![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 39, 30387-30393, September 29, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
§,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and

From the
Departments of Medicine, Pediatrics,
Pathology, and Pharmacology and Physiological Science, University of
Chicago, the ¶ Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, the
Center for
Cardiovascular Research, University of Rochester,
Rochester, New York 14642, and the ** Department of Medicine,
University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Received for publication, February 2, 2000, and in revised form, May 31, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prolonged serum deprivation induces a
structurally and functionally contractile phenotype in about 1/6 of
cultured airway myocytes, which exhibit morphological elongation and
accumulate abundant contractile apparatus-associated proteins. We
tested the hypothesis that transcriptional activation of genes encoding these proteins accounts for their accumulation during this phenotypic transition by measuring the transcriptional activities of the murine
SM22 and human smooth muscle myosin heavy chain promoters during
transient transfection in subconfluent, serum fed or 7 day
serum-deprived cultured canine tracheal smooth muscle cells. Contrary
to our expectation, SM22 and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain promoter
activities (but not viral murine sarcoma virus-long terminal
repeat promoter activity) were decreased in long term serum-deprived myocytes by at least 8-fold. Because serum response factor (SRF) is a required transcriptional activator of these and other
smooth muscle-specific promoters, we evaluated the expression and
function of SRF in subconfluent and long term serum-deprived cells.
Whole cell SRF mRNA and protein were maintained at high levels in
serum-deprived myocytes, but SRF transcription-promoting activity,
nuclear SRF binding to consensus CArG sequences, and nuclear SRF
protein were reduced. Furthermore, immunocytochemistry revealed
extranuclear redistribution of SRF in serum-deprived myocytes; nuclear
localization of SRF was restored after serum refeeding. These results
uncover a novel mechanism for physiological control of smooth
muscle-specific gene expression through extranuclear redistribution of
SRF and consequent down-regulation of its transcription-promoting activity.
Confluent cultured, passaged canine tracheal myocytes exhibit
divergent phenotypes when deprived of serum for 7 or more days. About
1/6 of these cells accumulate abundant contractile apparatus proteins,
increasing whole culture contents of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain
(smMHC)1 and SM22 by
5-7-fold (1, 2). These myocytes acquire a contractile phenotype,
characterized by morphological elongation, expression of functionally
coupled muscarinic M3 surface receptors, and substantial contraction (shortening) upon cholinergic stimulation. Presently, the
mechanism responsible for this phenotypic differentiation is unknown.
In cultured skeletal muscle, differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes
depends upon up-regulation of skeletal muscle-specific gene
transcription, which results in abundant contractile apparatus protein
accumulation (3-6). This precedent in skeletal muscle suggested that
similarly enhanced transcription of contractile apparatus genes might
account for the substantial smMHC and SM22 accumulation we observed in
long term serum-deprived tracheal smooth muscle cells. To test this
hypothesis, we assessed transcription from the smMHC and SM22 gene
promoters in both preconfluent serum fed and post confluent long term
serum-deprived tracheal myocytes. Contrary to our expectation, we found
markedly reduced transcription from these promoters in serum-deprived
myocytes, an effect mediated through reduced SRF binding activity
attributable to reversible, extranuclear relocation of SRF. Our study
discloses a novel mechanism for physiological regulation of smooth
muscle gene transcription mediated through redistribution of SRF from
nucleus to cytoplasm.
Cell Culture--
Canine tracheal myocytes were grown on
uncoated plastic dishes or glass coverslips (1) and were studied at
passage 1 or 2. Serum fed myocytes were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium:F-12 (1:1) plus 10% FBS, 0.1 mM
nonessential amino acids, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml
streptomycin. Serum-deprived cells were grown to confluence and then
maintained for Plasmids--
In pSM22luc, transcription of the luciferase
cDNA in pGL2basic is directed by bp Transfections--
Transient transfection of plasmid DNA was
accomplished with cationic lipids. LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies,
Inc.) provided efficient transfection of subconfluent, serum fed canine
tracheal myocytes, whereas DOTAP (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) allowed for serum-free transfection of 7-day-old
serum-deprived cells. Subconfluent myocytes in 6-well dishes were
transfected in Optimem (Life Technologies, Inc.) with 14 µg of
LipofectAMINE, 1.8 µg of luciferase reporter, and 0.6 µg of
pMSV Transduction with Replication-deficient Adenovirus--
The
AdSM22nlacZ virus was constructed by ligating a shuttle plasmid
(pCA3, Microbix Inc.) containing 445 bp of mouse SM22 promoter fused to
a nuclear-localizing lacZ reporter gene to
ClaI-linearized dL327 adenovirus. Viral plaques were
generated in HEK cells carrying the E1 gene of adenovirus. Putative
recombinant plaques were purified twice in HEK cells. High titer virus
(1-2 × 1010 pfu/ml) was analyzed for nuclear
lacZ reporter expression in PAC SMC (12) at
multiplicity of infection of 10-250; 50 multiplicity of infection
virus resulted in 100% transduction. Serum-deprived cultured tracheal
myocytes plated in 12-well dishes were transduced with AdSM22nlacZ in
medium containing 2% FBS and 50 multiplicity of infection virus. After
1 h, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and placed
in serum-free medium for 24 h. Myocytes were then fixed and
stained for Nuclear Extracts--
Nuclear extracts of 30-70% confluent,
serum fed ,or 0-8 day serum-deprived canine tracheal myocytes were
prepared at 4 °C using a modification of the method of Dignam
et al. (13). Myocytes were trypsinized and rinsed twice with
Dulbecco phosphate buffer, and then packed cells were incubated on ice
for 10 min with 10 vol of buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM DTT)
and then washed, and nuclei were pelleted in buffer A. Packed nuclei
were gently resuspended in 1 vol of extraction buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 420 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM DTT) and rocked for 30 min. After centrifugation, supernatants were dialyzed for 1 h against three changes of buffer D (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 100 mM
KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 0.5 mM DTT) and then clarified by centrifugation
at 14,000 rpm for 20 min. Protease inhibitors (leupeptin, antipain,
chymostatin, and pepstatin A, 5 µg/ml each, Sigma) were added, and
nuclear extracts were frozen in aliquots at Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Double-stranded
DNA fragments harboring the sequences of interest were prepared by
annealing complementary synthetic oligonucleotides and were end-labeled
with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [ Western Blot Analysis--
Protein lysates or nuclear extracts
from subconfluent, serum fed, or postconfluent, serum-deprived myocytes
were resolved using 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (1).
Serum response factor was detected as a 67-kDa band using anti-SRF
primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and enhanced
chemiluminescence reagents; AP-2 In Situ Hybridization--
7-Day-old serum-deprived airway
myocytes grown on glass coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde
in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), then washed with
phosphate-buffered saline, treated serially with proteinase K (0.1 µg/ml in 100 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0)
and acetic anhydride (0.25% v/v) in 0.1 M triethanolamine (pH 8.0), and then washed twice with SSC. Antisense and sense (for
control comparison) cRNA probes labeled by incorporation of
digoxigenin-UTP were synthesized by in vitro transcription from linearized pGEM3z containing the human SM22 cDNA (WS3-10 (14)), using the Dig RNA labeling kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and T7 or SP6 polymerase. Hybridization was performed overnight at
55 °C in 75% formamide, 1.3X SSC, 1X Denhardt's solution, 200 µg/ml yeast tRNA, 50 mM Na3PO4
(pH 7.4), 0.1 gm/ml dextran sulfate, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 250 nM Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA isolated from subconfluent
serum fed or 7-day serum-deprived tracheal myocytes was size
fractionated (20 µg/lane) by electrophoresis in 1.2%
formaldehyde-agarose and transferred to a Hybond plus membrane
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Prehybridization and hybridization were
performed using ExpressHyb solution (CLONTECH) at
60 °C and an SRF-specific probe prepared by random primer labeling of the full-length human SRF cDNA.
Immunocytochemistry--
Cellular localization of SRF was
identified by immunocytochemistry performed as described previously
(1), using primary anti-SRF antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology),
secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled antibody, and propidium
iodide or Hoescht 33342 nuclear counterstain. AP-2 SM22 and smMHC Promoter Activities Are Down-regulated in Long Term
Serum-deprived Airway Myocytes--
Fig.
1 shows the activities of the mouse SM22,
human smMHC, and MSV-LTR promoters in subconfluent or 7-day-old
serum-deprived myocytes. Transcription from both the SM22 and smMHC
promoters was The Lower Activity of the Smooth Muscle Gene Promoters in
Serum-deprived Myocytes Is Not Due to Selective Inactivity in
Nonelongated Cells--
Only 1/6 of serum-deprived tracheal smooth
muscle cells become elongated and accumulate large quantities of
contractile apparatus associated proteins (1). To determine whether the
lower overall transcriptional activity of SM22 and smMHC promoters in
serum-deprived cells was because of a differential activation of these
promoters in elongated, but not nonelongated, myocytes, we performed
three types of experiments.
First, we transfected serum-deprived myocytes with pMSV
Second, we employed replication-deficient adenovirus to accomplish more
uniform transfer of an SM22 promoter-driven nuclear localizing
lacZ reporter gene to all myocytes in serum-deprived cultures. Almost all elongated and nonelongated myocytes (Fig. 2d) were transduced and expressed the SM22 promoter-driven
reporter. This finding confirms that an exogenously introduced SM22
gene promoter is active in both elongated and flattened serum-deprived airway myocytes.
Finally, we performed in situ hybridization to evaluate
whether the endogenous SM22 gene is transcribed in both elongated and
nonelongated serum-deprived myocytes. A specific hybridization signal
using the SM22 antisense probe reveals the presence of endogenous SM22
mRNA in all myocytes (Fig. 2e); no specific
hybridization was seen with SM22 sense probe (not shown). Together,
these three lines of evidence exclude restricted activation of smooth
muscle-specific gene promoters to only elongated myocytes as a
potential explanation for the reduced smooth muscle gene promoter
activity seen in serum-deprived airway smooth muscle cells. These
experiments demonstrate uniform distribution of promoter activation
among serum-deprived airway myocytes and do not conflict with our
demonstration above that the overall level of promoter activation is
much reduced in these cells.
Long Term Serum-deprived Airway Myocytes Exhibit Decreased SRF
Binding Activity without Reduction of Whole-cell SRF
Abundance--
Because of the central importance of SRF in activating
smooth muscle gene transcription (7, 15-17), we analyzed SRF
transcription-promoting activity in long term serum-deprived airway
myocytes by quantifying transcription from the purely
SRF-dependent promoter contained in p5xCArGluc.
SRF-dependent luciferase expression was markedly reduced in
long term serum-deprived airway myocytes versus the high
level expression found in subconfluent serum fed cells transfected with
p5xCArGluc (Fig. 3a). In
contrast, transcription from the AP-2-dependent promoter
contained in p4xAP2luc was relatively elevated in long term
serum-deprived airway myocytes (Fig. 3a). Thus, SRF
transcription-promoting activity is selectively diminished in
serum-deprived myocytes.
Next we sought to determine whether this decrease in SRF
transcription-promoting activity stems from reduction in SRF gene expression or from reduced SRF DNA binding activity. Northern blot
analysis showed that SRF transcript levels remained high in both serum
fed and serum-deprived myocytes (Fig. 3b). Likewise, SRF
protein is abundant in both 70-100% confluent serum fed and multiday
serum-deprived cells (Fig. 3b). In contrast,
binding of SRF from nuclear extracts to oligonucleotides containing
either CArG element from the mouse SM22 promoter was markedly lower in serum-deprived myocytes (Fig. 3c). This reduction of SRF
binding activity was selective, in that binding of AP2 to its consensus site was similar in subconfluent or serum-deprived cells (Fig. 3d). Thus, a reduction of SRF binding activity, but not a
reduction in SRF mRNA levels or SRF protein abundance, can explain
its reduced transcriptional-promoting activity.
To evaluate whether other nuclear factors contribute to the formation
of SRF-containing DNA complexes found in extracts from subconfluent
myocytes, we performed additional EMSAs including antibodies directed
against SAP-1a, Elk-1, YY-1, p300/CBP, and C/EBP (Fig. 3e).
These antibodies neither prevented SRF-containing complex formation nor
supershifted the SRF-containing DNA complex. Thus, none of these
nuclear factors are contained within the SRF-containing complexes
identified in this assay.
Extranuclear Localization of SRF in Long Term Serum-deprived Smooth
Muscle Cells--
Nuclear translocation of several transcription
factors, including nuclear factor- This study was undertaken to identify mechanisms that lead to the
abundant accumulation of the contractile apparatus-associated proteins
SM22 and smMHC in long term serum-deprived cultured airway smooth
muscle cells (1, 2). By analogy with the transcriptional up-regulation
of muscle-specific genes that occurs when cultured skeletal myoblasts
differentiate to myotubes (3-6), we hypothesized that similar
transcriptional activation of smooth muscle-specific genes causes
cultured airway smooth muscle cells to acquire the contractile
phenotype during prolonged serum deprivation. However, our results
soundly disprove this possibility and instead demonstrate that
transcription from the SM22 and smMHC promoters is markedly reduced
during long term serum deprivation (Fig. 1). This reduction is not
because of restriction of promoter activity to the subset of myocytes
that acquire the contractile phenotype (Fig. 2) but rather is
attributable to reduction of SRF transcription promoting activity (Fig.
3), which in turn stems from extranuclear redistribution of SRF in all
long term serum-deprived smooth muscle cells (Fig. 3f and
4). The potential physiological importance of these observations is
considered below.
Much attention has been paid to mechanisms that restrict expression of
tissue-specific genes to smooth muscle cells. Mutational analyses of
transgene expression in cultured cells or in transgenic mice have
proven that binding of SRF to its consensus CArG sequence is required
for full transcriptional activation of smooth muscle-specific genes.
Perhaps best studied has been the SM22 promoter, whose activity depends
upon the binding of SRF to each of two CArG boxes within the 300 bp 5'
to the transcription start site. In cultured cells, mutations of either
element that prevent SRF binding reduce SM22 promoter activity by half,
and mutation of both CArG sites virtually ablates activity (24).
In vivo, the more 3' CArG box is required for SM22
promoter-driven tissue-specific reporter expression in transgenic mice
(16, 24, 25), but a potential quantitative influence of the 5'-CArG
site has not been tested. Two CArG sites within the rabbit and rat
smMHC promoters positively regulate transcription during transient
transfection of cultured smooth muscle (26-29), and CArG boxes within
the smMHC (30) and smooth muscle Several pathways controlling SRF transcription-promoting activity are
already known. First, SRF can partner with other nuclear factors, as it
does with Elk-1 or SAP-1 at the serum response element of the
c-fos promoter to effect its full activation
(33-37). However, DNA binding sites for ternary complex factors of the serum-responsive Ets family are not found adjacent to smooth muscle promoter CArG sites (15, 38), and we found no evidence for the presence
of such factors in SRF-containing nuclear protein·DNA complexes (Fig.
3e). The nonhistone chromosomal protein HMG-I(Y) can
potentiate SRF binding to the SM22 promoter, even in the absence of
direct HMG-I(Y) binding to DNA (39), and MHox can mediate increased SRF binding to the smooth muscle Instead, our results disclose a previously unknown mechanism whereby
SRF transcriptional activity is regulated through reversible translocation between cytoplasm and nucleus (Figs. 3f and
4). Gauthier-Rouviere et al. (23) identified a basic
sequence in the N-terminal region of SRF responsible for its nuclear
entry. Although basal protein kinase A activity was required for
nuclear SRF translocation (23), regulation through this pathway was not
specific, as SV40 nuclear localization also requires
cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity. Moreover,
cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulates extracellular
signal-regulated kinase 2 and p38 Regulation of SRF transcription-promoting activity could provide a
strategy for coordinated up- or down-regulation of expression of a
complement of smooth muscle contractile apparatus-associated proteins
in response to external environmental or internal cellular cues. Like
the SM22 and smMHC promoters, transcription from h-caldesmon, h1-calponin, smooth muscle
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
7 days in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium:F-12 containing 5 µg/ml insulin, 5 µg/ml transferrin, and 5 ng/ml selenium (ITS), as well as nonessential amino acids and
antibiotics as above. Fresh medium was provided every 48-72 h. Some
myocytes deprived of serum for 7 days were refed with 20% FBS
for 4 days. Long term serum-deprived myocytes from canine pulmonary
artery myocytes or canine aorta were similarly prepared.
445 to + 41 of the mouse SM22
gene (7). In p5xCArGluc, luciferase expression is directed by an
artificial promoter containing five copies of the SRF binding site
(CC(A/T)6GG, or "CArG box") upstream of a minimal TATA
box (Stratagene); p5xCArGluc does not contain the Ets binding site
contained in the c-fos serum response element. We
constructed psmMHCluc, in which the human smMHC promoter drives
luciferase expression, as follows. We determined that human chromosome
16p13 BAC clone CIT987SK-972D3 (GenBankTM HSU91323;
provided by Dr. Ung-Jin Kim) contains the 5'-end of the human smMHC
gene, as evidenced by sequence homology with rat, mouse, and rabbit
smMHC genes. BAC DNA was digested with KpnI and
SpeI, and the 3.3-kilobase fragment containing the smMHC
promoter and all of exon 1 ligated into
KpnI/SpeI-digested pGL3basic. pMSVluc and
pMSV
gal, in which the viral MSV-LTR promoter controls luciferase or
-galactosidase expression (8), and pSM22
gal, in which bp
445 to
+41 of the mouse SM22 gene direct lacZ expression (9), were
generated previously. To generate p4xAP2luc, four copies of the human
keratin K14 promoter sequence from bp
257 to
211, which contains an
AP-2 binding site (10), were cloned upstream of the minimal K14
promoter in the K14mpLuc vector (11), between the KpnI and
SacI sites. In preliminary studies, transcription from this
AP-2-dependent reporter was activated 5-10 times upon co-transfection with AP-2
expression plasmid in HepG2 and HeLa cells.2 All plasmids
were purified on CsCl gradients prior to transfection.
gal (used to normalize transfection efficiency)/well. Myocytes
were refed with serum 5 h later and harvested 48 h after
transfection for measurement of luciferase and
-galactosidase
activities (7, 8). Serum-deprived myocytes in 6-well dishes were
transfected in Optimem containing 20 µg of DOTAP, 1.8 µg of
luciferase reporter, and 0.6 µg of pMSV
gal. Myocytes were refed
5 h later with serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium:F12/ITS and then harvested 48 h after transfection. Luciferase activity was measured for each sample and normalized to its
-galactosidase activity (7, 8). Results from three to four wells
were averaged to provide the datum; experiments were repeated three to
nine times, and the average (± S.E.) is shown. Additional
serum-deprived myocytes were transfected with only pSM22
gal or
pMSV
gal (2.5 µg of DNA plus 20 µg of DOTAP; n = 3-4), stained 48 h later with X-gal, and the fraction of
blue-stained cells that are nonelongated determined by phase contrast
microscopy. Discrimination of elongated versus nonelongated
cells is easily made by visual inspection (cf. Fig. 2,
a and b).
-galactosidase activity using X-gal reagent.
80 °C until use.
-32P]ATP.
CArG-box-containing probes included those encompassing the 5'
(5'-GCTGCCCATAAAAGGTTTTTG-3') or 3'
(5'-CTTTCCCCAAATATGGAGCCTG-3') CArG boxes (underlined) of
the mouse SM22 promoter. An oligonucleotide harboring the AP2
binding site (5'- TCGAACTGACCGCCCGCGGCCCGT-3') was also used.
20,000 dpm (1-5 fmol) labeled oligonucleotide were preincubated for 15 min with 1.5 µl of binding buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20% Ficoll, 375 mM KCl, 5 mM
EDTA, 5 mM DTT) and 1 µg of poly(dI-dC). When indicated,
200-fold molar excess of unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide
containing an Sp1 binding site (5'- CCTGGCTAAAGGGGCGGGGCTTGGCCAGCC-3')
was added. For supershift experiments, 3 µg of antibody were added to
the incubation mixture. Binding reactions (3-6 µg of nuclear extract
protein) were performed at room temperature in 15 µl for 30 min.
DNA·protein complex formation was analyzed by electrophoresis
on 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels in TBE buffer (TBE, 40 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA). Supershift antibodies included anti-SRF (gift of Dr. R. Prywes), anti-human IL-5
antibody (TRFK-5; gift of Searle, Inc.), anti-SAP-1a,
anti-Elk-1, anti-YY1, anti-p300/CBP, and anti-C/EBP
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
was similarly detected as a
~50-kDa band using anti-AP-2
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
-thio-ATP, and 1 ng/µl
antisense or sense cRNA probe. Thereafter, slides were washed, digested with RNaseA (200 µg/ml at 37 °C for 45 min), rewashed (1X SSC, 55 °C, 10 min; 0.5X SSC, 55 °C, 1 h; 0.5X SSC, room
temperature, 5 min), and then blocked with 5% nonfat milk in
phosphate-buffered saline. Hybridized probe was detected with primary
anti-digoxigenin antibody and secondary rhodamine-labeled antibody;
cell nuclei were stained with Hoescht 33342.
was
immunolocalized in additional cells using primary anti-AP-2
antibody
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Samples were photographed on a Zeiss
Axioskop microscope with a Photometrics PXL cooled CCD camera and
Openlab V2 software (Improvision) or on a Nikon microscope with a
Photometrics Sensys CCD camera and IPLab Spectrum software (Signal Analytics).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
8-fold greater in subconfluent myocytes than in
7-day-old serum-deprived cells. In contrast, transcription from the
MSV-LTR promoter was greater in airway myocytes cultured under long
term serum deprivation. Thus, the reduction in smooth muscle gene
promoter activity in serum-deprived myocytes cannot be attributed to a generalized inhibition of gene transcription in such cells.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
SM22 and smMHC promoter activities are
down-regulated in long term serum-deprived airway myocytes.
Promoter activity is expressed as normalized luciferase activity
(arbitrary units). Both smooth muscle-specific promoter activities are
high and comparable to the MSV-LTR in serum fed cells. In
serum-deprived myocytes, SM22 and smMHC promoter activities are
markedly reduced, whereas MSV-LTR activity remains high.
gal or with
pSM22
gal and counted the proportion of X-gal-positive cells that
were nonelongated; Fig. 2, a
and b, demonstrates the typical appearance of nonelongated
and elongated myocytes. The fraction of nonelongated cells expressing
the lacZ transgene under control of SM22 promoter was only
slightly less than that found in cells expressing lacZ
driven by the MSV-LTR promoter. In both cases, over 2/3 of
-galactosidase-expressing cells were nonelongated (Fig.
2c). Thus, when exogenously introduced, the smooth
muscle-specific SM22 promoter is active in nonelongated as well as in
elongated myocytes.

View larger version (121K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
SM22 promoter activity is not
restricted to elongated myocytes in serum-deprived cultures.
Typical appearance of serum-deprived elongated (a) or
flattened (b) 7-day-old canine tracheal myocytes transfected
with pSM22
gal. c, fraction of
-galactosidase-expressing myocytes transfected with pSM22
gal or
pMSV
gal that are of nonelongated, flattened morphology; *,
p < 0.05. d, transduction of 7-day-old
serum-deprived airway myocytes with AdSM22nlacZ programs nuclear
expression of
-galactosidase, detected by X-gal staining, in both
elongated (thick arrows) and flattened (thin
arrows) cells. e, in situ hybridization
demonstrates that endogenous SM22 transcripts (red
fluorescence) are present in elongated (thick arrows) as
well as in flattened (thin arrows) cells; nuclei are
visualized by blue fluorescence of Hoescht 33342.

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
SRF-DNA binding and transcription promoting
activity, but not mRNA or protein levels, are decreased in long
term serum-deprived airway myocytes. a, activity of a
purely SRF-dependent artificial promoter (in p5xCArGluc),
reflected in its normalized luciferase activity, is much greater in
subconfluent serum fed than 7-day-old serum-deprived airway myocytes,
whereas that of an AP-2 dependent promoter (in p4xAP2luc) displays
greater activity in serum-deprived cells. b, Northern and
Western blot analyses of total RNA and whole cell extracts prepared
from 30 or 70% confluent serum fed and confluent myocytes deprived of
serum for 0-12 days, demonstrating that expression of SRF is
maintained at high levels in serum-deprived airway myocytes.
c, EMSA showing that nuclear extracts from subconfluent
(50%) airway myocytes contain SRF, which binds prominently to
oligonucleotide probes containing the 5'- or 3'-CArG boxes from the
murine SM22 promoter, whereas binding activity is markedly diminished
in 8-day-old serum-deprived airway myocytes. Specificity of the
SRF-containing DNA complex is demonstrated by selective supershift with
anti-SRF antibody and by specific competition with CArG-containing
unlabeled (cold) competitor oligonucleotides. d, EMSA
demonstrating that nuclear extracts from subconfluent, serum fed
(30-70%) or confluent airway myocytes deprived of serum for 0-8 days
contain AP2 that binds to its consensus DNA sequence, without loss of
DNA binding activity in serum-deprived myocytes. e, EMSA
demonstrating that SRF-containing DNA complexes formed with nuclear
extracts of 50% confluent serum fed airway myocytes are unaffected by
co-incubation with antibodies to SAP-1a, Elk-1, YY1, p300/CBP, or
C/EBP. f, Western blot demonstrating diminished SRF protein
and elevated AP-2 protein within nuclear extracts of 7-day-old
serum-deprived airway myocytes.
B (18, 19) and
glucocorticoid-glucocorticoid receptor complexes (20-22), controls
their transcription-regulating activity. A nuclear localization peptide
has been identified in SRF protein (23), but regulated nuclear
translocation of SRF has not yet been reported. To test whether
cytoplasmic redistribution of nuclear SRF could account for the
diminished nuclear SRF binding and transcription-promoting activities
observed in long term serum-deprived cells, we analyzed nuclear SRF
protein abundance by Western blot and immunostained smooth muscle cells
to localize SRF. SRF protein is diminished in nuclear extracts from
7-day-old serum-deprived tracheal myocytes versus 70%
confluent, serum fed cells (Fig. 3f). In contrast, nuclear
AP-2 protein increases with serum deprivation (Fig. 3f).
Furthermore, whereas SRF immunoreactivity is restricted to the nucleus
of subconfluent, serum fed airway myocytes (Fig. 4, a and b), SRF is
redistributed into the cytoplasm of long term serum-deprived cells,
where it appears as a perinuclear cloud (Fig. 4, c and
d) or as a polar extranuclear cap (Fig. 4, g and h). Refeeding of 7-day-old serum-deprived airway myocytes
with 20% FBS for 4 days restores full nuclear localization of SRF
(Fig. 4, e and f). Thus, SRF undergoes reversible
nuclear cytoplasmic redistribution in response to external myocyte
stimuli. Localization of SRF in an extranuclear polar cap was observed
not only in 10-day-old serum-deprived canine pulmonary artery myocytes
(shown in Fig. 4, g and h) but also in similarly
treated aortic and tracheal myocytes (not shown). In contrast to the
observed redistribution of SRF out of the nucleus in serum-deprived
airway myocytes, AP-2 immunostaining demonstrated cytoplasmic
predominance in serum fed subconfluent cells (Fig.
5, a and b), with
heterogeneous (Fig. 5, c and d) or more uniform
(Fig. 5, e and f) redistribution of AP-2 into the
nucleus of 7-day-old serum-deprived myocytes. Together, these results
confirm the specificity of intracellular SRF relocalization during long
term serum deprivation.

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Immunocytochemical localization of SRF
(fluorescein isothiocyanate fluorescence shown as
white) within cultured canine tracheal
(A-F) or pulmonary artery (G and
H) myocytes. B, D, F,
and H are identical to A, C,
E, and G, but include blue nuclear counterstain.
SRF appears exclusively within the nucleus in subconfluent, serum fed
airway myocytes (A and B) but is partially
redistributed to a perinuclear cloud (arrows) in 8-day-old
serum-deprived airway myocytes (C and D).
7-Day-old serum-deprived tracheal myocytes refed with 20% FBS again
completely translocate SRF to the nucleus (E and
F). In some serum-deprived cultures, nuclear exclusion of
SRF was more complete than shown in c and d. For
example, SRF was localized in a perinuclear cap in 10-day-old
serum-deprived canine pulmonary artery myocytes (G and
H). A similar appearance has also been observed in long term
serum-deprived tracheal and aortic myocytes (data not shown).

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Immunocytochemical localization of
AP-2
(fluorescein isothiocyanate fluorescence
shown as white) within cultured canine tracheal
myocytes. B, D, and F are identical to
A, C, and E but include blue nuclear
counterstain. AP-2 appears primarily within the cytoplasm in
subconfluent, serum fed airway myocytes (A and B)
but is heterogenously (C and D) or more uniformly
(E and F) redistributed to the nucleus in
7-day-old serum-deprived airway myocytes
(A-D).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin (17) first introns are also
required for smooth muscle-specific transgene expression in
vivo. Despite the clear cut necessity of SRF binding for full
transcriptional activation of smooth muscle-specific genes in
vitro or in vivo, the possibility that smooth muscle
cells regulate SRF binding activity as a physiological mechanism to
control smooth muscle gene transcription in response to changes in
external environment has not been addressed thoroughly. Only one study
suggested that increases in SRF binding partially up-regulate vascular
smooth muscle gene transcription in angiotensin II-treated myocytes
(31). Our results in cultured airway myocytes indicate that smooth
muscle cells can employ this strategy more generally and dramatically
and thereby extend this prior observation and a report that alterations
in SRF abundance regulate smooth muscle gene transcription during
embryogenesis (32) by revealing a novel mechanism through which SRF
activity is regulated.
-actin promoter in angiotensin II-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells (31). Conceivably, reduction in HMG-I(Y) or MHox activities during long term
serum deprivation could contribute to our observations. Second, SRF can
interact with p300/CBP, whose histone acetyltransferase activity may
regulate the availability of chromosomal DNA for transcription and
promote SRF-dependent transcription (40). No evidence for
p300 binding was revealed in our EMSA studies (Fig. 3e),
however. Third, phosphorylation of SRF by the ribosomal S6 kinase
pp90RSK, casein kinase II, or DNA-PK can enhance its transcription-promoting activity and DNA binding (37, 41-49). Whether
differential phosphorylation of SRF contributes to the differences in
binding activity observed in our subconfluent or long term
serum-deprived cells requires further study. Fourth, activation of the
Rho family GTPases can enhance the transcription-promoting activity of
SRF (50) in skeletal and nonmuscle cells, in part by modulating nuclear
factor-
B activity (51-55). RhoA can be activated during serum
exposure, so reduction in its activity during prolonged serum
deprivation might lower SRF activity and so reduce SM22 and smMHC
promoter activation. Co-expression of constitutively active RhoA
enhances transcription from the SM22 and smMHC promoters in tracheal
myocytes,3 but the
physiological importance of changes in Rho family GTPase activities in
our culture system, or in intact tissues in vivo, remains to
be established. Fifth, SRF
5 is a naturally occurring dominant
negative isoform of SRF (56), which interacts with full-length SRF and
binds DNA, but cannot activate transcription. SRF
5 transcripts are
more abundant in smooth muscle from proximal rather than distal aorta,
and these levels correlate inversely with SM22 and smMHC mRNA
levels in these areas. We do not think that increased SRF
5 abundance
accounts for the diminished SM22 and smMHC promoter activities observed
in serum-deprived myocytes. Had abundant SRF
5 been present in
serum-deprived cells, we would have expected SRF·SRF
5 DNA complex
formation to occur (56); this was not the case, as our experiments
revealed almost complete absence of SRF-containing complex formation in
serum-deprived myocytes.
translocation through control of
their association with cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase, PTP-SL
(57). Currently, the potential role of cAMP-dependent
protein kinase in mediating the extranuclear relocation of SRF in long
term serum-deprived smooth muscle cells, or the contribution of other
signaling pathways, remains to be established.
-actin, and telokin promoter/enhancers depends on SRF binding for maximal activation (15, 38, 58). Furthermore, physiological regulation of smooth muscle-specific gene
transcription through control of SRF activity might provide an
alternative explanation for recently published observations in
transgenic mice. Madsen et al. (30) found expression of an smMHC promoter/enhancer-driven lacZ reporter in transgenic mice in
some, but not all, cells within individual smooth muscle tissues. These
authors suggested that heterogeneous transgene activation might reflect
diverse embryological origins of myocytes comprising these tissues,
differences in local milieu, and/or episodic gene expression. Our
results support the possibility that local factors might lead
individual myocytes within a smooth muscle tissue to activate smooth
muscle promoters through the same SRF-dependent transcriptional regulatory program but to differing degrees according to their individual states of SRF transcription-promoting activity. Conceivably, differences in SRF activation might also lead to intertissue differences in transgenic SM22 promoter activity, in which
SM22 promoter-driven transgenes were expressed in vascular but not
visceral smooth muscle tissues (24, 25, 59).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We are indebted to Dr. William T. Gerthoffer for providing canine tracheal tissue for smooth muscle cell isolation and culture.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by NHLBI, National Institutes of Health Grants HL56399, HL64095, HL63314, HL20592, HL62572, and HL54685. Immunofluorescence studies were supported by the University of Chicago Cancer Research Center Digital Light Microsopy Facility.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Both authors contributed equally to this work.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of
Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 6026, Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-702-6790; Fax: 773-702-4736; E-mail:
jsolway@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000840200
2 S. Sinha, unpublished observation.
3 H.-W. Liu, B. Camoretti-Mercado, and J. Solway, unpublished observation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
smMHC, smooth muscle
myosin heavy chain;
SRF, serum response factor;
FBS, fetal bovine
serum;
bp, base pairs;
AP, activator protein;
X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Halayko, A. J., Camoretti-Mercado, B., Forsythe, S. M., Vieira, J. E., Mitchell, R. W., Wylam, M. E., Hershenson, M. B., and Solway, J. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, L197-L206 |
| 2. | Ma, X., Wang, Y., and Stephens, N. L. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, C1206-C1214 |
| 3. | Molkentin, J. D., and Olson, E. N. (1996) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 445-453 |
| 4. | Olson, E. N., Brennan, T. J., Chakraborty, T., Cheng, T. C., Cserjesi, P., Edmondson, D., James, G., and Li, L. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 104, 7-13 |
| 5. | Schneider, M. D., and Olson, E. N. (1988) Mol. Neurobiol. 2, 1-39 |
| 6. | Vandromme, M., Gauthier-Rouviere, C., Carnac, G., Lamb, N., and Fernandez, A. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 118, 1489-1500 |
| 7. | Solway, J., Seltzer, J., Samaha, F. F., Kim, S., Alger, L. E., Niu, Q., Morrisey, E. E., Ip, H. S., and Parmacek, M. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13460-13469 |
| 8. | Camoretti-Mercado, B., Forsythe, S. M., LeBeau, M. M., Espinosa, R., Vieira, J. E., Halayko, A. J., Willadsen, S., Kurtz, B., Ober, C., Evans, G. A., Thweatt, R., Shapiro, S., Niu, Q., Qin, Y., Padrid, P. A., and Solway, J. (1998) Genomics 49, 452-457 |
| 9. | Kim, S., Lin, H., Barr, E., Chu, L., Leiden, J. M., and Parmacek, M. S. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 1006-1014 |
| 10. | Leask, A., Rosenberg, M., Vassar, R., and Fuchs, E. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1985-1998 |
| 11. | Sinha, S., Degenstein, L., Copenhaver, C., and Fuchs, E. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2543-2555 |
| 12. | Rothman, A., Kulik, T. J., Taubman, M. B., Berk, B. C., Smith, C. W. J., and Nadal-Ginard, B. (1992) Circulation 86, 1977-1986 |
| 13. | Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 1475-1489 |
| 14. | Thweatt, R., Lumpkin, C. K., Jr., and Goldstein, S. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 187, 1-7 |
| 15. | Solway, J., Forsythe, S. M., Halayko, A. J., Vieira, J. E., Hershenson, M. B., and Camoretti-Mercado, B. (1998) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 158, S100-S108 |
| 16. | Li, L., Liu, Z., Mercer, B., Overbeek, P., and Olson, E. N. (1997) Dev. Biol. 187, 311-321 |
| 17. | Mack, C. P., and Owens, G. K. (1999) Circ. Res. 84, 852-861 |
| 18. | Baeuerle, P. A., and Baltimore, D. (1988) Cell 53, 211-217 |
| 19. | Zhao, Q., and Lee, F. S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8355-8358 |
| 20. | Galigniana, M. D., Housley, P. R., DeFranco, D. B., and Pratt, W. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16222-16227 |
| 21. | Okamoto, K., Tanaka, H., Ogawa, H., Makino, Y., Eguchi, H., Hayashi, S., Yoshikawa, N., Poellinger, L., Umesono, K., and Makino, I. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10363-10371 |
| 22. | Strubing, C., and Clapham, D. E. (1999) J. Gen. Physiol. 113, 239-248 |
| 23. | Gauthier-Rouviere, C., Vandromme, M., Lautredou, N., Cai, Q. Q., Girard, F., Fernandez, A., and Lamb, N. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 433-444 |
| 24. | Kim, S., Ip, H. S., Lu, M. M., Clendenin, C., and Parmacek, M. S. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2266-2278 |
| 25. | Li, L., Miano, J. M., Mercer, B., and Olson, E. N. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 849-859 |
| 26. | Madsen, C. S., Hershey, J. C., Hautmann, M. B., White, S. L., and Owens, G. K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6332-6340 |
| 27. | Madsen, C. S., Regan, C. P., and Owens, G. K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29842-29851 |
| 28. | Katoh, Y., Loukianov, E., Kopras, E., Zilberman, A., and Periasamy, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30538-30545 |
| 29. | Zilberman, A., Dave, V., Miano, J., Olson, E. N., and Periasamy, M. (1998) Circ. Res. 82, 566-575 |
| 30. | Madsen, C. S., Regan, C. P., Hungerford, J. E., White, S. L., Manabe, I., and Owens, G. K. (1998) Circ. Res. 82, 908-917 |
| 31. | Hautmann, M. B., Thompson, M. M., Swartz, E. A., Olson, E. N., and Owens, G. K. (1997) Circ. Res. 81, 600-610 |
| 32. | Browning, C. L., Culberson, D. E., Aragon, I. V., Fillmore, R. A., Croissant, J. D., Schwartz, R. J., and Zimmer, W. E. (1998) Dev. Biol. 194, 18-37 |
| 33. | Hill, C. S., Wynne, J., and Treisman, R. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 5421-5432 |
| 34. | Gille, H., Kortenjann, M., Thomae, O., Moomaw, C., Slaughter, C., Cobb, M. H., and Shaw, P. E. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 951-962 |
| 35. | Sharrocks, A. D. (1995) FEBS Lett. 368, 77-80 |
| 36. | Kortenjann, M., Thomae, O., and Shaw, P. E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4815-4824 |
| 37. | Papavassiliou, A. G. (1994) Anticancer Res. 14, 1923-1926 |
| 38. | Firulli, A. B., and Olson, E. N. (1997) Trends Genet. 13, 364-369 |
| 39. | Chin, M. T., Pellacani, A., Wang, H., Lin, S. S., Jain, M. K., Perrella, M. A., and Lee, M. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9755-9760 |
| 40. | Ramirez, S., Ali, S. S., Robin, P., Trouche, D., and Harel-Bellan, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31016-31021 |
| 41. | Chauhan, D., Kharbanda, S. M., Uchiyama, H., Urashima, M., and Anderson, K. C. (1995) Leuk. Res. 19, 337-344 |
| 42. | Liu, S. H., Ma, J. T., Yueh, A. Y., Lees-Miller, S. P., Anderson, C. W., and Ng, S. Y. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21147-21154 |
| 43. | Janknecht, R., Ernst, W. H., Houthaeve, T., and Nordheim, A. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 469-475 |
| 44. | Manak, J. R., de Bisschop, N., Kris, R. M., and Prywes, R. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 955-967 |
| 45. | Manak, J. R., and Prywes, R. (1993) Oncogene 8, 703-711 |
| 46. | Marais, R. M., Hsuan, J. J., McGuigan, C., Wynne, J., and Treisman, R. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 97-105 |
| 47. | Meyyappan, M., Atadja, P. W., and Riabowol, K. T. (1996) Biol. Sig. 5, 130-138 |
| 48. | Misra, R. P., Rivera, V. M., Wang, J. M., Fan, P. D., and Greenberg, M. E. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 4545-4554 |
| 49. | Rivera, V. M., Miranti, C. K., Misra, R. P., Ginty, D. D., Chen, R. H., Blenis, J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6260-6273 |
| 50. | Alberts, A. S., Geneste, O., and Treisman, R. (1998) Cell 92, 475-487 |
| 51. | Montaner, S., Perona, R., Saniger, L., and Lacal, J. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8506-8515 |
| 52. | Urich, M., Senften, M., Shaw, P. E., and Ballmer-Hofer, K. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1235-1241 |
| 53. | Wei, L., Zhou, W., Croissant, J. D., Johansen, F. E., Prywes, R., Balasubramanyam, A., and Schwartz, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30287-30294 |
| 54. | Zohn, I. E., Symons, M., Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M., Westwick, J. K., and Der, C. J. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1225-1235 |
| 55. | Van Aelst, L., and D'Souza-Schorey, C. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2295-2322 |
| 56. | Belaguli, N. S., Zhou, W., Trinh, T. H., Majesky, M. W., and Schwartz, R. J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4582-4591 |
| 57. | Blanco-Aparicio, C., Torres, J., and Pulido, R. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 1129-1136 |
| 58. | Miano, J. M., Carlson, M. J., Spencer, J. A., and Misra, R. P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9814-9822 |
| 59. | Moessler, H., Mericskay, M., Li, Z., Nagl, S., Paulin, D., and Small, J. V. (1996) Development (Camb.) 122, 2415-2425 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Halayko, T. Tran, and R. Gosens Phenotype and Functional Plasticity of Airway Smooth Muscle: Role of Caveolae and Caveolins Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2008; 5(1): 80 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Woodruff Gene Expression in Asthmatic Airway Smooth Muscle Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2008; 5(1): 113 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Asanoma, H. Kato, S. Yamaguchi, C. H. Shin, Z.-P. Liu, K. Kato, T. Inoue, Y. Miyanari, K. Yoshikawa, K. Sonoda, et al. HOP/NECC1, A Novel Regulator of Mouse Trophoblast Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24065 - 24074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Schaafsma, K. D. McNeill, G. L. Stelmack, R. Gosens, H. A. Baarsma, B. G. J. Dekkers, E. Frohwerk, J.-M. Penninks, P. Sharma, K. M. Ens, et al. Insulin increases the expression of contractile phenotypic markers in airway smooth muscle Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): C429 - C439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. G. McDonald and G. K. Owens Programming Smooth Muscle Plasticity With Chromatin Dynamics Circ. Res., May 25, 2007; 100(10): 1428 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Fan, A. Sebe, Z. Peterfi, A. Masszi, A. C.P. Thirone, O. D. Rotstein, H. Nakano, C. A. McCulloch, K. Szaszi, I. Mucsi, et al. Cell Contact-dependent Regulation of Epithelial-Myofibroblast Transition via the Rho-Rho Kinase-Phospho-Myosin Pathway Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 1083 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pasquet, F. Naye, C. Faucheux, O. Bronchain, A. Chesneau, P. Thiebaud, and N. Theze Transcription Enhancer Factor-1-dependent Expression of the {alpha}-Tropomyosin Gene in the Three Muscle Cell Types J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 34406 - 34420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Camoretti-Mercado, D. J. Fernandes, S. Dewundara, J. Churchill, L. Ma, P. C. Kogut, J. F. McConville, M. S. Parmacek, and J. Solway Inhibition of Transforming Growth Factor beta-enhanced Serum Response Factor-dependent Transcription by SMAD7 J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2006; 281(29): 20383 - 20392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Han, J.-K. Wen, B. Zheng, Y. Cheng, and C. Zhang Serum deprivation results in redifferentiation of human umbilical vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): C50 - C58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Wamhoff, D. K. Bowles, and G. K. Owens Excitation-Transcription Coupling in Arterial Smooth Muscle Circ. Res., April 14, 2006; 98(7): 868 - 878. |