![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 4, 2322-2327, January 28, 2000
,
,
,
From the
Department of Pharmaceutics and
Pharmacodynamics, Center for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, College of
Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612, § McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of
Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, and ¶ Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, Texas 77030
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes, such as
glutathione S-transferase and quinone reductase, play an
important role in the detoxification of chemical carcinogens. The
induction of these detoxifying enzymes by a variety of agents occurs at
the transcriptional level and is regulated by a cis-acting
element, called the antioxidant response element (ARE) or
electrophile-response element. In this study, we identified a signaling
kinase pathway that negatively regulates ARE-mediated gene expression.
Treatment of human hepatoma HepG2 and murine hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells
with tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) stimulated the activity
of p38, a member of mitogen-activated protein kinase family. Inhibition
of p38 activation by its inhibitor, SB203580, enhanced the induction of
quinone reductase activity and the activation of ARE reporter gene by
tBHQ. In contrast, SB202474, a negative analog of SB203580, had little
effect. Consistent with this result, interfering with the p38 kinase
pathway by overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of p38 or MKK3,
an immediate upstream regulator of p38, potentiated the activation of
the ARE reporter gene by tBHQ, whereas the wild types of p38 and MKK3
diminished such activation. In addition, inhibition of p38 activity
augmented the induction of ARE reporter gene activity by
tert-butylhydroxyanisole, sulforaphane, and
Preexposure of human and rodent cells to some chemical compounds
such as tert-butylhydroquinone
(tBHQ),1
tert-butyl hydroxyanisole (BHA), and sulforaphane (SUL)
prevents the toxic and neoplatic effects of carcinogens (1-3). The
cancer-preventive effects of these compounds have been attributed to
their ability to selectively induce phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes
such as quinone reductase (QR), glutathione S-transferase
(GST), UDP-glucuronosyl transferase, and epoxide hydrolase (3-7).
Biochemical and genetic studies show that the induction of these
detoxifying enzymes is primarily due to the transcriptional activation
of genes and is regulated by an enhancer, called antioxidant responsive
element (ARE) or electrophile-responsive element (8-11). Several
nuclear proteins have been found to interact with ARE and to regulate phase II gene expression, although controversial results were obtained
(12-17). However, the signal transduction pathways that relay the
chemical signals to ARE-protein complex remain to be elucidated.
p38 is a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family
that plays an important role in transducing extracellular signals into
the nucleus. p38 MAPK was originally identified in endotoxic
lipopolysaccharide-treated murine monocytes and macrophages as a
homologue of high osmolarity glycerol response 1 in yeast (18, 19).
Independently, p38 was also identified in human cells as a
cytokine-suppressive anti-inflammatory drug-binding protein (20) or as
a reactivating kinase (21, 22). The kinase activity of p38 is regulated
by phosphorylation on its threonyl and tyrosyl residues within the
tripeptide motif TGY by dual specificity kinases, MKK3 (23) and MKK6
(24), which, in turn, are regulated by the upstream MAPK kinase kinases
and small GTP-binding proteins, Rac1 and Cdc42 (25). The p38 pathway
has been shown to be activated by various physiological and
environmental stress signals such as proinflammatory cytokines (26),
endotoxin (27), heat shock (21), UV radiation (26), and hyperosmolarity
(18). Once activated, p38 can phosphorylate many transcription factors,
such as ATF2 (23), Elk-1 (28), CHOP/GADD153 (29), MEF2C (30), and SAP-1
(31), leading to the changes of gene expression. The activated p38 can
also phosphorylate MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 and 3, which
subsequently phosphorylate a small heat shock protein, HSP27 (21, 22,
32). Although the exact physiological roles of p38 remain to be
defined, this enzyme has been implicated in the production of cytokines
(33), T cell proliferation (34), neuronal differentiation (35),
platelet aggregation (36), and apoptosis (37). In this study, we
demonstrated that p38 was involved in the regulation of phase II gene
expression and acted as a negative regulator. We also showed that such
a negative role of p38 was regulated by an upstream kinase, MKK3.
Cell Culture, Antibodies, DNA Plasmids, and Chemicals--
Human
HepG2 and mouse Hepa1c1c7 hepatoma cell lines were obtained from ATCC
(Manassas, VA) and were cultured in minimum essential medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2.2 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were normally starved overnight in serum-free medium before treatment, unless otherwise indicated. The rabbit anti-p38 polyclonal antibody was purchased from New England Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, MA). The
anti-HA monoclonal antibody (12CA5) was purchased from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals. GST-ATF2-(1-96)-expressing plasmid was kindly provided
by Dr. J. Silvio Gutkind (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
pARE-TI-luciferase reporter construct (containing a single copy of the
41-base pair murine GST-Ya ARE and minimal TATA-Inr promoter) has been
described previously (38). The expression vector for wild-type p38,
pcDNA3-HA-p38 Immunocomplex Kinase Assays of p38 Activity--
After
treatment, cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline, and the whole cell lysate was prepared as described previously
(39). Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method
(Bio-Rad), and the endogenous p38 was immunoprecipitated with rabbit
anti-p38 polyclonal antibody with the aid of protein A-Sepharose beads.
The immunocomplex was spun down at high speed for 1 min and washed
twice with the buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.1, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 100 µM
Na3VO4, 5 µM ZnCl2,
30 mM Na4P2O7, 2 mM iodoacetatic acid, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 0.5% Triton X-100) and twice with kinase assay buffer
(20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM MgCl2,
2 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mM
Na3VO4, 50 mM Transient Transfection and Assays for Reporter Gene
Activity--
HepG2 cells were plated in six-well plates (1.5 × 105 cells/well) 24 h before transfection. Cells were
transfected with the indicated expression vectors using the
FuGENETM 6 protocol (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The
transfection mixture was replaced with fresh medium 12 h after
transfection. Cells were cultured for an additional 12 h prior to
drug treatment. The Selection for Stably Transfected HepG2 Cell Lines--
HepG2
cells were transfected with pARE-TI-luciferase construct using a
FuGENETM 6 protocol (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Cells
were cultured in fresh medium containing 0.8 mg/ml G418 24 h after
transfection. Clonal cell lines were selected for growth in the
presence of G418 by limiting dilution and confirmed by the inducible
activity of ARE-luciferase reporter gene by tBHQ. To avoid clonal
variation, four randomly selected clones were tested. Because similar
results were obtained with these clones, only the data with clone 4 (C4) were presented in this report.
Quinone Reductase Activity Assay--
After treatment, Hepa1c1c7
cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and
harvested in buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and
125 mM sucrose. Cell suspension was sonicated for 15 s
and left on ice for 10 min. The homogenates were centrifuged at
13,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. QR activity in the
supernatants was determined by measuring the reduction of
2,6-dichloroindophenol. Five µg of protein, as determined by the
Bradford method, was added to the cuvette containing 1 ml of assay
buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 60 µg of bovine serum albumin, 0.01% Tween 20, 5 µM FAD, 0.2 mM
NADH, and 80 µM 2,6-dichloroindophenol). The reaction was
carried out at 25 °C for 5 min and terminated by 30 µM
dicumarol. Absorbance at 600 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer. The specific QR activity was expressed as nmol of
2,6-dichloroindophenol reduced by 1 mg of protein within 1 min.
Western Blotting--
Cell lysates were prepared as described in
the immunocomplex kinase assays. 25 µg of protein, as determined by
the Bradford method, was resolved on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difuoride membrane
using a semidry transfer system (Fisher). Membrane was blocked with 5%
nonfat dry milk in TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 8 g/liter
NaCl, and 0.2 g/liter KCl) for 1 h at room temperature, prior to
incubation with 1 µg/ml of an anti-p38 polyclonal antibody in TBS
containing 3% nonfat milk at 4 °C overnight. Membrane was then
washed three times with TBS and blotted with a secondary antibody
conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:3,000 dilution; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) at room temperature for 1 h,
followed by three washes in TBS. The protein was visualized using the
ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Phase II Gene Inducer, tBHQ, Stimulates p38 Activity That Is
Inhibited by SB203580--
Human hepatoma HepG2 and mouse hepatoma
Hepa1c1c7 have been used as the model cell lines for the study of phase
II enzyme induction by various agents (41-43). Accordingly, we
examined the effect of tBHQ, a commonly used phase II enzyme inducer,
on p38 activity in the two cell lines. As shown in Fig.
1A, 100 µM tBHQ strongly induced p38 activity in HepG2 cells, as determined by immunocomplex kinase assays. Pretreatment with SB203580, a selective inhibitor of p38 (20, 44), attenuated the p38 activation by tBHQ,
whereas SB202474, a negative analog of SB203580 (20), had little
effect. Treatment with SB203580 alone also significantly decreased the
basal activity of p38 as compared with the control cells. Similar
results were obtained when Hepa1c1c7 cells were tested (Fig.
1B).
Inhibition of p38 Activity Augments the Induction of Quinone
Reductase Activity by tBHQ--
Phase II detoxifying enzymes include
GST, UDP-glucuronosyl transferase, epoxide hydrolase, and QR.
Experiments with Hepa1c1c7 cells showed that QR induction is a useful
indicator of overall phase II enzyme induction (3, 41, 43). To
understand the role of p38 activation in phase II enzyme regulation, we
examined the effect of SB203580 on the induction of QR activity by
tBHQ. Treatment of Hepa1c1c7 cells with tBHQ (100 µM) for
24 h resulted in a 4-fold induction of QR activity (Fig.
2). Surprisingly, co-treatment of tBHQ
with SB203580 potentiated such induction. Furthermore, SB203580 alone
also increased the QR activity. In contrast, the negative analog
SB202474 had no effect on either the basal or tBHQ-induced QR activity.
These results suggest that activation of p38 has a negative effect on
the induction of phase II genes such as QR.
Inhibition of p38 Activity Also Enhances the Induction of
ARE-dependent Reporter Gene Expression by
tBHQ--
Previous studies have shown that the induction of QR
activity by tBHQ is transcriptionally regulated by an ARE DNA response element (45, 46). To examine if the inhibitory effect of p38 on tBHQ
induction of QR activity is due to the changes in
ARE-dependent gene expression, we performed transient and
stable transfection assays. As shown in Fig.
3A, tBHQ induced more than
3-fold luciferase activity in HepG2 cells transfected transiently with
ARE-luciferase reporter construct. SB203580 but not SB202474
significantly enhanced tBHQ-induced luciferase activity. Furthermore,
SB203580 alone that inhibited the basal activity of p38 (Fig.
1A) stimulated luciferase activity (approximately 2-fold
over control). In contrast, no induction of luciferase activity was
observed when HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with the control
vector (Ti-luciferase), indicating that the activation of reporter gene
was specifically mediated by the ARE enhancer. Similar results were
obtained in a HepG2-derived cell line (C4) that was stably transfected
with an ARE-luciferase construct. SB203580 potentiated the
induction of luciferase activity by tBHQ in a
dose-dependent manner, whereas SB202474 had
little effect even at 20 µM concentration (Fig.
3B).
Dominant Negative Mutant of p38 Potentiates tBHQ-induced ARE
Reporter Gene Activity--
To provide further evidence for the
negative role of p38, we examined the effect of blockade of the p38
pathway with a dominant-negative p38 mutant on tBHQ-induced ARE
reporter gene activity. HepG2 cells were transfected with
ARE-luciferase reporter construct together with the plasmids encoding a
dominant-negative p38 mutant, p38(AGF), or wild-type p38. After
transfection, cells were treated with tBHQ (100 µM) for
24 h or left untreated as control. Overexpression of p38(AGF)
substantially augmented the induction of ARE reporter gene by tBHQ in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
4). Similar to SB203580, mutant p38 also
raised the basal activity of ARE reporter gene in untreated cells. In
contrast, forced expression of wild-type p38 decreased both basal and
tBHQ-induced ARE reporter gene activities (Fig. 4). These data
substantiate a negative role of p38 in the activation of
ARE-dependent phase II genes.
Inhibition of p38 Potentiates the Activation of
ARE-dependent Genes by BHA, SUL, and Activation of ARE-dependent Genes by Inhibition of p38
Shows an Earlier Kinetics than That by tBHQ--
The data above
indicate that p38 negatively regulates both basal and inducible
ARE-mediated gene expression. To obtain information on the potential
target of p38, we compared the time courses of the effect of SB203580
and the effect of tBHQ on ARE-driven transcription in C4 cells. As
shown in Fig. 6, no significant induction
of luciferase activity was observed until 6 h after challenge with
tBHQ (100 µM). However, the induction of luciferase
activity by SB203580 (5 µM) appeared earlier and was
detectable 3 h post-treatment. The stimulated luciferase activity
by both agents accumulated as the treatments progressed. This result
suggests that p38 may act directly on ARE-binding proteins or on the
proximal components of the ARE-binding proteins.
The Negative Role of p38 in ARE-mediated Gene Expression Is
Regulated by An Upstream Kinase, MKK3--
To understand the mechanism
of p38 activation by tBHQ, we examined the roles of upstream kinases,
MAPK kinases. Previous studies have shown that p38 activity can be
regulated by both MKK3 and MKK4 (23, 24). However, MKK4 but not MKK3
can also activate c-Jun N-terminal kinase (23, 25). Given that tBHQ is
a poor activator of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway (47), we
focused on the role of MKK3. As shown in Fig.
7A, while expression of MKK3
attenuated the induction of ARE reporter gene activity by tBHQ,
dominant-negative MKK3 mutant, MKK3(ala), augmented the induction.
Consistent with the luciferase assay result, wild-type MKK3 potentiated
the activation of p38 by tBHQ, whereas MKK3(ala) showed the opposite
effect (Fig. 7B). These data suggest that MKK3 is an
upstream regulator for the negative role of p38 in tBHQ-induced phase
II gene expression.
Phase II detoxifying enzymes are induced by a variety of
chemicals. A number of studies suggest that this induction is regulated through the signal transduction pathways that are initiated by the
inducers (48, 49). In the present study, we found that treatment of
human or murine hepatoma cells with tBHQ stimulated p38 activity.
Inhibition of tBHQ-induced p38 activity by its inhibitor, SB203580,
potentiated the induction of QR activity and ARE-reporter gene
expression by tBHQ, whereas SB202474, which did not inhibit p38
activity, was inactive. Interestingly, SB203580 also enhanced the basal
and the inducible activities of ARE-reporter gene by BHA, Although we provide good evidence that p38 inhibits basal and inducible
ARE-mediated gene expression, the cellular target that mediates such a
negative role of p38 is not clear. Since the induced luciferase
activity by SB203580 appears 3 h after treatment and shows an
earlier kinetics than that by tBHQ, we speculate that p38 may directly
act on ARE-binding proteins. p38 has been shown to phosphorylate
several transcription factors, including ATF2 (23), Elk-1 (28),
CHOP/GADD153 (29), MEF2C (30), and SAP-1 (31). However, these known
substrates do not seem to be the mediators of negative action of p38,
because we are unable to detect their presence in ARE-protein
complex.2 Recently, using gel
shift assays and cDNA transfection, several groups have identified
various ARE-binding proteins, including the members of the basic
leucine zipper transcription factor family, Nrf1 (15), Nrf2 (15,
17), and Maf (17, 49), and a non-basic leucine zipper nuclear protein,
designated as ARE-BP-1 (16, 38). Whether these ARE-binding proteins can
serve as substrates of p38 remains to be investigated. It is also
possible that p38 phosphorylates a protein that is able to regulate the
transcriptional activities of ARE-biding proteins. Indeed, a murine
cytosolic protein, named Keap1, has been identified to suppress
Nrf2 transcriptional activity by retaining Nrf2 in the
cytoplasm (50). A human homologue of Keap1 has also been cloned
independently (51). Sequence analysis of Keap1 and its human homologue
reveals several potential MAPK phosphorylation sites. It will be
interesting to examine the phosphorylation of Keap1 protein by MAPKs
and the biological consequence of this event.
Activation of p38 by tBHQ and other phase II enzyme inducers is
intriguing. p38 is preferentially activated by stress stimuli, such as
UV radiation (26), heat shock (21), hyperosmolarity (18), oxidative
stress (52), and proinflammatory cytokines (26). Genetic and
biochemical evidence indicates that activation of p38 by these stress
stimuli is mediated by upstream kinase, TAK1 or ASK1, that directly
activates MKK3 or MKK6, which, in turn, activates p38 (53, 54). Since
tBHQ, BHA, and Protein kinases have been previously implicated in the activation of
phase II genes. Okadaic acid, a potent inhibitor of
serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase, and Ras, a small GTPase
that activates many kinase pathways, have been shown to potently induce
ARE-mediated gene expression (55). Most recently, we demonstrated a
role of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK), another member of the MAPK family, in the induction of phase II detoxifying enzymes by chemicals (56). Inhibition of ERK2 activation by a specific
MAPK kinase inhibitor, PD98059, or by overexpression of a dominant
negative mutant of ERK2 attenuated the activation of
ARE-dependent reporter gene as well as the induction of QR activity by tBHQ and SUL in HepG2 and Hepa1c1c7 cells. Blockade of ERK
pathway also attenuated Ha-Ras-induced ARE-reporter gene activity.
Thus, in contrast to p38, ERK2 acts as a positive regulator of phase II
gene induction. The opposite effects of p38 and ERK2 indicate that a
complex mechanism may exist in regulating phase II gene expression.
Differential activation of these positive and negative pathways, such
as ERK versus p38, may determine the potency of a phase II
enzyme inducer. Although tBHQ, BHA, and In conclusion, we have demonstrated that a signaling kinase, p38,
negatively regulates the induction of ARE-dependent phase II gene expression. Such a negative role of p38 is mediated by an
upstream kinase, MKK3. Future studies will unravel the downstream effectors of p38.
-naphthoflavone. Thus, p38 kinase pathway functions as a negative
regulator in the ARE-mediated induction of phase II detoxifying enzymes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, was obtained from Dr. Zhengbin Yao (Amgen Inc.,
Boulder, CO). The expression vectors pCMV-Flag-p38
(AGF),
pRSV-Flag-MKK3, and pRSV-Flag-MKK3(ala) were gifts from Dr. Roger J. Davis (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Worcester, MA). The specific
p38 inhibitor, SB203580, and its negative analog, SB202474, were
purchased from Calbiochem. tBHQ, BHA, and
-NF were purchased from
Aldrich, and SUL was purchased from LKT Laboratories (St. Paul, MN).
[
-32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from NEN Life
Science Products.
-glycerophosphate, and 10 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate). Kinase
reaction was performed by incubation of the immunoprecipitate with 5 µg of GST-ATF2, 2 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, and 20 µM ATP in a 30-µl kinase assay for 30 min and
terminated by Laemmli buffer. The phosphorylated product was heated to
95 °C for 5 min and analyzed by electrophoresis, autoradiography, and phosphor imaging.
-galactosidase activity was determined as
described previously (40). The luciferase activity was determined
according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Promega,
Madison, WI). Briefly, after treatment, cells were washed twice with
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and harvested in reporter lysis
buffer. Following a brief centrifugation, a 20-µl supernatant was
used for the assay of luciferase activity with a TD-20/20 luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). Luciferase activity was normalized against
-galactosidase activity.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of tBHQ-induced p38 activation by
SB203580. HepG2 (A) or Hepa1c1c7 (B) cells
were incubated with SB203580 (5 µM), SB202474 (5 µM), or solvent (0.1% Me2SO) for 1 h
prior to challenge with tBHQ (100 µM) for an additional
1 h. Cells were harvested, and the endogenous p38 kinase activity
was determined by immunocomplex kinase assays using 5 µg of
GST-ATF2-(1-96) fusion protein as substrate. The protein level of p38
was determined by Western blotting. The experiment was repeated three
times.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Enhancement of tBHQ-induced QR
activity by SB203580. Hepa1c1c7 cells were treated with
SB203580 (5 µM), SB202474 (5 µM), or
solvent (0.1% Me2SO) for 1 h and then stimulated with
tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h. Cells were harvested and
assayed for QR activity by measuring the reduction of
2,6-dichloroindophenol as described under "Materials and Methods."
The data shown are means of four independent experiments ± S.D.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
SB203580 potentiates the induction of
ARE-luciferase reporter gene by tBHQ. A, HepG2 cells
were transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of pCH110-
-gal plasmid
and 1.5 µg of ARE-TI-luciferase reporter construct or the construct
without ARE enhancer (TI-Luc). After transfection, cells
were incubated for 12 h in culture medium and then incubated with
SB203580 (5 µM) or SB202474 (5 µM) for
1 h, prior to treatment with tBHQ (100 µM) for
24 h. Luciferase activity was determined and normalized against
-galactosidase activity. The amount of luciferase activity in the
cells that were transfected with ARE-luciferase construct but treated
with solvent alone was given an arbitrary value of 1. B,
HepG2 cells were transfected with an ARE-luciferase reporter construct,
and stably transfected cell clones were selected as described under
"Materials and Methods." C4, a randomly selected positive clone,
was treated with the indicated concentrations of SB203580 or SB202474
for 1 h before the addition of tBHQ (100 µM).
Luciferase activity was determined 24 h after treatment and
normalized against protein concentration. The level of luciferase
activity in untreated C4 cells was arbitrarily set to 1. The data shown
are means of three independent experiments performed in
duplicate.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Expression of a dominant negative mutant of
p38 augments the induction of ARE reporter gene by tBHQ. HepG2
cells were transfected in duplicate with 0.5 µg of pCH110-
-gal,
0.5 µg of an ARE-luciferase reporter construct, and different amounts
of the empty vector (Vec.) or the expression vectors for
wild-type p38 or a dominant-negative p38 mutant, p38(AGF). After
transfection, cells were incubated in culture medium for 12 h and
then treated with tBHQ (100 µM) for 24 h, or they
were left untreated as control. Luciferase activity was assayed and
normalized against
-galactosidase activity. The amount of luciferase
activity in untreated empty vector-transfected cells was arbitrarily
set to 1. The data shown are means of three independent
experiments.
-NF--
Phase II
detoxifying enzymes are induced by a variety of chemicals. We next
asked whether p38 MAPK plays a similar role in the induction of phase
II enzymes by other inducers. As shown in Fig.
5A, treatment with BHA,
-NF, and SUL stimulated the luciferase activity in the stably
transfected C4 cells. The induction of luciferase activity by all three
inducers was strongly enhanced by cotreatment with SB203580 but not
with SB202474. Treatment with SB203580 alone also stimulated luciferase
activity in the C4 cells. These results suggest that p38 also functions
as a negative regulator of BHA-,
-NF-, and SUL-induced phase II gene
expression. Interestingly, BHA and
-NF, like tBHQ, stimulated p38
activity that was inhibited by SB203580, whereas SUL is inactive (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effects of BHA,
-NF,
and SUL on ARE-mediated gene expression and p38 activity.
A, augmentation of BHA,
-NF, and SUL induction of
ARE-mediated reporter gene activity by SB203580. Stably transfected C4
cells were pretreated with SB203580 (5 µM), SB202474 (5 µM), or solvent (0.1% Me2SO) for 1 h
prior to the addition of BHA (100 µM),
-NF (5 µM), SUL (12.5 µM), or solvent. Luciferase
activity was determined 24 h after drug treatment and normalized
by protein concentration. The data, as expressed as -fold induction
over control (solvent-treated cells), are means and S.D. values of four
independent experiments. B, activation of p38 by BHA,
-NF, and SUL. C4 cells were untreated or pretreated with SB203580 (5 µM) before incubation with BHA (100 µM),
-NF (5 µM), or SUL (12.5 µM) for 1 h. The endogenous p38 activity was immunoprecipitated with a specific
antibody and assayed with GST-ATF2-(1-96) fusion protein as substrate.
The protein level of p38 was determined by Western blotting. The
experiment was repeated twice.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
SB203580 induces an earlier kinetics of
ARE-dependent gene activation than tBHQ. C4 cells were
treated with SB203580 (5 µM) or tBHQ (100 µM) for different times. Luciferase activity was
determined and normalized by protein concentration. The data obtained
from three separate experiments were expressed as -fold induction over
control (solvent-treated cells).

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Expression of a dominant negative mutant of
MKK3 inhibits tBHQ-induced p38 activation but increases ARE-driven
transcription. A, HepG2 cells were transfected in
duplicates with 0.5 µg of pCH110-
-gal, 0.5 µg of an
ARE-luciferase reporter construct, and 1 µg of expression vectors for
MKK3 or MKK3(ala) or empty vector as control. Transfected cells were
cultured in the fresh medium overnight, prior to stimulation with tBHQ
(100 µM) for 24 h. Luciferase activity was assayed
and normalized against
-galactosidase activity. The amount of
luciferase activity in untreated empty vector-transfected cells was
arbitrarily set to 1. B, HepG2 cells were plated in 60-mm
plates at a density of 5 × 105 and transfected with 3 µg of HA epitope-tagged p38 plasmid together with 3 µg of
expression vectors for MKK3 or MKK3(ala). 24 h after transfection,
cells were either stimulated with 100 µM tBHQ for 1 h or left untreated. The exogenous p38 was immunoprecipitated with
anti-HA monoclonal antibody (12CA5) and assayed for kinase activity as
described under "Materials and Methods." The data presented are
averages or examples of three independent experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-NF, and
SUL. Furthermore, overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of p38
or its upstream kinase, MKK3, augmented the induction of ARE-driven
transcription. However, overexpression of the wild-type p38 or MKK3
showed opposite effects. Therefore, this study, for the first time,
unravels a signal transduction pathway that negatively regulates
ARE-dependent phase II gene expression.
-NF are easily oxidized to reactive intermediates,
resulting in chemical stress, it is therefore conceivable that a
similar mechanism may also underlie the activation of p38 by these
agents. Indeed, overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of MKK3
inhibited p38 activation by tBHQ and attenuated the inhibitory effect
of p38. Interestingly, expression of a dominant negative mutant of TAK1
or ASK1 also inhibited tBHQ-induced p38 activity; however, we were
unable to detect any significant induction of TAK1 or ASK1 activity in
tBHQ-treated HepG2 cells, implicating the involvement of a TAK1- or
ASK1-related protein.2 The detailed mechanism by which tBHQ
and other phase II enzyme inducers stimulate p38 activity is currently
under investigation.
-NF activate both ERK and
p38 pathways, SUL stimulates ERK activity only, suggesting that
activation of the two kinase pathways can be dissociated from each
other. This may provide a molecular basis for the future design of
potential phase II enzyme inducers through structural refinement that
enhances the activation of ERK but does not induce or even inhibit p38 activity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. J. Silvio Gutkind for providing GST-ATF2-(1-96)-expressing plasmid; Dr. Zhengbin Yao (Amgen Inc., Boulder, CO) for providing pcDNA3-HA-p38; Dr. Roger J. Davis (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Worcester, MA) for providing pCMV-Flag-p38(AGF), pRSV-Flag-MKK3, and pRSV-Flag-MKK3(ala); and Jessie Leong Siew Ching for the preparation of plasmids for transfection assays.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-CA73647 (to A. T. K.) and R01-AI38649 and R01-AI42532 (to T. H. T.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Center for Pharmaceutical
Biotechnology MC870, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at
Chicago, 900 S. Ashland Ave., MBRB Rm. 3102, Chicago, IL 60607-7173. Tel.: 312-413-9646; Fax: 312-413-9303; E-mail: KongT@uic.edu.
2 R. Yu, and A.-N. T. Kong, unpublished results.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
tBHQ, tert-butylhydroquinone;
BHA, tert-butylhydroxyanisole;
SUL, sulforaphane;
-NF,
-naphthoflavone;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ATF2, activating transcription factor 2;
ARE, antioxidant responsive element;
QR, quinone reductase;
GST, glutathione S-transferase, TBS,
Tris-buffed saline;
HA, hemagglutinin;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Sporn, M. B., and Newton, D. L. (1979) Fed. Proc. 38, 2528-2534[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Wattenberg, L. W.
(1985)
Cancer Res.
45,
1-8 |
| 3. |
Zhang, Y.,
Talalay, P.,
Cho, C. G.,
and Posner, G. H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
2399-2403 |
| 4. |
Prochaska, H. W.,
DeLong, M. J.,
and Talalay, P.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
8232-8236 |
| 5. |
Morse, M. A.,
and Stoner, G. D.
(1993)
Carcinogenesis
14,
1737-1746 |
| 6. | Pezzuto, J. M. (1995) in Recent Advances in Phytochemistry: Phytochemistry of Medicinal Plants (Arnason, J. T. , Mata, R. , and Romeo, J. T., eds) , pp. 19-45, Plenum Press, New York |
| 7. | Kensler, T. W. (1997) Environ. Health Perspect. 105 Suppl. 4, 965-970 |
| 8. |
Rushmore, T. H.,
and Pickett, C. B.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
14648-14653 |
| 9. |
Friling, R. S.,
Bensimon, A.,
Tichauer, Y.,
and Daniel, V.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6258-6262 |
| 10. |
Rushmore, T. H.,
Morton, M. R.,
and Pickett, C. B.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
11632-11639 |
| 11. |
Li, Y.,
and Jaiswal, A. K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15097-15104 |
| 12. | Bergelson, S., Pinkus, R., and Daniel, V. (1994) Oncogene 9, 565-571[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Wang, B., and Williamson, G. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1219, 645-652[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Yoshioka, K.,
Deng, T.,
Cavigelli, M.,
and Karin, M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4972-4976 |
| 15. |
Venugopal, R.,
and Jaiswal, A. K.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14960-14965 |
| 16. | Wasserman, W. W., and Fahl, W. E. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 344, 387-396[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Itoh, K., Chiba, T., Takahashi, S., T., I., Igarashi, K., Katoh, Y., Oyake, T., Hayashi, N., Satoh, K., Hatayama, I., Yamamoto, M., and Nabeshima, Y.-I. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 236, 313-322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Han, J.,
Lee, J.-D.,
Bibbs, R.,
and Ulevitch, J.
(1994)
Science
265,
808-811 |
| 19. |
Brewster, J. L.,
de Valoir, T.,
Dwyer, N. D.,
Winter, E.,
and Gustin, M. C.
(1993)
Science
259,
1760-1763 |
| 20. | Lee, J. C., Laydon, J. T., McDonnell, P. C., Gallagher, T. F., Kumar, S., Green, D., McNulty, D., Blumenthal, M. J., Heys, J. R., Landvatter, S. W., Strickler, J. E., McLaughlin, M. M., Siemens, I. R., Fisher, S. M., Livi, G. P., White, J. R., Adams, J. L., and Young, P. R. (1994) Nature 372, 739-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Rouse, J., Cohen, P., Trigon, S., Morange, M., Alonso-Liamazares, A., Zamanillo, D., Hunt, T., and Nebreda, A. R. (1994) Cell 78, 1027-1037[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Freshney, N. W., Rawlinson, L., Guesdon, F., Jones, E., Cowley, S., Hsuan, J., and Saklatvala, J. (1994) Cell 78, 1039-1049[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Derijard, B.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Barrett, T.,
Wu, I.,
Han, J.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1995)
Science
267,
682-685 |
| 24. |
Moriguchi, T.,
Toyoshima, F.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Irie, K.,
Mori, E.,
Kuroyanagi, N.,
Hagiwara, M.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Nishida, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26981-26988 |
| 25. | Kyriakis, J., and Avruch, J. (1996) BioEssays 18, 567-577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Raingeaud, J.,
Gupta, S.,
Rogers, J. S.,
Dickens, M.,
Han, J.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7420-7426 |
| 27. |
Han, J.,
Lee, J. D.,
Tobias, P. S.,
and Ulevitch, R. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25009-25014 |
| 28. |
Thuerauf, D. J.,
Arnold, N. D.,
Zechner, D.,
Hanford, D. S.,
DeMartin, K. M.,
McDonough, P. M.,
Prywes, R.,
and Glembotski, C. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20636-20643 |
| 29. | Wang, X.-Z., and Ron, D. (1996) Science 272, 1347-1349[Abstract] |
| 30. | Han, J., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Kravchenko, V. V., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1997) Nature 386, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Whitmarsh, A. J., Yang, S. H., Su, M. S., Sharrocks, A. D., and Davis, R. J. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2360-2371[Abstract] |
| 32. |
McLaughlin, M. M.,
Kumar, S.,
McDonnell, P. C.,
Van Horn, S.,
Lee, J. C.,
Livi, G. P.,
and Young, P. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8488-8492 |
| 33. | Young, P. R. (1998) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 9, 239-257[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Crawley, J. B.,
Rawlinson, L.,
Lali, F. V.,
Page, T. H.,
Saklatvala, J.,
and Foxwell, B. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15023-15027 |
| 35. |
Morooka, T.,
and Nishida, E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24285-24288 |
| 36. |
Saklatvala, J.,
Rawlinson, L.,
Waller, R. J.,
Sarsfield, S.,
Lee, J. C.,
Morton, L. F.,
Barnes, M. J.,
and Farndale, R. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6586-6589 |
| 37. |
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Science
270,
1326-1331 |
| 38. |
Wasserman, W. W.,
and Fahl, W. E.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5361-5366 |
| 39. |
Yu, R.,
Jiao, J.-J.,
Duh, J.-L.,
Tan, T.-H.,
and Kong, A.-N. T.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2954-2959 |
| 40. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , pp. 16.66-16.67, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 41. |
Prochaska, H. J.,
and Talalay, P.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
4776-4782 |
| 42. |
Prestera, T.,
Holtzclaw, W. D.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Talalay, P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2965-2969 |
| 43. |
Gerhauser, C.,
You, M.,
Liu, J.,
Moriarty, R. M.,
Hawthorne, M.,
Metha, R. J.,
Moon, R. C.,
and Pezzuto, J. M.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
272-278 |
| 44. |
Young, P. R.,
McLaughlin, M. M.,
Kumar, S.,
Kassis, S.,
Doyle, M. L.,
McNulty, D.,
Gallagher, T. F.,
Fisher, S.,
McDonnell, P. C.,
Carr, S. A.,
Huddleston, M. J.,
Seibel, G.,
Porter, T. G.,
Livi, G. P.,
Adams, J. L.,
and Lee, J. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12116-12121 |
| 45. |
Favreau, L. V.,
and Pickett, C. B.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4556-4561 |
| 46. | Jaiswal, A. K. (1994) Pharmacogenetics 4, 1-10[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. |
Yu, R.,
Tan, T.-H.,
and Kong, A.-N. T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28962-28970 |
| 48. | Talalay, P. (1989) Adv. Enzyme Regul. 28, 237-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Hayes, J. D., and Pulford, D. J. (1995) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 30, 445-600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. |
Itoh, K.,
Wakabayashi, N.,
Yasutake, K.,
Ishii, T.,
Igarashi, K.,
Engel, J. D.,
and Yamamoto, M.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
76-86 |
| 51. | Nagase, T., Seki, N., Tanaka, K., Ishikawa, K., and Nomura, N. (1995) DNA Res. 2, 164-174 |
| 52. | Liu, Y., Guyton, K. Z., Gorospe, M., Xu, Q., Lee, J. C., and Holbrook, N. J. (1996) Free Radical Biol. Med. 21, 771-781[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. |
Shirakabe, K.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shibura, H.,
Irie, K.,
Matsuda, S.,
Moriguchi, T.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Nishida, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8141-8144 |
| 54. |
Ichijo, H.,
Nishida, E.,
Irie, K.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Saitoh, M.,
Motiguchi, T.,
Takagi, M.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Miyazono, K.,
and Gotoh, Y.
(1997)
Science
275,
90-94 |
| 55. | Ainbinder, E., Bergelson, S., and Daniel, V. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 243, 49-57[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 56. |
Yu, R.,
Lei, W.,
Mandlekar, S.,
Weber, M. J.,
Der, C. J.,
Wu, J.,
and Kong, A.-N. T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27545-27552 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. J. Buenz A BRIEF COMMUNICATION: Hepatocytes Detoxify Atuna racemosa Extract Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2006; 231(11): 1739 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Brust, F. S. Cayabyab, N. Zhou, and B. A. MacVicar p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Contributes to Adenosine A1 Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Depression in Area CA1 of the Rat Hippocampus J. Neurosci., November 29, 2006; 26(48): 12427 - 12438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-S. Keum, S. Yu, P. P.-J. Chang, X. Yuan, J.-H. Kim, C. Xu, J. Han, A. Agarwal, and A.-N. T. Kong Mechanism of Action of Sulforaphane: Inhibition of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Isoforms Contributing to the Induction of Antioxidant Response Element-Mediated Heme Oxygenase-1 in Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8804 - 8813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Xu, X. Yuan, Z. Pan, G. Shen, J.-H. Kim, S. Yu, T. O. Khor, W. Li, J. Ma, and A.-N. T. Kong Mechanism of action of isothiocyanates: the induction of ARE-regulated genes is associated with activation of ERK and JNK and the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Nrf2. Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1918 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Thasler, R. Dayoub, M. Muhlbauer, C. Hellerbrand, T. Singer, A. Grabe, K.-W. Jauch, H.-J. Schlitt, and T. S. Weiss Repression of Cytochrome P450 Activity in Human Hepatocytes in Vitro by a Novel Hepatotrophic Factor, Augmenter of Liver Regeneration J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 822 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, H. Liu, K. E. Iles, R.-M. Liu, E. M. Postlethwait, Y. Laperche, and H. J. Forman 4-Hydroxynonenal Induces Rat {gamma}-Glutamyl Transpeptidase through Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Mediated Electrophile Response Element/Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 Signaling Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 174 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. White, R. Tse, and B. A. Marroquin Stress-Activated Protein Kinases Mediate Cell Migration in Human Airway Epithelial Cells Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2005; 32(4): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Srinivasan, D. T. Bolick, M. E. Hatley, R. Natarajan, K. B. Reilly, M. Yeh, C. Chrestensen, T. W. Sturgill, and C. C. Hedrick Glucose Regulates Interleukin-8 Production in Aortic Endothelial Cells through Activation of the p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Diabetes J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31930 - 31936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang and G. B. Gordon A strategy for cancer prevention: Stimulation of the Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2004; 3(7): 885 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Shen, V. Hebbar, S. Nair, C. Xu, W. Li, W. Lin, Y.-S. Keum, J. Han, M. A. Gallo, and A.-N. T. Kong Regulation of Nrf2 Transactivation Domain Activity: THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE CASCADES AND SYNERGISTIC STIMULATORY EFFECT OF Raf AND CREB-BINDING PROTEIN J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 23052 - 23060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||