|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003350200 on July 3, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 40, 30878-30885, October 6, 2000
Novel Subtype of Type IIs Restriction Enzymes
BfiI ENDONUCLEASE EXHIBITS SIMILARITIES TO THE
EDTA-RESISTANT NUCLEASE Nuc OF SALMONELLA
TYPHIMURIUM*
Rimantas
Sapranauskas ,
Giedrius
Sasnauskas ,
Arunas
Lagunavicius,
Giedrius
Vilkaitis,
Arvydas
Lubys, and
Virginijus
Siksnys§
From the Institute of Biotechnology, Graiciuno 8, Vilnius 2028, Lithuania
Received for publication, April 19, 2000, and in revised form, June 15, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The type IIs restriction enzyme BfiI
recognizes the non-palindromic nucleotide sequence 5'-ACTGGG-3' and
cleaves complementary DNA strands 5/4 nucleotides downstream of the
recognition sequence. The genes coding for the BfiI
restriction-modification (R-M) system were cloned/sequenced and
biochemical characterization of BfiI restriction enzyme was
performed. The BfiI R-M system contained three proteins:
two N4-methylcytosine methyltransferases and a restriction enzyme.
Sequencing of bisulfite-treated methylated DNA indicated that each
methyltransferase modifies cytosines on opposite strands of the
recognition sequence. The N-terminal part of the BfiI
restriction enzyme amino acid sequence revealed intriguing similarities
to an EDTA-resistant nuclease of Salmonella typhimurium. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that BfiI, like the
nuclease of S. typhimurium, cleaves DNA in the absence of
Mg2+ ions and hydrolyzes an artificial substrate
bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate. However, unlike the
nonspecific S. typhimurium nuclease, BfiI
restriction enzyme cleaves DNA specifically. We propose that the
DNA-binding specificity of BfiI stems from the C-terminal part of the protein. The catalytic N-terminal subdomain of
BfiI radically differs from that of type II restriction
enzymes and is presumably similar to the EDTA-resistant nonspecific
nuclease of S. typhimurium; therefore, BfiI did
not require metal ions for catalysis. We suggest that BfiI
represents a novel subclass of type IIs restriction enzymes that
differs from the archetypal FokI endonuclease by the fold
of its cleavage domain, the domain location, and reaction mechanism.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Type IIs restriction enzymes recognize short non-palindromic DNA
sequences and, in the presence of Mg2+ ions, cleave both
DNA strands a short distance outside the recognition sequence (1).
Currently, our knowledge of the structure and mechanisms of catalysis
used by type IIs restriction enzymes is limited to the FokI
restriction enzyme that recognizes asymmetric nucleotide sequence
5'-GGATG and cleaves both DNA strands 9/13 nucleotides away from the
recognition sequence (2). According to proteolytic cleavage and
deletion analysis data (3, 4), further confirmed by structural studies
(5), FokI contains two functional domains, one responsible
for DNA recognition (N-terminal domain) and the other for cleavage
(C-terminal domain). Interestingly, the structural architecture of the
FokI cleavage domain displays a striking similarity to the
monomer of BamHI (6), demonstrating that both enzymes share
similar catalytic machinery despite the fact that they interact with
nucleic acids differently. Protein sequence comparisons suggest that
the StsI restriction enzyme, which recognizes the same
nucleotide sequence as FokI but cleaves DNA 10/14
nucleotides away, possesses a similar modular organization (7, 8).
However, we still lack evidence to indicate if other type IIs
restriction enzymes share a similar structural architecture.
The BfiI, isolated from Bacillus firmus S8120
strain, is a member of the type IIs restriction enzymes. The enzyme
recognizes non-palindromic nucleotide sequence 5'-ACTGGG and cleaves
complementary DNA strands 5 and 4 nucleotides beyond the recognition
sequence (9). In order to gain an insight into the structural
organization and mechanisms of DNA recognition and catalysis employed
by the type IIs restriction enzymes, we focused on the structural,
biochemical, and mechanistical characterization of the BfiI
restriction enzyme. Here we report the cloning and sequence analysis of
BfiI R-M1 system
and a biochemical characterization of the BfiI restriction endonuclease. We suggest that BfiI uses a novel catalytic
domain to perform DNA cleavage that radically differs from the one
employed by the archetypal FokI endonuclease and other type
II restriction enzymes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids and Strains--
The bacterial strain Bacillus
firmus S8120 was the source of genomic DNA. The Escherichia
coli strain ER2267
(e14 (mcrA ) endA1 supE44 thi-1
(mcrC-mrr)114::IS10
(argF-lac)U169 recA1/F' proA+B+
lacIq (lacZ)M15
zzf::mini-Tn10 (KmR)) was
obtained from New England Biolabs and used as a host in cloning
procedures. Both strains were grown in Luria broth medium at 37 °C.
Ampicillin and kanamycin were used at 60 µg/ml when necessary.
DNA Cloning and Construction of the Genomic
Library--
Isolation of genomic DNA from Bacillus firmus
cells pretreated with lysozyme was carried out as described in Ref. 10.
Plasmids were prepared by the alkaline-lysis procedure (11) and
purified as described (12). DNA manipulations were in accordance with standard procedures (13). Transformations of E. coli were
carried out using the CaCl2-heat shock method (13) or
electrotransformation using a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad). DNA in ligation
mixture was precipitated with ethanol to remove salts and dissolved in
H2O before electrotransformation. The gene library of
Bacillus firmus S8120 was constructed by partially digesting
genomic DNA with Bsp143I and ligating the fragments into
BamHI-cleaved and dephosphorylated pBR322. Ligation mixture was electrotransformed into ER2267. The plasmid population of the
library was purified, digested to completion with excess of BfiI, and used to transform ER2267. Plasmids of the
resulting transformants were subjected to the next round of selection,
and the plasmid DNA of surviving transformants was analyzed by
restriction enzyme digestion and subsequent electrophoresis in agarose gel.
Determination of the BfiI Endonuclease and Methylase
Activities--
The endonuclease activity in vitro was
assayed by incubation of 5 µl of cell-free extracts (prepared as
described in Ref. 14) with 1 µg of DNA at 37 °C for 1 h
in a 40-µl reaction volume containing 33 mM
Tris-CH3COOH, pH 7.9, at 37 °C, 10 mM Mg(CH3COO)2, 66 mM
KCH3COO, and 0.1 mg/ml BSA. BfiI-specific
in vivo methylation was assessed by incubating isolated
plasmid DNA with an excess of the BfiI restriction
endonuclease. Products of both reactions were analyzed by
electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gels.
DNA Sequencing and Analysis of Predicted Amino Acid
Sequences--
DNA sequencing was performed in both directions from a
series of nested deletions generated by Bal31 nuclease. The Cycle
ReaderTM DNA sequencing kit from Fermentas was employed,
and [ -33P]dATP was used to end-label pBR322 sequencing
primers with T4 polynucleotide kinase. Sequence data were compiled and
analyzed with the MicroGenie sequence analysis software program
(Beckman Instruments). Pairwise sequence comparison was performed by
FASTA (15). The data bases were searched for putative homologs with PSI-BLAST algorithm (16) using the deduced amino acid sequence of
BfiI restriction enzyme as a query.
Enzymes and Oligonucleotides--
All enzymes, plasmids,
sequencing primers, and kits were obtained from Fermentas. The
oligodeoxyribonucleotides used in this study were synthesized at
Fermentas. The double-stranded 30-bp oligonucleotide containing the
BfiI recognition sequence was obtained by annealing two
complementary oligonucleotides: 5'-AGC GTA GCA CTG GGC TGC TGA ACT GTG CTG-3' and 5'-CAG CAC
AGT TCA GCA GCC CAG TGC TAC GCT-3'.
Control experiments demonstrated that BfiI cleaved such a
duplex. The double-stranded 30-bp oligonucleotide lacking the
BfiI recognition sequence was obtained by annealing two
complementary oligonucleotides: 5'-AGC GTA GCA CGC CGG CGC TGA ACT GTG
CTG-3' and 5'-CAG CAC AGT TCA GCG CCG GCG TGC TAC GCT-3'.
All other chemicals used in this study were of the highest quality available.
Identification of Methylated Cytosines by Sodium Bisulfite
Treatment--
The analysis of methylation patterns was performed as
described in Ref. 17. In brief, plasmids pUC-BfiM1, pUC-BfiM2, and pUC-BfiM1M2 were methylated in vivo by expressing
corresponding methylase genes present in cis. Plasmids were
linearized with Alw44I restriction endonuclease,
ethanol-precipitated, and dissolved in H2O. Treatment of
DNA samples with sodium bisulfite converts unmodified cytosine residues
to uracil (17). Therefore, all unmodified cytosines appear in the
thymine lane after strand-specific polymerase chain reaction
amplification, whereas modified cytosine remains in the cytosine lane.
The bisulfite treatment of DNA was performed as described previously
(17), with the exception that an additional step of the thermal DNA
denaturation (95oC, 3 min) was introduced into the
protocol at the end of each hour of DNA treatment. The modified upper
DNA strand was amplified using strand-specific primers 5'-GTT GTG TAG
ATA ATT ATG ATA TGG GAG GG-3' and 5'-CAT TTT CCA ATA ATA AAC ACT TTT
AAA ATT CT-3', whereas the lower strand was amplified using primers
5'-TTT CAT TCA TCC ATA ATT ACC TAA CTC CCC-3' and 5'-ATG ATG AGT ATT
TTT AAA GTT TTG TTA TGT GG-3', respectively. The amplified DNA
fragments corresponded to the pUC19 sequences 1702-2300 nt (upper
strand) and 1672-2291 nt (lower strand) and included a unique
BfiI target located at nt 1744. Polymerase chain reaction
fragments were inserted into the SmaI-digested and
dephosphorylated pUC19, and recombinant plasmids were selected and sequenced.
Purification of BfiI Restriction Endonuclease--
The
BfiI was purified as described in Ref. 9. In brief, the
cells of B. firmus S8120 were collected at log phase,
disrupted by sonification, and BfiI protein purified by
chromatography on phosphocellulose, DEAE-cellulose, heparin-Sepharose,
and hydroxyapatite columns. The purified BfiI preparation
was stored at 20 °C in a buffer containing 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 50% glycerol. The
BfiI protein exhibited a single band on the
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Protein concentration was determined by
A280 using an extinction coefficient calculated from the amino acid composition (18) and is expressed in terms of monomer.
Plasmid DNA Cleavage by BfiI--
Supercoiled plasmid pUC19 was
purified twice by ultracentrifugation through a cesium chloride
gradient in the presence of ethidium bromide. The plasmid preparation
contained >90% supercoiled DNA. Cleavage experiments were performed
at 25 °C in a reaction buffer consisting of 30 mM
Tris-CH3COOH (pH 8.0) and 100 mM
KCH3COO. Reaction mixtures typically contained 2.3 nM supercoiled pUC19, 1-10 nM BfiI,
0.1 mg/ml BSA, and 0-10 mM
Mg(CH3COO)2 or 0-10 mM CaCl2 or 0-5 mM MnCl2. In all
cases, the total ionic strength was constant at 130 mM by
varying KCH3COO concentration. Reactions were initiated by
adding BfiI to a mixture of the other reaction components.
Aliquots were removed at fixed time intervals and mixed with 1/3 volume
of loading dye solution containing 0.3% SDS. The samples were heated
at 65 °C for 10 min and separated by electrophoresis through
agarose. Supercoiled, open-circular, and linear DNA forms (L1 and L2)
were resolved by electrophoresis in the agarose gel, and their amounts
were evaluated by densitometric analysis of ethidium bromide-stained
gels (19). Nearly identical results were obtained by quenching the
samples with equal volume of 1 M HCl, followed by immediate
neutralization of samples, DNA precipitation with 2-propanol, and
electrophoresis through agarose.
Bis(p-nitrophenyl) Phosphate Cleavage by
BfiI--
Bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate was purchased from
Sigma. Bis-pNPP cleavage experiments were performed at 25 °C in the
30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2-8.5) or 30 mM MES-KOH
(pH 6.0-6.8) reaction buffers containing 100 mM
KCH3COO. In the pH range 5.0-5.75, the reaction buffer
consisted of 130 mM
KCH3COO/CH3COOH. Reaction mixtures typically
contained 100-1000 nM BfiI and 2-10
mM bis-pNPP. In the inhibition experiments, 0-500
nM 30-bp oligonucleotide duplex (containing or lacking
BfiI recognition site) was added. Accumulation of the
reaction product p-nitrophenolate was monitored by measuring absorbance at 405 nm. At pH 6.0-8.5, the reaction progress was monitored directly in the cuvette with Beckman DU 640B
spectrophotometer for 10-25 min (the reaction progress curves remained
strictly linear for up to 90 min). Reaction velocities were obtained by linear regression and corrected for the protonation of
p-nitrophenolate. At pH 5.0-6.0, samples were withdrawn at
fixed time intervals from the total reaction volume and quenched by
adding equal volume of 1 M Na2CO3
and 1% SDS (pH 11). The samples were diluted, and absorbance at 405 nm
was measured. Reaction rates were evaluated by linear regression
analysis. At all pH values tested, spontaneous hydrolysis of bis-pNPP
in the absence of BfiI was not detected. The regression
analysis results are displayed as the optimal mean value ± one
standard deviation.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning of BfiI Restriction-Modification Genes--
The genes
coding for the BfiI restriction-modification system were
cloned using a strategy based on the selection of self-modifying recombinant plasmids that become resistant to the BfiI
restriction enzyme cleavage in vitro. The gene library of
Bacillus firmus S8120 was constructed by partially digesting
genomic DNA with Bsp143I and ligating the fragments into
BamHI-cleaved and dephosphorylated pBR322. After the second
round of BfiI digestion of plasmid population from partial
Bsp143I library (~300,000 clones) and re-transformation of
surviving plasmids into E. coli cells, several thousand
transformants were obtained and individual plasmids were isolated from
randomly picked transformants. Screening of 18 transformants revealed
17 BfiI-resistant recombinant plasmids that formed six
different groups after restriction mapping. Analysis of the crude cell
extracts prepared from representatives selected from each group
revealed that three of them possessed BfiI activity. Among
these clones, pBfiIRM14 contained the shortest cloned DNA fragment (5.6 kb) and was selected for deletion mapping and sequencing.
Localization and Organization of BfiI R-M Genes--
To determine
the location of BfiI R-M genes on the 5.6-kb insert, a
variety of subclones were constructed and tested for the methylation
and restriction phenotypes. The results are summarized in Fig.
1. pBfi-K was the smallest plasmid that
conferred both restriction and methylation phenotypes. The absence of
restriction endonuclease activity in cells carrying pBfi-KE or pBfi-KM
alongside the unaltered modification phenotype suggests that
MunI and Eco72I cleavage sites are situated
within the regulatory or structural part of the BfiIR gene.
Four plasmids, namely pBfi-N, pBfi-KN, pBfi-KM-E, and pBfi-KM-NB, were
only partially protected from digestion by BfiI. Two of
them, pBfi-KN and pBfi-KM-NB, carried DNA inserts from B. firmus that overlapped by just 300 nucleotides. Obviously, such a
region is too short to encode a full-length methylase. Type IIs R-M
systems often contain three proteins: one restriction enzyme and two
methylases with each methylase recognizing and modifying bases on the
opposite strands of the recognition site (20, 21). Therefore, we
assumed that methylation of the BfiI recognition sequence
might also be accomplished by two methylases. Comparison of the
modification phenotypes of cells carrying pBfi-KN, pBfi-KB, pBfi-KM-NB,
and pBfi-KM-N plasmids suggests that a possible boundary between two
methylation units is located within the
Bpu1102I-NcoI fragment. Since the plasmid pBfi-KM-NK carrying the NheI-KspAI deletion was
completely protected from BfiI cleavage and pBfi-K conferred
restriction-proficient phenotype, we concluded that the BfiI
R-M system is located within the 4.7-kb
KspAI-Kpn2I fragment. A DNA fragment of the same
length was detected after KspAI-Kpn2I cleavage of
plasmids isolated from two other restriction-proficient clones that had
been selected from the library (data not shown). The nucleotide
sequence of the KspAI-Kpn2I fragment was
determined on both strands (EMBL accession no. AJ290970). Three large
open reading frames (ORFs) were identified within the sequenced region
of 4662 bp (Fig. 1). They were in perfect agreement with the results of
the deletion mapping, indicating that genes bfiIMC1 and
bfiIMC2 code for two independent BfiI methylases,
M.BfiI(C1) and M.BfiI(C2), respectively, whereas
the third one, bfiIR, codes for the BfiI
restriction enzyme. Putative promoter sequences were found upstream of
all three genes (data not shown).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Deletion mapping of genes encoding the
BfiI R-M system. The thick
lines indicate the pBR322 host sequence, and the
boxed regions correspond to the heterologous
Bacillus firmus DNA. The open box
shows the sequenced DNA fragment. Black arrows
denote the location and orientation of BfiI R-M
genes bfiIMC1, bfiIMC2, and bfiIR,
respectively. Location of the gene for -lactamase bla,
and origin of replication ori of pBR322 are shown as
thin black lines. Plasmids pBfi-K,
pBfi-KM, pBfi-KE, pBfi-N, pBfi-KN, and pBfi-KB were obtained by
deletions of Kpn2I, Kpn2I-MunI,
Kpn2I-Eco72I, NdeI,
Kpn2I-NcoI, or
Kpn2I-Bpu1102I fragments from pBfiIRM14,
respectively. Excision of the NheI-KspAI,
Eco32I, NheI-Bpu1102I, or
NheI-NcoI fragments from pBfi-KM yielded
pBfi-KM-NK, pBfi-KM-E, pBfi-KM-NB, and pBfi-KM-N, respectively.
R(+) and R( ) indicates sublones exhibiting and
lacking restriction endonuclease phenotype. Methyltransferase
protection against digestion by BfiI restriction enzyme is
indicated as follows: M(+) = full protection,
M(+/ ) = partial protection, M( ) = no
protection.
|
|
Nucleotide and Protein Sequence Analysis of Methylases--
In the
ORF assigned for the first methylase gene, BfiIMC1,
translational start ATG codons appeared at nt positions 294 and 309 and
the termination codon at nt position 1434. Putative ribosome binding
sites AGGA (nt 286-289) and AGGTG (nt 299-303) were detected upstream
of both ATG sequences, respectively. Therefore, the position of a
translational start codon of bfiIMC1 could not be
unambiguously inferred from the nt sequence alone. The ORF for second
methylase, bfiIMC2, started 21 bp downstream of the
BfiIMC1 termination codon, ended at nt 2969 and encoded a
protein of 504 amino acid residues with a calculated mass of 57.9 kDa.
The bfiIMC2 gene was preceded by a strong putative ribosome
binding site AAGGAGGT (nt 1444-1451). Analysis of the deduced protein
sequences revealed that both M.BfiI(C1) and
M.BfiI(C2) contain conserved motifs F-G-G and TSPPY, typical for N4-methylcytosine methylases (data not shown). The mutual location
of the conserved motifs suggests that both methylases could be assigned
to the S12 class of N-methylases (22). Pairwise comparison of protein sequences of BfiI methylases
demonstrated only marginal resemblance (21% identity). The alignment
of the predicted protein sequences of BfiI methylases to the
protein sequences of other N4-methylcytosine methylases belonging to
the S12 class revealed similar levels of homologies.
Identification of Methylated Bases--
Deletion mapping and
protein sequence analysis of BfiI methylases suggested that
modification of the recognition site of BfiI is accomplished
by two independent N4-methylcytosine methylases each of them modifying
bases on the opposite strands of the recognition site. To determine the
positions of methylation, we applied the sodium bisulfite modification
technique adopted recently for mapping N4-methylcytosine residues in
DNA (17). To establish the methylation pattern of BfiI
methylases, three different recombinant plasmids were constructed by
cloning bfiIMC1 and bfiIMC2 genes separately or
in combination in a pUC19 vector that has a BfiI target
located at nt 1744 and DNA in vivo methylation was
accomplished by expressing methylase genes. Plasmid DNA was purified,
treated with sodium bisulfite, and analyzed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." As shown in Table
I, a single cytosine residue in each DNA
strand of the BfiI target survived the bisulfite attack in
the case of plasmid containing both genes of BfiI
methylases. In comparison, only the unique C of the ACTGGG
strand or the second C of the CCCAGT strand were resistant
to bisulfite in plasmids, carrying separate genes bfiIMC2
and bfiIMC1, respectively. None of the cytosines survived
the bisulfite treatment in the case of non-methylated pUC19 DNA (data
not shown). Methylcytosine residues were displayed with frequencies
ranging from 16% to 50%, inconsistent with the values reported
previously for N4-methylcytosine residues (17). Collectively, based on
the presence of conserved motifs characteristic of N4-methylcytosine
methylases and the sequencing of bisulfite-treated methylated DNAs, we
propose that M.BfiI(C1) modifies a second C base within the
strand CCCAGT, whereas the M.BfiI(C2) methylates the unique C of the ACTGGG strand yielding
N4-methylcytosines.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Efficiency of display for individual m4C residues at the recognition
sequence modified by BfiI methylases
Display efficiency for each position is determined as the ratio of
positive displays in the thymine lane of sequencing gel over total
number of clones sequenced.
|
|
Nucleotide and Protein Sequence Analysis of BfiI Restriction
Enzyme--
The BfiIR gene is located on the DNA strand
complementary to that bearing the genes for cognate methylases. Two
possible translation start codons TTG at nt 4092 and ATG at nt 4029 and
the termination codon TAA at nt 3018 were identified. Despite the
presence of putative Shine-Dalgarno sequences upstream of both
initiation codons (TAAGGGGG is located 7 bp upstream of TTG, and AAGGA
is 9 bp upstream of ATG), we assigned the initiation codon to
the TTG. This assumption relies on the experimental observation that cloning and expression of an amplified DNA fragment starting at the TTG
but not at ATG codon yielded an active BfiI enzyme (data not
shown). The ORF starting at TTG encoded a protein of 358 amino acid
residues with a calculated mass of 40 kDa that was close to the value
of 39 kDa estimated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not
shown). The predicted protein sequence of the bfiR gene was
aligned to the protein sequences in the data bases using PSI-BLAST server at NCBI. The analysis failed to reveal significant homologies above the threshold level; however, we noticed that the N-terminal part
of the BfiI exhibited marginal similarities to the
EDTA-resistant nuclease from Salmonella typhimurium (Fig.
2). The similarities between
BfiI and nuclease of S. typhimurium were below
statistical significance and could be treated only as guidelines for
further experiments. Therefore, seeking for the supportive evidence, we performed biochemical characterization of BfiI restriction
enzyme.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Comparison of protein sequences of
EDTA-resistant nuclease Nuc of S. typhimurium and
BfiI restriction enzyme. Only the N-terminal part
of BfiI sequence (residues 1-190) is shown.
White letters on the black
background indicate identical residues; black
letters on the gray background
indicate similar residues. The secondary structure elements shown above
for Nuc were defined from the three-dimensional structure of Nuc
(1bys.pdb). Secondary structure elements for BfiI were
predicted by PSIPRED server and are shown below the BfiI
sequence. Amino acid residues located at the active site of Nuc are
shown by . The initial alignment was obtained using by PSI-BLAST
algorithm (16) and improved manually.
|
|
Plasmid DNA Cleavage by BfiI Restriction
Enzyme--
Mg2+ ions are a necessary cofactor for DNA
cleavage by both type II and type IIs restriction enzymes. Strikingly,
preliminary data indicated that Mg2+ ions are not required
for phage DNA cleavage by
BfiI.2 In order to
study the metal ions requirement for BfiI catalysis and
quantitative evaluation of reaction rates of DNA cleavage in the
presence and absence of metal ions, we have chosen supercoiled plasmid
pUC19 that contains two recognition sites of BfiI, located at 364 and 1744 nucleotides from the origin of replication,
respectively. In this case, cleavage of pUC19 by BfiI at the
end of the reaction should give two linear DNA fragments of 1.4 and 1.3 kb. However, if either site is cut first in just one strand, an
open-circle DNA form will appear prior to linear DNA (Fig.
3A). The plasmid DNA cleavage
by restriction enzymes under single-turnover or steady state conditions
quite often provides rate constants for different reaction steps (19).
Therefore, pUC19 cleavage by BfiI was performed both under
single-turnover and multiple-turnover conditions.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Cleavage of supercoiled pUC19 by
BfiI restriction enzyme. A, schematic
representation of pUC19 cleavage by BfiI. B,
single-turnover cleavage of supercoiled pUC19 by BfiI. The
reaction mixture contained 100 mM KCH3COO, 30 mM Tris-CH3COOH, pH 8.0, 2.3 nM
pUC19, 10 nM BfiI, and 0.1 mg/ml BSA at
25 °C. Changes of concentrations of supercoiled ( ), open circular
( ), linear DNA with single double-strand break ( ), and linear DNA
with two double-strand breaks ( ) are shown. The solid
line represents the optimal fit of a single exponential to
the time course of the supercoiled pUC19 form cleavage. The best fit
yielded 0.052 ± 0.005 s 1 value for the
first order reaction rate constant. C, multiple-turnover
cleavage of the supercoiled form of pUC19 by BfiI in the
absence of Mg2+ ions. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM KCH3COO, 30 mM
Tris-CH3COOH, pH 8.0, 2.3 nM pUC19, 1.0 nM BfiI, and 0.1 mg/ml BSA at 25 °C. A linear
regression analysis applied to the data of the supercoiled pUC19
cleavage in the time interval 10-70 min (solid
line) yielded kcat value of
0.008 ± 0.001 min 1. D,
multiple-turnover cleavage of the supercoiled pUC19 by BfiI
in the presence of Mg2+ ions. The reaction mixture was as
in C, except that it contained 10 mM
Mg(CH3COO)2 and 70 mM
KCH3COO to keep the ionic strength of the buffer equal to
that of bufferin C. The experimentally determined
kcat value equals to 0.066 ± 0.006 min 1.
|
|
Cleavage of supercoiled pUC19 by BfiI in the absence of
metal ions under single-turnover reaction conditions at saturating enzyme concentrations (2.3 nM pUC19, 10 nM
BfiI) is presented in Fig. 3B. The concentration
of supercoiled DNA declines exponentially, and only a small amount of
open circular DNA accumulates during the reaction. The predominant
reaction product is linear DNA cleaved at a single site (L1), that is
subsequently converted to the final reaction product: linear DNA
cleaved at both sites (L2). The accumulation of large amounts of L1
under single-turnover reaction conditions suggests that cleavage rates
of the two BfiI sites differ significantly, most likely due
to differences in flanking nucleotide sequences. Restriction mapping of
the intermediate reaction product L1 indicated that pUC19 was
predominantly cleaved by BfiI at the recognition site
located at nt 1744. A single exponential was fitted to the data of the
supercoiled substrate cleavage. The optimal fit yielded a 0.052 ± 0.005 s 1 value for the first order reaction
rate constant (Fig. 3B). Addition of EDTA (1 mM)
or divalent metal ions (1-10 mM Mg2+, 1-10
mM Ca2+, 1-5 mM Mn2+)
to the reaction mixture did not affect the rate of plasmid DNA cleavage
by BfiI. The values of the first order reaction rate constant remained close to 0.052 s 1, and the
reaction patterns did not differ significantly from that presented in
Fig. 3B (data not shown).
The cleavage of supercoiled pUC19 DNA by BfiI in the
presence and absence of metal ions has also been studied under
multiple-turnover conditions with limiting enzyme ( 1 nM)
and an excess of substrate (2.3 nM). Under these conditions
the enzyme must perform several catalytic cycles in order to achieve
complete cleavage of substrate DNA. Analysis of the time course of DNA
hydrolysis by BfiI in the absence of divalent metal ions
revealed a steep decline in concentration of supercoiled DNA over the
first 10 min of the reaction followed by a very slow linear
steady-state phase (Fig. 3C). Noteworthy, the amount of the
supercoiled substrate cleaved during the burst phase equaled half the
amount of the BfiI monomer used in the reaction (Fig. 3,
C and D), suggesting that BfiI might interact with DNA as a dimer. The reaction rates corresponding to the
linear phase of the reaction progress curves increased with increasing
BfiI concentration but were invariant across the range of
substrate concentrations (1-10 nM pUC19) as expected for
an enzymatic reaction under steady-state conditions at saturating substrate concentrations (data not shown). The reaction rate determined from the slope of the slow linear phase was therefore treated as
vmax and the division of
vmax by BfiI concentration yielded the kcat. The kcat value
of 0.008 ± 0.001 min 1 (0.00013 s 1) was obtained from the data presented in
Fig. 3C. In order to test if the metal ions affect steady
state rates, we have studied cleavage of pUC19 by BfiI in
the presence of 1-10 mM Mg2+ ions. The
reaction progress curves remained biphasic in the presence of
Mg2+ ions; however, the slope of the slow linear phase
increased with increasing Mg2+ concentrations. At 10 mM Mg2+, the determined
kcat value was 0.066 ± 0.006 min 1, i.e. 10-fold higher than
kcat in the absence of Mg2+ ions
(Fig. 3D). Other metal ions tested (Ca2+,
Mn2+) exhibited a similar effect on the steady state rates
of pUC19 cleavage.
Hydrolysis of Bis(p-nitrophenyl) Phosphate by BfiI--
The
EDTA-resistant nuclease Nuc hydrolyzes the artificial substrate
bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate (23). Since the BfiI
restriction enzyme presumably possesses the Nuc-like catalytic domain,
we have tested the capability of BfiI to cleave bis-pNPP.
Different amounts of BfiI were incubated with 10 mM bis-pNPP and an increase of optical density at 405 nm
was monitored. The data presented in Fig.
4 clearly demonstrate that
BfiI hydrolyzes bis-pNPP. The reaction rate of bis-pNPP
hydrolysis is proportional to the enzyme concentration. Noteworthy,
Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions at 1-10 mM
concentrations and Mn2+ ions at 1-5 mM
concentration did not affect the rate of bis-pNPP hydrolysis by
BfiI (data not shown). The hydrolysis rate of bis-pNPP by
BfiI increased linearly with substrate concentration (1-10 mM), and we were unable to reach saturating concentrations
due to the limited substrate solubility. Since bis-pNPP hydrolysis by
BfiI was performed at substrate concentrations below the
Km, we used the second-order reaction rate constant
(which corresponds to the
kcat/Km) as a quantitative
parameter of the reaction velocity.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate
hydrolysis by BfiI restriction enzyme. The
reaction mixtures contained 10 mM
bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate and 0-0.8 µM
BfiI in the reaction buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM KCH3COO) at pH 7.2, 25 °C. The release of
reaction product 4-nitrophenolate was monitored at = 405 nm.
|
|
The ability to cleave bis-pNPP is the intrinsic property of
BfiI rather than of the contaminating phosphodiesterase
activity. Both the wild type BfiI and the enzyme purified to
apparent homogeneity from the E. coli strain containing a
cloned BfiI gene, possessed similar catalytic properties. In
order to change the purification strategy of BfiI, a
recombinant BfiI version containing a hexahistidine tag at
the N terminus of the protein was prepared and purified by
Ni2+-column affinity chromatography. This one-step
purification procedure yielded a nearly homogeneous His-tagged
BfiI version that retained the ability to cleave both
bis-pNPP and DNA.
The pH Dependence of Bis(p-nitrophenyl) Phosphate Hydrolysis Rate
by BfiI--
The studies of the pH dependence values of the rates of
enzymatic reactions sometimes allow determining the
pKa values of ionizable groups at the active site of
enzymes responsible for the catalytic activity. Therefore, we have
studied the pH dependence of the second order reaction rate of bis-pNPP
hydrolysis by BfiI (Fig. 5).
The pH dependence of the rate of bis-pNPP hydrolysis by BfiI
exhibited a characteristic, bell-shaped curve with an optimum at pH
5.5-6.0. The slopes of the acidic and alkaline limbs in the
log(k) versus pH plot, however, differed (Fig.
5). The alkaline limb gives a slope 1, while the slope of acidic limb is less than +0.5. The fit of the equation k = kmax
[H+]/([H+]+Ka) (24) to
the experimental data at the alkaline limb (pH 5.5-8.5) yielded the
optimal apparent pKa value of 6.4 ± 0.1 for a
catalytically important base at the BfiI active site.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
pH dependence of
bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate hydrolysis by
BfiI restriction enzyme. The reaction mixtures
typically contained 2-5 mM
bis(p-nitrophenyl)phosphate, 400 nM
BfiI in the reaction buffer with appropriate pH value.
p-Nitrophenolate release was monitored at 405 nm. Initial
reaction rates were obtained by linear regression. The solid
line represents the optimal fit of the equation
k = kmax[H+]/([H+]+Ka)
to the experimental data in the pH interval between 5.5 and 8.5. The
best fit parameters: kmax = 5.3 ± 0.2 s 1
M 1 and pKa = 6.4 ± 0.1.
|
|
Inhibition of Bis(p-nitrophenyl) Phosphate Hydrolysis by
DNA--
In order to check if the hydrolysis of artificial substrate
bis-pNPP and DNA proceeds at the same active site of BfiI,
we have studied the effect of DNA on the cleavage rates of bis-pNPP. The single turnover studies of pUC19 cleavage by BfiI
indicated that recognition sites on the DNA became saturated by
BfiI even at the minor excess of protein, suggesting tight
binding (see, above). Thus, if the reaction of the bis-pNPP hydrolysis
and DNA cleavage occurs at the same active site of BfiI, DNA
might act as an inhibitor of artificial substrate cleavage. Therefore,
reaction rates of bis-pNPP hydrolysis by BfiI were studied
in the presence of different amounts of synthetic 30-bp
oligonucleotides containing and lacking the recognition sequence of
BfiI (Fig. 6). The data presented in Fig. 6 demonstrate that increasing concentrations of
specific oligonucleotide effectively inhibited the rate of bis-pNPP
hydrolysis by BfiI. Interestingly, 30-bp nonspecific oligonucleotide at the same concentrations had only a minor effect on
the cleavage rates of the bis-pNPP by BfiI. If we assume
that the enzyme bound to the DNA is incapable of artificial substrate cleavage, the reaction rate of bis-pNPP hydrolysis should be
proportional to the free enzyme concentration (the concentration of
BfiI-bis-pNPP complex can be neglected since
Km value for bis-pNPP is significantly higher than
bis-pNPP concentrations used in our experiments). An equation
describing the dependence of free enzyme concentration on the total DNA
concentration according to a simple equilibrium E + DNA E · DNA was fitted to the data for the
specific oligonucleotide, presented in Fig. 6 (enzyme concentration was expressed in terms of dimer) to yield a KD value
of 30 nM for the BfiI-specific oligonucleotide
complex.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate
hydrolysis by BfiI in the presence of specific and
nonspecific oligonucleotide. Reaction mixtures contained 100 mM KCH3COO, 30 mM
Tris-CH3COOH, pH 7.2, 5 mM
bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate, 400 nM
BfiI, 0-500 nM oligonucleotide duplex either
containing ( ) or lacking ( ) BfiI recognition site at
25 °C. The reaction course was monitored spectrophotometrically at
405 nm, and initial velocities were calculated by linear regression
analysis. All displayed results are the mean values of at least three
experiments ± one standard deviation. An equation describing the
dependence of free enzyme concentration on the total oligonucleotide
concentration was fit to the experimental data for specific
oligonucleotide (solid line). The obtained
Kd of the enzyme-oligonucleotide complex equals 30 nM.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The restriction-modification system of the Bacillus
firmus S8120 strain comprises two methyltransferases and a single
restriction enzyme and is a typical type IIs system. Each methylase
recognizes and methylates bases on the opposite strands of the
recognition sequence making the modified DNA resistant to the
restriction enzyme cleavage. Mg2+ ions are a necessary
cofactor for DNA hydrolysis by type II and type IIs restriction enzymes
(25). Biochemical experiments strikingly revealed that Mg2+
ions are not required for the DNA cleavage by BfiI, raising
the question of how catalysis is achieved.
Based mostly on the structural and biochemical studies of
FokI endonuclease, the type IIs restriction enzymes are
thought to comprise two modules connected by a flexible linker (3-5). In the case of FokI, the N-terminal subdomain is responsible
for the DNA binding and the C-terminal for the cleavage. Structural comparisons revealed that the cleavage domain of FokI is
structurally very similar to the monomer of dimeric type II restriction
enzyme BamHI, suggesting a similar mechanism of catalysis
(5). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the FokI
restriction enzyme evolved through the fusion of the catalytic
machinery of the type II restriction enzyme to the separate DNA-binding
domain, and developed a sophisticated mechanism to couple catalysis to
sequence recognition.
Strikingly, protein sequence analysis of BfiI restriction
enzyme revealed (Fig. 2) that the N-terminal part of the protein exhibits weak similarities to an EDTA-resistant nuclease Nuc of S. typhimurium (26). The Nuc nuclease, encoded by the gene
located on the pKM101 plasmid of S. typhimurium, randomly
cuts single-stranded and double-stranded DNA in the absence of metal
ions (26, 27). The analysis of the protein sequence of Nuc unexpectedly
revealed identities with proteins belonging to the phospholipase D
superfamily (28, 29). Subsequent biochemical studies of Nuc
demonstrated that the enzyme catalyzes cleavage of the phosphodiester
bonds via a two step mechanism involving covalent phosphohistidine
intermediate of His-94 (30). Recently, the crystal structure of Nuc
nuclease has been solved to 2.0-Å resolution, providing us with
details of the active site organization (31). The amino acid residues His-94, Lys-96, Ser-109, Asn-111, and Glu-122 were found in close of
WO42 ion bound at the presumptive
active site of Nuc. The position of the His-94 residue at the active
site of Nuc is consistent with its predicted key role in catalysis.
Sequence alignment between Nuc and BfiI indicates (Fig. 2)
that all residues found at the active site of Nuc (including active site His) are conserved in BfiI restriction enzyme
suggesting a similar organization of the active sites. It is
interesting to note that secondary structure predictions for the
N-terminal domain of BfiI were very similar to the secondary
structure elements of Nuc, suggesting fold similarities (Fig. 2). Thus,
it was tempting to suggest that N-terminal domain of BfiI is
similar to Nuc. The similarities presented in Fig. 2, however, are
below the statistically significant level and should be treated with
caution. Therefore, we sought other evidence in support of the
hypothesis that BfiI possess a Nuc-like catalytic domain.
Unlike most nucleases, Nuc nuclease cleaves DNA in the absence of metal
ions (23, 26, 27). Restriction enzymes studied to date absolutely
require Mg2+ ions for phosphodiester bond cleavage.
Preliminary observations using phage DNA and quantitative studies
of pUC19 cleavage by BfiI (Fig. 3) indicate that metal ions
are unnecessary for the phosphodiester bond cleavage by BfiI
and suggest mechanistic similarity to Nuc nuclease. The single turnover
experiments with pUC19 and BfiI yielded the first-order rate
constant of 0.052 s 1 that presumably
corresponds to the rate of the chemical step (phosphodiester bond
cleavage) and is independent of the metal ion. The value of the rate
constant is more than 10-fold lower than values of the rate constants
of the chemical step reported for the
Mg2+-dependent restriction enzymes
EcoRI (32), EcoRV (33), and MunI (19).
The experiments with pUC19 cleavage under multiple turnover conditions
(Fig. 3) revealed, however, that a step other than the chemical step,
limits the overall reaction rate of pUC19 cleavage by BfiI.
Indeed, the kcat for the cleavage of the closed supercoiled pUC19 form by BfiI in the absence of the metal
ion was approximately 400-fold lower than the rate constant of the chemical step. It is possible that, under multiple turnover conditions, dissociation of the enzyme-product complex limits the overall reaction
rate. Interestingly, metal ions (Mg2+, Mn2+,
Ca2+) at 5-10 mM concentrations increased the
kcat value approximately 10-fold. A similar
effect has been reported for vaccinia virus topoisomerase (34). This
enzyme did not require metal ions for the DNA cleavage; however, it
exhibits metal dependence of product release rate.
Moreover, like the Nuc enzyme, BfiI exhibited the ability to
hydrolyze the artificial substrate bis-pNPP and metal ions were not
required for catalysis. Control experiments revealed that typical type
II restriction enzymes like MunI and Cfr10I or
type IIs enzyme FokI did not catalyze hydrolysis of bis-pNPP
either in the presence or absence of Mg ions. The reaction rate of the bis-pNPP cleavage by BfiI was much slower than the rate of
DNA cleavage. The second order reaction rate constant
(kcat/Km) for the bis-pNPP
cleavage by BfiI was equal to the 4.2 ± 0.1 M 1 s 1
(pH 6.0, 25 °C). Noteworthy, the value (4.2 M 1 s 1)
of the second order rate constant for bis-pNPP cleavage by
BfiI was close to the
kcat/Km value (10 M 1 s 1,
30 °C) reported for Nuc cleavage of bis-pNPP (23).
The highest rate of bis-pNPP hydrolysis both by the BfiI
restriction enzyme and the Nuc nuclease was observed at pH 5.5-6.0. The alkaline limb of pH dependence of bis-pNPP hydrolysis by
BfiI is consistent with the ionization of a base with an
apparent pKa value of 6.4. This value is close to
the pKa value of His residue and supports the
assumption that such a residue is located at the active site of
BfiI. The pH dependence of bis-pNPP hydrolysis by Nuc has
not been reported; however, the coincidence of the optimal pH values
for bis-pNPP hydrolysis by BfiI and Nuc suggests similar pH
dependence for artificial substrate hydrolysis by Nuc. In contrast to
the artificial substrate, BfiI cleaved plasmid DNA both at
pH 6.0 (data not shown) and pH 8.0 (Fig. 3B). The ability to
hydrolyze DNA at pH 7.5 has also been reported for the Nuc nuclease.
The differences in the pH dependence values for hydrolysis of small
artificial substrates and DNA by BfiI might be attributed to
the perturbation of the pKa values of active site
residues in the enzyme-DNA complex. If we assume that both protonated
and unprotonated BfiI forms are able to bind bis-pNPP, the
pKa value, determined from the pH dependence of the
kcat/Km ratio corresponds to
the ionization of catalytically important residue at the active site of
the free enzyme (24). The pKa value of the same
residue in the enzyme-DNA complex may be shifted significantly. Indeed,
such effects were reported for the barnase-catalyzed hydrolysis of RNA
and dinucleotides (35). The optimum pH for RNA hydrolysis of barnase
was 8.5 and exceeded that GpA transesterification by 3.5 units.
Alternatively, the decrease of the
kcat/Km ratio with the
increase of pH in the case of bis-pNPP hydrolysis by BfiI
might be explained by decreased binding (increased
Km) of the low molecular weight substrate while DNA
binding might be less sensitive to the pH change.
Collectively, our data indicate that BfiI exhibits most of
the enzymatic properties characteristic for the Nuc nuclease. However, unlike the nonspecific Nuc nuclease, BfiI restriction enzyme
cleaves phosphodiester bonds in DNA site-specifically (Fig. 3,
B-D). Both the specific DNA cleavage and bis-pNPP
hydrolysis proceeds at the same active site of BfiI.
Oligonucleotide containing the recognition sequence of BfiI
effectively inhibited hydrolysis of bis-pNPP (Fig. 6) at pH 7.0. In
contrast, a nonspecific oligonucleotide lacking the recognition
sequence of BfiI had only a marginal effect on the rate of
bis-pNPP hydrolysis. These experiments indicate that, unlike Nuc,
BfiI effectively discriminates between specific and
nonspecific DNA. Since sequence comparisons reveal similarities of
N-terminal part of BfiI protein to the Nuc nuclease, we
propose that DNA-binding specificity of BfiI stems from the
C-terminal part of the protein. It is possible that, as in
FokI (5), the nucleolytic domain of BfiI is
sequestered by the DNA-binding domain. Only upon BfiI
binding to its recognition sequence does the cleavage domain swing over
to the DNA cleavage site and the enzyme become activated. The possible
cross-talking interactions between the DNA binding and cleavage domains
of BfiI obviously require further studies.
 |
CONCLUSIONS |
The experimental evidence presented here indicates that, in
contrast to other restriction enzymes that require metal ions for
catalysis, BfiI cleaves DNA specifically in the absence of metal ions. We suggest that, like to other type IIs enzymes,
BfiI is composed of two subdomains that perform separate
cleavage and DNA-recognition functions. The catalytic N-terminal
subdomain of BfiI is presumably similar to that of
nonspecific nuclease Nuc that cleaves DNA in the absence of metal ions.
The C-terminal part of the BfiI presumably performs the
DNA-binding function. It is tempting to speculate that BfiI
evolved by fusion of the catalytic Nuc-like domain to the DNA-binding
domain. The archetypal type IIs restriction enzyme FokI, in
contrast to BfiI requires Mg2+ ions for DNA
cleavage, its cleavage domain is located at the C-terminal part of the
protein and is similar to the monomer of BamHI. Therefore,
we suggest that BfiI represents a novel subclass of type IIs
restriction enzymes that differ from the archetypal FokI by
the fold of the cleavage domain and by the location of the active site
and reaction mechanism. Thus, type IIs restriction enzymes
probably form a structurally and mechanistically diverse class. The
existence of several different evolutionary lineages of type II
restriction enzymes is probable. It will be interesting to see if the
Nuc-like fold has been adopted by other restriction enzymes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Jolanta Giedriene and Jolanta
Vitkute for the help with protein purification, Jurate Markauskiene and
Vida Petrusyte for their advice and suggestions. We express our
appreciation to Arvydas Janulaitis for critical reading of the
manuscript and his comments. We also thank Susan Sutcliffe for the
linguistic help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by MBI Fermentas.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ290970.
Both authors contributed equally to this work and should be
treated as joint first authors.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 370-2-602108, Fax: 370-2-602116; E-mail: siksnys@ibt.lt.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 3, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003350200
2
J. Vitkute and V. Petrusyte, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
R-M, restriction-modification;
bp, base pair(s);
bis-pNPP, bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
kb, kilobase pair(s);
nt, nucleotide(s);
ORF, open reading frame;
L1 and
L2, linear DNA forms 1 and 2.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Szybalski, W.,
Kim, S. C.,
Hasan, N.,
and Podhajska, A. J.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
100,
13-26
|
| 2.
|
Sugisaki, H.,
and Kanazawa, S.
(1981)
Gene (Amst.)
16,
73-78
|
| 3.
|
Li, L.,
Wu, L. P.,
and Chandrasegaran, S.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4275-4279
|
| 4.
|
Li, L.,
Wu, L. P.,
and Clarke, R.
(1993)
Gene (Amst.)
133,
79-84
|
| 5.
|
Wah, D. A.,
Hirsch, J. A.,
Dorner, L. F.,
Schildkraut, I.,
and Aggarwal, A. K.
(1997)
Nature
388,
97-100
|
| 6.
|
Newman, M.,
Strzelecka, T.,
Dorner, L. F.,
Schildkraut, I.,
and Aggarwal, A. K.
(1994)
Nature
368,
660-664
|
| 7.
|
Kita, K.,
Kotani, H.,
Ohta, H.,
Yanase, H.,
and Kato, N.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
618
|
| 8.
|
Kita, K.,
Suisha, M.,
Kotani, H.,
and Yanase, H.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
4167-4172
|
| 9.
|
Vitkute, J.,
Maneliene, Z.,
Petrusyte, M.,
and Janulaitis, A.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
3348-3349
|
| 10.
|
Marmur, J.
(1961)
J. Mol. Biol.
3,
208-218
|
| 11.
|
Birnboim, H. C.,
and Doly, J.
(1979)
Nucleic Acids Res.
7,
1513-1523
|
| 12.
|
Marko, M. A.,
Chipperfield, R.,
and Birnboim, H. C.
(1982)
Anal. Biochem.
121,
382-387
|
| 13.
|
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T.
(eds)
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual.
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 14.
|
Whitehead, P. R.,
and Brown, N. L.
(1985)
Arch. Microbiol.
141,
70-74
|
| 15.
|
Pearson, W. R.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2444-2448
|
| 16.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schaffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402
|
| 17.
|
Vilkaitis, G.,
and Klimasauskas, S.
(1999)
Anal. Biochem.
271,
116-119
|
| 18.
|
Pace, C. N.,
Vajdos, F.,
Fee, L.,
Grimsley, G.,
and Gray, T.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
2411-2423
|
| 19.
|
Sasnauskas, G.,
Jeltsch, A.,
Pingoud, A.,
and Siksnys, V.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
4028-4036
|
| 20.
|
Lubys, A.,
Lubiene, J.,
Kulakauskas, S.,
Stankevicius, K.,
Timinskas, A.,
and Janulaitis, A.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
2760-2766
|
| 21.
|
Gunn, J. S.,
and Stein, D. C.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4147-4152
|
| 22.
|
Timinskas, A.,
Butkus, V.,
and Janulaitis, A.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
157,
3-11
|
| 23.
|
Zhao, Y.,
Stuckey, J. A.,
Lohse, D. L.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
2655-2658
|
| 24.
|
Fersht, A.
(1999)
Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science
, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York
|
| 25.
|
Roberts, R. J.,
and Halford, S. E.
(1993)
in
Nucleases
(Linn, S. M.
, Lloyd, R. S.
, and Roberts, R. J., eds)
, pp. 35-88, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 26.
|
Pohlman, R. F.,
Liu, F.,
Wang, L.,
More, M. I.,
and Winans, S. C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
4867-4872
|
| 27.
|
Winans, S. C.,
and Walker, G. C.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
154,
1117-1125
|
| 28.
|
Koonin, E. V.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
242-243
|
| 29.
|
Ponting, C. P.,
and Kerr, I. D.
(1996)
Protein Sci.
5,
914-922
|
| 30.
|
Gottlin, E. B.,
Rudolph, A. E.,
Zhao, Y.,
Matthews, H. R.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9202-9207
|
| 31.
|
Stuckey, J. A.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
278-284
|
| 32.
|
Wright, D. J.,
Jack, W. E.,
and Modrich, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31896-31902
|
| 33.
|
Vermote, C. L. M.,
and Halford, S. E.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
6082-6089
|
| 34.
|
Stivers, J. T.,
Shuman, S.,
and Mildvan, A. S.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
327-339
|
| 35.
|
Gordon-Beresford, R. M.,
Van Belle, D.,
Giraldo, J.,
and Wodak, S. J.
(1996)
Proteins
25,
180-194
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Sasnauskas, B. A. Connolly, S. E. Halford, and V. Siksnys
Template-directed addition of nucleosides to DNA by the BfiI restriction enzyme
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 1, 2008;
36(12):
3969 - 3977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Orlowski and J. M. Bujnicki
Structural and evolutionary classification of Type II restriction enzymes based on theoretical and experimental analyses
Nucleic Acids Res.,
June 1, 2008;
36(11):
3552 - 3569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Gasiunas, G. Sasnauskas, G. Tamulaitis, C. Urbanke, D. Razaniene, and V. Siksnys
Tetrameric restriction enzymes: expansion to the GIY-YIG nuclease family
Nucleic Acids Res.,
February 11, 2008;
36(3):
938 - 949.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Saravanan, K. Vasu, S. Ghosh, and V. Nagaraja
Dual Role for Zn2+ in Maintaining Structural Integrity and Inducing DNA Sequence Specificity in a Promiscuous Endonuclease
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 2, 2007;
282(44):
32320 - 32326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Zhang, Y. Bao, L. Higgins, and S.-y. Xu
Rational design of a chimeric endonuclease targeted to NotI recognition site
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
October 20, 2007;
(2007)
gzm049v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-h. Chan, Y. Bao, E. Ciszak, S. Laget, and S.-y. Xu
Catalytic domain of restriction endonuclease BmrI as a cleavage module for engineering endonucleases with novel substrate specificities
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 25, 2007;
35(18):
6238 - 6248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-i. Miyazono, M. Watanabe, J. Kosinski, K. Ishikawa, M. Kamo, T. Sawasaki, K. Nagata, J. M. Bujnicki, Y. Endo, M. Tanokura, et al.
Novel protein fold discovered in the PabI family of restriction enzymes
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 19, 2007;
35(6):
1908 - 1918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Orlowski, M. Boniecki, and J. M. Bujnicki
I-Ssp6803I: the first homing endonuclease from the PD-(D/E)XK superfamily exhibits an unusual mode of DNA recognition
Bioinformatics,
March 1, 2007;
23(5):
527 - 530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Sasnauskas, B. A. Connolly, S. E. Halford, and V. Siksnys
Site-specific DNA transesterification catalyzed by a restriction enzyme
PNAS,
February 13, 2007;
104(7):
2115 - 2120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Gemmen, R. Millin, and D. E. Smith
DNA looping by two-site restriction endonucleases: heterogeneous probability distributions for loop size and unbinding force
Nucleic Acids Res.,
May 24, 2006;
34(10):
2864 - 2877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Armalyte, J. M. Bujnicki, J. Giedriene, G. Gasiunas, J. Kosinski, and A. Lubys
Mva1269I: A Monomeric Type IIS Restriction Endonuclease from Micrococcus Varians with Two EcoRI- and FokI-like Catalytic Domains
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 16, 2005;
280(50):
41584 - 41594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Grazulis, E. Manakova, M. Roessle, M. Bochtler, G. Tamulaitiene, R. Huber, and V. Siksnys
Structure of the metal-independent restriction enzyme BfiI reveals fusion of a specific DNA-binding domain with a nonspecific nuclease
PNAS,
November 1, 2005;
102(44):
15797 - 15802.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. A. Cymerman, G. Meiss, and J. M. Bujnicki
DNase II is a member of the phospholipase D superfamily
Bioinformatics,
November 1, 2005;
21(21):
3959 - 3962.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Interthal, H. J. Chen, and J. J. Champoux
Human Tdp1 Cleaves a Broad Spectrum of Substrates, Including Phosphoamide Linkages
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 28, 2005;
280(43):
36518 - 36528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Chmiel, M. Radlinska, S. D. Pawlak, D. Krowarsch, J. M. Bujnicki, and K. J. Skowronek
A theoretical model of restriction endonuclease NlaIV in complex with DNA, predicted by fold recognition and validated by site-directed mutagenesis and circular dichroism spectroscopy
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
April 1, 2005;
18(4):
181 - 189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Pawlak, M. Radlinska, A. A. Chmiel, J. M. Bujnicki, and K. J. Skowronek
Inference of relationships in the 'twilight zone' of homology using a combination of bioinformatics and site-directed mutagenesis: a case study of restriction endonucleases Bsp6I and PvuII
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 31, 2005;
33(2):
661 - 671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Saravanan, J. M. Bujnicki, I. A. Cymerman, D. N. Rao, and V. Nagaraja
Type II restriction endonuclease R.KpnI is a member of the HNH nuclease superfamily
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 23, 2004;
32(20):
6129 - 6135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Gowers, S. R.W. Bellamy, and S. E. Halford
One recognition sequence, seven restriction enzymes, five reaction mechanisms
Nucleic Acids Res.,
June 29, 2004;
32(11):
3469 - 3479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Skowron, J. Majewski, A. Zylicz-Stachula, S. M. Rutkowska, I. Jaworowska, and R. I. Harasimowicz-Slowinska
A new Thermus sp. class-IIS enzyme sub-family: isolation of a 'twin' endonuclease TspDTI with a novel specificity 5'-ATGAA(N11/9)-3', related to TspGWI, TaqII and Tth111II
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 15, 2003;
31(14):
e74 - e74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Sasnauskas, S. E. Halford, and V. Siksnys
How the BfiI restriction enzyme uses one active site to cut two DNA strands
PNAS,
May 27, 2003;
100(11):
6410 - 6415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Vogel, O. Schilling, M. Niecke, J. Bettmer, and W. Meyer-Klaucke
ElaC Encodes a Novel Binuclear Zinc Phosphodiesterase
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 2, 2002;
277(32):
29078 - 29085.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Pingoud, E. Kubareva, G. Stengel, P. Friedhoff, J. M. Bujnicki, C. Urbanke, A. Sudina, and A. Pingoud
Evolutionary Relationship between Different Subgroups of Restriction Endonucleases
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 12, 2002;
277(16):
14306 - 14314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Vilkaitis, A. Lubys, E. Merkiene, A. Timinskas, A. Janulaitis, and S. Klimasauskas
Circular permutation of DNA cytosine-N4 methyltransferases: in vivo coexistence in the BcnI system and in vitro probing by hybrid formation
Nucleic Acids Res.,
April 1, 2002;
30(7):
1547 - 1557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Grazulis, M. Deibert, R. Rimseliene, R. Skirgaila, G. Sasnauskas, A. Lagunavicius, V. Repin, C. Urbanke, R. Huber, and V. Siksnys
Crystal structure of the Bse634I restriction endonuclease: comparison of two enzymes recognizing the same DNA sequence
Nucleic Acids Res.,
February 15, 2002;
30(4):
876 - 885.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Bath, S. E. Milsom, N. A. Gormley, and S. E. Halford
Many Type IIs Restriction Endonucleases Interact with Two Recognition Sites before Cleaving DNA
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 1, 2002;
277(6):
4024 - 4033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Pingoud and A. Jeltsch
Structure and function of type II restriction endonucleases
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 15, 2001;
29(18):
3705 - 3727.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Rimseliene and A. Janulaitis
Mutational Analysis of Two Putative Catalytic Motifs of the Type IV Restriction Endonuclease Eco57I
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 23, 2001;
276(13):
10492 - 10497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Soundararajan, Z. Chang, R. D. Morgan, P. Heslop, and B. A. Connolly
DNA Binding and Recognition by the IIs Restriction Endonuclease MboII
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2002;
277(2):
887 - 895.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|