JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kong, A.-N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kong, A.-N. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 4, 2322-2327, January 28, 2000


p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Negatively Regulates the Induction of Phase II Drug-metabolizing Enzymes That Detoxify Carcinogens*

Rong YuDagger , Sandhya MandlekarDagger , Wei LeiDagger , William E. Fahl§, Tse-Hua Tan, and A.-N. Tony KongDagger ∥

From the Dagger  Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Center for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612, § McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, and  Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferase and quinone reductase, play an important role in the detoxification of chemical carcinogens. The induction of these detoxifying enzymes by a variety of agents occurs at the transcriptional level and is regulated by a cis-acting element, called the antioxidant response element (ARE) or electrophile-response element. In this study, we identified a signaling kinase pathway that negatively regulates ARE-mediated gene expression. Treatment of human hepatoma HepG2 and murine hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells with tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) stimulated the activity of p38, a member of mitogen-activated protein kinase family. Inhibition of p38 activation by its inhibitor, SB203580, enhanced the induction of quinone reductase activity and the activation of ARE reporter gene by tBHQ. In contrast, SB202474, a negative analog of SB203580, had little effect. Consistent with this result, interfering with the p38 kinase pathway by overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of p38 or MKK3, an immediate upstream regulator of p38, potentiated the activation of the ARE reporter gene by tBHQ, whereas the wild types of p38 and MKK3 diminished such activation. In addition, inhibition of p38 activity augmented the induction of ARE reporter gene activity by tert-butylhydroxyanisole, sulforaphane, and beta -naphthoflavone. Thus, p38 kinase pathway functions as a negative regulator in the ARE-mediated induction of phase II detoxifying enzymes.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preexposure of human and rodent cells to some chemical compounds such as tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ),1 tert-butyl hydroxyanisole (BHA), and sulforaphane (SUL) prevents the toxic and neoplatic effects of carcinogens (1-3). The cancer-preventive effects of these compounds have been attributed to their ability to selectively induce phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes such as quinone reductase (QR), glutathione S-transferase (GST), UDP-glucuronosyl transferase, and epoxide hydrolase (3-7). Biochemical and genetic studies show that the induction of these detoxifying enzymes is primarily due to the transcriptional activation of genes and is regulated by an enhancer, called antioxidant responsive element (ARE) or electrophile-responsive element (8-11). Several nuclear proteins have been found to interact with ARE and to regulate phase II gene expression, although controversial results were obtained (12-17). However, the signal transduction pathways that relay the chemical signals to ARE-protein complex remain to be elucidated.

p38 is a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family that plays an important role in transducing extracellular signals into the nucleus. p38 MAPK was originally identified in endotoxic lipopolysaccharide-treated murine monocytes and macrophages as a homologue of high osmolarity glycerol response 1 in yeast (18, 19). Independently, p38 was also identified in human cells as a cytokine-suppressive anti-inflammatory drug-binding protein (20) or as a reactivating kinase (21, 22). The kinase activity of p38 is regulated by phosphorylation on its threonyl and tyrosyl residues within the tripeptide motif TGY by dual specificity kinases, MKK3 (23) and MKK6 (24), which, in turn, are regulated by the upstream MAPK kinase kinases and small GTP-binding proteins, Rac1 and Cdc42 (25). The p38 pathway has been shown to be activated by various physiological and environmental stress signals such as proinflammatory cytokines (26), endotoxin (27), heat shock (21), UV radiation (26), and hyperosmolarity (18). Once activated, p38 can phosphorylate many transcription factors, such as ATF2 (23), Elk-1 (28), CHOP/GADD153 (29), MEF2C (30), and SAP-1 (31), leading to the changes of gene expression. The activated p38 can also phosphorylate MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 and 3, which subsequently phosphorylate a small heat shock protein, HSP27 (21, 22, 32). Although the exact physiological roles of p38 remain to be defined, this enzyme has been implicated in the production of cytokines (33), T cell proliferation (34), neuronal differentiation (35), platelet aggregation (36), and apoptosis (37). In this study, we demonstrated that p38 was involved in the regulation of phase II gene expression and acted as a negative regulator. We also showed that such a negative role of p38 was regulated by an upstream kinase, MKK3.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture, Antibodies, DNA Plasmids, and Chemicals-- Human HepG2 and mouse Hepa1c1c7 hepatoma cell lines were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA) and were cultured in minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2.2 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were normally starved overnight in serum-free medium before treatment, unless otherwise indicated. The rabbit anti-p38 polyclonal antibody was purchased from New England Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, MA). The anti-HA monoclonal antibody (12CA5) was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. GST-ATF2-(1-96)-expressing plasmid was kindly provided by Dr. J. Silvio Gutkind (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). pARE-TI-luciferase reporter construct (containing a single copy of the 41-base pair murine GST-Ya ARE and minimal TATA-Inr promoter) has been described previously (38). The expression vector for wild-type p38, pcDNA3-HA-p38alpha , was obtained from Dr. Zhengbin Yao (Amgen Inc., Boulder, CO). The expression vectors pCMV-Flag-p38alpha (AGF), pRSV-Flag-MKK3, and pRSV-Flag-MKK3(ala) were gifts from Dr. Roger J. Davis (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Worcester, MA). The specific p38 inhibitor, SB203580, and its negative analog, SB202474, were purchased from Calbiochem. tBHQ, BHA, and beta -NF were purchased from Aldrich, and SUL was purchased from LKT Laboratories (St. Paul, MN). [gamma -32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from NEN Life Science Products.

Immunocomplex Kinase Assays of p38 Activity-- After treatment, cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and the whole cell lysate was prepared as described previously (39). Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad), and the endogenous p38 was immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-p38 polyclonal antibody with the aid of protein A-Sepharose beads. The immunocomplex was spun down at high speed for 1 min and washed twice with the buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.1, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 100 µM Na3VO4, 5 µM ZnCl2, 30 mM Na4P2O7, 2 mM iodoacetatic acid, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5% Triton X-100) and twice with kinase assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM beta -glycerophosphate, and 10 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate). Kinase reaction was performed by incubation of the immunoprecipitate with 5 µg of GST-ATF2, 2 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP, and 20 µM ATP in a 30-µl kinase assay for 30 min and terminated by Laemmli buffer. The phosphorylated product was heated to 95 °C for 5 min and analyzed by electrophoresis, autoradiography, and phosphor imaging.

Transient Transfection and Assays for Reporter Gene Activity-- HepG2 cells were plated in six-well plates (1.5 × 105 cells/well) 24 h before transfection. Cells were transfected with the indicated expression vectors using the FuGENETM 6 protocol (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The transfection mixture was replaced with fresh medium 12 h after transfection. Cells were cultured for an additional 12 h prior to drug treatment. The beta -galactosidase activity was determined as described previously (40). The luciferase activity was determined according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI). Briefly, after treatment, cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and harvested in reporter lysis buffer. Following a brief centrifugation, a 20-µl supernatant was used for the assay of luciferase activity with a TD-20/20 luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). Luciferase activity was normalized against beta -galactosidase activity.

Selection for Stably Transfected HepG2 Cell Lines-- HepG2 cells were transfected with pARE-TI-luciferase construct using a FuGENETM 6 protocol (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Cells were cultured in fresh medium containing 0.8 mg/ml G418 24 h after transfection. Clonal cell lines were selected for growth in the presence of G418 by limiting dilution and confirmed by the inducible activity of ARE-luciferase reporter gene by tBHQ. To avoid clonal variation, four randomly selected clones were tested. Because similar results were obtained with these clones, only the data with clone 4 (C4) were presented in this report.

Quinone Reductase Activity Assay-- After treatment, Hepa1c1c7 cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and harvested in buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 125 mM sucrose. Cell suspension was sonicated for 15 s and left on ice for 10 min. The homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. QR activity in the supernatants was determined by measuring the reduction of 2,6-dichloroindophenol. Five µg of protein, as determined by the Bradford method, was added to the cuvette containing 1 ml of assay buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 60 µg of bovine serum albumin, 0.01% Tween 20, 5 µM FAD, 0.2 mM NADH, and 80 µM 2,6-dichloroindophenol). The reaction was carried out at 25 °C for 5 min and terminated by 30 µM dicumarol. Absorbance at 600 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer. The specific QR activity was expressed as nmol of 2,6-dichloroindophenol reduced by 1 mg of protein within 1 min.

Western Blotting-- Cell lysates were prepared as described in the immunocomplex kinase assays. 25 µg of protein, as determined by the Bradford method, was resolved on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difuoride membrane using a semidry transfer system (Fisher). Membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 8 g/liter NaCl, and 0.2 g/liter KCl) for 1 h at room temperature, prior to incubation with 1 µg/ml of an anti-p38 polyclonal antibody in TBS containing 3% nonfat milk at 4 °C overnight. Membrane was then washed three times with TBS and blotted with a secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:3,000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) at room temperature for 1 h, followed by three washes in TBS. The protein was visualized using the ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Phase II Gene Inducer, tBHQ, Stimulates p38 Activity That Is Inhibited by SB203580-- Human hepatoma HepG2 and mouse hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 have been used as the model cell lines for the study of phase II enzyme induction by various agents (41-43). Accordingly, we examined the effect of tBHQ, a commonly used phase II enzyme inducer, on p38 activity in the two cell lines. As shown in Fig. 1A, 100 µM tBHQ strongly induced p38 activity in HepG2 cells, as determined by immunocomplex kinase assays. Pretreatment with SB203580, a selective inhibitor of p38 (20, 44), attenuated the p38 activation by tBHQ, whereas SB202474, a negative analog of SB203580 (20), had little effect. Treatment with SB203580 alone also significantly decreased the basal activity of p38 as compared with the control cells. Similar results were obtained when Hepa1c1c7 cells were tested (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Inhibition of tBHQ-induced p38 activation by SB203580. HepG2 (A) or Hepa1c1c7 (B) cells were incubated with SB203580 (5 µM), SB202474 (5 µM), or solvent (0.1% Me2SO) for 1 h prior to challenge with tBHQ (100 µM) for an additional 1 h. Cells were harvested, and the endogenous p38 kinase activity was determined by immunocomplex kinase assays using 5 µg of GST-ATF2-(1-96) fusion protein as substrate. The protein level of p38 was determined by Western blotting. The experiment was repeated three times.

Inhibition of p38 Activity Augments the Induction of Quinone Reductase Activity by tBHQ-- Phase II detoxifying enzymes include GST, UDP-glucuronosyl transferase, epoxide hydrolase, and QR. Experiments with Hepa1c1c7 cells showed that QR induction is a useful indicator of overall phase II enzyme induction (3, 41, 43). To understand the role of p38 activation in phase II enzyme regulation, we examined the effect of SB203580 on the induction of QR activity by tBHQ. Treatment of Hepa1c1c7 cells with tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h resulted in a 4-fold induction of QR activity (Fig. 2). Surprisingly, co-treatment of tBHQ with SB203580 potentiated such induction. Furthermore, SB203580 alone also increased the QR activity. In contrast, the negative analog SB202474 had no effect on either the basal or tBHQ-induced QR activity. These results suggest that activation of p38 has a negative effect on the induction of phase II genes such as QR.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Enhancement of tBHQ-induced QR activity by SB203580. Hepa1c1c7 cells were treated with SB203580 (5 µM), SB202474 (5 µM), or solvent (0.1% Me2SO) for 1 h and then stimulated with tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h. Cells were harvested and assayed for QR activity by measuring the reduction of 2,6-dichloroindophenol as described under "Materials and Methods." The data shown are means of four independent experiments ± S.D.

Inhibition of p38 Activity Also Enhances the Induction of ARE-dependent Reporter Gene Expression by tBHQ-- Previous studies have shown that the induction of QR activity by tBHQ is transcriptionally regulated by an ARE DNA response element (45, 46). To examine if the inhibitory effect of p38 on tBHQ induction of QR activity is due to the changes in ARE-dependent gene expression, we performed transient and stable transfection assays. As shown in Fig. 3A, tBHQ induced more than 3-fold luciferase activity in HepG2 cells transfected transiently with ARE-luciferase reporter construct. SB203580 but not SB202474 significantly enhanced tBHQ-induced luciferase activity. Furthermore, SB203580 alone that inhibited the basal activity of p38 (Fig. 1A) stimulated luciferase activity (approximately 2-fold over control). In contrast, no induction of luciferase activity was observed when HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with the control vector (Ti-luciferase), indicating that the activation of reporter gene was specifically mediated by the ARE enhancer. Similar results were obtained in a HepG2-derived cell line (C4) that was stably transfected with an ARE-luciferase construct. SB203580 potentiated the induction of luciferase activity by tBHQ in a dose-dependent manner, whereas SB202474 had little effect even at 20 µM concentration (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SB203580 potentiates the induction of ARE-luciferase reporter gene by tBHQ. A, HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of pCH110-beta -gal plasmid and 1.5 µg of ARE-TI-luciferase reporter construct or the construct without ARE enhancer (TI-Luc). After transfection, cells were incubated for 12 h in culture medium and then incubated with SB203580 (5 µM) or SB202474 (5 µM) for 1 h, prior to treatment with tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h. Luciferase activity was determined and normalized against beta -galactosidase activity. The amount of luciferase activity in the cells that were transfected with ARE-luciferase construct but treated with solvent alone was given an arbitrary value of 1. B, HepG2 cells were transfected with an ARE-luciferase reporter construct, and stably transfected cell clones were selected as described under "Materials and Methods." C4, a randomly selected positive clone, was treated with the indicated concentrations of SB203580 or SB202474 for 1 h before the addition of tBHQ (100 µM). Luciferase activity was determined 24 h after treatment and normalized against protein concentration. The level of luciferase activity in untreated C4 cells was arbitrarily set to 1. The data shown are means of three independent experiments performed in duplicate.

Dominant Negative Mutant of p38 Potentiates tBHQ-induced ARE Reporter Gene Activity-- To provide further evidence for the negative role of p38, we examined the effect of blockade of the p38 pathway with a dominant-negative p38 mutant on tBHQ-induced ARE reporter gene activity. HepG2 cells were transfected with ARE-luciferase reporter construct together with the plasmids encoding a dominant-negative p38 mutant, p38(AGF), or wild-type p38. After transfection, cells were treated with tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h or left untreated as control. Overexpression of p38(AGF) substantially augmented the induction of ARE reporter gene by tBHQ in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4). Similar to SB203580, mutant p38 also raised the basal activity of ARE reporter gene in untreated cells. In contrast, forced expression of wild-type p38 decreased both basal and tBHQ-induced ARE reporter gene activities (Fig. 4). These data substantiate a negative role of p38 in the activation of ARE-dependent phase II genes.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression of a dominant negative mutant of p38 augments the induction of ARE reporter gene by tBHQ. HepG2 cells were transfected in duplicate with 0.5 µg of pCH110-beta -gal, 0.5 µg of an ARE-luciferase reporter construct, and different amounts of the empty vector (Vec.) or the expression vectors for wild-type p38 or a dominant-negative p38 mutant, p38(AGF). After transfection, cells were incubated in culture medium for 12 h and then treated with tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h, or they were left untreated as control. Luciferase activity was assayed and normalized against beta -galactosidase activity. The amount of luciferase activity in untreated empty vector-transfected cells was arbitrarily set to 1. The data shown are means of three independent experiments.

Inhibition of p38 Potentiates the Activation of ARE-dependent Genes by BHA, SUL, and beta -NF-- Phase II detoxifying enzymes are induced by a variety of chemicals. We next asked whether p38 MAPK plays a similar role in the induction of phase II enzymes by other inducers. As shown in Fig. 5A, treatment with BHA, beta -NF, and SUL stimulated the luciferase activity in the stably transfected C4 cells. The induction of luciferase activity by all three inducers was strongly enhanced by cotreatment with SB203580 but not with SB202474. Treatment with SB203580 alone also stimulated luciferase activity in the C4 cells. These results suggest that p38 also functions as a negative regulator of BHA-, beta -NF-, and SUL-induced phase II gene expression. Interestingly, BHA and beta -NF, like tBHQ, stimulated p38 activity that was inhibited by SB203580, whereas SUL is inactive (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of BHA, beta -NF, and SUL on ARE-mediated gene expression and p38 activity. A, augmentation of BHA, beta -NF, and SUL induction of ARE-mediated reporter gene activity by SB203580. Stably transfected C4 cells were pretreated with SB203580 (5 µM), SB202474 (5 µM), or solvent (0.1% Me2SO) for 1 h prior to the addition of BHA (100 µM), beta -NF (5 µM), SUL (12.5 µM), or solvent. Luciferase activity was determined 24 h after drug treatment and normalized by protein concentration. The data, as expressed as -fold induction over control (solvent-treated cells), are means and S.D. values of four independent experiments. B, activation of p38 by BHA, beta -NF, and SUL. C4 cells were untreated or pretreated with SB203580 (5 µM) before incubation with BHA (100 µM), beta -NF (5 µM), or SUL (12.5 µM) for 1 h. The endogenous p38 activity was immunoprecipitated with a specific antibody and assayed with GST-ATF2-(1-96) fusion protein as substrate. The protein level of p38 was determined by Western blotting. The experiment was repeated twice.

Activation of ARE-dependent Genes by Inhibition of p38 Shows an Earlier Kinetics than That by tBHQ-- The data above indicate that p38 negatively regulates both basal and inducible ARE-mediated gene expression. To obtain information on the potential target of p38, we compared the time courses of the effect of SB203580 and the effect of tBHQ on ARE-driven transcription in C4 cells. As shown in Fig. 6, no significant induction of luciferase activity was observed until 6 h after challenge with tBHQ (100 µM). However, the induction of luciferase activity by SB203580 (5 µM) appeared earlier and was detectable 3 h post-treatment. The stimulated luciferase activity by both agents accumulated as the treatments progressed. This result suggests that p38 may act directly on ARE-binding proteins or on the proximal components of the ARE-binding proteins.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   SB203580 induces an earlier kinetics of ARE-dependent gene activation than tBHQ. C4 cells were treated with SB203580 (5 µM) or tBHQ (100 µM) for different times. Luciferase activity was determined and normalized by protein concentration. The data obtained from three separate experiments were expressed as -fold induction over control (solvent-treated cells).

The Negative Role of p38 in ARE-mediated Gene Expression Is Regulated by An Upstream Kinase, MKK3-- To understand the mechanism of p38 activation by tBHQ, we examined the roles of upstream kinases, MAPK kinases. Previous studies have shown that p38 activity can be regulated by both MKK3 and MKK4 (23, 24). However, MKK4 but not MKK3 can also activate c-Jun N-terminal kinase (23, 25). Given that tBHQ is a poor activator of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway (47), we focused on the role of MKK3. As shown in Fig. 7A, while expression of MKK3 attenuated the induction of ARE reporter gene activity by tBHQ, dominant-negative MKK3 mutant, MKK3(ala), augmented the induction. Consistent with the luciferase assay result, wild-type MKK3 potentiated the activation of p38 by tBHQ, whereas MKK3(ala) showed the opposite effect (Fig. 7B). These data suggest that MKK3 is an upstream regulator for the negative role of p38 in tBHQ-induced phase II gene expression.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Expression of a dominant negative mutant of MKK3 inhibits tBHQ-induced p38 activation but increases ARE-driven transcription. A, HepG2 cells were transfected in duplicates with 0.5 µg of pCH110-beta -gal, 0.5 µg of an ARE-luciferase reporter construct, and 1 µg of expression vectors for MKK3 or MKK3(ala) or empty vector as control. Transfected cells were cultured in the fresh medium overnight, prior to stimulation with tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h. Luciferase activity was assayed and normalized against beta -galactosidase activity. The amount of luciferase activity in untreated empty vector-transfected cells was arbitrarily set to 1. B, HepG2 cells were plated in 60-mm plates at a density of 5 × 105 and transfected with 3 µg of HA epitope-tagged p38 plasmid together with 3 µg of expression vectors for MKK3 or MKK3(ala). 24 h after transfection, cells were either stimulated with 100 µM tBHQ for 1 h or left untreated. The exogenous p38 was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA monoclonal antibody (12CA5) and assayed for kinase activity as described under "Materials and Methods." The data presented are averages or examples of three independent experiments.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Phase II detoxifying enzymes are induced by a variety of chemicals. A number of studies suggest that this induction is regulated through the signal transduction pathways that are initiated by the inducers (48, 49). In the present study, we found that treatment of human or murine hepatoma cells with tBHQ stimulated p38 activity. Inhibition of tBHQ-induced p38 activity by its inhibitor, SB203580, potentiated the induction of QR activity and ARE-reporter gene expression by tBHQ, whereas SB202474, which did not inhibit p38 activity, was inactive. Interestingly, SB203580 also enhanced the basal and the inducible activities of ARE-reporter gene by BHA, beta -NF, and SUL. Furthermore, overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of p38 or its upstream kinase, MKK3, augmented the induction of ARE-driven transcription. However, overexpression of the wild-type p38 or MKK3 showed opposite effects. Therefore, this study, for the first time, unravels a signal transduction pathway that negatively regulates ARE-dependent phase II gene expression.

Although we provide good evidence that p38 inhibits basal and inducible ARE-mediated gene expression, the cellular target that mediates such a negative role of p38 is not clear. Since the induced luciferase activity by SB203580 appears 3 h after treatment and shows an earlier kinetics than that by tBHQ, we speculate that p38 may directly act on ARE-binding proteins. p38 has been shown to phosphorylate several transcription factors, including ATF2 (23), Elk-1 (28), CHOP/GADD153 (29), MEF2C (30), and SAP-1 (31). However, these known substrates do not seem to be the mediators of negative action of p38, because we are unable to detect their presence in ARE-protein complex.2 Recently, using gel shift assays and cDNA transfection, several groups have identified various ARE-binding proteins, including the members of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family, Nrf1 (15), Nrf2 (15, 17), and Maf (17, 49), and a non-basic leucine zipper nuclear protein, designated as ARE-BP-1 (16, 38). Whether these ARE-binding proteins can serve as substrates of p38 remains to be investigated. It is also possible that p38 phosphorylates a protein that is able to regulate the transcriptional activities of ARE-biding proteins. Indeed, a murine cytosolic protein, named Keap1, has been identified to suppress Nrf2 transcriptional activity by retaining Nrf2 in the cytoplasm (50). A human homologue of Keap1 has also been cloned independently (51). Sequence analysis of Keap1 and its human homologue reveals several potential MAPK phosphorylation sites. It will be interesting to examine the phosphorylation of Keap1 protein by MAPKs and the biological consequence of this event.

Activation of p38 by tBHQ and other phase II enzyme inducers is intriguing. p38 is preferentially activated by stress stimuli, such as UV radiation (26), heat shock (21), hyperosmolarity (18), oxidative stress (52), and proinflammatory cytokines (26). Genetic and biochemical evidence indicates that activation of p38 by these stress stimuli is mediated by upstream kinase, TAK1 or ASK1, that directly activates MKK3 or MKK6, which, in turn, activates p38 (53, 54). Since tBHQ, BHA, and beta -NF are easily oxidized to reactive intermediates, resulting in chemical stress, it is therefore conceivable that a similar mechanism may also underlie the activation of p38 by these agents. Indeed, overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of MKK3 inhibited p38 activation by tBHQ and attenuated the inhibitory effect of p38. Interestingly, expression of a dominant negative mutant of TAK1 or ASK1 also inhibited tBHQ-induced p38 activity; however, we were unable to detect any significant induction of TAK1 or ASK1 activity in tBHQ-treated HepG2 cells, implicating the involvement of a TAK1- or ASK1-related protein.2 The detailed mechanism by which tBHQ and other phase II enzyme inducers stimulate p38 activity is currently under investigation.

Protein kinases have been previously implicated in the activation of phase II genes. Okadaic acid, a potent inhibitor of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase, and Ras, a small GTPase that activates many kinase pathways, have been shown to potently induce ARE-mediated gene expression (55). Most recently, we demonstrated a role of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK), another member of the MAPK family, in the induction of phase II detoxifying enzymes by chemicals (56). Inhibition of ERK2 activation by a specific MAPK kinase inhibitor, PD98059, or by overexpression of a dominant negative mutant of ERK2 attenuated the activation of ARE-dependent reporter gene as well as the induction of QR activity by tBHQ and SUL in HepG2 and Hepa1c1c7 cells. Blockade of ERK pathway also attenuated Ha-Ras-induced ARE-reporter gene activity. Thus, in contrast to p38, ERK2 acts as a positive regulator of phase II gene induction. The opposite effects of p38 and ERK2 indicate that a complex mechanism may exist in regulating phase II gene expression. Differential activation of these positive and negative pathways, such as ERK versus p38, may determine the potency of a phase II enzyme inducer. Although tBHQ, BHA, and beta -NF activate both ERK and p38 pathways, SUL stimulates ERK activity only, suggesting that activation of the two kinase pathways can be dissociated from each other. This may provide a molecular basis for the future design of potential phase II enzyme inducers through structural refinement that enhances the activation of ERK but does not induce or even inhibit p38 activity.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that a signaling kinase, p38, negatively regulates the induction of ARE-dependent phase II gene expression. Such a negative role of p38 is mediated by an upstream kinase, MKK3. Future studies will unravel the downstream effectors of p38.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. J. Silvio Gutkind for providing GST-ATF2-(1-96)-expressing plasmid; Dr. Zhengbin Yao (Amgen Inc., Boulder, CO) for providing pcDNA3-HA-p38; Dr. Roger J. Davis (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Worcester, MA) for providing pCMV-Flag-p38(AGF), pRSV-Flag-MKK3, and pRSV-Flag-MKK3(ala); and Jessie Leong Siew Ching for the preparation of plasmids for transfection assays.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-CA73647 (to A. T. K.) and R01-AI38649 and R01-AI42532 (to T. H. T.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

par To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Center for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology MC870, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 900 S. Ashland Ave., MBRB Rm. 3102, Chicago, IL 60607-7173. Tel.: 312-413-9646; Fax: 312-413-9303; E-mail: KongT@uic.edu.

2 R. Yu, and A.-N. T. Kong, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: tBHQ, tert-butylhydroquinone; BHA, tert-butylhydroxyanisole; SUL, sulforaphane; beta -NF, beta -naphthoflavone; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ATF2, activating transcription factor 2; ARE, antioxidant responsive element; QR, quinone reductase; GST, glutathione S-transferase, TBS, Tris-buffed saline; HA, hemagglutinin; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Sporn, M. B., and Newton, D. L. (1979) Fed. Proc. 38, 2528-2534[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Wattenberg, L. W. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 1-8[Free Full Text]
3. Zhang, Y., Talalay, P., Cho, C. G., and Posner, G. H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 2399-2403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Prochaska, H. W., DeLong, M. J., and Talalay, P. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 8232-8236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Morse, M. A., and Stoner, G. D. (1993) Carcinogenesis 14, 1737-1746[Free Full Text]
6. Pezzuto, J. M. (1995) in Recent Advances in Phytochemistry: Phytochemistry of Medicinal Plants (Arnason, J. T. , Mata, R. , and Romeo, J. T., eds) , pp. 19-45, Plenum Press, New York
7. Kensler, T. W. (1997) Environ. Health Perspect. 105 Suppl. 4, 965-970
8. Rushmore, T. H., and Pickett, C. B. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14648-14653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Friling, R. S., Bensimon, A., Tichauer, Y., and Daniel, V. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6258-6262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Rushmore, T. H., Morton, M. R., and Pickett, C. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11632-11639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Li, Y., and Jaiswal, A. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15097-15104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Bergelson, S., Pinkus, R., and Daniel, V. (1994) Oncogene 9, 565-571[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Wang, B., and Williamson, G. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1219, 645-652[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Yoshioka, K., Deng, T., Cavigelli, M., and Karin, M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 4972-4976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Venugopal, R., and Jaiswal, A. K. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14960-14965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Wasserman, W. W., and Fahl, W. E. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 344, 387-396[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Itoh, K., Chiba, T., Takahashi, S., T., I., Igarashi, K., Katoh, Y., Oyake, T., Hayashi, N., Satoh, K., Hatayama, I., Yamamoto, M., and Nabeshima, Y.-I. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 236, 313-322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Han, J., Lee, J.-D., Bibbs, R., and Ulevitch, J. (1994) Science 265, 808-811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Brewster, J. L., de Valoir, T., Dwyer, N. D., Winter, E., and Gustin, M. C. (1993) Science 259, 1760-1763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Lee, J. C., Laydon, J. T., McDonnell, P. C., Gallagher, T. F., Kumar, S., Green, D., McNulty, D., Blumenthal, M. J., Heys, J. R., Landvatter, S. W., Strickler, J. E., McLaughlin, M. M., Siemens, I. R., Fisher, S. M., Livi, G. P., White, J. R., Adams, J. L., and Young, P. R. (1994) Nature 372, 739-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Rouse, J., Cohen, P., Trigon, S., Morange, M., Alonso-Liamazares, A., Zamanillo, D., Hunt, T., and Nebreda, A. R. (1994) Cell 78, 1027-1037[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Freshney, N. W., Rawlinson, L., Guesdon, F., Jones, E., Cowley, S., Hsuan, J., and Saklatvala, J. (1994) Cell 78, 1039-1049[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Derijard, B., Raingeaud, J., Barrett, T., Wu, I., Han, J., Ulevitch, R. J., and Davis, R. J. (1995) Science 267, 682-685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Moriguchi, T., Toyoshima, F., Gotoh, Y., Iwamatsu, A., Irie, K., Mori, E., Kuroyanagi, N., Hagiwara, M., Matsumoto, K., and Nishida, E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26981-26988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Kyriakis, J., and Avruch, J. (1996) BioEssays 18, 567-577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Raingeaud, J., Gupta, S., Rogers, J. S., Dickens, M., Han, J., Ulevitch, R. J., and Davis, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7420-7426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Han, J., Lee, J. D., Tobias, P. S., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25009-25014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Thuerauf, D. J., Arnold, N. D., Zechner, D., Hanford, D. S., DeMartin, K. M., McDonough, P. M., Prywes, R., and Glembotski, C. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20636-20643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Wang, X.-Z., and Ron, D. (1996) Science 272, 1347-1349[Abstract]
30. Han, J., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Kravchenko, V. V., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1997) Nature 386, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Whitmarsh, A. J., Yang, S. H., Su, M. S., Sharrocks, A. D., and Davis, R. J. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2360-2371[Abstract]
32. McLaughlin, M. M., Kumar, S., McDonnell, P. C., Van Horn, S., Lee, J. C., Livi, G. P., and Young, P. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8488-8492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Young, P. R. (1998) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 9, 239-257[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Crawley, J. B., Rawlinson, L., Lali, F. V., Page, T. H., Saklatvala, J., and Foxwell, B. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15023-15027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Morooka, T., and Nishida, E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24285-24288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Saklatvala, J., Rawlinson, L., Waller, R. J., Sarsfield, S., Lee, J. C., Morton, L. F., Barnes, M. J., and Farndale, R. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6586-6589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Xia, Z., Dickens, M., Raingeaud, J., Davis, R. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1995) Science 270, 1326-1331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Wasserman, W. W., and Fahl, W. E. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5361-5366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Yu, R., Jiao, J.-J., Duh, J.-L., Tan, T.-H., and Kong, A.-N. T. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 2954-2959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , pp. 16.66-16.67, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
41. Prochaska, H. J., and Talalay, P. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 4776-4782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Prestera, T., Holtzclaw, W. D., Zhang, Y., and Talalay, P. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2965-2969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Gerhauser, C., You, M., Liu, J., Moriarty, R. M., Hawthorne, M., Metha, R. J., Moon, R. C., and Pezzuto, J. M. (1997) Cancer Res. 57, 272-278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Young, P. R., McLaughlin, M. M., Kumar, S., Kassis, S., Doyle, M. L., McNulty, D., Gallagher, T. F., Fisher, S., McDonnell, P. C., Carr, S. A., Huddleston, M. J., Seibel, G., Porter, T. G., Livi, G. P., Adams, J. L., and Lee, J. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12116-12121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Favreau, L. V., and Pickett, C. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 4556-4561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Jaiswal, A. K. (1994) Pharmacogenetics 4, 1-10[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Yu, R., Tan, T.-H., and Kong, A.-N. T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28962-28970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Talalay, P. (1989) Adv. Enzyme Regul. 28, 237-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Hayes, J. D., and Pulford, D. J. (1995) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 30, 445-600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Itoh, K., Wakabayashi, N., Yasutake, K., Ishii, T., Igarashi, K., Engel, J. D., and Yamamoto, M. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 76-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Nagase, T., Seki, N., Tanaka, K., Ishikawa, K., and Nomura, N. (1995) DNA Res. 2, 164-174
52. Liu, Y., Guyton, K. Z., Gorospe, M., Xu, Q., Lee, J. C., and Holbrook, N. J. (1996) Free Radical Biol. Med. 21, 771-781[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Shirakabe, K., Yamaguchi, K., Shibura, H., Irie, K., Matsuda, S., Moriguchi, T., Gotoh, Y., Matsumoto, K., and Nishida, E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8141-8144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Ichijo, H., Nishida, E., Irie, K., ten Dijke, P., Saitoh, M., Motiguchi, T., Takagi, M., Matsumoto, K., Miyazono, K., and Gotoh, Y. (1997) Science 275, 90-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Ainbinder, E., Bergelson, S., and Daniel, V. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 243, 49-57[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Yu, R., Lei, W., Mandlekar, S., Weber, M. J., Der, C. J., Wu, J., and Kong, A.-N. T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27545-27552[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
E. J. Buenz
A BRIEF COMMUNICATION: Hepatocytes Detoxify Atuna racemosa Extract
Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2006; 231(11): 1739 - 1743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. B. Brust, F. S. Cayabyab, N. Zhou, and B. A. MacVicar
p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Contributes to Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Depression in Area CA1 of the Rat Hippocampus
J. Neurosci., November 29, 2006; 26(48): 12427 - 12438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y.-S. Keum, S. Yu, P. P.-J. Chang, X. Yuan, J.-H. Kim, C. Xu, J. Han, A. Agarwal, and A.-N. T. Kong
Mechanism of Action of Sulforaphane: Inhibition of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Isoforms Contributing to the Induction of Antioxidant Response Element-Mediated Heme Oxygenase-1 in Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells.
Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8804 - 8813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
C. Xu, X. Yuan, Z. Pan, G. Shen, J.-H. Kim, S. Yu, T. O. Khor, W. Li, J. Ma, and A.-N. T. Kong
Mechanism of action of isothiocyanates: the induction of ARE-regulated genes is associated with activation of ERK and JNK and the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Nrf2.
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1918 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
W. E. Thasler, R. Dayoub, M. Muhlbauer, C. Hellerbrand, T. Singer, A. Grabe, K.-W. Jauch, H.-J. Schlitt, and T. S. Weiss
Repression of Cytochrome P450 Activity in Human Hepatocytes in Vitro by a Novel Hepatotrophic Factor, Augmenter of Liver Regeneration
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 822 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
H. Zhang, H. Liu, K. E. Iles, R.-M. Liu, E. M. Postlethwait, Y. Laperche, and H. J. Forman
4-Hydroxynonenal Induces Rat {gamma}-Glutamyl Transpeptidase through Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Mediated Electrophile Response Element/Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 Signaling
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 174 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
S. R. White, R. Tse, and B. A. Marroquin
Stress-Activated Protein Kinases Mediate Cell Migration in Human Airway Epithelial Cells
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2005; 32(4): 301 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Srinivasan, D. T. Bolick, M. E. Hatley, R. Natarajan, K. B. Reilly, M. Yeh, C. Chrestensen, T. W. Sturgill, and C. C. Hedrick
Glucose Regulates Interleukin-8 Production in Aortic Endothelial Cells through Activation of the p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Diabetes
J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31930 - 31936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
Y. Zhang and G. B. Gordon
A strategy for cancer prevention: Stimulation of the Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway
Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2004; 3(7): 885 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Shen, V. Hebbar, S. Nair, C. Xu, W. Li, W. Lin, Y.-S. Keum, J. Han, M. A. Gallo, and A.-N. T. Kong
Regulation of Nrf2 Transactivation Domain Activity: THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE CASCADES AND SYNERGISTIC STIMULATORY EFFECT OF Raf AND CREB-BINDING PROTEIN
J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 23052 - 23060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]