![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 4, 2560-2567, January 28, 2000
From the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Cox Institute, and the Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The insulin-responsive aminopeptidase
(IRAP/VP165/gp160) was identified originally in GLUT4-containing
vesicles and shown to translocate in response to insulin, much like the
glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4). This study characterizes the trafficking
and kinetics of IRAP in exocytosis, endocytosis, and recycling to the
membrane in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. After exposure of 3T3-L1 adipocytes to
insulin, IRAP translocated to the plasma membrane as assessed by either cell fractionation, surface biotinylation, or the plasma membrane sheet
assay. The rate of exocytosis closely paralleled that of GLUT4. In the
continuous presence of insulin, IRAP was endocytosed with a half-time
of about 3-5 min. IRAP endocytosis is inhibited by cytosol
acidification, a property of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, but not by
the expression of a constitutively active Akt/PKB. Arrival in an LDM
fraction derived via subcellular fractionation exhibited a slower time
course than disappearance from the cell surface, suggesting additional
endocytic intermediates. As assayed by membrane "sheets," GLUT4 and
IRAP showed similar internalization rates that are
wortmannin-insensitive and occur with a half-time of roughly 5 min.
IRAP remaining on the cell surface 10 min following insulin removal was
both biotin- and avidin-accessible, implying the absence of thin-necked
invaginations. Finally, endocytosed IRAP quickly recycled back to the
plasma membrane in a wortmannin-sensitive process. These results
demonstrate rapid endocytosis and recycling of IRAP in the presence of
insulin and trafficking that matches GLUT4 in rate.
The metabolic hormone insulin promotes the disposal of glucose
into its peripheral target tissues, adipose and muscle.
Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake is mediated primarily by the rapid
movement of the fat/muscle-specific glucose transporter
(GLUT)1 4 from a latent
intracellular compartment to the cell surface (1). The subcellular
trafficking of GLUT4 has been studied using an impermeant photolabel
specific for the extracellular sugar-binding site of the transporter
(2-4). These studies demonstrated that in the presence of insulin
there was constant recycling of GLUT4 between the intracellular
compartment and the plasma membrane, although the total amount of GLUT4
in the plasma membrane was elevated and constant. There are data
supporting the existence of exocytotic intermediates in which GLUT4
might be present in the membrane but inaccessible to substrate (2).
Also, a recent report studying GLUT4 in CHO cells demonstrated
endocytotic intermediates similar to those described for a synaptic
vesicle protein, synaptophysin (5, 6).
Recently, the insulin-responsive aminopeptidase (IRAP) has been cloned,
shown to reside in the GLUT4-containing basal compartment, and also
translocate to the plasma membrane after insulin stimulation (7, 8).
The physiological function of IRAP has been hypothesized to be hormonal
modulation of circulating vasoactive peptides such as vasopressin (9,
10). Indeed, determining the normal function of IRAP might be critical
in defining the mechanism of diabetic complications such as
hypertension or peripheral vascular disease that might result from
impaired translocation of IRAP. Therefore, investigating the normal
trafficking and biology of IRAP is critical not only to illuminate
insulin-stimulated trafficking but as a first step in eventually
defining pathologies in conditions such as diabetes.
The purpose of this study was to describe the trafficking and kinetics
of IRAP in the context of GLUT4 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Several studies
have shown overlapping subcellular distribution of GLUT4 by light
microscopy (11, 12) and subcellular fraction (13, 14). Whereas the
steady state location of IRAP is overlapping with GLUT4, its
trafficking has not been described in detail. One report suggests that
IRAP and GLUT4 traffic differently in response to high glucose or
glucosamine (15). Another demonstrates IRAP exclusion from cardiac
secretory granules containing atrial natriuretic factor and GLUT4 (11).
Finally, a third report studying rat fat demonstrates that IRAP does
not internalize in the presence of insulin (16); this is in marked
contrast to the constitutive recycling of GLUT4.
In an effort to define the trafficking and kinetics of IRAP movement,
we have adapted protocols using biotinylation to develop assays
measuring endocytosis and recycling of IRAP back to the cell surface.
Additionally, we employed the plasma membrane sheet protocol to compare
directly IRAP and GLUT4 levels on the cell surface. By using these
techniques we find IRAP is endocytosed rapidly both in the presence and
absence of insulin. Moreover, IRAP is endocytosed and exocytosed with
rates similar to GLUT4. These techniques have also allowed us to study
other details of IRAP as follows: its endocytosis is inhibited by
cytosolic acidification, a property of clathrin mediated endocytosis,
but not by a constitutively active Akt/PKB. Endocytic intermediates
likely occur between exiting the plasma membrane and arrival in the
LDM. Finally, we can directly demonstrate endocytosed IRAP rapidly
recycles to the plasma membrane in the presence of insulin.
Materials--
Crystalline porcine insulin was a gift of Lilly.
Polyclonal antibodies against IRAP cytoplasmic amino terminus were
kindly donated by Metabolex, Inc. (Hayward, CA). Polyclonal sheep
anti-GLUT4 antibodies were raised against a glutathione
S-transferase fusion protein encoding the last 31 amino
acids of the GLUT4 carboxyl terminus. Monoclonal mouse anti-IRAP were
raised against the 110 amino acids of the IRAP amino terminus. Affinity
purified/subtracted rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-sheep and affinity
purified/subtracted fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey
anti-mouse antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West
Grove, Pa). Bovine serum albumin used in translocation assays was from
Calbiochem. Wortmannin was purchased from Sigma and stored as a 10 mM stock in Me2SO. 125I-Protein A
was purchased from ICN Radiochemicals (Irvine, CA). A bicinchoninic
acid protein assay kit for the determination of protein concentrations
was from Pierce as were 2,2'-azine-di[3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate], streptavidin-HRP, neutravidin-HRP, sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin, and sulfo-NHS-S-S-biotin. Unless otherwise noted, all other chemicals were from Sigma.
Cell Culture--
3T3-L1 fibroblasts were grown at 37 °C in a
humidified atmosphere of 7.5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium containing 10% calf serum (Life Technologies Inc.).
Cells were plated onto either 18-mm square number 1 coverslips, 6-well
or 10-cm plates, and differentiated 2 days postconfluence with
dexamethasone (0.4 mg/ml), 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine (0.5 mM), and 10% fetal bovine serum as described (17) but
without supplemental insulin and including 25 µM
troglitazone. Adipocytes were maintained in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, fed every 7 days,
and used at approximately 10-30 days postdifferentiation. 3T3-L1
fibroblasts expressing both a myristoylated, constitutively active form
of the serine/threonine kinase Akt (myr-Akt-(D4-129)) and an empty
vector control (neo) were generously provided by Richard Roth, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA. The constitutively active myr-Akt construct
includes an amino-terminal myristoylation sequence rendering the
molecule constitutively active. The pleckstrin homology domain, amino
acids 4-129, was removed. The effects on glucose uptake of stable
expression of these constructs into 3T3-L1s was described previously
(18).
IRAP Biotinylation Assay for Translocation--
The presence of
IRAP on the cell surface was determined using an IRAP biotinylation
assay similar to that described previously (19). 3T3-L1 adipocytes in
6-well dishes were washed twice in PBS, once in Leibovitz-15 media with
0.2% BSA, and left in that media for 2 h at 37 °C. Cells were
treated with 20 nM insulin for 20 min. All subsequent steps
were performed at 4 °C. Cells were washed twice in ice-cold KRPH
(128 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.25 mM
CaCl2, 1.25 mM MgSO4, 5 mM NaPO4, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) and treated with 1 ml of 0.5 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin in KRPH for 30 min. Each plate was then bathed three times for 10 min each in KRPH
containing 20 mM glycine, twice with KRPH, and finally lysed in 1 ml of Solubilization Buffer (1% Triton, 150 mM
NaCl, 20 mM Tris-Cl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µM leupeptin, 1 µM pepstatin A, pH 7.4). The lysate was vortexed briefly, incubated for 15 min, and centrifuged at 23,000 × g for 15 min. After passing the
supernatants through a 45-µm filter (Millipore), BCA assay was
performed to determine protein concentration. 600 µg of protein was
diluted to 500 µl with Solubilization Buffer and reacted with
polyclonal anti-IRAP sera overnight, followed by 3-6 h incubation in
protein A-Sepharose. These conditions were shown to consistently remove
greater than 90% of IRAP from the supernatant. SDS-gels of the boiled
and reduced immunoadsorbates were transferred to PVDF+ membranes,
blocked in TBS-T with 6% BSA, treated with 1 µg/ml of
streptavidin-HRP for 2 h, washed in TBS-T, and developed using
ECL+ (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) on a STORM 860 Scanner detecting
chemifluorescence. The signal intensity of quantitated samples was
shown to be within the linear range of detection.
Subcellular Fractionation--
Cells were fractionated by
standard techniques (2). Briefly, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were resuspended in
HES (255 mM sucrose, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA), homogenized by passing through an EMBL Cell
Cracker (clearance of 18 µm), and subjected to differential centrifugation. The supernatant from the following spins were serially
removed and pelleted in a Ti70 rotor as follows: 19,000 × g (20 min), 41,000 × g (20 min), and
180,000 × g (75 min). The first 19,000 × g pellet was resuspended, loaded onto a sucrose cushion
(1.12 M sucrose, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA), and isolated from the interface yielding the
Plasma Membrane (PM) fraction as the pellet of a 41,000 × g spin (20 min). The last 180,000 × g
pellet corresponded to the Low Density Microsome (LDM) fraction. After
resuspension of pellets in Solubilization Buffer, protein concentration
was determined by bicinchoninic acid protein assay, and 20 µg of each
fraction was loaded for Western blotting. For immunoprecipitation, 100 µg of LDM and 50 µg of PM were solubilized in 1% Triton, passed
through a 45 µm filter, and used for immunoprecipitation of IRAP as
detailed above. For experiments measuring total cell IRAP in parallel,
aliquots removed after passage through the Cell Cracker but before
differential centrifugation were raised to 1% Triton and 100 mM NaCl and subjected to immunoprecipitation of IRAP as
detailed above.
Immunofluorescence of Plasma Membrane Sheets--
To measure the
presence of GLUT4 and IRAP on the cell surface, the plasma membrane
sheet assay was used (20, 21) with modifications to allow quantitation
of triple label. Plasma membrane "sheets" were prepared and
processed for indirect immunofluorescence using affinity purified sheep
antibodies to the carboxyl-terminal portion of GLUT4 and pooled ascites
derived from three separate monoclonal hybridomas raised against the
amino terminus of IRAP. Following primary incubation, membranes were
incubated with rhodamine-conjugated anti-sheep secondary and
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antisera. To
stain for plasma membranes, 0.1 µg/µl
phosphatidylethanolamine-biotin (Molecular Probes) and 0.1 µg/µl
Marina-Blue Neutra-Lite Avidin (Molecular Probes) were included with
primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. The images were
acquired using a Princeton Instruments cooled CCD camera, and the
amounts of GLUT4 and IRAP on the plasma membrane were quantitated by
measuring the fluorescence intensity of at least seven fields. Digital
image processing was performed as described previously except
quantitated in 2 channels of florescence (21, 22).
For washout experiments, insulin was removed using an acid wash
technique (23). Cells were quickly washed twice in KRPM (128 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.25 mM
CaCl2, 1.25 mM MgSO4, 5 mM NaPO4, 10 mM MES, pH 6.0), and
returned to 37 °C in the same buffer.
For wortmannin treatment, cells were treated with drug either prior to
or after insulin stimulation. For the former, 500 nM wortmannin was added for the final 50 min, and insulin was added for
the final 20 min of a 2-h incubation in serum-free media. For the
latter, cells were stimulated with 20 nM insulin for 20 min, incubated with 500 nM wortmannin at 4 °C for 30 min, and warmed in the presence of 500 nM wortmannin for 10 min.
IRAP Reversible Biotinylation Assay for Endocytosis--
IRAP
endocytosis was measured by its protection from cleavage by a
membrane-impermeable reagent based on published pulse-chase protocols
(24, 25). Cells were stimulated with insulin, biotinylated, and
glycine-treated as for Biotinylation Translocation Assay except for the
substitution of sulfo-NHS-S-S-biotin for sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin. After
washing twice with KRPH, cells were raised to 37 °C by the addition
of prewarmed Leibovitz-15 medium containing 0.2% BSA and 100 nM insulin and then floated on a water bath at a setting sufficient to maintain temperature. Following "chase" incubation periods of 0.5-20 min, cells were removed to an ice bath, and washed
twice with KRPH at 4 °C. All subsequent steps were performed at
4 °C. Cells were washed once and incubated for 15-min intervals in
Cleavage Buffer (50 mM glutathione, 90 mM NaCl,
1 mM MgCl, 0.1 mM CaCl, 60 mM NaOH,
0.2% BSA, pH 8.6) for a total of 45 min. Subsequent to washing cells
in KRPH three times, cells were solubilized and processed as for
Biotinylation Translocation Assay using an anti-IRAP
immunoprecipitation protocol with the omission of reducing agent in
SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Alternatively, cell lysates were incubated with
streptavidin-agarose for 1 h and eluted with sample buffer
containing reducing agent and developed as for Biotinylation Translocation Assay with the replacement of rabbit anti-IRAP and 125I-protein A for streptavidin-HRP. Data are expressed
either as "Cell Surface IRAP" or "Percent Escaping Cleavage."
The former is determined by first subtracting the value of
biotinylation after immediate cleavage from all other values, dividing
by total uncleaved signal, and subtracting from 1. The latter is
determined by first subtracting the value of biotinylation after
immediate cleavage from all other values and dividing by maximum
protected signal.
Cytosolic Acidification--
As described previously (26, 27),
cells were exposed to a media containing acetic acid in order to
acidify cytosol. After biotinylation and glycine treatment cells were
washed twice in Leibovitz-15, pH 5.0 (HCl), washed twice in
Leibovitz-15, pH 5.0 (acetic acid), and left in a third wash of
Leibovitz-15, pH 5.0 (acetic acid), for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were
exposed to identical media prewarmed to 37 °C, chilled at various
times, and cleaved as described under Reversible Biotinylation Assay.
IRAP Biotinylation Assay Avidin Accessibility--
The
accessibility of biotin to avidin was performed as described (28) with
minor modifications. All steps were performed at 4 °C. Following
biotinylation and glycine treatment, cells were treated with avidin
buffer (KRPH, 0.2% BSA, 250 µg/ml avidin) for 1 h, washed twice
in KRPH, and incubated for 30 min in biocytin buffer (KRPH, 0.2% BSA,
250 µg/ml biocytin) to quench remaining available avidin sites. Cells
were rinsed three times in KRPH and processed as in Biotinylation Assay
for Translocation with the omission of boiling step before loading
samples for SDS-PAGE to preclude disassembly of the avidin-biotin complexes.
Reappearance Assay--
The recycling of IRAP back to the cell
surface was monitored based on a published protocol examining recycling
of antigen in B cells (29). Cells were stimulated with insulin,
biotinylated, glycine-treated, and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min as
described for the IRAP Reversible Biotinylation Protocol with the
substitution of LC-LC biotin for cleavable S-S biotin. Cells were then
avidin-treated and biocytin-quenched as described above. Cells were
warmed again to 37 °C for indicated times and returned to 4 °C by
the addition of cooled KRPH. All subsequent steps were performed at
4 °C. Next, cells were treated with Neutravidin Buffer (KRPH, 0.2%
BSA, 25 µg/ml neutravidin-HRP) for 1 h and quenched with
biocytin a second time. Lysates were prepared, and IRAP was
immunoprecipitated from 1 mg of protein as described above.
2,2'-Azine-di[3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate] (ABTS) was added to
immunoprecipitates, incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, pelleted, and the
reaction product measured at A405 nm.
IRAP Translocates like GLUT4 from the LDM to the PM--
IRAP
recently has been identified (8), cloned (7), and its subcellular
distribution shown to be overlapping with GLUT4 (11-14). In an attempt
to characterize IRAP trafficking in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, we measured
insulin-stimulated translocation to the cell surface by three
complimentary methods. The first was a quantitative biotinylation
protocol adapted from published studies (8, 14). Insulin treatment
induced a large increase in IRAP available at the cell surface for
biotinylation (Fig. 1A). We
next applied techniques that are useful for measuring GLUT4
translocation as well as that of IRAP. After stimulating cells with
insulin or maintaining them in a basal state, we homogenized cells and
fractionated them into Plasma Membrane (PM), and Low Density Microsome
(LDM) fractions (Fig. 1B) (30). Insulin elicited a dramatic
redistribution of IRAP from the LDM fraction to the PM fraction,
similar to GLUT4 (31). Finally, to compare directly trafficking of
GLUT4 and IRAP in the same cells, we labeled membrane sheets for the
presence of IRAP and GLUT4 (Fig. 1C). Quantitation of images
revealed a similar degree of translocation between the two proteins.
These results demonstrating insulin-stimulated translocation of IRAP are consistent with previous reports (12, 14, 32) and serve to
emphasize the parallel between IRAP and GLUT4 trafficking.
In the Presence of Insulin IRAP Is Rapidly Endocytosed and
Continues to Recycle to the Plasma Membrane--
A recent report
demonstrated that IRAP does not endocytose in the presence of insulin
in rat fat (16). To measure internalization in our cells, we adapted a
reversible biotinylation technique to pulse-chase labeled IRAP into
cells and determine the amount remaining on the surface by its
susceptibility to a membrane-impermeable cleavage reagent. Cells were
stimulated with insulin, biotinylated at 4 °C to label IRAP, and
rewarmed in the presence of insulin for lengthening time. At the
indicated time points, cells were chilled again and treated with an
impermeant reducing agent, which cleaves the disulfide bond joining the
biotin moiety with the protein-binding NHS ester. Thus, at time 0 most
of the total label should be removed, and if internalization occurs, at
later time points the biotin label should be protected. By using this
method we indeed saw rapid and extensive internalization of IRAP (Fig. 2, A and B). In
Fig. 2A, lysates were precipitated with avidin-agarose and submitted to Western blot analysis with antibodies against IRAP. In
Fig. 2B lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-IRAP antibodies, and the biotinylated IRAP was detected with
streptavidin-HRP. Results were quantitated and expressed as cell
surface IRAP. By using either method of detection, IRAP was found to be
rapidly internalized in the presence of insulin with a
t1/2 of approximately 3 min.
To determine the kinetics of the entire population of IRAP, cells were
biotinylated at 37 °C in the presence of insulin for increasing
times, and afterward biotinylated material was precipitated from cell
lysates with avidin-agarose as in Fig. 2A. Precipitated material was then assayed for IRAP by Western blot analysis and compared with total cellular IRAP. Fig. 2C demonstrates a
time-dependent increase in IRAP biotinylation such that
virtually all IRAP in the cell has translocated to the cell surface at
least once by 1 h. Furthermore, since cell surface levels of IRAP
are constant after 10 min of insulin stimulation (Fig. 5A),
these data indicate that intracellular stores of IRAP are constantly
driven to the cell surface to replace the internalized IRAP
demonstrated in Fig. 2, A and B.
IRAP Endocytosis Is Inhibited by Cytosol Acidification but Not by
myr-Akt--
Cytosolic acidification has been shown to inhibit
potently clathrin-mediated endocytosis by disruption of the clathrin
lattice (33). Insulin-treated, biotinylated cells were warmed for 2 or
5 min in regular or cytosolic acidification media and then exposed to
cleavage buffer (Fig. 3A). For
the final washout lane, cells were warmed for 5 min in acidification
media, chilled, washed, and warmed for the final 15 min in pH 7.4 media. Cytosolic acidification prevented any sequestration from
cleavage buffer, but its removal allowed biotinylated IRAP to
endocytose and escape cleavage. These data support a role for clathrin
in the endocytosis of IRAP.
We next tested the mechanism of Akt-induced increases of plasma
membrane IRAP. A constitutively active myristoylated Akt results in a
large increase in IRAP and GLUT4 present at the plasma membrane (Fig.
3B, inset) (21). To test whether Akt might be
inhibiting endocytosis, cells expressing a constitutively active
myr-Akt construct were compared with empty vector controls in a
reversible biotinylation endocytosis assay as in Fig. 2B.
Both cells demonstrated similar rates indicating that inhibition of
endocytosis does not account for the ability of myr-Akt to stimulate
translocation of IRAP to the cell surface.
IRAP Arrival in the LDM Is Slower Than Escape from
Cleavage--
Because of the likelihood that development of
biotinylated IRAP's resistance to cleavage is a very early event in
its endocytosis, the rate of escape from cleavage was compared with the
rate of arrival into LDM. Sensitivity to cleavage by impermeant
reducing agent was determined from experiments performed as in Fig.
2B, with the data expressed as percent escaping cleavage.
Arrival into the LDM was determined by fractionating cells treated as in Fig. 2, A and B, immunoprecipitating IRAP from
the LDM pellet, and assaying for biotinylated IRAP with
streptavidin-HRP. At 5 min after warming there was a smaller quantity
of IRAP present in LDM compared with that which is inaccessible to
extracellular cleavage (Fig.
4A). To verify this delay, the
escape from cleavage was determined in the same cells used to measure
arrival in LDM. As shown in Fig. 4B, after 1 min of
internalization, there was a statistically significant difference in
the percent escaping cleavage (40%) versus that arriving in
LDM (15%). This discrepancy does not simply reflect contamination of
PM with LDM as indicated by its disappearance at later time points.
Thus, after a 40-min chase, 60% more of the internalized IRAP is
pelleted in the LDM fraction compared with the recovery of internalized
IRAP in the LDM after a 1-min chase.
IRAP Exocytic and Endocytic Rates Are Similar to GLUT4 in the
Presence and Absence of Insulin, Respectively--
To compare IRAP and
GLUT4 trafficking directly, plasma membrane sheets were used to assay
the quantity of these proteins on the same cell surfaces at different
time points after the addition or removal of insulin. The data
represented in Fig. 5A
demonstrate cells treated with 20 nM insulin at time 0 and
warmed for lengthening periods before surface levels of IRAP and GLUT4
were measured. IRAP and GLUT4 exocytotic rates are very similar, with a
half-time of approximately 5 min. To measure endocytotic rate in the
absence of insulin, a similar analysis was performed as shown in Fig. 5B. Insulin was withdrawn, and surface levels of IRAP and
GLUT4 were measured after lengthening times. Again, rates of
endocytosis correlate closely, with a half-time of approximately 5 min.
Finally, we compared the effect of wortmannin on IRAP and GLUT4
trafficking. Wortmannin potently inhibited translocation of the two
proteins if added before insulin treatment (Fig. 5C),
similar to previous reports (12). When wortmannin was added after
insulin stimulation in parallel to insulin withdrawal, the surface
levels of IRAP and GLUT4 decreased identically. Moreover, the rates of
internalization were identical to those observed when insulin was
removed in the absence of wortmannin (Fig. 5C).
Plasma Membrane IRAP Is Biotin- and Avidin-accessible in the
Presence and after the Withdrawal of Insulin--
Recent reports (6,
34) have indicated the presence of synaptic vesicle proteins in
compartments continuous with the plasma membrane but restricted by
thin-necked invaginations limiting accessibility to the large (69 kDa)
probe avidin. A recent report (5) has extended these findings to CHO
cells exogenously expressing GLUT4 showing that GLUT4, but not
transferrin receptor, was selectively sequestered in a compartment near
the plasma membrane as determined by immunofluorescence. We therefore
sought evidence for the presence of IRAP in such a compartment in
3T3-L1 adipocytes. To test IRAP accessibility to biotin, cells were
exposed to insulin and then withdrawn from the hormone for increasing
times before being chilled and biotinylated to determine the amount of
accessible IRAP. Shown in Fig.
6A is a comparison of the
amount of cell surface IRAP as determined by biotin accessibility and
plasma membrane sheets. Given the close correlation, it is likely that
the immunostained IRAP on sheets is all accessible to biotin. To
determine avidin accessibility, cells either in the presence of insulin
or 10 min after removal were biotinylated as above, maintained at
4 °C, and then exposed to avidin to complex all available biotin
sites. The remaining avidin was quenched with biocytin, and IRAP was immunoprecipitated and Western-blotted for streptavidin-HRP to detect
free biotin on IRAP. When 3T3-L1 adipocytes were exposed to avidin
immediately after biotinylation, greater than 90% of the biotin sites
on the protein were exofacially disposed and available for binding to
avidin. Similar data were obtained after allowing the cells to
internalize biotinylated IRAP for 10 min. Thus, IRAP appears accessible
to both biotin and avidin at all time points tested.
Rapid Wortmannin-sensitive Recycling of IRAP Back to the Cell
Surface--
To ascertain whether there is continuous recycling of
IRAP in the presence of insulin, IRAP was biotinylated, allowed to
internalize for 5 min, chilled, and all remaining biotin sites on the
cell surface were quenched with avidin. Cells were then rewarmed for the indicated times to allow exocytosis of internalized label. Finally,
cells were chilled and exposed to neutravidin-HRP to bind newly exposed
biotin residues. IRAP was immunoprecipitated and assayed for HRP
activity. Fig. 7A demonstrates
a time-dependent increase in HRP activity associated with
IRAP. After 3 min of warm-up, 60% of maximum measured levels were
achieved. In Fig. 7B, cells were exposed to 500 nM wortmannin during the final warm-up, demonstrating
wortmannin sensitivity of the reappearance process.
Originally identified as a constituent of GLUT4-containing
vesicles, the physiological role and trafficking pathways of IRAP still
remain undefined. The current study represents an attempt to define the
trafficking and kinetics of IRAP. We demonstrate four novel findings.
First, IRAP trafficking resembles closely that of GLUT4. IRAP displays
similar exocytosis and internalization rates, also undergoing constant
recycling between the plasma membrane and the LDM fraction in the
presence of insulin. Moreover, IRAP is likely endocytosed via
clathrin-coated pits, the means proposed for GLUT4 endocytosis
(35-38). Second, the candidate insulin effector Akt does not inhibit
IRAP endocytosis, indicating a truly insulinomimetic activity of the
kinase on exocytosis. Third, endocytic intermediates likely occur
between exit from the cell surface and arrival in LDM fraction. Fourth,
IRAP is unlikely to be endocytosed via plasma membrane continuous
compartments invoked for synaptic vesicle trafficking. These results
compliment previous reports demonstrating the steady-state
colocalization of IRAP with GLUT4 and lend support to the idea of a
family of insulin-responsive proteins that traffic similarly
(11-14).
An important finding of this study is the continuous endocytosis of
IRAP in the presence of insulin. By using a pulse-chase reversible
biotinylation technique, we demonstrate the recycling of IRAP in the
presence of insulin is rapid and robust, such that within 5 min of
insulin-stimulated translocation, 80% of surface-labeled IRAP is
intracellular. During this period when steady-state levels are
unchanged, intracellular IRAP is mobilized to the cell surface to
replace the endocytosed population. These data correlate well with the
reported constant recycling of GLUT4 in the presence of insulin (2, 4),
but the data disagree with a recent study in rat fat cells in which no
cell surface-labeled IRAP appeared in the LDM over the course of 30 min
of insulin stimulation (16). To reduce the likelihood that technical
differences might account for this discrepancy, we have used two
methods to detect endocytosed IRAP. First, we isolated biotinylated
IRAP by avidin-agarose beads and stained blots with anti-IRAP
antibodies comparing total IRAP protein to the amount escaping cleavage
reagent. Second, we immunoprecipitated IRAP and stained blots with
avidin-HRP to compare total biotin signal in IRAP to the biotin signal
in IRAP escaping cleavage. Both techniques demonstrated endocytosis in
the presence of insulin. Perhaps differences in 3T3-L1 adipocytes
versus rat fat might account for the discrepancy. In
agreement with the above report, we do also detect endocytosis of
transferrin receptor in the presence of
insulin.2
Although no previous reports have quantified IRAP internalization in
adipocytes, GLUT4 internalization rates have been measured in the
presence of insulin (4). The rate of internalization in 3T3-L1
adipocytes was ascertained using a labeled substrate analog covalently
bound to the GLUT4 receptor by photoactivation. By following this
kinetic pool in the presence of insulin, the authors determined a
half-time for endocytosis of 4.2 min for GLUT4 exit from the plasma
membrane fraction. This is very similar to the 3-min half-time measured
for IRAP using techniques described above. Although the differences are
probably within experimental variation, a functional measurement of
escape from a membrane cleavage reagent could be different from
movement between homogenized cell fractions, as used for GLUT4. We
indeed detected a delay when comparing rates of escape from cleavage
reagent to rates of arrival in the LDM. Within the same samples, there
was more than a 2-fold difference in the amount of IRAP internalized
into the whole cell lysate versus that recovered in the LDM
after a 1-min chase. This is reflected in a significantly lower
recovery of endocytosed signal in the LDM at early time points compared with ones at equilibrium; 60% more of the endocytosed signal was recovered in LDM after a 40-min chase compared with a 1-min chase. The
absence of endocytosed signal from the LDM at early time points might
indicate that the protected IRAP is either in a closed but pre-fission
state or perhaps in an immature vesicle of sedimentation properties
different than those of LDM.
When measured in parallel, GLUT4 and IRAP showed almost identical
exocytic and endocytic rates, prompting the question of whether IRAP is
endocytosed by a similar mechanism as GLUT4. GLUT4 has been shown by
electron microscopy (39) and cytosolic acidification (40) to bud from
clathrin-coated pits. IRAP possesses similar intracellular dileucine
motifs to GLUT4, but these were not necessary for endocytosis of IRAP
in chimerae with transferrin receptor expressed in CHO cells (41).
Therefore, we assayed IRAP endocytosis under conditions inhibiting
clathrin lattice formation, and we found that cytosolic acidification
completely and reversibly ablated internalization, supporting a role
for clathrin-mediated endocytosis of IRAP. Considering these
similarities in mechanism and rate, it seems likely IRAP and GLUT4 are
endocytosed by similar means.
A recent report concluded that GLUT4 endocytosis in CHO cells (5)
exhibits characteristics similar to those proposed for synaptic
vesicles (6, 34). These latter studies suggest that synaptic vesicle
biogenesis might occur from compartments continuous with the plasma
membrane but with thin-necked constrictions such that whereas biotin
may access this compartment, avidin may not (6). Since IRAP and GLUT4
show similar means of endocytosis, it seemed possible that the
insulin-responsive vesicle might also bud directly from the plasma
membrane, particularly in light of the recent demonstration of the
presence of GLUT4 in peripheral structures in CHO cells (5). However,
we found that IRAP was both biotin- and avidin-accessible in the
presence of insulin and, after its withdrawal, inconsistent with the
hypothesis of a plasma membrane-continuous donor compartment as
formulated in PC12 cells (6). A second prediction of the work in
synaptic vesicles and also reported for GLUT4 in CHO cells is that
cooling of cells to 15-18 °C would selectively inhibit endocytosis
of IRAP but not transferrin receptor. Attempts to demonstrate this phenomenon for IRAP in 3T3-L1 cells have also been
unsuccessful.2
Developing an assay for IRAP endocytosis has allowed us to ask whether
the putative downstream signaling molecule from the insulin receptor
Akt is stimulating exocytosis or inhibiting endocytosis. A
constitutively active construct of the Akt kinase did not inhibit endocytosis of IRAP indicating that Akt increases cell surface levels
of IRAP by a truly insulinomimetic capacity of stimulating exocytosis.
In conclusion, this study provides evidence for similar if not
identical trafficking in rate and path between IRAP and GLUT4. The
endocytosis of IRAP appears be clathrin-mediated and not analogous to
models proposed for synaptic vesicle recycling. We also provide novel
evidence for endocytic intermediates and the role of Akt in stimulating
exocytosis. The correlation in trafficking between GLUT4 and IRAP imply
that investigations of the mechanisms of GLUT4 retention and recycling
are equally pertinent to IRAP. Indeed, given the capacity of
microinjected IRAP amino-terminal fragments to stimulate GLUT4
translocation (42), the molecular machinery responsible for sorting
these molecules will likely be identical. Future studies might further
delineate these broadly outlined steps of endocytosis and recycling of
IRAP into more detailed movements between specific compartments.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Insulin-stimulated IRAP translocation in
3T3-L1 adipocytes. A, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated
with or without insulin (Ins) (20 nM) for the
final 20 min of a 2-h serum-free incubation in Leibovitz-15 medium
containing 0.2% BSA. Cells were then chilled, biotinylated, and
quenched as described under "Experimental Procedures." Shown is a
streptavidin-HRP-stained Western blot of IRAP immunoprecipitates. The
graph represents the mean ± S.E. of three experiments. Values in
the presence of insulin were set to 100%. B, cells were
stimulated as in A, fractionated, and submitted to Western
blot with anti-IRAP. Maximum values in PM and LDM were set to 100%. A
representative experiment is shown, as well as a graph showing the
mean ± S.D. of three experiments. C, cells were
stimulated as in A, and the extent of GLUT4 or IRAP
translocation was determined by the plasma membrane sheet assay. Images
were captured with a cooled CCD camera; a composite photomicrograph of
a typical plasma membrane sheet experiment depicting translocation is
shown. Images such as these were quantitated to generate the shown
graph. Values in the presence of insulin were set to 100%, and the
other values were normalized accordingly. The translocation graph
represents the mean ± S.E. of three experiments.
PE-biotin, phosphatidylethanolamine-biotin.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Constitutive endocytosis and exocytosis of
IRAP in the presence of insulin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
A, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were serum-deprived for 2 h in
Leibovitz-15 medium containing 0.2% BSA and stimulated with or without
20 nM insulin for the final 20 min. Cells were chilled,
biotinylated with reversible sulfo-NHS-S-S-biotin, quenched, and
rewarmed in 100 nM insulin for various amounts of time to
allow endocytosis of IRAP. At the conclusion of the warming, cells were
chilled again, washed, and incubated with a cell-impermeable biotin
cleavage buffer. Shown is a representative Western blot of
avidin-agarose precipitates stained with anti-IRAP and
125I-protein A. B, similar experiments as in
A except after cell lysis IRAP was immunoprecipitated and
transferred to Western blots that were stained by streptavidin-HRP.
Data are expressed as the percent cell surface IRAP at 0 time. Shown is
the mean ± S.E. of three experiments. C, 3T3-L1
adipocytes were serum-deprived for 2 h in Leibovitz-15 medium
containing 0.2% BSA and then incubated in 37 °C KRPH containing
sulfo-NHS-LC-LC-biotin and 100 nM insulin for increasing
times. Cells were quenched and lysed, and Western blots of
avidin-agarose precipitates or control lysates were stained with
anti-IRAP as shown in Fig. 1A. Data are expressed as % total IRAP. Shown is the mean ± S.E. of three experiments.
N/A, not applicable.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of cytosolic acidification and
expression of myr-Akt on internalization of IRAP in 3T3-L1
adipocytes. A, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were stimulated with
insulin, biotinylated, and quenched as in Fig. 2B. Cytosol
was acidified to pH 5.0 by the addition of Leibovitz-15, pH 5.0, at
4 °C and warmed to 37 °C in the same buffer for indicated times.
For the final washout lane, cells were warmed for 5 min in
cytosol-acidifying media, chilled, and washed with Leibovitz-15, pH
7.4, three times and warmed for the remaining 15 min in the same
buffer. At the indicated times, cells were chilled and treated with
cell-impermeable cleavage buffer as in Fig. 2B. Shown is a
representative Western blot of IRAP immunoprecipitates stained with
streptavidin-HRP. B, 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated as in Fig.
2B. Shown are the internalization curves for cells either
expressing the constitutively active myr-Akt construct or empty vector
control (Neo). Results are presented as the mean ± S.D. of three
experiments. Inset, Neo and Myr-Akt cells were stimulated
with insulin and biotinylated as in Fig. 1A. Shown is a
representative Western blot of IRAP immunoprecipitates stained with
streptavidin-HRP.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Comparison of IRAP appearance in the LDM
versus escape from cleavage. A, 3T3-L1
adipocytes were stimulated with insulin, biotinylated, quenched, and
warmed for increasing times and exposed to biotin cleavage buffer as in
Fig. 2B. Cells were then homogenized in HES, and subcellular
fractions were prepared. IRAP was immunoprecipitated from resuspended
LDM pellets, and the immunoprecipitate was blotted for biotin-IRAP with
streptavidin-HRP (solid line). Results are presented as the
mean ± S.D. of three experiments. Shown also are experiments
performed as in Fig. 2B with IRAP immunoprecipitated from
whole cells (shaded line). Results are presented as the
mean ± S.D. of three experiments. Data are expressed as percent
escaping cleavage with maximum values set to 100%. B, cells
were treated exactly as above, warmed for 1 min, and then homogenized.
Before fractionation, portions of sample were removed and raised to 1%
Triton to measure total cellular-protected IRAP. Remaining homogenates
were fractionated to yield LDM pellets for immunoprecipitation to
determine protected IRAP in LDM. The asterisk denotes the
statistical significant (p < 0.05) difference between
whole cell biotin-IRAP and LDM biotin-IRAP. Results are presented
as the mean ± S.E. of three experiments. Data are expressed as
above.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Comparison of IRAP and GLUT4 rates of
exocytosis and internalization. A, 3T3-L1 adipocytes
were incubated for 2 h in serum-free media and stimulated with
insulin (20 nM) for increasing lengths of time. IRAP and
GLUT4 translocation were determined by plasma membrane sheet assay. The
graph represents the mean ± S.E. of three experiments.
B, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were stimulated with insulin (20 nM) for 20 min as in Fig. 1C. Cells were briefly
chilled and stripped of insulin with an acid wash. After warming for
increasing times, GLUT4 and IRAP translocation was measured by plasma
membrane sheet assay. The graph represents the mean ± S.E. of
three experiments. C, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated as in
B except exposed to 500 nM wortmannin either for
30 min prior to insulin treatment (+ Wortmannin) or during
10 min of warm-up (10 min Wortmannin). The graph
represents the mean ± S.E. of three experiments.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Biotin and avidin accessibility to IRAP in
the presence and after the withdrawal of insulin. A, 3T3-L1
adipocytes were stimulated with insulin, then withdrawn for increasing
amounts of time as in Fig. 5B, and chilled. Cells were
biotinylated, quenched, and lysed for IRAP immunoprecipitation and
Western blotting with streptavidin-HRP (dashed
line). The graph represents the mean ± S.E.
of three experiments. The IRAP data from Fig. 5B are
replotted (shaded line). B, 3T3-L1 adipocytes
were treated as in A except, following biotinylation at 0 or
10 min, cells were exposed to excess avidin at 4 °C and then
quenched in excess biocytin before homogenization, immunoprecipitation
of IRAP, and Western blotting with streptavidin-HRP. The
graph represents the mean ± S.E. of three
experiments.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Recycling of endocytosed IRAP back to the
cell surface. A, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were stimulated with
insulin, biotinylated, and quenched as in Fig. 1A and then
warmed for 5 min at 37 °C before being chilled and treated with
avidin as in Fig. 6B to quench all available surface sites.
Cells were then rewarmed for increasing times before being chilled
again and incubated with neutravidin-HRP to bind any newly available
sites. Finally, cells were lysed, and immunoprecipitated IRAP was
incubated with ABTS to measure HRP activity. Colorimetric changes were
measured at 405 nm. B, cells were treated as above except
incubated in the presence or absence of 500 nM wortmannin
during final warm-up.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank the following for their contributions to this manuscript: Metabolex Inc. kindly donated anti-IRAP antibodies; Scott Summers offered thoughtful discussion and assistance in figure design; J. Todd Lawrence altruistically donated cells; and Cass Lutz provided assistance in the typing and editing of this manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK39615 (to M. J. B.) and MSTP 5-T32-GM-07170 (to L. A. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Clinical Research
Bldg., 415 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel.: 215-898-5001;
Fax: 215-573-9138; E-mail: birnbaum@hhmi.upenn.edu.
2 L. A. Garza and M. J. Birnbaum, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: GLUT, glucose transporter; IRAP, insulin responsive aminopeptidase; BSA, bovine serum albumin; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide; PM, plasma membrane; LDM, low density microsomes; LC, long chain; ABTS, 2,2'-azine-di[3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate]; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Birnbaum, M. J. (1992) Int. Rev. Cytol. 137, 239-297[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Satoh, S.,
Nishimura, H.,
Clark, A. E.,
Kozka, I. J.,
Vannucci, S. J.,
Simpson, I. A.,
Quon, M. J.,
Cushman, S. W.,
and Holman, G. D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
17820-17829 |
| 3. |
Jhun, B. H.,
Rampal, A. L.,
Liu, H.,
Lachaal, M.,
and Jung, C. Y.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17710-17715 |
| 4. |
Yang, J.,
and Holman, G. D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4600-4603 |
| 5. |
Wei, M. L.,
Bonzelius, F.,
Scully, R. M.,
Kelly, R. B.,
and Herman, G. A.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
565-575 |
| 6. |
Schmidt, A.,
Hannah, M. J.,
and Huttner, W. B.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
445-458 |
| 7. |
Keller, S. R.,
Scott, H. M.,
Mastick, C. C.,
Aebersold, R.,
and Lienhard, G. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23612-23618 |
| 8. |
Kandror, K. V.,
and Pilch, P. F.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8017-8021 |
| 9. |
Rogi, T.,
Tsujimoto, M.,
Nakazato, H.,
Mizutani, S.,
and Tomoda, Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
56-61 |
| 10. |
Herbst, J. J.,
Ross, S. A.,
Scott, H. M.,
Bobin, S. A.,
Morris, N. J.,
Lienhard, G. E.,
and Keller, S. R.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
E600-E606 |
| 11. | Martin, S., Rice, J. E., Gould, G. W., Keller, S. R., Slot, J. W., and James, D. E. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 2281-2291[Abstract] |
| 12. | Malide, D., St-Denis, J. F., Keller, S. R., and Cushman, S. W. (1997) FEBS Lett. 409, 461-468[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Sumitani, S.,
Ramlal, T.,
Somwar, R.,
Keller, S. R.,
and Klip, A.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
1029-1034 |
| 14. |
Ross, S. A.,
Scott, H. M.,
Morris, N. J.,
Liung, W.-Y.,
Mao, F.,
Lienhard, G. E.,
and Keller, S. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3328-3332 |
| 15. | Filippis, A., Clark, S., and Proietto, J. (1998) Biochem. J. 330, 405-411 |
| 16. |
Kandror, K. V.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25210-25217 |
| 17. |
Garcia de Herreros, A.,
and Birnbaum, M. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19994-19999 |
| 18. |
Kohn, A. D.,
Summers, S. A.,
Birnbaum, M. J.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31372-31378 |
| 19. |
Summers, S. A.,
Garza, L. A.,
Zhou, H.,
and Birnbaum, M. J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5457-5464 |
| 20. |
Fingar, D. C.,
Hausdorff, S. F.,
Blenis, J.,
and Birnbaum, M. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3005-3008 |
| 21. | Kohn, A. D., Summers, S. A., Birnbaum, M. J., and Roth, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31372-31378 |
| 22. | Hausdorff, S. F., Frangioni, J. V., and Birnbaum, M. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21931-21934 |
| 23. |
Gibbs, E. M.,
Allard, W. J.,
and Lienhard, G. E.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
16597-16603 |
| 24. | Bretscher, M. S., and Lutter, R. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 4087-4092[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Le Bivic, A.,
Real, F. X.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
9313-9317 |
| 26. |
Sandvig, K.,
Olsnes, S.,
Petersen, O. W.,
and van Deurs, B.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
679-689 |
| 27. |
Hansen, S. H.,
Sandvig, K.,
and van Deurs, B.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
121,
61-72 |
| 28. |
Carter, L. L.,
Redelmeier, T. E.,
Woollenweber, L. A.,
and Schmid, S. L.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
37-45 |
| 29. | Watts, C., and Davidson, H. W. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 1937-1945[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Simpson, I. A., Yver, D. R., Hissin, P. J., Wardzala, L. J., Karnieli, E., Salans, L. B., and Cushman, S. W. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 763, 393-407[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Clancy, B. M.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
12434-12443 |
| 32. |
Kandror, K.,
and Pilch, P. F.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
138-142 |
| 33. |
Heuser, J.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
401-411 |
| 34. |
Takei, K.,
Mundigl, O.,
Daniell, L.,
and De Camilli, P.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
1237-1250 |
| 35. |
Slot, J. W.,
Geuze, H. J.,
Gigengack, S.,
Lienhard, G. E.,
and James, D. E.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
123-135 |
| 36. |
Kao, A. W.,
Ceresa, B. P.,
Santeler, S. R.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25450-25457 |
| 37. |
Volchuk, A.,
Narine, S.,
Foster, L. J.,
Grabs, D.,
De Camilli, P.,
and Klip, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8169-8176 |
| 38. |
Al-Hasani, H.,
Hinck, C. S.,
and Cushman, S. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17504-17510 |
| 39. |
Robinson, L. J.,
Pang, S.,
Harris, D. S.,
Heuser, J.,
and James, D. E.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
1181-1196 |
| 40. |
Garippa, R. J.,
Johnson, A.,
Park, J.,
Petrush, R. L.,
and McGraw, T. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20660-20668 |
| 41. |
Johnson, A. O.,
Subtil, A.,
Petrush, R.,
Kobylarz, K.,
Keller, S. R.,
and McGraw, T. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17968-17977 |
| 42. |
Waters, S. B.,
D'Auria, M.,
Martin, S. S.,
Nguyen, C.,
Kozma, L. M.,
and Luskey, K. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23323-23327 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Flaumenhaft, N. Rozenvayn, D. Feng, and A. M. Dvorak SNAP-23 and syntaxin-2 localize to the extracellular surface of the platelet plasma membrane Blood, September 1, 2007; 110(5): 1492 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Swiatecka-Urban, L. Talebian, E. Kanno, S. Moreau-Marquis, B. Coutermarsh, K. Hansen, K. H. Karlson, R. Barnaby, R. E. Cheney, G. M. Langford, et al. Myosin Vb Is Required for Trafficking of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator in Rab11a-specific Apical Recycling Endosomes in Polarized Human Airway Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2007; 282(32): 23725 - 23736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Peck, S. Ye, V. Pham, R. N. Fernando, S. L. Macaulay, S. Y. Chai, and A. L. Albiston Interaction of the Akt Substrate, AS160, with the Glucose Transporter 4 Vesicle Marker Protein, Insulin-Regulated Aminopeptidase Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 20(10): 2576 - 2583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gonzalez and T. E. McGraw Insulin Signaling Diverges into Akt-dependent and -independent Signals to Regulate the Recruitment/Docking and the Fusion of GLUT4 Vesicles to the Plasma Membrane Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2006; 17(10): 4484 - 4493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Mandal, U. R. Pendurthi, and L. V. M. Rao Cellular localization and trafficking of tissue factor Blood, June 15, 2006; 107(12): 4746 - 4753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liu, J. C. Hou, R. T. Watson, and J. E. Pessin Initial entry of IRAP into the insulin-responsive storage compartment occurs prior to basal or insulin-stimulated plasma membrane recycling Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2005; 289(5): E746 - E752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hosaka, C. C. Brooks, E. Presman, S.-K. Kim, Z. Zhang, M. Breen, D. N. Gross, E. Sztul, and P. F. Pilch p115 Interacts with the GLUT4 Vesicle Protein, IRAP, and Plays a Critical Role in Insulin-stimulated GLUT4 Translocation Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2005; 16(6): 2882 - 2890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |