13, 78 ± 17, 47 ± 9, and 31 ± 6 of WT, respectively (Table I). Thus, with the exception of L734F, there appears to be good agreement between MTP-mediated triglyceride transfer activity and the ranking order of the mutants with respect to size and hydrophobicity of residues at positions 734 and 782. The impaired activity of L734F may result from destabilization of helix A. Our model predicts that a phenylalanine residue at position 734 would cause steric hindrance with Gln739.

Lipid Binding and Fusogenic Properties of MTP-- WT and mutant MTP-PDI complexes were individually incubated with phospholipid vesicles containing radiolabeled triglyceride and evaluated for the dual MTP function of lipid interaction and triglyceride binding (Fig. 4, b and c). From 13C NMR spectroscopic studies (23) we envisage that the carbonyl groups of vesicle-solubilized triglyceride reside close to the vesicle surface. WT MTP-PDI increased the size of the phospholipid vesicles (Fig. 4, b and c) and acquired radiolabeled triglyceride from vesicles (Fig. 4, b and c). The interaction of L734A with lipid was markedly impaired and the amount of radiolabeled triglyceride acquired from the vesicles reduced. V782A and N780Y acquired very little radiolabeled triglyceride despite near normal ability to interact with lipid. The interaction of the double mutant L734A/V782A with lipid was similar to L734A but no radiolabeled triglyceride was acquired (data not shown). These results, and the reduced triglyceride transfer activities of L734A, V782A, and L734A/V782A (Table I), indicate that Leu734 of helix A and Val782 of helix B facilitate the triglyceride acquisition and binding step of the MTP-mediated triglyceride transfer process. The results also suggest that helix A of MTP confers MTP with fusogenic activity. Fusion peptides were first identified in the envelope protein of viruses, where they facilitate the entry of the virus into a host cell (24). Typically, they comprise between 12 and 26 residues and are highly hydrophobic (24, 25). Predicted helix A contains 12 amino acids, 8 of which are hydrophobic. Its predicted helical structure is in accord with the helical conformation of viral fusion peptides in the active state (24, 25).

The proposition that helix A is fusogenic is also suggested by theoretical and experimental data on the isolated peptide PISVVKGLILLI. This peptide is predicted to adopt an oblique (~30° angle) orientation at a water-lipid interface (data not shown) and promote membrane destabilization. Accordingly, MTP helical peptide A causes the leakage of calcein from SUVs (Fig. 4d), intravesicular lipid mixing (Fig. 4e), and an increase in vesicle size (data not shown). Importantly, a peptide corresponding to the highly active mutant L734M increased intravesicular lipid mixing activity, suggesting a tight coupling between the lipid mixing activity of peptide A and MTP-mediated triglyceride transfer activity (Table I).

Concluding Comments-- We have used molecular modeling to derive sufficient structural information to understand how the MTP-PDI complex might extract neutral lipid from its sites of synthesis, in the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (26) for transfer to apoB during lipoprotein assembly. Our data indicate that MTP has a fusion peptide at the entrance to a hydrophobic lipid binding cavity, which inserts into a lipid membrane to perturb the orientation of phospholipid acyl chains. The formation of thermodynamically unstable inverted phases (27) may expose the acyl chains of neutral lipid and phospholipid monomers for interactions with helix B and the hydrophobic lipid binding cavity of MTP. We envisage that the extraction of neutral lipids from a membrane is further facilitated by electrostatic interactions between Arg781 of helix B and the negative charges on the phosphate groups of bilayer phospholipid molecules. Such interactions would be expected to increase the affinity of the cavity entrance of MTP with lipid. The discovery of lipid-interacting helical peptides at the entrance of the lipid binding cavities of the lipases (28), along with the predicted cavities of CETP (29) and lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase (30), suggests that the mechanism of lipid acquisition described here for MTP might apply to other lipid binding proteins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. G. Kemball-Cook and I. Bartok for help with the graphics work, Dr. C. Mann for reading of the manuscript, Professor L. Banaszak for important discussions and encouragement throughout this project, and Dr. A. Decout and Professors J. Vandekerckhove and R. Brasseur for help with the peptide studies.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the British Medical Research Council, the British Heart Foundation (Grants PG/97011 and PG/98032), and the Minnesota Supercomputer Institute.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44 208 3838308; Fax: 44 208 3832028; E-mail: carol.shoulders@csc.mrc.ac.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 12, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000364200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CM, chylomicron; apoB, apolipoprotein B; CETP, cholesteryl ester transfer protein; FABP, fatty acid-binding protein; LV lipovitellin, MTP, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein; PDI, protein disulfide isomerase; SUVs, small unilamellar vesicles; VLDL, very low density lipoproteins; VTG, vitellogenin; WT, wild type.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sharp, D., Blinderman, L., Combs, K. A., Kienzle, B., Ricci, B., Wagner-Smith, K., Gil, C. M., Turck, C. W., Bourna, M. E., Rader, D. J., Aggerbeck, L. P., Gregg, R. E., Gordon, D. A., and Wetterau, J. R. (1993) Nature 365, 65-69
2. Narcisi, T. M. E., Shoulders, C. C., Chester, S. A., Read, J., Brett, D. J., Harrison, G. B., Grantham, T. T., Fox, M. F., Povey, S., de Bruin, T. W. A., Erkelens, D. W., Muller, D P R., Lloyd, J. K., and Scott, J. (1995) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 1298-13310
3. Mann, C. J., Anderson, T. A., Read, J., Chester, S. A., Harrison, G. B., Koechl, S., Ritchie, P. J., Bradbury, P., Hussain, F. S., Amey, J., Vanloo, B., Rosseneu, M., Infante, R., Hancock, J. M., Levitt, D. G., Banaszak, L. J., Scott, J., and Shoulders, C. C. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 391-408
4. Anderson, T. A., Levitt, D. G., and Banaszak, L. J. (1998) Structure 6, 895-909
5. Bradbury, P., Mann, C. J., Koechl, S., Anderson, T. A., Chester, S. A., Hancock, J. M., Ritchie, P. J., Amey, J., Harrison, G., Levitt, D. G., Banaszak, L. J., Scott, J., and Shoulders, C. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3149-3164
6. Timmins, P. A., Poliks, B., and Banaszak, L. (1992) Science 257, 652-655
7. Atzel, A., and Wetterau, J. R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 10444-10450
8. Segrest, J. P, Jones, M. K, Mishhra, V. K, Anantharamaiah, G. H, and Garber, D. W. (1994) Arterioscler. Thromb. 14, 1674-1685
9. Jones, T. A., Zou, J. Y., Cowan, S. W., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 47, 110-119
10. Ritchie, P. J., Decout, A., Amey, J., Mann, C. J., Read, J., Rosseneu, M., Scott, J., and Shoulders, C. C. (1999) Biochem. J. 332, 305-310
11. Peelman, F., Goethals, M., Vanloo, B., Labeur, C., Brasseur, R., Vandekerckhove, J., and Rosseneu, M. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 249, 708-715
12. Decout, A., Labeur, C., Goethals, M., Brasseur, R., and Rosseneu, M. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1372, 102-116
13. Voneche, V., Portetelle, D., Kettmann, R., Willems, L., Limbach, K., Paoletti, E, Ruysschaert, J. M., Burny, A., and Brasseur, R. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3810-3814
14. Lesk, A. M., Levitt, M., and Chothia, C. (1986) Protein Eng. 1, 77-78
15. Callebaut, I., Labesse, G., Durand, P., Poupon, A., Canard, L., Chomilier, J., Henrissat, B., and Mornon, J. P. (1997) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53, 621-645
16. Viguera, A. R., and Serrano, L. (1999) Protein Sci. 8, 1733-1742
17. Penel, S., Hughes, E., and Doig, A. (1999) J. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 127-143
18. Jamil, H., Dickson, J. K., Jr., Chu, G-H., Lago, M. W., Rinehart, J. K., Biller, S. A., Gregg, R. E., and Wetterau, J. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6549-6554
19. Beamer, J., Carrol, F., and Eisenberg, D. (1997) Science 276, 1861-1864
20. Bernlohr, D. A., Simpson, M. A., Hertzel, A. V., and Banaszak, L. J. (1997) Proteins 17, 277-303
21. Cistola, D. P., Kim, K., Rogl, H., and Frieden, C. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7559-7565
22. Ohashi, K., Ishibashi, S., Osuga, J. I, Harada, K, Inaba, T, Yagyu, H., and Yamada, N. (1996) Circulation 94 (suppl.), I-346
23. Miller, K. W., and Small, D. M. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 443-451
24. Brasseur, R, Pillot, T, Lins, L, Vandekerckhove, J., and Rosseneu, M. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 167-171
25. Xing Han, Steinhauer, D. A., Wharton, S. A., and Tamm, L. K. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 15052-15059
26. Hebbachi, A.-M., and Gibbons, G. F. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1441, 36-50
27. Epand, R. M. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 3, 353-368
28. Cajal, Y., Svendsen, A., Girona, V., Patkar, S. A., and Alsina, A. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 413-423
29. Bruce, C., Beamer, L. J., and Tall, A. R. (1998) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 426-434
30. Peelman, F., Vinaimont, N., Verhe, A., Vanloo, B., Verschelde, J. L., Labeur, C., Seguret-Mace, S., Hutchinson, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tavernier, J., and Rosseneu, M. (1998) Protein Sci. 7, 587-599
31. Schwartz, R. M., and Dayhoff, M. O. (1979) Atlas Protein Sequences and Structure , pp. 353-358, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D. C.


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. M. W. Smolenaars, O. Madsen, K. W. Rodenburg, and D. J. Van der Horst
Molecular diversity and evolution of the large lipid transfer protein superfamily
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 489 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Rava, G. K. Ojakian, G. S. Shelness, and M. M. Hussain
Phospholipid Transfer Activity of Microsomal Triacylglycerol Transfer Protein Is Sufficient for the Assembly and Secretion of Apolipoprotein B Lipoproteins
J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11019 - 11027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. A. Sellers, L. Hou, D. R. Schoenberg, S. R. Batistuzzo de Medeiros, W. Wahli, and G. S. Shelness
Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein Promotes the Secretion of Xenopus laevis Vitellogenin A1
J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13902 - 13905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
L. Wang and D. M. Small
Interfacial properties of amphipathic {beta} strand consensus peptides of apolipoprotein B at oil/water interfaces
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1704 - 1715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. A. Sellers, L. Hou, H. Athar, M. M. Hussain, and G. S. Shelness
A Drosophila Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein Homolog Promotes the Assembly and Secretion of Human Apolipoprotein B: IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN AND INSECT LIPID TRANSPORT AND METABOLISM
J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(22): 20367 - 20373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
M. M. Hussain, J. Shi, and P. Dreizen
Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein and its role in apoB-lipoprotein assembly
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 22 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
C. Xie, L. A. Woollett, S. D. Turley, and J. M. Dietschy
Fatty acids differentially regulate hepatic cholesteryl ester formation and incorporation into lipoproteins in the liver of the mouse
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2002; 43(9): 1508 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
T. Y. Chang, C. C. Y. Chang, X. Lu, and S. Lin
Catalysis of ACAT may be completed within the plane of the membrane: a working hypothesis
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2001; 42(12): 1933 - 1938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Bakillah and M. M. Hussain
Binding of Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein to Lipids Results in Increased Affinity for Apolipoprotein B. EVIDENCE FOR STABLE MICROSOMAL MTP-LIPID COMPLEXES
J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2001; 276(33): 31466 - 31473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/39/30372    most recent
C000364200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Read, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shoulders, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Read, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shoulders, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.