| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 40, 31016-31023, October 6, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, Hakozaki 6-10-1 Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
Received for publication, April 6, 2000, and in revised form, July 6, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KF707
possesses a chromosomally encoded bph gene cluster
responsible for the catabolism of biphenyl/polychlorinated biphenyls. The gene cluster consists of
(orf0)bphA1A2(orf3)bphA3A4BCX0X1X2X3D. We
studied the role of orf0 and transcription in the KF707
bph operon. Primer extension analyses revealed that at
least as many as six transcriptional initiation sites exist upstream of
orf0, bphA1, bphX0,
bphX1, and bphD, including two upstream of
bphD. The orf0-disruptant failed to grow on
biphenyl but accumulated large amounts of the biphenyl ring
meta-cleavage yellow compound (2-hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoate). Western blot analysis revealed that ORF0 protein is inducibly expressed in KF707 in the
presence of biphenyl. Gel shift assay revealed that ORF0 directly binds
to the orf0 operator region. This binding was greatly
enhanced by addition of the biphenyl ring meta-cleavage
yellow compound. These results indicated that orf0,
bphA1A2(orf3)bphA3A4BC and bphX0X1X2X3D
are independently transcribed, and that ORF0 protein belonging to
the GntR family is involved in the regulation of the bph
operon in KF707 and is absolutely required for the expression of
orf0 and bphX0X1X2X3D.
The biphenyl-utilizing bacteria have been widely isolated from
various environmental samples, which include both Gram-negative and
Gram-positive bacteria. Because these organisms are able to degrade
polychlorinated biphenyls, xenobiotic compounds known as one of
the most serious environmental pollutants, biochemical and genetic
bases of polychlorinated biphenyl degradation have been extensively
studied by many workers. The biphenyl/polychlorinated biphenyls
degradative genes, termed bph, were first cloned from Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KF707 (1-3) and then from
many Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains (4-17).
The bph gene cluster of KF707 is organized as
(orf0)bphA1A2(orf3)bphA3A4BCX0X1X2X3D (Fig.
1). The bphA1 and
bphA2 genes encode a large subunit and a small subunit of
the terminal dioxygenase, respectively, bphA3 encodes a
ferredoxin, and bphA4 encodes a ferredoxin reductase. These
four gene products associate to form a multicomponent biphenyl
dioxygenase that is involved in the initial oxygenation of the biphenyl
ring. The bphB gene encodes a biphenyl dihydrodiol
dehydrogenase. The bphC gene encodes a 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl
(23DHBP)1 dioxygenase that is
involved in the ring meta-cleavage. The bphD gene
encodes a 2-hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoate (HOPD) hydrolase to
obtain benzoate and 2-hydroxypenta-2,4-dienoate. The bphX0
gene encodes a putative glutathione S-transferase, but the
role of this enzyme is yet unknown in the catabolism of biphenyl. The
bphX1, bphX2, and bphX3 genes,
encoding 2-hydroxypenta-2,4-dienoate hydratase, acetaldehyde
dehydrogenase, and 4-hydroxy-2-oxovalerate aldolase, respectively, are
involved in the catabolism of 2-hydroxy-penta-2,4-dienoate to
acetyl coenzyme A (Fig. 1). The roles of orf0 and
orf3 in this operon remain to be elucidated.
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Catabolic pathway for degradation of biphenyl
and organization of the bph gene cluster in P. pseudoalcaligenes KF707. Compound I,
biphenyl; compound II, 2,3-dihydroxy-4-phenylhexa-4,6-diene
(dihydrodiol compound); compound III, 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl;
compound IV, 2-hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dieonic
acid (biphenyl meta-cleavage compound); compound
V, benzoic acid; compound VI,
2-hydroxypenta-2,4-dienoic acid. The enzymes were as follows:
BphA1-BphA2-BphA3-BphA4, biphenyl dioxygenase; BphB, dihydrodiol
dehydrogenase; BphC, 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl dioxygenase; BphX0,
glutathione S-transferase; BphX1,
2-hydroxypenta-2,4-dienoate hydratase; BphX2, acetaldehyde
dehydrogenase (acylating); BphX3, 4-hydoxy-2-oxovalerate aldolase;
BphD, 2-hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dieonic acid
hydrolase.
Despite the detailed biochemical and genetic analyses of bph
genes of various soil bacteria, the knowledge concerning regulation have remained unclear. Recently, it was suggested that the
bph gene cluster in Tn4371 found from
Ralstonia eutropha A5, bphEFGA1A2A3BCD, forms an
operon transcribed from a 
70 promoter and that the
bphS gene product negatively regulates the transcription of
the bph gene cluster as a repressor (18). On the other hand,
the bph operon in Gram-positive Rhodococcus sp.
M5, bpdC1C2BADEF, is regulated by the two-component signal transduction system of bpdS and bpdT. These
bpd genes are inducibly transcribed by biphenyl. In this
system, BpdS and BpdT function as a sensor histidine kinase and a
response regulator, respectively (19). Here we report the versatile
transcription of the KF707 bph gene cluster, indicating that
the ORF0 protein is an activator and is absolutely involved in the
expressions of its own orf0 and bphX0X1X2X3D and
that at least six transcriptional initiation sites are present in the
KF707 bph gene cluster.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions-- The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table I. The biphenyl-utilizing strain P. pseudoalcaligenes KF707 was grown in basal salt medium (BSM) supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) biphenyl as a sole source of carbon as described previously (1). Biphenyl-utilizing defective derivatives of KF707 such as KF730 (bphA1::Tn5-B21), KF748 (bphB::Tn5-B21), and KF744 (bphC::Tn5-B21) were previously constructed (20), and KF7095 (orf0::TcR) was constructed in this study. They were grown in BSM supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) sodium succinate and tetracycline (Tc) (30 µg/ml). For agar plates (1.5% w/v), biphenyl was supplied as vapor in the inverted lid of a Petri dish.
|
Enzyme Assay-- Strain KF707 and the derivatives were pregrown in BSM supplemented with biphenyl or succinate for 24 h, and the one hundredth culture was transferred to the same fresh medium to grow to the stationary phase. Cells were disrupted with a French pressure cell (Ohtake Co., Tokyo) and centrifuged at 14,700 × g for 30 min; the supernatant was used as the crude extract.
BphC (23DHBP dioxygenase) and BphD (HOPD hydrolase) activities were assayed as described previously (1). One unit of BphC activity was defined as the amount of enzyme to produce 1 µmol of biphenyl ring meta-cleavage compound (HOPD)/min. One unit of BphD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme to degrade 1 µmol of HOPD/min. BphX0 (glutathione S-transferase) and BphX2 (acetaldehyde dehydrogenase) activities were measured as described by Habig and Jakoby (21) and Shingler et al. (22), respectively.
DNA Manipulations, Sequencing, and RNA Preparation--
DNA
manipulations were performed essentially as described by Sambrook
et al. (23). Plasmids were prepared by the rapid alkaline procedure. The DNA fragments to be sequenced were cloned into pUC19
(Takara Shuzo) or pBluescriptII® SK(
) (Stratagene). By using
appropriate primers (Sawady Technology Co., Tokyo), transcriptional initiation sites were determined by the primer extension method. RNA
preparation was performed for the cells grown to an
A600 of 0.7 as described by Ausubel
et al. (24). The concentration and purity of the RNA were
estimated from the
A260/A280 ratio and from
the RNA bands on formaldehyde-denatured agarose gel electrophoresis.
Primer Extension Analyses--
Primer extension was performed
with the primer extension kit according to the manufacturer's
instruction (Promega). The primers used in this study were labeled with
[
-32P]ATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by T4
polynucleotide kinase (Takara Shuzo). A 20-50-µg aliquot of total
RNA was used in each primer extension reaction. The end-labeled primers
were complementary to 23-24-bp sequences located 22-23 nucleotides
downstream of the first nucleotides of the orf0,
bphX1, and bphD start codon, respectively. In the
analysis of bphX0, we used the following primer:
5'-CGTAAGGGCGACGGTTTTGCGTAAGTA-3' (in bphC coding sequence). Signal intensities were quantified with a densitometer using
Bio-PROFIL, version 6.0 (Vilber Lourmat).
RT-PCR-- RT-PCR was performed using the RT-PCR kit according to the manufacturer's instruction (TOYOBO, Osaka). For the detection of the orf0-mRNA, the following primers were used for 8 µg of total RNA: 5'-ATGAATACGAGAACTCCAAGC-3' and 5'-CCGCTGACCTCATAGCGC-3' within orf0 coding sequence. To examine whether orf0 and bphA1 could be co-transcribed, the following primers encompassing the both genes were used: 5'-CGAGATGCCGAGCGCTGT-3' within orf0 coding sequence and 5'-CTTCTTTGATTGATGAGCTCAT-3' within bphA1 coding sequence. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis through 2.0% agarose gel.
Construction of orf0 Expression Plasmid--
The orf0
of KF707 was amplified from chromosomal DNA using the following
primers:
5'-AGCTCCATGGGAATGAATACG-AGAACTCCAAGCGGC-3' for
the forward sequence, where the NcoI site is underlined and the start codon ATG is in bold type. For the reverse primer sequence, 5'-AAGGCTGTCGACCCTCAACAAACCGAATTCCCGAAC-3' was used, where
the SalI site is underlined. Amplification of
orf0 was carried out for 25 cycles under the following
conditions: denaturation, 94 °C for 1 min; primer annealing,
52 °C for 1.5 min; and primer extension, 72 °C for 1.5 min. The
PCR products were digested by NcoI and SalI and
inserted at the NcoI and XhoI sites of pET32b(+) (Novagen), which contains an
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside-inducible T7
promoter. The orf0 was designed to be fused to Trx
(thioredoxin protein)·TagTM, S·TagTM, and His·Tag® at 5' end and
His·Tag® at the 3' end. The resulting plasmid,
pET32b(+)-orf0 (pTWF3), was transformed into
Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) (Novagen).
Purification of ORF0 Protein and Western Blot Analysis--
The
E. coli BL21 (DE3) (pTWF3) was grown in LB medium
containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml) to obtain an
A600 of 0.6. Expression of the proteins was
induced by 1 mM
isopropyl--D-thiogalactopyranoside for 4 h. The
cells were then suspended in cold 50 mM MOPS buffer containing 5% (v/v) glycerol and disrupted by a French pressure cell
(Ohtake). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the
supernatant was mixed with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose (Qiagen) and incubated on ice for 1 h. The matrix was washed twice with buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 30 mM imidazole). The proteins were
eluted with the same buffer, containing 250 mM imidazole.
Protein was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the
gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Cell extracts of
Pseudomonas strains were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred to Trans-Blot® Transfer
Medium (Bio-Rad). Anti-ORF0 antibody was prepared by the method
described by Imajoh-Ohmi et al. (25). Western blot analysis
using anti-ORF0 antibody was carried out to detect the expression of
ORF0 protein in KF707 by the method described by Imajoh-Ohmi et
al. (25). Signal intensities were quantified with a densitometer.
Construction of pSUPB101--
The TcR gene (4.3 kb)
was removed from pSUP102::Tn5-B30 (20, 26) by
XhoI digestion. A 2.5-kb SalI fragment containing
the orf0 gene was inserted into the XhoI site of
pSUP102::Tn5-B30
TcR. Because the
resultant plasmid has the unique XhoI site in the middle of
the inserted fragment, a purified TcR gene from
pSUP102::Tn5-B30 was then inserted into the
XhoI site within orf0 to generate pSUPB101 (Table
I). pSUPB101 containing orf0 disrupted by the
TcR gene was introduced into E. coli S17-1 (27)
by transformation.
Southern Blot Analysis-- Southern blot analysis was performed using the DIG DNA Labeling and Detection Kit according to the manufacturer's instruction (Roche Diagnostics). The chromosomal DNA of the Pseudomonas strains listed in Table I were digested with XhoI and subjected to electrophoresis through 1.0% agarose gels. The digested DNA fragments were transferred onto Biodyne® B (PALL). Hybridization was performed with the DIG-11-dUTP-labeled BamHI-EcoRI fragment (3.9 kb) from pSUP102::Tn5-B30 vector as a probe.
RNase Protection Assay-- RNase protection assay was performed using the RNase protection kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Diagnostics). The RNA probe used in this assay was labeled with DIG-11-UTP by the methods of in vitro transcription using the DIG RNA Labeling Kit (Roche Diagnostics). The probe for the bphX0-mRNA was prepared by cloning a ClaI-PstI fragment containing bphC and bphX0 into pBluescriptII® KS(+) to create pTWF7, which was then linearized with HincII to use as a probe.
Gel Shift Assay-- The following two oligonucleotides were synthesized and annealed to obtain the DNA sequence of the orf0 operator region: 5'-CCGATAAATATAAATATCGATTATCGACATTTTTGAAG-3' and 5'-CTTCAAAAATGTCGATAATCGATATTTATATTTATCGG-3'. The DIG oligonucleotide 3'-end labeling kit (Roche Diagnostics) was used for labeling and binding reaction. The reaction mixtures (33 µl) contained 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, 6 µg of poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 0.8 pmol of DIG-11-ddUTP-labeled DNA, and 0-20 µg of purified ORF0 protein. When necessary, 100 pmol of cold target DNA fragment, 100 pmol of unrelated DNA (5'-AAGGCTCTCGAGCCTCAACAAACCGAATTCCCGAAC-3'), 1 mM of 23DHBP (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka), or 1 mM of HOPD was added. After incubation for 30 min at room temperature, the mixtures were fractionated by electrophoresis at 150 V constant voltage in 8% polyacrylamide gel with cold TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate, 1 mM EDTA).
E. coli JM109 carrying pTWF6 (pTV118N-orf0) or
pTV118N was grown in LB medium containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml) and
0.1 mM isopropyl--D-thiogalactopyranoside
overnight. The cells were then suspended in EDTA- and
dithiothreitol-free binding buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 10% glycerol) and disrupted by a French pressure
cell (Ohtake). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the
supernatant was mixed with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose and
incubated on ice for 1 h. The matrix was washed twice with buffer
(20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 10% glycerol,
20 mM imidazole). The proteins were eluted with the same
buffer, containing 250 mM imidazole. Protein (purified
ORF0) was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The
protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay
kit (Bio-Rad). Bovine serum albumin was used as a standard.
Preparation of Biphenyl Ring meta-Cleavage Yellow Compound
(HOPD)--
KF7095 (orf0-disruptant, Table I) was grown in
BSM supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) sodium succinate and Tc (30 µg/ml)
overnight. After centrifugation, the cells were suspended in binding
buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol),
and 0.2% (w/v) of 23DHBP was added to the cell suspension. After
2 h of incubation, cells were removed by centrifugation at
14,700 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant was
filter-sterilized and stocked at 80 °C until use.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Disruption of orf0--
It was previously shown that
orf0 is not directly responsible for the enzymatic activity
of biphenyl dioxygenase (encoded by bphA1A2A3A4) (28). The
orf0 encoded a putative protein of 245 amino acids, and the
data base search revealed that the ORF0 protein shares 28% identity to
GntR, a regulatory protein known as the transcriptional repressor of
the gluconate operon in Bacillus subtilis (29). These two
proteins exhibited a high similarity of amino acid sequence in the
N-terminal region (Fig. 2A).
Furthermore, a helix-turn-helix motif involved in DNA-binding was
predicted in the N-terminal region of ORF0 (Fig. 2B).
Therefore, ORF0 was considered to be a possible regulatory protein
belonging to the GntR family (30).
|
To investigate the function, we disrupted orf0 in strain KF707. For this purpose, the plasmid pSUPB101 in which the TcR gene was inserted in orf0 was constructed as described under "Experimental Procedures." E. coli S17-1 cells carrying pSUPB101 were filter-mated with KF707 overnight. pSUPB101 cannot replicate in Pseudomonas strains; therefore, single cross-over recombinants were first screened on BSM agar plates supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) succinate, Tc (30 µg/ml), and gentamicin (20 µg/ml). Such single cross-over recombinants were repeatedly subcultured in LB broth to obtain double cross-over recombinants. These were checked for growth on BSM plates supplemented with succinate, Tc, and gentamicin. The loss of the vector-borne gentamicin resistance gene was confirmed by Southern blot analysis (data not shown).
Strain KF7095 (orf0-disruptant) failed to grow on biphenyl
and accumulated large amounts of the biphenyl ring
meta-cleavage yellow compound (HOPD) (Fig.
3). In the case of strain KF707 (wild type), HOPD accumulated temporarily, but reduced gradually because of
the conversion to benzoic acid by the BphD enzyme (HOPD hydrolase). These results strongly suggested that the bphA1A2A3A4BC
genes are expressed in KF7095, but the bphD gene is not.
|
Enzyme Activities of BphC, BphX0, BphX2, and BphD in KF707
Derivatives--
We previously obtained the following KF707 transposon
mutant strains; KF730 in which Tn5-B21 is inserted in
bphA1 (bphA1::Tn5-B21), KF748 in which Tn5-B21 is inserted in bphB
(bphB::Tn5-B21), and KF744 in which
Tn5-B21 is inserted in bphC
(bphC::Tn5-B21) (20). Using these
transposon mutants and the orf0-disruptant (KF7095), we
measured the enzyme activities of BphC, BphX0, BphX2, and BphD (Fig.
4). No activity of BphC (23DHBP
dioxygenase) was detected in KF730 because the bphB and
bphC genes were not expressed by a polar effect of
Tn5-B21 inserted in the bphA1 gene. Likewise, no
activity of BphC in KF748 and KF744 was detected. These mutants failed
to grow on biphenyl. However, these three strains exhibited the enzyme
activities of BphX0 (glutathione S-transferase), BphX2 (acetaldehyde dehydrogenase), and BphD (HOPD hydrolase). More interestingly, the KF7095 (orf0-disruptant) exhibited the
BphC activity but no BphX0, BphX2, nor BphD activity. The same strain accumulated large amounts of the biphenyl ring meta-cleavage
yellow compound (HOPD) (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the
bphA1A2(orf3)A3A4BC and the bphX0X1X2X3D are
independently transcribed.
|
Primer Extension Analysis of the orf0 and Detection of RNA Transcript-- Based on the enzyme assays using KF7095, it was indicated that there are at least two different expression systems in the bph gene clusters in KF707. One is the orf0-independent system for the expression of the bphA1A2(orf3)bphA3A4BC genes, and the other is the orf0-dependent system for the expression of the bphX region and bphD genes.
To examine how the orf0 is transcribed, we performed primer
extension analysis. One transcriptional initiation site was found at
106 nucleotides upstream of the start codon of orf0 (Fig.
5A). The possible promoter
sequence was assigned to TTGACA (35 region) and
TAAGTT (10 region) (Fig. 5B). This promoter sequence is
similar to the consensus sequence of the E. coli
70-dependent promoter. The extension signal
from the biphenyl-grown cells (Fig. 5A, lane B)
was much (2.5 times) stronger than that of the succinate-grown cells
(Fig. 5A, lane S), indicating that the
transcription of orf0 is induced by biphenyl. We also
performed Northern blot analysis using antisense orf0 RNA
probe but failed to obtain a clear signal corresponding to the
orf0 (data not shown).
|
In addition, we performed RT-PCR against the total RNAs of KF707 and KF7095 using the primers designed to anneal the orf0-coding region from the start codon to the upstream of the unique XhoI site in which the TcR gene is inserted in KF7095. The results clearly show that 200-bp RT-PCR products were detected when KF707 was grown on either biphenyl or succinate (Fig. 5C, lanes 1 and 2). The amount of RT-PCR product was much higher in the biphenyl-grown cells than that of the succinate-grown cells. However, no amplified DNA was detected in KF7095 (Fig. 5C, lane 3). The result clearly indicated that orf0 is not transcribed in KF7095. We also performed RT-PCR to examine whether orf0 and bphA1 are co-transcribed using the primers encompassing the both genes, but no amplified DNA was detected (Fig. 5C, lane 4). This result indicated that orf0 and bphA1 are independently transcribed.
Western Analysis of ORF0 Protein--
We were successful in
expressing the ORF0 protein as His-tagged form in E. coli.
After purification, we prepared antibody against the ORF0 protein.
Using the anti-ORF0 antibody, we detected the ORF0 protein of 27.7 kDa
in size from KF707 cell extracts by Western blot analysis (Fig.
6). These data allowed us to conclude that orf0 is absolutely expressed in KF707. The signal from
the biphenyl-grown cells (Fig. 6, lane 1) was much stronger
(3.1 times) than that of succinate-grown cells, indicating that the
expression of ORF0 is induced in the presence of biphenyl. This is
consistent with the result obtained in the primer extension analysis
and the RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 5, A and C).
|
Binding of ORF0 Protein to the Operator Region--
The results
obtained in primer extension analysis and Western analysis strongly
indicated that orf0 is inducibly expressed in the presence
of biphenyl (Figs. 5A and 6). In addition, the ORF0 protein
could be considered to be a regulatory protein in the KF707
bph operon because ORF0 exhibits a helix-turn-helix DNA
binding motif in the N-terminal half (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the sequence boxed in Fig. 5B could be a possible
ORF0-binding region (termed an operator region). This sequence is
located between the transcriptional initiation site and the start codon
of orf0 and is similar to the binding sites of some
GntR-type regulators such as AphS in the aph operon of a
phenol-degrader Comamonas testosteroni TA441 (Fig.
7 and Ref. 31).
|
To confirm whether ORF0 directly binds to the operator region, we
performed gel shift assay. As described under "Experimental Procedures," a 38-bp fragment located between the transcriptional initiation site and start codon of orf0 was labeled with
DIG-11-ddUTP. The ORF0 protein fused to His·Tag® at the C terminus
was expressed in E. coli carrying pTV118N-orf0
(pTWF6). The purified ORF0 protein (28 kDa) was used in gel shift
assay. When the ORF0 protein was mixed with the labeled DNA fragment,
its mobility was retarded (Fig. 8,
shifted band I in lane 2). The labeled DNA
fragment was not shifted when an excess amount of cold target DNA was
added (Fig. 8, lane 3). The addition of an unrelated DNA did
not affect the binding of ORF0 to the target DNA (Fig. 8, lane
6). The shifted band was not detected when the cell extract of
E. coli carrying pTV118N was used as a control (Fig. 8,
lane 7). These results strongly indicated that the ORF0
protein specifically binds to the operator region that lies between its
transcriptional initiation site and the start codon.
|
More interestingly, in the presence of biphenyl-metabolites such as 23DHBP and HOPD, the retardation of shifted bands were much more notable, and the signal intensities were stronger, particularly in the presence of HOPD (Fig. 8, shifted band II in lanes 4 and 5). These observations indicated that the ORF0 protein strongly binds to the operator region in the presence of biphenyl-metabolites.
Determination of Transcriptional Initiation Sites of bphX0, bphX1,
and bphD--
Because KF7095 did not have any enzyme activities of
BphX0, BphX2, and BphD (Fig. 4), it is conceivable that there are at least two independent transcripts of bphA1A2(orf3)A3A4BC and
bphX0X1X2X3D. The transcriptional initiation site was found
far upstream of 452 nucleotides from the start codon of
bphX0 (Fig. 9A,
lane B). This site lies within the center of the coding
sequence of bphC. No extension signal was detected when the
cells were grown in the absence of biphenyl (Fig. 9A,
lane S), indicating that the expression of bphX0
is induced by biphenyl or its metabolites. In the case of KF7095, a
faint band was detected (Fig. 9A, lane M), but
this was concluded to be an artificial band from the following experiments. Using the antisense RNA probe of bphX0 (Fig.
9C), we performed RNase protection assay to detect the
mRNA of bphX0. As shown in Fig. 9B, the
mRNA of bphX0 was detected in KF707 but not in KF7095.
Furthermore, we did primer extension analysis using the primer
complementary to the sequence located 24 nucleotides downstream of the
bphX0 start codon. No extension signal was detected in
KF7095 (data not shown). These results were consistent with the fact
that no BphX0 enzyme activity is detected and allowed us to conclude
that bphX0 is not expressed in KF7095 and that orf0 is involved in the transcription of
bphX0.
|
Further primer extension analyses revealed one transcriptional
initiation site at 48 nucleotides upstream of the start codon of
bphX1 (Fig. 10A,
lane B). However, no signal was detected from succinate-grown cells (Fig. 10A, lane S) nor from
KF7095 (Fig. 10A, lane M). These results suggest
that BphX1 is induced by biphenyl or its metabolites and that the
orf0 product is absolutely required in the expression.
|
In addition, two transcriptional initiation sites were found at 30 and
29 nucleotides upstream of the start codon of bphD (Fig.
10B, lane B). The other faint bands detected in
lane B were ignored because they were not detected in several primer
extension analyses. These two extension signals were detected, but
weakly, even in the absence of biphenyl (Fig. 10B,
lane S). The intensities of the extension signals detected
in the presence of biphenyl (Fig. 10B, lane
B) were much stronger (2.7 times) than those in the absence of
biphenyl (Fig. 10B, lane S), indicating
that bphD is inducibly transcribed in the presence of
biphenyl and its metabolites. On the other hand, KF7095 exhibited no
extension signal of the bphD gene (Fig. 10B,
lane M), indicating that orf0 is absolutely required for the expression of bphD as in the case of
bphX0 and bphX1.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
In this study, it was found that the ORF0 protein belonging to the GntR family is involved in the regulation of the bph operon in P. pseudoalcaligenes KF707. The orf0 was inducibly expressed in the presence of biphenyl (Figs. 5A and 6). It was further demonstrated that ORF0 itself directly binds to the operator region (Figs. 5B, 7, and 8) by gel shift assays. The retardation was greatly enhanced in the presence of biphenyl ring meta-cleavage compound (HOPD) (Fig. 8). These results indicate that the ORF0 protein may change the conformation in the presence of HOPD and strongly binds to the operator region and promotes the transcription of its own gene.
It was first reported that the GntR protein negatively regulates the gnt operon in B. subtilis (29). The GntR-type regulatory proteins involved in the degradation of aromatic compounds are also reported to be repressors (18, 31). However, ORF0 in KF707 is not likely to be a repressor (silencer) but more likely to be an activator being required for the expression of the lower pathway genes of bphX0X1X2X3D (Figs. 4, 9B and 10 (A and B)).
We have preliminary data demonstrating that ORF0 protein also binds to the upstream region (about 200 bp) of bphX0 and bphX1, respectively (data not shown). Thus, it seems that ORF0 controls its own expression and acts as an activator for the expression of bphX0X1X2X3D. However, the same protein is not involved in the expression of the bphA1A2(orf3)bphA3A4BC genes, because the orf0-disruptant (KF7095) converts biphenyl to the HOPD (Fig. 3), indicating that these genes are expressed without the ORF0 protein. Along with this finding, we previously reported that one transcriptional initiation site is located 104 nucleotides upstream of the start codon of bphA1 (3). Furthermore, the result obtained in RT-PCR (Fig. 5, lane 4) revealed that no mRNA encompassing both orf0 and bphA1 is present. These results allowed us to conclude that the orf0 is transcribed alone but not co-transcribed with other degradative genes. The bphS and aphS regulatory genes are independently transcribed with respect to their degradative genes (18, 31). On the other hand, the gntR gene in the gnt operon of B. subtilis is inducibly co-transcribed with the other genes. In this case the expression of the GntR repressor is posttranscriptionally regulated (32).
In this and the previous studies (3), primer extension analyses revealed that transcriptional initiation sites exist upstream of orf0, bphA1, bphX0, bphX1, and bphD, respectively. These results revealed that the bph gene cluster has at least six transcriptional initiation sites, including two for the bphD gene. It was reported previously that three transcriptional initiation sites are found upstream of bphA in Pseudomonas sp. strain LB400 whose bph gene cluster is nearly identical to that of KF707 (6). However, the transcription and regulation of LB400 bph genes have not yet been studied in detail since then.
As shown in Figs. 3 and 4, KF7095 expressed BphC but not BphX0, BphX2, and BphD. Primer extension analysis identified the transcriptional initiation site upstream of bphX0 in wild type KF707 (Fig. 9A). These results strongly indicate that the bphA1A2(orf3)A3A4BC and the bphX0X1X2X3D are independently transcribed. However, no typical transcriptional termination signal was found downstream of bphC. At the present, we could determine six transcriptional initiation sites in the KF707 bph operon by primer extension analyses but failed to obtain information about the promoters except for orf0 and the transcriptional terminator(s) in this study. No typical terminator sequences were found in the operon. To investigate the sizes of mRNA transcripts, we performed Northern blot analyses using the antisense probes of bph genes. However, we failed to detect the clear transcript signals because they were smeared (data not shown).
A number of studies in the past revealed that many of the gene clusters
involved in the degradations of aromatic compounds including biphenyl
are present on movable elements such as plasmids and transposons. Such
elements permit microorganisms to degrade aromatic compounds by
horizontal gene transfer. It was reported that the bph gene
cluster involved in the metabolism of biphenyl/4-chlorobiphenyl is
located in the 55-kb transposon Tn4371 (17, 18, 33, 34). Our
recent study also revealed that the 90-kb bph-sal element coding for biphenyl and salicylate metabolism behaves like a
conjugative transposon in Pseudomonas putida KF715 whose
bph gene cluster is nearly identical to that of KF707 except
that the bphX0X1X2X3 genes were deleted (35). If this is the
case in KF707, the bph genes could be foreign genes derived
from other strains. Such genes might be regulated and expressed in
different fashions because the sigma factor(s) in KF707 may recognize
certain regions as promoters. This could be the reason why so many
transcriptional initiation sites were detected in the KF707
bph gene clusters.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) D85852, M83673, D85853, and D85851.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel. and Fax:
81-92-642-2849; E-mail: kfurukaw@agr.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 18, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003023200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
23DHBP, 2,3-dihydroxybiphneyl;
Bph+/
, phenotype able/unable to
grow on biphenyl as a sole carbon source;
BSM, basal salt medium;
DIG, digoxigenin;
HOPD, 2-hydroxy-6-oxo-6-phenylhexa-2,4-dienoate (biphenyl
ring meta-cleavage yellow compound);
MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid;
RT, reverse
transcriptase;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
Tc, tetracycline;
bp, base pair(s);
kb, kilobase(s).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
|
|---|
| 1. | Furukawa, K., and Miyazaki, T. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 166, 392-398 |
| 2. | Furukawa, K., Arimura, N., and Miyazaki, T. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 427-429 |
| 3. | Taira, K., Hirose, J., Hayashida, S., and Furukawa, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4844-4853 |
| 4. | Kimbara, K., Hashimoto, T., Fukuda, M., Koana, T., Takagi, M., Oishi, M., and Yano, K. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171, 2740-2747 |
| 5. | Hayase, N., Taira, K., and Furukawa, K. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 1160-1164 |
| 6. | Erickson, B. D., and Mondello, F. J. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 2903-2912 |
| 7. | Hofer, B., Eltis, L. D., Dowling, D. N., and Timmis, K. N. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 130, 47-55 |
| 8. | Hofer, B., Backhaus, S., and Timmis, K. N. (1994) Gene (Amst.) 144, 9-16 |
| 9. | Kikuchi, Y., Nagata, Y., Hinata, M., Kimbara, K., Fukuda, M., Yano, K., and Takagi, M. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 1689-1694 |
| 10. | Kikuchi, Y., Yasukochi, Y., Nagata, Y., Fukuda, M., and Takagi, M. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 4269-4276 |
| 11. | Masai, E., Yamada, A., Healy, J. M., Hatta, T., Kimbara, K., Fukuda, M., and Yano, K. (1995) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 2079-2085 |
| 12. | Masai, E., Sugiyama, K., Iwashita, N., Shimizu, S., Hauschild, J. E., Hatta, T., Kimbara, K., Yano, K., and Fukuda, M. (1997) Gene (Amst.) 187, 141-149 |
| 13. | Wang, Y., Garnon, J., Labbe, D., Bergeron, H., and Lau, P. C. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 164, 117-122 |
| 14. | Kim, E., and Zylstra, G. J. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 3095-3103 |
| 15. | Kim, E., Kim, Y., and Kim, C. K. (1996) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 262-265 |
| 16. | Lau, P. C., Garnon, J., Labbe, D., and Wang, Y. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 171, 53-57 |
| 17. | Merlin, C., Springael, D., Mergeay, M., and Toussaint, A. (1997) Mol. Gen. Genet. 253, 499-506 |
| 18. | Mouz, S., Merlin, C., Springael, D., and Toussaint, A. (1999) Mol. Gen. Genet. 262, 790-799 |
| 19. | Labbe, D., Garnon, J., and Lau, P. C. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 2772-2776 |
| 20. | Furukawa, K., Hayashida, S., and Taira, K. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 98, 21-28 |
| 21. | Habig, W. H., and Jakoby, W. B. (1981) Methods Enzymol. 77, 398-405 |
| 22. | Shingler, V., Powlowski, J., and Marklund, U. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 711-724 |
| 23. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 24. | Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. D., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Unit 4.4 , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
| 25. | Imajoh-Ohmi, S., Tsujimura, K., and Inagaki, M. (1994) Koupeputidokoutaijikken purotokohru (in Japanese) , pp. 47-118, Shujunsha, Tokyo |
| 26. | Simon, R., Quandt, J., and Klipp, W. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 80, 161-169 |
| 27. | Simon, R., Priefer, U., and Puhler, A. (1983) Bio/Technology 1, 784-790 |
| 28. | Kimura, N., Nishi, A., Goto, M., and Furukawa, K. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 3936-3943 |
| 29. | Fujita, Y., and Fujita, T. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 4524-4528 |
| 30. | Haydon, D. J., and Guest, J. R. (1991) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 63, 291-295 |
| 31. | Arai, H., Akahira, S., Ohishi, T., and Kudo, T. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 33, 1132-1140 |
| 32. | Fujita, Y., Fujita, T., and Miwa, Y. (1990) FEBS Lett. 267, 71-74 |
| 33. | Merlin, C., Springael, D., and Toussaint, A. (1999) Plasmid 41, 40-54 |
| 34. | Springael, D., Kreps, S., and Mergeay, M. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 1674-1681 |
| 35. | Nishi, A., Tominaga, K., and Furukawa, K. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 1949-1955 |
| 36. | Yoshida, K., Miwa, Y., Ohmori, H., and Fujita, Y. (1995) Mol. Gen. Genet. 248, 583-591 |
| 37. | Allison, S. L., and Phillips, A. T. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 5470-5476 |
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Shintani, M. Urata, K. Inoue, K. Eto, H. Habe, T. Omori, H. Yamane, and H. Nojiri The Sphingomonas Plasmid pCAR3 Is Involved in Complete Mineralization of Carbazole J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2007; 189(5): 2007 - 2020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Mukerjee-Dhar, M. Shimura, D. Miyazawa, K. Kimbara, and T. Hatta bph genes of the thermophilic PCB degrader, Bacillus sp. JF8: characterization of the divergent ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase and hydrolase genes upstream of the Mn-dependent BphC Microbiology, December 1, 2005; 151(12): 4139 - 4151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Tropel and J. R. van der Meer Bacterial Transcriptional Regulators for Degradation Pathways of Aromatic Compounds Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2004; 68(3): 474 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Furukawa, H. Suenaga, and M. Goto Biphenyl Dioxygenases: Functional Versatilities and Directed Evolution J. Bacteriol., August 15, 2004; 186(16): 5189 - 5196. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. J. Denef, J. Park, T. V. Tsoi, J.-M. Rouillard, H. Zhang, J. A. Wibbenmeyer, W. Verstraete, E. Gulari, S. A. Hashsham, and J. M. Tiedje Biphenyl and Benzoate Metabolism in a Genomic Context: Outlining Genome-Wide Metabolic Networks in Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2004; 70(8): 4961 - 4970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Takeda, A. Yamada, K. Miyauchi, E. Masai, and M. Fukuda Characterization of Transcriptional Regulatory Genes for Biphenyl Degradation in Rhodococcus sp. Strain RHA1 J. Bacteriol., April 1, 2004; 186(7): 2134 - 2146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Watanabe, H. Fujihara, and K. Furukawa Characterization of the Second LysR-Type Regulator in the Biphenyl-Catabolic Gene Cluster of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KF707 J. Bacteriol., June 15, 2003; 185(12): 3575 - 3582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sakai, K. Miyauchi, N. Kato, E. Masai, and M. Fukuda 2-Hydroxypenta-2,4-dienoate Metabolic Pathway Genes in a Strong Polychlorinated Biphenyl Degrader, Rhodococcus sp. Strain RHA1 Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2003; 69(1): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Rigali, A. Derouaux, F. Giannotta, and J. Dusart Subdivision of the Helix-Turn-Helix GntR Family of Bacterial Regulators in the FadR, HutC, MocR, and YtrA Subfamilies J. Biol. Chem., April 5, 2002; 277(15): 12507 - 12515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Beltrametti, D. Reniero, S. Backhaus, and B. Hofer Analysis of transcription of the bph locus of Burkholderia sp. strain LB400 and evidence that the ORF0 gene product acts as a regulator of the bphA1 promoter Microbiology, August 1, 2001; 147(8): 2169 - 2182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. R. Master and W. W. Mohn Induction of bphA, Encoding Biphenyl Dioxygenase, in Two Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Degrading Bacteria, Psychrotolerant Pseudomonas Strain Cam-1 and Mesophilic Burkholderia Strain LB400 Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2001; 67(6): 2669 - 2676. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Ohtsubo, M. Delawary, K. Kimbara, M. Takagi, A. Ohta, and Y. Nagata BphS, a Key Transcriptional Regulator of bph Genes Involved in Polychlorinated Biphenyl/Biphenyl Degradation in Pseudomonas sp. KKS102 J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2001; 276(39): 36146 - 36154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
