JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porter, M.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 4, 2721-2726, January 28, 2000


Reciprocal Regulation of Hck Activity by Phosphorylation of Tyr527 and Tyr416
EFFECT OF INTRODUCING A HIGH AFFINITY INTRAMOLECULAR SH2 LIGAND*

Margaret PorterDagger , Thomas Schindler§, John Kuriyan§, and W. Todd MillerDagger ∥

From the Dagger  Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8661 and the § Laboratories of Molecular Biophysics,  Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Src family tyrosine kinase Hck possesses two phosphorylation sites, Tyr527 and Tyr416, that affect the catalytic activity in opposite ways. When phosphorylated, Tyr527 and residues C-terminal to it are involved in an inhibitory intramolecular interaction with the SH2 domain. However, this sequence does not conform to the sequence of the high affinity SH2 ligand, pYEEI. We mutated this sequence to YEEI and show that this mutant form of Hck cannot be activated by exogenous SH2 ligands. The SH3 domain of Hck is also involved in an inhibitory interaction with the catalytic domain. The SH3 ligand Nef binds to and activates YEEI-Hck mutant in a similar manner to wild-type Hck, indicating that disrupting the SH3 interaction overrides the strengthened SH2 interaction. The other phosphorylation site, Tyr416, is the autophosphorylation site in the activation loop. Phosphorylation of Tyr416 is required for Hck activation. We mutated this residue to alanine and characterized its catalytic activity. The Y416A mutant shows a higher Km value for peptide and a lower Vmax than autophosphorylated wild-type Hck. We also present evidence for cross-talk between the activation loop and the intramolecular binding of the SH2 and SH3 domains.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Hematopoietic cell kinase (Hck)1 is a Src family nonreceptor tyrosine kinase expressed predominantly in cells of the myeloid and B-lymphoid lineages (1, 2). Hck has the characteristic SH2 and SH3 domains found in Src family kinases (for review, see Ref. 3). Three-dimensional structures of both Src and Hck (4-8) show that the SH3 domain binds a polyproline type II helix in the linker region between the SH2 domain and the catalytic domain (3). The SH2 domain binds a sequence in the C-terminal tail that requires phosphorylation on Tyr527 by c-Src kinase (CSK) (3) (chicken c-Src numbering is used throughout this paper). Intramolecular binding of both the SH2 and SH3 domains inhibits enzyme activity, and disruption of either of the interactions is associated with enzymatic activation and cell transformation (9-19).

In addition to the negative regulatory roles of the SH2 and SH3 domains, they are also able to target Src kinases to their substrates (Fig. 1). In this model, binding of substrates by the SH2 and/or SH3 domains would target Hck to potential substrates and concomitantly activate the catalytic domain. Evidence that supports this model has been obtained for Src. Src associates with its substrates p130Cas and AFAP-110 via direct binding of the SH2 and SH3 domains of Src to ligand binding motifs in the substrates (20, 21). These interactions appear to enhance the catalytic activity of Src; a peptide containing the SH2 and SH3 ligand motifs of Sin, a p130Cas-related Src substrate, activates c-Src (22).


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Positive and negative regulatory roles of the SH2 and SH3 domains. The catalytic domain of Hck (green) is shown in its down-regulated state with the SH2 domain (orange) bound to the C-terminal tail and the SH3 domain (blue) bound to the linker region. The binding affinity of both the SH2 and SH3 intramolecular ligands is relatively low. Exogenous higher affinity SH3 and SH2 ligands can disrupt the intramolecular interactions and activate Hck. The dashed lines indicate that the exogenous SH2 and SH3 ligands may be on the same polypeptide or on separate polypeptides, and they may be present on an Hck substrate. In the latter case, activated Hck would be tethered to the substrate and phosphorylate it at an enhanced rate. pY, phosphorylated tyrosine.

For Src, the sequences of the intramolecular ligands for the SH2 domain and SH3 domain do not conform to the highest affinity sequences as determined for the isolated domains (11, 23). The SH2 domain ligand in the C-terminal tail of Src, pYQPG, is not the highest affinity sequence. Peptide library studies showed that the preferred SH2 ligand sequence is pYEEI (23). The binding affinity of these sequences to the SH2 domain of Src was determined by isothermal titration calorimetry (24). The Kd values for the pYEEI-containing peptide and the pYQPG-containing peptide are 0.2 µM and 29 µM, respectively (24). Thus, the SH2 domain of Src displays a 150-fold higher affinity for the high affinity sequence, pYEEI, than for the tail sequence, pYQPG. Our premise is that the intramolecular SH2-binding site is lower in affinity so that exogenous ligands containing higher affinity sequences can compete for binding to the SH2 domain (11). We mutated the C-terminal tail of Hck from YQQQ to YEEI to determine the effect of introducing a high affinity intramolecular ligand on enzyme regulation and substrate targeting.

A recent crystal structure of YEEI-Hck in complex with the inhibitor PP1 is relevant to our mutant studies (Fig. 2A) (7). The relative orientation of SH3, SH2, and catalytic domains is unchanged from WT Hck (Fig. 2A). Importantly, this is the first Hck structure to model the activation loop (residues 404-432) (7). The activation loop containing unphosphorylated Tyr416 is positioned such that access of peptide substrates to the catalytic machinery is blocked (Fig. 2B) (7). It has been shown previously for Lck that the activation loop, when phosphorylated, is not in the active site (Fig. 2B) (25). These data, together with the fact that autophosphorylation on Tyr416 in the activation loop is required for maximum activity (15, 26-31), are consistent with a model where autophosphorylation causes a change in the conformation of the activation loop. In this model, autophosphorylation increases the catalytic activity of the enzyme by causing the activation loop to move out of the substrate-binding site, thereby allowing access to substrates. We mutated Tyr416 to alanine to investigate the relationship between autophosphorylation and kinase activity for Hck. We also used this mutant to investigate the relationship between autophosphorylation and down-regulation by intramolecular binding of SH2 and SH3 domains.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Structure of Hck. A, crystal structure of down-regulated YEEI-Hck in complex with the inhibitor PP1 (7). The SH3 domain is shown in yellow, the SH2 domain is green, the catalytic domain is blue, and the activation loop, linker region, and C-terminal tail are in red. The PP1 inhibitor is shown in green in the active site of Hck. B, effect of autophosphorylation on the activation loop. The structure on the left is the unphosphorylated form of YEEI-Hck (7), and the structure on the right is the autophosphorylated form of Lck (25). The activation loop is shown in red. When Tyr416 is unphosphorylated (left), it interacts with residues inside the peptide-binding site. In this conformation, the activation loop blocks the peptide-binding site. When Tyr416 is phosphorylated (right), the activation loop moves out of the peptide-binding site.

The crystal structure of down-regulated Hck (7) also suggests that the orientation of helix alpha C in the catalytic domain is a critical determinant of enzymatic activity. Before Hck is autophosphorylated, Glu310 on helix alpha C is pointed out of the active site. In crystal structures of active protein kinases such as Lck, helix alpha C is rotated relative to its position in Hck, and Glu310 projects inward toward the ATP-binding site (7, 11). When Hck is activated by autophosphorylation, Glu310 forms an ion pair with Lys295 and positions this residue to coordinate the alpha  and beta  phosphates of ATP (11). To test the importance of this ion pair in Hck catalysis, we mutated Glu310 to alanine and measured the catalytic activity of the enzyme.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein Expression and Purification-- C-terminally phosphorylated WT Hck and mutant forms of the enzyme were produced in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells (5, 7). His-tagged WT Hck, E310A Hck, and YEEI Hck were purified as described (7), except that the final purification step for WT Hck was a gamma -phosphate-linked ATP-Sepharose column (31). After the final column the protein was visualized as a single band by SDS-PAGE.

The purification method for Y416A Hck was similar, but several minor modifications were made. Cells expressing His-tagged Y416A Hck were lysed in a French pressure cell in 50 ml of HiLoad Q buffer A (20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 10% glycerol, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol) containing protease inhibitors (5 mg/liter aprotinin, 5 mg/liter leupeptin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), 0.1 mM vanadate, and 1 mM EDTA. Cell lysate was diluted to 200 ml, centrifuged, and filtered. The first step of purification was two 5-ml HiTrap SP columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in series with a HiLoad 26/10 Q-Sepharose High Performance (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The HiTrap SP columns were removed, and protein was eluted from the HiLoad Q column with a linear NaCl gradient. Fractions containing Hck were pooled, and NaCl and imidazole were added to match the column-loading buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 5% glycerol, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, M NaCl and 20 mM imidazole) for the 20 ml nickel nitrilotriacetic acid Superflow column (Qiagen). Hck was loaded onto the column, washed in buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 5% glycerol, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol), and eluted with a linear imidazole gradient. After pooling Hck-containing fractions, the His-tag was cleaved overnight on ice using a final concentration of 0.02 mg/ml His-tagged Tev protease. Complete cleavage of His tag was determined by SDS-PAGE. Buffer was exchanged with Mono Q buffer A (20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol) to remove imidazole. 2 ml of nickel nitrilotriacetic acid resin was added to 20 ml of sample and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with rocking to remove His-tagged Tev protease. The unbound fraction and one wash (5 ml) were collected and loaded onto a Mono Q HR 5/5 column. Protein was eluted from the Mono Q column with a linear NaCl gradient. Fractions containing Hck were pooled and concentrated to 0.5 ml on an Ultrafree-15 centrifugal filter unit (Millipore) and loaded on a Superdex 75 HR 10/30 equilibrated in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 50 mM NaCl, and 3 mM dithiothreitol. After the final column the protein was visualized as a single band by SDS-PAGE. The concentration of Y416A was determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad).

For WT and each of the mutants, we confirmed that Tyr527 was phosphorylated by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry analysis (5). Treatment of the sample with Yersinia protein tyrosine phosphatase caused a loss of 80 molecular mass units from the tryptic fragment containing Tyr527, confirming its phosphorylation state.

HIV-1 NL4-3 Nef protein was expressed as a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein in Escherichia coli NB42 cells. Cells were lysed in a French pressure cell in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitors (5 mg/liter aprotinin, 5 mg/liter leupeptin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Cell lysate was centrifuged and added to glutathione-agarose at 4 °C (Molecular Probes). The pellet was extracted with 1.5% N-lauroyl sarcosine, 25 mM triethanolamine, 100 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors (5 mg/liter aprotinin, 5 mg/liter leupeptin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at 4 °C for 30 min (32). The sample was centrifuged, and the detergent-extracted supernatant was added to the glutathione beads. After a 1-h incubation at 4 °C, the beads were washed. Glutathione-agarose with immobilized GST-Nef was used directly in ligand binding experiments or treated with 20 mM glutathione in 50 mM Tris, pH 8 to elute GST-Nef. The concentration of GST-Nef was determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad).

Synthetic Peptides-- Peptides were prepared by solid phase synthesis on an Applied Biosystems automated 431A peptide synthesizer. The peptides were purified by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography and characterized by MALDI-TOF. The sequences of the peptides used are: substrate peptide for phosphocellulose assay, Arg-Arg-Leu-Ile-Glu-Asp-Ala-His-Tyr-Ala-Ala-Arg-Gly (31); substrate peptide for the coupled assay, Ala-Glu-Glu-Glu-Ile-Tyr-Gly-Glu-Phe-Glu-Ala-Lys-Lys-Lys-Lys-Gly (33); SH2 binding peptide (pYEEI), Glu-Pro-Gln-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Pro-Ile-Lys-Gln (31); peptide containing both SH2 domain binding motif (pYEEI) and substrate motif, Arg-Arg-Leu-Glu-Asp-Ala-Ile-Tyr-Ala-Ala-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Glu-Pro-Pro-Gln-Tyr(P)-Glu-Glu-Ile-Gly (34); the control peptide for the pYEEI-containing substrate has the same sequence except Tyr(P) is substituted by Phe (34).

Protein Kinase Assays-- Kinase assays were performed by two methods: (i) the phosphocellulose paper assay (35, 36) and (ii) a coupled spectrophotometric assay (29). All experiments were carried out at 30 °C. The phosphocellulose assay buffer contained 30 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.84 mM peptide substrate, 0.5 mM ATP, and 100-500 cpm/pmol [gamma -32P]ATP. The phosphocellulose assay reactions were terminated by the addition of 10% ice-cold trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged, and aliquots were spotted onto p81 phosphocellulose paper (Whatman). The phosphocellulose paper was washed and counted in a scintillation counter to measure incorporation of 32P into peptide. E310A mutant and a WT control were assayed in duplicate both with and without preincubation (1 h, 4 °C, 1 µM enzyme, 200 µM ATP) in a final concentration of 80 nM enzyme.

WT, YEEI mutant, and Y416A Hck were assayed by the spectrophotometric assay (29). In this assay, the production of ADP was coupled to the oxidation of NADH measured as a reduction in absorbance at 340 nm. Reactions were performed in 500 µl of buffer containing 100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 0.28 mM NADH, 89 units/ml pyruvate kinase, and 124 units/ml lactate dehydrogenase. When autophosphorylated Hck was required, 1-10 µM Hck was preincubated with 0.5 mM ATP for 30 min at room temperature (31). Initial rates were measured, and kinetic parameters were determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the rates. Km was determined by fitting data to the Michaelis-Menten equation. Km values for ATP were determined using a range of ATP concentrations (20-500 µM) and 600 µM peptide substrate. Km values for peptide were determined using a range of peptide concentrations (75-2000 µM) and 250 µM ATP. The activation constant, Kact, was determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the rates as a function of ligand concentration (Nef or pYEEI peptide) using the equation,
v<SUB>a</SUB>=V<SUB><UP>act</UP></SUB>[<UP>L</UP>]/(K<SUB><UP>act</UP></SUB>+[<UP>L</UP>]) (Eq. 1)
where va = velocity measured in the presence of ligand minus the velocity measured in its absence, Vact = the maximal activated velocity minus the velocity measured in the absence of ligand, and [L] is the concentration of either Nef or pYEEI peptide (38). The Kact values for WT and YEEI-Hck were determined using preincubated enzyme and varying concentrations of pYEEI (8-500 µM) or Nef (3-75 µM). All Kact determinations were performed in substrate concentrations of 500 µM ATP and 600 µM peptide. To measure the time course of autophosphorylation, assays were done in 250 µM ATP and 600 µM peptide substrate, with no preincubation of enzyme with ATP.

Mutagenesis-- Mutagenesis was performed using the Stratagene QuikChange kit according to the manufacturer's directions. Mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Nef Binding Experiments-- Increasing amounts of WT Hck or YEEI Hck were added to GST-Nef immobilized on glutathione-agarose beads in buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM sodium vanadate, and 1 mM dithiothreitol in a final volume of 140 µl. After a 30-min incubation at 4 °C, the beads were washed in same buffer. Hck bound to Nef was eluted in 50 µl of 5× Laemmli buffer and resolved using SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and detected with anti-c-Src rabbit polyclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology Inc.), anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, and an enhanced chemiluminescent detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

YEEI-Hck-- The association between the SH2 domain and the C-terminal tail has an inhibitory effect on the catalytic activity of WT Hck (15). YEEI-Hck was designed to have a higher affinity association between the C-terminal tail and the SH2 domain. We first studied the kinetic properties of YEEI-Hck. YEEI-Hck is activated by autophosphorylation with similar kinetics to WT (Table I). Using autophosphorylated enzyme, we also determined that the ATP Km and Vmax were similar for WT and YEEI-Hck (Table I). Although dephosphorylation of Tyr527 in WT Hck is known to promote autophosphorylation (15), engineering a stronger intramolecular SH2 interaction does not affect the kinetic properties of the catalytic domain.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Kinetic parameters for WT Hck and YEEI-Hck
Kinetic parameters were determined using the spectrophotometric assay. Enzymes were preincubated with ATP to allow autophosphorylation on Tyr416 prior to kinetic analysis except in the case of lag time measurements. Determinations of Vmax, Kact, and Km were carried out at 10 nM enzyme. For determination of Km for ATP, the peptide concentration was held constant at 600 µM. Lag time for autophosphorylation was determined at 50 nM enzyme.

We measured the accessibility of the SH2 domain of YEEI-Hck to exogenous ligands in two ways. First, we measured Kact, the concentration of ligand required to half-maximally activate the enzyme, for a synthetic phosphopeptide containing the high affinity SH2 binding sequence pYEEI. Autophosphorylated WT is activated by this peptide approximately 2-fold with a Kact of 31 µM (Fig. 3A and Table I). In contrast, the YEEI mutant form of Hck is not activated by pYEEI peptide at concentrations up to 500 µM. Therefore, the Kact for YEEI-Hck is more than an order of magnitude higher than WT (Fig. 3A). The second method we used to show that the SH2 domain of YEEI-Hck was not available for binding exogenous ligands involved the use of a substrate containing a pYEEI motif. Previous experiments from this laboratory showed that WT Hck phosphorylated substrates containing pYEEI sequences at an enhanced rate compared with control substrates with an FEEI sequence (34). This SH2 domain-pYEEI interaction presumably promotes phosphorylation of other tyrosines within the substrates by raising the effective local concentration of potential phosphorylation sites near the active site. This substrate is not phosphorylated at a higher rate by YEEI-Hck (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that exogenous pYEEI peptide cannot compete with an intramolecular pYEEI motif.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   YEEI-Hck binds SH3 ligands but not SH2 ligands. A, WT Hck can be activated by an SH2 ligand, but YEEI cannot. Increasing concentrations of pYEEI peptide (0-550 µM) were added to 10 nM autophosphorylated enzyme, either WT (circles) or YEEI-Hck (squares). Initial rates for phosphorylation of substrate peptide (600 µM) were measured using the spectrophotometric assay, as described in the text. va is the velocity measured in the presence of pYEEI peptide minus the velocity measured in its absence (38). B, peptides with SH2 domain binding motifs are phosphorylated preferentially by WT Hck but not by YEEI Hck. The pYEEI substrate sequence is RRLEDAIYAAGGGGGEPPQpYEEIG (pY is phosphorylated tyrosine), and the FEEI-containing substrate sequence is RRLEDAIYAAGGGGGEPPQFEEIG. Initial rates were determined by the spectrophotometric assay using 35 µM peptide substrate and 500 µM ATP. The reactions were carried out with autophosphorylated WT or YEEI-Hck.

The extent to which the intramolecular binding of the SH2 domain affects the ability of SH3 domain ligands to activate Hck is not fully understood. We determined whether a strengthened SH2 domain interaction affects the SH3 domain interaction by measuring Kact for Nef, a potent ligand for the SH3 domain of Hck (15, 39). If the intramolecular SH3 domain interaction depended on the affinity of SH2 domain interaction, YEEI-Hck would be expected to have a higher Nef Kact. However, YEEI-Hck has a slightly lower Kact for Nef than WT (Table I), indicating that the higher affinity SH2 domain interaction does not increase the affinity of the intramolecular SH3 interaction. We also analyzed the binding of Nef by SH3 domains of YEEI-Hck and WT directly. Consistent with the fact that Nef activates WT and YEEI-Hck with a similar Kact, Nef binds to WT and YEEI-Hck to a similar extent (Fig. 4).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Similar binding of WT and YEEI-Hck to immobilized GST-Nef. Increasing amounts of Hck (WT or YEEI-Hck) were added to GST-Nef immobilized on glutathione-agarose beads; the numbers above the lanes indicate the micrograms of Hck added. The beads were washed to remove unbound enzyme, and the bound protein was eluted by boiling in 5× Laemmli buffer and resolved by SDS-PAGE. Hck was visualized by Western blotting with anti-Pan Src family polyclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) (31).

E310A-- To examine the importance of Glu310, we mutated Glu310 to alanine. We analyzed this mutant using the phosphocellulose paper assay. Preincubated E310A mutant and a WT control were assayed in duplicate in a final concentration of 80 nM enzyme. For E310A, 200 counts/min above background were incorporated into peptide after a 10-min reaction. For WT, 89,800 counts/min above background were incorporated into peptide. Therefore, we estimate that mutation of this one residue decreases kinase activity under these conditions by >400-fold.

Y416A-- Phosphorylation of Tyr416 leads to activation of Hck (15, 25-29). In the absence of SH2 or SH3 ligands, autophosphorylation is a relatively slow, intermolecular process (15). Displacement of the regulatory apparatus dramatically increases the rate of autophosphorylation (15). The proposed connection between phosphorylation and activation is that phosphorylation of Tyr416 causes a conformational change in the activation loop that causes it to move out of the catalytic site (Fig. 2B). Before Hck has undergone autophosphorylation, the activation loop containing Tyr416 blocks the active site such that peptide substrate cannot bind (7). This blockage of the active site likely increases substrate Km and lowers the rate of substrate turnover. However, we are unable to accurately measure the kinetics of nonautophosphorylated Hck because addition of ATP to Hck immediately results in the formation of some amount of autophosphorylated Hck, producing a mixture of autophosphorylated and nonautophosphorylated Hck. In the first 5 min after the addition of ATP, autophosphorylated Hck phosphorylates 12-fold more substrate than Hck that has not been preincubated with Hck (Fig. 5, inset). Since autophosphorylation significantly increases the activity of Hck, the generation of even a small amount of autophosphorylated Hck prevents us from obtaining accurate kinetic measurements for nonautophosphorylated Hck.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Y416A cannot be activated by autophosphorylation. 10 nM WT without ATP preincubation (dotted line), 10 nM Y416A Hck (dashed line), or WT preincubated with ATP (solid line) was added to 250 µM ATP and 600 µM peptide substrate, and peptide phosphorylation was monitored by the spectrophotometric assay. Data were recorded every 9 s.

To further investigate the role of autophosphorylation, we generated a mutant in which Tyr416 is mutated to alanine. We reasoned that alanine rather than phenylalanine would be the best substitute for Tyr416. In the structure of down-regulated Hck, a network of hydrogen-bonding interactions involving the side chain of Tyr416 helps to stabilize the activation loop. Neither phenylalanine nor alanine would be able to participate in these hydrogen bonds, so neither change is a good mimic of the unphosphorylated state. A potential problem with any amino acid substitution at Tyr416 is that the conformation of the activation loop could be destabilized and become exposed to solvent. Therefore, we selected alanine to avoid the interaction of the bulky hydrophobic side chain of tyrosine with solvent.

The mutant Y416A enzyme has the expected linear relationship between enzyme concentration and activity (data not shown). Since Y416A cannot be activated by autophosphorylation at Tyr416 its activity (Vmax) is lower than autophosphorylated WT (Table II). However, the Y416A mutant is activated relative to down-regulated Hck (Fig. 5 and Fig. 5 inset). This may be due to the fact that tyrosine is better able than alanine to participate in the contacts in the active site that stabilize the inhibitory conformation of the activation loop. Fig. 5 shows that Y416A cannot be activated by autophosphorylation. Nonautophosphorylated WT Hck shows the increase in activity with time that is characteristic of autophosphorylation, whereas Y416A activity is linear with time similar to autophosphorylated Hck.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Kinetic parameters for WT Hck and Y416A mutant
Kinetic parameters were determined using the spectrophotometric assay. Wild-type Hck was preincubated with ATP to allow autophosphorylation on Tyr416 prior to kinetic analysis. Determinations of Vmax, Kact, and Km were carried out at 10 nM enzyme. For determination of ATP Km, the peptide concentration was held constant at 600 µM. For determination of peptide Km, the ATP concentration was held constant at 500 µM.

Consistent with the fact that autophosphorylation improves peptide binding by moving the activation loop containing Tyr416 out of the active site, the Km value for peptide substrate is 2-fold higher for Y416A than for WT (Table II). The Km for ATP was not changed by the mutation, indicating that autophosphorylation does not effect the ATP-binding site of Hck (Table II). The Kact values for both pYEEI and Nef are increased for Y416A (Table II). This suggests a correlation between activation by autophosphorylation and increased availability of the SH2 and SH3 domains for substrate binding.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this paper, we describe experiments aimed at understanding the opposing roles of Tyr527 and Tyr416 in regulation of Src family kinases. Our model, based on structural analysis (7) and kinetic data (Table II), is that the Y416A mutant is intermediate between unphosphorylated and autophosphorylated WT, both in terms of its predicted structure and its enzymatic activity. Y416A is not a perfect mimic of the unphosphorylated state because alanine cannot participate in the contacts in the active site that stabilize the inhibitory conformation of the activation loop. However, kinetic data from Y416A sheds light on the properties of unphosphorylated WT Hck. Our observation that Y416A has a lower Vmax than WT (Table II) supports the structural work showing that autophosphorylation stabilizes the activation loop in an active conformation (7). The Km for peptide substrate is higher for Y416A than WT (Table II), consistent with the hypothesis that the activation loop blocks the peptide-binding site when Tyr416 is unphosphorylated. The Km for ATP is unchanged (Table II), indicating that phosphorylation and subsequent rearrangement of the active site does not appear to affect the ATP-binding site.

Comparisons of the three-dimensional structures of down-regulated kinases (4, 5, 7) with those of an active kinase (25) indicate that the "inward" conformation of helix alpha C (11) is necessary for activity. Glu310 on helix alpha C forms an ion-pair with Lys295 that stabilizes the inward conformation. Our results on the E310A mutant provide evidence that Glu310 is indispensable for kinase activity and strongly suggest that the active conformation of Src family kinases absolutely requires the ion pair between Glu310 and Lys295 for activity.

Our data also support the idea of cross-talk between the active site and the intramolecular binding of SH2 and SH3 domains. The Kact values for both pYEEI and Nef are increased for Y416A relative to WT (Table II). This suggests that Hck has a higher tendency to bind exogenous ligands once it is autophosphorylated. Consistent with this, the Kact of an SH3 ligand is 10-fold higher for nonautophosphorylated Hck than for autophosphorylated Hck.2 Although there appears to be a synergistic effect between ligand binding and autophosphorylation, it is not known whether ligand binding precedes autophosphorylation or is a result of autophosphorylation for Hck in vivo. It has previously been shown that binding of exogenous ligands promotes autophosphorylation (31). This work shows that the converse may also be true: autophosphorylation promotes exogenous ligand binding.

The temporal order of autophosphorylation and ligand binding may vary for Src family kinases in vivo depending on the cell type and signaling stimulus. However, the interdependence of autophosphorylation and ligand binding suggests the following scenario: binding of an initial ligand activates Hck and triggers autophosphorylation. Once autophosphorylated, Hck has an enhanced ability to bind other downstream binding partners and substrates.

We also engineered a mutant form of Hck with a high affinity intramolecular SH2 ligand in the C-terminal tail. Although binding of the SH2 domain to intramolecular ligand is known to be involved in down-regulating the enzyme, the YEEI-Hck mutant had similar values of Vmax and Km(ATP) to WT (Table I). The main effect of increasing the affinity of the intramolecular SH2 ligand was that YEEI-Hck could not be activated by exogenous pYEEI-containing ligands (Fig. 2A and Table I). Furthermore, because the SH2 domain could not bind exogenous ligands, YEEI-Hck did not preferentially phosphorylate substrates containing SH2 domain ligands (Fig. 2B).

Although YEEI-Hck was unable to bind exogenous SH2 ligand-containing peptides, its ability to bind and be activated by an SH3 domain ligand was comparable to WT (Fig. 4 and Table I). This indicates that the SH3 domain binds ligand in a way that is independent of the intramolecular binding of the SH2 domain. Disruption of the SH3 interaction with ligand can override a strengthened SH2-tail interaction. These observations suggest that SH3 domains have a major role in directing Src kinase-signaling pathways. The Src SH3 domain ligand interaction has been demonstrated to be required for targeting to Sin (18), AFAP-110 (17), synapsin I (37), Fak (38), and Cas.3

Our results for YEEI-Hck provide evidence for the model depicted in Fig. 1. The naturally occurring intramolecular ligand for the SH2 domain of Hck, pYQQQ, has low affinity; this permits exogenous high affinity ligands (such as pYEEI) to displace the C-terminal tail and activate the enzyme. The intramolecular interactions in Src family kinases have been fine-tuned to be strong enough to help maintain the catalytic domain in its down-regulated conformation but weak enough to respond to a variety of cellular stimuli.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank P. Pellicena for helpful discussions and for initial experiments on substrates containing pYEEI motifs.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA58530.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

par To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, Basic Science Tower, T-6, School of Medicine, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8661. Tel.: 516-444-3533; Fax: 516-3444-3432; E-mail: miller@physiology.pnb.sunysb.edu.

2 M. Porter, W. T. Miller, J. Nguyen, and W. Lim, unpublished observations.

3 P. Pellicena and W. T. Miller, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Hck, hematopoietic cell kinase; WT, wild type; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight; GST, glutathione S-transferase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Quintrell, N., Lebo, R., Varmus, H., Bishop, J. M., Pettenati, M. J., Le Beau, M. M., Diaz, M. O., and Rowley, J. D. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2267-2275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Law, D. A., Gold, M. R., and DeFranco, A. L. (1992) Mol. Immunol. 29, 917-926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Brown, M. T., and Cooper, J. A. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1287, 121-149[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Xu, W., Harrison, S. C., and Eck, M. J. (1997) Nature 385, 595-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Sicheri, F., Moarefi, I., and Kuriyan, J. (1997) Nature 385, 602-609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Williams, J. C., Weijland, A., Gonfloni, S., Thompson, A., Courtneidge, S. A., Superti-Furga, G., and Wierenga, R. K. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 274, 757-775[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Schindler, T., Sicheri, F., Pico, A., Gazit, A., Levitzki, A., and Kuriyan, J. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 639-648[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Xu, W., Doshi, A., Lei, M., Eck, M. J., and Harrison, S. C. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 629-638[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Cooper, J. A., and Howell, B. (1993) Cell 73, 1051-1054[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Superti-Furga, G., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1995) Bioessays 17, 321-330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Nguyen, J. T., and Lim, W. A. (1997) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 256-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Mayer, B. J. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 295-298
13. Murphy, S. M., Bergman, M., and Morgan, D. O. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5290-5300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Superti-Furga, G., Fumagalli, S., Koegl, M., Courtneidge, S. A., and Draetta, G. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2625-2634[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Moarefi, I., LaFevre-Bernt, M., Sicheri, F., Huse, M., Lee, C.-H., Kuriyan, J., and Miller, W. T. (1997) Nature 385, 650-653[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Briggs, S. D., Sharkey, M., Stevenson, M., and Smithgall, T. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17899-17902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Liu, X., Brodeur, S. R., Gish, G., Songyang, Z., Cantley, L. C., Laudano, A. P., and Pawson, T. (1993) Oncogene 8, 1119-1126[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Cartwright, C. A., Eckhart, W., Simon, S., and Kaplan, P. L. (1987) Cell 49, 83-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Gonfloni, S., Williams, J. C., Hattula, K., Weijland, A., Wierenga, R. K., and Superti-Furga, G. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 7261-7271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Nakamoto, T., Sakai, R., Ozawa, K., Yazaki, Y., and Hirai, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8959-8965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Guappone, A. C., and Flynn, D. C. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 175, 243-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Alexandropoulos, K., and Baltimore, D. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1341-1355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanafusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Bradshaw, J. M., Grucza, R. A., Ladbury, J. E., and Waksman, G. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 9083-9090[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Yamaguchi, H., and Hendrickson, W. A. (1996) Nature 384, 484-489[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ferracini, R., and Brugge, J. (1990) Oncogene Res. 5, 205-219[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Weijland, A., Neubauer, G., Courtneidge, S. A., Mann, M., Wierenga, R. K., and Superti-Furga, G. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 240, 756-764[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Cooper, J. A., and MacAuley, A. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 4232-4236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Barker, S. C., Kassel, D. B., Weigl, D., Huang, X., Luther, M. A., and Knight, W. B. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 14843-14851[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Boerner, R. J., Kassel, D. B., Barker, S. C., Ellis, B., DeLacy, P., and Knight, W. B. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 9519-9525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. LaFevre-Bernt, M., Sicheri, F., Pico, A., Porter, M., Kuriyan, J., and Miller, W. T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32129-32134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Xu, B., Bird, V. G., and Miller, W. T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29825-29830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Songyang, Z., Carraway, K. L., Eck, M. J., Harrison, S. C., Feldman, R. A., Mohammadi, M., Schlessinger, J., Hubbard, S. R., Smith, D. P., Eng, C., Lorenzo, M. J., Ponder, B. A. J., Mayer, B. J., and Cantley, L. C. (1995) Nature 373, 536-539[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Pellicena, P., Stowell, K. R., and Miller, W. T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15325-15328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Casnellie, J. E. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 200, 115-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Garcia, P., Shoelson, S. E., George, S. T., Hinds, D. A., Goldberg, A. R., and Miller, W. T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25146-25151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Onofri, F., Giovedi, S., Vaccaro, P., Czernik, A. J., Valtorta, F., De Camilli, P., Greengard, P., and Benfenati, F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12168-12173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Thomas, J. W., Ellis, B., Boerner, R. J., Knight, W. B., White, G. C., II, and Schaller, M. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 577-583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Lee, C.-H., Leung, B., Lemmon, M. A., Zheng, J., Cowburn, D., Kuriyan, J., and Saksela, K. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5006-5015[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Li, S. L. Young, N. King, and W. T. Miller
Signaling Properties of a Non-metazoan Src Kinase and the Evolutionary History of Src Negative Regulation
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15491 - 15501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Nika, L. Tautz, Y. Arimura, T. Vang, S. Williams, and T. Mustelin
A Weak Lck Tail Bite Is Necessary for Lck Function in T Cell Antigen Receptor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 36000 - 36009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. D. Faraldo-Gomez and B. Roux
On the importance of a funneled energy landscape for the assembly and regulation of multidomain Src tyrosine kinases
PNAS, August 21, 2007; 104(34): 13643 - 13648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Cantiani, M. C. Manara, C. Zucchini, P. De Sanctis, M. Zuntini, L. Valvassori, M. Serra, M. Olivero, M. F. Di Renzo, M. P. Colombo, et al.
Caveolin-1 Reduces Osteosarcoma Metastases by Inhibiting c-Src Activity and Met Signaling
Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7675 - 7685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Tringali, B. Lupo, L. Anastasia, N. Papini, E. Monti, R. Bresciani, G. Tettamanti, and B. Venerando
Expression of Sialidase Neu2 in Leukemic K562 Cells Induces Apoptosis by Impairing Bcr-Abl/Src Kinases Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14364 - 14372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-P. Chong, A. S. Chan, K.-C. Chan, N. A. Williamson, E. C. Lerner, T. E. Smithgall, J. D. Bjorge, D. J. Fujita, A. W. Purcell, G. Scholz, et al.
C-terminal Src Kinase-homologous Kinase (CHK), a Unique Inhibitor Inactivating Multiple Active Conformations of Src Family Tyrosine Kinases
J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 32988 - 32999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Koenig, C. Mueller, C. Hasel, G. Adler, and A. Menke
Collagen Type I Induces Disruption of E-Cadherin-Mediated Cell-Cell Contacts and Promotes Proliferation of Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells.
Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4662 - 4671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
E. Ozkirimli and C. B. Post
Src kinase activation: A switched electrostatic network
Protein Sci., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 1051 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. K. Ghosh, A. L. Reddi, N. L. Rao, L. Duan, V. Band, and H. Band
Biochemical Basis for the Requirement of Kinase Activity for Cbl-dependent Ubiquitinylation and Degradation of a Target Tyrosine Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 36132 - 36141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Giannini and M.-J. Bijlmakers
Regulation of the Src Family Kinase Lck by Hsp90 and Ubiquitination
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5667 - 5676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
F. R. Papa, C. Zhang, K. Shokat, and P. Walter
Bypassing a Kinase Activity with an ATP-Competitive Drug
Science, November 28, 2003; 302(5650): 1533 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. S. Goldberg, D. B. Alexander, P. Pellicena, Z.-Y. Zhang, H. Tsuda, and W. T. Miller
Src Phosphorylates Cas on Tyrosine 253 to Promote Migration of Transformed Cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2003; 278(47): 46533 - 46540.