[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P Inhibits Bombesin-induced Mitogenic Signal Transduction Mediated by
Both Gq and G12 in Swiss 3T3 Cells*
James
Sinnett-Smith
,
Chintda
Santiskulvong
,
Javier
Duque, and
Enrique
Rozengurt§
From the Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Molecular
Biology Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1786
Received for publication, May 2, 2000, and in revised form, June 29, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Substance P (SP) analogues including
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
are broad spectrum neuropeptide antagonists and potential anticancer agents, but their mechanism of action is not fully understood. Here, we
examined the mechanism of action of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
as an inhibitor of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signal
transduction and cellular DNA synthesis in Swiss 3T3 cells. Addition of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
at 10 µM, caused a striking rightward shift in the
dose-response curves of DNA synthesis induced by bombesin, bradykinin,
or vasopressin and markedly inhibited the activation of
p42mapk (ERK-2) and p44mapk (ERK-1) induced by
these GPCR agonists. In addition, this SP analogue also prevented the
protein kinase C-dependent activation of protein kinase D
induced by these agonists.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
at a concentration (10 µM) that inhibited these
Gq-mediated events, also prevented GPCR agonist-induced
responses mediated through the G proteins of the G12
subfamily. These include bombesin-induced assembly of focal adhesions,
formation of parallel arrays of actin stress fibers, increase in the
tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK),
p130Cas, and paxillin, and formation of a complex between
FAK and Src. We conclude that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
acts as a mitogenic antagonist of neuropeptide GPCRs blocking signal
transduction via both Gq and G12.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Neuropeptides stimulate DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in
cultured cells and are implicated as growth factors in a variety of
fundamental processes including development, inflammation, tissue
regeneration, and neoplastic transformation (1, 2). In particular,
bombesin and its mammalian counterpart gastrin-releasing peptide
(GRP)1 bind to a G
protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) (3, 4) that promotes
G
q-mediated activation of
isoforms of phospholipase C (5-7) to produce two second messengers as follows: inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate that mobilizes Ca2+ from internal
stores and diacylglycerol that activates PKC (8-10). The bombesin/GRP
GPCR also interacts with members of the G12 family leading
to rapid Rho-dependent assembly of focal adhesions,
formation of actin stress fibers, and an increase in tyrosine
phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins including the non-receptor
tyrosine kinase FAK and the adaptor proteins paxillin and
p130Cas (10-17). Subsequently, bombesin induces striking
activation of serine phosphorylation cascades including
p42mapk/p44mapk (18-21) leading to
increased expression of immediate early response genes, stimulation of
cell cycle events, and subsequent cell proliferation (10, 22-25).
Neuropeptides and their receptors are implicated as autocrine growth
factors for small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), one of the most
clinically aggressive human cancers (26). SCLC cells secrete and
respond mitogenically to multiple neuropeptides including bombesin/GRP,
bradykinin, cholecystokinin, galanin, gastrin, neurotensin, and
vasopressin (26-29). Neuropeptides have also been implicated as
autocrine and/or paracrine growth factors for other common solid tumors
including colon, breast, prostate, and pancreas (30-34). Consequently,
antagonists capable of blocking the biological effects of multiple
neuropeptides (e.g. broad spectrum neuropeptide antagonists) could provide a novel approach to the treatment of SCLC and other human
cancers in which multiple neuropeptides are involved as growth factors.
Substance P (SP) analogues including
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
and
[Arg6,D-Trp7,9,MePhe8]SP
(6-11) inhibit the activation of signal transduction pathways and the
mitogenic action of a range of neuropeptides structurally unrelated to
SP in mouse Swiss 3T3 cells (20, 35-37). These broad spectrum
neuropeptide antagonists also inhibit the proliferation of SCLC cell
lines in liquid culture, in soft agar, and as xenografts in nude mice
(35, 36, 38-41). As a result,
[Arg6,D-Trp7,9,MePhe8]SP
(6-11) has entered into a phase I clinical trial. More recently, a
more potent neuropeptide antagonist,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
has been identified that also inhibits signal transduction and cell
proliferation (20, 39). Since broad spectrum neuropeptide antagonists
could provide a novel approach to the treatment of SCLC and other solid
cancers, an understanding of their mechanism of action will be critical
for their further development.
Several models have been proposed to explain the molecular mechanism(s)
by which agonists promote GPCR activation (see Ref. 42 for review). The
widely used conformational selection model envisages that GPCRs cycle
spontaneously (i.e. in the absence of ligand) between
different conformational states: the inactive (R) and the
active (R*) state (42). Agonists are thought to stabilize
the active conformation of the receptor thereby increasing the
probability for receptor-mediated activation of G protein (42).
Receptors capable of activating two different G proteins
(e.g. the bombesin/GRP receptor that interacts with Gq and G12) have been proposed to exist in
three conformational states as follows: an inactive state that is
favored energetically in the absence of agonist (R), a state
that activates G12 (R*1) and a state
that activates Gq (R*2). In this
context, Jarpe and collaborators (43) proposed recently that SP
analogues act in a novel manner, stabilizing the active conformation of
the bombesin/GRP receptor that interacts with G12 and
proportionally reducing the receptor population that interacts with
Gq. In the framework of this model, SP analogues would act as agonists for G12-mediated events and as antagonists for
Gq-mediated events. It was further suggested that the
inhibitory effect of broad spectrum SP antagonists on
neuropeptide-stimulated cell proliferation could result, at least in
part, from the disruption of the coordinated signaling that normally
emanates from GPCRs. In support of this model, Jarpe et al.
(43) demonstrated that [D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP,
a less potent analogue of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
induced actin reorganization and assembly of focal adhesions. Our
previous results, however, lead us to conclude that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
coordinately inhibits signal transduction pathways activated by
bombesin and other neuropeptides, but focal adhesion assembly and actin
remodeling were not evaluated (20, 39).
The experiments presented here were designed to examine the mechanism
of action of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
as an inhibitor of neuropeptide-mediated signal transduction and
cellular DNA synthesis. Specifically, we examined whether this
synthetic peptide antagonist, at concentrations that selectively inhibit neuropeptide-induced DNA synthesis and ERK activation, acts as
an agonist of G12-mediated events including assembly of focal adhesions, formation of stress fibers, and tyrosine
phosphorylation of the focal adhesion proteins FAK,
p130Cas, and paxillin. On the basis of the results
presented here, we conclude that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
acts as a mitogenic antagonist of neuropeptide GPCRs blocking signal
transduction via both Gq and G12.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
Stock cultures of Swiss 3T3 cells were
maintained in DMEM, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in a
humidified atmosphere containing 10% CO2 and 90% air at
37 °C. For experimental purposes, Swiss 3T3 cells were plated in
100-mm dishes at 6 × 105 cells/dish or 35-mm dishes
at 1 × 105 cells/dish in DMEM containing 10% fetal
bovine serum and used after 6-8 days when the cells were confluent and quiescent.
Immunoprecipitation--
Quiescent cultures of Swiss 3T3 cells
(1-2 × 106 cells) were washed twice with DMEM and
incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with or without
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,D-Leu11]Substance
P as indicated. Bombesin (1 nM) and other agonists were
then added, and the cultures were incubated for a further 10 min at
37 °C. The stimulation was terminated on ice by aspirating the
medium and solubilizing the cells. For the immunoprecipitation of FAK
and p130Cas and paxillin the cells were lysed with 1 ml of
ice-cold lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1%
Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM NaF, and 1 mM
4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride. For the
immunoprecipitation of Src-FAK complexes the above lysis buffer was
supplemented with 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 10% glycerol.
For the immunoprecipitation of PKD the cells were lysed with a lysis
buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 (44).
Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, and
the pellets were discarded. After centrifugation, supernatants were
transferred to fresh tubes, and proteins were immunoprecipitated at
4 °C for 4 h with protein A-agarose linked to the desired
antibody, PA-1 antipeptide antiserum for PKD, polyclonal anti-FAK or
anti-Src family (SRC-2) antibodies as described previously (12,
45-47), or anti-mouse IgG-agarose-linked mAb to p130Cas or
paxillin. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer
and extracted in 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1 mM EDTA, 6% SDS, 2 mM
EDTA, 4% 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol). The samples were boiled
for 10 min and resolved by 8% SDS-PAGE.
Western Blotting--
After SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred
to Immobilon-P membranes. After transfer, membranes were blocked using
5% nonfat dried milk in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.2, and
incubated for at least 2 h at 22 °C with the desired antibodies
diluted in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.2, containing 3% nonfat
dried milk. Bound primary antibodies to immunoreactive bands were
visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies.
Assay of p42mapk (ERK-2) and p44mapk
(ERK-1) Activation--
Quiescent cultures of Swiss 3T3 cells grown on
35-mm dishes were washed twice with DMEM and incubated for 5 min at
37 °C with or without
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,D-Leu11]Substance
P as indicated. The cultures were then treated with various agonists as
indicated and incubated for a further 5 min at 37 °C. The
stimulation was terminated on ice by aspirating the medium and
solubilizing the cells with 200 µl of 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The
samples were boiled for 10 min, resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and
transferred to Immobilon-P membranes.
Activation of p42mapk and p44mapk occurs
through phosphorylation of specific threonine and tyrosine residues
(48) resulting in slower migrating forms in SDS-PAGE gels. These
activated forms were monitored by using a specific
anti-phospho-p44/p42mapk-mAb (New England Biolabs) that
recognizes only the activated forms phosphorylated on Thr-202 and
Tyr-204.
Kinase Assay of PKD--
The kinase activity of PKD was
determined in an in vitro kinase assay by mixing 20 µl of
immunocomplexes with 10 µl of a phosphorylation mixture containing
(final concentration) 100 µM [
-32P]ATP
(specific activity 400-600 cpm/pmol), 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM DTT.
After 10 min of incubation at 30 °C, the reaction was stopped by
washing with 1 ml of kinase buffer and then adding 200 µl equal
volume of 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, pH
6.8, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1 M
Na3VO4, 6% SDS, 10% glycerol, and 4%
2-mercaptoethanol), followed by SDS-PAGE analysis. The gels were dried,
and the 110-kDa radioactive band corresponding to autophosphorylated
PKD (44) was visualized by autoradiography.
DNA Synthesis Measurements--
Confluent and quiescent cultures
of Swiss 3T3 cells were washed twice with DMEM and incubated with
DMEM/Waymouth's medium (1:1, v/v) containing
[3H]thymidine (1 µCi/ml, 1 µM) and
various additions as described in the figure legends. After 40 h
of incubation at 37 °C, cultures were washed twice with PBS and
incubated in 5% trichloroacetic acid at 4 °C for 20 min to remove
acid-soluble radioactivity, washed with ethanol, and solubilized in 1 ml of 2% Na2CO3 and 0.1 M NaOH.
The acid-insoluble radioactivity was determined by scintillation
counting in 6 ml of Beckman Readysafe.
Immunostaining of Cells--
Swiss 3T3 cells in 35-mm dishes
were washed with serum-free DMEM and treated with agonists and/or
inhibitors at 37 °C as indicated. For staining of actin, cells were
washed twice with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min
at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for
10 min at room temperature, and blocked with 10% fetal bovine serum in
PBS. The cells were then incubated with TRITC-conjugated phalloidin
(0.25 µg/ml) in PBS for 10 min at room temperature and washed five
times with PBS. In order to visualize focal adhesions, Swiss 3T3 cells were fixed, permeabilized as described above, and incubated with anti-vinculin mAb (dilution 1:100) for 2 h at room temperature. Cells were subsequently washed three times with PBS and then incubated with FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG as second antibody at a dilution of
1:100 for another 30 min at room temperature. Immunofluorescence was
visualized in both cases using a Zeiss immunofluorescence microscope.
Images were collected with a 63× lens (Zeiss Plan Apochromat, NA1.4).
Materials--
Bombesin, bradykinin, vasopressin,
Pasteurella multocida toxin, anti-vinculin mAb, and
TRITC-conjugated phalloidin were obtained from Sigma. ECL reagents were
from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
and
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
were obtained from Bachem. FAK polyclonal Ab C-20, Src polyclonal Ab,
and Tyr(P) monoclonal Ab PY20 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa
Cruz, CA). Anti-p130Cas and paxillin monoclonal Abs were
from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). The phosphospecific
antibody to tyrosine 397 of FAK was obtained from
BIOSOURCE International (Camarillo, CA). The
anti-phospho-p44/p42mapk-mAb (E10) was from New England
Biolabs (Beverly, MA). All other reagents used were of the purest grade available.
 |
RESULTS |
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
Selectively Inhibits Neuropeptide-induced DNA Synthesis--
To
examine whether
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
preferentially inhibits the mitogenic activity of
neuropeptide-activated GPCRs, quiescent cultures of Swiss 3T3
cells, arrested in the G0 phase of the cell cycle, were
transferred to serum-free media supplemented with [3H]thymidine and increasing concentrations of
growth-promoting agonists either in the absence or in the presence of
10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP.
The cumulative incorporation of radiolabeled precursor into DNA was
measured after 40 h of incubation.
Addition of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
caused a striking rightward shift in the dose-response curves of DNA
synthesis induced by bombesin, bradykinin, and vasopressin which act
via distinct GPCRs (Fig. 1). The
inhibitory effect was reversed at the higher concentrations of each
peptide agonist (Fig. 1A), suggesting that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
inhibits the mitogenic activity of neuropeptides in a competitive fashion.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P preferentially inhibits the mitogenic activity of
neuropeptide-activated GPCRs. A, bombesin, bradykinin,
and vasopressin dose-response relationships in the absence ( ) and
presence ( ) of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. Confluent and quiescent cultures of Swiss 3T3 cells were washed and
incubated at 37 °C in 2 ml of DMEM/Waymouth's medium containing 1 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine and either increasing
concentrations of bombesin (with 100 ng/ml insulin) or bradykinin (with
500 ng/ml insulin) or vasopressin (with 100 ng/ml insulin) either in
the absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. B, EGF, PDGF, PDBu, and PGF2 dose-response
relationships in the absence ( ) and presence ( ) of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. Confluent and quiescent cultures of Swiss 3T3 cells were washed and
incubated at 37 °C in 2 ml of DMEM/Waymouth's medium containing
containing 1 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine and increasing
concentrations of EGF (with 100 ng/ml insulin), PDGF, PDBu (with 100 ng/ml insulin), or PGF2 (with 100 ng/ml insulin) either
in the absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. After 40 h, DNA synthesis was assessed by measuring the
[3H]thymidine incorporated into acid-precipitable
material. Results are expressed as a percentage of the incorporation
induced by the highest concentration of agonists, and data are shown as
the mean ± S.E. (n = 3).
|
|
In contrast,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
did not interfere with the mitogenic effect induced via EGF or PDGF
tyrosine kinase receptors or by pharmacological agents that directly
activate signal transduction pathways bypassing receptors including the
biologically active phorbol ester phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu), a
direct activator of the classic and novel isoforms of PKC (Fig.
1B), or the P. multocida toxin, a potent mitogen
that activates Gq (results not shown). Similarly, exposure
to
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
did not affect DNA synthesis stimulated by PGF2
which acts through a GPCR coupled to Gq (49, 50). Taken together, the results presented in Fig. 1 substantiate the notion that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
selectively targets GPCRs for mitogenic neuropeptides.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
Selectively Inhibits Neuropeptide-induced ERK Activation--
In order
to test further the selectivity of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
as an inhibitor of neuropeptide-mediated mitogenic signals, we also
determined the effect of this synthetic peptide on early activation of
p42mapk (ERK-2) and p44mapk (ERK-1) induced by
multiple agonists. To examine ERK activation, lysates of Swiss 3T3
cells incubated for 5 min in the absence or in the presence of 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
and subsequently challenged with multiple stimuli were analyzed by
immunoblotting using a site-specific antibody that recognizes the
dually phosphorylated (active) forms of ERK-1 and ERK-2.
As shown in Fig. 2, ERK activation
induced by stimulation with 1 nM bombesin, 5 nM
vasopressin, or 5 nM bradykinin was dramatically reduced by
exposure of the cells to 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP.
In contrast, ERK activation induced by either PDGF (2.5 ng/ml) or EGF
(2.5 ng/ml) was not affected by addition of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
at an identical concentration. Similarly, prior exposure to
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
did not affect ERK activation via direct stimulation of PKC with PDBu
or through the Gq-coupled receptor for
PGF2
.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P preferentially inhibits the ERK activation of neuropeptide-activated
GPCRs. A, inhibition of ERK activation induced by
bombesin, bradykinin, and vasopressin by
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. Confluent and quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells were washed twice with DMEM
and incubated for 5 min with 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. Cells were subsequently challenged with bombesin (1 nM),
bradykinin (5 nM), or vasopressin (5 nM) for 5 min. B-D,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P does not inhibit ERK activation induced by EGF, PDGF, PDBu, and
PGF2 . Confluent and quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells were
washed twice with DMEM and incubated for 5 min with 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. Cells were then challenged with EGF (2.5 ng/ml), PDGF (1 ng/ml),
PDBu (at the indicated concentrations), or PGF2 (at the
indicated concentrations) for 5 min. Cells were then lysed in 2×
SDS-PAGE sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with
phospho-ERK antibody as described under "Experimental Procedures."
The results presented here are typical of three independent
experiments.
|
|
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
Prevents Gq-mediated PKD Activation--
PKD/PKCµ is a
serine/threonine protein kinase (51, 52) with structural,
enzymological, and regulatory properties distinct from other members of
the PKC family (53). PKD is rapidly activated by a variety of
neuropeptide agonists including bombesin, bradykinin, and vasopressin
that signal through heptahelical receptors coupled to Gq
(54-56). Recent results indicate that G
q activation is
sufficient to stimulate sustained PKD activation via PKC and show that
the endogenous G
q mediates PKD activation in response to
acute bombesin receptor stimulation (56). Here, we determined the
effect of [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
on bombesin-stimulated PKD activation.
Confluent and quiescent cultures of Swiss 3T3 cells, treated with or
without increasing concentrations of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
were stimulated with bombesin for 10 min and lysed, and PKD was
immunoprecipitated with an antibody directed against the 15 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of this enzyme. The immunocomplexes were
incubated with [
-32P]ATP and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and autoradiography to examine the level of autophosphorylation. As
illustrated by Fig. 3 and in agreement
with previous results, stimulation of Swiss 3T3 cells with bombesin
induced a striking increase in PKD activity that was maintained during
cell disruption and immunoprecipitation. Shown in Fig. 3, for the first
time, treatment of the cells with [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
blocked PKD activation induced by subsequent addition of bombesin, in a
concentration-dependent fashion. Half-maximal inhibition was achieved at 7 µM, and addition of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
at 20 µM inhibited bombesin-induced PKD activation by
~90%. This SP analogue also prevented PKD activation induced by
stimulation with either bradykinin or vasopressin (Fig.
3B).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits PKD activation by bombesin, bradykinin, and
vasopressin. A, confluent and quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells
were washed twice with DMEM and incubated for 5 min with increasing
concentrations of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P (SP analogue), as indicated. The cells were then stimulated with 10 nM bombesin for 10 min at 37 °C and lysed. The lysates
were immunoprecipitated with PA-1 antiserum and PKD activity in the
immunocomplexes was determined by autophosphorylation as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The autoradiogram shown is
representative of two independent experiments. The results are
expressed as a percentage of the maximal activation obtained with
bombesin in the absence of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. B, the experimental conditions were identical to those
described in A except that the cells were stimulated with
either 10 nM bradykinin (BRK) or 10 nM vasopressin (VP) instead of bombesin.
|
|
Effect of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
on G12-mediated Events, Assembly of Focal Adhesions, and
Formation of Stress Fibers--
The preceding results indicate that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
selectively targets neuropeptide-mediated signals. Recently, it has been proposed that antagonists of this class act in a novel manner, stabilizing the active conformation of GPCR that interacts with G12, thereby acting as an agonist for
G12-mediated events but as an antagonist for
Gq-mediated events (43). In order to test this hypothesis,
we determined the effect of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
on cellular responses stimulated by bombesin receptor via the
subunits of the G12 subfamily.
Activated G
12 and G
13 (which comprise the
G12 subfamily) are known to induce Rho activation (15,
57-60) via recruitment and activation of a GDP/GTP exchange factor
(61) and to promote Rho-dependent stress fiber formation
and focal adhesion assembly in Swiss 3T3 cells (15, 62). Consequently,
if
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
acts as a selective G12 agonist, it should induce focal
adhesion assembly and stress fiber formation at concentrations that
inhibit mitogenic signaling in Swiss 3T3 cells. To test this
prediction, quiescent cultures of these cells were preincubated in the
absence or in the presence of 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
challenged with or without bombesin and then fixed. Focal adhesions were visualized by staining with anti-vinculin mAb (Fig. 4), and the organization of the actin
cytoskeleton was revealed with TRITC-phalloidin (Fig.
5).

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits assembly of focal adhesions in Swiss 3T3 cells induced by
bombesin. Confluent and quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells were washed and
preincubated without ( ) or with (SP analogue) 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P for 5 min at 37 °C and then challenged for a further 10 min either
in the absence ( ) or the presence (Bom) of 1 nM bombesin. Cells were then washed, fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. Focal
adhesions were visualized by staining with vinculin mAb followed by
FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG and visualized using a Zeiss fluorescence
microscope as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results
are typical of three independent experiments.
|
|

View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits the formation of actin stress fibers in cells induced by
bombesin. Confluent and quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells were washed and
preincubated without ( ) or with (SP analogue) 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P for 5 min at 37 °C and then incubated for a further 10 min either
in the absence( ) or the presence (Bom) of 1 nM
bombesin. Cells were then washed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and
permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. Focal adhesions were visualized
by staining with TRITC-conjugated phalloidin (0.25 µg/ml) for 10 min
and visualized using a Zeiss fluorescence microscope as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Results are typical of five independent
experiments.
|
|
Quiescent cultures of Swiss 3T3 cells exhibited only very few focal
adhesions. As expected, stimulation with 1 nM bombesin induced a dramatic increase in the assembly of well defined,
pear-shaped focal adhesions (Fig. 4) and in the formation of parallel
arrays of actin stress fibers (Fig. 5). In contrast, pretreatment of the cells with
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
at 10 µM, a concentration that markedly inhibited
neuropeptide-mediated Gq signaling and DNA synthesis (Figs.
1-3), did not induce a significant increase in the formation of either
focal adhesions (Fig. 4) or stress fibers (Fig. 5). The salient feature
of these experiments is that pretreatment of the cells with 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
strikingly prevented the assembly of focal adhesions (Fig. 4) and the
increase in actin stress fibers induced by bombesin (Fig. 5). The
findings presented in Figs. 4 and 5 are inconsistent with the
hypothesis that predicts that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
induces G12-mediated events at concentrations that
block Gq-mediated signaling.
Inhibitory Effect of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
on Additional G12-mediated Events, Tyrosine Phosphorylation
of FAK, p130Cas, and Paxillin--
G
12 and
G
13 also mediate the increase in the tyrosine
phosphorylation of FAK, paxillin, and p130Cas through a
Rho-dependent pathway (16). Consequently, if
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
acts as a selective G12 agonist, this synthetic peptide
should induce tyrosine phosphorylation of these focal adhesion
proteins, at concentrations that prevent Gq-mediated
signaling. In order to test this prediction, lysates of Swiss 3T3 cells
treated with or without 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
and challenged with or without bombesin were immunoprecipitated with
anti-FAK antibody. The immune complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
followed by Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) mAb. As shown in Fig.
6 (A and B),
addition of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
at 10 µM did not promote FAK tyrosine phosphorylation
but, in contrast, dramatically inhibited (~90%) the increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK induced by bombesin.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK, phosphorylation of FAK at
Tyr-397, and the formation of the Src·FAK complex induced by
bombesin. A,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK induced by bombesin.
Confluent and quiescent cells were washed and incubated for 5 min at
37 °C without ( ) or with (+) 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P (SP analogue). Cells were then stimulated with 1 nM bombesin (Bom) for 10 min at 37 °C and
lysed. The lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FAK polyclonal
antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting
using an anti-Tyr(P) mAb as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Result shown are representative of four independent
experiments. B, scanning densitometry. The results shown are
the values (mean ± S.E.; n = 4) obtained by
scanning densitometry, expressed as a percentage of the maximal FAK
phosphorylation obtained with 1 nM bombesin in the absence
of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. All other experimental details are as described under
"Experimental Procedures." C,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits phosphorylation of FAK at Tyr-397 and the formation of the
Src·FAK complex induced by bombesin. Confluent and quiescent cells
were washed and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C without ( ) or with
(+) 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P (SP analogue). Cells were then stimulated with 1 nM bombesin for 10 min at 37 °C and lysed. The lysates
were immunoprecipitated with either anti-FAK or anti-Src polyclonal
antibody as indicated, and the immunoprecipitates were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes.
Phosphorylation of Tyr-397 in the FAK immunoprecipitates was detected
by Western blotting using a phosphospecific polyclonal antibody
(FAK 397). The formation of an Src·FAK complex in the Src
immunoprecipitates (Src I.P.) was detected by Western
blotting using an anti-FAK polyclonal antibody (FAK). All
other details are as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
Extensive evidence indicates that FAK translocation to nascent focal
adhesions promotes its autophosphorylation as a result of clustering
and/or conformational changes. Because the major site of FAK
autophosphorylation, Tyr-397, is a potential high affinity binding site
for the SH2 domain of Src, the phosphorylation of this site in response
to GPCR activation facilitates the formation of a FAK/Src signaling
complex (63). In order to test further whether
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
acts as an agonist for G12-mediated events, we examined the effect of this synthetic peptide on bombesin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK at Tyr-397 and on Src·FAK complex
formation which depends on the tyrosine phosphorylation of Tyr-397. The results, shown in Fig. 6C, indicate that treatment with 10 µM [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
neither induced a significant increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK at Tyr-397 nor promoted Src·FAK complex formation. In
contrast, exposure to this SP analogue strikingly inhibited the
increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK at Tyr-397 and the
formation of a complex between Src and FAK induced by bombesin.
In order to substantiate the results obtained with FAK, we examined the
effect of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
on bombesin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the adaptor proteins
p130Cas and paxillin. As illustrated by Fig.
7, addition of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
at 10 µM did not induce tyrosine phosphorylation of
either p130Cas or paxillin. In contrast, this SP analogue
markedly inhibited the increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of
p130Cas and paxillin induced by bombesin. Taken together,
our results support the conclusion that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
(at 10 µM) acts as an antagonist that coordinately
prevents GPCR-induced events mediated by either Gq or
G12.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of p130Cas and paxillin
induced by bombesin. A,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of p130Cas induced by
bombesin. Confluent and quiescent cells were washed and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C without ( ) or with (+) 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P (SP analogue). Cells were then stimulated with 1 nM bombesin (Bom) for 10 min at 37 °C and
lysed. The lysates were immunoprecipitated with an
anti-p130Cas mAb, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed
by Western blotting using an anti-Tyr(P) mAb as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Result shown are representative of three
independent experiments. B, scanning densitometry. The
results shown are the values (mean ± S.E. n = 3)
obtained by scanning densitometry, expressed as a percentage of the
maximal p130Cas phosphorylation obtained with 1 nM bombesin. All experimental details are as described
under "Experimental Procedures." C,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin induced by bombesin.
Confluent and quiescent cells were washed and incubated for 5 min at
37 °C without ( ) or with (+) 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P (SP analogue). Cells were then stimulated with 1 nM bombesin for 10 min at 37 °C and lysed. The lysates
were immunoprecipitated with an anti-paxillin mAb, and the
immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting using an
anti-Tyr(P) mAb as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Results shown are representative of three independent experiments.
D, scanning densitometry. The results shown are the
values (mean ± S.E. n = 3) obtained by scanning
densitometry, expressed as a percentage of the maximal paxillin
phosphorylation obtained with 1 nM bombesin. All
other experimental details are described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
Inhibits Focal Adhesion Assembly and Tyrosine Phosphorylation of FAK
and Paxillin Induced by Bombesin--
The results presented here
appear to contrast with those reported previously by Jarpe et
al. (43) who demonstrated that [D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP,
a less potent analogue of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
induced actin reorganization and focal adhesion assembly. However,
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
promoted these responses at concentrations higher than those used
in the present study, and the possibility that this SP analogue, at a
lower concentration, could also inhibit G12-mediated
events, as shown here with
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
was not explored. In an effort to reconcile these discrepancies, we
determined the effect of
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
on bombesin-induced focal adhesion assembly and tyrosine
phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin.
As shown in Fig. 8, treatment with 20 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
neither promoted focal adhesion assembly nor induced a significant increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin. In
contrast, exposure to this SP analogue markedly inhibited the increase
in focal adhesion assembly and tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and
paxillin induced by bombesin stimulation (Fig. 8). Thus,
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP,
like
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
inhibited focal adhesion assembly and tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK
and paxillin.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits assembly of focal adhesions and tyrosine phosphorylation of
FAK and paxillin induced by bombesin. A, confluent and
quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells were washed and preincubated without ( ) or
with 20 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]Substance
P for 5 min at 37 °C and then challenged for a further 10 min either
in the absence ( ) or the presence of 1 nM bombesin
(Bom). Cells were then washed, fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. Focal
adhesions were visualized by staining with vinculin mAb followed by
FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG and visualized using a Zeiss fluorescence
microscope as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results
are typical of three independent experiments. B,
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]Substance
P inhibits tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin induced by
bombesin. Confluent and quiescent cells were washed and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C without ( ) or with (+) 20 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]Substance
P. Cells were then stimulated with 1 nM bombesin
(Bom) for 10 min at 37 °C and lysed. The lysates were
either immunoprecipitated with an anti-FAK mAb or anti-Tyr(P) mAb. The
FAK immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting using an
anti-Tyr(P) mAb, and the anti-Tyr(P) mAbs were analyzed by Western
blotting using an anti-paxillin mAb as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Result shown are representative of four independent
experiments. C, scanning densitometry. The results shown are
the values (mean ± S.E. n = 4) obtained by
scanning densitometry, expressed as a percentage of the maximal FAK or
paxillin phosphorylation obtained with 1 nM bombesin. All
experimental details are as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
Stimulates Morphological Responses and Tyrosine Phosphorylation of FAK
and Paxillin at High Concentrations--
We also examined the effect
of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
on focal adhesion assembly and tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and
paxillin at concentrations higher than 10 µM. As shown in
Fig. 9, exposure of Swiss 3T3 cells to 50 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
promoted the assembly of only few focal adhesions and caused actin
cytoskeletal changes that were not equivalent to the parallel arrays of
stress fibers induced by bombesin (results not shown). Furthermore,
addition of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
at 50 µM induced a low level of tyrosine phosphorylation
of FAK and paxillin as compared with the effect induced by bombesin in
parallel cultures. Interestingly, exposure of the cells to [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
at 50 µM markedly reduced the assembly of focal adhesions and the increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins
induced by bombesin. We conclude that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
acts as an antagonist of neuropeptide GPCRs that signal via both
Gq and G12, but at higher concentrations, this
synthetic peptide induces additional effects that lead to limited
assembly of focal adhesions and to a low level of tyrosine
phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of high concentrations of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P on assembly of focal adhesions and tyrosine phosphorylation of focal
adhesion proteins. A, effect of high concentrations of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P on assembly of focal adhesions in Swiss 3T3 cells challenged with or
without bombesin. Confluent and quiescent Swiss 3T3 cells were washed
and preincubated without ( ) or with (SP analogue) 50 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P for 5 min at 37 °C. The cells were then incubated for a further 10 min either in the absence ( ) or the presence of 1 nM
bombesin (Bom). Cells were then washed, fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100. Focal
adhesions were visualized by staining with vinculin mAb followed by
FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG and visualized using a Zeiss fluorescence
microscope as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results
are typical of three independent experiments. B, effect of
50 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P on tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin in Swiss 3T3 cells
challenged with or without bombesin. Confluent and quiescent cells were
washed and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C without ( ) or with (+) 50 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance
P (SP analogue). Cells were then stimulated with 1 nM bombesin for 10 min at 37 °C and lysed. The lysates
were immunoprecipitated with either anti-FAK polyclonal antibody or
paxillin mAb, and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western
blotting using an anti-Tyr(P) mAb described under "Experimental
Procedures." Result shown are representative of three independent
experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
SP analogues including
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
and
[Arg6,D-Trp7,9,MePhe8]SP
(6-11) are an interesting class of agents that inhibit the activation
of signal transduction pathways and the mitogenic action of a range of
neuropeptides structurally unrelated to SP. These synthetic peptides
also inhibit the proliferation of human cancer cells both in
vitro and in nude mice and have entered in phase I clinical
trials. Consequently, the mechanism of action of these agents is
attracting considerable interest.
Jarpe and collaborators (43) proposed recently that broad spectrum SP
antagonists act in a novel manner, stabilizing the active conformation
of GPCR that interacts with G12, thereby acting as an
agonist for G12-mediated events but as an antagonist for Gq-mediated events. It was further suggested that the
inhibitory effect of these synthetic peptides on
neuropeptide-stimulated cell proliferation could result, at least in
part, from the disruption of the coordinated signaling that normally
emanates from the GPCRs. Our own results, however, lead us to conclude
that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
and other agents of this class coordinately inhibit signal transduction
pathways activated by neuropeptides (20, 39). In the present study we
attempted to distinguish between these alternative mechanisms of
action. Specifically, we examined whether [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
used at a concentration that inhibits neuropeptide-induced DNA
synthesis, ERK activation, and PKC-dependent PKD
activation, acts as a selective agonist of G12-mediated events.
It is well established that GPCR-induced increases in tyrosine
phosphorylation of FAK, paxillin, and p130Cas are
downstream of Rho activation, stress fiber formation, and focal
adhesion assembly (64-70). Activated G
12 and
G
13 are known to induce Rho activation (15, 57-59) via
recruitment and activation of a GDP/GTP exchange factor (61) and to
promote Rho-dependent stress fiber formation and focal
adhesion assembly in Swiss 3T3 cells (15, 62). Furthermore, activated
G
12 and G
13 stimulate tyrosine
phosphorylation of FAK, paxillin, and p130Cas via Rho (16).
Taken together, these findings indicate the existence of a signal
transduction pathway whereby agonist occupation of GPCRs activates
G
12 and/or G
13 leading to
Rho-dependent formation of actin stress fibers and assembly
of focal adhesions resulting in the recruitment of FAK to focal
adhesions and in the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK, paxillin, and
p130Cas. In order to elucidate whether
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
promotes the selective activation of this pathway, we examined in the
present study the effects of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
on the assembly of focal adhesions, the formation of actin stress
fibers, and the tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK, paxillin, and
p130Cas.
Our results demonstrate that pretreatment of Swiss 3T3 cells with 10 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
a concentration that markedly inhibited neuropeptide-mediated Gq signaling and DNA synthesis, did not induce a
significant increase in the formation of either focal adhesions or
stress fibers. In contrast, pretreatment with
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
strikingly prevented the assembly of focal adhesions and the increase
in actin stress fibers induced by bombesin. Furthermore, our results
also demonstrate that treatment with
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
neither induced a significant increase in the overall tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK nor induced tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK at
Tyr-397, the major autophosphorylation site in this enzyme. Accordingly, exposure to
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
did not promote Src·FAK complex formation. Similarly,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
did not induce tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin or
p130Cas. A salient feature of the results presented here is
that treatment with
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
dramatically inhibited the increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of
these focal adhesion proteins induced by bombesin. Thus,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
at a concentration that inhibits Gq signaling and
mitogenesis by neuropeptides, also prevents G12-mediated
events including focal adhesion assembly, stress fiber formation, and
tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins.
Jarpe et al. (43) demonstrated that
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP,
a less potent analogue of
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
induced actin reorganization and focal adhesion assembly at
concentrations higher than that used in the present study. A possible
explanation for the apparent discrepancy between our results obtained
with
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
and those with
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
is that a single amino acid change at position 5 from
D-Phe5 to
D-Trp5 is responsible for the drastic change in
the properties of these antagonists. However, Jarpe et al.
(43) did not examine the possibility that
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP,
at a lower concentration, could also inhibit G12-mediated events, as shown here with
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP.
In the present study, we show that
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP
(at 20 µM) markedly inhibited bombesin-induced assembly
of focal adhesions and tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin. Furthermore, we could also demonstrate that exposure of Swiss 3T3 cells
to 50 µM
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
promoted cytoskeletal rearrangements, formation of some focal adhesions, and a low level of tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion-associated proteins. These effects were much less prominent than those induced by bombesin in parallel cultures, and even at these
concentrations, the SP analogue markedly reduced the assembly of focal
adhesions and the tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins
induced by bombesin.
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP,
at high concentrations, may act as a low affinity partial agonist of an
as yet unidentified GPCR expressed in Swiss 3T3 cells stabilizing an
intermediate receptor conformation as suggested by the sequential
binding model proposed by Gether and Kobilka (42). This sequential
binding model takes into account structural and kinetic studies that
are not readily accommodated by the conformational selection model.
Alternatively,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
could induce cellular effects via non-receptor pathways since SP
analogues are known to insert into lipid membranes (71), and these
charged and lypophilic peptides can directly modulate G protein
activity (72).
In conclusion,
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
acts as a broad spectrum mitogenic antagonist of neuropeptide GPCRs
blocking signal transduction via both Gq and
G12. However, at higher concentrations, this synthetic peptide induces additional effects that lead to a low level of focal
adhesions and a low level of tyrosine phosphorylation of focal
adhesion-associated proteins. These findings are not compatible with
the hypothesis that
[D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]SP
stabilizes a bombesin receptor conformation that interacts selectively
with G12 but indicate that this SP analogue inhibits bombesin signaling mediated by both Gq and
G12.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Richard Waldron and Cliff Hurd
for helpful comments and suggestions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from the Margaret E. Early Medical Research Trust.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
§
Ronald S. Hirshberg professor of Translational Pancreatic Cancer
Research. To whom correspondence should be addressed: 900 Veteran Ave.,
Warren Hall Rm. 11-124, Dept. of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los
Angeles, CA 90095-1786. Tel.: 310-794-6610; Fax: 310-267-2399; E-mail:
erozengurt@mednet.ucla.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 3, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003702200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GRP, gastrin-releasing peptide;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
FAK, focal adhesion kinase;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
Ab, antibody;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PDBu, phorbol
12,13-dibutyrate;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor;
PKC, protein
kinase C;
SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma;
mapk, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
SP, Substance P;
TRITC, tetramethylrhodamine B
isothiocyanate;
PKD, protein kinase D;
PGF2
, prostaglandin F2
.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rozengurt, E.
(1986)
Science
234,
161-166
|
| 2.
|
Rozengurt, E.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
G177-G182
|
| 3.
|
Battey, J. F.,
Way, J. M.,
Corjay, M. H.,
Shapira, H.,
Kusano, K.,
Harkins, R.,
Wu, W. J. M.,
Slattery, T.,
Mann, E.,
and Feldman, R. I.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
395-399
|
| 4.
|
Zachary, I.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
3947-3950
|
| 5.
|
Offermanns, S.,
Heiler, E.,
Spicher, K.,
and Schultz, G.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
349,
201-204
|
| 6.
|
Hellmich, M. R.,
Battey, J. F.,
and Northup, J. K.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
751-756
|
| 7.
|
Jian, X.,
Sainz, E.,
Clark, W. A.,
Jensen, R. T.,
Battey, J. F.,
and Northup, J. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11573-11581
|
| 8.
|
Nånberg, E.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2741-2747
|
| 9.
|
Erusalimsky, J. D.,
Friedberg, I.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
19188-19194
|
| 10.
|
Charlesworth, A.,
Broad, S.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
1337-1345
|
| 11.
|
Ridley, A. J.,
and Hall, A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
389-399
|
| 12.
|
Zachary, I.,
Sinnett-Smith, J.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19031-19034
|
| 13.
|
Sinnett-Smith, J.,
Zachary, I.,
Valverde, A. M.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14261-14268
|
| 14.
|
Rodríguez-Fernández, J. L.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19321-19328
|
| 15.
|
Buhl, A. M.,
Johnson, N. L.,
Dhanasekaran, N.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24631-24634
|
| 16.
|
Needham, L. K.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14626-14632
|
| 17.
|
Casamassima, A.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9363-9370
|
| 18.
|
Mitchell, F. M.,
Heasley, L. E.,
Qian, N. X.,
Zamarripa, J.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8623-8628
|
| 19.
|
Seufferlein, T.,
Withers, D. J.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21471-21477
|
| 20.
|
Seckl, M. J.,
Higgins, T.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29453-29460
|
| 21.
|
Withers, D. J.,
Seufferlein, T.,
Mann, D.,
Garcia, B.,
Jones, N.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2509-2514
|
| 22.
|
Rozengurt, E.,
and Sinnett-Smith, J.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
2936-2940
|
| 23.
|
Rozengurt, E.,
and Sinnett-Smith, J.
(1988)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
35,
261-295
|
| 24.
|
Mann, D. J.,
Higgins, T.,
Jones, N. C.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
1759-1766
|
| 25.
|
Slice, L.,
Walsh, J. H.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27562-27566
|
| 26.
|
Rozengurt, E.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
11,
116-122
|
| 27.
|
Sethi, T.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
3621-3623
|
| 28.
|
Bunn, P. A., Jr.,
Chan, D.,
Stewart, J.,
Gera, L.,
Tolley, R.,
Jewett, P.,
Tagawa, M.,
Alford, C.,
Mochzuki, T.,
and Yanaihara, N.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
3602-3610
|
| 29.
|
Seufferlein, T.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
5758-5764
|
| 30.
|
Qin, Y.,
Ertl, T.,
Cai, R. Z.,
Halmos, G.,
and Schally, A. V.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
1035-1041
|
| 31.
|
Smith, J. P.,
Shih, A.,
Wu, Y.,
McLaughlin, P. J.,
and Zagon, I. S.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
R1078-R1084
|
| 32.
|
Kaufmann, R.,
Schafberg, H.,
Rudroff, C.,
Henklein, P.,
and Nowak, G.
(1997)
Neuropeptides
31,
573-583
|
| 33.
|
Aprikian, A. G.,
Tremblay, L.,
Han, K.,
and Chevalier, S.
(1997)
Int. J. Cancer
72,
498-504
|
| 34.
|
Singh, D.,
Joshi, D. D.,
Hameed, M.,
Qian, J.,
Gascâon, P.,
Maloof, P. B.,
Mosenthal, A.,
and Rameshwar, P.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
388-393
|
| 35.
|
Woll, P. J.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
1859-1863
|
| 36.
|
Woll, P. J.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
3968-3973
|
| 37.
|
Nyâeki, O.,
Rill, A.,
Schon, I.,
Orosz, A.,
Schrett, J.,
Bartha, L.,
and Nagy, J.
(1998)
J. Pept. Sci.
4,
486-495
|
| 38.
|
Langdon, S.,
Sethi, T.,
Ritchie, A.,
Muir, M.,
Smyth, J.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
4554-4557
|
| 39.
|
Seckl, M. J.,
Higgins, T.,
Widmer, F.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
51-54
|
| 40.
|
Bepler, G.,
Zeymer, U.,
Mahmoud, S.,
Fiskum, G.,
Palaszynski, E.,
Rotsch, M.,
Willey, J.,
Koros, A.,
Cuttitta, F.,
and Moody, T. W.
(1988)
Peptides (Elmsford)
9,
1367-1372
|
| 41.
|
Everard, M. J.,
Macaulay, V. M.,
Millar, J. L.,
and Smith, I. E |